Kellan Lutz's Height
6ft 0.25in (184 cm)
American Actor best known for his role as Emmett Cullen in the Twilight Saga series. Other films he has had notable roles include Immortals, The Legend of Hercules and The Expendables 3. On his website he claims to be 6ft 1 tall with a weight of 187lbs. I met him at a Massive Events Twilight convention in 2009. In this photo (by Malcolm) Kellan had about 1/4 inch less sneaker than us that day. He was also listed on the Ford Models website as 6ft.
5ft 8 Rob and 5ft 8 Jenny with Kellan
You May Be Interested
Add a Comment 235 comments
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 18/May/16
Cavill I think could have 1cm on Lutz...
Johno said on 18/May/16
Yeh Rob, i do not see Cavil as taller but them being the same height may hold true although i got my own assumptions.
Mark, the picture you posted is the same one before and the one i posted is a zoomed in shot of them two at the same event. with your one, Cavil's eyeline is the same as Lutz's but his chin is up and do not believe Lutz has a small forehead.
I don't think anyone had Lutz at 5'11; more rather wakes up at 6'0.5 and goes to sleep at 5'11.75 thus, averages around Rob 's listed height of him.
said on 17/May/16
@Johno, again, Henry is tilting his head in the picture.
Here, Cavill and Lutz both are standing straight as possible in this equal camera position. No insane distortion of the image. Cavill is at the back, yet he appears slightly taller than Kellan.
5'11" is ridiculous and much too low for Kellan. I think Kellan does need a good upgrade.
said on 17/May/16
Rob, I know Everyone has debated about this, but could Kellan Edge out Henry or does Henry slightly edge out Kellan?
Editor Rob: I think it would be unlikely that Kellan is taller...although I certainly wouldn't rule out the chance both were the same.
Celebheights 6'1.5 said on 14/May/16
Or maybe they are both 6'0 1/2"-6'0 3/4"? There's no way that they are 5'11 3/4".
Mark said on 13/May/16
@Johno Here is the problem. A lot of the pictures Kellan edges out Henry was when the Camera lens are slightly distorted from a completely different angle. When it's distorted, you never really see the actual measurement.
The reason why I chose a photo like the one I used is because it's less distorted, both are standing straight without the camera having to distort the image with a different angle.
said on 12/May/16
Again; not the best of shots but probably accurate then the other's in the catelogue, Cavil's eyeline is just about the same as Lutz's but out of the two, i believe Lutz has the longer eyeline therefore, there is more skull thickness under his hair then Cavil's and Lutz probably would be the taller the two if i had the hazard a guess but even if he hasn't got the longer eyeline, i cannot see Cavil being taller then him. There are probably alot of underlying factors that we cannot see but based on the above picture; Cavil is not taller then Lutz and Certainly not by 0.5-inches or 0.75-inches.
Lutz was listed as 6'0 on his model agency, it seems that maybe he his taller end judging by Rob's comparison. Perhaps Rob can give his opinion. I certainly can't see height between them.
Johno said on 12/May/16
No Mark; the pictures are limited and the ones you supplied have Cavil always looking up and trying to stand as a erect as possible. The pictures you have supplied are partial; half shots, the top half but even then i cannot see Cavil taller then Lutz; you have measure below Hair and Lut's.
The picture i have supplier; is not perfect but it is a full bodyshot and out of the two; Cavil and Lutz, Cavil is standing the better as he always does and his formals look about 1.25-inches in thickness and they seem to be thicker then Lutz's. I do see Lutz having the edge if all the factors were to be corrected and at best ----- Cavil the same height as Lutz.
Now, in terms of the two snapshots above; luckily they are both of with Rob and Jenny. 0.25-inches is the smallest factor realistically that Rob categorically states and is equal to the thickness of Rob's hair i.e. it is miniscule and even comparing him with Jenny [Rob usually stands taller then Jenny], even compared to her; his height does not go above 6'0 and does appear to be less. It might be a good idea for Rob to superimpose a scale on those shots to guide; i am consident Lutz would not go above 6'0 even factoring in 0.25-inches for shoes.
Lutz has head tilted; his left eye seesaws down but conversely, his right raises and even using the higher eyeline, i can see him going above 6'0 at his lowest, he seems comfortably lower.
That top end estimate of 6'1.25 seems way out for me; i cannot see Lutz going 6'1.25 or above based on the comparisons. Lutz in all reason probably wakes up at 6'0.5 in the morning and goes to sleep at 5'11.75
Lutz was listed at 6'0 afterall and this seems like his average height; i can't see Cavil averaging more then this, he does not seem like a strong 6-footer let alone a weak 6'1 as your implying.
Once again, a superimposed scale on the above pictures would help. Perhaps Rob can add it. For now ...
Lutz 6'0.5 morning, 5'11.75 evening
Cavil ~ 6'0.5 morning, ~ 5'11.75 evening
Celebheights 6'1.5 said on 11/May/16
A lot of the ones who think that he appears to be in the 5'11" range in the above photo aren't considering the fact that his head is tilted in a way that makes him appear shorter than he actually is, and the headwear also does the same thing. Just from going by the shoulder level (and the footwear disadvantage, with the facial sizes being considered), Kellan Lutz appears to be approximately 4 1/2" inches taller than Rob. 6'0 1/2" might make more sense than 6'0 1/4".
Mark said on 8/May/16
Oh and there are alot of pictures of Cavill and Lutz, Johno. You just have to pick which one has the less distortion image and more the equal picture of both standing straight at the camera without going to different sides.
Oh and if you didn't EVEN READ WHAT ROB SAID ABOUT THE PICTURE ABOVE, you should again. ROB ACTUALLY HAD THE FOOTWEAR ADVANTAGE on Kellan for the picture above. I hope you have a pair of eyes to read because you clearly don't seem to have one.
I could see Kellan at 185.5/183.5 cm. Nothing less of that.
said on 8/May/16
Oh look, Johno. A more equal position of Cavill and Kellan standing straight. Henry is still behind Kellan yet Cavill is still taller than Lutz.
said on 8/May/16
Johno, those footwear aren't as thick you think they are. There is a light where it makes look thick but in reality it's not.
Here, Henry is on the back of the camera, yet he's still taller than Kellan Lutz. Cavill's shoulder level is still higher than Kellan's shoulder level.
said on 6/May/16
Mark, there isn't many pictures of those two but from i can see from the above is, Cavil is the same height as Lutz at best.
Cavil obviously has the thicker footwear out of the two and also the posture. You correct these factors and Cavil is the same height as Lutz at best.
I can clearly see, Lutz goes below 6'0 at his lowest but can probably average 6'0 or at least near there.
Mark said on 5/May/16
Johno, I already posted a picture where Henry was on the back of the camera and the crowd, yet Cavill is still taller than Kellan.
Johno said on 1/May/16
S.J.H, he looks around 5'11.5-6'0 with Rob and Jenny and is listed 6'0 on his resume.
He is taller than Bradley Cooper and with Henry Cavil, i believe Lutz is taller than himself. Cavil is usually always in thicker formal wear when standing next to Lutz and Lutz is usually in thinner, with a casual pose to.
S.J.H said on 30/Apr/16
I strongly doubted that Lutz is 6'0 and robert pattinson a weak 6'0 like 5'11-3/4
paulkersey32 said on 28/Apr/16
. He does not "destroy" Marsden. Hes around 2inchs above. Also 140 for 6' is bone skinny. And I read yrs ago he was 6 3" and bought it cuz his crazy unique proportions. Whoever said hes 220....no. Ifs hes this height hes not over 200. He even stated 187. Muscular 6" above 185 is buff
said on 16/Apr/16
Rob, if Kellan Lutz is a guy 184 cm. What would be the height of the guy next to him in this picture??
Look: Click Here
Editor Rob: he could have a bit less footwear so near 6ft 4 possibly
Johno said on 12/Apr/16
He can look under 6'0 at his lowest and probably is over 6'0 earlier on and thus that 6'0 listed height on that model agency is probably the best estimate.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 11/Apr/16
6ft0½ is still debatable.
Celebheights 6'1.75"/187 CM said on 9/Apr/16
He's no more than two inches shorter than Terrell Owens (who was measured at 6'2 7/8") in the photos of the two together.
Johno said on 4/Apr/16
Knappstern what are my own rules? That Rob is not around 5'8 and 1/8th in the afternoon like stated in Rob's biography? That Rob and Jenny both easily clear Lutz's eyelevel? That Lutz does not look any taller than 6'0 there?
Lutz 5'11.75 - 6'0
Knappstern said on 31/Mar/16
Johno, you're just following your own rules, not Rob ones.
Johno said on 29/Mar/16
Knappstern, when the comparisons are right in front of you, most people have the luxury of calling out the height of the celebrity with reasonable accuracy.
I see Kellan around 5'11.75; 6'0, if Rob is 5'8 and 1/8ths ---- how can you call these estimates, "absurd", when alot of readers have said the samething?
Why don't you go ask Rob to add 2/3 cms to his own height of 5'8 and 1/8ths if you want to add height to your celebrities; i am just following the rules.
Knappstern said on 23/Mar/16
Johno, when you're tall with precision?
Cut off 2/3 cm to your stature and you'll find your own judgement. You're a bit absurd.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 16/Mar/16
I'm sure he isn't far off his claim but it does look like he wears bigger shoes a lot when he's with taller guys. . That's why he might not look much shorter than Dolph Lundgren and Terry Crews in photos.
Johno said on 9/Mar/16
5'11.75 might be a more secure bet.
Johno said on 4/Mar/16
said on 9/Feb/16
Rob, you got him before he became a big movie star...what are the chances of you crossing paths with him again?
Editor Rob: I wouldn't call him a big star, I'm sure he was going to do another convention but pulled out...no idea if he'll be back.
Celebheights 6'1.75/187 CM
said on 26/Nov/15
By Zac Efron:
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 2/Nov/15
"Kellan Lutz's height is 6ft 0½in (184cm)"
No more or less...
Andrea said on 2/Nov/15
Rob himself said that in person is no different than a guy like Big Alex, so 6' flat isn't impossible but the listing is fair...
S.J.H said on 2/Nov/15
He is only 6 foot. I wouldnt be surprise he is this mark.
Celebheights 6'1.75/187 CM said on 1/Nov/15
I could actually buy 186 CM for an out of bed measurement. Just look at how tall he stands by actors who are 5'8"-5'10". There's no way that somebody who is under 6'0" (or 6'0") would be able to stand that tall by them.
Judd ISR said on 26/Sep/15
Yeah I'd agree too
said on 23/Sep/15
Rob among those four choice?
[Editor Rob: I'd stick with no less than B]
Robbin said on 1/Sep/15
I think hes more likely to be 5'11.75 , solid 182cm though
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 24/Aug/15
230lbs is a joke. Near 220lbs in Hercules I could believe though.
6ft1 out of bed for sure.
"Kellan Lutz's height is 6ft 0½in (184cm)"
said on 21/Aug/15
@Rob do you think Kellan hits 6-1 early in the morning or does he come up short?
[Editor Rob: I believe he would hit that mark, I doubt any less than it.]
Josh1 said on 8/Aug/15
5'11.5 - 6'0 range.
James Edward Crowley
said on 27/Jul/15
Rob how much did Kellan Lutz weigh in the twilight films i would say at
least 230 pounds he looked huge in the twilight films.
[Editor Rob: not sure he'd be quite that much. Maybe 220 is possible.]
said on 11/Jul/15
Rob, how many cm do you drop form the moment you wake up until late in night?
[Editor Rob: can be 1.5-1.9 range, anywhere in there.]
Celebheights 6'1.75/187 CM
said on 15/Jun/15
How come he looks 6'2" by 6'6" Ramses Barden?
I'm not saying that he is (he isn't), but it's weird that he appears that tall by him.
Mark said on 13/Jun/15
In pictures with Henry Cavill who is listed at 6'0.5", Lutz appears slightly taller. I think he is more like 6'1" unless Cavill is 5'11" which I doubt.
said on 8/May/15
Rob, how come he doesn't look 184 in the above photos? Is it the posture, which I doubt because in every photo I have seen him, he usually has great posture?And the beanie that he has on makes it very difficult to know where his head stops. I think 183 that you had him before fits him better, though I wouldn't be surprised if he dropped little under 6" in the evening.
[Editor Rob: generally I think he can look in the stronger 6ft range.]
Celebheights 6'1.75/187 CM
said on 20/Apr/15
He destroys James Marsden:
The footwear (which is identical):
There is no way that there's only 2.75" inches between them.
Judd said on 2/Apr/15
5'11?????? I would be surprised if he would be measured a flat 6'...
I think he's a strong 6'0.25" guy
said on 31/Mar/15
With a measured 6'1" Drew Butler, a punter with the NFL Arizona Cardinals:
Hypado said on 29/Mar/15
Kellan Lutz's height is 6ft 0.25in (183,6 cm)
183,6 or maybe 184,0 cm for Lutz.
Celebheights 6'1.5"-6'2" said on 22/Mar/15
He was about the same as Samuel L. Jackson in Arena. Would these listings work better?
Samuel L. Jackson-6'1.25" (today)
Kellan Lutz-6'0.5" (I don't see a full inch between them).
Ryan Mason 185.0 cm said on 9/Mar/15
Looks no more than 5'11.75 ( 182 cm )
said on 17/Feb/15
Rob at 6,0-6.25 is weighing 140 exact skinny you think? I look skinny
[Editor Rob: you would look skinny at that weight for 6ft range]
said on 14/Feb/15
Rob, would 5'11 range be a possibillity?
[Editor Rob: pretty much zero chance.]
Dmeyer said on 10/Feb/15
Does look a weaker 184cm than cavill Who looks a haïr taller
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 9/Feb/15
Nah, Cavill would be taller than this guy and totally disagree that he'd be a better Chris Evans. Lutz can't act at all and that comment he made about how he'll win an oscar some day...career down the drain
Joe said on 1/Feb/15
No, he is definitely a 6 footer, might be 6-1, he is taller than Henry Cavill, his co-star from the Immortals. Cavill is under 6-1, about 6'0.5", and Lutz looked taller. Lutz has large broad shoulders and classic blonde all American looks, he was strongly considered for Captain America, considering his looks and his physique I have no idea how they passed him up for Chris Evans, he would have made a far superior Captain America. Evans already was in a Marvel film as the Human Torch.
said on 19/Jan/15
, finally a pic were he looks bang on 6'0.25/183-4cm , good pic head to feet similar shoes décent angle
Dmeyer said on 18/Jan/15
If he is just 183.5cm then sly banderas and statham are just 173-4cm max
Judd said on 7/Oct/14
does look 6' with rob, but you need to consider his shoes...6'0.25" on the nose!
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 29/Sep/14
I think right between 6ft and 6ft1 is on the money for Lutz
Clay said on 26/Sep/14
He was owning Sly, Wesley Snipes, Jason Statham and other Expendables cast mates. His posture with Rob isn't good and a tooque makes you look MM's shorter I know from experience. I believe 6'0.25-6'0.5.
Real said on 18/Sep/14
he looks like 5'11(180cm) in the pic Rob
Danny said on 16/Sep/14
In all reality he could be 5'10-5'11 without shoes on, and 6'0 with lifts. Most 5'10 guys can pull off a 6'0 look when wearing most shoes with a standard heel.
184.9 on a bad day
said on 29/Aug/14
Rob, when you listed someone at 6 ft 0.25 it is 184 on the dot or under 184 ?
[Editor Rob: it's not quite 184, several mm under, but it's more to say the person can look more than just 6ft flat]
MrTBlack said on 18/Aug/14
They don't measure Ford Models so he probably did claim 6'0" and said 6'1" when he went to Hollywood. That's what actors do, they grown an inch when they get big!
andrew said on 14/Aug/14
he's more than 184 cm !
he's at the same height as Ryan Lochte ! looks 186 cm
Sxuza said on 13/Aug/14
I think he's taller than what's listed here. Check out his candids on any gossip site. He's usually towering over everyone in a way that doesn't happen at 184cm.
Dmeyer said on 8/Aug/14
6'0.5 in listing would be Nice defenetly not à 183cm flat guy
Rhonda (Snowy) said on 5/Aug/14
Looks a flat 6ft to me.
Dmeyer said on 31/Jul/14
He destroys all expendables 3 mêmebers height
184.9 on a bad day said on 3/Jul/14
Kellan Lutz 183.5-1.84.
Liam McIntyre 185.5-186.
To be fair Lutz Can look taller than this listing,
if Rob don't meeting him i buy 185 too
Look taller than Cavill and Pattinson.
said on 20/Jun/14
I gotta ask Rob, do you think he looks as big as 'BIG ROB' in this elevator shoes? You say you were 6.25 in them.
[Editor Rob: I think he could be]
said on 18/Jun/14
rob this guy can realy look 6 ft 1 with snipes lundgren and many others if he didnt look about 6 ft with you i would have thaught 6 ft 1 was possible
[Editor Rob: he ain't no 6ft 1 in person, but yeah with good posture he can pull off looking 184 range I feel, even at times near 6ft 1.]
said on 12/May/14
Rob, Kellan Lutz and Liam Mcintyre (listed 6ft 1.25) are both the same height more or less, what do you think?
said on 7/May/14
"Editor Rob: a little over 6 foot is probably fairer, for every guy 6 foot there's as many 6ft 0.25 or 5ft 11.75 out there in the world.]"
Ummm, no, there isn't. It's not a huge difference, but the 5'11.75s outnumber 6 foot evens, and they outnumber the 6'.25s. Any cursory look at a bell curve can tell you that.
[Editor Rob: the difference in amounts isn't going to be much to bother about on a bell curve when you move in such small 1/4 inches and you are talking about millions of 6 footers worldwide.]
Alex 6ft 0 said on 29/Mar/14
Looks a solid 6'0. He looks pretty much same as me I think
dmeyer said on 28/Jan/14
I met David Moore twice in both times looked 189cm
MD said on 27/Jan/14
Sharp eye. I had noticed that. From that picture, we can tell at the very least that he was on the toes of his left foot.
Anon183 said on 26/Jan/14
doesn't it look like he is on tip toes / increasing his height with that Wendy lady below? Explains a lot
said on 18/Jan/14
hers the shoes she had on
said on 18/Jan/14
Kellan wih 5'10 5'11 Wendy Williams. She has on 4 inch heels and he has on maybe an inch/inch and a half footwear .. thats if he doesnt have on hidden lifts as the boots are high tops.
MD said on 9/Jan/14
Nah, she's just a strange woman all the way around. Unsettlingly so. She has a creepy head-size fetish. lol
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 6/Jan/14
You've got dreadful taste in men :)
Emily said on 28/Dec/13
I just noticed he has long legs AND a small head. These are kind of the perfect proportions
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 23/Dec/13
He's definitely sporting heels with JDM (who claims 6ft2, but might be a fraction more). But I think he's at least 6ft0.5 if not a weak 6ft1. That would make Pattinson 6ft-6ft0.25 tops, which is fair.
Legend said on 16/Dec/13
said on 11/Dec/13
He obviously can't be that tall, Seahawksfan. So, there is another explanation, obviously. I hate you took that photo I posted on Joel's page to bring it over here since there is obviously something going on in it that can't be explained without seeing footwear and where they are standing.
[Editor Rob: sometimes differences do get hidden, look at Ronaldo and Terrell
...we know Ronaldo is measured 6ft 1 and Terrell near 6ft 3...]
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 5/Dec/13
"Kellan Lutz's height is 6ft 0.75in (185cm)"
Can look his claim.
Balrog said on 2/Dec/13
I could buy 6'0.5" for him since he actually looks same height as Henry Cavill even though the last one has perfect posture. But Pattinson is rather a 6'0" flat and a sloucher
Josh said on 29/Nov/13
5'11.5 182cm the most.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 28/Nov/13
Pattinson is a normal 6ft, IMO (184.5cm out of bed, 182.5cm before bed).
This guy can look near his claim, quite often. I'll settle on 6ft0.5-6ft0.75 range.
wiltonstilts said on 27/Nov/13
He seems a lil shorter than 6 foot even
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 8/Sep/13
I wouldnt call him imposing.
But, he does have good muscle definition.
cole said on 27/Aug/13
He's a 6ft flat guy.
Jack said on 26/Aug/13
His muscular physique gives the impression of a larger guy. He is fairly ripped and imposing with an athletic build
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 29/Jul/13
Rob Pattinson 6ft0.25in/184cm
Kellan Lutz 6ft0.75in/185cm
Rob Pattinson 6ft/183cm
Kellan Lutz 6ft0.5in/184cm
Choose one. Either way, Kellan looks 0.5in taller
Akmal said on 27/Jul/13
Nate said on 19/Jul/13
Funny how nobody comments on this guy anymore since the downgrade!! : )
wiltonstilts said on 29/Jun/13
5'11.5. Does not look 6'01 .....
Alex 6ft 0 1/8 said on 13/Jun/13
Would be pretty much 6'0 taking into account the 1/4 less footwear
johno said on 10/May/13
Balrog said on 10/Apr/13
Solid 6 footer.
gavros said on 1/Mar/13
This guy wears lifts.It's obvious.He looks a tad over 6'1" in every pic when he is only 6'.
Josh said on 14/Feb/13
said on 29/Jan/13
Look at Brad Cooper and Kellan w/ 5'11 and 5/8 Victor Cruz. What do you think?
SHAHROOZ said on 24/Dec/12
Rob,do you see Kellan Lutz with Victor Cruz who is listed 6.0 foot.please check it
said on 5/Nov/12
Rob, what makes Kellan Lutz such a difficult celebrity to guess his height? he looks a lil under 184cm to me as well...but it took us time to list him correctly.
[Editor Rob: a little over 6 foot is probably fairer, for every guy 6 foot there's as many 6ft 0.25 or 5ft 11.75 out there in the world.]
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 27/Oct/12
I think 184cm is a good shout for Kellan. But nothing over
JohnDosen said on 18/Oct/12
Sorry to say Rob, but if you say Kellan is 6.0" you can't say Robert Pattinson is 6,0.25" It doesn't make any sense, whatsoever! Robert Pattinson is shorter than Kellan, in almost every single pic., so to claim Robert as a genuine 6,0.25" footer, and Kellan as a "mere" 6.0 footer, is kinda ridiculous.
Kellan must be higher than 6 feet, otherwise you have two downgrade Robert. As it is now, it doesn't make any sense.
173 said on 15/Oct/12
I agree, balrog.
balrog said on 14/Oct/12
Rob, but Kellan always towers over Lautner, at least 4 in, you put Lutz at 6 foot, Lautner gotta be 5'8 flat at most.
said on 13/Oct/12
Rob, what made you change idea? He looks taller than Pattinson, who's 184 in your opinion!
[Editor Rob: in person he really looks no different than guys like Big Alex or Grant Bowler do, genuine 6 footers, and the modelling agency have him at 6 foot. For this kind of work why did they not go with his claim and put him down as 6 foot - I believe it's quite possible he was measured in the 6 foot range.
you could argue then why does Pattinson's modelling agency have him at 6ft 2...maybe he told them he was that height with his hair!]
balrog said on 11/Oct/12
If you downgrade Lutz you should downgrade both Lautner and Pattinson.
Jack said on 7/Oct/12
Yeah 183 is too low for him. Maybe you should give him 6'0.25"(184 cm) at least Rob.
said on 6/Oct/12
Ramses Barden was measured 6'6 barefoot at the 2009 nfl combine Click Here
about half an inch taller than bradley cooper based on eye levels Click Here
Jack said on 4/Oct/12
He has an inch on Pattinson. So Robert is nothing taller than 180 cm.
Big T said on 29/Sep/12
Looks a little over 180 cm in the photos, my guess is 182-183 cm out of bed.
Jack said on 20/Sep/12
Rob he is clearly taller than Robert Pattinson. How could he be less than 184 cm?
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 12/Sep/12
barefoot - 184cm
in shoes - 186cm
Wind said on 7/Sep/12
@Jack I haven't seen him barefoot that often so yeah :)
Jack said on 6/Sep/12
@Wind 6'2" maybe in shoes..
Wind said on 2/Sep/12
I cant seem to understand how some of u keep saying kellan is 6'0.5''
How the hell can u be so precise just by looking at a photo?? Even if u measured him with a tape u could be wrong by half an inch. Besides Rob has a trained eye AND he met him in person. Enough talking over 1cm.
And BTW Kellan most certainly looks 6'1''. I would even buy 6'2''.
Tony said on 16/Aug/12
Yes I do think his small head makes him look taller, but hes really not standing up completely straight, so I think Rob is right with the 185 cm listing, but hes definitely not any taller than 185 cm. Good job Rob.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 8/Aug/12
Yeah he's 6ft0.5(184cm). Probably 185cm
out of bed.
Jake: 1.82 m-- 1.83 m-- 1.84 m said on 5/Aug/12
I agree with LeBron6: 184 cm.
LeBron6 said on 31/Jul/12
Kellan Lutz's height is 6 ft 0.5 in (184.15 cm)
said on 31/Jul/12
Rob this right here is pure evidence for a downgrade. As this guy is listed at 5'11.75" and has the same posture and looks same height as kellan does next to you if not taller. Downgrade needed as this listing is clearly off by atleast 1/2".
[Editor Rob: kellan's taller than llewllyn in person, although there is a chance he's more 184.]
LeBron6 said on 31/Jul/12
Rob, why can't you understand that the 5'11"-5'11.5" that he looks in these pics, plus the couple of cms he loses from posture and the .25 inch less footwear does not equal a full 6'1''? I could buy 6'0.75" absolute max for this guy. I think anywhere from 6'0"-6'0.5" is fair for this guy but deffinetly not a full 6'1". Downgraded needed rob.
LeBron6 said on 30/Jul/12
Common Rob, 6'1" is rediculous. The hat makes him look taller in this shot. And his small head makes him look even taller. He has a maximum of 2.25 inches on you in that shot. So he would have to gain atleast 2.5 inches from slightly tilting his head up. I could buy 6'0.5"-6'0.75" absoulute max. Downgrade needed rob!
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 29/Jul/12
I'm not convinced he's 185cm
Hob said on 27/Jul/12
kellan lutz is 5'11.5 in picture walk on street along Peter Facinelli he don't even look over 1.5" taller than 5'10 Peter Facinelli.
BigT said on 24/Jul/12
Looks 180 cm max in the pics with Rob and Jenny. Most I ever see for this guy is between 180 and 183 cm.
MaskDeMasque said on 11/Jun/12
looks 5'11 based on the photos above. i suppose with better posture maybe 6'.
kurp said on 8/Feb/12
I'd say he's more 184 from these photos, probably wakes up at 185.5
henry said on 8/Feb/12
I he has smal head and broad shoulders.this reason he look big and musculer.I agree rob.he is 6-6'1.
RD said on 24/Jan/12
I don't think the difference between the people in the photos is 5 inches. It's hard to tell with the hat, but just eyeballing it, he looks 180cm (5'11").
J.J. said on 23/Jan/12
Looks 6'0.5" plus his 0.25 shoe disadvantage so he is definitely 6'0.75" so yeah his 6'1" claim is fair
xyz.reg(185.4cms-???cms) said on 4/Jan/12
@omg hahahah.....A big LOL to your name and then to what you said..learn to read properly..i never said he is 5ft 10.5..he looks that height after slouching..what i m saying is he is 6ft 0.25in barefoot...according to my perspective..!!
said on 31/Dec/11
with 6'2" adam gregory.
ya right. said on 30/Dec/11
vtec, do you see the soles on his shoes? their huge,kid.
omg hahahah..... said on 30/Dec/11
xyz.reg. Do you even knoww what 5'10.5 looks like? i'm EXACTLY 5'10.5 and wearing 3inch heels makes me 6'2, and i cant even slouch to make me 5'10.5, hes definetely 6'1, the tip of his head compared to the tip of robs head is a huge difference. I cant believe anyone would think hes 5'10, thats ridiculous, mandy moores 5'10( which he starred a movie with her "love,wedding,marriage")
xyz.reg(186cms-187cms) said on 23/Dec/11
Looks 5ft 10.5in slouching..if he stands straight..hair above 6ft max....!!
ChiasmataX said on 21/Dec/11
With his posture in these pictures, it is hard to determine his real height, but up-straight I don't think he's taller than the guy from height challenge # 10. I ignore his picture with Rob because he had weird posture. If that was his best posture with Jenny he looked 182cm. If that wasn't then then he is around 183-184cm during the day. He might be near 185 cm in the morning which is what he claimed.
said on 17/Dec/11
Come on now, it's obvious this guy is closer to 6' flat than 6'1". I even doubt he reaches 6', he looks 5'11 next to Rob. There's no way he's 9cm taller than 176cm listed Stephen Moyer:
184cm at the absolute MAX for Lutz, 182-183 is probably a better estimate.
Not Popeye said on 11/Dec/11
If this guy is 6'1, I'm Popeye
said on 5/Dec/11
lutz is shorter than 6.05 henry cavill.
time to downgrade.
Yaspaa said on 5/Dec/11
More 6'0 than 6'1.
said on 1/Dec/11
I can't judge kellan's leg posture from this picture, but his back looks quite straight in second picture. I don't think he's 6'1.. 5'11max. What do you think Rob?
[Editor Rob: he can look 6ft-6ft 1 range I feel, I don't believe he looked under 6 foot.]
said on 27/Nov/11
Rob can you explain these photos ? He looks 5'11. I don't ubderstand.
[Editor Rob: I think he does lose a couple of cm from his posture]
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 26/Nov/11
At least 6"0...
FTD said on 25/Nov/11
He is a big guy and i think his build makes him look bigger. Where are you at that 6'1 is "Huge?" I'd say "Tall" starts at 6'0 maybe 5'11.
Silent d said on 22/Nov/11
Definately 6 foot 1. He is huge. Taller than pattinson. When he went on ellen he looked 6 foot 2. If he is 180cm, does that mean pattinson is 178cm. I don't think so, he is about the same height as robert, maybe slightly taller. 185cm easy. Pattinson is pretty solid 184cm.
Maximus said on 20/Nov/11
That all depends on how tall 50cent is.....kelly is definetly taller than 50 cent and 50 cent is listed at 6' so 5'11" minimum. With that in mind 6'1" seems very likely...he has 50cent by minimum 2"
karÃ„Â±n said on 17/Nov/11
realty he is 6'0.25 in night my height
anonim said on 15/Nov/11
I changed my mind, this man, maybe 6'0 .5 inch flat 6 feet
anonim said on 15/Nov/11
In this photo looks 5'11 .5 or less.
vtec said on 12/Nov/11
this guy is 5'11" max
said on 22/Oct/11
rob why did you go to a twilight convention it's the worst book and movie franchise of all time!
[Editor Rob: Jenny wanted to go, but it's a good way to get some photos for the site, that's primarily why I go to events.]
Legend said on 19/Oct/11
Derrick said on 19/Oct/11
I think he's around six feet no more he's dont tower over Sharni his GF and she's 56 57
Tman said on 14/Oct/11
Can you beleave this guy was even considered for Conan the mother of all Babarians,I mean Jesus what the hell has hollywood come to!
5\'10guy\'n\'still growing said on 11/Oct/11
6'0 guy solid thats it maybe less 5'11.take off the hat maybe his long hair or what is under the hat and you got a 6'0 guy
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 10/Oct/11
Hes 183cm-184cm...not over 6"0.5.
Don't believe hes 187lbs either.
Closer to 170lbs
Alex said on 10/Oct/11
Legend, he looks more 6'0. Yes with Rob he can look shorter than that but hes leaning in which will take height away. With Jenny he can look 6'0.
Greg said on 6/Oct/11
Looks 5'11.75'', 6'0'' even when you take the footwear disadvantage.
6'1'' is a joke, I'm sorry. He's tall, but just barely.
Legend said on 5/Oct/11
USYD you are fooled.
USYD said on 3/Oct/11
I think he's 184.5cm. He has Jenny at near eye-level and she's 5'8.25".
Legend said on 29/Sep/11
Everyone in the world seems to think he's not 6'1, including me.
Cranberries (18m, 193cm)
said on 27/Sep/11
"i've never seen this guy look lanky,i mean shouldn't a guy over 6 foot look a bit lanky at 187lbs? Maybe 183.5cm tops for him!"
Kellan Lutz does not have a robust build. His arms are short and his spine is long; he has someone average-sized bones, with a bit more muscle and a bit less fat.
^See how his arms barely make it past his crotch? His arms are short, so it takes less muscle to make them look thick.
Also, 183cm flat is my highest guess.
jake, 1.82 m said on 21/Sep/11
6ft flat or 6ft0.25 at the very most.
anonim said on 15/Sep/11
maybe he is 180.5
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 6/Sep/11
Seriously not looking any taller than 5"11 in the pics.
Martin said on 6/Sep/11
He is not 6'1.
Legend said on 23/Aug/11
LOL HHH is 6'1.25
ak said on 23/Aug/11
kellan is not standing straight there at all on one pic with HHH he's taller than the game still i give him 6'0.5 by bed time strong 6'1 out of bed
Gained weight instead said on 20/Aug/11
Looks 182cm. His build makes him appear a bit taller.
said on 19/Aug/11
Kellen Lutz with 6'2 triple h Click Here
said on 18/Aug/11
Rob, hes shorter than John Cena but Cena is listed shorter on here. What do you think?
[Editor Rob: I think Cena has camera advantage in that shot]
verastegui said on 11/Aug/11
Rob Kellan Lutz at least 183 drop any
sa said on 7/Aug/11
Ã„Â± am sorry he loos 5'11.5
Larc 6 ft 1.75 in said on 28/Jul/11
If he's 6'1 then I must be at least 6'3.75, because I clearly look at least 2inches taller than that beside my 5'8 cousin, she doesn't even reach my eyelevel.
6'0.25 is closer.
jake said on 24/Jul/11
Not 6ft1. He's 6ft0.25 absolute max I think.
Voiceless dental fricative
said on 24/Jul/11
Rob, I'll give deference to your judgment in regards to Lutz being 6'1, as in person you are in a much better position to gauge height than we are from static images. But why does he look so short in these photos? Was he really just dropping THAT MUCH in posture?
[Editor Rob: if I'm not as sure on someone being their claim or possibly less, until I am I would just leave someone at what they claim.]
said on 19/Jul/11
There are a number of pictures on Google where this guy looks no more than 2 inches taller than 5'9.25" Stephen Moyer. Including:
Legend said on 14/Jul/11
He's not 6'1. Now thats funny.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 12/Jul/11
Your 6ft, he's 6ft1 and you say he's 'way taller' than you?
6ft Los A said on 7/Jul/11
Im 6foot, he ways taller than me, met in L.A, he was wearing flipflops, might try to load up picture, Def. minimum 6-1, dude is tall
meeple said on 3/Jul/11
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 28/Jun/11
His upper body isn't huge in the slightest.
Legend said on 27/Jun/11
Katrina said on 25/Jun/11
Terryman, his upper body is huge (looks like he works out quite a bit) so I think its his built that prevents him from looking lanky. 6'1 seems appropriate for him.
Terryman said on 23/Jun/11
i've never seen this guy look lanky,i mean shouldn't a guy over 6 foot look a bit lanky at 187lbs? Maybe 183.5cm tops for him!
SAK said on 23/Jun/11
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 8/Jun/11
As much as I am impressed by your precise estimates, USYD, this guy does not look over 6ft(183cm) in the pics. He looks 180-181cm...but with better posture probably 183cm or max 184cm
Lutz has shoe disadvantage and hardly is standing straight, so yeah that has to be taken into consideration,
184cm @ lowest, 185cm as his afternoon height,
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 18/Jun/11
6ft0.5 tops Rob
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 8/Jun/11
As much as I am impressed by your precise estimates, USYD, this guy does not look over 6ft(183cm) in the pics. He looks 180-181cm...but with better posture probably 183cm or max 184cm
Legend said on 6/Jun/11
James said on 31/May/11
5'11 with poor posture in the pics
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 17/May/11
I see 5"11 flat in both pics...
But I think 6"0(183cm) is fair
gogo said on 13/May/11
his proportions make him look very tall, i have a friend like him, look 6'2 from a distance but actually is 6'0-6'0.5
said on 8/May/11
Bruce Campbell, next to Rob, looks much taller than Lutz does. And Campbell is listed as 6'0.5'. 5'11.5" is my best guess for Kellan Lutz.
Next to 5'8" Jackson Rathbone, he still hardly looks 6'.
Taking into account anomalies and footware advantages, etc., I seriously think you should bump him down to 6' flat, Rob.
Legend said on 6/May/11
His height is 5'11.5 and thats my official verdict.
The Horse of FUNK said on 2/May/11
"Hailey says on 14/Jan/11
You have to be kidding me Kellan Lutz is a giant he is way taller that 6 1. I love Emmett!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! And Kellan!!!!!!"
Lol, I guess I now understand where those 6'5" listings come from for his character on Twilight websites.
MD said on 30/Apr/11
Rampage, why you come to this page and use two days to make those comments? Honestly, who cares? Did he ever do or say anything rude to you? Grow up.
Legend said on 29/Apr/11
He doesn't look over 6 feet to me.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 28/Apr/11
187lbs is nothing spectacular anyway...
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 27/Apr/11
He does look like a weakling alright...I would mop the floor with him and Pattinson no bother
Aaron said on 18/Apr/11
I'm back, ready to hate.
Seriously, look at this little guy. His head and his fists are smaller than Rob's, and Rob is a perfect model of average-sized. It's ridiculous he plays Emmett in Twilight, a character who's supposed to be like 6'5". Lutz isn't even 180 lbs. on his heaviest day.
Oy vey, popular casting...
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 18/Apr/11
Like Pattinson I don't think this guy is less than 6"0...despite I personally feel about them as human beings
hakunamatata said on 17/Apr/11
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 16/Apr/11
Could not agree with you more, Legend...I despise this guy even more than Rob Pattinson
Legend said on 9/Apr/11
He appears a douche with his arm around Rob like he's imposing himself.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 27/Mar/11
Looks 181-182cm in the pics....maybe 184cm? Not convinced he's 6ft1(185cm)
Aaron said on 24/Mar/11
Kellan Lutz LOOKS "giant", I suppose, because he has a rather small head and a squat posture. He has that "looming" appearance. But he's closer to 6' than 6'1" IMO. $0.02
Big Jon said on 14/Mar/11
6'0 more than 6'1 unles he is really leaning....no more than 4 inches on Jenny
said on 27/Feb/11
I have to admit he really looks shorter here than 6'1 but pics with fellow actors show that Rob's listing should be accurate. Click Here Click Here
James said on 16/Feb/11
About 5'11 with poor posture in these pics.
K4 said on 15/Feb/11
Might be 182-183cm.
anonymous said on 6/Feb/11
looks under 6'1''
has never looked particularly tall to me
Mathew said on 5/Feb/11
I'd say a little less than the full 6'1".
Anonymous said on 31/Jan/11
6'1. Not a giant but.. a fairly tall man.
somebody new said on 20/Jan/11
he's 6'1 tops. Since when is that considered giant ??lol
Hailey said on 14/Jan/11
You have to be kidding me Kellan Lutz is a giant he is way taller that 6 1. I love Emmett!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! And Kellan!!!!!!
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 8/Jan/11
6"0.5(184cm) at the most
Mr. Patosakee said on 12/Dec/10
Kellan lutz is a legit 180cm man trust me
somebody new said on 5/Dec/10
so u're saying these 2 pics with Rob and Jenny arent graphical material we can use ??? lol... I'm done arguing with you Moke... everybody has his own oppinion and you're not the one to change things!
Moke said on 30/Nov/10
Of course you can make things up, but as you have no graphical material to prove your point you won't change anything :)
somebody new said on 26/Nov/10
well Moke, we can make our own oppinions about stuff. You're hilarious, because you have nothing to say.
Moke said on 22/Nov/10
Haha, you're all a bit hilarious. I mean, Rob met him, talked, took the pic and decided to list him as 6'1. Somebody got a pic that proves he's below that? Talk is cheap :)
Matt said on 22/Nov/10
oh come on... 6ft 1 is really pushing it. even with the 1/4 inch shoe adv and the slight posture loss I barely see 6ft 0. He looks to be in the 5ft 11 range in reality.
lolo said on 15/Nov/10
height: 6'0.25 (184cm)
somebody new said on 11/Nov/10
just because his mugshot says 6ft doesent mean its accurate at all. It may be the best gwess we have, but I'd rather believe the pics with Rob and Jenny. You get a better idea of height with someone measured instead of someone gwessed...
Moke said on 10/Nov/10
As long he's 6ft here, he stays this height:) I mean, it's the best guess we have. Even if 50 may be 5'11.5 Kellan Lutz nevertheless appears 6'1 next to him.
somebody new said on 9/Nov/10
nooooooooo waaaaay 50 cent is 6ft...
said on 8/Nov/10
Together with 6ft 50 cent: Click Here
/ Click Here
You guys are all wrong: legit 6'1 (if not a bit taller?) :)
Larc186-188cm said on 1/Nov/10
I see 6'0.25 at max. That means also that Pattinson is more like 5'11.5 than 6'0.5.