BRUTAL said on 15/Jan/14
@ Mr. R
Cold?. He always seems gentlemanly in interviews. Perhaps he's just not all that good at talking to people in social situations. Did you even say anything to him?. As for his height, looks over 5ft 10 but under 6ft....
NJP said on 14/Jan/14
A strong 5'11" in every Chris Pine picture I've seen him in.
MD said on 14/Jan/14
Key phrase "about". I maintain that he is almost 6'0". He's 182cm. He is nearly the currently listed height, but it's also equally clear that he's not quite the listed height.
Mr. R said on 13/Jan/14
I saw Benedict last night at a screening of 12 Years a Slave. He was very cold and walked by us without stopping or talking. Onscreen, he seems very tall, but he is really thin. 6 feet is about right.
me said on 12/Jan/14
In Sherlock Season 1, Episode 2 he looks shorter than Bertie Carvel who is listed as 6'0.
cole said on 8/Jan/14
Going by a lot of his fan-sites, his claim might be 184 cm. At least it's listed under "facts about Benedict Cumberbatch" on a lot of these sites. I'm sorry, but I just can't see that. I haven't seen or heard him claim his height, has anyone?
I still stand by 182 cm range - 183 cm is not impossible though.
Yaspaa said on 5/Jan/14
He's too close in height with David Tennant to be under 6'0.
MEE said on 4/Jan/14
DR Watson must be veery short then!
cole said on 30/Dec/13
@Rampage: Personally I just can't see him over 6ft. All of the reasons why, I have listed in previous comments. He might be a teeny tiny fraction over 6ft straight out of bed, but that's not his mid-day/evening height imo. The listings on celebheights is meant to be barefoot mid-day/evening heights, correct?
In that regard I doubt he's a full 6ft, as he looks the same height as 5'11.5 Matt Smith and marginally shorter than Jamie Campbell Bower (who is 6ft). Rob have met both Matt and Jamie, and neither of them looked over 6ft with him. He can look anywhere between 5'11.5 and 6ft - so I'd go with the one between the two - 5'11.75. That's very reasonable for Cumberbatch imo, with a flat 6ft perhaps as an early day height. With Pine as well, who is in the strong 6ft range himself, he looks noticably shorter.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 29/Dec/13
I stand by 183-184cm. He reminds me a bit of Alan Rickman
cole said on 28/Dec/13
Click Here
You've met Jamie Campbell Bower, Rob - and 6ft is a solid listing for him. What do you make of this pic of Benedict with him? I think Jamie would be slightly taller. Jamie has a higher shoulder level, he's slouching and Benedict is holding a straight posture. Footwear could be a slight factor.
Editor Rob
they are pretty close, Jamie might edge him a fraction, although I don't know if their footwear is exactly the same.
cole said on 24/Dec/13
Rob regarding that mugshot, now it's only speculation, but the top of his head seems to be around the 6'0.5 mark, correct? Meaning he's 184 cm or so, maybe 184,5 cm in dress shoes. Of course it varies what different dress shoes give in height, but the ones I have feel very regular, and they make me go from 5'10.75 to 5'11.75 - 6' zone. He might have a slightly longer head than myself, maybe 0,5-1 cm or so (just guessing), so to me it seems more likely that he's about the 5'11.5 - 5'11.75 mark. But since we can't see his footwear in that shot it's impossible to tell accurately. I just get the overall impression that he's a "slightly under 6ft guy" anyway from looking at him with Firth, Pine, Hardy, Gattiss and Freeman.
Would you perhaps go with 5'11.75 for him? It seems the best guess to me. The mugshot rules out anything over 6ft imo, unless of course he's actually barefoot.
Editor Rob
182 or 3 are both arguable...maybe if actually measured he could stretch to the 183 mark.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 23/Dec/13
I'd give Firth 186cm and this dude 183-184cm
Realist said on 22/Dec/13
Really Thin Frame, more like a 5'11 1/2(182 cm)guy, slightly shorter than colin firth whos more like 6'0.75(185 cm)
MD said on 19/Dec/13
With 5'11.5" Jimmy Kimmell:
Click Here
I think that this is a case of a long head making someone look taller than they are. He is not much shorter than listed, but I'd go with 182 cm, max, instead of a full 6'0". He's a tall enough guy, but he's just not quite 6'0".
Halb said on 16/Dec/13
Just watched Sherlock, didn't seem much shorter than Gatgiss.
NJP said on 16/Dec/13
Comparatively the difference in height between Benedict and Martin freeman is less when you compare Henry Cavill and Freeman. Cavill is listed as 184, Benedict 183.
Click Here
Click Here
Freeman comes up to Benedicts eyeline in most pictures, however against Cavill he appears significantly under his eyeline.
Click Here
Click Here
Cavill upgraded or Cumberbatch down graded?
Senor Jones said on 4/Nov/13
I saw Benedict Cumberbatch at the Into Darkness premiere, and I'm 6ft 1 and he looked like he was like 5ft 10, I was towering over him for some reason
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 1/Nov/13
I'm still sticking with 183-84cm. He was barely shorter than Colin Firth.
He edged out Ciaran Hinds (also listed 6ft, but might be a hair under it now)
jim said on 10/Oct/13
Ivy - If you look at one of the pictures below, you can see that Pine is wearing boots while BC seems to be wearing converse types
Mil said on 2/Oct/13
I always thought BC looked so tall in Sherlock (but then camera angles/shoe lifts/lankiness can be deceiving). When I met him last year, my immediate thought was "He's a lot shorter than I imagined". Most of my male friends and colleagues are 6'0 to 6'6, he did not feel to be in their height range, I put him at around 5'11.
cole said on 10/Sep/13
The reason why I just can't see over 6ft for Benedict is that he can look more than 1 inch shorter than 6'1 Mark Gatiss, both on set, and in pics off set. He certainly doesn't look 0.75-0.5" shorter than Mark, so 184 cm is not likely imo.
cole said on 8/Sep/13
I would go with 182 over 184, but that's just me. Like I've said; 183 is fine for Benedict, but it would be about the highest I'd argue.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 8/Sep/13
184cm looks closer than 182cm, IMO. In Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy he held his own opposite 186cm Colin Firth and 187-188cm Mark Strong.
cole said on 30/Aug/13
180 cm is out of the question. Personally I would go with 182 cm, but 183 cm is perfectly possible.
Fruit said on 26/Aug/13
@Sam
Click Here
Yeah, if you look at the top of their heads it doesn't look like a big difference because of posture and hair, but then you notice how much higher Hiddleston's shoulders are and suddenly it's obvious. They're wearing similar shoes there, too.
It shows well that Cumberbatch can look a lot taller than he is, but I still think he's way more likely 6' than 5'11".
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 25/Aug/13
"Benedict Cumberbatch's height is 6ft 0.25in (184cm)"
Possibly 184cm on the nose. Looked near Firth's height in TTSS.
Jane said on 24/Aug/13
Met Benedict last year, have a photo standing next to him. I'm 1.77m, was wearing flats - and I'm pretty sure he's 1.83, might be 1.84m in the morning. This was in the evening btw. (He was wearing dress shoes, but almost no heels on those.)
gsbr said on 21/Aug/13
In the other photos taken from that event, Tennant looks taller.
Click Here
Click Here
cole said on 13/Aug/13
That pic with David Tennant was very strange looking. ersonally I wouldn't use that to go by when judging Tennant's and Cumberbatch's height.
miko said on 10/Aug/13
Tennant rarely ever looks a full 6'1 to be fair.
Betsy said on 8/Aug/13
If Benedict is 6'0, why does he look even slightly taller than David Tennant in this pic?
Click Here
They seem to have more or less the same shoes on, so either Cumberbatch is taller than 6'0, or Tennant is in fact shorter than 6'1"...
cole said on 29/Jul/13
But he is taller than just 5'11 flat, were he that height, the likes of Tom Hardy and Gary Oldman would be 5'8 or less, and I can't quite see that. Colin Firth would be about 5'11.75 - 6' as well, and I don't think he's shorter than 6'0.5 - 6'1 range.
cole said on 29/Jul/13
People comparing him to Fallon need to take a look at Fallon's footwear. Cumberbatch would be the taller of the two barefoot.
cole said on 29/Jul/13
Click Here
It would make sense to me this way: Idris Elba at 6'2.75, Benedict Cumberbatch at 5'11.5 and Hugh Laurie at 6'2. What's your take on that one Rob?
Yup, reaching near 6'1 in what is probably dress shoes (mugh shot pic), since he's in a suit and all, he could be more 5'11.5 - 5'11.75 range.
Balrog said on 27/Jul/13
Cole in that pic he's actually reaching 6'1'' in shoes. So I'd say he's close to 6 feet. 182 cm guy like everyone is saying.
Silent d said on 24/Jul/13
He always looked tall. 6 foot.
cole said on 23/Jul/13
Click Here
6' in shoes? I don't think Benedict is taller than 5'11.5.
Editor Rob
that photo had been forgotten, glad it's been linked to again.
Emily said on 18/Jul/13
Rob, he does have a longer head than would be average for his height, right?
How long do you guess?
Editor Rob
he's got a thin head so adds a bit to how long it looks, I would say just 9.5-10 inch range.
wartank said on 14/Jul/13
Based on the evidences provided, I'll put him at 181-182cm or 5'11.5".
wartank said on 14/Jul/13
Judging from the photo angles and posture I'd put B.C. as 181cm.
Balrog said on 11/Jul/13
Hiddleston is 2in taller than him. Pine could be closer to 6'1'', many pics of him next to Denzel Washigton, Karl Urban and Zachary Quinto suggest it.
Sam said on 10/Jul/13
He can look like an inch shorter than Chris Pine but is close enough to six feet. He's probably close to the same height as Gosling, Chris Evans, DiCaprio, Christian Bale, etc. Cumberbatch can look barely an inch shorter than 6'2" Tom Hiddleston...maybe I just like typing the name Cumberbatch.
Click Here
Elizabeth Renant said on 18/Jun/13
Films are hard to judge by, given different shoes, sets, etc. But having seen BC in wide range of stuff, he seems like a pretty solid 6" to me. Pine is listed ast 6'1" in many places, and in Star Trek it was hard to tell the difference, depending on the scene. He just doesn't have the look of a 5'11" guy straining for 6".
Ace said on 17/Jun/13
Looks a solid inch shorter than Chris Pine
Click Here
Click Here
I still have trouble believing that Chris Pine is anything shorter than 6'1. It would really make Cumberbatch struggle with 6'0 otherwise.
gsbr said on 31/May/13
I think he was a little shorter than the 6'0.5" Chris Pine in Star Trek. His facial structure definitely makes him look taller than he really is. I thought he was listed at 6'2".
Emily said on 25/May/13
How long is his head? Close to 10 inches?
Anon72 said on 1/May/13
Looks very close in height to 6'0.5" Chris Pine. And looks tall on Sherlock as well. Seems to be a solid 6 footer to me. Pine does look slightly taller though...
Shorty. said on 28/Apr/13
Chest to Head with Benedict Cumberbatch? I'll make an exception ;)
Late said on 19/Jan/13
blackjoda says on 7/Jan/13
If you compare him to Mark Gatiss (6ft1) he cant't be 6ft tall.
---------
Agree. 182cm in the morning. 180cm at night. 5'11 to 5'11 1/2
He's slim and fit enough to 'look' a reasonably strong 6ft.
blackjoda said on 7/Jan/13
If you compare him to Mark Gatiss (6ft1) he cant't be 6ft tall.
Late said on 1/Jan/13
Looks a good inch shorter than Mark Gatiss on Sherlock. Gatiss is listed at 185cm.
Cumberbatch looks more like a 180-183cm to me.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 25/Dec/12
6ft1(185cm) out of bed
6ft0.75(185cm) morning
6ft0.75(185cm) lunchtime
6ft0.5(184cm) afternoon
6ft0.5(184cm) evening
6ft0.25(184cm) night
flash said on 28/Sep/12
He does look over 6ft on Sherlock, but in the show Fortysomething he's a couple inches shorter than 6ft 2.5 Hugh Laurie. He was also 27 at the time, so unlikely he's grown since then. 6ft seems a proper listing.
Anon said on 1/Sep/12
I'm unsure of what footwear or whatever he was wearing, but in the photo I have with him, in which we both appear to be standing quite upright, I'd say he's 6ft at the very least, if not an inch or two more (I'm 5'10.5 so judging relative to that).
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 26/Aug/12
At least 184cm. Similar to 185-186cm Colin Firth.
UK182.5cm said on 8/Aug/12
Jake says on 30/Jan/12
Click Here
Three seconds in shows his height pretty clearly :P
The question is, is he wearing shoes for that or not? I'm betting he didn't take his shoes off for a silly joke mugshot, it wasn't meant to accurately portray his height. He looks somewhere between 184 and 185 on that, so either he is slightly over 6'0 or slightly under assuming that he's wearing his shoes.
bel said on 4/Aug/12
The funny thing is that his agent's description of him says that he is 6ft. (but apparently he is being modest!) I've seen him up close in real life, and I would put him at at least 6'1", maybe more. There is also a photo of him standing next to Clint Eastwood, and Benedict is almost as tall as Clint (who is famously 6'4", or probably 6'3" these days due to age)
belgrave said on 4/Aug/12
The funny thing is that his agent's description of him says that he is 6ft. (but apparently he is being modest!) I've seen him up close in real life, and I would put him at at least 6'1", maybe more. There is also a photo of him standing next to Clint Eastwood, and Benedict is almost as tall as Clint (who is famously 6'4", or probably 6'3" these days due to age)
Elizabeth Renant said on 11/Jun/12
Just watched all the Holmes DVDs AND saw Tinker Tailor - Cumberbatch has got to be over 6' - it's clear watching him next to just about everyone else, not just the very short Dr. Watson.
Jake: 1.82 m-- 1.83 m-- 1.84 m said on 9/Jun/12
He looks 6ft range- like 1.83 m +.
jake, 1.82 m- 1.83 m- 1.84 m said on 1/Feb/12
I'd say he's 6" 0.25 (183.5 cm).
Jake said on 30/Jan/12
Click Here
Three seconds in shows his height pretty clearly :P
Dave said on 29/Jan/12
He certainly looks tall but then look at him next to Roger Allam (Allam looks only 5ft 9 in most things)
Click Here I have seen Benedict standing next to allam in lots of pictures and allam always looks taller.
If you've seen game of thrones the first episode Roger allam stands next to Harry lloyd (who is 6ft according to most sources) a lot and he is absolutely dwarfed
Click Here So unless Allam wears high heels everywhere (which i doubt) i wouldn't say cumberbatch is 6ft, it is also possible lloyd is wearing shoe lifs in game of thrones. Be curious to find out what height they are though
Sam said on 26/Jan/12
In Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy, he looked around the same height as Colin Firth and a hair taller than Ciaran Hinds.
liesbling said on 17/Jan/12
He's easily in 183-186 range.
jasper said on 10/Jan/12
Click Here - skip to 19 seconds. a picture with david tennant whos 6'1 on this site and benedict looks half to a full inch taller
Edith said on 2/Dec/11
Benedict Cumberbatch is: 6' 0½" (1.84 m)
DUH!
Josh B said on 1/Oct/11
Click Here
Don't think he's 1.5 inches shorter here, about 3.20 into the video. Not great for height comparison though.
jamz said on 11/Sep/11
He's 6'1" for sure
Deborah said on 1/Aug/11
I agree--he's at least 6'2". I was reading an interview with the wardrobe person for the first Sherlock series, and she remarked about how tall and thin he is with very long feet. I also watched excerpts from his BBB presentation on Rattigan, where he revisited Harrow school and saw a picture of himself as a young boy with HUGE hands. Has anyone guessed his weight? I've heard him described as rail thin.
Jane said on 14/Jul/11
Yeah, 6'1" to 6'2" sounds right for him. Definitely not under 6', although his weight does make him look taller than he actually is. And then there's Martin Freeman... he's tiny. :P
HI thar said on 16/Jun/11
Er the mugshot would actually make him slightly over 6 ft., if it's accurate...
anon182 said on 24/May/11
Click Here
Right near the beginning there's a mugshot of him with the heights behind, 182-183 seems about right assuming he's wearing shoes.
Deborah Dessaso said on 22/Mar/11
He's definitely close to or over six feet tall. He also appears to be quite thin. I understand that he a bout of pneumonia while filming Sherlock. Perhaps this explains his weight.
Anonymous said on 15/Jan/11
I agree with everyone else, this guy looks 6'2" on the TV show Sherlock.
chl said on 1/Jan/11
He is actually 6"1 and a half.