Add a Comment6858 comments
Average Guess (1424 Votes)
5ft 10.62in (179.4cm)
5ft 10.62in (179.4cm)
Djdjdjd said on 14/Jul/21
@pierre you have to consider effective height
If a people have a heel of 1
3 inches there's is a footwear advantage of 0.3 inches, not of 1.3 inches
It's clear the concept for all of readers
Elevator shoes give a little advantage
@pierre you have to consider effective height
If a people have a heel of 1
3 inches there's is a footwear advantage of 0.3 inches, not of 1.3 inches
It's clear the concept for all of readers
Elevator shoes give a little advantage
ChaosControl 6'2.50 said on 14/Jul/21
If he was 179 179.5 barefoot then how much tall would he be with this huge heels next to Robert Redford.....almost 190....Imo 179/179.5 is around the same probability as Kane almost 6"7'.
Pretty good odds by the sound of it then
If he was 179 179.5 barefoot then how much tall would he be with this huge heels next to Robert Redford.....almost 190....Imo 179/179.5 is around the same probability as Kane almost 6"7'.
Pretty good odds by the sound of it then
slim 6'1 said on 14/Jul/21
177cm@
I reckon Norton is at least 1.5-2cm taller than Pitt
Remember Pitt is wearing chunky doc martens to look taller
177cm@
I reckon Norton is at least 1.5-2cm taller than Pitt
Remember Pitt is wearing chunky doc martens to look taller
Pierre said on 13/Jul/21
ChaosControl 6'2.50 said on 11/Jul/21
Pierre said on 6/Jul/21
MaskDeMasque said on 5/Jul/21
@Pierre
Show my one image or an example of a film where he looks under 5'10. I don't think you can.
@MaskDeMasque= Yeah of course it will be hard to find an example,Brad rarely stands barefoot in movies....
Yeah especially if you need him to stand in a inch-deep trench, he’s probably 179-179.5cm
If he was 179 179.5 barefoot then how much tall would he be with this huge heels next to Robert Redford.....almost 190....Imo 179/179.5 is around the same probability as Kane almost 6"7'.
ChaosControl 6'2.50 said on 11/Jul/21
Pierre said on 6/Jul/21
MaskDeMasque said on 5/Jul/21
@Pierre
Show my one image or an example of a film where he looks under 5'10. I don't think you can.
@MaskDeMasque= Yeah of course it will be hard to find an example,Brad rarely stands barefoot in movies....
Yeah especially if you need him to stand in a inch-deep trench, he’s probably 179-179.5cm
If he was 179 179.5 barefoot then how much tall would he be with this huge heels next to Robert Redford.....almost 190....Imo 179/179.5 is around the same probability as Kane almost 6"7'.
Djdjdjd said on 12/Jul/21
@pierre you have to consider effective height
If a people have a heel of 1
3 inches there's is a footwear advantage of 0.3 inches, not of 1.3 inches
It's clear the concept for all of readers
Elevator shoes give a little advantage
@pierre you have to consider effective height
If a people have a heel of 1
3 inches there's is a footwear advantage of 0.3 inches, not of 1.3 inches
It's clear the concept for all of readers
Elevator shoes give a little advantage
Dr Decker said on 11/Jul/21
Looks near 5-11
Looks near 5-11
ChaosControl 6'2.50 said on 11/Jul/21
Pierre said on 6/Jul/21
MaskDeMasque said on 5/Jul/21
@Pierre
Show my one image or an example of a film where he looks under 5'10. I don't think you can.
@MaskDeMasque= Yeah of course it will be hard to find an example,Brad rarely stands barefoot in movies....
Yeah especially if you need him to stand in a inch-deep trench, he’s probably 179-179.5cm
Pierre said on 6/Jul/21
MaskDeMasque said on 5/Jul/21
@Pierre
Show my one image or an example of a film where he looks under 5'10. I don't think you can.
@MaskDeMasque= Yeah of course it will be hard to find an example,Brad rarely stands barefoot in movies....
Yeah especially if you need him to stand in a inch-deep trench, he’s probably 179-179.5cm
Pierre said on 6/Jul/21
MaskDeMasque said on 5/Jul/21
@Pierre
Show my one image or an example of a film where he looks under 5'10. I don't think you can.
@MaskDeMasque= Yeah of course it will be hard to find an example,Brad rarely stands barefoot in movies....
MaskDeMasque said on 5/Jul/21
@Pierre
Show my one image or an example of a film where he looks under 5'10. I don't think you can.
@MaskDeMasque= Yeah of course it will be hard to find an example,Brad rarely stands barefoot in movies....
MaskDeMasque said on 5/Jul/21
@Pierre
Show my one image or an example of a film where he looks under 5'10. I don't think you can.
@Pierre
Show my one image or an example of a film where he looks under 5'10. I don't think you can.
MaskDeMasque said on 26/Jun/21
Average guess is probably spot on.
Average guess is probably spot on.
Pierre said on 26/Jun/21
5"9.75' peak absolute max
5"9.75' peak absolute max
viper said on 22/Jun/21
Qiyu Song said on 21/Jun/21
Anything above 5’10 1/2 is ridiculous, anything under 5’10 is not possible.
Which is why I've been saying for a while he's 5-10 1/4
It makes sense. He did write down 5-10 for his height
Qiyu Song said on 21/Jun/21
Anything above 5’10 1/2 is ridiculous, anything under 5’10 is not possible.
Which is why I've been saying for a while he's 5-10 1/4
It makes sense. He did write down 5-10 for his height
Djdjdjd said on 21/Jun/21
@6 ft and half and inch
In America there are more stupidity
The legend for height is this, there is a shared standard, also Sweden user in Reddit agree that :
Under 1 70 short
1 70 1 73 medium short
1 74 1 74 5 below average
1 74 5 1 77. 5 average
1 78 1 81 tallish
Over 1 81 tall
Stop
@6 ft and half and inch
In America there are more stupidity
The legend for height is this, there is a shared standard, also Sweden user in Reddit agree that :
Under 1 70 short
1 70 1 73 medium short
1 74 1 74 5 below average
1 74 5 1 77. 5 average
1 78 1 81 tallish
Over 1 81 tall
Stop
Qiyu Song said on 21/Jun/21
Anything above 5’10 1/2 is ridiculous, anything under 5’10 is not possible.
Anything above 5’10 1/2 is ridiculous, anything under 5’10 is not possible.
CDS said on 20/Jun/21
@Pierre: I dont think Redford was EVER a solid 5'10". I would say even in his prime, was your classic 5'9" guy, 5'10" in shoes. A movie line magaxine issue in the 90s pegged him at 5'8", and some on here who've met him in person have guessed him as low as 5'7"!
@Pierre: I dont think Redford was EVER a solid 5'10". I would say even in his prime, was your classic 5'9" guy, 5'10" in shoes. A movie line magaxine issue in the 90s pegged him at 5'8", and some on here who've met him in person have guessed him as low as 5'7"!
Gascon said on 20/Jun/21
@Pierre
I always thought he was a solid 5'10.
In meet Joe Black, he looked a good 2-3 three inches taller than Anthony Hopkins. He's really good at giving the impression that he's taller than he really is.
Anything less than 5'9 is out of the question. If I were to guess: 5"10.25-5
@Pierre
I always thought he was a solid 5'10.
In meet Joe Black, he looked a good 2-3 three inches taller than Anthony Hopkins. He's really good at giving the impression that he's taller than he really is.
Anything less than 5'9 is out of the question. If I were to guess: 5"10.25-5
6ft and half an inch said on 18/Jun/21
Rob I think your answer is the most logic one and I totally agree with you I alwayse wondered when people (specially women) said 6ft is the least acceptable for being tall but yeah you're right 5'11" isn't that short to be considered no tall lol
Rob I think your answer is the most logic one and I totally agree with you I alwayse wondered when people (specially women) said 6ft is the least acceptable for being tall but yeah you're right 5'11" isn't that short to be considered no tall lol
Pierre said on 18/Jun/21
Click Here Click Here If he's 5"11' or very close to this mark then why he needs this huge heels next to Robert Redford probably absolute max 5"10' in 2001(Spy Game he was in his 65s).(Robert Redford who wears poor soles as you can see in the second pic) .....
Click Here Click Here If he's 5"11' or very close to this mark then why he needs this huge heels next to Robert Redford probably absolute max 5"10' in 2001(Spy Game he was in his 65s).(Robert Redford who wears poor soles as you can see in the second pic) .....
Slim 6'1.5 said on 18/Jun/21
I’m not rob but I do believe tall starts at 6ft-6’1” nothing more or less
I’m not rob but I do believe tall starts at 6ft-6’1” nothing more or less
Slim 6'1.5 said on 18/Jun/21
Even to pull off 184cm in oceans and 182 in fight club it’s possible the guy is 181-181.5. I hear Brad has a heart of gold!
I had a vision Brad came to Australia and came to my grandmas house, maybe I’ll meet him before rob does! I’ll ask him about his height then we can lock this page 👍
Even to pull off 184cm in oceans and 182 in fight club it’s possible the guy is 181-181.5. I hear Brad has a heart of gold!
I had a vision Brad came to Australia and came to my grandmas house, maybe I’ll meet him before rob does! I’ll ask him about his height then we can lock this page 👍
6 and half an inch said on 16/Jun/21
Rob, what is tall in your point of view ?
Editor Rob
Rob, what is tall in your point of view ?
Editor Robin public, 5ft 11.5 is a range I think (in UK) starts to enter the bottom range of tall zone. For each inch above that, the percentage of men at each range becomes smaller...by the time you hit 6ft 4 you are taller than 99 out of 100 men.
Chaos 6'2 1/2 said on 16/Jun/21
Think he’s right at 179cm
Think he’s right at 179cm
Slim 6'1.5 said on 15/Jun/21
He can’t be under 179 as he looks over 4 inches taller than Angelina Jolie
He can’t be under 179 as he looks over 4 inches taller than Angelina Jolie
Nik Ashton said on 14/Jun/21
@ 177cm - He’s like Tom then!
@ 177cm - He’s like Tom then!
viper said on 14/Jun/21
5-10 1/4 is what he is
5-10 1/4 is what he is
177cm said on 13/Jun/21
Brad is a man of many different heights but he usually doesn’t look shorter than the 5’11” he claims. I personally think he’s in the 5’10.5” - 5’10.75” range and at times he wears lifts to look 6ft+
Brad is a man of many different heights but he usually doesn’t look shorter than the 5’11” he claims. I personally think he’s in the 5’10.5” - 5’10.75” range and at times he wears lifts to look 6ft+
Pierre said on 10/Jun/21
@Canson = more probabilities Leonardo can stretch up to 5"10' in the afternoon than Brad imo.
@Canson = more probabilities Leonardo can stretch up to 5"10' in the afternoon than Brad imo.
Canson said on 9/Jun/21
@Pierre: the full 5’11” may be shaky but 5’10” flat being the most he is is also a suspect estimate. I can’t see him as anything under that. In fact, he can look 5’10.5 more often. Anything between 5’10 and 5’11 is possible
@Pierre: the full 5’11” may be shaky but 5’10” flat being the most he is is also a suspect estimate. I can’t see him as anything under that. In fact, he can look 5’10.5 more often. Anything between 5’10 and 5’11 is possible
Canson said on 9/Jun/21
@Pierre: the full 5’11” may be shaky but 5’10” flat being the most he is is also a suspect estimate. I can’t see him as anything under that. In fact, he can look 5’10.5 more often
@Pierre: the full 5’11” may be shaky but 5’10” flat being the most he is is also a suspect estimate. I can’t see him as anything under that. In fact, he can look 5’10.5 more often
Qiyu Song said on 9/Jun/21
Peak: 5’10 1/4
Now: 5’10
Peak: 5’10 1/4
Now: 5’10
Slim 6'1.5 said on 7/Jun/21
He sometimes looks near 5 inches taller than Angelina Jolie
There’s no way in hell he’s shorter than 179cm…
He sometimes looks near 5 inches taller than Angelina Jolie
There’s no way in hell he’s shorter than 179cm…
DDH said on 7/Jun/21
I bet he's 5'10 barefoot.
I bet he's 5'10 barefoot.
Slim 6'1.5 said on 28/May/21
I think Leo and Brad are 0.5-1cm apart
I think Leo and Brad are 0.5-1cm apart
viper said on 27/May/21
He's 5-10
He's 5-10
James Harris said on 25/May/21
Finding it hard to See him as 5 foot 11
Finding it hard to See him as 5 foot 11
James B 171.5cm said on 22/May/21
Rob but assuming there is still 1/4 between Brad and Leo....surely 1/4 is not noticeable right?
Editor Rob
Rob but assuming there is still 1/4 between Brad and Leo....surely 1/4 is not noticeable right?
Editor Robhalf inch is something that can become noticeable, but it can blend into nothing, or look an inch just with small shoe/posture/camera differences.
Slim 6'1.5 said on 22/May/21
Good call @rampage.
@Editor Rob, why did he lie about his age? For what movie was it?
Editor Rob
Good call @rampage.
@Editor Rob, why did he lie about his age? For what movie was it?
Editor RobIt's not a movie, but for teen magazine, one of those 'fill in your details' and he knocked 2 years off his age.
Not that uncommon.
Not that uncommon.
Original said on 21/May/21
Pitt's 5'9.75 nowadays (5'10 peak), Di Caprio 5'11-5'11.25". That's the difference imo.
Pitt's 5'9.75 nowadays (5'10 peak), Di Caprio 5'11-5'11.25". That's the difference imo.
Pierre said on 21/May/21
Click Here Leonardo /Prince Albert
Click Here Robert Knepper / Prince Albert
Robert Knepper/Rob strong 5"8' Click Here
Leonardo /Brad shoes looking similar Click Here
Leonardo /Arnold Click Here
Arnold perfect posture /Hafthor = Click Here
Their respective shoes Click Here
Hafthor's scale = Click Here Arnold looks no less than 2 inches under Hafthor's lower ears/lower nose.
Click Here Leonardo /Prince Albert
Click Here Robert Knepper / Prince Albert
Robert Knepper/Rob strong 5"8' Click Here
Leonardo /Brad shoes looking similar Click Here
Leonardo /Arnold Click Here
Arnold perfect posture /Hafthor = Click Here
Their respective shoes Click Here
Hafthor's scale = Click Here Arnold looks no less than 2 inches under Hafthor's lower ears/lower nose.
CDS said on 20/May/21
Adam Varco said:
"He's two inches shorter than Leo in Once Upon a Time in Hollywood. 5'10" "
Like editor Rob said, there was a big footwear difference in the earlier part of the film. But if you look to the latter parts, and the footwear is comparable, the two actors appear almost dead even...
Adam Varco said:
"He's two inches shorter than Leo in Once Upon a Time in Hollywood. 5'10" "
Like editor Rob said, there was a big footwear difference in the earlier part of the film. But if you look to the latter parts, and the footwear is comparable, the two actors appear almost dead even...
Cjcjcj said on 20/May/21
1 inches, not 1.5 inches sorry
1 inches, not 1.5 inches sorry
Pierre said on 19/May/21
0 % probabilities for 5"11' barefoot.
Very slim probability full 5"10'
Imo
0 % probabilities for 5"11' barefoot.
Very slim probability full 5"10'
Imo
Cjcjcj said on 18/May/21
There is no height in shoes, height was measured with correct posture in afternoon. Posture influence very height
Height in shoes is a strange concept, 90 of shoes have almost 1.5 inches of heel in Europe, especially in formal occasion, there is no very footwear advantage
For example shoes with 2.4 lift give 3.4 cm effective
Pitt is almost 1 80 cm barefoot
5 ft 10 is height with bad posture
There is no height in shoes, height was measured with correct posture in afternoon. Posture influence very height
Height in shoes is a strange concept, 90 of shoes have almost 1.5 inches of heel in Europe, especially in formal occasion, there is no very footwear advantage
For example shoes with 2.4 lift give 3.4 cm effective
Pitt is almost 1 80 cm barefoot
5 ft 10 is height with bad posture
James B 171.5cm said on 18/May/21
Rob Saw a recent photo on Instagram and Leonardo edges him by a noticeable amount.
Obviously not a big amount mind you but still detectable
Editor Rob
Rob Saw a recent photo on Instagram and Leonardo edges him by a noticeable amount.
Obviously not a big amount mind you but still detectable
Editor RobI think Leo does edge him, just a question of how much you think tat is...
Joey Diaz said on 16/May/21
Pitt is 5’10 max. The fact that he would write 5’10 on auditions form is pretty telling. The fact that he’s lean, has thick hair and wears advantageous footwear all give him the appearance of being taller...but he’s not.
Pitt is 5’10 max. The fact that he would write 5’10 on auditions form is pretty telling. The fact that he’s lean, has thick hair and wears advantageous footwear all give him the appearance of being taller...but he’s not.
Qiyu Song said on 16/May/21
5’10.25 peak.
5’10 now.
5’10.25 peak.
5’10 now.
Jtm said on 15/May/21
He lied about his age but not his height? I don’t buy it at all.
He lied about his age but not his height? I don’t buy it at all.
ADAM VARCO said on 14/May/21
He's two inches shorter than Leo in Once Upon a Time in Hollywood. 5'10"
Editor Rob
He's two inches shorter than Leo in Once Upon a Time in Hollywood. 5'10"
Editor RobBig footwear difference in Leo's favour in that film
Slim 6'1.5 said on 13/May/21
Editor Rob
yeah he lied about that.
~~~~~~~~
Editor Rob
yeah he lied about that.
~~~~~~~~
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 13/May/21
Honestly, 181cm is as arguable as 179cm, IMO...Pitt is one of those guys that's impossible to pin down along with two other leading men (Depp and Cruise)
Honestly, 181cm is as arguable as 179cm, IMO...Pitt is one of those guys that's impossible to pin down along with two other leading men (Depp and Cruise)
Jtm said on 13/May/21
Didn’t he also claimed he was born 1965 in that teen magazine?
Editor Rob
Didn’t he also claimed he was born 1965 in that teen magazine?
Editor Robyeah he lied about that.
Cjcjcj said on 13/May/21
@Slim Also 5 ft 9 is not short for males, in this forum there are people with disformobic disturb of personality, average is between 1 75- 1 77 or 1 78, people with a more stupidity and ignorance do not deserve any comment
@Slim Also 5 ft 9 is not short for males, in this forum there are people with disformobic disturb of personality, average is between 1 75- 1 77 or 1 78, people with a more stupidity and ignorance do not deserve any comment
viper said on 12/May/21
I would downgrade Brad to 5-10 1/4
At least a downgrade to 5-10.5
I would downgrade Brad to 5-10 1/4
At least a downgrade to 5-10.5
James B 171.5cm said on 11/May/21
Rob maybe he mistakenly wrote 5’10 instead of 11 on his audition form perhaps?
Editor Rob
Rob maybe he mistakenly wrote 5’10 instead of 11 on his audition form perhaps?
Editor RobSomebody had said they seen it, but at least we know and have seen Pitt writing 5ft 11 in the teen magazine...that at least is provable.
Slim 6'1.5 said on 11/May/21
@Rob, why would he claim 5’10 instead of 5’11?
I still believe anywhere between 179-181 is where he measures at…
Editor Rob
@Rob, why would he claim 5’10 instead of 5’11?
I still believe anywhere between 179-181 is where he measures at…
Editor RobIt's still a bit of an unknown...
Pierre said on 10/May/21
viper said on 8/May/21
Lol, I guess Brad is jealous of himself since he wrote down 5-10 for his height
@Viper Then the question would be 5"10' was it the real height or a number a little bit rounded like sometimes....I have my own idea about this.
viper said on 8/May/21
Lol, I guess Brad is jealous of himself since he wrote down 5-10 for his height
@Viper Then the question would be 5"10' was it the real height or a number a little bit rounded like sometimes....I have my own idea about this.
Miss Sandy Cowell said on 10/May/21
@ Pierre - You've sent in a nice picture there, and one that is fresh in my mind, having just seen the thought provoker of a film.
Thanks! 😄👌
@ Pierre - You've sent in a nice picture there, and one that is fresh in my mind, having just seen the thought provoker of a film.
Thanks! 😄👌
viper said on 8/May/21
Lol, I guess Brad is jealous of himself since he wrote down 5-10 for his height
Lol, I guess Brad is jealous of himself since he wrote down 5-10 for his height
Jtm said on 6/May/21
Jealous or maybe because over 5’10 is hard to believe. Go watch Johnny suede and tell me if that’s 5’11 and I bet he isn’t even a full 2 inches taller than Phoenix without help.
Jealous or maybe because over 5’10 is hard to believe. Go watch Johnny suede and tell me if that’s 5’11 and I bet he isn’t even a full 2 inches taller than Phoenix without help.
Slim 6'1.5 said on 5/May/21
He’s of average height but closer to tall than short
In the oceans movies he would pull off 184cm with lifts
He’s of average height but closer to tall than short
In the oceans movies he would pull off 184cm with lifts
Slim 6'1.5 said on 5/May/21
@Rob, how does Pitt pull off looking so much taller than Damon & Clooney?
He’s more than 3 inches taller than Joaquin Phoenix who I suspect is more 172 than 5’8”
Anyone who says sub 179cm is just jealous of you ask me
Editor Rob
@Rob, how does Pitt pull off looking so much taller than Damon & Clooney?
He’s more than 3 inches taller than Joaquin Phoenix who I suspect is more 172 than 5’8”
Anyone who says sub 179cm is just jealous of you ask me
Editor Robmaybe sometimes has a slightly thicker heel and better posture
Jtm said on 4/May/21
Christian’s pictures are not working and he’s probably wearing lifts anyway.
Christian’s pictures are not working and he’s probably wearing lifts anyway.
Pierre said on 3/May/21
@Miss Sandy = Angles of camera can give an advantage sometimes.
Click Here Here is a pic of movie Kalifornia = David Duchovny closer to the camera than Brad but the camera isn't particularly low here plus distant to both men and so the advantage isn't really significant for the closest man imo.David in terrible posture still looks easily taller than Brad here.
@Miss Sandy = Angles of camera can give an advantage sometimes.
Click Here Here is a pic of movie Kalifornia = David Duchovny closer to the camera than Brad but the camera isn't particularly low here plus distant to both men and so the advantage isn't really significant for the closest man imo.David in terrible posture still looks easily taller than Brad here.
Miss Sandy Cowell said on 1/May/21
Right at the end of Kalifornia, Brad's character, Early Grayce, breaks his way into a building, where there are lots of life size clothes horses floating about.
He takes them and puts them in an array of extremely rude positions. I must say, I did find this rather amusing, my boyfriend having done the same with certain of my toy ANIMALS! 😲
Right at the end of Kalifornia, Brad's character, Early Grayce, breaks his way into a building, where there are lots of life size clothes horses floating about.
He takes them and puts them in an array of extremely rude positions. I must say, I did find this rather amusing, my boyfriend having done the same with certain of my toy ANIMALS! 😲
Miss Sandy Cowell said on 1/May/21
@ Pierre - Never, ever 5ft6, but I can believe 5ft10.5/75 from the evidence I've seen in Kalifornia, comparing him to the strong 6ft guy, David Duchovny.
I rolled back the scene when Brad and David were coming out of the pub, and Brad's Early Grace does NOT have to look up to speak to David's Brian.
⭐ This is the film in which you hear Brad Pitt's description: 5ft11, which I can go along with for his morning height, at least in those days. (1992)
5ft10.75. 😁👍
@ Pierre - Never, ever 5ft6, but I can believe 5ft10.5/75 from the evidence I've seen in Kalifornia, comparing him to the strong 6ft guy, David Duchovny.
I rolled back the scene when Brad and David were coming out of the pub, and Brad's Early Grace does NOT have to look up to speak to David's Brian.
⭐ This is the film in which you hear Brad Pitt's description: 5ft11, which I can go along with for his morning height, at least in those days. (1992)
5ft10.75. 😁👍
JustJoey said on 1/May/21
Brad’s 5’10” flat.
Brad’s 5’10” flat.
Fida Khan said on 30/Apr/21
Hey Rob,
How tall is he here with Jimmy Fallon?
Click Here
Editor Rob
Hey Rob,
How tall is he here with Jimmy Fallon?
Click Here
Editor RobNot that much shorter
Qiyu Song said on 30/Apr/21
Full barefoot 5’11 for brad is a joke, but he is obviously not a 5’9 guy. I guess he could reach 5’10.5 in the morning and 5’10 for evening when he was young. Nowadays he became a typical 5’10 guy and he may be 5’9.75 at night. Brad usually appears as a 6 footer with lift shoes. And I would say Clooney is about 5 inches shorter than Brad.
Full barefoot 5’11 for brad is a joke, but he is obviously not a 5’9 guy. I guess he could reach 5’10.5 in the morning and 5’10 for evening when he was young. Nowadays he became a typical 5’10 guy and he may be 5’9.75 at night. Brad usually appears as a 6 footer with lift shoes. And I would say Clooney is about 5 inches shorter than Brad.
Christian said on 30/Apr/21
Brad Pitt looks at least 3 inches taller than Joaquin Phoenix
tinyurl.com/54hp5nvb
tinyurl.com/3nws8ze5
Brad Pitt looks at least 3 inches taller than Joaquin Phoenix
tinyurl.com/54hp5nvb
tinyurl.com/3nws8ze5
berta said on 30/Apr/21
i still believe brad pitt was a very strong 5´11 guy. i think 181 on good days at his peak and today maybe 0,5 less. dicaprio is probably 181,5. 181 sounds a fraction to short for him. could pull of 182 many times.
i still believe brad pitt was a very strong 5´11 guy. i think 181 on good days at his peak and today maybe 0,5 less. dicaprio is probably 181,5. 181 sounds a fraction to short for him. could pull of 182 many times.
Slim 6'1.5 said on 29/Apr/21
AllBlack
5’10 & 5’11 is not short for males
AllBlack
5’10 & 5’11 is not short for males
Impartial Judge said on 29/Apr/21
This guy was never 5'11 in his life lol
This guy was never 5'11 in his life lol
AllBlack said on 26/Apr/21
My wife saw both Brad Pitt and George Clooney in Amsterdam. She was excited, but also disappointed how short they were. Even with lifts, Brad was way shorter than her. She is 6 feet. George was 5’9 or so
My wife saw both Brad Pitt and George Clooney in Amsterdam. She was excited, but also disappointed how short they were. Even with lifts, Brad was way shorter than her. She is 6 feet. George was 5’9 or so
Aadarsh P S said on 24/Apr/21
Hey Rob, what do you think is his morning, afternoon and night time height?
Editor Rob
Hey Rob, what do you think is his morning, afternoon and night time height?
Editor RobYou can't rule out the chance Pitt has lost a small fraction, lately I can see the argument for just under 5ft 11 for him...182-3 to 180 at dinner time.
Mikester said on 21/Apr/21
5ft10.75
5ft10.75
Pierre said on 19/Apr/21
Leo weak 5'10"
Brad strong 5'9"
Leo weak 5'10"
Brad strong 5'9"
viper said on 19/Apr/21
He's 178cm
He's 178cm
Xosrow said on 18/Apr/21
He is definitely shorter than leo he might be 179ish
He is definitely shorter than leo he might be 179ish
CDS said on 15/Apr/21
I posted this before but may have forgotten to hit the "submit " button, so forgive me if it appears twice.
Like I said earlier, this should probably go on cruise's page. But I guess is somewhat relevant here since Tom and Brad did star in "interview with the vampire "?
My guess for Tom is an end of day barefoot 5'6.5"-5'6.75",which puts him pretty close to 5'8" in a pair of shoes. Add his mane of hair to that, and standing in front of a height chart, about 5'9", his own claim the past 30 years. That's with no lifts. Now we've seen him wearing the big boots and more recently even Rob I believe recognized the shoes with the lifts built in at a premiere , and that could easily boost him up into the 5'10" zone. So you can see how his "the last samarai" costar, Billy Connelly, could become confused...
I posted this before but may have forgotten to hit the "submit " button, so forgive me if it appears twice.
Like I said earlier, this should probably go on cruise's page. But I guess is somewhat relevant here since Tom and Brad did star in "interview with the vampire "?
My guess for Tom is an end of day barefoot 5'6.5"-5'6.75",which puts him pretty close to 5'8" in a pair of shoes. Add his mane of hair to that, and standing in front of a height chart, about 5'9", his own claim the past 30 years. That's with no lifts. Now we've seen him wearing the big boots and more recently even Rob I believe recognized the shoes with the lifts built in at a premiere , and that could easily boost him up into the 5'10" zone. So you can see how his "the last samarai" costar, Billy Connelly, could become confused...
Pierre said on 15/Apr/21
Tom 5"6' ,shoes do the rest...
Tom 5"6' ,shoes do the rest...
CDS said on 14/Apr/21
This should probably go on his page, but I do think its possible cruise could be a barefoot, end of day, 5'6.5"-5'6.75", which would make him pretty close to 5'8" in a pair of shoes, and with his mane, 5'9" standing up straight in front of a height chart, and guess what, that's been his own claim the past 30 years!
This should probably go on his page, but I do think its possible cruise could be a barefoot, end of day, 5'6.5"-5'6.75", which would make him pretty close to 5'8" in a pair of shoes, and with his mane, 5'9" standing up straight in front of a height chart, and guess what, that's been his own claim the past 30 years!
MaskDeMasque said on 14/Apr/21
@CDS and Viper
I can't see Cruise less than 5'7.
@CDS and Viper
I can't see Cruise less than 5'7.
viper said on 13/Apr/21
I think Tom is no more than 5-7, but 5-6.5 wouldn't totally shock me.
Danimal said Cruise was listed at 5-6 3/4 in a magazine
I think Tom is no more than 5-7, but 5-6.5 wouldn't totally shock me.
Danimal said Cruise was listed at 5-6 3/4 in a magazine
MaskDeMasque said on 12/Apr/21
@CDS
Haha, if you think tom is that short, I think you need to learn about reading height better. Lemme guess, Tom cruise is 5'6 yea?
@CDS
Haha, if you think tom is that short, I think you need to learn about reading height better. Lemme guess, Tom cruise is 5'6 yea?
CDS said on 12/Apr/21
@Mask: I meant the earlier films of brad pitt, sorry, the first of my two posts below I was referring to mr. Pitt.
And as for Tom hardy, he's not very tall, more like 5'7"-5'8"...
@Mask: I meant the earlier films of brad pitt, sorry, the first of my two posts below I was referring to mr. Pitt.
And as for Tom hardy, he's not very tall, more like 5'7"-5'8"...
MaskDeMasque said on 12/Apr/21
@CDS
I've seen his earlier films, he looks like a strong 5'10 guy in them. Farrell is no way that short, look at a legit 5'9 like Hardy, Colin looks taller than tom on screen and in photos. The shortest Colin could be is 5'9.5.
@CDS
I've seen his earlier films, he looks like a strong 5'10 guy in them. Farrell is no way that short, look at a legit 5'9 like Hardy, Colin looks taller than tom on screen and in photos. The shortest Colin could be is 5'9.5.
viper said on 11/Apr/21
Agreed that Colin is 5-9 at mist
Agreed that Colin is 5-9 at mist
CDS said on 10/Apr/21
@Masque: I would actually put colin Farrell more in the 5'8.5"-5'9" range (your classic 5'10" in shoes guy), so yes would agree, Pitt would have an inch or more over him...
@Masque: I would actually put colin Farrell more in the 5'8.5"-5'9" range (your classic 5'10" in shoes guy), so yes would agree, Pitt would have an inch or more over him...
CDS said on 10/Apr/21
@Masque: I would look at earlier films in his career, and only at end of day, would I guess he dips below 5'10". Out of bed, I think he could be 5'10"-5'10.75" even. I point to that German motorcycle license someone on this very site posted a long time ago, he was measured (in cm), which came to just under 5'9", even below Pierres estimates! Now this device may not be the most accurate, but it would be hard to imagine a legitimate 5'11", or even 5'10" guy realistically measuring that low, with ANY device.
My guess though still places brad in the 5'10" zone barefoot, 5'11" in shoes, which like I said , matches pretty closely to his own claims early in his career...
@Masque: I would look at earlier films in his career, and only at end of day, would I guess he dips below 5'10". Out of bed, I think he could be 5'10"-5'10.75" even. I point to that German motorcycle license someone on this very site posted a long time ago, he was measured (in cm), which came to just under 5'9", even below Pierres estimates! Now this device may not be the most accurate, but it would be hard to imagine a legitimate 5'11", or even 5'10" guy realistically measuring that low, with ANY device.
My guess though still places brad in the 5'10" zone barefoot, 5'11" in shoes, which like I said , matches pretty closely to his own claims early in his career...
Pierre said on 10/Apr/21
Of course he's under 5"10', Leonardo himself looking max full 5"10' by lots of comparisons.He is a pic inwhich Brad and Leo are wearing around same heels Click Here
Of course he's under 5"10', Leonardo himself looking max full 5"10' by lots of comparisons.He is a pic inwhich Brad and Leo are wearing around same heels Click Here
MaskDeMasque said on 10/Apr/21
@CDS
What makes you think he's below 5'10? I don't think he's ever looked less than 5'10 range. A 5'9.5-5'10 range guy is like Colin Farrell, Pitt would have around an inch on him.
@CDS
What makes you think he's below 5'10? I don't think he's ever looked less than 5'10 range. A 5'9.5-5'10 range guy is like Colin Farrell, Pitt would have around an inch on him.
viper said on 8/Apr/21
I'm not convinced Vin is 5-11
Think he's 5-10 range at best
I'm not convinced Vin is 5-11
Think he's 5-10 range at best
Zoltan said on 8/Apr/21
Peak: 5 ft 10 5/8
Now: 5 ft 10 1/8
Peak: 5 ft 10 5/8
Now: 5 ft 10 1/8
CDS said on 7/Apr/21
@masque: yes, I agree Vin would be taller, just thought with Brad's history of lifts, posture, and always somehow conveniently standing in the right spot, if the two were seen in public together, he might appear just a tiny bit taller than diesel. And I would actually guess Pitt lower than your guess, while not as low as Pierres estimates (although would not rule them out), would place brad at an end of day, barefoot height, of somewhere between 5'9.5"-5'10", still easily around 5'11" in a pair of sneakers, and would make perfect sense for both the 5'10" and 5'11" listings, which, as has been pointed out many times on this site, he himself put those heights down on resumes and audition forms. Of course, with the lifts, and thick heeled boots he's been repeatedly seen wearing, easily over six feet...
@masque: yes, I agree Vin would be taller, just thought with Brad's history of lifts, posture, and always somehow conveniently standing in the right spot, if the two were seen in public together, he might appear just a tiny bit taller than diesel. And I would actually guess Pitt lower than your guess, while not as low as Pierres estimates (although would not rule them out), would place brad at an end of day, barefoot height, of somewhere between 5'9.5"-5'10", still easily around 5'11" in a pair of sneakers, and would make perfect sense for both the 5'10" and 5'11" listings, which, as has been pointed out many times on this site, he himself put those heights down on resumes and audition forms. Of course, with the lifts, and thick heeled boots he's been repeatedly seen wearing, easily over six feet...
MaskDeMasque said on 7/Apr/21
@CDS
Vin would be taller. He's a legit 5'11 imo but with Pitt I see 5'10.75 at the absolute max but 5'10.5 much more likely.
@CDS
Vin would be taller. He's a legit 5'11 imo but with Pitt I see 5'10.75 at the absolute max but 5'10.5 much more likely.
CDS said on 6/Apr/21
@Rising: right, brad towered over Hopkins in, "meet Joe black". I recall first seeing a trailer for that, and remember thinking, was brad that much taller than Hopkins, in "legends of the fall", made only a few years earlier. I dismissed it since I can recall thinking, well, that earlier film was mostly outdoors, on uneven ground.
So later on, I happen to catch LOTF on TV one day, and notice, what others on here too have pointed out, the scene on the porch of the family ranch in the film, very flat even surface, and brad looks barely taller than Hopkins, in fact the two look about dead even!
I think someone on this site even pinpointed when about brad started wearing lifts, at about 1996? I would say that is about spot on...
@Rising: right, brad towered over Hopkins in, "meet Joe black". I recall first seeing a trailer for that, and remember thinking, was brad that much taller than Hopkins, in "legends of the fall", made only a few years earlier. I dismissed it since I can recall thinking, well, that earlier film was mostly outdoors, on uneven ground.
So later on, I happen to catch LOTF on TV one day, and notice, what others on here too have pointed out, the scene on the porch of the family ranch in the film, very flat even surface, and brad looks barely taller than Hopkins, in fact the two look about dead even!
I think someone on this site even pinpointed when about brad started wearing lifts, at about 1996? I would say that is about spot on...
Rising174cm said on 6/Apr/21
@CDS: I'd definitely guess Vin is taller than Brad, although I don't think either regularly wear lifts, per se. However, in Vin's case, that's more of a technicality. The thick-heeled logger boots he always wears could add close to 2" or at least 1.75", which is the range a lot of standard elevator shoes add and his exaggerated military posture combined with his footwear makes it clear he's height conscious. On a rare occasion Vin didn't wear boots to the 2013 Grammys, he actually did wear an elevator shoe. I've had Vin at 5'11.5" since he was listed at 6'0" on this site, although he did make a rare appearance over a decade ago in normal dress shoes with his then-girlfriend. Her official height as a model was 5'10" so if we take that at face value, she would have been about 6'1" in heels and Vin was at least an inch shorter in dress shoes so I can see why people think he's more like 5'11" flat. I also can't rule out Vin wearing additional lifts inside his logger boots at times, but of course, there's no way to prove this one way or another. I'll just say that you can identify the brands of some he's worn. For one example, he's worn Skechers Cascades logger boots.
As for Brad, while I'm fine remaining in the minority on this until I see clear evidence of an elevator shoe design or his ankle being too high, I will say that his height in Meet Joe Black doesn't make sense if he didn't wear lifts. As I've said before, Anthony Hopkins was likely near 176 cm peak, imo so even if you give him the average 2 cm loss of a 60 year old, he'd still be 174 cm at the time and Brad looked a good 3" taller, which makes no sense. Even if Hopkins was only 5'9" peak, I still can't see him below 5'8.5" in 1998. With that said, I'm surprised that everyone can't agree that Brad's 5'11" claim rules out anything over that such as 181 cm. Additionally, while excellent posture and some of the boots he's worn can explain him looking as tall as 182 cm or possibly 6'0" at times, we've also seen him look more like 5'10.5", particularly throughout his early roles, but even more recently on occasion such as certain events for Fury and Inglorious Bastards.
@CDS: I'd definitely guess Vin is taller than Brad, although I don't think either regularly wear lifts, per se. However, in Vin's case, that's more of a technicality. The thick-heeled logger boots he always wears could add close to 2" or at least 1.75", which is the range a lot of standard elevator shoes add and his exaggerated military posture combined with his footwear makes it clear he's height conscious. On a rare occasion Vin didn't wear boots to the 2013 Grammys, he actually did wear an elevator shoe. I've had Vin at 5'11.5" since he was listed at 6'0" on this site, although he did make a rare appearance over a decade ago in normal dress shoes with his then-girlfriend. Her official height as a model was 5'10" so if we take that at face value, she would have been about 6'1" in heels and Vin was at least an inch shorter in dress shoes so I can see why people think he's more like 5'11" flat. I also can't rule out Vin wearing additional lifts inside his logger boots at times, but of course, there's no way to prove this one way or another. I'll just say that you can identify the brands of some he's worn. For one example, he's worn Skechers Cascades logger boots.
As for Brad, while I'm fine remaining in the minority on this until I see clear evidence of an elevator shoe design or his ankle being too high, I will say that his height in Meet Joe Black doesn't make sense if he didn't wear lifts. As I've said before, Anthony Hopkins was likely near 176 cm peak, imo so even if you give him the average 2 cm loss of a 60 year old, he'd still be 174 cm at the time and Brad looked a good 3" taller, which makes no sense. Even if Hopkins was only 5'9" peak, I still can't see him below 5'8.5" in 1998. With that said, I'm surprised that everyone can't agree that Brad's 5'11" claim rules out anything over that such as 181 cm. Additionally, while excellent posture and some of the boots he's worn can explain him looking as tall as 182 cm or possibly 6'0" at times, we've also seen him look more like 5'10.5", particularly throughout his early roles, but even more recently on occasion such as certain events for Fury and Inglorious Bastards.
Slim 6'1.5 said on 6/Apr/21
Vin would edge Pitt for sure
Is it crazy to guess Pitt as 181cm?
Vin would edge Pitt for sure
Is it crazy to guess Pitt as 181cm?
Sulu2021 said on 4/Apr/21
He is average height for an American man.
He is average height for an American man.
CDS said on 1/Apr/21
As for question below, who is taller, Pitt or Vin Diesel, yes my guess is both are indeed regular lift wearers, while Diesel I would put at about 5'11" (6'1" in the big boots he wears, as seems to be universally agreed upon), but Brad at around an inch or so less.
With that being said, while I've never seen a shot of the 2 of them next to each other, but due to posture (and probably more effective lifts), I would not be the least bit surprised if Brad actually appeared a tad taller...
As for question below, who is taller, Pitt or Vin Diesel, yes my guess is both are indeed regular lift wearers, while Diesel I would put at about 5'11" (6'1" in the big boots he wears, as seems to be universally agreed upon), but Brad at around an inch or so less.
With that being said, while I've never seen a shot of the 2 of them next to each other, but due to posture (and probably more effective lifts), I would not be the least bit surprised if Brad actually appeared a tad taller...
Juan Cruz Gamarra said on 30/Mar/21
Peak: 178,5cm
Now: 177,5cm
Peak: 178,5cm
Now: 177,5cm
viper said on 30/Mar/21
5-10 max
5-10 max
Xosrow said on 29/Mar/21
Bradley cooper is 184~185 just search bradley cooper and brad pitt . To understand what irritating means lol brad the irritater
Bradley cooper is 184~185 just search bradley cooper and brad pitt . To understand what irritating means lol brad the irritater
Xosrow said on 29/Mar/21
I cant consider him more than 180 and less than 178
I cant consider him more than 180 and less than 178
Dmeyer said on 25/Mar/21
Even counnting Sly 3cm shoes advantage and posture , how Come Pitt dosnt look t'aller than Sly is an enigma
Even counnting Sly 3cm shoes advantage and posture , how Come Pitt dosnt look t'aller than Sly is an enigma
Dmeyer said on 25/Mar/21
Pitt Can give illusion of 6-6'0,5 in but Never looks over 182cm even with good posture and cuban heels , somewere 184cm shoes on , while vin Can look 6-0,5-6-1 liké 187cm shoes on in the 4-5cm shoes on , vin will look taller
Pitt Can give illusion of 6-6'0,5 in but Never looks over 182cm even with good posture and cuban heels , somewere 184cm shoes on , while vin Can look 6-0,5-6-1 liké 187cm shoes on in the 4-5cm shoes on , vin will look taller
Vincent Caleb said on 25/Mar/21
Vin Diesel I would say has the edge on Pitt IMO. Average guess could be right on for Pitt.
Vin Diesel I would say has the edge on Pitt IMO. Average guess could be right on for Pitt.
Eusebiu - 6'1" (185 cm) said on 24/Mar/21
Since Brad Pitt and Vin Diesel are well known for using elevator shoes and both can pull of a 6'1" (185-186 cm) look, I wonder who would be taller if they would stand next to each other barefoot.
I have a odd feeling they are the same height at 5'11" (180 cm).
Since Brad Pitt and Vin Diesel are well known for using elevator shoes and both can pull of a 6'1" (185-186 cm) look, I wonder who would be taller if they would stand next to each other barefoot.
I have a odd feeling they are the same height at 5'11" (180 cm).
Pierre said on 21/Mar/21
MJKoP said on 18/Mar/21
Pierre said on 16/Mar/21
Parker said on 16/Mar/21
Pierre said on 15/Mar/21
@MJKoP Imo Brad is a bit shorter than you guess his height.
MJKop guesses are always closer to reality than yours IMO.
Yeah because you believe your own guesses are closer to reality than mine.
They sure are - as are most other guesses, too...so what are the odds that you are the mistaken one?
It’s pretty easy to answer your question....If thousand guys do the same mistake and if I'm the only one to guess the reality,then my odds are 100% ...
MJKoP said on 18/Mar/21
Pierre said on 16/Mar/21
Parker said on 16/Mar/21
Pierre said on 15/Mar/21
@MJKoP Imo Brad is a bit shorter than you guess his height.
MJKop guesses are always closer to reality than yours IMO.
Yeah because you believe your own guesses are closer to reality than mine.
They sure are - as are most other guesses, too...so what are the odds that you are the mistaken one?
It’s pretty easy to answer your question....If thousand guys do the same mistake and if I'm the only one to guess the reality,then my odds are 100% ...
Devenee Sim said on 21/Mar/21
179cm
179cm
Pierre said on 21/Mar/21
Click Here Brad (and Leonardo) next to maybe full 5"9' Johnny Depp a bit more distant to the camera and looking not perfectly straight
( Click Here another Leonardo a bit closer to the camera than Johnny )
Leonardo /Sean Penn one time closer to the camera Click Here one time more distant Click Here
Sean Penn /George Harrison listed 5"10' Click Here
Click Here Johnny Depp and Michael Jackson
Michael wearing cow boy boots /Eddie Murphy 5"9.25' flat shoes = Click Here
Click Here Johnny Depp /Nicolas Cage
Nicolas Cage /Tom Sizemore 5"10.25' Click Here Click Here
Brad under 5"10' peak imo
Click Here Brad (and Leonardo) next to maybe full 5"9' Johnny Depp a bit more distant to the camera and looking not perfectly straight
( Click Here another Leonardo a bit closer to the camera than Johnny )
Leonardo /Sean Penn one time closer to the camera Click Here one time more distant Click Here
Sean Penn /George Harrison listed 5"10' Click Here
Click Here Johnny Depp and Michael Jackson
Michael wearing cow boy boots /Eddie Murphy 5"9.25' flat shoes = Click Here
Click Here Johnny Depp /Nicolas Cage
Nicolas Cage /Tom Sizemore 5"10.25' Click Here Click Here
Brad under 5"10' peak imo
Vincent Caleb said on 18/Mar/21
@Daedric:
The second Brad Pitt photo the ground is tilting to Paltrow’s favor, although the first one is legit. I can see how he looks scarcely over 5’10” there. The Qualley photo is garbage though.
@Daedric:
The second Brad Pitt photo the ground is tilting to Paltrow’s favor, although the first one is legit. I can see how he looks scarcely over 5’10” there. The Qualley photo is garbage though.
MJKoP said on 18/Mar/21
Pierre said on 16/Mar/21
Parker said on 16/Mar/21
Pierre said on 15/Mar/21
@MJKoP Imo Brad is a bit shorter than you guess his height.
MJKop guesses are always closer to reality than yours IMO.
Yeah because you believe your own guesses are closer to reality than mine.
They sure are - as are most other guesses, too...so what are the odds that you are the mistaken one?
Pierre said on 16/Mar/21
Parker said on 16/Mar/21
Pierre said on 15/Mar/21
@MJKoP Imo Brad is a bit shorter than you guess his height.
MJKop guesses are always closer to reality than yours IMO.
Yeah because you believe your own guesses are closer to reality than mine.
They sure are - as are most other guesses, too...so what are the odds that you are the mistaken one?
Pierre said on 17/Mar/21
@Slim = Gwyneth / James Corden = Click Here
James Corden tiptoeing /Samuel Anderson 5"10.25' not perfectly straight for the photo =
Click Here
@Slim = Gwyneth / James Corden = Click Here
James Corden tiptoeing /Samuel Anderson 5"10.25' not perfectly straight for the photo =
Click Here
Slim 6'1.5 said on 17/Mar/21
I doubt Paltrow is 5’9”, she’s way closer to 5’8”, Pitt is a little bit taller than her... those nude pics mean nothing...
I doubt Paltrow is 5’9”, she’s way closer to 5’8”, Pitt is a little bit taller than her... those nude pics mean nothing...
Pierre said on 16/Mar/21
Parker said on 16/Mar/21
Pierre said on 15/Mar/21
@MJKoP Imo Brad is a bit shorter than you guess his height.
MJKop guesses are always closer to reality than yours IMO.
Yeah because you believe your own guesses are closer to reality than mine.
Parker said on 16/Mar/21
Pierre said on 15/Mar/21
@MJKoP Imo Brad is a bit shorter than you guess his height.
MJKop guesses are always closer to reality than yours IMO.
Yeah because you believe your own guesses are closer to reality than mine.
Parker said on 16/Mar/21
Pierre said on 15/Mar/21
@MJKoP Imo Brad is a bit shorter than you guess his height.
MJKop guesses are always closer to reality than yours IMO.
Pierre said on 15/Mar/21
@MJKoP Imo Brad is a bit shorter than you guess his height.
MJKop guesses are always closer to reality than yours IMO.
Pierre said on 15/Mar/21
MJKoP said on 15/Mar/21
@Daedric That 2nd to last link perfectly exemplifies why photographs can't always be trusted.
Lena Dunham is 5'3.25", appears to be standing on even ground, is wearing flat sandals, is BEHIND Brad(who is wearing his boots)....yet STILL somehow looks to tower over him. LOL
@MJKoP Imo Brad is a bit shorter than you guess his height.
MJKoP said on 15/Mar/21
@Daedric That 2nd to last link perfectly exemplifies why photographs can't always be trusted.
Lena Dunham is 5'3.25", appears to be standing on even ground, is wearing flat sandals, is BEHIND Brad(who is wearing his boots)....yet STILL somehow looks to tower over him. LOL
@MJKoP Imo Brad is a bit shorter than you guess his height.
MJKoP said on 15/Mar/21
@Daedric That 2nd to last link perfectly exemplifies why photographs can't always be trusted.
Lena Dunham is 5'3.25", appears to be standing on even ground, is wearing flat sandals, is BEHIND Brad(who is wearing his boots)....yet STILL somehow looks to tower over him. LOL
@Daedric That 2nd to last link perfectly exemplifies why photographs can't always be trusted.
Lena Dunham is 5'3.25", appears to be standing on even ground, is wearing flat sandals, is BEHIND Brad(who is wearing his boots)....yet STILL somehow looks to tower over him. LOL
Tropeiro said on 14/Mar/21
177cm or 178cm.
177cm or 178cm.
Daedric said on 11/Mar/21
Again, I don't see how in 2021 people still think Brad is 5'11. It is 5'10 at most.
Watch him with Gwyneth Paltrow (5'9 / 1.75) Watch his shoes, they are on the same level.
Click Here
Click Here
Brad Pitt has always worn elevator shoes, so it's difficult to define his height based on the photos.
Brad and Margaret Qualley (1,72):
Click Here
Click Here
Again, I don't see how in 2021 people still think Brad is 5'11. It is 5'10 at most.
Watch him with Gwyneth Paltrow (5'9 / 1.75) Watch his shoes, they are on the same level.
Click Here
Click Here
Brad Pitt has always worn elevator shoes, so it's difficult to define his height based on the photos.
Brad and Margaret Qualley (1,72):
Click Here
Click Here
Slim 6'1.5 said on 11/Mar/21
He easily wakes up at 182.5-183cm
He easily wakes up at 182.5-183cm
Pierre said on 10/Mar/21
carlospe said on 9/Mar/21
Pierre said on 9/Mar/21
You can't say Leo is 5'10 standing tall because is impossible. He is 5'10.5 standin tall for a measurement at worst. If he really was 5'10 standing tall he would look 5'9
Nah to me he looks taller than you believe because his body is relatively slim.
carlospe said on 9/Mar/21
Pierre said on 9/Mar/21
You can't say Leo is 5'10 standing tall because is impossible. He is 5'10.5 standin tall for a measurement at worst. If he really was 5'10 standing tall he would look 5'9
Nah to me he looks taller than you believe because his body is relatively slim.
Slim 6'1.5 said on 9/Mar/21
Everything sub 5’10.5 should be ruled out
Everything sub 5’10.5 should be ruled out
carlospe said on 9/Mar/21
Pierre said on 9/Mar/21
You can't say Leo is 5'10 standing tall because is impossible. He is 5'10.5 standin tall for a measurement at worst. If he really was 5'10 standing tall he would look 5'9
Pierre said on 9/Mar/21
You can't say Leo is 5'10 standing tall because is impossible. He is 5'10.5 standin tall for a measurement at worst. If he really was 5'10 standing tall he would look 5'9
Pierre said on 9/Mar/21
carlospe said on 7/Mar/21
You are wasting your time. Nobody agree you. Saying Leo is max 5'10 is absolutely out of debate. The lowest he looks when he is relax is 178 cm. He is at least 179 cm.
So Tom Hardy is 173 cm? One of the best evidences.. With Monaco looks 178 cm at worst being relax. Leo is a 179-180 guy.
I don't waste my time because this is not very important for me if the majority guess him 5"11' or more(I suggest you eventually to read old comments at his page and you will see I'm not the only one to guess him shorter than your guess)
Albert of Monaco by Robert Knepper is big max 5"10.5' and Leonardo doesn't look really more relax than Prince Albert .Only the top of his hairs could look timidly(maybe) as high as Prince Albert.Then I could hardly claim Leo close to 5"11' range than to 5"10' here.Same thing with other comparisons I posted.
carlospe said on 7/Mar/21
You are wasting your time. Nobody agree you. Saying Leo is max 5'10 is absolutely out of debate. The lowest he looks when he is relax is 178 cm. He is at least 179 cm.
So Tom Hardy is 173 cm? One of the best evidences.. With Monaco looks 178 cm at worst being relax. Leo is a 179-180 guy.
I don't waste my time because this is not very important for me if the majority guess him 5"11' or more(I suggest you eventually to read old comments at his page and you will see I'm not the only one to guess him shorter than your guess)
Albert of Monaco by Robert Knepper is big max 5"10.5' and Leonardo doesn't look really more relax than Prince Albert .Only the top of his hairs could look timidly(maybe) as high as Prince Albert.Then I could hardly claim Leo close to 5"11' range than to 5"10' here.Same thing with other comparisons I posted.
carlospe said on 7/Mar/21
Pierre said on 6/Mar/21
You are wasting your time. Nobody agree you. Saying Leo is max 5'10 is absolutely out of debate. The lowest he looks when he is relax is 178 cm. He is at least 179 cm.
So Tom Hardy is 173 cm? One of the best evidences.. With Monaco looks 178 cm at worst being relax. Leo is a 179-180 guy.
Pierre said on 6/Mar/21
You are wasting your time. Nobody agree you. Saying Leo is max 5'10 is absolutely out of debate. The lowest he looks when he is relax is 178 cm. He is at least 179 cm.
So Tom Hardy is 173 cm? One of the best evidences.. With Monaco looks 178 cm at worst being relax. Leo is a 179-180 guy.
Jade Aimers said on 6/Mar/21
179cm
179cm
Pierre said on 6/Mar/21
carlospe said on 5/Mar/21
Pierre said on 3/Mar/21
You have to keep in mind It's not the same to look 5'10 that be 5'10. Leo probably looks 5'10 in those photos but he is just relax and we all know his posture is not good.
If he stands tall for a measurement he is taller than 5'10. He would reach 5'10.5 at least or 179 cm range.
He is 4 or 5 cm taller than Tom Hardy and about 4 cm shorter than Tarantino. Tarantino is listed at 6'1 but If he even was 6'0 Leonardo is still taller than 5'10.
Leo is no less than 5'10.5. With Monaco looks 5'10 range and he is not straight just look at his neck and posture. Leo again 5'10.5 or 179 cm. I don't rule out a weak 5'10.75 in a good day when he was 25.
Even with a perfect posture Leo here is never two inches taller than Justin Long,himself not perfectly straight here if you got this way.Leo looks very close in height to Justin.Then even by taking a small margin Leo looks big max 5"10' by this comparison .By Robert Knepper next to Prince Albert= same thing.Leo never looks 2 inches taller than Robert.Max 1.5 .If Robert is really full 5"8.75' then Leonardo could be maybe 5"10.25'(if Prince Albert does not lose a fraction of height between 2009 and 2015)
About Quentin Tarentino's height = HE's lot's of time slouching in pics,here is how much tall he looks with a posture just a bit relaxed next to Christoph Waltz (Quentin closer to the camera) Click Here
And here a bit relaxed posture next to Leonardo looking straight Click Here Leonardo never close to 5"11' here again
carlospe said on 5/Mar/21
Pierre said on 3/Mar/21
You have to keep in mind It's not the same to look 5'10 that be 5'10. Leo probably looks 5'10 in those photos but he is just relax and we all know his posture is not good.
If he stands tall for a measurement he is taller than 5'10. He would reach 5'10.5 at least or 179 cm range.
He is 4 or 5 cm taller than Tom Hardy and about 4 cm shorter than Tarantino. Tarantino is listed at 6'1 but If he even was 6'0 Leonardo is still taller than 5'10.
Leo is no less than 5'10.5. With Monaco looks 5'10 range and he is not straight just look at his neck and posture. Leo again 5'10.5 or 179 cm. I don't rule out a weak 5'10.75 in a good day when he was 25.
Even with a perfect posture Leo here is never two inches taller than Justin Long,himself not perfectly straight here if you got this way.Leo looks very close in height to Justin.Then even by taking a small margin Leo looks big max 5"10' by this comparison .By Robert Knepper next to Prince Albert= same thing.Leo never looks 2 inches taller than Robert.Max 1.5 .If Robert is really full 5"8.75' then Leonardo could be maybe 5"10.25'(if Prince Albert does not lose a fraction of height between 2009 and 2015)
About Quentin Tarentino's height = HE's lot's of time slouching in pics,here is how much tall he looks with a posture just a bit relaxed next to Christoph Waltz (Quentin closer to the camera) Click Here
And here a bit relaxed posture next to Leonardo looking straight Click Here Leonardo never close to 5"11' here again
Pierre said on 6/Mar/21
carlospe said on 5/Mar/21
Pierre said on 3/Mar/21
You have to keep in mind It's not the same to look 5'10 that be 5'10. Leo probably looks 5'10 in those photos but he is just relax and we all know his posture is not good.
If he stands tall for a measurement he is taller than 5'10. He would reach 5'10.5 at least or 179 cm range.
He is 4 or 5 cm taller than Tom Hardy and about 4 cm shorter than Tarantino. Tarantino is listed at 6'1 but If he even was 6'0 Leonardo is still taller than 5'10.
Leo is no less than 5'10.5. With Monaco looks 5'10 range and he is not straight just look at his neck and posture. Leo again 5'10.5 or 179 cm. I don't rule out a weak 5'10.75 in a good day when he was 25.
Even with a perfect posture Leo here is never two inches taller than Justin Long,himself not perfectly straight here if you got this way.Leo looks very close in height to Justin.Then even by taking a small margin Leo looks big max 5"10' by this comparison .By Robert Knepper next to Prince Albert= same thing.Leo never looks 2 inches taller than Robert.Max 1.5 .If Robert is really full 5"8.75' then Leonardo could be maybe 5"10.25'(if Prince Albert does not lose a fraction of height between 2009 and 2015)
About Quentin Tarentino's height = HE's lot's of time slouching in pics,here is how much tall he looks with a posture just a bit relaxed next to Christoph Waltz (Quentin closer to the camera) Click Here
And here a bit relaxed posture next to Leonardo looking straight Click Here Leonardo never cole to 5"11' here again
carlospe said on 5/Mar/21
Pierre said on 3/Mar/21
You have to keep in mind It's not the same to look 5'10 that be 5'10. Leo probably looks 5'10 in those photos but he is just relax and we all know his posture is not good.
If he stands tall for a measurement he is taller than 5'10. He would reach 5'10.5 at least or 179 cm range.
He is 4 or 5 cm taller than Tom Hardy and about 4 cm shorter than Tarantino. Tarantino is listed at 6'1 but If he even was 6'0 Leonardo is still taller than 5'10.
Leo is no less than 5'10.5. With Monaco looks 5'10 range and he is not straight just look at his neck and posture. Leo again 5'10.5 or 179 cm. I don't rule out a weak 5'10.75 in a good day when he was 25.
Even with a perfect posture Leo here is never two inches taller than Justin Long,himself not perfectly straight here if you got this way.Leo looks very close in height to Justin.Then even by taking a small margin Leo looks big max 5"10' by this comparison .By Robert Knepper next to Prince Albert= same thing.Leo never looks 2 inches taller than Robert.Max 1.5 .If Robert is really full 5"8.75' then Leonardo could be maybe 5"10.25'(if Prince Albert does not lose a fraction of height between 2009 and 2015)
About Quentin Tarentino's height = HE's lot's of time slouching in pics,here is how much tall he looks with a posture just a bit relaxed next to Christoph Waltz (Quentin closer to the camera) Click Here
And here a bit relaxed posture next to Leonardo looking straight Click Here Leonardo never cole to 5"11' here again
JOGA said on 6/Mar/21
In 2007, I stayed at the same Namibian hotel (The Burning Shore- it's good ! )that Brad and Angelina were staying at when she gave birth to Shiloh, not at the same time, of course. I asked the hotel manageress what Brad Pitt looked like. I'm 5' 11" but can appear 6 foot or so. She looked me up and down and replied, " He's about the same size as you. "
I would conclude that Brad Pitt is around 5 foot 11.
In 2007, I stayed at the same Namibian hotel (The Burning Shore- it's good ! )that Brad and Angelina were staying at when she gave birth to Shiloh, not at the same time, of course. I asked the hotel manageress what Brad Pitt looked like. I'm 5' 11" but can appear 6 foot or so. She looked me up and down and replied, " He's about the same size as you. "
I would conclude that Brad Pitt is around 5 foot 11.
carlospe said on 5/Mar/21
Pierre said on 3/Mar/21
You have to keep in mind It's not the same to look 5'10 that be 5'10. Leo probably looks 5'10 in those photos but he is just relax and we all know his posture is not good.
If he stands tall for a measurement he is taller than 5'10. He would reach 5'10.5 at least or 179 cm range.
He is 4 or 5 cm taller than Tom Hardy and about 4 cm shorter than Tarantino. Tarantino is listed at 6'1 but If he even was 6'0 Leonardo is still taller than 5'10.
Leo is no less than 5'10.5. With Monaco looks 5'10 range and he is not straight just look at his neck and posture. Leo again 5'10.5 or 179 cm. I don't rule out a weak 5'10.75 in a good day when he was 25.
Pierre said on 3/Mar/21
You have to keep in mind It's not the same to look 5'10 that be 5'10. Leo probably looks 5'10 in those photos but he is just relax and we all know his posture is not good.
If he stands tall for a measurement he is taller than 5'10. He would reach 5'10.5 at least or 179 cm range.
He is 4 or 5 cm taller than Tom Hardy and about 4 cm shorter than Tarantino. Tarantino is listed at 6'1 but If he even was 6'0 Leonardo is still taller than 5'10.
Leo is no less than 5'10.5. With Monaco looks 5'10 range and he is not straight just look at his neck and posture. Leo again 5'10.5 or 179 cm. I don't rule out a weak 5'10.75 in a good day when he was 25.
Clif booth said on 5/Mar/21
I can't see brad under 179.7cm peak
I can't see brad under 179.7cm peak
Jade Aimers said on 4/Mar/21
179cm
179cm
Pierre said on 3/Mar/21
Jonah Hill /Justin Long 5"9' Click Here Click Here Click Here
Jonah Hill / Leonardo Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here
etc etc ....Leonardo nothing above 5"10' again
Jonah Hill /Justin Long 5"9' Click Here Click Here Click Here
Jonah Hill / Leonardo Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here
etc etc ....Leonardo nothing above 5"10' again
Slim 6'1.5 said on 3/Mar/21
I just can’t see Brad under 179cm
I just can’t see Brad under 179cm
carlospe said on 2/Mar/21
Pierre said on 2/Mar/21
If you want to argue I guarantee you Leo is closer to 5'11 than 5'10. Actually he probably was 5'11 in a good day and nowadays a solid 5'10 7/8 range
Pierre said on 2/Mar/21
If you want to argue I guarantee you Leo is closer to 5'11 than 5'10. Actually he probably was 5'11 in a good day and nowadays a solid 5'10 7/8 range
carlospe said on 2/Mar/21
Pierre said on 2/Mar/21
Ok.. buy you can't say that Leo is 177 cm please... That guess is out of debate.
Pierre said on 2/Mar/21
Ok.. buy you can't say that Leo is 177 cm please... That guess is out of debate.
Pierre said on 2/Mar/21
carlospe said on 28/Feb/21
Pierre
I'm not saying Leo is 181 man because It's obvious he is not that tall. He has 4-5 cm on Tom Hardy.
He is somewhere 179.2-180.0. This is very clear to all eyes.
And Brad Pitt is a typical 178 guy
My pics ( comparisons lots of time by celebrities Rob has seen and took a pic next to them) are showing 5"10' range not 5"11'.And Brad logically a bit less.
carlospe said on 28/Feb/21
Pierre
I'm not saying Leo is 181 man because It's obvious he is not that tall. He has 4-5 cm on Tom Hardy.
He is somewhere 179.2-180.0. This is very clear to all eyes.
And Brad Pitt is a typical 178 guy
My pics ( comparisons lots of time by celebrities Rob has seen and took a pic next to them) are showing 5"10' range not 5"11'.And Brad logically a bit less.
viper said on 1/Mar/21
Pitt-Paltrow pics really are the best evidence he's never been taller than 5-10.
Combined with writing 5-10 on an audition form
Pitt-Paltrow pics really are the best evidence he's never been taller than 5-10.
Combined with writing 5-10 on an audition form
carlospe said on 28/Feb/21
Pierre
I'm not saying Leo is 181 man because It's obvious he is not that tall. He has 4-5 cm on Tom Hardy.
He is somewhere 179.2-180.0. This is very clear to all eyes.
And Brad Pitt is a typical 178 guy
Pierre
I'm not saying Leo is 181 man because It's obvious he is not that tall. He has 4-5 cm on Tom Hardy.
He is somewhere 179.2-180.0. This is very clear to all eyes.
And Brad Pitt is a typical 178 guy
carlospe said on 28/Feb/21
Pierre said on 28/Feb/21
Even If I guess 174 cm for Tom Hardy, Leo gets 178.5. 177 is out and the biggest joke lolll
Pierre said on 28/Feb/21
Even If I guess 174 cm for Tom Hardy, Leo gets 178.5. 177 is out and the biggest joke lolll
carlospe said on 28/Feb/21
Pierre said on 28/Feb/21
Another one for you:
Click Here
Try to be serious. I'm reading a lot of guys are laughing too on your guesses here.
Leo standing tall is a 180 guy 179.2 is the lowest he can get
Pierre said on 28/Feb/21
Another one for you:
Click Here
Try to be serious. I'm reading a lot of guys are laughing too on your guesses here.
Leo standing tall is a 180 guy 179.2 is the lowest he can get
carlospe said on 28/Feb/21
Pierre said on 28/Feb/21
With TOM HARDY is an evidence Leo can't be less than 179.5. Rob met Tom Hardy and said he was taller than him and a solid 5'9 guy closer to be 176 than 175.
Saying Leo is 177 cm makes Tom Hardy 172 cm. Man you are not good guessing leave the page
Pierre said on 28/Feb/21
With TOM HARDY is an evidence Leo can't be less than 179.5. Rob met Tom Hardy and said he was taller than him and a solid 5'9 guy closer to be 176 than 175.
Saying Leo is 177 cm makes Tom Hardy 172 cm. Man you are not good guessing leave the page
Pierre said on 28/Feb/21
carlospe said on 27/Feb/21 If you say Leo is 177 cm you neeed glasses.
Leonardo /Sean Penn Click Here in this Sean in terrible posture = Click Here
Sean Penn/5"10' Georges Harrison Click Here
Click Here recent Leonardo /Arnold
Click Here recent Arnold /Triple H
Click Here recent Triple H / Alberto Del Rio (Alberto himself wearing probably more shoe and standing in better posture than Rob looking painfully a full 6"2' Click Here )
Or Triple H looking painfully as high as Hafthor's lower ears/lower nose = Click Here
Click Here = here the scale with Hafthor's lower nose /lower ears (around 6"0')
Oh yeah...Leonardo is 5"11' here 😊
carlospe said on 27/Feb/21 If you say Leo is 177 cm you neeed glasses.
Leonardo /Sean Penn Click Here in this Sean in terrible posture = Click Here
Sean Penn/5"10' Georges Harrison Click Here
Click Here recent Leonardo /Arnold
Click Here recent Arnold /Triple H
Click Here recent Triple H / Alberto Del Rio (Alberto himself wearing probably more shoe and standing in better posture than Rob looking painfully a full 6"2' Click Here )
Or Triple H looking painfully as high as Hafthor's lower ears/lower nose = Click Here
Click Here = here the scale with Hafthor's lower nose /lower ears (around 6"0')
Oh yeah...Leonardo is 5"11' here 😊
Daedric said on 28/Feb/21
It is difficult to know his height based on photos with other people because he is always using tricks and elevators. But the older photos, with his ex-girlfriend Gwyneth Paltrow, reveal his true height.
See that they are wearing very similar shoes, so there is no significant advantage. Gwyneth is 175 (5'9) and he is almost the same height as her.
These photos convinced me that Brad is 5'10 (178) or 177
Click Here
Click Here
But then, when he uses his elevators::
Click Here
It is difficult to know his height based on photos with other people because he is always using tricks and elevators. But the older photos, with his ex-girlfriend Gwyneth Paltrow, reveal his true height.
See that they are wearing very similar shoes, so there is no significant advantage. Gwyneth is 175 (5'9) and he is almost the same height as her.
These photos convinced me that Brad is 5'10 (178) or 177
Click Here
Click Here
But then, when he uses his elevators::
Click Here
carlospe said on 28/Feb/21
Pierre said on 27/Feb/21
Lol lots of tennis players have their heights inflated... yes I know that but Djokovic is no less than 186 cm and Murray is no less than 187 and Nadal is no less than 183.5 cm trust me. Leo is 180 cm again. You can't argue 177 cm for him because Rob will ban you and I would do it too lol. Use glasses
Pierre said on 27/Feb/21
Lol lots of tennis players have their heights inflated... yes I know that but Djokovic is no less than 186 cm and Murray is no less than 187 and Nadal is no less than 183.5 cm trust me. Leo is 180 cm again. You can't argue 177 cm for him because Rob will ban you and I would do it too lol. Use glasses
Original said on 27/Feb/21
Leo Di Caprio: 180.5cm (5'11), 180 and 181 are both very arguable.
Brad Pitt: 177.5cm (weak 5'10) I can see both 177 and 178 as possible, but not less than that and def no more than 178.5cm too. He needed small lifts to reach Di Caprio's height in the red carpet I'm sure of that.
The difference between both, Leo and Brad, is not less than 2.5cm and I quite argue about 3cm, now if you have Di Caprio only in the 177cm range (for some users like Pierre), than the max Pitt can be is 175cm and more likely in the 174 range.... no way Pitt is 174, 175 or even 176, but 177 - 178cm.
Leo Di Caprio: 180.5cm (5'11), 180 and 181 are both very arguable.
Brad Pitt: 177.5cm (weak 5'10) I can see both 177 and 178 as possible, but not less than that and def no more than 178.5cm too. He needed small lifts to reach Di Caprio's height in the red carpet I'm sure of that.
The difference between both, Leo and Brad, is not less than 2.5cm and I quite argue about 3cm, now if you have Di Caprio only in the 177cm range (for some users like Pierre), than the max Pitt can be is 175cm and more likely in the 174 range.... no way Pitt is 174, 175 or even 176, but 177 - 178cm.
Pierre said on 27/Feb/21
carlospe said on 27/Feb/21
Pierre said on 27/Feb/21
Prince Monaco is just 5-6 cm shorter than Djokovic and 4 cm shorter than Nadal. Do the math. He is about 179-180 cm and Leo look taller than him in a lot of photos. If you say Leo is 177 cm you neeed glasses. He is more 180 cm . He is about 5 cm taller than Tom Hardy who is no less than 174.7 cm.
Leo 180 cm 100%. My lowest is 179.3 cm and highest is 180.3 cm. (5'11")
Lol lots of tennis players have their heights inflated ,and I know all this pics inwhich Leonardo looks taller than Prince Albert = Pics with low angle of camera plus Leonardo a bit closer to the camera...
carlospe said on 27/Feb/21
Pierre said on 27/Feb/21
Prince Monaco is just 5-6 cm shorter than Djokovic and 4 cm shorter than Nadal. Do the math. He is about 179-180 cm and Leo look taller than him in a lot of photos. If you say Leo is 177 cm you neeed glasses. He is more 180 cm . He is about 5 cm taller than Tom Hardy who is no less than 174.7 cm.
Leo 180 cm 100%. My lowest is 179.3 cm and highest is 180.3 cm. (5'11")
Lol lots of tennis players have their heights inflated ,and I know all this pics inwhich Leonardo looks taller than Prince Albert = Pics with low angle of camera plus Leonardo a bit closer to the camera...
carlospe said on 27/Feb/21
Pierre said on 27/Feb/21
Prince Monaco is just 5-6 cm shorter than Djokovic and 4 cm shorter than Nadal. Do the math. He is about 179-180 cm and Leo look taller than him in a lot of photos. If you say Leo is 177 cm you neeed glasses. He is more 180 cm . He is about 5 cm taller than Tom Hardy who is no less than 174.7 cm.
Leo 180 cm 100%. My lowest is 179.3 cm and highest is 180.3 cm. (5'11")
Pierre said on 27/Feb/21
Prince Monaco is just 5-6 cm shorter than Djokovic and 4 cm shorter than Nadal. Do the math. He is about 179-180 cm and Leo look taller than him in a lot of photos. If you say Leo is 177 cm you neeed glasses. He is more 180 cm . He is about 5 cm taller than Tom Hardy who is no less than 174.7 cm.
Leo 180 cm 100%. My lowest is 179.3 cm and highest is 180.3 cm. (5'11")
Pierre said on 27/Feb/21
I wouldn't even bet Leonardo is a full 5"10' by Prince Albert and Robert Knepper,and Brad looks shorter than Leonardo then the probability Brad is himself a full 5"10' seems to me very slim.
Leonardo 5"9.75' /5"10'
Brad 5"9.25'
I wouldn't even bet Leonardo is a full 5"10' by Prince Albert and Robert Knepper,and Brad looks shorter than Leonardo then the probability Brad is himself a full 5"10' seems to me very slim.
Leonardo 5"9.75' /5"10'
Brad 5"9.25'
carlospe said on 26/Feb/21
Genau 5ft9 7/8 said on 15/Feb/21
Dicaprio is not 5'11.5. Dicaprio 5'11 max. 5'10 3/4 closer to the truth.
Hardy is 5'9
Brad pitt 5'10.25
Damon 5'9.25
Genau 5ft9 7/8 said on 15/Feb/21
Dicaprio is not 5'11.5. Dicaprio 5'11 max. 5'10 3/4 closer to the truth.
Hardy is 5'9
Brad pitt 5'10.25
Damon 5'9.25
carlospe said on 26/Feb/21
Andrija said on 12/Feb/21
Yes you would edged him by 1 cm maybe 2 cm
Andrija said on 12/Feb/21
Yes you would edged him by 1 cm maybe 2 cm
Slim 6'1.5 said on 25/Feb/21
jordi
Yeah he did wear lifts in meet joe black to dwarf sir Anthony Hopkins
jordi
Yeah he did wear lifts in meet joe black to dwarf sir Anthony Hopkins
Dmeyer said on 24/Feb/21
He defenetly droped 0,25 in so Peak 5ft 10,75 now 5-10,5
He defenetly droped 0,25 in so Peak 5ft 10,75 now 5-10,5
viper said on 24/Feb/21
Those are some gigantic lifts Stallone is wearing.
Not surprised he's taller than Pitt
Those are some gigantic lifts Stallone is wearing.
Not surprised he's taller than Pitt
Daedric said on 23/Feb/21
Rob, here is Pitt with Gwyneth Paltrow (175 / 5'9) She even looks a little taller than him. Watch your shoes too. Don't you think he's a solid 5'10?
Click Here
Rob, here is Pitt with Gwyneth Paltrow (175 / 5'9) She even looks a little taller than him. Watch your shoes too. Don't you think he's a solid 5'10?
Click Here
Pierre said on 23/Feb/21
@Roberto=Agree with you ,clearly not 5"11' range.
Sly's shoes are looking huge here,however I personnaly guess Sly's current height a bit under 5"8' now.
Click Here here is how much tall looks Sly next to Prince Albert Of Monaco.I don't know his shoes here( but very probably they give him a little help).And Sly stands a bit closer to the camera than Prince Albert here)
Now here is Robert Knepper imo big max 5"8.75' ( here with Rob = Click Here ) next to Prince Albert = Click Here Click Here
Click Here Brad closer to the camera and wearing an advantageous cap/beret.
Click Here
Prince Albert and Leonardo = Click Here Click Here
Brad again with advantageous cap/beret / Leonardo = Click Here Click Here Click Here
@Roberto=Agree with you ,clearly not 5"11' range.
Sly's shoes are looking huge here,however I personnaly guess Sly's current height a bit under 5"8' now.
Click Here here is how much tall looks Sly next to Prince Albert Of Monaco.I don't know his shoes here( but very probably they give him a little help).And Sly stands a bit closer to the camera than Prince Albert here)
Now here is Robert Knepper imo big max 5"8.75' ( here with Rob = Click Here ) next to Prince Albert = Click Here Click Here
Click Here Brad closer to the camera and wearing an advantageous cap/beret.
Click Here
Prince Albert and Leonardo = Click Here Click Here
Brad again with advantageous cap/beret / Leonardo = Click Here Click Here Click Here
Roberto Justos said on 22/Feb/21
In my opinion, Pitt has a maximum of 5'10. Notice this photo next to Stallone (1.73m). Yes, Stallone is wearing elevator shoes, so I guess he has 5'11 in that photo. Brad, next to him, in shoes, at the same height.
Click Here
In my opinion, Pitt has a maximum of 5'10. Notice this photo next to Stallone (1.73m). Yes, Stallone is wearing elevator shoes, so I guess he has 5'11 in that photo. Brad, next to him, in shoes, at the same height.
Click Here
jordi said on 22/Feb/21
Are this lift shoes @rob?
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Editor Rob
Are this lift shoes @rob?
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Editor Robthey don't look like your typical elevator style, but with shoes/boots, fitting half to 3/4 inch lifts inside them is something that most people will struggle to tell.
Slim 6'1.5 said on 22/Feb/21
Tyler durden is the joker 🃏
Tyler durden is the joker 🃏
Jakey said on 21/Feb/21
The height is always so difficult to guess, especially if to judge the height in shoes, that's tremendously difficult!
The height is always so difficult to guess, especially if to judge the height in shoes, that's tremendously difficult!
Pierre said on 17/Feb/21
Click Here Here is Gwyneth next to Thierry Guibert,both standing in the same good posture.Gwyneth looks big max as high as him,and she wears huge heels in this event = Click Here
Now here is Robbie Williams next to Thierry Guibert thierry a bit more in relaxed posture = Click Here
And Finally Robbie next to Thierry and Gwyneth (all pics same event).Gwyneth by all this comparisons looks max same height as Robbie here,but remember that Robbie wear slim sneakers and Gwyneth huge heels.
Now here is Robbie next to Goldie 5"9.5'range (here with Rob= Click Here )Robbie beeing barefoot = Click Here
then Robbie to me is maybe a strong 5"11' but not over imo.
Now Gwyneth wearing shoes this time that are looking apparently only a fraction more than Brad(Brad wearing an advantageous cap) = Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here
To me Brad isn't the same range height as Robbie this time again.
I buy maybe 5"9.5' peak
Click Here Here is Gwyneth next to Thierry Guibert,both standing in the same good posture.Gwyneth looks big max as high as him,and she wears huge heels in this event = Click Here
Now here is Robbie Williams next to Thierry Guibert thierry a bit more in relaxed posture = Click Here
And Finally Robbie next to Thierry and Gwyneth (all pics same event).Gwyneth by all this comparisons looks max same height as Robbie here,but remember that Robbie wear slim sneakers and Gwyneth huge heels.
Now here is Robbie next to Goldie 5"9.5'range (here with Rob= Click Here )Robbie beeing barefoot = Click Here
then Robbie to me is maybe a strong 5"11' but not over imo.
Now Gwyneth wearing shoes this time that are looking apparently only a fraction more than Brad(Brad wearing an advantageous cap) = Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here
To me Brad isn't the same range height as Robbie this time again.
I buy maybe 5"9.5' peak
slim 6'1 said on 17/Feb/21
Genau 5ft9 7/8
I’m not rob but those are really good guesses
Genau 5ft9 7/8
I’m not rob but those are really good guesses
Genau 5ft9 7/8 said on 15/Feb/21
Rob what would you say about these figures:
Pitt 5ft10 7/8
DiCaprio 5ft11 1/2
Clooney 5ft10 1/2 Peak, current 5ft10
McConaughey 5ft10 3/4
Hardy 5ft9 1/4
Damon 5ft9 1/2
Whalberg 5ft7 3/4
Rob what would you say about these figures:
Pitt 5ft10 7/8
DiCaprio 5ft11 1/2
Clooney 5ft10 1/2 Peak, current 5ft10
McConaughey 5ft10 3/4
Hardy 5ft9 1/4
Damon 5ft9 1/2
Whalberg 5ft7 3/4
Dmeyer said on 13/Feb/21
You will bé listed 5-10,75-11 and Pitt at Peak will bé very slightly taller
You will bé listed 5-10,75-11 and Pitt at Peak will bé very slightly taller
Dmeyer said on 13/Feb/21
I have Seen enaugh to juste Matt Damon as 5-9,5 by this Mark George isnt less than 5-10,5 Pitt even counnting posture footwear and angle Pitt isnt less than 1,25in over damon and IS aleast Clooney height or 0,5in over so 5-10,5-5-11 covers the Guy he could have shipped near 0,3in now since hé looks shorter near DiCaprio that hé use to look t'aller 20 years ago
I have Seen enaugh to juste Matt Damon as 5-9,5 by this Mark George isnt less than 5-10,5 Pitt even counnting posture footwear and angle Pitt isnt less than 1,25in over damon and IS aleast Clooney height or 0,5in over so 5-10,5-5-11 covers the Guy he could have shipped near 0,3in now since hé looks shorter near DiCaprio that hé use to look t'aller 20 years ago
viper said on 13/Feb/21
Brad does SEEM to edge out Clooney.
I absolutely don't think Brad is anything more than 5-10.25 at best as he wrote down 5-10 on an audition form.
Clooney looks Max, Max 5-10 his whole life IMO.
It wouldn't surprise me If Clooney is just 5-9.5
Brad does SEEM to edge out Clooney.
I absolutely don't think Brad is anything more than 5-10.25 at best as he wrote down 5-10 on an audition form.
Clooney looks Max, Max 5-10 his whole life IMO.
It wouldn't surprise me If Clooney is just 5-9.5
CDS said on 12/Feb/21
"Clif booth said on 10/Feb/21
@ rising : ok I agree with you because you think that brad is somewhere between 5'10"75-5ft11 and I think that is very possible but I think that 5'11"25 isn't impossible for his peak because he always looks noticeably taller than Angelina in high hells and he could look very close to 6ft actors like Ryan gosling and norton"
Regardless of what this site's inflated listings say, I would put both gosling and Norton at closer to 5'11"..
"Clif booth said on 10/Feb/21
@ rising : ok I agree with you because you think that brad is somewhere between 5'10"75-5ft11 and I think that is very possible but I think that 5'11"25 isn't impossible for his peak because he always looks noticeably taller than Angelina in high hells and he could look very close to 6ft actors like Ryan gosling and norton"
Regardless of what this site's inflated listings say, I would put both gosling and Norton at closer to 5'11"..
Andrija said on 12/Feb/21
If I go to bed at 179.5 usually, and wake up a bit over 181, would I edge Pitt? Also, what would you think I would be listed on this site?
If I go to bed at 179.5 usually, and wake up a bit over 181, would I edge Pitt? Also, what would you think I would be listed on this site?
MarcusTheSwede said on 12/Feb/21
The only one close to accurate here is Pierre. Brad is at best at best 5”10 without his massive boots and pictures with Angelina doesnt count bcs he always Wears thick boots or dress shoes with very very suspicious angle of ankles in the shoes wich points to height inserts plus heel. He is short as short is without his massive shoes and special shoes. Fantastic Website Thanks Rob
The only one close to accurate here is Pierre. Brad is at best at best 5”10 without his massive boots and pictures with Angelina doesnt count bcs he always Wears thick boots or dress shoes with very very suspicious angle of ankles in the shoes wich points to height inserts plus heel. He is short as short is without his massive shoes and special shoes. Fantastic Website Thanks Rob
Clif booth said on 10/Feb/21
@ rising : ok I agree with you because you think that brad is somewhere between 5'10"75-5ft11 and I think that is very possible but I think that 5'11"25 isn't impossible for his peak because he always looks noticeably taller than Angelina in high hells and he could look very close to 6ft actors like Ryan gosling and norton
@ rising : ok I agree with you because you think that brad is somewhere between 5'10"75-5ft11 and I think that is very possible but I think that 5'11"25 isn't impossible for his peak because he always looks noticeably taller than Angelina in high hells and he could look very close to 6ft actors like Ryan gosling and norton
Clif booth said on 10/Feb/21
@ rising : ok I agree with you because you think that brad is somewhere between 5'10"75-5ft11 and I think that is very possible but I think that 5'11"25 isn't impossible for his peak because he always looks noticeably taller than Angelina in high hells and he could look very close to 6ft actors like Ryan gosling and norton
@ rising : ok I agree with you because you think that brad is somewhere between 5'10"75-5ft11 and I think that is very possible but I think that 5'11"25 isn't impossible for his peak because he always looks noticeably taller than Angelina in high hells and he could look very close to 6ft actors like Ryan gosling and norton
Pierre said on 10/Feb/21
@Rising = Then read some old comments at Bruce page = several guys who met him wrote he looks hardly full 5"11'
Click Here Click Here here Brad by forcing his posture still looks shorter than him.
Another Jimmy Fallon /Stephen Colbert(looking a weak 5"10' next to Barack)= Click Here Stephen not particularly straight on his legs and looking down while Jimmy's head is looking up.
Jimmy Fallon to me looks hardly a full 5"11' here.
Then Brad hardly a full 5"10' barefoot by this comparisons.
@Rising = Then read some old comments at Bruce page = several guys who met him wrote he looks hardly full 5"11'
Click Here Click Here here Brad by forcing his posture still looks shorter than him.
Another Jimmy Fallon /Stephen Colbert(looking a weak 5"10' next to Barack)= Click Here Stephen not particularly straight on his legs and looking down while Jimmy's head is looking up.
Jimmy Fallon to me looks hardly a full 5"11' here.
Then Brad hardly a full 5"10' barefoot by this comparisons.
Rising174cm said on 9/Feb/21
@Pierre: Not buying it. I saw Fallon years ago with someone I knew to be 5'11.25"-5'11.5" and he was not shorter. He's standing behind Colbert in that photo. Bruce was at least 5'11". Few people doubt that. A single promo pic that appears to favor Hanks doesn't change that, especially when we have the pic of them at an event.
The reports of Brad wearing lifts for The Big Short may be accurate, then.
@Clif: I didn't say he was 5'10.5", I was just correcting the assertion that he's never looked that short and not always with loose posture. Also, I do believe Leo is only about 5'11" flat. Also, here's full pics from the Berlin premiere you showed: Click Here Click Here Leo is clearly taller even though you can see he has at least a fraction less heel. On the Kimmel show, they were on their way to the LA premiere and Leo was taller there as well: Click Here I've also posted video from the premiere that shows this. And Pitt again had probably 1/4" heel advantage: Click Here Click Here
5'10.75" is highly likely. I can see why some say 5'11", though I doubt it, but 5'11.25" should really be out of the question since the man himself only claimed 5'11" in an interview in which he claimed to be 2 years younger than he is! I suspect he'd have claimed 6' at even a flat 5'11", but over that? He'd be among the most modest, least height aware actors in Hollywood to not claim 6' at 5'11" and change. As for Clooney, I do agree Pitt looked taller with the exception of that Venice photocall where Clooney did have a footwear advantage. However, Pitt is standing closer to the camera in at least a couple of those pics making the difference look even greater and I'd also bet Clooney had shrunk below 5'10.5"(assuming he was that tall) in the most recent of those pics.
@Pierre: Not buying it. I saw Fallon years ago with someone I knew to be 5'11.25"-5'11.5" and he was not shorter. He's standing behind Colbert in that photo. Bruce was at least 5'11". Few people doubt that. A single promo pic that appears to favor Hanks doesn't change that, especially when we have the pic of them at an event.
The reports of Brad wearing lifts for The Big Short may be accurate, then.
@Clif: I didn't say he was 5'10.5", I was just correcting the assertion that he's never looked that short and not always with loose posture. Also, I do believe Leo is only about 5'11" flat. Also, here's full pics from the Berlin premiere you showed: Click Here Click Here Leo is clearly taller even though you can see he has at least a fraction less heel. On the Kimmel show, they were on their way to the LA premiere and Leo was taller there as well: Click Here I've also posted video from the premiere that shows this. And Pitt again had probably 1/4" heel advantage: Click Here Click Here
5'10.75" is highly likely. I can see why some say 5'11", though I doubt it, but 5'11.25" should really be out of the question since the man himself only claimed 5'11" in an interview in which he claimed to be 2 years younger than he is! I suspect he'd have claimed 6' at even a flat 5'11", but over that? He'd be among the most modest, least height aware actors in Hollywood to not claim 6' at 5'11" and change. As for Clooney, I do agree Pitt looked taller with the exception of that Venice photocall where Clooney did have a footwear advantage. However, Pitt is standing closer to the camera in at least a couple of those pics making the difference look even greater and I'd also bet Clooney had shrunk below 5'10.5"(assuming he was that tall) in the most recent of those pics.
Jtm said on 9/Feb/21
He looked really awkward in big short like he was standing on a box or something like that. His tall appearance would look more natural if he was truly over 5’10. By the way still not buying that he’s legitimately taller than Clooney.
He looked really awkward in big short like he was standing on a box or something like that. His tall appearance would look more natural if he was truly over 5’10. By the way still not buying that he’s legitimately taller than Clooney.
viper said on 9/Feb/21
He's gotta be wearing lifts in the Big Short movie.
He physically looks 6-1 or so
He's gotta be wearing lifts in the Big Short movie.
He physically looks 6-1 or so
viper said on 9/Feb/21
He's always been 5-10
He wrote it down on an audition form
He's always been 5-10
He wrote it down on an audition form
Pierre said on 8/Feb/21
@Rising = in the pic bruce stands closer to the camera than Tom Hanks.Then the probability Bruce is a full 5"11' here seems to me slim
@Rising = in the pic bruce stands closer to the camera than Tom Hanks.Then the probability Bruce is a full 5"11' here seems to me slim
Pierre said on 8/Feb/21
Rising174cm said on 6/Feb/21
@Pierre: I have no idea what you're seeing because there's nowhere near 1.5" between Hanks and Willis at the 1999 event. Anything under 5'11" peak for Willis is out of the question. 5'10.5" would have made a guy like 5'9" Don Johnson under 5'8" back in the 90s.
Back to Pitt, remember, he was clearly shorter than 5'11.5" Jimmy Fallon back to back some years ago: tinyurl.com/ff5onqrv 5'10.75" looks believable for Brad there.
but Jimmy Fallon isn't 5"11.5'.To me he wear sometimes advantageous shoes.
here is Stephen Colbert /Barack( probably more a weak 6"1' now let's say he still is a complete 6"1') = Click Here
Now Jimmy Fallon with around same shoes as Stephen (Stephen in relaxed posture) Click Here
Rising174cm said on 6/Feb/21
@Pierre: I have no idea what you're seeing because there's nowhere near 1.5" between Hanks and Willis at the 1999 event. Anything under 5'11" peak for Willis is out of the question. 5'10.5" would have made a guy like 5'9" Don Johnson under 5'8" back in the 90s.
Back to Pitt, remember, he was clearly shorter than 5'11.5" Jimmy Fallon back to back some years ago: tinyurl.com/ff5onqrv 5'10.75" looks believable for Brad there.
but Jimmy Fallon isn't 5"11.5'.To me he wear sometimes advantageous shoes.
here is Stephen Colbert /Barack( probably more a weak 6"1' now let's say he still is a complete 6"1') = Click Here
Now Jimmy Fallon with around same shoes as Stephen (Stephen in relaxed posture) Click Here
Clif booth said on 8/Feb/21
if brad a few times look 5'10"5 with loose posture or bad camera angle that doesn't mean he is only 5'10"5 .leo sometimes struggle to look 5ft11 and I am sure he is above that mark
if brad a few times look 5'10"5 with loose posture or bad camera angle that doesn't mean he is only 5'10"5 .leo sometimes struggle to look 5ft11 and I am sure he is above that mark
Clif booth said on 8/Feb/21
Brad looks taller than clooney in almost every photo I have seen them together. I think 5'10"75 is the lowest range for his peak and 5'11"25 is the highest range .these are photos of him and George Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here
Brad looks taller than clooney in almost every photo I have seen them together. I think 5'10"75 is the lowest range for his peak and 5'11"25 is the highest range .these are photos of him and George Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here
Canson said on 8/Feb/21
@Rising: that’s interesting. Yea I don’t agree with Pierre there either. I could buy somewhere in the 179-180(best case) range or 178-179 (worst case)
@Rising: that’s interesting. Yea I don’t agree with Pierre there either. I could buy somewhere in the 179-180(best case) range or 178-179 (worst case)
Rising174cm said on 8/Feb/21
@CDS: Believe me, I know I'm in the minority lol. But the point of my recent posts has been that I think the photographic evidence people take as lifts aren't actually evidence of lifts. Obviously, he's worn thick heels at times, particularly the good 2" heels in Spy Game, but for the most part, I think he's just worn a bit larger heel than average(1.2"-1.3"). His height has varied from looking about barely 179 cm at times to a solid 182 cm, but with a larger than average heel, that is feasible for a 179-180 cm guy. Then at some of the events he's looked shorter at, Brad was wearing shoes that made him look not quite as tall as Clooney in motorcycle boots at the Venice Film Festival in 2008. In fact, his footwear has varied in public from thin 2 cm shoes to those thick Guidi boots, which add at least 4 cm and his posture is looser at times in recent years.
@CDS: Believe me, I know I'm in the minority lol. But the point of my recent posts has been that I think the photographic evidence people take as lifts aren't actually evidence of lifts. Obviously, he's worn thick heels at times, particularly the good 2" heels in Spy Game, but for the most part, I think he's just worn a bit larger heel than average(1.2"-1.3"). His height has varied from looking about barely 179 cm at times to a solid 182 cm, but with a larger than average heel, that is feasible for a 179-180 cm guy. Then at some of the events he's looked shorter at, Brad was wearing shoes that made him look not quite as tall as Clooney in motorcycle boots at the Venice Film Festival in 2008. In fact, his footwear has varied in public from thin 2 cm shoes to those thick Guidi boots, which add at least 4 cm and his posture is looser at times in recent years.
Slim 6'1" said on 7/Feb/21
Definitely wore lifts to the big short premiere
Definitely wore lifts to the big short premiere
CDS said on 7/Feb/21
"...because I don't believe Brad actually wears lifts,"
@rising: You and I usually agree, but on this we strongly disagree. I think you and sitemaster Rob are in a small minority in fact who don't think brad wears lifts. There has been a massive amount of evidence, just on this site alone , of the pictures of his "enhanced" footwear, not to mention the drastic differences between height comparisons with others at different times (like at one time he'll look barely taller than so and so, and in the next shot, he's half a foot taller! LOL). In fact, I'd say that's pretty obvious why such a wide spread of height guesses (from 5'9" to over 6'!) for him, way more than the average inch or two. With that being said, I will say, in recent times, it does seem like he's either "lightened up on the lifts" lol, or maybe even stopped wearing them altogether? (Could explain the more recent shots of him looking a tad shorter than George Clooney, or about even with Sly Stallone?), perhaps getting up there in age, his doctor warned him against it, or maybe just not the priority it used to be for him. Ftr, I stand by my previous guesses of around 5'10" barefoot (5'11" in shoes)...
"...because I don't believe Brad actually wears lifts,"
@rising: You and I usually agree, but on this we strongly disagree. I think you and sitemaster Rob are in a small minority in fact who don't think brad wears lifts. There has been a massive amount of evidence, just on this site alone , of the pictures of his "enhanced" footwear, not to mention the drastic differences between height comparisons with others at different times (like at one time he'll look barely taller than so and so, and in the next shot, he's half a foot taller! LOL). In fact, I'd say that's pretty obvious why such a wide spread of height guesses (from 5'9" to over 6'!) for him, way more than the average inch or two. With that being said, I will say, in recent times, it does seem like he's either "lightened up on the lifts" lol, or maybe even stopped wearing them altogether? (Could explain the more recent shots of him looking a tad shorter than George Clooney, or about even with Sly Stallone?), perhaps getting up there in age, his doctor warned him against it, or maybe just not the priority it used to be for him. Ftr, I stand by my previous guesses of around 5'10" barefoot (5'11" in shoes)...
Jack Shen said on 6/Feb/21
He’s closer to 5”10’ than 5”11’ nowadays. Decent chance of 5”10’ and a half at 12am am for his peak
He’s closer to 5”10’ than 5”11’ nowadays. Decent chance of 5”10’ and a half at 12am am for his peak
Rising174cm said on 6/Feb/21
@Pierre: I have no idea what you're seeing because there's nowhere near 1.5" between Hanks and Willis at the 1999 event. Anything under 5'11" peak for Willis is out of the question. 5'10.5" would have made a guy like 5'9" Don Johnson under 5'8" back in the 90s.
Back to Pitt, remember, he was clearly shorter than 5'11.5" Jimmy Fallon back to back some years ago: tinyurl.com/ff5onqrv 5'10.75" looks believable for Brad there.
@Pierre: I have no idea what you're seeing because there's nowhere near 1.5" between Hanks and Willis at the 1999 event. Anything under 5'11" peak for Willis is out of the question. 5'10.5" would have made a guy like 5'9" Don Johnson under 5'8" back in the 90s.
Back to Pitt, remember, he was clearly shorter than 5'11.5" Jimmy Fallon back to back some years ago: tinyurl.com/ff5onqrv 5'10.75" looks believable for Brad there.
Genau said on 6/Feb/21
Could he have lost 1/5 inch or so now maybe even 1/4 inch
Editor Rob
Could he have lost 1/5 inch or so now maybe even 1/4 inch
Editor RobPitt i s quite a fit looking guy in his 50s, if he's lost anything it might only be a few mm.
slim 6'1 said on 5/Feb/21
Yeah rising I think Tom hanks was just a solid 182cm
Yeah rising I think Tom hanks was just a solid 182cm
Pierre said on 5/Feb/21
@Rising= Bruce looks clearly not closer to Tom Hanks's height to me.I would say around 5"10.5' next to him(by considering tom hanks full 6"0' peak...)
@Rising= Bruce looks clearly not closer to Tom Hanks's height to me.I would say around 5"10.5' next to him(by considering tom hanks full 6"0' peak...)
Rising174cm said on 4/Feb/21
@Pierre: I think that picture favors Hanks, though Hanks was indeed taller than Willis. Bruce could probably look 5'11" flat with Hanks at the time of that movie, though in this 1999 picture, it's tough to imagine that much difference even if Hanks stands straight: tinyurl.com/lj9f2anm That said Hanks was more likely 182 cm range, imo.
Either way, Bruce was definitely looking 5'11" flat by 2006-2007 if you compare him to 5'9" listed Justin Long and 5'11.75" listed Timothy Olyphant, which is bad news for Clooney, who looked 2 cm shorter in the full pic from that time and a series of pics taken that night.
@Pierre: I think that picture favors Hanks, though Hanks was indeed taller than Willis. Bruce could probably look 5'11" flat with Hanks at the time of that movie, though in this 1999 picture, it's tough to imagine that much difference even if Hanks stands straight: tinyurl.com/lj9f2anm That said Hanks was more likely 182 cm range, imo.
Either way, Bruce was definitely looking 5'11" flat by 2006-2007 if you compare him to 5'9" listed Justin Long and 5'11.75" listed Timothy Olyphant, which is bad news for Clooney, who looked 2 cm shorter in the full pic from that time and a series of pics taken that night.
slim 6'1 said on 1/Feb/21
Good call berta, imho at smallest he’s 179cm and and biggest he’s 181cm
He’s of average height but closer to tall than short
Good call berta, imho at smallest he’s 179cm and and biggest he’s 181cm
He’s of average height but closer to tall than short
Rising174cm said on 1/Feb/21
@berta: I agree to a point, but we can safely rule out 181 cm as his 5'11" claim means that's the absolute most he could be. Also, he has definitely looked under 180 as I showed in my posts on 25/Dec/20, 6/Jan/21, 8/Jan/21 and 27/Jan/21 with DiCaprio, Tarantino, Waltz, Bernthal, Lerman, LaBeouf, Pena and even the 2008 Venice photocall with Clooney showed.
He has also definitely looked under 180 on screen such as Across the Tracks with Rick Schroder where Pitt looked 179 range assuming Schroder is/was as tall as listed, Thelma and Louise where Brad's cowboy boots gave him at least a 3.5 cm advantage over Geena Davis in flats and I'd say Kalifornia with an honest 183 cm David Duchovny.
With that said, because I've seen enough to conclude Brad was taller than George Clooney despite the Venice photocall and Clooney could have been as tall as 5'10.5" himself, imo and because I don't believe Brad actually wears lifts, I'd say 5'10.5" is Brad's minimum, but a bit low for how tall he's looked such as in slippers with Clooney and Damon in socks. And I don't believe the theories that those slippers could give much height. On the other hand, DiCaprio is at least 1/4" taller and Rob has narrowed Leo down to either 5'11" or 5'11.25" and at the very least, Bernthal, whom Rob confirmed isn't over 5'11" in person is no shorter than Brad and from the evidence, likely 1/4" taller. So 5'10.75" fits best and it makes it a bit easier to believe he wouldn't claim 6' while lying about his age.
@berta: I agree to a point, but we can safely rule out 181 cm as his 5'11" claim means that's the absolute most he could be. Also, he has definitely looked under 180 as I showed in my posts on 25/Dec/20, 6/Jan/21, 8/Jan/21 and 27/Jan/21 with DiCaprio, Tarantino, Waltz, Bernthal, Lerman, LaBeouf, Pena and even the 2008 Venice photocall with Clooney showed.
He has also definitely looked under 180 on screen such as Across the Tracks with Rick Schroder where Pitt looked 179 range assuming Schroder is/was as tall as listed, Thelma and Louise where Brad's cowboy boots gave him at least a 3.5 cm advantage over Geena Davis in flats and I'd say Kalifornia with an honest 183 cm David Duchovny.
With that said, because I've seen enough to conclude Brad was taller than George Clooney despite the Venice photocall and Clooney could have been as tall as 5'10.5" himself, imo and because I don't believe Brad actually wears lifts, I'd say 5'10.5" is Brad's minimum, but a bit low for how tall he's looked such as in slippers with Clooney and Damon in socks. And I don't believe the theories that those slippers could give much height. On the other hand, DiCaprio is at least 1/4" taller and Rob has narrowed Leo down to either 5'11" or 5'11.25" and at the very least, Bernthal, whom Rob confirmed isn't over 5'11" in person is no shorter than Brad and from the evidence, likely 1/4" taller. So 5'10.75" fits best and it makes it a bit easier to believe he wouldn't claim 6' while lying about his age.
berta said on 1/Feb/21
i think most poepe underlist brad. i dont agrre with the average 179,4 cm guess. he have never looked under 180 cm. often pulls of 181-182. i dont think he is 182 but i think beetween 180-181.
i think most poepe underlist brad. i dont agrre with the average 179,4 cm guess. he have never looked under 180 cm. often pulls of 181-182. i dont think he is 182 but i think beetween 180-181.
Rising174cm said on 1/Feb/21
@Rob: Yeah, that was my conclusion as well so I don't really think he is a lift wearer. More a guy who wears solid 1.2"-1.3" shoes to premieres and even a bit thicker like those expensive Guidi boots which probably added over 1.6". Of course, nobody can rule out small lifts of 1/2" or even 1/4", which I've seen marketed, but we'll never know that as those are undetectable.
@Rob: Yeah, that was my conclusion as well so I don't really think he is a lift wearer. More a guy who wears solid 1.2"-1.3" shoes to premieres and even a bit thicker like those expensive Guidi boots which probably added over 1.6". Of course, nobody can rule out small lifts of 1/2" or even 1/4", which I've seen marketed, but we'll never know that as those are undetectable.
Rising174cm said on 30/Jan/21
It was reported in tabloids that Brad wore lifts for The Big Short because he was co-starring with two six footers in Ryan Gosling and Christian Bale and I will say that the premiere for that film is one of the times I can most understand people thinking Brad was actual wearing elevator shoes: Click Here Click Here With that said, while those shoes do have the angle around the laces you might expect to see on an elevator shoe, upon viewing more photos from the side, I'm not sure Brad's shoes are as short in length or high in the back as actual elevator shoes would be: Click Here Click Here Click Here
So in that case, my best *guess* would be not elevator shoes, but probably a 3 cm shoe nonetheless. I can also see people thinking Brad wore elevators to this 2007 event: Click Here Click Here Brad also looked comfortably 5'11" range at that event. I've never seen a model of elevator shoe that looked like that, but then Brad does wear very expensive shoes and I think the back would be high enough to accommodate a lift. Similarly, people thought Brad was wearing lifts at this event from the same year: Click Here Click Here At first glance, it could look like it, but upon seeing more pictures, imo, he was merely wearing a solid 1.3" heel: Click Here
However, Brad did look a good 3" taller than Anthony Hopkins in Meet Joe Black. As I've mentioned on his page, Hopkins consistently looked a solid 5'9" to me in his 70s and 80s films and he was 60 in Meet Joe Black. Could he have shrunk from 176 cm to 174 cm by that film? Possible, but then Brad still looked 182 cm in comparison and even today at 80+, Hopkins is still probably 172 cm, imo. Could he have worn elevator shoes or lifts? I'd say possibly: Click Here Click Here Although I'm not sure other shoes he wore in the film looked much less normal than Hopkins: Click Here
Editor Rob
It was reported in tabloids that Brad wore lifts for The Big Short because he was co-starring with two six footers in Ryan Gosling and Christian Bale and I will say that the premiere for that film is one of the times I can most understand people thinking Brad was actual wearing elevator shoes: Click Here Click Here With that said, while those shoes do have the angle around the laces you might expect to see on an elevator shoe, upon viewing more photos from the side, I'm not sure Brad's shoes are as short in length or high in the back as actual elevator shoes would be: Click Here Click Here Click Here
So in that case, my best *guess* would be not elevator shoes, but probably a 3 cm shoe nonetheless. I can also see people thinking Brad wore elevators to this 2007 event: Click Here Click Here Brad also looked comfortably 5'11" range at that event. I've never seen a model of elevator shoe that looked like that, but then Brad does wear very expensive shoes and I think the back would be high enough to accommodate a lift. Similarly, people thought Brad was wearing lifts at this event from the same year: Click Here Click Here At first glance, it could look like it, but upon seeing more pictures, imo, he was merely wearing a solid 1.3" heel: Click Here
However, Brad did look a good 3" taller than Anthony Hopkins in Meet Joe Black. As I've mentioned on his page, Hopkins consistently looked a solid 5'9" to me in his 70s and 80s films and he was 60 in Meet Joe Black. Could he have shrunk from 176 cm to 174 cm by that film? Possible, but then Brad still looked 182 cm in comparison and even today at 80+, Hopkins is still probably 172 cm, imo. Could he have worn elevator shoes or lifts? I'd say possibly: Click Here Click Here Although I'm not sure other shoes he wore in the film looked much less normal than Hopkins: Click Here
Editor Robthey don't look like an elevator shoe to me.
Some shoes though do have better (and thicker) insoles than others.
Some shoes though do have better (and thicker) insoles than others.
Rising174cm said on 28/Jan/21
Nah, Rob was already listing Bruce with a current height of 5'11" flat around that time and Bruce was still noticeably shorter than Arnold, who was around 6'0" by then. There were already quite a few comparisons around that time that showed Bruce wasn't over 5'11" any more such as with Ashton Kutcher.
Nah, Rob was already listing Bruce with a current height of 5'11" flat around that time and Bruce was still noticeably shorter than Arnold, who was around 6'0" by then. There were already quite a few comparisons around that time that showed Bruce wasn't over 5'11" any more such as with Ashton Kutcher.
Clif booth said on 28/Jan/21
I am ok with clooney 5'10"5 . Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here these photos from different evevnts he look the same height with 5'11"25 leo
I am ok with clooney 5'10"5 . Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here these photos from different evevnts he look the same height with 5'11"25 leo
Dmeyer said on 28/Jan/21
Pics of Clooney and willis show that Willis was still 181ish so over 5-11 his shoes look flat 2cm type and Clooney was never full 5-11
Pics of Clooney and willis show that Willis was still 181ish so over 5-11 his shoes look flat 2cm type and Clooney was never full 5-11
Pierre said on 28/Jan/21
Rising174cm said on 27/Jan/21
Clooney was 5'10.5" max, imo. Here he is at age 45 with 5'11" Bruce Willis: Click Here
Now here is a younger Bruce (supposed a bit above 5"11') next to Tom Hanks 6"0' (Bruce a bit closer to the camera so logically a slighty advantage)= Click Here ....
Rising174cm said on 27/Jan/21
Clooney was 5'10.5" max, imo. Here he is at age 45 with 5'11" Bruce Willis: Click Here
Now here is a younger Bruce (supposed a bit above 5"11') next to Tom Hanks 6"0' (Bruce a bit closer to the camera so logically a slighty advantage)= Click Here ....
Rising174cm said on 27/Jan/21
Clooney was 5'10.5" max, imo. Here he is at age 45 with 5'11" Bruce Willis: Click Here Nowadays, Clooney has lost some height. Here he is at age 55 with 5'8" Mark Wahlberg(in Timberlands) Click Here
Pitt is and was taller than Clooney, but it's not clear by how much. In 2008, Clooney could look taller than Pitt, albeit with at least 1 cm more footwear: Click Here Click Here
I think Bloom is closer to 5'10" as well. 5'11"-5'11.25" Leo always has at least an inch on him: Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here and Bloom does not look over 5'10" with 5'7.25" Jerry Bruckheimer: Click Here Click Here
Brad is taller than Bloom as well, but Bloom's constant slouching at that event made the difference look greater than it is. At the red carpet, you could see there wasn't that much difference even accounting for tilt: Click Here
Imo: 5'10.75" for Pitt, 5'10.5" peak and 5'10" current for Clooney and about 5'10", maybe 5'10.25" for Bloom.
Clooney was 5'10.5" max, imo. Here he is at age 45 with 5'11" Bruce Willis: Click Here Nowadays, Clooney has lost some height. Here he is at age 55 with 5'8" Mark Wahlberg(in Timberlands) Click Here
Pitt is and was taller than Clooney, but it's not clear by how much. In 2008, Clooney could look taller than Pitt, albeit with at least 1 cm more footwear: Click Here Click Here
I think Bloom is closer to 5'10" as well. 5'11"-5'11.25" Leo always has at least an inch on him: Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here and Bloom does not look over 5'10" with 5'7.25" Jerry Bruckheimer: Click Here Click Here
Brad is taller than Bloom as well, but Bloom's constant slouching at that event made the difference look greater than it is. At the red carpet, you could see there wasn't that much difference even accounting for tilt: Click Here
Imo: 5'10.75" for Pitt, 5'10.5" peak and 5'10" current for Clooney and about 5'10", maybe 5'10.25" for Bloom.
Pierre said on 27/Jan/21
Clif booth said on 26/Jan/21
Brad Pitt next to henry who is listed 5'10"5 Click Here
Brad Pitt with ornaldo bloom who is listed 5'10"5 Click Here
Brad Pitt with clooney who is listed 5'10"75 Click Here
He always looks 5ft11 peak to me
Then what's going on here ? = Click Here his advantageous hat is hardly higher than Georges's top of hairs and Georges does not stand even straight....
Maybe there is a new adage= when a man wear an advantageous hat his advantageous shoes are stored in the closet....
Clif booth said on 26/Jan/21
Brad Pitt next to henry who is listed 5'10"5 Click Here
Brad Pitt with ornaldo bloom who is listed 5'10"5 Click Here
Brad Pitt with clooney who is listed 5'10"75 Click Here
He always looks 5ft11 peak to me
Then what's going on here ? = Click Here his advantageous hat is hardly higher than Georges's top of hairs and Georges does not stand even straight....
Maybe there is a new adage= when a man wear an advantageous hat his advantageous shoes are stored in the closet....
slim 6'1 said on 26/Jan/21
At the Troy premiere he did seek to wear lifts next to bana and bloom 👍
At the Troy premiere he did seek to wear lifts next to bana and bloom 👍
Clif booth said on 26/Jan/21
Brad Pitt next to henry who is listed 5'10"5 Click Here
Brad Pitt with ornaldo bloom who is listed 5'10"5 Click Here
Brad Pitt with clooney who is listed 5'10"75 Click Here
He always looks 5ft11 peak to me
Brad Pitt next to henry who is listed 5'10"5 Click Here
Brad Pitt with ornaldo bloom who is listed 5'10"5 Click Here
Brad Pitt with clooney who is listed 5'10"75 Click Here
He always looks 5ft11 peak to me
slim 6'1 said on 25/Jan/21
Here he holds his own against Michael rapaport:
bit.ly/2M3Iqxc
Here he holds his own against Michael rapaport:
bit.ly/2M3Iqxc
Rising174cm said on 25/Jan/21
@Slim: There will never be any offense taken over a disagreement on height, that would be silly. With that said, I don't really have to wonder as I've already seen them standing together at those two events, including video which is most reliable. At the other event where there wasn't video, Pitt looked 5'10.5" at best with other cast members. At best, they'd be the same height since we know for sure Pitt wasn't over 5'11" having admitted to being that height.
And really, that claim suggests not quite 5'11" since Brad shaved two years off his age in the same interview. Ask 6'0" Geena Davis. They had her in flats with a young Brad in cowboy boots meaning at 5'11", he should have been about half an inch taller. I don't agree that he looked 5'9" with Rapaport, but he did look 5'10" range. Same thing with an honest 6'0" David Duchovny(Pitt's character was described at 5'11" in the film) and maybe 5'10.5" with Rick Schroder. And I say this as someone who is not sold on Brad being a lift wearer. Early 90s, I'd say 5'10.5", but I could buy more 5'10.75" with Leo, Bernthal and Clooney.
@Slim: There will never be any offense taken over a disagreement on height, that would be silly. With that said, I don't really have to wonder as I've already seen them standing together at those two events, including video which is most reliable. At the other event where there wasn't video, Pitt looked 5'10.5" at best with other cast members. At best, they'd be the same height since we know for sure Pitt wasn't over 5'11" having admitted to being that height.
And really, that claim suggests not quite 5'11" since Brad shaved two years off his age in the same interview. Ask 6'0" Geena Davis. They had her in flats with a young Brad in cowboy boots meaning at 5'11", he should have been about half an inch taller. I don't agree that he looked 5'9" with Rapaport, but he did look 5'10" range. Same thing with an honest 6'0" David Duchovny(Pitt's character was described at 5'11" in the film) and maybe 5'10.5" with Rick Schroder. And I say this as someone who is not sold on Brad being a lift wearer. Early 90s, I'd say 5'10.5", but I could buy more 5'10.75" with Leo, Bernthal and Clooney.
slim 6'1 said on 25/Jan/21
He’s not very good looking but yeah he does have good proportions that make him look solid tall, he does have a torso of that of a 6’ or even a 6’1” guy. I wouldn’t argue any less than 179cm for Pitt
Very similar height wise to Leo
He’s not very good looking but yeah he does have good proportions that make him look solid tall, he does have a torso of that of a 6’ or even a 6’1” guy. I wouldn’t argue any less than 179cm for Pitt
Very similar height wise to Leo
Blackened said on 24/Jan/21
Five inches shorter than Michael Rapaport. 5-9.
Five inches shorter than Michael Rapaport. 5-9.
Original said on 24/Jan/21
....."Arch agree to disagree, he pulls of anywhere between 177-183cm"
Pretty much agree, he loooks so unconfortable to reach 183cm tho (Troy event etc) and 177 can be just bad pictures (like in Venice and some other) too.
I think he/was is 178cms that often uses a extra inch in his shoes to reach 5'11. He is not especial shorter or tallish, just average white guy with good proportions that makes him look taller.
5'10 or 178cms.
....."Arch agree to disagree, he pulls of anywhere between 177-183cm"
Pretty much agree, he loooks so unconfortable to reach 183cm tho (Troy event etc) and 177 can be just bad pictures (like in Venice and some other) too.
I think he/was is 178cms that often uses a extra inch in his shoes to reach 5'11. He is not especial shorter or tallish, just average white guy with good proportions that makes him look taller.
5'10 or 178cms.
slim 6'1 said on 23/Jan/21
No hard feelings @Rising174 but I agree with honest5’11”, Pitt would edge bernthal not the other way around
No hard feelings @Rising174 but I agree with honest5’11”, Pitt would edge bernthal not the other way around
Tunman said on 23/Jan/21
Maybe a hair under 5'11 is perfect,in Thelma and Louise he could look up to a solid 3cm smaller than Geena Davis
Maybe a hair under 5'11 is perfect,in Thelma and Louise he could look up to a solid 3cm smaller than Geena Davis
Kylo said on 22/Jan/21
Rob, let’s say a 5’11 at night guy like Brad is 5’11 3/4 when he wakes up, if he claimed 6’0 would you consider him to be dishonest about his height?
Editor Rob
Rob, let’s say a 5’11 at night guy like Brad is 5’11 3/4 when he wakes up, if he claimed 6’0 would you consider him to be dishonest about his height?
Editor Robif he said 'in shoes' I'd say that was fair...but if he meant barefoot, I would say that's typical in acting terms - many 5ft 11 will be tempted to put down 6ft or claim it.
ChaosControl 6'2 1/2 said on 22/Jan/21
I remember watching Star Wars for the first time but I doesn’t mean I believe the events portrayed in the films to be true. The same with Pierre’s guesses, I read them but don’t believe they’re accurate
I remember watching Star Wars for the first time but I doesn’t mean I believe the events portrayed in the films to be true. The same with Pierre’s guesses, I read them but don’t believe they’re accurate
Rising174cm said on 21/Jan/21
@Honest5'11": Except it was Bernthal who edged Pitt at 2 separate events in full pics and video so it really us the other way around. At best, they'd be the same height, but Pitt tends to have more advantageous posture and footwear while Bernthal can slouch so really, Bernthal at about 5'11" and Pitt maybe 5'10.75". He is definitely taller than Clooney, though, especially now.
@Honest5'11": Except it was Bernthal who edged Pitt at 2 separate events in full pics and video so it really us the other way around. At best, they'd be the same height, but Pitt tends to have more advantageous posture and footwear while Bernthal can slouch so really, Bernthal at about 5'11" and Pitt maybe 5'10.75". He is definitely taller than Clooney, though, especially now.
MJKoP said on 21/Jan/21
ChaosControl 6'2 1/2 said on 19/Jan/21
@Pierre remembering something doesn’t make it real. I remember the first time I watched a Star Wars film. Doesn’t make Star Wars real
No offense, but that has to be the most nonsensical analogy I've ever heard. If you remembered Star Wars as being historical events that you actually lived through as opposed to merely being a sci-fi flick...then yeah, remembering something wouldn't necessarily make it real.
You remembered Star Wars as a movie because Star Wars IS a movie.
ChaosControl 6'2 1/2 said on 19/Jan/21
@Pierre remembering something doesn’t make it real. I remember the first time I watched a Star Wars film. Doesn’t make Star Wars real
No offense, but that has to be the most nonsensical analogy I've ever heard. If you remembered Star Wars as being historical events that you actually lived through as opposed to merely being a sci-fi flick...then yeah, remembering something wouldn't necessarily make it real.
You remembered Star Wars as a movie because Star Wars IS a movie.
ChaosControl 6'2 1/2 said on 20/Jan/21
@Pierre I remembered it cause New Hope is a good movie I watched as a kid. Stop trying to gaslight me into an existential crisis
@Pierre I remembered it cause New Hope is a good movie I watched as a kid. Stop trying to gaslight me into an existential crisis
Pierre said on 20/Jan/21
ChaosControl 6'2 1/2 said on 19/Jan/21
@Pierre remembering something doesn’t make it real. I remember the first time I watched a Star Wars film. Doesn’t make Star Wars real
But science fiction movies are made to understand the reality of life....Then if you remember this movie there is a reason....
ChaosControl 6'2 1/2 said on 19/Jan/21
@Pierre remembering something doesn’t make it real. I remember the first time I watched a Star Wars film. Doesn’t make Star Wars real
But science fiction movies are made to understand the reality of life....Then if you remember this movie there is a reason....
ChaosControl 6'2 1/2 said on 19/Jan/21
@Pierre remembering something doesn’t make it real. I remember the first time I watched a Star Wars film. Doesn’t make Star Wars real
@Pierre remembering something doesn’t make it real. I remember the first time I watched a Star Wars film. Doesn’t make Star Wars real
slim 6'1 said on 18/Jan/21
He’ll definitely edge out Clooney
He’ll definitely edge out Clooney
Pierre said on 18/Jan/21
Vincent Caleb said on 14/Jan/21
@Pierre:
Me and Chaos were just joking around with each other and pointing out little spelling errors lol. I think we are both using using phones, so there are going to be a couple accidental errors. Just a joke mate.
...
Vincent Caleb said on 14/Jan/21
@Pierre:
Me and Chaos were just joking around with each other and pointing out little spelling errors lol. I think we are both using using phones, so there are going to be a couple accidental errors. Just a joke mate.
...
Pierre said on 17/Jan/21
ChaosControl 6'2.5 said on 14/Jan/21
@Pierre sorry I forgot the massive glowing satire tag you so desperately need
Oh interesting...It's been a while since I've used it...Then this means you regularly read my comments and also keep them in memory....Then maybe my arguments/guesses are not so far from reality...
ChaosControl 6'2.5 said on 14/Jan/21
@Pierre sorry I forgot the massive glowing satire tag you so desperately need
Oh interesting...It's been a while since I've used it...Then this means you regularly read my comments and also keep them in memory....Then maybe my arguments/guesses are not so far from reality...
slim 6'1 said on 17/Jan/21
I’ve got a gut feeling Pitt and Beckham will visit Australia in the foreseeable future,
I’ve got a gut feeling Pitt and Beckham will visit Australia in the foreseeable future,
slim 6'1 said on 17/Jan/21
Arch agree to disagree, he pulls of anywhere between 177-183cm
Arch agree to disagree, he pulls of anywhere between 177-183cm
CDS said on 16/Jan/21
Arch Stanton said on 15/Jan/21
Pitt's height truly is an enigma, he has looked anything from 5'9.5 to 6'1 over the years!!
Exactly! And anyone with that much of a guessed height spread -- further proof of lifts, AND that the lower guesses are probably closer to the reality. Hmmm.... Pierre's guesses suddenly don't seem so ridiculous now do they??😁
Arch Stanton said on 15/Jan/21
Pitt's height truly is an enigma, he has looked anything from 5'9.5 to 6'1 over the years!!
Exactly! And anyone with that much of a guessed height spread -- further proof of lifts, AND that the lower guesses are probably closer to the reality. Hmmm.... Pierre's guesses suddenly don't seem so ridiculous now do they??😁
Arch Stanton said on 15/Jan/21
Pitt's height truly is an enigma, he has looked anything from 5'9.5 to 6'1 over the years!!
Pitt's height truly is an enigma, he has looked anything from 5'9.5 to 6'1 over the years!!
Vincent Caleb said on 14/Jan/21
@Pierre:
Me and Chaos were just joking around with each other and pointing out little spelling errors lol. I think we are both using using phones, so there are going to be a couple accidental errors. Just a joke mate.
@Pierre:
Me and Chaos were just joking around with each other and pointing out little spelling errors lol. I think we are both using using phones, so there are going to be a couple accidental errors. Just a joke mate.
Honest5'11" said on 14/Jan/21
Pitt would edge Bernthal by a cm I feel. In the movie Accountant Bernthal looked near 4 inches shorter than Ben Affleck, Pitt would've looked at least slightly taller.
Pitt would edge Bernthal by a cm I feel. In the movie Accountant Bernthal looked near 4 inches shorter than Ben Affleck, Pitt would've looked at least slightly taller.
ChaosControl 6'2.5 said on 14/Jan/21
@Pierre sorry I forgot the massive glowing satire tag you so desperately need
@Pierre sorry I forgot the massive glowing satire tag you so desperately need
Pierre said on 13/Jan/21
Vincent Caleb said on 12/Jan/21
ChaosControl 6'2.5 said on 12/Jan/21
@Vincent who is Choas Control? Is he a friend of Peirre?
I don’t know, but who is Peirre? Is he a friend of Canson? I could have sworn his name was Pierre with the I before the E...
lol
Well...this is a very interesting comment....If this guys are talking about me this is imo the proof my guesses does not leave them indifferent and bother them...😎
Again max 5"9.5' for me
Vincent Caleb said on 12/Jan/21
ChaosControl 6'2.5 said on 12/Jan/21
@Vincent who is Choas Control? Is he a friend of Peirre?
I don’t know, but who is Peirre? Is he a friend of Canson? I could have sworn his name was Pierre with the I before the E...
lol
Well...this is a very interesting comment....If this guys are talking about me this is imo the proof my guesses does not leave them indifferent and bother them...😎
Again max 5"9.5' for me
Canson said on 13/Jan/21
Vincent Caleb said on 12/Jan/21
ChaosControl 6'2.5 said on 12/Jan/21
@Vincent who is Choas Control? Is he a friend of Peirre?
I don’t know, but who is Peirre? Is he a friend of Canson? I could have sworn his name was Pierre with the I before the E...
lol
😂 🤣 🤣 🤣
Vincent Caleb said on 12/Jan/21
ChaosControl 6'2.5 said on 12/Jan/21
@Vincent who is Choas Control? Is he a friend of Peirre?
I don’t know, but who is Peirre? Is he a friend of Canson? I could have sworn his name was Pierre with the I before the E...
lol
😂 🤣 🤣 🤣
ChaosControl 6'2.5 said on 13/Jan/21
@Voncent (sorry, meant Vincent) just spell my name right and I won’t joke about it
@Voncent (sorry, meant Vincent) just spell my name right and I won’t joke about it
Mikester said on 13/Jan/21
maybe 5ft10.75 is accurate for bradlio.
maybe 5ft10.75 is accurate for bradlio.
Vincent Caleb said on 12/Jan/21
ChaosControl 6'2.5 said on 12/Jan/21
@Vincent who is Choas Control? Is he a friend of Peirre?
I don’t know, but who is Peirre? Is he a friend of Canson? I could have sworn his name was Pierre with the I before the E...
lol
ChaosControl 6'2.5 said on 12/Jan/21
@Vincent who is Choas Control? Is he a friend of Peirre?
I don’t know, but who is Peirre? Is he a friend of Canson? I could have sworn his name was Pierre with the I before the E...
lol
Canson said on 12/Jan/21
@Pierre: there’s no way Pitt is only 5’9.5”. Even I don’t always see 5’11” with him (rarely do I) but I’ve seen enough to rule out anything outside of 5’10-5’11 range. He’s probably similar in height with Allen Iverson who I have at 5’10.5”
@Pierre: there’s no way Pitt is only 5’9.5”. Even I don’t always see 5’11” with him (rarely do I) but I’ve seen enough to rule out anything outside of 5’10-5’11 range. He’s probably similar in height with Allen Iverson who I have at 5’10.5”
Pierre said on 12/Jan/21
Click Here Ahahah = some internauts here who call the 5"9' range guessers "trolls" apparently don't know the gain with magic shoes!
Click Here hum.... let's see =what are the shoes that could give the most height gain here?....
Click Here Ahahah = some internauts here who call the 5"9' range guessers "trolls" apparently don't know the gain with magic shoes!
Click Here hum.... let's see =what are the shoes that could give the most height gain here?....
Jtm said on 12/Jan/21
I usually disagree with Pierre and his reasons but he’s spot on about Pitt.
I usually disagree with Pierre and his reasons but he’s spot on about Pitt.
ChaosControl 6'2.5 said on 12/Jan/21
@Vincent who is Choas Control? Is he a friend of Peirre?
@Vincent who is Choas Control? Is he a friend of Peirre?
Clif booth said on 12/Jan/21
@rising :Anthoer photo brad look taller than john berthnal Click Here
Editor Rob
@rising :Anthoer photo brad look taller than john berthnal Click Here
Editor Roba tricky surface to deduce height differences.
Vincent Caleb said on 11/Jan/21
@Choas Control: he has Charlie Hunnam at max 5’11” yet Charlie met Rob and looked really close to the full 6’0”. When I challenged him on it he said that Charlie had to have a huge footwear advantage, despite Rob stating that he in fact had more footwear than Charlie. That is his argument whenever someone looks taller than his guess. Lifts. That, or that they have a camera advantage, while he is infamous for posting pictures with bad angles. Clearly the truth is not something he is searching for.
@Choas Control: he has Charlie Hunnam at max 5’11” yet Charlie met Rob and looked really close to the full 6’0”. When I challenged him on it he said that Charlie had to have a huge footwear advantage, despite Rob stating that he in fact had more footwear than Charlie. That is his argument whenever someone looks taller than his guess. Lifts. That, or that they have a camera advantage, while he is infamous for posting pictures with bad angles. Clearly the truth is not something he is searching for.
Pierre said on 11/Jan/21
slim 6'1 said on 11/Jan/21
Chaos control, don’t feed the trolls
@slim 6"1' ...
slim 6'1 said on 11/Jan/21
Chaos control, don’t feed the trolls
@slim 6"1' ...
ChaosControl 6'2.5 said on 11/Jan/21
Slim I’m not feeding the trolls, unless you count giving them a taste of their own medicine. I do enjoy winding up the trolls
Slim I’m not feeding the trolls, unless you count giving them a taste of their own medicine. I do enjoy winding up the trolls
Clif booth said on 11/Jan/21
@rising cm :believe me it's hard to know who is taller between brad and john berthnal because they aren't standing next to each other and the difference between them is so small.maybe they are the same height which I highly recommend . even if brad is 5'10"75 you wouldn't notice any difference especially when they far from each other. anthor photo brad look taller Click Here
@rising cm :believe me it's hard to know who is taller between brad and john berthnal because they aren't standing next to each other and the difference between them is so small.maybe they are the same height which I highly recommend . even if brad is 5'10"75 you wouldn't notice any difference especially when they far from each other. anthor photo brad look taller Click Here
Clif booth said on 10/Jan/21
Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here brad with leo he looks 5ft11 there
Click Here with clooney there he also looks 5ft11-25
Click Here Click Here he looks1-1.5cm taller than bloom there ,both in the same boots . Ithink 5'10"5 seems very hard to believe ,5ft11 is very good listing
Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here brad with leo he looks 5ft11 there
Click Here with clooney there he also looks 5ft11-25
Click Here Click Here he looks1-1.5cm taller than bloom there ,both in the same boots . Ithink 5'10"5 seems very hard to believe ,5ft11 is very good listing
Rising174cm said on 10/Jan/21
No way Pitt would edge Bernthal after looking shorter than him in full photos from 2 events and even video from one. I can buy Bernthal at 5'11" and Pitt at 5'10.75". Pitt generally has excellent posture and slightly thick footwear while Bernthal can have loose posture.
No way Pitt would edge Bernthal after looking shorter than him in full photos from 2 events and even video from one. I can buy Bernthal at 5'11" and Pitt at 5'10.75". Pitt generally has excellent posture and slightly thick footwear while Bernthal can have loose posture.
Heights are barefeet estimates, derived from quotations, official websites, agency resumes, in person encounters with actors at conventions and pictures/films.
Other vital statistics like weight or shoe size measurements have been sourced from newspapers, books, resumes or social media.
Celebrity Fan Photos and Agency Pictures of stars are © to their respective owners.