Brett Dalton's Height
6ft 2 (188 cm)
American actor best known for playing Grant Ward on TV series Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. On Twitter he once mentioned his height, saying "I'm 6'2". In this photo I had 1/3rd inch more sneaker.
5ft 8 Rob and Brett @ Starfury Ultimates, 2017
You May Be Interested
Clark Gregg
5ft 8 ½ (174 cm)
5ft 8 ½ (174 cm)
Iain De Caestecker
5ft 7 ¼ (171 cm)
5ft 7 ¼ (171 cm)
Henry Simmons
6ft 4 (193 cm)
6ft 4 (193 cm)
Chloe Bennet
5ft 5 ½ (166 cm)
5ft 5 ½ (166 cm)
Add a Comment183 comments
Average Guess (109 Votes)
6ft 1.48in (186.6cm)
6ft 1.48in (186.6cm)
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 28/Apr/23
6ft is a joke...could fall a fraction shy of 6ft2 though
6ft is a joke...could fall a fraction shy of 6ft2 though
184guy2 said on 15/Apr/23
6-0 ... maybe 6-0.5
6-2 hilarious
6-0 ... maybe 6-0.5
6-2 hilarious
5'7 and a fraction said on 29/Jan/23
Just shy of 6'2. Average guess is a bit low though.
Just shy of 6'2. Average guess is a bit low though.
Mr. Bergstein said on 23/Nov/22
A bit below 6ft 2.
A bit below 6ft 2.
Darksol64 said on 21/Sep/22
6'2 is fair to claim but I'm betting he would actually measure around 187 before bed.
It's too bad Rob can't bring his stadio to the conventions then we could know for sure!
6'2 is fair to claim but I'm betting he would actually measure around 187 before bed.
It's too bad Rob can't bring his stadio to the conventions then we could know for sure!
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 27/Apr/22
6ft is ridiculous....this guy is easily around 6ft2, worst case a fraction under
6ft is ridiculous....this guy is easily around 6ft2, worst case a fraction under
Vick Jane Moretti said on 21/Jan/22
Jesus!Brett is 4 inches (top) higher than Rob.
"Pure" 6 feet.
Jesus!Brett is 4 inches (top) higher than Rob.
"Pure" 6 feet.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 8/Oct/21
Average guess is off slightly. Don't think under 187cm
Average guess is off slightly. Don't think under 187cm
Philip550 said on 4/Sep/21
@David Tang
You really need to repeat physics lessons.
@David Tang
You really need to repeat physics lessons.
Elene said on 10/Aug/21
I see 6’1.5 like the average guess
I see 6’1.5 like the average guess
David Tang said on 13/Jul/21
also rob, even of the cameras taller, that wouldn't change anything with him. camera height doesn't really change differences between people.
also rob, even of the cameras taller, that wouldn't change anything with him. camera height doesn't really change differences between people.
David Tang said on 13/Jul/21
"Less sneaker for a start, and in photos you can exaggerate/reduce difference with camera height. For once, this is a camera that is as tall as the top of my head.
If you photographed from a 5ft 4 person's perspective I'm sure he'd have looked taller." rob what do you mean by that. do you eman that if your taller, he won't look as tall with the camera?. also he can't be more than 6'1 in the photo. he isn't even half a head taller than you, or just barely ahlf a head. he's go to be no more than 6'1. or maybe is it just cause your closer to the camera. either way i think 6'1.75 is a better listing. he doesn't even look 6 inches taller than you.
"Less sneaker for a start, and in photos you can exaggerate/reduce difference with camera height. For once, this is a camera that is as tall as the top of my head.
If you photographed from a 5ft 4 person's perspective I'm sure he'd have looked taller." rob what do you mean by that. do you eman that if your taller, he won't look as tall with the camera?. also he can't be more than 6'1 in the photo. he isn't even half a head taller than you, or just barely ahlf a head. he's go to be no more than 6'1. or maybe is it just cause your closer to the camera. either way i think 6'1.75 is a better listing. he doesn't even look 6 inches taller than you.
David Tang said on 13/Jul/21
"Less sneaker for a start, and in photos you can exaggerate/reduce difference with camera height. For once, this is a camera that is as tall as the top of my head.
If you photographed from a 5ft 4 person's perspective I'm sure he'd have looked taller." rob what do you mean by that. do you eman that if your taller, he won't look as tall with the camera?. also he can't be more than 6'1 in the photo. he isn't even half a head taller than you, or just barely ahlf a head. he's go to be no more than 6'1. or maybe is it just cause your closer to the camera. either way i think 6'1.75 is a better listing. he doesn't even look 6 inches taller than you.
"Less sneaker for a start, and in photos you can exaggerate/reduce difference with camera height. For once, this is a camera that is as tall as the top of my head.
If you photographed from a 5ft 4 person's perspective I'm sure he'd have looked taller." rob what do you mean by that. do you eman that if your taller, he won't look as tall with the camera?. also he can't be more than 6'1 in the photo. he isn't even half a head taller than you, or just barely ahlf a head. he's go to be no more than 6'1. or maybe is it just cause your closer to the camera. either way i think 6'1.75 is a better listing. he doesn't even look 6 inches taller than you.
David Tang said on 13/Jul/21
"Less sneaker for a start, and in photos you can exaggerate/reduce difference with camera height. For once, this is a camera that is as tall as the top of my head.
If you photographed from a 5ft 4 person's perspective I'm sure he'd have looked taller." rob what do you mean by that. do you eman that if your taller, he won't look as tall with the camera?. also he can't be more than 6'1 in the photo. he isn't even half a head taller than you, or just barely ahlf a head. he's go to be no more than 6'1.
"Less sneaker for a start, and in photos you can exaggerate/reduce difference with camera height. For once, this is a camera that is as tall as the top of my head.
If you photographed from a 5ft 4 person's perspective I'm sure he'd have looked taller." rob what do you mean by that. do you eman that if your taller, he won't look as tall with the camera?. also he can't be more than 6'1 in the photo. he isn't even half a head taller than you, or just barely ahlf a head. he's go to be no more than 6'1.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 6/May/21
Editor Rob: On Arrow the lowest I would argue is 6ft 2.75.
He looked taller than David Ramsey on the the show and in person too...David is a solid enough 6ft 2 guy, I doubt he falls under it really.
Forgot about David Ramsay! he would most probably edge out Brett aswell based on how he looks next to you...it could be a case of him being a fraction over 6ft2 and Brett a fraction under.
Editor Rob
Editor Rob: On Arrow the lowest I would argue is 6ft 2.75.
He looked taller than David Ramsey on the the show and in person too...David is a solid enough 6ft 2 guy, I doubt he falls under it really.
Forgot about David Ramsay! he would most probably edge out Brett aswell based on how he looks next to you...it could be a case of him being a fraction over 6ft2 and Brett a fraction under.
Editor Rob6ft 2-2.25 for David and 6ft 1.75-2 for Brett are arguable range they could measure.
OriginalAnon said on 30/Apr/21
Looks 186cm, not over.
Looks 186cm, not over.
Dmeyer said on 2/Feb/21
Looks 184cm in the pic
Looks 184cm in the pic
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 12/Dec/20
Yeah Rob, that could be possible especially if Blackthorne is a little under 6ft3 which has been argued for a few years now
I think generally Brett does look around 6ft2 though. I’d be hesitant to give him 6ft1½. He can probably clear that at least...
Editor Rob
Yeah Rob, that could be possible especially if Blackthorne is a little under 6ft3 which has been argued for a few years now
I think generally Brett does look around 6ft2 though. I’d be hesitant to give him 6ft1½. He can probably clear that at least...
Editor RobOn Arrow the lowest I would argue is 6ft 2.75.
He looked taller than David Ramsey on the the show and in person too...David is a solid enough 6ft 2 guy, I doubt he falls under it really.
He looked taller than David Ramsey on the the show and in person too...David is a solid enough 6ft 2 guy, I doubt he falls under it really.
Lomax said on 11/Dec/20
That’s the height difference between me and my mom and I’m not 6’2
That’s the height difference between me and my mom and I’m not 6’2
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 10/Oct/20
No, this guy is definitely closer to 6ft2 than 6ft1...forget 6ft
A fraction below it at worst though Rob?
Editor Rob
No, this guy is definitely closer to 6ft2 than 6ft1...forget 6ft
A fraction below it at worst though Rob?
Editor Rob6ft 1.5 would be absolute lowest I'd attempt to argue, but 6ft 1.75 is a figure he might measure, beside Paul Blackthorne he could look a weaker 6ft 2 range.
leox said on 22/Sep/20
183 barefoot nightheight - typical american celebrity height reporting - add by 2 inches. if he is 184 cm or 185 cm he would claim 189-190 cm
183 barefoot nightheight - typical american celebrity height reporting - add by 2 inches. if he is 184 cm or 185 cm he would claim 189-190 cm
Christian 6'5 3/8" said on 20/Sep/20
Average Guess of 6'1.49" isn't impossible, but absolutely no less.
Average Guess of 6'1.49" isn't impossible, but absolutely no less.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 19/Sep/20
6ft2 is still fair for him
6ft2 is still fair for him
Nik Ashton said on 14/Sep/20
@ Junior - I agree, particularly as Rob has more sneak!
@ Junior - I agree, particularly as Rob has more sneak!
Carlos Santana said on 13/Sep/20
Why does he look like 6'1 in this photo?
Editor Rob
Why does he look like 6'1 in this photo?
Editor RobLess sneaker for a start, and in photos you can exaggerate/reduce difference with camera height. For once, this is a camera that is as tall as the top of my head.
If you photographed from a 5ft 4 person's perspective I'm sure he'd have looked taller.
If you photographed from a 5ft 4 person's perspective I'm sure he'd have looked taller.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 12/Jul/20
He gives a shorter impression than Gatiss...
He gives a shorter impression than Gatiss...
Chris Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 25/May/20
@TheBat Agree he can look pretty much a decent 6'2 guy with others but also look more like a fraction below 6'2.
@TheBat Agree he can look pretty much a decent 6'2 guy with others but also look more like a fraction below 6'2.
TheBat said on 22/Nov/19
@Yang
He's always been 6'2" he's taller than every 6'1" range guy he's with. If you think he's below 6'1 7/8" you need your eyes checked.
@Yang
He's always been 6'2" he's taller than every 6'1" range guy he's with. If you think he's below 6'1 7/8" you need your eyes checked.
Yang (5 footer 8, 172-173) said on 26/Sep/19
I've met him in Boston Comic Con back in 2015 and got his autograph like in the pic above, had really awesome conversation with him for about 10 min or so if I can remember it correctly, he first insisted on taking selfie pose with me as well just like Will Smith.... when he stood next to me to put his hands and arms on my shoulder for selfie, he was about 6 ft 1 quarter range as I stood below his eye levels... cool and funny and nicest male celebs I've met so far other than Will Smith, Zac Efron and Tom Felton etc...!!! Nice dude for sure....
I've met him in Boston Comic Con back in 2015 and got his autograph like in the pic above, had really awesome conversation with him for about 10 min or so if I can remember it correctly, he first insisted on taking selfie pose with me as well just like Will Smith.... when he stood next to me to put his hands and arms on my shoulder for selfie, he was about 6 ft 1 quarter range as I stood below his eye levels... cool and funny and nicest male celebs I've met so far other than Will Smith, Zac Efron and Tom Felton etc...!!! Nice dude for sure....
Importer said on 7/Jul/19
1/8 downgrade? Not necessary.
1/8 downgrade? Not necessary.
Nik said on 17/Jun/19
The average vote (6'1.49" after 68 votes!) is too low!
The average vote (6'1.49" after 68 votes!) is too low!
khaled taban said on 14/Jun/19
This guy is 187cm, not too far from the listing above.
This guy is 187cm, not too far from the listing above.
TheBat said on 13/Jun/19
@Importer
Agreed. He also looks 6'2" next to Clark Gregg and Luke Mitchell in real life.
@Importer
Agreed. He also looks 6'2" next to Clark Gregg and Luke Mitchell in real life.
Importer said on 12/May/19
He always looked 6'2 on AoS. A better photo perhaps would effect the average guess votes.
He always looked 6'2 on AoS. A better photo perhaps would effect the average guess votes.
Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 24/Apr/19
Rob, which lowest would you choose for Brett?
A. 186.5cm
B. 187cm
C. 187.5cm
Editor Rob
Rob, which lowest would you choose for Brett?
A. 186.5cm
B. 187cm
C. 187.5cm
Editor RobBigger chance of C than B I feel....but you can still be surprised when measuring somebody.
Bobby said on 28/Nov/18
It looks a 5-inch difference to me, not 6 inches. His eye level is also 5'8, which puts him around 6'1 or 184cm. So, this is a weird one. Was he dropping posture or something?
Editor Rob
It looks a 5-inch difference to me, not 6 inches. His eye level is also 5'8, which puts him around 6'1 or 184cm. So, this is a weird one. Was he dropping posture or something?
Editor RobHe was standing good, the camera is high up so it's not doing what it usually does to a smaller person (making them look shorter).
TheBat said on 22/Nov/18
With Clark Gregg and other Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. cast members. Brett is 6'2" throughout the day.
Click Here
With Clark Gregg and other Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. cast members. Brett is 6'2" throughout the day.
Click Here
berta said on 10/Nov/18
Could he be 187 guy rob? IN a video with mark pallegrino he looked atleast 1 inch shorter than pallegrino. Really strange video.
Editor Rob
Could he be 187 guy rob? IN a video with mark pallegrino he looked atleast 1 inch shorter than pallegrino. Really strange video.
Editor RobI cannot for the life of me see Brett smaller than Mark in person, but I do know that Brett's posture is all over the place with people. 187 is the lowest I'd have thought.
Andrea said on 29/Oct/18
Zampo, while it is true that Brett is standing slightly behind Rob, if you take a look at the older comments, you can see that the same Rob said that they're standing within an inch of each other and that he'd need to stand over 4 inches closer to gain any camera advantage (if the camera is below 5'8, as in this case), so I doubt that carries any weight.
That being said, without considering any footwear advantage, I wouldn't say he looks any taller than 184 here, so barely 185 once you take it into account. But again, Rob swears he looked very near 6'2, all things considered, so I'm going to take his word for it, especially since I haven't seen that much of him and I don't know how tall he generally looks...
Zampo, while it is true that Brett is standing slightly behind Rob, if you take a look at the older comments, you can see that the same Rob said that they're standing within an inch of each other and that he'd need to stand over 4 inches closer to gain any camera advantage (if the camera is below 5'8, as in this case), so I doubt that carries any weight.
That being said, without considering any footwear advantage, I wouldn't say he looks any taller than 184 here, so barely 185 once you take it into account. But again, Rob swears he looked very near 6'2, all things considered, so I'm going to take his word for it, especially since I haven't seen that much of him and I don't know how tall he generally looks...
Sakz said on 29/Oct/18
@Zampo Going by the picture and mugshot lines alone he looks a similar height to me (around 6'0.5-75 at a low). However, taking Robs footwear advantage into account and the fact that Brett may not be standing as tall as he can, I can see him creeping over 6'1 if measured. 6'2 does seem high but we have to remember Robs seen him in person so there's a chance he could measure close to it. Sometimes what we see in pictures isn't always reflective of how tall someone may look in person.
@Zampo Going by the picture and mugshot lines alone he looks a similar height to me (around 6'0.5-75 at a low). However, taking Robs footwear advantage into account and the fact that Brett may not be standing as tall as he can, I can see him creeping over 6'1 if measured. 6'2 does seem high but we have to remember Robs seen him in person so there's a chance he could measure close to it. Sometimes what we see in pictures isn't always reflective of how tall someone may look in person.
Zampo said on 26/Oct/18
I think if one was to base their estimate on this photo. Taking all into consideration, he is struggling to look over 6'1.25 (186 cm).
I would need to see more of him with other people. If He is generally looking near 6'2 then I doubt he is below 187 cm.
@Rampage(-_-_-)Clover:
Junior may be right. A 6'1.5-6'1 5/8 at a low measured person will be looking 6'1 3/4. I reckon a good proportion of 3/4 listings on this site are those who would measure in the 1/2-5/8 range (in fact potentially a majority). Aside from those in the 5'8 range where I think those listings, most likely "fit to the tee".
I think if one was to base their estimate on this photo. Taking all into consideration, he is struggling to look over 6'1.25 (186 cm).
I would need to see more of him with other people. If He is generally looking near 6'2 then I doubt he is below 187 cm.
@Rampage(-_-_-)Clover:
Junior may be right. A 6'1.5-6'1 5/8 at a low measured person will be looking 6'1 3/4. I reckon a good proportion of 3/4 listings on this site are those who would measure in the 1/2-5/8 range (in fact potentially a majority). Aside from those in the 5'8 range where I think those listings, most likely "fit to the tee".
Zampo said on 26/Oct/18
@Andrea:
I made that assessment back when I believe my estimations weren't very good. Lol. Reviewing it again, not taking into consideration footwear or the fact Dalton is slightly behind Rob. I would say 184/185 cm (depending on head size) possibly, is how he looks here. Where the 5'8 line comes to Dalton's face would be around 5'7.5 on mine.
@Andrea:
I made that assessment back when I believe my estimations weren't very good. Lol. Reviewing it again, not taking into consideration footwear or the fact Dalton is slightly behind Rob. I would say 184/185 cm (depending on head size) possibly, is how he looks here. Where the 5'8 line comes to Dalton's face would be around 5'7.5 on mine.
TheBat said on 23/Oct/18
Yeah 6’2” all the way. And he’s one awesome actor! Brett is also my personal choice for Batman.
Yeah 6’2” all the way. And he’s one awesome actor! Brett is also my personal choice for Batman.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 30/Aug/18
Junior, I'm with Rob on this...I think 6ft1¾ is his low
Junior, I'm with Rob on this...I think 6ft1¾ is his low
Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 23/Aug/18
6'1 1/2 to 6'1 5/8 (187) will be what he get measured. I don't think 6'1 3/4 anymore.
6'1 1/2 to 6'1 5/8 (187) will be what he get measured. I don't think 6'1 3/4 anymore.
Jordan87 said on 28/Jun/18
Def not full 6'2". No Way even with the .3" Advantage but He is 6'1 Solid for sure.
Def not full 6'2". No Way even with the .3" Advantage but He is 6'1 Solid for sure.
Chase said on 27/Jun/18
He looks exactly 5 inches taller. If you have a 0.3 inch advantage then shouldn’t that put him around 6’1.5? I feel like 6’1.75 would be a comfortable downgrade.
He looks exactly 5 inches taller. If you have a 0.3 inch advantage then shouldn’t that put him around 6’1.5? I feel like 6’1.75 would be a comfortable downgrade.
Andrea said on 11/Jun/18
Zampo, no offence, but if this is how you look next to someone who is 169-70, then you're probably a lot closer to 5'11 than 6' as the picture shows a 4 inches difference (certainly no more than 11 cms)...
Zampo, no offence, but if this is how you look next to someone who is 169-70, then you're probably a lot closer to 5'11 than 6' as the picture shows a 4 inches difference (certainly no more than 11 cms)...
Dream(5'9.5") said on 16/May/18
Agreed with @Junior
The 6'0" guesses are silly.
Agreed with @Junior
The 6'0" guesses are silly.
Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 7/May/18
I bet if Rob get to measure Brett is still under 6'2 but a few mm over 6'1.75". The average guess seem low for him.
I bet if Rob get to measure Brett is still under 6'2 but a few mm over 6'1.75". The average guess seem low for him.
Zampo said on 2/May/18
Another tricky one. It's a reasonable listing though. Both Rob and Brett are standing well. This is how I look with someone roughly in the 169/170 cm range, which would be about a 5.25 inch difference, as this was taken at 11:00 am in the morning, meaning Rob is about 5'8.25 this would make Dalton about 6'1.5 (186.7), factor in footwear advantage, 187.5. Lest not forget that he will drop a some mm by afternoon. I say he is roughly in the 187 cm zone. However, this is all based on this single photo.
Rob, I think I'm getting the hang of this now!
Editor Rob
Another tricky one. It's a reasonable listing though. Both Rob and Brett are standing well. This is how I look with someone roughly in the 169/170 cm range, which would be about a 5.25 inch difference, as this was taken at 11:00 am in the morning, meaning Rob is about 5'8.25 this would make Dalton about 6'1.5 (186.7), factor in footwear advantage, 187.5. Lest not forget that he will drop a some mm by afternoon. I say he is roughly in the 187 cm zone. However, this is all based on this single photo.
Rob, I think I'm getting the hang of this now!
Editor RobBrett looks a bit shorter than he would if he had a bit more footwear and the camera was lower. I can see 6ft 1.75 as a low range for him, but I think if measured he has to be somewhere in 6ft 1.75-2 zone.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 24/Apr/18
187-188cm is likelier than 186-187cm
187-188cm is likelier than 186-187cm
Thunderfin said on 20/Apr/18
Why is the average guess 6'1.5 when his head (not even tilted much) isn't even breaking the 6'1 mark with shoes?
Editor Rob
Why is the average guess 6'1.5 when his head (not even tilted much) isn't even breaking the 6'1 mark with shoes?
Editor RobHe typically looks over 6ft 1 flat in Agents of Shield and from what I've said, in person.
Deloris's said on 9/Apr/18
186,5 perfect
Not full 188
186,5 perfect
Not full 188
QM6'1QM said on 30/Mar/18
I think 186-186.5 cm, best guess for this guy.
I think 186-186.5 cm, best guess for this guy.
berta said on 26/Feb/18
i think legit 187 fuy
i think legit 187 fuy
Junior said on 7/Jan/18
Brett is 187.5cm to be exact if Luke Mitchell is decent 6'1 as rob mention. 187.5cm a round up still 6'2 because i had never see 3cm between Brett and Luke most of time look 2-2.5cm different. Luke lowest could just be flat 185cm.
Brett is 187.5cm to be exact if Luke Mitchell is decent 6'1 as rob mention. 187.5cm a round up still 6'2 because i had never see 3cm between Brett and Luke most of time look 2-2.5cm different. Luke lowest could just be flat 185cm.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 25/Dec/17
Rob, was this guy taller than Mark Gatiss?
Editor Rob
Rob, was this guy taller than Mark Gatiss?
Editor Rob yes, he comfortably cleared 6ft 1 with less footwear. I'd say he measures taller...how much exactly is another matter, it may well not be a full inch but less.
Nik said on 15/Dec/17
I certainly think he is close to 6'2" after much examination!
I certainly think he is close to 6'2" after much examination!
ArnieDan said on 7/Dec/17
Clearly 6ft in the picture. 6ft1 without the shoewear disadvantage and Rob standing slightly in front. But he has a better posture and legs closed, unlike Rob.
Clearly 6ft in the picture. 6ft1 without the shoewear disadvantage and Rob standing slightly in front. But he has a better posture and legs closed, unlike Rob.
Dreampuffe(5'9.5 said on 23/Nov/17
He behind the camera and he has less footwear.
He behind the camera and he has less footwear.
Alex 6'3 said on 19/Nov/17
The shortest 188 cm guy I ever seen. How he could be a 188 if his eye level is 173 cm? He's more like 185 cm..
The shortest 188 cm guy I ever seen. How he could be a 188 if his eye level is 173 cm? He's more like 185 cm..
aknawkneemoose said on 27/Oct/17
rob this dude needs a downgrade. i'm 189 and my eye level is an EASY 5'9 but it's more like 5'10 when my posture is perfect. his eyes are at barely 5'8. also his head barely touches the 6'1 mark on the graphic. i feel like he may be a hair over 6'1
rob this dude needs a downgrade. i'm 189 and my eye level is an EASY 5'9 but it's more like 5'10 when my posture is perfect. his eyes are at barely 5'8. also his head barely touches the 6'1 mark on the graphic. i feel like he may be a hair over 6'1
Andrea said on 22/Oct/17
Whoever says that he looks 6'2 with Rob has no clue about height differences!
He may well be or look near enough his claim in person but he looks barely 185 here (not even the full 6'1), accounting for footwear of course.
Whoever says that he looks 6'2 with Rob has no clue about height differences!
He may well be or look near enough his claim in person but he looks barely 185 here (not even the full 6'1), accounting for footwear of course.
Frost said on 14/Oct/17
Rob how accurate are the grid lines and how do you go about calibrating them?
Editor Rob
Rob how accurate are the grid lines and how do you go about calibrating them?
Editor Rob as long as the 2 people are say within 1 inch of each other then you can use my own head as the guide since we know it's length.
Dreampuffe(5'9.5") said on 8/Oct/17
@Johns Exactly my thoughts.
@Johns Exactly my thoughts.
Johns said on 5/Oct/17
WTF guys? He is CLEARLY 6'2" in this picture, even with Rob's footwear advantage. If he was 6'1" his mouth would be much closer to Rob's eye level.
WTF guys? He is CLEARLY 6'2" in this picture, even with Rob's footwear advantage. If he was 6'1" his mouth would be much closer to Rob's eye level.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 30/Jul/17
He's taller than 6ft1 guys.
He's taller than 6ft1 guys.
S.J.H said on 8/Jun/17
My guess Luke Mitchell had drag all his co-star down by 0.25'. Rob should downgrade dalton at 6'1.75 , watch some episode and event of A.O.S there is no way an inch between both more like they're 1.5-2cm apart. Mitchell 6'1 and Dalton 6'1.75
My guess Luke Mitchell had drag all his co-star down by 0.25'. Rob should downgrade dalton at 6'1.75 , watch some episode and event of A.O.S there is no way an inch between both more like they're 1.5-2cm apart. Mitchell 6'1 and Dalton 6'1.75
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 6/Jun/17
Has to be close to this
Has to be close to this
Mark(5'9.25 said on 2/Jun/17
Rob, it's been years, but would you argue a strong 6'2" or a weak 6'2" for Dalton.
I personally would keep Dalton at 6'2", but not lower than 6'1.75".
Editor Rob
Rob, it's been years, but would you argue a strong 6'2" or a weak 6'2" for Dalton.
I personally would keep Dalton at 6'2", but not lower than 6'1.75".
Editor Rob 6ft 1.75 isn't an impossibility.
I can't see 6ft 1.25-6ft 1.5 though, it seemed too low from what I seen that weekend.
I can't see 6ft 1.25-6ft 1.5 though, it seemed too low from what I seen that weekend.
World Citizen said on 1/Jun/17
He looks 185 max here, even without that footwear disadvantage.
He looks 185 max here, even without that footwear disadvantage.
Mark(5'9.25") said on 29/Mar/17
Rob, this is probably me, but the more I see this picture, the more I'm convinced Brett is a legit 6'2" person. I would agree with what you said. Like you said, he doesn't have the best posture when taking pictures.
Rob, this is probably me, but the more I see this picture, the more I'm convinced Brett is a legit 6'2" person. I would agree with what you said. Like you said, he doesn't have the best posture when taking pictures.
S.J.H said on 28/Mar/17
Some Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D actors height i have notice:
Brett Dalton 186cm
Luke mitchell 184.5cm (mitchell say he is about 6'1 not i'm 6'1)
J. August Richards 189cm
Henry Simmons 191cm (5'11.5 Mr R claim he met him in real look 6'3 to him)
Gabriel Luna 179.5cm
Jamie Harris 181cm
Adrian Pasdar 176cm
Clarke Gregg 172cm
Kyle MacLachlan 180cm
Nick Blood 172cm
Iain De Caestecker 169cm
Adrianne Palicki 178cm
Bill Paxton 180.5cm
Ming Na Wen 158cm
Chloe Bennett 164cm
Some Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D actors height i have notice:
Brett Dalton 186cm
Luke mitchell 184.5cm (mitchell say he is about 6'1 not i'm 6'1)
J. August Richards 189cm
Henry Simmons 191cm (5'11.5 Mr R claim he met him in real look 6'3 to him)
Gabriel Luna 179.5cm
Jamie Harris 181cm
Adrian Pasdar 176cm
Clarke Gregg 172cm
Kyle MacLachlan 180cm
Nick Blood 172cm
Iain De Caestecker 169cm
Adrianne Palicki 178cm
Bill Paxton 180.5cm
Ming Na Wen 158cm
Chloe Bennett 164cm
Eric said on 21/Mar/17
186cm 100%
186cm 100%
Bard said on 14/Mar/17
Strong 6'1, accounting for footwear difference.
Strong 6'1, accounting for footwear difference.
CD said on 11/Mar/17
Rob, would you say there's any tilt in your favour here? Based on the height chart he is looking around 6ft 0.5 range but when looking at the photo from an angle I can believe he looks at least 5 inches taller than you, plus less footwear...
Editor Rob
Rob, would you say there's any tilt in your favour here? Based on the height chart he is looking around 6ft 0.5 range but when looking at the photo from an angle I can believe he looks at least 5 inches taller than you, plus less footwear...
Editor Rob CD, the camera is on a tripod so not being hand-held, it's probably as straight as you cuold get.
Berta said on 11/Mar/17
I thing he is half incheckning under the listing not more
I thing he is half incheckning under the listing not more
S.J.H said on 24/Feb/17
Dalton is really 6'1.25 up here he did'nt look quite 185cm but 1/3 less he can be 186cm
Dalton is really 6'1.25 up here he did'nt look quite 185cm but 1/3 less he can be 186cm
Mark(5'9.25 said on 3/Feb/17
Another under 6'0.5" listing again.. -__- Let's ignore the fact Rob had the footwear advantage and Brett was behind the camera.
Another under 6'0.5" listing again.. -__- Let's ignore the fact Rob had the footwear advantage and Brett was behind the camera.
6'1-6'1.5 Guy said on 3/Feb/17
His eye level 5'8, which means that it is a maximum of 6'1. Excluding shoes and hair, he most likely will be 6'0.5.
His eye level 5'8, which means that it is a maximum of 6'1. Excluding shoes and hair, he most likely will be 6'0.5.
Sammy Derrick said on 18/Jan/17
Brett Dalton 6'1.5
Brett Dalton 6'1.5
phil said on 1/Dec/16
i really can't see how he could 6"2, he look about 6"1 there if you take into consideration footwear difference and the camera angle. And those who say he look taller on tv, keep in mind theres a lot of factors that can influence it.
i really can't see how he could 6"2, he look about 6"1 there if you take into consideration footwear difference and the camera angle. And those who say he look taller on tv, keep in mind theres a lot of factors that can influence it.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 29/Nov/16
Rob, which is more likely, Dalton measuring a little under 6ft2 or Luke Mitchell measuring a little over 6ft1?
They look rather close on Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D., maybe Brett just nipping Luke slightly but never by a full inch.
Editor Rob
Rob, which is more likely, Dalton measuring a little under 6ft2 or Luke Mitchell measuring a little over 6ft1?
They look rather close on Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D., maybe Brett just nipping Luke slightly but never by a full inch.
Editor Rob all I can say in person Dalton gave a slightly taller look than Mitchell, but the footwear difference (or swing) is at least 0.8 inch range.
Mark(5'9.25 said on 23/Nov/16
The 185 cm claims are ridiculous.
The 185 cm claims are ridiculous.
Booker said on 12/Nov/16
Most probably the biggest mistake on this site. This guy is 185 cm. In this pic he looks 187 cm with shoes.
Most probably the biggest mistake on this site. This guy is 185 cm. In this pic he looks 187 cm with shoes.
S.J.H said on 4/Nov/16
Dalton at most 6'1.25 and luke mitchell 6'0 , seriously real 6'2 is almost way taller than dalton
Dalton at most 6'1.25 and luke mitchell 6'0 , seriously real 6'2 is almost way taller than dalton
Sarah said on 24/Oct/16
Just about 6'2"
Just about 6'2"
Pierre said on 24/Oct/16
For me Brett is in 6"1' range.With same shoes and postures(Rob is a little more relaxed imo) the peak of Rob's head would be at the same height as Brett's eyes imo=imo the difference is about ~12 cm=Rob 173 Brett around 185 or strong 185=6"1'(185.42)
For me Brett is in 6"1' range.With same shoes and postures(Rob is a little more relaxed imo) the peak of Rob's head would be at the same height as Brett's eyes imo=imo the difference is about ~12 cm=Rob 173 Brett around 185 or strong 185=6"1'(185.42)
Mark said on 30/Sep/16
I think roughly 6'2" is good for Dalton. Despite less footwear, he has an edge on Luke Mitchell who is a solid 6'1".
I think roughly 6'2" is good for Dalton. Despite less footwear, he has an edge on Luke Mitchell who is a solid 6'1".
Mark said on 27/Sep/16
6'1.75" is the worst I give Dalton. 6'2" is fine for him.
I'm serious, if I find another comment that says '511" for Dalton,' I'm going to laugh so hard that I might likely run out of oxygen.
6'1.75" is the worst I give Dalton. 6'2" is fine for him.
I'm serious, if I find another comment that says '511" for Dalton,' I'm going to laugh so hard that I might likely run out of oxygen.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 23/Sep/16
Dalton: 187.5cm
Mitchell: 185.5cm
Dalton: 187.5cm
Mitchell: 185.5cm
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 23/Sep/16
Dalton: 187.5cm
Mitchel: 185.5cm
Dalton: 187.5cm
Mitchel: 185.5cm
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 22/Sep/16
Rob, could a fraction under this possibly be closer?
Editor Rob
Rob, could a fraction under this possibly be closer?
Editor Rob at worst 6ft 1.75, wouldn't go lower than that range.
Mark said on 22/Sep/16
Not to mention Dalton doesn't always have the best posture, so try meeting someone who looks 6'2" or more and know that a lot of photos can be deceiving.
Not to mention Dalton doesn't always have the best posture, so try meeting someone who looks 6'2" or more and know that a lot of photos can be deceiving.
Mark said on 19/Sep/16
Okay, the 6'1" claims are just insane. Even if anyone didn't meet him, Dalton clearly has an inch over Mitchell, a solid 6'1" person.
The chart isn't always right because sometimes the person standing is slightly away from the camera or the image is distorted.
I'm going to buy Dalton at 6'2" since he had a footwear disadvantage here and he still has an edge on Luke Mitchell.
Okay, the 6'1" claims are just insane. Even if anyone didn't meet him, Dalton clearly has an inch over Mitchell, a solid 6'1" person.
The chart isn't always right because sometimes the person standing is slightly away from the camera or the image is distorted.
I'm going to buy Dalton at 6'2" since he had a footwear disadvantage here and he still has an edge on Luke Mitchell.
Mark said on 15/Sep/16
@S.J.H then we should downgrade Luke Mitchell to 5'11" if you want to play it that way.
@S.J.H then we should downgrade Luke Mitchell to 5'11" if you want to play it that way.
TK said on 10/Sep/16
The posts below are from site enthusiasts who are using visual perspectives and this one photo. They have never watched Brett dalton, he is very tall. Taller than 6ft 1.5 craig ferguson and towers on agents of shield
The posts below are from site enthusiasts who are using visual perspectives and this one photo. They have never watched Brett dalton, he is very tall. Taller than 6ft 1.5 craig ferguson and towers on agents of shield
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 31/Aug/16
The 6ft1 and below claims are ridiculous....
The 6ft1 and below claims are ridiculous....
S.J.H said on 5/Aug/16
6'0.5 at best
6'0.5 at best
The Man said on 5/Aug/16
NX said on 4/Aug/16
________________
5'11" is way too low no matter how you look at it. The crown of Rob's head reaches just below Dalton's eyes, and since the average length from the eyeline to the crown of the head is roughly 4.5", he'a already 6'1" there. Take away Rob's 1/3" of footwear, and he's about 6'1 1/3"
NX said on 4/Aug/16
________________
5'11" is way too low no matter how you look at it. The crown of Rob's head reaches just below Dalton's eyes, and since the average length from the eyeline to the crown of the head is roughly 4.5", he'a already 6'1" there. Take away Rob's 1/3" of footwear, and he's about 6'1 1/3"
Mark said on 4/Aug/16
NX If that's the case then we should downgrade Luke Mitchell to 5'10" then.
NX If that's the case then we should downgrade Luke Mitchell to 5'10" then.
NX said on 4/Aug/16
Take away the hair and footwear and hes 5'11 max. There is definitely no more than 3 inches between him and rob.
Take away the hair and footwear and hes 5'11 max. There is definitely no more than 3 inches between him and rob.
shiva 181 cms said on 3/Aug/16
This guy looks max 186 cms adjusting the diff so adding 1/3 inch makes him 187 cms i think rob he can be downgraded to 6'1.75 or 6'1.5 rather giving afull 6'2 which he isnt
This guy looks max 186 cms adjusting the diff so adding 1/3 inch makes him 187 cms i think rob he can be downgraded to 6'1.75 or 6'1.5 rather giving afull 6'2 which he isnt
The Man said on 3/Aug/16
Dalton's obviously not quite the full 6'2". He must be at least a strong 6'1" though.
Dalton's obviously not quite the full 6'2". He must be at least a strong 6'1" though.
Mark said on 2/Aug/16
The fact that Brett had a footwear disadvantage means that he would be taller than in the picture. Also, Dalton edges out Luke Mitchell who is a legit 6'1".
The fact that Brett had a footwear disadvantage means that he would be taller than in the picture. Also, Dalton edges out Luke Mitchell who is a legit 6'1".
Bard said on 1/Aug/16
Strong 6'1 judging from the pic and footwear disadvantage.
Strong 6'1 judging from the pic and footwear disadvantage.
Josh said on 27/Jul/16
The height chart makes him look below 6'2, but I'm sure if he stood his tallest he would be that. He definitely nothing under 6'1.5
The height chart makes him look below 6'2, but I'm sure if he stood his tallest he would be that. He definitely nothing under 6'1.5
Dr 188 said on 26/Jul/16
I have met him ,Unfortunately no pic , but he is definitely 188 cm
I have met him ,Unfortunately no pic , but he is definitely 188 cm
Candyman said on 26/Jul/16
Earl said on 19/Jul/16
If you remove his hairline, i would say he is 6'0"
Facts
Earl said on 19/Jul/16
If you remove his hairline, i would say he is 6'0"
Facts
Earl said on 19/Jul/16
If you remove his hairline, i would say he is 6'0"
If you remove his hairline, i would say he is 6'0"
Mark said on 19/Jul/16
The footwear disadvantages is the reason why Brett looks that tall. Also, meeting him in person would actually be a lot better because you would get the sense of how tall a person is.
Dalton is an inch taller than Luke Mitchell.
The footwear disadvantages is the reason why Brett looks that tall. Also, meeting him in person would actually be a lot better because you would get the sense of how tall a person is.
Dalton is an inch taller than Luke Mitchell.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 17/Jul/16
I wouldn't argue less than 187cm because he's at a disadvantage in footwear. I see a strong 6ft1 in the photo.
I wouldn't argue less than 187cm because he's at a disadvantage in footwear. I see a strong 6ft1 in the photo.
slothee said on 15/Jul/16
His hair just grazes the 6'1" mark in that photo. If you had 1/3in more footwear, or even 1/2in more footwear, he'd still struggle with 6'2". I'd give him 6'1.5" but even I think that's generous as well.
His hair just grazes the 6'1" mark in that photo. If you had 1/3in more footwear, or even 1/2in more footwear, he'd still struggle with 6'2". I'd give him 6'1.5" but even I think that's generous as well.
Man said on 12/Jul/16
He's Deffo 6"2
He's Deffo 6"2
Nils said on 12/Jul/16
looks 6'1 range in photo, Rob are you closer to the camera? appears so to me.
If not i think it's pretty clear this is not a 6ft 2 man.
Editor Rob
looks 6'1 range in photo, Rob are you closer to the camera? appears so to me.
If not i think it's pretty clear this is not a 6ft 2 man.
Editor Rob I'd have said within an inch.
Ideally I should actually stand between 2-4 inches nearer than a taller man because the high point of the smaller man's head is further from the camera than the forehead/nose/bridge of the taller man.
Here's what I mean: Click Here
With the 186 guy from the challenge I appear probably about 171-2cm against him in the photo. He gains advantage in the camera frame because the top of my head is a few inches further away than his nose/bridge area...
If I moved closer by about 3-4 inches the top of my head would be roughly the same distance to the camera as his nose/bridge area and neither of us would gain any sort of advantage.
I'd need to be over 4 inches in front of a guy like that to start gaining any camera advantage against a taller guy (if the camera is under 5ft 8).
Ideally I should actually stand between 2-4 inches nearer than a taller man because the high point of the smaller man's head is further from the camera than the forehead/nose/bridge of the taller man.
Here's what I mean: Click Here
With the 186 guy from the challenge I appear probably about 171-2cm against him in the photo. He gains advantage in the camera frame because the top of my head is a few inches further away than his nose/bridge area...
If I moved closer by about 3-4 inches the top of my head would be roughly the same distance to the camera as his nose/bridge area and neither of us would gain any sort of advantage.
I'd need to be over 4 inches in front of a guy like that to start gaining any camera advantage against a taller guy (if the camera is under 5ft 8).
Eric said on 11/Jul/16
6'0.5 or 184 no more
6'0.5 or 184 no more
184guy said on 10/Jul/16
Rob,I'm having hard time to find this guy 1.5 taller than the 184 guy
Click Here
Editor Rob
Rob,I'm having hard time to find this guy 1.5 taller than the 184 guy
Click Here
Editor Rob he is taller than that, but yeah I can understand how he might not look an inch taller.
Peter 179cm said on 10/Jul/16
He barely looks taller than 6'0 with the height chart,maybe 184cm and 185 if you add his hair...As i said before,he's 185cm at most.
Editor Rob
He barely looks taller than 6'0 with the height chart,maybe 184cm and 185 if you add his hair...As i said before,he's 185cm at most.
Editor Rob I would be surprised if he was as short as 6ft 1.
Alex said on 8/Jul/16
As I seid, this guy looks not over 184 cm.
As I seid, this guy looks not over 184 cm.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 8/Jul/16
He's not as low as 6ft1 flat or not under
He's not as low as 6ft1 flat or not under
Johnny said on 7/Jul/16
WTF ?? 189-190 out of bed?? Is he a Elastic Man or something?? Despite the fact he is a Inhuman in the TV series , its quite impossible a man arround 6ft 2.5 -3 (190cm) in the morning shrinks into a flat 6ft1 ,just like its shown in the picture above .Just look at the F*%CKING height chart added!!!!! In fact, im also 184.5cm night and arround 186.5 cm right after awakening, which i believe its arround Brett´s range.
WTF ?? 189-190 out of bed?? Is he a Elastic Man or something?? Despite the fact he is a Inhuman in the TV series , its quite impossible a man arround 6ft 2.5 -3 (190cm) in the morning shrinks into a flat 6ft1 ,just like its shown in the picture above .Just look at the F*%CKING height chart added!!!!! In fact, im also 184.5cm night and arround 186.5 cm right after awakening, which i believe its arround Brett´s range.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 6/Jul/16
I doubt he's under 187cm.
I doubt he's under 187cm.
Andrea said on 6/Jul/16
Ahahaha, Alex, what's your problem with shoes?
Rob is a strong 5'8 BAREFOOT, this guy looks 184 at most, add 1/3 inch for shoe difference and he does look 185ish, IN THIS PHOTO!
The same Rob said that a couple of cms were probably lost in the picture, though!
So 187ish (6'1.5-6'1.75 zone) is probably what he would measure!
Ahahaha, Alex, what's your problem with shoes?
Rob is a strong 5'8 BAREFOOT, this guy looks 184 at most, add 1/3 inch for shoe difference and he does look 185ish, IN THIS PHOTO!
The same Rob said that a couple of cms were probably lost in the picture, though!
So 187ish (6'1.5-6'1.75 zone) is probably what he would measure!
Peter 179cm said on 5/Jul/16
Looks nearly 184cm with perfect posture next to Rob,with a bit less footwear.MAX 6'1 for this guy,Rob definitely overestimated him.I'd say he's 1 inch overlisted here,if not 3cm.
Looks nearly 184cm with perfect posture next to Rob,with a bit less footwear.MAX 6'1 for this guy,Rob definitely overestimated him.I'd say he's 1 inch overlisted here,if not 3cm.
Alex said on 4/Jul/16
If he was a 190 with shoes on, there would be 16-15 cm of difference between Rob and Dalton, that's a lot...I don't see all this difference in the pic.
If he was a 190 with shoes on, there would be 16-15 cm of difference between Rob and Dalton, that's a lot...I don't see all this difference in the pic.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 3/Jul/16
Out of bed: 189/190cm
Before bed: 187/188cm
Out of bed: 189/190cm
Before bed: 187/188cm
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 3/Jul/16
184cm is a joke. A solid 187cm at least and probably 189-190cm in shoes
184cm is a joke. A solid 187cm at least and probably 189-190cm in shoes
Alex said on 2/Jul/16
You're really too optimistic about this guy Rob. Next to him you should be around 177-178 cm, in that case, he would be 189-190 cm, and so, 187-188 cm barefoot, without doubt. He seems 187 cm just with shoes, at most, so I really can't imagine how he could be a real 187 cm without footwear. It's just impossible.
Editor Rob
You're really too optimistic about this guy Rob. Next to him you should be around 177-178 cm, in that case, he would be 189-190 cm, and so, 187-188 cm barefoot, without doubt. He seems 187 cm just with shoes, at most, so I really can't imagine how he could be a real 187 cm without footwear. It's just impossible.
Editor Rob I don't think I overestimated him, but of course I am open to such a possibility...
jajamen said on 2/Jul/16
Rob, is 6'1.75 good for him?
Editor Rob
Rob, is 6'1.75 good for him?
Editor Rob it is arguable yes.
Alex said on 1/Jul/16
Rob, have you counted this guy with shoes on? Actually he can be a 187 with shoes, but he must be 184 barefoot. Otherwise in this pic he is around 189-190 cm, and would be short next to you, also if you was 175 cm in that pic.
Editor Rob
Rob, have you counted this guy with shoes on? Actually he can be a 187 with shoes, but he must be 184 barefoot. Otherwise in this pic he is around 189-190 cm, and would be short next to you, also if you was 175 cm in that pic.
Editor Rob in any of those comparison photos, it is just as if we didn't have shoes...of course you should add a third of an inch onto brett because he had less footwear.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 30/Jun/16
Dmeyer said on 26/Jun/16
So 12-12,5cm eye level plus 1cm shoes plus 173,2cm around 186,5cm in the pic
Which really would make him 187.5cm since he has less shoe.
Dmeyer said on 26/Jun/16
So 12-12,5cm eye level plus 1cm shoes plus 173,2cm around 186,5cm in the pic
Which really would make him 187.5cm since he has less shoe.
the Slav said on 30/Jun/16
Rob; he isnt 188 cm at all. Looks 185-186 cm and has good posture
Editor Rob
Rob; he isnt 188 cm at all. Looks 185-186 cm and has good posture
Editor Rob he might not look as tall in this photo, but in person he looked taller than 6ft 1.
mike m said on 28/Jun/16
ummm... on that height chart he is at least an inch under 6-2.
ummm... on that height chart he is at least an inch under 6-2.
Powerhouse said on 28/Jun/16
He's about 6'1
He's about 6'1
Alex said on 27/Jun/16
186 cm no more.
186 cm no more.
Dmeyer said on 26/Jun/16
So 12-12,5cm eye level plus 1cm shoes plus 173,2cm around 186,5cm in the pic
Editor Rob
So 12-12,5cm eye level plus 1cm shoes plus 173,2cm around 186,5cm in the pic
Editor Rob depends on how much hair he has, that can be harder to tell at times.
184guy said on 25/Jun/16
I see 6'1-6'1.25 in the photo
+ 0,3 senaker 6'1.3-6'1.55 so about 187 is fair
I see 6'1-6'1.25 in the photo
+ 0,3 senaker 6'1.3-6'1.55 so about 187 is fair
Johan said on 25/Jun/16
6'1.5" 187cm.
6'1.5" 187cm.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 24/Jun/16
185cm is too low and 183cm is just a joke. Anywhere from 186-188cm is an arguable range.
185cm is too low and 183cm is just a joke. Anywhere from 186-188cm is an arguable range.
Dmeyer said on 23/Jun/16
To me hé looks max 10cm over rob like 6 ft 1/8 183cm plus 1cm shoes 184cm
Editor Rob
To me hé looks max 10cm over rob like 6 ft 1/8 183cm plus 1cm shoes 184cm
Editor Rob I think his eyelevel is probably nearer 5 inches than 4.5 range.
Alex said on 23/Jun/16
185 cm in this pic
185 cm in this pic
mrtguy said on 21/Jun/16
Come on is this how a 6'2'' is really suppose to look next to a 5'8'' guy??
Editor Rob
Come on is this how a 6'2'' is really suppose to look next to a 5'8'' guy??
Editor Rob he should look taller...
I do think he is taller than he looks though.
I do think he is taller than he looks though.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 20/Jun/16
Somewhere in the 187-188cm zone looks closer. Doesn't look much over 6ft1 here…
Somewhere in the 187-188cm zone looks closer. Doesn't look much over 6ft1 here…
Peterson188cm said on 19/Jun/16
Rob, What time of day this photo was taken ?? He does look a strong 6'1.
Editor Rob
Rob, What time of day this photo was taken ?? He does look a strong 6'1.
Editor Rob that was about 11-11.15am.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 19/Jun/16
I think he gives a similar impression to Luke Mitchell but has less footwear. Brett at a weak 6ft2 and Luke at a strong 6ft1 is possible. They also look close on Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D.
I think he gives a similar impression to Luke Mitchell but has less footwear. Brett at a weak 6ft2 and Luke at a strong 6ft1 is possible. They also look close on Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D.
TapeWormMeasure said on 19/Jun/16
Where did you get that shirt Rob? I love it
Editor Rob
Where did you get that shirt Rob? I love it
Editor Rob I pretty much wear Cabela shirts all the time, they usually have good pockets for keeping passport, tickets etc safe....
Leo 5'8 said on 18/Jun/16
Looks 6'0 flat in the photo, but Rob had 1/3 more snicker
Looks 6'0 flat in the photo, but Rob had 1/3 more snicker
Alex 6'0 said on 18/Jun/16
Taking into account the footwear I can see 6'1 for him. Certainly not 6'2
Taking into account the footwear I can see 6'1 for him. Certainly not 6'2
Arch Stanton said on 18/Jun/16
Rob, is a similar sort of height to Clive Owen possible? Taking into account what you said and having a look at him in other pics I've have gone with 6'1.75. In that 187 range, guessing that he might dip a little under the 6'2". In the photo he does look more 6'1 but then it's a photo and as Andrea says big Colin could look and inch inch and half shorter in his photo than reality.
Editor Rob
Rob, is a similar sort of height to Clive Owen possible? Taking into account what you said and having a look at him in other pics I've have gone with 6'1.75. In that 187 range, guessing that he might dip a little under the 6'2". In the photo he does look more 6'1 but then it's a photo and as Andrea says big Colin could look and inch inch and half shorter in his photo than reality.
Editor Rob you could make an argument for a fraction under 6ft 2 of course, but I wouldn't go much lower as the bottom of a range.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 17/Jun/16
"Brett Dalton's Height is 6ft 1¾in (187.325cm)"
"Brett Dalton's Height is 6ft 1¾in (187.325cm)"
Strong 5ft9 said on 17/Jun/16
Either he's 6'1.5 or 6'1.75. But 6'2 is pretty close and maybe a good estimate as well.
Either he's 6'1.5 or 6'1.75. But 6'2 is pretty close and maybe a good estimate as well.
Andrea said on 17/Jun/16
Rob, since there are still some people who say he looks over 6'1 with you, can you make the "mugshot style" photo for him too??? I'd say he looks 184 at most, without considering any footwear difference :)
Rob, since there are still some people who say he looks over 6'1 with you, can you make the "mugshot style" photo for him too??? I'd say he looks 184 at most, without considering any footwear difference :)
Mathew Robinson (190 cm) said on 17/Jun/16
Looks about 6'1" here. Maybe he'd measure closer to 6'2" than 1", but he very well could be somewhere between the two marks.
Looks about 6'1" here. Maybe he'd measure closer to 6'2" than 1", but he very well could be somewhere between the two marks.
Andrea said on 17/Jun/16
Yeah, Tyson is one of the very few cases where he can look a bit taller than his listing... But generally they all look shorter than their listing if you try to be as objective as possible!
Yeah, Tyson is one of the very few cases where he can look a bit taller than his listing... But generally they all look shorter than their listing if you try to be as objective as possible!
Shredder said on 17/Jun/16
I am not going to lie . He looks about 6'0.75 here or so , with less footwear I'd give him 6'1.25 , If he's 6'2 than it's a rare pic where this isn't the true telling of hi height lol.
I am not going to lie . He looks about 6'0.75 here or so , with less footwear I'd give him 6'1.25 , If he's 6'2 than it's a rare pic where this isn't the true telling of hi height lol.
Danimal (176-178cm) said on 16/Jun/16
No way is that 6'2". That's not even 6'1".
No way is that 6'2". That's not even 6'1".
Moke said on 16/Jun/16
"nobody is infallible, they can over or under-estimate, although I do try my best not to get an honest estimate."
I don't quite follow. Can you help me Rob? For Dalton I think 6'2 is definitely closer than 6'1.
Editor Rob
"nobody is infallible, they can over or under-estimate, although I do try my best not to get an honest estimate."
I don't quite follow. Can you help me Rob? For Dalton I think 6'2 is definitely closer than 6'1.
Editor Rob I'm just saying that I don't think he looks over 6ft 1 in this photo, but in person I thought was comfortably over 6ft 1 up close and didn't think I over-estimated him.
Andrea said on 16/Jun/16
Yeah, i know... After all, a listing on this site will never change celebrities' real heights :)
But you, you are infallible! ;) I'd be surprised if you overestimated someone you met in person by a big inch!
What i'm saying is that, if you see random photos on this site, they will NEVER look taller than their listing and not rarely noticeably shorter than their listing!
I know it's not easy to take an ideal photo at these events, also because you're not the photographer, but still there's quite a big number of celebrities you met that look half an inch and over under their listings! In those cases, the only thing you can do is to trust your estimate...
Editor Rob
Yeah, i know... After all, a listing on this site will never change celebrities' real heights :)
But you, you are infallible! ;) I'd be surprised if you overestimated someone you met in person by a big inch!
What i'm saying is that, if you see random photos on this site, they will NEVER look taller than their listing and not rarely noticeably shorter than their listing!
I know it's not easy to take an ideal photo at these events, also because you're not the photographer, but still there's quite a big number of celebrities you met that look half an inch and over under their listings! In those cases, the only thing you can do is to trust your estimate...
Editor Rob there will be some, I think Tyson looks over 5ft 10 flat, but I don't think he actually is.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 16/Jun/16
He looks similar as Luke Mitchell in Rob's photo. Probably would still edge him out though
He looks similar as Luke Mitchell in Rob's photo. Probably would still edge him out though
Mark said on 16/Jun/16
This is definitely not 6'2.
He's standing completely straight and he's at best 6'1.
Why not just go with the fact that your estimation was off by 1 inch, instead of going against blatant photographic proof?
This is definitely not 6'2.
He's standing completely straight and he's at best 6'1.
Why not just go with the fact that your estimation was off by 1 inch, instead of going against blatant photographic proof?
Judd said on 16/Jun/16
IMO he does look a strong 6'1 even with the shoes difference (0,8 cms) maybe 186 cms
IMO he does look a strong 6'1 even with the shoes difference (0,8 cms) maybe 186 cms
Andrea said on 15/Jun/16
Well, then a good inch was stolen by someone... Maybe Big G is collecting all these missing inches to become 6'8 :)
Actually, there's more than one celebrity you took a photo with who can look a good inch shorter in the photo! I wonder if it's really so easy and frequent or maybe you're just a bit generous at times...
Well, in Colin Salmon's case, i can certainly believe he's near 6'4, even if the photo doesn't show it, because i've seen him in a few photos and scenes and he does look it!
As for this guy, seeing him with you and having a QUICK look at him with Luke (who seems a genuine 185), i would have said 185ish was possible... Again, i don't know him! So i'm gonna trust you and "accept" he's 6'2, even if he looks noway near it, HERE :)
Editor Rob
Well, then a good inch was stolen by someone... Maybe Big G is collecting all these missing inches to become 6'8 :)
Actually, there's more than one celebrity you took a photo with who can look a good inch shorter in the photo! I wonder if it's really so easy and frequent or maybe you're just a bit generous at times...
Well, in Colin Salmon's case, i can certainly believe he's near 6'4, even if the photo doesn't show it, because i've seen him in a few photos and scenes and he does look it!
As for this guy, seeing him with you and having a QUICK look at him with Luke (who seems a genuine 185), i would have said 185ish was possible... Again, i don't know him! So i'm gonna trust you and "accept" he's 6'2, even if he looks noway near it, HERE :)
Editor Rob you or anybody else can perfectly believe nearer 6ft 1 than 2 if he looks that to you...nobody is infallible, they can over or under-estimate, although I do try my best not to get an honest estimate.
But I would have guessed nearer 6ft 2 than 1.
But I would have guessed nearer 6ft 2 than 1.
Eric said on 15/Jun/16
barely 185...with equal shoes he is barely 186 or strong 6'1
barely 185...with equal shoes he is barely 186 or strong 6'1
BorkLaser said on 15/Jun/16
Surprisingly he doesn't look 6'2" at all, comparing this picture with the one you have with Alberto Del Rio, Rob. He looks 185 cm. Perhaps you could add the height scale like you do in some other photos?
Surprisingly he doesn't look 6'2" at all, comparing this picture with the one you have with Alberto Del Rio, Rob. He looks 185 cm. Perhaps you could add the height scale like you do in some other photos?
Aza said on 15/Jun/16
Looks close but not quite 74 inches listing.
Looks close but not quite 74 inches listing.
c-mo said on 15/Jun/16
this type of 6'2 look is in the ideal range . there are many 6'2 guys who look rather lanky/goofy/uncoordinated and are too skinny etc. but this guy carries the height very well
this type of 6'2 look is in the ideal range . there are many 6'2 guys who look rather lanky/goofy/uncoordinated and are too skinny etc. but this guy carries the height very well
SAK said on 15/Jun/16
Looks 186/187cm
Looks 186/187cm
Andrea said on 15/Jun/16
What do you actually mean with that photo, Rob? He does look 184 at most, like i said... Plus 1/3 inch, 185ish! Do you mean that one inch went away with the photo? If that's the case, i can believe he's not much under 6'2! Did he look a good inch taller than the 184 challenger, without looking at his footwear?
I wonder why he also doesn't look much different than Luke in photos, sometimes actually shorter... Maybe cameras don't like him and make him appear 6'1 at most when he really is 6'2 :)
Editor Rob
What do you actually mean with that photo, Rob? He does look 184 at most, like i said... Plus 1/3 inch, 185ish! Do you mean that one inch went away with the photo? If that's the case, i can believe he's not much under 6'2! Did he look a good inch taller than the 184 challenger, without looking at his footwear?
I wonder why he also doesn't look much different than Luke in photos, sometimes actually shorter... Maybe cameras don't like him and make him appear 6'1 at most when he really is 6'2 :)
Editor Rob I'm saying I expected him to look like his eyes were an inch above my hair, which is normally how a guy 187 range would look, but it didn't turn out like that.
Either I guessed him too high or a couple cm was lost in the photo...I really don't think I guessed him too high!
Either I guessed him too high or a couple cm was lost in the photo...I really don't think I guessed him too high!
Andrea said on 15/Jun/16
He looks 183-184 here, add "about" a cm for shoe difference and he's more 184-185 than anywhere near 6'2!
Luke looks a good inch taller but again he has nearly an inch less than Brett, so they probably wouldn't be much different but still Luke looks a more solid 6'1 than this guy!
Unless the photographer was the same of Colin Salmon and managed to take away an inch from the photo, there's noway this guy is even close to 6'2!!!
He looks 183-184 here, add "about" a cm for shoe difference and he's more 184-185 than anywhere near 6'2!
Luke looks a good inch taller but again he has nearly an inch less than Brett, so they probably wouldn't be much different but still Luke looks a more solid 6'1 than this guy!
Unless the photographer was the same of Colin Salmon and managed to take away an inch from the photo, there's noway this guy is even close to 6'2!!!
berta said on 15/Jun/16
yeah good listing could be 187 but if he have lower shoes then i guess 188 is right
yeah good listing could be 187 but if he have lower shoes then i guess 188 is right
Johno said on 14/Jun/16
Something must not be telling by this picture because no way do i see 6'2.
Editor Rob
Something must not be telling by this picture because no way do i see 6'2.
Editor Rob The photographers camera is on a tripod and about 5ft 7 high.
I set up a camera similar height (but a few feet further away) with roughly same focal length and me just over 187cm:
Click Here
I fully expected Brett to look as tall as that!
Also re: Andrea, you mentioned on Luke's page how he and dalton could look close in height and yes in photos I saw that too...
But in person Brett looked no shorter than Luke, before considering the swing in footwear was like 0.8 inch range.
I set up a camera similar height (but a few feet further away) with roughly same focal length and me just over 187cm:
Click Here
I fully expected Brett to look as tall as that!
Also re: Andrea, you mentioned on Luke's page how he and dalton could look close in height and yes in photos I saw that too...
But in person Brett looked no shorter than Luke, before considering the swing in footwear was like 0.8 inch range.
TJE said on 14/Jun/16
6'1.5 would be better
6'1.5 would be better
the Slav said on 14/Jun/16
@Rob
Don't see more than 6'1.25-6'1.5 to be honest. 6'2 is a bit of a stretch
@Rob
Don't see more than 6'1.25-6'1.5 to be honest. 6'2 is a bit of a stretch
truth said on 14/Jun/16
Good listing.
Good listing.
Hypado said on 14/Jun/16
Brett Dalton's Height - 6ft 2in (188 cm)
Yes, a legit 6ft 2 in SHIELD tv series. Great Photo.
Brett Dalton's Height - 6ft 2in (188 cm)
Yes, a legit 6ft 2 in SHIELD tv series. Great Photo.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 14/Jun/16
hmmm I see a similar impression to Luke Mitchell here but unlike Luke who has more shoe than Rob, this guy has less. So he could still be 6ft2
hmmm I see a similar impression to Luke Mitchell here but unlike Luke who has more shoe than Rob, this guy has less. So he could still be 6ft2
CD said on 14/Jun/16
6ft 1.5 appears to be nearer the mark, he pretty much looks 5 inches taller than Rob and plus has a bit less footwear. His claim of 6ft 2 isn't a terrible one.
6ft 1.5 appears to be nearer the mark, he pretty much looks 5 inches taller than Rob and plus has a bit less footwear. His claim of 6ft 2 isn't a terrible one.
Andrea said on 14/Jun/16
Wow, you met Brett too then :)
I reconfirm what i said on Luke's page... He looks nowhere near 6'2! Unless something "strange" is going on in this picture, he doesn't look over 6'1!!! I mean, you can even make an argument for 184 range here! One of the shortest "6'2" guys ever!
Wow, you met Brett too then :)
I reconfirm what i said on Luke's page... He looks nowhere near 6'2! Unless something "strange" is going on in this picture, he doesn't look over 6'1!!! I mean, you can even make an argument for 184 range here! One of the shortest "6'2" guys ever!
Andrew M said on 30/Nov/14
Another perfect person! Scunner! What do these folk eat, growing up?
@ Rampage(-_-_-)Clover - I dunno about the suit, I think it makes him look a bit thin, which he doesn't on the show. And Chino-style turned up hems are unusual. Still, it no doubt costs a few bob!
Another perfect person! Scunner! What do these folk eat, growing up?
@ Rampage(-_-_-)Clover - I dunno about the suit, I think it makes him look a bit thin, which he doesn't on the show. And Chino-style turned up hems are unusual. Still, it no doubt costs a few bob!
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 28/Oct/14
I love that suit!
6ft2 is fair...tall guy
I love that suit!
6ft2 is fair...tall guy
Yuppijaa said on 16/May/14
In Agents of SHIELD he looks like 6'3.
Editor Rob
In Agents of SHIELD he looks like 6'3.
Editor Rob i'm sure he's shorter than j august richards
Ilyathe2nd said on 27/Mar/14
On his March 24th 2014 appearance on Craig Ferguson Brett seemed even a little shorter than Craig. Maybe it's a footwear issue, but certainly not posture; Craig is slouching, Brett isn't. He comes in at 25:58 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MkJTSHPUtwI Maybe Brett is 185-186? Or Craig is taller than the 187 he's listed as? Craig does seem to have bigger heels though.
On his March 24th 2014 appearance on Craig Ferguson Brett seemed even a little shorter than Craig. Maybe it's a footwear issue, but certainly not posture; Craig is slouching, Brett isn't. He comes in at 25:58 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MkJTSHPUtwI Maybe Brett is 185-186? Or Craig is taller than the 187 he's listed as? Craig does seem to have bigger heels though.
Heights are barefeet estimates, derived from quotations, official websites, agency resumes, in person encounters with actors at conventions and pictures/films.
Other vital statistics like weight or shoe size measurements have been sourced from newspapers, books, resumes or social media.
Celebrity Fan Photos and Agency Pictures of stars are © to their respective owners.