How tall is Brock Lesnar - Page 8

Add a Comment4297 comments

Average Guess (743 Votes)
6ft 2.23in (188.6cm)
Sam said on 19/Jun/17
Joe could be 5'10.5. He looked no taller than 5'11 next to Lesnar and only edged out the likes of Kurt Angle (confirmed 5'10) and Kevin Owens and seem to remember him being shorter than CM Punk. At first glance he does seem taller, like as tall as some of the other legit 6'0 wrestlers, at least on his own, but I think that's more his percieved height. Maybe because he has long legs? But if anything just makes Lesnar's 6'2 height more legit.
Christian-196.5cm (6ft5 3/8) said on 19/Jun/17
@Freak

Joe at 6ft is a joke. You inflate him just so you can make Lesnar 6'3".
Randomdude said on 18/Jun/17
Joe is about 5'10.5 he was about the same height as 5'10 Paul Heyman

honestly the height difference beteween Brock and Joe was not huge at all.
juggernaut said on 18/Jun/17
Brock looked 3 inches taller than Joe who is 5'11' imo..so Brock is easily 6'2'-6'2'5 not 6'3' but quite close
Christian-196.5cm (6ft5 3/8) said on 18/Jun/17
@ma

He looks nearly identical to Triple H, although he looks shorter because of his head tilting down. Click Here But I guess flat 6'1" isn't impossible for Nakamura either. It'll be intresting to see him and Rollins have a stare down in the future.
Freak said on 17/Jun/17
Brock looked 3 inches taller than 6 ft Samoa Joe.
So 6 ft 3 is right.
291 pounds for him today
ma said on 16/Jun/17
@Christian-196.5cm (6ft5 3/8)

Are you sure that Nakamura is 6 ft 1.25 ?
He looks shorter than Triple H that today is more 6 ft 1.5. I believe Nakamura is more a 6 ft 1 guy, Rollins always gives a taller impression with HHH

Click Here:
Christian-196.5cm (6ft5 3/8) said on 12/Jun/17
@ma

Mahal was not taller than Rawley in this clip. And it's likely that Rawley wore normal shoes because he was in regular clothes, while Mahal wore wrestling boots because he was in his ring gear. Not to mention the fact that he wore a turban. Click Here At best Mahal is 6'3.25" nothing more. And him being 6'3.25" would put Rusev nothing more than 5'11" since he looked easily 4.5" shorter (although Mahal had slightly thicker boots) So a 4.25" difference.
na67 said on 12/Jun/17
brock was never over 280lb at his peak, wwe always in fluctuates weights by 12-16lb.
ma said on 10/Jun/17
For me Rusev could be 181-182 cm ( 5 ft 11.25-5); he stand on the ring or barefoot or with less thick shooes than other wrestler...And I remember that he was taller barefoot than ziggler with shoes...
As for Mahal, he was surely taller than 6 ft 3 Mojo Rawley and close with Orton that has the bigger boots... I would have guessed him at 6 ft 3.75 in
Christian-196.5cm (6ft5 3/8) said on 9/Jun/17
@ma

Rusev maybe 5'11" and Mahal maybe 6'3.25"
peopleschamp said on 9/Jun/17
Lesnar 6'2" at his (peak). Lesnar 6'1.75"-6'1.5" (now).
ma said on 8/Jun/17
@Christian-196.5cm (6ft5 3/8)

I still think that Joe has a chance of being a weak 180 cm as absolute top ( 5 ft 10.75) due to his weight seems shorter
What are your guesses on Rusev and Jinder Mahal?
Christian-196.5cm (6ft5 3/8) said on 7/Jun/17
@ma

Samoa Joe is really like 178-179. He's barely taller than 177 Kevin Owens. Joe's 6'2" billing is insane.
ma said on 6/Jun/17
Samoa Joe is very close with Paul heyman height... He could be 180 cm but I don't think more... Brock will dwarf him
Christian-196.5cm (6ft5 3/8) said on 4/Jun/17
@Danimal

I guess 187cm is arguable, although I can't see him anything below that.
Randomdude said on 31/May/17
@Andy he's a legit 6'2 not a legit 6'3 if he was a legit 6'2 the NFL wouldn't have measured him at 6'2 or K1 wouldn't have listed him at 6'2 either who are normally spot on with their heights.
Andy said on 29/May/17
I'd say 6'3. Next to a 6'4 overeem you can tell he's legit 6'3.
Bazza said on 24/May/17
189 - out of bed 187 - before bed. The listing is fair.
Danimal said on 23/May/17
Christian-196.5cm (6ft5 3/8) said on 23/May/17
Lesnar was recently described as 6'3 1/2" Click Here I find it kind of odd because this is the first time that I've seen a WWE wrestler being billed at a half inch.

Met the guy in Vegas in 2008. My 6'3" friend was noticeably taller than him. He's under 6'2".
Randomdude said on 23/May/17
so am I going to take Paul Heymans word that he is 6'3 and a half(who is a good friend and promoter to Brock) or the official NFL combines record and K1's record that he is 6'2. I think I'm going with the NFL and K1 lol
Sammy Derrick said on 23/May/17
@Christian-196.5cm (6ft5 3/8) said on 23/May/17
Lesnar was recently described as 6'3 1/2" Click Here I find it kind of odd because this is the first time that I've seen a WWE wrestler being billed at a half inch.
Editor Rob: ah, the old fractional 'fooled ya' trick, where a celebrity gives a very specific height, which surely must be accurate - if it's that specific, they must be telling the truth!

btw, I am actually 5ft 8 and 7/8ths 😈 🤞
Come on guys it's Paul Heyman,he was a wrestling promoter(they embellish information).
Christian-196.5cm (6ft5 3/8) said on 23/May/17
Editor Rob: ah, the old fractional 'fooled ya' trick, where a celebrity gives a very specific height, which surely must be accurate - if it's that specific, they must be telling the truth!

btw, I am actually 5ft 8 and 7/8ths 😈

-------

At least you're actually 5ft8 7/8" at your absolute highest, so it's not a bad or wrong claim. Lesnar however is probably like 6'3" max out of bed. I believe once you claim a height that is any more than your absolute highest, it's considered inflating/exaggerating.
Christian-196.5cm (6ft5 3/8) said on 23/May/17
Lesnar was recently described as 6'3 1/2" Click Here I find it kind of odd because this is the first time that I've seen a WWE wrestler being billed at a half inch.
Editor Rob
ah, the old fractional 'fooled ya' trick, where a celebrity gives a very specific height, which surely must be accurate - if it's that specific, they must be telling the truth!

btw, I am actually 5ft 8 and 7/8ths 😈 🤞
CNROM89 said on 21/May/17
@Rob

Rob, how tall is UFC fighter Junıor Dos Santos?
Editor Rob
Cnrom, he looks like he is very similar to Brock...certainly no shorter, but is he taller? I don't know...I'd safely rule out 6ft 4 though!
Wrs567 said on 10/May/17
Rob, In your honest opinion, how much difference do you see between Cena and Lesnar here?

Click Here

I see 185cm and 188cm

What do you see there?
ma said on 7/May/17
@CNROM89
No it' s long. Compared to an average male people torso because Brock it is longer because Brock is 189-188 cm across the day.
He has long legs and normal torso but it is very long if you talk about average shrinkage.
Shocked
CNROM89 said on 5/May/17
Brock's torso is massive but not long. He has long arms and long legs.
ma said on 5/May/17
@Freak
Yeah according to you a big guy like Brock with a very long and massive torso shrinks only 0.5 inc from out of bed to midnight.
Amazing! that would be the most important discovey of 2017
Es said on 3/May/17
@Freak yeh no doubt. Click Here Check this vid out and pause at 1:06. THE most impressive and baddest mofo ive ever seen in the WWE to this day.
Randomdude said on 3/May/17
nah Freak I would go as high as 6'2.5 on a very good day and that would be mid day I would say my midnight he is 6'2 flat which is still very tall most people don't realise how tall 6'2 actually is.

In his prime I would say 6'2.5 at night
Freak said on 2/May/17
@Es Brock at his peak shape was for sure over 300 pounds and wwe billed him at 6 ft 4 and 306 pounds which was very very honest!
Personally I though he was around 320 pounds because he was able to bench press over 550 pounds and deadlift over 700 pounds and squat more than 800 pounds! He was a freak, the size of two beefed guy and with an impressive back and chest.
Regarding height he was between 6 ft 4 and 3 during the day. Today I think he is 6 ft 3.25 out of bed and 6 ft 2.75 midnight and close to 300 pounds
FLU said on 1/May/17
6'2" is spot on.
Es said on 28/Apr/17
I think at his leanest and most muscular he was 280lb in 2002/3. He was often billed at 295lb and even 302lb for a dark match. Today I believe he hovers around 270-75lb. Height wise I'd say 6'2 is a fair guess give or take a few cm for time of day.
ma said on 22/Apr/17
@Freak
HHH was taller than Goldberg! You don't have to count HHH hair but imagine him shaved! Clearly shorter!
Only a crazy man would list peak Goldberg at 6 ft 2 and peak HHH at 6 ft2.75!!!
Face reality, try to figure out height; I know you are the biggest bodybuilding and muscles lover bur look only at height not at "chest as wide as a mountain"
Wrs567 said on 21/Apr/17
Here is the footwear! If anything Lesnars footwear was thicker!!

Click Here

Goldberg was clearly the taller man!

Click Here

Click Here

By the way, I agree with mikos listings
ma said on 21/Apr/17
@Freak' s height for wwe superstar at peak:
Lesnar 7 foot
Goldberg 5 foot
looool
Freak said on 21/Apr/17
I think I've had enough of this website..It was fun here but also at times it felt it was getting personal..Whatever this is my last post..And I'll post the heights of all wrestlers(since I am only interested in their heights) of prime and current

Bautista Prime-6'3' Today-6'2'75
Lesnar Prime-6'2'25 or 6'2'5
Goldberg Prime-6'2' Today-6'1'5
Triple H Prime-6'2'75 Today-6'2'(since 2002 IMO)
Dwayne Rock johnson Prime-6'3' Today-6'2'5
Bobby Lashley Prime-6'1'5 or 6'1'
Steve Austin Prime-6'1' Today-6'0'5
Vince McMahon Prime-6'2' Today-6
John Cena Prime-6'1' Today-6'0'5
Seth Rollins Prime-6'1'
Ambrose Prime-6'0'5
Roman Reigns Prime 6'2'25
Bigshow Prime 7'0'5 Today-6'10'5
Undertaker Prime 6'7'5 Today-6'6'5
Kane prime 6'8' Today-6'7'
Strowman Prime 6'7'25
Booker T prime 6'1' Today 6'0'5
Samoa Joe Prime 5'11'
Kevin Owens Prime 5'9'5
Kurt Angle Prime 5'10'5 Today 5'10'
Freak said on 21/Apr/17
@Randomdude Ya,I work in Brock's house in Canada..Kidding me ? No,I only get offended when people call me names just when I have proved something right..
Freak said on 21/Apr/17
@ma But still Triple H is taller in all..As I said before Goldberg never edged out Triple H..
Randomdude said on 20/Apr/17
Freak do you know Brock personally? because you seem to get very offended when people notice he isn't as tall as most think he is,seems weird
miko said on 20/Apr/17
What is going on here..

As for PEAK heights in the early 2000's:

Rock was 6'3, Goldberg was 6'2.5 and Lesnar 6'2.

Today, Rock is still around 6'2.75/6'3, Goldberg has probably lost half an inch with age and is 6'2 range, and Lesnar is 6'2.

In the staredowns between Lesnar and Goldberg recently, they looked very similar, on some occasions Goldberg had bigger footwear but Lesnar was standing tall and tiptoeing like he seems to do a lot these days. On the rare occasion in the staredowns Goldberg did stretch his neck out he could look marginally taller than Lesnar though.

Barefoot in 2017, it'd be very close.
ma said on 20/Apr/17
@Freak

Here is the proof Goldberg was taller than HHH

Click Here:
Both men have same elegant shoes, so same footwear.
Freak said on 20/Apr/17
There in that pic,w The Rock Goldberg is closer to the camera and ffs is an inch shorter than The Rock..You said Goldberg edged out Triple H where is that pic? You have time to call me a hypocrite..Yet,couldn't prove that..Yes,Goldberg was 0.5 taller than Lesnar in that pic..You didn't show the footwears did you? Now,who is a hypocrite?
Freak said on 20/Apr/17
@Wrs567 Yo,by wrestling matches I didn't include staredowns and such...If that makes me a hypocrite and yes Lesnar is always at a footwear disadvantage..like it or not..
ma said on 19/Apr/17
@freak
I hope you finally learnt the lesson that at peak Lesnar was not taller than Bill Goldberg

Click Here:
Actually brock looked more 6 ft 1.75 if Bill was 6 ft 2.5
Wrs567 said on 19/Apr/17
Just under an inch here here, putting Goldberg rightly at 6'2.5'' and Rock at 6'3''

Click Here

Here is Lesnar shorter than Goldberg, clear as day

Click Here
Wrs567 said on 19/Apr/17
''And please in a wrestling match in all the action I don't think anybody notices the boots at that point..''

Freak you're a hypocrite.

You are always the one to say ''oh brock had less footwear in that match!''

''ohh brocks footwear is less than everyones!'' ''ohh look Goldberg has a huge heel on!''

You always notice the footwear in matches and segments, and now you're saying who notices footwear lol
Freak said on 19/Apr/17
If Goldberg was 6'2'5 minimum peak then Rock must've been 6'3'5 peak as well as Batista,they were both an inch taller than Goldberg..
AV64 said on 19/Apr/17
Easily 189cm barefoot (6'2.5) , Big dude. Can look near 6'4 In some thick boots.
ma said on 18/Apr/17
@freak
saying that Lesnar is around 6 ft 2.5 and Goldberg never over 6 ft 2 peak is pure insanity, madness, folly, craziness, foolery.
Never heard something more stupid...And once i've heard Cena at 5 ft 11 but this is even more ridiculous because it' a height comparison not a guessing, so it's obvious to see who was taller.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 18/Apr/17
Goldberg was 6ft2½(189.23cm) minimum peak…
Freak said on 18/Apr/17
Not really,Brock never had huge soles or anything & Triple H never edged him out..But Triple H edged Goldberg out ..& Triple H's or Lesnar's hair are not like Sheamus's that it gives any advantage to their height ..Prove to me that Goldberg edged out Triple H..& yes Goldberg was never more than 6'2'..And please in a wrestling match in all the action I don't think anybody notices the boots at that point..
Wrs567 said on 18/Apr/17
''ok did we see the footwear in those WrestleMania 20 pics.?''

Here we go again...... Yes I did see the footwear because I watched the whole PPV

I'm sure a lot of people did too. Both had on equal height giving wrestling boots

Lesnar had hair advantage over Goldberg too. Goldberg was still comfortably taller.

Goldberg did edge out Triple H, They looked the same height to you because

you are including Triple H's hair! shave Triple H's hair and Goldberg is taller

And Triple H edged out Brock Lesnar in 2002, Lesnars boots gave more height

and his hairstyle also favored him but Triple H was still a tad taller

If Bill was 'never over 6ft 2' then that means Brock was never even 6'2'' to begin with
Freak said on 18/Apr/17
Goldberg's footwear
Click Here
Freak said on 18/Apr/17
ok yes,the footwear right?? If Lesnar is taller than someone than something is favouring him?? ok did we see the footwear in those WrestleMania 20 pics.? No ..since Goldberg was slight taller even without knowing the footwear's..So Goldberg was the taller man..You say Lesnar being taller than Berg is insanity? Sorry,But Since Goldberg never edged out Triple H..and was always a bit shorter..Lesnar did..So Obviously, I'd think Lesnar was taller..Bill was never over 6'2' in his prime..6'1'5 today..
Wrs567 said on 18/Apr/17
You can't even see the footwear with Goldberg and Lesnars backstage picture wtf?

And the picture has a tilt favoring Lesnar

We CLEARLY seen them in the ring at WrestleMania 20, nose to nose!

Goldberg was CLEARLY taller than Lesnar

To even think Lesnar was taller than Goldberg back then is just pure Insanity
ma said on 16/Apr/17
@kvhjs
Ok so according to you Seth Rollins is 5 ft 9 ( billed 6 ft 1) and kurt angle( billed 6 ft 2 )is 5 ft 10?
You are good at guessing height
kvhjs said on 16/Apr/17
Kurt said in a 2009 Vindy.com article, "I'm listed at 6-feet-2...Everyone in wrestling is four inches shorter than the program says they are".Back when kurt angle was listed at 6 ft 2 brock lesnar was listed an 6ft4 therefore lesnar is 6ft tall.
Freak said on 16/Apr/17
In that backstage pic w Goldberg ,you don't have to be a height specialist to realize Lesnar is easily taller..I'd say Lesnar is 6'2'25..But just could be 6'2'5 on his best..Gives a taller impression(forget the tip-toeing)
Randomdude said on 15/Apr/17
No they also measured his height,they DO measure your height in the NFL combine,he was measured at 6'2 3/8ths it was posted on the internet a few years ago.
aaronious said on 14/Apr/17
not really sure here everyone is getting this 6'2" garbage. the NFL never measured Lesnars height, he did the NFL combine, he didn't get drafted. the only thing they measured was his weight, is 40-yard dash, his standing jump, his standing long jump, and the number of times he could bench 225lbs.
Wrs567 said on 13/Apr/17
The more I see of Lesnar, especially from 2003 - 2004

the more slightly under 6'2'' he looks to me

like 6'1.75''
Randomdude said on 11/Apr/17
@Es he is clearly not 6'3 barefoot when he was measured 6'2 by the NFL and also is clearly shorter than 6'3 Wiz Khalifa
Es said on 10/Apr/17
I believe brock is 190cm barefoot (6'3)
ma said on 10/Apr/17
@Freak
in the pic with lesnar and goldberg bill has the edge
Freak said on 9/Apr/17
With 6'3' Rock in 2003
Click Here
Freak said on 9/Apr/17
Brock w Goldberg backstage in 2003 or 04..posted this before but gotta send u proof lol..
Click Here
Freak said on 9/Apr/17
Brock Lesnar barefoot w 6'3' Rock in 2011..Rock was in sneakers
Click Here
Freak said on 9/Apr/17
An inch shorter than 6'3' Rock in 2003
Click Here
Freak said on 9/Apr/17
Proof? ok Here you go
Goldberg with 6'2' Triple H..Either Triple H is taller or they are the same ,look at the top of their heads.. Click Here
ma said on 9/Apr/17
@Freak
post pics of peak goldberg and brock...There is no way goldberg was shorter or equal than brock at peak...always 0.5-0.75 inc taller
ma said on 8/Apr/17
@Freak
please if you consider peak Goldberg shorter than Lesnar prove it. Post pics or something, because all videos I watched Goldberg was at least 0.5 inc taller
Randomdude said on 8/Apr/17
yup and Goldberg is 6'3 then also Taker is 6'10 Kane is 6'11 big Cass is 7'0
Freak said on 8/Apr/17
Let me just add this, In a recent podcast w Good ole JR Goldberg said Brock is a big dude & is 6'4'..lol
Freak said on 8/Apr/17
Well,Lesnar is easily taller than Goldberg today even w a flat footwear..But I don't think Bill was more than 6'2' and a quarter in his prime..An inch shorter than 6'3' Rock at the time..Shorter than Batista as well,Was taller than Brock in 2004 but again I've seen backstage pics of Brock & Bill without wrestling gear..and Brock edged him out..I'd say he was the same as Triple H in his prime..Today a bit shorter than Hunter. ..6'1'5 is what he should be..
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 6/Apr/17
A prime Goldberg would edge Brock
Wrs567 said on 6/Apr/17
Lesnar looked a little bit shorter than Goldberg at WrestleMania

But yes, Goldberg had a tad more in footwear

Barefoot they would measure the same
Freak said on 5/Apr/17
I wouldn't bet anything lower for Lesnar than 6'2' and neither below 6'1'5 for Goldberg..I believe they can't be lower than that,perhaps a bit over..Strowman is 6'7' IMO..Vince is 6 foot and Kurt 5'10'.
James B said on 5/Apr/17
Brock is a strong 6ft2.

He looked bigger width wise/height wise than Goldberg at mania
Eagles said on 5/Apr/17
Lesnar looked 6'1.5" 290-295lbs at mania. Berg looked 6'1" 250-255lbs
Wrs567 said on 5/Apr/17
I don't think Lesnar is low as 6'1.5'', 6'2'' is good

But he has looked low as 6'1.5'' MANY times

He could't look 6'2'' with Miesha Tate, Even Rob said it!

He looked shorter than Seth Rollins with a slight camera disadvantage

In 2003 he couldn't even look 4 inches taller than Kurt Angle at times
Annonymous said on 4/Apr/17
But Lesnar isn't 6'1.5...he's about the most legit 6'2'' and change you'll find out there. Strowman's huge, a giant Goliath. He's closer to 6'8'' than 6'6''.
ma said on 4/Apr/17
I m sure that Lesnar was tip-toeing in face off with Strowman or he was standing on only one foot...He looked 4.5 inc shorter but he gained height with his usual tricks
Randomdude said on 4/Apr/17
Also Lesnar is closer to the camera
Freak said on 4/Apr/17
5 and a half?? well if that's true Lesnar would be 6'1'5 and Strowman is 6'7'..Kidding me? and
how do you know Brock is tip-toeing lol..Max diff from that pic could be 5 inches..though I believe it wouldn't be more than 4.5 ..what's your take Rob?
Freak said on 4/Apr/17
Looked 4-4.5 inches shorter than Braun in their faceoff last night..
Wrs567 said on 4/Apr/17
Rob, how many inches do you see with Strowman and Lesnar? 5 and a half?

Click Here

By the way, Strowman is leaning down and Lesnar is tip-toeing there
Freak said on 4/Apr/17
Don't know if Florida is 6'2' or not..But Rob lists him that..I believe he is the same as Triple H who I still don't think is shorter than 6'2'..
Wrs567 said on 3/Apr/17
Flo Rida is NOT 6'2''!!

Here he is with a 5'8'' - 5'9'' Ric Flair,

and he is also shorter than Triple H who is a bit under 6'2'' today

Click Here
Freak said on 3/Apr/17
With 6'2' Florida
Click Here
Freak said on 3/Apr/17
@wrs567 its because I believe in the faceoffs twice #1 at Survivor Series Goldberg had the footwear advantage still Lesnar looked .5 taller..
#2 At that RAW Goldberg had the cowboy boots and Lesnar w usual sneakers still Lesnar was .25 taller when relaxed,.5 or 1 when tip-toeing..I don't remember when did Bill or Brock ever had the same footwear..
ma said on 2/Apr/17
Lesnar could be around 6 ft 3 out of bed...but around 6 ft 2.25 in the morning (10am) and drop to 6 ft 2 at late afternoon
Wrs567 said on 2/Apr/17
Freak, I'm not being rude towards you, so don't take it the wrong way please

But I think it's insane how you think Goldberg is 186cm and Lesnar looks close to 6'3''

It's just mind boggling my man

Since both Lesnar and Goldberg are the exact same height! (Both had equally thick footwear)
Freak said on 2/Apr/17
I believe Lesnar may reach 6'2'5 in the morning out of bed..But if that measurement was in the morning ..I'd say 6'2'.25 for him eventhough he looks close to 6'3' for me..
Jalen C Gilmer said on 1/Apr/17
6'2.25 at minimum.
ma said on 1/Apr/17
real wwe superstar weights today
Lesnar 123 kg 280 pounds
Triple H 109 kg 240 pounds
Cena 114 kg 251 pounds
Goldberg 110 kg 240 pounds
Orton 105 kg 230 pounds
Owens 113 kg 250 pounds
Strowman 165 kg 365 pounds
Reigns 114 kg 251 pounds
Randomdude said on 30/Mar/17
he'doubt he is 189 cm night time height if he was measured at 6'2 3/8'ths 189 cm morning height
Annonymous said on 29/Mar/17
He hasn't appeared to have lost anything from age 25 to 40 what so ever. Still looks 189 CM night time height today.
Paul said on 27/Mar/17
I don't know Brock personally but one of my uncles is a bodybuilder and he met a friend of Brock and he claimed that he is close 6'2 (his friend is 6'2 too) and he said he is looks a bit, but just a bit shorter, like 0.5-1cm, Brock could be 187-187.5, but no less than that. He also mentioned that he used to be a bit taller like 189-190.
Luke said on 26/Mar/17
Brock Lesnar is better than Goldberg. I would like to see lesnar beat him at Wrestlemania 33. Goldberg is boring to watch.
ma said on 26/Mar/17
@Freak
Yeah at his peak Cena could have been over the 6 ft 0.5 listed... maybe 6 ft 0.75....
I respect him much than any other wrestler cause he claimed 6 foot and 6 ft 1 which are very honest claims.
Wrs567 said on 26/Mar/17
There wasn't 1.5 inches between Cena and Lesnar

But you are right though, Cena was 6'1'' back then

It was an inch max there, it could look less than that too
Freak said on 26/Mar/17
Yo @ma Your links are all about that Google search of Lesnar face to face w Cena,The Angle & Rock links are also the same..Maybe,my device has a problem..Or you posted the same links in all three..& I believe At his lowest Lesnar at morning would be 6'2'5 and 6'2'.25 throughout the day & night..& Lesnar was 1.5 inches taller than Cena in that 2003 staredown,no clue about footwear but I am sure Cena was 6'1' at that time..6'0'5 today...
Oliver said on 25/Mar/17
How tall is Ryback he has been listed as 6'3" and 6'2" in the past, Rob can you start a page for Ryback please and Mason Ryan maybe? -Thanks
ma said on 25/Mar/17
Ok @Freak here are my evidences
with similar footwear with 184 cm John Cena

Click Here:

with 178 cm Kurt angle

Click Here:

with 191 cm the rock

Click Here:

I think that this is enough to consider him as a 6 ft 2 or a solid 6 ft 2 nightime but not a 6 ft 2.5- 6 ft 3 in like you said.
Please if you reply me don't say something like " Brock is taller than 6 ft 2 because he has a chest as wide as a mountain" but remain focused on height, otherwise type on ilovebodybuilding.com :)
Canson said on 25/Mar/17
@WRS567: yep no reason to be upset at me just because your idol the rock isn't really 6'3". You cheer up or grow up
Freak said on 25/Mar/17
Instead of arguing like kids over somebody's comments..post pics to prove your point about the height of an individual..Everybody got the right to express their opinion doesn't mean you make fun of somebody else at least..
Freak said on 25/Mar/17
You could've called me a troll if I had said Lesnar was 6'3' or 6'4' Just because I said Lesnar's height can vary from 188.5-189cm doesn't mean I change his height all the time.. Our height tends to decrease a bit throughout the day from the morning which is a natural process and to say Lesnar has got chests the size the mountains and such doesn't mean he got mountain size chests but that they are wide which is just kind of poetic to add which you'll will not understand..
But no,I am not a bodybuilding fan..And just because I don't downgrade Lesnar's height doesn't mean he is a God for me..
Chris said on 23/Mar/17
A bit over 6"2 out of bed 6"3
Wrs567 said on 22/Mar/17
@Canson: Dude there is no need to be upset just because I don't believe your friend met The Rock

lol cheer up.
Canson said on 21/Mar/17
@Ma: don't waste your time with WRS567. He is the epitome of a troll. Having his own agenda in making people a certain height
ma said on 20/Mar/17
@Wrs567 @Freak
I think that probably @Freak is a troll because he seems to enjoy change the height on Brock Lesnar...
The fact that he underlines every time that he is taller than what we supposed and he argues to comments like "he his taller than 6 ft 2 because he has shoulders like mountains, massive triceps, enormous chest, wonderful body and he is quick as hell " (and other stuff not related to height) makes me think that he enjoys to give random heights just because he is a bodybuilding or wrestling fan...Anyways, don't get angry Freak, we are just give our opinions with all due respect :)
James B said on 19/Mar/17
Well I think most would agree perhaps brocks physique is more noteworthy in the WWE world than his height.......I mean of course a legit 6'2 is tall but obviously it's no giant. A guy like Andre was noteworthy not only for his MONSTROUS build but also his giant sized height.

All Andre would have to do is sit on Brock lesner to defeat him in a match
ma said on 16/Mar/17
@freak
I don't know why you do think that lesnar is so taller than Goldberg... you speak about Brock like he is your god...what do you think of his weight? You would describe Brock as a 6 ft 3 and 300 pounds Lol... are you a wrestling entrepreneur?
ma said on 16/Mar/17
@freak @wrs567
For freak lesnar can be both 6 ft 3 6 ft 2.5 6 ft 2.25 and a strong 6 foot 2nightime..... I don't understand why he changes range of height... probably he thinks he is a superhuman ( like he said with massive shoulders like mountains 😂 lol) that can decide his own height...
Man say an official evening height and stick to it don't change your mind every comment. I Know you are Brock best fan but face reality in last face off with Goldberg he was no taller.
Wrs567 said on 15/Mar/17
''I believe Brock Lesnar is absolutely 6'2'5 in the morning..possibly dipping down to 6'2'25 in the evening''

Humans lose up to 3cms in height through the day.

And you think Lesnar shrinks only a quarter inch??? lol

Wow, you really do think he is Superman don't you?

So according to you he wakes up at 189cm and still stays roughly 189cm in the evening

Amazing
Randomdude said on 15/Mar/17
@Freak

he's not a strong 6'2 he's 6'2 for sure but his measurement which was probably mid day was 6'2 3/8's

so yeah 6'2 and almost a half but probably falls to 6'2 by night
James B said on 14/Mar/17
Out of bed these days could be bang on 6'3 and 62.5-6'2.75 in the morning. In 2002 maybe a fraction over 6'3 out of bed
ma said on 14/Mar/17
@Freak
Brock here looked 2 inches shorter than Hogan that was probably around the 192 mark...Looks a weak 188 here (probably he was not tip-toeing)
Freak said on 14/Mar/17
Brock,Angle and Hogan in 2003
Click Here
Freak said on 14/Mar/17
NO,I absolutely disagree that Brock never was 6'2'25 or 6'2'5 He freakin edged out 6'2' Triple H in 2002 hell he only looked 0.5 shorter than 6'3' Rock in 2002..Man,I've seen Kurt and Brock and yes,Brock was taller at a bit over 4 inches over him..Hell to say Brock was not '4' above Angle is ridiculous..And bdw if Brock was measured 6'2'3/8 then does it mean he is a flat 6'2' or 6'2'25 ..Yes,I don't think Brock lost any height but most of the pics in which Brock's height is guessed has absolute no clue of the footwear..As Rob said there are more chances that Brock would measure over 6'2' rather than under..188.5cm is what I'll guess Brock at the lowest,189 at his best close to 6'3'..He edged out 6'2' Del Rio in a segment on RAW And bdw if you have watched RAW Triple H was as tall or a bit taller than 6'2' listed Mick Foley tonight...No clue of footwear..But Triple H is still 6'2' I'd say a weak 6'2' due to his posture..On the other hand Lesnar is a strong 6'2' reason being he is a bit over that..Like it or not ...He does give a 6'3' impression when tip-toeing..IMO Brock's size is a reason why people underestimate his height...
...
Freak said on 13/Mar/17
First of all,I don't think Brock would claim 6'4' ..6'3' is what he'll say,he may tip-toe at times but unlike Dwayne who claims 6'5' which is ridiculous..He certainly wouldn't brag about his height or something like that..I believe Brock Lesnar is absolutely 6'2'5 in the morning..possibly dipping down to 6'2'25 in the evening..If he was 6'2' flat he wouldn't ever edge out 6'1'5 Goldberg w Footwear advantage..nor Triple H who I still believe is a flat 6'2' despite people claiming he has lost height,Maybe '0.5' from late 90s..He has awful posture at times..Brock is a huge man w chests as wide as a mountain..He doesn't give the impression of a very tall man due to his massive physique ..For me Brock 6'2'25-6'2'5,Triple H-6'2' flat..Ya,and that 6'2'3/8 NFL measurement I want a link if anyone can provide hopefully....
ma said on 13/Mar/17
@James
Yes it is possible shrinkage but brook doesn't look shorter on tv. I'd say you can make a case for less than 0.25 inc...; for me he looks taller this day than when he started wrestling ( probably due to his tip-toeing mania)
Wrs567 said on 13/Mar/17
He hasn't lost any height since his measurement though

because he hasn't been active ENOUGH to lose height

His body also hasn't taken ENOUGH punishment to cause height loss

Yes of course he is a legit tall man at 6'2'', no one is denying that

But he was NEVER as tall as 6'2.25'' - 6'2.5'' because

at times he couldn't even look 4 inches taller than a weak 5'10'' Kurt Angle!
Wrs567 said on 12/Mar/17
I have a question for you guys?

Can we all agree John Cena was the full 6'1'' back in 2003?

Click Here
James B said on 12/Mar/17
A fraction of height loss at nearly 40 for a guy like Brock lesner is entirely possible. Just consider these factors

He's had decades of physical wrestling (and probably injuries)

Brock is not a giant at 6ft2 range but he is never the less a legit tall man (tall people are more prone to losing height because of longer spines)

If Brock is 6'2 1/4 today than the full 6'2 1/2 is possible in his 20s. If he's just 6ft2 now then yes I would say a proper 6'2 1/2 is less likely

Being 270 pounds at 6'2 must put a strain on his body and joints since that is a lot of extra mass to carry for that height
James B said on 12/Mar/17
Well in person he would probably claim to be "6ft4"
ma said on 12/Mar/17
@James
Everything is possible if you make real in your head. But if are a realistic guy you will notice that he was not (and still now) 6 ft 2.5.
Of course if you say in the morning he could be, but we are talking of late afternoon height, so zero chances he is a 6 ft 2.5 in guy nigh time.
But you can believe what you want.... A lot of wwe wrestling fan believe that he is underlisted and deserves 6 ft 4: they say like you that this is possible....
glen said on 11/Mar/17
would i be able to be as dominant and strong as brock lesnar at 5 foot 11 inches. i train very hard everyday to be as him
Wrs567 said on 11/Mar/17
@James B: No it isn't possible, because he hasn't lost height

He also got a morning height measurement of 6'2'' 3/8ths in 2004

which means he couldn't even reach 6'2.5'' in the morning!

stop being so naive
James B said on 10/Mar/17
Well I think we can all agree that Brock was never a 6'3 guy but 6'2.5 is possible when he started in WWE back in 2002
Freak said on 10/Mar/17
Lol..Brock was wearing sneakers and Goldberg an inch boot possibly a bit more..When Brock was tip-toeing at times he looked an inch taller..When relaxed he was like .25 taller excluding his hair..I don't think Brock could gain more than 2cm by tip-toeing ..Bdw Goldberg would be 186cm on the mark..I think even Bobby Lashley would be .25 taller than Goldberg...Looked .25 shorter than 6'2' Del Rio on Impact Wrestling..And Brock when measured 6'2'3/8 by the NFL don't know if morning or evening..is 6'2'.25 how the hell can he be a flat 6'2'..You have to be kidding...But,if you're gonna say Brock is a flat 6'2' in that case Goldberg no more than 6'1'25 barefoot..I suggest Rob to watch that video and pause at certain points to not only see the footwear difference but how much Lesnar gains on tip-toeing and how much when relaxed (PS:he wouldn't be tip-toeing the whole segment) have a look..
ma said on 10/Mar/17
@Freak
Why you always said that 6 ft 2.5 in is possible for Lesnar in the morning? You try to make your fake prediction more belivable?
We are talking about late afternoon height, so later than 5pm.
I don't wanna hear brook is 6 ft 3 because out of bed is possible.... If you said that you mean that he is 6 ft 2 or possible 6ft 2.25 evening. So as the majority of users, you do agree that he is 6ft 2 or a hair over.
Sonny Black said on 9/Mar/17
I met Mir and was surprised to find that he's only about 6'1.5, so I know Lesnar is no taller than 6'2. It's funny though cause they're both listed as 6'3 guys but you know on tv they definitely look it.
ma said on 9/Mar/17
@Wrs567
I agree with you.
Always thought that he was more 6 ft 2.25 but seems impossible for him beeing that tall. I agree with who says he is 6ft 2inc.
Goldberg today 187cm barefoot with boots last night 191-192 cm
Lesnar 188 cm barefoot with sneakers 190.5 cm with tip-toeing 193cm
Freak said on 8/Mar/17
Rob,I had no idea the sole of the boots Goldberg was wearing were these big.. Man I have to guess they are 1.5 inches ..High time Goldberg be downgraded to 6'1'5
Click Here
Wrs567 said on 8/Mar/17
Lesnar was tip-toeing like hell with Goldberg

Yes, Goldberg had a thick heel, I agree, I seen that

But Lesnar had equally thick chunky soles on his running shoes

Goldberg is in his 50's now, a 2cm loss is not impossible, he may have dipped a little below 6'2''

Still Lesnar is not over 6'2''

Don't forget Lesnar is a good bit shorter than a 6'2.5'' listed Wiz Khalifa!
RP said on 7/Mar/17
Rob, Lesnar is more like 5/8" to 3/4" taller now, not 1/4"...Goldberg's cowboy boots gave him at least a 0.50" advantage over Brock's sneakers.
IMO:
Brock: 6'2-3/8"
Goldberg: 6'1-3/4"
Peak Goldberg: 6'2-3/4"
James B said on 7/Mar/17
Last night Goldberg was in much thicker footwear than lesner
miko said on 7/Mar/17
Brock was on his tiptoes through a lot of that segment.
MDV said on 7/Mar/17
Bill has footwear advantage and lesnar tip-toes as usual
6 ft 2 for both

Click Here
Randomdude said on 7/Mar/17
no Sterlo Goldberg is not still 6'2

Goldberg 6'1.25 Brock 6'2 - 6'2.25
Freak said on 7/Mar/17
Have a look at this Rob..Lesnar is tip-toeing a little bit but look at Goldberg's big soles..Footwear advantage for Goldberg big time..If they're barefoot just imagine their height
Click Here
oz89 said on 7/Mar/17
brocks stopped his jump up to the ring entrance , seen him botch it a few times on raw , shame , gave such an intimidating impression, must be getting old or?
Freak said on 7/Mar/17
And should I mention this,that i saw Lesnar tip-toeing again sometimes to look a full inch taller than Goldberg..Bill already had the footwear advantage..Even in wwe2k17 game Goldberg is shorter than both Lesnar & Triple H despite Goldberg being billed 6'4' 280lbs..Hilarious..Bdw I believe Goldberg is 6'1'5 at most ...Lesnar is greately underestimated by some here..6'2'5 is not impossible for Lesnar on a morning measurement ..
Freak said on 7/Mar/17
Lol @wrs567 Before you compare the height of Lesnar & Goldberg ..have a look at their footwears as well..Goldberg was wearing a high soled (at least an inch ) boot and Lesnar was wearing his usual sneakers..Yet,Brock looked .25 taller so,if they are barefoot or w same footwear Lesnar will be half or a full inch taller..plz check Goldberg's boots
ma said on 7/Mar/17
@sterlo
In the pic that you posted, Brock is tip-toeing. From the segment of last night I definitly change my opinion: I always thought that brock was more 189cm than 188 at around midday, but for sure he is not that tall. He should have more height on Goldeberg last night; he looked exactly 6 ft 2....Sometimes brock looked shorter than goldberg when he was not tip-toeing(if you shave brock' s head he would have been shorter)
Sterlo said on 6/Mar/17
As seen on Raw tonight, If Goldberg is still 6'2 then Brock Lesnar is 6'3 Click Here
Wrs567 said on 6/Mar/17
Before the ''Brock looked 6ft 3'' comments arrive again

No he didn't. He looked exactly 6'2'' with Goldberg

Lesnar has hair advantage!!

Click Here

Rob, same height?
Editor Rob
a chance Lesnar is a 1/4 inch taller, but his style is about half inch of hair.
nelo said on 6/Mar/17
brock is 188cm legit
Wrs567 said on 6/Mar/17
''188.5 cm on the evening''

Now that's not too bad of a guess Freak.

I think he can hold about 188.4 through the day. A decent 6'2''

May not slip under 188 in the evening
Freak said on 6/Mar/17
@Eagles Like it or not, Goldberg is nowhere close to legit..He was an amazing athlete but probably the worst wrestler..To say he is gifted is just too much..I've seen guys twice the athlete he is and yet wouldn't say them gifted..As far as could've taken a different route applies not only to him but the others who didn't train mma or such..But his cardio is garbage..Even in his prime, he wouldn't last a minute w Lesnar..and that's not even close..He trains muay Thai yet after wrestling for like 30 sec against Owens..He was all washed up..gasping for air like as if he wrestled for an hour..Sorry to say...
Freak said on 5/Mar/17
Don't forget that in early 2004 Lesnar had a motorcycle accident,that might've had a impact on his height..But I don't think he ever lost height..He looks slight taller than early 2000s..I'd say he would measure 189cm on the morning..188.5 cm on the evening..6'2'.25-6'2'5..
Wrs567 said on 5/Mar/17
Lol at 6'2.5'' in the past

Remember John Cena was almost the same height as him back in 2003?

So I guess John Cena was 186cm?

Since Kurt Angle was 3.5 inches shorter than Lesnar

I guess Kurt Angle was 5'11.5'' then too???

Lol listen to yourselves.....
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 4/Mar/17
He could look 6ft2½ in the past.
Eagles said on 4/Mar/17
@freak, to say Goldberg isn't legit is ridiculous. He could have taken a different route after college football and been a legitimate PRIDE-MMA fighter of the 90's. The dude was just as gifted as Lesnar. He's also 50 now. We all wish he could rewind the clock and be Lesnar's age, and if he could, it would be a 3 round bloody MMA fight.
James B said on 3/Mar/17
6'2.25 now and 6'2.5 in his 20s
Wrs567 said on 3/Mar/17
''miko said on 3/Mar/17
If anything in staredowns today he looks taller today than in back in 2002, maybe posture related''

You left out ''ridiculous tip-toeing''
Oliver said on 3/Mar/17
I think Brock Lesnar is 188-189 cm, he looks it easily
miko said on 3/Mar/17
If anything in staredowns today he looks taller today than in back in 2002, maybe posture related. He hasn't lost any height.

He is likely a shade over 6'2 but maybe not a full 6'2.25.
Wrs567 said on 3/Mar/17
He hasn't lost height at all, I don't know where this is coming from

He hasn't wrestled long enough or taken enough 'bumps' to lose height

and he's still in his 30's, too young to lose height

Lesnars first WWE run only lasted 2 years, maybe less

and since he came back in 2012 he's always been part-time

He hasn't wrestled for 15 years straight like a John Cena has

He's always been 6'2'' and nothing more
Freak said on 2/Mar/17
What a Gem,Brock and Goldberg probably in 2004
Click Here
Wrs567 said on 1/Mar/17
My estimate for an afternoon tape/stadiometer measurement would be

yes this is a GUESS

exactly 188.4 with normal posture

After seeing him next to people and comparing
James B said on 1/Mar/17
Rob do you think the full 6'2.5 is very much possible back in 2002?

Remember at king of the ring 2002 he only looked 2 inches shorter than Test that and if he's 6'2.25 now that might indicate he was 6'2.5 when he debuted with WWE. All these years of physical wrestling could have defo knocked off a small fraction and carrying so much weight must also put a strain on his body as well.
Editor Rob
James, it's always been arguable he could have pulled off a fractin over 6ft 2.
Freak said on 1/Mar/17
Brock w 7'1' Great Khali
Click Here
Freak said on 1/Mar/17
John Cena,Brock Lesnar,Rollins,Triple H all in one pic
Click Here
Dakota said on 1/Mar/17
6ft 2.25 is possible for Brock Lesnar
Wrs567 said on 27/Feb/17
Rob, do you think Lesnar could look a little under 6'2''

with Miesha Tate here? who is a weak 5'6''

Click Here
Editor Rob
wrs, I wouldn't say he looks over 6ft 2, under a little is possible just in that one photo.
randomdude said on 25/Feb/17
@Brian he is not 6'3 for sure he wass measured at 6'2 3/8's by the NFL which may have even been a morning measurement

Sable is not that tall
Chuck said on 25/Feb/17
Goldberg would fare better vs Lesnar than Mark Hunt did vs Lesnar in their non scripted UFC fight. Goldberg could counter Lesnar's take down charges more effectively than Mark Hunt did. Goldberg is faster and more athletic. If we are talking lesnar vs goldberg both in their primes, its a potentially even fight. They would both be 6'3" 265-266lb. in Ufc.
Brian said on 24/Feb/17
Hey Rob,

How tall is Sable ( his wife ) ?
Brock is definitely 6ft 3 for sure.
Freak said on 24/Feb/17
Brock & Trips squared off in 2002,Look at the 1:28 and 2:39 mark Where I believe Brock edges out Hunter.. I believe Brock was atleast .25 taller...
Click Here
Viktor said on 23/Feb/17
How come Brock edged out HHH?
Vegas said on 23/Feb/17
Lesnar in his prime was an ncaa division 1 champion with a 106-5 so he was a once in a lifetime athlete at that level.

Brauns a strong dude but in a real fight prime lesnar would tear him limb from limb. He won the ufc title with little to no mma experience in his 30s, imagine he started training for that right out of college..
Freak said on 23/Feb/17
lol Brock would destroy Strowman whether in his prime or today..Brock is a mercenary,Strowman a Strongman..I think Brock would be 189 cm barefoot today,Although many here thinks he is only 188 and no more,still can't figure out how did Goldberg edge him out 14 years ago..probably footwear cos he was dwarfed by 6'2' Triple H..Brock edged out Triple H..This is tricky...
ma said on 23/Feb/17
@warrior
Of course Lesnar. Quicker faster and able to fight. Strowman is not able to fight, only to lift weights.
VeryShortRussianDude said on 23/Feb/17
Click Here

Rob, What would be your estimation for Colin Cowherd looking at this video up against Lesnar?
Freak said on 22/Feb/17
Yes,I agree Strowman is nowhere near Lesnar in terms of speed and agility,I knew from before He was a strongman..But my point is you can be quick and agile even above 6'2...
Es said on 22/Feb/17
@Freak Braun strowman is agile for his size but no where near as quick and agile as LESNAR
ma said on 22/Feb/17
@Freak
I think that you are taking WWE stuff too seriously. They are just like actors: Strowman looks quicker because the WWE staff tell other guys to look weak and motionless.
ma said on 22/Feb/17
@ Freak
Just put Braun Strowman and Lesnar in a running competition on 100 m...Lesnar would beat him when Strowman is around 50 m completed...
Strowman is simply stronger because is a strongman but not agile and quick as Lesnar... he is extraordinary quick for his size but every athlete shorter than 6 ft 2.25 in wwe roster would be quicker and faster than him
Freak said on 22/Feb/17
Braun Strowman is 6'7' and he is just as quick,agile and stronger than Lesnar..Height has nothing to do w speed and athleticism.. And yes Brock always seems 189cm to me barefoot...I wouldn't go 188cm unless I get link to his actual NFL measurement..Period..
Wrs567 said on 21/Feb/17
@Warrior: Lesnar looked a little under 6'2'' sometimes with Kurt Angle

He didn't have a good 4 inches on Kurt all the time.

He is also a inch - inch and a half shorter than Wiz Khalifa who claims 6'2''

6'2'' is the maximum Lesnar could be without shoes
ma said on 21/Feb/17
@Es
Yes, I agree. If you are taller than 6 ft 2 in most of the cases you will be goofy in movements and not quick and athletic as Brock Lesnar is.
Es said on 20/Feb/17
188cm (6'2) is the perfect height for athlete who wants to be big and imposing but also quick and agile at the same time , lethal height.
Ice said on 18/Feb/17
Guys like Kane and Undertaker are the more impressive wrestlers because of their height IMO .. Id much rather be them than Lesnar .
Freak said on 17/Feb/17
Rob,How much does Mark Henry look w 6'6'5 Braun Strowman?
Click Here
Randomdude said on 17/Feb/17
posture looks fine to me

he's 6'2 no doubt but he's not a strong 6'2 he is 188 and 189 on a good day max
Freak said on 16/Feb/17
Well,if the measurement was in the morning than maybe Brock is a strong 6'2' but he still gives me a taller impression,wouldn't judge height from that pic of Wiz w Brock it has awful posture...
Randomdude said on 16/Feb/17
I guess it was around the morning but the time was never said allthough there was a few pictures released as far as I know and it did look pretty early
Wrs567 said on 16/Feb/17
How on earth can Lesnar be 189 - 190?cm

When he is clearly more than an inch shorter than Wiz Khalifa?

Click Here

And Wiz claims 6'2'' for himself!

and those NFL height measurements are done right in the morning

So yeah, Lesnar couldn't even reach 6'2.5'' barefoot in the morning!

He was also in his 20's in 2004, so he was at his absolute physical peak
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 15/Feb/17
Could make a case for 6ft2¼
Freak said on 15/Feb/17
Well,if Brock was measured at 6'2'3/8 by the NFL He is 6'2'25 right? but was it a morning or an evening measurement..Cos,Ever since Brock has returned he always looked 189-190 in my eyes..He edged out many I thought were the same or taller than him...If the measurement was an evening one..Then on a morning one he would be 189 cm..Still a very tall and huge man..He always looked 6'3' w taller guys like Taker & Show..
Wrs567 said on 15/Feb/17
I like how the majority of people can see now

that Lesnar isn't over 188cm barefoot

still a very tall guy, but nothing over 6'2'' max
MDV said on 13/Feb/17
Lesnar 188-189 guy
Overeem 190-191 guy
Lesnar tip-toeing always....or he stands on one foot ho gain 2 cm
Es said on 13/Feb/17
Look guys , a STRONG 6ft 1 guy (186-186.5) can look anywhere between 6ft 2.5/3 RANGE in a good pair of boots/trainers. that bracket of height will always be tricky to nail down.
Eagles said on 13/Feb/17
Overeem is taller than Lesnar. Overeem is 6'2.75"-6'3"
Randomdude said on 13/Feb/17
@Freak how can Brock be 6'5 if he was measured at 6'2 3/8's yes maybe close to 6'2.5 in the morning but he's not 6'2.5
Freak said on 12/Feb/17
Rob,Do you think Lesnar is tip toeing in that pic or is it a way of him standing w that foot? & also how much do both look?
Freak said on 12/Feb/17
So is Brock tip-toeing in that pic w Overeem lol..
Chuck said on 12/Feb/17
in the lesnar and wiz picture Lesnar is either 5'10.5" and wiz is 6'3" or Lesnar is 6'1.75-6'2" and wiz is 6'5.5"
Freak said on 11/Feb/17
Yes Bautista,Rock,Edge were all taller by Lesnar in their prime w Edge being the tallest at 6'3'25 in my IMO..But I doubt Goldberg as he was edged out by 188cm Triple H on every face off..I believe it was lifts that gave him a slight edge over Lesnar 13 years ago as Lesnar never wore lifts and he edged out Triple H..But today,I can bet Lesnar will edge out Bautista,Edge and would be the same as Dwayne if not .25 short at most..He edged out 186 cm Goldberg by an inch..So,I will still say Lesnar is 6'2'5 ..lowest at 6'2,25 ..A strong 6'2' weak 6'3' between 6'2'-6'3' and bdw I'd love to see Rob measure Lesnar on the stadiometer..lol
qyhj said on 11/Feb/17
Look at the foot of Lesnar in the staredown between him and Alistair.

Click Here
ma said on 10/Feb/17
Rob,
please add the longest WWE universal champion Kevin Owens
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 9/Feb/17
Bray Wyatt is a hard guy to pin down. Similar to Mark Henry in that he can look from 6ft up to 6ft3. Definitely somewhere within that range. I wouldn't go under 6ft1.
Wrs567 said on 9/Feb/17
That 6'2.5'' - 6'3'' zone is for guys like Batista, The Rock, Edge, Peak Goldberg, Wiz Khalifa

All of these guys are and were taller than Brock Lesnar

Lesnar is a legit 6'2'' guy but nothing more

Roman is also not over 6'2''
miko said on 9/Feb/17
Bray is somewhere around 6'1. Next to Harper, Rowan and Strowman he looks small as they are all huge.
Eagles said on 9/Feb/17
UFC Lesnar: 6'2" 266lbs
WWE Lesnar: 6'2" 280lbs

Goldberg 2003: 6'2.25" 270lbs
Goldberg today: 6'1.5" 261lbs

Alastair Overeem Roids: 6'2.5" 268lbs
Aliatair Overeem Today: 6'2.5" 248lbs
Freak said on 9/Feb/17
Brock did edge out Triple H back in 2002 by .5 in their stare down on RAW after the night Lesnar won his first WWE title from Rock..Brock always looked a weak 6'3' and was always quoted 6'3'-6'4' by the announcers those early 2000s
Wrs567 said on 8/Feb/17
Brock just about beats Roman in height due to a larger head

Click Here

A strong 188cm for Brock and a weak 188cm for Roman in my opinion

A 90's Triple H would've edged both out in height

Roman really needs to get that extra 1/4 taken off from his listing
Freak said on 7/Feb/17
Rob,what are the chances Lesnar hits 190cm in the morning? Is it believable for him Rob? I'd think he is 189 cm on an evening measurement..
Wrs567 said on 5/Feb/17
Bray is actually a lot taller than most people think

I wouldn't put Bray under 6'1'' at all

He can even look a good 186cm at times
MDV said on 5/Feb/17
Bray Wyatt a 6 ft 0.75- 6 ft 1 sounds right ?
He was a little taller than Cena
He looks more than 10 cm shorter than 196 listed Luke Harper
Shorter around an inch by Triple H (today)
Shorter than Reigns
Very similar to Ryback (both entered in WWE in the nexus in the same year and both listed 6 ft 3)
Plus, he uses cowboy hells that give him 1.5-2 inc...That's why for me he looks more 6 ft 0.75
Randomdude said on 2/Feb/17
@tough bro Brocks not 6'3 if he is shorter than 6'3 Wiz and was actually measured at 6'2 3/8ths by the NFL
Wrs567 said on 1/Feb/17
@Tough bro: I doubt Kurt Angle is 6'3'', but it's your opinion though
Tough bro said on 31/Jan/17
@Wrs567.... he's 6ft 3.
Wrs567 said on 30/Jan/17
''maybe a fraction over in the morning but no more''

Morning heights don't count. All humans shrink throughout the day
Randomdude said on 29/Jan/17
Wiz Khalifa claims 6'2 but I would say he is closer to 6'3 and looks a lot taller than Lesnar in this pic

Lesnar is 6'2 maybe a fraction over in the morning but no more

Click Here
Freak said on 29/Jan/17
Not really,I gotta believe Wiz is 6'3' and Brock would be a plain 6'2' as you say if he didn't edge out Goldberg..Hell,He was measured over 6'2' so how can you say he is simply 6'2' and not a fraction over it,and cmon Brock can't be anything below 6'2'.25..I'd still say 6'2'5..You can say he is 6'2' ..we can agree to disagree..
Wrs567 said on 27/Jan/17
I am really not going to go back and forth over a centimeter Freak lol

If you think he is 6'2.5'', then that's great. I don't

I think barefoot he can't be taller than 188cm Max

He just looks too short to be in that 189cm - 190cm range

Wiz Khalfia is listed 6'2.5'' on this site, and he is also taller than Lesnar

Click Here

Click Here

You just need to accept Lesnar isn't over a plain 6'2''
Freak said on 27/Jan/17
I'd say this I find it funny that Ppl actually think Goldberg is 6'2' today,We saw Reigns, Lesnar edge him out who are 6'2'+ even w Bill having footwear advantage.. So imagine him barefoot w these two,Also I have to believe He gotta be nose to nose w Steve Austin barefoot..6'2' in his prime no doubt .But since guys w bigger abdomen lose much height w age that's what caught both Goldberg and Batista...As Even BigShow lost 2 inches over the years..Triple H,Hogan,Undertaker who noticeably lost height over the years due to injuries,surgeries over the years...
Freak said on 27/Jan/17
Lol @Wrs567 Lesnar did look 4 inches taller than Angle many times,And I don't believe these pics where there is no clue of footwear..Yes,He did look 6'3' against Goldberg cos Bill ain't 6'2..But yes Brock was measured over 6'2' and yes,he is.. 189 cm..You could prove me wrong w some barefoot pics huh?
Wrs567 said on 26/Jan/17
Lol at Lesnar looking 6'3'' with Goldberg.

He did NOT look anywhere near 6'3''

Once again he looked the same height as Goldberg, just like at Survivor Series

He just had hair over Goldberg, which gave the illusion of him being slightly taller

Lmao some people man

He didn't even look 4 inches taller than Kurt Angle back in the day at times, that cancels out anything over 6'2''

Click Here
Freak said on 26/Jan/17
Yes @MDV Lesnar does tip toe but he still looks 189cm if he stands still..I've watched the entire segment..But he doesn't tip toe all the time..When he was face to face w Goldberg before Taker showed up he was an inch taller if Goldberg does put his leg a little up at times especially at Survivor Series..Lesnar looks a solid 6'3' when he does tip toe..But He is 189 cm in relaxed posture..
Freak said on 26/Jan/17
Lol..Lesnar was measured above 6'2' if not 6'3'..How can he be 6'2' at most.. He is taller than Frank Mir by .5 and Mir will be 6'2' atleast..Goldberg would be 6'2' at most in his prime,Because he was shorter than Triple H..No idea how Goldberg edged out Lesnar at Mania 20..I believe has to be lifts as Lesnar edged out Triple H even in 2002..I've watched all their segments..
Today Triple H-6'2' ,Goldberg-6'1'5,Lesnar-6'2'5 based on all segments I've watched from 2002 till today...and yes John Cena would be 6'1' in early 2000...Though I haven't seen anybody barefoot other than Lesnar
Rick said on 25/Jan/17
Goldberg said he was 260-270lbs on a podcast after he returned. Lesnar also said he weighed 290lbs back around august when he talked about Connor Mcrgergor in a YouTube video.
MDV said on 25/Jan/17
@berta @freak
Here I explain how Lesnar can looks a solid 6 ft 3 in wwe especially last night against Goldberg.
Look at his feet: or he is tip-toeing or he stands only on one foot gaining 2 cm!
If you look with attention the segment you will see that he always gain height and can pass easily for a 6 ft 3.
Those are the pics that WWE.com published in the gallery of Undertaker vs Lesnar vs Goldberg staredown.

Click Here

Click Here

Lesnar gains 3 cm arriving at 192 cm (I still think he is closer to 189 than 188)...But he is not a 6 ft 2.75 guy or over.
Please Rob, watch the segment and tell me if you have the impression that Lesnar is tip-toeing.
Sonny Black said on 25/Jan/17
He's 6'2 at the most, like maybe out of bed he's 6'2 but at the end of the day he's below that mark. I met Frank Mir and Mir is 6'1.5 at most, Brock is barely any taller than Mir.
RP said on 25/Jan/17
Word is that Goldberg is currently only 244-247 lbs
berta said on 25/Jan/17
in the photo with him goldberg and undertaker he looked easy 190 if the others are the height they are listed. i still think he is 189 . goldberg looks shorer than 188 to me these days. when he was younger i thought he looked 189 sometimes even 190. but peak 189 is fair for goldberg today he looks only 187 and undertaler looks maybe 197-98 and peak was maybe 200-201
Freak said on 24/Jan/17
Yes,Taker would be the heaviest at 280lbs but not 6'5' rather 6'6'1/2 ..Lesnar the most muscular at 275lbs atleast 6'2'5,Goldberg at 250lbs looked 6'1'5 to me an inch shorter than Lesnar..No way he is 6'2' only in his prime he was..Both Taker & Bill lost a few cms but Lesnar may just only have lost a cm in his motorcycle accident in 2004..I believe Lesnar was 6'2'75 in his prime, 6'2'5 today..& measured like 6'2'3/8 in NFL as all say...Taker lost an inch was nearly 6'8' in his prime...
ma said on 24/Jan/17
Lesnar was at least 1.5 inc taller than Goldberg: but look at his feet he was always tip-toeing!!!
I still think that Lesnar is 6 ft 2.25 and Goldberg around 6 ft 1.75/6 ft 2 today so Lesnar is taller but not that much.
Taker is around 6 ft 6.5
weights:
Taker: 290 pounds
Lesnar 280 pounds
Goldebrg: 248 pounds
rendi said on 24/Jan/17
Eagles said on 24/Jan/17
All no shoes measurement tonights stare down, Taker was 6'5.50", Lesnar was 6'2.25", Goldberg was 6'1.75"

Also taker looked 277lbs, Lesnar looked 273lbs, Goldberg looked 262lbs

Takers been out of his prime, Lesnar is at the end of his prime, Goldberg is past his prime


There was more than an inch difference between lesnar and goldberg, more like 1.5 inch and pretty sure Lesnar weighs way more than 273 lbs and golberg weighs below 250 lbs.
Eagles said on 24/Jan/17
All no shoes measurement tonights stare down, Taker was 6'5.50", Lesnar was 6'2.25", Goldberg was 6'1.75"

Also taker looked 277lbs, Lesnar looked 273lbs, Goldberg looked 262lbs

Takers been out of his prime, Lesnar is at the end of his prime, Goldberg is past his prime
Freak said on 23/Jan/17
This is interesting...Brock,Taker & Goldberg all in the same ring..Taker the tallest & Goldberg the shortest in the ring..
Click Here
Wrs567 said on 21/Jan/17
Stephanie McMahon is shorter than a 2012 Justin Bieber when she isn't in heels

Click Here

Rob, please don't list her in the 5'7'' range, she is shorter than that
Editor Rob
169 range is probably the most I'd argue for her.
Freak said on 20/Jan/17
Even at the Royal Rumble last year,Braun only looked max 3 inches taller than Lesnar..Braun may just be 6'6'.5 could be 6'7'..Brock ain't no 6'3' or even 6'2' but he is in between 6'2'5 tbh(189cm)...No less,A bit over 6'2'..
Randomdude said on 18/Jan/17
that was not even a proper staredown there were way to far back from each other so you couldn't even tell if it was 3 inches or 5

and as I said Lesnar was measured just over 6'2 by the NFL yes 189 is possible on a good day but he is not 190 cm he was atleast 2 inches shorter than legit 6'4 Billy Gunn
Freak said on 17/Jan/17
Looked only max 3 inches shorter than Braun Strowman..last RAW...
valentino said on 17/Jan/17
brock lesnar 189-190

goldberg 186-187

roman 188-189
Al said on 16/Jan/17
Listed as 6'2 in his first MMA bout
Freak said on 15/Jan/17
Well,the average guess doesn't lie I.e 189 cm for Lesnar which i think Lesnar is,The only time he looked 6'2' to me was when he met Triple H and was standing casually, Trips was standing straight and they looked the same..Lesnar vs Bautista at OVW was an example of how both men were the exact same height when they locked up except maybe Dave was 10lb heavier..Lesnar all these days gives a solid 189cm impression..Both Lesnar & Rock were .5 shorter than legit 6'3' Hogan...
Wrs567 said on 15/Jan/17
For me Sheamus is a near enough 6'3'' guy, probably 190cm

To me Brock Lesnar is just about 6'2'', I think Robs got his listing spot on
Viktor said on 15/Jan/17
Sheamus wear lifts
hunt said on 15/Jan/17
is a tall tank.. find him lenghthier than the prince williams
MDV said on 13/Jan/17
@Wrs567
Lesnar looked shorter because he had less footwear by 1.75 inc...Sheamus has big boots (2-2.5 inc) and Lesnar boots are around 0.5-0.75 inc...
Lesnar is around 188-189 and Sheamus around 189-190
Wrs567 said on 12/Jan/17
Brock Lesnar and Sheamus had a match at a WWE live event not too long ago

Lesnar was CLEARLY shorter than Sheamus

I'm not even including Sheamus haircut
Eagles said on 12/Jan/17
I'm 6'1.56" so Lesnar has to be 6'2"
Freak said on 11/Jan/17
Now 6'2'2/8 funny? Last time i think I saw Someone say Lesnar was measured at 6'2'3/8 ...Man,I would love to see any link based on Lesnar's actual NFL measurement,Please either provide a link or provide barefoot pics...

Heights are barefeet estimates, derived from quotations, official websites, agency resumes, in person encounters with actors at conventions and pictures/films.

Other vital statistics like weight or shoe size measurements have been sourced from newspapers, books, resumes or social media.

Celebrity Fan Photos and Agency Pictures of stars are © to their respective owners.