Add a Comment2962 comments
Average Guess (240 Votes)
5ft 11.31in (181.1cm)
5ft 11.31in (181.1cm)
Ka said on 24/Jun/11
James I have to disagree on this one. Bruce at peak was near 6 ft, looked every bit of it next to Arnie in the 80s & 90s. Even on the biggest footwear, Stallone only scrap eye to eye with him. This listing is fine on his peak. The question is Bruce is still at peak or is 5'11 now, no lower though. The reason is at the Expendable events, and w/ Colin Firth, he looks the listed height. But with Kutcher and Justin Long, he looks 5'11 flat. He can walk shorter than 5'11, but I think he's 5'11 range, pick 182, 181, or 180.
James I have to disagree on this one. Bruce at peak was near 6 ft, looked every bit of it next to Arnie in the 80s & 90s. Even on the biggest footwear, Stallone only scrap eye to eye with him. This listing is fine on his peak. The question is Bruce is still at peak or is 5'11 now, no lower though. The reason is at the Expendable events, and w/ Colin Firth, he looks the listed height. But with Kutcher and Justin Long, he looks 5'11 flat. He can walk shorter than 5'11, but I think he's 5'11 range, pick 182, 181, or 180.
Legend said on 22/Jun/11
He's 5'10.75 now.
He's 5'10.75 now.
James said on 22/Jun/11
Dmeyer says on 20/Jun/11
Was 181-2 range up to late 40s now 180cm looking 179 with bas posture
Never really looked over 5'11 or 6ft for that matter even back in the 80's.
5'11 flat i think was his peak. 5'11 1/2 and 6ft in shoes. has been 5'10 1/2 since 2005 or 2006?
Dmeyer says on 20/Jun/11
Was 181-2 range up to late 40s now 180cm looking 179 with bas posture
Never really looked over 5'11 or 6ft for that matter even back in the 80's.
5'11 flat i think was his peak. 5'11 1/2 and 6ft in shoes. has been 5'10 1/2 since 2005 or 2006?
Dural said on 22/Jun/11
James says on 11/Jun/11
5'11 (180cm) peak
5'10.5 (179cm) today
Probably will not be over 5'10 once he hits 60.
Arnie looks 180cm these days as well.
--------
Agreed
James says on 11/Jun/11
5'11 (180cm) peak
5'10.5 (179cm) today
Probably will not be over 5'10 once he hits 60.
Arnie looks 180cm these days as well.
--------
Agreed
Dmeyer said on 20/Jun/11
Was 181-2 range up to late 40s now 180cm looking 179 with bas posture
Was 181-2 range up to late 40s now 180cm looking 179 with bas posture
James said on 11/Jun/11
5'11 (180cm) peak
5'10.5 (179cm) today
Probably will not be over 5'10 once he hits 60.
Arnie looks 180cm these days as well.
5'11 (180cm) peak
5'10.5 (179cm) today
Probably will not be over 5'10 once he hits 60.
Arnie looks 180cm these days as well.
James said on 10/Jun/11
Sam looked 6'2 in Pulp Fiction and for bruce he just looked 5'11 in that film
Sam looked 6'2 in Pulp Fiction and for bruce he just looked 5'11 in that film
dmeyer said on 10/Jun/11
bruce can look similar height with arnie today arnie is 5 ft 11.75 today no more as tyou can see beside 184cm david cameron bruce looks solid 5 ft 11
bruce can look similar height with arnie today arnie is 5 ft 11.75 today no more as tyou can see beside 184cm david cameron bruce looks solid 5 ft 11
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 8/Jun/11
Saw Pulp Fiction for the millionth time last night and here are my thoughts
Samuel L. Jackson 6ft2.75(190cm)
John Travolta 6ft0.5(184cm)
Bruce Willis 5ft11.75(182cm)
Uma Thurman 5ft11(180cm)
Ving Rhames 5ft10.75(180cm)
With the exception of Jackson, I'd say that is how they'd measured back then and now
Saw Pulp Fiction for the millionth time last night and here are my thoughts
Samuel L. Jackson 6ft2.75(190cm)
John Travolta 6ft0.5(184cm)
Bruce Willis 5ft11.75(182cm)
Uma Thurman 5ft11(180cm)
Ving Rhames 5ft10.75(180cm)
With the exception of Jackson, I'd say that is how they'd measured back then and now
James said on 8/Jun/11
i have too admit even in his early films he did not look over 5'11.
i have too admit even in his early films he did not look over 5'11.
Mamun said on 6/Jun/11
Hey Brad my buddy , hopefully I will be attending the Hollywoodshows on the 16th of July ! Will you be there ?
Regards
SUPERMUN
Hey Brad my buddy , hopefully I will be attending the Hollywoodshows on the 16th of July ! Will you be there ?
Regards
SUPERMUN
mrleft3t said on 6/Jun/11
his cute tall girlfriend dont know her name is 1.78 and whehn she is not in heels he is taller so 1.80-1.82
by the way good job bruce
his cute tall girlfriend dont know her name is 1.78 and whehn she is not in heels he is taller so 1.80-1.82
by the way good job bruce
burby said on 5/Jun/11
Big heels in Oceans 12.
Big heels in Oceans 12.
Chameleon said on 31/May/11
Lalalalala RampageClover
Kutcher is 6'2 max.
Lalalalala RampageClover
Kutcher is 6'2 max.
Anna Stesia said on 30/May/11
Bruce is currently in this state filming a new flick. I was upclose and personal about 5 days ago, and can truthfully assert that he weighs about 165lbs-if that-and is roughly 5'9-in shoes. I am 5'5" and wore three inch heels that night...he and I were just about eye-level.
Bruce is currently in this state filming a new flick. I was upclose and personal about 5 days ago, and can truthfully assert that he weighs about 165lbs-if that-and is roughly 5'9-in shoes. I am 5'5" and wore three inch heels that night...he and I were just about eye-level.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 29/May/11
Ashton Kutcher is minimum 6ft2.5
Ashton Kutcher is minimum 6ft2.5
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 29/May/11
Kutcher is minimum 6ft2.5
Kutcher is minimum 6ft2.5
Laufer said on 28/May/11
I met him before 2-3 years, while i was in L.A.( "saw him" will be better) and my 6' were just under him. I would say 1.84-5.
I met him before 2-3 years, while i was in L.A.( "saw him" will be better) and my 6' were just under him. I would say 1.84-5.
Legend said on 25/May/11
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 24/May/11
Bruce Willis 5"11.75(182cm)
Ashton Kutcher 6"2.75(190cm)
-----------------------------------------------------
Kutcher is 6'1.75
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 24/May/11
Bruce Willis 5"11.75(182cm)
Ashton Kutcher 6"2.75(190cm)
-----------------------------------------------------
Kutcher is 6'1.75
Legend said on 24/May/11
He's not even 5'11 now days. 179cm is my estimate of him today.
He's not even 5'11 now days. 179cm is my estimate of him today.
Chameleon said on 24/May/11
6'1? You mean 5'11 max? most likely 5'10 range? Yeah, your right.
6'1? You mean 5'11 max? most likely 5'10 range? Yeah, your right.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 24/May/11
Bruce Willis 5"11.75(182cm)
Ashton Kutcher 6"2.75(190cm)
Bruce Willis 5"11.75(182cm)
Ashton Kutcher 6"2.75(190cm)
Brad said on 23/May/11
But I met him 20 times, he's 6' 1", best wishes, across from The Bronx Zoo.
But I met him 20 times, he's 6' 1", best wishes, across from The Bronx Zoo.
Mathew said on 23/May/11
The dudes a weak 5'11", 6'1" no way, 5'11.5" is even a stretch.
The dudes a weak 5'11", 6'1" no way, 5'11.5" is even a stretch.
Chameleon said on 19/May/11
Hes nothing over 5'11.
Hes nothing over 5'11.
James said on 16/May/11
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 14/May/11
Looks close to 6"1 in Pulp Fiction...
NO WAY he looked slightly shorter than john travolta and physically bruce looked a 5'11 guy in that film not 6'1.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 14/May/11
Looks close to 6"1 in Pulp Fiction...
NO WAY he looked slightly shorter than john travolta and physically bruce looked a 5'11 guy in that film not 6'1.
Chameleon said on 15/May/11
he's noway near 6'1.
he's noway near 6'1.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 14/May/11
Looks close to 6"1 in Pulp Fiction...
Looks close to 6"1 in Pulp Fiction...
James said on 12/May/11
Rob do you think that Ashton Kutcher could be pushing 190cm?
Rob do you think that Ashton Kutcher could be pushing 190cm?
Chameleon said on 12/May/11
Yeah might indeed be 5'10.5
Yeah might indeed be 5'10.5
marko said on 12/May/11
i think he is 5 ft 11
i think he is 5 ft 11
TheVerve180 said on 11/May/11
5ft10.5 max...yeah but hes an actor...so he must say 6feet or else he will loose his female fan base LOL!...around 5ft11.25 morning.
5ft10.5 max...yeah but hes an actor...so he must say 6feet or else he will loose his female fan base LOL!...around 5ft11.25 morning.
marko said on 10/May/11
5 FT 11.5 PEAK
5 FT 11.5 PEAK
Chameleon said on 10/May/11
Willis for sure aint nothing over 180cm, Kutcher is much taller and Im not even sure if hes a solid 6'2 lol.
Willis for sure aint nothing over 180cm, Kutcher is much taller and Im not even sure if hes a solid 6'2 lol.
James said on 9/May/11
Bruce Willis 5'11 (180cm)
Ashton Kutcher 6'2.5 (189cm)
Bruce Willis 5'11 (180cm)
Ashton Kutcher 6'2.5 (189cm)
James said on 9/May/11
dmeyer says on 7/May/11
james how tall are you
5ft9.25 (176cm)....... why are you interested to know?
dmeyer says on 7/May/11
james how tall are you
5ft9.25 (176cm)....... why are you interested to know?
TruebloodFan said on 9/May/11
@dmeyer says on 2/May/11
kutcher is 189cm in person that steel makes willis more 180 than 182
haha dmeyer, Kutcher is a questionable 6ft2 when seen on screen. he never looks as tall as Kevin Kline or Morgan Freeman, and those guys were 6ft2 peak. forget 189cm for Kutcher. it's pure fantasy, even bigger fantasy next to Diaz and she's no more than 5ft7. he was born in '1974' and he's '6ft3'. rite...
Bruce Willis is 180cm or a cm more, nothing less, but Kutcher isn't 6ft2. 6ft2 is Kline, Freeman, Affleck, etc. height. has nothing to do with Kutcher.
@dmeyer says on 2/May/11
kutcher is 189cm in person that steel makes willis more 180 than 182
haha dmeyer, Kutcher is a questionable 6ft2 when seen on screen. he never looks as tall as Kevin Kline or Morgan Freeman, and those guys were 6ft2 peak. forget 189cm for Kutcher. it's pure fantasy, even bigger fantasy next to Diaz and she's no more than 5ft7. he was born in '1974' and he's '6ft3'. rite...
Bruce Willis is 180cm or a cm more, nothing less, but Kutcher isn't 6ft2. 6ft2 is Kline, Freeman, Affleck, etc. height. has nothing to do with Kutcher.
Chameleon said on 9/May/11
No he hasnt ever seen 6 foot not in the morning either. 180 max!
No he hasnt ever seen 6 foot not in the morning either. 180 max!
dmeyer said on 7/May/11
if you want to see the video were i mesure ask rob ,
if you want to see the video were i mesure ask rob ,
dmeyer said on 7/May/11
james how tall are you
james how tall are you
dmeyer said on 7/May/11
he actualy was 3 in over me and i mesure over 5 ft 11 at night so he has to be 6 ft 2.5 range by the time i met him i thaught i was 5 ft 11 but i am a bit over that , rob saw the video were i mesure close to 6 ft at 3 pm i woke up at 8am that day by bed time i think i am near 181.5 cm , i got mesured several time 181.5 182 183 183.5 depending of the time of the day i once got mesured 181cm so thats the shortest i could be so kutcher has to be minimum 6 ft 2.25 and likely 6 ft 2.5
he actualy was 3 in over me and i mesure over 5 ft 11 at night so he has to be 6 ft 2.5 range by the time i met him i thaught i was 5 ft 11 but i am a bit over that , rob saw the video were i mesure close to 6 ft at 3 pm i woke up at 8am that day by bed time i think i am near 181.5 cm , i got mesured several time 181.5 182 183 183.5 depending of the time of the day i once got mesured 181cm so thats the shortest i could be so kutcher has to be minimum 6 ft 2.25 and likely 6 ft 2.5
ACG said on 6/May/11
Mathew says on 2/May/11
Bon_ says on 2/May/11
He still sees it in the morning easily.
No.
Yes.
Mathew says on 2/May/11
Bon_ says on 2/May/11
He still sees it in the morning easily.
No.
Yes.
ka said on 6/May/11
Click Here
Admit that some pics Bruce only looks 180 flat, but remember that a bald guy would have a hair disadvantage over others with hair. Plus Bruce does seem to stoop a little bit in some pic. Here in similiar camera position w/ 5'11 Rourke, Bruce is taller. He might still 182 cm, or pretty darn close to it
Click Here
Admit that some pics Bruce only looks 180 flat, but remember that a bald guy would have a hair disadvantage over others with hair. Plus Bruce does seem to stoop a little bit in some pic. Here in similiar camera position w/ 5'11 Rourke, Bruce is taller. He might still 182 cm, or pretty darn close to it
James said on 4/May/11
dmeyer says on 2/May/11
kutcher is 189cm in person that steel makes willis more 180 than 182
I thought u said he was not over 6'2 in person?
dmeyer says on 2/May/11
kutcher is 189cm in person that steel makes willis more 180 than 182
I thought u said he was not over 6'2 in person?
Chameleon said on 3/May/11
Apparently Timothy Olyphant was easily taller than him in Die Hard 4.
Willis has never been over 5'11 it can be argue'd that hes even in the 5'10 range.. yep.
Apparently Timothy Olyphant was easily taller than him in Die Hard 4.
Willis has never been over 5'11 it can be argue'd that hes even in the 5'10 range.. yep.
Mathew said on 2/May/11
Bon_ says on 2/May/11
He still sees it in the morning easily.
No.
Bon_ says on 2/May/11
He still sees it in the morning easily.
No.
James said on 2/May/11
Yeah for someone of Bruce's height 1 inch seems a bit extreme at only 56....... i doubt bruce was ever 6ft but more 5'11 peak.
Yeah for someone of Bruce's height 1 inch seems a bit extreme at only 56....... i doubt bruce was ever 6ft but more 5'11 peak.
dmeyer said on 2/May/11
kutcher is 189cm in person that steel makes willis more 180 than 182
kutcher is 189cm in person that steel makes willis more 180 than 182
Bon_ said on 2/May/11
He still sees it in the morning easily.
He still sees it in the morning easily.
Chameleon said on 1/May/11
He hasnt ever seen 6'0. Its obvious next to Kutcher.
He hasnt ever seen 6'0. Its obvious next to Kutcher.
Bon_ said on 21/Apr/11
6' flat at peak, now maybe 5'11.75
6' flat at peak, now maybe 5'11.75
MHouillon said on 19/Apr/11
A weak 6 footer in his heydays, a strong 181cm (5'11.25 I think) now. Beckham-height. Too short for 182, too tall for 5'11.
A weak 6 footer in his heydays, a strong 181cm (5'11.25 I think) now. Beckham-height. Too short for 182, too tall for 5'11.
tell-em said on 19/Apr/11
lol u don't lose an inch at 56. thats ridiculous. maybe a half inch but thats the most.
lol u don't lose an inch at 56. thats ridiculous. maybe a half inch but thats the most.
Alex said on 18/Apr/11
Hes 56 and could have def lost an inch.
Hes 56 and could have def lost an inch.
Legend said on 17/Apr/11
5'10.75 now
5'10.75 now
Chameleon said on 17/Apr/11
No way has he shrunk an inch, next to Kutcher he has never seen 6'0
No way has he shrunk an inch, next to Kutcher he has never seen 6'0
Alex said on 16/Apr/11
6'0 peak. 5'11 today
6'0 peak. 5'11 today
Bon_ said on 15/Apr/11
Willis's sturdy build doesn't do him any favours in height gauging, but I'm absolutely certain he's around the 6' flat mark.
Willis's sturdy build doesn't do him any favours in height gauging, but I'm absolutely certain he's around the 6' flat mark.
James said on 13/Apr/11
If Ashton Kutcher is 188cm like demeyer saw him at then bruce is looking 179cm these days in comparison.
If Ashton Kutcher is 188cm like demeyer saw him at then bruce is looking 179cm these days in comparison.
Chameleon said on 12/Apr/11
He cant be more then 180 flat considering he's towerd by Ashton Kutcher.
He cant be more then 180 flat considering he's towerd by Ashton Kutcher.
ka said on 11/Apr/11
But Bruce was tilting his head down, plus his posture isn't completely straight. Mamun was right when he said Bruce "did not reach for the star" like he and Uncle Bashir did. 5'11.5 fits Bruce good enough. I think it's his bald head made him looked more 5'11 nowaday
But Bruce was tilting his head down, plus his posture isn't completely straight. Mamun was right when he said Bruce "did not reach for the star" like he and Uncle Bashir did. 5'11.5 fits Bruce good enough. I think it's his bald head made him looked more 5'11 nowaday
TruebloodFan said on 10/Apr/11
isn't under 180.00cm @ nite for sure. IMO somehow on this pages, most big stars like Willis, Cruise, Gibson, Pitt, Sly have a being-2cm-overrated pattern. Even Arnold I believe was 185 peak, not 187.
isn't under 180.00cm @ nite for sure. IMO somehow on this pages, most big stars like Willis, Cruise, Gibson, Pitt, Sly have a being-2cm-overrated pattern. Even Arnold I believe was 185 peak, not 187.
James said on 10/Apr/11
Even if he is not quite 6ft he is still tall.
Even if he is not quite 6ft he is still tall.
Lucas said on 8/Apr/11
Now, it's simply! Let's do this reasonament:
Bruce is in the perfect medium distance between Mamun and Uncle Bashir; so the medium height is:
(1.88+1.73)/2=180,5 (5'11")
if you consider that these heights are evening heights, normally someone lost 2 cm from the morning to the night, so Bruce Willis Morning height is about 182,5 cm (5'11.75").
Personally, i think he could be also shorter tha 182,5 cm!
Now, it's simply! Let's do this reasonament:
Bruce is in the perfect medium distance between Mamun and Uncle Bashir; so the medium height is:
(1.88+1.73)/2=180,5 (5'11")
if you consider that these heights are evening heights, normally someone lost 2 cm from the morning to the night, so Bruce Willis Morning height is about 182,5 cm (5'11.75").
Personally, i think he could be also shorter tha 182,5 cm!
Brad said on 8/Apr/11
1" taller than Pitt
1" taller than Pitt
Legend said on 7/Apr/11
He's 5'10.75, thats it.
He's 5'10.75, thats it.
TruebloodFan said on 7/Apr/11
180.something cm. a full 5ft11. he's got a long head, especially the upper part. look at the eye levels and the head levels in photo with 'Uncle Bashir'. Willis is kinda leaning, but there's an ~8 cm difference in height. he's clearly above the exact average, and he is taller than Brad Pitt.
180.something cm. a full 5ft11. he's got a long head, especially the upper part. look at the eye levels and the head levels in photo with 'Uncle Bashir'. Willis is kinda leaning, but there's an ~8 cm difference in height. he's clearly above the exact average, and he is taller than Brad Pitt.
James said on 7/Apr/11
Appeared 5'11 in Pulp Fiction
Appeared 5'11 in Pulp Fiction
Lucas said on 3/Apr/11
5'11.5" (1.82 m) out of bed at his peak
5'11" now
I don't think he ever been over 1.82 m.
5'11.5" (1.82 m) out of bed at his peak
5'11" now
I don't think he ever been over 1.82 m.
Brad said on 31/Mar/11
James is correct, frame it.
James is correct, frame it.
James said on 30/Mar/11
Bruce Willis 5'11
Ashton Kutcher 6'2
Bruce Willis 5'11
Ashton Kutcher 6'2
marshall said on 29/Mar/11
c'mon give him 6 foot, anyone who is '.5' off the next inch will be that inch in the morning anyway.
c'mon give him 6 foot, anyone who is '.5' off the next inch will be that inch in the morning anyway.
Chameleon said on 29/Mar/11
Keep in mind that Ashton Kutcher towers over this guy..
Keep in mind that Ashton Kutcher towers over this guy..
Bon_ said on 26/Mar/11
Bullcrap, Willis is at least 5'11.75, but now I think he's 183 cm or 6'flat
Bullcrap, Willis is at least 5'11.75, but now I think he's 183 cm or 6'flat
toby said on 23/Mar/11
Looks about 5'10 barefoot. No idea how he gets away with saying hes 6'2
Looks about 5'10 barefoot. No idea how he gets away with saying hes 6'2
Brad said on 14/Mar/11
G grammar but I agree, Ben destroys other A listers large, he had to wear Stallone wedge jobs.
G grammar but I agree, Ben destroys other A listers large, he had to wear Stallone wedge jobs.
James said on 13/Mar/11
Brad says on 12/Mar/11
In Armaggedon he was in the biggest lifts of his career
Esspecially if he had did star alongside Ben Afflick.
Brad says on 12/Mar/11
In Armaggedon he was in the biggest lifts of his career
Esspecially if he had did star alongside Ben Afflick.
Brad said on 12/Mar/11
In Armaggedon he was in the biggest lifts of his career
In Armaggedon he was in the biggest lifts of his career
James said on 10/Mar/11
Yeah LOL like there really is 1 inch between kutcher and bruce
Yeah LOL like there really is 1 inch between kutcher and bruce
dmeyer said on 10/Mar/11
defenetly lifts in some of his movies looks 6 ft 1 in some scenes in armaggedon and the fifth element he can pull off 185cm but most times looks 180 182 range
defenetly lifts in some of his movies looks 6 ft 1 in some scenes in armaggedon and the fifth element he can pull off 185cm but most times looks 180 182 range
tell-em said on 10/Mar/11
he wishes he had david letterman, carson daly, damon wayans, or even chris tucker's height. you should the films of his with taller actors. he packs big boots/lifts in em.
he wishes he had david letterman, carson daly, damon wayans, or even chris tucker's height. you should the films of his with taller actors. he packs big boots/lifts in em.
Brad said on 9/Mar/11
5' 11" peak. Cybil took off her shoes most of the time with Bruce in lifts on Moonlighting. G said 6' 1" and he met him "many times". The laughter still is heard.
5' 11" peak. Cybil took off her shoes most of the time with Bruce in lifts on Moonlighting. G said 6' 1" and he met him "many times". The laughter still is heard.
dmeyer said on 9/Mar/11
i met kutcher he is about 6 ft 2 to 6 ft 2.5 and willis dosnt seem more than 3 to 3.5 in shorter so 5 ft 11
i met kutcher he is about 6 ft 2 to 6 ft 2.5 and willis dosnt seem more than 3 to 3.5 in shorter so 5 ft 11
Chameleon said on 9/Mar/11
Yes 180 without shoes for sure, Ashton Kutcher towers this guy!
Yes 180 without shoes for sure, Ashton Kutcher towers this guy!
JD89 said on 8/Mar/11
in THE FIFTH ELEMENT he was taller than Milla Jovovich and Chris Tucker by a lot of inches ,he looked about 6'3(190) in it (obviously he's not that tall).
by the way i saw a 1997 photo of the entire cast at the Cannes film festival and he looked shorter than Tucker by a couple of inches and about the same height of Milla with heels on , Milla is exactly 174cm (claimed it in an italian fashion magazine same years ago)+ 10cm heels about 6'(183cm) ,Tucker is 6'2(188cm)with shoes , judging from the photo Willis is 6'(183cm) with shoes on , 5'11(180cm) barefoot.
in THE FIFTH ELEMENT he was taller than Milla Jovovich and Chris Tucker by a lot of inches ,he looked about 6'3(190) in it (obviously he's not that tall).
by the way i saw a 1997 photo of the entire cast at the Cannes film festival and he looked shorter than Tucker by a couple of inches and about the same height of Milla with heels on , Milla is exactly 174cm (claimed it in an italian fashion magazine same years ago)+ 10cm heels about 6'(183cm) ,Tucker is 6'2(188cm)with shoes , judging from the photo Willis is 6'(183cm) with shoes on , 5'11(180cm) barefoot.
dmeyer said on 8/Mar/11
in movies he can looks 5 ft 11.5 and over
in movies he can looks 5 ft 11.5 and over
tell-em said on 7/Mar/11
mamun stated that he had 1 inch shoes, and willis had footwear advantage. willis has been known to wear big footwear and cowboy boots.
mamun stated that he had 1 inch shoes, and willis had footwear advantage. willis has been known to wear big footwear and cowboy boots.
James said on 6/Mar/11
i agree Demeyer 6ft was unlikely for his peak. more a 5'11 guy but he was still above average in height.
i agree Demeyer 6ft was unlikely for his peak. more a 5'11 guy but he was still above average in height.
dmeyer said on 6/Mar/11
5 ft 11 now a smidge over it at peak maybe
5 ft 11 now a smidge over it at peak maybe
dmeyer said on 6/Mar/11
does mamun remeber wath footwear him and willis had
does mamun remeber wath footwear him and willis had
dmeyer said on 6/Mar/11
rob do you agree willis now is 5 ft 11 or 5 ft 10.75 wath is the shortest he could be today at evening height and wath height was he at his lowest at night
Editor Rob
rob do you agree willis now is 5 ft 11 or 5 ft 10.75 wath is the shortest he could be today at evening height and wath height was he at his lowest at night
Editor Rob 5ft 11 today could be reasonable, I don't know if he drops under that mark though.
dmeyer said on 6/Mar/11
he looks about 1 in under 6ft geena davis and he has very low heeled footwear 0.5 in type and not grea posture wis proves he was nothing less than 5 ft 11 peak like near 6 ft out of bed at peak 5 ft 11 to 5 ft 11.5 is arguable now 5 ft 10.5 to 5 ft 11 is arguable
he looks about 1 in under 6ft geena davis and he has very low heeled footwear 0.5 in type and not grea posture wis proves he was nothing less than 5 ft 11 peak like near 6 ft out of bed at peak 5 ft 11 to 5 ft 11.5 is arguable now 5 ft 10.5 to 5 ft 11 is arguable
Klaus said on 6/Mar/11
He looks a strong 5'11 with Mamum.
He looks a strong 5'11 with Mamum.
James said on 4/Mar/11
Aaron says on 4/Mar/11
"Quite a tall guy at his peak and still is to a degree."
How do you figure, James? 5'11" is average, and average, IMO, is pathetic :P.
Bruce is average at best; always looked small to me. He doesn't have the greatest genes either. Take one look at Rumer Willis; microcephalic with a giant cherubic chin.
I thought the average was 5'9?
Aaron says on 4/Mar/11
"Quite a tall guy at his peak and still is to a degree."
How do you figure, James? 5'11" is average, and average, IMO, is pathetic :P.
Bruce is average at best; always looked small to me. He doesn't have the greatest genes either. Take one look at Rumer Willis; microcephalic with a giant cherubic chin.
I thought the average was 5'9?
Bon_ said on 4/Mar/11
Barefoot 5'11 is clearly above average, I'd venture to say particularly in some western countries where giving height in shoes is quite popular.
Barefoot 5'11 is clearly above average, I'd venture to say particularly in some western countries where giving height in shoes is quite popular.
ikbtops said on 4/Mar/11
Never been tall in anything,ever.
Never been tall in anything,ever.
dmeyer said on 4/Mar/11
around 5 ft 11 peak and still near that now
around 5 ft 11 peak and still near that now
Aaron said on 4/Mar/11
"Quite a tall guy at his peak and still is to a degree."
How do you figure, James? 5'11" is average, and average, IMO, is pathetic :P.
Bruce is average at best; always looked small to me. He doesn't have the greatest genes either. Take one look at Rumer Willis; microcephalic with a giant cherubic chin.
"Quite a tall guy at his peak and still is to a degree."
How do you figure, James? 5'11" is average, and average, IMO, is pathetic :P.
Bruce is average at best; always looked small to me. He doesn't have the greatest genes either. Take one look at Rumer Willis; microcephalic with a giant cherubic chin.
dmeyer said on 2/Mar/11
bruce lost max 1cm maybe only 0.5cm he aint that old and he is fit 5 ft 11.25 to 5 ft 11.5 peak 5 ft 10.75 to 5 ft 11 now
bruce lost max 1cm maybe only 0.5cm he aint that old and he is fit 5 ft 11.25 to 5 ft 11.5 peak 5 ft 10.75 to 5 ft 11 now
Ed said on 26/Feb/11
5-10 met him and he was barefoot... 5-11.5 no way
5-10 met him and he was barefoot... 5-11.5 no way
Bon_ said on 25/Feb/11
6' flat is just about possible at his peak, but not anything over that surely
6' flat is just about possible at his peak, but not anything over that surely
tell-em said on 24/Feb/11
too bad mamun doesn't remember saying that. but i remember. and that anonymous poster was me!
too bad mamun doesn't remember saying that. but i remember. and that anonymous poster was me!
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 24/Feb/11
Looks an inch shorter than 6"1(185cm) Colin Firth...making him look 6"0(183cm)
Looks an inch shorter than 6"1(185cm) Colin Firth...making him look 6"0(183cm)
James said on 23/Feb/11
oh if bruce had footware advantage then i take 6ft back.
oh if bruce had footware advantage then i take 6ft back.
James said on 23/Feb/11
6'0 (183cm) peak
6'0 (183cm) peak
Anonymous said on 23/Feb/11
5'11''...not 6'0". mamun has stated that willis had footwear advantage 3 years ago. 6'2" sam jackson had 3 inches on willis.
5'11''...not 6'0". mamun has stated that willis had footwear advantage 3 years ago. 6'2" sam jackson had 3 inches on willis.
burby said on 22/Feb/11
5'11.03" peak height with a Stallone effect added.
5'11.03" peak height with a Stallone effect added.
RisingForce said on 21/Feb/11
Thanks, Mamun, I noticed that when I first saw the pictures and I agree.
Thanks, Mamun, I noticed that when I first saw the pictures and I agree.
James said on 21/Feb/11
With 187cm Colin Firth looks close to 6'
Click Here
Click Here
i think he could still be 182cm judging by those photos. Very good chance he was 183cm in his 20's.
With 187cm Colin Firth looks close to 6'
Click Here
Click Here
i think he could still be 182cm judging by those photos. Very good chance he was 183cm in his 20's.
James said on 21/Feb/11
What seems odd to me is that mamun estimated arnie at 5'10-5'11 and Bruce at 6'0.........
What seems odd to me is that mamun estimated arnie at 5'10-5'11 and Bruce at 6'0.........
Brad said on 21/Feb/11
Correct Rob G. Never was over.
Correct Rob G. Never was over.
James said on 20/Feb/11
Either 5'11.75 or 6'0 for his peak. I think there is a good chance he was 6'0 for sure but never over that mark.
today probably 5'11.25 (181cm).
he's a tall guy.
Either 5'11.75 or 6'0 for his peak. I think there is a good chance he was 6'0 for sure but never over that mark.
today probably 5'11.25 (181cm).
he's a tall guy.
Rob G said on 20/Feb/11
@RICHARD
Pitt is most probably NOT 5'11", just check out his page here.
Willis was and is a solid 5'11" and no more.
@RICHARD
Pitt is most probably NOT 5'11", just check out his page here.
Willis was and is a solid 5'11" and no more.
Mamun said on 18/Feb/11
My verdict , Bruce is not " REACHING FOR THE STARS " like me and uncle Bashir ! You can all clearly see that in the above pictures . He could have gained some more height if he was to put up our kind of posture . 6' is possible for Bruce !
Hope this helps !
Regards
SUPERMUN
My verdict , Bruce is not " REACHING FOR THE STARS " like me and uncle Bashir ! You can all clearly see that in the above pictures . He could have gained some more height if he was to put up our kind of posture . 6' is possible for Bruce !
Hope this helps !
Regards
SUPERMUN
RICHARD said on 18/Feb/11
I believe he's around 182 cm still,hell even back in 1995s 12 Monkeys he was slightly taller than 5ft11 Brad Pitt,though Pitt had hair advantage while Willis was completely bald so in some scenes both appeared the same height,but I'm willing to bet Willis is still taller than Pitt,esp.if he has good posture and no lifts/
I believe he's around 182 cm still,hell even back in 1995s 12 Monkeys he was slightly taller than 5ft11 Brad Pitt,though Pitt had hair advantage while Willis was completely bald so in some scenes both appeared the same height,but I'm willing to bet Willis is still taller than Pitt,esp.if he has good posture and no lifts/
James said on 17/Feb/11
i think his footware advantage in the pic probably makes him look 6ft 1/2?
i think his footware advantage in the pic probably makes him look 6ft 1/2?
tell-em said on 17/Feb/11
hes probably in lifts or has footwear advantage over mamun. mamun has stated that willis had footwear advantage. mamun was in 1 inch shoes.
hes probably in lifts or has footwear advantage over mamun. mamun has stated that willis had footwear advantage. mamun was in 1 inch shoes.
Brad said on 16/Feb/11
James must be drinking "G Juice"...guaranteed to elevate celeb heights 1-2 inches after drinking.
James must be drinking "G Juice"...guaranteed to elevate celeb heights 1-2 inches after drinking.
James said on 9/Feb/11
In the left pics given Bruce has worse posture than Mamun he actually looks like could be 6'1/2 if he stood as well as Mamun.
With Uncle Bashir looks 5'10.5 leaning foward and 5'11.5 maybe if he stood as bood as Bashir.
Rob do you think 5'11.75 or 6'0 for bruce when he was in his 20's?
Editor Rob
In the left pics given Bruce has worse posture than Mamun he actually looks like could be 6'1/2 if he stood as well as Mamun.
With Uncle Bashir looks 5'10.5 leaning foward and 5'11.5 maybe if he stood as bood as Bashir.
Rob do you think 5'11.75 or 6'0 for bruce when he was in his 20's?
Editor Rob 182cm is fair, whether 11.5 or 11.75, I think you could argue anywhere in the 5ft 11-6ft range for him.
James said on 7/Feb/11
Yeah Kutcher toweres over Bruce
Yeah Kutcher toweres over Bruce
Chameleon said on 6/Feb/11
I agree, I remember seeing a backstage video of Bruce next to Ashton Kutcher, he was owned... I say 1.80
I agree, I remember seeing a backstage video of Bruce next to Ashton Kutcher, he was owned... I say 1.80
Rob G said on 1/Feb/11
Shorter than Perry, shorter than Olyphant, he's 5'11" and no more.
Shorter than Perry, shorter than Olyphant, he's 5'11" and no more.
Bon_ said on 28/Jan/11
5'11.5 at least at peak, more likely around 5'11.75.
5'11.5 at least at peak, more likely around 5'11.75.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 27/Jan/11
5"11.75(182cm)
Close to 6"1(185cm) in shoes
5"11.75(182cm)
Close to 6"1(185cm) in shoes
James said on 23/Jan/11
Bruce gives 6'1 guys a bad reputation.
Bruce gives 6'1 guys a bad reputation.
Brad said on 22/Jan/11
Big lifts with Ben. The stuff he wore with Cybil are out of the 70's, monster heel. The fact he claims 6' 1" means he is paranoid. Hey, Bruce, 5' 11" bud, never more.
Big lifts with Ben. The stuff he wore with Cybil are out of the 70's, monster heel. The fact he claims 6' 1" means he is paranoid. Hey, Bruce, 5' 11" bud, never more.
James said on 22/Jan/11
Quite a tall guy at his peak and still is to a degree.
Quite a tall guy at his peak and still is to a degree.
TruebloodFan said on 22/Jan/11
I agree about scenes with Affleck. He did look easily over 6ft. Lifts probably.
Watch 'Death Becomes Her'. That movie is a good proof that Bruce has always been a strong 5ft11. He wasn't a full 6ft, but certainly over the 180cm mark.
I agree about scenes with Affleck. He did look easily over 6ft. Lifts probably.
Watch 'Death Becomes Her'. That movie is a good proof that Bruce has always been a strong 5ft11. He wasn't a full 6ft, but certainly over the 180cm mark.
the shredder said on 22/Jan/11
I don't know why you guys go crazy over the 6'1 that he claims , he has claimed 6'0 also , he could be 6'0.5 with shoes , 5'11 or a little over seems right barefoot and yes Glenn was off at times , 6'3 Will Smith lol !
I don't know why you guys go crazy over the 6'1 that he claims , he has claimed 6'0 also , he could be 6'0.5 with shoes , 5'11 or a little over seems right barefoot and yes Glenn was off at times , 6'3 Will Smith lol !
tell-em said on 21/Jan/11
5'11" tops peak,and about 5'10.5" today. look at him w/ letterman...LOL @ his 6'1" claim.
5'11" tops peak,and about 5'10.5" today. look at him w/ letterman...LOL @ his 6'1" claim.
Ace said on 21/Jan/11
I cannot in good faith see Willis at 6`1.5 in this image :P Click Here
Especially considering that Cybill is barefoot!
I cannot in good faith see Willis at 6`1.5 in this image :P Click Here
Especially considering that Cybill is barefoot!
James said on 20/Jan/11
6'1.5 in dress shoes LOL I am dying of laughter.
6'1.5 in dress shoes LOL I am dying of laughter.
Brad said on 20/Jan/11
6' 1" is laughable. In those 2.5" heeled customs in '85 he'd be 6' 3.5" with Sybil.
6' 1" is laughable. In those 2.5" heeled customs in '85 he'd be 6' 3.5" with Sybil.
Clay said on 20/Jan/11
Glenn saw him at 6'1-6'2 consistently.
Glenn saw him at 6'1-6'2 consistently.
tell-em said on 19/Jan/11
not even in casuals would he reach 6'1"
not even in casuals would he reach 6'1"
Dutchtower 6\'8 said on 19/Jan/11
Looks no more than 5 '11
Looks no more than 5 '11
Rob G said on 17/Jan/11
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 16/Jan/11
6"1.5(187cm) in dress shoes
lol !!!
Sorry, but when did you EVER seen him at 6'1.5"?
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 16/Jan/11
6"1.5(187cm) in dress shoes
lol !!!
Sorry, but when did you EVER seen him at 6'1.5"?
James said on 17/Jan/11
Sam Jackson was a 6'2 guy at his peak.
Sam Jackson was a 6'2 guy at his peak.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 16/Jan/11
6"1.5(187cm) in dress shoes
6"1.5(187cm) in dress shoes
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 14/Jan/11
Samuel L. Jackson was 6"2.75 in his prime
Samuel L. Jackson was 6"2.75 in his prime
Anonymous said on 13/Jan/11
he did looks tall in RED, but Morgan Freeman could look sometimes 3" taller than Bruce, so 5'11.5 it's fairly safe.
he did looks tall in RED, but Morgan Freeman could look sometimes 3" taller than Bruce, so 5'11.5 it's fairly safe.
tell-em said on 10/Jan/11
lol @ his 6'1" claims. letterman, a true 6'1" man clearly owned him by a near 3 inches.
lol @ his 6'1" claims. letterman, a true 6'1" man clearly owned him by a near 3 inches.
burby said on 10/Jan/11
6'1" in space with Affleck, on the moon with Shepard, and in the black hole of height that is the Bronx.
6'1" in space with Affleck, on the moon with Shepard, and in the black hole of height that is the Bronx.
Brad said on 9/Jan/11
He wore them with Cybil.
He wore them with Cybil.
Master of Rolls said on 9/Jan/11
yup da stated height above is right
yup da stated height above is right
James said on 8/Jan/11
Brad says on 7/Jan/11
But he claims 6' 1", intense laughter.
6'1 if he borrowed Slys pair of shoes.
Brad says on 7/Jan/11
But he claims 6' 1", intense laughter.
6'1 if he borrowed Slys pair of shoes.
Brad said on 7/Jan/11
But he claims 6' 1", intense laughter.
But he claims 6' 1", intense laughter.
Legend said on 5/Jan/11
He's always been 5'10.5
He's always been 5'10.5
James said on 4/Jan/11
yeah bruce did look tallish in armedgeddon.
yeah bruce did look tallish in armedgeddon.
Brad said on 4/Jan/11
I've seen Ben in person, if Willis looks tall with Ben, he's in customs.
I've seen Ben in person, if Willis looks tall with Ben, he's in customs.
ACG said on 3/Jan/11
Brad says on 25/Dec/10
With Ben, he had on whoppers.
And you know this how.....?
Brad says on 25/Dec/10
With Ben, he had on whoppers.
And you know this how.....?
James said on 2/Jan/11
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 24/Dec/10
Really James....
I thought he could look about 6"1 in that movie when standing next to 6"2.25(189cm) Ben Affleck
Well maybe that is because in the scenes he had with ben afflick he did not want to look small.
that said he did look a good 1inch taller than 5'10 1/2 Owen Wilson.
still though 181-182cm in Armeggedon. Ben Afflick was really not that much taller than bruce willis at only 3 inches so i do not really know why he wanted to wear 'whoppers' with ben. LOL its not like he was sharing a scene with tim robbins who would have really made him look short.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 24/Dec/10
Really James....
I thought he could look about 6"1 in that movie when standing next to 6"2.25(189cm) Ben Affleck
Well maybe that is because in the scenes he had with ben afflick he did not want to look small.
that said he did look a good 1inch taller than 5'10 1/2 Owen Wilson.
still though 181-182cm in Armeggedon. Ben Afflick was really not that much taller than bruce willis at only 3 inches so i do not really know why he wanted to wear 'whoppers' with ben. LOL its not like he was sharing a scene with tim robbins who would have really made him look short.
Clay said on 29/Dec/10
In Armageddon he did look kinda tall.
In Armageddon he did look kinda tall.
xkon said on 27/Dec/10
Do you think he looks 6ft on the right photo next to 6ft2 Uncle Bashir. I think the height difference should not be that big between a 6ft2 and 6ft person.
Do you think he looks 6ft on the right photo next to 6ft2 Uncle Bashir. I think the height difference should not be that big between a 6ft2 and 6ft person.
Brad said on 25/Dec/10
With Ben, he had on whoppers.
With Ben, he had on whoppers.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 24/Dec/10
Really James....
I thought he could look about 6"1 in that movie when standing next to 6"2.25(189cm) Ben Affleck
Really James....
I thought he could look about 6"1 in that movie when standing next to 6"2.25(189cm) Ben Affleck
James said on 22/Dec/10
182cm max in Armeggedon.
182cm max in Armeggedon.
Spence said on 21/Dec/10
Peak 5'11.5 today 5'11..Never a full 6
Peak 5'11.5 today 5'11..Never a full 6
Zack Hull said on 18/Dec/10
Bruce Willis had to be a very cool superhero in the Die Hard series. He's not a giant. It would be cool if he were 6'4" barefoot and 6'5" in shoes. In the movie called The Kid, he is like "Somebody call the Waah-ambulance!" Funny quote. I'll say.
Bruce Willis had to be a very cool superhero in the Die Hard series. He's not a giant. It would be cool if he were 6'4" barefoot and 6'5" in shoes. In the movie called The Kid, he is like "Somebody call the Waah-ambulance!" Funny quote. I'll say.
dirtyharry1979 said on 16/Dec/10
Willis has got lifts on man, come on! I've always seen this guy as 5'10" realistically. He's fantastic though isn't he. Love his films.
Willis has got lifts on man, come on! I've always seen this guy as 5'10" realistically. He's fantastic though isn't he. Love his films.
James said on 2/Dec/10
180cm at night today.
180cm at night today.
Bon said on 30/Nov/10
5'11.75 peak is alright for him, and no more.
5'11.75 peak is alright for him, and no more.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 26/Nov/10
A little under 6"0...182/183cm
A little under 6"0...182/183cm
lolo said on 23/Nov/10
looks 5'11 on both pictures
looks 5'11 on both pictures
Brad said on 16/Nov/10
5' 11" for the last 35 years.
5' 11" for the last 35 years.
Pamco said on 13/Nov/10
Looked a solid 6'0 in die hard 2
Looked a solid 6'0 in die hard 2
Anonymous said on 12/Nov/10
never 6'0". 5'11" flat and today hes below that.
never 6'0". 5'11" flat and today hes below that.
Dash RipRoc said on 11/Nov/10
Met him in '02 at a restaurant in NYC with Mr Joseph Peshie;definitely 6'1/2".Definitely a grounded,focused professional with a keen sense of street smarts and wisdom.Good sense of humor too.He's a funny guy you know.
Met him in '02 at a restaurant in NYC with Mr Joseph Peshie;definitely 6'1/2".Definitely a grounded,focused professional with a keen sense of street smarts and wisdom.Good sense of humor too.He's a funny guy you know.
James said on 11/Nov/10
6ft flat in the morning in the 1980's.
6ft flat in the morning in the 1980's.
TruebloodFan said on 11/Nov/10
6ft flat in the 80s. 181-2 today is realistic for this guy.
6ft flat in the 80s. 181-2 today is realistic for this guy.
Legend said on 5/Nov/10
5'10.75 is Bruce Willis, Good actor.
5'10.75 is Bruce Willis, Good actor.
James said on 3/Nov/10
He really is not 6'0 Brandon.
He really is not 6'0 Brandon.
Brandon said on 2/Nov/10
I've heard he's about 6'0 like me.
I've heard he's about 6'0 like me.
anonymous said on 1/Nov/10
you're blind its 3 inches. when hes standing a bit behind its over 3 inches. hes 5'10" these days.
you're blind its 3 inches. when hes standing a bit behind its over 3 inches. hes 5'10" these days.
James said on 1/Nov/10
Letterman was never 6'2 look at him with Alan Light.
Letterman was never 6'2 look at him with Alan Light.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 31/Oct/10
Letterman could've been 6"2 at peak.
Letterman could've been 6"2 at peak.
Bon said on 31/Oct/10
181.5-182.0 at his peak in the evening
181.5-182.0 at his peak in the evening
RisingForce said on 30/Oct/10
I just watched it, if Letterman is 6'1.5" then Bruce isn't 5'10". He looks smaller at first because he's standing a bit behind him. The 5'10" stuff is silly to me.
I just watched it, if Letterman is 6'1.5" then Bruce isn't 5'10". He looks smaller at first because he's standing a bit behind him. The 5'10" stuff is silly to me.
James said on 30/Oct/10
David Letterman must be 6'1 flat nowadays
David Letterman must be 6'1 flat nowadays
Anonymous said on 29/Oct/10
well he didn't look 5'11" next to letterman this week. he looked about 5'10". go youtube it. its up.
well he didn't look 5'11" next to letterman this week. he looked about 5'10". go youtube it. its up.
Dural said on 29/Oct/10
He could be 5'10.5" today and 5'11" peak. I doubt he was ever taller than 5'11.5".
He could be 5'10.5" today and 5'11" peak. I doubt he was ever taller than 5'11.5".
RisingForce said on 28/Oct/10
He's not 5'10" and I think he's taller than a flat 5'11".
He's not 5'10" and I think he's taller than a flat 5'11".
jtm said on 28/Oct/10
he is 5'10-5'10.5 nowadays and stallone is 5'7.
he is 5'10-5'10.5 nowadays and stallone is 5'7.
176cm said on 27/Oct/10
looks 5'10.5" to me
looks 5'10.5" to me
Brad said on 27/Oct/10
He might be.
He might be.
James said on 26/Oct/10
He was never a full 6ft even at his peak.
Brad how do you know he's never been over 5'11? If he was never over 5'11 then that would mean his current his 5'10 1/2.
He was never a full 6ft even at his peak.
Brad how do you know he's never been over 5'11? If he was never over 5'11 then that would mean his current his 5'10 1/2.
Ed said on 3/Jul/09
Alex2401 makes a good point...I recently shot a scene with another actor who is a good 6.2.5 and during the scenes where we are walking together I only look about 1-2 inches shorter than him, when in reality Im 4 inches shorter...you just cant tell on film.
Alex2401 makes a good point...I recently shot a scene with another actor who is a good 6.2.5 and during the scenes where we are walking together I only look about 1-2 inches shorter than him, when in reality Im 4 inches shorter...you just cant tell on film.
Ed said on 3/Jul/09
no its not James, he could be 5.11 barefooted but really is no more...i saw him at 5.10.5
no its not James, he could be 5.11 barefooted but really is no more...i saw him at 5.10.5
James said on 3/Jul/09
well its not easy to tell between 5'10.5 and 5'11.
well its not easy to tell between 5'10.5 and 5'11.
ed said on 3/Jul/09
Funny that some of you are comparing Bruce's height to Matt Perry... I already mentioned the story about being face to face with Bruce when he was barefoot at a party and he is 5.10.5 on the nose...since I am 5.10 and was nose to nose with him and i had my sneakers on.
I also saw Matt Perry in person at the Grill in the bottom of the Beverly Hills Hotel a few years ago. I was sitting there having lunch and he walked in looking like he just woke up, with the Wall St. Journal in his hands. He is 6.0 no taller, no shorter... Definitely taller than Willis when I saw him at the party...
btw, im no celeb stalker or paratzi, just have worked in businesses where ive ran in to some of them...
Funny that some of you are comparing Bruce's height to Matt Perry... I already mentioned the story about being face to face with Bruce when he was barefoot at a party and he is 5.10.5 on the nose...since I am 5.10 and was nose to nose with him and i had my sneakers on.
I also saw Matt Perry in person at the Grill in the bottom of the Beverly Hills Hotel a few years ago. I was sitting there having lunch and he walked in looking like he just woke up, with the Wall St. Journal in his hands. He is 6.0 no taller, no shorter... Definitely taller than Willis when I saw him at the party...
btw, im no celeb stalker or paratzi, just have worked in businesses where ive ran in to some of them...
James said on 2/Jul/09
Demeyer mentiond on the Matthew Perry height page that he can look similar height to David Scwhimmer on freinds.
Demeyer mentiond on the Matthew Perry height page that he can look similar height to David Scwhimmer on freinds.
Alex2401 said on 2/Jul/09
Don't compare Bruce in movies,do it in real life photos and videos.In Armageddon
he is inch shorter than Ben Affleck,in real life clips 3" maybe 4".
In Whole ten yards he is taller than Perry in real life clips shorter.
So Bruce is definitely 5'11 or shorter.
Don't compare Bruce in movies,do it in real life photos and videos.In Armageddon
he is inch shorter than Ben Affleck,in real life clips 3" maybe 4".
In Whole ten yards he is taller than Perry in real life clips shorter.
So Bruce is definitely 5'11 or shorter.
Rob G said on 2/Jul/09
James, Perry certainly does look it a lot, but then again he appeared same height as Agassi who is roughly 5'11" (anyone remember that picture) but he also often looks genuinly tall, more on the 6'0" side, so I give him 5'11.5" or 5'11.75" to be precise, but there is a good chance he wakes at 6'0" or little above that mark. As to Willis I really don't now, maybe he was 5'11.5" peak or something, but nowadays he looks no more then 5'11" to me.
James, Perry certainly does look it a lot, but then again he appeared same height as Agassi who is roughly 5'11" (anyone remember that picture) but he also often looks genuinly tall, more on the 6'0" side, so I give him 5'11.5" or 5'11.75" to be precise, but there is a good chance he wakes at 6'0" or little above that mark. As to Willis I really don't now, maybe he was 5'11.5" peak or something, but nowadays he looks no more then 5'11" to me.
James said on 2/Jul/09
Maybe Perrys 6ft?
Maybe Perrys 6ft?
Sam said on 2/Jul/09
He does look exactly 5'11.5 with Mam.
He does look exactly 5'11.5 with Mam.
TELLEM said on 1/Jul/09
James says on 1/Jul/09
Remeber though Bruce is bald and Perry migth have hair advantage making him look taller
go watch the whole nine yards, then the trl clips, and if you don't have a change of mind, then ur hopeless
James says on 1/Jul/09
Remeber though Bruce is bald and Perry migth have hair advantage making him look taller
go watch the whole nine yards, then the trl clips, and if you don't have a change of mind, then ur hopeless
James said on 1/Jul/09
Remeber though Bruce is bald and Perry migth have hair advantage making him look taller
Remeber though Bruce is bald and Perry migth have hair advantage making him look taller
Rob G said on 1/Jul/09
Well to be fair it is a while since I saw The whole nine yards so you guys may be right that he looked same height as Perry. I give him 5'11".
Well to be fair it is a while since I saw The whole nine yards so you guys may be right that he looked same height as Perry. I give him 5'11".
TELLEM said on 30/Jun/09
those vids show hes 5'11 next to matthew perry. in "the whole nine yards" willis looked a bit taller/same height as perry, but here he looks obviously shorter.
those vids show hes 5'11 next to matthew perry. in "the whole nine yards" willis looked a bit taller/same height as perry, but here he looks obviously shorter.
unknown said on 30/Jun/09
Rob G....I agree, Perry and Willis heights need to be switched or Perry needs a upgrade. Perry never looks shorter than Willis haven't found one vid yet
Rob G....I agree, Perry and Willis heights need to be switched or Perry needs a upgrade. Perry never looks shorter than Willis haven't found one vid yet
James said on 30/Jun/09
Rob G yeah but in tht movie I saw with Perry and Willis, compared to how Matthe Perry looked against some other guys in the film I did not find it easy to belive 6'1.
Brad says on 30/Jun/09
Willis is 5' 11".
Nowadays maybe but at peak he could have been over.
Rob G yeah but in tht movie I saw with Perry and Willis, compared to how Matthe Perry looked against some other guys in the film I did not find it easy to belive 6'1.
Brad says on 30/Jun/09
Willis is 5' 11".
Nowadays maybe but at peak he could have been over.
Brad said on 30/Jun/09
Willis is 5' 11".
Willis is 5' 11".
Rob G said on 29/Jun/09
Hehe yeah James the exact same thing happened to me, I also pegged Willis at 6'0" and Perry at 6'1" ... until I opened my eyes here... But what bothers me is that Perry is listed on this site at 5'11.25" and Willis at 5'11.5" but it seems it should be the other way round, I mean look at the second video I posted Perry appears to have easily 2 inches on Willis
Hehe yeah James the exact same thing happened to me, I also pegged Willis at 6'0" and Perry at 6'1" ... until I opened my eyes here... But what bothers me is that Perry is listed on this site at 5'11.25" and Willis at 5'11.5" but it seems it should be the other way round, I mean look at the second video I posted Perry appears to have easily 2 inches on Willis
James said on 29/Jun/09
Funny Rob G in 2006 before I came on this site I saw that film and thought that Perry and Willis were both 6'1ers lol. Well actually originally I though Perry was 6'1 and Willis was 6'0.
Funny Rob G in 2006 before I came on this site I saw that film and thought that Perry and Willis were both 6'1ers lol. Well actually originally I though Perry was 6'1 and Willis was 6'0.
TELLEM said on 29/Jun/09
same height as 5'11 tom sizemore
same height as 5'11 tom sizemore
Rob G said on 29/Jun/09
James, he looked similar to Perry's height in Friends, yes, but other than that I thought he looked about an inch under Perry in Whole nine yards and Whole ten yards, also check this out, Willis looks shorter here at 3:00
Click Here
or here, at about 1:30 - 1:45
Click Here
To sum up Willis really looks clearly shorter than Perry
James, he looked similar to Perry's height in Friends, yes, but other than that I thought he looked about an inch under Perry in Whole nine yards and Whole ten yards, also check this out, Willis looks shorter here at 3:00
Click Here
or here, at about 1:30 - 1:45
Click Here
To sum up Willis really looks clearly shorter than Perry
James said on 28/Jun/09
I thought he looked the same height as Perry
I thought he looked the same height as Perry
Rob G said on 28/Jun/09
Shorter than a weak 6'0" Matthew Perry
Shorter than a weak 6'0" Matthew Perry
James said on 27/Jun/09
Shorter than 6ft Timoth Olyphant
Shorter than 6ft Timoth Olyphant
Frank2 said on 27/Jun/09
Willis should be shorter than Turturro since Willis is 5'11".
Willis should be shorter than Turturro since Willis is 5'11".
TELLEM said on 26/Jun/09
wasn't willis shorter than 6'0 john turturro in What just happened?
wasn't willis shorter than 6'0 john turturro in What just happened?
DMEYER said on 26/Jun/09
HE LOOKS TALL IN WATH JUST HAPPEND HE HAS ABOUTT 4 IN OR ALEAST 3.5 IN TALLER THAN DENIRO WHO IS NO MORE THAN 5 FT 8 SO CLOSE ENAUGH 6 FT FOR WILLIS IN LATE MOVIE HE LOOKS NEARER 5 FT 11 IF I COMPARE MY SELF TO DENIRO AND WILLIS TO DENIRO I WOULD SAY BRUCE IS 0.5 IN TALLER THAN ME MAYBE HE HAD COWBOY BOOTS AND IS 5 FT 11
HE LOOKS TALL IN WATH JUST HAPPEND HE HAS ABOUTT 4 IN OR ALEAST 3.5 IN TALLER THAN DENIRO WHO IS NO MORE THAN 5 FT 8 SO CLOSE ENAUGH 6 FT FOR WILLIS IN LATE MOVIE HE LOOKS NEARER 5 FT 11 IF I COMPARE MY SELF TO DENIRO AND WILLIS TO DENIRO I WOULD SAY BRUCE IS 0.5 IN TALLER THAN ME MAYBE HE HAD COWBOY BOOTS AND IS 5 FT 11
Ace said on 26/Jun/09
In fairness to Kutcher Tellem, those photos are the shortest i have ever seen Kutcher look.
In fairness to Kutcher Tellem, those photos are the shortest i have ever seen Kutcher look.
James said on 19/Jun/09
In all honesty Bruce really did not look a great deal shorter than Arnie in old Planet Hollywood pics and he dosen't force posture like Sly or Arnie either.
In all honesty Bruce really did not look a great deal shorter than Arnie in old Planet Hollywood pics and he dosen't force posture like Sly or Arnie either.
TELLEM said on 19/Jun/09
and after that, look at some pics of kutcher and snoop before you try to evaluate kutcher's height at 6'4.
and after that, look at some pics of kutcher and snoop before you try to evaluate kutcher's height at 6'4.
TELLEM said on 19/Jun/09
ACG says on 18/Jun/09
T.J. says on 8/Jun/09
EXACTLY the same height as Gene Simmons (6'1")
So either Gene is 5'11" or Bruce is 6'1"
Words of wisdom. Bruce IS 6-1. 5-11 for Gene is utterly insane.
so that makes tom sizemore is 6'1 aswell? that makes dennis farrina 6'2.5? perhaps you should look at the pics i posted of bruce and ashton kutcher
ACG says on 18/Jun/09
T.J. says on 8/Jun/09
EXACTLY the same height as Gene Simmons (6'1")
So either Gene is 5'11" or Bruce is 6'1"
Words of wisdom. Bruce IS 6-1. 5-11 for Gene is utterly insane.
so that makes tom sizemore is 6'1 aswell? that makes dennis farrina 6'2.5? perhaps you should look at the pics i posted of bruce and ashton kutcher
Brad said on 19/Jun/09
ACG: another certified Glenn.
ACG: another certified Glenn.
ed said on 19/Jun/09
i am the only person here that has stood nose to nose with Bruce while he was barefooted... it happened in 1996 and he is a solid 5.10.5 no taller
i am the only person here that has stood nose to nose with Bruce while he was barefooted... it happened in 1996 and he is a solid 5.10.5 no taller
Alex2401 said on 18/Jun/09
Willis always looks 2-5cm shorter than Schwarzenegger,he never looked same height
like Arnold who is listed 183cm here,Bruce cannot be 182cm,no way,180cm(5'11)max.
I've saw Bruce 7-8 years ago,and what i saw was 5'10-5'11 range.I can't say precise like 178 or 179cm but i can say range 177-180cm 100%,not over 180cm ,no way,im 180cm and he was the same height like me or slight shorter.
Willis always looks 2-5cm shorter than Schwarzenegger,he never looked same height
like Arnold who is listed 183cm here,Bruce cannot be 182cm,no way,180cm(5'11)max.
I've saw Bruce 7-8 years ago,and what i saw was 5'10-5'11 range.I can't say precise like 178 or 179cm but i can say range 177-180cm 100%,not over 180cm ,no way,im 180cm and he was the same height like me or slight shorter.
ACG said on 18/Jun/09
T.J. says on 8/Jun/09
EXACTLY the same height as Gene Simmons (6'1")
So either Gene is 5'11" or Bruce is 6'1"
Words of wisdom. Bruce IS 6-1. 5-11 for Gene is utterly insane.
T.J. says on 8/Jun/09
EXACTLY the same height as Gene Simmons (6'1")
So either Gene is 5'11" or Bruce is 6'1"
Words of wisdom. Bruce IS 6-1. 5-11 for Gene is utterly insane.
James said on 17/Jun/09
How do you guys know he was never over 5'11 in his life? Have you measured him?
How do you guys know he was never over 5'11 in his life? Have you measured him?
Doug said on 17/Jun/09
Alex2401, Willis is a good example of a strong 5'11", weak 6'
Alex2401, Willis is a good example of a strong 5'11", weak 6'
Brad said on 17/Jun/09
Alex2401 is correct.
Alex2401 is correct.
Alex2401 said on 16/Jun/09
Bruce was never over 180cm (5'11) in his life.
Bruce was never over 180cm (5'11) in his life.
James said on 15/Jun/09
I'd say 5'11.5 at peak
I'd say 5'11.5 at peak
Hugh 190cm said on 14/Jun/09
5ft11.75 now and 6ft0.25 peak. Personally I don't think he's lost height.
5ft11.75 now and 6ft0.25 peak. Personally I don't think he's lost height.
flash_of_eden said on 14/Jun/09
I thought Mamun was 5'8.25"? Wouldn't that make Bruce an even 6' here?
I thought Mamun was 5'8.25"? Wouldn't that make Bruce an even 6' here?
James said on 14/Jun/09
Yeah I remember I saw an episode of Moonlighting where he did not look over the 5'11 mark.
Yeah I remember I saw an episode of Moonlighting where he did not look over the 5'11 mark.
RisingForce said on 14/Jun/09
I think the 5'11.75" figure I've seen him listed at is probably correct. His posture would explain how he looks shorter than that at times.
I think the 5'11.75" figure I've seen him listed at is probably correct. His posture would explain how he looks shorter than that at times.
Ace said on 14/Jun/09
Alex, technically, Willis at his "peak" was during his moonlighting days , and there he never looked 6`0. Although i do confess in Die Hard he did look near 6`0. Still, i bet a prime Willis measures out no more than 5`11.5. And whether he is even still that tall today is debatable, as he can look under it a lot.
Alex, technically, Willis at his "peak" was during his moonlighting days , and there he never looked 6`0. Although i do confess in Die Hard he did look near 6`0. Still, i bet a prime Willis measures out no more than 5`11.5. And whether he is even still that tall today is debatable, as he can look under it a lot.
Brad said on 14/Jun/09
5' 11" now & then. 6' 1" is a farce. 6' in "effect".
5' 11" now & then. 6' 1" is a farce. 6' in "effect".
James said on 14/Jun/09
dmeyer says on 14/Jun/09
5 ft 11 to 5 ft 11.25 peak 5 ft 10.5 now
I think thats too low personally. I think at peak Willis was 5'11.5-6'0.
dmeyer says on 14/Jun/09
5 ft 11 to 5 ft 11.25 peak 5 ft 10.5 now
I think thats too low personally. I think at peak Willis was 5'11.5-6'0.
Alex said on 14/Jun/09
James, Willis has never looked more than 6'0. I'd say 6'0 at his peak. Today no more than 5'11.
James, Willis has never looked more than 6'0. I'd say 6'0 at his peak. Today no more than 5'11.
177cmmmmmm said on 14/Jun/09
willis is 5'10-5-11
willis is 5'10-5-11
dmeyer said on 14/Jun/09
5 ft 11 to 5 ft 11.25 peak 5 ft 10.5 now
5 ft 11 to 5 ft 11.25 peak 5 ft 10.5 now
Brad said on 13/Jun/09
Ace is the place. Those location shoes he wore in the "Baretta Alley" (every episide of Baretta seems to shot in bad downtown L.A.) with Cybil had huge heel.
Ace is the place. Those location shoes he wore in the "Baretta Alley" (every episide of Baretta seems to shot in bad downtown L.A.) with Cybil had huge heel.
James said on 13/Jun/09
I doubt a legit 6ft
I doubt a legit 6ft
Big King said on 13/Jun/09
Willis looks a legit 6'0".
Willis looks a legit 6'0".
James said on 13/Jun/09
glenn stated a few times that he could never get a photo with Bruce.
As for Bruce being 6'1? Well maybe in big chunky boots like Vin Disel wears.
glenn stated a few times that he could never get a photo with Bruce.
As for Bruce being 6'1? Well maybe in big chunky boots like Vin Disel wears.
Ace said on 13/Jun/09
Its funny brad, even if glenn were 5`8, and bruce owned glenn by 4.5 inches, than that would make bruce still only 6`0.5, not 6`1.
Either way, Bruce rarely looks anymore than 5`11.5, and on his old show, moonlighting, he often struggled with it. 5`8 Cybil Shepard would be barefoot, and he would look max 3 inches taller than her, even when he was wearing shoes. And when she would wear even 2 inch heels, he would barely be taller than her.
Its funny brad, even if glenn were 5`8, and bruce owned glenn by 4.5 inches, than that would make bruce still only 6`0.5, not 6`1.
Either way, Bruce rarely looks anymore than 5`11.5, and on his old show, moonlighting, he often struggled with it. 5`8 Cybil Shepard would be barefoot, and he would look max 3 inches taller than her, even when he was wearing shoes. And when she would wear even 2 inch heels, he would barely be taller than her.
GUK said on 13/Jun/09
To my mind this guy is 5ft 10 to 5ft 11 in height, he has never been 6ft barefoot.
To my mind this guy is 5ft 10 to 5ft 11 in height, he has never been 6ft barefoot.
Brad said on 13/Jun/09
Bruce at 6' 1" might possibly be the dumbest figure I've heard. $5 says Glenn has a photo with him but he's getting owned by 4.5..
Bruce at 6' 1" might possibly be the dumbest figure I've heard. $5 says Glenn has a photo with him but he's getting owned by 4.5..
James said on 12/Jun/09
I woulden't rule Bruce Willis being 5'11.5 in his peak, but I think a 2cm loss it is not impossible.
I woulden't rule Bruce Willis being 5'11.5 in his peak, but I think a 2cm loss it is not impossible.
Hugh 190cm said on 12/Jun/09
I will say that Willis has the build of a 6ft1 guy. I still think he's 5ft11.75 (182-183cm).
I will say that Willis has the build of a 6ft1 guy. I still think he's 5ft11.75 (182-183cm).
TELLEM said on 12/Jun/09
correctomundo james.
correctomundo james.
James said on 12/Jun/09
Well TELLEM out of Kutcher, Willis and Snoop I think one of thier heights might be off? Maybe Bruce should be downgraded back to 5'11?
Well TELLEM out of Kutcher, Willis and Snoop I think one of thier heights might be off? Maybe Bruce should be downgraded back to 5'11?
TELLEM said on 11/Jun/09
shoot ashton kutcher owns willis big and snoop is 6'4 and he OWNS ashton kutcher big.
shoot ashton kutcher owns willis big and snoop is 6'4 and he OWNS ashton kutcher big.
James said on 11/Jun/09
If Bruce is 6'1 then Ben has to be 6'4 which he ain't.
If Bruce is 6'1 then Ben has to be 6'4 which he ain't.
Heights are barefeet estimates, derived from quotations, official websites, agency resumes, in person encounters with actors at conventions and pictures/films.
Other vital statistics like weight or shoe size measurements have been sourced from newspapers, books, resumes or social media.
Celebrity Fan Photos and Agency Pictures of stars are © to their respective owners.