Bud said on 15/May/14
Bud looked 6'2 with Lou Ferringo,but he was 61 years old
Click Here and seems to have 4 inches on Philip Michael Thomas at 20:04 ,32:40 and 38:50
AlexMahone said on 14/May/14
With legit 6'4 (193cm) Riccardo Pizzuti who played always the bad guy in Bud movies, Bud 1-2cm shorter, so the 6'2.75-6'3 range in his prime is ok.
Wilbur if you have a mission to downgrade Bud, make it, but your opinion is nonsense.
Bud said on 13/May/14
Also Rob, Piroch with Vic Armstrong who is listed at 183 and looks it
Click Here Click Here Click Here
and with a young Harrison Ford
Click Here
And now Piroch with Vic
Click Here Click Here
So Rob,if Piroch was 188 (witch i am not sure,u are the expert u can tell better than me)than how tall looked Bud with him at the age of 58?
wilbur walsh said on 13/May/14
with angelo romani you have the master evidence he was max max 6'1"-6'1.25"(185-186cm). He was just a couple of inches(5cm) taller than romani. A legit 6'3"-6'4"(192-193cm) would have towered over 5'11"(180cm) angelo romani. Bud, you have proven bud spencer was under 6'2.75"(190cm), like i always said. When he was very young as a swimmer, he was max 6'1.5"(187cm) for sure. 6'3"-6'4"(192-193cm) is a joke.
Bud said on 13/May/14
Rob,i found another rare picture.How tall you think he was with stuntman Piroch Gabor who i think looks 190 with 180cm tall Kristina Loken cuz i think she wears here 5cm heels
Click Here Click Here
Here Bud was 58 years old so 1cm lost in height is possible.The slim guy in grey suit who Bud is talking to is Piroch
Click Here Click Here
Editor Rob
he can look maybe 2cm smaller than the stuntman
francesco said on 12/May/14
in some sites Cammarelle is listed as 192 cm.
For me 191.5 in the morning and 188.5 in the evening.
In that picture I see only 5-6 cm difference but maybe bud had higher shoes.
I think bud is now 184 in the morning and 181 at night but sometimes it seems 179-180 because of his horrible posture
As a young man I think 192-193 in the morning are correct.
wilbur walsh said on 10/May/14
Look at here:
Click Here -
Click Here
bud is with amateur heavyweight boxer roberto cammarelle. Pics of about 3 years ago, bud was 80, but still in good shape. Cammarelle is always listed at 6'2.75"(190cm), bud looks 6ft-6'0.75"(183-185cm) with cammarelle. Impossible he was 6'3"-6'4"(192-193cm) at his peak. Bud peak was 6'1.25"-6'1.5"(186-187cm), when he was a young swimmer. Anyway, i do NOT see him over 6'2"(188cm)at his peak. Absolutely.
kevin said on 9/May/14
Maio there was a video on youtube and too bad i can't find it anymore, where gerry scotty and bud were around the same heigh, bud was 2 cm taller at max, that pretty much proves that scotty is at least 1,83 (he claims 1,84) and bud is no more than 1,85 nowdays
Vi said on 1/May/14
193 and 192 cm in Two officially measures by FIN when he was in the olympic team.he is the first italian able to swim 100 freestyle under 1'
All others data are bullsxxx
wilbur walsh said on 28/Apr/14
Against the evidence starts the "troll accuse", if i am a
troll you are a fanboy. ok, rob can you say your opinion about the difference between peter graves and bud spencer. Starting point is peter graves was 6'3"-6'3.25"(191-192cm). I do not know if it is true or not, but they say that height. I see 2 full inches between graves and spencer, so i say spencer looks in the 6'1"(185cm) range with graves. Both worn cowboy boots, same ground level.
the pic:
Click Here Graves the tall one in the middle, spencer far right.
What do you think rob, please?
TheTruth_is said on 27/Apr/14
1.It is obvious that u are a
troll,or u need glasses,every normal man can see that the top of the head of bud is almost at the same height as Peters,and there eye level is almost the same,put a ruler kid and u will see!If u don't belive me ASK Rob the height expert what is the difference between Bud and Peter!
2.James Coburn looked 6'2 with Peter Graves and a young 6'4 tall George Kennedy.
With Eddie Murphy in the Nutty Professor film HE WAS 68 years old,he could have lost an inch!
wilbur walsh said on 26/Apr/14
i know all of them worn cowboy boots because they were cowboy films, but i repeat: i do not care how tall were other actors, but did bud look 6'5"(195cm)with cowboy boots on? no way.
1)Again with graves:
Click Here
bud's top head is at the same level of graves's eyes. Clearly 7-8cm difference. So if graves was a legit 6'3.25"(192cm), bud looks max 6'1"(185cm).
2) who said james coburn was a legit 6'2"(188cm)? proven? unfortunately coburn is part of that big group of hollywood movie stars with overestimated heights.
Coburn with 5'9.25"(176cm)Eddie Murphy:
Click Here
coburn looks about 7-8cm taller than murphy. There is more or less the same difference coburn-murphy and bud-graves. Murphy's top head is at the same level of coburn's eyes. So with murphy at 5'9.25"(176cm), coburn is 6ft-6'1"(183-185cm). (6'1"(185cm) is the max acceptable. And bud looks more or less as tall as coburn, or just a little bit taller. So bud was 6'1"-6'1.5"(185-187cm max)
TheTruth_is said on 26/Apr/14
You are wrong,how can u see 7 cm between them?
1.He looked MAX 3 cm shorter than Graves,and i saw the whole movie they had same flat footwear,and the pic u gave is horrible for height comparison look here at 36:00 and 37:54,53:45,1:35:50
Click Here
2.And in the films in witch he wore 2 inches cowboy boots EVERYBODY were them,cuz they were cowboy films,so he didin't had height advantage on people!
3.and in the video i posted below u can see he is taller than 6'2 James Cobourn,who wears cowboy boots with 2 inches heels.
wilbur walsh said on 25/Apr/14
TheTruth_is says on 18/Apr/14
He looked close to the height of 192 Peter Graves Click Here
what? he looks clearly 2-3 inches shorter than graves!!! what are saying?! if graves was a legit 6'3.25"(192cm), bud looks max max 6'1"(185cm)!
Minimum 3 inches(7cm) shorter than graves:
Click Here
i repeat, he always worn cowboy boots, 2 inches(5cm) heels. If he was 6'2.75"(190cm)barefoot, he would have looked in the 6'4.75"(195cm) range with his cowboy boots on!! did he look near 6'5"(195cm)? absolutely not! bud spencer swimmer very young was max 6'1.5" (187cm). And terence hill was about 5'10"-5'10.5"(177-178cm). This is realistic.
TheTruth_is said on 18/Apr/14
I heard so many incorrect information here,it is time to make justice:
1.Bud was measured 6'2 barefoot at the age of 63 when people lose height
Click Here
2.He looked close to the height of 192 Peter Graves
Click Here
3.He was taller than 6'2 James Coburn
Click Here
wilbur walsh said on 17/Apr/14
kevin says on 10/Apr/14
6,2" in the 80s Click Here here he seems to have 3cm over 6'1" Pippo Baudo.
where do you see 3 cm over baudo? They are the same height. bud looks
6'1" with Pippo Baudo and he was in his 40ies. bud peak 6'1.5" (187cm). terence hill was never 5'11.5"(182cm), absolutely, he was about 5'10"-5'10.5"(177-178cm).Also you have to consider they often worn cowboy boots in their movies, so 2 inches(5cm) heels. anyway, i do not see bud spencer over 6'1.5"(187cm) peak barefoot.
Bud said on 12/Apr/14
Rob,i think this is the best scene for height comparison,that is an 8 cm difference right?
Click Here
Editor Rob
yeah it can look in that range there
kevin said on 10/Apr/14
6,2" in the 80s
Click Here here he seems to have 3cm over 6'1" Pippo Baudo, nowdays he's as tall as Gerry Scotty, I'd say a flat 6,1" (1,84) not more
Bud said on 9/Apr/14
Look Maio,here Bud was 54 years old,but still had 10 cm on Hill
Click Here
Bud said on 31/Mar/14
Rob,based on these pics what do you think is the height diference between Bud,and Hill
Click Here Click Here In the first it looks 10 cm to me,in the second it looks 8 cm?so witch one of the 2 looks more like it is showing the truth?Based on the pics,cuz in Buds movies i think camera angels are so strange,they don't show the truth,and Buds posture is pretty bad in them too.
Editor Rob
in the full shot you can say he appears near 4 inch taller, whether ground is even for both I'm not sure
Bud said on 31/Mar/14
He couldn't lost height by the age of 40,at the age of 37 the height difference between him and Terence Hill was the same when he was 50 years old
Click Here Click Here
Andrea said on 30/Mar/14
Rob, from what you think the 192 and 193 claims come? He always claims those heights in interview, even recently. I doubt he's ever been so tall...
Editor Rob
maybe he measured in shoes that height...could he really have lost height by 40?
Robert said on 21/Mar/14
A rare occasion when he is standing straight with 6'2-2.5 James Coburn ,he is 6'3 when he is standing straight
Click Here
Robert said on 20/Mar/14
Yea,he always looked like a guy who has a lot of muscles under fat,not like most fat guys who have only fat under fat.
Metric said on 20/Mar/14
I think he looked best in his late 40s. He is absolutely HUGE but still athletic strong and AWESOME looking in Flatfoot in Africa (think he was 48 when they made that). Wonderful movie. And Bud dances in that movie. Despite weighing 300 lbs he moves so smooth and you can tell he is very flexible. He was a tremendous athlete for sure.
As for his height...I´m close to Robs estimate. Between 6-2 to 6-3 is what he looked in the movies.
Robert said on 20/Mar/14
He looked best at the age of 37-38,he had HUGE back,and shoulders,but wasn't really fat
Click Here Click Here
Metric said on 19/Mar/14
Bud looked like a muscle god at 300 lbs. Big and supremely strong/confident.
But at 340 lbs he looked fat and not so good. Today he is down to 275 lbs again.
Bud said on 18/Mar/14
His height was 6.75
His weight age 37-43 270 pounds(122kg)
45-50 290-300 pounds(130-135kg)
At the age of 65 in an interview he sad his weight is 341 pounds(155kg)
Metric said on 18/Mar/14
Thank you for adding Bud Spencer, Rob. One of the greatest and most charismatic movie stars of the 70s and 80s.
Bud said on 18/Mar/14
That is soo wrong,he was very fit till the age of 35,after that he put up a little weight,but he wasn't so fat to loose height, he was pretty fat at the age of 46,before that he was only overweight,or a little obese.He was 6'75 in his 40s,he looked that height with James Coburn ,Joe Bugner,who Rob sad that was legit 6'4 guy.From 37-45 he was only overweight,anyway that kind of weight wont make him loose height.
Click Here Click Here
francesco said on 17/Mar/14
If you go to see the photos when he was a swimmer always seemed very high also because the photos are set to swimmers (usually high), and not to ordinary people.
Now it is down a lot and seems to be even lower for the horrible posture (it seems that not even the neck)
For me as a young man was really 192/193 in the morning (190 in the evening)
By age 40 he had already turned down a lot because of the weight (189 in the morning)
Now I think it's 184 in the morning and 181 in the evening
From personal experience the people after the age of 80 can be lowered even 5 or more inches (10 cm)
Bud said on 14/Mar/14
Rob, what do you think was his weight in his late 30s,early 40s,when he had his first films such as They Call Me Trinity,and he wasn't so fat
wilbur walsh said on 13/Mar/14
no bud, joe bugner was max 6'3"(190cm). And i said he worn sneakers, bud spencer worn his cowboy boots, 2 inches heels(5cm). And joe bugner looks clearly 2 inches taller. i repeat bud spencer peak height was 6'1"-6'1.25"(185-186cm). Anyway i do not see him over 6'1.5"(187cm) at his peak. Absolutely.
Andrea said on 7/Mar/14
Rob, he did claim 192 and 193 many times in italian interviews. Doubt he's ever been that tall... 6'2.75 is a good guess for a very young Bud, since it's very possible that he already lost a fraction over 40s... I think he might still measure over 6'0 today, if he stood at his tallest, at 84 years old!!
Bud said on 4/Mar/14
With legit 6'4 heavyweight boxing champion Joe Bugner standing face to face at 0:08 and 3:55,the quality is good,you can also see how thick are there shoes
Click Here
wilbur walsh said on 27/Feb/14
One of my favourite actor...but never been so tall...With boxer joe bugner (approx. 6'3"), he looked 2 full inches shorter, and bugner worn sneakers, bud with cowboy boots...here with football player alessandro nesta almost 10 years ago:
Click Here
Nesta has been listed 6'1"-6'1.5"(185-187cm)through his career. Bud was clearly 3-4 full inches shorter than nesta. Ok he was almost 80. He looked max 5'11" with nesta at 80, it is impossible he was 6'3" at 20!. I think bud peak height was 6'1"-6'1.25"(185-186cm). Anyway i do not see him over 6'1.5"(187cm) at his peak. Absolutely.
Jonah said on 27/Feb/14
Rob, when you will create a "Terence's page"?
Tuga said on 25/Feb/14
Red183 says on 23/Feb/14
Here´s why, the yellow line is the pivot of my head, the red line is my actual measured height.
Click Here
Never knew they measured Mulder on the xfiles :)
Sam said on 25/Feb/14
Here's the pictures of the young, fit Bud Spencer that Thorwald78 mentions. Wow, he's almost unrecognizable. His weight gain by the time he was a well known was almost on a Orson Welles or Marlon Brando level.
Click Here
Walter said on 24/Feb/14
Carlo Pedersoli isn´t nearly that tall (1,90 m) now, this was his peak height, roughly. About 1,84 m (6-0,5) now. Host Markus Lanz is that height:
Click Here
Bud said on 23/Feb/14
I saw this scene many years ago in Tv(wich has better quality) and he was in socks.Besides it would look lame if the policeman says to you when they arrest you to took off your shoes for the measurment but u step there in shoes.LOL They sad to him to take of his clock,suit,and he tooked tham of,after that the policeman sad to him'take of your shoes and put it on the table'.
Bud said on 23/Feb/14
Click at 39:10
Click Here and u can see that he was in socks,when he raises his feet a little u can clearly see that those are socks,not shoes and the policeman sad to him,that he has to take off his shoes and put it on the table at 38:58.Unfortunatly i couldnt find the english version of the clip,so that everybody can understand what they say,but belive me i know that language very well.At 63 years old there in socks he looks very close to 6ft2,so in his 40s he probabobly was 6ft2.75.Yes a couple of minutes later he was photographed again but on ANOTHER wall,wich has no numbers on it.When he is first photographed he is in a small,narrow place,the second time he is in a lerge place,click at 40:31 and u see,u cant compare the two walls.
Richard said on 23/Feb/14
Bud says on 21/Feb/14
Rob,here he was 63 years old and was in socks.Here if he would strech himself for a measurment he would hit 6ft2? at 39:27 Click Here
[Editor Rob: it's a good link, he could measure barefoot near 6ft 2 then]
----------------------
Yes, looks 6'2 at 63 years of age. But he could be taller given the fact that he has massive girth putting pressure on the intervertebral discs in his back. So he could still have hit 6'3 out of bed at that age.
But of course, that would still not be his height since weight pulling him down or otherwise he would not have been able to make use of his potential height.
He is frequently listed as 6'4 in his youth and give that weight and other factors might have taken their toll on him I don't see 6'3.5 peak for him as being out of the question. But in this clip 6'2 for sure.
Nowadays, given the same weight and being over 80 years old I would be surprised if he was over 6.0,5'
truth said on 22/Feb/14
would have guessed 6ft3.
Tuga said on 22/Feb/14
Great to see Bud Spencer listed here!
IMO could have been 6'3 peak, looks around 6'2 in bud´s clip.
Carl B. said on 21/Feb/14
Bud Spencer was never 6'4" like he was pretending. I'm a big fan and I saw all his movies and pictures, he was 6'2"-6'2.5" before the 80's and barely 6'0 today. Terence Hill is 5'10" and always wears cowboy boots or huge sneakers that put him in the 5'11.5"-6'0" range.
Small man syndrome said on 21/Feb/14
Definitely a tall guy, with a big presence on screen. Probably a spot on listing.
Bud said on 21/Feb/14
Rob,here he was 63 years old and was in socks.Here if he would strech himself for a measurment he would hit 6ft2? at 39:27
Click Here
Editor Rob
it's a good link, he could measure barefoot near 6ft 2 then
Bud said on 21/Feb/14
That photo is very usefull, he is in socks there.He looks 6ft2 there,but when he filmed that episode of Extralarge he was already 63 years old.Rob sad a man at that age shrinks usually half an inch,so Bud in his prime was AT LEAST 6ft2.5,but i think a big guy like him easily can shrunk one inch at that age so alomst 6ft3 prime looks alright for Buds height. With Thomas Gottchalk who was 6ft3.5, he was on inch taller than Hugh Laurie,Bud looked 6ft1.5,but at that time he was already 65 and he sad his weight than was 340 pounds, weighing that much can make people shrink more than an avarage guy would,that is a lot of strain on the spine.
Thorwald78 said on 20/Feb/14
Bud was an olympic swimming athlete in the '50s.
Italian Swimming Federation (FIN) data tells he was 193 cm for 102 kg at the age of 23.... In that time's pictures he looked like a mountain of muscles!! In the '80s, when he played many comedy-action roles, he declared a weight of 134 kg. In the last 20 years I know he took care of his health for his heart, eyes...and to grow old well!
I saw him recently in television and some photos and he seemed very close to 190 cm here indicated...
Sam said on 20/Feb/14
Ah, if anything, Seagal is impersonating Bud Spencer! He definitely was a big dude, good addition. This height would make Terence Hill around six foot.
Dural said on 20/Feb/14
I've seen him 2 or 3 years ago at a book signing and he did look 5'11.5" max with my 5'9" mate.
He must have lost at least 3 inches from his peak or it was just his posture.
Phil said on 20/Feb/14
What the.... PEAK was at least 6-4½.
Arch Stanton said on 19/Feb/14
189-90 seems a good shout for him. Love his Seagal impersonation in the above photo "My name's Seagal, Steven Seagal" :-]