Add a Comment543 comments
Average Guess (91 Votes)
6ft 2.93in (190.3cm)
6ft 2.93in (190.3cm)
RP said on 6/Aug/11
Rob....must change to 6'2". John is 6'2" barefoot. Even his profile from The Dukes of Hazard in h1980 list him as 6'2" at the age of 20. Unless he grew after 20??
Rob....must change to 6'2". John is 6'2" barefoot. Even his profile from The Dukes of Hazard in h1980 list him as 6'2" at the age of 20. Unless he grew after 20??
John said on 5/Aug/11
Tom Welling is 2cm taller than John. I've frozen tons of frames that support this even ones where you can see their feet. You need to watch more closely, Tom more often appears to have the edge.
Tom Welling is 2cm taller than John. I've frozen tons of frames that support this even ones where you can see their feet. You need to watch more closely, Tom more often appears to have the edge.
Terryman said on 2/Aug/11
2-3cm on Tom welling in Smallville
2-3cm on Tom welling in Smallville
Hansen said on 28/Jul/11
james , he cant be 6ft3. not even 6ft2.5 barefoot. 6ft2 is fair enough to judge him. he does't look 6ft3ish in smallville. i reckon he claim 6ft3.5 w shoe.
james , he cant be 6ft3. not even 6ft2.5 barefoot. 6ft2 is fair enough to judge him. he does't look 6ft3ish in smallville. i reckon he claim 6ft3.5 w shoe.
david said on 27/Jul/11
5'8" reaches the exact same place on my face as that pic with Rob and john, and I'm 6'2"
5'8" reaches the exact same place on my face as that pic with Rob and john, and I'm 6'2"
James said on 19/Jul/11
I think 6'3 is accurate
I think 6'3 is accurate
Hansen said on 19/Jul/11
pushing 188cm with rob. 192cm as he claim with shoe morning?? although rob stand abit closer to camera but Nike Shox given almost 4cm and rob had 0.7inch shoe, so i guess 6ft2 goes for him fair. he might be on a bad day and stand 6ft1.5 here.
pushing 188cm with rob. 192cm as he claim with shoe morning?? although rob stand abit closer to camera but Nike Shox given almost 4cm and rob had 0.7inch shoe, so i guess 6ft2 goes for him fair. he might be on a bad day and stand 6ft1.5 here.
John said on 16/Jul/11
I believe Tom,John, and Justin are all very close in height. I've seen multiple pics outside of Smallville that prove this. There are pics at a Hellcats casting party that show Tom appearing taller than Justin and vise versa depending on the angle. The thing is angles are tricky, if you are within a few centimeters of each other height wise it can become quite difficult to tell who is indeed taller from pictures and video.
Justin has said in multiple interviews that Tom is taller than himself, could he be saying this to keep the illusion of the show intact, maybe. He also said that when wearing the Green Arrow outfit his boots have enough lift to make him taller than even Tom, his words. This gives me the impression that they're very close in height and mere centimeters one way or the other is enough to give either the advantage.
As far as John goes, I've seen one pic outside of Smallville at a black tie affair with John and Tom standing on level ground both wearing dress shoes and they looked nearly identical in height. I'll try to find this pic and post it for you to see.
I believe Tom,John, and Justin are all very close in height. I've seen multiple pics outside of Smallville that prove this. There are pics at a Hellcats casting party that show Tom appearing taller than Justin and vise versa depending on the angle. The thing is angles are tricky, if you are within a few centimeters of each other height wise it can become quite difficult to tell who is indeed taller from pictures and video.
Justin has said in multiple interviews that Tom is taller than himself, could he be saying this to keep the illusion of the show intact, maybe. He also said that when wearing the Green Arrow outfit his boots have enough lift to make him taller than even Tom, his words. This gives me the impression that they're very close in height and mere centimeters one way or the other is enough to give either the advantage.
As far as John goes, I've seen one pic outside of Smallville at a black tie affair with John and Tom standing on level ground both wearing dress shoes and they looked nearly identical in height. I'll try to find this pic and post it for you to see.
Clark said on 15/Jul/11
I respectfully disagree. I think the lore of Clark Kent mandates that Clark is taller than his dad, Jonathan. IF...Tom Welling is taller than John or Justin why so many different angles --especially with Justin. Take notice how Justin is always walking a few steps behind Tom. I have never seen the two walk side by side by side with a full camera pan back shoes-to head. The last comic con Justin is standing with Tom pointing to his daughter in the audience and what do you know--justin is a bit taller. This is from a simple video camera not from the CW. Also, Tom has always wears these monster boots especially when he in the dark blur uniform. Those heels must be close to 1 inch and 3/4 -2 inches. The then WB picked and actor to play Jonathan Kent that was bit taller than the principal actor and wanted to keep the illusion that Clark is taller than his dad--which I understand. John is a bit taller than Tom in real life, but on Smallville he is not. I think 6'3" is dead on for John. "every episode of Smallville" is carefully crafted to keep the illusion...
I respectfully disagree. I think the lore of Clark Kent mandates that Clark is taller than his dad, Jonathan. IF...Tom Welling is taller than John or Justin why so many different angles --especially with Justin. Take notice how Justin is always walking a few steps behind Tom. I have never seen the two walk side by side by side with a full camera pan back shoes-to head. The last comic con Justin is standing with Tom pointing to his daughter in the audience and what do you know--justin is a bit taller. This is from a simple video camera not from the CW. Also, Tom has always wears these monster boots especially when he in the dark blur uniform. Those heels must be close to 1 inch and 3/4 -2 inches. The then WB picked and actor to play Jonathan Kent that was bit taller than the principal actor and wanted to keep the illusion that Clark is taller than his dad--which I understand. John is a bit taller than Tom in real life, but on Smallville he is not. I think 6'3" is dead on for John. "every episode of Smallville" is carefully crafted to keep the illusion...
John said on 27/Jun/11
I've seen every episode of Smallville and paused multiple scenes with Tom and John standing side by side and John is no taller. I've done this with scenes where you can see both their feet and they are on even ground with John at times appearing slightly shorter than Tom. Certainly camera angles and so forth can contribute to this however I believe John does not have the edge in height over Tom.
I've seen every episode of Smallville and paused multiple scenes with Tom and John standing side by side and John is no taller. I've done this with scenes where you can see both their feet and they are on even ground with John at times appearing slightly shorter than Tom. Certainly camera angles and so forth can contribute to this however I believe John does not have the edge in height over Tom.
Terryman said on 25/Jun/11
tom welling 1,88-9metres john schneider 1,90-1metres
tom welling 1,88-9metres john schneider 1,90-1metres
John said on 17/Jun/11
I agree, Andrea! Tom is easily as tall as John!
I agree, Andrea! Tom is easily as tall as John!
ANDREA[ITA] said on 15/Jun/11
he's 189-190! tom welling is about the same!
he's 189-190! tom welling is about the same!
Legend said on 15/Jun/11
He's 6'2 and Welling is 6'1.75 max.
He's 6'2 and Welling is 6'1.75 max.
James said on 8/Jun/11
6'2-6'3 is not impossible
6'2-6'3 is not impossible
Lenad said on 4/Jun/11
I reckon hes more 6'2 range to be honest. Still nothing under 6'2. Probably floats between 189and190cm
I reckon hes more 6'2 range to be honest. Still nothing under 6'2. Probably floats between 189and190cm
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 27/May/11
6ft2.75(190cm) looks right or 6ft3 max...
Tom Welling looks 6ft2 flat
6ft2.75(190cm) looks right or 6ft3 max...
Tom Welling looks 6ft2 flat
John said on 25/May/11
Peg all you want Legend, there's not an inch and a half between them. I also don't think he is taller than Welling. There are too many scenes in Smallville that point to the contrary.
Peg all you want Legend, there's not an inch and a half between them. I also don't think he is taller than Welling. There are too many scenes in Smallville that point to the contrary.
Legend said on 24/May/11
He was taller than Welling regardless, who I peg at 6'1.5 in reality.
He was taller than Welling regardless, who I peg at 6'1.5 in reality.
James said on 22/May/11
i think 6'3 is ok for John. Did not look over 6'3 when he appeared on Nip Tuck.
i think 6'3 is ok for John. Did not look over 6'3 when he appeared on Nip Tuck.
John said on 21/May/11
Legend, there's not two inches between John and Hasselhoff. John is taller than 6'2.
Legend, there's not two inches between John and Hasselhoff. John is taller than 6'2.
James said on 18/May/11
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 17/May/11
Looks 6"3.5(192cm) beside The Hoff (6"4 at least)
The Hoff is not 6'4 at least.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 17/May/11
Looks 6"3.5(192cm) beside The Hoff (6"4 at least)
The Hoff is not 6'4 at least.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 17/May/11
Looks 6"3.5(192cm) beside The Hoff (6"4 at least)
Looks 6"3.5(192cm) beside The Hoff (6"4 at least)
Legend said on 17/May/11
Looks 6'2 even.
Looks 6'2 even.
James said on 14/May/11
Looks a solid 192cm compared to Hasselhoff.
Looks a solid 192cm compared to Hasselhoff.
lordrandall91 said on 13/May/11
just stop try to downgrading him! to clear all your doubts, here you have a picture:
Click Here
he's with david hassellhoff who is for sure 193 cms! they look the same! he's gotta be at least 191! rob put him right ;)
just stop try to downgrading him! to clear all your doubts, here you have a picture:
Click Here
he's with david hassellhoff who is for sure 193 cms! they look the same! he's gotta be at least 191! rob put him right ;)
Cranberries said on 8/May/11
191cm flat evening, IMO.
191cm flat evening, IMO.
James said on 4/May/11
maybe somewhere between 6'2-6'3?
maybe somewhere between 6'2-6'3?
Lenad said on 2/May/11
I dont think hes a full 6'3. 190cm max. I wouldnt argue under 6ft2 though
I dont think hes a full 6'3. 190cm max. I wouldnt argue under 6ft2 though
James said on 20/Apr/11
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 18/Apr/11
He doesn't look under 6"2 ever
Agreed
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 18/Apr/11
He doesn't look under 6"2 ever
Agreed
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 18/Apr/11
He doesn't look under 6"2 ever
He doesn't look under 6"2 ever
James said on 15/Apr/11
6 inches but rob is not standing as good as schneider who i think has footware advantage over rob?
If rob stood as straight and if Schneider wore smaller shoes that would add up to a 5 inch difference.
Like I said nowhere near 6'3 compared to a 5'8 man in the photo.
6 inches but rob is not standing as good as schneider who i think has footware advantage over rob?
If rob stood as straight and if Schneider wore smaller shoes that would add up to a 5 inch difference.
Like I said nowhere near 6'3 compared to a 5'8 man in the photo.
Viper said on 14/Apr/11
Nah, he at least has 6 inches on Rob. Or at the minimum 5.5
Nah, he at least has 6 inches on Rob. Or at the minimum 5.5
James said on 14/Apr/11
Mathew says on 12/Apr/11
James says on 25/Mar/11
even looks as low as 6'1.25 (186cm) with rob.
I'd say he looks taller than that. His eye level is comfortably an inch and a half above the top of Rob's head, so he looks 6'2" anyways.
Yeah but Johns hairstyle is defenintly adding more height and making him look taller so gives of a 6'2 illusion in the photo. if he shaved his head i bet he would look 6'1 in the pic. he's got hair advantage in his favour for sure looks like his hairstyle is adding 1.5 to his height.
1.5 inches over robs head????? maybe more 1 inch so yeah i guess 6'2 is possible in the pic but no way does he look 6'3 in the photo.
Mathew says on 12/Apr/11
James says on 25/Mar/11
even looks as low as 6'1.25 (186cm) with rob.
I'd say he looks taller than that. His eye level is comfortably an inch and a half above the top of Rob's head, so he looks 6'2" anyways.
Yeah but Johns hairstyle is defenintly adding more height and making him look taller so gives of a 6'2 illusion in the photo. if he shaved his head i bet he would look 6'1 in the pic. he's got hair advantage in his favour for sure looks like his hairstyle is adding 1.5 to his height.
1.5 inches over robs head????? maybe more 1 inch so yeah i guess 6'2 is possible in the pic but no way does he look 6'3 in the photo.
Mathew said on 12/Apr/11
James says on 25/Mar/11
even looks as low as 6'1.25 (186cm) with rob.
I'd say he looks taller than that. His eye level is comfortably an inch and a half above the top of Rob's head, so he looks 6'2" anyways.
James says on 25/Mar/11
even looks as low as 6'1.25 (186cm) with rob.
I'd say he looks taller than that. His eye level is comfortably an inch and a half above the top of Rob's head, so he looks 6'2" anyways.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 12/Apr/11
No actually, he looks 188-189cm with Rob with a slouch
190-191cm upstraight...6"3 is fine. He probably got measured at 192cm out of bed and therefore thinks he's almost 6"4
No actually, he looks 188-189cm with Rob with a slouch
190-191cm upstraight...6"3 is fine. He probably got measured at 192cm out of bed and therefore thinks he's almost 6"4
adams1818 said on 4/Apr/11
Nothing under 188cm. 189 seems to be the most accurate.
Nothing under 188cm. 189 seems to be the most accurate.
James said on 25/Mar/11
even looks as low as 6'1.25 (186cm) with rob.
even looks as low as 6'1.25 (186cm) with rob.
Jake T. said on 23/Mar/11
Tom Welling and Schneider are pretty even in height. Maybe 6'2.75 is the correct mark.
Tom Welling and Schneider are pretty even in height. Maybe 6'2.75 is the correct mark.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 19/Mar/11
Looks 187cm or 188cm in the picture
Looks 187cm or 188cm in the picture
dog said on 16/Mar/11
Weird. I met this guy 30 years ago at a Bruce Springsteen concert at LA Coliseum. The person I was with remarked (prior to meeting him) that it was John Schneider. I told her she was crazy cuz Schneider is tall and this guy was not. I'm 6'4" and had 3-4 inches on him easily.
Weird. I met this guy 30 years ago at a Bruce Springsteen concert at LA Coliseum. The person I was with remarked (prior to meeting him) that it was John Schneider. I told her she was crazy cuz Schneider is tall and this guy was not. I'm 6'4" and had 3-4 inches on him easily.
Chameleon said on 26/Feb/11
Allright then :)
Allright then :)
James said on 26/Feb/11
i disagree he is 1 inch taller than 6'2. Hasselhoff is 6'3 1/2 these days.
Schneider is the full 6'3 (191cm).
Sure in the photo he looks 6'1 1/2 in comparison to rob but that is just the way the pic is taken.
i disagree he is 1 inch taller than 6'2. Hasselhoff is 6'3 1/2 these days.
Schneider is the full 6'3 (191cm).
Sure in the photo he looks 6'1 1/2 in comparison to rob but that is just the way the pic is taken.
SolidSnake said on 26/Feb/11
has a bit of a big belly. At 6'3 he is probably 200 pounds ish not 175
has a bit of a big belly. At 6'3 he is probably 200 pounds ish not 175
Chameleon said on 25/Feb/11
Yeah well we cant see their feet and Hassl might be slouching, but I dont know, he may be 191 as listed but with Rob I cant see more then 188cm.
Yeah well we cant see their feet and Hassl might be slouching, but I dont know, he may be 191 as listed but with Rob I cant see more then 188cm.
Vegas said on 25/Feb/11
chameleon he looks same nearly height as david hasselhoff in photos Click Here
kevin peter hall is listed at 7'3 (i think he is more 7'1 based on how he measured up next to 6'8 richard moll on nightcourt) but either way certainly isn't 13 inches or indeed 11 inches taller than schneider in dukes, 1min 50seconds Click Here
chameleon he looks same nearly height as david hasselhoff in photos Click Here
kevin peter hall is listed at 7'3 (i think he is more 7'1 based on how he measured up next to 6'8 richard moll on nightcourt) but either way certainly isn't 13 inches or indeed 11 inches taller than schneider in dukes, 1min 50seconds Click Here
Chameleon said on 24/Feb/11
Indeed, Im sticking with 6'2.
Indeed, Im sticking with 6'2.
James said on 24/Feb/11
Chameleon in the picture he looks 188cm but next to mick foley he defenintly looks 6'3 although that said mick foleys foleys isn't always brilliant?
To be frank in the pic with rob i also woulden't rule out 187cm.
Chameleon in the picture he looks 188cm but next to mick foley he defenintly looks 6'3 although that said mick foleys foleys isn't always brilliant?
To be frank in the pic with rob i also woulden't rule out 187cm.
Chameleon said on 24/Feb/11
I thought you ment he looks 188cm?? Who were you talking about?
I do think this guy is 188cm.
I thought you ment he looks 188cm?? Who were you talking about?
I do think this guy is 188cm.
James said on 23/Feb/11
John Schneider 188cm? i don't think so the guy is a legit 191cm.
John Schneider 188cm? i don't think so the guy is a legit 191cm.
Chameleon said on 22/Feb/11
Yeah James this guy is 188cm.
Yeah James this guy is 188cm.
James said on 20/Feb/11
yeah vegas foley can look under 6'2 with bad posture.
funny u would think that terrible fall he had of the hell in a cell back in 1998 would have made him lose height.
yeah vegas foley can look under 6'2 with bad posture.
funny u would think that terrible fall he had of the hell in a cell back in 1998 would have made him lose height.
Vegas said on 19/Feb/11
James says on 29/Dec/10
yeah rob in your video schneider looks a solid 6'3 with Foley. Are you sure Mick foley is not 6'1.5 (187cm) though?
___________
met foley in person a few times, he ain't under 6'2, not standing fully tall anyway
robs got hillbilly jim at 6'5 and foley certainly ain't anywhere near 4 or even 3 inches shorter than him, 1min 40seconds onward Click Here
James says on 29/Dec/10
yeah rob in your video schneider looks a solid 6'3 with Foley. Are you sure Mick foley is not 6'1.5 (187cm) though?
___________
met foley in person a few times, he ain't under 6'2, not standing fully tall anyway
robs got hillbilly jim at 6'5 and foley certainly ain't anywhere near 4 or even 3 inches shorter than him, 1min 40seconds onward Click Here
James said on 16/Feb/11
Chameleon says on 13/Feb/11
Yeah I agree he's 188cm.
On Nip Tuck he looked 188cm
Chameleon says on 13/Feb/11
Yeah I agree he's 188cm.
On Nip Tuck he looked 188cm
Chameleon said on 13/Feb/11
Yeah I agree he's 188cm.
Yeah I agree he's 188cm.
James said on 27/Jan/11
I agree with rob looks 188cm.
I agree with rob looks 188cm.
xkon said on 26/Jan/11
6ft2 Alan Ritchson looks as tall as Schneider next to Rob. Look where both of their chins come, just above Rob's eyebrows. Don't you think John Schneider could be 6ft2?
Click Here
6ft2 Alan Ritchson looks as tall as Schneider next to Rob. Look where both of their chins come, just above Rob's eyebrows. Don't you think John Schneider could be 6ft2?
Click Here
James said on 30/Dec/10
Rob one more question who had more footware advantage that day mick foley or john schneider?
Rob one more question who had more footware advantage that day mick foley or john schneider?
James said on 30/Dec/10
Rob one more question who had more footware advantage that day mick foley or john schneider?
Editor Rob
Rob one more question who had more footware advantage that day mick foley or john schneider?
Editor Rob they are pretty similar, 1.3 or 1.4 inch
James said on 29/Dec/10
yeah rob in your video schneider looks a solid 6'3 with Foley. Are you sure Mick foley is not 6'1.5 (187cm) though?
Editor Rob
yeah rob in your video schneider looks a solid 6'3 with Foley. Are you sure Mick foley is not 6'1.5 (187cm) though?
Editor Rob I think mick is a 6ft 2 guy
James said on 27/Dec/10
rob with mick foley he actually looks under 6'2. could it be dodgy camera angle? both foley and schneider have got big footware.
in the pic with you rob he looks 6'2.5 (189cm)
Editor Rob
rob with mick foley he actually looks under 6'2. could it be dodgy camera angle? both foley and schneider have got big footware.
in the pic with you rob he looks 6'2.5 (189cm)
Editor Robdirtyharry1970 said on 3/Dec/10
oh come on 6'2" guy no more. get real.
oh come on 6'2" guy no more. get real.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 30/Nov/10
6"2.75(190cm)
6"2.75(190cm)
Mike said on 16/Nov/10
I bet he is wearing Cowboy boots they will add at least 1.5 to height
I bet he is wearing Cowboy boots they will add at least 1.5 to height
James said on 31/Oct/10
yeah with rob he looks 6'2.5
yeah with rob he looks 6'2.5
anonymous said on 29/Oct/10
this guy is definitely not 6'4.5'' in the morning, The guy looks 6'3'' at absolute tops. Could even be in the 6'2'' range.
this guy is definitely not 6'4.5'' in the morning, The guy looks 6'3'' at absolute tops. Could even be in the 6'2'' range.
Patrick said on 1/Jul/09
sidewalk: sorry I watched the series as accurately as possible and Tom is 60% of the time taller and that is really clear, 35% as tall as Jhon and 5% he looks shorter.
Open your eyes and get rid of what you thought before, any prejudice, and you see what have seen all the people i showed it. Even so, John is 6'3 and no less than 6'2/5, in my humble opinion.
sidewalk: sorry I watched the series as accurately as possible and Tom is 60% of the time taller and that is really clear, 35% as tall as Jhon and 5% he looks shorter.
Open your eyes and get rid of what you thought before, any prejudice, and you see what have seen all the people i showed it. Even so, John is 6'3 and no less than 6'2/5, in my humble opinion.
sidewalk said on 30/Jun/09
yoyo says on 31/May/09
sometimes he looks as tall as 6ft2.5 Tom Welling. maybe 6ft3 in his prime
I watch the show all the time and John is taller than Tom Welling.
yoyo says on 31/May/09
sometimes he looks as tall as 6ft2.5 Tom Welling. maybe 6ft3 in his prime
I watch the show all the time and John is taller than Tom Welling.
J.J. said on 28/Jun/09
Doesn't look 6'3" looks more 6'2.25" & his maximum might be 6'2.5" in that picture
Doesn't look 6'3" looks more 6'2.25" & his maximum might be 6'2.5" in that picture
Hugh 190cm said on 20/Jun/09
could look 6ft3-6ft.5 in Dukes of Hazzard.
could look 6ft3-6ft.5 in Dukes of Hazzard.
James said on 14/Jun/09
Dosen't look a full 6'3 in the pic. When he appeared on Nip Tuck he didn't look to have 5 inches on Dylan Walsh either.
Dosen't look a full 6'3 in the pic. When he appeared on Nip Tuck he didn't look to have 5 inches on Dylan Walsh either.
Anon_V said on 11/Jun/09
My sis met him twice and had picts made with him. He was about a foot taller than her, she's 5'4. Said he was super nice, very friendly.
My sis met him twice and had picts made with him. He was about a foot taller than her, she's 5'4. Said he was super nice, very friendly.
sarah said on 3/Jun/09
Perfect photo, rob.John seems a very nice person, rob?
Editor Rob
Perfect photo, rob.John seems a very nice person, rob?
Editor Rob yes he is a charming guy.
yoyo said on 31/May/09
sometimes he looks as tall as 6ft2.5 Tom Welling. maybe 6ft3 in his prime.
sometimes he looks as tall as 6ft2.5 Tom Welling. maybe 6ft3 in his prime.
Doug said on 29/May/09
I NEVER thought he looked 6'4" as he is listed at. He looks more like a 6'2.5-6'3" guy.
I NEVER thought he looked 6'4" as he is listed at. He looks more like a 6'2.5-6'3" guy.
Alex says on 21/May/09 said on 21/May/09
He looks 6,2 or 6,2.5 max in the picture with Rob.
He looks 6,2 or 6,2.5 max in the picture with Rob.
Sid said on 11/May/09
yoyo He looks 6'3 there. he was taller then mick foley was 6'2
yoyo He looks 6'3 there. he was taller then mick foley was 6'2
yoyo said on 27/Apr/09
John Schneider more close to 6ft2 in reality.. Picture above looks 6ft2 though.
John Schneider more close to 6ft2 in reality.. Picture above looks 6ft2 though.
Hugh said on 23/Apr/09
I wrote MySelf and he replied saying he's 6'5".
LOL.
I wrote MySelf and he replied saying he's 6'5".
LOL.
David Melton said on 18/Apr/09
I wrote John Schneider and he replied saying he's 6'4".
I wrote fred rogers too and he replied saying he's 6'.
I wrote John Schneider and he replied saying he's 6'4".
I wrote fred rogers too and he replied saying he's 6'.
Patrick said on 8/Apr/09
I'm with you on this too Yaspaa: happy birthday 6'3 John!
I'm with you on this too Yaspaa: happy birthday 6'3 John!
Yaspaa said on 8/Apr/09
happy birthday John.
happy birthday John.
Sarcos mercy said on 17/Mar/09
He is not too tall nor too short for the height of a man.
He is not too tall nor too short for the height of a man.
Hugh said on 13/Mar/09
Anonymous says on 12/Mar/09
If he was in Shox, that mean he is 6'2.5 beside Rob.
-------------
The difference between Shox and converse is at least one full inch.
Anonymous says on 12/Mar/09
If he was in Shox, that mean he is 6'2.5 beside Rob.
-------------
The difference between Shox and converse is at least one full inch.
Anonymous said on 12/Mar/09
If he was in Shox, that mean he is 6'2.5 beside Rob.
If he was in Shox, that mean he is 6'2.5 beside Rob.
Clark said on 1/Mar/09
I believe in this pic_-John was wearing Converse All Stars--that have NO heel. I think 6'3" is about right. Keep in mind, we are not asking these folks to stand at their tallest when taking the picture. I am an inch taller when I stand up straight.
Editor Rob
I believe in this pic_-John was wearing Converse All Stars--that have NO heel. I think 6'3" is about right. Keep in mind, we are not asking these folks to stand at their tallest when taking the picture. I am an inch taller when I stand up straight.
Editor Rob he was wearing Nike Shox.
Patrick said on 23/Feb/09
Hugh, it is "one" episode of the fourth season but since I watch them on the bounce, I just can
Hugh, it is "one" episode of the fourth season but since I watch them on the bounce, I just can
Hugh said on 19/Feb/09
What episode are you talking about Patrick?
What episode are you talking about Patrick?
Patrick said on 19/Feb/09
Dear Yaspaa, thanks for your words and concern: guys, be all careful and think twice before accepting getting shoulder surgery! I
Dear Yaspaa, thanks for your words and concern: guys, be all careful and think twice before accepting getting shoulder surgery! I
Yaspaa said on 16/Feb/09
Hugh,the guy is reaching out and he's no vomituous youth,he's a seasoned guy who is trying to put things aside....saying that it is good to 'watch'. Pat,how is the shoulder doing?
Hugh,the guy is reaching out and he's no vomituous youth,he's a seasoned guy who is trying to put things aside....saying that it is good to 'watch'. Pat,how is the shoulder doing?
Jason W. said on 8/Feb/09
surely at almost 6'4 , he has got to weigh more than 175 lbs. lol i would guess closer to the 200 lbs mark.
surely at almost 6'4 , he has got to weigh more than 175 lbs. lol i would guess closer to the 200 lbs mark.
Patrick said on 2/Feb/09
Sorry Hugh, frankly; I didn
Sorry Hugh, frankly; I didn
Hugh said on 28/Jan/09
Patrick, I trust EdRob of course, I think it's really strange you're telling this. I was just noticing things the way they seem to be. Don't tell "no hard feelings" when you just tried to create them writing your previous post.
Patrick, I trust EdRob of course, I think it's really strange you're telling this. I was just noticing things the way they seem to be. Don't tell "no hard feelings" when you just tried to create them writing your previous post.
Patrick said on 28/Jan/09
Hugh, I never want to be right at all cost. That
Hugh, I never want to be right at all cost. That
Hugh said on 20/Jan/09
(That anonymous one was me,obviously). Alright, I'm not that awful in writing, but in reading..LOL. :D
This adds ~ 0.5", making Schneider 6'2", max 6'2.5" to me (189 cm but I'm still doubtful about it, because as I said I've tried the same picture producing some evidences that make me think he is not taller than 6'2" barefoot).
(That anonymous one was me,obviously). Alright, I'm not that awful in writing, but in reading..LOL. :D
This adds ~ 0.5", making Schneider 6'2", max 6'2.5" to me (189 cm but I'm still doubtful about it, because as I said I've tried the same picture producing some evidences that make me think he is not taller than 6'2" barefoot).
Anonymous said on 19/Jan/09
Rob I know you were barefoot, but as you said before you already were wearing a 0.3" shoes. He still had 1" advantage on you because of his shoes. Am I so awful in writing?
Editor Rob
Rob I know you were barefoot, but as you said before you already were wearing a 0.3" shoes. He still had 1" advantage on you because of his shoes. Am I so awful in writing?
Editor Rob I said he may have about 0.3 inch advantage over me. I always wear sneakers in or around 1 inch apart from couple conventions where I wore 0.75 inch. His Nike Shox might be 1.3 inch.
Hugh said on 19/Jan/09
You didn't read my posts carefully. Looking Rob's pictures, you can see (as I said before Rob posted the last one!!) Schneider 6'2", but you have to take in account his posture and shoes. If he was having a straight posture, he would be 6'2.5" or 6'3" but you still have to remember you have to remove at least 1.3" because of shoes!!! Then he is 6'2" or something less (6'1.5"). And this is not because I'm telling you here, but just because you can measure by yourself on those pictures. After this everybody can tell whatever he/she wants (he is 5', or he is 7'), but facts are there.
Editor Rob
You didn't read my posts carefully. Looking Rob's pictures, you can see (as I said before Rob posted the last one!!) Schneider 6'2", but you have to take in account his posture and shoes. If he was having a straight posture, he would be 6'2.5" or 6'3" but you still have to remember you have to remove at least 1.3" because of shoes!!! Then he is 6'2" or something less (6'1.5"). And this is not because I'm telling you here, but just because you can measure by yourself on those pictures. After this everybody can tell whatever he/she wants (he is 5', or he is 7'), but facts are there.
Editor Rob I think I confused you with the markings - they represent barefoot as I was 5ft 8 barefoot on the other image I'm comparing against...so as he stands there he was on the 6ft 2, or 6ft 2.5 with hair but this I mean is how he would be barefoot.
Yaspaa said on 19/Jan/09
So Hugh,that means 6'2ish in his shox,thats crazy!
So Hugh,that means 6'2ish in his shox,thats crazy!
Hugh said on 19/Jan/09
Yaspaa, Rob said that but he included Schneider shoes (as you can see in the last picture he posted). To obtain his barefoot height you have to remove at least an inch.
Yaspaa, Rob said that but he included Schneider shoes (as you can see in the last picture he posted). To obtain his barefoot height you have to remove at least an inch.
Da Man said on 18/Jan/09
That's why put the "~" in front of 6'2", meaning roughly 6'2". :)
That's why put the "~" in front of 6'2", meaning roughly 6'2". :)
Yaspaa said on 17/Jan/09
He did say adding another half inch would be fine.
He did say adding another half inch would be fine.
Da Man said on 16/Jan/09
I think Rob pretty much proved Schneider is a ~6'2" guy.
I think Rob pretty much proved Schneider is a ~6'2" guy.
Yaspaa said on 16/Jan/09
Ooh,handbags at the ready,its sarcasm tennis.
Ooh,handbags at the ready,its sarcasm tennis.
Hugh said on 15/Jan/09
You're really a pleasant person Patrick..Obviously you are one of the "someone" who "wants to be right at all cost", thank you for admitting it and for underlining that your affirmations are suspect and "dangerous".
Fortunately here are some pictures that confirm what you admitted, so it is really evident.
You're really a pleasant person Patrick..Obviously you are one of the "someone" who "wants to be right at all cost", thank you for admitting it and for underlining that your affirmations are suspect and "dangerous".
Fortunately here are some pictures that confirm what you admitted, so it is really evident.
Patrick said on 15/Jan/09
Very good "comparison job" Ed Rob! I like you Hugh because you obviously know better than "him" what "he" did and how he stood etc. When someone wants to be right at all cost, I find that really suspect, even "dangerous" (about other topics more serious I mean). John looks and appears next to chart as 6'3. Deal.
Very good "comparison job" Ed Rob! I like you Hugh because you obviously know better than "him" what "he" did and how he stood etc. When someone wants to be right at all cost, I find that really suspect, even "dangerous" (about other topics more serious I mean). John looks and appears next to chart as 6'3. Deal.
talker said on 13/Jan/09
this guy can be deceiving,i recently saw an 80's TV movie with him and he didnt look any more than 6'2"max,but searching for pics of him with other celebs in the net he is clearly around 6'3"or more,there's a photo of him with Hasselhoff where they look identical height.He doesnt look it in his movies.
this guy can be deceiving,i recently saw an 80's TV movie with him and he didnt look any more than 6'2"max,but searching for pics of him with other celebs in the net he is clearly around 6'3"or more,there's a photo of him with Hasselhoff where they look identical height.He doesnt look it in his movies.
Hugh said on 12/Jan/09
Yes Rob, but you had a bad posture too in the picture with Schneider, and he had 1.3 in of shoes while you didn't...These pictures are teaching me more about celebrities heights.
Editor Rob
Yes Rob, but you had a bad posture too in the picture with Schneider, and he had 1.3 in of shoes while you didn't...These pictures are teaching me more about celebrities heights.
Editor Rob my posture is ok, I did have a rucksack that day, my posture is worse in another shot with This Lady that day.
Yaspaa said on 12/Jan/09
Is your head closer to the camera here Rob?,I cant buy him under 6'2,he appears to have good posture but his hips indicate him leaning slightly to one side. What about the Routh picture surely that would come out the same. This has my head spinning,a guy under 6'2 surely wouldn't have the gall to say 6'4;would he?
Editor Rob
Is your head closer to the camera here Rob?,I cant buy him under 6'2,he appears to have good posture but his hips indicate him leaning slightly to one side. What about the Routh picture surely that would come out the same. This has my head spinning,a guy under 6'2 surely wouldn't have the gall to say 6'4;would he?
Editor Rob I think adding another 1/2 inch posture for John is fine, routh was standing pretty decent.
Hugh said on 12/Jan/09
Rob, on the left side you didn't have a bad posture, while you do on the right side of that picture. Including Schneider posture and shoes I can guess a 6'1.5" barefoot for him.
Rob, on the left side you didn't have a bad posture, while you do on the right side of that picture. Including Schneider posture and shoes I can guess a 6'1.5" barefoot for him.
hugh said on 11/Jan/09
I knew you would answer this way, but i've never seen an underestimated height on the web.Anyway it is just one picture between others it is not the last answer on this question..
I knew you would answer this way, but i've never seen an underestimated height on the web.Anyway it is just one picture between others it is not the last answer on this question..
Yaspaa said on 11/Jan/09
Hugh the 6'5 guy I was comparing Jared Padalecki to is listed as 6'5 everywhere but you didn't want to know,climbing the mirrors was your response I believe.
Hugh the 6'5 guy I was comparing Jared Padalecki to is listed as 6'5 everywhere but you didn't want to know,climbing the mirrors was your response I believe.
Hugh said on 10/Jan/09
Yaspaa, you can just google
Frank Rogers height
and you'll see everywhere he was 6'0" (he is dead). Didn't you know him?
Yaspaa, you can just google
Frank Rogers height
and you'll see everywhere he was 6'0" (he is dead). Didn't you know him?
Yaspaa said on 10/Jan/09
I wouldn't give John 6'3 but definately 6'2 and change not 6'1 which was my point about Routh. Hugh how do you know fred is 6'0,if he is John looks to be under 6'0,very iffy.
I wouldn't give John 6'3 but definately 6'2 and change not 6'1 which was my point about Routh. Hugh how do you know fred is 6'0,if he is John looks to be under 6'0,very iffy.
Da Man said on 9/Jan/09
Yaspaa says on 9/Jan/09
"The difference is very similar to Brandon Routh. Is he also under 6'2."
IMO, Routh looks 6'2" to 6'2.5" at the max with Rob.
Yaspaa says on 9/Jan/09
"The difference is very similar to Brandon Routh. Is he also under 6'2."
IMO, Routh looks 6'2" to 6'2.5" at the max with Rob.
Yaspaa said on 9/Jan/09
The difference is very similar to Brandon Routh. Is he also under 6'2.
The difference is very similar to Brandon Routh. Is he also under 6'2.
Hugh said on 8/Jan/09
Yaspaa, I already knew what you say. But this picture doesn't show any difficulties of interpretation. I'm 6'1" (185.5 cm), one of my friend is 5'8.1" (173 cm). We've tried the same picture, I've worn my 1 year old Nike Shox, he his converse... The result is exactly the same.
Wearing my shox i'm 189.2 cm.
Yaspaa, I already knew what you say. But this picture doesn't show any difficulties of interpretation. I'm 6'1" (185.5 cm), one of my friend is 5'8.1" (173 cm). We've tried the same picture, I've worn my 1 year old Nike Shox, he his converse... The result is exactly the same.
Wearing my shox i'm 189.2 cm.
Brad said on 8/Jan/09
Hey John, show up at Ray Courts' show this year. Hey John, remember the carpet tubes at Calico Corners in Mount Kisko, I rolled in them also!
Hey John, show up at Ray Courts' show this year. Hey John, remember the carpet tubes at Calico Corners in Mount Kisko, I rolled in them also!
Yaspaa said on 7/Jan/09
Hugh, this road has been covered extensively and he certainly isn't 6'1 that is getting stupid,he is taller than Mick Foley and was noticeably taller than David Caruso and looked extremely similar in stature to 6'4 listed Rex Linn in a relatively recent episode of CSI Miami. Hugh I am reluctant to consider your reluctency towards John being 6'1,you cant attempt to be that accurate when all you have is a two 2 dimentional representation of a 3 dimentional image. You are missing the forest for the trees,dont delve too deep,you know what happend to the dwarves in Lord Of The Rings. 189.5
Hugh, this road has been covered extensively and he certainly isn't 6'1 that is getting stupid,he is taller than Mick Foley and was noticeably taller than David Caruso and looked extremely similar in stature to 6'4 listed Rex Linn in a relatively recent episode of CSI Miami. Hugh I am reluctant to consider your reluctency towards John being 6'1,you cant attempt to be that accurate when all you have is a two 2 dimentional representation of a 3 dimentional image. You are missing the forest for the trees,dont delve too deep,you know what happend to the dwarves in Lord Of The Rings. 189.5
Hugh said on 7/Jan/09
Rob, what you say makes me think Schneider smaller than I supposed, less than 6'2", just a 6'1" and this sounds strange for a guy who says " i'm 6'4" "...
Considering your head height 25 cm (head tip to chin tip), making proportions on the picture you are 15 cm smaller than Schnider (including shoes heights). If you are 172.7 cm + 0.6 cm (shoes thickness) then Schnider is 172.7 + 0.6 + 15 = 188.3 cm including 1.3" (3.3 cm) because of shoes, making him 188.3 - 3.3 = 185 cm barefoot. Were you on the tips of your feet? :) I'm reluctant to consider him 6'1"...
Rob, what you say makes me think Schneider smaller than I supposed, less than 6'2", just a 6'1" and this sounds strange for a guy who says " i'm 6'4" "...
Considering your head height 25 cm (head tip to chin tip), making proportions on the picture you are 15 cm smaller than Schnider (including shoes heights). If you are 172.7 cm + 0.6 cm (shoes thickness) then Schnider is 172.7 + 0.6 + 15 = 188.3 cm including 1.3" (3.3 cm) because of shoes, making him 188.3 - 3.3 = 185 cm barefoot. Were you on the tips of your feet? :) I'm reluctant to consider him 6'1"...
Hugh said on 7/Jan/09
Rob, what you say makes me think Schneider smaller than I supposed, less than 6'2", just a 6'1" and this sounds strange for a guy who says " i'm 6'4" "...
Considering your head height 25 cm (head tip to chin tip), making proportions on the picture you are 15 cm smaller than Schnider (including shoes heights). If you are 172.7 cm + 0.6 cm (shoes thickness) then Schnider is 172.7 + 0.6 + 15 = 188.3 cm including 1.3" because of shoes, making him 188.3 - 3.3 = 185 cm barefoot. Were you on the tips of your feet? :) I'm reluctant to consider him 6'1"...
Rob, what you say makes me think Schneider smaller than I supposed, less than 6'2", just a 6'1" and this sounds strange for a guy who says " i'm 6'4" "...
Considering your head height 25 cm (head tip to chin tip), making proportions on the picture you are 15 cm smaller than Schnider (including shoes heights). If you are 172.7 cm + 0.6 cm (shoes thickness) then Schnider is 172.7 + 0.6 + 15 = 188.3 cm including 1.3" because of shoes, making him 188.3 - 3.3 = 185 cm barefoot. Were you on the tips of your feet? :) I'm reluctant to consider him 6'1"...
Hugh said on 6/Jan/09
Gary as you can see John Schneider eye level is 5'10" max, considering rob'shoes and posture, john shoes (Nike Shox) and posture then his eye level is 5'9" barefoot. As you say about yourself, I can guess again max 6'2".
Gary as you can see John Schneider eye level is 5'10" max, considering rob'shoes and posture, john shoes (Nike Shox) and posture then his eye level is 5'9" barefoot. As you say about yourself, I can guess again max 6'2".
Hugh said on 6/Jan/09
I don't know what are Rob'shoes, but Schneider wears Nike Shox which are really thick. In this picture i can guess 6'2" max for Schneider.
Editor Rob
I don't know what are Rob'shoes, but Schneider wears Nike Shox which are really thick. In this picture i can guess 6'2" max for Schneider.
Editor Rob they didn't look new so I would say 1.3 maybe, I'd just go with 1/4 inch more than me that day.
I was just looking at the original pic, it was taken at 11.20am. That morning I was up something like 4am to get down to Birmingham...
I was just looking at the original pic, it was taken at 11.20am. That morning I was up something like 4am to get down to Birmingham...
linebacker40 said on 5/Jan/09
He always looked to me roughly an inch taller than Welling in Smallville, who I think is 6'3". Maybe it's the way he's somewhat angled in this picture that brings him down to the 6'3" range. Regardless, I still think he's a 6'4" flat when standing straight.
He always looked to me roughly an inch taller than Welling in Smallville, who I think is 6'3". Maybe it's the way he's somewhat angled in this picture that brings him down to the 6'3" range. Regardless, I still think he's a 6'4" flat when standing straight.
Gary said on 4/Jan/09
Im 6-2.5 barefoot and 5-9.75 eye level, and with shoes im 6-3.5 and 5-10.75 eye level, if rob is 5-9 with shoes, then he's around 6-3 maybe 6-3.25 in the picture
Im 6-2.5 barefoot and 5-9.75 eye level, and with shoes im 6-3.5 and 5-10.75 eye level, if rob is 5-9 with shoes, then he's around 6-3 maybe 6-3.25 in the picture
Lenad said on 3/Jan/09
6'3 with the top of his hair.
6'3 with the top of his hair.
Lionel said on 1/Jan/09
He look 6'2.25 or 6'2.5 beside Rob and has a head shorter than him as well.
He look 6'2.25 or 6'2.5 beside Rob and has a head shorter than him as well.
Anonymous said on 27/Nov/08
He looks 6'2 -6'2.5 barefeet, when he said he was nearly 6'4 that was with shoes (6'3 - 6'3.5)
He looks 6'2 -6'2.5 barefeet, when he said he was nearly 6'4 that was with shoes (6'3 - 6'3.5)
Josh said on 19/Nov/08
He looks 6'3 with shoes on so hes a solid 6'2 barefeet .
He looks 6'3 with shoes on so hes a solid 6'2 barefeet .
Alex said on 18/Nov/08
He can actually look only 6'2 with Rob as well.
He can actually look only 6'2 with Rob as well.
Patrick said on 6/Nov/08
Anonymous, where have you seen them, Jared and Him, together? I don't deny what you claim but I remember a picture of David Hasselhoff with him and Jhon looked taller wihtout the shade of a doubt! So,I wish i could see Jared and Him on a pic. Anyway, he's so tall Jared...
Anonymous, where have you seen them, Jared and Him, together? I don't deny what you claim but I remember a picture of David Hasselhoff with him and Jhon looked taller wihtout the shade of a doubt! So,I wish i could see Jared and Him on a pic. Anyway, he's so tall Jared...
Anonymous said on 21/Oct/08
He's got Geoff Stults (6'2.5 at least)height.
He's got Geoff Stults (6'2.5 at least)height.
Anonymous said on 21/Oct/08
Jared Padalecki had 2 inches taller than him.
Jared Padalecki had 2 inches taller than him.
Anonymous said on 21/Oct/08
You are right,Ian.
You are right,Ian.
Anonymous said on 10/Oct/08
despite his height he's got a head shorter than rob so I would say 6'2.5 tall
despite his height he's got a head shorter than rob so I would say 6'2.5 tall
Anonymous said on 8/Oct/08
he's got nearly Julian McMahon height in Nip/Tuck I will say 6'2.5 at best and 6'3 in the morning.
he's got nearly Julian McMahon height in Nip/Tuck I will say 6'2.5 at best and 6'3 in the morning.
Brad said on 2/Sep/08
I met him at a car show and again after sneaking on The Burbank Studios lot in '80. He's 6' 3". I was 6' 7" in regular shoes, he 6' 5.5" in boots. Warner Bros. ripped him off for millions on the merchandising. Said I could pass as Brad Duke.
I met him at a car show and again after sneaking on The Burbank Studios lot in '80. He's 6' 3". I was 6' 7" in regular shoes, he 6' 5.5" in boots. Warner Bros. ripped him off for millions on the merchandising. Said I could pass as Brad Duke.
Ian said on 14/Aug/08
6ft2. He's eyes see 5ft9 level and add max of 5 inches of forehead above eye level gives 6ft2.
6ft2. He's eyes see 5ft9 level and add max of 5 inches of forehead above eye level gives 6ft2.
Lego said on 7/Aug/08
i think he's more 6'2.5 than a proper 6'3 really, he does look 6'3+ in the image though.
looks like a nice guy unlike various celebrities.
i think he's more 6'2.5 than a proper 6'3 really, he does look 6'3+ in the image though.
looks like a nice guy unlike various celebrities.
Alex said on 4/Aug/08
6'3 with Rob.
6'3 with Rob.
Patrick said on 4/Aug/08
I am 1/August "Anonymous" !
I am 1/August "Anonymous" !
Anonymous said on 1/Aug/08
Very well posted Bob H.!
As for the kind of shoes they both usually wear, Yaspaa is right.
I just would add we scarcely Tom
Very well posted Bob H.!
As for the kind of shoes they both usually wear, Yaspaa is right.
I just would add we scarcely Tom
Bob H. said on 30/Jul/08
Watching Willie Nelson's 'Stagecoach' right this minute. Schneider is about 2 inches taller than Johnny Cash. Cash's eyes are at the bottom of Schneider's nose. Giving Cash 6'1" or so... and Schneider appears to be exactly 6'3".
Watching Willie Nelson's 'Stagecoach' right this minute. Schneider is about 2 inches taller than Johnny Cash. Cash's eyes are at the bottom of Schneider's nose. Giving Cash 6'1" or so... and Schneider appears to be exactly 6'3".
Yaspaa said on 14/Jul/08
Schneider is in boots aplenty,he works a farm.
Schneider is in boots aplenty,he works a farm.
Candyman said on 14/Jul/08
Tom Welling can sometimes appear "taller" or lankier only due to the fact that he always wears boots which make his legs look longer while Schniedr is usually wearing loafers or casual dress shoes.
Tom Welling can sometimes appear "taller" or lankier only due to the fact that he always wears boots which make his legs look longer while Schniedr is usually wearing loafers or casual dress shoes.
patrick said on 1/Jul/08
Anonymous is "me", Patrick!
Anonymous is "me", Patrick!
Anonymous said on 5/Jun/08
There is a big difference between 5'6 and 5'8 as Ed.Rob is KC.
I can assure you that differences are more obvious in shorter heights than higher ones for an obscure reason. You need to be very tall to make a 5'8 man looking as Rob does for Rob is not small.
There is a big difference between 5'6 and 5'8 as Ed.Rob is KC.
I can assure you that differences are more obvious in shorter heights than higher ones for an obscure reason. You need to be very tall to make a 5'8 man looking as Rob does for Rob is not small.
K C said on 29/May/08
im 5'6 and my brother is 6'4 and i barely pass his shoulder. this doesnt seem right.
im 5'6 and my brother is 6'4 and i barely pass his shoulder. this doesnt seem right.
Yaspaa said on 29/May/08
I can see you point Marco,maybe footwear is an issue.
I can see you point Marco,maybe footwear is an issue.
Marco said on 28/May/08
Why are Welling and Routh listed here as 6'2.5 if they seem to be taller or at least the same height than Schneider?
Why are Welling and Routh listed here as 6'2.5 if they seem to be taller or at least the same height than Schneider?
Yaspaa said on 3/May/08
John made an appearance in a recent episode of CSI Miami,I watched it and he did look particularly tall and more slender than usual,he may have lost some weight.
John made an appearance in a recent episode of CSI Miami,I watched it and he did look particularly tall and more slender than usual,he may have lost some weight.
patrick said on 17/Mar/08
You know Yaspaa, you write very well and that confirms how much you would downgrade yourself
You know Yaspaa, you write very well and that confirms how much you would downgrade yourself
Yaspaa said on 15/Mar/08
Patrick,some really interesting stuff there. Many of your mentioned shows are what I was watching as a child,so my opinions on these shows are from a childs perspective. The 'Trek' however is my biggest love. I loved the original series but TNG totally has my heart,Voyager is great to a lesser extent,Enterprise is OK and DS9 ( a soap opera in space)I really enjoy.Sci-fi/fantasy I tend to love in general,so yes, 'Trek' I really miss,I hope the new movie is good.
CSI, I watched and enjoyed for the first 4 seasons,but when CSI Miami,CSI New York and then 'bones', I got quite bored,there are only so many times you can watch someone with a black light looking for blood and other unpleasant bodily fluids.
NCIS brings quality, unpredictable storylines with a silver lining of humour and charm which I am thoroughly enjoying at the moment.
I am a TV freak,TV shows tend to give much more closure to the watcher over 'most' movies,you can really get attached to characters over the course of how ever many seasons,and in these shows I am always aware of their statural prominence,estimating how tall I think they are,for the only purpose of.. knowing.
I will give any show a try and if it offers well written witty,interesting or exciting storylines I will keep watching it and keep mentally measuring actors summits. A tout a l'heure.
Patrick,some really interesting stuff there. Many of your mentioned shows are what I was watching as a child,so my opinions on these shows are from a childs perspective. The 'Trek' however is my biggest love. I loved the original series but TNG totally has my heart,Voyager is great to a lesser extent,Enterprise is OK and DS9 ( a soap opera in space)I really enjoy.Sci-fi/fantasy I tend to love in general,so yes, 'Trek' I really miss,I hope the new movie is good.
CSI, I watched and enjoyed for the first 4 seasons,but when CSI Miami,CSI New York and then 'bones', I got quite bored,there are only so many times you can watch someone with a black light looking for blood and other unpleasant bodily fluids.
NCIS brings quality, unpredictable storylines with a silver lining of humour and charm which I am thoroughly enjoying at the moment.
I am a TV freak,TV shows tend to give much more closure to the watcher over 'most' movies,you can really get attached to characters over the course of how ever many seasons,and in these shows I am always aware of their statural prominence,estimating how tall I think they are,for the only purpose of.. knowing.
I will give any show a try and if it offers well written witty,interesting or exciting storylines I will keep watching it and keep mentally measuring actors summits. A tout a l'heure.
patrick said on 13/Mar/08
Yaspaa! I had lost you again! Please, mention soon what pages you are usually writing on.
Thereby, I
Yaspaa! I had lost you again! Please, mention soon what pages you are usually writing on.
Thereby, I
Thomas said on 3/Mar/08
what does the red "r" and the green "g" after some heights mean
Editor Rob
what does the red "r" and the green "g" after some heights mean
Editor Rob glenn or rob picture on that page. Helps those who just want to look at entries on this site with photos.
Yaspaa said on 29/Feb/08
Is there other modern shows you are as passionate about Patrick?
Is there other modern shows you are as passionate about Patrick?
Yaspaa said on 29/Feb/08
Ah,Patrick you have tracked me down and are not wrong in assuming that I am not easily manipulated.When I am wrong I am still right,lol,and sticking with that belief will make me content forever.
I think John looks a solid 6'2 in this picture,maybe 0.25 inches more but not 6'3 and certainly not the 6'4 he claims. With the 0.5 inch height advantage Tom Welling seems to have over John in Smallville,would indicate Tom at at around 6'2.5 - 6'2.75 ( based on this picture).
Ah,Patrick you have tracked me down and are not wrong in assuming that I am not easily manipulated.When I am wrong I am still right,lol,and sticking with that belief will make me content forever.
I think John looks a solid 6'2 in this picture,maybe 0.25 inches more but not 6'3 and certainly not the 6'4 he claims. With the 0.5 inch height advantage Tom Welling seems to have over John in Smallville,would indicate Tom at at around 6'2.5 - 6'2.75 ( based on this picture).
patrick said on 29/Feb/08
Yaspaa ! what a pleasure to meet you here !
So, you won
Yaspaa ! what a pleasure to meet you here !
So, you won
Yaspaa said on 28/Feb/08
Hmmm,quite a passive answer Rob (sorry to use you in third person earlier). What do you think about the Tom Welling/John Schneider comparison?
Do you think they make Tom appear taller in the show?
Would they choose a guy to play the character of Clark's father if he was taller than the guy playing the Clark character?
Editor Rob
Hmmm,quite a passive answer Rob (sorry to use you in third person earlier). What do you think about the Tom Welling/John Schneider comparison?
Do you think they make Tom appear taller in the show?
Would they choose a guy to play the character of Clark's father if he was taller than the guy playing the Clark character?
Editor Rob I think they are very similar on the show and angles can and footwear can swing differences a little in either favor.
Yaspaa said on 28/Feb/08
The top of Rob's head is level with the point of John's nose and it's the same story with Brandon Routh. I don't think John is the full 6'3,generally looking a smidge shorter than 6'2.5 Tom Welling in Smallville. I only see a six inch difference in the picture,I think I'll go with 6'2.25.
Editor Rob
The top of Rob's head is level with the point of John's nose and it's the same story with Brandon Routh. I don't think John is the full 6'3,generally looking a smidge shorter than 6'2.5 Tom Welling in Smallville. I only see a six inch difference in the picture,I think I'll go with 6'2.25.
Editor Rob although I am as near level distance with Routh, but here I am slightly closer than john. Although Schneider was wearing decent Nike Shox, about 1/4 inch more than me anyway.
Yaspaa said on 27/Feb/08
Usually seems a tad shorter than Tom Welling, not a tad taller.
Usually seems a tad shorter than Tom Welling, not a tad taller.
anonymous said on 6/Feb/08
brandon routh is 6`2.5. And schneider here looks slightly taller. 6`3 is pretty bang on.
brandon routh is 6`2.5. And schneider here looks slightly taller. 6`3 is pretty bang on.
Viper said on 18/Jan/08
Well, he looks 6-2 1/2 max wth Rob.
Well, he looks 6-2 1/2 max wth Rob.
anonymous said on 18/Jan/08
how do you figure 189 max!?
how do you figure 189 max!?
anonymous said on 17/Jan/08
uhhh... viper, those pictures prove only one thing. That you were dead wrong all along. they prove he is 6`3
uhhh... viper, those pictures prove only one thing. That you were dead wrong all along. they prove he is 6`3
AAAA said on 15/Jan/08
True patrick..... he is a big guy
True patrick..... he is a big guy
patrick said on 15/Jan/08
John looks 6'3 here as usual. No less than 6'2.5! No way Tom Welling being shorter than him! On the contrary, he always appeared taller in off-show events. Those guys are all really tall and very well built!
So, this pic just should be enough.
John looks 6'3 here as usual. No less than 6'2.5! No way Tom Welling being shorter than him! On the contrary, he always appeared taller in off-show events. Those guys are all really tall and very well built!
So, this pic just should be enough.
Da Man said on 10/Jan/08
I gotta say Vegas, if that line was razor sharp, Rob would be missing significant brain matter in the Schneider and Momoa pics.
I gotta say Vegas, if that line was razor sharp, Rob would be missing significant brain matter in the Schneider and Momoa pics.
AAAA said on 8/Jan/08
Sugar Honey Iced Tea...completely forgot he was wearing shocks, ..... I retract my previous statements. He is dead on with Routh. Nevermind. 189-190. Not a clear 6'3 but close.
Sugar Honey Iced Tea...completely forgot he was wearing shocks, ..... I retract my previous statements. He is dead on with Routh. Nevermind. 189-190. Not a clear 6'3 but close.
Dallas said on 8/Jan/08
I think John Schneider is probably right at 6'4 and Tom Welling is right at 6'3 which accounts for the close to an inch difference in their height. John appears to have like 3 inches on John Glover and Tom Wopat both who are 6'1.
I think John Schneider is probably right at 6'4 and Tom Welling is right at 6'3 which accounts for the close to an inch difference in their height. John appears to have like 3 inches on John Glover and Tom Wopat both who are 6'1.
Viper said on 8/Jan/08
So hes 189cm max. Pretty much what Ive been saying all along :)
So hes 189cm max. Pretty much what Ive been saying all along :)
Vegas said on 8/Jan/08
here are four photos
rob is only up to schneiders nostrils and rob is slightly closer to the camera Click Here
rob and routh, rob is side by side here and leaning ever so slightly, thing to remember is routh has a smallish head, the rocks forehead was much larger Click Here
most peg jimmy smits at 6'3 looks the exact same difference between smits/glenn and rob/schneider Click Here
rob has jason momoa listed at 6'4, based on this pic he would have approx 0.75" on smits and schneider and a little more on routh Click Here
Editor Rob
here are four photos
rob is only up to schneiders nostrils and rob is slightly closer to the camera Click Here
rob and routh, rob is side by side here and leaning ever so slightly, thing to remember is routh has a smallish head, the rocks forehead was much larger Click Here
most peg jimmy smits at 6'3 looks the exact same difference between smits/glenn and rob/schneider Click Here
rob has jason momoa listed at 6'4, based on this pic he would have approx 0.75" on smits and schneider and a little more on routh Click Here
Editor Rob pretty much...
routh/me on as near plane, very similar shoe heights, posture is decent for both of us, the lean is v small there.
schneider, yes slightly closer here, he has 1/4-1/3 inch footwear advantage so I think it evens itself. But he has a little lesser posture than Routh.
routh/me on as near plane, very similar shoe heights, posture is decent for both of us, the lean is v small there.
schneider, yes slightly closer here, he has 1/4-1/3 inch footwear advantage so I think it evens itself. But he has a little lesser posture than Routh.
Da Man said on 7/Jan/08
I see zero appreciable difference between Routh and Schneider. In both Rob is well above their nostrils (which would be a roughly 6.5" difference) and about 1" below the eyeline. I just played with the pics in paint, and the two look almost exactly the same height.
I see zero appreciable difference between Routh and Schneider. In both Rob is well above their nostrils (which would be a roughly 6.5" difference) and about 1" below the eyeline. I just played with the pics in paint, and the two look almost exactly the same height.
AAAA said on 7/Jan/08
Well yeah I defn agree that it is almost impossible to tell, but Schneider just looks MARGINALLY taller to me for some reason next to you Rob
Well yeah I defn agree that it is almost impossible to tell, but Schneider just looks MARGINALLY taller to me for some reason next to you Rob
AAAA said on 7/Jan/08
Well he looks taller next to Rob than Brandon Routh, who most seemed to agree was 6'2.5. I know the pic with Routh is closer up, but the top of Robs head is close to the tip of the nose, while in Routh's pic Robs head is closer to the middle of the nose. miniscule, but when discussing .25in in heights, then it all matters
And rob appears to be standing without a head tilt, which he had slightly in Rouths pic ( ROB, not harping at all on you BTW, I think both pics are outstanding...keep up the great work).
To sum up my lenghty discourse, Schneider looks taller next to Rob then Routh, and Routh looks 6'2.5 solid next to Rob. IMO Routh is a 189-190 guy, schneider is 190 at least, more 191. I wish I could post pic anaylsis but I just landed from a MISERABLE plane ride and have to get back in the grind for school tommrow. Hope to hear from you all agan.
Editor Rob
Well he looks taller next to Rob than Brandon Routh, who most seemed to agree was 6'2.5. I know the pic with Routh is closer up, but the top of Robs head is close to the tip of the nose, while in Routh's pic Robs head is closer to the middle of the nose. miniscule, but when discussing .25in in heights, then it all matters
And rob appears to be standing without a head tilt, which he had slightly in Rouths pic ( ROB, not harping at all on you BTW, I think both pics are outstanding...keep up the great work).
To sum up my lenghty discourse, Schneider looks taller next to Rob then Routh, and Routh looks 6'2.5 solid next to Rob. IMO Routh is a 189-190 guy, schneider is 190 at least, more 191. I wish I could post pic anaylsis but I just landed from a MISERABLE plane ride and have to get back in the grind for school tommrow. Hope to hear from you all agan.
Editor Rob I think it's really close in both to be honest, both hard to tell apart BUT, Routh has better posture, I noticed that about him, John has decent posture but not as good as Brandon.
Anonymous said on 6/Jan/08
In the pictures with Hasslehoff (assuming he is still 6ft 4in) Schneider looks 6ft 3.5in so 6ft 3in makes complete sense. He also does have good posture.
In the pictures with Hasslehoff (assuming he is still 6ft 4in) Schneider looks 6ft 3.5in so 6ft 3in makes complete sense. He also does have good posture.
Anonymous... said on 6/Jan/08
dude im 6'-3" 3/4" i saw him at the event and i met him to get his autograph John was shorter than me by like 2 inches u do the math.... o and when u mentioned johns height was proabably 6-2.5? think again....their shoe heel difference might play a part too....tho not much just a thought
dude im 6'-3" 3/4" i saw him at the event and i met him to get his autograph John was shorter than me by like 2 inches u do the math.... o and when u mentioned johns height was proabably 6-2.5? think again....their shoe heel difference might play a part too....tho not much just a thought
AAAA said on 6/Jan/08
Well the diff here is really close to the Photo Glenn has with Smits. Maybe he is only 190(6'2.75) now, but I feel like he was def 191(solid 6'3) and may have lost a cm. He is close to 50. Whats funny is some places have him at 6'4 or more, even though he has said 6'3 himself or "almost" 6'4
Well the diff here is really close to the Photo Glenn has with Smits. Maybe he is only 190(6'2.75) now, but I feel like he was def 191(solid 6'3) and may have lost a cm. He is close to 50. Whats funny is some places have him at 6'4 or more, even though he has said 6'3 himself or "almost" 6'4
Katie said on 6/Jan/08
Oh, man, I love me some John Schneider. Though if he's still 6'3, then I think that puts Tom at a solid 6'3, too, according to this Smallville promo photo from season 1: Click Here
Oh, man, I love me some John Schneider. Though if he's still 6'3, then I think that puts Tom at a solid 6'3, too, according to this Smallville promo photo from season 1: Click Here
venus said on 5/Jan/08
I agree, he's 6-2 1/2. That guy's head is up to his nostrils, now if the top of Rob's head was up to his bottom lip, then it would be legit.
I agree, he's 6-2 1/2. That guy's head is up to his nostrils, now if the top of Rob's head was up to his bottom lip, then it would be legit.
Viper said on 5/Jan/08
I still say 6-2 1/2 at most for Schneider.
I still say 6-2 1/2 at most for Schneider.
Danny said on 4/Jan/08
Top of Rob's head is on the same level as Johns nose... Imo 6'2 - 6'2.5
Top of Rob's head is on the same level as Johns nose... Imo 6'2 - 6'2.5
Da Man said on 4/Jan/08
Maybe I'm off here, but I don't see more than 5.5" - 6" max between Rob and John here. What was the footwear in this pic?
Maybe I'm off here, but I don't see more than 5.5" - 6" max between Rob and John here. What was the footwear in this pic?
Anonymous said on 4/Jan/08
maximus, are you a genuine 5'10 1/2 barefoot,??
maximus, are you a genuine 5'10 1/2 barefoot,??
sid said on 3/Jan/08
I just cottoned onto who you are. Remember index!!! Lmao robert, I want your job. Can I swap with you please?
Editor Rob
I just cottoned onto who you are. Remember index!!! Lmao robert, I want your job. Can I swap with you please?
Editor Rob you'd be better off sticking to warehousing...sorry, I work hard these days, 9 hour days, minimum wage...I still can't afford a proper house, still scrounge off the family. Nothing's changed in 8 years ;)
maximus said on 2/Jan/08
my experience is that 98% of all people exaggerate their height....hands down....its rare for me to meet someone that actually gives their true height...I've met people that claim 6'2 and are only an inch or two taller than me...I am 5'10 1/2.
my experience is that 98% of all people exaggerate their height....hands down....its rare for me to meet someone that actually gives their true height...I've met people that claim 6'2 and are only an inch or two taller than me...I am 5'10 1/2.
Anonymous said on 2/Jan/08
wow 6'3 and 175lbs, he's under weight by 10-20lbs.
wow 6'3 and 175lbs, he's under weight by 10-20lbs.
anonymous said on 2/Jan/08
he was a tad taller than tom welling, i guess he is 1.90 max, he seems to have 15cms on that guy in the pic 1.73 plus 15 : 1.88, but he is not straight so 1.90 must be
he was a tad taller than tom welling, i guess he is 1.90 max, he seems to have 15cms on that guy in the pic 1.73 plus 15 : 1.88, but he is not straight so 1.90 must be
TheMan said on 1/Jan/08
Yeah deffently 6,3 is an inch over welling who if anything is a good 6,2.
Yeah deffently 6,3 is an inch over welling who if anything is a good 6,2.
OutBenchThis said on 1/Jan/08
Doesn't look any bigger than 6'2.5"
Doesn't look any bigger than 6'2.5"
5'6 and 21 said on 1/Jan/08
I think it's the first time they have an exact height for a star. I think John is 6'3 I have all the Smallville season in dvd and honestly there are very good shots where you can see Tom and John very cleary and I think John got 1 inch over Tom. My guess is John: 6'3 and Tom Welling: 6'2 or 6'2.5. That would be the exact barefoot measure to me.
I think it's the first time they have an exact height for a star. I think John is 6'3 I have all the Smallville season in dvd and honestly there are very good shots where you can see Tom and John very cleary and I think John got 1 inch over Tom. My guess is John: 6'3 and Tom Welling: 6'2 or 6'2.5. That would be the exact barefoot measure to me.
RobertJ said on 1/Jan/08
nice pic Rob, did Routh look taller when you met him or Schneider? Or were they pretty much the same height
Editor Rob
nice pic Rob, did Routh look taller when you met him or Schneider? Or were they pretty much the same height
Editor Rob both are real hard to tell apart. Actually someone sent me a routh photo showing him looking nearer 6ft 3.5!
AAAA said on 1/Jan/08
Outstanding Pic rob... Looks 6'3 to me
Outstanding Pic rob... Looks 6'3 to me
Alex2 said on 1/Jan/08
Vey looky to meet him Rob, happy new year
Vey looky to meet him Rob, happy new year
Arma said on 1/Jan/08
Cool picture rob. Looks a big man and proves tom welling as being a tall like him
Cool picture rob. Looks a big man and proves tom welling as being a tall like him
patrick said on 3/Dec/07
Keith, that is an old debate and never Tom looked so short, even in the first season! It has been said many times taht Tom had to look younger and really the son of John at the time, not as "Superman". A lot of us read or heard co stars or producers of the show explaining Tom ahd to play bare foot or in slippers while the others had (and still have) to play over boxes, even platforms. I have the entire show in DVD and, loving it and being rather accurate in watching it, I can assure you that except , for example, in the hospital scene, Tom does not look shorter. As tall as John and sometimes taller, yes.
Tom shorter than 6'2 is simply ridiculous and Jhon is obviously not less r=than 6'2.5 even though I think he is 6'3.
Keith, that is an old debate and never Tom looked so short, even in the first season! It has been said many times taht Tom had to look younger and really the son of John at the time, not as "Superman". A lot of us read or heard co stars or producers of the show explaining Tom ahd to play bare foot or in slippers while the others had (and still have) to play over boxes, even platforms. I have the entire show in DVD and, loving it and being rather accurate in watching it, I can assure you that except , for example, in the hospital scene, Tom does not look shorter. As tall as John and sometimes taller, yes.
Tom shorter than 6'2 is simply ridiculous and Jhon is obviously not less r=than 6'2.5 even though I think he is 6'3.
Keith said on 1/Dec/07
We can clearly see that in oldie Smallville episodes. John Schneider it's taller than Tom Welling's 6'2. It's Like at least 2 inches taller than Tom. So, either Tom is shorter than 6'2 or John it's taller than what Glenn or Rob are saying.
We can clearly see that in oldie Smallville episodes. John Schneider it's taller than Tom Welling's 6'2. It's Like at least 2 inches taller than Tom. So, either Tom is shorter than 6'2 or John it's taller than what Glenn or Rob are saying.
patrick said on 29/Nov/07
I agree with Dawn of course. Tom W. does not look short for all that. I see int the Dukes episode always 3 inches between them, not less;That after all, less than 8 cm and it is not that huge; just legitimates the fact "John is clearly taller"; deal.
I agree with Dawn of course. Tom W. does not look short for all that. I see int the Dukes episode always 3 inches between them, not less;That after all, less than 8 cm and it is not that huge; just legitimates the fact "John is clearly taller"; deal.
Jason said on 28/Nov/07
''or its more likely you were not close enough to make an accurate estimation like many others such as nathan jones, big show, matt morgan, jbl and the rest...''
This wasn't during the show. It was outdoors in the wee hours, where I was right next to him.
''or its more likely you were not close enough to make an accurate estimation like many others such as nathan jones, big show, matt morgan, jbl and the rest...''
This wasn't during the show. It was outdoors in the wee hours, where I was right next to him.
Dawn said on 28/Nov/07
I just got done watching 13 episodes of The Dukes of Hazzard. He is at least 6'3" no doubt. He always looked taller than Tom Wopat, and they both wore cowboy boots. Besides, he himself says he's 6'3".
I just got done watching 13 episodes of The Dukes of Hazzard. He is at least 6'3" no doubt. He always looked taller than Tom Wopat, and they both wore cowboy boots. Besides, he himself says he's 6'3".
Vegas said on 28/Nov/07
Jason says on 28/Nov/07
Yeah, but some of them it's not like I tried to make an exact estimate. I changed my mind after seeing his listing and looking at photos where I thought he just didn't physically look as tall as he seemed. After considering that, I would say it's likely he was in boots (he was dressed up)/me over-estimating
or its more likely you were not close enough to make an accurate estimation like many others such as nathan jones, big show, matt morgan, jbl and the rest...
Jason says on 28/Nov/07
Yeah, but some of them it's not like I tried to make an exact estimate. I changed my mind after seeing his listing and looking at photos where I thought he just didn't physically look as tall as he seemed. After considering that, I would say it's likely he was in boots (he was dressed up)/me over-estimating
or its more likely you were not close enough to make an accurate estimation like many others such as nathan jones, big show, matt morgan, jbl and the rest...
patrick said on 28/Nov/07
DaMan, I saw at least I think, every photo ever made with Tom and John. I admit, of course, that some of them show Tom slightly smaller but, frankly more often taller and, in this case, always more clearly than the contrary. John told it at least two times (please, don't ask me when or where! I can't remember but I am sure of that!). Let's say they are the same...Tom could not be less than 6'2.5, in any case.
John always loooks taller in his other shows; In diagnostic murder where he embodies a very nasty but suave guy, he towers the son of Dick Van Dyke who is reasonably listed at 6'1, what he seems to be.
DaMan, I saw at least I think, every photo ever made with Tom and John. I admit, of course, that some of them show Tom slightly smaller but, frankly more often taller and, in this case, always more clearly than the contrary. John told it at least two times (please, don't ask me when or where! I can't remember but I am sure of that!). Let's say they are the same...Tom could not be less than 6'2.5, in any case.
John always loooks taller in his other shows; In diagnostic murder where he embodies a very nasty but suave guy, he towers the son of Dick Van Dyke who is reasonably listed at 6'1, what he seems to be.
Jason said on 28/Nov/07
Yeah, but some of them it's not like I tried to make an exact estimate. I changed my mind after seeing his listing and looking at photos where I thought he just didn't physically look as tall as he seemed. After considering that, I would say it's likely he was in boots (he was dressed up)/me over-estimating.
Yeah, but some of them it's not like I tried to make an exact estimate. I changed my mind after seeing his listing and looking at photos where I thought he just didn't physically look as tall as he seemed. After considering that, I would say it's likely he was in boots (he was dressed up)/me over-estimating.
Vegas said on 27/Nov/07
Jason says on 27/Nov/07
My impression of him was 6'1 1/2'' ... but, retrospectively, I would say he's probably 6'0 1/2'' or 6'0
what retrospectively made you change your opinion, a photo, viper's opinions, something else.
meeting a wrestler in person is the best way to determine height, not photos, videos or other people comments attempting to sway you; Jason you chop and change too much in retrospect, makes me feel you are not getting as close to these guys as you claim..... hence height estimations are a waste of time
Jason says on 27/Nov/07
My impression of him was 6'1 1/2'' ... but, retrospectively, I would say he's probably 6'0 1/2'' or 6'0
what retrospectively made you change your opinion, a photo, viper's opinions, something else.
meeting a wrestler in person is the best way to determine height, not photos, videos or other people comments attempting to sway you; Jason you chop and change too much in retrospect, makes me feel you are not getting as close to these guys as you claim..... hence height estimations are a waste of time
Jason said on 27/Nov/07
My impression of him was 6'1 1/2'' ... but, retrospectively, I would say he's probably 6'0 1/2'' or 6'0''.
My impression of him was 6'1 1/2'' ... but, retrospectively, I would say he's probably 6'0 1/2'' or 6'0''.
Viper said on 27/Nov/07
Jason, do you think Elijah Burke is his listed 6-1?
Jason, do you think Elijah Burke is his listed 6-1?
Jason said on 27/Nov/07
It's far from scraping the bottom of the barrel; when I saw the Major Brothers billed as 6'1'', that was enough to tell me I was off.
It's far from scraping the bottom of the barrel; when I saw the Major Brothers billed as 6'1'', that was enough to tell me I was off.
Da Man said on 26/Nov/07
I wish I could find them, AAAA. I posted them I guess about a year ago now on Tom's page. There was a whole cast shot, and a shot of Tom and John standing shoulder to shoulder.
I wish I could find them, AAAA. I posted them I guess about a year ago now on Tom's page. There was a whole cast shot, and a shot of Tom and John standing shoulder to shoulder.
AAAA said on 26/Nov/07
DaMan. could you post some of those pics, I'd like to see them
DaMan. could you post some of those pics, I'd like to see them
Viper said on 26/Nov/07
"you guys; still trying to pick holes in my estimations after nearly two years, lol,"
Its probably because your estimations can be wrong!!! Nobody is 100 percent perfect judging height in person. And saying that Mick is a legit 6-3 barefoot is wrong, even If you thought that.
"you guys; still trying to pick holes in my estimations after nearly two years, lol,"
Its probably because your estimations can be wrong!!! Nobody is 100 percent perfect judging height in person. And saying that Mick is a legit 6-3 barefoot is wrong, even If you thought that.
Da Man said on 26/Nov/07
Patrick, have you seen the season 1 Smallville premiere (event/party) pics with Tom and John? John was a bit taller than Tom in all of them. Personally, I trust photos like those more than Smallville photos. Even though there are numerous Smallville photos that show the two at the same height, or even with John a bit taller. I realize there are Smallville promotional photos and screen caps that show Tom taller than John, I think they are a bit suspect however.
Patrick, have you seen the season 1 Smallville premiere (event/party) pics with Tom and John? John was a bit taller than Tom in all of them. Personally, I trust photos like those more than Smallville photos. Even though there are numerous Smallville photos that show the two at the same height, or even with John a bit taller. I realize there are Smallville promotional photos and screen caps that show Tom taller than John, I think they are a bit suspect however.
Da Man said on 26/Nov/07
There is no more than .25" difference there and, as usual, Foley's posture isn't the greatest. Footwear is basically equal. These two could very easily be the same height.
There is no more than .25" difference there and, as usual, Foley's posture isn't the greatest. Footwear is basically equal. These two could very easily be the same height.
Vegas said on 26/Nov/07
you guys; still trying to pick holes in my estimations after nearly two years, lol, quoting WWE.com listings is scraping the bottom of the barrel :P
the foley i met in april 2006 was 6'3 standing tall, quoting wwe.com or telling me i am wrong ain't gonna chance my mind, you guys were not there that night standing next to foley, but 4 of my friends and my brother were and they will back me up 100%. you can look at all the photos you want but i ain't gonna chance my mind unless i meet him again and he appears shorter in person!! i don't care if you don't believe me, just don't keep bringing it up time and time and time again; there are far more bizarre in person sightings on this website than foley at 6'3.....
you guys; still trying to pick holes in my estimations after nearly two years, lol, quoting WWE.com listings is scraping the bottom of the barrel :P
the foley i met in april 2006 was 6'3 standing tall, quoting wwe.com or telling me i am wrong ain't gonna chance my mind, you guys were not there that night standing next to foley, but 4 of my friends and my brother were and they will back me up 100%. you can look at all the photos you want but i ain't gonna chance my mind unless i meet him again and he appears shorter in person!! i don't care if you don't believe me, just don't keep bringing it up time and time and time again; there are far more bizarre in person sightings on this website than foley at 6'3.....
Jason said on 26/Nov/07
The WWF used to bill Foley as 6'2''. I remember when he debuted as Mankind, they had him as 6'2'' 260lbs, but then immediately inflated it to 287lbs, where it stayed ever after. You'd think if they padded his weight, they wouldn't under-bill his height...
The WWF used to bill Foley as 6'2''. I remember when he debuted as Mankind, they had him as 6'2'' 260lbs, but then immediately inflated it to 287lbs, where it stayed ever after. You'd think if they padded his weight, they wouldn't under-bill his height...
Viper said on 25/Nov/07
Vegas, Rob was there and he even admits that John looked taller. Mick is not 6-3.
Vegas, Rob was there and he even admits that John looked taller. Mick is not 6-3.
AAAA said on 25/Nov/07
Whoa!? those pics with hasselhoff are pretty crazy. He has always looked at least 6'4 to me, and even a little taller in knight rider. yet john seems right there with them. I can't supersize the pics, so I am just oing by the tumbnails, if anyone can blow them up it'd be great to see them in better detail
Vegas, I think on the shoe page rob has profiled both shoxs and tims. Foley's tims look to be he 1.5in type. There are some other tims with a heel even more pronounced than a cowboy boot, upwards of 2in I have seen without measuring, but Foley's aren't those kind. If I remeber the the shox's on the sneaker page are said to be 1.41in, so the difference is <.1 in advantage. I agree that the footwear dif is negligible.
Side note, Foley has stubby arms.
Rob, I look foward to seeing that pic. May help to come closer to unveiling the mystery of Welling as well.
Whoa!? those pics with hasselhoff are pretty crazy. He has always looked at least 6'4 to me, and even a little taller in knight rider. yet john seems right there with them. I can't supersize the pics, so I am just oing by the tumbnails, if anyone can blow them up it'd be great to see them in better detail
Vegas, I think on the shoe page rob has profiled both shoxs and tims. Foley's tims look to be he 1.5in type. There are some other tims with a heel even more pronounced than a cowboy boot, upwards of 2in I have seen without measuring, but Foley's aren't those kind. If I remeber the the shox's on the sneaker page are said to be 1.41in, so the difference is <.1 in advantage. I agree that the footwear dif is negligible.
Side note, Foley has stubby arms.
Rob, I look foward to seeing that pic. May help to come closer to unveiling the mystery of Welling as well.
Vegas said on 25/Nov/07
yet he looked 6'3.5-6'4 standing next to 6'5 hillbilly jim in a video i posted, which you conveniently swept under the carpet. viper you question my estimations every chance you get (especially foley) but you quote mr mexican mentor all the time like its the truth and he provided not one grain of evidence to support his claims......
schneider is wearing 1.5" shox there, those boots of foleys are giving 1.5", cowboy boots only give 1.8", no way foleys are giving more than cowboys, lol. if foley was to stand fully tall he would be at least as tall as schneider, he is barely a 1/4" shorter there and schneider looks as tall as hasselhoff, hey maybe hasselhoff is <6'2 as well ;)
foley looked shorter than orton because he was leaning badly as he does all the time, like this Click Here and him standing straight
yet he looked 6'3.5-6'4 standing next to 6'5 hillbilly jim in a video i posted, which you conveniently swept under the carpet. viper you question my estimations every chance you get (especially foley) but you quote mr mexican mentor all the time like its the truth and he provided not one grain of evidence to support his claims......
schneider is wearing 1.5" shox there, those boots of foleys are giving 1.5", cowboy boots only give 1.8", no way foleys are giving more than cowboys, lol. if foley was to stand fully tall he would be at least as tall as schneider, he is barely a 1/4" shorter there and schneider looks as tall as hasselhoff, hey maybe hasselhoff is <6'2 as well ;)
foley looked shorter than orton because he was leaning badly as he does all the time, like this Click Here and him standing straight
Viper said on 25/Nov/07
I guess that makes Randy Orton 6-6 then, lol. Id say Foley has a half an inch in footwear to counter the very small lean anyway. Face it, Foley is not 6-3.
I guess that makes Randy Orton 6-6 then, lol. Id say Foley has a half an inch in footwear to counter the very small lean anyway. Face it, Foley is not 6-3.
Vegas said on 25/Nov/07
foley is leaning to the right there too that must be taken into account (foley leaning, say its not true) look at the position of his eyes/mouth he is losing about half an inch Click Here anyway since when are we going to ascertain foleys height from a photo, lol, he looked 4" shorter in a photo i saw a while back with orton
btw viper, Schneider has 3" on Wopcat not 2" Click Here and he is the same height as david hasselhoff Click Here seems someone was too quick to downgrade a person again, lol
foley is leaning to the right there too that must be taken into account (foley leaning, say its not true) look at the position of his eyes/mouth he is losing about half an inch Click Here anyway since when are we going to ascertain foleys height from a photo, lol, he looked 4" shorter in a photo i saw a while back with orton
btw viper, Schneider has 3" on Wopcat not 2" Click Here and he is the same height as david hasselhoff Click Here seems someone was too quick to downgrade a person again, lol
Viper said on 25/Nov/07
Well, that throws Vegas's 6-3 claims for Mick Foley out the window, LOL. The lowest Mick could be is 6-1 1/2. John is nothing under 6-2. John is at least 6-2 1/2 there If Mick is a full 6-2. I still think John is 6-2ish, but not quite a full 6-3.
Well, that throws Vegas's 6-3 claims for Mick Foley out the window, LOL. The lowest Mick could be is 6-1 1/2. John is nothing under 6-2. John is at least 6-2 1/2 there If Mick is a full 6-2. I still think John is 6-2ish, but not quite a full 6-3.
Brah said on 24/Nov/07
Nice pic Rob! Schneider is only marginally taller than Foley. Scneider in Nike Shox and Foley in boots, so the footwear looks about even.
Nice pic Rob! Schneider is only marginally taller than Foley. Scneider in Nike Shox and Foley in boots, so the footwear looks about even.
AAAA said on 24/Nov/07
what do you think of the height comp between Foley and Schnider. the footwear should be pretty close, with a .1 to .2 advantage to foley. shocks give 1.41in and those boots give like 1.5-1.7 in depending on the exact timberland model
what do you think of the height comp between Foley and Schnider. the footwear should be pretty close, with a .1 to .2 advantage to foley. shocks give 1.41in and those boots give like 1.5-1.7 in depending on the exact timberland model
Anonymous said on 12/Nov/07
Yes, I did e-mail John Schneiders Official Website and he responded back saying that he is exactly 6ft 3in tall
Yes, I did e-mail John Schneiders Official Website and he responded back saying that he is exactly 6ft 3in tall
Da Man said on 3/Oct/07
John has looked a bit taller than Tom in a few event/party photos. There was one photo where the two were shoulder-to-shoulder, the exact same distance from the camera and John looked .25" - .5" taller than Tom. That was the most conclusive pic I've seen with the two.
John has looked a bit taller than Tom in a few event/party photos. There was one photo where the two were shoulder-to-shoulder, the exact same distance from the camera and John looked .25" - .5" taller than Tom. That was the most conclusive pic I've seen with the two.
Viper said on 3/Oct/07
Somebody a long time ago mentioned John at 6-1 1/2 before. And yes, John has certantly looked taller than Welling before.
Somebody a long time ago mentioned John at 6-1 1/2 before. And yes, John has certantly looked taller than Welling before.
Shiku said on 2/Oct/07
hes taller than welling? Impossible wtf? he looked 6'1 to 6'1.5 max next to welling on smallville
hes taller than welling? Impossible wtf? he looked 6'1 to 6'1.5 max next to welling on smallville
sf said on 1/Jun/07
I read the e-bay site, and he said it was actually used in one of the Dukes movies. The last bid I saw was &100,000.
I read the e-bay site, and he said it was actually used in one of the Dukes movies. The last bid I saw was &100,000.
Viper said on 31/May/07
Ive seen that car on sale in a car magazine for only 34,000 before. One of them from the show. As a matter of fact a guy who lives down the road from me has an EXACT replica of the general lee charger. I dont think its one of the ones from the show. I beleive he just customized it from the ground up to look like one. Either way it looks amazing. Looks exactly like it. He carries it around to car shows I beleive. Its always on a trailer it seems.
Ive seen that car on sale in a car magazine for only 34,000 before. One of them from the show. As a matter of fact a guy who lives down the road from me has an EXACT replica of the general lee charger. I dont think its one of the ones from the show. I beleive he just customized it from the ground up to look like one. Either way it looks amazing. Looks exactly like it. He carries it around to car shows I beleive. Its always on a trailer it seems.
sf said on 31/May/07
Yes, he's selling one from one of the Dukes movies on E-bay.
Yes, he's selling one from one of the Dukes movies on E-bay.
Viper said on 30/May/07
What kind of car? You talking about the General Lee Charger?
What kind of car? You talking about the General Lee Charger?
sf said on 29/May/07
Yea - all I need is $100,000!
Yea - all I need is $100,000!
D. Ray Morton said on 29/May/07
Cool! The red one with the numbers on the doors?
Cool! The red one with the numbers on the doors?
sf said on 28/May/07
I'm going to buy his car off of E-bay...
I'm going to buy his car off of E-bay...
anonymous said on 27/May/07
i think he is probably 6`2.5 however. he was the same height as tom welling on smallville.
i think he is probably 6`2.5 however. he was the same height as tom welling on smallville.
anonymous said on 27/May/07
looks pretty darn tall in the dukes of hazaard. easily 6`2.5-6`3.25.
looks pretty darn tall in the dukes of hazaard. easily 6`2.5-6`3.25.
Patrick said on 8/May/07
OK, let's say he's not lying Viper but slightly exagerating in claiming 6'4 but not in saying "almost". He's really tall and not less than "almost 6'3" for sure.
OK, let's say he's not lying Viper but slightly exagerating in claiming 6'4 but not in saying "almost". He's really tall and not less than "almost 6'3" for sure.
Viper said on 1/May/07
Well, he is an actor and Im not surprised hes lying.
Well, he is an actor and Im not surprised hes lying.
Kal-El said on 30/Apr/07
I believe John is telling the truth, he doesn't need to lie like other actors about his height.
I believe John is telling the truth, he doesn't need to lie like other actors about his height.
Viper said on 30/Apr/07
He doesnt look almost 6-4. Funny, Tom Welling says he is almost 6-3 as well.
He doesnt look almost 6-4. Funny, Tom Welling says he is almost 6-3 as well.
Editor Rob said on 30/Apr/07
2002 Larry King:
"I did get too skinny. The other side of being overweight, once you've lost the weight. I got -- I'm almost 6'4" and my lightest, after my heaviest, was 175 pounds, and"
2002 Larry King:
"I did get too skinny. The other side of being overweight, once you've lost the weight. I got -- I'm almost 6'4" and my lightest, after my heaviest, was 175 pounds, and"
Anonymous said on 28/Apr/07
I watch alot of Dukes of Hazzard reruns and looking at John then he seems to be about 6 foot 4.5 but on the show he wears big cowboy boots so he is most likely around 6 foot 2-3 and Jude Stringfellow John was 12 in 1972 he was born in 1960 and lied about his age to get on the Dukes he even admits it on interviews on the DVD seasons.
I watch alot of Dukes of Hazzard reruns and looking at John then he seems to be about 6 foot 4.5 but on the show he wears big cowboy boots so he is most likely around 6 foot 2-3 and Jude Stringfellow John was 12 in 1972 he was born in 1960 and lied about his age to get on the Dukes he even admits it on interviews on the DVD seasons.
Viper said on 26/Apr/07
Well, the man is listed at 6-3 everywhere, and he flat out does not look like a 6-4 man. So yes, Id say he was lying. Jason, I remember you telling me about that.
Well, the man is listed at 6-3 everywhere, and he flat out does not look like a 6-4 man. So yes, Id say he was lying. Jason, I remember you telling me about that.
Kal-El said on 26/Apr/07
i agreed with you Viper on that, almost every celebs lie about their height(people in general puts an inch, sometimes 2 inches and sometimes 3 inches!) but some celebrities who are in fact tall doesn't need to lie about it. I guess most short and average celebrities(and normal people)lie about their height.But like i said before i think John doesn't need to lie about his height.
i agreed with you Viper on that, almost every celebs lie about their height(people in general puts an inch, sometimes 2 inches and sometimes 3 inches!) but some celebrities who are in fact tall doesn't need to lie about it. I guess most short and average celebrities(and normal people)lie about their height.But like i said before i think John doesn't need to lie about his height.
Viper said on 26/Apr/07
Well, celebs lie about their height all the time.
Well, celebs lie about their height all the time.
Jason said on 26/Apr/07
Viper, one of my former best friends is friends with Schneider and used to go to his house and hang out with him. I lost contact with her in 2003 though ... really kicking myself that that happened lol! Her husband is 6'5'' so we could have really nailed this one otherwise...
Viper, one of my former best friends is friends with Schneider and used to go to his house and hang out with him. I lost contact with her in 2003 though ... really kicking myself that that happened lol! Her husband is 6'5'' so we could have really nailed this one otherwise...
Kal-El said on 26/Apr/07
In my personal case i am 6ft2 and i don't need to lie about my height. For example, if i was a famous actor like John is, i wouldn't raise my height on an interview like you suppose that John Schneider did . Don't you think that Viper?
In my personal case i am 6ft2 and i don't need to lie about my height. For example, if i was a famous actor like John is, i wouldn't raise my height on an interview like you suppose that John Schneider did . Don't you think that Viper?
Viper said on 25/Apr/07
No way is Schneider 6-4. Hes listed at 6-3, so hes not over that even. I personally peg him at 6-2 1/4.
No way is Schneider 6-4. Hes listed at 6-3, so hes not over that even. I personally peg him at 6-2 1/4.
Heights are barefeet estimates, derived from quotations, official websites, agency resumes, in person encounters with actors at conventions and pictures/films.
Other vital statistics like weight or shoe size measurements have been sourced from newspapers, books, resumes or social media.
Celebrity Fan Photos and Agency Pictures of stars are © to their respective owners.