Add a Comment1071 comments
Average Guess (169 Votes)
6ft 0.8in (184.9cm)
6ft 0.8in (184.9cm)
Hugh 190cm said on 5/Jun/09
Saw Field of dreams last night. Throughout the whole movie Costner had 2 inches over Ray Liotta. So seeming Liotta is listed as 5ft11.5 here that would make Costner 6ft1.5.
Saw Field of dreams last night. Throughout the whole movie Costner had 2 inches over Ray Liotta. So seeming Liotta is listed as 5ft11.5 here that would make Costner 6ft1.5.
Hugh 190cm said on 4/Jun/09
185-186cm.
185-186cm.
Lenad said on 29/May/09
I now think 184cm min and 186cm max.
I now think 184cm min and 186cm max.
sidewinder said on 22/May/09
6'1 all the time also for me.
6'1 all the time also for me.
Lenad said on 14/May/09
Anonymous is Hugh
Anonymous is Hugh
Anonymous said on 8/May/09
With loose posture Costner may appear under 6ft1 but up straight he's probably a shade over 6ft1. So 186cm currently. Really he's lost no height.
With loose posture Costner may appear under 6ft1 but up straight he's probably a shade over 6ft1. So 186cm currently. Really he's lost no height.
Anonymous said on 29/Apr/09
Costner's height may fluctuate between 185-187cm depending on the time of the day. AT peak I'd say 188cm was his morning height.
Costner's height may fluctuate between 185-187cm depending on the time of the day. AT peak I'd say 188cm was his morning height.
Lenad said on 20/Apr/09
I think 184cm and 187cm max. 6'1.5 isnt out of the question but anything more is
I think 184cm and 187cm max. 6'1.5 isnt out of the question but anything more is
TELLEM said on 13/Apr/09
so if sean connery (who is 6'1.5) is taller than kevin costner by an inch in "the untouchables" then that means kevin costner was 6'0.5. 6'0.5 for kevin costner.
so if sean connery (who is 6'1.5) is taller than kevin costner by an inch in "the untouchables" then that means kevin costner was 6'0.5. 6'0.5 for kevin costner.
Hugh 190cm said on 12/Apr/09
I still buy 187cm for Costner in his prime. 80's-90's and 6ft1 flat now and possibly 186cm on a good day.
I still buy 187cm for Costner in his prime. 80's-90's and 6ft1 flat now and possibly 186cm on a good day.
Hugh 190cm said on 10/Apr/09
A 5ft11.5 Dane Cook would make Costner 6ft1.5.
A 5ft11.5 Dane Cook would make Costner 6ft1.5.
Hugh 190cm said on 7/Apr/09
James it clearly isn't seeming he's 2 inches taller than 6ft listed Dane Cook and pretty identical height wise with legitmate 6ft2 William Hurt in Mr. Brooks. Infact I'd say in the morning Coustner could be 186-187cm.
James it clearly isn't seeming he's 2 inches taller than 6ft listed Dane Cook and pretty identical height wise with legitmate 6ft2 William Hurt in Mr. Brooks. Infact I'd say in the morning Coustner could be 186-187cm.
Hugh 190cm said on 31/Mar/09
6ft1.5 peak surely.
6ft1.5 peak surely.
TELLEM said on 31/Mar/09
i meant costner being 1.5 inch shorter than connery
i meant costner being 1.5 inch shorter than connery
TELLEM said on 30/Mar/09
the fact that connery was about 1.5 inch shorter than 6'2 sean connery puts him at 6'0.5...watch the movie the untouchables.
the fact that connery was about 1.5 inch shorter than 6'2 sean connery puts him at 6'0.5...watch the movie the untouchables.
yoyo said on 2/Mar/09
hes never been 6ft1.5. his been 6ft1 all the while.
hes never been 6ft1.5. his been 6ft1 all the while.
_-_-_-Hugh-_-_-_/ said on 1/Mar/09
I think Costner could be 186cm-187cm after a good nights sleep.
I think Costner could be 186cm-187cm after a good nights sleep.
\-_-_-(Hugh)-_-_-// said on 23/Feb/09
Okay maybe he shrinks a little below 6ft1 in the evening. Peak I'd say was about 186cm-187cm.
Okay maybe he shrinks a little below 6ft1 in the evening. Peak I'd say was about 186cm-187cm.
brotha said on 21/Feb/09
Coster always at least looked 6'1" with other actors, I'd even give him an .5 inch increase.
Coster always at least looked 6'1" with other actors, I'd even give him an .5 inch increase.
Lenad said on 21/Feb/09
184 min. Maybe its possible hes closer to 6'2 but that has to be the max. Maybe 186 out of bed?
184 min. Maybe its possible hes closer to 6'2 but that has to be the max. Maybe 186 out of bed?
\-_-_-(Hugh)-_-_-/ said on 16/Feb/09
But the reality is that he is between 185cm-187cm.
But the reality is that he is between 185cm-187cm.
Hugh said on 10/Feb/09
Yeah, U Turn's right. Costner is definately a proper 6ft1 guy.
Yeah, U Turn's right. Costner is definately a proper 6ft1 guy.
U turn said on 9/Feb/09
Still looks a solid 6ft1 if not a bit more perhaps.
Still looks a solid 6ft1 if not a bit more perhaps.
Lenad said on 7/Feb/09
I would say absouloute min a solid 184cm. Chances are hes always been closer to 6'1 then 6'2.
I would say absouloute min a solid 184cm. Chances are hes always been closer to 6'1 then 6'2.
Hugh said on 6/Feb/09
Costner has always been a pretty well-built guy. I'd say Costner was around 6ft1.5 back then. He has however gotten a little heavier over the last few years which might give the illusion of him being shorter.
Costner has always been a pretty well-built guy. I'd say Costner was around 6ft1.5 back then. He has however gotten a little heavier over the last few years which might give the illusion of him being shorter.
beatlefan said on 6/Feb/09
I watched 'Dances with Wolves' the other day when I was snowed in, he looks pretty tall in the film. He is well proportioned as well and does look quite lanky. He looks a similar height to the native Americans and I understand they tend to be on the tall side. The film is quite old now but I doubt he has shrunk.
I watched 'Dances with Wolves' the other day when I was snowed in, he looks pretty tall in the film. He is well proportioned as well and does look quite lanky. He looks a similar height to the native Americans and I understand they tend to be on the tall side. The film is quite old now but I doubt he has shrunk.
Hugh said on 1/Feb/09
I'd say Costner would hit 6ft1.5 out of bed and 6ft1 flat just before bed.
I''d say Pierce Brosnan hits 188cm out of bed and goes to bed at 186cm.
I'd say Costner would hit 6ft1.5 out of bed and 6ft1 flat just before bed.
I''d say Pierce Brosnan hits 188cm out of bed and goes to bed at 186cm.
Hugh said on 27/Jan/09
I'd say Costner could be 6ft1.5 out of bed these days. So that means he's a legit 6ft1. He does tend to slouch alot.
I'd say Costner could be 6ft1.5 out of bed these days. So that means he's a legit 6ft1. He does tend to slouch alot.
Hugh said on 25/Jan/09
Maybe Costner is a little over 6ft1. because he was over an inch taller than 6ft Dane Cook.
Maybe Costner is a little over 6ft1. because he was over an inch taller than 6ft Dane Cook.
Hugh said on 25/Jan/09
Yes James. That is possible. He's a tall guy. Don't you agree?
Yes James. That is possible. He's a tall guy. Don't you agree?
Hugh said on 25/Jan/09
Costner is still 6ft1 legit and a bit more in his prime.
Costner is still 6ft1 legit and a bit more in his prime.
Ali said on 24/Jan/09
He does wear big cow boy boots, so these give him an inch.
I think his height is about 6 feet or 6'0.5. 185 cm is too
much I think.
He does wear big cow boy boots, so these give him an inch.
I think his height is about 6 feet or 6'0.5. 185 cm is too
much I think.
Ali said on 24/Jan/09
I always thought Costner was 5'10 or so, but
he is taller. I would say 6'0. He was clearly
shorter than Connery who is 187cm.
I think Costner is 183 cm.
I always thought Costner was 5'10 or so, but
he is taller. I would say 6'0. He was clearly
shorter than Connery who is 187cm.
I think Costner is 183 cm.
Hugh said on 24/Jan/09
Well James, I vaguely remeber you arguing Robbins as over 6ft5. Like 197cm. If Robbins was that tall when that puts Costner at 187-188cm. I'd say 187cm Costner.
Well James, I vaguely remeber you arguing Robbins as over 6ft5. Like 197cm. If Robbins was that tall when that puts Costner at 187-188cm. I'd say 187cm Costner.
Hugh said on 23/Jan/09
I think Costner was 186-187cm up till the late 90's to early 2000's.
I think Costner was 186-187cm up till the late 90's to early 2000's.
Hugh said on 23/Jan/09
Perfect James! Rob this guy deserves a peak height. 186cm or 187cm. Your decision.
Perfect James! Rob this guy deserves a peak height. 186cm or 187cm. Your decision.
Hugh said on 22/Jan/09
I'd ay as of 1987 Costner was 187cm and Connery 189cm.
I'd ay as of 1987 Costner was 187cm and Connery 189cm.
Hugh said on 21/Jan/09
TNTinCA, people do grow after 18. It's very common. I grew till I was 21 or so.
TNTinCA, people do grow after 18. It's very common. I grew till I was 21 or so.
Hugh said on 20/Jan/09
James, he looked eye level with Connery. He looked I'd say a centimetere or so under Connery. It's the tallest I've seen Costner look.
James, he looked eye level with Connery. He looked I'd say a centimetere or so under Connery. It's the tallest I've seen Costner look.
TNTinCA said on 19/Jan/09
I read somewhere that Costner claimed he was only 5'7" or so when he was 18 but had a growth spurt afterwards to take him to 6'1". Kind of unusual. Most men don't grow after age 18.
I read somewhere that Costner claimed he was only 5'7" or so when he was 18 but had a growth spurt afterwards to take him to 6'1". Kind of unusual. Most men don't grow after age 18.
jimmythessaint said on 19/Jan/09
i've met Kevin in person with his wife. He doesn't look it but i'm 6' and i looked up to him a fair bit. He's over 6'1
i've met Kevin in person with his wife. He doesn't look it but i'm 6' and i looked up to him a fair bit. He's over 6'1
Hugh said on 19/Jan/09
187cm I can buy peak. It wouldn;t suprise me one bit if he hasn't shrunk.
187cm I can buy peak. It wouldn;t suprise me one bit if he hasn't shrunk.
Hugh said on 19/Jan/09
He still looks in very good shape. I'd be suprised if he lost more than a centimetre in height. I'd 186-187cm peak.
He still looks in very good shape. I'd be suprised if he lost more than a centimetre in height. I'd 186-187cm peak.
Hugh said on 18/Jan/09
It wouldn't suprise me one bit if Costner measured close to 6ft2 in the morning.
It wouldn't suprise me one bit if Costner measured close to 6ft2 in the morning.
Leung said on 13/Jan/09
James says on 13/Jan/09
Dane Cook must be 5ft11-5ft11.5 then!
Yes I believe 5
James says on 13/Jan/09
Dane Cook must be 5ft11-5ft11.5 then!
Yes I believe 5
Hugh said on 13/Jan/09
Not necessarily. Maybe Costner is a little over 6ft1.
Not necessarily. Maybe Costner is a little over 6ft1.
Hugh said on 12/Jan/09
Well anyway Dane Cook WAS in Mr. Brooks and was around 1.5-2 inches shorter than Costner.
Well anyway Dane Cook WAS in Mr. Brooks and was around 1.5-2 inches shorter than Costner.
Josh.J said on 11/Jan/09
which episode? coz i cant remember him from anywhere and cant find evidence online.
which episode? coz i cant remember him from anywhere and cant find evidence online.
Hugh said on 11/Jan/09
No Dane Cook was on an episode of 30 Rock.
No Dane Cook was on an episode of 30 Rock.
Josh.J said on 10/Jan/09
"Hugh says on 6/Jan/09
I saw Dane Cook on 30 Rock and he looked about an inch taller than Alec Balwdin. So he's a solid 6ft. Costner looked no shorter than 6ft2 listed William Hurt. I think he is or at least was over 6ft1."
i think you mean Will Arnet not Dane Cook, and yeah arnet is a solid 6'2" guy
"Hugh says on 6/Jan/09
I saw Dane Cook on 30 Rock and he looked about an inch taller than Alec Balwdin. So he's a solid 6ft. Costner looked no shorter than 6ft2 listed William Hurt. I think he is or at least was over 6ft1."
i think you mean Will Arnet not Dane Cook, and yeah arnet is a solid 6'2" guy
Hugh said on 10/Jan/09
6ft1 at least. a solid two inches on Dane Cook.
6ft1 at least. a solid two inches on Dane Cook.
Hugh said on 10/Jan/09
yeah anonymous posted a beautiful pic with Ashton. He looks barely shorter.
yeah anonymous posted a beautiful pic with Ashton. He looks barely shorter.
Hugh said on 10/Jan/09
6ft1 to 6ft1.5 seems about right.
6ft1 to 6ft1.5 seems about right.
linebacker40 said on 7/Jan/09
Another very solid 6'1" actor.
Another very solid 6'1" actor.
Anonymous said on 6/Jan/09
He has to be a strong 6'2
With ashton kutcher almost same height
Click Here
With Kyle Maclachlan listed 6'0
Click Here
With Bruce Willis which is a strong 6'0 or maybe a weak 6'1
Click Here
He has to be a strong 6'2
With ashton kutcher almost same height
Click Here
With Kyle Maclachlan listed 6'0
Click Here
With Bruce Willis which is a strong 6'0 or maybe a weak 6'1
Click Here
Hugh said on 6/Jan/09
I saw Dane Cook on 30 Rock and he looked about an inch taller than Alec Balwdin. So he's a solid 6ft. Costner looked no shorter than 6ft2 listed William Hurt. I think he is or at least was over 6ft1.
I saw Dane Cook on 30 Rock and he looked about an inch taller than Alec Balwdin. So he's a solid 6ft. Costner looked no shorter than 6ft2 listed William Hurt. I think he is or at least was over 6ft1.
Hugh said on 3/Jan/09
The 6ft co-star you're talking about, James is Dane Cook.
The 6ft co-star you're talking about, James is Dane Cook.
Hugh said on 2/Jan/09
6ft1 at least.
6ft1 at least.
Seth said on 2/Jan/09
6'0 at least
6'0 at least
Mister Lennon said on 1/Jan/09
Solid 6'1 for this guy.
Solid 6'1 for this guy.
Hugh said on 1/Jan/09
Now here's a guy whose really 6ft1. I also watched Robin Hood and it's a safe bet that he was at least 6ft1 there. He looked eye level with Sean Connery again and not much shorter than Morgan Freeman.
Now here's a guy whose really 6ft1. I also watched Robin Hood and it's a safe bet that he was at least 6ft1 there. He looked eye level with Sean Connery again and not much shorter than Morgan Freeman.
adam said on 1/Jan/09
Costner was at least 6-1 peak. 6-1
Costner was at least 6-1 peak. 6-1
Hugh said on 30/Dec/08
I wathced Mr. Brooks last night and he looked no shorter than 6ft2 listed William Hurt. He also looked 1.5 inches taller than 6ft listed Dane Cook.
I wathced Mr. Brooks last night and he looked no shorter than 6ft2 listed William Hurt. He also looked 1.5 inches taller than 6ft listed Dane Cook.
T.J. said on 29/Dec/08
He looks only 1 inch taller than Meat Loaf, who Ron listed as 5'10, so if he's 6'1, then meat loaf is 6'
He looks only 1 inch taller than Meat Loaf, who Ron listed as 5'10, so if he's 6'1, then meat loaf is 6'
Lenad said on 29/Dec/08
To be honest I dont really know what I can buy at the highest. You think he was at least 187cm at peak.
To be honest I dont really know what I can buy at the highest. You think he was at least 187cm at peak.
Hugh said on 28/Dec/08
Lenad, what's the heightest you'd buy for Costner. I personally think 185cm the lowest.
Lenad, what's the heightest you'd buy for Costner. I personally think 185cm the lowest.
Lenad said on 27/Dec/08
I can buy 6'0 1/2 at the lowest.
I can buy 6'0 1/2 at the lowest.
Hugh said on 21/Dec/08
In other words he's tall.
In other words he's tall.
Anonymous said on 16/Dec/08
Stood right next to him in an L.A. restaurant. He was wearing cowboy boots with a 1.5 to 2 inch heel. I'm 6 ft and he was about 2 inches taller than me.
Stood right next to him in an L.A. restaurant. He was wearing cowboy boots with a 1.5 to 2 inch heel. I'm 6 ft and he was about 2 inches taller than me.
Hugh said on 15/Dec/08
James, do you think that Costner is tall?
James, do you think that Costner is tall?
Hugh said on 14/Dec/08
I think Kutcher could be a weak 6ft3, like 190cm.
I think Kutcher could be a weak 6ft3, like 190cm.
Lenad said on 11/Dec/08
Ashton Kutcher being a proper 6ft3 guy isnt out of the question. It looks a bit questionable though.
Ashton Kutcher being a proper 6ft3 guy isnt out of the question. It looks a bit questionable though.
Hugh said on 10/Dec/08
Do you know what, rob? You should make a height comparing article. Where say they compare one celebrities height with another. For Instance. Nicholas Cage and say Billy Zane. Two random celebrities. Then compare the two height wise. That sort of thing.
Do you know what, rob? You should make a height comparing article. Where say they compare one celebrities height with another. For Instance. Nicholas Cage and say Billy Zane. Two random celebrities. Then compare the two height wise. That sort of thing.
Hugh said on 9/Dec/08
I think Costner could still be 185cm. Peak was probably about 187cm.
I think Costner could still be 185cm. Peak was probably about 187cm.
Hugh said on 8/Dec/08
Viper Ashton is close to 6ft3 if not 6ft3. He towers over Bruce Willis.
Viper Ashton is close to 6ft3 if not 6ft3. He towers over Bruce Willis.
Viper said on 7/Dec/08
Hugh, get real. Ashton is nowhere close to 6-3.
Hugh, get real. Ashton is nowhere close to 6-3.
Spence said on 6/Dec/08
Ashton Kutcher looks good of 4cm over costner.
Ashton Kutcher looks good of 4cm over costner.
Hugh said on 5/Dec/08
I think it colud be that Ashton Kutcher is 6ft2.75 and Costner is 6ft1.25. That's about 1.5 inches apart.
I think it colud be that Ashton Kutcher is 6ft2.75 and Costner is 6ft1.25. That's about 1.5 inches apart.
DMEYER said on 1/Dec/08
i met costner and he was solid 6 ft 1 and i met kutcher and he looked 6 ft2.5 but in the gardian the differance seems more than that
i met costner and he was solid 6 ft 1 and i met kutcher and he looked 6 ft2.5 but in the gardian the differance seems more than that
Hugh said on 1/Dec/08
Do you beleive that Pierce Brosnan could be a little taller than Colin Firth?
Do you beleive that Pierce Brosnan could be a little taller than Colin Firth?
Hugh said on 1/Dec/08
hmmmmm. I can occasionally look it depending on posture. Peak maybe?
hmmmmm. I can occasionally look it depending on posture. Peak maybe?
Hugh said on 28/Nov/08
This guy has horrendous posture. However his posture in the Untouchables was good and that was what made him look eye level with Connery.
This guy has horrendous posture. However his posture in the Untouchables was good and that was what made him look eye level with Connery.
Hugh said on 27/Nov/08
Actually James wasn't that movie with Robbins a baseball movie. Because there is a picture posted down the page where Costner looks only 1.5 inches shorter!
Actually James wasn't that movie with Robbins a baseball movie. Because there is a picture posted down the page where Costner looks only 1.5 inches shorter!
Hugh said on 25/Nov/08
Well, I think Costner's a tall guy. 6ft1 flat and 6ft1.5 peak.
Well, I think Costner's a tall guy. 6ft1 flat and 6ft1.5 peak.
TR said on 25/Nov/08
I met Kevin Costner two weeks ago at the Ryman Auditorium in Nashville with his band Modern West. He was wearing cowboy boots with two inch heels. I'm 5'11" and standing directly next to him, Kevin Costner is 6'1" without the heels. Also, great guy and great music.
I met Kevin Costner two weeks ago at the Ryman Auditorium in Nashville with his band Modern West. He was wearing cowboy boots with two inch heels. I'm 5'11" and standing directly next to him, Kevin Costner is 6'1" without the heels. Also, great guy and great music.
Hugh said on 25/Nov/08
I'm not saying he's 6ft2. But Yeah Willis is likely 5ft11-6ft these days. Personally I'm on Glenn's side regarding Willis. I'm saying 185-186cm now and 187cm peak. He's younger than say Pierce Brosnan whose lost only 1cm himself. They're also quite close in height.
I'm not saying he's 6ft2. But Yeah Willis is likely 5ft11-6ft these days. Personally I'm on Glenn's side regarding Willis. I'm saying 185-186cm now and 187cm peak. He's younger than say Pierce Brosnan whose lost only 1cm himself. They're also quite close in height.
Hugh said on 23/Nov/08
In some scenes in The Guardian he looked 1.5 inches shorter than Kutcher. Other times he looked only 1cm shorter. My guess is Kutcher 190cm, Costner 186cm.
In some scenes in The Guardian he looked 1.5 inches shorter than Kutcher. Other times he looked only 1cm shorter. My guess is Kutcher 190cm, Costner 186cm.
Hugh said on 21/Nov/08
In The Guardian he looked every bit of 6ft1.
In The Guardian he looked every bit of 6ft1.
Hugh said on 20/Nov/08
Next to Connery he looked 6ft2ish.
Next to Connery he looked 6ft2ish.
TELLEM said on 19/Nov/08
this guy is only 53 years old...how the hell did he shrink already? 6'1 period.
this guy is only 53 years old...how the hell did he shrink already? 6'1 period.
Lenad said on 19/Nov/08
Nah 6ft1 peak is the stongest possibility. He looked more like 6'1 next to Tim Robbins and Ashton Kutcher.
Nah 6ft1 peak is the stongest possibility. He looked more like 6'1 next to Tim Robbins and Ashton Kutcher.
Hugh said on 18/Nov/08
Peak 6ft1.5 is a strong possibility. These Days 6ft1 flat.
Peak 6ft1.5 is a strong possibility. These Days 6ft1 flat.
Hugh said on 15/Nov/08
Sorry guys, forgot to put my name.
Sorry guys, forgot to put my name.
Anonymous said on 14/Nov/08
My money is on 6ft1 to 6ft2 peak.
My money is on 6ft1 to 6ft2 peak.
Gonzalo said on 14/Nov/08
Strange discussion. Costner is 6`1. One of the easiest actors to pin. His height doesn
Strange discussion. Costner is 6`1. One of the easiest actors to pin. His height doesn
adam said on 12/Nov/08
Tim Robbins was around 6-5 peak and Costner about 4 inches less. In the film they did together they used all the tricks possibly to make the two guys look pretty even in every way. Yes, in that film Robbins looks barely two inches taller which is not the case.
Costner could have been a little more than 6-1 prime but certainly not anywhere near Robbins` height. The difference between the two is far more than 1
Tim Robbins was around 6-5 peak and Costner about 4 inches less. In the film they did together they used all the tricks possibly to make the two guys look pretty even in every way. Yes, in that film Robbins looks barely two inches taller which is not the case.
Costner could have been a little more than 6-1 prime but certainly not anywhere near Robbins` height. The difference between the two is far more than 1
anonymous said on 11/Nov/08
He looks 6 foot 1. In 3000 miles to graceland he looked 10cm than kurt russell and about 20cm taller than courtney cox. He's 6 foot 1.
He looks 6 foot 1. In 3000 miles to graceland he looked 10cm than kurt russell and about 20cm taller than courtney cox. He's 6 foot 1.
Hugh said on 6/Nov/08
James you can be honest with me. If you think Kevin was no more than 6ft1. That's fine. I personally think he could've been 6ft2ish in the morning.
James you can be honest with me. If you think Kevin was no more than 6ft1. That's fine. I personally think he could've been 6ft2ish in the morning.
Hugh said on 4/Nov/08
James would you think it's fair to give Costner a peak height.
James would you think it's fair to give Costner a peak height.
Hugh said on 1/Nov/08
No, Costner is still 6ft1. I could've sworn he was 6ft2 in the Untouchables and Robin Hood. Also Dancing with Wolves.
No, Costner is still 6ft1. I could've sworn he was 6ft2 in the Untouchables and Robin Hood. Also Dancing with Wolves.
Catsman said on 29/Oct/08
Hugh - Connery claims that he was only ever 6'1" & 1/2, so Costner would be 6'1 by your calculation.
Hugh - Connery claims that he was only ever 6'1" & 1/2, so Costner would be 6'1 by your calculation.
Brad said on 28/Oct/08
Met him today. 6' 1".
Met him today. 6' 1".
Hugh said on 24/Oct/08
6ft1.5 peak for Costner? Watch The Untouchables. He's barely shorter than 6ft2 Connery.
6ft1.5 peak for Costner? Watch The Untouchables. He's barely shorter than 6ft2 Connery.
Ray said on 24/Oct/08
Hugh, you're saying Costner was 6'2" and 6'1" now ?? He only just into his 50's. There's no way he losing an inch in height unless he has some form of osteoporosis or he's had vertabrae fused. That's not the way the human body works. He may have lost MAYBE 1/2 inch. Also if Costner is 6'2" then Hackman must have been over 6'3". Check out No Way Out. Hackman, I admit was tall in his youth probably 6'2.4" (189 cm). Costner was about 6'1" and has maybe lost a fraction of an inch now
Hugh, you're saying Costner was 6'2" and 6'1" now ?? He only just into his 50's. There's no way he losing an inch in height unless he has some form of osteoporosis or he's had vertabrae fused. That's not the way the human body works. He may have lost MAYBE 1/2 inch. Also if Costner is 6'2" then Hackman must have been over 6'3". Check out No Way Out. Hackman, I admit was tall in his youth probably 6'2.4" (189 cm). Costner was about 6'1" and has maybe lost a fraction of an inch now
Hugh said on 21/Oct/08
Well Willis doesn't strike me as being anything less than 5ft11, if anything he's slightly over that mark. Costner always looks at least 2 inches taller. I wouldn't rule out a 6ft2 peak and a solid 6ft1 or maybe 6ft1.25 now.
Well Willis doesn't strike me as being anything less than 5ft11, if anything he's slightly over that mark. Costner always looks at least 2 inches taller. I wouldn't rule out a 6ft2 peak and a solid 6ft1 or maybe 6ft1.25 now.
Ray said on 21/Oct/08
well are you saying Fry is more than 6'4.5" ? No chance
well are you saying Fry is more than 6'4.5" ? No chance
Hugh said on 20/Oct/08
Ray, Connery was still 6ft2 when the Untouchables was made. Kutcher and Costner are both similiar in build. I'd say at most there was 1.5 inches between Kuthcer and Costner.
Ray, Connery was still 6ft2 when the Untouchables was made. Kutcher and Costner are both similiar in build. I'd say at most there was 1.5 inches between Kuthcer and Costner.
Ray said on 20/Oct/08
In I.Q. Robbins and Fry were exactly the same height. Robbins at peak was at most 6'4.5". Costner 6'1" at most, peak. Connery and Costner were close in height in The Untouchables.
In I.Q. Robbins and Fry were exactly the same height. Robbins at peak was at most 6'4.5". Costner 6'1" at most, peak. Connery and Costner were close in height in The Untouchables.
Lenad said on 19/Oct/08
Yes James Ashton can look 6 ft 3 I admit it, but he can also look 6'1-ish on that 70s show
Yes James Ashton can look 6 ft 3 I admit it, but he can also look 6'1-ish on that 70s show
Lenad said on 18/Oct/08
Im going to say again Hugh, Ashton kutcher is more 6'2 than 6'3. i agree with Mr R that Costner is closer to 6 feet now.
Im going to say again Hugh, Ashton kutcher is more 6'2 than 6'3. i agree with Mr R that Costner is closer to 6 feet now.
Hugh said on 18/Oct/08
Costner was slouching in those scenes with Kutcher. When he stood up straight he was about an inch shorter. In that Picture with Robbins he looks about an inch shorter lol.
Costner was slouching in those scenes with Kutcher. When he stood up straight he was about an inch shorter. In that Picture with Robbins he looks about an inch shorter lol.
Mr. R said on 18/Oct/08
I do remember seeing an article when they were filming "The Untouchables" that the magazine said "six foot" Kevin Costner playing "six foot" Eliot Ness. My guess is that Costner is between 6 foot and 6-1, and is now closer to 6 feet. Ashton Kutcher was at least 2.5 inches taller in The Guardian. There was a pic, that I can't find of the two of them, I believe in People Magazine, and they were standing next to each other. Kutcher is noticeably taller!
I do remember seeing an article when they were filming "The Untouchables" that the magazine said "six foot" Kevin Costner playing "six foot" Eliot Ness. My guess is that Costner is between 6 foot and 6-1, and is now closer to 6 feet. Ashton Kutcher was at least 2.5 inches taller in The Guardian. There was a pic, that I can't find of the two of them, I believe in People Magazine, and they were standing next to each other. Kutcher is noticeably taller!
Hugh said on 17/Oct/08
James if Costner is lower than 6ft1 then Robbins is 6ft4 tops. And I do remember you arguing that Robbins was 197cm and has lost 2cm. Robbins at 6ft5.5 would result in Costner being 6ft3.5 lol.
James if Costner is lower than 6ft1 then Robbins is 6ft4 tops. And I do remember you arguing that Robbins was 197cm and has lost 2cm. Robbins at 6ft5.5 would result in Costner being 6ft3.5 lol.
Hugh said on 17/Oct/08
Viper I don't think Costner is 6ft2. Well not nowadays. What I'm saying is that Kevin might have been close to 6ft2 twenty years ago. If costner is 6ft then Robbins is 6ft1.5. Exactly infin.
Viper I don't think Costner is 6ft2. Well not nowadays. What I'm saying is that Kevin might have been close to 6ft2 twenty years ago. If costner is 6ft then Robbins is 6ft1.5. Exactly infin.
Viper said on 16/Oct/08
Hugh is ridiculous. Arguing that Costner is 6-2? LOL
Hugh is ridiculous. Arguing that Costner is 6-2? LOL
Hugh said on 16/Oct/08
No about an inch. There is also a fair chance that Kutcher is 6ft3.
No about an inch. There is also a fair chance that Kutcher is 6ft3.
Hugh said on 15/Oct/08
In all of his early movies he looks 6ft2. In the Guardian he's barely an inch shorter than Ashton Kutcher. 186-187cm is a possibility.
In all of his early movies he looks 6ft2. In the Guardian he's barely an inch shorter than Ashton Kutcher. 186-187cm is a possibility.
Hugh said on 13/Oct/08
6ft1 flat nowadays. Was probably up to 187cm say 20 years ago.
6ft1 flat nowadays. Was probably up to 187cm say 20 years ago.
Hugh said on 12/Oct/08
I really don't think Costner is as low as 6ft.
I really don't think Costner is as low as 6ft.
Hugh said on 11/Oct/08
Mr. Brooks came out last year and Kevin must have lost some height by then. Either Costner gets upgraded or Hurt gets downgraded.
Mr. Brooks came out last year and Kevin must have lost some height by then. Either Costner gets upgraded or Hurt gets downgraded.
Viper said on 11/Oct/08
Better chance hes 6-0 then 6-2.
Better chance hes 6-0 then 6-2.
Hugh said on 10/Oct/08
I'm beginning to entertain the idea of Costner being 6ft2 or close because in Mr. Brooks he's the same height as legit 6ft2 William Hurt.
I'm beginning to entertain the idea of Costner being 6ft2 or close because in Mr. Brooks he's the same height as legit 6ft2 William Hurt.
Hugh said on 7/Oct/08
I'm not sure James. I think Glenn was THE guy on this site and I feel I'd like Glenn lose my temper and start using bad language and eventually get Banned. There are some guys on this site I can see myself getting into conflict with. Also I don't know how to download pistures onto this site.
I'm not sure James. I think Glenn was THE guy on this site and I feel I'd like Glenn lose my temper and start using bad language and eventually get Banned. There are some guys on this site I can see myself getting into conflict with. Also I don't know how to download pistures onto this site.
Lenad said on 6/Oct/08
Well that does explain a few things Hugh. Maybe you should be a contributer to this site.
Well that does explain a few things Hugh. Maybe you should be a contributer to this site.
Hugh said on 5/Oct/08
And it's not like I see celebs like every week.
And it's not like I see celebs like every week.
Hugh said on 4/Oct/08
I travel to L.A a lot. And also a lot of celebs I see by coincidence. Pure coincidence.
I travel to L.A a lot. And also a lot of celebs I see by coincidence. Pure coincidence.
Lenad said on 3/Oct/08
I just know James. If you read the FAQ it says that the only encounters you take seriously are Mr R and Frank 2.
I just know James. If you read the FAQ it says that the only encounters you take seriously are Mr R and Frank 2.
Hugh said on 3/Oct/08
I don't know. I'll admit that I didn't get a picture with Connery. He was in a bit of a rush. He was gentleman to say the least though. I never met Costner. I saw him from a few feet as I did with Samuel L. Jackson.
I don't know. I'll admit that I didn't get a picture with Connery. He was in a bit of a rush. He was gentleman to say the least though. I never met Costner. I saw him from a few feet as I did with Samuel L. Jackson.
Hugh said on 3/Oct/08
Well, 6ft2 or close to 6ft2. Did Sean Connery look over 6ft2 in that film? It's been a while since I saw it. I just remeber Costner Towering over everyone and looking almost the same height as Connery.
Well, 6ft2 or close to 6ft2. Did Sean Connery look over 6ft2 in that film? It's been a while since I saw it. I just remeber Costner Towering over everyone and looking almost the same height as Connery.
Lenad said on 2/Oct/08
Hugh In The Untouchables Connery was probably about 6'1 because his youth was 6'1 1/2 and for the last time youve never met Sean Connery or Seen Kevin Costner.
Hugh In The Untouchables Connery was probably about 6'1 because his youth was 6'1 1/2 and for the last time youve never met Sean Connery or Seen Kevin Costner.
Hugh said on 1/Oct/08
The proof is in The Untouchables and The Guardian.
The proof is in The Untouchables and The Guardian.
Hugh said on 30/Sep/08
You and Viper want everyone to be shorter.
You and Viper want everyone to be shorter.
Lenad said on 30/Sep/08
Hugh You claim to have met several celebrites and then say they appeared surprisingly tall. You say Sean Connery was at least 6'2 in the flesh when he really just scraped it in his youth. And Hugh, Costner wouldnt have lost height. He's only in his early 50's. If anything Costner could be a little under 6'1. He even said "About 6'1". You want everyone to be taller. Cut it out. You get off.
Hugh You claim to have met several celebrites and then say they appeared surprisingly tall. You say Sean Connery was at least 6'2 in the flesh when he really just scraped it in his youth. And Hugh, Costner wouldnt have lost height. He's only in his early 50's. If anything Costner could be a little under 6'1. He even said "About 6'1". You want everyone to be taller. Cut it out. You get off.
Hugh said on 29/Sep/08
No I haven't Lenad. YOU get off.
No I haven't Lenad. YOU get off.
Lenad said on 27/Sep/08
Hugh you've seen every celebrity. Stop lying. Get off.
Hugh you've seen every celebrity. Stop lying. Get off.
Viper said on 22/Sep/08
He was never 6-2.
He was never 6-2.
Hugh said on 21/Sep/08
Kevin still looks at least 6ft1 and may very well have stood 6ft2 in his prime.
Kevin still looks at least 6ft1 and may very well have stood 6ft2 in his prime.
Hugh said on 10/Sep/08
I'm saying he might have been close to 6ft2 at his peak.
I'm saying he might have been close to 6ft2 at his peak.
Viper said on 10/Sep/08
LOL, now you're saying hes 6-2!!! Please Hugh, stop upgrading.
LOL, now you're saying hes 6-2!!! Please Hugh, stop upgrading.
Hugh said on 9/Sep/08
Viper stop downgrading people.
Viper stop downgrading people.
Viper said on 8/Sep/08
Hugh stop upgrading people
Hugh stop upgrading people
Hugh said on 6/Sep/08
Rob how about a peak height. He did look 6ft2ish when I saw him in London a couple of years ago.
Rob how about a peak height. He did look 6ft2ish when I saw him in London a couple of years ago.
Hugh said on 30/Aug/08
Kevin has described himself as 6ft2 in the past. I do beleive he can look it. He's at least 6ft1 more likely 186-187cm range.
Kevin has described himself as 6ft2 in the past. I do beleive he can look it. He's at least 6ft1 more likely 186-187cm range.
Hugh said on 30/Aug/08
He was 1-2cm shorter than Connery.
It should be:Connery 188-189cm.
Costner 186-187cm.
Connery has lost half an inch so today he's 6ft2 flat.
He was 1-2cm shorter than Connery.
It should be:Connery 188-189cm.
Costner 186-187cm.
Connery has lost half an inch so today he's 6ft2 flat.
Hugh said on 27/Aug/08
I think was closer to 6ft2 at his peak. Still looks at least 6ft1. NOTHING LESS.
I think was closer to 6ft2 at his peak. Still looks at least 6ft1. NOTHING LESS.
charlrose said on 31/Jul/08
6'0" or 6'1" is about right - I have pics with him from a local celeb golf tournament and I'm 5'9" - he's got some height on me - at least a few inches...
6'0" or 6'1" is about right - I have pics with him from a local celeb golf tournament and I'm 5'9" - he's got some height on me - at least a few inches...
Mr. R said on 31/Jul/08
On Conan last night, he said that he was 5-2 in high school, grew seven inches his senior year, and grew in college. He says that he is now "about 6-1".
On Conan last night, he said that he was 5-2 in high school, grew seven inches his senior year, and grew in college. He says that he is now "about 6-1".
Brad said on 31/Jul/08
6' 1" is correct.
6' 1" is correct.
Danimal said on 25/Jul/08
Anonymous says on 25/Jul/08
Woah. 6'1"? Wasn't he like 5'2" when he graduated High School? WTF?
That is true. He had an insane growth spurt. Just like Michael Jordan who grew from 5'6" to 6'4" in ONE summer apparently.
Anonymous says on 25/Jul/08
Woah. 6'1"? Wasn't he like 5'2" when he graduated High School? WTF?
That is true. He had an insane growth spurt. Just like Michael Jordan who grew from 5'6" to 6'4" in ONE summer apparently.
Anonymous said on 25/Jul/08
Woah. 6'1"? Wasn't he like 5'2" when he graduated High School? WTF?
Woah. 6'1"? Wasn't he like 5'2" when he graduated High School? WTF?
Hugh said on 17/Jul/08
hes built like a 6ft2 guy
hes built like a 6ft2 guy
Hugh said on 16/Jul/08
I feel 186-187cm is more apropriate. In the guardian he looked only 1-2cm shorter than Ashton.
I feel 186-187cm is more apropriate. In the guardian he looked only 1-2cm shorter than Ashton.
Brubaker said on 15/Jul/08
In No Way Out he's 1 inch shorter than gene hackman
In No Way Out he's 1 inch shorter than gene hackman
RICHARD said on 23/Jun/08
I was like Kevin in HS,I guess. I was 5'3 or 5'4 when I was 14-15 in 9th grade,5'6-5'8 in 10th grade,5'8 or 5'9 in 11th grade, and then grew to 5'9.5-5'10 in 12th grade. I'm not sure if I'll get to 6',or over for that matter,since I'm 18,but I'm very energetic and eat pretty good and drink milk and eat dairy products.
I was like Kevin in HS,I guess. I was 5'3 or 5'4 when I was 14-15 in 9th grade,5'6-5'8 in 10th grade,5'8 or 5'9 in 11th grade, and then grew to 5'9.5-5'10 in 12th grade. I'm not sure if I'll get to 6',or over for that matter,since I'm 18,but I'm very energetic and eat pretty good and drink milk and eat dairy products.
Hugh said on 19/Jun/08
This guy is closer to 6ft2.
This guy is closer to 6ft2.
Scott B. said on 28/May/08
He looks to be 6'1 and Glenn at 5'9.
He looks to be 6'1 and Glenn at 5'9.
maurison said on 17/May/08
he looks about 6'2 on this pic!
he looks about 6'2 on this pic!
Costner fan said on 25/Apr/08
On Larry King Live, Costner said -- when explaining how short he was in h.s. and the late growth spurt -- that he was 6' 2". I think most American men state their height at what they think they are while wearing shoes.
On Larry King Live, Costner said -- when explaining how short he was in h.s. and the late growth spurt -- that he was 6' 2". I think most American men state their height at what they think they are while wearing shoes.
Anonymous KinG said on 29/Mar/08
Pics above makes Glenn looks 172ish.. A solid 185cm..
Pics above makes Glenn looks 172ish.. A solid 185cm..
Johnny Boy said on 16/Mar/08
Yes, many people grow after 20 years old but not in their late twenties. I know at least three people who have grown two or three inches since they were twenty (one was 5'10 now he looks a solid 6').
Yes, many people grow after 20 years old but not in their late twenties. I know at least three people who have grown two or three inches since they were twenty (one was 5'10 now he looks a solid 6').
gary said on 8/Mar/08
Lucian-Ro I was 6'1.5 at 15 and 6'2 at 17 and stayed that till 33 now almost 25 im 6'2.5, i grew half a inch in the last 6 months at age 24, this is barefoot and i also lose about 1/2inch at night to, ive heard about some people growing 7,8 even nine inches from 18 to 21, you never know, what height would u like to be? about 5'10 or so?
Lucian-Ro I was 6'1.5 at 15 and 6'2 at 17 and stayed that till 33 now almost 25 im 6'2.5, i grew half a inch in the last 6 months at age 24, this is barefoot and i also lose about 1/2inch at night to, ive heard about some people growing 7,8 even nine inches from 18 to 21, you never know, what height would u like to be? about 5'10 or so?
dmeyer said on 7/Feb/08
honest 6 ft 1 in in person could even be flurting with 186 cm maybe peak height 6'1.25 now 6'0.75 186 peak 185 now or maybe he lost nothing and was 185.5 and still is
honest 6 ft 1 in in person could even be flurting with 186 cm maybe peak height 6'1.25 now 6'0.75 186 peak 185 now or maybe he lost nothing and was 185.5 and still is
Dwood said on 6/Feb/08
I had a chance to stand next to K. Costner in 1992 - and was surprised by how tall he was. I am 6ft 2.5in. and he was a little shorter than me, so 6ft 1in sounds about right.
I had a chance to stand next to K. Costner in 1992 - and was surprised by how tall he was. I am 6ft 2.5in. and he was a little shorter than me, so 6ft 1in sounds about right.
sam said on 4/Feb/08
yo glenn did u ever have any growth spurts or anything... (like short stature, to five eight, or always kinda that average kinda height growin' up...)
yo glenn did u ever have any growth spurts or anything... (like short stature, to five eight, or always kinda that average kinda height growin' up...)
Danny said on 1/Feb/08
Wow, he looks taller than i expected! Solid 6'1
Wow, he looks taller than i expected! Solid 6'1
Lucian-Ro said on 12/Jan/08
I read the previous comments about costner and other's about rodman, And remained very suprised so i asked my father the age that he stopped growing and to my surprise he said that he grew several centimetres between 19 and 20.5 years.
May that mean that i will have a late growth to??? ... because I'm 17.5 years old and only 5ft 7.75 when i go to sleep and 5ft 8.5 when i wake up ... though and i'm half an inch taller than my father ... please give an answer ..
I read the previous comments about costner and other's about rodman, And remained very suprised so i asked my father the age that he stopped growing and to my surprise he said that he grew several centimetres between 19 and 20.5 years.
May that mean that i will have a late growth to??? ... because I'm 17.5 years old and only 5ft 7.75 when i go to sleep and 5ft 8.5 when i wake up ... though and i'm half an inch taller than my father ... please give an answer ..
Odie said on 16/Dec/07
i'd give him 6'0.5
i'd give him 6'0.5
dmeyer said on 18/Nov/07
you can tall by the pic that costner is 1.5 to 2 in over willis , in person costner loked 6'1er might 6'0.75 now nearing 184 since he looked smaler than kutcher but he didnt look under 185 cm in person
you can tall by the pic that costner is 1.5 to 2 in over willis , in person costner loked 6'1er might 6'0.75 now nearing 184 since he looked smaler than kutcher but he didnt look under 185 cm in person
Radcliffe said on 15/Nov/07
He looks 6'1 plus in this pic only bcos glenn is behind him. If Glenn was shoulder to shoulder id peg Costner at 184 cm.
He looks 6'1 plus in this pic only bcos glenn is behind him. If Glenn was shoulder to shoulder id peg Costner at 184 cm.
Anonymous said on 20/Sep/07
Could be 6'2" cuz he looks to take on Glenn like 6 inches, like 5 1/2 inches or could be close to 6'2".
Could be 6'2" cuz he looks to take on Glenn like 6 inches, like 5 1/2 inches or could be close to 6'2".
Alex said on 16/Sep/07
I'm 6'1 flat out of bed for a short period of time. One morning when my friend spent the night 2 years ago he measured me with measuring tape and said I was 6'1 1/4 but I never got over 6'1 right out of bed but I lose that height kinda fast and down to 6'0.5 not long after.
I'm 6'1 flat out of bed for a short period of time. One morning when my friend spent the night 2 years ago he measured me with measuring tape and said I was 6'1 1/4 but I never got over 6'1 right out of bed but I lose that height kinda fast and down to 6'0.5 not long after.
glenn said on 3/Sep/07
that must've been some serious growing pains!
that must've been some serious growing pains!
Bababoom said on 30/Aug/07
I'm dying to now how he grew from 5'0 in high school to 6'1.
I'm dying to now how he grew from 5'0 in high school to 6'1.
Franco said on 29/Aug/07
yee, and dont forget Constener was also leaning to the right slightly.
indeed pretty easy to pin down and a very good person (funny), came to italy
in a program called STRISCIA LA NOTIZIA where a magician made a funny trick
but the trick didnt work he started to laugh hard and joke with the guy :P
i like kevin.
yee, and dont forget Constener was also leaning to the right slightly.
indeed pretty easy to pin down and a very good person (funny), came to italy
in a program called STRISCIA LA NOTIZIA where a magician made a funny trick
but the trick didnt work he started to laugh hard and joke with the guy :P
i like kevin.
Anonymous said on 27/Aug/07
This picture clearly shows the difference between a 5'8" man and a 6'1" man, as oppposed to the one of Glenn and Powers Boothe which imo only shows a four inch difference.
This picture clearly shows the difference between a 5'8" man and a 6'1" man, as oppposed to the one of Glenn and Powers Boothe which imo only shows a four inch difference.
Viper said on 22/Aug/07
Im pretty certain that measurement was in shoes.
Im pretty certain that measurement was in shoes.
Gonzalo said on 22/Aug/07
Costner looks like the 6`1 guy he is in that pic. One of the easiest actors to pin in this site.
Costner looks like the 6`1 guy he is in that pic. One of the easiest actors to pin in this site.
Franco said on 22/Aug/07
Connery is pretty tall just look at most of his movies, in fact i think that during 007 he looked shorter than today lol
connery today is 185cm and in the past he mightve been no less than 188cm maybe 189cm but never 190cm
Connery is pretty tall just look at most of his movies, in fact i think that during 007 he looked shorter than today lol
connery today is 185cm and in the past he mightve been no less than 188cm maybe 189cm but never 190cm
Anthony said on 21/Aug/07
Connery was probably 6'1.75 or something like that.
Connery was probably 6'1.75 or something like that.
Mario said on 21/Aug/07
Connery was measured at 6 ft 2.4 in his 20s, so I think it's pretty possible for him to be 6 ft 2.75 straight out of bed. Of course he has now lost height, but even now at almost 80 he doesn't seem any shorter than 6 ft 1.25 to me.
Connery was measured at 6 ft 2.4 in his 20s, so I think it's pretty possible for him to be 6 ft 2.75 straight out of bed. Of course he has now lost height, but even now at almost 80 he doesn't seem any shorter than 6 ft 1.25 to me.
AAAA said on 20/Aug/07
OKAY AFTER SOME EXTENSIVE RESEARCH ON MY PART I HAVE FOUND THIS
1. I never bought connery being 6'3.
2.I actually read about an hour ago that he said in an interview he was 6'2, then pasued and said between 6'1.5 and 6'2.
3. I also read madame toussad measured him barefoot at 6'1.8 for his was statue and the statue is 6'3 even in the wax model dress shoes and tux for james bond.
3. I'm not surenow anymore. I thought he was an even 6'2 when he was younger. He always looked big to me
OKAY AFTER SOME EXTENSIVE RESEARCH ON MY PART I HAVE FOUND THIS
1. I never bought connery being 6'3.
2.I actually read about an hour ago that he said in an interview he was 6'2, then pasued and said between 6'1.5 and 6'2.
3. I also read madame toussad measured him barefoot at 6'1.8 for his was statue and the statue is 6'3 even in the wax model dress shoes and tux for james bond.
3. I'm not surenow anymore. I thought he was an even 6'2 when he was younger. He always looked big to me
venus said on 20/Aug/07
From this pic of Costner, he looks a clean 6'2 to me.
From this pic of Costner, he looks a clean 6'2 to me.
Viper said on 20/Aug/07
Now I would find that hard to beleive.
Now I would find that hard to beleive.
Mario said on 19/Aug/07
Nah, maybe connery hit 6 ft 2.75 out of bed for 5 seconds.
Nah, maybe connery hit 6 ft 2.75 out of bed for 5 seconds.
dmeyer said on 19/Aug/07
he is defenetly about 6'2 in the morning i am 5'11.75 morning and he was about 2 in on me
he is defenetly about 6'2 in the morning i am 5'11.75 morning and he was about 2 in on me
Viper said on 19/Aug/07
Maybe Connery hit 6-2 straight out of bed for 5 seconds.
Maybe Connery hit 6-2 straight out of bed for 5 seconds.
Mario said on 18/Aug/07
Connery had to much advantage on 6 ft1 guy's to be any shorter than 6 ft 2. Even in the late 80s he wasn't any shorter than 6 ft 2. People tend to undestimate postures
Connery had to much advantage on 6 ft1 guy's to be any shorter than 6 ft 2. Even in the late 80s he wasn't any shorter than 6 ft 2. People tend to undestimate postures
AAAA said on 17/Aug/07
I respect that opinion of Connery and I agree with you on the 6'1.5 looking legit 6'2. Connery just doesn't seem to me personally like a candidate for that because he was never particulary lanky or thin. He was trim and in shape, but he was always a pretty big guy, and Big guys don't seem to get that lenghting effect, at least in my expirence both personally and trying to gauge height of others
I respect that opinion of Connery and I agree with you on the 6'1.5 looking legit 6'2. Connery just doesn't seem to me personally like a candidate for that because he was never particulary lanky or thin. He was trim and in shape, but he was always a pretty big guy, and Big guys don't seem to get that lenghting effect, at least in my expirence both personally and trying to gauge height of others
Viper said on 17/Aug/07
Well, you can certaintly appear a legit 6-2 at 6-1 1/2. Connery was a strong 6-1, weak 6-2 guy.
Well, you can certaintly appear a legit 6-2 at 6-1 1/2. Connery was a strong 6-1, weak 6-2 guy.
AAAA said on 17/Aug/07
Really Viper. He always seemed a tall, legit 6'2 guy when he was younger. I could see him only being 6'1 now, maybe even down to 6'.75, but he was always tall. He was at least as tall as Michael Caine, who was definitly a legit 6'2 back in the 70's.
Really Viper. He always seemed a tall, legit 6'2 guy when he was younger. I could see him only being 6'1 now, maybe even down to 6'.75, but he was always tall. He was at least as tall as Michael Caine, who was definitly a legit 6'2 back in the 70's.
Dave said on 16/Aug/07
i agree with you viper, connery's height has always been overrated. Costner IS a SOLID 6'1 tho, i always thought he was only about 6', but seeing him here and in a few pics with bigger guys, he is a legit 6'1
i agree with you viper, connery's height has always been overrated. Costner IS a SOLID 6'1 tho, i always thought he was only about 6', but seeing him here and in a few pics with bigger guys, he is a legit 6'1
Anonymous said on 15/Aug/07
Yeah he looks 6'1.
Yeah he looks 6'1.
Viper said on 15/Aug/07
I dont think Connery was ever taller than 6-1 1/2.
I dont think Connery was ever taller than 6-1 1/2.
AAAA said on 14/Aug/07
He may have been a bit over 6'1, closer to 6'1.5. He wasn't even close to a full inch shorter than connery in the Untochables, and Connery still looked 6'2 in his 50's
He may have been a bit over 6'1, closer to 6'1.5. He wasn't even close to a full inch shorter than connery in the Untochables, and Connery still looked 6'2 in his 50's
Franco said on 13/Aug/07
yeah he is a solid 6'1 but i still insist in the past he surely was at least 6'1.5 or 186cm, dancing with wolves movie is a good example.
yeah he is a solid 6'1 but i still insist in the past he surely was at least 6'1.5 or 186cm, dancing with wolves movie is a good example.
6'3'' JK said on 13/Aug/07
Looks 6'1'' next to Glenn
Looks 6'1'' next to Glenn
TR said on 12/Aug/07
I stood directly next to Kevin Costner as he stood outside a famous pancake
house in Music City. He was wearing flat loafers and I'm a solid 5'11" and he was two inches taller than me. He is a solid 6'1".
I stood directly next to Kevin Costner as he stood outside a famous pancake
house in Music City. He was wearing flat loafers and I'm a solid 5'11" and he was two inches taller than me. He is a solid 6'1".
dmeyer said on 12/Aug/07
did look 6'1 3 years ago but near kutcher look more 6'0.25 to 6'0.5 lost 1 cm maybe
did look 6'1 3 years ago but near kutcher look more 6'0.25 to 6'0.5 lost 1 cm maybe
Danimal said on 12/Aug/07
Melvin, why are you off on everyone's height by 2"? Kevin has only been listed at 6'1".
Melvin, why are you off on everyone's height by 2"? Kevin has only been listed at 6'1".
Franco said on 11/Aug/07
no he isnt 6'3 that's for sure but it is very possible he was 186cm-187cm in the past and during the 90's, today he mostly look 184-185cm and it shows the most in the movie MR. BROOKS (excellent movie btw).
Costner in my eyes, has lost at least 1cm of height since the 90s that for sure.
no he isnt 6'3 that's for sure but it is very possible he was 186cm-187cm in the past and during the 90's, today he mostly look 184-185cm and it shows the most in the movie MR. BROOKS (excellent movie btw).
Costner in my eyes, has lost at least 1cm of height since the 90s that for sure.
Pete said on 11/Aug/07
I always thought he was small but met him once and he was huge about 6-2!
I always thought he was small but met him once and he was huge about 6-2!
Melvin said on 11/Aug/07
Used to get listed at 6ft 3 circa 1990.
Used to get listed at 6ft 3 circa 1990.
AAAA said on 11/Aug/07
He looked real tall in THe Untouchables, especially in those period suits. back in the day the suits were cut form fitting on top and fuller in the pants. It creates a tapering up, and on a lean guy can enhance the apperarece of one height over an inch. This is one of the reasons Cary Grant could look 6'2ish. He was a lean, well proportioned 6'.5 guy who wore these suits well. I doubt he did it on purpose, but those suits enhance height
He looked real tall in THe Untouchables, especially in those period suits. back in the day the suits were cut form fitting on top and fuller in the pants. It creates a tapering up, and on a lean guy can enhance the apperarece of one height over an inch. This is one of the reasons Cary Grant could look 6'2ish. He was a lean, well proportioned 6'.5 guy who wore these suits well. I doubt he did it on purpose, but those suits enhance height
Peetie said on 11/Aug/07
yep , around 6-1 to 6-2. He's a lot taller than Glenn (12-14 cm. different).
yep , around 6-1 to 6-2. He's a lot taller than Glenn (12-14 cm. different).
Franco said on 10/Aug/07
i wouldnt doubt costner if he says 6'1 or 6'2 he is a very decent person.
he looks 6'2 in that picture so 6'1 is correct.
i wouldnt doubt costner if he says 6'1 or 6'2 he is a very decent person.
he looks 6'2 in that picture so 6'1 is correct.
dmeyer said on 10/Aug/07
does look a 6'1er in that pics and he also did in person
does look a 6'1er in that pics and he also did in person
azz said on 10/Aug/07
wow,he looks for me small in the movies,i didnt think he is that tall
wow,he looks for me small in the movies,i didnt think he is that tall
CarbonM5 said on 10/Aug/07
Totally with Glenn on this. As I have mentioned further down this page, I walked past Costner as he was leaving a London hotel and he was definitely in the 6-1 range. I also noticed that he was wearing very flat deck-type shoes.
Totally with Glenn on this. As I have mentioned further down this page, I walked past Costner as he was leaving a London hotel and he was definitely in the 6-1 range. I also noticed that he was wearing very flat deck-type shoes.
fox said on 9/Aug/07
wow he looks atleast 6'1 in that picture...
Editor Rob
wow he looks atleast 6'1 in that picture...
Editor Rob Costner head looks bit bigger than normal, he does appear to have a few inches advantage over glenn in terms of closeness.
Mario said on 9/Aug/07
That cannot be true. He was certainly wearing elevator shoes,din't he?
That cannot be true. He was certainly wearing elevator shoes,din't he?
Anonymous said on 9/Aug/07
I knew a guy that was 5'3" as a freshman, and when he graduated he was 6'5".
I knew a guy that was 5'3" as a freshman, and when he graduated he was 6'5".
glenn said on 9/Aug/07
saw him 2 years ago give an illusion of 5-11ish.this night,he was 6-1 for sure.
saw him 2 years ago give an illusion of 5-11ish.this night,he was 6-1 for sure.
Anthony said on 9/Aug/07
Looks an easy 6'1 with Glenn.
Looks an easy 6'1 with Glenn.
dmeyer said on 31/Jul/07
your dreaming cliff at 5'11 before bed he was about 2 in taller
your dreaming cliff at 5'11 before bed he was about 2 in taller
Cliff said on 30/Jul/07
I met him at Eldorda Casino in Shreveport last year. I'm 6 foot and he was at least 2 inches shorter than me.
I met him at Eldorda Casino in Shreveport last year. I'm 6 foot and he was at least 2 inches shorter than me.
dmeyer said on 10/Jul/07
kutcher is nothing under 188 cm and likely 189 190
kutcher is nothing under 188 cm and likely 189 190
RICHARD said on 7/Jul/07
I heard he was 5'2 when he entered high school. He had a growth spurt when he was in 12th grade so he must have had to grow when he was 18 and maybe he reached 6'1 in his 20s before age 25.
I heard he was 5'2 when he entered high school. He had a growth spurt when he was in 12th grade so he must have had to grow when he was 18 and maybe he reached 6'1 in his 20s before age 25.
Gonzalo said on 21/Jun/07
In this pic he also looks 6`1
Click Here
Kyle MacLachlan is listed here 6`0
In this pic he also looks 6`1
Click Here
Kyle MacLachlan is listed here 6`0
david said on 21/Jun/07
David Robinson grew 10 inches in college.
David Robinson grew 10 inches in college.
Cat Stevens said on 2/Jun/07
What do you think about this one?i think it proves that he's 6'1
Click Here
What do you think about this one?i think it proves that he's 6'1
Click Here
dmeyer said on 30/May/07
he did look a solid 185 cm like 6'1 3 years ago for some reason he dosn look it near kutcher i met kutsher 2 times he seemed 3 to 3.25 in taller than me and costner seemed 1.75 to 2 in taller but the differance between them seems more than 1 to 1.25 in so i dont get it
he did look a solid 185 cm like 6'1 3 years ago for some reason he dosn look it near kutcher i met kutsher 2 times he seemed 3 to 3.25 in taller than me and costner seemed 1.75 to 2 in taller but the differance between them seems more than 1 to 1.25 in so i dont get it
glenn said on 30/May/07
got him tonight.6-1.looked shorter in the pic and shorter 2 years ago.
got him tonight.6-1.looked shorter in the pic and shorter 2 years ago.
Viper said on 28/May/07
Well, he had 2 inches at least on Jay Leno this past week, maybe even closer to 3.
Well, he had 2 inches at least on Jay Leno this past week, maybe even closer to 3.
dmeyer said on 27/May/07
in person looked a solid 6'1 3 years ago maybe 6'0.75 in 185 cm i agree all his career 6'1 but now might be 6'0.5 in
in person looked a solid 6'1 3 years ago maybe 6'0.75 in 185 cm i agree all his career 6'1 but now might be 6'0.5 in
CarbonM5 said on 25/May/07
6-1 without a doubt. Saw him in London a couple of years ago. Stood right next to him as he was leaving a hotel and he towered me - I'm circa 5-10.
6-1 without a doubt. Saw him in London a couple of years ago. Stood right next to him as he was leaving a hotel and he towered me - I'm circa 5-10.
Jos said on 23/May/07
i always thought he was short,but seeing this and some pictures more closely i agree he's tall,and a very strong 6-1
i always thought he was short,but seeing this and some pictures more closely i agree he's tall,and a very strong 6-1
KylieBaby said on 23/May/07
wait a minute...if anyone has seen the guardian maybe they can back me up. there was a considerable height difference between costner and kutcher......like i would guess close to (if not more than) 3 inches. seriously...i may be a little off here but i swear it was a verrrry noticeable.
wait a minute...if anyone has seen the guardian maybe they can back me up. there was a considerable height difference between costner and kutcher......like i would guess close to (if not more than) 3 inches. seriously...i may be a little off here but i swear it was a verrrry noticeable.
sam said on 7/May/07
I'd love to see a picture of cosner back in highschool when he was much shorter. that would be funny
I'd love to see a picture of cosner back in highschool when he was much shorter. that would be funny
janice said on 4/May/07
i might say his about 184cm tall nowadays..
i might say his about 184cm tall nowadays..
Unknown said on 2/May/07
In the beginning, I thought that Costner would be just average, but after I saw him with Connery, I saw that he was almost as tall as Connery.
Therefore, the 6 feet range sounds appropriate.
In the beginning, I thought that Costner would be just average, but after I saw him with Connery, I saw that he was almost as tall as Connery.
Therefore, the 6 feet range sounds appropriate.
TheJerk said on 11/Apr/07
Right. Thinking of Ashton at 5-11 1/2 makes me laugh. As I actually said not too long ago today Ashton is just shy of 6-2 - Kevin's gotta be close to 6-1, if not 6-1.
Right. Thinking of Ashton at 5-11 1/2 makes me laugh. As I actually said not too long ago today Ashton is just shy of 6-2 - Kevin's gotta be close to 6-1, if not 6-1.
Viper said on 11/Apr/07
5-10 for Costner would make Ashton Kutcher 5-11 1/2, and thats not right.
5-10 for Costner would make Ashton Kutcher 5-11 1/2, and thats not right.
Boxing Fighter said on 10/Apr/07
5ft10?!!?!?
What?! Are you crazy?!
Click Here with tim robbins
maybe 6ft nowadays, but 5ft10 is ridiculous!
5ft10?!!?!?
What?! Are you crazy?!
Click Here with tim robbins
maybe 6ft nowadays, but 5ft10 is ridiculous!
Anonymous said on 10/Apr/07
I'm 6'-0" and he's not 6'-1" by a long shot -- I've met him repeatedly.
Maybe 5'-10" at best.
I'm 6'-0" and he's not 6'-1" by a long shot -- I've met him repeatedly.
Maybe 5'-10" at best.
Viper said on 7/Mar/07
I dont think hes lost anything. Looks the same to me.
I dont think hes lost anything. Looks the same to me.
al said on 6/Mar/07
costner may have lost a inch recently watching him now and from a few years back.
costner may have lost a inch recently watching him now and from a few years back.
Unknown said on 27/Feb/07
I watched the movie "The Untouchables".Strange. I never thaught that Costner would be that tall. He was just a little bit shorter than Sean Connery.
I watched the movie "The Untouchables".Strange. I never thaught that Costner would be that tall. He was just a little bit shorter than Sean Connery.
Gabe said on 26/Feb/07
"How can someone move to 6-1, if he was 5-2 when leaving highschool."
^^ agreed, by the way im not tall myself (5ft10) and wanna be bigger. im 17 years old. any suggestions exept grow hormones?
"How can someone move to 6-1, if he was 5-2 when leaving highschool."
^^ agreed, by the way im not tall myself (5ft10) and wanna be bigger. im 17 years old. any suggestions exept grow hormones?
Robert said on 16/Feb/07
I think that Costner always wears lift that make him at least 5 inches taller.
Editor Rob
I think that Costner always wears lift that make him at least 5 inches taller.
Editor Rob and I think you're trying to bring shame on the name Robert with your lunacy!
Chris said on 16/Feb/07
There is a 1.5 inch diffirence between Costner and Kutcher in The Guardian. So 185 cm looks right for Costner and 189 cm for Kutcher.
There is a 1.5 inch diffirence between Costner and Kutcher in The Guardian. So 185 cm looks right for Costner and 189 cm for Kutcher.
Viper said on 10/Feb/07
Robert, you are right that Anthony Edwards physically looks taller. Though Anthony has had 6-1 mentioned about him before, as well as Costner being mentioned as 6-0, out of his own mouth before.
Robert, you are right that Anthony Edwards physically looks taller. Though Anthony has had 6-1 mentioned about him before, as well as Costner being mentioned as 6-0, out of his own mouth before.
Robert said on 8/Feb/07
Compare 6-2 Anthony Edwards with Kevin Costner.
Does it not sound ridiculous, if Anthony would be just one inch taller than him?
I mean that Anthonny looks much taller than Costner.
Compare 6-2 Anthony Edwards with Kevin Costner.
Does it not sound ridiculous, if Anthony would be just one inch taller than him?
I mean that Anthonny looks much taller than Costner.
dmeyer said on 5/Feb/07
i met costner and i think he is a strong 6 ft 1 like like 6'1 at night i am 5'11 at night and he was about 2 inches taller
i met costner and i think he is a strong 6 ft 1 like like 6'1 at night i am 5'11 at night and he was about 2 inches taller
Viper said on 5/Feb/07
Thats interesting. He has been quoted as just saying hes 6-0 before.
Thats interesting. He has been quoted as just saying hes 6-0 before.
Alex said on 5/Feb/07
I just saw "the guardian". If Kutcher is a solid 6'2", then Costner is a solid 6'1".
I just saw "the guardian". If Kutcher is a solid 6'2", then Costner is a solid 6'1".
Moke said on 4/Feb/07
He`s taller than 6`1! He`s just about 1cm below Ashton Kutcher
He`s taller than 6`1! He`s just about 1cm below Ashton Kutcher
Glenn said on 31/Jan/07
Geez that sounds painful.
Geez that sounds painful.
SLH said on 31/Jan/07
There was a kid in my class in Wisconsin who did -- was about 5'3 out of high school and 6'3 at a 5-yr reunion. Not unheard of, just not usual.
There was a kid in my class in Wisconsin who did -- was about 5'3 out of high school and 6'3 at a 5-yr reunion. Not unheard of, just not usual.
Viper said on 29/Jan/07
I have to agree, going from 5-2 to 6-1 after high school is flat out unbeleivable.
I have to agree, going from 5-2 to 6-1 after high school is flat out unbeleivable.
Heights are barefeet estimates, derived from quotations, official websites, agency resumes, in person encounters with actors at conventions and pictures/films.
Other vital statistics like weight or shoe size measurements have been sourced from newspapers, books, resumes or social media.
Celebrity Fan Photos and Agency Pictures of stars are © to their respective owners.