Add a Comment3561 comments
Average Guess (492 Votes)
Peak: 6ft 9.65in (207.4cm)
Current: 6ft 8.7in (205cm)
Peak: 6ft 9.65in (207.4cm)
Current: 6ft 8.7in (205cm)
JT said on 3/Aug/08
Worthy's about 6'8" so that's not going to be him. That guy looks around 6'4"-6'5".
Worthy's about 6'8" so that's not going to be him. That guy looks around 6'4"-6'5".
Mattiew_- said on 3/Aug/08
"wolverinejoe80 says on 23/Jul/08
nash looks huge! i remember that all star weekend. i remember he was in the celebrity baseball game with david robinson and he appeared to a legit 6ft 11 compared to 7ft drob. maybe it was hair but i believed nash was 6ft 11 then."
I second that 100%
No way Nash was under 6'10 in his prime .
That's ****ing BS .
"wolverinejoe80 says on 23/Jul/08
nash looks huge! i remember that all star weekend. i remember he was in the celebrity baseball game with david robinson and he appeared to a legit 6ft 11 compared to 7ft drob. maybe it was hair but i believed nash was 6ft 11 then."
I second that 100%
No way Nash was under 6'10 in his prime .
That's ****ing BS .
LV said on 3/Aug/08
JT says on 2/Aug/08
Click Here Anyone know who these guys are next to Nash? The guy to Nash's left looks a bit like Mario Lemieux (hockey), who I believe was around 6'3"-6'4".
James Worthy?
JT says on 2/Aug/08
Click Here Anyone know who these guys are next to Nash? The guy to Nash's left looks a bit like Mario Lemieux (hockey), who I believe was around 6'3"-6'4".
James Worthy?
JT said on 2/Aug/08
Click Here Anyone know who these guys are next to Nash? The guy to Nash's left looks a bit like Mario Lemieux (hockey), who I believe was around 6'3"-6'4".
Click Here Anyone know who these guys are next to Nash? The guy to Nash's left looks a bit like Mario Lemieux (hockey), who I believe was around 6'3"-6'4".
JT said on 1/Aug/08
Click Here Those are big shoes but likely no more than a 1.5" heel. Same shoes here Click Here If he walked funny, it's because they were untied (or he was drunk).
Click Here Those are big shoes but likely no more than a 1.5" heel. Same shoes here Click Here If he walked funny, it's because they were untied (or he was drunk).
Vegas said on 1/Aug/08
the situation you are talking about Dan is when hall and nash attacked bischoff on ppv in june 1996, hall is wearing very big boots and bischoff is wearing ~2 inch cowboys, nash is wearing flat slippers so both hall and bischoff have at least 1.5 inches footwear advantage over nash, the camera angle sucks most of the time but nash still looks at least 4 inches taller than hall there Click Here
the situation you are talking about Dan is when hall and nash attacked bischoff on ppv in june 1996, hall is wearing very big boots and bischoff is wearing ~2 inch cowboys, nash is wearing flat slippers so both hall and bischoff have at least 1.5 inches footwear advantage over nash, the camera angle sucks most of the time but nash still looks at least 4 inches taller than hall there Click Here
Dan said on 31/Jul/08
Oh great, u know what situation i was talking about. Yes he wore those boots over his jeans. This was a video i saw in Youtube where he was wearing those jeans and jean shirt when they just started. When Hall and Nash came out, Hall looked kind of funny walking b/c it didn't seem normal. Yes, he definitely was at most 3 inches shorter tahn Nash on that occasion.
Oh great, u know what situation i was talking about. Yes he wore those boots over his jeans. This was a video i saw in Youtube where he was wearing those jeans and jean shirt when they just started. When Hall and Nash came out, Hall looked kind of funny walking b/c it didn't seem normal. Yes, he definitely was at most 3 inches shorter tahn Nash on that occasion.
Annoyed said on 30/Jul/08
6'10 out of bed, 6'9.5 evening now.
6'10 out of bed, 6'9.5 evening now.
Vegas said on 29/Jul/08
hall with possibly 7.5 inches+ on Mr T today and 2 inches taller than lou ferrigno??
hall with possibly 7.5 inches+ on Mr T today and 2 inches taller than lou ferrigno??
Danimal said on 29/Jul/08
Dan says on 29/Jul/08
Was Hogan taller or shorter than Scott Hall in the NWO days? I remembered when they did those NWO Commerials, Hall was a bit taller. How tall were they back in 1996-1998?
Also, i remembered one time when the NWO wasnt formed yet and saw Hall and Nash. Hall was wearing those jeans and jean shirt and was wearing these HUGE BOOTS. When both of them came out, I think Scott Hall looked only like 2-3 inches shorter than Nash
Hall was a weak 6'5" guy. Hogan was about the same height as him in the NWO (1996-1999). He only appeared taller when he wore his cowboy boots and that was usually for live commentary in the ring. Hogan from the 1980's would have probably had a legite 1" on Hall. Current Hogan would 1000000% be shorter than Hall by 1.5".
Dan says on 29/Jul/08
Was Hogan taller or shorter than Scott Hall in the NWO days? I remembered when they did those NWO Commerials, Hall was a bit taller. How tall were they back in 1996-1998?
Also, i remembered one time when the NWO wasnt formed yet and saw Hall and Nash. Hall was wearing those jeans and jean shirt and was wearing these HUGE BOOTS. When both of them came out, I think Scott Hall looked only like 2-3 inches shorter than Nash
Hall was a weak 6'5" guy. Hogan was about the same height as him in the NWO (1996-1999). He only appeared taller when he wore his cowboy boots and that was usually for live commentary in the ring. Hogan from the 1980's would have probably had a legite 1" on Hall. Current Hogan would 1000000% be shorter than Hall by 1.5".
Dave said on 29/Jul/08
im sorry guys, but hall was certainly the taller of the two (hogam/hall) it wasnt much, but hogan never looked taller!
and i know what you were talking about, hall wore these huge boots out over his jeans and he was NO MORE than 3 inches smaller than nash on THAT occaision.... but usually nash towered him by some 5 inches.
im sorry guys, but hall was certainly the taller of the two (hogam/hall) it wasnt much, but hogan never looked taller!
and i know what you were talking about, hall wore these huge boots out over his jeans and he was NO MORE than 3 inches smaller than nash on THAT occaision.... but usually nash towered him by some 5 inches.
willl said on 29/Jul/08
nash was a legit 6'9 atleast at some point in his wrestling career..defintely within an two inches, id say one of Paul Wight when they were feuding in WCW...Theres no way Nash is only 6'8 right now...and hall was atleast 6'5 at some point in his wrestling career..
nash was a legit 6'9 atleast at some point in his wrestling career..defintely within an two inches, id say one of Paul Wight when they were feuding in WCW...Theres no way Nash is only 6'8 right now...and hall was atleast 6'5 at some point in his wrestling career..
Dan said on 29/Jul/08
Was Hogan taller or shorter than Scott Hall in the NWO days? I remembered when they did those NWO Commerials, Hall was a bit taller. How tall were they back in 1996-1998?
Also, i remembered one time when the NWO wasnt formed yet and saw Hall and Nash. Hall was wearing those jeans and jean shirt and was wearing these HUGE BOOTS. When both of them came out, I think Scott Hall looked only like 2-3 inches shorter than Nash
Was Hogan taller or shorter than Scott Hall in the NWO days? I remembered when they did those NWO Commerials, Hall was a bit taller. How tall were they back in 1996-1998?
Also, i remembered one time when the NWO wasnt formed yet and saw Hall and Nash. Hall was wearing those jeans and jean shirt and was wearing these HUGE BOOTS. When both of them came out, I think Scott Hall looked only like 2-3 inches shorter than Nash
tuga said on 28/Jul/08
Here goes mine:
Big show: 7'1 peak 7' today
nash: 6'10 maybe a little more, today 6'9
Taker:6'8 1/2 peak, today still looks 6'8 next to bigger men
kane:6'8 1/2, due to noticeable worst posture 6'8 today
khali:7'1
hogan:6'6 peak, today 6'4
Andre the giant: 7' peak, later 6'10
sid 6'8 peak, today??
Haystacks honestly I
Here goes mine:
Big show: 7'1 peak 7' today
nash: 6'10 maybe a little more, today 6'9
Taker:6'8 1/2 peak, today still looks 6'8 next to bigger men
kane:6'8 1/2, due to noticeable worst posture 6'8 today
khali:7'1
hogan:6'6 peak, today 6'4
Andre the giant: 7' peak, later 6'10
sid 6'8 peak, today??
Haystacks honestly I
Annoyed said on 28/Jul/08
Nice Danimal, not far off my opinions to be perfectly honest.
Nice Danimal, not far off my opinions to be perfectly honest.
Ghost said on 28/Jul/08
Danimal,
How can you Taker be under 6'7 and Khali over 7 feet when the difference between him and Taker looks more like 4 than 5 inches? Please answer.
I'd say Taker is still 6'7,5 today and Khali is 7'05.
Danimal,
How can you Taker be under 6'7 and Khali over 7 feet when the difference between him and Taker looks more like 4 than 5 inches? Please answer.
I'd say Taker is still 6'7,5 today and Khali is 7'05.
Danimal said on 28/Jul/08
Annoyed says on 25/Jul/08
nice one Danimal. what is your opinions on Nash and the other " Giants " heights? ( by that i mean, Andre, Kane, Taker, Khali,big show, the usual suspects ;) ) ??
Nash Prime - 6'9.5"-6'10" - Today - 6'8"-6'8.5"
Big Show Prime - 7'0.5"-7'1" - Today - 6'11-6'11.5"
Taker Prime - 6'7.5-6'8" - Today - 6'6"-6'6.5"
Kane - 6'7.5"-6'8"
Khali - 7'0.5"-7'1"
Hogan Prime - 6'6" - Today - 6'3.5"
Andre The Giant Prime 6'11.5"-7'0" - Near Death - 6'9.5"-6'10"
Sid - 6'7"
Haystacks Peak - 6'9" - Later - 6'7"
Annoyed says on 25/Jul/08
nice one Danimal. what is your opinions on Nash and the other " Giants " heights? ( by that i mean, Andre, Kane, Taker, Khali,big show, the usual suspects ;) ) ??
Nash Prime - 6'9.5"-6'10" - Today - 6'8"-6'8.5"
Big Show Prime - 7'0.5"-7'1" - Today - 6'11-6'11.5"
Taker Prime - 6'7.5-6'8" - Today - 6'6"-6'6.5"
Kane - 6'7.5"-6'8"
Khali - 7'0.5"-7'1"
Hogan Prime - 6'6" - Today - 6'3.5"
Andre The Giant Prime 6'11.5"-7'0" - Near Death - 6'9.5"-6'10"
Sid - 6'7"
Haystacks Peak - 6'9" - Later - 6'7"
Supermanfan380 said on 27/Jul/08
Dan,
Can be either.
Ussually it is the afternoon height, as most folks compress after about the first hour of the day, and by the time they get to a doctors office, or a sports weigh in, they have already been up for several hours.
Dan,
Can be either.
Ussually it is the afternoon height, as most folks compress after about the first hour of the day, and by the time they get to a doctors office, or a sports weigh in, they have already been up for several hours.
Dan said on 26/Jul/08
Are all heights measured morning, day or night?
Are all heights measured morning, day or night?
Annoyed said on 25/Jul/08
nice one Danimal. what is your opinions on Nash and the other " Giants " heights? ( by that i mean, Andre, Kane, Taker, Khali,big show, the usual suspects ;) ) ??
nice one Danimal. what is your opinions on Nash and the other " Giants " heights? ( by that i mean, Andre, Kane, Taker, Khali,big show, the usual suspects ;) ) ??
Alex2 said on 25/Jul/08
Omg Ola...Yea great comparison with Hall (all bending their knees with low camera angle and not even standing by each other) my god!
Omg Ola...Yea great comparison with Hall (all bending their knees with low camera angle and not even standing by each other) my god!
Danimal said on 25/Jul/08
Annoyed says on 24/Jul/08
Danimal i study science so i think i am aware of what evidence is. You dont have to be cheeky or offensive man, i do state it is just an opinion based on what everything points to, i never said im right, but i am definetly pretty close to the real heights. You really dont have to be offensive though.
Fair enough man.
Annoyed says on 24/Jul/08
Danimal i study science so i think i am aware of what evidence is. You dont have to be cheeky or offensive man, i do state it is just an opinion based on what everything points to, i never said im right, but i am definetly pretty close to the real heights. You really dont have to be offensive though.
Fair enough man.
Supermanfan380 said on 25/Jul/08
I think the Hogan stuff can be kept on Hogan's page, but I still have seen nothing that proves that Nash was anything under 6'10" peak. He himself claims 6'10" on his website, and anecdotal evidence he has said this to many fans as well as when he first entered wrestling, as a no-name, he was announced at 6'10" and 325 pounds. Later when he got more popular it got exaggerated all the way up to 7'1" and 367 at one point.
I think the Hogan stuff can be kept on Hogan's page, but I still have seen nothing that proves that Nash was anything under 6'10" peak. He himself claims 6'10" on his website, and anecdotal evidence he has said this to many fans as well as when he first entered wrestling, as a no-name, he was announced at 6'10" and 325 pounds. Later when he got more popular it got exaggerated all the way up to 7'1" and 367 at one point.
Annoyed said on 24/Jul/08
Danimal i study science so i think i am aware of what evidence is. You dont have to be cheeky or offensive man, i do state it is just an opinion based on what everything points to, i never said im right, but i am definetly pretty close to the real heights. You really dont have to be offensive though.
Danimal i study science so i think i am aware of what evidence is. You dont have to be cheeky or offensive man, i do state it is just an opinion based on what everything points to, i never said im right, but i am definetly pretty close to the real heights. You really dont have to be offensive though.
mike said on 24/Jul/08
i agree with you vegas there is a 4 inch difference.
i agree with you vegas there is a 4 inch difference.
Danimal said on 24/Jul/08
Ola says on 23/Jul/08
Annoyed says on 22/Jul/08
"Hulk Hogan 6'6" 6'5" (note:Hogan isnt over 6'4 anymore)"
...he never was
Of course he was never 6'4". He was ALWAYS MAX 6'3" (rolls eyes at Ola's shear lack of class and cluelessness)
Ola says on 23/Jul/08
Annoyed says on 22/Jul/08
"Hulk Hogan 6'6" 6'5" (note:Hogan isnt over 6'4 anymore)"
...he never was
Of course he was never 6'4". He was ALWAYS MAX 6'3" (rolls eyes at Ola's shear lack of class and cluelessness)
Danimal said on 23/Jul/08
Annoyed says on 22/Jul/08
Here is the Definitive List . The frst height is their peak morning height and the second is their peak evening height. Remember these are their PEAK morning and eveing heights, not what they may be now after back and Knee Operations. This is based on ALOT of research and evidence finding ( pics videos interviews ) so id say i am pretty sure on all of these. )
Name Morning Evening
Giant Gonzalez 7'6.75" 7'5.25"
Great Khali 7'1.75 7'1"
Andre The Giant 6'11" 6'10" ( at one point was slightly over 7'0" )
Big Show 7'0" 6'11"
Kevin Nash 6'10" 6'9.25"
The Undertaker 6'8.5" 6'7.75"
Kane 6'8.5" 6'8"
Sid Vicious 6'8" 6'7.5"
Viscera 6'6.75" 6'6"
Test 6'7" 6'6"
Hulk Hogan 6'6" 6'5" (note:Hogan isnt over 6'4 anymore)
Mike Awesome 6'6" 6'5"
Jake The Snake 6'5.75" 6'5"
Scott Hall 6'5.5" 6'4.5"
The Rock 6'3.5" 6'3"
Goldberg 6'2.5" 6'2"
Brock Lesnar 6'2.25" 6'2"
Triple H 6'2" 6'1.75"
Stone Cold 6'1.75" 6'1"
Mark Henry 6'1.75" 6'0.75"
Rob Van Dam 5'11.25" 5'10.75"
This list took me along long time to compile and i know alot of people will be angry or annoyed or disagree but that is fine, but rest assured, i did use lots of evidence when weighing up the heights, i used testimonies, interviews, stories from on this site, videos on Youtube, videos and DVD's i own, college football and athletics reports and newspaper stories, police records, eye witness accounts, my own eye witness accounts coupled with other Data. I factored in body mass, training frequency, body shape and wrestling frequeny at their peak, posture habits and then i put all the information together and came to these conclusions i would say im accurate to within a half inch if i am not actually completely right. i know not everyone will agree but these are the heights the interpretation of the evidence gives. Fluctuations in Height loss can account for varying discrepancies with regard to comparing wrestlers against each other. Anyway i would appreciate feedback both positive and negative on this post as it has taken me a long time to compile and type up. Thanks.
Do you even know what the term "EVIDENCE" truly mean? Everything you've done was use your subjective opinions. Nice try, but there are MANY errors. MANY.
Annoyed says on 22/Jul/08
Here is the Definitive List . The frst height is their peak morning height and the second is their peak evening height. Remember these are their PEAK morning and eveing heights, not what they may be now after back and Knee Operations. This is based on ALOT of research and evidence finding ( pics videos interviews ) so id say i am pretty sure on all of these. )
Name Morning Evening
Giant Gonzalez 7'6.75" 7'5.25"
Great Khali 7'1.75 7'1"
Andre The Giant 6'11" 6'10" ( at one point was slightly over 7'0" )
Big Show 7'0" 6'11"
Kevin Nash 6'10" 6'9.25"
The Undertaker 6'8.5" 6'7.75"
Kane 6'8.5" 6'8"
Sid Vicious 6'8" 6'7.5"
Viscera 6'6.75" 6'6"
Test 6'7" 6'6"
Hulk Hogan 6'6" 6'5" (note:Hogan isnt over 6'4 anymore)
Mike Awesome 6'6" 6'5"
Jake The Snake 6'5.75" 6'5"
Scott Hall 6'5.5" 6'4.5"
The Rock 6'3.5" 6'3"
Goldberg 6'2.5" 6'2"
Brock Lesnar 6'2.25" 6'2"
Triple H 6'2" 6'1.75"
Stone Cold 6'1.75" 6'1"
Mark Henry 6'1.75" 6'0.75"
Rob Van Dam 5'11.25" 5'10.75"
This list took me along long time to compile and i know alot of people will be angry or annoyed or disagree but that is fine, but rest assured, i did use lots of evidence when weighing up the heights, i used testimonies, interviews, stories from on this site, videos on Youtube, videos and DVD's i own, college football and athletics reports and newspaper stories, police records, eye witness accounts, my own eye witness accounts coupled with other Data. I factored in body mass, training frequency, body shape and wrestling frequeny at their peak, posture habits and then i put all the information together and came to these conclusions i would say im accurate to within a half inch if i am not actually completely right. i know not everyone will agree but these are the heights the interpretation of the evidence gives. Fluctuations in Height loss can account for varying discrepancies with regard to comparing wrestlers against each other. Anyway i would appreciate feedback both positive and negative on this post as it has taken me a long time to compile and type up. Thanks.
Do you even know what the term "EVIDENCE" truly mean? Everything you've done was use your subjective opinions. Nice try, but there are MANY errors. MANY.
wolverinejoe80 said on 23/Jul/08
nash looks huge! i remember that all star weekend. i remember he was in the celebrity baseball game with david robinson and he appeared to a legit 6ft 11 compared to 7ft drob. maybe it was hair but i believed nash was 6ft 11 then.
nash looks huge! i remember that all star weekend. i remember he was in the celebrity baseball game with david robinson and he appeared to a legit 6ft 11 compared to 7ft drob. maybe it was hair but i believed nash was 6ft 11 then.
Dave said on 22/Jul/08
scott hall hasa more than an inch on triple h.... he has at least 2 inches on him!!!.... if not more.
scott hall hasa more than an inch on triple h.... he has at least 2 inches on him!!!.... if not more.
TELLEM said on 22/Jul/08
wasn't there a picture around here of scott hall and triple h in the wwf mid 90s that looked like hall had to inches on triple h not 1.
wasn't there a picture around here of scott hall and triple h in the wwf mid 90s that looked like hall had to inches on triple h not 1.
Annoyed said on 22/Jul/08
Here is the Definitive List . The frst height is their peak morning height and the second is their peak evening height. Remember these are their PEAK morning and eveing heights, not what they may be now after back and Knee Operations. This is based on ALOT of research and evidence finding ( pics videos interviews ) so id say i am pretty sure on all of these. )
Name Morning Evening
Giant Gonzalez 7'6.75" 7'5.25"
Great Khali 7'1.75 7'1"
Andre The Giant 6'11" 6'10" ( at one point was slightly over 7'0" )
Big Show 7'0" 6'11"
Kevin Nash 6'10" 6'9.25"
The Undertaker 6'8.5" 6'7.75"
Kane 6'8.5" 6'8"
Sid Vicious 6'8" 6'7.5"
Viscera 6'6.75" 6'6"
Test 6'7" 6'6"
Hulk Hogan 6'6" 6'5" (note:Hogan isnt over 6'4 anymore)
Mike Awesome 6'6" 6'5"
Jake The Snake 6'5.75" 6'5"
Scott Hall 6'5.5" 6'4.5"
The Rock 6'3.5" 6'3"
Goldberg 6'2.5" 6'2"
Brock Lesnar 6'2.25" 6'2"
Triple H 6'2" 6'1.75"
Stone Cold 6'1.75" 6'1"
Mark Henry 6'1.75" 6'0.75"
Rob Van Dam 5'11.25" 5'10.75"
This list took me along long time to compile and i know alot of people will be angry or annoyed or disagree but that is fine, but rest assured, i did use lots of evidence when weighing up the heights, i used testimonies, interviews, stories from on this site, videos on Youtube, videos and DVD's i own, college football and athletics reports and newspaper stories, police records, eye witness accounts, my own eye witness accounts coupled with other Data. I factored in body mass, training frequency, body shape and wrestling frequeny at their peak, posture habits and then i put all the information together and came to these conclusions i would say im accurate to within a half inch if i am not actually completely right. i know not everyone will agree but these are the heights the interpretation of the evidence gives. Fluctuations in Height loss can account for varying discrepancies with regard to comparing wrestlers against each other. Anyway i would appreciate feedback both positive and negative on this post as it has taken me a long time to compile and type up. Thanks.
Here is the Definitive List . The frst height is their peak morning height and the second is their peak evening height. Remember these are their PEAK morning and eveing heights, not what they may be now after back and Knee Operations. This is based on ALOT of research and evidence finding ( pics videos interviews ) so id say i am pretty sure on all of these. )
Name Morning Evening
Giant Gonzalez 7'6.75" 7'5.25"
Great Khali 7'1.75 7'1"
Andre The Giant 6'11" 6'10" ( at one point was slightly over 7'0" )
Big Show 7'0" 6'11"
Kevin Nash 6'10" 6'9.25"
The Undertaker 6'8.5" 6'7.75"
Kane 6'8.5" 6'8"
Sid Vicious 6'8" 6'7.5"
Viscera 6'6.75" 6'6"
Test 6'7" 6'6"
Hulk Hogan 6'6" 6'5" (note:Hogan isnt over 6'4 anymore)
Mike Awesome 6'6" 6'5"
Jake The Snake 6'5.75" 6'5"
Scott Hall 6'5.5" 6'4.5"
The Rock 6'3.5" 6'3"
Goldberg 6'2.5" 6'2"
Brock Lesnar 6'2.25" 6'2"
Triple H 6'2" 6'1.75"
Stone Cold 6'1.75" 6'1"
Mark Henry 6'1.75" 6'0.75"
Rob Van Dam 5'11.25" 5'10.75"
This list took me along long time to compile and i know alot of people will be angry or annoyed or disagree but that is fine, but rest assured, i did use lots of evidence when weighing up the heights, i used testimonies, interviews, stories from on this site, videos on Youtube, videos and DVD's i own, college football and athletics reports and newspaper stories, police records, eye witness accounts, my own eye witness accounts coupled with other Data. I factored in body mass, training frequency, body shape and wrestling frequeny at their peak, posture habits and then i put all the information together and came to these conclusions i would say im accurate to within a half inch if i am not actually completely right. i know not everyone will agree but these are the heights the interpretation of the evidence gives. Fluctuations in Height loss can account for varying discrepancies with regard to comparing wrestlers against each other. Anyway i would appreciate feedback both positive and negative on this post as it has taken me a long time to compile and type up. Thanks.
Clay said on 22/Jul/08
Show, when straightened, looks nothing under 7'0'' next to Giant Khali.
Show, when straightened, looks nothing under 7'0'' next to Giant Khali.
TELLEM said on 21/Jul/08
heres a vid with nash and 6'6 dan spivey (waylon mercy) nash looks 3 inches over spivey...watch them @ 2:44...nash was either 6'9 or 6'10 peak...i'll be 6'9 Click Here
heres a vid with nash and 6'6 dan spivey (waylon mercy) nash looks 3 inches over spivey...watch them @ 2:44...nash was either 6'9 or 6'10 peak...i'll be 6'9 Click Here
Supermanfan380 said on 21/Jul/08
I still think Big Show is very tall when he stands completely straight. His posture is bad, but I doubt his bones themselves have actually shrunk.
When he is in the ring with someone close in height, he does fix his posture. Otherwise he tends to hunch over.
I still think Big Show is very tall when he stands completely straight. His posture is bad, but I doubt his bones themselves have actually shrunk.
When he is in the ring with someone close in height, he does fix his posture. Otherwise he tends to hunch over.
Anonymous said on 21/Jul/08
Supermanfan380; BS still has a lot of height now. He's at least 6'8. Maybe a bit more.
Supermanfan380; BS still has a lot of height now. He's at least 6'8. Maybe a bit more.
tuga said on 20/Jul/08
Great vids and pics JT, Nash could have been even a little above 6'10.
And I agree with Danimal, Big Show had to be at least 7'1 peak.
About hall 6'5 suits him right like you say JT, if anything, he could have been a little more.
Great vids and pics JT, Nash could have been even a little above 6'10.
And I agree with Danimal, Big Show had to be at least 7'1 peak.
About hall 6'5 suits him right like you say JT, if anything, he could have been a little more.
JT said on 20/Jul/08
Click Here Hall sure looked a solid 6'5" early in his career. Hennig was around 6'1". Hall had poor posture even in the NWO WCW days with his "bad guy" persona.
Click Here Hall sure looked a solid 6'5" early in his career. Hennig was around 6'1". Hall had poor posture even in the NWO WCW days with his "bad guy" persona.
Supermanfan380 said on 19/Jul/08
Danimal, I think that BS still had a lot of height as recent as 2003 (may have been 2002). Durring the Shawn Michaels, Nash, X-Pac NWO angle, BS was also part of the team for a while, and I remember nash and he in the ring at the same time durring one TV taping, and BS had 2"-3" on Nash even then.
Danimal, I think that BS still had a lot of height as recent as 2003 (may have been 2002). Durring the Shawn Michaels, Nash, X-Pac NWO angle, BS was also part of the team for a while, and I remember nash and he in the ring at the same time durring one TV taping, and BS had 2"-3" on Nash even then.
Danimal said on 18/Jul/08
WOW, goes to show how tall The Big Show used to be seeing a Nash was still peak height in 1996 and Big Show had 3" on him back then. Big Show would have towered 6'10" Danny Manning and would have been taller than David Robinson. I am 100% sure Big Show has lost considerable height in the last 9-13 years. He was once a legite 7'1".
WOW, goes to show how tall The Big Show used to be seeing a Nash was still peak height in 1996 and Big Show had 3" on him back then. Big Show would have towered 6'10" Danny Manning and would have been taller than David Robinson. I am 100% sure Big Show has lost considerable height in the last 9-13 years. He was once a legite 7'1".
JT said on 17/Jul/08
Derek says on 17/Jul/08
JT- Just out of curiosity, is that from the 1994 All-Star game?
I believe so.
Derek says on 17/Jul/08
JT- Just out of curiosity, is that from the 1994 All-Star game?
I believe so.
Vegas said on 17/Jul/08
you said 5'10 a few months jason :)
you said 5'10 a few months jason :)
Jason said on 17/Jul/08
I stood next to Ricky Steamboat - who was very nice - for a few minutes, I don't think he was over 5'9''.
I stood next to Ricky Steamboat - who was very nice - for a few minutes, I don't think he was over 5'9''.
Derek said on 17/Jul/08
JT- Just out of curiosity, is that from the 1994 All-Star game?
JT- Just out of curiosity, is that from the 1994 All-Star game?
Vegas said on 17/Jul/08
great video JT hadn't seen that in years, danny manning was listed at 6'10 in the nba and nash clearly taller in the video, we just need the video of nash standing next to kareem now :)
great video JT hadn't seen that in years, danny manning was listed at 6'10 in the nba and nash clearly taller in the video, we just need the video of nash standing next to kareem now :)
AnnoyeD said on 17/Jul/08
ure right superfan, completely right. Nash is 6'10 morning barefoot, Undertaker is 6'8.5 morning barefoot, Both will loose roughly an inch over the course of any given day taking into account their punishing regimes. Nash starts at 6'10 but drops to 6'9. Taker starts at 6'8.5 but drops to 6'7.5 . On a day where they dont train or wrestle thy would prolly only lose about 1/2 an inch t0 3/4 an inch. Also i dont think their old enough to have lost height and i dont think either of them have had any major operations or posture problems. The Dilemma would be now.....do u give them their morning heights or evening heights, i always go with morning as it is your true actual height.
ure right superfan, completely right. Nash is 6'10 morning barefoot, Undertaker is 6'8.5 morning barefoot, Both will loose roughly an inch over the course of any given day taking into account their punishing regimes. Nash starts at 6'10 but drops to 6'9. Taker starts at 6'8.5 but drops to 6'7.5 . On a day where they dont train or wrestle thy would prolly only lose about 1/2 an inch t0 3/4 an inch. Also i dont think their old enough to have lost height and i dont think either of them have had any major operations or posture problems. The Dilemma would be now.....do u give them their morning heights or evening heights, i always go with morning as it is your true actual height.
Dan said on 16/Jul/08
Does anyone know how tall Scott Hall is? He looked to be very tall like 6'5 in the NWO days but once he came back to WWE with Hogan and Nash, he looked like he shrunk. He didn't even look taller than the Rock who is 6'3.
Does anyone know how tall Scott Hall is? He looked to be very tall like 6'5 in the NWO days but once he came back to WWE with Hogan and Nash, he looked like he shrunk. He didn't even look taller than the Rock who is 6'3.
Steve said on 16/Jul/08
Yes,in comparation to Kurt Angle Nash looks solid 6'9".On most of his matches with UT nash 1.5" on him and if UT is 6'7" to 6'7.5" that would make Nash solid 6'9".
Yes,in comparation to Kurt Angle Nash looks solid 6'9".On most of his matches with UT nash 1.5" on him and if UT is 6'7" to 6'7.5" that would make Nash solid 6'9".
Danimal said on 16/Jul/08
Supermanfan380 says on 16/Jul/08
UT may just be giving his "rounded" height. He may be 6'8.5" and just says "'bout six eight" when he is asked. For many years the WWE listed him at 6'10.5".
Nash does have bigger structure than UT. Nash had a more impressive build at one time, and has wider clavicle structure making his Silhouette much bigger than UT's. Not to mention the larger volume of hair and really being around 1.5" taller, and it is no wonder Nash had so much more of a BIG factor than UT. However under close scrutiny accounting for the difference in Nash's Silhouette, the actual difference is not more than 2
Supermanfan380 says on 16/Jul/08
UT may just be giving his "rounded" height. He may be 6'8.5" and just says "'bout six eight" when he is asked. For many years the WWE listed him at 6'10.5".
Nash does have bigger structure than UT. Nash had a more impressive build at one time, and has wider clavicle structure making his Silhouette much bigger than UT's. Not to mention the larger volume of hair and really being around 1.5" taller, and it is no wonder Nash had so much more of a BIG factor than UT. However under close scrutiny accounting for the difference in Nash's Silhouette, the actual difference is not more than 2
Supermanfan380 said on 16/Jul/08
UT may just be giving his "rounded" height. He may be 6'8.5" and just says "'bout six eight" when he is asked. For many years the WWE listed him at 6'10.5".
Nash does have bigger structure than UT. Nash had a more impressive build at one time, and has wider clavicle structure making his Silhouette much bigger than UT's. Not to mention the larger volume of hair and really being around 1.5" taller, and it is no wonder Nash had so much more of a BIG factor than UT. However under close scrutiny accounting for the difference in Nash's Silhouette, the actual difference is not more than 2
UT may just be giving his "rounded" height. He may be 6'8.5" and just says "'bout six eight" when he is asked. For many years the WWE listed him at 6'10.5".
Nash does have bigger structure than UT. Nash had a more impressive build at one time, and has wider clavicle structure making his Silhouette much bigger than UT's. Not to mention the larger volume of hair and really being around 1.5" taller, and it is no wonder Nash had so much more of a BIG factor than UT. However under close scrutiny accounting for the difference in Nash's Silhouette, the actual difference is not more than 2
JT said on 16/Jul/08
With Cal Ripken, Jr. Click Here
With Danny Manning Click Here
With David Robinson Click Here
Click Here
With Cal Ripken, Jr. Click Here
With Danny Manning Click Here
With David Robinson Click Here
Click Here
Alex2 said on 15/Jul/08
If Taker says 6'8" and 6'9" then he could mean that hes in the middle (6'8.5") I could believe that as peak but today 6'7.5" sounds right.
If Taker says 6'8" and 6'9" then he could mean that hes in the middle (6'8.5") I could believe that as peak but today 6'7.5" sounds right.
AnnoyeD said on 14/Jul/08
yeah, i am seriousley now going with 6'10" barefoot morning height but can drop down to about 6'9.5" Taker is defo about 6'8" - 6'8.5" in his hay-day and there was an inch and a half between them in alot of their matches. also.....why does Taker say he is 6'9" right, but then in alot of DVD' and magazine interviews from other people AND himself as 6'8" ......could he actually just be 6'8"?? f course not! HE MUST be 6'5"! and Hulk Hogan is only 6'2 and Goldberg is 6'1" amd Stone Cold Steve Austin is 5'10" OBVIOUSLEY! ( btw that was sarcasm )
yeah, i am seriousley now going with 6'10" barefoot morning height but can drop down to about 6'9.5" Taker is defo about 6'8" - 6'8.5" in his hay-day and there was an inch and a half between them in alot of their matches. also.....why does Taker say he is 6'9" right, but then in alot of DVD' and magazine interviews from other people AND himself as 6'8" ......could he actually just be 6'8"?? f course not! HE MUST be 6'5"! and Hulk Hogan is only 6'2 and Goldberg is 6'1" amd Stone Cold Steve Austin is 5'10" OBVIOUSLEY! ( btw that was sarcasm )
Anonymous said on 13/Jul/08
Alex2 says on 10/Jul/08
LV says on 6/Jul/08
Ola says on 3/Jul/08
Ola says on 3/Jul/08
So im a troll or just stupid?
Yes and yes.
LOL!
Poor Ola...lol..;)
Alex2 says on 10/Jul/08
LV says on 6/Jul/08
Ola says on 3/Jul/08
Ola says on 3/Jul/08
So im a troll or just stupid?
Yes and yes.
LOL!
Poor Ola...lol..;)
Anonymous said on 13/Jul/08
I would like to see a few pics from that, or the vid, on Jericho, however, that should be on his page if he has one.
back to the main subject, Nash's close friend, Scott Hall, is obviously going to exaggerate as much as possible for Kevin.
When Nash first go into wrestling, back when JR was still working for WCW (and we know he would not call Nash shorter than he really is) Nash was anounced at 6'10" and "over 300" pounds. I don't believe Nash to have ever been 6'11" barefoot. Maybe 6'10" and change at his peak, but not quite 6'11".
I would like to see a few pics from that, or the vid, on Jericho, however, that should be on his page if he has one.
back to the main subject, Nash's close friend, Scott Hall, is obviously going to exaggerate as much as possible for Kevin.
When Nash first go into wrestling, back when JR was still working for WCW (and we know he would not call Nash shorter than he really is) Nash was anounced at 6'10" and "over 300" pounds. I don't believe Nash to have ever been 6'11" barefoot. Maybe 6'10" and change at his peak, but not quite 6'11".
Alex2 said on 13/Jul/08
5'8" is rediculous for Jericho.
5'8" is rediculous for Jericho.
Vegas said on 13/Jul/08
at the recent ric flair tribute on raw jericho was standing next to ricky steamboat and jericho was taller and most pin steamboat at a legit 5'10 barefoot, i for one founding that interesting...
at the recent ric flair tribute on raw jericho was standing next to ricky steamboat and jericho was taller and most pin steamboat at a legit 5'10 barefoot, i for one founding that interesting...
Supermanfan380 said on 12/Jul/08
Gazz,
That is because Hall is promoting Nash.
Nash has said himself, that he is 6'10". These days he may be more like 6'9".
Hall saying that Nash is 6'11 3/4th" in socks is just him trying to put over Nash as a 7footer, or close enough to call "7 foot".
Other wrestlers will do this for each other too. When they refer to a buddy, if he is in the same room, or half the planet away, they must always exaggerate on their friends behalf. Not just in height and weight but accomplishments too. It is a form a wrestler etiquette. Just ask Paul Wight (BigShow) if Kevin Nash is really 7ft, and he will tell you
Gazz,
That is because Hall is promoting Nash.
Nash has said himself, that he is 6'10". These days he may be more like 6'9".
Hall saying that Nash is 6'11 3/4th" in socks is just him trying to put over Nash as a 7footer, or close enough to call "7 foot".
Other wrestlers will do this for each other too. When they refer to a buddy, if he is in the same room, or half the planet away, they must always exaggerate on their friends behalf. Not just in height and weight but accomplishments too. It is a form a wrestler etiquette. Just ask Paul Wight (BigShow) if Kevin Nash is really 7ft, and he will tell you
gazz said on 12/Jul/08
I saw a rf shoot video with nash and hall 2 nights ago it must of been very recent within the last year, anyway hall said within it 'nash is 6 foot 11 3/4 with his socks on' later in the interview he kept refering to him as 7 foot. make of it what you will
I saw a rf shoot video with nash and hall 2 nights ago it must of been very recent within the last year, anyway hall said within it 'nash is 6 foot 11 3/4 with his socks on' later in the interview he kept refering to him as 7 foot. make of it what you will
Alex2 said on 10/Jul/08
LV says on 6/Jul/08
Ola says on 3/Jul/08
Ola says on 3/Jul/08
So im a troll or just stupid?
Yes and yes.
LOL!
LV says on 6/Jul/08
Ola says on 3/Jul/08
Ola says on 3/Jul/08
So im a troll or just stupid?
Yes and yes.
LOL!
Alex2 said on 10/Jul/08
I would love to see a Nash and Undertaker staredown today.
I would love to see a Nash and Undertaker staredown today.
Rocky said on 8/Jul/08
I saw nash here years ago when he was diseal, He looked to be 6ft10, now he probably is 6'9 cause of knees surgery and etc. I saw him pretty close, where they where coming into the arena He's tall not huge like Kane was. Kane is diff story
I saw nash here years ago when he was diseal, He looked to be 6ft10, now he probably is 6'9 cause of knees surgery and etc. I saw him pretty close, where they where coming into the arena He's tall not huge like Kane was. Kane is diff story
NashOwnsAll said on 7/Jul/08
That is a well balanced comparison supermanfan, well done.
estimates are reasonable too.
That is a well balanced comparison supermanfan, well done.
estimates are reasonable too.
Supermanfan380 said on 6/Jul/08
Ola, I will give you credit that UT is closer in height to Nash than previously thought, however, that being said, it is not because Nash at his peak was shorter than claimed, only that UT may have been taller than estimated before.
I would say it is around 1"-2" difference. could be 1.5".
The WM match they almost never were at a level difference from the camera to tell and the angles were not good either, as the ring is tilted just as much as the cameras. Nash also appears so much taller than UT because his hair has a lot more volume, and Nash had a thicker build with wider shoulders too. That and we really do not know if either of their footwear is adding an inch. Many boots just have a.75
Ola, I will give you credit that UT is closer in height to Nash than previously thought, however, that being said, it is not because Nash at his peak was shorter than claimed, only that UT may have been taller than estimated before.
I would say it is around 1"-2" difference. could be 1.5".
The WM match they almost never were at a level difference from the camera to tell and the angles were not good either, as the ring is tilted just as much as the cameras. Nash also appears so much taller than UT because his hair has a lot more volume, and Nash had a thicker build with wider shoulders too. That and we really do not know if either of their footwear is adding an inch. Many boots just have a.75
LV said on 6/Jul/08
Ola says on 3/Jul/08
Ola says on 3/Jul/08
So im a troll or just stupid?
Yes and yes.
Ola says on 3/Jul/08
Ola says on 3/Jul/08
So im a troll or just stupid?
Yes and yes.
Frank said on 2/Jul/08
Well Mr E Andre was taller than Tyler Mane by about 2 inches late in Andres Career when he was all broken down and Nash looked alittle taller than Mane so i would say Andre would have been Taller than Nash not by much but still Taller
Well Mr E Andre was taller than Tyler Mane by about 2 inches late in Andres Career when he was all broken down and Nash looked alittle taller than Mane so i would say Andre would have been Taller than Nash not by much but still Taller
Mr. E said on 1/Jul/08
I think it's closer to about two inches, but I digress. Plus, Taker has an unsually long forehead. Taker's eye level comparisons with others leave him looking shorter than he really is. Check some of his pics with Sid. Sid's shoulders and eyes are always much higher. The same can be said about the staredown pic with Taker and Brock Lesnar. Taker didn't have a lot on him until that head just continued to go on and on. I think Taker is one of the more unusl one's because he doesn't look like a 6-8 guy unless he's standing next to someone that challenges his height. He really come across as a 6-6 guy. Someone once mention that Taker never stands tfully tall unless he has to. I think to a degree the same can be said for Nash. Although I think he's lost a bit, I still think he's 6-9 and some change. I know it's tough with apples to oranges, but I've seen it done on the Andre/Big Show page. How does Nash match up with Andre? Does anyone have that?
I think it's closer to about two inches, but I digress. Plus, Taker has an unsually long forehead. Taker's eye level comparisons with others leave him looking shorter than he really is. Check some of his pics with Sid. Sid's shoulders and eyes are always much higher. The same can be said about the staredown pic with Taker and Brock Lesnar. Taker didn't have a lot on him until that head just continued to go on and on. I think Taker is one of the more unusl one's because he doesn't look like a 6-8 guy unless he's standing next to someone that challenges his height. He really come across as a 6-6 guy. Someone once mention that Taker never stands tfully tall unless he has to. I think to a degree the same can be said for Nash. Although I think he's lost a bit, I still think he's 6-9 and some change. I know it's tough with apples to oranges, but I've seen it done on the Andre/Big Show page. How does Nash match up with Andre? Does anyone have that?
Dave said on 1/Jul/08
kevin nash is comfortably taller than taker, by anything up to 2 inches, without any trouble whatsoever....... there is countless pics, matches and footage to suggest anything up to a 2 inch difference... and besides the odd biased, innaccurate and circumstantial pic theres NO evidence to suggest that taker is close to nash's height, the very least is one inch.... but anyone who has watched them wrestle or met them will know there is a bigger difference than that...... besides, i am a solid 2 inches taller than a friend of mine, but there are many pics of us in countless drunken nights and joking around where he looks the same height and if not even taller at times! pics mean nothing.
kevin nash is comfortably taller than taker, by anything up to 2 inches, without any trouble whatsoever....... there is countless pics, matches and footage to suggest anything up to a 2 inch difference... and besides the odd biased, innaccurate and circumstantial pic theres NO evidence to suggest that taker is close to nash's height, the very least is one inch.... but anyone who has watched them wrestle or met them will know there is a bigger difference than that...... besides, i am a solid 2 inches taller than a friend of mine, but there are many pics of us in countless drunken nights and joking around where he looks the same height and if not even taller at times! pics mean nothing.
Eric said on 1/Jul/08
Kevin Nash is definitely taller than Mark Calaway aka The Undertaker by about 2 inches.In 1996 they had a stare down whilst being interviewed in the locker room and taker had to look up into Kevin's eyes.Taker is 6' 8" so I'd say Kevin Nash is 6' 10"
Kevin Nash is definitely taller than Mark Calaway aka The Undertaker by about 2 inches.In 1996 they had a stare down whilst being interviewed in the locker room and taker had to look up into Kevin's eyes.Taker is 6' 8" so I'd say Kevin Nash is 6' 10"
NashOwnsAll said on 1/Jul/08
If people watch that video again, the camera swings closer to Nash for a second, Nash clearly looks taller, but then when the camera swings closer to Undertaker, he looks taller than Nash.
It's people like Red and LV who keep look at the point where the camera is closer to Nash where he appears over 2 inches taller.
The best frame capture is the one I posted the other day where the camera is even between the 2, the gap is around 1 inch considering Nash/Diesel's *big* hair :) while taker's hair is flat
Take a look at the size of undertaker's eye, most human eyes that are normally open (not strained as if you seen a ghost open) is 1/2 - 3/4 of an inch in height, so lets just say for arguments sake taker's eye is 3/4 inch in size, so compare it to the gap in height and you'll see only an inch in height difference.
If people watch that video again, the camera swings closer to Nash for a second, Nash clearly looks taller, but then when the camera swings closer to Undertaker, he looks taller than Nash.
It's people like Red and LV who keep look at the point where the camera is closer to Nash where he appears over 2 inches taller.
The best frame capture is the one I posted the other day where the camera is even between the 2, the gap is around 1 inch considering Nash/Diesel's *big* hair :) while taker's hair is flat
Take a look at the size of undertaker's eye, most human eyes that are normally open (not strained as if you seen a ghost open) is 1/2 - 3/4 of an inch in height, so lets just say for arguments sake taker's eye is 3/4 inch in size, so compare it to the gap in height and you'll see only an inch in height difference.
Alex2 said on 1/Jul/08
Ola NOBODY likes you! Your posts make me cry there so funny and wrong! How tall are you? 4'6"!?!
Ola NOBODY likes you! Your posts make me cry there so funny and wrong! How tall are you? 4'6"!?!
tuga said on 1/Jul/08
Vegas is right about the low camera angle BUT THIS IS NOT THE CASE WITH THIS VIDEO!
You have there Paul bearer, tell me where does he look closer in height to taker or nash?? If anything he even looks shorter...
Common, why do you want to see a bigger difference than it is in reality?
Vegas is right about the low camera angle BUT THIS IS NOT THE CASE WITH THIS VIDEO!
You have there Paul bearer, tell me where does he look closer in height to taker or nash?? If anything he even looks shorter...
Common, why do you want to see a bigger difference than it is in reality?
Atoadaso said on 30/Jun/08
Lower angles bring things closer together in height.
Lower angles bring things closer together in height.
LV said on 30/Jun/08
Ola says on 30/Jun/08
Red no you're stupid! a low camera angle will give the advantage to the TALLER one... i still say 1 inches between them. why? becouse undertaker probarly had very low shoes but i think everyone can live with a 1 1/2 inches difference, they can also live with only 1
You make no sense. Stop posting here.
Ola says on 30/Jun/08
Red no you're stupid! a low camera angle will give the advantage to the TALLER one... i still say 1 inches between them. why? becouse undertaker probarly had very low shoes but i think everyone can live with a 1 1/2 inches difference, they can also live with only 1
You make no sense. Stop posting here.
Vegas said on 30/Jun/08
low camera angle will give advantage to shorter person
Click Here
low angle Click Here
low camera angle will give advantage to shorter person
Click Here
low angle Click Here
tuga said on 30/Jun/08
LV says on 29/Jun/08
Why does everyone that wants to discredit a picture always say that a particular individual was closer to the camera? I don't think Nash is any closer to the camera in those pictures than UT.
He
LV says on 29/Jun/08
Why does everyone that wants to discredit a picture always say that a particular individual was closer to the camera? I don't think Nash is any closer to the camera in those pictures than UT.
He
NashOwnsAll said on 30/Jun/08
I think some of you have problems with perceiving the size on an inch or simply just trolling.
Everybody knows deep down that they are very close in height, 1 to 1.5 inch, thats it. If people had a really good grasp of how much an inch actually is in a picture there wouldnt be this much of a disagreement.
I think some of you have problems with perceiving the size on an inch or simply just trolling.
Everybody knows deep down that they are very close in height, 1 to 1.5 inch, thats it. If people had a really good grasp of how much an inch actually is in a picture there wouldnt be this much of a disagreement.
LV said on 29/Jun/08
Why does everyone that wants to discredit a picture always say that a particular individual was closer to the camera? I don't think Nash is any closer to the camera in those pictures than UT.
Why does everyone that wants to discredit a picture always say that a particular individual was closer to the camera? I don't think Nash is any closer to the camera in those pictures than UT.
Frank said on 29/Jun/08
I would say there might be about 1.5 difference at best like i was saying for 2 years now i have that on VHS AND looked @ it many times ...When Taker stands really straight he narrows the difference
I would say there might be about 1.5 difference at best like i was saying for 2 years now i have that on VHS AND looked @ it many times ...When Taker stands really straight he narrows the difference
tuga said on 29/Jun/08
Some say 1 inch others 2 inches, I
Some say 1 inch others 2 inches, I
Red said on 28/Jun/08
NashOwnsAll look at the camera position in your pic - much lower than in my pic and that
NashOwnsAll look at the camera position in your pic - much lower than in my pic and that
tuga said on 28/Jun/08
LV says on 27/Jun/08
Good find Red (Click Here). Clearly two inches Ola, not just one.
LV, nash is closer to camera, look at NashOwnsAll pic, there
LV says on 27/Jun/08
Good find Red (Click Here). Clearly two inches Ola, not just one.
LV, nash is closer to camera, look at NashOwnsAll pic, there
NashOwnsAll said on 27/Jun/08
Here is the staredown pic between Diesel and Undertaker, looks like 1 - 1.5 inches to me.
Click Here
Refer to the size of undertaker's eyes, if you think the gap is 2.5 or 3 inches then his eyes must be 1.5 - 2 inches! LOL
Here is the staredown pic between Diesel and Undertaker, looks like 1 - 1.5 inches to me.
Click Here
Refer to the size of undertaker's eyes, if you think the gap is 2.5 or 3 inches then his eyes must be 1.5 - 2 inches! LOL
Red said on 27/Jun/08
LV look down this page at red 22/Jun/08
LV look down this page at red 22/Jun/08
Red said on 27/Jun/08
I say
Nash 6
I say
Nash 6
tuga said on 27/Jun/08
Im anonymous below...
Im anonymous below...
Anonymous said on 27/Jun/08
I agree 1 inch is to low, Red, I can
I agree 1 inch is to low, Red, I can
LV said on 26/Jun/08
Someone please post the close-up stills of Nash and the Undertaker which clearly shows Nash 2"+ taller! Ola's stupid claims are driving everyone crazy again.
Someone please post the close-up stills of Nash and the Undertaker which clearly shows Nash 2"+ taller! Ola's stupid claims are driving everyone crazy again.
Red said on 26/Jun/08
Nash is not even standing straight in your pic Ola - I
Nash is not even standing straight in your pic Ola - I
Red said on 24/Jun/08
The camera angla was much lower in the pic you mean. For the vid I
The camera angla was much lower in the pic you mean. For the vid I
Frank said on 24/Jun/08
I have that Taker, Nash staredown and when Taker stands up straight there is about an 1.5 difference Nash looks alot taller in the begining and at the end taker stands very straight and there is a small difference between them
I have that Taker, Nash staredown and when Taker stands up straight there is about an 1.5 difference Nash looks alot taller in the begining and at the end taker stands very straight and there is a small difference between them
tuga said on 23/Jun/08
Red, if you have the video post it, in that its clear no way even 2 inches, last time you posted it someone also took a pic out of it and the difference was much smaller than your photo...
Red, if you have the video post it, in that its clear no way even 2 inches, last time you posted it someone also took a pic out of it and the difference was much smaller than your photo...
Red said on 23/Jun/08
from this distance - there
from this distance - there
tuga said on 23/Jun/08
Red says on 22/Jun/08
Click Here lol Ola thats the biggest inch I
Red says on 22/Jun/08
Click Here lol Ola thats the biggest inch I
Big Show said on 22/Jun/08
Click Here
I'm not sure if there has ever been posted a good comparison between Nash and Sid Vicious, but here's a good one. From 3:58 and onwards there's a good staredown between them and Nash looks to be 2 inches taller. The video is from 1995.
Click Here
I'm not sure if there has ever been posted a good comparison between Nash and Sid Vicious, but here's a good one. From 3:58 and onwards there's a good staredown between them and Nash looks to be 2 inches taller. The video is from 1995.
Mamun said on 18/Jun/08
This picture was taken march of 2004 .
Regards
mamun
This picture was taken march of 2004 .
Regards
mamun
Alex2 said on 11/Jun/08
Danimal, I just find it funny how Flair's police file listed as 6'1" humm. You think he could have been 6'0" peak?
Danimal, I just find it funny how Flair's police file listed as 6'1" humm. You think he could have been 6'0" peak?
Alex said on 7/Jun/08
Danimal, I'd still love to see a peak Hogan face off with some of these wrestlers today. Guys like Big Show, Khali, Kane. Sure he'd be much shorter still but not like it would be today.
Danimal, I'd still love to see a peak Hogan face off with some of these wrestlers today. Guys like Big Show, Khali, Kane. Sure he'd be much shorter still but not like it would be today.
Steve said on 6/Jun/08
COMPARING TO MAMUN NASH IS ABSOLUTELY WITHOUT A DOUBT TALLER THAN MANE.
COMPARING TO MAMUN NASH IS ABSOLUTELY WITHOUT A DOUBT TALLER THAN MANE.
Alex2 said on 6/Jun/08
Ola, just cause a wrestler is "Billed" to a height, it doesnt always mean he aint that height, for example look at Mark Henry and Randy Orton, both are billed to their exact real height and if anything are a little taller!
Ola, just cause a wrestler is "Billed" to a height, it doesnt always mean he aint that height, for example look at Mark Henry and Randy Orton, both are billed to their exact real height and if anything are a little taller!
Danimal said on 6/Jun/08
Kiat says on 6/Jun/08
If Flair is only 5'11", how could Hogan be 6'6"? I don't see a 7 inch difference between them. 5 inches or so.
Hogan hasn't been 6'6" since the 1980's. Show me comparsions of them from the 1980's. Flair ALWAYS wore high heeled designer shoes to his interviews. He was very vain. I'm sure he hit 6'1" with the shoes.
Kiat says on 6/Jun/08
If Flair is only 5'11", how could Hogan be 6'6"? I don't see a 7 inch difference between them. 5 inches or so.
Hogan hasn't been 6'6" since the 1980's. Show me comparsions of them from the 1980's. Flair ALWAYS wore high heeled designer shoes to his interviews. He was very vain. I'm sure he hit 6'1" with the shoes.
Supermanfan380 said on 6/Jun/08
flair could be 5'11", and that would still put Nash at 6'10" peak. flair always looked shorter than 6ft, even if the other wrestlers were really as big as claimed. Size was never flairs gimmick.
flair could be 5'11", and that would still put Nash at 6'10" peak. flair always looked shorter than 6ft, even if the other wrestlers were really as big as claimed. Size was never flairs gimmick.
Vegas said on 6/Jun/08
yet flair was booked at 6'1 Click Here
when WWE.com listed Big show at 399lb you didn't believe that
WWE.com lists jessa ventura at 6'2, you still say 6'4
where is the proof that just because someone is listed at a certain weight and height on wwe.com they cannot be above that, what makes WWE.com so right?? michael cole was listed at 5'7 on there and he was 5-6 inches minimum taller than mysterio in the ring. mike tenay was listed at 5'8 on tnas website, yet he stood 1 inch taller than a measured 5'9.5" nfl star in the middle of the ring
yet flair was booked at 6'1 Click Here
when WWE.com listed Big show at 399lb you didn't believe that
WWE.com lists jessa ventura at 6'2, you still say 6'4
where is the proof that just because someone is listed at a certain weight and height on wwe.com they cannot be above that, what makes WWE.com so right?? michael cole was listed at 5'7 on there and he was 5-6 inches minimum taller than mysterio in the ring. mike tenay was listed at 5'8 on tnas website, yet he stood 1 inch taller than a measured 5'9.5" nfl star in the middle of the ring
Kiat said on 6/Jun/08
If Flair is only 5'11", how could Hogan be 6'6"? I don't see a 7 inch difference between them. 5 inches or so.
If Flair is only 5'11", how could Hogan be 6'6"? I don't see a 7 inch difference between them. 5 inches or so.
Danimal said on 5/Jun/08
Clay says on 4/Jun/08
Flair is peak 6'0'' and 5'11'' today. Get it right.
Get it right? I bet your a little insecure man in real life. FLAIR was billed at 5'11" and 220 pounds upon his return to the WWF in 2001-2002 ON THEIR WEBSITE. FACT. He WAS never over 5'11".
Clay says on 4/Jun/08
Flair is peak 6'0'' and 5'11'' today. Get it right.
Get it right? I bet your a little insecure man in real life. FLAIR was billed at 5'11" and 220 pounds upon his return to the WWF in 2001-2002 ON THEIR WEBSITE. FACT. He WAS never over 5'11".
Alex said on 5/Jun/08
Clay I could buy that. 6'0 peak but today 5'10.5, maybe 5'11.
Clay I could buy that. 6'0 peak but today 5'10.5, maybe 5'11.
Clay said on 4/Jun/08
Flair is peak 6'0'' and 5'11'' today. Get it right.
Flair is peak 6'0'' and 5'11'' today. Get it right.
anonymous said on 4/Jun/08
flair is around 6,1" sting another 2 inches taller a good 6,3".
flair is around 6,1" sting another 2 inches taller a good 6,3".
Alex said on 4/Jun/08
Hogan looked 6'4-6'4.5 around 2000 and 6'3 in 2002. He was no more than 1/2 inch tops taller than The Rock.
Hogan looked 6'4-6'4.5 around 2000 and 6'3 in 2002. He was no more than 1/2 inch tops taller than The Rock.
Danimal said on 3/Jun/08
supes78 says on 2/Jun/08
Yeah, if Magic is 6'7", then Nash looks a good 6'10" tall. That photo was taken in the early mid 90s in a casual setting, outside of any wrestling venues.
Which also puts Scott Hall at 6'5" and we know that Hogan was the same height as Nash from 1996-2000, which leads me to believe that Hogan was around 6'5" up until 2000 and taller pre-1990. Come 2002, we saw a pigmea Hogan come back to the WWF :(.
supes78 says on 2/Jun/08
Yeah, if Magic is 6'7", then Nash looks a good 6'10" tall. That photo was taken in the early mid 90s in a casual setting, outside of any wrestling venues.
Which also puts Scott Hall at 6'5" and we know that Hogan was the same height as Nash from 1996-2000, which leads me to believe that Hogan was around 6'5" up until 2000 and taller pre-1990. Come 2002, we saw a pigmea Hogan come back to the WWF :(.
MK said on 3/Jun/08
Clay says on 3/Jun/08
I see a slouching Nash, and I see more than a foot over Manum. He is in his 40's - Alex2 is right he has probably lost half an inch as well.
More like a full 1'' imo, if he was a full 6'10'' peak then it could be as much as 1.5''
Clay says on 3/Jun/08
I see a slouching Nash, and I see more than a foot over Manum. He is in his 40's - Alex2 is right he has probably lost half an inch as well.
More like a full 1'' imo, if he was a full 6'10'' peak then it could be as much as 1.5''
Clay said on 3/Jun/08
I see a slouching Nash, and I see more than a foot over Manum. He is in his 40's - Alex2 is right he has probably lost half an inch as well.
I see a slouching Nash, and I see more than a foot over Manum. He is in his 40's - Alex2 is right he has probably lost half an inch as well.
JT said on 3/Jun/08
Ola says on 2/Jun/08
cantstop25, sting was 2 inches taller than bret hart and ric flair what part of that do you still not understand?....
Who doesn't understand??
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Here
Ola says on 2/Jun/08
cantstop25, sting was 2 inches taller than bret hart and ric flair what part of that do you still not understand?....
Who doesn't understand??
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Here
supes78 said on 2/Jun/08
Yeah, if Magic is 6'7", then Nash looks a good 6'10" tall. That photo was taken in the early mid 90s in a casual setting, outside of any wrestling venues.
Yeah, if Magic is 6'7", then Nash looks a good 6'10" tall. That photo was taken in the early mid 90s in a casual setting, outside of any wrestling venues.
Alex2 said on 2/Jun/08
Ola sometimes you can say some good things, but annoting untrue statements like below really p*****s me off and others, Nash was easuily 6'10", he had 2" on Taker, and just look at him with Kurt Angle (even today) he has around 1 foot on him, not like you watch TNA...
Ola sometimes you can say some good things, but annoting untrue statements like below really p*****s me off and others, Nash was easuily 6'10", he had 2" on Taker, and just look at him with Kurt Angle (even today) he has around 1 foot on him, not like you watch TNA...
Danimal said on 2/Jun/08
Supermanfan380 says on 2/Jun/08
Trying to compare Nash to guys like Sting is absurd. There is too much difference to tell peg Nash accurately within 0.5" of his actual height at the time.
I would say one should try to compare to guys of similar stature with known heights. Guys like Sid, UT, Kane, BigShow etc
Supermanfan380 says on 2/Jun/08
Trying to compare Nash to guys like Sting is absurd. There is too much difference to tell peg Nash accurately within 0.5" of his actual height at the time.
I would say one should try to compare to guys of similar stature with known heights. Guys like Sid, UT, Kane, BigShow etc
Supermanfan380 said on 2/Jun/08
Trying to compare Nash to guys like Sting is absurd. There is too much difference to tell peg Nash accurately within 0.5" of his actual height at the time.
I would say one should try to compare to guys of similar stature with known heights. Guys like Sid, UT, Kane, BigShow etc
Trying to compare Nash to guys like Sting is absurd. There is too much difference to tell peg Nash accurately within 0.5" of his actual height at the time.
I would say one should try to compare to guys of similar stature with known heights. Guys like Sid, UT, Kane, BigShow etc
LV said on 1/Jun/08
JT says on 31/May/08
Viper says on 30/May/08
The 6-7 1/2 NBA guy looks taller in comparison to Nash.
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here This should put Nash at 6
JT says on 31/May/08
Viper says on 30/May/08
The 6-7 1/2 NBA guy looks taller in comparison to Nash.
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here This should put Nash at 6
LV said on 1/Jun/08
supes78 says on 31/May/08
Here's Magic Johnson with legitimate 6'5" Razor Ramone and Nash:
Click Here
So just exactly how tall is Magic because Nash seems to have a good 3 inches on him.
He is 6'7". I'll never understand why he was listed at 6'9" since Larry Bird was clearly 2" taller throughout their careers.
supes78 says on 31/May/08
Here's Magic Johnson with legitimate 6'5" Razor Ramone and Nash:
Click Here
So just exactly how tall is Magic because Nash seems to have a good 3 inches on him.
He is 6'7". I'll never understand why he was listed at 6'9" since Larry Bird was clearly 2" taller throughout their careers.
tuga said on 1/Jun/08
Good comparison JT, like I tought, Nash even with a relaxed posture and tilting his head is still CLEARLY TALLER.
Even 6'9 for his current height may be to low.
Great find supes78, I mentioned that photo before but could not find it, thats yet again another proof that anything under 6'10 peak for nash is ridiculous, he could even be a little above that.
Good comparison JT, like I tought, Nash even with a relaxed posture and tilting his head is still CLEARLY TALLER.
Even 6'9 for his current height may be to low.
Great find supes78, I mentioned that photo before but could not find it, thats yet again another proof that anything under 6'10 peak for nash is ridiculous, he could even be a little above that.
Steve said on 1/Jun/08
Picture with 6'7"1/2 tall NBA player is confusing,even if Nash would be leaned it would give him hardly half of an inch difference,and he appears to be 6'9" in nowadays.
Picture with 6'7"1/2 tall NBA player is confusing,even if Nash would be leaned it would give him hardly half of an inch difference,and he appears to be 6'9" in nowadays.
supes78 said on 31/May/08
Here's Magic Johnson with legitimate 6'5" Razor Ramone and Nash:
Click Here
So just exactly how tall is Magic because Nash seems to have a good 3 inches on him.
Here's Magic Johnson with legitimate 6'5" Razor Ramone and Nash:
Click Here
So just exactly how tall is Magic because Nash seems to have a good 3 inches on him.
cantstop25 said on 31/May/08
cmon ola sting aint 6'1", its just common sense just because he appears that tall on occasions doesnt make him that height, he can appear 6'4" at times as well. hes a strogn 6'2" no doubt about it
cmon ola sting aint 6'1", its just common sense just because he appears that tall on occasions doesnt make him that height, he can appear 6'4" at times as well. hes a strogn 6'2" no doubt about it
JT said on 31/May/08
Viper says on 30/May/08
The 6-7 1/2 NBA guy looks taller in comparison to Nash.
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here This should put Nash at 6
Viper says on 30/May/08
The 6-7 1/2 NBA guy looks taller in comparison to Nash.
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here This should put Nash at 6
Danimal said on 30/May/08
Viper says on 30/May/08
The 6-7 1/2 NBA guy looks taller in comparison to Nash.
Nash is not standing straight.
Viper says on 30/May/08
The 6-7 1/2 NBA guy looks taller in comparison to Nash.
Nash is not standing straight.
Alex said on 30/May/08
This guy does appear to be 6'0 compared to Kurt Angle.
This guy does appear to be 6'0 compared to Kurt Angle.
Viper said on 30/May/08
The 6-7 1/2 NBA guy looks taller in comparison to Nash.
The 6-7 1/2 NBA guy looks taller in comparison to Nash.
JT said on 28/May/08
tuga says on 27/May/08
Hope this helps estimating nash
tuga says on 27/May/08
Hope this helps estimating nash
anonymous said on 27/May/08
nash 6,10" (billed at 7,0")undertaker 6,8"(billed at 6,10")big show 7,0"(billed at 7,4")
nash 6,10" (billed at 7,0")undertaker 6,8"(billed at 6,10")big show 7,0"(billed at 7,4")
Alex2 said on 27/May/08
I think Kevin Nash at peak could well have been 6'10.5" but now is 6'9", Rob you really need to make a peak and current height :) No way was he only 6'9" peak......
I think Kevin Nash at peak could well have been 6'10.5" but now is 6'9", Rob you really need to make a peak and current height :) No way was he only 6'9" peak......
tuga said on 27/May/08
Hope this helps estimating nash
Hope this helps estimating nash
Alex said on 27/May/08
That picture with Greg isn't a good picture. No way can Greg really be 6'0 1/2. I would say he is more 5'11.
That picture with Greg isn't a good picture. No way can Greg really be 6'0 1/2. I would say he is more 5'11.
mike said on 27/May/08
oh maybe 8 ,ok
oh maybe 8 ,ok
JT said on 25/May/08
mike says on 24/May/08
a good 6-7 inch difference in height there jt between sting and nash.
Sting barely comes up to Nash's mouth. That's about an 8 inch gap.
mike says on 24/May/08
a good 6-7 inch difference in height there jt between sting and nash.
Sting barely comes up to Nash's mouth. That's about an 8 inch gap.
mike said on 24/May/08
steve borden aka(sting) hios bio says he,s 6,3".
steve borden aka(sting) hios bio says he,s 6,3".
mike said on 24/May/08
a good 6-7 inch difference in height there jt between sting and nash.
a good 6-7 inch difference in height there jt between sting and nash.
marotte said on 23/May/08
I don't think he's ever been 6-7 cause he is not over 6-4 today and loosing 3 inches .......... I don't think so
I don't think he's ever been 6-7 cause he is not over 6-4 today and loosing 3 inches .......... I don't think so
ImRight said on 23/May/08
He's 6'10.5". Not a hair shorter. I'm right.
He's 6'10.5". Not a hair shorter. I'm right.
Clay said on 23/May/08
And next to the gigantic 7'0'' Andre the Giant, Viper.
And next to the gigantic 7'0'' Andre the Giant, Viper.
Viper said on 22/May/08
Hogan only looks 6-7 with a suppossed 6-0 1/2 Greg on here.
Hogan only looks 6-7 with a suppossed 6-0 1/2 Greg on here.
mike said on 22/May/08
nash of the outsiders 6,10", scott hall 6,5".
nash of the outsiders 6,10", scott hall 6,5".
mike said on 21/May/08
hogan may have been as much as 6,7" tops.
hogan may have been as much as 6,7" tops.
Danimal said on 20/May/08
JT says on 20/May/08
Nash still looks really tall in your pics Vegas. I think Rhino
JT says on 20/May/08
Nash still looks really tall in your pics Vegas. I think Rhino
Danimal said on 20/May/08
Luger was 6'3". This was his football listing, which was established on this site a while ago.
Luger was 6'3". This was his football listing, which was established on this site a while ago.
Jason said on 20/May/08
Could be anything from 5-6'' in that pic. Nash has a relatively small forehead, but a long head from the brow, down.
Could be anything from 5-6'' in that pic. Nash has a relatively small forehead, but a long head from the brow, down.
mike said on 20/May/08
nash has a good 6 inches on luger who i believe is around 6,4". so nash in that pic is easily 6,10".
nash has a good 6 inches on luger who i believe is around 6,4". so nash in that pic is easily 6,10".
Viper said on 20/May/08
How would Charles Barkley look next to Kevin Nash Vegas.
How would Charles Barkley look next to Kevin Nash Vegas.
Steve said on 20/May/08
He cannot be less than 6'9"(206cm) in nowadays.6'10(208cm) peak height.
He cannot be less than 6'9"(206cm) in nowadays.6'10(208cm) peak height.
JT said on 20/May/08
Nash still looks really tall in your pics Vegas. I think Rhino
Nash still looks really tall in your pics Vegas. I think Rhino
Vegas said on 19/May/08
i have never really paid too much attention to stings weight to be honest, he made his comeback to tna on the very first live impact which i was at and wrestled on the next two shows which i also attended. he is in great shape, jumping around and looking as fresh as ever
i have never really paid too much attention to stings weight to be honest, he made his comeback to tna on the very first live impact which i was at and wrestled on the next two shows which i also attended. he is in great shape, jumping around and looking as fresh as ever
Alex said on 19/May/08
When I first saw Nash come onto the stage back in late 2006 at the autograph session I swear he at first gave me a 6'7 impression but then I looked at him and he looked between 6'8 and 6'9. He was on a stage and I was 15-20 feet away so it wasn't the most accurate range to judge his height.
When I first saw Nash come onto the stage back in late 2006 at the autograph session I swear he at first gave me a 6'7 impression but then I looked at him and he looked between 6'8 and 6'9. He was on a stage and I was 15-20 feet away so it wasn't the most accurate range to judge his height.
Vegas said on 19/May/08
Click Here a 6'8 nash would be bad news for a lot of nba players like the number 40 to his left there howard wood who the nba said was 6'7 Click Here reggie johnson to his right number 32 was listed at 6'9 and is a good inch shorter Click Here
Click Here a 6'8 nash would be bad news for a lot of nba players like the number 40 to his left there howard wood who the nba said was 6'7 Click Here reggie johnson to his right number 32 was listed at 6'9 and is a good inch shorter Click Here
Alex2 said on 17/May/08
I think its safe to say Nash was good 6'10" peak.
I think its safe to say Nash was good 6'10" peak.
Mattiew_- said on 16/May/08
6'10.5-6'11" peak sounds legit to me ...
6'9 to 6'9.5 nowadays ...
6'10.5-6'11" peak sounds legit to me ...
6'9 to 6'9.5 nowadays ...
Dave said on 14/May/08
alex i agree..... in the new nwo wwe times there was less of a difference between the two
alex i agree..... in the new nwo wwe times there was less of a difference between the two
Alex said on 14/May/08
Sometimes I saw a 2 inch difference between Nash and Big Show, this was in 2002.
Sometimes I saw a 2 inch difference between Nash and Big Show, this was in 2002.
Dave said on 14/May/08
@ tom.... on a uk tv show called 'live and kicking' on a saturday morning, he was on the show and talking about wresting, not taking it seriously at all and almost breaking the rule of saying wrestling is fake.... and he corrected, the man said something like 'so, you ate 7 feet tall then!' or something.... and he said, nah nah, wcw only say that, im actually around 6'10...... so after this honesty, why would he lie??
@ tom.... on a uk tv show called 'live and kicking' on a saturday morning, he was on the show and talking about wresting, not taking it seriously at all and almost breaking the rule of saying wrestling is fake.... and he corrected, the man said something like 'so, you ate 7 feet tall then!' or something.... and he said, nah nah, wcw only say that, im actually around 6'10...... so after this honesty, why would he lie??
Tom.. said on 14/May/08
Recall when he was an active wrestler in WCW, he was once interviewed on a talk show. They spoke about him being 7ft. He then corrected them saying "I'm actually between 6.10' and 6.11 - but don't tell WCW I told you that".
Recall when he was an active wrestler in WCW, he was once interviewed on a talk show. They spoke about him being 7ft. He then corrected them saying "I'm actually between 6.10' and 6.11 - but don't tell WCW I told you that".
Danimal said on 13/May/08
Well, Nash got a 6'10" listing in College and Big Show got a 7'1" listing. There WAS a 3" difference between them from 1996-2002. If these measurements were with shoes, Nash, could have been less than 6'9" and Big Show 7'0" respectively. Today, I give Nash at least 6'8" and Show not less than 6'11".
Well, Nash got a 6'10" listing in College and Big Show got a 7'1" listing. There WAS a 3" difference between them from 1996-2002. If these measurements were with shoes, Nash, could have been less than 6'9" and Big Show 7'0" respectively. Today, I give Nash at least 6'8" and Show not less than 6'11".
Dave said on 13/May/08
@ mike, its well known that nash does not wear huge footwar (like kane etc).... as his knees simply forbid it, for years nash has insisted that the flatter and down to earth the sole on his wrestling boots the better, and i have to say his boots always looked flat for a wrestling boot. And i think most if not all of us can agree that:
At peak height, 6'10 was CERTAINLY a possiblility..... (i myself personally believe a 6'10 peak is very true)
And nowadays after countless knee surgeries and worse posture he could be as low as 6'8.5.
I think even if nowadays nash was in the ring with wwe's taker and kane we would see a clearly taller man, by 2 inches in my opinion.
@ mike, its well known that nash does not wear huge footwar (like kane etc).... as his knees simply forbid it, for years nash has insisted that the flatter and down to earth the sole on his wrestling boots the better, and i have to say his boots always looked flat for a wrestling boot. And i think most if not all of us can agree that:
At peak height, 6'10 was CERTAINLY a possiblility..... (i myself personally believe a 6'10 peak is very true)
And nowadays after countless knee surgeries and worse posture he could be as low as 6'8.5.
I think even if nowadays nash was in the ring with wwe's taker and kane we would see a clearly taller man, by 2 inches in my opinion.
Supermanfan380 said on 12/May/08
I still have not been convinced that at Nash's peak he was anything short of 208 cm, or 6'10".
The 6'9" current listing I agree with, but there should be an added statement of {6'10" peak}.
I still have not been convinced that at Nash's peak he was anything short of 208 cm, or 6'10".
The 6'9" current listing I agree with, but there should be an added statement of {6'10" peak}.
miki said on 11/May/08
yeah Kevin Nash barefoot is 2.06 cm, is really tall. Undertaker & Kane are "only" 2.02-2.03 cm, Hogan 1.92 cm, Batista 1.90 cm .. is real barefoot, wwe ever exagerates heigth. Big Show is 2.13, Great Khali is 2.16 cm and Giant Gozalez was 2.29,
yeah Kevin Nash barefoot is 2.06 cm, is really tall. Undertaker & Kane are "only" 2.02-2.03 cm, Hogan 1.92 cm, Batista 1.90 cm .. is real barefoot, wwe ever exagerates heigth. Big Show is 2.13, Great Khali is 2.16 cm and Giant Gozalez was 2.29,
mike said on 11/May/08
hunched forward shaking mamuns hand there is about a 12 inch difference between the two.however if nash were to stand perfectly straight there would have to be a 14 inch difference placing nash at an even 6,10" bare minumum 6,9".
hunched forward shaking mamuns hand there is about a 12 inch difference between the two.however if nash were to stand perfectly straight there would have to be a 14 inch difference placing nash at an even 6,10" bare minumum 6,9".
mike said on 11/May/08
kevin nash had at least a foot or more over Kurt angle,kurt angle i believe is at least 5,10",but then again we have to take into account the footwear kevin was wearing.
kevin nash had at least a foot or more over Kurt angle,kurt angle i believe is at least 5,10",but then again we have to take into account the footwear kevin was wearing.
Alex2 said on 9/May/08
6'10-6'10.5" peak 6'8.5-6'9 today.
6'10-6'10.5" peak 6'8.5-6'9 today.
Alex said on 9/May/08
Nash was 6'10 at his peak I do strongly believe, he did look it. Far as today he could be as low as 6'8-6'8 1/2 but I'd push more toward 6'9 though. When I saw him in person I estimated 6'8 1/2.
Nash was 6'10 at his peak I do strongly believe, he did look it. Far as today he could be as low as 6'8-6'8 1/2 but I'd push more toward 6'9 though. When I saw him in person I estimated 6'8 1/2.
Dave said on 9/May/08
jesse D, thats a GREAT point, i nearly forgot about that!!!.... he was measured as 6'10 for both punisher for costume, and he was 6'10!
jesse D, thats a GREAT point, i nearly forgot about that!!!.... he was measured as 6'10 for both punisher for costume, and he was 6'10!
mike said on 9/May/08
domo nash has never been 7 foot tall,that is what he,s billed at. kevin nash has admitted himself to be only 6,10" on many occasions,even as deisel he was billed at 7 foot.
domo nash has never been 7 foot tall,that is what he,s billed at. kevin nash has admitted himself to be only 6,10" on many occasions,even as deisel he was billed at 7 foot.
JesseD said on 8/May/08
I remember on the "making of" feature of "The Punisher (2004)" that the costume designer said he was 6 foot 10.
I remember on the "making of" feature of "The Punisher (2004)" that the costume designer said he was 6 foot 10.
Domo said on 8/May/08
Kevin Nash, the wrestler from TNA is 7 foot tall
Kevin Nash, the wrestler from TNA is 7 foot tall
cantstop25 said on 8/May/08
dave the angle favors hoyt bigtime, morgan does tower over hoyt, you can also tell becasue morgan towers over cornette a lot more then hoyt does. nash and morgan are on a completely different level then hoyt and abyss when it comes to height
dave the angle favors hoyt bigtime, morgan does tower over hoyt, you can also tell becasue morgan towers over cornette a lot more then hoyt does. nash and morgan are on a completely different level then hoyt and abyss when it comes to height
Alex2 said on 7/May/08
I actually saw a recent impact where Matt Morgan didnt have to duck through a door, so that door must have been about 7'0" as id put Matt around 6'9"
I actually saw a recent impact where Matt Morgan didnt have to duck through a door, so that door must have been about 7'0" as id put Matt around 6'9"
mike said on 7/May/08
kevin nash has never appeared to me to be less than 6,10". if anything today he,s probably closer to 6,9" minumum.
kevin nash has never appeared to me to be less than 6,10". if anything today he,s probably closer to 6,9" minumum.
Dave said on 2/May/08
firstly i dont think matt morgan towers hoyt... alot of that is angles... and not just that. Abyss is 6'5 min. And doors everywhere are different heights!, i know of many dorrs that are about 6'!!!!!!!!!! then upwards to 6'10!
firstly i dont think matt morgan towers hoyt... alot of that is angles... and not just that. Abyss is 6'5 min. And doors everywhere are different heights!, i know of many dorrs that are about 6'!!!!!!!!!! then upwards to 6'10!
Viper said on 2/May/08
6-2-6-3? Thats wild. Actually there are doorways shorter than that in some old homes from the 1700s. Because people were a lot shorter then on average.
6-2-6-3? Thats wild. Actually there are doorways shorter than that in some old homes from the 1700s. Because people were a lot shorter then on average.
Alex said on 1/May/08
In my house most of the doors ways are 6'5-6'6. One is 6'7.
In my house most of the doors ways are 6'5-6'6. One is 6'7.
Alex2 said on 30/Apr/08
Alex some of my doors are scraping the 7 foot mark! LOL and others as low as 6'4"-6'8"
Alex some of my doors are scraping the 7 foot mark! LOL and others as low as 6'4"-6'8"
Alex said on 28/Apr/08
It depends on the house. Most nowadays are 6'8 but you can get some as low as 6'6 and as high as 6'10 in houses. Office buildings they're even taller I think.
My friend lives in an old house where some of the doorways are 6'2-6'3! I have to almost duck with my sneakers on.
It depends on the house. Most nowadays are 6'8 but you can get some as low as 6'6 and as high as 6'10 in houses. Office buildings they're even taller I think.
My friend lives in an old house where some of the doorways are 6'2-6'3! I have to almost duck with my sneakers on.
Viper said on 26/Apr/08
Doors in my house are 6-8-6-10.
Doors in my house are 6-8-6-10.
Alex2 said on 26/Apr/08
alot of doors can be around 6'6" though.
alot of doors can be around 6'6" though.
Mr. 6'5'' said on 25/Apr/08
Hey, looking at that kids profile there are pictures of him next to a door, and lets say that door is the average 6'8'', no way is he the 6'6'' he claims, more like 6'4'' at the ost, and he even ooks it next to hoyt in that picture
Hey, looking at that kids profile there are pictures of him next to a door, and lets say that door is the average 6'8'', no way is he the 6'6'' he claims, more like 6'4'' at the ost, and he even ooks it next to hoyt in that picture
Alex2 said on 17/Apr/08
Lance Hoyt was always 1-2" taller than 6'5.5 Abyss
Lance Hoyt was always 1-2" taller than 6'5.5 Abyss
Vegas said on 16/Apr/08
met hoyt in person during the live tna impact a few weeks ago, he was wearing huge boots and on slightly higher ground but he looked 6'6ish
met hoyt in person during the live tna impact a few weeks ago, he was wearing huge boots and on slightly higher ground but he looked 6'6ish
cantstop25 said on 14/Apr/08
sine lance hoyt doesnt hae a page I thought id post this here, here is lance hoyt looking 2-3 inces taller then a kid who claims to be 6'6" on his myspace page.
Click Here
I found this nteresting becasue I thought lance hoyt was only about 6'6" after he was towered by matt morgan, as you can see by this entire gallery
Click Here
sine lance hoyt doesnt hae a page I thought id post this here, here is lance hoyt looking 2-3 inces taller then a kid who claims to be 6'6" on his myspace page.
Click Here
I found this nteresting becasue I thought lance hoyt was only about 6'6" after he was towered by matt morgan, as you can see by this entire gallery
Click Here
miko said on 10/Apr/08
Probably closer to 6"8 these days, still a tall guy though.
Probably closer to 6"8 these days, still a tall guy though.
Supermanfan380 said on 6/Apr/08
Taller height it a dominant trait. So likely his kid would be rather tall. I think his wife is about 5-10 or 5-11, so for a woman she is tall too. They would have needed a tragedy to keep their son from getting very tall. At 6-1 at age 11, I would expect him to be around 7ft as an adult.
However, I think Nash would prefer he boy not get into a business that can eat them alive.
Taller height it a dominant trait. So likely his kid would be rather tall. I think his wife is about 5-10 or 5-11, so for a woman she is tall too. They would have needed a tragedy to keep their son from getting very tall. At 6-1 at age 11, I would expect him to be around 7ft as an adult.
However, I think Nash would prefer he boy not get into a business that can eat them alive.
supes78 said on 5/Apr/08
Jeez. According to this interview, his 11 year old son is already 6'1" tall!
Click Here
I think we have another future giant here.
Jeez. According to this interview, his 11 year old son is already 6'1" tall!
Click Here
I think we have another future giant here.
Alex2 said on 4/Apr/08
I don't think any of those guys standing in that picture are below 6'3 if you look.
I don't think any of those guys standing in that picture are below 6'3 if you look.
Supermanfan380 said on 4/Apr/08
MK, Nash was listed at 6'10" back then.
MK, Nash was listed at 6'10" back then.
MK said on 2/Apr/08
JT says on 2/Apr/08
I'm referring to the guy to Nash's right (No. 40), not No. 32.
In that case i'd give No.40 6'5''-6'6'', Nash 6'9''-6'10'' and No.32 6'8''-6'9''. btw does anyone know what Nash himself was listed at on that same site?
JT says on 2/Apr/08
I'm referring to the guy to Nash's right (No. 40), not No. 32.
In that case i'd give No.40 6'5''-6'6'', Nash 6'9''-6'10'' and No.32 6'8''-6'9''. btw does anyone know what Nash himself was listed at on that same site?
JT said on 2/Apr/08
MK says on 2/Apr/08
5-6 inches??, surely thats a typing error JT, that would put Nash over 7'0'' lol, 6'10'' max he does look tho, probably at his full peak back then, 6'8.5'' is what i'd give him nowadays.
I'm referring to the guy to Nash's right (No. 40), not No. 32.
MK says on 2/Apr/08
5-6 inches??, surely thats a typing error JT, that would put Nash over 7'0'' lol, 6'10'' max he does look tho, probably at his full peak back then, 6'8.5'' is what i'd give him nowadays.
I'm referring to the guy to Nash's right (No. 40), not No. 32.
MK said on 2/Apr/08
5-6 inches??, surely thats a typing error JT, that would put Nash over 7'0'' lol, 6'10'' max he does look tho, probably at his full peak back then, 6'8.5'' is what i'd give him nowadays.
5-6 inches??, surely thats a typing error JT, that would put Nash over 7'0'' lol, 6'10'' max he does look tho, probably at his full peak back then, 6'8.5'' is what i'd give him nowadays.
JT said on 2/Apr/08
MK says on 1/Apr/08
LV, Nash has 0.5'' at best on Johnson, check the shoulder level, plus Johnson is slouching slightly, Nash is standing dead straight...
It looks like the camera is slightly to the left of the players though, so it favors everyone left of Nash. Nash has the 6'7" listed guy to his right by 5-6 inches, and we know Nash is probably 6'10" max.
MK says on 1/Apr/08
LV, Nash has 0.5'' at best on Johnson, check the shoulder level, plus Johnson is slouching slightly, Nash is standing dead straight...
It looks like the camera is slightly to the left of the players though, so it favors everyone left of Nash. Nash has the 6'7" listed guy to his right by 5-6 inches, and we know Nash is probably 6'10" max.
LV said on 1/Apr/08
Pretty blurry photo to be making out .5". Regardless, Nash is taller. The top of Nash's head goes up to the top of Johnson's afro if not more, easily closer to 1".
Pretty blurry photo to be making out .5". Regardless, Nash is taller. The top of Nash's head goes up to the top of Johnson's afro if not more, easily closer to 1".
MK said on 1/Apr/08
LV, Nash has 0.5'' at best on Johnson, check the shoulder level, plus Johnson is slouching slightly, Nash is standing dead straight.(well done with that btw JT)
LV, Nash has 0.5'' at best on Johnson, check the shoulder level, plus Johnson is slouching slightly, Nash is standing dead straight.(well done with that btw JT)
LV said on 31/Mar/08
JT, that is an excellent picture. I've never seen any photos of him while he was in college except that one. He is clearly much taller than Johnson especially if you factor out Johnson's afro.
JT, that is an excellent picture. I've never seen any photos of him while he was in college except that one. He is clearly much taller than Johnson especially if you factor out Johnson's afro.
JT said on 30/Mar/08
Interesting photo of Nash from 1978 (age 19) when playing center on the University of Tennessee basketball team (Click Here). The guys to the left (Howard Wood) and right (Reggie Johnson) of Nash in the photo were both NBA draft picks and were listed at 6
Interesting photo of Nash from 1978 (age 19) when playing center on the University of Tennessee basketball team (Click Here). The guys to the left (Howard Wood) and right (Reggie Johnson) of Nash in the photo were both NBA draft picks and were listed at 6
Supermanfan380 said on 28/Mar/08
I still think it would be a good idea to add, under the 6'9" listing a "peak height of 6-10"
Anyhow, WCW listed his stats at 7'1" and 367 pounds. He was never that tall, at his tallest, or that heavy, even when he debuted. He may have been 350ish when he was "steel", but he was never a 367 pounder either.
Gotta love the late 1990s WCW stats. exagg much.
I still think it would be a good idea to add, under the 6'9" listing a "peak height of 6-10"
Anyhow, WCW listed his stats at 7'1" and 367 pounds. He was never that tall, at his tallest, or that heavy, even when he debuted. He may have been 350ish when he was "steel", but he was never a 367 pounder either.
Gotta love the late 1990s WCW stats. exagg much.
RICHARD said on 24/Mar/08
He looks like a solid 6'9,300 pound guy to me.
He looks like a solid 6'9,300 pound guy to me.
JT said on 21/Mar/08
With 6'3" Kevin Greene, a former linebacker and defensive end for the then LA Rams. Click Here
With 6'3" Kevin Greene, a former linebacker and defensive end for the then LA Rams. Click Here
Regan99 said on 21/Mar/08
the seems to be around 1 foot 1-2 inches diffrents between them both and that would make nash around 6,9 to 6,10 but if kevin nash stood proud and was not slouching a little he could gain around another 1 to 2 inchs makeing his over all height 6,11 to 7 foot ...which is believable
the seems to be around 1 foot 1-2 inches diffrents between them both and that would make nash around 6,9 to 6,10 but if kevin nash stood proud and was not slouching a little he could gain around another 1 to 2 inchs makeing his over all height 6,11 to 7 foot ...which is believable
Robby said on 14/Mar/08
6'9" right now is believable. but you should also note that Nash has had numerous knee operations that do take away height. so I believe he was 6'10" at his peak.
6'9" right now is believable. but you should also note that Nash has had numerous knee operations that do take away height. so I believe he was 6'10" at his peak.
MK said on 10/Mar/08
I'd say 6'9.5'' peak, 6'8.5'' now but it dosen't need stating. Either way 6'9'' average seems feesable.
I'd say 6'9.5'' peak, 6'8.5'' now but it dosen't need stating. Either way 6'9'' average seems feesable.
Supermanfan380 said on 9/Mar/08
Rob - could you add a "6'10" (208)cm peak height" to the listing on the page?
The general consensus here seems that he was a solid 6
Rob - could you add a "6'10" (208)cm peak height" to the listing on the page?
The general consensus here seems that he was a solid 6
Alex2 said on 8/Mar/08
If you got a PEAK Nash he would be clearly taller than Morgan who is in his PEAK.
If you got a PEAK Nash he would be clearly taller than Morgan who is in his PEAK.
Supermanfan380 said on 6/Mar/08
Found another old one. Ron Simmons vs. Oz. This Match was from back when Nash was wrestling as
Found another old one. Ron Simmons vs. Oz. This Match was from back when Nash was wrestling as
Alex said on 6/Mar/08
JT, those pictures are better. Mainly the first where they look the same height, could be 1/2 inch difference at most. Look anywhere from 6'8 to 6'9 tops.
JT, those pictures are better. Mainly the first where they look the same height, could be 1/2 inch difference at most. Look anywhere from 6'8 to 6'9 tops.
Alex said on 5/Mar/08
Nash is no more than 6'9 at most today. And I wouldn't doubt him as low as 6'8 flat today with a 2 inch height loss. Its possible. He looked 6'8-6'9 in person in late 2006. Use to be a 6'10 guy I think. Morgan looks around the same height, maybe even a bit taller. I give Morgan 6'9.
Nash is no more than 6'9 at most today. And I wouldn't doubt him as low as 6'8 flat today with a 2 inch height loss. Its possible. He looked 6'8-6'9 in person in late 2006. Use to be a 6'10 guy I think. Morgan looks around the same height, maybe even a bit taller. I give Morgan 6'9.
Supermanfan380 said on 5/Mar/08
I think that on the site here, they should add to the 6'9" height listed for Nash, that he had a peak height of 6'10" back in the 1990s.
Sure he may only be 6'9" now, but he is close to 50 years old, with damage to both knees, and clearly would have had another inch and change, 6'10", 10 years ago.
I think that on the site here, they should add to the 6'9" height listed for Nash, that he had a peak height of 6'10" back in the 1990s.
Sure he may only be 6'9" now, but he is close to 50 years old, with damage to both knees, and clearly would have had another inch and change, 6'10", 10 years ago.
Supermanfan380 said on 4/Mar/08
I think had either of them made it to the NBA they would have been listed as 7'0" or even 7'1", as the NBA is almost as bad as WWE at padding heights.
It would stand to reason that college stats are more accurate.
I think had either of them made it to the NBA they would have been listed as 7'0" or even 7'1", as the NBA is almost as bad as WWE at padding heights.
It would stand to reason that college stats are more accurate.
Dave said on 4/Mar/08
good pics vegas, and yeah i agree with you.... also, if these 2 were in the nba i think they would have been listed closer to 7ft.
But i still firmly believe (especially after seeing the way nash looked on impact against kurt angle) that a 99 nash would have been taller than morgan, even if only a cm or two. but nowadays it seems they are very very close in height. good work vegas
good pics vegas, and yeah i agree with you.... also, if these 2 were in the nba i think they would have been listed closer to 7ft.
But i still firmly believe (especially after seeing the way nash looked on impact against kurt angle) that a 99 nash would have been taller than morgan, even if only a cm or two. but nowadays it seems they are very very close in height. good work vegas
Vegas said on 2/Mar/08
nash and morgan in tna Click Here and Click Here and Click Here
both nash and morgan were listed at 6'10 in college basketball so there would never have been much if anything between these guys
Morgan played ball for Chaminade Silverswords and his listing is here third last paragraph Click Here
Nash Click Here
i have found college ball listings to be far more legit than nba listings, many big men have their college listings increased by an inch and sometimes 2 inches in the nba
nash and morgan in tna Click Here and Click Here and Click Here
both nash and morgan were listed at 6'10 in college basketball so there would never have been much if anything between these guys
Morgan played ball for Chaminade Silverswords and his listing is here third last paragraph Click Here
Nash Click Here
i have found college ball listings to be far more legit than nba listings, many big men have their college listings increased by an inch and sometimes 2 inches in the nba
Supermanfan380 said on 1/Mar/08
Back then his legs were muscular enough to see the both the Vastus-Lateralis, and Vastus-Medialis (outer and inner Quadriceps
Back then his legs were muscular enough to see the both the Vastus-Lateralis, and Vastus-Medialis (outer and inner Quadriceps
MK said on 1/Mar/08
How tall do y'all reckon Matt Morgan is, even with them huge shoes he still doesn't match, i'd say Nash has 1.5'' on Morgan and probably 1-0.5'' on Nathan Jones. So maybe 6'8.5'' for Jones??(btw great find with that vid Supermanfan)
How tall do y'all reckon Matt Morgan is, even with them huge shoes he still doesn't match, i'd say Nash has 1.5'' on Morgan and probably 1-0.5'' on Nathan Jones. So maybe 6'8.5'' for Jones??(btw great find with that vid Supermanfan)
Dave said on 28/Feb/08
nash looks HUGE there, id agree with 350 from nash.... HUGE, in height and physique
nash looks HUGE there, id agree with 350 from nash.... HUGE, in height and physique
Alex2 said on 27/Feb/08
No way was Nash only 6'9" PEAK i could believe that today but no way peak.
No way was Nash only 6'9" PEAK i could believe that today but no way peak.
Dave said on 27/Feb/08
nash was listed as high as 7'1 quite often in wcw, infact he was listed that high most of the time.
nash was listed as high as 7'1 quite often in wcw, infact he was listed that high most of the time.
TNTinCA said on 25/Feb/08
He absolutely DWARFED Thomas Jane in the Punisher movie. I would have said at least a foot of difference between them. Thomas Jane is around 5'10" I believe. So at least 6'9" for Nash if not maybe even 6'10".
He absolutely DWARFED Thomas Jane in the Punisher movie. I would have said at least a foot of difference between them. Thomas Jane is around 5'10" I believe. So at least 6'9" for Nash if not maybe even 6'10".
MK said on 25/Feb/08
15 years back i'd say 6'10 now probably 6'8.5
15 years back i'd say 6'10 now probably 6'8.5
Alex said on 24/Feb/08
I've seen Nash said at 7'1 in WCW too with The Giant at 7'4. That made most more sense.
I've seen Nash said at 7'1 in WCW too with The Giant at 7'4. That made most more sense.
Dave said on 24/Feb/08
still, i am impressed at how well nash sizes up to the big show... show also had bigger lifts on both occaisions. Show always had bigger lifts than nash. Infact as i recall there was a discussion remarking on how small nash's lifts were, especially in wcw days. And there was a rumour that it was something to do with his knees and the ankle arch being bad for him. I think nash still sizes up to big show the best out of every wrestler (aside from khali of course). And i still firmly believe nash to be no less than 6'9 at any point.... meaning big show must be very near his 7' billing. IMO.
still, i am impressed at how well nash sizes up to the big show... show also had bigger lifts on both occaisions. Show always had bigger lifts than nash. Infact as i recall there was a discussion remarking on how small nash's lifts were, especially in wcw days. And there was a rumour that it was something to do with his knees and the ankle arch being bad for him. I think nash still sizes up to big show the best out of every wrestler (aside from khali of course). And i still firmly believe nash to be no less than 6'9 at any point.... meaning big show must be very near his 7' billing. IMO.
JT said on 24/Feb/08
Alex2, WCW usually referred to Nash as being 7'0".
Alex2, WCW usually referred to Nash as being 7'0".
Alex2 said on 23/Feb/08
Humm, i noticed WCW builled Show as "7 Foot 4" and Nash as 6 Foot 10", they should have builled Nash 6'11, and Show at 7'4" is rediculous, as if their is 6" between them LOL.
Humm, i noticed WCW builled Show as "7 Foot 4" and Nash as 6 Foot 10", they should have builled Nash 6'11, and Show at 7'4" is rediculous, as if their is 6" between them LOL.
Mr. E said on 22/Feb/08
Thanks Vegas, I was curious due to the fact that the WCW video shows Nash tip toeing to get up in Shows face.
Thanks Vegas, I was curious due to the fact that the WCW video shows Nash tip toeing to get up in Shows face.
Vegas said on 22/Feb/08
here you go Mr.E, nash closer to the camera too there circa 2002-2003 Click Here
WCW staredown now show slightly closer here, if you notice in both photos nash's eyeline is level with the tip of big shows nose Click Here
here you go Mr.E, nash closer to the camera too there circa 2002-2003 Click Here
WCW staredown now show slightly closer here, if you notice in both photos nash's eyeline is level with the tip of big shows nose Click Here
Mr. E said on 22/Feb/08
Does anyone have the standoff of the WWE version of the NWO with Show and Nash? I think that's what we all getting at. In WCW there's around 3" between the two, but a little less in WWE.
Does anyone have the standoff of the WWE version of the NWO with Show and Nash? I think that's what we all getting at. In WCW there's around 3" between the two, but a little less in WWE.
Mr_6'5 said on 21/Feb/08
everyone has to remember that big show has a huge head! maybe 12 or 13 inches big, just compare the average head to his, and you'll see this. he definitely looked 7ft next to that chump mayweather, and i believe he was 7'1'' in WCW and now 7ft flat
everyone has to remember that big show has a huge head! maybe 12 or 13 inches big, just compare the average head to his, and you'll see this. he definitely looked 7ft next to that chump mayweather, and i believe he was 7'1'' in WCW and now 7ft flat
Vegas said on 21/Feb/08
here you go frank i used a screenshot of wight and gene from 1995 in the ring so no funny camera work like putting people on boxes etc
i also made gene about half an inch taller than mayweather despite gene being billed at 5'8 for nearly 20 years and mayweather listed at 5'8 3/4 in boxing, wer are missing about half an inch on the top of big shows head with mayweather but they come out very close
Click Here
also what about big shows basketball billing, he is one of the few wrestlers whom we have a legit NCAA listing for
here you go frank i used a screenshot of wight and gene from 1995 in the ring so no funny camera work like putting people on boxes etc
i also made gene about half an inch taller than mayweather despite gene being billed at 5'8 for nearly 20 years and mayweather listed at 5'8 3/4 in boxing, wer are missing about half an inch on the top of big shows head with mayweather but they come out very close
Click Here
also what about big shows basketball billing, he is one of the few wrestlers whom we have a legit NCAA listing for
cantstop25 said on 21/Feb/08
wha are you talking about frank? why do people keep saying he didnt look 7' with mayweather he completely dwarfed the guy, I think people are too focused on mayweather big bodyguard, the dudes huge I would guess 6'10"-7' though it was really hard to tell from angles. but watch this clip
Click Here
pause it at 2:25 big show stands up straight and it looks like a foot and a half difference
wha are you talking about frank? why do people keep saying he didnt look 7' with mayweather he completely dwarfed the guy, I think people are too focused on mayweather big bodyguard, the dudes huge I would guess 6'10"-7' though it was really hard to tell from angles. but watch this clip
Click Here
pause it at 2:25 big show stands up straight and it looks like a foot and a half difference
Dave said on 21/Feb/08
big show WAS taller in wcw! thats the very point!, his posture was copnsiderably better in wcw as he was very lean, in wwe hes always hunched, even now when hes back.... just look at his posture in wcw! hes perfectly straight! nowadays big show WOULD NOT size up as well against nash as he did back then, also because how his knees are twisted to the side a little, which is clearly visible when you look at him from a frontal view, this is obviously caused because of his tremendous weight..... the fact remains, big show was taller in wcw, a mix of better posture, being lighter and not having bowed knees. His absolute height may have changed very little, but with the knees bent and the bad posture he looks shorter now.... id love to see a nowadays big show with a 99 nash, there wouldnt be 3 inches, thats for sure.
big show WAS taller in wcw! thats the very point!, his posture was copnsiderably better in wcw as he was very lean, in wwe hes always hunched, even now when hes back.... just look at his posture in wcw! hes perfectly straight! nowadays big show WOULD NOT size up as well against nash as he did back then, also because how his knees are twisted to the side a little, which is clearly visible when you look at him from a frontal view, this is obviously caused because of his tremendous weight..... the fact remains, big show was taller in wcw, a mix of better posture, being lighter and not having bowed knees. His absolute height may have changed very little, but with the knees bent and the bad posture he looks shorter now.... id love to see a nowadays big show with a 99 nash, there wouldnt be 3 inches, thats for sure.
Frank said on 21/Feb/08
Lifts are inside the boot so its hard to spot so you could draw all the lines you want... Show looks hugh @ times but he did not look like a 7 footer next to a 5ft 7ish or 5ft 8 Mayweather and he did not look 7ft next to that 6ft 1.5 guy on Show's Page
Lifts are inside the boot so its hard to spot so you could draw all the lines you want... Show looks hugh @ times but he did not look like a 7 footer next to a 5ft 7ish or 5ft 8 Mayweather and he did not look 7ft next to that 6ft 1.5 guy on Show's Page
Alex said on 20/Feb/08
JT, I see 3 inches or so too between the 2. Other times I've only see 2 inches. Big Show likely has boots a bit bigger than Nashs.6'10 Nash to a 7'0 Big Show unless Big Show was a bit taller back in WCW.
JT, I see 3 inches or so too between the 2. Other times I've only see 2 inches. Big Show likely has boots a bit bigger than Nashs.6'10 Nash to a 7'0 Big Show unless Big Show was a bit taller back in WCW.
JT said on 20/Feb/08
Frank says on 12/Feb/08
I could see Big Show 6ft 11 barefoot without lifts
Anonymous says on 11/Feb/08
I would love to see a pic of Nash and Big Show today, I think that nash has totally kept his height and is still a big 6'9 today. I think show was only about 6'10+ at his peak
Mark says on 11/Feb/08
Dave. Agreed. I do believe Wight to be 6'10
Big Show with at least 3 inches on Nash from 1998 (Click Here) (Click Here)
Big Show
Frank says on 12/Feb/08
I could see Big Show 6ft 11 barefoot without lifts
Anonymous says on 11/Feb/08
I would love to see a pic of Nash and Big Show today, I think that nash has totally kept his height and is still a big 6'9 today. I think show was only about 6'10+ at his peak
Mark says on 11/Feb/08
Dave. Agreed. I do believe Wight to be 6'10
Big Show with at least 3 inches on Nash from 1998 (Click Here) (Click Here)
Big Show
Big Show said on 19/Feb/08
Click Here
Here's another video which features the second part of a battle royal at Smackdown 11/23/2003. In the end team Lesnar gangs up on John Cena and Chris Benoit. At 7:30 Big Show looks considerably taller than Jones, but because of the cropped video image it's unclear how far Jones is standing infront of Big Show.
Click Here
Here's another video which features the second part of a battle royal at Smackdown 11/23/2003. In the end team Lesnar gangs up on John Cena and Chris Benoit. At 7:30 Big Show looks considerably taller than Jones, but because of the cropped video image it's unclear how far Jones is standing infront of Big Show.
cantstop25 said on 19/Feb/08
this is the video where big show appeared much taller then nathan jones
this is the video where big show appeared much taller then nathan jones
Frank said on 12/Feb/08
I could see Big Show 6ft 11 barefoot without lifts
I could see Big Show 6ft 11 barefoot without lifts
Anonymous said on 11/Feb/08
I would love to see a pic of Nash and Big Show today, I think that nash has totally kept his height and is still a big 6'9 today. I think show was only about 6'10+ at his peak and has lost some, and would be about the exact same height as nash today.
I would love to see a pic of Nash and Big Show today, I think that nash has totally kept his height and is still a big 6'9 today. I think show was only about 6'10+ at his peak and has lost some, and would be about the exact same height as nash today.
Mark said on 11/Feb/08
Dave. Agreed. I do believe Wight to be 6'10 but think Jones is around 2 inches shorter approx. Morgan around the same and that would link in with Jones being around 1.5- 2 inches taller than Taker.
Dave. Agreed. I do believe Wight to be 6'10 but think Jones is around 2 inches shorter approx. Morgan around the same and that would link in with Jones being around 1.5- 2 inches taller than Taker.
Dave said on 11/Feb/08
so....... lets say that big show is the supposed 6'10 that everyone thinks he is on his page. And now you are saying theres a 5 INCH difference between him and nathan.... that makes nathan 6'5. And THAT my friends, is rubbish. I saw nathan from 3 metres away at a smackdown signing a few years back, and let me tell you hes BY FAR the tallest '6'5' man ive ever seen..... infact so convincing that the very least he could be is actually around 6'8 or so. Not to mention that this 5 inch prediction means that morgan is about 6'4 tops, as too is undertaker..... what a load of bs.
so....... lets say that big show is the supposed 6'10 that everyone thinks he is on his page. And now you are saying theres a 5 INCH difference between him and nathan.... that makes nathan 6'5. And THAT my friends, is rubbish. I saw nathan from 3 metres away at a smackdown signing a few years back, and let me tell you hes BY FAR the tallest '6'5' man ive ever seen..... infact so convincing that the very least he could be is actually around 6'8 or so. Not to mention that this 5 inch prediction means that morgan is about 6'4 tops, as too is undertaker..... what a load of bs.
JT said on 9/Feb/08
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
I've also seen a few videos of Big Show being significantly taller than Nathan Jones. People are getting more clever with how they title the videos so it's harder to find these clips now.
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
I've also seen a few videos of Big Show being significantly taller than Nathan Jones. People are getting more clever with how they title the videos so it's harder to find these clips now.
Alex said on 8/Feb/08
Big Show 5 inches taller than Jones? Wow, never seen that before. At times he looked 2 inches taller tops than Jones but could have been angles or Jones in bigger footwear.
Big Show 5 inches taller than Jones? Wow, never seen that before. At times he looked 2 inches taller tops than Jones but could have been angles or Jones in bigger footwear.
cantstop25 said on 7/Feb/08
I rememebr when big show was on tough enough he only had 2 inches on him at most, though he should be three inche taller
I rememebr when big show was on tough enough he only had 2 inches on him at most, though he should be three inche taller
Vegas said on 7/Feb/08
morgan and jones Click Here
show had approx 2.5-3 inches on morgan and the same on jones. Actually one time on tv show looked alot taller than jones as in about five inches, may have been the camera angle but it got me thinking at the time, i would love to find that clip on the net
morgan and jones Click Here
show had approx 2.5-3 inches on morgan and the same on jones. Actually one time on tv show looked alot taller than jones as in about five inches, may have been the camera angle but it got me thinking at the time, i would love to find that clip on the net
Alex said on 7/Feb/08
Gollum those prediction are prettu bad, yopu have andre at 7'1.5?!? He was 6'11.5 and Kamala at 6'7" is a bit odd also.
Gollum those prediction are prettu bad, yopu have andre at 7'1.5?!? He was 6'11.5 and Kamala at 6'7" is a bit odd also.
Alex said on 7/Feb/08
Cantstop maybe the same height but I don't think I seen the pic with them look the same. Also maybe Jones wore lifts to appear closer height to Big Show.
I remember Big Show always had like 2-3 inches on Morgan as well. Or was it more?
Cantstop maybe the same height but I don't think I seen the pic with them look the same. Also maybe Jones wore lifts to appear closer height to Big Show.
I remember Big Show always had like 2-3 inches on Morgan as well. Or was it more?
Tom said on 7/Feb/08
I dunno, Kevin Nash to me still looks around 6.10' these days. Which leads me to believe he used to be at his peak somewhere between 6.10 1/2 & 6.11'.
I dunno, Kevin Nash to me still looks around 6.10' these days. Which leads me to believe he used to be at his peak somewhere between 6.10 1/2 & 6.11'.
Heights are barefeet estimates, derived from quotations, official websites, agency resumes, in person encounters with actors at conventions and pictures/films.
Other vital statistics like weight or shoe size measurements have been sourced from newspapers, books, resumes or social media.
Celebrity Fan Photos and Agency Pictures of stars are © to their respective owners.