Lucie Arnaz's Height
5ft 8 ½ (174 cm)
American actress best known for tv show Here's Lucy. In a 1970's LA Times article it mentioned, " "Little" Lucie (who stands a slim 5 feet 8-3/4)", which she mentioned in a 1971 Dick Cavett show. In an interview in 1977 she also said: "It's tough being 5 feet 8 and one half inches when you're out with a guy who's 5 feet 6"
Photo by PR Photos
Photo by PR Photos
Add a Comment12 comments
Average Guess (3 Votes)
5ft 8.83in (174.8cm)
5ft 8.83in (174.8cm)
richinkle said on 6/Nov/19
Bob, can you please show the interview where she claims 5'-8 1/2". Otherwise, the 5'-8 3/4" interview, which we can see for ourselves, should take precedence. Otherwise, it's hearsay. Just my opinion.
Thank you. Richinkle
Editor Rob
Bob, can you please show the interview where she claims 5'-8 1/2". Otherwise, the 5'-8 3/4" interview, which we can see for ourselves, should take precedence. Otherwise, it's hearsay. Just my opinion.
Thank you. Richinkle
Editor RobIt's in January 9th, 1977 edition of a newspaper called Salina Journal.
It's behind a paywall, so if you want to see the article, you could sign up for a free trial.
It's behind a paywall, so if you want to see the article, you could sign up for a free trial.
Nik Ashton said on 18/Oct/19
It should be cool not tough! It is in my 📚!
It should be cool not tough! It is in my 📚!
richinkle said on 15/Oct/19
Why does Celebheights list her at 5'-8 1/2", when she says quite clearly in this interview with Dick Cavett that she is 5'-8 3/4"?
Click Here
Editor Rob
Why does Celebheights list her at 5'-8 1/2", when she says quite clearly in this interview with Dick Cavett that she is 5'-8 3/4"?
Click Here
Editor Robshe has claimed 5ft 8 and a half and also I've seen an 8 and 1/4 as well.
Eric W Tam said on 2/Mar/19
Why does google list her at 5'10 when she seemed to be honest and claiming not even 5'9? When I'm famous, Google might as well list me in the pushing 5'11.5 range.
Why does google list her at 5'10 when she seemed to be honest and claiming not even 5'9? When I'm famous, Google might as well list me in the pushing 5'11.5 range.
richinkle said on 30/Mar/17
So Bob, do you think it's worth considering a change of height here, based on the below reference?
Editor Rob
So Bob, do you think it's worth considering a change of height here, based on the below reference?
Editor Rob the 8.75 is certainly believable too, I will give her that quote.
richinkle said on 28/Mar/17
At 13:35 in this 1971 interview with Dick Cavett, a 19-year old Lucie Arnaz notes: "It's normal to be 5'-8 and 3/4 at 19, but it was tough being 5'-7" at 14". I would venture to guess she may have even reached 5'-9". This is about as verifiable a primary source as you can find!
Click Here
At 13:35 in this 1971 interview with Dick Cavett, a 19-year old Lucie Arnaz notes: "It's normal to be 5'-8 and 3/4 at 19, but it was tough being 5'-7" at 14". I would venture to guess she may have even reached 5'-9". This is about as verifiable a primary source as you can find!
Click Here
richinkle said on 9/Jun/15
I agree with Shadow 2. This seems about right. In "Here's Lucy", Lucie Arnaz and Gale Gordon always looked very close in height. Lucille Ball, at 5'-7" is no mo than 1 1/2" shorter than her very tall daughter.
I agree with Shadow 2. This seems about right. In "Here's Lucy", Lucie Arnaz and Gale Gordon always looked very close in height. Lucille Ball, at 5'-7" is no mo than 1 1/2" shorter than her very tall daughter.
Shadow2 said on 26/Aug/12
This current height for Lucie is more realistic than other taller heights previously given. She never towered over her mother or Gale Gordon in the "Here's Lucy" shows.
This current height for Lucie is more realistic than other taller heights previously given. She never towered over her mother or Gale Gordon in the "Here's Lucy" shows.
richinkle said on 17/Jan/12
Lucie Arnaz is Lucille Ball's daughter. She's a very tall and leggy - at least 5'-9", if not a bit taller.
Lucie Arnaz is Lucille Ball's daughter. She's a very tall and leggy - at least 5'-9", if not a bit taller.
jasperwazap said on 31/Dec/11
Lucille Ball i never would have thought she was that tall 5'9'' and a bit. but Mary Tyler Moore used to get listed at 6'2'' which is outrageous since she never looked over 5'8'' on her show.
Lucille Ball i never would have thought she was that tall 5'9'' and a bit. but Mary Tyler Moore used to get listed at 6'2'' which is outrageous since she never looked over 5'8'' on her show.
sam said on 15/Nov/07
She did look about 2 inches taller than Katharine Hepburn, so this is probably accurate.
She did look about 2 inches taller than Katharine Hepburn, so this is probably accurate.
richinkle said on 15/Aug/06
I think this height is very accurate. A good friend of mine sat right behind her at this year's Tony Awards. My 5'-11" friend said she looked "gigantic", and estimated her to be around 5'-10". He also said she looked terrific. I've seen recent pictures of her and agree.
On "Here's Lucy", she never looked more than 1 1/2 to 2" taller than her mother, which confirms Lucille Ball's height of 5'-7 1/2".
I think this height is very accurate. A good friend of mine sat right behind her at this year's Tony Awards. My 5'-11" friend said she looked "gigantic", and estimated her to be around 5'-10". He also said she looked terrific. I've seen recent pictures of her and agree.
On "Here's Lucy", she never looked more than 1 1/2 to 2" taller than her mother, which confirms Lucille Ball's height of 5'-7 1/2".
Heights are barefeet estimates, derived from quotations, official websites, agency resumes, in person encounters with actors at conventions and pictures/films.
Other vital statistics like weight or shoe size measurements have been sourced from newspapers, books, resumes or social media.
Celebrity Fan Photos and Agency Pictures of stars are © to their respective owners.