teenager said on 13/Mar/11
@hill
i couldn't agree more
mj was a pretty tall guy he was 5'11"
even his heels didn't give more that 1.5 inches , 2 inches at most
5'11 is perfect for him
omer said on 13/Mar/11
mj was 5'11
tht's it
rob please upgrade his height
just look at his photo with oprah
hill said on 12/Mar/11
i say he was 5'10- 5'11. He was pretty tall, not 6' feet but defiantly not 5'8. For everyone who is saying his shoes made up for the what, the 4-5 inches that made him appear to be 5'11, that's absurd. If Michael was strutting around in high heels like that, I'm sure he would have had much more negative attention then what he got.
His shoes might have contributed to an 1 inch of his height but really no more then that.
d wade said on 10/Mar/11
looks 5,7 with Michael jordan rob should downgrade him to 5,8 or 5,7.
Cynthia said on 9/Mar/11
I think it's safe to say he was somewhere between 5'8" and 5'10" at his peak height.
alex said on 6/Mar/11
df
No we can't see his shoes in the photos that Omi posted but we did see Michael's entire body including his shoes in his interview with Oprah from 1993 when he showed her how to moonwalk in his movie theatre.He didn't have lifts and he still was towering a lot over Oprah.And the interview was actually BROADCASTED LIVE not RECORDED (remember that during the interview the fire alarm went off and Oprah said somethinh like:" The fire alarm just went off.Remember that this is a live Interview from Neverland and anything can happen"),so he couldn't have had the interview edited.So don't you ****ing tell us that he was 169 cm cause you don't believe that yourself. We are not all stupid you know.
Maybe he wasn't a big 185 cm guy but to exaggerate things like this and say that he was 169 cm like some people say that's more than RIDICULOUS and UNTRUE.
You people need to stop on hating on Michael cause you can't change the fact that he's a MUSICAL GENIUS and A LEGEND.Get used with that!
alex said on 6/Mar/11
df
No we can't see his shoes in the photos that Omi posted but we did see Michael's entire body including his shoes in his interview with Oprah from 1993 when he showed her how to moonwalk in his movie theatre.He didn't have lifts and he still was towering a lot over Oprah.And the interview was actually BROADCASTED LIVE not RECORDED (remember that during the interview the fire alarm went off and Oprah said somethinh like:" The fire alarm just went off.Remember that this is a live Interview from Neverland and anything can happen"),so he couldn't have had the interview edited.So don't you ****ing tell us that he was 169 cm cause you don't believe that yourself. We are not all stupid you know.
Maybe he wasn't a big 185 cm guy but to exaggerate things like this and say that he was 169 cm like some people say that's more than RIDICULOUS and UNTRUE.
You people need to stop on hating on Michael cause you can't change the fact that he's a MUSICAL GENIUS and A LEGEND.Get used with that!
alex said on 6/Mar/11
df
No we can't see his shoes in the photos that Omi posted but we did see Michael's entire body including his shoes in his interview with Oprah from 1993 when he showed her how to moonwalk in his movie theatre.He didn't have lifts and he still was towering a lot over Oprah.And the interview was actually BROADCASTED LIVE not RECORDED (remember that during the interview the fire alarm went off and Oprah said somethinh like:" The fire alarm just went off.Remember that this is a live Interview from Neverland and anything can happen"),so he couldn't have had the interview edited.So don't you ****ing tell us that he was 169 cm cause you don't believe that yourself. We are not all stupid you know.
Maybe he wasn't a big 185 cm guy but to exaggerate things like this and say that he was 169 cm like some people say that's more than RIDICULOUS and UNTRUE.
You people need to stop on hating on Michael cause you can't change the fact that he's a MUSICAL GENIUS and A LEGEND.Get used with that!
alex said on 5/Mar/11
df
No we can't see his shoes in the photos that Omi posted but we did see Michael's entire body including his shoes in his interview with Oprah from 1993 when he showed her how to moonwalk in his movie theatre.He didn't have lifts and he still was towering a lot over Oprah.And the interview was actually BROADCASTED LIVE not RECORDED (remember that during the interview the fire alarm went off and Oprah said somethinh like:" The fire alarm just went off.Remember that this is a live Interview from Neverland and anything can happen"),so he couldn't have had the interview edited.So don't you ****ing tell us that he was 169 cm cause you don't believe that yourself. We are not all stupid you know.
Maybe he wasn't a big 185 cm guy but to exaggerate things like this and say that he was 169 cm like some people say that's more than RIDICULOUS and UNTRUE.
You people need to stop on hating on Michael cause you can't change the fact that he's a MUSICAL GENIUS and A LEGEND.Get used with that!
Why Rob said on 4/Mar/11
King Of PoP Michael Jackson Was 5 ft 10 Inch Tall ! 100 %
d wade said on 4/Mar/11
is dwarfed by 6,5 Michael jordan here
Click Here didnt look over 5,7 with Michael jordan
rocky said on 2/Mar/11
Not a big fan, but paid all that money to see him?
df said on 24/Feb/11
how do you know he's not wearing lifts on those pictures? you can't see his shoes.
Biggie said on 24/Feb/11
Mj is around 5'11"
he ain't shorter then that
i saw him on the dangeroes concert
I'm not a very big fan
but seriously he is 180 cm 5'11"
5'11 is right for mj
Omi said on 24/Feb/11
@Ignite
C'mon men "me" is absoloutely right Michael jackson is 5'11"
look at this photo of mj with 5'6.5" Oprah
mj is not wearing lifts in these photos
c'mon mj is about 4 inches taller
Click HereClick HereClick HereClick HereClick Here
Ignite said on 23/Feb/11
Before you insist on Michael Jackson Height 5'11, watch carefully his heels.
Yes, he is definitely 5'11 ON SHOE LIFTS!
me said on 23/Feb/11
Michael Jackson Height:5'11
My brother met him
my brother is 5'9
and he said that mj is taller then me
i asked how many inches
he said two
and guys i'm not lyin
he is actually 5'11
end of argument
d wade said on 21/Feb/11
the same height are you sightless mike tyson is 5,10 and looks 2 inches taller
than michael jackson
troll.
MMM said on 18/Feb/11
Well I've Actually met Michael Jackson Back In 2002
I'm 5'8
And Guys Really he isn't shorter than 5'8 and 5'9
he was towering me about Ummmmm
oh yes 3 inches
so that makes him 5'11"
well yeah mj is 5'11"
i wish i could show u the photo
Mr. Kaplan said on 16/Feb/11
Troll. Tyson is 5'10". He says so, and the editor of this site met him. End of story.
Dr.dre said on 16/Feb/11
@d wade
yo man in that photo mj and tyson looked exactly the same height
tyson is 5'11 and mj is 5'11 too
go get some life
don't make him short
SolidSnake said on 16/Feb/11
On the police record it said 5'11 and 120 pounds
Joe said on 12/Feb/11
It seems that some fanatics can't sleep at night if Michael Jackson's real height is under 175 cm.
alex said on 11/Feb/11
Michael was clearly 175 cm no matter the lies haters like ASERA say!PERIOD!
P.S: **** the rest( the HATERS ) Michael IS THE BEST!
d wade said on 11/Feb/11
he is much shorter than mike tyson even when he is standing straight and tyson not
Click Here so he was around 5,7 not more.
alex said on 11/Feb/11
Asera:He's only ever really looked tall with people who are about 5'3 or shorter? Seems like you have some brain issues!
As far as I know Michael's ex-wife Debbie Rowe is over 5'3, over 174 cm and Michael even without heels was still taller than her.
Here is a photo of Michael and Debbie:
Click Here So 5'3 or under is only in your mind-haters's minds.Just accept the facts! Michael was over 174 cm and that's a FACT! PERIOD!
Of course Michael is as great and loved no matter what his height was (HAHA HATERS) but when lying unfair people like you live on this planet Michael's FAIR FANS WILL ALWAYS DEFEND HIM! PERIOD! Night, Night!!!
Asera said on 11/Feb/11
Click HereIt's SO funny to me that this site has Michael at 5'9 and Sylvester Stallone at 5'9 yet Michael was clearly much shorter than Stallone, just like he was with another REAL 5'9 guy Eddie Murphy!
Click HereWhy can't they just admit already that in TRUTH he was just barely even 5'7 in his 20's, I just dont understand it.
An affirmant in Tokyo said on 11/Feb/11
No other 5'7 or 5'8 men look as great and taller as MJ did.
The Jackson brothers including Michael are generally shorter people, but on stage they look more gorgeous and greater than anybody.
Asera said on 10/Feb/11
Here's my album of MJ height pictures
Click Here
Viper said on 10/Feb/11
I wonder how he looked taller in his later years though. Platform shoes?
Asera said on 9/Feb/11
Of course he was 5'7! He's only ever really looked tall with people who are about 5'3 or shorter...He was closer to 5'6 George Lucas in height than 5'9 Eddie Murphy. Looked the same as 5'7 Frank Sinatra in the 80's. Just accept the facts already. Besides, what's so terrible about him being shorter than 5'9 anyway? People come in ALL kinds of different shapes and sizes. He's Michael Jackson! He should be as great and loved no matter what height he actually REALLY was in life.
Roland said on 9/Feb/11
Asera - Yeah I agree. He was about 5'7 tops. When ever he wasn't performing in his trademark loafers he would always wear those shoes with the heels on them.
btw I think he was 105 in the 80s. I read his book and he said he had a desire for a dancers body. Not exactly anorexic. Apparently he was 136 or something when he died. Even though he looked noticeably skinner then rather than in the 80s.
Brad said on 9/Feb/11
Murphy wears lifts, Jax's posture is always bad in poses. Both are 5' 9". 5' 9" a few feet from me in a court. He's taller than you think with good posture and if you ever saw him close-up.
Asera said on 8/Feb/11
Just look at this
Click HereEddie Murphy actually really IS 5'9...and Michael is clearly shorter even though he has on shoes that give him a lot more height advantage over Eddie's much flatter shoes! Michael was only 5'7 or about 169-170 cm MAX and that's it. That's also exactly the way he looked with George Lucas too. NOT 5'9, not 5'8...but just about 5'7! Barely an inch taller than a well known 167 cm guy!
And if people STILL refuse to understand this very simple and obvious fact then there's nothing I can do. You just go ahead and believe in lies but I'd much rather stick to the TRUTH.
Asera said on 8/Feb/11
Just look at this
Click HereEddie Murphy actually really IS 5'9...and Michael is clearly shorter even though he has on shoes that give him more height advantage over Eddie's much flatter shoes! Michael was only 5'7 or 169-170 cm MAX and that's it. That's also exactly the way he looked with George Lucas too. NOT 5'9, not 5'8...but just about 5'7!
Asera said on 8/Feb/11
I don't know if the whole autopsy report is a fake...but the height measuring definitely IS! One thing is sure at least, we know that at least when Michael was still ALIVE he was never more than 5'7 without shoes on. For some odd reason they're still lying about his height, I can't imagine why though. It's not like it's very difficult for anyone to see for themselves that he wasn't really 5'9.
We can all see ourselves from evidence that he was NOT over 5'7 ever.
Funny thing is, they did already admit (
Click Here ) that in the 80's he was the same height and weight as Fred Astaire. So 5'7 and about 100 lbs in his 20's. Great height for a dancer! Anorexic if that weight is true unfortunately. It's really obvious he was never a big man in any kind of way. VERY small, slight and slender actually. At least by the "western" standards!
It's actually quite ridiculous to claim he was 5'9.
An affirmant in Tokyo said on 7/Feb/11
A Japanese famous singer (Hiromi Go) who was a huge MJ fan, visited Michael courteously at his suite in Tokyo in the late 80's. It was MJ's first solo world tour (Bad World Tour). The Japanese singer recalls, his first impression of Michael was, (MJ was) shorter than he had expected. The singer's height is 5 ft 9 in (175 cm). 175 cm man doesn't think 175 cm man shorter. Obviously his 'short' means MJ was under 175 cm tall.
Very suggestive reminiscences.
Msec said on 7/Feb/11
5'7 is 170 cm or even 171 not 167 get your facts straight. And Michael looked 5'9-5'10. He had long limbs, so I would go for 5'8. Mainly because he was shorter than Eddie Murphy who is 5'9 and Paul.
alex said on 6/Feb/11
Anonymous: 5'7 (167 cm?). Are you for real?Next you're going to say that he was 4'0.You haters hate Michael so much that the internet is full of your lies.
Now it appears that Michael was even shorter than his father, his ex-wife Debbie and Whitney Houston who are both over 173 cm!Standing next to all of them Michael was still taller even without heels so he sure wasn't 167 cm.
How could Michael have been 167 cm when every video of him and his ex wife Debbie that I see he is taller than her even without his heels and SHE IS NOT A SMALL WOMEN!
You people think that we all are stupid to believe your hating ****?
You keep your unfair crap for yourself.Maybe Michael wasn't 180 cm or so but he sure wasn't 167 cm(5'7) either.
Yeah he was between 175-176cm.
Anonymous said on 6/Feb/11
I really don't think there's anyone around who seriously believes the obvious lies about MJ being 5'9, no matter what they try to claim. He's just never even looked like he's any more than 5'7 so obviously he WAS that height or maybe even shorter. If he was really 5'9 he wouldn't have needed high heeled boots to LOOK like he's 5'9! So 5'7 it is!
Ignite said on 2/Feb/11
Maybe especially his very long arms and legs, his broad shoulder and his big hands...have made illusions to the people that he is a tall man.
Legendary superstars have features in common that the mediocre never have.
Asera said on 2/Feb/11
Also 5'7 is NOT short at all really! In China and Asia in general he was pretty much average height for a man and most women there are only about 5'1 or 5'2 like this girl
Click HereLook at videos of Michael in Japan, he doesn't really stand out from the crowd at all there
Click Here
Msec said on 2/Feb/11
Mr Jackson with absoutely flat shoes
Click HereYou decide...
Msec said on 2/Feb/11
Well,never would I tought that Michael was less than 5'9, but some pictures show it, so he can't be the same height as someone as tall as 5'7 and 6'0 and in some pictures he is, so it's very confusing.I agree he was wearing heeled boots, and it's OK, but he had very long legs, could this be the reason for the ilussion? Or was he really 5'10? Could someone explain this, how could he have the proportions of a 5'10 guy and be 5'7?
Asera said on 1/Feb/11
Anyone who still stubbornly insists that Michael was really 5'9 is simply out of their mind or in denial about the truth! ONLY in his heels was he ever that tall!The picture of Michael and Lucas right next to each other proves without any doubt that he was never over 5'7. Lucas is around 167 cm, everyone knows that, and Michael is maybe a few cm or an inch at most taller. One inch from 5'6 is 5'7! He sure doesn't look 5'9 next to GL...and not 5'8 either! 5'7 flat is most accurate here. And not only that but other evidence shows this clearly as well. He could have been exactly 5'7 right after waking up. Maybe a little bit less most of the time as we all shrink a little during the day.
Click Here
MJJ said on 1/Feb/11
Even in the early 80's, Michael Jackson height was publicly said to be 175 cm.
And many people have doubted his real height, never thought he's over 175 cm.
Many sensible MJ fans accept the fact that his real height is at least 1 or 2 inches shorter.
alex said on 30/Jan/11
Mr.Kaplan:You hater I could say the same thing about you.Just posting some random pictures where Michael looks smaller because he doesn't stand straight.
But here are some VIDEOS and LIVE PERFORMANCES of Michael where he doesn't have heels and he still looks over 175 cm and not 169.
Click HereClick HereClick HereClick HereAnd if you wanna talk about ridiculous heels a better example is PRINCE the singer who wears high heels and women heels
Mr. Kaplan said on 30/Jan/11
I wouldn't go as far as 169 cm, but accept the fact that he wasn't over 173.
Mr. Kaplan said on 30/Jan/11
Click HereHe isn't slouching any more than Clinton on this picture.
alex said on 30/Jan/11
Mr.Kaplan:You hater I could say the same thing about you.Just posting some random pictures where Michael looks smaller because he doesn't stand straight.
But here are some VIDEOS and LIVE PERFORMANCES of Michael where he doesn't have heels and he still looks over 175 cm and not 169.
Click HereClick HereClick HereClick HereAnd if you wanna talk about ridiculous heels a better example is PRINCE the singer who wears high heels and women heels.
Jackie said on 30/Jan/11
@Alex - Don't waste your time with Asera. Every celebrity I look at that has any relation to Michael Jackson he's there. Not talking about the celebrity at hand but instead Michael Jackson. He's obviously not a fan. He's obsessed rather then interested in his height.
I think Michael Jackson was about 5'8 at best. Maybe a centimeter or two shorter. He was very smart with his footwear. He ofter looked about 5'11 with shoes that had heels on them.
Mr. Kaplan said on 30/Jan/11
5'11" and 99 lbs in the Thriller era... yea right. He would've been in the hospital with such a low BMI.
Mr. Kaplan said on 30/Jan/11
alex, you are way off. Just posting some random pictures were Jackson looks taller because of his footwear. He's dwarfed by Clinton. Look at the ridiculous heels on some pictures.
alex said on 29/Jan/11
Asera: Here are photos of Michael and Whitney Houston who is a tall women - she's 174-175 cm and Michael is taller than her with or with heels.So he is over 174cm not 169 cm.You're delusional!
Click HereClick HereInstead of posting stupid comments trying to convince people of something that is not true - "that Michael was 169 cm" why won't you post comments talking about Michael's MEGATALENT , his GENIUS, his LEGENDARY MUSIC...
Am I supposed to think that I am right when I say that you are a hater?!Wow...
alex said on 29/Jan/11
Asera: Here are photos of Michael and Whitney Houston who is a tall women - she's 174-175 cm and Michael is taller than her with or with heels.So he is over 174cm not 169 cm.You're delusional!
Click HereClick HereInstead of posting stupid comments trying to convince people of something that is not true - "that Michael was 169 cm" why won't you post comments talking about Michael's MEGATALENT , his GENIUS, his LEGENDARY MUSIC...
Am I supposed to think that I am right when I say that you are a hater?!Wow...
alex said on 29/Jan/11
Asera: Here are photos of Michael and Whitney Houston who is a tall women - she's 174-175 cm and Michael is taller than her with or with heels.So he is over 174cm not 169 cm.You're delusional!
Click HereClick HereInstead of posting stupid comments trying to convince people of something that is not true - "that Michael was 169 cm" why won't you post comments talking about Michael's MEGATALENT , his GENIUS, his LEGENDARY MUSIC...
Am I supposed to think that I am right when I say that you are a hater?!Wow...
P.Y.T. said on 29/Jan/11
Michael's height on barefoot:
Under 170 cm: skeletally impossible!
171 to 174 cm is proper.
Over 175 cm: also skeletally impossible!
Chris said on 29/Jan/11
Michael had te weirdest height ever! Sometimes he didn't look very tall, but sometimes he did, the only way we could ever really know was if he got measured standing up straight. I heard on his autopsy report, he was 5'11.
alex said on 28/Jan/11
Asera: Here are photos of Michael and Whitney Houston who is a tall women - she's 174-175 cm and Michael is taller than her with or with heels.So he is over 174cm not 169 cm.You're delusional!
Click HereClick HereInstead of posting stupid comments trying to convince people of something that is not true - "that Michael was 169 cm" why won't you post comments talking about Michael's MEGATALENT , his GENIUS, his LEGENDARY MUSIC...
Am I supposed to think that I am right when I say that you are a hater?!Wow...
alex said on 28/Jan/11
Asera: Here are photos of Michael and Whitney Houston who is a tall women - she's 174-175 cm and Michael is taller than her with or with heels.So he is over 174cm not 169 cm.You're delusional!
Click HereClick HereInstead of posting stupid comments trying to convince people of something that is not true - "that Michael was 169 cm" why won't you post comments talking about Michael's MEGATALENT , his GENIUS, his LEGENDARY MUSIC...
Am I supposed to think that I am right when I say that you are a hater?!Wow...
alex said on 28/Jan/11
Asera: Here is a photo of Michael and Whitney Houston who is a tall women - she's 174-175 cm and Michael is taller than her with or with heels.So he is over 174 cm not 169 cm.You're delusional!
Click HereInstead of posting stupid comments trying to convince people of something that is not true - "that Michael was 169 cm" why won't you post comments talking about Michael's MEGATALENT , his GENIUS, his LEGENDARY MUSIC...
Am I supposed to think that I am right when I say that you are a hater?!Wow...
alex said on 28/Jan/11
Asera: Here is a photo of Michael and Whitney Houston who is a tall women - she's 174-175 cm and Michael is taller than her with or with heels.So he is over 174 cm not 169 cm.You're delusional!
Click HereInstead of posting stupid comments trying to convince people of something that is not true - "that Michael was 169 cm" why won't you post comments talking about Michael's MEGATALENT , his GENIUS, his LEGENDARY MUSIC...
Am I supposed to think that I am right when I say that you are a hater?!Wow...
Asera said on 27/Jan/11
Michael 169 cm and Sheryl about 156 cm both without their shoes on.
Click HereClick HereCompare also Ola Ray who is in this same height range,from 5'1 to 5'2, with Michael.
Looks just about 5 inches smaller than him!They ALL do.There's even a part in the Making of Thriller where they both wear flat shoes and he looks exactly 5'7 or 170 cm to her 157 cm!
Ignite said on 27/Jan/11
alex:
If you watch the photo carefully, you can see they stood on the different foot positions; The photo fosters illusions to the people that they look the same height. Purposely McArtney was shrinking and laying his body forward, while Michael stretching his body to the fullest like a stick.
Also I watched the "Say Say Say" many times. Michael was in so great shape that they look the same height in some scenes. But in reality, it is clear McArtney surpasses Michael in height by at least 2 inches.
Of course, I don't think Michael was very small. But I think he was not tall.
I quite agree with you on your comments later.
So...it doesn't matter to me if he was not tall.
Viper said on 27/Jan/11
MJ certaintly looked taller in his later years though.
alex said on 27/Jan/11
Asera: Dancers are usually small people?I wouldn't bet on that.Take Nick Carter (BSB) for instance.He is not small.He is 185 cm and he still is fast and agile!Not like Michael of course but he is.
And how can you compare Michael's height with his mother's saying that he's small like his mother?
Did you ever see how Michael looks next to his mother?He is a lot taller than her with or without heels.He towers over her with at least 20cm.And he's taller than his father too.
You just like to talk for the sake of talking.No arguments to sustain your comments.
alex said on 26/Jan/11
Ignite: In the photo I wanted to show Michael and Paul McCartney they stand together naturally and they look the same height.No trick.But for some reason, maybe the link to the photo is broken we can't see the photo.
Did you also see Michael's and Paul's video that they did together, "Say, Say"? In the video they look the same height and they stand together naturally although we can't see in the video if they had heels or not.
And long time fans like you say should also know that while Michael was not very tall on the other hand he wasn't a dwarf either like you people are trying to make him look with your comments.
And people who met Michael in person say that he was tall.But that's not what matters most.
Here's what Paul McCartney himself said about Michael in a interview that you can see on youtube:
Quote:" Michael was MASIVELY TALENTED"!
This and what Michael did for this world and his talent are more important.He was a GENIUS, he is a LEGEND and his MEGATALENT can't even be compared or surpassed with/by none of today's artists.Michael's LEGENDARY MUSIC and the LEGACY he left with us will live forever.
Asera said on 26/Jan/11
So how tall was he really? After all the analyzing and comparing, from 5'6 to 5'7 seems the most likely and realistic...when he was younger obviously! Looking about the same as 5'6 Lucas in his 20's.
Michael also clearly has the physique and body proportions of someone between 5'5 and 5'7. Defnitely NOT of someone as tall as 5'9!
Click HereHe looks VERY close to Diana Ross,that's why I compare them together so much. They just look too close in height and body proportions for him to be taller. She's between 5'4 and 5'5.
And dancers usually ARE smaller people. If he was 5'9 or over I doubt he could be nearly as fast and agile!I think his height was just perfect for him too. I wouldn't want him to be any taller!Makes him even more appealing(and cute&sexy!)to me. I guess I just like guys close to my own height.
And you must also remember that Michael's mother Katherine is VERY tiny,she only looks about 4'11-5'0 most of the time.And height is very much hereditary and in the genes.It wouldn't be very likely that her kids would grow to be giants either! That's the main reason most of the Jackson kids are quite small also, all the girls and Randy, Marlon and Michael are at least. I think Jermaine and Jackie are a little bit taller than the others.
Ignite said on 26/Jan/11
This photo is a clever trick.
If they stand together naturally, it is obvious McCartney is taller than Michael by at least 2 inches.
Long time MJ fans know he was not tall man.
alex said on 25/Jan/11
Here is a photo of Michael and Paul McCartney.As we can see Michael doesn't have heels or at least that's how it looks like and they are the same height .Michael was obviously over 174 cm.
Let's see you yelling now:
Click here :
Click Here
SJ said on 24/Jan/11
Bill Clinton is 188cm
Mr. Kaplan said on 24/Jan/11
McCartney was 5'10.5". Jackson wore lifts. Hence why Clinton dwarfs him.
Smelly said on 23/Jan/11
I know MJ's height is 172 - 174 cm.
Anonymous said on 23/Jan/11
Michael would be 5'11 ONLY wearing 4 inch platform shoes!
Asera said on 23/Jan/11
You guys are just getting sillier and sillier! First MJ is 5'9 and now he's 5'11! Wow! Next thing he will probably be 6'0! I wonder how he grew that much since in his 20's and 30's I'm pretty sure he barely reached 5'7
Click HereClick HereClick HereClick HereClick Hereoh yeah...he didn't REALLY grow after all! Michael looking 5-6 inches smaller than 184 cm Bill Clinton
Click Here Bill's head is definitely HUGE and who knows what type of shoes MJ is wearing!
He liked these kind of shoes a lot
Click HereClick HereClick HereClick HereIt is absolutely amazing how SHORT and small a good 5'9-5'11 guy can look next to a 5'6 guy and tiny 5'0-5'3 women when he's NOT wearing high heeled boots ; )
Click Here Click HereI'm pretty sure Mr.moonwalker and alex are either MAJORLY deluded "fans" or some kind of MJ height propaganda
trolls. That's the only explanation for their comments. I'm sure most people appreciate actual research into the real TRUTH though!
Asera said on 23/Jan/11
Watch
Click HereSheryl is 156 cm ( about the same height as Stevie Nicks who is 5'1
Click Here ) and Michael I bet is just about169 cm barefoot!He would be about 172 cm in his shoes and she about 162 cm in her heels. The height difference doesn't look over 4 inches.He sure doesn't look over 5 inches taller than her when they're both wearing shoes!
And always remember that celebrities and their publicity people are VERY rarely honest about height, for some odd reason it's a really bid deal in Hollywood. This is such a great example.Maybe this will teach people to be more wary of trusting magazines and other places that list heights. Even this site has most people at least 2 inches too tall!The readers knows the truth though a lot of times, you can't fool us. Back in the 80's MJ was probably still listed more accurately as 5'7 and people knew that as fact. He's too small to be any taller. Anyone can see that.Over the years he just seemed to mysteriously "grow" more taller in the public imagination though he never grew physically any taller, more like the opposite in fact!
Asera said on 23/Jan/11
Look...Sheryl Crow is ONLY 155-157 cm so Michael can't POSSIBLY be 5'9!!
Click HereFor Michael to be 5'9 he would have to be at least 5 inches taller than her when she's in her heels! And he DEFINITELY doesn't look that tall next to her in pictures OR video.Again just compare her and other women under 5'2 with Michael to MJ with Diana Ross. Diana is around 5'4 and looks considerably taller with Michael. She even often looks the same height or taller than him in her heels. Even their body proportions look similar.
He also looks the same size as George Lucas who everyone KNOWS is only 5'6 or 168 cm at most!
You're ONLY wasting your time trying to convince people...there is no way in HELL MJ was EVER over 5'7 without his shoes on. It's just not possible.
alex, he obviously wasn't 175 cm because he looks nowhere NEAR that tall with George Lucas, with Eddie Murphy, with Janet, with Marlon Brando, or with Ronald Reagan OR Bill Clinton. He doesn't look that tall with this Alan guy either who is supposed to be 179 cm!It's just utterly ridiculous to try to say he was that height. No way! I don't care how many times you try to convince us, he was taller than 5'7 only in your delusional mind.
Again, most people here know that Sheryl Crow is only 5'2 at most :
Click HereAnd Diana Ross looks too close to his height or even taller in heels for him to be over 5'7. And she is only 163-164 cm tall!
Michael was the same height as 5'7 Frank Sinatra :
Click HereClick HereAnd again with 5'6 Lucas
Click HereYou're not convincing me at all with this "fan" propaganda. We sensible MJ fans KNOW the truth. Michael was VERY clearly 169-170 cm MAX!Certainly no more. And it's really obvious too!
Mr.moonwalker, he sure doesn't look even 5'9 here
Click HereDiana Ross must be around 5'7 for Michael to be 5'9
Click HereClick Herelook at them close to each other in WATW :
Click HereClick HereClick HereShe was wearing flat shoes in that...MJ is about 5'7 or under and that's all.
Anonymous said on 23/Jan/11
Don't fool yourselves anymore people...he was clearly no way even 5'7 without shoes! Closer to 5'6 in reality I would say! There's practically NO difference between him and George Lucas in that picture where they stand RIGHT next to each other. And I doubt Lucas is any more than 167 cm. And it's absolutely true Sheryl Crow is about 5'1.5" without her high heels. With heels on she's only just about 5'4" !
alex said on 23/Jan/11
To M.J: 169-166cm?haha that's a laugh.Now in your delusional mind Michael was even smaller than his 2 wifes, Lisa Marie and Debbie Rowe ?You people are braindead.Debbie Rowe was over 174 cm and Michael was taller than her without his heels.So he was obviously over 175 cm.You haters need to grow up.
Mr.moonwalker said on 23/Jan/11
He's 5'11
People Who think that mj was below 5'8 sre totally wrong
well look at this
MJ WITH 5'6.5 OPRAH
Come on people he is defenitly about 4 inches taller
Click Here
Anonymous said on 22/Jan/11
A huge LOL at 5'9!! More like 5'7 at most!
M.J said on 22/Jan/11
I think he was 169 cm...seems much more than likely.And if he lost height over time maybe even more closer to 166cm later on.Look at this video of the 45'th birthday party
Click HereThere are some REALLY tall bodyguards who tower over everyone but even the shorter or more "average" guys are ALL taller than Mike.He's simply a short guy and that's it!
Mr. Kaplan said on 22/Jan/11
Lee J. Cobb was 5'10", and Brando was shorter than him. Marlon described his father as 180 cm (5'11") and he is obviously a few inches shorter than him on pictures.
But on the picture with MJ, I'd say he is wearing lifts anyway. They are about even.
alex said on 21/Jan/11
Here is a video of Michael and Nick Carter (BSB) who is a tall men - 184 cm and still next to Nick Michael doesn't look that small. There is no way in hell that Michael was under 176 cm. Click here:
Click Here
alex said on 21/Jan/11
Here is a video of Michael and Nick Carter (BSB) who is a tall men - 184 cm and still next to Nick Michael doesn't look that small.
Click Here
Asera said on 21/Jan/11
I've analyzed Janet a bit too for fun...Janet is clearly under 5'2.Anything from 155 to 157 cm seems likely for her!
In the VMA's with Michael in 1995 :
Click HereClick HereJust look how tiny they both are! Michael was even wearing some type of higher heeled boots too in that,I got a glimpse of his shoes.
And in the Grammy's 1984
Click HereJanet seems to be about the same size as the 5'2 or 156-158 cm Shery Crow is next to Michael :
Click HereClick HereFrom this we can only conclude that Janet is under 5'2! Seems more closer to 5'1 sometimes.It's funny how many women around Michael were around this same height : from 5'1-5'2.
I think he was pretty much evenly exactly 5'7 in his younger years.There really is no doubt about THAT!
The 164 cm Diana Ross looks considerably taller next to him than these other much smaller women do!
Click Here
alex said on 21/Jan/11
Asera:Go on Youtube and watch the video of Michael and Nick Carter (BSB) who is a tall men - 184 cm and next to Nick Michael is not very short. But Michael was a beautiful men in all the ways.
And yes only superficial people care about these things.I didn't start this fight and topic.What Michael did for this world and his talent are more important than anything else.He was a GENIUS,he is a LEGEND and his MEGATALENT can't be compared with none of today's artists who's music I don't think will still be played and copied in 30-40 years like Michael's music is.Michael's LEGENDARY music and the LEGACY he left with us will live forever.
Anonymous said on 20/Jan/11
Michael's 5'9", around 175cm for 2 reasons:
He's leaning, if he adopted Alan's posture his eyelevel would be around the bridge of Alan's nose.
His shoulder level's similar/even to 179cm 5'10.5" Alan even though Alan's posture is perfect and Michael is leaning slightly towards him.
Mr. Kaplan said on 20/Jan/11
Asera just tore apart each and every 5'11" claim from clowns here. Cheers!
alex said on 20/Jan/11
Let me repeat just a phrase from my previous comment in order for you to uderstand cause maybe it's too long for you:Go on Youtube and watch the video of Michael and Nick Carter (BSB) who is a tall men - 184 cm and next to Nick Michael is not very short.
Anonymous said on 20/Jan/11
Let me repeat just a phrase from my previous comment in order for you to uderstand cause maybe it's too long for you:Go on Youtube and watch the video of Michael and Nick Carter (BSB) who is a tall men - 184 cm and next to Nick Michael is not very short.
Asera said on 20/Jan/11
LOL! I KNOW I'm right! After all this researching...He was 5'8-5'9 only IN HIS SHOES!And barefoot just about 5'7.But who really cares about THAT except superficial people. What matters most is that he was the most talented and beloved musical/entertainment GENIUS this panet has ever seen! And he did more good and healing for this hurting world than anyone else. With great fame comes great responsibility in my opinion. And Michael ALWAYS made healing the World his most important goal and mission.He could be 5'3 for all I care, I would still admire him and love more than anyone else.It's for the person behind the personality!
alex said on 20/Jan/11
Asera:I have Michael's autopsy report in my computer. So I have seen the document.And you said it yourself!That we can't really know how tall Michael was and that all we have is guesses.If that's so then how can you claim and say that Michael was 171-172 cm based on photos that you see and make it a fact? Talking about Injustice.Make up your mind. But if you want to talk about photos then go watch photos of Michael and Whithney Houston who is taller than Diana Ross.Whithney has over 175 cm and we can see that both Michael and Whithney have the same height.Or watch videos of Michael and his second wife Debbie Rowe who is over 173 cm and Michael still was taller than her! In this case how can you claim that Michael was under 171 cm?Delusional much? Or you're in fact a hater?Michael can't be 172 cm since Whithney is over 175 cm and they both look the same height . Or go on Youtube and watch the video of Michael and Nick Carter (BSB) who is a tall men - 184 cm and next to Nick Michael is not very short.
Allan said on 19/Jan/11
@Asera - I was just about to mention the comparison with Eddie Murphy.
I agree with you. I think he was about 5'8 at the most. Most likely closer to 5'7.
I'm a fan and all, but I noticed during the later years in his career around the 90s when he wasn't performing he would wear shoes that kind of had heels. I don't know the exact name and I can't give a picture, but I'm sure someone knows what I'm talking about. They weren't the casual loafers.
Those shoes must add nearly 2 inches. Seriously. Because at the 1984 Grammys he was barely taller then Quincy Jones who is listed at 5'6.5 here..
Asera said on 19/Jan/11
Look at this video of Michael and Sheryl together :
Click HereYeah...she's 5'3 or 5'2 and Michael is definitely 5'7 and no taller! There is NO doubt about it. They're both really quite small people!Michael sounds so good too in that rehearsal.SUCH an unlimited entertainment genius!
Asera said on 19/Jan/11
Here's something that surprised me. Michael and Sheryl Crow :
Click HereAccording to this site she's definitely under 5'3...Many say she's more 5'2 than 5'3
Click HereThere's also some discussion about "Michael" there.I wonder could they mean any other Michael than MJ? Probably not! Since it seems like in his youth he was just about over 5'7 like we've already seen from many pictures.He was the same height as 5'7 Frank Sinatra in his 20's. During Thriller he was said to be the exact same height and weight as Fred Astaire, who was 5'7! He looked often the same height as 5'4 Diana Ross wearing heels.And he also looked nearly the same height as George Lucas during Captain EO. They say he lost some height which could be because he looked so much shorter than Bill Clinton in 2002! So the "mystery" is solved pretty much.
MJ's peak height was probably around 5'7.5 171 cm! Just like I said earlier,though I didn't consider if he lost any height over time.
But yeah, the Jacksons are definitely a short family! Especially the women are all under 5'3 :
Click HereAnd Michael is SUCH a clear 5'7 and half that it's absolutely ridiculous there are still people who dont see it! He just simply LOOKS shorter!Not even average.You just can't do much about your GENES, if the mother is as small as Katherine is(she looks barely 5 feet tall!) then it's not likely the kids will be very tall either.
And I really don't care what any brainwashed fans or publicity people say anymore, I KNOW this is the truth.It's obvious! This site has MJ 2 inches taller than he really was, and so does the autopsy.
Asera said on 19/Jan/11
Seriously I've had enough of braindead MJ "fans" telling me that
"Michael MUST have been 5'9 because it said so in the official autopsy report!!!"
oh god, this is getting too ridiculous!
If Eddie Murphy is 5'9 then MJ can't POSSIBLY be the same height since he's much shorter :
Click HereNO! For the last time Michael was barely over 5'7.
He's also almost the same height as George Lucas :
Click HereWhy can't they see the truth I wonder?Please someone finally tell MJ fans the autopsy measuring is totally false and fake!
Asera said on 19/Jan/11
alex...How is he 5'9 next to 5'8 Marlon Brando in this picture?
Click HereCome on now...Just use your eyes for once!
Asera said on 19/Jan/11
And about Michael and Diana since you apparently wouldn't even properly read what I wrote about them...I wrote She LOOKS the same height or even slightly taller than Michael in a LOT of pictures of them together where she's likely wearing high heeled shoes :
Click HereClick HereClick HereClick HereClick HereClick HereClick HereThe height difference between them obviously wasn't very big then!She always easily looked the same height as he did. And she's under 5'5. Just think about that.
Even if she was wearing heels ALL the time in those pictures he couldn't be taller than 5'8.
And here's the pictures of Michael with George Lucas :
Click HereClick HereLucas is 5'6...and Michael looks only a few cm taller! How on earth do you explain that if he's really supposed to be as tall as 5'9. It's impossibe! I'm 5'6 and if I stand right next to someone who is REALLY 5'9 the height difference shows a lot more clearly! Michael looks about 3-4 cm taller than Lucas. Which means he is 171-172 cm tall.It's so clear to see.I CAN'T possibly be the only one who sees this!
Asera said on 19/Jan/11
I don't really CARE what the autopsy says! I trust my own eyes over something that I've never even SEEN or witnessed myself and have no way of knowing if that autopsy is truthful or not! Were YOU there when they measured him? I dont think so...Then how do you know the "autopsy" is completely truthful.There's a LOT of strange and suspicious things happening around Michael's death/murder!We have no way of knowing if that autopsy is even real or not. We haven't seen Michael being measured by ANYONE.All we have is guesses.As far as I know he's never mentioned how tall he is in public. All we have is pictures and video to make our own conclusions.It seems like YOU're the one who is being delusional here when you refuse to look at all the proof I've shows about MJ's height. Just look at his pictures with Bill Clinton, does that really look like he's 5'9 to you?Clinton is 184 cm and Michael is over 10 cm shorter! He can't possibly be 5'9.
And I'm not the only one who says he wasn't 5'9 either!
I've shown many times visual proof that Michael was NOT over 5'8 and you still refuse to even listen or look at it. I wont argue about this anymore, It's useless.I've just said my opinion and I've shown that he was clearly shorter than Eddie Murphy who is 175 cm or 176...how can he be shorter than Eddie if he's 5'9 himself? That doesn't make ANY sense you realize. When will people start trusting their own eyes.I'm just wondering.
Asera said on 18/Jan/11
Alex calm down!I just said she was probably wearing high heels in that picture and that's WHY she looks taller! Did you even look at it?Yes of course Michael was taller than her! I wasn't even saying he wasn't taller! Only that when she wore heels she LOOKED taller. Just like Michael when he wore heels.Nobody ever mentions the shoes which is pretty stupid when we're talking about height.
If Diana was 5'4 or 5'5 then MJ was surely OVER 5'7 clearly but not over 5'8. Have you seen that picture of Michael with George Lucas. They look so close in height that the difference was probably only a few cm. And Lucas is 5'6.
I'm only trying to find out the truth about MJ's height!It seem like such a mystery to most people.They just assume he was tall because he's so incredibly famous and powerful. Well we've seen that was not the case.
See Eddie Murphy for example IS 5'9 and he's clearly taller than Michael :
Click HereEddie was even wearing very flat shoes in that and Michael was wearing his boots which give a few cm extra height!And he still looks shorter!Look at the shoes thats all I'm saying.
alex said on 18/Jan/11
Asera: The official autopsy report clearly says that Michael was 5'9'' and that's something you cannot fight with unless you think in your delusional mind that you can fight over an official document and a doctor or coroner that measured Michael.So Michael was over 175 cm. Period! Also that picture of Michael and Diana Ross that you posted and said that she is taller than Michael...You've got to be kidding or you need glasses.Take a good look at the picture and see that Michael is as tall or even taller than Diana.As I said before the only time when Diana was taller than Michael was when Michael was a little kid.As he grew up Michael became taller than Diana and that's a PROVED FACT!
Asera said on 17/Jan/11
Here's another one of Clinton and Michael :
Click Here
alex said on 17/Jan/11
Dk you envious hater his name is not Jacko.His name is Michael in his birth certificate,in his passport,ID and you cannot change that with these stupid names that the MEDIA BRAINWASHED YOU WITH! Asera: Diana Ross taller than Michael?You must have been eating junkfood or you're on crack.The only time when Diana was taller than Michael was when Michael was 12 years old.When Michael grew up he left Diana behind as he became taller than her and we have for instance the "We are the World" video where Michael is staying right next to Diana and he's clearly taller than her.That's a fact that nobody can change.Period!
Asera said on 17/Jan/11
Does he even LOOK like he's 5'9 in that picture with this Alan guy who is supposedly 179 cm? NO!He looks a lot shorter...more like closer to 5'7 or 5'8 at most.
Look here's the Alan guy with Bill Clinton :
Click HereClick HereAnd here's the picture of Michael and Clinton again :
Click HereMichael was NOT 5'9! It's just physically impossible. He looks shorter than 5'4-5'5 Diana Ross who probably had high heeles on in this picture :
Click HereMichael wasn't over 5'8!
Oh and dk...If I were you I REALLY woulnd't be calling Michael "jacko" around his devoted followers and fans!! That's just EXTREMELY rude and stupid!I wish you haters would just leave Michael and us alone finally and stop insulting him!That WONT be tolerated just know that.
dk said on 16/Jan/11
@alex
You can't trust eye level with things like this. Jacko's too smart for that.
@ASERA
You are correct. So true?
Asera said on 16/Jan/11
Look alex I think I'll trust my OWN eyes and senses on this instead of hearsay about height. People,especially in Hollywood, are rarely truly honest about their height. Photographic and video evidence SHOWS very clearly that Michael was betweeen 5'7 and 5'8 all his life and It's really not that hard to see the TRUTH, just open your eyes and stop being delusional. Again I have to wonder..WHY exactly is it SO terrible that he was under 5'8 and no taller? I just don't get it. Why do you so desperately want to believe in a lie that he was taller when he so ovbiously wasn't. It's not "unfair" to say the truth, it's just simply the truth and nothing more. I'm not trying to be "unfair" to Michael in any way here. It's just so easy to see too, I mean come on!
Asera said on 16/Jan/11
Michael with Bill Clinton :
Click HereThe height difference between them is like 20cm!! You STILL want to stubbornly insist that he was taller than 171 cm? Despite all this clear evidence and proof I've shown you that it's simply not true? I honestly cant believe that...Why do MJ fans want to delude themselves into believing something that was obviously NOT true ever. Michael was NEVER over 5'8, just accept it already and move on. It's just not possible in any way.He was under 5'8 in his 20's and also in his 40's too. And that's the FACT!
Asera said on 16/Jan/11
Michael with Marlon Brando who was about 5'8 :
Click HereIt's funny he looks so much taller than Michael there...He must be wearing some of those "special shoes" or something!
alex said on 16/Jan/11
Debbie Rowe Michael's second wife is a quite tall women, she is over 173 cm and Michael sitting next to her is still taller than Debbie even without his heels.So you can't seriously claim that Michael was under 172 cm.That's unfair.Lisa Marie instead who is much shorter than Michael and Debbie looked so short next to Michael especially when she wasn't wearing high heels.
Doo Doo said on 16/Jan/11
Michael was obviously under 175cm on barefoot.
I have been a huge MJ fan for almost 30 years.
In the early 1980s, I read his biography written by Mark Bego that said his height was about 175cm. In that book, you can see the picture of MJ in the Off the Wall era, wearing high heel boots.
Many long time MJ fans know he is not in fact tall. Also know that is not wrong thing.
alex said on 16/Jan/11
Asera:Your comments are really ridiculous.Michael did used flat and comfortable shoes.Remember that Michael was also a dancer and a PERFECTIONIST and on stage he used most of the time confortable shoes as he would have not allowed to ruin his show by using very high heels especially that heels can make someone like Michael who danced all the time feel tired. Besides just because he sometimes used heels dosen't mean that he wanted to look taller.Maybe he just love it. Your comments do not stand. Why is Nicole Kidman for instance who is already a tall women using heels?Because she just likes it!? Michael was over 175cm.171 cm dosen't stand no matter how many comments you post.
Asera said on 15/Jan/11
Also one thing I have to add...IF Michael really was over 5'8-5'9 like some people desperately try to claim, then WHY would he bother with high heeled boots so much? Doesn't make much sense to me. I think he was obviously wearing them in public so much to LOOK or seem to be average height or taller!No average height man would feel the need to do that I think...Of course I can't really say for sure because I'm not a man :P
But anyway...
Just think about it. If he really was 5'9 or taller why would he bother with heels at all? Why not just wear flat(and more comfortable) shoes all the time?
And honestly when I look at the picture of Michael and Lucas next to each other I just can't see much of a height difference.It's like a few cm only. And THAT is very significant. If he really was 5'9 we would be able to see a clearer difference between them right away!I'm about 5'6 and when I stand next to someone who is 5'9 the difference is very obvious.With MJ and Lucas it's NOT very obvious at all. Which makes me think Michael was probably closer to 5'7.
Asera said on 15/Jan/11
Again I quote from
Click HereThe references part of this article says :
"Lauren Goode (June 30, 2009). "Deborah Landis, Designer of the Red Jacket Michael Jackson Wore in “Thriller”". Wall Street Journal (Speakeasy).
Click Here Retrieved July 4, 2009. "At the time, she says, the 25-year-old Jackson weighed only 99 lbs, with a 26-inch waist (“exactly the same height and weight as Fred Astaire”), and one of the challenges she faced was making the performer appear more “virile.”"
Read that again..."Exactly the same height and weight as Fred Astaire"!! How tall was Fred? Well, most people say around 5'7!! Just figure it out yourself people. It's not THAT hard surely. If you got a guy who is as thin and long legged as MJ AND he's even wearing high heeled boots/shoes a lot in public appearances then he WILL inevitably look much taller in pictures and real life than what his actual REAL height is in bare feet.Which was under 5'8 clearly. Now we can always debate about where exactly he is in there between 5'7 and 5'8 but he's obviously not any taller OR shorter than that either. That's just not very likely when you look at hom next to people like George Lucas who's height is well know to be 5'6...Michael looks to me about 4 cm taller.
And I just don't think he was THAT short for a man. I mean look at MJ's old manager Frank Dileo! That guy isn't even 5'3 tall! Or Michael's good old rival Prince! It's not the biggest deal in the world, well at least in MY opinion it isn't.
Mr. Kaplan said on 15/Jan/11
Heels and lifts aren't the same thing. If that would be ****** up if Sinatra wore high heels.
SJ said on 15/Jan/11
Maybe Tom Cruise and MJ are of same height.
Great shape make them look taller.
me said on 14/Jan/11
@Mr Kaplan
Women in hooker heels doesn't walk like clowns. They can dance on those.
T.J. said on 13/Jan/11
Standing straight, I believe he was a strong 5'10"
Mr. Kaplan said on 13/Jan/11
You do realize that these shoes would need to be 5 inches high, right? 5'7" barefoot = 6'0" in shoes (say Tyson is 5'11" with trainers). I don't see how anyone could wear shoes 5" high without looking and walking like a clown.
Asera said on 13/Jan/11
Just look at the kind of shoes he used to wear and the heels on them! :
Click HereClick HereClick HereClick HereClick HereClick HereThese kind of shoes would easily make him look over 5'9 or so!The heels are probably 2-3 inches so that together with his REAL height of 5 ft 7.5 or 171-172 cm would be enough to create an ILLUSION of more height.But it's still ONLY an illusion people. He was never over 5'8 in any possible way.
Michael looks the same height as Lenny Kravitz who is probably only 5'7 or even shorter! :
Click HereWell they both seem to also really love high heeled shoes and boots :
Click HereFace it already...You only WANT him to be taller because of his enormous and otherworldly fame and power all over the world.
MJ is definitely larger than life than anyone else for sure in all his achievements but in real actual physical height he WAS shorter than average. And there is nothing wrong with that!
Asera said on 13/Jan/11
Anonymous said :
"lol look the pic alan is 1,79m and look mj he is smaller then 1 inch on his dead i hear in the tv he was 1,72m"
You would be absolutely correct ;)
I would say he was more likely 171 cm than 172 cm actually...Maybe 172 in the mornings but definitely 171 cm most of the time.
Michael and George Bush :
Click HereClick HereClick HereClick HereLook at the boots he was wearing at the time :
Click HereMichael and the Reagans :
Click HereMichael and 5'4 Diana Ross :
Click HereClick HereIt is absolutely undeniable if you actually bother looking at all the proof!
Asera said on 13/Jan/11
Here's some pictures of 6'1 Ronald Reagan and MJ :
Click HereClick HereClick HereAs you can see the clear obvious height difference shows Michael is only about 171-172 cm tall and can not possibly be ANY more than that!Reagan wasn't even at his peak height back then and MJ was standing as tall and straight as possible with GREAT posture. It's time to admit everyone who still claims Michael was some kind of a giant or taller than 5'7-5'8 that you are just simply WRONG.This site has MJ's REAL height all wrong and it's been proved many times already!He was NEVER 5'9, at most probably 172 cm at his tallest.
Just wake up and face reality already! I'm a HUGE fans of Michael's too and I can clearly see the obvious reality. Why can't the rest of you?
Asera said on 13/Jan/11
Frank Sinatra (also about) 5'7 and MJ :
Click HereClick HereAlso consider the fact this was when MJ was in his early 20's and Sinatra was older. So...they're the SAME height! both slightly over 5'7.
Jesus said on 13/Jan/11
M.J is 5'10.
Mr. Kaplan said on 11/Jan/11
I don't care how big your lifts are, you can't be taller than a 5'10" guy when you're 5'7".
me said on 10/Jan/11
Sinatra is a lifts wearer
Mr. Kaplan said on 10/Jan/11
Something doesn't fit. Is it really Tyson on the far-left? Well, according to the picture, he was shorter than 5'7" Frank Sinatra, which doesn't make sense. According to the same picture, Sinatra is taller than Jackson!
Mr.moonwalker said on 10/Jan/11
@Mr.Kaplan
Here R Some Pics Of MJ & Brooke Shields
They R Quite The Same Height
But Brooke Shields Is Actually 6 Feet & Mj is 5'11
Click HereClick HereClick HereClick HereAnd Mj With Paul Mccartney both are 5'11" & They R Stated 5'11 too.
Click HereClick HereClick HereAnd here mj with mike tyson , mike tyson is 5'11" we all know that
Click HereClick Herein this pic mike is standing far left and u can compare his height with mj , mj is standing in the middle
Click Hereand here with 5'6.5 Oprah winfrey , mj is obviously towering her about 4 inches
Click HereClick HereClick Herehere oprah in a photoshot with mj , she is using a very thick & tall woden rectangular-shaped thing to make herself as tall as the king mj
i believe it's as tall as 4 inches , and mj is still about 0.5 or 1 inch taller
Click Herethis is all the proof that anybody would , want to believe mj is 5'11
o yeah here's mj with briney spears , britney is 5'4
she's wearing heels in this , if u don't believe she's wearing heels
watch the video
Click Here
MARKO said on 9/Jan/11
michael is maybe 5ft 10
alex said on 9/Jan/11
Mr. Kaplan and all the other
trolls and Michael haters here.Brooke Shields is a tall woman but she is also using high heels because I saw some picture of her and Michael where she probably didn't have heels and Michael looked as tall as she did.Also when Lady Diana who was a tall woman visited Michael at one of his concerts the diference between Michael and Diana wasn't that big.And she had heels. So you Michael haters overhere those who use all the time in their comments
"Jackson" instead of Michael why won't you find a job?You are not going to fool anybody.
alex said on 9/Jan/11
Mr. Kaplan and all the other
trolls and Michael haters here.Brooke Shields is a tall woman but she is also using high heels because I saw some picture of her and Michael where she probably didn't have heels and Michael looked as tall as she did.Also when Lady Diana who was a tall woman visited Michael at one of his concerts the diference from Michael and Diana wasn't that big.And she had heels. So you Michael haters overhere those who use all the time in their comments
"Jackson" instead of Michael why won't you find a job?You are not going to fool anybody.
Mr. Kaplan said on 6/Jan/11
Why is he 3-4 inches shorter than Brooke Shields WITH FLATS, people?
Money$ said on 6/Jan/11
@alex
he doesnt look small because he is 5'11"
Mj is 2 inches shorter
that's it mj is 5'11"
me said on 5/Jan/11
@alex
5.9 is not very small.
alex said on 4/Jan/11
Guys, back in 1992 Michael came with the Dangerous Tour in my country.During Black or White performance he changed his clothes and he had BOOTS WITH NO HEELS and he still looked tall.Also there is a video on Youtube where Michael is standing next to Nick Carter (backstreet Boys).Nick Carter is tall- 185 cm and in that video although Michael is shorter than Nick, Michael still doesn't look very small.
ACG said on 3/Jan/11
me says on 1/Jan/11
@admire.
Can't rule out that he may have had leg lengthening surgery later in his career either. He had so many things done, it would be just another.
Not a chance in hell. Do you realize what that might have done to his dancing skills? He'd be risking his entire career and passion for a couple of extra inches....Michael may have been a bit eccentric, but he wasn't batsh!t crazy.
Mr. Kaplan said on 2/Jan/11
5'11" would make him look HUGE in his footwear. He isn't.
Anonymous said on 2/Jan/11
lol look the pic alan is 1,79m and look mj he is smaller then 1 inch on his dead i hear in the tv he was 1,72m
me said on 1/Jan/11
@admire.
Can't rule out that he may have had leg lengthening surgery later in his career either. He had so many things done, it would be just another.
Alissa Jackson said on 1/Jan/11
Michael is 5' 10".This is accurate. he claimed in his autobiography, Moonwalk, that he was 5' 10". Some sources that i have seen said he was 5' 9" but I disagree. I am 5' 11" and am 13 years old (a girl) so I know that he was barely shorter. I know Tito and Blanket personally. Gotta love you Michael!
Admire said on 31/Dec/10
Michael Jackson's the greatest artist of all time,a great human beign.Height is nothing for him compared to his talent.But,we must know to tell the truth.
There's enough proof to tell he's 5'11 6".
Tuy4454 said on 31/Dec/10
@American Gangster ,
JB 5'2???What ???
He's 5'4
Mr. Kaplan said on 30/Dec/10
They've got the same shoes and Jackson is two inches shorter. Now just wait for the
trolls to say McCartney was 6'0"!
me said on 30/Dec/10
5.10 mcccartney with mj.
Click Here
Mr. Kaplan said on 23/Dec/10
Mj 5'11
------
Troll.
me said on 16/Dec/10
If MJ is 5.11, 5.9 Dianne Sawyer should not be taller than him. He's 5.8.
ACG said on 15/Dec/10
I saw some behind-the-scenes photos from that photoshoot with Winfrey...interestingly enough, it is OPRAH who is standing on a big box, not Michael!
Mr.moonwalker said on 14/Dec/10
@ A huge MJ fan in Tokyo
mj is 5'11" my friend
look at this photo of mj and 5'6.5" oprah winfrey
mj towers her about 4 inches
Click HereClick Here
Bicious said on 13/Dec/10
Big respect for MJ.
About his height: too many proofs show him average or under average. Too many for a 5'11''-6'00'' dude. And i talk about his earlier times, when he did not were lifts. 5'8.5''-5'10'' seem fair.
A huge MJ fan in Tokyo said on 11/Dec/10
I think Michael was about 5 feet 8 inches.
Diane Sawer's height is 5' 9" (1.75 m).
Click Here
Mr.moonwalker said on 10/Dec/10
Mj Was 5'11" ok every news report says that
no way he is shorter then that
i might agree that he was 5'10
but no according to my research and many news research's
he's 5'11"
meshael said on 10/Dec/10
mj is 5'7-5'8 range, he's still the best ever, he's an icon to all people that who wants to be like him. who cares if he's 5'7, he still the king of pop.
me said on 9/Dec/10
@frank
He also looked very small in Say Say Say. He might be 5.8.
Asera said on 6/Dec/10
LOL! Brooke Shields actually IS 5'11!! Then how could Michael possibly be the same height as she is and still look almost 10 cm shorter?! Michael was even clearly shorter than Eddie Murphy and he's only 5'9!
You people are so silly. What's so wrong and awful about accepting the TRUTH about Michael's real height I wonder...It's not such a bad thing to be 5'7. He could have ended up much shorter than that because of his genes and eating disorders which all affect height.
Besides 5'7 is a pretty ideal height for a male dancer. Makes him very limber,fast and agile when compared to someone who would be 5'10 for example!Height can be a disadvantage for a dancer you know.And Michael was the greatest dancer of all time!
And that is also evident in this video too :
Click Here
As you can clearly see he is in reality MUCH smaller and more agile than someone who is even 5'9 could really be!And there was nothing wrong with his posture either!
Asera said on 6/Dec/10
Obviously there are people here who are really quite delusional...Seriously, Michael WAS only about 5'7 and nothing you CLAIM can possiby change that fact! We have actual photographic evidence that he's the same height as Frank Sinatra who was 5'7 and also nearly the same height as George Lucas who is 5'6! MJ WAS only 171 cm tall!! If you met him only ONCE and he was wearing boots with heels of like 5-6 cm(which he did many times!) then obviously you would think he was about 5'9! But that's NOT his real height in any way!He was clearly SHORTER than Eddie Murphy who is about 5'9! He looks almost the same height as Diana Ross when she was wearing heels, and she's 5'4. So you all figure it out.
People have also compared his body type and height being the same as Fred Astaire's who was 5'7. Both dancers and both VERY thin. Both about 5'7 tall.
Also before someone here mentioned that Ola Ray who was in Thriller film is 5'2, and there's a part in the making of Thriller documentary when she's walking/standing right next to Michael and they are both wearing flat shoes. She looks about 5 inches shorter than him, which makes him slightly over 5'7 tall! Come on now people,just look at ALL the evidence. There is no way in hell Michael was ever even 5'8!!
When he was 25 he actually weighed only 100 lbs and his height was 171 cm!
Asera said on 6/Dec/10
Very CLEARLY only about 171-172 cm tall!Anything over that is simply NOT possible :
Click HereJust think when he wears the kind of boots with 5-6 cm heels he can very easily look almost 5'10 to people who don't know any better!
me said on 4/Dec/10
@Barbie Girl
5.11 would put him taller than 5.10 McCartney. McCartney had an inch on him.
deedah46 said on 3/Dec/10
met mike in france @ disneyland.he is about 5'9.i am 5'7 and was wearing heels.
Will said on 3/Dec/10
Michael Jackson is 5'9 1/2" tall.
Barbie Girl said on 2/Dec/10
MJ is 5'11" guys
Mr. Kaplan said on 1/Dec/10
Look at the pics with Brooke Shields. Now if posture alone can make you three full inches shorter, I'm outta here!
ACG said on 30/Nov/10
Mr. Kaplan...of course you CAN make yourself shorter! It's called "slouching", Michael did a heck of a lot of that, including in the above picture.
Mr. Kaplan said on 29/Nov/10
Can we agree on one thing? You CAN make yourself taller, but you CAN'T make yourself shorter! So taking this in consideration, why does he look the same height as 5'7" Frank Sinatra, he is towered by 5'11" Brooke Shields, then looks around 5'9"-5'10" the next time? I'll give you a hint: The answer starts with an "L".
Xcape said on 26/Nov/10
MJ is 100% 5'11" ( 180 cm ) you people who say he's 5'8" or under
hey Asere how in the hell is he 5'7" - 5'8"
look at this photo with 5'6.5" opraha winfrey so are you sayin michael is only towering about half or 1.5 inch come on he's at least 4 inch taller.
Click HereClick Hereso please don't ever say he's 5'8 or below.
Mr. Kaplan said on 26/Nov/10
Stallone said he was 5'10.75". Does that mean we have to believe it?
Asera said on 25/Nov/10
Michael IS in reality only between 5'7-5'8, about 171 cm tall! Just look at his mother!She is really VERY short, and so are Janet, Randy and LaToya too.
Michael also had anorexia too since he was a teenager at least, it made him seem even smaller and more fragile sometimes. He even said if he could live without eating at all he would. Now doesn't that tell you that maybe there's something wrong?
cyn said on 24/Nov/10
I would say he Michael jackson is no shorter than 5"8 and no taller than 5'10.
His Autopsy said he was 5'9. And in his book, Moonwalk, he said himself that he was 5'10. That was in the late 80's so he could have lost an inch since then.
Viper said on 23/Nov/10
MJ is closer the camera. He looks taller than he actually is because of it. Have MJ take a step back and hes even shorter with Alan Light.
MJ is 5'7
The Horse of FUNK said on 22/Nov/10
Just looking at this Alan Light picture again and I don't know how anyone who claims they can expertly gauge height (looking at Viper) can say MJ is not 5'9". Shoulders, people, SHOULDERS. Look at their shoulder levels. THEN, take into account MJ trying to minimize the height difference with Light's kid. MJ is CLEARLY leaning and bending in with the kid.
MJ looks like he was losing roughly an inch due to his posture. If MJ straightened out then that would be a 5'9" man, just like the coroner measured. 5'8.75" or 5'9.25"? I don't know, but close enough.
I do, however, agree this 5'11" nonsense is, well... nonsense lol.
Jan said on 22/Nov/10
MJ was not 5'11. He wore lifts often too.
Click HereMJ does not look like he towers much over James Brown, who is only 5'5 at best. Even if he was wearing lifts, MJ should tower more over James Brown if he is 5'11.
In my opinion, MJ does not tower Janet by 7 inches. It looks like about 4 inches and I'm not Janet's hair. Have you ever thought that maybe MJ was wearing his lifts in the picture with Janet anyway? In the Bad era, he had those tall boats. Maybe you are thinking MJ is 5'11 in 1990 because of the lifts he often wore around then.
DVD said on 22/Nov/10
the king of pop is 5'11"
Xcape said on 22/Nov/10
Anonymous look at this mj and 5'4" janet jackson
mj is towering like 7 inches so he 5'8" is impossible for him
but i beleive in the off the wall era he was about 5'9"
however in the 90's he is defenetly 5'11" he grew
just to remind you janet is wearing about 3 inches heel
and her big hair must have give her two inches
still janet infront of mj is looking smaller
Click HereClick Herei'm that you know he is 5'11" now
Anonymous said on 22/Nov/10
MJ was MAX 5'8 and that is being generous. He was never 5'11 in his life time, ever. I would say he is more like a strong 5'7.
Click HereNancy Reagan was 5'4 and MJ is clearly not much taller than her. Maybe 5'7, possibley 5'8. Her heel does not look really high.
Click HereUsher is clearly TALLER as MJ's hair does not count. MJ is about up to Usher's eyebrows and Usher is only listed at 5'8.
Mika de France said on 21/Nov/10
Look here (with Brooke Shields);
Click Hereand
Click Hereand
Click Hereand
Click HereNever the same size.
Xscape, impossible to know if MJ is wearing heels or not your photos like this one, but MJ has often tended to heels.
The size of Michael Jackson is a mystery lol.
For me, it is 1.77cm.
Sorry for my English, I'm French.
me said on 21/Nov/10
Maybe he had leg lengthening procedure. This guy had so many things done on him that I wouldn't doubt it. He was definately not 5.11 in his 20s. He was 5.8-5.9 back in the day.
DVD said on 20/Nov/10
Well i Have to admit he's 5'11" after seeing xcape's theory
well xcape your right he's 5'11" no doubt
Danimal said on 19/Nov/10
Always thought he was in the 5'10"-5'11" range... Seeing he was shorter than MAX 5'10" Mike Tyson, I'd give him TOPS 5'9", but in reality, probably closer to 5'8"-5'8.5"..
Mr. Kaplan said on 16/Nov/10
What is wrong with you? Hair isn't included in your height. He's clearly shorter than Usher.
Xcape said on 16/Nov/10
Michael Jackson height: 5'11" (180 cm)
Hey "American Gangster" you better listen to tis paki gangster.
are you crazy or something how in the hell can you make him 5'8"
That's so stupid.And who told you that Usher is 5'7" He's 5'9.5" ( Real Height ).
Look at these photos of usher & the 5'4" justin bieber Usher is clearly towering him more then 3 inches.
Click HereClick HereClick HereAnd look at this photo of MJ & Usher mj is about 1.5 inches taller so that makes him 5'11" as simple as that.
Click Hereand in this photo Mj's top head is coming out of the box and usher's doesn't even touch the line.
Click Hereand look at these photos of MJ & 5'6.5" Oprah Winfrey , even with oprah's big hair Mj is still toweing her about 4 inches.
Click HereClick HereClick Herehere's the proof that he is 5'11".
This is especially for viper , you better see it.
Rob please tell me what i said is correct change his height to 5'11" Please...
Mr. Kaplan said on 15/Nov/10
Trolls can't answer the FACT that MJ is a few inches shorter than Brooke Shields.
Xcape said on 12/Nov/10
MJ is 5'11"
me said on 9/Nov/10
The late MJ wore lifts and thicker shoes. He didn't wear them when he was young. I think that's where the height confusion came in.
me said on 7/Nov/10
Brooke Shields is 5.11 and she was always taller than him as I can recall.
Calvin Klein said on 5/Nov/10
Michael Jackson Height:5'11" ( 180 Cm )
The Proof
Click HereThis is the end of the story he's 5'11" that's it no more arguments.
PS:when his fans take a photo with him mj's always taller.
me said on 5/Nov/10
Navi's height is as reliable as a driver's license. I have reasons to believe he might be around 5.8 like Usher.
Mr. Kaplan said on 4/Nov/10
Y'all are in denial. He's dwarfed by 5'11" Shields and noticeably shorter than 5'10.5" Light, yet you still believe he was 5'10" or over.
mrknowitall said on 3/Nov/10
hes 5'10" everyone.
me said on 3/Nov/10
@Big Moma
The late MJ with 5.8 Usher. They appear the same height. MJ seem to have more footwear too. 5.11 is rediculous for him. People get shorter when they age, not taller.
Click Here
Annoying Orange said on 3/Nov/10
Michael Jacksons Height:5 Ft 11 Inch
He is the same as his impersonator navi who is the greatsest mj impersonator
of all time.Navi is 5'11" Look At This.
Navi's Height
Click HereMichael Jackson And Navi
Click Here
youtube said on 3/Nov/10
I think 5'11" is perfect for him.
We Love you The King Of Pop , Rock & every music genre we've ever known.
Big Moma said on 3/Nov/10
Well i've seen photos of Michael Jackson with celebs and searched more about him
And according to the photos he's 5'11" yeah that's right.
but i've noticed that in the 80s he use to be shorter then 5'11"
Acoording to the photos he use to be about 5'9.5"
but we all know if have we to write the height of mj we'll write 5'11"
because thats his latest height
even when he died he was 5'11".
Rip the Greatest Entertainer Of All Time
The King of Music You'll Always Be Rememberd.
me said on 3/Nov/10
@BIO
Autopsy reports aren't accurate. They just do a real general measurement with the corpse lying down. That's why they have Tupac at over 6 ft and Lennon at 5.6, etc. We all know those figures aren't true.
Viper said on 2/Nov/10
Brooke Shields is really 6'6, lol
BIO said on 2/Nov/10
Michael is 5.10 thats what he's autopsy report said.
Mr. Kaplan said on 2/Nov/10
Everybody knows Poitier was at least 6'7"!!!!
me said on 2/Nov/10
If MJ is 5.11, how do you explain this. Brooke (5.11) does not appear to be wearing hooker heels.
Click Here
Jodie girl said on 2/Nov/10
Just a question did Micheal Jackson and Jennifer Lopez perform together on a stage need the answer urgintly please and M.J is 5.11 no a fence .oky! quit in a hurry!!! See u later guys!!! With the answer post the address on here plez!!! Mwah!
kuzz said on 2/Nov/10
@Viper
Viper says on 1/Nov/10
Hes never been taller than 5'7.5 in his life
Bro Just see the proofs i got
On the date of 31st oct 2010 one i wrote
just see the photos , and if you think mj is 5'7.5"
then i guess martin bashir is 5'3" , Britney is 5'1"
Janet is 5'0 - 5'1" ,madonna is 5'0" , usher is 5'5"
and Oprah is 5'0" duhhhhh come on viper dont make him
5'7" , and don't say that oprah is 5'0" thats stupid.
jus admit it vipr hes 5'11".
kuzz said on 2/Nov/10
@ME
What you must be kidding me
Look at the difference between
britney spears and mjs height.
Viper said on 1/Nov/10
LOL at Usher being 5'9-5'9.5, hes closer to 5'7
ACG said on 1/Nov/10
Read the newest comment on the Benny Hill page.
Viper said on 1/Nov/10
Hes never been taller than 5'7.5 in his life
Mr. Kaplan said on 31/Oct/10
Proofs? He was the same height as Sinatra, dwarfed by 5'11" Brooke Shields.
me said on 31/Oct/10
@kuzz
He might even be 5.8 as someone suggested, because Usher is only 5.8 and they looked the same height.
me said on 31/Oct/10
@kuzz
He looked about 5.9 in all those pics.
Jodie girl said on 31/Oct/10
Oh! Just shut up Mr Kaplan way do u take note of everything i say is it a problem mm? Cause u are a problem thank u anyway ! Mwah
Dural said on 31/Oct/10
@me
I think you confound Spielberg with George Lucas and I know you don't grow in your 30's or 40's, it was ironic - well, maybe not. You can't trust MJs shoes because he wore heels pretty often.
Mr. Kaplan said on 30/Oct/10
Most people never really pay attention to a person's footwear. Unless they are truly interested in the subject of height.
Anonymous said on 30/Oct/10
Sorry ACJ 4 making u case look not good but thank u any way! Mwah! Im not gonna do that any more sorry!
Jodie girl said on 30/Oct/10
Oky im tied of fighting with u so called "people" if u say his 5.1 or shorter then that .so be it and i wont remember of his hight i will remeber him of how we chatted with the kids and all the nice things he said 2 me and my 2 kids he s a very kind and caring man with a talant god gave him !
Jun from Japan said on 30/Oct/10
I have been a MJ's huge fan for almost 30 years.
Conclusion: I think that MJ was about 5 feet and 8 inches tall.
He had long arms and legs, having so perfect a frame that made him look much taller.
That was a real MAGIC.
Jodie girl said on 30/Oct/10
I meet Micheal Jackon in 2007 he was standing infront of me with my 2 kids beside me and he told us he looked in my eyes and he s exact words was this exact! Micheal: Um? My hieght is 5.11 and u seem abit short how tall are u? Jodie? And there u go!! Exact words i can still remember it very well and i wont 4get that day that i i of all people sow him and spoke 2 2 him and its still a shoke 4 4 me when i remeber it DURAAL SOW TROLL SOME WHERE ELSE !!! (laugh out loud) if u dont beleive me? O.K. Y
me said on 29/Oct/10
@dural a middle age growth spurt doesn't make you taller. It's really the elephant man disease. You just end up looking like a neanderthal.
me said on 29/Oct/10
@Jodie Girl
If mj is 5.11, then McCartney is 6ft. This is just not true. In all the pics, I've never seen MJ taller than sir paul.
me said on 29/Oct/10
@dural
You can't trust Spielburg height in that pic because he's probably wearing lifts. MJ doesn't wear lifts. He's not the type.
ACG said on 29/Oct/10
Jodie girl says on 29/Oct/10
Well Micheal is 5.11 and i dont need glasses because most of the people says so "VIPER" and MR KAPLAN i met him in 2007 with my family and my 2 kids and he s definitly tall 5.11 i asked him no? my son asked him !and my daughter!, because they really love him so they asked any question and this one was one of them his hieght !and i was there, im really not lieing ,im telling the truth and please dont make fun of me. im just giving my honest opining just like everyone on here! thank u!!! R.I.P MJ WE LOVE U!!!!
Even though I think that he was 5'11" as well, you're not making my case look good.
Jodie girl said on 29/Oct/10
Thank u Anon thank u very much! That u are agreeing with me M.J IS AND WILL ALLWAYS BE 5.11 MWAH!!! And someone that dont agree with me go "TROLL" somewhere else out of space that is an advise please take it thank u !!! again!:-)
Jodie girl said on 29/Oct/10
Thank u Anon thank u very much! That u are agreeing with me M.J IS AND WILL ALLWAYS BE 5.11 MWAH!!!
Dural said on 29/Oct/10
Jodie girl, then
1. he must have a growth spurt in his 30s or 40s,
2. you percieved him to be taller,
3. he was wearing high heels and you didn't notice
4. was standing on higher ground
5. it was a double
Jodie girl said on 29/Oct/10
Well Micheal is 5.11 and i dont need glasses because most of the people says so "VIPER" and MR KAPLAN i met him in 2007 with my family and my 2 kids and he s definitly tall 5.11 i asked him no? my son asked him !and my daughter!, because they really love him so they asked any question and this one was one of them his hieght !and i was there, im really not lieing ,im telling the truth and please dont make fun of me. im just giving my honest opining just like everyone on here! thank u!!! R.I.P MJ WE LOVE U!!!!
Anonymous said on 28/Oct/10
I guess Jodie Girl's eye sight is better than yours
me said on 28/Oct/10
@jodie
You better get your eyes checked
Mr. Kaplan said on 27/Oct/10
Jodie girl says on 27/Oct/10
Well he is 5.11 definitly and Micheal s about the same length as Light!!!
Are you blind, or did you just forget to wear your glasses?
Viper said on 27/Oct/10
LOL, who are these
trolls?
Jodie girl said on 27/Oct/10
Well he is 5.11 definitly and Micheal s about the same length as Light!!!
Anonymous said on 26/Oct/10
sheilla,
I don't think it's true.There can be much more like that.Never mind how tall he was,never mind what his appearence was.Michael was a kind hearted massively talented kind generous,innocent man.He was't wierd.Never!!!There was only one Michael Jackson.And if there were 2 there has to be another equally talented person as him.
RisingForce said on 26/Oct/10
I'm fine with either 5'8" or 5'9". I'm atleast open to 5'9" because of his slouch, but he looked more like 5'8" to me when he was actually standing next to someone with a known height. When he stood by himself, he could look taller, maybe due to his thin frame.
Mr. Kaplan said on 21/Oct/10
Just for the record, it is NOT possible to wear lifts 4 inches high. The picture up with 5'10.5" Alan Light shows CLEARLY that he's not over 5'8.5". But let me guess once again - Light is wearing lifts too?
me said on 21/Oct/10
Sammy Davis Jr. was probably on Lifts too. He's a tiny guy. Check out Goldie Hawn's pumps.
Frank2 said on 8/Jul/09
Jackson looking 5 inches shorter than 6' Brooke Shields:
Click HereThat's Emanuel Lewis Jackson is holding.
Another shot of Jackson with Shields:
Click HereJackson with 6' Ronald Reagan:
Click HereLooks five inches shorter.
And here:
Click HereJackson with 5'7" Frank Sinatra:
Click HereCheck the heels on Jackson's shoes:
Click HereI think Jackson borrowed Sly's custom made boots seen in JUDGE DREDD for this appearance with Lisa Marie:
Click HereAnd finally....
Click Here
Kobajack said on 8/Jul/09
Yeah, I would have guessed he was about this tall. I was curious after seeing "Living With Michael Jackson" in which he towers over the little Indian journalist who made him look over six-feet. It must have been that the "little Indian journalist" was 5'7 at the most.
Sunny said on 8/Jul/09
Dural : LOL! Are those pictures supposed to be some kind of proof that he was 5'10? He looks about 173cm or shorter in ALL those pictures! Never in a million years was he ever 5'10...except maybe with heels ;)
The picture with Eddie Murphy proves it. He has heeled boots on and Murphy is wearing very flat shoes and is STILL taller! I really think you should change his height to 5'8 on this site...
Massafagga said on 8/Jul/09
175 tops - as low as 172 with his back problems.
miles smiles said on 7/Jul/09
I can't access the pic at the moment (due to heavy internet traffic or something), but if you google Michael Jackson/Lionel Richie, you will see several pics of them looking pretty much exactly the same height. Lionel is allegedly 5-11. I'm not saying Michael was 5-11, but I really think he was about 5-10.
Frank2 said on 7/Jul/09
Jackson and Lionel Ritchie:
Click HereRitchie is listed at 5'11", but is really about 5'10". I know since I met him in a Hollywood recording studio a friend of mine owns. As you can see, Jackson is two inches shorter.
Ritchie with actor Raymond St. Jacques who was 6'1":
Click HereThe shot is tilted. Ritchie is about three inches shorter.
Ritchie and group:
Click HereJackson with 5'6" Quincy Jones who I've met:
Click HereThis is pretty much how Jackson looked back in the 1980s when I met him:
Click HereHe should have stopped with all the plastic surgery.
Anonymous said on 7/Jul/09
Michael was on the short side, at 5-8. No way was he average height. Hes not 5-9. What was really funny was some woman on tv said she thought he looked taller than expected. I guess she thought he looked 5-6.
ALICE said on 7/Jul/09
I am still in tears. i cant really beleave we lost him, he was one of the greats. All day i have been watching his video's. It still feels like he is here but that will some day come to an end. We will miss him and see him in our kindom what and were ever that may be. Oh hope his legacy stays true. No one will be the same.
We will love and miss you forever,
Alice Triche
Defcon said on 7/Jul/09
Check this out, Eddie murphy listed as 5'9.25 this is a shot I found with him and MJ
Click Here
Anonymous said on 7/Jul/09
I think he was about 173 cm...that's 5'8. Some fans still want to believe that he was 5'10 or taller, but that was clearly not the case. I'm a fan myself and I don't have any problems admitting that he wasn't very tall. He had a very strong voice and personality in a small body. I think it makes him even more amazing.
Ali UK said on 7/Jul/09
i stood by his waxwork in madame tussauds in london and he is pretty small for a guy. i am 5'8" and i don't think he was taller than that.
jazzgirl said on 7/Jul/09
Look at the picture of him with Brooke Shields, who was 6-foot. Michael is probably 5'8" or 5'9"
miles smiles said on 6/Jul/09
I believe Michael was a solid 5-10, especially when you see pics of him next to a 5-6.5 Quincy Jones and a 5-11 Lionel Richie. He often wore pretty flat loafers.
Anonymous said on 5/Jul/09
jackson always wore very flat footwear while he was performing and on other occasions, this made him look shorter around people, jackson was between 5'9 and 5'10
Sandra said on 5/Jul/09
Micheal Jackon: You will always be the King of Pop! I am so Sad and still in shock that you are not here with us. But know with Angels to sing, dance and give them your Love as well. Your the Hottest Man No Matter What anyone says!