Add a Comment306 comments
Average Guess (67 Votes)
5ft 9.63in (176.9cm)
5ft 9.63in (176.9cm)
Reminidi said on 26/Jun/07
Jagger has been whereing very ugly ortho looking workout shoes for many years now - who only knows what is inside (don't think I'd want to take a close look either, lol) Looked 5-9ish and frail when I saw him up close 10 yers ago. Can look a bunch taller though, must be his skinny arese frame...lol
Jagger has been whereing very ugly ortho looking workout shoes for many years now - who only knows what is inside (don't think I'd want to take a close look either, lol) Looked 5-9ish and frail when I saw him up close 10 yers ago. Can look a bunch taller though, must be his skinny arese frame...lol
A. Rodney Rodriguez said on 14/May/07
looks in that pic like Mick is closest to the camera (see hows his hand looks outsized), my hump is that his height is exaggarated by an inch or so maybe. saw him up pretty close once and he looked about 5-9 to maybe barely 5-10 but very thin which exaggarates his heighth somewhat me thinks. back to your regular programeing. he once stated he is only 125 pounds P.S. Mick wears really ugly orthopedic looking shoes onstage for the past 10+ years, check em out, they seem to have thick heels.
looks in that pic like Mick is closest to the camera (see hows his hand looks outsized), my hump is that his height is exaggarated by an inch or so maybe. saw him up pretty close once and he looked about 5-9 to maybe barely 5-10 but very thin which exaggarates his heighth somewhat me thinks. back to your regular programeing. he once stated he is only 125 pounds P.S. Mick wears really ugly orthopedic looking shoes onstage for the past 10+ years, check em out, they seem to have thick heels.
venice beach said on 12/Apr/07
it's possible that leo wears heels
it's possible that leo wears heels
glenn said on 6/Apr/07
and the last time i saw leo he was 6-1!!!
and the last time i saw leo he was 6-1!!!
glenn said on 6/Apr/07
now you see what i mean about jude law brad? how can jude be 5-9,5-10 when he was 2 or 3 inches taller than mick? what happened was probably this-mick was 5-9 that night,which ive seen,and jude was 5-11 with better posture too.
now you see what i mean about jude law brad? how can jude be 5-9,5-10 when he was 2 or 3 inches taller than mick? what happened was probably this-mick was 5-9 that night,which ive seen,and jude was 5-11 with better posture too.
Brad said on 6/Apr/07
Mick is 5' 10". Jagger destroying Dicaprio's height is amazing. Mick must be in cowboy boots, he looks well over 6'.
Mick is 5' 10". Jagger destroying Dicaprio's height is amazing. Mick must be in cowboy boots, he looks well over 6'.
glenn said on 30/Mar/07
it is crazy cause i saw dicaprio at 6-1, 4 months ago.wood was 510.5 in youth.he is 5-9.5 now.jagger looks 5-9.5 to 5-11.5 whenever i see him.
it is crazy cause i saw dicaprio at 6-1, 4 months ago.wood was 510.5 in youth.he is 5-9.5 now.jagger looks 5-9.5 to 5-11.5 whenever i see him.
Pik said on 29/Mar/07
I've posted this picture before, but somehow it was deleted. How can Wood and Damon both be 5'10 ? Look at this picture !
Click Here
I've posted this picture before, but somehow it was deleted. How can Wood and Damon both be 5'10 ? Look at this picture !
Click Here
JMG said on 20/Mar/07
very odd picture here of Jagger...
Click Here
Mick Jagger(5'10"), Dicaprio (5'11"ish),and Ron Wood(5'9")
Dicaprio seems his normal height here but Jagger...wow! he must be wearing unbelievable lifts in this photo to appear 6'1" to 6'2"
very odd picture here of Jagger...
Click Here
Mick Jagger(5'10"), Dicaprio (5'11"ish),and Ron Wood(5'9")
Dicaprio seems his normal height here but Jagger...wow! he must be wearing unbelievable lifts in this photo to appear 6'1" to 6'2"
mcfan said on 16/Feb/07
I agree with Phibes about Jagger being taller than Lennon by a slight margin. He was also very slightly taller than McCartney. I have a vivid memory of this. I would think he was 5'10.5 when he was young...maybe close to 5'10 now.
I agree with Phibes about Jagger being taller than Lennon by a slight margin. He was also very slightly taller than McCartney. I have a vivid memory of this. I would think he was 5'10.5 when he was young...maybe close to 5'10 now.
Phibes said on 11/Feb/07
No way Jagger's height is 5'8-5'9, that's impossible. He never used to wear high-heeled boots (not even in the 60s), check him out in any of the concerts (e.g. on YouTube) - Hyde park 69, Rock'n'Roll Circus 68 or 81 tour (Let's Spend the Night Together film), Bridges of Babylon, Voodoo Lounge Tour.. always flat shoes/trainers - and he always looked taller than say Richards, Ron Wood (5'9). Watch him standing next to Lennon (5'11) in Rock'nRoll Circus both wore flat shoes and Jagger looked a bit taller. Or check him out wearing white trainers and yellow suit and standing next to Vaclav Havel (5'7) in Prague in 1990. Or next to Freddie Mercury (5'9-5'9 1/2) backstage during Live Aid (both wearing trainers) Jagger looks way taller than both of them. Or performing Miss You with Timberlake who's supposed to be around 6'. People who say he's cca 5'8 probably never saw Jagger. There's no way he's shorter than 5'10-5'11.
No way Jagger's height is 5'8-5'9, that's impossible. He never used to wear high-heeled boots (not even in the 60s), check him out in any of the concerts (e.g. on YouTube) - Hyde park 69, Rock'n'Roll Circus 68 or 81 tour (Let's Spend the Night Together film), Bridges of Babylon, Voodoo Lounge Tour.. always flat shoes/trainers - and he always looked taller than say Richards, Ron Wood (5'9). Watch him standing next to Lennon (5'11) in Rock'nRoll Circus both wore flat shoes and Jagger looked a bit taller. Or check him out wearing white trainers and yellow suit and standing next to Vaclav Havel (5'7) in Prague in 1990. Or next to Freddie Mercury (5'9-5'9 1/2) backstage during Live Aid (both wearing trainers) Jagger looks way taller than both of them. Or performing Miss You with Timberlake who's supposed to be around 6'. People who say he's cca 5'8 probably never saw Jagger. There's no way he's shorter than 5'10-5'11.
Viper said on 17/Jan/07
Mick has always looked around 5-10 to me.
Mick has always looked around 5-10 to me.
Glenn said on 17/Jan/07
It is interesting.I thought Jagger was 5-8ish too,until years gone by,I noticed he had a slouch.in the street he normally looks 5-9.5,5-10.rare occasion,mostly on stage,he can look 5-11.he towers the whole band.tour book has him at 5-10.Keith at 5-9,Charlie at 5-8,Woody at 5-10.5.Woody can give a 5-9 impression from a slouch.but is indeed around 5-10.
It is interesting.I thought Jagger was 5-8ish too,until years gone by,I noticed he had a slouch.in the street he normally looks 5-9.5,5-10.rare occasion,mostly on stage,he can look 5-11.he towers the whole band.tour book has him at 5-10.Keith at 5-9,Charlie at 5-8,Woody at 5-10.5.Woody can give a 5-9 impression from a slouch.but is indeed around 5-10.
Rober.R said on 15/Jan/07
That is really interesting Elle. I wonder how many pop stars in the sixties were measured in cuban heels?
That is really interesting Elle. I wonder how many pop stars in the sixties were measured in cuban heels?
Elle said on 9/Dec/06
I spent an entire evening in the mid-eighties at a dinner party at Jagger's townhouse in the West Eighties (NYC). He talked to and flirted with me enough to absolutely gauge him at 5'8.5", he was wearing totally flat Capezio jazz shoes (and Nicholson was there and he was a bit taller at 5'9", and I'm 5'11"). Also Jerry Hall was creeping about in her bare feet and she was just an inch shorter than I, making her 5'10". I was there for over six hours so I had plenty of time to compare, and, of course, party!
I spent an entire evening in the mid-eighties at a dinner party at Jagger's townhouse in the West Eighties (NYC). He talked to and flirted with me enough to absolutely gauge him at 5'8.5", he was wearing totally flat Capezio jazz shoes (and Nicholson was there and he was a bit taller at 5'9", and I'm 5'11"). Also Jerry Hall was creeping about in her bare feet and she was just an inch shorter than I, making her 5'10". I was there for over six hours so I had plenty of time to compare, and, of course, party!
Glenn said on 20/Oct/06
In a 90s tour book it had Woody at 5-10.5 and Mick at 5-10.I always thought Woody was 5-8,but after studying him closely,I realised he had a slouch.
In a 90s tour book it had Woody at 5-10.5 and Mick at 5-10.I always thought Woody was 5-8,but after studying him closely,I realised he had a slouch.
Glenn said on 14/Oct/06
No,no.Jones was the shortest.5-5 or 5-6.study those old pics.he wore the biggest heels and still was shortest.
No,no.Jones was the shortest.5-5 or 5-6.study those old pics.he wore the biggest heels and still was shortest.
Anthony said on 13/Oct/06
Thanks for the info, Glenn. How tall would you say Jones was. I'd estimate about 5'7-ish.
Thanks for the info, Glenn. How tall would you say Jones was. I'd estimate about 5'7-ish.
Glenn said on 12/Oct/06
Charlie Boy is 5-8.Wyman is 5-6.Taylor is 5-11,6ft.Woody is 5-10.Mick appeared 5-11 on stage.and usually does.in the street,he can look 5-9 to 5-11 in low cut shoes.
Charlie Boy is 5-8.Wyman is 5-6.Taylor is 5-11,6ft.Woody is 5-10.Mick appeared 5-11 on stage.and usually does.in the street,he can look 5-9 to 5-11 in low cut shoes.
Anonymous said on 11/Oct/06
biography on mick jagger states his height at 5ft9
biography on mick jagger states his height at 5ft9
Anthony said on 27/Sep/06
Mick's leaning forward, and he's not afraid to wear height enhancing shoes.
Mick's leaning forward, and he's not afraid to wear height enhancing shoes.
Matt said on 27/Sep/06
The footwear and ground level in this picture is suspect but it appears that Jagger is taller than 5'10'', especially if DiCaprio is 5'11'':
Click Here
The footwear and ground level in this picture is suspect but it appears that Jagger is taller than 5'10'', especially if DiCaprio is 5'11'':
Click Here
Anthony said on 26/Sep/06
Glenn, do you know the heights of the other Rolling Stones? By my own estimates, I'd say Charlie was maybe 5'7 (or 5'8 at his peak), Bill 5'8-5'9, Woody about 5'9-5'10, and Mick Taylor about 5'10-5'11.
Glenn, do you know the heights of the other Rolling Stones? By my own estimates, I'd say Charlie was maybe 5'7 (or 5'8 at his peak), Bill 5'8-5'9, Woody about 5'9-5'10, and Mick Taylor about 5'10-5'11.
Tom T. said on 26/Sep/06
Yep, EJ definitely 5'6"
Yep, EJ definitely 5'6"
Glenn said on 23/Sep/06
No Paul.sorry.
No Paul.sorry.
Paul said on 22/Sep/06
Does anyone know how tall Mick's son James is? I'm just interested.
Does anyone know how tall Mick's son James is? I'm just interested.
Glenn said on 10/Sep/06
I was wrong.he is 5-6.not 5-7,5-8 that I thought.and certainly not the 5-9,5-10 he can look at times.in the top 10 or 20 hardest photos with to get.16 years of asking.in NYC he poses maybe once a year,if that.luckily the photo came out fine.
I was wrong.he is 5-6.not 5-7,5-8 that I thought.and certainly not the 5-9,5-10 he can look at times.in the top 10 or 20 hardest photos with to get.16 years of asking.in NYC he poses maybe once a year,if that.luckily the photo came out fine.
Anthony said on 9/Sep/06
That's grea, Glenn. I always assumed Elton was no more than 5'7.
That's grea, Glenn. I always assumed Elton was no more than 5'7.
Glenn said on 9/Sep/06
ELTON JOHN MY MAN! FINALLY POSED WITH ME!
ELTON JOHN MY MAN! FINALLY POSED WITH ME!
Glenn said on 8/Sep/06
I believed the Jagger 5-8 myth for awhile.mainly cause he looked that in my friends photos.
I believed the Jagger 5-8 myth for awhile.mainly cause he looked that in my friends photos.
Anthony said on 8/Sep/06
"I met jagger and he was no more than 5'9", he isnt a tall guy."
Not a tall guy, but not as small as many people have made him out to be. 5'9-5'10.
And I'm in interested in finding out who this shapeshifter is.
"I met jagger and he was no more than 5'9", he isnt a tall guy."
Not a tall guy, but not as small as many people have made him out to be. 5'9-5'10.
And I'm in interested in finding out who this shapeshifter is.
Glenn said on 8/Sep/06
Right Anthony.JUST last night I caught a shapeshifter Ive been chasing 16 years.by surprise, and I think he forgot to where his lifts! its not hard to figure out who and if it isnt up by tommorow,Ill reveal who.one of the hardest to get ever.
Right Anthony.JUST last night I caught a shapeshifter Ive been chasing 16 years.by surprise, and I think he forgot to where his lifts! its not hard to figure out who and if it isnt up by tommorow,Ill reveal who.one of the hardest to get ever.
ralph said on 8/Sep/06
I met jagger and he was no more than 5'9", he isnt a tall guy.
I met jagger and he was no more than 5'9", he isnt a tall guy.
Anthony said on 7/Sep/06
I agree with you, Glenn. Mick has to be at least 5'10 if he can achieve looking taller than 5''11 Jerry...with the right footwear, of course:
Click Here
Click Here
I agree with you, Glenn. Mick has to be at least 5'10 if he can achieve looking taller than 5''11 Jerry...with the right footwear, of course:
Click Here
Click Here
Glenn said on 25/Aug/06
Again.Jagger is 5-10.Richards is 5-9.Bowie was or is slightly under 5-10.more 5-9 if you ask me.
Again.Jagger is 5-10.Richards is 5-9.Bowie was or is slightly under 5-10.more 5-9 if you ask me.
mcfan said on 24/Aug/06
This guy was definitely 5'10.5 if Bowie was 5'10. In "Dancing In The Streets" he was a half-inch taller than Bowie.
This guy was definitely 5'10.5 if Bowie was 5'10. In "Dancing In The Streets" he was a half-inch taller than Bowie.
Daniel said on 24/Aug/06
Well, in the picture recently posted by Anthony we see that Jagger is a bit taller than Ronnie Wood, who, in turn, is not any shorter than Rod Stewart, who is at least 5'10.5''
Well, in the picture recently posted by Anthony we see that Jagger is a bit taller than Ronnie Wood, who, in turn, is not any shorter than Rod Stewart, who is at least 5'10.5''
Daniel said on 23/Aug/06
Yes, if you look at the photograph posted by Anthony you'll notice a difference of 5-6 inches in favor of the girl. But she must have been wearing high heels too, that probabbly added 2-3 inches to the difference. So, the real difference between both of them should be 3-4 inches, that is, Mick Jagger –in his middle 60s- is not shorter than 5-11, unless he's wearing high heels too.
Yes, if you look at the photograph posted by Anthony you'll notice a difference of 5-6 inches in favor of the girl. But she must have been wearing high heels too, that probabbly added 2-3 inches to the difference. So, the real difference between both of them should be 3-4 inches, that is, Mick Jagger –in his middle 60s- is not shorter than 5-11, unless he's wearing high heels too.
Raz + Mary said on 17/Aug/06
So Eoin, are you just estimating these guys heights or do you actually know. Cos I know for a fact Mick Jagger is not 5"10.
So Eoin, are you just estimating these guys heights or do you actually know. Cos I know for a fact Mick Jagger is not 5"10.
Daniel said on 9/Aug/06
Besides, if you look at the picture posted by mcfan on 24/Apr/06 you'll see that Jagger is at least 3 inches taller than Springsteen, who is 5-10. So, I don't understand how everybody seems to have fun puttin' down Mick's height. Of course nowadays Jagger has shrunk a little, maybe even 2 inches, but in his early youth he must have been at least 6ft tall.
Besides, if you look at the picture posted by mcfan on 24/Apr/06 you'll see that Jagger is at least 3 inches taller than Springsteen, who is 5-10. So, I don't understand how everybody seems to have fun puttin' down Mick's height. Of course nowadays Jagger has shrunk a little, maybe even 2 inches, but in his early youth he must have been at least 6ft tall.
Daniel said on 8/Aug/06
Well, I have a book about the Stones, with a lot of fotographs of all the members of the band, and in all of them Jagger seems to be at least 6ft tall. There's even a picture of him walking hand in hand with former wife Jerry Hall (who is no less than 5-11) and is clear that he is taller than her (2 or 3 inches), since they both are barefoot and walking relaxed, neither straightin' up nor slouching.
Well, I have a book about the Stones, with a lot of fotographs of all the members of the band, and in all of them Jagger seems to be at least 6ft tall. There's even a picture of him walking hand in hand with former wife Jerry Hall (who is no less than 5-11) and is clear that he is taller than her (2 or 3 inches), since they both are barefoot and walking relaxed, neither straightin' up nor slouching.
Viper652 said on 3/Aug/06
Yeah, hes no shorter than 5-9,.
Yeah, hes no shorter than 5-9,.
Glenn said on 3/Aug/06
Looks 5-10 when I see him,but I believe 5-9.
Looks 5-10 when I see him,but I believe 5-9.
Brad said on 2/Aug/06
Met him at a gas station in Greenwich Ct. in '78, he's 5'9" in sneakers.
Met him at a gas station in Greenwich Ct. in '78, he's 5'9" in sneakers.
MHouillon said on 14/Jun/06
Mick Jagger is 177cm
Mick Jagger is 177cm
Orlando said on 26/May/06
I guess he's a 5' 9" at the most. Haven't you noticed he always wears elevated shoes/sneakers? He seems small framed but with his good posture and mercurial leaness he looks taller than he really is. Besides, the man is always jumping and romping, no way of having a good estimate about his actual height...
I guess he's a 5' 9" at the most. Haven't you noticed he always wears elevated shoes/sneakers? He seems small framed but with his good posture and mercurial leaness he looks taller than he really is. Besides, the man is always jumping and romping, no way of having a good estimate about his actual height...
mcfan said on 5/May/06
If McCartney is 5'11 in his prime then I guess Jagger should be put up to 5'11.25. Jagger, Tom Jones, and Eric Clapton were marginally taller than McCartney so something is wrong with Jagger's height at 5'10....or McCartney should be downgraded to 5'10 in his prime and 5'9.5 now.
If McCartney is 5'11 in his prime then I guess Jagger should be put up to 5'11.25. Jagger, Tom Jones, and Eric Clapton were marginally taller than McCartney so something is wrong with Jagger's height at 5'10....or McCartney should be downgraded to 5'10 in his prime and 5'9.5 now.
Glenn said on 25/Apr/06
jagger still is 5-10.bowie shrunk to 5-9.
jagger still is 5-10.bowie shrunk to 5-9.
mcfan said on 15/Jan/06
I would place Jagger at 5'10.5 at his peek. He's probably 5'10 at the most now, but he was just a little more than 5'10. Slightly taller than Lennon, McCartney, and Richards.
I would place Jagger at 5'10.5 at his peek. He's probably 5'10 at the most now, but he was just a little more than 5'10. Slightly taller than Lennon, McCartney, and Richards.
alive said on 9/Jan/06
http://www.pearljam.com/images/live/pittsburgh2.jpg
here with 5foot 7 Eddie Vedder
what do you think rob?
http://www.pearljam.com/images/live/pittsburgh2.jpg
here with 5foot 7 Eddie Vedder
what do you think rob?
cendrin rovini said on 30/Nov/05
Saw Jagger walking next to Bowie and he was smaller. An interviewer wrote in a book that he was smaller than expected, 170cm. I have no idea, was always looking more like 178cm to me..
Saw Jagger walking next to Bowie and he was smaller. An interviewer wrote in a book that he was smaller than expected, 170cm. I have no idea, was always looking more like 178cm to me..
mcfan said on 21/Aug/05
Mick Jagger is no way 5'6 or 5'7. He's a half-inch taller than David Bowie and was roughly the same height as Lennon and McCartney. He was 5'10 but I'm sure like all men 62 years old he could have shrunk an inch.
Mick Jagger is no way 5'6 or 5'7. He's a half-inch taller than David Bowie and was roughly the same height as Lennon and McCartney. He was 5'10 but I'm sure like all men 62 years old he could have shrunk an inch.
CelebHeights Editor said on 21/Aug/05
Some comments from a gossip newsgroup thread on Mick's height:
"I have seen him in person and he is a shrimp. Maybe 5'6 or 5'7 at most, and that is being charitable. He is very short. I'm 5'5 and he wasn't much taller."
"Julianna Margulies rcently stated that she was shocked how tiny he was after working with him on a film. She was somewhat patronizing about it"
"I'm 5'9" and when I *brushed shoulders* (errr.... walked by him at a large party) with him he seemed a good head shorter than I was, though the 5'5 - 5'6" estimate seems on target"
"I'm six feet even, I don't remember Mick's footwear but I was wearing Chuck Taylors which don't add any height. I don't remember Mick being really short but I did look down on him a little heightwise. I'd guess him to be maybe 5'9."
Some comments from a gossip newsgroup thread on Mick's height:
"I have seen him in person and he is a shrimp. Maybe 5'6 or 5'7 at most, and that is being charitable. He is very short. I'm 5'5 and he wasn't much taller."
"Julianna Margulies rcently stated that she was shocked how tiny he was after working with him on a film. She was somewhat patronizing about it"
"I'm 5'9" and when I *brushed shoulders* (errr.... walked by him at a large party) with him he seemed a good head shorter than I was, though the 5'5 - 5'6" estimate seems on target"
"I'm six feet even, I don't remember Mick's footwear but I was wearing Chuck Taylors which don't add any height. I don't remember Mick being really short but I did look down on him a little heightwise. I'd guess him to be maybe 5'9."
Eggplant said on 9/Jul/05
Saw him at Madame Tussaud's, too. Very slightly shorter than me at 5'10. Maybe 5'9-5'9 1/2.
Saw him at Madame Tussaud's, too. Very slightly shorter than me at 5'10. Maybe 5'9-5'9 1/2.
Heights are barefeet estimates, derived from quotations, official websites, agency resumes, in person encounters with actors at conventions and pictures/films.
Other vital statistics like weight or shoe size measurements have been sourced from newspapers, books, resumes or social media.
Celebrity Fan Photos and Agency Pictures of stars are © to their respective owners.