Nat Wolff's Height
6ft ¼ in (183.5 cm)
American actor best known for roles in films such as The Fault in Our Stars, Stuck in Love and Palo Alto. In an interview with the Inquisitr he mentioned height, saying "I just find that I'm not growing anymore actually. I'm seriously done growing. I'm 6'1 but I'm done. Can you write that down, that I'm 6'1? I really want to get that in there"
Photos by PR Photos
Photos by PR Photos
You May Be Interested
Emma Roberts
5ft 1 ½ (156 cm)
5ft 1 ½ (156 cm)
Ansel Elgort
6ft 3 (191 cm)
6ft 3 (191 cm)
Shailene Woodley
5ft 7 ¾ (172 cm)
5ft 7 ¾ (172 cm)
Lily Collins
5ft 4 (163 cm)
5ft 4 (163 cm)
Add a Comment21 comments
Average Guess (32 Votes)
6ft 0.16in (183.3cm)
6ft 0.16in (183.3cm)
Progking said on 10/Nov/20
185 morning, 183 night probably, around 6'0.25 during the day.
185 morning, 183 night probably, around 6'0.25 during the day.
Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 29/Apr/19
Average guess could be the lowest he get measured.
Average guess could be the lowest he get measured.
Chase said on 18/Jul/18
I’m guessing John Green is around 6 foot to weak 6 foot range?
Click Here
Editor Rob
I’m guessing John Green is around 6 foot to weak 6 foot range?
Click Here
Editor RobYes he might be almost 6ft
Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 11/Jul/18
Same height as David Boreanaz and Kellen Lutz.
Same height as David Boreanaz and Kellen Lutz.
Dream(5'9.5 said on 11/Apr/18
He's is over 6'0 for sure.
Though, I don't like the Netflix's Death Note film.
He's is over 6'0 for sure.
Though, I don't like the Netflix's Death Note film.
Charles Roundtree said on 15/Mar/18
He's 6'0.5 close to 6'1
He's 6'0.5 close to 6'1
Lol said on 9/Oct/17
Actually Nat is a legit 6'0. Disregard 5'11
Actually Nat is a legit 6'0. Disregard 5'11
Mark(5'9.5 said on 8/Sep/17
Rob, how tall did he look in that 'Death Note' netflix movie? or have you not seen it yet?
Editor Rob
Rob, how tall did he look in that 'Death Note' netflix movie? or have you not seen it yet?
Editor Rob not yet seen it.
Will plan to though.
Will plan to though.
RainbowBlaster5 said on 31/Dec/16
Minimum 182/183 max 84/185 .
Minimum 182/183 max 84/185 .
John said on 6/Oct/15
If Justice Smith is 5'10, he can't be over 5'11.75/6'0. I'd give him 182 barefoot.
If Justice Smith is 5'10, he can't be over 5'11.75/6'0. I'd give him 182 barefoot.
KotoAmatsukami said on 4/Sep/15
6' or 183cm
6' or 183cm
HB said on 31/Jul/15
Seems to be shorter than Miles Teller (6'0) in this photo, even taking perspective into account.
Click Here
Seems to be shorter than Miles Teller (6'0) in this photo, even taking perspective into account.
Click Here
AJ said on 17/Jul/15
I'd say 6' is probably the safest mark looking at everything he's been in lately, especially next cara delvingne.
I'd say 6' is probably the safest mark looking at everything he's been in lately, especially next cara delvingne.
chris141 said on 4/Mar/15
nahhhhh, a skinny 182cm, no taller
nahhhhh, a skinny 182cm, no taller
Hypado said on 4/Feb/15
Nat Wolff is 182/183/184 cm
Nat Wolff is 182/183/184 cm
Height183 said on 12/Jan/15
Rob, Do you think he'd really edge me out in height? We are about the same age too.
Editor Rob
Rob, Do you think he'd really edge me out in height? We are about the same age too.
Editor Rob it's possible he would a little, but you might look similar in photos together.
Chris said on 29/Dec/14
His shoes in the above pic look stuffed. They must give him at least 1,5 inches.
His shoes in the above pic look stuffed. They must give him at least 1,5 inches.
Height183 said on 29/Dec/14
Rob, is his brother a good 5'10''? Click Here
Editor Rob
Rob, is his brother a good 5'10''? Click Here
Editor Rob possibly close to that, maybe a bit shy of it.
MD said on 26/Dec/14
With Ansel Elgort who is listed as a full 6'3", here:
Click Here
Click Here
They are both losing height, so I guess the debate would be over how much each is losing given their different poses. I'd argue that the difference between the two is at the very least three full inches, though.
With Ansel Elgort who is listed as a full 6'3", here:
Click Here
Click Here
They are both losing height, so I guess the debate would be over how much each is losing given their different poses. I'd argue that the difference between the two is at the very least three full inches, though.
Alex said on 25/Dec/14
I think 6'1 is right on, a little strange for someone who never looks short but insists on his height being known.
Certainly looks taller, and comfortably so, than 5'11/6'0 James Franco.
Click Here
No idea what that makes Jack Kilmer or his male co-stars, though, apparently these young guys are all 5'8 (no idea on Kilmer) according to their profiles.
Click Here
Click Here
I think 6'1 is right on, a little strange for someone who never looks short but insists on his height being known.
Certainly looks taller, and comfortably so, than 5'11/6'0 James Franco.
Click Here
No idea what that makes Jack Kilmer or his male co-stars, though, apparently these young guys are all 5'8 (no idea on Kilmer) according to their profiles.
Click Here
Click Here
uhoh said on 25/Dec/14
His grape colored suit gives him the illusion of being a terrific actor. He looks to be about 6 feet tall though!
His grape colored suit gives him the illusion of being a terrific actor. He looks to be about 6 feet tall though!
Heights are barefeet estimates, derived from quotations, official websites, agency resumes, in person encounters with actors at conventions and pictures/films.
Other vital statistics like weight or shoe size measurements have been sourced from newspapers, books, resumes or social media.
Celebrity Fan Photos and Agency Pictures of stars are © to their respective owners.