Add a Comment427 comments
Average Guess (139 Votes)
6ft 0.29in (183.6cm)
6ft 0.29in (183.6cm)
Hijopotamus said on 29/Jan/17
Rafa was a tad bit taller than Federer just now both standing together with same shoes.
Rafa was a tad bit taller than Federer just now both standing together with same shoes.
anon said on 26/Jan/17
Yh Nadal looks about this range would measure probabably 183-184cm range, Great Player on a side note prefer him to Roger Federer, Both are very popular guys worldwide, Federer has the better more appealing style to Watch but Nadal always comes over like a genuine Down to earth guy whereas Federer come across Arrogant to me though most top sportsman tend to have sort of Arrogance about them.
It's as if Federer like Djokovic tries too hard to get laughs from People, Nadal is more like Murray in that sense
Yh Nadal looks about this range would measure probabably 183-184cm range, Great Player on a side note prefer him to Roger Federer, Both are very popular guys worldwide, Federer has the better more appealing style to Watch but Nadal always comes over like a genuine Down to earth guy whereas Federer come across Arrogant to me though most top sportsman tend to have sort of Arrogance about them.
It's as if Federer like Djokovic tries too hard to get laughs from People, Nadal is more like Murray in that sense
Jakob said on 25/Jan/17
In that picture Rob put up, I'm seeing:
Roddick 188
Berdych (I think that's him) 194
Djokovic 187 (looks smaller there, maybe the depth of his position is off, I think most times he looks that though)
Rafa 184
Federer 185
Soderling 190
Murray 188 (he looks not straight there)
Ferrer 175 (sometimes he looks less)
In that picture Rob put up, I'm seeing:
Roddick 188
Berdych (I think that's him) 194
Djokovic 187 (looks smaller there, maybe the depth of his position is off, I think most times he looks that though)
Rafa 184
Federer 185
Soderling 190
Murray 188 (he looks not straight there)
Ferrer 175 (sometimes he looks less)
Johnson said on 23/Jan/17
@James that picture does not justice to Nadal. And is better to compare side by side. Cooper is far of him the picture. I know how Nadal towers over Bisbal and Arda Turan 175-176
@James that picture does not justice to Nadal. And is better to compare side by side. Cooper is far of him the picture. I know how Nadal towers over Bisbal and Arda Turan 175-176
Johnson said on 22/Jan/17
Gasquet is listed 185 cm tall and shorter tan Nadal. 183?
Gasquet is listed 185 cm tall and shorter tan Nadal. 183?
Leung said on 21/Jan/17
@James, Nadal and Bradley look the same height.
@James, Nadal and Bradley look the same height.
James said on 18/Jan/17
@Johnson Interestingly Ramos never looks over 1.82. And Nadal is still shorter than the full 1.84 (6' 0.5") Bradley Cooper.
@Johnson Interestingly Ramos never looks over 1.82. And Nadal is still shorter than the full 1.84 (6' 0.5") Bradley Cooper.
Johnson said on 17/Jan/17
Nadal is 184.5 taller than 183 Ramos. Federer is 185.5. Nadal has some height left in the tank as Rob said of Taylor Swift I say it with Nadal. Nadal has bad posture. With gut bust who knows what he reaches... perhaps his psyotherapist got an ertor of measurement at 186.5 the nurse could be short... it is a typical mistake. I doubt Nadal is on tip toes or with shoes on
Nadal is 184.5 taller than 183 Ramos. Federer is 185.5. Nadal has some height left in the tank as Rob said of Taylor Swift I say it with Nadal. Nadal has bad posture. With gut bust who knows what he reaches... perhaps his psyotherapist got an ertor of measurement at 186.5 the nurse could be short... it is a typical mistake. I doubt Nadal is on tip toes or with shoes on
James said on 16/Jan/17
@PK That's a logical fallacy known as argumentum ad hominem. You simply criticize the person who esposes an argument instead of refuting his argument.
Nadal is shorter than 1.84 Bradley Cooper:
Click Here
So can you explain me in what sense is Nadal under-estimated?
@PK That's a logical fallacy known as argumentum ad hominem. You simply criticize the person who esposes an argument instead of refuting his argument.
Nadal is shorter than 1.84 Bradley Cooper:
Click Here
So can you explain me in what sense is Nadal under-estimated?
James said on 14/Jan/17
@PK Nadal is my favorite tennis player of all time.
But it doesn't change the fact that Nadal is shorter than 1.84 Bradley Cooper:
Click Here
Click Here
Nadal is in the 1.83 range rather than a full 1.84.
@PK Nadal is my favorite tennis player of all time.
But it doesn't change the fact that Nadal is shorter than 1.84 Bradley Cooper:
Click Here
Click Here
Nadal is in the 1.83 range rather than a full 1.84.
PK said on 12/Jan/17
Federer is vastly more popular than Nadal or Djokovic.
In fact, there are so many fanatics and worshipers.
And they hate Nadal because Nadal beats Federer so many times (Novak recentl years too).
On internet, there are so many pounding (trolls) on Nadal (and Djokovic ).
These pounding includes their hieght, IMHO. :)
So I'm estimating Federer's height a bit over-estimated while Nadal/Djokovic under-estimated.
Federer is vastly more popular than Nadal or Djokovic.
In fact, there are so many fanatics and worshipers.
And they hate Nadal because Nadal beats Federer so many times (Novak recentl years too).
On internet, there are so many pounding (trolls) on Nadal (and Djokovic ).
These pounding includes their hieght, IMHO. :)
So I'm estimating Federer's height a bit over-estimated while Nadal/Djokovic under-estimated.
James said on 12/Jan/17
@Johnson He used the trip of standing on tiptoe with sneakers. That's the only way Nadal could be 1.87. He is shorter than 1.85 Federer come on, be serious. You know Nadal is obviously under 1.85. Those listings are bullbagoogle and you know it.
@Johnson He used the trip of standing on tiptoe with sneakers. That's the only way Nadal could be 1.87. He is shorter than 1.85 Federer come on, be serious. You know Nadal is obviously under 1.85. Those listings are bullbagoogle and you know it.
Johnson said on 12/Jan/17
@James but my links are not just listings as in Casillas and Benzema case, are words by physiotheraps and sources doing comparison of his growth from junior days to adult.In fact official listings from. ATP doesn't move since debuting ATP at 17. I think he used the "gut method" or "método de la tripa" for measuring that tall anyway.
@James but my links are not just listings as in Casillas and Benzema case, are words by physiotheraps and sources doing comparison of his growth from junior days to adult.In fact official listings from. ATP doesn't move since debuting ATP at 17. I think he used the "gut method" or "método de la tripa" for measuring that tall anyway.
James said on 11/Jan/17
@Johnson Maybe some tennis players are overlisted as NBA players. Pics are sometimes more reliable than official listings, remember Casillas has always been listed as 1.85 and Benzema is now listed as 1.87 at Real Madrid webpage.
Nadal is shorter than 1.84 Cooper, and Cooper is shorter than legit 1.85 Federer.
Click Here
I would love to see a video where Nadal is measured without shoes. I would be very surprised if he is over 1.83.
@Johnson Maybe some tennis players are overlisted as NBA players. Pics are sometimes more reliable than official listings, remember Casillas has always been listed as 1.85 and Benzema is now listed as 1.87 at Real Madrid webpage.
Nadal is shorter than 1.84 Cooper, and Cooper is shorter than legit 1.85 Federer.
Click Here
I would love to see a video where Nadal is measured without shoes. I would be very surprised if he is over 1.83.
Ali said on 11/Jan/17
183cm is his height. 184cm for Fed.186 for djoker, 187 for Roddick and 188 for Murray. Rob you really ought to change that Nadal picture.
Many better ones.
183cm is his height. 184cm for Fed.186 for djoker, 187 for Roddick and 188 for Murray. Rob you really ought to change that Nadal picture.
Many better ones.
Johnson said on 11/Jan/17
David Ferrer looks 175 cm no less in any case. (Perhaps he would claim 176)
I have 3 more links of medical height of Nadal
186.5 cm (2009)
Click Here
2010 187 cm
Click Here
2002 to 2005 from 182 to 186
Click Here
David Ferrer looks 175 cm no less in any case. (Perhaps he would claim 176)
I have 3 more links of medical height of Nadal
186.5 cm (2009)
Click Here
2010 187 cm
Click Here
2002 to 2005 from 182 to 186
Click Here
Chris said on 9/Jan/17
I think the listing before was more accurate could even scrape 185 teatime in my opinion granted he does have big hair but so does federer and at times they don't look really any different. How tall is ferrer? 174 maybe looks a little less than 5"9.
I think the listing before was more accurate could even scrape 185 teatime in my opinion granted he does have big hair but so does federer and at times they don't look really any different. How tall is ferrer? 174 maybe looks a little less than 5"9.
Johnson said on 8/Jan/17
And the pictures I put with Zidane are from 2005, Nadal turning 19
And the pictures I put with Zidane are from 2005, Nadal turning 19
Johnson said on 8/Jan/17
Hey guys, according to his physyotherapist Rafael Maymó, Nadal is no longer 1.85 but 186 and half!!
Click Here
Gutbusting?
Hey guys, according to his physyotherapist Rafael Maymó, Nadal is no longer 1.85 but 186 and half!!
Click Here
Gutbusting?
James said on 6/Jan/17
@anon She is a famous Israeli model called Bar Refaeli. She is very good looking, isn't she? You have a page for her in celebheights, she is listed as 1.74.
@anon She is a famous Israeli model called Bar Refaeli. She is very good looking, isn't she? You have a page for her in celebheights, she is listed as 1.74.
anon said on 5/Jan/17
james who is the girl in that pic with Roger, Nadal and cooper and what range would we guess her- 5 ft 7?
james who is the girl in that pic with Roger, Nadal and cooper and what range would we guess her- 5 ft 7?
James said on 5/Jan/17
@John Nadal does look tall to me.
@John Nadal does look tall to me.
Johnson said on 3/Jan/17
Rob, look at Nadal with Zidane. They have the same height
Rob, look at Nadal with Zidane. They have the same height
Johnson said on 3/Jan/17
@James I don't like those pics in movement. In my opinion:
Ramos (solid 6 footer) 183 cm
Van Persie 187 cm
De Gea 190 cm
Wawrinka 183, Nadal 184.5, Federer 185.5, Djokovic 187.5, Murray 188.5
@James I don't like those pics in movement. In my opinion:
Ramos (solid 6 footer) 183 cm
Van Persie 187 cm
De Gea 190 cm
Wawrinka 183, Nadal 184.5, Federer 185.5, Djokovic 187.5, Murray 188.5
James said on 3/Jan/17
Absolutely brilliant job Rob!!!!! This page is very accurate and reliable. Thanks for the downgrade it was really necessary for Nadal :).
Yep, Nadal is for sure in the 1.83-183.5 range, rather than a full 1.84.
With normal (not forced) posture, Nadal looks 2 cm shorter than 185 Federer, so he is for sure 1.83 (6 ft)=
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
By the way, if you ever think of making a page for Sergio Ramos, I think he is no more than 1.82. Ramos looks 2 cm shorter than 6 ft listed Robin Van Persie:
Click Here
And Van Persie really looks 6 ft next to 1.87 Henry:
Click Here
Click Here
Even if Van Persie is 1.84 (I'm not sure of that), he still looks 2 cm taller than Ramos, so I can't see Ramos being more than 1.82.
Absolutely brilliant job Rob!!!!! This page is very accurate and reliable. Thanks for the downgrade it was really necessary for Nadal :).
Yep, Nadal is for sure in the 1.83-183.5 range, rather than a full 1.84.
With normal (not forced) posture, Nadal looks 2 cm shorter than 185 Federer, so he is for sure 1.83 (6 ft)=
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
By the way, if you ever think of making a page for Sergio Ramos, I think he is no more than 1.82. Ramos looks 2 cm shorter than 6 ft listed Robin Van Persie:
Click Here
And Van Persie really looks 6 ft next to 1.87 Henry:
Click Here
Click Here
Even if Van Persie is 1.84 (I'm not sure of that), he still looks 2 cm taller than Ramos, so I can't see Ramos being more than 1.82.
Mark(5'9.25 said on 30/Dec/16
He is taller than Wawrinka. I wouldn't go lower than this listing.
He is taller than Wawrinka. I wouldn't go lower than this listing.
Rory said on 29/Dec/16
Nadal definitely edges Wawrinka who has always looked 6 ft range, minimum 182. Federer does look at least half a half inch taller than Nadal though. Nadal is probably a solid 6'1 out of bed and falls to a comfortable 183 at worst.
Nadal definitely edges Wawrinka who has always looked 6 ft range, minimum 182. Federer does look at least half a half inch taller than Nadal though. Nadal is probably a solid 6'1 out of bed and falls to a comfortable 183 at worst.
Rory said on 29/Dec/16
Hmm the downgrade seems a bit harsh, I think 6'0.5 looked pretty believable when stood tall. 6'0.25 isn't a travesty though, he'd measure it after a match anyhow.
Hmm the downgrade seems a bit harsh, I think 6'0.5 looked pretty believable when stood tall. 6'0.25 isn't a travesty though, he'd measure it after a match anyhow.
Pierric said on 28/Dec/16
Around 183.5 for me...6'0.25"
Editor Rob
Around 183.5 for me...6'0.25"
Editor Rob It is a mark he may well measure.
Click Here...I'd put him bang on that mark with the other players, I think even Roddick has a claim of looking 6ft 2 there.
Click Here...I'd put him bang on that mark with the other players, I think even Roddick has a claim of looking 6ft 2 there.
Gambino said on 6/Nov/16
Rob, do you think Petra Kvitova is taller than him with the shoes she's wearing on this picture ? Click Here
Editor Rob
Rob, do you think Petra Kvitova is taller than him with the shoes she's wearing on this picture ? Click Here
Editor Rob depending on their postures - and Nadal at times isn't great - there is a chance of being a little taller
anon said on 4/Nov/16
Djokovic aint 188-189 more chance he is 187 range, Murray claimed 187.5cm if we say Murray is 188cm ( 6'2) he always looks a bit taller than Djokovic, Novak's wesbite had his height listed as 187cm for years before they changed it to the 6'2 188cm going off the Atp stats, I would imagine the official height for Novak was the 187cm that was on his site beforehand.
Rob has him about right- He probably around 6'1.5- 6'1.75
Djokovic aint 188-189 more chance he is 187 range, Murray claimed 187.5cm if we say Murray is 188cm ( 6'2) he always looks a bit taller than Djokovic, Novak's wesbite had his height listed as 187cm for years before they changed it to the 6'2 188cm going off the Atp stats, I would imagine the official height for Novak was the 187cm that was on his site beforehand.
Rob has him about right- He probably around 6'1.5- 6'1.75
Johnson said on 30/Oct/16
@Rob I think you should renew Carlos Moya thread. He has claimed 190 cm recently @Mark the difference between Roger and Novak is not that high
@Rob I think you should renew Carlos Moya thread. He has claimed 190 cm recently @Mark the difference between Roger and Novak is not that high
Mark said on 13/Sep/16
Nadal doesn't always have the best posture. He does look the same with Federer in some cases, but Federer does have an edge on Nadal.
Still, I would put Nadal at 184 - 185 cm when he stands with much better posture. 185 - 186 cm for Federer and 188 -189 cm for Djokovic.
Nadal doesn't always have the best posture. He does look the same with Federer in some cases, but Federer does have an edge on Nadal.
Still, I would put Nadal at 184 - 185 cm when he stands with much better posture. 185 - 186 cm for Federer and 188 -189 cm for Djokovic.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 12/Aug/16
Nadal - solid 184cm
Federer - solid 185cm
Sharapova - solid 186cm
Djokovic - solid 187cm
Murray - solid 188cm
Nadal - solid 184cm
Federer - solid 185cm
Sharapova - solid 186cm
Djokovic - solid 187cm
Murray - solid 188cm
heightchecker34 said on 31/Jul/16
Nadal is a 184 cm guy... never quite reaching the 6'1 mark except in the early morning, then for the rest of the day walks around as a 6'0.5 guy. Always looked at worst an inch shorter than Federer, and he doesn't always have the best posture, however standing up straight, he is most definitely at the 184 cm mark. Vamos!
Nadal is a 184 cm guy... never quite reaching the 6'1 mark except in the early morning, then for the rest of the day walks around as a 6'0.5 guy. Always looked at worst an inch shorter than Federer, and he doesn't always have the best posture, however standing up straight, he is most definitely at the 184 cm mark. Vamos!
Bob said on 25/Jul/16
Nadal is at least 2 inches shorter than Federer but they are listed both at 6'1" or here Nadal 6'0.5".
Nadal is at least 2 inches shorter than Federer but they are listed both at 6'1" or here Nadal 6'0.5".
Johno said on 3/May/16
Shorter than Federer and Ronaldo, can't see him any more than a 6'0 flat, probably could dip below it to.
Shorter than Federer and Ronaldo, can't see him any more than a 6'0 flat, probably could dip below it to.
plus said on 24/Apr/16
@spainmen191cm
Pau is 215 cm and Marc Gasol 213 cm
@spainmen191cm
Pau is 215 cm and Marc Gasol 213 cm
appe 6ft0.5 said on 29/Mar/16
Looks shorter than what he is. I think it is his body frame (pretty muscular and narrow shoulders).
Looks no more than 184cm but he can measure very well around 185cm lunch time.
Looks shorter than what he is. I think it is his body frame (pretty muscular and narrow shoulders).
Looks no more than 184cm but he can measure very well around 185cm lunch time.
spainmen191cm said on 6/Mar/16
Rob how tall do you think is the male model that appears in this photo if Nadal is 184?
Click Here
Editor Rob
Rob how tall do you think is the male model that appears in this photo if Nadal is 184?
Click Here
Editor Rob might be 192cm
plus said on 17/Jan/16
Nadal is no less tan 184,5 look at him with Arda Turan (measured live at 176 cm in a clip video)
Click Here
Click Here
Nadal is no less tan 184,5 look at him with Arda Turan (measured live at 176 cm in a clip video)
Click Here
Click Here
Martin said on 8/Jan/16
I met him about two weeks ago, I took a photo with him and we were at the exact height and I´m 1.81.
I met him about two weeks ago, I took a photo with him and we were at the exact height and I´m 1.81.
spainmen191cm said on 7/Jan/16
Rob how tall do you think is Pau Gasol? he claimed to be 215cm tall in an interview
Click Here
Click Here
Editor Rob
Rob how tall do you think is Pau Gasol? he claimed to be 215cm tall in an interview
Click Here
Click Here
Editor Rob he may not be far off that mark when measured.
plus said on 28/Dec/15
Rafa Nadal is as tall as Zidane. Zidane is 184.5 in my opinion. There are pictures of both them
Rafa Nadal is as tall as Zidane. Zidane is 184.5 in my opinion. There are pictures of both them
spainmen191cm said on 20/Dec/15
Rob, how tall do you think is this guy if Nadal is 184?
Click Here
Editor Rob
Rob, how tall do you think is this guy if Nadal is 184?
Click Here
Editor Rob he could look 191-2 range
pierric said on 18/Nov/15
He's exactly 6'0 1/4"
He's exactly 6'0 1/4"
plus said on 2/Oct/15
Nadal is 184,5 in the morning, that's why he gets listed 185 cm. A 184,5 guy is a legit 185, people don't put 0,5 in general measurings. About Pau Gasol, he is 2,15 cm, and Marc Gasol is SHORTER than him. Marc is 2,13 no more
Nadal is 184,5 in the morning, that's why he gets listed 185 cm. A 184,5 guy is a legit 185, people don't put 0,5 in general measurings. About Pau Gasol, he is 2,15 cm, and Marc Gasol is SHORTER than him. Marc is 2,13 no more
Appe 6ft 0.5 said on 27/Aug/15
@guy he is 189-190
@guy he is 189-190
Guy said on 24/Aug/15
Rob, roughly what height would you give for the guy in the middle (Hakuho--widely seen as the greatest sumo wrestler ever), accounting for the sandals vs tennis shoes?
Click Here
Rob, roughly what height would you give for the guy in the middle (Hakuho--widely seen as the greatest sumo wrestler ever), accounting for the sandals vs tennis shoes?
Click Here
Jim Hopper said on 21/Aug/15
I stayed in Inca Majorca this year. Was lucky to Rafa at the town one day parked near the Market. I stood 6 feet away from him as he was talking to some friends. He had flat sandals type on as did I. I am 6-3" just. I'd say 6-0 even is his height.
I stayed in Inca Majorca this year. Was lucky to Rafa at the town one day parked near the Market. I stood 6 feet away from him as he was talking to some friends. He had flat sandals type on as did I. I am 6-3" just. I'd say 6-0 even is his height.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 12/Jul/15
I think Murray can pull off 188-189cm at least.
I think Murray can pull off 188-189cm at least.
spainmen191cm said on 29/May/15
Rob, how tall do you think is Pau Gasol? He claimed to be 215cm tall in an interview
Click Here
Click Here
Rob, how tall do you think is Pau Gasol? He claimed to be 215cm tall in an interview
Click Here
Click Here
Celebheights 6'1.5"-6'2" said on 14/Mar/15
Andy Murray tends to have perfect posture that can make him appear past 6'3", when he's no more than 6'2". If any other player has horrid posture, it's Djokovic.
Andy Murray tends to have perfect posture that can make him appear past 6'3", when he's no more than 6'2". If any other player has horrid posture, it's Djokovic.
AIO said on 12/Mar/15
People here dont have idea that posture makes a big difference.. nadal (and murray on a lesser extent) has horrible posture.. meanwhile federer and djokovic have solid posture. You can pretty much appear 1-2 inches shorter based on poor posture ... just look how nadal put his sholder and relaxed knees in all pictures.. nadal is 1.85.
People here dont have idea that posture makes a big difference.. nadal (and murray on a lesser extent) has horrible posture.. meanwhile federer and djokovic have solid posture. You can pretty much appear 1-2 inches shorter based on poor posture ... just look how nadal put his sholder and relaxed knees in all pictures.. nadal is 1.85.
Matt 185cm said on 8/Feb/15
@Appe I believe there is a very high chance he is 184cm +- 3mm
@Appe I believe there is a very high chance he is 184cm +- 3mm
Appe 6' 0.5 said on 6/Feb/15
@matt 185cm so would you bet for him exactly 184cm?
@matt 185cm so would you bet for him exactly 184cm?
Matt 185cm said on 5/Feb/15
I got in a picture with Nadal at the Australian open before his training session, with a roughly 1cm shoe disadvantage (0.6in converse vs his thick looking sneaker) we were exact same height.
I got in a picture with Nadal at the Australian open before his training session, with a roughly 1cm shoe disadvantage (0.6in converse vs his thick looking sneaker) we were exact same height.
joe joe said on 15/Dec/14
Joe Cassillas has always been listed as 5'11 on the Real madrid website and was always pegged at 1m82 other than on soccer computer games. where he is put down as 1'85. It's only this year Real have made his height 1m85 on their website. He never looks as tall as 1m 84 and 1m83 guys like bale and benzema. There is no way casillas ever hits 1'84 during the day let alone 1m 85
Joe Cassillas has always been listed as 5'11 on the Real madrid website and was always pegged at 1m82 other than on soccer computer games. where he is put down as 1'85. It's only this year Real have made his height 1m85 on their website. He never looks as tall as 1m 84 and 1m83 guys like bale and benzema. There is no way casillas ever hits 1'84 during the day let alone 1m 85
joe said on 2/Dec/14
Rob, I think he is exactly 185 cm looks this photo with cassilas said to be 6'1 (185) but it seems 181https://encrypted-tbn2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSq7cqY7oNIQzkG8lftgO_CuDt4upzO8bLzpzO3xNEtwwp_AIu4
Rob, I think he is exactly 185 cm looks this photo with cassilas said to be 6'1 (185) but it seems 181https://encrypted-tbn2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSq7cqY7oNIQzkG8lftgO_CuDt4upzO8bLzpzO3xNEtwwp_AIu4
MD said on 26/Nov/14
Yeah, I'm sure people understood that when you made very clear of it in your previous post (i.e. "the original one:))
Yeah, I'm sure people understood that when you made very clear of it in your previous post (i.e. "the original one:))
Luc said on 11/Nov/14
Rafael nadal 184
Federer 186
Gasquet 182
dimitrov 188
wawrinka 184
murray 187.5
djokovic 1.87
tsonga 1.87.5
Rafael nadal 184
Federer 186
Gasquet 182
dimitrov 188
wawrinka 184
murray 187.5
djokovic 1.87
tsonga 1.87.5
Judd said on 11/Nov/14
I agree, too. He does look 0,5" shorter than Federer (6'1").
I agree, too. He does look 0,5" shorter than Federer (6'1").
Paul 181cm said on 8/Nov/14
I think 184cm is bang on accurate for Nadal.
Do you guys think Milos Raonic is really his listed height of 6'5? I see him closer to 6'4 range, could be as low as 6'4.25 he looked at least 0.50-0.75" shorter than 6'5 Tomas Berdych face to face.
I think 184cm is bang on accurate for Nadal.
Do you guys think Milos Raonic is really his listed height of 6'5? I see him closer to 6'4 range, could be as low as 6'4.25 he looked at least 0.50-0.75" shorter than 6'5 Tomas Berdych face to face.
matt said on 4/Aug/14
Murray is taller than Tsonga, saw them at queens last year even backstage wile it was raining and playing table tennis together and Murray looked an Inch taller or close to it, They even shook hands at the end of it, Tsonga is at least 6'1.5, He looks same as Djokovic for example.
I still think Andy Murray could be more 6'2.25- 6'2.5 area he looks generally more than just a flat 6'2, His claim might have been after all day training its a funny one because Djokovic does look around 6'2 he looked a full Inch taller than Federer at wimbledon and I am not convinced Federer is below 185cm.
Murray is taller than Tsonga, saw them at queens last year even backstage wile it was raining and playing table tennis together and Murray looked an Inch taller or close to it, They even shook hands at the end of it, Tsonga is at least 6'1.5, He looks same as Djokovic for example.
I still think Andy Murray could be more 6'2.25- 6'2.5 area he looks generally more than just a flat 6'2, His claim might have been after all day training its a funny one because Djokovic does look around 6'2 he looked a full Inch taller than Federer at wimbledon and I am not convinced Federer is below 185cm.
176,2Tunman said on 1/Jul/14
@seahawksfan
good listings in general except for Murray who claimed 187,5 so no more than 6'2 flat rather a weak 6'2.Tsonga seems in the same range,I doubt he would be as short as 6'1.5 so rather 6'2.
Oh,and Sergio Ramos is a true 6'0 but is not a Tennis player,he's a footballer playing for Real Madrid.
@seahawksfan
good listings in general except for Murray who claimed 187,5 so no more than 6'2 flat rather a weak 6'2.Tsonga seems in the same range,I doubt he would be as short as 6'1.5 so rather 6'2.
Oh,and Sergio Ramos is a true 6'0 but is not a Tennis player,he's a footballer playing for Real Madrid.
Gonzalo said on 17/Jun/14
Seahawksfan 187-188 CM. says on 12/Jun/14
7'0" including hair possibly. Here he is by 7'0" measured Shaq (pay attention to the hair):
Click Here
Seahawksfan, that is not Shaq, it´s Andrew Bynum, listed 7`1 barefoot.
By no means Gasol is 6.10,5. Gasol has been measured above 2`13. The least you can argue for him is 2`12. I saw him playing in Madrid in the 2007 European Championship and he was huge. He was as tall as a guy listed 2`17, and he towered over Kirilenko who is a legit 2`06 guy
As for Shaq, his shoes were thicker than most. Someone posted long ago a link that said that he was 7`1 without shoes
Seahawksfan 187-188 CM. says on 12/Jun/14
7'0" including hair possibly. Here he is by 7'0" measured Shaq (pay attention to the hair):
Click Here
Seahawksfan, that is not Shaq, it´s Andrew Bynum, listed 7`1 barefoot.
By no means Gasol is 6.10,5. Gasol has been measured above 2`13. The least you can argue for him is 2`12. I saw him playing in Madrid in the 2007 European Championship and he was huge. He was as tall as a guy listed 2`17, and he towered over Kirilenko who is a legit 2`06 guy
As for Shaq, his shoes were thicker than most. Someone posted long ago a link that said that he was 7`1 without shoes
Vegas said on 10/Jun/14
Seahawksfan 187-188 CM. says on 2/Jun/14
By Pau Gasol whose listed as 7'0" which probably means more like 6'10.25":
__________
is there two seahawks gimmicks on here? the other day you tried to claim Terry Crews is 6'6. gasol is on video noticeably taller than chris bosh and bosh was measured 6'10.25 barefoot
Seahawksfan 187-188 CM. says on 2/Jun/14
By Pau Gasol whose listed as 7'0" which probably means more like 6'10.25":
__________
is there two seahawks gimmicks on here? the other day you tried to claim Terry Crews is 6'6. gasol is on video noticeably taller than chris bosh and bosh was measured 6'10.25 barefoot
Gonzalo said on 9/Jun/14
I am not sure if a picture of a 1`84 man next to a 2`14 man is the best to judge someone´s height. I don`t think so.
There a many pics of Nadal next to people who are in the 1`80-85 area that proves he is around 1`84
Here is Nadal next to his uncle Miguel Ángel, listed 1`87 when he played pro football
Click Here
Nadal next to Zidane, who was listed 1´85. I have seen him Zidane in the flesh and I can tell you he was every bit of that height
Click Here
Congratulations Rafa Nadal for your ninth Roland Garros.
I am not sure if a picture of a 1`84 man next to a 2`14 man is the best to judge someone´s height. I don`t think so.
There a many pics of Nadal next to people who are in the 1`80-85 area that proves he is around 1`84
Here is Nadal next to his uncle Miguel Ángel, listed 1`87 when he played pro football
Click Here
Nadal next to Zidane, who was listed 1´85. I have seen him Zidane in the flesh and I can tell you he was every bit of that height
Click Here
Congratulations Rafa Nadal for your ninth Roland Garros.
Gonzalo said on 3/Jun/14
Seahawksfan 187-188 CM. says on 2/Jun/14
By Pau Gasol whose listed as 7'0" which probably means more like 6'10.25":
Click Here
He comes up to his shoulders, and I don't think that's how a 6 footer would come up by a 6'10" guy.
GASOL WAS MEASURED 2,14.4, SO HE IS A STRONG 7 FOOTER
Seahawksfan 187-188 CM. says on 2/Jun/14
By Pau Gasol whose listed as 7'0" which probably means more like 6'10.25":
Click Here
He comes up to his shoulders, and I don't think that's how a 6 footer would come up by a 6'10" guy.
GASOL WAS MEASURED 2,14.4, SO HE IS A STRONG 7 FOOTER
pjk said on 28/May/14
I honestly don't think Nadal is over 6ft at all. If you look at the photo of David Cameron with all the top players Nadal looks a good inch shorter than Cameron. He doesn't seem to have great posture but i think he looks 5'11 or absolute maximum of 6ft but i am not sure about that.
Recently Murray gave his real height and i think if Nadal did the same it would be less than listed.
I honestly don't think Nadal is over 6ft at all. If you look at the photo of David Cameron with all the top players Nadal looks a good inch shorter than Cameron. He doesn't seem to have great posture but i think he looks 5'11 or absolute maximum of 6ft but i am not sure about that.
Recently Murray gave his real height and i think if Nadal did the same it would be less than listed.
Radd said on 16/Apr/14
@John says on 28/Jan/13
"Sak, excellent find! I think it is evidence for Nadal and Fed are close in height as they are right next to each other and you can see Fed is only slightly taller.
The biggest surprise in this picture is the disparity between Novak and Murray. At times they look within a cm of each other...but here Novak looks 6'1.5 max and Andy looks 6'2.5+ Hmmmmm....not sure what to make of it. "
Nadal is like 1-2 inches forward which makes him appear even shorter than he is..
@John says on 28/Jan/13
"Sak, excellent find! I think it is evidence for Nadal and Fed are close in height as they are right next to each other and you can see Fed is only slightly taller.
The biggest surprise in this picture is the disparity between Novak and Murray. At times they look within a cm of each other...but here Novak looks 6'1.5 max and Andy looks 6'2.5+ Hmmmmm....not sure what to make of it. "
Nadal is like 1-2 inches forward which makes him appear even shorter than he is..
MD said on 27/Mar/14
Alexander, Andy Murray already has his own discussion page here if you're interested to see what others are saying.
Alexander, Andy Murray already has his own discussion page here if you're interested to see what others are saying.
Balrog said on 26/Mar/14
Wawrinka legit 6footer or pretty close to it. Berdych near 6'5", Gasquet 6'0", Tsonga legit 6'2" and Nishikori 5'9" range, maybe near 5'10"
Wawrinka legit 6footer or pretty close to it. Berdych near 6'5", Gasquet 6'0", Tsonga legit 6'2" and Nishikori 5'9" range, maybe near 5'10"
Alexander said on 25/Mar/14
What would you guys consider Andy Murray? Some say he is 6 ft 2 and some say he is 6 ft 3 1/2.
What would you guys consider Andy Murray? Some say he is 6 ft 2 and some say he is 6 ft 3 1/2.
SAK said on 25/Mar/14
How tall are some of the other guys like; Wawrinka, Berdych, Tsonga, Gasquet and Nishikori
How tall are some of the other guys like; Wawrinka, Berdych, Tsonga, Gasquet and Nishikori
Josh said on 25/Mar/14
Alex no way Andy is 1.90 lol. Nadal not the same as Fed either
Alex no way Andy is 1.90 lol. Nadal not the same as Fed either
Alexander said on 24/Mar/14
Rafael Nadal: 1.85
Novak Djokovic: 1.87
Roger Federer: 1.85
Andy Murray: 1.90
Olivier Rochus: 1.66
Ivo Karlovic: 2.11
Rafael Nadal: 1.85
Novak Djokovic: 1.87
Roger Federer: 1.85
Andy Murray: 1.90
Olivier Rochus: 1.66
Ivo Karlovic: 2.11
Voiceless Dental Fricative said on 22/Mar/14
This listing is fair. It corresponds to Murray's claim of 6'1.8
Federer is over billed however.
I would say:
Federer 6'0.75
Nadal 6'0.25
This listing is fair. It corresponds to Murray's claim of 6'1.8
Federer is over billed however.
I would say:
Federer 6'0.75
Nadal 6'0.25
True Story. said on 25/Feb/14
the other thing is you have to compare people in pictures where they have comparable postures, I have friends my same height and some have bad posture and they appear a tad shorter in pictures than me, however we have measured many times and we are spot on the same height,
Here is a picture of nadal and fed with similar posture (which is rare because rafa tends to bend to the sides meanwhile fed has always striaght back and perect pictures (you can easily appear 1-2 inches shorter than your are when you bend your legs or back while standing up for pictures..)
Click Here
thats how even rafa and fed are in terms of height.
the other thing is you have to compare people in pictures where they have comparable postures, I have friends my same height and some have bad posture and they appear a tad shorter in pictures than me, however we have measured many times and we are spot on the same height,
Here is a picture of nadal and fed with similar posture (which is rare because rafa tends to bend to the sides meanwhile fed has always striaght back and perect pictures (you can easily appear 1-2 inches shorter than your are when you bend your legs or back while standing up for pictures..)
Click Here
thats how even rafa and fed are in terms of height.
MD said on 12/Feb/14
No one was going to take Nick seriously, anyway, so it's probably best just to ignore him, now. The page had been pretty slow, and he obviously came to troll.
No one was going to take Nick seriously, anyway, so it's probably best just to ignore him, now. The page had been pretty slow, and he obviously came to troll.
Balrog said on 10/Feb/14
6'0''. 5'11'' is too low. Novak can't be 184cm, be serious.
6'0''. 5'11'' is too low. Novak can't be 184cm, be serious.
Nick said on 7/Feb/14
Nadal is no more than 180/1cm very very tops. Also Djokovic at 188cm is out of the question, he is 184/5cm and still being generous.
Nadal is no more than 180/1cm very very tops. Also Djokovic at 188cm is out of the question, he is 184/5cm and still being generous.
oonoo said on 1/Feb/14
federer tall than nadal
federer tall than nadal
me said on 26/Jan/14
same as wawrinka
same as wawrinka
Josh said on 16/Jan/14
6'0-6'0.25...Thought he was near 6'1 for the longest time, but the evidence is now overwhelming.
6'0-6'0.25...Thought he was near 6'1 for the longest time, but the evidence is now overwhelming.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 15/Jan/14
"Rafeal Nadal's height is 6ft 0.25in (184cm)"
I wouldn't go under 6ft since he can pull off looking near 6ft1
"Rafeal Nadal's height is 6ft 0.25in (184cm)"
I wouldn't go under 6ft since he can pull off looking near 6ft1
Balrog said on 14/Jan/14
As I been saying forever. 6'0''
Novak 6'1.5'' and Roger 6'1''
As I been saying forever. 6'0''
Novak 6'1.5'' and Roger 6'1''
Pleb said on 6/Jan/14
Should had added the words 'constantly' and 'often' somewhere in my previous post since people are lacking discernment these days. Unfortunately can't edit post so have to make do without them.
Should had added the words 'constantly' and 'often' somewhere in my previous post since people are lacking discernment these days. Unfortunately can't edit post so have to make do without them.
Pleb said on 6/Jan/14
Murray is at the least 2 inches and at the most 3 inches taller than Nadal, Nadals eye level is consistently just above Murrays mouth by 1-2cm. Now the usual distance from eye to mouth varies in the range of 3-4 inches. You do the math.
Why would Murray undersell his height? If anything he is honest, which indicates integrity, which is seriously lacking in this world. Therefore worthy of respect in my book.
Funny observation I made in my life time within this odd world, lies are accepted at face value, truth is brushed aside. Fascinating...
Murray is at the least 2 inches and at the most 3 inches taller than Nadal, Nadals eye level is consistently just above Murrays mouth by 1-2cm. Now the usual distance from eye to mouth varies in the range of 3-4 inches. You do the math.
Why would Murray undersell his height? If anything he is honest, which indicates integrity, which is seriously lacking in this world. Therefore worthy of respect in my book.
Funny observation I made in my life time within this odd world, lies are accepted at face value, truth is brushed aside. Fascinating...
Pleb said on 4/Jan/14
With Murray Claiming 187.5cm, fat chance for Nadal being a 6 footer. Murray has at least 2 inches on him. Making Nadal a weak 6 footer at best, he's likely to measure 5'11-5'11.5 barefoot, 6'0.5-6'1 in his custom thick sole Nikes.
Nadal being under 6ft isn't going to suddenly make him a worse tennis player is it? Talk about being deluded...
With Murray Claiming 187.5cm, fat chance for Nadal being a 6 footer. Murray has at least 2 inches on him. Making Nadal a weak 6 footer at best, he's likely to measure 5'11-5'11.5 barefoot, 6'0.5-6'1 in his custom thick sole Nikes.
Nadal being under 6ft isn't going to suddenly make him a worse tennis player is it? Talk about being deluded...
Pleb said on 18/Dec/13
Fat chance of Josie being 175cm when looking like this next to a 6'1 Ronaldo. Cronaldos eye level is piratically on Mourinhos scalp, Josie is around 5'8.
Click Here
Click Here
Fat chance of Josie being 175cm when looking like this next to a 6'1 Ronaldo. Cronaldos eye level is piratically on Mourinhos scalp, Josie is around 5'8.
Click Here
Click Here
Pleb said on 14/Dec/13
Real Madrid needs to get there stadiometer fixed, Bale listed 183cm has around an Inch on Alonso, Benzema listed 184.1cm is shorter than Bale and looks over an Inch shorter than 186.5cm Ronaldo. Ronaldo is apparently still growing and is taller than Kaka now, maybe Real Madrid stadiometer is just bonkers.
Mourinho is listed 174cm, more chance he is under that than over. Even if he is 175cm, still fat chance of Nadal being over 6ft.
184cm is good for Nadal? Guessed you missed him standing next to a 184cm David Cameron, or space time somehow got warped, distorting the photons when those shots were taken.
Real Madrid needs to get there stadiometer fixed, Bale listed 183cm has around an Inch on Alonso, Benzema listed 184.1cm is shorter than Bale and looks over an Inch shorter than 186.5cm Ronaldo. Ronaldo is apparently still growing and is taller than Kaka now, maybe Real Madrid stadiometer is just bonkers.
Mourinho is listed 174cm, more chance he is under that than over. Even if he is 175cm, still fat chance of Nadal being over 6ft.
184cm is good for Nadal? Guessed you missed him standing next to a 184cm David Cameron, or space time somehow got warped, distorting the photons when those shots were taken.
Pleb said on 11/Dec/13
With 5'8ish Mourinho and 182cm listed Alonso in flats who always consistently looks 2cm shorter than 183cm listed Gareth Bale.
Click Here
Jose may have footwear advantage, 1/2 inch at most. Nadal doesn't look like a 6ft plus guy there, even with the advantage of being nearer the camera.
With 5'8ish Mourinho and 182cm listed Alonso in flats who always consistently looks 2cm shorter than 183cm listed Gareth Bale.
Click Here
Jose may have footwear advantage, 1/2 inch at most. Nadal doesn't look like a 6ft plus guy there, even with the advantage of being nearer the camera.
Voiceless Dental Fricative said on 7/Dec/13
Juan Z: sloped sidewalk in that vid.
Juan Z: sloped sidewalk in that vid.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 5/Dec/13
"Rafael Nadal's height is 6ft 0.25in (184cm)"
I think there's a full 1in between him and Federer and about 2in between him and Djokovic.
"Rafael Nadal's height is 6ft 0.25in (184cm)"
I think there's a full 1in between him and Federer and about 2in between him and Djokovic.
SAK said on 30/Nov/13
@Pleb,thanks for posting vid.
@Pleb,thanks for posting vid.
Juan Z said on 30/Nov/13
Until Roland Garros 2005 ATP Nadal´s Height was 6´0.
I think the ATP ranks the heights of some players with footwears included.
Federer looks almost a inch more taller than Nadal in this video
Click Here
Maybe Nadal have footwear more taller than Federer. That is the explication because they have similar height on court.
Nadal: 6´0.5 (184 cm)
Federer: 6´1.25 (186 cm)
Djokovic: 6´2 (188 cm)
The reason because Nadal is more tallers than atp 6 feets player is obviously they are not 6, they are 5´11 without footwear.
Until Roland Garros 2005 ATP Nadal´s Height was 6´0.
I think the ATP ranks the heights of some players with footwears included.
Federer looks almost a inch more taller than Nadal in this video
Click Here
Maybe Nadal have footwear more taller than Federer. That is the explication because they have similar height on court.
Nadal: 6´0.5 (184 cm)
Federer: 6´1.25 (186 cm)
Djokovic: 6´2 (188 cm)
The reason because Nadal is more tallers than atp 6 feets player is obviously they are not 6, they are 5´11 without footwear.
Pleb said on 28/Nov/13
Will Smith footwear appears to be some Supra TK.
Will Smith footwear appears to be some Supra TK.
Pleb said on 27/Nov/13
@SAK With Bolt, Nadel had over an inch in footwear, Bolt was virtually in flats.
Click Here
@SAK With Bolt, Nadel had over an inch in footwear, Bolt was virtually in flats.
Click Here
Pleb said on 27/Nov/13
@SAK Here's the vid with Smith and Djokovic: Click Here Not the best quality afraid.
At 0:53-1:00 when the shots was taken, none of them were standing up straight, in fact they were all posing to be the same height, Smith had one leg in front of the other and was slightly leaning forward.
At 0:37 secs onwards you can get the best view of Smiths footwear, looks to be some black trainers that gives less than the typical tennis shoe.
Also notice at 0:37 when Nadal is posing with Smith, he is balancing himself on one leg to appear taller...
Click Here With 6f4.5 Zlatan Ibrahimovic, Zlatans eye level looks to be above Nadals head.
Interesting shots with 181cm/5ft11.5 listed Nene:
Click Here
Click Here
@SAK Here's the vid with Smith and Djokovic: Click Here Not the best quality afraid.
At 0:53-1:00 when the shots was taken, none of them were standing up straight, in fact they were all posing to be the same height, Smith had one leg in front of the other and was slightly leaning forward.
At 0:37 secs onwards you can get the best view of Smiths footwear, looks to be some black trainers that gives less than the typical tennis shoe.
Also notice at 0:37 when Nadal is posing with Smith, he is balancing himself on one leg to appear taller...
Click Here With 6f4.5 Zlatan Ibrahimovic, Zlatans eye level looks to be above Nadals head.
Interesting shots with 181cm/5ft11.5 listed Nene:
Click Here
Click Here
Voiceless Dental Fricative said on 27/Nov/13
I think he could be under listed. He utterly towers Stiller.
I think he could be under listed. He utterly towers Stiller.
SAK said on 26/Nov/13
Click Here Next to Will Smith unfortunately cannot see footwear.
But he seems to pretty similar height to 6f1/6f1.5 guys.
Click Here Next to Will Smith unfortunately cannot see footwear.
But he seems to pretty similar height to 6f1/6f1.5 guys.
Pleb said on 18/Nov/13
The only way Rafa would make up the height difference is if his neck is 2-3 inches longer than David Camerons. Plus David Cameron is in a relaxed posture there, one leg in front of the other, dropping an inch or more. So no, my evidence strongly suggest Nadal is under 6ft, more in the 5'11 range.
The only way Rafa would make up the height difference is if his neck is 2-3 inches longer than David Camerons. Plus David Cameron is in a relaxed posture there, one leg in front of the other, dropping an inch or more. So no, my evidence strongly suggest Nadal is under 6ft, more in the 5'11 range.
MD said on 15/Nov/13
Are we looking at the same picture (one I'm sure has been posted here many times before), Pleb? Rafa is clearly losing height with his stance and a slight bending at the neck, and yet he STILL looks almost identical in height to the prime minister. If that's the picture you're going to show to "prove" he's 5'11", you've given evidence for quite the opposite.
Are we looking at the same picture (one I'm sure has been posted here many times before), Pleb? Rafa is clearly losing height with his stance and a slight bending at the neck, and yet he STILL looks almost identical in height to the prime minister. If that's the picture you're going to show to "prove" he's 5'11", you've given evidence for quite the opposite.
Sylinher said on 14/Oct/13
I have never understood...how people can say that Nadal looks shorter than 1.84.
I mean seriously is ridiculous, he is a tall guy..there can be any doubt..there are people who are 1.80-1.82 and are seen as tall people...so i guess it could be for his posture.
Here Nadal with Djokovic...I mean if the serbian is 1.87 then nadal is a legit 1.84...my point is Nadal doesn't look like a short person next to Djokovic..both look tall
Click Here
Here with Murray
Click Here
And Finally with Cristiano Ronaldo and spanish football player Raul who is supposed to be 1.78
Click Here
I have never understood...how people can say that Nadal looks shorter than 1.84.
I mean seriously is ridiculous, he is a tall guy..there can be any doubt..there are people who are 1.80-1.82 and are seen as tall people...so i guess it could be for his posture.
Here Nadal with Djokovic...I mean if the serbian is 1.87 then nadal is a legit 1.84...my point is Nadal doesn't look like a short person next to Djokovic..both look tall
Click Here
Here with Murray
Click Here
And Finally with Cristiano Ronaldo and spanish football player Raul who is supposed to be 1.78
Click Here
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 25/Sep/13
Strangely resembles his arch rival Roger Federer in the above pic. Could be 6ft0.25/184cm but probably no less. I agree with Anon, he does edge out weak 6fters, so 182cm is out of the question.
Federer generallt looks about 2cm taller than Nadal
Strangely resembles his arch rival Roger Federer in the above pic. Could be 6ft0.25/184cm but probably no less. I agree with Anon, he does edge out weak 6fters, so 182cm is out of the question.
Federer generallt looks about 2cm taller than Nadal
Lurk said on 10/Sep/13
Looks no more than a flat 6 feet most of the time. 1 1/2 inch shorter than Djokovic I think.
Looks no more than a flat 6 feet most of the time. 1 1/2 inch shorter than Djokovic I think.
Balrog said on 9/Sep/13
In the final it was obvious that Djokovic was a good 4cm taller than Nadal. Close to 2in difference.
In the final it was obvious that Djokovic was a good 4cm taller than Nadal. Close to 2in difference.
Radd said on 3/Sep/13
I have seen them many times stand together. Nadal is 185 guy for sure, Federer 186, nole between 187-188 cm and Murray is 189.
Its safe to say 185-189 cm is the best height for a tennis player.
I have seen them many times stand together. Nadal is 185 guy for sure, Federer 186, nole between 187-188 cm and Murray is 189.
Its safe to say 185-189 cm is the best height for a tennis player.
Daniele said on 2/Sep/13
Tennis players's listings are pretty accurate. If not 185cm, 184cm seems correct.
Tennis players's listings are pretty accurate. If not 185cm, 184cm seems correct.
Balrog said on 29/Aug/13
Radd in none of your pics we can see footwear. Nadal is 183cm. I clearly remember he was listed at that and he suddenly got pumped at 6'1"
Radd in none of your pics we can see footwear. Nadal is 183cm. I clearly remember he was listed at that and he suddenly got pumped at 6'1"
Radd said on 27/Aug/13
Nadal is 185, he has clear advantage on all 6 foot people listed.
Look at him next to 182 cm casillas..
Click Here
Nadal next to 183 cm sergio ramos..
Click Here
nadal next to 183 cm wawrinka..
Click Here
Nadal next to 183 cm fernando gonzalez:
Click Here
Nadal is easily 185 cm (6'1 guy)
Nadal has clear advantage on all people listed as 6 foot tall
what about nadal next to cristiano ronaldo (who is listed 186 cm)
Click Here
Nadal is 185, he has clear advantage on all 6 foot people listed.
Look at him next to 182 cm casillas..
Click Here
Nadal next to 183 cm sergio ramos..
Click Here
nadal next to 183 cm wawrinka..
Click Here
Nadal next to 183 cm fernando gonzalez:
Click Here
Nadal is easily 185 cm (6'1 guy)
Nadal has clear advantage on all people listed as 6 foot tall
what about nadal next to cristiano ronaldo (who is listed 186 cm)
Click Here
chris said on 10/Aug/13
would say he looks more 6ft with his body but he's probably 184/185 and Federer is more 185/186.
would say he looks more 6ft with his body but he's probably 184/185 and Federer is more 185/186.
Ras said on 28/Jun/13
Arch Stanton says on 25/Jun/13
The guy who beat him yesterday is listed at 5 ft 10 and Nadal looked easily 3 inches taller. I suspect Darcis was more 5'9.5", but Nadal did look a full 6'1" guy in comparison and taller than 6'.
-----------------------
Darcis is listed as 177cm, so my guess is that he is 5'9.5".
Arch Stanton says on 25/Jun/13
The guy who beat him yesterday is listed at 5 ft 10 and Nadal looked easily 3 inches taller. I suspect Darcis was more 5'9.5", but Nadal did look a full 6'1" guy in comparison and taller than 6'.
-----------------------
Darcis is listed as 177cm, so my guess is that he is 5'9.5".
Ras said on 28/Jun/13
SAK says on 10/Jun/13
Bruno says: In this video he holds his own really well next to Felipe.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
How tall is El Príncipe Felipe?
------------------------------------------------------------------------
He's listed as 6'5.5 here but I'd give him more like 6'4 since he doesn't look that tall next to some other people.
SAK says on 10/Jun/13
Bruno says: In this video he holds his own really well next to Felipe.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
How tall is El Príncipe Felipe?
------------------------------------------------------------------------
He's listed as 6'5.5 here but I'd give him more like 6'4 since he doesn't look that tall next to some other people.
Joe joe said on 25/Jun/13
what do you think of this rob Nadal along side 1m85 Zidane
Click Here
Editor Rob
what do you think of this rob Nadal along side 1m85 Zidane
Click Here
Editor Rob he can look six one there
Arch Stanton said on 25/Jun/13
The guy who beat him yesterday is listed at 5 ft 10 and Nadal looked easily 3 inches taller. I suspect Darcis was more 5'9.5", but Nadal did look a full 6'1" guy in comparison and taller than 6'.
The guy who beat him yesterday is listed at 5 ft 10 and Nadal looked easily 3 inches taller. I suspect Darcis was more 5'9.5", but Nadal did look a full 6'1" guy in comparison and taller than 6'.
Kyuss said on 23/Jun/13
Federer is a legit 6-1" guy imo,nadal looks a 6-0" guy.
Federer is a legit 6-1" guy imo,nadal looks a 6-0" guy.
Anon said on 18/Jun/13
@ Sak. I think your estimates are nearly there. But I would place Rafa:
185.5cm out of bed.
184.5cm in late morning.
183.5cm at night, or 183cm after a tennis match as a result of full spinal compression.
@ Sak. I think your estimates are nearly there. But I would place Rafa:
185.5cm out of bed.
184.5cm in late morning.
183.5cm at night, or 183cm after a tennis match as a result of full spinal compression.
SAK said on 12/Jun/13
Anyone posting anything lower then 6f/183cm for Rafa, are the posters who pretty much downgrade everyone. There are some celebs who do deserve downgrading. But Rafa is not one of them.
185 - morning
184 - most of the day (most relevant)
183 - late at night
Anyone posting anything lower then 6f/183cm for Rafa, are the posters who pretty much downgrade everyone. There are some celebs who do deserve downgrading. But Rafa is not one of them.
185 - morning
184 - most of the day (most relevant)
183 - late at night
Balrog said on 11/Jun/13
Ferrer is 5'8''. Nadal is 6'0''
Ferrer is 5'8''. Nadal is 6'0''
SAK said on 10/Jun/13
Bruno says: In this video he holds his own really well next to Felipe.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
How tall is El Príncipe Felipe?
Bruno says: In this video he holds his own really well next to Felipe.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
How tall is El Príncipe Felipe?
SAK said on 10/Jun/13
Here is Rafa next to Bolt(6f5) and BB player P.Gasol(7ft).
Click Here
Click Here
Its fair to say he is definately not below 6ft.
Here is Rafa next to Bolt(6f5) and BB player P.Gasol(7ft).
Click Here
Click Here
Its fair to say he is definately not below 6ft.
Bruno said on 10/Jun/13
In this video he holds his own really well next to Felipe. In my book he's definitely 184-185 cm tall.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=chnDQyU7WLk
In this video he holds his own really well next to Felipe. In my book he's definitely 184-185 cm tall.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=chnDQyU7WLk
Arch Stanton said on 9/Jun/13
Alexandra says on 11/May/13
He looks shorter because he has large shoulders and a muscular body, but he's the exact same height as Roger Federer, 1.85 cm. I have seen almost all of their matches together and in similar tennis shoes and standing next to each other they are the same height.
I doubt many would agree with that. Federer has always looked a bit taller to me, 2 cm difference looks accurate to me.
Alexandra says on 11/May/13
He looks shorter because he has large shoulders and a muscular body, but he's the exact same height as Roger Federer, 1.85 cm. I have seen almost all of their matches together and in similar tennis shoes and standing next to each other they are the same height.
I doubt many would agree with that. Federer has always looked a bit taller to me, 2 cm difference looks accurate to me.
Arch Stanton said on 9/Jun/13
Martin says on 16/Apr/13
I find it hard to believe this guy is 184 actually. Might be his tallest though but 182 is more probable.
Hardly. I watched the Nadal vs Ferrer match earlier. Ferrer is listed at 5 ft 9 and pretty much looks near it 5'8.5"-5'9" by his proportions and Nadal looked almost 4 inches taller. Nadal looked virtually 6'1" in comparison. 184-5 is fine, i'd lean more on 6'12 than 6' to be honest. Sub 6 ft is just laughable. He's a tall guy, see him next to average guys like Ferrer.
Martin says on 16/Apr/13
I find it hard to believe this guy is 184 actually. Might be his tallest though but 182 is more probable.
Hardly. I watched the Nadal vs Ferrer match earlier. Ferrer is listed at 5 ft 9 and pretty much looks near it 5'8.5"-5'9" by his proportions and Nadal looked almost 4 inches taller. Nadal looked virtually 6'1" in comparison. 184-5 is fine, i'd lean more on 6'12 than 6' to be honest. Sub 6 ft is just laughable. He's a tall guy, see him next to average guys like Ferrer.
avi said on 9/Jun/13
Murray must be 6'2 as Nadal is 2 inches shorter.I think he is 6 flat 5'11 is too low cause that would mean Federer would be 6'0 only and he is 6'1 flat.
Murray must be 6'2 as Nadal is 2 inches shorter.I think he is 6 flat 5'11 is too low cause that would mean Federer would be 6'0 only and he is 6'1 flat.
Alexandra said on 11/May/13
He looks shorter because he has large shoulders and a muscular body, but he's the exact same height as Roger Federer, 1.85 cm. I have seen almost all of their matches together and in similar tennis shoes and standing next to each other they are the same height.
He looks shorter because he has large shoulders and a muscular body, but he's the exact same height as Roger Federer, 1.85 cm. I have seen almost all of their matches together and in similar tennis shoes and standing next to each other they are the same height.
Martin said on 16/Apr/13
I find it hard to believe this guy is 184 actually. Might be his tallest though but 182 is more probable.
I find it hard to believe this guy is 184 actually. Might be his tallest though but 182 is more probable.
Average Joe said on 26/Mar/13
He is clearly an inch or more shorter than a 6'05 David Cameron. So a typical 5'11 guy that gets passed off for a solid 6'1...
Click Here
He is clearly an inch or more shorter than a 6'05 David Cameron. So a typical 5'11 guy that gets passed off for a solid 6'1...
Click Here
Dean 5ft 9.25 said on 14/Feb/13
@ Elijah - Well Rob said 29-32 is average for a guy of my height so technically im upper average in terms of leg size having 32". Nothing to write home about but tbh I think I have a noticably long femer bone but my tibula/fibula part of my leg looks shorter proportionatly.
@ Elijah - Well Rob said 29-32 is average for a guy of my height so technically im upper average in terms of leg size having 32". Nothing to write home about but tbh I think I have a noticably long femer bone but my tibula/fibula part of my leg looks shorter proportionatly.
SAK said on 14/Feb/13
@Elijah, you must have long legs in proportion to your height. Because 32" is better suited for 5f11/6f guys.
Nadal, has average length legs (maybe a little shortish) compared to his height. I think his physique gives the impression he is shorter then he actually is.
@Elijah, you must have long legs in proportion to your height. Because 32" is better suited for 5f11/6f guys.
Nadal, has average length legs (maybe a little shortish) compared to his height. I think his physique gives the impression he is shorter then he actually is.
SAK said on 14/Feb/13
@Elijah, you must have long legs in proportion to your height. Because 32" is better suited for 5f11/6f guys.
Nadal, has average length legs (maybe a little shortish) compared to his height. I think his physique gives the impede he is shorter then he actually is.
@Elijah, you must have long legs in proportion to your height. Because 32" is better suited for 5f11/6f guys.
Nadal, has average length legs (maybe a little shortish) compared to his height. I think his physique gives the impede he is shorter then he actually is.
Elijah said on 11/Feb/13
@UK183: When you have that much of an excess on your jeans, it means it's too big, and barefoot you'd be treading on it. I am 182-183cm and not even a 34" does that for me, that is the size that I wear all the time and I get only a single "break" at the front from when it overlaps my shoe/boot and barefoot I don't tread over it at all, which means that it's definitely not too big for me. I would probably have to go the next size up, like 36" for me to get the same effect as in this picture.
So since you get that effect on a 34", it's definitely too big for you.
@Balrog and Dean: Every 5'9" guy I have met and asked wears a 32", so I don't think it's long. But I have never met another guy who is 6' or 6'1" with a 34" like me. I have seen some 6'2" and 6'3" guys like that but even among guys that tall, a lot or maybe even most have a 32". So it looks like 32" might be the "norm" for guys between about 5'9 and 6'2".
@UK183: When you have that much of an excess on your jeans, it means it's too big, and barefoot you'd be treading on it. I am 182-183cm and not even a 34" does that for me, that is the size that I wear all the time and I get only a single "break" at the front from when it overlaps my shoe/boot and barefoot I don't tread over it at all, which means that it's definitely not too big for me. I would probably have to go the next size up, like 36" for me to get the same effect as in this picture.
So since you get that effect on a 34", it's definitely too big for you.
@Balrog and Dean: Every 5'9" guy I have met and asked wears a 32", so I don't think it's long. But I have never met another guy who is 6' or 6'1" with a 34" like me. I have seen some 6'2" and 6'3" guys like that but even among guys that tall, a lot or maybe even most have a 32". So it looks like 32" might be the "norm" for guys between about 5'9 and 6'2".
Peyman-6ft said on 1/Feb/13
@john
nice observation on him , yea thats how I look like too . I am actually 6feet but I give the impression of a (5'10''-5'11'') guy . It's not good but what can I do about it ?! That's my naturality .
I also don't have short legs or arms , they're just averagish ,
many people tell me every now & then : '' oh I thought you're shorter like 179-180 but now I see a 184 guy!!'' & I say I'm 183 & 75kg !!
I guess I just have small hands & feet
we are stretched out average guys as you said ! Lol
@john
nice observation on him , yea thats how I look like too . I am actually 6feet but I give the impression of a (5'10''-5'11'') guy . It's not good but what can I do about it ?! That's my naturality .
I also don't have short legs or arms , they're just averagish ,
many people tell me every now & then : '' oh I thought you're shorter like 179-180 but now I see a 184 guy!!'' & I say I'm 183 & 75kg !!
I guess I just have small hands & feet
we are stretched out average guys as you said ! Lol
John said on 31/Jan/13
Sak, yeah they seem mostly legit with a couple exceptions.
It's surprising actually because I think some of the weights are definitely wrong. The weights seem 'user submitted' either by the players themselves or someone in their team. Many of them are never updated even when a player has clearly lost or gained weight.
Sak, yeah they seem mostly legit with a couple exceptions.
It's surprising actually because I think some of the weights are definitely wrong. The weights seem 'user submitted' either by the players themselves or someone in their team. Many of them are never updated even when a player has clearly lost or gained weight.
SAK said on 29/Jan/13
@John, I do get what you are saying about Nadal, and actually agree with it as well.
He gives the 5f11 impression.
In general tennis listings are pretty accurate or close enough.
@John, I do get what you are saying about Nadal, and actually agree with it as well.
He gives the 5f11 impression.
In general tennis listings are pretty accurate or close enough.
John said on 29/Jan/13
Also to add, I think the photo of Rafa here is evidence of him looking not that tall even though he is pushing 6'1. What I mean is, I think he is actually taller than he comes across...but his proportions look shorter.
He is obviously not a short guy, but just from looking at him I would guess 5'11. He has that slightly taller than average but definitely not 'tall' look with a longish torso, shorter limbs and athletic frame. Kind of like Agassi...except Nadal actually is borderline tall and is like a stretched out average guy if that makes sense.
Also to add, I think the photo of Rafa here is evidence of him looking not that tall even though he is pushing 6'1. What I mean is, I think he is actually taller than he comes across...but his proportions look shorter.
He is obviously not a short guy, but just from looking at him I would guess 5'11. He has that slightly taller than average but definitely not 'tall' look with a longish torso, shorter limbs and athletic frame. Kind of like Agassi...except Nadal actually is borderline tall and is like a stretched out average guy if that makes sense.
John said on 28/Jan/13
Sak, excellent find! I think it is evidence for Nadal and Fed are close in height as they are right next to each other and you can see Fed is only slightly taller.
The biggest surprise in this picture is the disparity between Novak and Murray. At times they look within a cm of each other...but here Novak looks 6'1.5 max and Andy looks 6'2.5+ Hmmmmm....not sure what to make of it.
Sak, excellent find! I think it is evidence for Nadal and Fed are close in height as they are right next to each other and you can see Fed is only slightly taller.
The biggest surprise in this picture is the disparity between Novak and Murray. At times they look within a cm of each other...but here Novak looks 6'1.5 max and Andy looks 6'2.5+ Hmmmmm....not sure what to make of it.
John said on 20/Jan/13
It depends, usually there is slight bunching but not as much as in that picture. I prefer little to none, but there is usually some naturally regardless of the length of the pants, since the pants will naturally go in over the shoes.. Too much like there can look somewhat sloppy imo. Those pants look a little long for Nadal.
I could wear anything from 32 to 34 and make it work. I prefer 32's and to wear them low with little bunching. I wouldn't wear anything less than 32 though as one of the worst looks is when the pants are noticeably too short---looks very unstylish and kind of 'geeky' imo.
It depends, usually there is slight bunching but not as much as in that picture. I prefer little to none, but there is usually some naturally regardless of the length of the pants, since the pants will naturally go in over the shoes.. Too much like there can look somewhat sloppy imo. Those pants look a little long for Nadal.
I could wear anything from 32 to 34 and make it work. I prefer 32's and to wear them low with little bunching. I wouldn't wear anything less than 32 though as one of the worst looks is when the pants are noticeably too short---looks very unstylish and kind of 'geeky' imo.
Balrog said on 19/Jan/13
A 32 inseam is really common on guys 6'0" and 6'1". That's why I said that it's weird at 5'9'' having a 32 inseam, you must have long legs and a short torso. On the other hand shoes doesn't tell height because I met 5'7'' guys who wears 11 US and I've friend who is near 6'3'' and wears the same 11 US.
A 32 inseam is really common on guys 6'0" and 6'1". That's why I said that it's weird at 5'9'' having a 32 inseam, you must have long legs and a short torso. On the other hand shoes doesn't tell height because I met 5'7'' guys who wears 11 US and I've friend who is near 6'3'' and wears the same 11 US.
UK183cm said on 18/Jan/13
What I am confused about with inseam is whether the bottom of your trousers should bunch up and wrap around your shoe like they are on Nadal in the photo. 32" doesn't usually do that for me, 34 inch would do. Can anyone tell me if that's how trousers should be worn? I think I'll just buy some 34" trousers and see what they're like.
What I am confused about with inseam is whether the bottom of your trousers should bunch up and wrap around your shoe like they are on Nadal in the photo. 32" doesn't usually do that for me, 34 inch would do. Can anyone tell me if that's how trousers should be worn? I think I'll just buy some 34" trousers and see what they're like.
John said on 18/Jan/13
I wear 32 at 6'1, but it is a little short because I wear it low down near my hips. My true size would be a 33, which I think is average for my height.
I wear 32 at 6'1, but it is a little short because I wear it low down near my hips. My true size would be a 33, which I think is average for my height.
Dean 5ft 9.25 said on 15/Jan/13
Why is 32 weird for a 5'9? Ask Rob, its 29-32 which is normal for a 5'9 so Im above average but nothing out of ordinary.
@ Peyman - Im 23 and havnt grown since 17. I have a 5'8 wingspan as well so definetly bigger all round in my lower body.
Why is 32 weird for a 5'9? Ask Rob, its 29-32 which is normal for a 5'9 so Im above average but nothing out of ordinary.
@ Peyman - Im 23 and havnt grown since 17. I have a 5'8 wingspan as well so definetly bigger all round in my lower body.
Balrog said on 11/Jan/13
I'm a shy over 6'1'' and I wear 34 inseam depends on what kind of pants. 11 ½ US in shoes. Really weird a 5'9'' with 32 inseam.
I'm a shy over 6'1'' and I wear 34 inseam depends on what kind of pants. 11 ½ US in shoes. Really weird a 5'9'' with 32 inseam.
Peyman-6ft said on 10/Jan/13
@Dean ,
so we wear the same size
you certainly have tall legs
if I were you , I'd try streching , hanging etc to gain some more height.
It's obviously easier to increase torso than legs .
How old are you now
@Dean ,
so we wear the same size
you certainly have tall legs
if I were you , I'd try streching , hanging etc to gain some more height.
It's obviously easier to increase torso than legs .
How old are you now
Dean 5ft 9.25 said on 9/Jan/13
I wear 32 trousers and im barely 176. I must have a proper short torso right!?
I wear 32 trousers and im barely 176. I must have a proper short torso right!?
Stephen said on 9/Jan/13
i think this guy wears inseem 32.
i think this guy wears inseem 32.
Josh said on 9/Jan/13
6'0.5 is right
6'0.5 is right
John said on 9/Jan/13
Stephen, thats right...he has a avg/slightly above avg guy proportion...he is like an elongated 5'11 guy...like Agassi if he worked out more and was stretched out 2 inches.
Stephen, thats right...he has a avg/slightly above avg guy proportion...he is like an elongated 5'11 guy...like Agassi if he worked out more and was stretched out 2 inches.
Pedro said on 8/Jan/13
Solid 185 guy he seems the same height as cristiano ronaldo
Solid 185 guy he seems the same height as cristiano ronaldo
UK183cm said on 8/Jan/13
His proportions are identical to mine, I am 184.5-182.5. Listing seems pretty good.
His proportions are identical to mine, I am 184.5-182.5. Listing seems pretty good.
Stephen said on 8/Jan/13
look at Nadal proportion, once you see him in a picture alone he doesn't give the impression of a tall guy...but once you see him near Roger Federer who i think is around 185.5 at night he's definitely just a bit shorter just like 1.5cm shorter no more, so 184 cm at night for nadal is a good estimation and claiming 6'1 is ok.
look at Nadal proportion, once you see him in a picture alone he doesn't give the impression of a tall guy...but once you see him near Roger Federer who i think is around 185.5 at night he's definitely just a bit shorter just like 1.5cm shorter no more, so 184 cm at night for nadal is a good estimation and claiming 6'1 is ok.
Peyman-6ft said on 8/Jan/13
I agree SAK
I agree SAK
SAK said on 7/Jan/13
@Balrog, I myself at times think he is 183cm aswell. I was referring to people who say he is 5f11 on federers page. I think it's fair to say 184 early part of day, 183 later part of day. He hovers around those two numbers.
@Balrog, I myself at times think he is 183cm aswell. I was referring to people who say he is 5f11 on federers page. I think it's fair to say 184 early part of day, 183 later part of day. He hovers around those two numbers.
Arch Stanton said on 7/Jan/13
Spot on, and finally....
Spot on, and finally....
John said on 7/Jan/13
Jake, I think he is more 184+. I know it seems crazy to squabble over a cm, but I am surprised at some of these 6 foot flat estimations for him. I certainly don't see any major difference in height between him and Fed. To me they look very, very close in height.
Jake, I think he is more 184+. I know it seems crazy to squabble over a cm, but I am surprised at some of these 6 foot flat estimations for him. I certainly don't see any major difference in height between him and Fed. To me they look very, very close in height.
John said on 6/Jan/13
Peyman, nope, they are very close. When they stand together, it looks like 1/2 inch at most. Basically there's a small difference, but it's at small as a difference can be and still be noticeable. Definitely not a full inch.
An inch is more the difference between Fed and Djokovic.
Peyman, nope, they are very close. When they stand together, it looks like 1/2 inch at most. Basically there's a small difference, but it's at small as a difference can be and still be noticeable. Definitely not a full inch.
An inch is more the difference between Fed and Djokovic.
Voiceless Dental Fricative said on 6/Jan/13
He always looked a bit shorter than Fed.
He always looked a bit shorter than Fed.
Balrog said on 6/Jan/13
SAK, on the court, he looks an inch shorter than Federer who is a legit 6'1'' man plus look at him next to Ibrahimovic.
The listing is the max I could see Nadal, I'd put him at 6'0'' flat, he was listed at that height before fame.
SAK, on the court, he looks an inch shorter than Federer who is a legit 6'1'' man plus look at him next to Ibrahimovic.
The listing is the max I could see Nadal, I'd put him at 6'0'' flat, he was listed at that height before fame.
tom said on 6/Jan/13
i met him at queens club,i play and went to watch,nadal was 5 or 6 feet away from me,we both had nikes on,so id say shoe wise its about the same,hes just over 6' im 6-2.5 and i get the felling 6.0 is bang on more or less.
i met him at queens club,i play and went to watch,nadal was 5 or 6 feet away from me,we both had nikes on,so id say shoe wise its about the same,hes just over 6' im 6-2.5 and i get the felling 6.0 is bang on more or less.
Peyman-6ft said on 6/Jan/13
nadal : 6ft 0.75in out of bed , 6ft 0in when going to sleep
& federer is exactly an inch taller
nadal : 6ft 0.75in out of bed , 6ft 0in when going to sleep
& federer is exactly an inch taller
SAK said on 6/Jan/13
Thanks Rob. So glad you put him up. 184cm is spot on for him. I know many posters will be saying he is lower then this, but he's not.
Thanks Rob. So glad you put him up. 184cm is spot on for him. I know many posters will be saying he is lower then this, but he's not.
John said on 6/Jan/13
Finally!
Agree with this listing.
Finally!
Agree with this listing.
Heights are barefeet estimates, derived from quotations, official websites, agency resumes, in person encounters with actors at conventions and pictures/films.
Other vital statistics like weight or shoe size measurements have been sourced from newspapers, books, resumes or social media.
Celebrity Fan Photos and Agency Pictures of stars are © to their respective owners.