How tall is Scott Eastwood

Scott Eastwood's Height

5ft 10 ¾ (179.7 cm)

American actor best known for roles in films Texas Chainsaw 3D, Trouble with the Curve, The Longest Ride, Dawn Patrol and The Forger.

How tall is Scott Eastwood
Photo by PR Photos

You May Be Interested

Height of Clint Eastwood
Clint Eastwood
5ft 11 (180 cm)
Height of Britt Robertson
Britt Robertson
5ft 2 ½ (159 cm)
Height of Cara Delevingne
Cara Delevingne
5ft 7 ¼ (171 cm)
Height of Ben Affleck
Ben Affleck
6ft 2 ¼ (189 cm)

Add a Comment239 comments

Average Guess (137 Votes)
5ft 10.42in (178.9cm)
Shawn 184.2cm said on 27/Aug/23
Rob, has he ever claimed a height?
Editor Rob
I've not heard or read him claiming one.
John feeddy said on 9/Jun/23
What’s his morning vs evening height
Nile Song said on 23/Apr/23
I don't think his legs are quite as short as you might think from seeing this photo haha - but they are definitely shorter than those of the average person of the same height. It looks like his mother has short legs so I guess that trait was inherited from her (if this isn't her, someone please correct me):
Click Here
berta said on 2/Jan/23
never over 180 and never under 178. I think 179 cm
Coldice said on 2/Oct/22
5ft 9 ⅞ , 177.4 cm
Jake: 1.84 m - 1.85 m said on 31/Aug/22
Pedro Pascal and Ben Mendelsohn are more 5ft 10.75 guys than Eastwood IMO. Scott is around 179 cm.
Wehrmacht180 said on 27/Jul/22
177 cm
MaskDeMasque 5'9.5 said on 20/Mar/22
Around the 179cm mark.
Cold Water said on 19/Mar/22
177.1 cm
James B 171.5 said on 24/Aug/21
he certainly did not inherit his fathers long legs.

Nothing wrong at all with his height though. Some could argue men look there best in the 5'11 range compared to guys who are over 6feet
Vanessa Meyers said on 8/Aug/21
He’s shorter than 5’10. I met him and my friend met him. She is 5’7 and he was her height. I’d say he’s 5’8 or 5’9 in shoes. I am 5’5 and he was barely taller than me.
David duFresne said on 12/Jun/21
His dad is underlisted, he may be overlisted by a tad. People don't have big families much these days, but back in the days four or five kids wasn't unusual, and you'd often see a variation from 5'7 to 6'3 all coming from the same genes. I think the only surprise here is how much he resembles him facially. Something over 5'10, but not by much imho. He seems a cool guy, his dad did his best to not spoil him and Scott doesn't sugarcoat his dad, which would be difficult but I'm sure a lot of celebs would try. Clint's westerns don't need to be remade, at least not yet, and his son is not the guy to do it. Height was a big part of the Eastwood character. Maybe a grandson will pop up when his films really start looking ancient to the new generation.
Arch Stanton said on 9/Jun/21
Yes that's his mother, short legs, and explains why Scott ended up 5 inches shorter than his father. Scott seems like a cool guy, an outdoors fun type of guy but some people act as if he is the clone of his dad which is just laughable. A 35 year old Clint in the Dollars Trilogy looked mature enough to be the father of the current Scott even at the same age!
Miss Sandy Cowell said on 23/Mar/21
Does anyone know the height of Scott's Mum? 😏
Editor Rob
I believe This is her.
ALEXIZ/180cm said on 23/Mar/21
178 cm max
Miss Sandy Cowell said on 21/Mar/21
🎂🎁🎈🎊 Happy Birthday Scott! 🎊🎈🎁🎂

Here's wishing Scott Eastwood a wonderful 35th Birthday! 😉👌🍻

5ft10.75

🎂🎁🎈🎊🎂🎁🎈🎊🎂🎁🎈🎊🎂🎁🎈🎊
Uy said on 15/Feb/21
Rob wouldn't you agree be got mixture both parents height. Because many people would consider him fairly tall. Slightly above average but not giant. In fact unlike keifer and Josh brolin he still has some tall Gene's
Editor Rob
yeah, he got a kind of middling or just above that height, his Mother is shortish from what I've seen.
Genau said on 30/Jan/21
Short legs but i think 178.5-179 is his height througout most of the day
Genau said on 16/Dec/20
5ft10 5/8
Slim 6'1" said on 25/Oct/20
A slight downgrade necessary
Boxing Fighter said on 10/Oct/20
He is taller than this. Unless his father is shorter than 6ft he appears to be the same or even taller. I guess no less than 5ft11, most likely 6ft.
Click Here
Slim 6'1" said on 2/Oct/20
Closer to 5’10” than 5’11
178.5-179 is better
Slim 6'1" said on 9/Aug/20
178.5-179
MD said on 7/Aug/20
5'7" and 5'8" are ridiculous estimates. That said, I do think he's shorter than listed. Here he is with 5'8.75" John Boyega:

Click Here

Click Here

No way is he nearer 5'11" than he is 5'10".
Arch Stanton said on 5/Aug/20
Click Here

She's on higher ground there and still looks over 5 ft 10. Looks a weak 5'11 guy to me.
QueenB said on 2/Aug/20
@ArchSanton - the post right below yours proves he’s NOT 5”10. The woman he has been seen with: Charlotte McKinney is not 5”10...Yet there’s countless photos of them, side by side, and their almost exactly the same height. If she is 5”7, that makes him 5”8. This isn’t even a debate when there’s so many photos providing how tall he is when you can compare him to a 5”7 model!
Arch Stanton said on 19/Jul/20
Nah he's taller than 5'10, he was looking taller with better posture than his dad in the last photo I saw. I don't think he has anywhere near the looks and presence Clint had in his prime but the guy is clearly a chick magnet, fair play to him and he seems a fun guy who enjoys the outdoors. I wouldn't have thought him and Charlotte would be each other's type, but I'm sure they're enjoying themselves!
Paulina said on 12/Jul/20
Sorry. This is wrong. He dated Charlotte McKinney who is known for being 5”7- and their exactly the same height. Google any photo of them -and a photo. Doesn’t lie. @Rob check it out yourself.
madhair said on 12/Jun/20
@Rob how about a 5ft10 listing. I don't think he above 5ft10.
Editor Rob
I'd need to look more at that, it would be the lowest I'd have ever guessed him.
Nik Ashton said on 10/Jun/20
@ Sandy Cowell - He might think he’s short, we know different though! 💩😷
Bogusbu6'0 said on 8/Jun/20
@Rob I say Mario Lopez 5'9 and Scott 5'10 max. Give him a downgrade to 5'10.25 at least. 180 cm is way too tall
Bogusbu6'0 said on 8/Jun/20
@Rob Lopez ain't above 5ft9. This mark is the tallest he can be. He is the kind of guy who likes to use good shoes to have advantage and look taller with actors. I'd say he is a weak 5'9 guy considered 175 cm as an average latin with good proportions and perfect posture.
Bogusbu6'0 said on 8/Jun/20
@Rob and I read some people says he is a 5'9 guy with good posture-
Bogusbu6'0 said on 8/Jun/20
@Rob here posing side by side. Look at his proportions. He has short torso.He is 5'9.25 range. At least a downgrade to 5'10. Almost 5'11 is so much just look.
Click Here
Editor Rob
I see a few photos of them, I'd give Eastwood the better chance of being taller, though it's hard to imagine him above 5ft 10 really...but then, there's an argument for Lopez being 5ft 9-9.5 range himself.
jerton179 said on 3/Jun/20
@Rob tell me what you think. With Mario Lopez 5'9:
Click Here
I never belived Scott was 5'11 but I'm surprised he looked a weak 5'9
Editor Rob
He didn't look much different than mario, it would be interesting to see them posing side by side. At times 5ft 10 for Scott can seem believable.
Jake Camp said on 1/Apr/20
I would argue this is too low. If you see the Getty images of “Scott Eastwood and Clint Eastwood” you can see that he has some height over (now acclaimed 6’ Clint)

Clint has obviously lost height over the years and Scott does look taller than him. And I know you will say “oh ever heard of angles” first off, yes I have and I know a lot about camera angles actually. Some of the shots aren’t even angled and you can clearly see the difference (even if it’s half inch)
Miss Sandy Cowell said on 21/Mar/20
🎂🎁🎉🎈 Happy Birthday Scott! 🎈🎉🎁🎂

Wishing Scott Eastwood a Very Happy 34th Birthday. I see he starred in 'Texas Chainsaw 3D' with Alexandra Daddario, so that means that yes, I DO own one of Scott's films. He doesn't resemble his Dad much, or I think I'd have noticed him. Maybe in a few years, as Arch says!

5ft11. 😁👍🍻

🎂🎁🎉🎈🎂🎁🎉🎈🎂🎁🎉🎈🎂🎁🎉🎈
James B 172c, said on 20/Mar/20
Arch Stanton said on 19/Mar/20
Nah, not a patch on Clint in his prime MakeScottWolverine, look at him in the western outfit, if that guy appeared in the Good Bad and Ugly you'd laugh. Maybe when he's nearer 40 he'll look more rugged and be more like his dad.


Rugged or not he will never be his dads height of 6ft3 1/2
Arch Stanton said on 19/Mar/20
Nah, not a patch on Clint in his prime MakeScottWolverine, look at him in the western outfit, if that guy appeared in the Good Bad and Ugly you'd laugh. Maybe when he's nearer 40 he'll look more rugged and be more like his dad.
Nik Ashton said on 17/Mar/20
@ Vexacus - 😂😂😂😂😂😂!
Vexacus said on 16/Mar/20
5'11 short guy
MakeScottWolverine said on 8/Feb/20
Yeah I'm not buying that he's even 5'10" He's more like 5'8"-9" without shoes. And THAT's PERFECT! Why? because he needs to be the new wolverine. His dad whom he looks exactly like was the archetype for wolverine in the comics most popular years. The whole cigar smoking, tough attitude, squint eye grimace thing. That is the trademark style of the Logan/Wolverine character, and they based it on Clint Eastwood. Numerous comics have portrayed Wolverine with a clone of that dirty hairy look. Even his line "do you feel lucky bub"? Scott is perfect for this role. And HUGH was great and all but he was too tall really. Scott is a great height and has the perfect face. It's meant to be.
Miss Sandy Cowell said on 5/Feb/20
But he might think it stinks, Nik! 😝💩

5ft10.75. Still a good height in the showbiz world.
Nik Ashton said on 3/Feb/20
It’s great he is shorter than his Dad and I am chuffed to give him his 200th comment!
Nik Ashton said on 3/Feb/20
He ain’t short!
TheBat said on 13/Dec/19
5'10.5" at the very least. Rob's listing is totally fine.
VitoCheng said on 12/Nov/19
179.7cm⋯⋯⋯⋯
185 said on 16/Sep/19
So he now play as wolverine, just like a lot people want. A shorter and a bit less attractive than Hugh.
Yang (5 footer 8, 172-173) said on 14/Sep/19
He is about 5ft 10 quarter range!!!
@David, exactly. It can mean cheat Gene's like son and daughter is either taller or shorter than his father and mother..
David duFresne said on 9/Jul/19
The reason why very tall men like Sutherland and Eastwood can have average sized children is called reversion to the mean. 6'4 is likely not an optimal height for human beings (although some get lucky with proportions and can live into their 90s like Christopher Lee). A 5'7 man whose male relatives are mostly taller will likely have a taller son unless he marries a very short woman, while a man like Eastwood I would presume is probably the tallest in his family and got a lucky roll of the dice with genetics and nutrition but was unlikely to repeat in the next generation. Scott looks a very average 5'10 1/2 to me, but I can't spot 1/4 inch differences.
Vibram said on 9/May/19
Kathyy, Farrell is clearly in Cowboy boots with flip-flop wearing Scott Eastwood. Farrell is a 176.5cm or 5ft9.5 guy. Scott is a solid 179.5 / 5ft10.8 range possibly 5ft11 out of bed = I agree with the listing.
Kathyy said on 5/Apr/19
Hi,

look at that PIC with Collin Farrel 5´9.
Click Here
Kathyy said on 28/Mar/19
Rob, how can I post a Picture?
Editor Rob
Please use https://bitly.com/ to shorten any links to urls that are like http://www.website.com/image.jpg
houss said on 25/Mar/19
Rob , I don't understand how do you see the difference between 180cm Man and 179,7 cm !
Editor Rob
Sometimes the 1/4 inches are more a feeling that a person at times looks 5ft 11 but also 5ft 10 range, so slight adjustments are given...more saying I think there is a greater chance this person falls under 5ft 11, but I'm not so sure he is just 5ft 10.5
TheBat said on 23/Mar/19
Respectable listing, I could even see Scott at 5'11" depending on the time of day. I'd love it if he got cast as the next Wolverine in the future.
Kathyy said on 22/Mar/19
Hi,

I have found PICS with Collin Farrel 5´9 and i look like the same height.
Miss Sandy Cowell said on 21/Mar/19
🎈🎂🎁 Happy Birthday Scott! 🎁🎂🎈

So Clint's son is 32 today! Doesn't time just fly by? Happy Birthday Scott - and a Happy New Year to you too....🍻

You can have a Birthday 5ft10.75. 😊
Intevel said on 25/Feb/19
Rob did you know that he’s in the Taylor Swift video, “Wildest Dreams?” And one of Taylor’s main lines is “He’s so TALL....”
Editor Rob
Yeah, maybe 'He's not so tall' wouldn't have quite worked, though it is more adept at describing the character in the video!
James G. said on 20/Feb/19
5’10.75 is a great listing, though.
James G. said on 20/Feb/19
180cm, if he’s not 5’11, he’s so little under it, it’s unnoticeable
Monkey knees said on 7/Jan/19
5ft 10.5in morning height. Tops.
MAD SAM said on 12/Aug/18
Typically looks like a 5’11” guy but I guess he’s 179 cm at 5’10.5”
Zampo said on 17/May/18
It would be very interesting to see who would be taller between Scott and Michael B Jordan.
JamesThegalman said on 16/May/18
So you say 5’10.25 would be his lowest height Rob ?
Editor Rob
I could see estimates like that, but for me it would be probably the lowest I'd go for.
Dmeyer said on 20/Apr/18
Some boots arnie wears give 4-4.5cm est but many have à la normal thik 3cm heel
Dmeyer said on 19/Apr/18
To me he looks shorter than à Guy like jude law
Dmeyer said on 19/Apr/18
From looking at him with the cast of fast... He bas à hard time looking over 178 cm 5'10_10,25
Tomm said on 10/Apr/18
looked a little taller than Kurt Russell, high 5'9-low5'10
samuelgoup said on 29/Mar/18
Rob he is 177 range not even 5'10. Watch The 15 17 to Paris premiere in LA (his dad movie). Arnold Schwazenneger today at 70 years old beinng 5'10.75 is 1 inch over Scott Eastwood:
Click Here
Editor Rob
I would expect Arnold to look at least an inch taller as he has a thicker heel on, one of his cowboy type boots.
Tall Sam said on 29/Mar/18
It's funny people amazed at the difference in height between Clint and Scott, since the difference between Donald and Kiefer Sutherland is about 2 inches more.
Tall Sam said on 28/Mar/18
Could look about 3 inches taller than John Boyega in some scenes from Pacific Rim: Uprising, also looks a little more muscular I think these days. IMO Scott is a fairly likable screen presence but not thus far showing the particular extreme charisma necessary to be a huge movie star as his father was at peak.
Conan said on 26/Mar/18
Scott's height is 5 ft 10 1/4 in (178.5 cm). He is just taller than me 1/2 inch (1.3 cm) and I'm 5 ft 9 3/4 in (177.2 cm)
Stevenman said on 21/Mar/18
Rob. Scott is 176-177 cm you can clearly see Arnold has the edge by 3 cm at least who is about 180 today
pause at 1:09
Click Here
Berta said on 16/Mar/18
I just get weak 179 from him like 178.7
JamesThegalman said on 19/Feb/18
Which one do you think could be measured taller Rob Scott or jamie dornan ?
Editor Rob
At the moment I give Scott an edge, but he too could be 179cm
Walker said on 16/Feb/18
Erik said on 14/Feb/18
Do you know what are angles? Do you know what is effect close camara to look taller?
Clint is easily 1'5/2 inches on Scott is he stretch stand for meaured. Scott is a weak 5'10 guy or 5'9.75 . 5'11'25 maybe in your dreams
Erik said on 14/Feb/18
Edges out the old man? I don't see 5'11.25 as unreasonable.

Click Here

Click Here

Click Here
Allie said on 26/Dec/17
Scott may be short because his mom I believe wasn't that tall. But his dad also may have short genes and lucked out by getting a tall gene.
Michael said on 26/Dec/17
Although Scott may measure 179.7 in real life, he looks 175 in the movies or photos. If he's 188 all the girls would be all over him
berta said on 9/Dec/17
179 cm flat
Jack The Smackhead said on 27/Nov/17
Not the best picture as he looks a lot shorter than he probably is here. 179cm would be my guess.
James B said on 23/Nov/17
Rob he never looks tall does he? actually really average in height. Some 5'10.5 guys can pull of looking tall but he sure doesn't.

If I didn't know his height I would have guessed 5ft9 by looking at him.
Editor Rob
proportionally he does look a more average height man.
Slim 185 said on 21/Nov/17
Anonymous, yeah most probaly, but I’m uncertain how height genes work tbh.
G 5 10 said on 21/Nov/17
Which one is the greatest posibility Rob , He being 5’10.5 or 5’11?
Editor Rob
probably a decent chance of 5ft 10.5
Anonymous said on 18/Nov/17
What If u have a 5.8 father and a 5.10 mum does this mean ur baby will grow to be at 6 foot?
Anonymous said on 18/Nov/17
That's weird he didn't get clin'ts height at his peak.Everyone says u get ur height from your parents or at least that's what people say.
Monkey knees said on 14/Nov/17
5 10 max. Lot shorter than his dad at peak.
Tim said on 15/Oct/17
As I said, with Mario Lopez he looked more or less like him. I think he is not over 5'9 and impossible to push over 5'9.5. Proportions very far from a 5'11 man
Flyin said on 13/Oct/17
Weak 5'10, 177cm. Rob how come he appears an inch shorter than 179.7cm Tyrese Gibson in every shot of f and f 8?.
Slim said on 6/Sep/17
He'd wake up 5'11.25" but shrink to his real height very quickly.
Arch Stanton said on 4/Sep/17
Well he doesn't look much like Clint unlike Scott but the body frame and hair type is similar.
hardguy said on 3/Sep/17
5'9 to me but looks really handsome and bieber and all
James B said on 31/Aug/17
Kyle Eastwood reminds me of Hugh Grant facially and with his hairsstyle
Arch Stanton said on 31/Aug/17
I was watching a jazz concert and Kyle Eastwood was stood next to a guy at the end who is about 5 ft 6 and he had a full head on him. With him he really looked taller and 6'2 and near Clint's peak height. If Kyle is say 6'2 flat then the guy is morelike 5'4.5 which seems impossible! I agree that Kyle can look as low as 6'2 flat but he does slouch a lot I think.
James B said on 24/Aug/17
Looking at him in photos he certainly doesn't look as tall as David Beckham or Brad Pitt. Looks more 5'9 or 5'10 in pics.
Tommy said on 17/Aug/17
What is the chance he goes under 5'10.75 ?
Editor Rob
I can see a 5ft 10.5 possibility for him.
Rising - 174 cm said on 27/Jul/17
Key word is "walking" - you can't judge height accurately from still photos of two people walking mid-stride. But even leaving that aside for now, Scott looks several inches taller in your photos anyway. He's not 5'7"-5'8". I will bet 10 grand on that. Maybe we can get a Paul Newman type bet going and Scott may even consent to getting measured if he knew there was such a bet with such high stakes! Hey, I can dream anyway. It'd be the easiest 10 grand I could hope to make!
Parker said on 27/Jul/17
Katie said on 24/Jul/17
Hi PArker. Check out the photos of him walking to gym with Charlotte Mckinny. They look about the same height. She's 5"7

You think they look the same height Katie? I don't know what to say, I can't get into a debate if that's what you think, but of course you are entitled to your opinion like everyone else on this site. For what its worth, he looks about 3 inches taller to me.
sundaze said on 25/Jul/17
He is 5"10
Rising - 174 cm said on 25/Jul/17
Kurt Russell 5'7"? Actually, from what I read from an actress who worked with him, he's really only 5'3"! Seriously, don't believe everything you hear. Kurt is around 5'9", but can look taller at times. Those stuntmen must have fallen on their heads too many times! Scott looks near an inch taller than Kurt, but he may not be standing as tall as he could and who knows what shoes they're wearing? We don't as they're not visible in the photo. I believe Statham is at least about 5'8.5" or so, though I'm sure he can look shorter since he often slouches. But he's too far behind to compare his height in the photo. Scott is probably between 5'10" and 5'10.5", imo. Scott at 5'8" would make The Rock not much over 6 feet, maybe 184 cm at most when he's actually over 6'2".
Dmeyer said on 24/Jul/17
Havnt Seen much of the Guy but 5'10,5 us closer
Parker said on 23/Jul/17
Katie said on 22/Jul/17
No one here on this forum believes he is 5"10 Rob

I believe he's minimum 5'10 Katie. A 5'8 Scott Eastwood would put Kevin Hart at 5foot - he's short, but not that short.
Click Here
Katie said on 22/Jul/17
No one here on this forum believes he is 5"10 Rob. Look at all th photos with him standing next to 5"8 Jason Stathom. There the exact same height. Also, a 5"10 person would have much longer legs.
Richardspain said on 19/Jul/17
Sorry I don't believe he is 180cm

179 maybe

His father neither was a strong 192 cm 189/190cm barefoot is more credible
Katie said on 19/Jul/17
5"8 flat footed. Shoes 5"10. There are several photos of him with Jason Stathom and Kurt Russell. Jason seen with Rosie his model girl friend is 5"8 standing next to her. Then Kurt Russell has never been taller than 5"7 and everyone in the stunt man world knows this. To state Scott is 5"10 is inaccurate. Maybe with the correct angles or lifts he can appear taller but it doesn't change the fact he is a much smaller man than his father.
tall or nah said on 8/Jul/17
I have a 6'3" dad and a 5'5" mom.
I ended up at 6'0".
In Scott's case I think he is 5'10.5" to 5'11".
James B said on 3/Jul/17
Alex- I was 5'6.5-5'7 at your age and only grew half an inch from 16-20. My mum is 5'1.5 and dad 5'9.5-5'10 when they were younger.

I would say though you could have a growth spurt at 16 it's not impossible because I used to have a friend who was 5'11 aged 16 and he's now around 6'2 I think.
Alex said on 3/Jul/17
Rob, would you reckon that I, at age 16 and 5'6.5", would turn out to be of very similar height to Scott Eastwood, given the heights of my parents: 6'3.5" father & 5'0" mother?
James B said on 28/Jun/17
His other son Kyle defo took after clint in height
shiva182cms said on 21/Jun/17
Scott inhereted 50-50 height from his dad and his mom

Peak clint 6'3.5
Clint's wife 5'2 equalent to 5'6.5or 5'7 for a male
avg of 6'3.5 and 5'6.5 Eauals 5'11
Scott's about 5'11
Arch Stanton said on 12/Jun/17
His mother is about 5 ft 2. Click Here so Scott at 5 ft 11 is explainable given how tall Clint was.
Hi said on 10/Jun/17
How tall is his mom?
Matt677 said on 28/May/17
Looks,about 5ft10 flat usually mabye could see this listing right out of,bed
ronald said on 21/May/17
he looked 5 inches shorter than the rock in latest furious movie
ok said on 21/May/17
He is Dutch average in flats imo (tallest country in the world atm)
peter gabriel said on 11/May/17
more like 5'9
6'1-6'1.5 Guy said on 7/May/17
Ice said on 11/Feb/16
I live in Vienna , and I can guarantee you that the average height for a white / black / ex-jugoslavian man in this city is nowhere under 6'0 . Im 6'2.5" , a height that does not even stand out at all in Vienna , Im maybe slightly above average . Literally every second/third man on the street is my height or taller.

I do not know, of course, it's very difficult for me to believe in this ...
In that case, Vienna is a city of giants.
If 6'2.5 is not a high growth, then this is already a dead end of some kind. Soon, the average altitude will skyrocket to 6'2-6'3 ".
Thank you.
berta said on 5/May/17
179 could be the best listing but 178 coudl also be good. 180 is to mutchchchchchchcch
Richardspain said on 27/Apr/17
I don't believe it! Clint Eastwood's son is shorter than his father..
RisingForce said on 26/Apr/17
In fairness, Kurt wears cowboy boots a lot and can still look about 5'10" or so in them so we should know what Kurt's footwear is since he was measured up pretty well to Vin Diesel recently(who also had his infamous boots). Was Scott really shorter than Tyrese? I believe Tyrese to be closer to 5'10" than 5'11" himself so that's strange. But I do agree anyway that Scott is closer to 5'10" than 5'11".
berta said on 26/Apr/17
rob you should really look in to this guy some more. he is clearly no taller than 179 and could be 178. kurt russel is listed as 176 and may have lost 1 cm he is almost 70 years old and he was barely 1 inch shorter. if kurt is 175 now then this guy is barely 178 if kurt still is 176 then this guy could be 178-79 range but not 180. he is also youngetr and should have better posture and win 1 cm more there. and still just 2 cm beetween them
James B said on 25/Apr/17
shiva182cms said on 15/Apr/17
he looks more hand some than Clint Eastwood



Yeah right
Shredder said on 15/Apr/17
Tyrees Gibson was taller than him . Gibson must be 5'11 or scott is just a strong 5'10.
shiva182cms said on 15/Apr/17
he looks more hand some than Clint Eastwood
shiva182cms said on 15/Apr/17
He certainly has a better height than his father in reality, but for movies his dad's height is better and at his height he'd look like a small guy on screen
John said on 15/Apr/17
How likely 5'10.25 would be his absolute low Rob ? I can see 2cm differences between him and Kurt Russel in FF8.
Editor Rob
sometimes he can look 178-9, other times I think near 180
Christian said on 13/Apr/17
Spot on listing IMO. The rock is clearly over 6'2 tall and Scott doesn't look dwarfed by him by any stretch of the imagination. There is no way this guy is under 5'10 IMO unless the Rock is below 6'1.
Thomas Veil said on 9/Apr/17
5'9 even, he didn't get his dad's height
berta said on 8/Apr/17
he looks really short beside dwayne johnson. i think there is atleat 10 cm beetween them. 179 listing could be better
Josh said on 3/Apr/17
Don't think he is this tall. Always thought he was tallish 5 11. But now think he is a good couple inches shorter.
RisingForce said on 2/Apr/17
He can look about 5'10.5" with Kevin Hart depending on how much Kevin is leaning, but you must be counting all of Scott's hair to get only around 3" and Scott has at least an extra inch hair. Top of his head seems about 4.5" shorter than Rock or at least 4" minimum.
177 cm (m|GER/NRW/CGN) said on 29/Mar/17
@RisingGore
Can't see more than 3"... it's even above Rocks eyes...
Arch Stanton said on 28/Mar/17
Click Here I mean look at Clint's jawline and nose structure there in comparison. Beckham and Jackman are closer I think in that respect, though in fairness Scott is a lot younger.
Arch Stanton said on 28/Mar/17
Editor Rob: James, I've certainly read over the years some quotes from girls on forums and twitter being disappointed when they discovered the height of a favourite actor.

But, you'd be surprised how many women actually don't find guys like Pitt, Clooney attractive.

Sometimes when actors start speaking on certain subjects from their white Ivory towers, it turns people off!

Yeah I've heard quite a lot of women comment that Chris Hemsworth or Hugh Jackman are more attractive than Brad Pitt. Pitt is kind of goofy in a way. I don't think he's looked as good since he went with Jolie, late 90s though in films like Fight Club I think he was about as close to perfection as you can get. I think you'd find it's mostly older women who would find Clooney handsome, he has a debonair look which doesn't appeal much to young girls, but a guy like Jackman approaching 50, I think you'd still get a fair proportion of women in their 20s liking him too. Scott's a good looking lad but contrary to what some people say he's not really a dead ringer or clone of his dad, a good resemblance facially, yes but not as chiselled and rugged/masculine as Clint was in his prime IMO, and of course totally lacking the height. Clint was the sort of guy who could walk into a large, chatty room and people go silent, he had that sort of commanding presence. I doubt most women would think of Pitt and clooney as tall, more average range, I don't think they'd care much if they were both a few inches shorter. Though a guy like Cruise gets a lot of stick from women for being short, part of it is the media exaggeration, most will think he's about 5 ft 1 or 2 so not surprising!
The Exorcist said on 27/Mar/17
@RisingForce: He looks about 5'10.5 with Kevin Hart and The Rock, IMO.
RisingForce said on 27/Mar/17
It's a shame Statham is standing so far back. I'd be very interested in who was taller between him and Kurt Russell side by side. Scott only looks 5'10" there as well as with The Rock: Click Here I don't see Scott's head higher than Rock's eyes if you exclude his hair.
Morris said on 21/Mar/17
175-178 cm.
Yuval said on 17/Mar/17
Rob, do you know the claim that sons get more of their height from the mom's side, and vice verca doughters get height from their dad's?. I did not found scientific evidence that support that, but it seems to be not far of reality, at least from my observations on my friends and family.
James B said on 9/Mar/17
Rob do you think guys like Scott, brad Pitt and George clooney would still be as popular with the ladies if they were all 5ft7?
Editor Rob
James, I've certainly read over the years some quotes from girls on forums and twitter being disappointed when they discovered the height of a favourite actor.

But, you'd be surprised how many women actually don't find guys like Pitt, Clooney attractive.

Sometimes when actors start speaking on certain subjects from their white Ivory towers, it turns people off!
James B said on 9/Mar/17
Yep dead ringer for his dad (except for the height department)
Jervis said on 23/Nov/16
Looked similar to Jimmy Kimmel on the Ellen show.
Ray said on 22/Nov/16
I'd say he's 5'11".
Arch Stanton said on 15/Nov/16
He is increasingly looking like Clint, but he looks like he's trying hard to look like or even be his father though. Like he's really studied the squints and grimaces to look bad ass haha but it doesn't really work with him!
Kai said on 8/Nov/16
Downgrade time Rob.. 5'10.25 !
Adam said on 31/Oct/16
He looked 178/179cm on Snowden. Didnt look like a tallish 180.
kai said on 21/Oct/16
Dear Rob, what would you have guessed for his lowest height? 178.5cm or 179cm ?
Editor Rob
not sure I'd be comfortable trying to argue less than 179 for him.
Arch Stanton said on 19/Oct/16
He looks better in last few years since he's been Hollywooderized.
Sandy Cowell said on 18/Oct/16
I had no idea that Clint Eastwood's son was acting in films! How interesting is this website? I'll have to check out a film or two of his! Until then, I don't feel I have the right to comment any more than I have done.
Arch Stanton said on 11/Oct/16
He does have some sort of screen presence and is clearly a chick magnet, but he completely lacks the badass quality his father has. That's not a height thing but he's very different in terms of personality. Efforts to cast him in the sorts of roles Clint was in just look forced and a bit embarrassing as he just looks too nice/cleancut to pull it off. It worked with Clint because he genuinely looks badass and a guy you'd not want to mess with. Scott seems more like the kind of guy who would apologize and send around a bouqet of flowers if his dog peed on your lawn LOL.
Arch Stanton said on 10/Oct/16
Saw him in the Longest Ride, and thought nowhere near as tall as Clint actually has a much better screen presence than I thought. This guy is having an absolute blast, you can see in the film the effect he has on women. Most guys over 6 ft would trade in a few inches to have that!
John said on 5/Oct/16
He's not 5'11. This guy is 5'10 at best. I would go a little shorter than that. He's probably about 5'9.75" or something. Russell Wilson and Johnny Manziel are 5'11. Both are noticeably taller than him.
John Baptist said on 30/Sep/16
Click Here
5'10 and a quarter with jason statham Rob ? Considering SE has angle advantages.
Editor Rob
Kurt is on the other side, and I think he has a bit more than an inch on Kurt there.
James said on 19/Sep/16
180cm is almost tall range, not sure why he looks so short, women think he's tiny for some reason as well. Perhaps its the big head and short legs.
James B said on 14/Aug/16
Scott Eastwood in some photos looks a bit like a young Hugh Jackman actually.
Arch Stanton said on 8/Aug/16
Henrik said on 13/Apr/16
I suppose Clint must have had a taste for the most petite flight attendants whom he could find. Science argues that a son usually takes more after his mother's side of the family.

That's his mother. Click Here Yes, that's where the shorter height is coming from, she looks no more than 5 ft 2. Looks nothing like her as a lot of lads don't look anything like their mothers. The only thing he probably got from her was the shorter height and a personality. Scott seems to be a laughy- jokey, outgoing sort of guy, typical Californian surf boy sort of thing, and his father was more serious and quiet and reserved. Clint was a lot more rugged and masculine looking even at Scott's age too.
Ingrid said on 28/Jun/16
strong 5'10.25
Aaron Zamora said on 26/May/16
Is there any chance of you meeting him and getting a picture with him?
Editor Rob
unlikely unfortunately.
Ryan Allen said on 5/May/16
Rob what was the reason for downgrading Scott Eastwood ?
Editor Rob
he's been stuck on this height for ages.
Aaron Zamora said on 24/Apr/16
Other than his listed height which do you think he would measure 5'10.5 or 5'11?
Editor Rob
at times really I could say either of those figures he can look...
Henrik said on 13/Apr/16
I suppose Clint must have had a taste for the most petite flight attendants whom he could find. Science argues that a son usually takes more after his mother's side of the family.
Arch Stanton said on 7/Mar/16
Yep it's definitely not the actor Alan Bates, they've got it wrong on that site in thinking it's the same man, Bates died in 2003, that was 2008 haha! Still, look at him with Cullum. Doesn't look over 6'2 with him does he?
Editor Rob
yeah I now wouldn't have thought of him as being 6ft 3.
Arch Stanton said on 7/Mar/16
@Rob, I think you're right actually, I mean look at him here next to an old Alan Bates!! Click Here A legit 6 ft 4 guy could do all the slouching in the world and still look taller next to him and Jamie than that. Kyle has definitely claimed 6 ft 4, I've seen it somewhere. He can look 6'3" range on stage but if you really look at most comparisons you'd think more 6'2"!
Flyin said on 5/Mar/16
How can a son of someone 6"4 be the same height as me. Btw father 6"0, brother 5"11.5' mother 5"6. So slightly shorter than siblings in my case but that's nearly a head in difference.
Arch Stanton said on 4/Mar/16
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 28/Jan/16
Rob, any guesses for Clint's other son, Kyle?


He's also been listed 6ft4
Editor Rob: he doesn't look 6ft 4, at first I thought 6ft 2!

He can look anything from 6'2-6'4!! I've seen the Kyle Eastwood band quite a bit, they're really good. On stage Kyle can really look 6'3-6'4 range and look quite towering at times, but in photos with Clint and people for some reason looks 6'2 range as Rob says. I think we can rule out a legit 6'4 but there's a chance of 6'3", his posture often isn't great. I think he's one of those guys who slouch a lot and would measure a bit taller than you think. Click Here That was taken about ten years ago I think when Clint would have been about 6 ft 1. On stage with Pitt, Jolie and his dad here, though Pitt is a bit further back Click Here Do you not think that he might be 6'3 ish Rob? I agree he can look just 6'2 in a lot of photos, but I think he does slouch a bit, there's a good chance of 6'2.5-6'3 range I think. I think we can rule out a legit 6 ft 4.
Editor Rob
well looking a bit more and I think he could be near 6ft 2 the more I looked!
Ice said on 11/Feb/16
I live in Vienna , and I can guarantee you that the average height for a white / black / ex-jugoslavian man in this city is nowhere under 6'0 . Im 6'2.5" , a height that does not even stand out at all in Vienna , Im maybe slightly above average . Literally every second/third man on the street is my height or taller .
Ryan Allen said on 6/Feb/16
I meant a region for Dinaric Alps I know it's not a country grizz
grizz said on 1/Feb/16
Dinaric Alps is not a country.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 28/Jan/16
Rob, any guesses for Clint's other son, Kyle?


He's also been listed 6ft4
Editor Rob
he doesn't look 6ft 4, at first I thought 6ft 2!
Ryan Allen said on 22/Jan/16
Some people here are saying 5'11 is average, 5'11 is not average here in the United States , it's 71.9. Percentile in height , 5'11 is above average ,still not tall , but a very decent height in which Scott Eastwood is .
Ryan Allen said on 22/Jan/16
There is only six countries in the world that 5'11 is below 70% in height Dinaric Alps, Germany, Austria , Denmark,norway. Serbia .
Stormtrooper JB-007 said on 11/Jan/16
@Allie, I think you deserve your own page on here. Great idea Rob: You should start a website called non-celeb heights. I'd be glad to be a guinea pig too
MD said on 10/Dec/15
That shot the same thing, if not even more so.
MD said on 7/Dec/15
@Rob, I think you must have meant it the other way around. The angles are all wrong, but it seems to me that it'd be about debating how much shorter he is in that particular picture than Buble (of course considering possible footwear advantage for Buble). Seems clear to me that they'd be very close in height.
Editor Rob
there was another shot. At times I've seen Scott in photos leaning a bit and he can look near 5ft 10, but I'm not sure he really is that low though.
sfs324 said on 4/Dec/15
Click Here

Thoughts on this Rob? Michael most definitely has a shoe advantage assuming he's wearing dress shoes.
Editor Rob
he doesn't look much taller than buble
Sebs said on 13/Nov/15
Allie you're 5'10 and obviously as a women you'd notice men taller than you. You probably don't even realize the multitude of 5'8-9ers let alone the below 6 foot 5'11er
Allie said on 12/Nov/15
Nothing wrong with being 5'11, like how being 5'6 as a girl Isn't bad either. I'm just saying from my personal experience, I've come across both a handful of guys taller than 6 ft, but also guys shorter than 6'0. Also, I wanted to say that my old high school as I graduated last year heh.

Also, just wondering, do any of these stats or height databases take samples and numbers from a good majority of the country? Cause I do know stats and surveys (which is typically how these numbers are formed) typically tend to just take numbers from a fraction and then put it down as the official thing. Which seems fine, unless they measured from a bunch short or tall people and other reasons. If anyone could answer as Wikipeida's got results back from 2005 :p.
184.3cm (Night) said on 12/Nov/15
Legit 5'11 is taller than 70 percent of men across the globe. Only the tallest countries in the world have it as an average. Being taller than 70 percent is more than the majority.

To put in in perspective 6 foot is around the 80th percentile.

Between 5'9 -5'10.75 you have millions of men. Thats the bulk of the population in the western world. Anything under is <40 percentile.
Jack said on 11/Nov/15
I'm 5'11'.. I went to high school, college and several major cities. And I was a bit taller then the majority of men. seems like a perfectly fine height to me.
Allie said on 11/Nov/15
I wouldn't say most men. 5'11 is only above average in some countries from stats. Stats aren't always the most accurate thing as they only document a fraction of the population then average it out. Because I'm doubting that everyone in the country was measured when they did the stats to calculate average height for the country.

In my school alone, I'm live in Canada, yet A good chunk guys in my school who I swear are 6'1-6'2 and taller (I'm 5'10 and have stood beside them in near similar footwear). and they're still growing possibly as they're only 17-18 But there are also guys who are average height, or still short but still growing.
Sebs said on 6/Nov/15
5'11 is comfortably taller than most men
Dan said on 1/Nov/15
Charming guy but definitely not tall. I would say he's average, around the 5' 11" mark.
Allie said on 18/Oct/15
Sure. If he is 5'9 range then that would make Taylor Swift 5'7 range which would make Karlie only 5'11 or so. And so on and so fourth. But they're not short.
keekers said on 26/Sep/15
Stood next to him last night and he is at most 5'9.5"
Allie said on 23/Sep/15
Around 5'11 seems right.
Jim Hopper said on 21/Sep/15
Actually looks quite short in the picture. Not his dads range at all.
MaryAnne said on 10/Sep/15
He is so tall and handsome as hell!
Arch Stanton said on 2/Sep/15
Rob see Click Here I find it hard to belive he's wearing big lifts there but he really does pull off looking about 184 with Swift!! Perhaps it's not unreasonable that he has a hidden lift in those boots to look taller with Swift, but wearing lifts on a safari in Africa seems weird!
Editor Rob
I don't think he generally looks much different than 5ft 11, although in one still there he can appear taller.
Duhon said on 31/Aug/15
He's the lead in the new taylor swift video and it appears they try to play-up his height over her.
grizz said on 31/Aug/15
5in is a huge difference. normal for daughters, but far from regular for sons. hell, I am 1in shorter than my dad and it's fairly visible in pictures/real life,let alone 5 inches.
btw,he seems to have 2inches over taylor swift in wildest dreams video. both were wearing cowboy boots.
5'11 Stud said on 30/Aug/15
Found better lift action in the same video:
Click Here
5'11 Stud said on 30/Aug/15
Strong lift action with T-Swift:
Click Here
James B said on 6/Aug/15
Clint for his generation must have been well within the very tall range. Amongst today's young generation a peak clint would still probably be probably be right at the high end of tall
Sam said on 31/Jul/15
No not a big difference, I've know guys who were much taller than their dads than that but it still puts Clint as very tall when he was young and Scott within the high-average range.
Arch Stanton said on 30/Jul/15
5 inches shorter than your father is a big difference.
James B said on 29/Jul/15
Well he would have been 4-5 inches shorter than his peak dad who was probably 6'3 1/2

Not a massive difference
MD said on 28/Jul/15
If anyone comments on him being "short," it's relative to his father. Expectations are higher because of that for people who've never met him. He's not short, though.
James B said on 26/Jul/15
Rob a lot of people comment on the Internet this guys short
James B said on 24/Jul/15
Wonder who would get more women rob prime clint or Scott?
Editor Rob
Clint probably.
Allie said on 16/Jun/15
Height all depends. I know a guy whose 6'4-6'5 and his dad was about 5'7 on a good day. I believe his was mom was shorter, but according to him, his moms brothers were in the tall side. Which probably explains how he got to be so tall. Can't say the same the same about his sister though.

I think maybe 5'10.5, weak 5'11 is a spot on listing. Especially after seeing the pictures with 5'10.5 Erin Heatherton.
Arch Stanton said on 12/Jun/15
Liam Hemsworth especially third photo down looks like he could be Clint's son too! Click Here And he has a Clint like height too!
JB said on 14/May/15
5'11" is actually a fantastic height for bodybuilding. makes it very easy to fill out your frame and look aesthetic. And a legit 5'11" is actually taller than most people give it credit for. Just a tad away from 6" after all. Scott is a good solid height and is built great, and by the looks of it he has no complaints. might not be quite as tall as his Dad was. But in the real world thats pretty irrelevant.
Ron said on 8/May/15
Rob, what would you guess his weight is around? He has a amazing physique for his height.
Editor Rob
maybe near to 170
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 3/May/15
@James B: Weak 5ft11 is upper-average.
James B said on 2/May/15
I wouldn't say he looks short in the above pic but more at the lower end of average
Amaze said on 20/Apr/15
I can understand 5'8 being short some places but 5'10 is not short anywhere in the world. He'd be towered by young Clint his dad but he's still at a good height
maximus said on 10/Apr/15
5'10" is not short....you are right at about 6ft with shoes. I'm 5'10-1/4" and have never been called short.....right at around 6ft with shoes.....short is someone like cruise, Hoffman, pacino...its obvious they are not average height even with shoes on.
Arch Stanton said on 31/Mar/15
I saw a comment or two on him the other day in which people called him really short. Compared to Clint short, yes, but he looks upper average to me, not short at all. This guy seems to be everywhere at the moment, the Hollywood agents are certainly doing a good job of promoting him. Some of the staged photos look a bit silly though, you can tell they're telling him to squint and look as much like his father as possible. They even dress him like a cowboy in certain photo shoots. Yes, there's quite a strong resemblance there but I don't think he looks even close to as good as his father looked at that age. I think they should stop saying he's Clint's son and trying to make him look as much like him as possible and let him be himself.
Arch Stanton said on 2/Nov/14
Yeah he looks short in the above photo. Generally he gives a 5'10 range impression. Obviously a strong resemblance facially to a young Clint including the crow's lines and premature aging LOL but he's miles shorter and although seems a nice guy he really doesn't seem to have the charisma and raw masculinity and presence that his dad had. Perhaps in ten years and with greater acting experience he will become so, but it must be very tough having such a father to live up to!
lelman said on 17/Oct/14
Odd proportions, looks like a 5ft 8 guy there, maybe it's because his suit is too big for him.
Arch Stanton said on 9/Sep/14
Yeah I think Kyle is genuinely near his 6'4" claim, he looks similar height to a peak Clint, 6'3.5" is arguable but he tends to slouch a lot to can look 6'2" range. Whenever I see him on stage he always towers above the others.
Arch Stanton said on 4/Sep/14
@Greg, not 3 inches, in The Trouble with the Curve I think it was his dad only looked about 1-1.5 inches taller.
Arch Stanton said on 6/Aug/14
Sam says on 14/Apr/14
He most resembles his dad (in his younger years) of the Eastwood children I've seen but I'm guessing the stewardess that Clint impregnated (while himself married or engaged I believe) wasn't particularly tall.

Agreed that facially he's the most similar, although at times Kyle can look uncannily like a 70s Clint and looks a similar long-legged height. Click Here
SAK said on 30/Jun/14
He must feel quite short next to his father (even after shrinkage).
boris said on 19/Jun/14
surprisingly isn't as tall as his father was at peak, still a spitting image of him
5'10 sounds right
James B said on 9/Jun/14
Scott looks 5'9 in the photo
Mathew said on 26/May/14
Arch Stanton says on 30/Apr/14
What I mean by "I wouldn't place too much emphasis on how he looks in photographs" is that he can look anything from 6'2-6'4 in photos but usually slouches and looks taller on stage in videos than he does in photos. I could certainly believe he is 6'3" range anyway.

---

He seldom looks 6'4" without some kind of camera advantage. I don't buy him at 6'4". 6'2" looked reasonable to me, but maybe he's really 6'3".
Arch Stanton said on 30/Apr/14
What I mean by "I wouldn't place too much emphasis on how he looks in photographs" is that he can look anything from 6'2-6'4 in photos but usually slouches and looks taller on stage in videos than he does in photos. I could certainly believe he is 6'3" range anyway.
Arch Stanton said on 30/Apr/14
@ Mathew

I wouldn't place too much emphasis on how he looks in photographs.

Click Here
Click Here
Click Here

He can look 6'3"-6'4 lot to me. He certainly looks easily 6'3" on stage IMO. I think he's similar to Clint's peak height.
Arch Stanton said on 30/Apr/14
@ Mathew

I agree he tends to look 6'2" range in photographs with Clint but if you see him on stage he really looks near his claim. He's head and shoulders above some of the other musicians at times.
Mathew said on 28/Apr/14
Arch Stanton says on 24/Apr/14
Yeah I think Kyle Eastwood is genuinely near his 6'4" claim, he looks in on stage and looks gangly, even if he tends to look more 6'2" range in most photos with Clint. That's one talented family, check out some of his tracks on youtube like Marrakesh, Andalucia and Cafe Calypso. Some of the best recent jazz stuff I've ever heard. Alison looks tall range not sure on her because of heels but I believe I've seen her look near 6 ft in heels, she could be 5'8-5'9". Very sexy too, out of Clint's children she is the one who seems to have inherited that raw thing that Clint always had. Kyle seems quite shy, humble, and down to earth.

---

I have to disagree about Kyle being 6'4", I just don't see it. 6'2" range looks right to me.
Sam said on 25/Apr/14
IDK on Alison, in the past I think I've seen 5'10" listings, but 5'9" is certainly possible. She was only a couple inches in heels I think under John Cusack. Yeah, anywhere in the 6'2" to 6'4" range is possible for Kyle, it's hard to tell. In certain recent photos, he's got a few inches over his dad. Never heard his music but for sure Kyle and Clint share a love of jazz, I understand Clint was quite pleased with Kyle's career path.
Arch Stanton said on 24/Apr/14
Yeah I think Kyle Eastwood is genuinely near his 6'4" claim, he looks in on stage and looks gangly, even if he tends to look more 6'2" range in most photos with Clint. That's one talented family, check out some of his tracks on youtube like Marrakesh, Andalucia and Cafe Calypso. Some of the best recent jazz stuff I've ever heard. Alison looks tall range not sure on her because of heels but I believe I've seen her look near 6 ft in heels, she could be 5'8-5'9". Very sexy too, out of Clint's children she is the one who seems to have inherited that raw thing that Clint always had. Kyle seems quite shy, humble, and down to earth.
Sam said on 24/Apr/14
Somebody in my ex's family was 6'5"-6'6" with two parents who peaked around 5'7", although the mom came from a tallish family, so of course one can't predict height solely from the parents. I'm not sure how tall Rossif's mom is but I'd bet Kiefer's was quite short, if one of the parents is shorter, the odds increase of the child being shorter but it's never sure-fire. Getting back to Clint's kids, both Kyle and Alison are quite tall and I think their mom was only around average height.
Arch Stanton said on 23/Apr/14
Even if his mother is shortish considering his dad was 6'4" he's quite short considering even if there's nothing wrong with 180. Rossif Sutherland's parents are a similar height and he ended up 6'5". You wouldn't expect him to be under 6 ft but it happens, at least he's taller than Kiefer!!
Emil said on 21/Apr/14
Didn't quite have his dads height de he ;)?
Nonetheless, 180 cm is perfectly fine
Damon said on 16/Apr/14
There are some photos of him walking about with model Erin Heatherton who's listed here at 5'10.5. Not too sure on the footwear, she might be in heels, but she's definitely taller than him in the pictures
James B said on 15/Apr/14
Spitting image of his dad in the 1950s.
Arch Stanton said on 15/Apr/14
Thanks for adding this Rob! Exactly what I guessed. somewhere in 5'10.5"-5'11" range. @Sam, yeah his mother in the photo I saw next to Clint was probably 5'2"-5'3" range, looked quite short. He's not really notable as an actor yet, but I suspect he will be given his name and unlike Kyle who shys away from the Hollywood thing, he seems very proud of being Clint's son and seems very confident. Yes, he looks the most like a young Clint facially out of all of his kids, clearly an obvious resemblance there, but absolutely nowhere near him in stature, presence and charisma. Clint was much more manlier and intimidating looking, even at that age.
MD said on 15/Apr/14
This is has to be an upper-end listing. Bradley Cooper looks a bit more than just an inch-and-a-half than Scott.
richkid123 said on 15/Apr/14
@Emmett I am 5'7"
Emmett said on 14/Apr/14
@Richkid123 Haha how tall are you? I'd love to think that all the good looking guys are about this height, because that's how tall I am!
Small dude :( said on 14/Apr/14
LOL how exactly is he not good looking? Very handsome man.
Sam said on 14/Apr/14
He most resembles his dad (in his younger years) of the Eastwood children I've seen but I'm guessing the stewardess that Clint impregnated (while himself married or engaged I believe) wasn't particularly tall.
SAK said on 14/Apr/14
In the pic above he looks shortish. But overall I would agree with this listing.
Chris said on 13/Apr/14
Goodlooking? Nah, he's not really to me.
James B said on 13/Apr/14
You forgot to mention beckham.
Raj said on 13/Apr/14
A full 5 inches shorter than his father! Kind like Sutherland and his father. He has the same long-leg proportions as his father, which make him look taller. Weak 5'11"
Richkid123 said on 12/Apr/14
is it me or are all the goodlooking guys around 5'11" pitt clooney carmack mcconaughey eastwood
James B said on 12/Apr/14
Eh I thought he was 5'8!

Heights are barefeet estimates, derived from quotations, official websites, agency resumes, in person encounters with actors at conventions and pictures/films.

Other vital statistics like weight or shoe size measurements have been sourced from newspapers, books, resumes or social media.

Celebrity Fan Photos and Agency Pictures of stars are © to their respective owners.