Add a Comment1074 comments
Average Guess (149 Votes)
Peak: 6ft 4.12in (193.3cm)
Current: 6ft 3.21in (191cm)
Peak: 6ft 4.12in (193.3cm)
Current: 6ft 3.21in (191cm)
Dmeyer said on 1/Sep/18
Strong 191cm 6'3,25 today with 195 barkley looks this
Strong 191cm 6'3,25 today with 195 barkley looks this
MJKoP said on 1/Sep/18
Editor Rob said on 30/Aug/18
I didn't see him much outwith this meeting, so can't really comment on stories...though I think even if you don't really want to be somewhere (but are being paid) you can at least act interested 😎
He was "acting" interested! 😏 Have you seen even one of his movies? 🤣
Editor Rob said on 30/Aug/18
I didn't see him much outwith this meeting, so can't really comment on stories...though I think even if you don't really want to be somewhere (but are being paid) you can at least act interested 😎
He was "acting" interested! 😏 Have you seen even one of his movies? 🤣
Connor Simpson said on 1/Sep/18
@MJKoP he would easily be able to block a knee from hitting him, I wouldn't even try to take him on in real life, just to be on the safe side!
@MJKoP he would easily be able to block a knee from hitting him, I wouldn't even try to take him on in real life, just to be on the safe side!
Christian 6'5 3/8" said on 1/Sep/18
@Andrea
Seagal's taller but only by a very small amount. Click Here Maybe not as much as 1cm or 1/2" like Canson says but it looks about 1/4".
@Andrea
Seagal's taller but only by a very small amount. Click Here Maybe not as much as 1cm or 1/2" like Canson says but it looks about 1/4".
eren said on 31/Aug/18
rob , where do you get those celebs though lol , i mean you have a lots of pictures with them like dylan o'brien etc how do you just find them and bring them to your studio or wherever
also how do you get those informations about celebs-heights , like you just compare each other and get a result ? like jb claimed 175cm and you say he is 172 (i do not say it's a lie) it just means that you do not act with what they claims , so where do you get the info ?
Editor Rob
rob , where do you get those celebs though lol , i mean you have a lots of pictures with them like dylan o'brien etc how do you just find them and bring them to your studio or wherever
also how do you get those informations about celebs-heights , like you just compare each other and get a result ? like jb claimed 175cm and you say he is 172 (i do not say it's a lie) it just means that you do not act with what they claims , so where do you get the info ?
Editor RobWell, heights are still guesses. It helps if you have measured people at various heights, that gives you an idea how tall say 6 foot or 6ft 5 looks from your perspective, or beside other people (whose height you know like friends).
99.9% of these photos are from conventions in the UK.
99.9% of these photos are from conventions in the UK.
viper said on 31/Aug/18
I could set up an appointment for your new contact lenses, because Merriman clearly does. Even Stevie Wonder sees it
I could set up an appointment for your new contact lenses, because Merriman clearly does. Even Stevie Wonder sees it
MJKoP said on 30/Aug/18
Sandy Cowell said on 24/Aug/18
Blimey! He looks huge, I mean seriously!
Well I am gonna cheat!
6ft4 and a bit tops. knock off a quarter inch for today's height!
I don't wish to take him on!
Just 'take a knee' in his junk and run away...then turn around and laugh at him trying to catch up(and that's not a knock at his weight - watch him "running" when he was skinny; just adds to the unintentional comedy of him trying to act)!
Sandy Cowell said on 24/Aug/18
Blimey! He looks huge, I mean seriously!
Well I am gonna cheat!
6ft4 and a bit tops. knock off a quarter inch for today's height!
I don't wish to take him on!
Just 'take a knee' in his junk and run away...then turn around and laugh at him trying to catch up(and that's not a knock at his weight - watch him "running" when he was skinny; just adds to the unintentional comedy of him trying to act)!
Ud191cm said on 30/Aug/18
Rob was he a jerk in the convention? heard a lot of awful stories about him.
Editor Rob
Rob was he a jerk in the convention? heard a lot of awful stories about him.
Editor RobI didn't see him much outwith this meeting, so can't really comment on stories...though I think even if you don't really want to be somewhere (but are being paid) you can at least act interested 😎
Csimpson6ft said on 29/Aug/18
@Canson there's definitely a very good chance that Seagal could be 6'3 flat!
@Canson there's definitely a very good chance that Seagal could be 6'3 flat!
Canson said on 29/Aug/18
@Visitor: hard to say if he is with Rob but with a 6’4.5 Charles Barkley he appears to be only 6’3” which is how he also looks with Merriman. Of course we can’t see the shoes each person is wearing in most of the pics.
@Visitor: hard to say if he is with Rob but with a 6’4.5 Charles Barkley he appears to be only 6’3” which is how he also looks with Merriman. Of course we can’t see the shoes each person is wearing in most of the pics.
Andrea said on 29/Aug/18
If you really think that "Merriman is clearly shorter than 6-3 Seagal", viper, I think you need a pair of glasses because he really doesn't: Click Here
If you really think that "Merriman is clearly shorter than 6-3 Seagal", viper, I think you need a pair of glasses because he really doesn't: Click Here
Canson said on 28/Aug/18
@Viper: even with the tilt he’s still shorter. I’d be surprised if Merriman were even 6’3” at a low let alone over that mark.
@Viper: even with the tilt he’s still shorter. I’d be surprised if Merriman were even 6’3” at a low let alone over that mark.
Visitor said on 28/Aug/18
@Pierre Standing tilted like that, (even if tip toed) on the OFF leg, gives you about 2-3 MILLIMETERS of extra height. Nowhere near a centimeter. Just tested it myself.
Also noteworthy, Seagal is in no way standing his tallest as if he was being measured (Rob on the other hand is standing tall). Photos also sometimes mess with the perspective, them standing that far apart from each other makes it more difficult to estimate accurately. Just drawing a straight line between the top of their heads doesn't work here at all.
@Pierre Standing tilted like that, (even if tip toed) on the OFF leg, gives you about 2-3 MILLIMETERS of extra height. Nowhere near a centimeter. Just tested it myself.
Also noteworthy, Seagal is in no way standing his tallest as if he was being measured (Rob on the other hand is standing tall). Photos also sometimes mess with the perspective, them standing that far apart from each other makes it more difficult to estimate accurately. Just drawing a straight line between the top of their heads doesn't work here at all.
Ian Coleman said on 28/Aug/18
6 foot 4 "and an eighth?" You're spoofin' us. Nobody's height can be calibrated within an eight of inch, surely, even if you're measuring them in person. Height is just too variable.
Editor Rob
6 foot 4 "and an eighth?" You're spoofin' us. Nobody's height can be calibrated within an eight of inch, surely, even if you're measuring them in person. Height is just too variable.
Editor RobWell it is an entertainment site 😲
AAAA said on 27/Aug/18
Didn’t big The Big G have a photo with Segal. It be interesting to see all the old Glenn photos next to the Rob photos with the same celebrity. Would he have looked his 5’6.5 or would he have seemed a weak 5’8 because without accounting for him rocking those “thick casuals” of his, his words not mine. If anyone can find it on the Portman page, the boots he rocked used to be there. Frye Harness with a 2 inch stacked heel. Fresh outta the box they give 1.75 or a bit moreover barefoot height.
Rob, you think any of those pics are out there in the internet ether?
Editor Rob
Didn’t big The Big G have a photo with Segal. It be interesting to see all the old Glenn photos next to the Rob photos with the same celebrity. Would he have looked his 5’6.5 or would he have seemed a weak 5’8 because without accounting for him rocking those “thick casuals” of his, his words not mine. If anyone can find it on the Portman page, the boots he rocked used to be there. Frye Harness with a 2 inch stacked heel. Fresh outta the box they give 1.75 or a bit moreover barefoot height.
Rob, you think any of those pics are out there in the internet ether?
Editor RobI don't think Seagal looked that tall with Glenn, though like most cases, there are too many unknowns about street photos.
Canson said on 27/Aug/18
Even with the tilt, Seagal still is at least a CM taller than Merriman. Maybe 1/2”. If Seagal is really 6’3.5 (he doesn’t look that with Rob), Merriman May be 6’3. If Seagal is how he looks with Rob (6’3), Merriman is 6’2.5 which is how he looks
Even with the tilt, Seagal still is at least a CM taller than Merriman. Maybe 1/2”. If Seagal is really 6’3.5 (he doesn’t look that with Rob), Merriman May be 6’3. If Seagal is how he looks with Rob (6’3), Merriman is 6’2.5 which is how he looks
viper said on 27/Aug/18
Merriman is clearly shorter than 6-3 Seagal.
Merriman is clearly shorter than 6-3 Seagal.
Pierre said on 27/Aug/18
@Andrea =if you stand like Steven seems to be, all the body tilting a little bit on a side,so the opposite foot very slightly on tiptoe, your pelvis rotate upwards a little bit and you gain a little bit height like 1 or 1.5 cm.Take in consideration Steven's head looks upward compared to Rob's head which can be advantageous for the height in a picture,and imo Rob does not force his posture here
@Andrea =if you stand like Steven seems to be, all the body tilting a little bit on a side,so the opposite foot very slightly on tiptoe, your pelvis rotate upwards a little bit and you gain a little bit height like 1 or 1.5 cm.Take in consideration Steven's head looks upward compared to Rob's head which can be advantageous for the height in a picture,and imo Rob does not force his posture here
Andrea said on 25/Aug/18
I doubt it, Christian. If you look at the tops of their heads, Shawne doesn't look any shorter than Seagal, so no less than 6'3.5 if we go by Rob's 6'3.5 estimate for Steven (which is quite believable, once you take into account the 4 degrees tilt that Rob said to have against him).
I doubt it, Christian. If you look at the tops of their heads, Shawne doesn't look any shorter than Seagal, so no less than 6'3.5 if we go by Rob's 6'3.5 estimate for Steven (which is quite believable, once you take into account the 4 degrees tilt that Rob said to have against him).
Rising - 174 cm said on 25/Aug/18
I'm not sure tilt has much to do with Barkley and Seagal since I thought the claims Barkley was favored were arguing his head was closer. If it was tilted in anyone's favor, I wouldn't say it was in Baqrkley's favor judging by the background, but even if there were no questions about posture or anything, we'd still have to know their footwear to determine the difference.
I'm not sure tilt has much to do with Barkley and Seagal since I thought the claims Barkley was favored were arguing his head was closer. If it was tilted in anyone's favor, I wouldn't say it was in Baqrkley's favor judging by the background, but even if there were no questions about posture or anything, we'd still have to know their footwear to determine the difference.
Sandy Cowell said on 24/Aug/18
Blimey! He looks huge, I mean seriously!
Well I am gonna cheat!
6ft4 and a bit tops. knock off a quarter inch for today's height!
I don't wish to take him on!
Blimey! He looks huge, I mean seriously!
Well I am gonna cheat!
6ft4 and a bit tops. knock off a quarter inch for today's height!
I don't wish to take him on!
Canson said on 23/Aug/18
@Christian: with Seagal’s head tilted as well. I would say it’s still 1/2” diff and Merriman looks 6’2.5 if that’s the case
@Christian: with Seagal’s head tilted as well. I would say it’s still 1/2” diff and Merriman looks 6’2.5 if that’s the case
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 23/Aug/18
Anything less than a solid 6ft4 is a joke for Seagal's peak
Anything less than a solid 6ft4 is a joke for Seagal's peak
Canson said on 22/Aug/18
I agree with Visitor. Wonder if you rotate the pic with Charles Barkley if that will make them closer in height. barkley with Seagal looks similar to Merriman and Seagal
I agree with Visitor. Wonder if you rotate the pic with Charles Barkley if that will make them closer in height. barkley with Seagal looks similar to Merriman and Seagal
Dmeyer said on 22/Aug/18
the smallest peak is 6 ft 3.75 and now 6ft 3-3.25 highest 6 ft 4.25 peak 6 ft 3.5 now
the smallest peak is 6 ft 3.75 and now 6ft 3-3.25 highest 6 ft 4.25 peak 6 ft 3.5 now
Christian 6'5 3/8" said on 22/Aug/18
@Andrea
Seagal edges Shawne out by 1/4" in the pic, which would make Shawne look 6'2.75" if we go by how Seagal looks in the pic with Rob at 6'3". Click Here
@Andrea
Seagal edges Shawne out by 1/4" in the pic, which would make Shawne look 6'2.75" if we go by how Seagal looks in the pic with Rob at 6'3". Click Here
Rising - 174 cm said on 22/Aug/18
I don't see Barkley having an advantage overall as any camera advantage would be 1 cm max, imo, but posture could be more, but we'd have to know what their footwear is. I agree Seagal looked tall in Machete, though I did thought he looked pretty heavy in that. I think Seagal has held onto his height pretty well and he still seems to stand pretty straight, especially compared to other tall men his age. I think he's lost 2 cm max and possibly just half an inch.
I don't see Barkley having an advantage overall as any camera advantage would be 1 cm max, imo, but posture could be more, but we'd have to know what their footwear is. I agree Seagal looked tall in Machete, though I did thought he looked pretty heavy in that. I think Seagal has held onto his height pretty well and he still seems to stand pretty straight, especially compared to other tall men his age. I think he's lost 2 cm max and possibly just half an inch.
Visitor said on 21/Aug/18
I second that, Seagal is taller no matter how you rotate that pic. Some kind of lens distortion would be another story. Phone cameras (which I assume was used to take that photo) have many features that sometimes mess with things. I was recently in a pic with some friends. Taken at close range, the photo manages at the same time to make two equal height guys look an inch apart and make a 5'9" guy look like a dwarf next to two 5'11 guys (half a head shorter). So sometimes... just remember the grain of salt.
I second that, Seagal is taller no matter how you rotate that pic. Some kind of lens distortion would be another story. Phone cameras (which I assume was used to take that photo) have many features that sometimes mess with things. I was recently in a pic with some friends. Taken at close range, the photo manages at the same time to make two equal height guys look an inch apart and make a 5'9" guy look like a dwarf next to two 5'11 guys (half a head shorter). So sometimes... just remember the grain of salt.
Canson said on 21/Aug/18
@Rob: you’re right about footwear we don’t see it
@Rob: you’re right about footwear we don’t see it
Canson said on 21/Aug/18
Seagal is clearly taller than Merriman
Seagal is clearly taller than Merriman
Andrea said on 21/Aug/18
Yeah, he doesn't look any taller than Shawne there, once you take into account the tilt in Steven's favour.
Yeah, he doesn't look any taller than Shawne there, once you take into account the tilt in Steven's favour.
Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 20/Aug/18
Closer to truth i see Seagal was 6'4 peak not sure the 1/8 extra. Dipping into 6'3 now. Look to have lost 2cm than a 1.5cm.
Closer to truth i see Seagal was 6'4 peak not sure the 1/8 extra. Dipping into 6'3 now. Look to have lost 2cm than a 1.5cm.
Visitor said on 19/Aug/18
Guys... look for a pic on this site with a 6'1 something person. Look at a bunch of them.
Just saying, if Seagal's 6'1, basically every 6 footer listed here is actually 5'10 and so on and so on. ...so no, not that low. As for height loss, I don't think Seagal has lost anything due to AGE, but to WEIGHT. Being even slightly overweight (and possibly less active than before) will not only make one LOOK shorter, but actually make them shorter. I'm decades younger than Seagal and gaining only a little bit of weight (less than 15 lbs) slowly made my posture so bad that I noticed I had lost an inch of height. Losing weight and some exercising has improved it and I've gotten some of it back. I still today am a bit over 6 ft in the morning, the difference is that I used to STAY very close to that mark during the day instead of losing about 2 cm basically within an hour, like happens now.
Last time I saw Seagal on screen I think was Machete... he looked really tall. That was 2009, 2010? He still looked a good weight back then as well.
Guys... look for a pic on this site with a 6'1 something person. Look at a bunch of them.
Just saying, if Seagal's 6'1, basically every 6 footer listed here is actually 5'10 and so on and so on. ...so no, not that low. As for height loss, I don't think Seagal has lost anything due to AGE, but to WEIGHT. Being even slightly overweight (and possibly less active than before) will not only make one LOOK shorter, but actually make them shorter. I'm decades younger than Seagal and gaining only a little bit of weight (less than 15 lbs) slowly made my posture so bad that I noticed I had lost an inch of height. Losing weight and some exercising has improved it and I've gotten some of it back. I still today am a bit over 6 ft in the morning, the difference is that I used to STAY very close to that mark during the day instead of losing about 2 cm basically within an hour, like happens now.
Last time I saw Seagal on screen I think was Machete... he looked really tall. That was 2009, 2010? He still looked a good weight back then as well.
Canson said on 17/Aug/18
@Junior; I think 184guy is right in that it’s 3cm all things considered. Meaning the camera angle Barkley has along with Barkley’s loose posture. Maybe 3.5cm which makes sense.
@Junior; I think 184guy is right in that it’s 3cm all things considered. Meaning the camera angle Barkley has along with Barkley’s loose posture. Maybe 3.5cm which makes sense.
MJKoP said on 17/Aug/18
Bradley said on 13/Aug/18
Potential mug shot from the L.A. County Sheriff's Department soon?
I hope so(and NOT because we'll be able to see what height he's listed as).
Bradley said on 13/Aug/18
Potential mug shot from the L.A. County Sheriff's Department soon?
I hope so(and NOT because we'll be able to see what height he's listed as).
Sal smitherton said on 16/Aug/18
I was vacationing in Turks and Caicos with my wife Stephanie and unbelievably we ran into Stephen at the bar along the beach. I'm no slouch at 6 ft 2 in. as I stood next to Stephen posing for a picture that my wife Stephanie was taking it was clear that I was slightly taller than him. So I'm going to say he is more like 6' 1" to 6'1.5". Not bad but I'm surprised that he feels like he needs to lie about his height.
I was vacationing in Turks and Caicos with my wife Stephanie and unbelievably we ran into Stephen at the bar along the beach. I'm no slouch at 6 ft 2 in. as I stood next to Stephen posing for a picture that my wife Stephanie was taking it was clear that I was slightly taller than him. So I'm going to say he is more like 6' 1" to 6'1.5". Not bad but I'm surprised that he feels like he needs to lie about his height.
Canson said on 16/Aug/18
@184guy: he is leaning but favored by the camera as well
@184guy: he is leaning but favored by the camera as well
Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 16/Aug/18
Nothing change a fact. Charles Barkley look 4cm taller than aging Seagal.
Nothing change a fact. Charles Barkley look 4cm taller than aging Seagal.
Visitor said on 15/Aug/18
He looks 191 cm here, even not correcting for the very relaxed posture. I would believe 6'4" even today.
He looks 191 cm here, even not correcting for the very relaxed posture. I would believe 6'4" even today.
184guy2 said on 15/Aug/18
@Canson , he is leaning , considering him 3cms taller and leaning and Steven at 191-192 , that would make Charles 194-195 plus the leaning so he looks 6'5 range in the photo . Again , would be interest see Charles's shoes and if he had something inside them .
@Canson , he is leaning , considering him 3cms taller and leaning and Steven at 191-192 , that would make Charles 194-195 plus the leaning so he looks 6'5 range in the photo . Again , would be interest see Charles's shoes and if he had something inside them .
Rising - 174 cm said on 13/Aug/18
@Christian: Barkley's head is only slightly bigger. It's tough to tell exactly because Barkley doesn't have a goatee or anything on his head, but it looks like a 2-3 pixel difference to me. If we assume they actually have the same head size then that'd be a 0.5 to 1 cm advantage, but that could be partially or entirely the actual head size difference. It's not a big difference either way. I'd think Barkley could straighten up at least that much.
@Christian: Barkley's head is only slightly bigger. It's tough to tell exactly because Barkley doesn't have a goatee or anything on his head, but it looks like a 2-3 pixel difference to me. If we assume they actually have the same head size then that'd be a 0.5 to 1 cm advantage, but that could be partially or entirely the actual head size difference. It's not a big difference either way. I'd think Barkley could straighten up at least that much.
Bradley said on 13/Aug/18
Potential mug shot from the L.A. County Sheriff's Department soon?
Potential mug shot from the L.A. County Sheriff's Department soon?
Christian 6'5 3/8" said on 12/Aug/18
@184guy2
I agree with you that Barkley's head was closer to the cam than Seagal's. His whole body may have not, but his head was, and that's what made him look a bit taller.
@Rising
You can tell that Barkley's head looks bigger than Seagal's. It goes to show you that his head was closer to the camera, but not necessarily his whole body. You don't have to have your whole body closer to the camera next to someone to look taller, just your head is enough.
@184guy2
I agree with you that Barkley's head was closer to the cam than Seagal's. His whole body may have not, but his head was, and that's what made him look a bit taller.
@Rising
You can tell that Barkley's head looks bigger than Seagal's. It goes to show you that his head was closer to the camera, but not necessarily his whole body. You don't have to have your whole body closer to the camera next to someone to look taller, just your head is enough.
Canson said on 11/Aug/18
@184guy: I agree 100%. That’s a 3cm difference and Barkley is favored. Seagal may be more like 6’3.25 at a low today whereas Barkley 6’4.5. I could easily see a 6’4” Seagal at his peak though
@184guy: I agree 100%. That’s a 3cm difference and Barkley is favored. Seagal may be more like 6’3.25 at a low today whereas Barkley 6’4.5. I could easily see a 6’4” Seagal at his peak though
Greg99 said on 11/Aug/18
A big guy, peak of 6'4" seems correct, and not much under that now. Clearly gives the impression in the above image that he doesn't want to be there.
A big guy, peak of 6'4" seems correct, and not much under that now. Clearly gives the impression in the above image that he doesn't want to be there.
Rising - 174 cm said on 10/Aug/18
@Christian: I basically agree on the height difference in the photo, but I don't see a clear camera advantage. There could be one if the camera is on Barkley's side and if it's lower than they are, it would probably favor Barkley, but the opposite is true if it's higher. Barkley's head looks in proportion to me though. Even if I did see a clear camera advantage, I'd hesitate to say how much it added, though you can make a rough estimate of how much height you'll lose with a certain stance. I would generally agree 6'3" flat looked possible, but it looks less plausible if you rotate the photo 4 degrees as Rob said and Rob said he probably wouldn't guess below 191.
@Arch: I agree he could look close to 100 pounds heavier than he did in Above the Law at one point. He even looked significantly heavier in Out for Justice than he had in Above the Law. He's clearly lost quite a bit of weight compared to his heaviest, though, which is good to see.
@Gracian: Seagal's cowboy boots will give him an inch or more advantage over Shaq's sandals and he's much closer to the camera. If you don't account for footwear and camera advantages, you could come away thinking Seagal was only a few inches taller than weak 5'9" Sly Stallone! Click Here
@Christian: I basically agree on the height difference in the photo, but I don't see a clear camera advantage. There could be one if the camera is on Barkley's side and if it's lower than they are, it would probably favor Barkley, but the opposite is true if it's higher. Barkley's head looks in proportion to me though. Even if I did see a clear camera advantage, I'd hesitate to say how much it added, though you can make a rough estimate of how much height you'll lose with a certain stance. I would generally agree 6'3" flat looked possible, but it looks less plausible if you rotate the photo 4 degrees as Rob said and Rob said he probably wouldn't guess below 191.
@Arch: I agree he could look close to 100 pounds heavier than he did in Above the Law at one point. He even looked significantly heavier in Out for Justice than he had in Above the Law. He's clearly lost quite a bit of weight compared to his heaviest, though, which is good to see.
@Gracian: Seagal's cowboy boots will give him an inch or more advantage over Shaq's sandals and he's much closer to the camera. If you don't account for footwear and camera advantages, you could come away thinking Seagal was only a few inches taller than weak 5'9" Sly Stallone! Click Here
Christian 6'5 3/8" said on 10/Aug/18
@Rising
Barkley does have looser posture than Seagal but Barkley's camera advantage negates that. He has about 1.5" on Seagal but Seagal could very well be 6'3" flat based on the pic with Rob.
@Rising
Barkley does have looser posture than Seagal but Barkley's camera advantage negates that. He has about 1.5" on Seagal but Seagal could very well be 6'3" flat based on the pic with Rob.
Dmeyer said on 10/Aug/18
You could list him 191cm 6 et 3,25
Editor Rob
You could list him 191cm 6 et 3,25
Editor RobThat might be the lowest I'd have guessed.
Gracian said on 10/Aug/18
Rob, did you see Seagal's photos I sent in a comment a few days ago? He really looked closer 194 cm than 193 so I think he deserves a 1/8 inch upgrade. Please, Rob, please reply to my comment.
Editor Rob
Rob, did you see Seagal's photos I sent in a comment a few days ago? He really looked closer 194 cm than 193 so I think he deserves a 1/8 inch upgrade. Please, Rob, please reply to my comment.
Editor RobAt the moment I am happy with the just over 6ft 4 and 3.5 today listing.
184guy2 said on 9/Aug/18
@Canson
In the pic Barkley looks 3 cm taller and is leaning , unfortunely we can't see their footwear . Their faces also looks to be side by side , if anything Charles's head could be a bit closer to the cam.
@Canson
In the pic Barkley looks 3 cm taller and is leaning , unfortunely we can't see their footwear . Their faces also looks to be side by side , if anything Charles's head could be a bit closer to the cam.
Canson said on 9/Aug/18
@Rising: I’m seeing 1” and Barkley would actually have camera advantage like he does in many pics used on this site. He could be closer to 6’3” like Christian said as well or 6’3.25 but that still doesn’t look much more than 1”
@Rising: I’m seeing 1” and Barkley would actually have camera advantage like he does in many pics used on this site. He could be closer to 6’3” like Christian said as well or 6’3.25 but that still doesn’t look much more than 1”
James B 172cm said on 9/Aug/18
Who would be taller a peak Jeff Goldblum or Seagal?
Editor Rob
Who would be taller a peak Jeff Goldblum or Seagal?
Editor RobArguably you could put both in the same zone.
Rising - 174 cm said on 9/Aug/18
@Canson: I don't see that. Barkley looks at least 1.5" even with loose posture: Click Here Look at the difference between the top of their heads, but Barkley also looks to be slouching more.
@Canson: I don't see that. Barkley looks at least 1.5" even with loose posture: Click Here Look at the difference between the top of their heads, but Barkley also looks to be slouching more.
Christian 6'5 3/8" said on 9/Aug/18
Looks around 6'3" flat though.
Looks around 6'3" flat though.
Arch Stanton said on 9/Aug/18
"Well he certainly is a lot more bulkier in his 60's than 30's, probably 4 stones heavier. It may have contributed a little bit to some loss."
4 stone, 56 pounds? If you compared him in around 2008 to 1988's Above the Law when he's have been 36 or 37 I'd have said nearer 7 stone gain, he looked near 100 pounds heavier at one point. Today he seems to have lost some weight from a few years back when he was massive, probably for health reasons, so may he is more 4 stone heavier than he was in his 30s today.
Editor Rob
"Well he certainly is a lot more bulkier in his 60's than 30's, probably 4 stones heavier. It may have contributed a little bit to some loss."
4 stone, 56 pounds? If you compared him in around 2008 to 1988's Above the Law when he's have been 36 or 37 I'd have said nearer 7 stone gain, he looked near 100 pounds heavier at one point. Today he seems to have lost some weight from a few years back when he was massive, probably for health reasons, so may he is more 4 stone heavier than he was in his 30s today.
Editor RobYes, in person today I'd estimate 4 stones heavier, but his absolute heaviest may well have been a couple of stone more than 2018 weight.
Canson said on 9/Aug/18
So looking at him with Charles Barkley, it proves the point that Barkley isn’t more than maybe 194cm range
So looking at him with Charles Barkley, it proves the point that Barkley isn’t more than maybe 194cm range
Peterson188cm said on 8/Aug/18
Peak: 193.6cm
Today: 192.0cm
Peak: 193.6cm
Today: 192.0cm
Joe257 said on 8/Aug/18
I would Say about 6'3" Flat in the Picture above for Steven Seagal (if He Stood Straight), Certainly a Strong 6'4" in His Youth, more like 6'4.5" or So [although the often-worn Big Black Cowboy Boots throw most Estimations Off].
Rob, do You Think that Steven Seagal's Noticeable Weight Gain Contributed to His Height Disparity; making Him Look Taller in His Youth (when Thinner), and Shorter Now (when Fatter)!?
Editor Rob
I would Say about 6'3" Flat in the Picture above for Steven Seagal (if He Stood Straight), Certainly a Strong 6'4" in His Youth, more like 6'4.5" or So [although the often-worn Big Black Cowboy Boots throw most Estimations Off].
Rob, do You Think that Steven Seagal's Noticeable Weight Gain Contributed to His Height Disparity; making Him Look Taller in His Youth (when Thinner), and Shorter Now (when Fatter)!?
Editor RobWell he certainly is a lot more bulkier in his 60's than 30's, probably 4 stones heavier. It may have contributed a little bit to some loss.
MJKoP said on 8/Aug/18
"American Actor, Martial Artist, and the Russian Foreign Ministry's special representative envoy for Russian-US humanitarian ties" 😜 🇷🇺
"American Actor, Martial Artist, and the Russian Foreign Ministry's special representative envoy for Russian-US humanitarian ties" 😜 🇷🇺
Arch Stanton said on 8/Aug/18
Wow, this was surely one of the most wanted photos after Cruise and Stallone. Glad you met him and he was glad to get rid of you haha! I'm sure stood better Seagal looked 6'3.5. I still think 194 peak is nearer though, .25 wouldn't be a stretch.
Wow, this was surely one of the most wanted photos after Cruise and Stallone. Glad you met him and he was glad to get rid of you haha! I'm sure stood better Seagal looked 6'3.5. I still think 194 peak is nearer though, .25 wouldn't be a stretch.
Gracian said on 7/Aug/18
Rob, I think 6'4.25" as his peak height really fits better for him." Kelly LeBrock often liked to wear high heels, but Seagal always looked like a giant next to her. Here are the pictures of Seagal and Kelly from 1987:
Click Here
Click Here
And here Seagal and Kelly in 1990:
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Steven alongside Shaquille O'Neal in 1990:
Click Here
And here the photos from the 1995 event, which include Nicole Kidman, Jim Carrey, Arnold Schwarzenegger, Whoopi Goldberg, Julianne Moore, Clint Eastwood, Sylvester Stallone, Gerard Depardieu and many others alongside Seagal, Steven at this event still looked strong 6'4" : Click Here
Click Here
In "Under Siege" in 1992 Steven looked no less than 4 inches taller than Tommy Lee Jones. In the 80's and most of the 90's, Steven looked over 6'4". Rob, will you give him upgrade to 6'4.25" now?
Rob, I think 6'4.25" as his peak height really fits better for him." Kelly LeBrock often liked to wear high heels, but Seagal always looked like a giant next to her. Here are the pictures of Seagal and Kelly from 1987:
Click Here
Click Here
And here Seagal and Kelly in 1990:
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Steven alongside Shaquille O'Neal in 1990:
Click Here
And here the photos from the 1995 event, which include Nicole Kidman, Jim Carrey, Arnold Schwarzenegger, Whoopi Goldberg, Julianne Moore, Clint Eastwood, Sylvester Stallone, Gerard Depardieu and many others alongside Seagal, Steven at this event still looked strong 6'4" : Click Here
Click Here
In "Under Siege" in 1992 Steven looked no less than 4 inches taller than Tommy Lee Jones. In the 80's and most of the 90's, Steven looked over 6'4". Rob, will you give him upgrade to 6'4.25" now?
Msn1'87 said on 7/Aug/18
Rob, looking at this picture, what is your honest estimation?
Editor Rob
Rob, looking at this picture, what is your honest estimation?
Editor RobAt his tallest I think over 6ft 3 for Seagal and solid 6ft 4 25 years ago.
Msn1'87 said on 7/Aug/18
Looks 1’89 - 1’90 here. Don’t think he’s lost much, max 2 cm, so 1’91-92 peak.
Looks 1’89 - 1’90 here. Don’t think he’s lost much, max 2 cm, so 1’91-92 peak.
viper said on 6/Aug/18
I think he looks 6-2.5 here
I think he looks 6-2.5 here
Dream(5'9.5 said on 6/Aug/18
Was he 'easily' taller than J August Richards when you met him in person?
Of course, at peak, Seagal would have Richards by a good inch.
Editor Rob
Was he 'easily' taller than J August Richards when you met him in person?
Of course, at peak, Seagal would have Richards by a good inch.
Editor RobWell, they wouldn't be that far apart if you saw them up close.
Rising - 174 cm said on 6/Aug/18
@James B: Well in that case, Seagal definitely looks 6'4" max there while Lundgren looks 6'4" minimum. Seagal is probably still 6'3.25" or 6'3.5", though. I agree with berta, though. Seagal looks like he's lost some weight recently. Still much heavier than his prime, but nowhere near his heaviest.
@James B: Well in that case, Seagal definitely looks 6'4" max there while Lundgren looks 6'4" minimum. Seagal is probably still 6'3.25" or 6'3.5", though. I agree with berta, though. Seagal looks like he's lost some weight recently. Still much heavier than his prime, but nowhere near his heaviest.
Pierre said on 6/Aug/18
To my eyes,he seems to be a little bit under 6"3' by this pic;his posture seems to be disadvantageous at first sight but i think finally the contrary,all his body(even his legs) seems to be a little bit inclined on the left side and then i think he gain a little bit height in this posture because his pelvis can tilt up.And his head tilts up compared to Rob's head;and Rob does not force his posture.
Nice picture.
To my eyes,he seems to be a little bit under 6"3' by this pic;his posture seems to be disadvantageous at first sight but i think finally the contrary,all his body(even his legs) seems to be a little bit inclined on the left side and then i think he gain a little bit height in this posture because his pelvis can tilt up.And his head tilts up compared to Rob's head;and Rob does not force his posture.
Nice picture.
tree said on 6/Aug/18
But why his whole body looks like big mass of darkness?
I can't tell where his body ends and arms start.
But why his whole body looks like big mass of darkness?
I can't tell where his body ends and arms start.
MJKoP said on 6/Aug/18
Seems more than an inch taller than Tom Welling here, but I call that body language the "a down payment on my new yacht better be worth this"...I'd also describe that as his facial expression here, but when has he ever NOT had that look? :P
Seems more than an inch taller than Tom Welling here, but I call that body language the "a down payment on my new yacht better be worth this"...I'd also describe that as his facial expression here, but when has he ever NOT had that look? :P
MAD SAM said on 6/Aug/18
Peak 193.5 cm, right now 192 cm
Peak 193.5 cm, right now 192 cm
Rising - 174 cm said on 5/Aug/18
@Rob: Yeah, that's definitely a reason. Dolph was also into weight training while Seagal didn't look to do much of that and I have never heard he did. Dolph said he was having a lot of trouble for 3-4 years before the double hip replacement, I know he had a motorcycle accident that led to torn ligaments filming Missionary Man in 2007 and his upper body and the way he holds himself also looks to me like someone who has had their share of injuries and has lost quite a bit of height even if I didn't know how much taller he use to be.
@Rob: Yeah, that's definitely a reason. Dolph was also into weight training while Seagal didn't look to do much of that and I have never heard he did. Dolph said he was having a lot of trouble for 3-4 years before the double hip replacement, I know he had a motorcycle accident that led to torn ligaments filming Missionary Man in 2007 and his upper body and the way he holds himself also looks to me like someone who has had their share of injuries and has lost quite a bit of height even if I didn't know how much taller he use to be.
James B 172cm said on 5/Aug/18
rising-174
i emailed the ultimate bad guy back in 2008 and he told me seagal wore cowboy boots in the scenes they shared in Fire Down Below.
rising-174
i emailed the ultimate bad guy back in 2008 and he told me seagal wore cowboy boots in the scenes they shared in Fire Down Below.
berta said on 5/Aug/18
he actually does look thinner and healthier than i thought he would look. Ok he is 192 cm now at 66. i think we all can agree that peak was either 193 ore 194. I personally think steven looked a very legit 6 foot 4 guy at peak so i woudl go with 1/4 over 6 foot 4. this listing or a small fraction over at peak.
he actually does look thinner and healthier than i thought he would look. Ok he is 192 cm now at 66. i think we all can agree that peak was either 193 ore 194. I personally think steven looked a very legit 6 foot 4 guy at peak so i woudl go with 1/4 over 6 foot 4. this listing or a small fraction over at peak.
Connor Simpson said on 5/Aug/18
Looks more 6'2-6'2.5 here but that's because he's leaning, without the lean maybe 6'3.5 is still possible, is there a chance Seagal could be 6'3 flat now Rob? He's not that far off from being 70 now right?
Editor Rob
Looks more 6'2-6'2.5 here but that's because he's leaning, without the lean maybe 6'3.5 is still possible, is there a chance Seagal could be 6'3 flat now Rob? He's not that far off from being 70 now right?
Editor RobI would be more surprised if he only measured 6ft 3 than over it.
Rising - 174 cm said on 5/Aug/18
It's amazing because Dolph is 5-6 years younger and takes better care of himself, though Dolph seems to have had worse injuries and has worse posture. Both were probably right around 6'4", but if anything, Dolph was taller in their primes as you can see comparing both Dolph and Seagal with 6'8"(?) Scott L. Schwartz, a.k.a. "Ultimate Bad Guy": Click Here Dolph looks no more than 3.5" shorter while Seagal looks at least 4" shorter. Dolph does have what look to me like a typical 1.25" type boot, but he never wore the bigger heeled boots Seagal often does, though I'd have to guess Seagal wasn't wearing them that day.
Editor Rob
It's amazing because Dolph is 5-6 years younger and takes better care of himself, though Dolph seems to have had worse injuries and has worse posture. Both were probably right around 6'4", but if anything, Dolph was taller in their primes as you can see comparing both Dolph and Seagal with 6'8"(?) Scott L. Schwartz, a.k.a. "Ultimate Bad Guy": Click Here Dolph looks no more than 3.5" shorter while Seagal looks at least 4" shorter. Dolph does have what look to me like a typical 1.25" type boot, but he never wore the bigger heeled boots Seagal often does, though I'd have to guess Seagal wasn't wearing them that day.
Editor RobWell, I think you have to consider their physical nature in films.
Seagal has been a more static actor...baddies run up to him and get knocked over without much effort.
Dolph I think has done a lot more physical work in films and more stunts.
Seagal has been a more static actor...baddies run up to him and get knocked over without much effort.
Dolph I think has done a lot more physical work in films and more stunts.
Nik said on 4/Aug/18
He certainly doesn't come across as being taller than his listed height!
He certainly doesn't come across as being taller than his listed height!
James B 172cm said on 4/Aug/18
yeah i'd say he looks 6ft2 with rob
yeah i'd say he looks 6ft2 with rob
Tall Sam said on 4/Aug/18
Not a fan of his personally as he comes off as a real sleaze on numerous levels but he was in some films I like (Under Siege or Executive Decision) when someone other than him was making shots behind the scenes. He does looks listed well.
Not a fan of his personally as he comes off as a real sleaze on numerous levels but he was in some films I like (Under Siege or Executive Decision) when someone other than him was making shots behind the scenes. He does looks listed well.
Pierre said on 4/Aug/18
Rob,a question=do you know when you're standing only on one feet as Steven seems to stand here you can gain a little bit height?(Your pelvis can be higher in this posture when you place the other foot a little bit on tiptoe)
Editor Rob
Rob,a question=do you know when you're standing only on one feet as Steven seems to stand here you can gain a little bit height?(Your pelvis can be higher in this posture when you place the other foot a little bit on tiptoe)
Editor RobI don't think he is doing that one foot thing...more like I'd add a couple cm to his height here.
Andrea said on 4/Aug/18
Well, if there is as much as a 4 degrees tilt against him, which is quite hard to tell with a neutral background like this, he would easily be near his 6'3.5 listing without it, I think...
Editor Rob
Well, if there is as much as a 4 degrees tilt against him, which is quite hard to tell with a neutral background like this, he would easily be near his 6'3.5 listing without it, I think...
Editor RobIt's a good possibility he would be near it.
Declan Mclean said on 4/Aug/18
He looks 6 feet 5, but is an easy 6,3 if we do the math with a 5,8 rob paul standing next to him.
He looks 6 feet 5, but is an easy 6,3 if we do the math with a 5,8 rob paul standing next to him.
abcde said on 4/Aug/18
Steven Seagal 191 cm not more, maybe 190 cm
Steven Seagal 191 cm not more, maybe 190 cm
Gracian said on 4/Aug/18
Rob, I have two questions for you.
1. You said that his peak height is possible anywhere from 6'4" to 6'4.5" range. Can I still argue 1/8 upgrade to 6'4.25" for Seagal?
2. Did Steven personally look taller than Lundgren?
Please, Rob, answer both of my questions.
Editor Rob
Rob, I have two questions for you.
1. You said that his peak height is possible anywhere from 6'4" to 6'4.5" range. Can I still argue 1/8 upgrade to 6'4.25" for Seagal?
2. Did Steven personally look taller than Lundgren?
Please, Rob, answer both of my questions.
Editor RobSteven is taller than Dolph in person...by a good inch, I think Dolph lost more height than Seagal.
I can see how 4.25 in 1990's is possible.
I can see how 4.25 in 1990's is possible.
Rising - 174 cm said on 4/Aug/18
@Rob: Interesting since it did seem he was less engaged for the photo than many you have with the hands in his pockets, but some people are more comfortable with this type of thing than others as you say. I see about a 6" difference in the pic, but I can see how he'd be losing some height. He has worn cowboy boots and cuban heels quite a bit in the past so good for this pic he wasn't wearing boots like that.
@Rob: Interesting since it did seem he was less engaged for the photo than many you have with the hands in his pockets, but some people are more comfortable with this type of thing than others as you say. I see about a 6" difference in the pic, but I can see how he'd be losing some height. He has worn cowboy boots and cuban heels quite a bit in the past so good for this pic he wasn't wearing boots like that.
MJKoP said on 4/Aug/18
My condolences, Rob. XD
My condolences, Rob. XD
184guy said on 4/Aug/18
Yeah ... about 6'3.5 nowdays....
Yeah ... about 6'3.5 nowdays....
Rising - 174 cm said on 4/Aug/18
Wow, didn't expect to see Seagal with Rob in the top corner! Nice pic, Rob. How was Steven in person and what were his footwear and posture like?
Editor Rob
Wow, didn't expect to see Seagal with Rob in the top corner! Nice pic, Rob. How was Steven in person and what were his footwear and posture like?
Editor RobI think footwear was a basic shoe so not much difference, I think would give him near 2cm more if he was standing at his absolute tallest.
As for interaction, from speaking to a few folk who got his autograph they did get more conversation from him, but photo ops aren't really a place, they can be quite quick at times.
As for interaction, from speaking to a few folk who got his autograph they did get more conversation from him, but photo ops aren't really a place, they can be quite quick at times.
Myself said on 4/Aug/18
Rob, Did he really look over 6'3.25 that day?
It's quite a strange photo, he wasn't comfortable getting closer?
Editor Rob
Rob, Did he really look over 6'3.25 that day?
It's quite a strange photo, he wasn't comfortable getting closer?
Editor RobAs I replied above, I am not sure this was his kind of 'thing'...but I think he got better with people the more the weekend went on.
Pierre said on 4/Aug/18
Rob,what type of shoes is he wearing in the picture next to you please?
Rob,what type of shoes is he wearing in the picture next to you please?
Andrea said on 4/Aug/18
Unless he's losing something like 1.5 inches more than you, he looks nowhere near 6'3.5 here, but more somewhere around 6'2...
Editor Rob
I think he probably has lost half inch or so of height by age 65. He was taller than Tom Welling that weekend.
But I think if you give him back about 4 degree for the tilt, he is closer to his height.
There were several folk who got a photo before me but he wasn't interacting much at first, he barely even looked at me. He had his arms crossed like he normally does and then put them in his pockets. Mr Seagal, I ain't going to nick your wallet 🤑 To be fair, after I thanked him, he did say thank you very much and looked at me. I think I sensed relief in his eyes that I was leaving his presence 😄
As a Sensei, this whole photoshoot experience probably felt a bit strange for him....this was the 1st session he did that weekend, in the other subsequent 3 sessions he asked to be sat down beside attendees...at £75, I am glad I got him earlier that day.
Unless he's losing something like 1.5 inches more than you, he looks nowhere near 6'3.5 here, but more somewhere around 6'2...
Editor RobI think he probably has lost half inch or so of height by age 65. He was taller than Tom Welling that weekend.
But I think if you give him back about 4 degree for the tilt, he is closer to his height.
There were several folk who got a photo before me but he wasn't interacting much at first, he barely even looked at me. He had his arms crossed like he normally does and then put them in his pockets. Mr Seagal, I ain't going to nick your wallet 🤑 To be fair, after I thanked him, he did say thank you very much and looked at me. I think I sensed relief in his eyes that I was leaving his presence 😄
As a Sensei, this whole photoshoot experience probably felt a bit strange for him....this was the 1st session he did that weekend, in the other subsequent 3 sessions he asked to be sat down beside attendees...at £75, I am glad I got him earlier that day.
World Citizen said on 4/Aug/18
Looks 6 ft 2.5 at best
Looks 6 ft 2.5 at best
Dream(5'9.5") said on 4/Aug/18
This I agree. Nice picture Rob!
This I agree. Nice picture Rob!
tree said on 4/Aug/18
If at 66 he is still 192cm no way he was not a strong 6ft4 guy
Any guess on his current weight?
Was he nice that day?xd
If at 66 he is still 192cm no way he was not a strong 6ft4 guy
Any guess on his current weight?
Was he nice that day?xd
Paddy said on 29/Jul/18
I just saw him and confirmed with Rob that he is actually 6'4" on the dot.
I just saw him and confirmed with Rob that he is actually 6'4" on the dot.
James B 171.5cm said on 3/Jul/18
rampage-there didnt look much between seagal and wayans
rampage-there didnt look much between seagal and wayans
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 24/Jun/18
I thought he could look 6ft4-5 in Glimmer Man if Wayans is a solid 6ft3
I thought he could look 6ft4-5 in Glimmer Man if Wayans is a solid 6ft3
James B 170.8cm said on 17/Apr/18
Rob i thought at times he looked at most 6'4 compared too keenan ivory wayans in the glimmer man.
Did seagal already lose height by 1996? Or could keenan be a shade over 6'3?
Editor Rob
Rob i thought at times he looked at most 6'4 compared too keenan ivory wayans in the glimmer man.
Did seagal already lose height by 1996? Or could keenan be a shade over 6'3?
Editor RobI think an inch on screen can sometimes seem barely anything. When seagal lost his first fraction is harder to pinpoint.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 25/Mar/18
Adnan, you must be on crack if you think Seagal is 186-187cm
Adnan, you must be on crack if you think Seagal is 186-187cm
Adnan said on 24/Mar/18
6'2" maybe 186 or 187 cm about 6 to 7" on putin (5'7")
6'2" maybe 186 or 187 cm about 6 to 7" on putin (5'7")
sulu2018 said on 12/Mar/18
The "Your guess" height options needs to be updated to every 1/8 inch instead of only every 1/4 inch so that those whose listings are like 6ft 4 1/8 can have a guessing option of 6ft 4, 6ft 4 1/4, or 6ft 4 1/2, not just the ones with 3/8, 5/8 or 7/8 inch.
Editor Rob
The "Your guess" height options needs to be updated to every 1/8 inch instead of only every 1/4 inch so that those whose listings are like 6ft 4 1/8 can have a guessing option of 6ft 4, 6ft 4 1/4, or 6ft 4 1/2, not just the ones with 3/8, 5/8 or 7/8 inch.
Editor RobUnfortunately it's tied in to the listing itself and 1/4 inch increments.
berta said on 10/Mar/18
Snoop Dogg 6ft3 1/2(192cm)
Chevy Chase 6ft3 1/2(192cm)
Liam Neeson 6ft4 1/8(193,5cm)
Steven Seagal 6ft4 1/8(193,5cm)
David Hasselhoff 6ft4 1/8(193,5cm)
Jeff Goldblum 6ft4 1/4(194cm)
Randy Quaid 6ft4 3/4(195cm)
Tim Robbins 6ft4 7/8(195,5cm)
Vince Vaughn 6ft4 7/8(195,5cm)
Snoop Dogg 6ft3 1/2(192cm)
Chevy Chase 6ft3 1/2(192cm)
Liam Neeson 6ft4 1/8(193,5cm)
Steven Seagal 6ft4 1/8(193,5cm)
David Hasselhoff 6ft4 1/8(193,5cm)
Jeff Goldblum 6ft4 1/4(194cm)
Randy Quaid 6ft4 3/4(195cm)
Tim Robbins 6ft4 7/8(195,5cm)
Vince Vaughn 6ft4 7/8(195,5cm)
berta said on 10/Mar/18
good update. i wonder if dolph really was taller than steven.
good update. i wonder if dolph really was taller than steven.
sulu2018 said on 21/Feb/18
Someone can lose 5/8 to 3/4 inch or anything between as they get older.
Someone can lose 5/8 to 3/4 inch or anything between as they get older.
Canson said on 13/Feb/18
Looked 6’4 in Half Past as well
Looked 6’4 in Half Past as well
Canson said on 13/Feb/18
I concur with Christian. Charles Barkley also had him by 1” or so. Peak tho in Above the Law looked 6’4” flat sane with Under Seige
I concur with Christian. Charles Barkley also had him by 1” or so. Peak tho in Above the Law looked 6’4” flat sane with Under Seige
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 30/Jan/18
He looked a proper 6ft4½ in Above The Law
He looked a proper 6ft4½ in Above The Law
berta said on 9/Jan/18
i think seagal is one fo those guys that was 193 at the absolute worst days in eveening. and a fraction over usually.
i think seagal is one fo those guys that was 193 at the absolute worst days in eveening. and a fraction over usually.
Anonymous said on 24/Dec/17
Steven is a really big guy, I saw him live when he made a movie, he looked easly over 6'3. "Probably a solid 6'4" he did all the people around dwarfs.
Steven is a really big guy, I saw him live when he made a movie, he looked easly over 6'3. "Probably a solid 6'4" he did all the people around dwarfs.
181cm said on 10/Dec/17
192cm is his height today....
192cm is his height today....
James B said on 21/Nov/17
He could also pass as taller because he stood with excellent posture in some of his earlier films.
He could also pass as taller because he stood with excellent posture in some of his earlier films.
James B said on 18/Nov/17
Rampage- I don't understand why your asking Rob a question you already know the answer too? Look at him alongside keenan ivory wayans in glimmer man because even if Keenan is 6'3 1/2 like you believe he his seagal doesnt look a full 6'5 in comparison.
Rampage- I don't understand why your asking Rob a question you already know the answer too? Look at him alongside keenan ivory wayans in glimmer man because even if Keenan is 6'3 1/2 like you believe he his seagal doesnt look a full 6'5 in comparison.
miko said on 16/Nov/17
6'4 prime and rake thin in his earlier years, he could pass for taller at times.
Today he's overweight and older, but is still clearly 6'3 plus, he's held his height very well.
6'4 prime and rake thin in his earlier years, he could pass for taller at times.
Today he's overweight and older, but is still clearly 6'3 plus, he's held his height very well.
Christian-6'5 3/8 said on 16/Nov/17
Likely legit 193cm at his peak but today could be 191cm since he looked the same as Jon Jones who's also 191-ish Click Here
Likely legit 193cm at his peak but today could be 191cm since he looked the same as Jon Jones who's also 191-ish Click Here
Dmeyer said on 15/Nov/17
Oftnenly wear 1,5-1,75 shoes so not more than 6'4 Peak or 6'3,75 today 6'3-3,5
Oftnenly wear 1,5-1,75 shoes so not more than 6'4 Peak or 6'3,75 today 6'3-3,5
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 15/Nov/17
Rob, what are the chances of 6ft5 for a young Seagal?
Editor Rob
Rob, what are the chances of 6ft5 for a young Seagal?
Editor Rob at times I'm sure he could look that tall to people, but I never seen enough to think he really was that tall in the 80's and early 90's during his prime.
James B said on 12/Nov/17
Rob he wore cowboy boots in fire down below down.
Rob he wore cowboy boots in fire down below down.
James B said on 9/Nov/17
Rob not doubting he was 6'4 peak but he did often wear big shoes didn't he in his films
A genuine 6'4 who wears big heeled shoes would look closer too 6'5.
Editor Rob
Rob not doubting he was 6'4 peak but he did often wear big shoes didn't he in his films
A genuine 6'4 who wears big heeled shoes would look closer too 6'5.
Editor Rob I can't remember exactly, did he have cowboy boots in some films?
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 5/Nov/17
In Above The Law a fair few of the guys that he fights are the same height or taller than him!
In Above The Law a fair few of the guys that he fights are the same height or taller than him!
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 1/Nov/17
Chances are higher that he's lost 1in but was a bit over 6ft4 in his prime
Chances are higher that he's lost 1in but was a bit over 6ft4 in his prime
Junior said on 27/Oct/17
Click Here: If base on this picture with Charles Barkley i don't see anything over 6'3.25" for Seagal but not sure about their footwear.
Click Here: If base on this picture with Charles Barkley i don't see anything over 6'3.25" for Seagal but not sure about their footwear.
Dmeyer said on 18/Oct/17
Those boots Seagal IS wearing will give 4cm , Dolph usualy wore shoes in thé 3cm rangé so 1cm advantage not so much
Those boots Seagal IS wearing will give 4cm , Dolph usualy wore shoes in thé 3cm rangé so 1cm advantage not so much
Ted said on 2/Oct/17
Dolph has lost more height than Seagal and he is 5 or 6 years younger than him. He's not even 60 yet. Crazy.
Seagal is still between 6' 3'' and 6' 4''.
Dolph has lost more height than Seagal and he is 5 or 6 years younger than him. He's not even 60 yet. Crazy.
Seagal is still between 6' 3'' and 6' 4''.
Rising - 174 cm said on 30/Sep/17
I agree, James. Dolph looked taller than Seagal to me, especially since Dolph didn't wear the cowboy boots Seagal did. If you compare both of them to Ultimate Bad Guy(about 6'8", but claims 6'10"!), Dolph measured up noticeably better than Seagal did: Click Here We can account for Dolph's footwear there, but even assuming Seagal didn't have his heeled boots. Of course, Seagal would probably be taller now despite letting himself go and being half a decade older while Dolph has stayed in shape. Goldblum might have been "a touch" above 6'4" as he said, though he's looking 6'3.5" max to me compared to Liam Hemsworth nowadays. Hasselhoff maybe, but I'm less sure of Neeson.
Anyway, this is what I'm referring to as far as Seagal's boots
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Still wearing them recently: Click Here and even way back when he did Above the Law, you can see he had Cuban heels: Click Here
Full 6'4"? Yeah. Over it? I'm not so sure. The fact he could look it might be explained by his choice of footwear.
I agree, James. Dolph looked taller than Seagal to me, especially since Dolph didn't wear the cowboy boots Seagal did. If you compare both of them to Ultimate Bad Guy(about 6'8", but claims 6'10"!), Dolph measured up noticeably better than Seagal did: Click Here We can account for Dolph's footwear there, but even assuming Seagal didn't have his heeled boots. Of course, Seagal would probably be taller now despite letting himself go and being half a decade older while Dolph has stayed in shape. Goldblum might have been "a touch" above 6'4" as he said, though he's looking 6'3.5" max to me compared to Liam Hemsworth nowadays. Hasselhoff maybe, but I'm less sure of Neeson.
Anyway, this is what I'm referring to as far as Seagal's boots
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Still wearing them recently: Click Here and even way back when he did Above the Law, you can see he had Cuban heels: Click Here
Full 6'4"? Yeah. Over it? I'm not so sure. The fact he could look it might be explained by his choice of footwear.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 18/Sep/17
Arch, I honestly think Neeson and Hasselhoff are as deserving of that billing as Seagal
Arch, I honestly think Neeson and Hasselhoff are as deserving of that billing as Seagal
James B said on 18/Sep/17
Arch-Dolph seemed like a guy who was slightly taller.
Arch-Dolph seemed like a guy who was slightly taller.
Arch Stanton said on 16/Sep/17
Rob, perhaps you could tweak to 6'4.25 peak, it's the average here, like Goldblum and Dolph I don't think it's hard to believe if you measured him in the 80s he'd have measured a tad over 6'4 flat.
Rob, perhaps you could tweak to 6'4.25 peak, it's the average here, like Goldblum and Dolph I don't think it's hard to believe if you measured him in the 80s he'd have measured a tad over 6'4 flat.
Canson said on 24/Aug/17
6'4" at his lowest peak
6'4" at his lowest peak
Canson said on 14/Aug/17
Peak 6'4" no higher.
Peak 6'4" no higher.
Junior said on 13/Aug/17
He look as listed a 6'4 peak
He look as listed a 6'4 peak
Ted said on 30/Jul/17
After watching Above The Law, I think its safe to say that he could scrape 6' 5'' in the morning. Very tall and very lanky.
After watching Above The Law, I think its safe to say that he could scrape 6' 5'' in the morning. Very tall and very lanky.
Max said on 13/Jul/17
When you are very tall, above 6'3" and you are heavy, above 250lbs. People always think you are shorter than you are because very few people are truly large. I am 6'5.5" & 300 lbs, and people will say I am 6'4" and then are shocked when someone they know is a certified 6'4" like cop is a couple inches shorter than me...Steven is a tall guy but "looked much taller in his early work because he was 100 lbs lighter. I am a fan and think people enjoy picking on him, online. People don't have much to say when in front of a guy over 6'3" and over 250lbs with a Black Belt.
When you are very tall, above 6'3" and you are heavy, above 250lbs. People always think you are shorter than you are because very few people are truly large. I am 6'5.5" & 300 lbs, and people will say I am 6'4" and then are shocked when someone they know is a certified 6'4" like cop is a couple inches shorter than me...Steven is a tall guy but "looked much taller in his early work because he was 100 lbs lighter. I am a fan and think people enjoy picking on him, online. People don't have much to say when in front of a guy over 6'3" and over 250lbs with a Black Belt.
Matt Rohler Iowa said on 3/Jul/17
I believe big Steve to be around 6ft 3 inch nowadays. I believe he was close to 6ft 5 when he was younger. His slim body frame made him appear taller. I'm the biggest fan personally.
I believe big Steve to be around 6ft 3 inch nowadays. I believe he was close to 6ft 5 when he was younger. His slim body frame made him appear taller. I'm the biggest fan personally.
Ted said on 26/Jun/17
6' 4.5'' peak.
6' 4.5'' peak.
Canson said on 24/Jun/17
Prime was 6'4" definitely like in Above the law in the 80s today may have dipped to 192cm
Prime was 6'4" definitely like in Above the law in the 80s today may have dipped to 192cm
RisingForce said on 2/Jun/17
Thanks, Rob. I've only watched a few of Seagal's straight to video movies as they're generally not up to par with his late 80s/early 90s, but I'll probably check that one out.
Editor Rob
Thanks, Rob. I've only watched a few of Seagal's straight to video movies as they're generally not up to par with his late 80s/early 90s, but I'll probably check that one out.
Editor Rob yeah, compared to some films like Under Seige or Nico, Seagal's last 15 years hasn't been particularly memorable...
RisingForce said on 30/May/17
Are there any particular examples of Seagal looking obviously under 6'4" lately? I'm asking as an honest question because I haven't followed him much in a few years now so I'm curious to see if he's definitely lost height or not.
Editor Rob
Are there any particular examples of Seagal looking obviously under 6'4" lately? I'm asking as an honest question because I haven't followed him much in a few years now so I'm curious to see if he's definitely lost height or not.
Editor Rob he looks to have had numerous scenes in Maximum Conviction with Stone Cold Austin, I still meant to watch it one day.
Canson said on 21/Mar/17
@Jonesey: look at Irvin next to Aikman and Emmit. He's for sure 6'2. To be honest the pic you posted with magic Johnson and Charles Barkley Merriman looks disadvantaged by the camera in both. A 6'7" Magic would put Merriman 6'3 but looks like magic has the camera angle. A 6'4.5 Barkley (by the way I agree on Barkley's height because a friend of mine met him and said he's my height) looks about 2" taller with camera advantage. But I won't discredit you if you did meet him in person. I wasn't right next to him I was about 100 feet or so when I met him. However Michael Irvin I have met and shook hands with so no way he's only 6'0" tall and 4 inches shorter than me (I'm Just about 6'4 3/8).
Click Here
@Jonesey: look at Irvin next to Aikman and Emmit. He's for sure 6'2. To be honest the pic you posted with magic Johnson and Charles Barkley Merriman looks disadvantaged by the camera in both. A 6'7" Magic would put Merriman 6'3 but looks like magic has the camera angle. A 6'4.5 Barkley (by the way I agree on Barkley's height because a friend of mine met him and said he's my height) looks about 2" taller with camera advantage. But I won't discredit you if you did meet him in person. I wasn't right next to him I was about 100 feet or so when I met him. However Michael Irvin I have met and shook hands with so no way he's only 6'0" tall and 4 inches shorter than me (I'm Just about 6'4 3/8).
Click Here
Canson said on 21/Mar/17
@Jonesey: now Irvin is for sure 6'2". I stood right next to him. You cannot always use pictures to differentiate height differences. Maybe you are right for Merriman but Irvin is for sure 6'2.
@Jonesey: now Irvin is for sure 6'2". I stood right next to him. You cannot always use pictures to differentiate height differences. Maybe you are right for Merriman but Irvin is for sure 6'2.
Jonesey said on 19/Mar/17
You thought Michael Irvin was 6'2 when he looks no taller than 6'0 with measured athletes on his instagram.
Merriman looks 6'2 with a weak 6'2.1 morning measured Larry English. Click Here
Merriman looks 6'2 Max with 5'11 measured Nolan Carroll. Click Here
Only looks 6'0 here with 5'11 Mario. Click Here
You thought Michael Irvin was 6'2 when he looks no taller than 6'0 with measured athletes on his instagram.
Merriman looks 6'2 with a weak 6'2.1 morning measured Larry English. Click Here
Merriman looks 6'2 Max with 5'11 measured Nolan Carroll. Click Here
Only looks 6'0 here with 5'11 Mario. Click Here
Canson said on 19/Mar/17
Maybe you're right about merriman but he looked taller than that to me but I wasn't right next to him either. I myself am 6'4" and change and he didn't look that small to me
Maybe you're right about merriman but he looked taller than that to me but I wasn't right next to him either. I myself am 6'4" and change and he didn't look that small to me
Jonesey said on 18/Mar/17
Canson you have to admit Merriman physically looks no taller than 6'2 here. Click Here
Canson you have to admit Merriman physically looks no taller than 6'2 here. Click Here
Jonesey said on 18/Mar/17
Canson, Ive seen Merriman up close and he gave more of a 6'1 impression. He was measured 6'2 at his pro day.
Rudy Gay said hes 6'2 on his twitter.
Anyway he looks 6'2 with Seagal.
How tall do you think 6'5.1 Nelson Rosario is If Merriman was taller than 6'2.
Merriman looks 6'1 with him. Click Here
Canson, Ive seen Merriman up close and he gave more of a 6'1 impression. He was measured 6'2 at his pro day.
Rudy Gay said hes 6'2 on his twitter.
Anyway he looks 6'2 with Seagal.
How tall do you think 6'5.1 Nelson Rosario is If Merriman was taller than 6'2.
Merriman looks 6'1 with him. Click Here
Sandy Cowell said on 18/Mar/17
Last night I saw the beginning of a Stephen Seagal film and I thought, "Next time I see this guy on the Latest Comments page, then I really must check him out!"
That day came a whole lot sooner than expected and yes, Stephen is every bit as tall as I thought he would be; I said "He's got to be a strong 6ft4!"
I didn't catch which year the film was made and it is always helpful to do so to suss out the possible shrinkage that might have taken place since, but Steve was dragging around an unconscious man with the relative ease that most of us would experience with an awkward sack of spuds! He looked fit and huge and gets 6ft4.25 from me for his peak and 6ft3.5 for today's height.
There were other very tall men in the film but I reckon he was the tallest! The women seemed all of normal to just below normal height, so that was how I came to my assumption of a strong 6ft4!
Last night I saw the beginning of a Stephen Seagal film and I thought, "Next time I see this guy on the Latest Comments page, then I really must check him out!"
That day came a whole lot sooner than expected and yes, Stephen is every bit as tall as I thought he would be; I said "He's got to be a strong 6ft4!"
I didn't catch which year the film was made and it is always helpful to do so to suss out the possible shrinkage that might have taken place since, but Steve was dragging around an unconscious man with the relative ease that most of us would experience with an awkward sack of spuds! He looked fit and huge and gets 6ft4.25 from me for his peak and 6ft3.5 for today's height.
There were other very tall men in the film but I reckon he was the tallest! The women seemed all of normal to just below normal height, so that was how I came to my assumption of a strong 6ft4!
Canson said on 17/Mar/17
Shawn Merriman is taller than 6'2". I've seen him in public albeit not close but even from the distance of maybe 100 feet he looked taller. I'd say he's close to 6'4" if not a full 6'4"
Shawn Merriman is taller than 6'2". I've seen him in public albeit not close but even from the distance of maybe 100 feet he looked taller. I'd say he's close to 6'4" if not a full 6'4"
Canson said on 17/Mar/17
Shawn Merriman is taller than 6'2". I've seen him in public albeit not close but even from the distance of maybe 100 feet he looked taller.
Shawn Merriman is taller than 6'2". I've seen him in public albeit not close but even from the distance of maybe 100 feet he looked taller.
msn187 said on 15/Feb/17
Just watched Submerged. Occasional hilarious doubles aside, he doesn't seem much taller than 6'1" Vinnie Jones. 2 inches is pushing it, more like 3-4 cm between them.
6ft 2-2.5in (188-89 cm)
Peak height was 6ft 3-3.5in (191-92 cm)
Just watched Submerged. Occasional hilarious doubles aside, he doesn't seem much taller than 6'1" Vinnie Jones. 2 inches is pushing it, more like 3-4 cm between them.
6ft 2-2.5in (188-89 cm)
Peak height was 6ft 3-3.5in (191-92 cm)
msn187 said on 2/Feb/17
Closer to 6'3" not 6'4", cut the bull [2]
Closer to 6'3" not 6'4", cut the bull [2]
Dalfi said on 29/Dec/16
He might be in the 6ft 2in nowdays (looks 2 inches taller than Vinnie Jones)
He might be in the 6ft 2in nowdays (looks 2 inches taller than Vinnie Jones)
berta said on 17/Dec/16
he was in that liam neeson range little over 6 foot 4 peak and now 6 4 ore slightly under. actuallty looks 193 still in my eyes
he was in that liam neeson range little over 6 foot 4 peak and now 6 4 ore slightly under. actuallty looks 193 still in my eyes
steve said on 26/Oct/16
Makes no difference to me. He is a 6' plus man who is just that. He does know something about martial arts.
Makes no difference to me. He is a 6' plus man who is just that. He does know something about martial arts.
@Heightcrazyred6ft said on 8/Oct/16
Rob, how about a current height? Would like to vote for it :)
Editor Rob
Rob, how about a current height? Would like to vote for it :)
Editor Rob I think it is probably more than likely today a bit of loss, but for nothing large.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 3/Oct/16
There were a number of six-footers in Above The Law (i.e. Henry Silva, Ronny Cox, Chelcie Ross) so his height wasn't always that noticeable. Plus...
Click Here
Two guys at the end of this clip who are visibly taller than him. The one who tries to pick a fight with him and gets thumped looks at least 6ft7 range while the other guy he walks past after is maybe 6ft5-6 range.
There were a number of six-footers in Above The Law (i.e. Henry Silva, Ronny Cox, Chelcie Ross) so his height wasn't always that noticeable. Plus...
Click Here
Two guys at the end of this clip who are visibly taller than him. The one who tries to pick a fight with him and gets thumped looks at least 6ft7 range while the other guy he walks past after is maybe 6ft5-6 range.
Morningheight 182cm said on 3/Oct/16
Never mind those 2000's movies people go back when this man was younger like in Above the Law he could have maxed out at 6'4.5 then. Remember once you hit certain age you'll be losing some height.
Never mind those 2000's movies people go back when this man was younger like in Above the Law he could have maxed out at 6'4.5 then. Remember once you hit certain age you'll be losing some height.
Aza said on 27/Sep/16
Apologies... Axa post is from me.... Eyesight is becoming poor, I stand by the 6'3 claim as he seems to wear boots all the time and weight and age must be taking some toll on his height . Would say his peak was 6'4.
Apologies... Axa post is from me.... Eyesight is becoming poor, I stand by the 6'3 claim as he seems to wear boots all the time and weight and age must be taking some toll on his height . Would say his peak was 6'4.
Arch Stanton said on 27/Sep/16
He was only in one 80s film as a star though ;-)
He was only in one 80s film as a star though ;-)
Axa said on 26/Sep/16
Do not think he was ever 6'5. 6'4 peak and 6'3 today .
Do not think he was ever 6'5. 6'4 peak and 6'3 today .
James B said on 26/Sep/16
Arch- with his boots and slim frame in his 80s films I am sure he could pull of near 6'5.
Arch- with his boots and slim frame in his 80s films I am sure he could pull of near 6'5.
Arch Stanton said on 26/Sep/16
Nah he was never a legit 6'5, check out Ext Wounds with 6'4.5 Bill Duke and 6'6 Matthew G Taylor. If anything he lokoed 6 ft 3 range in that film! 194 peak is the most I could buy. He used to wear big ass boots a lot which made him a bit taller.
Nah he was never a legit 6'5, check out Ext Wounds with 6'4.5 Bill Duke and 6'6 Matthew G Taylor. If anything he lokoed 6 ft 3 range in that film! 194 peak is the most I could buy. He used to wear big ass boots a lot which made him a bit taller.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 21/Sep/16
Peak: 193-194cm
Today: 192-193cm
Peak: 193-194cm
Today: 192-193cm
Shredder said on 20/Sep/16
He was6 ft 5 peak and still 6 '4 and change now
He was6 ft 5 peak and still 6 '4 and change now
travis said on 19/Sep/16
he still 6'4 good
he still 6'4 good
Canson said on 11/Sep/16
@Dmeyer: looks like 2 to me maybe even just 1/2". Barkley 6'4 1/2 would make Seagal 192+.
@Dmeyer: looks like 2 to me maybe even just 1/2". Barkley 6'4 1/2 would make Seagal 192+.
Dmeyer said on 10/Sep/16
Looks à good 3,5-4cm under 194cm barkley so solid 6 ft 3,25in no more
Looks à good 3,5-4cm under 194cm barkley so solid 6 ft 3,25in no more
123 said on 9/Sep/16
he was never a legit 6'4" he used to stand at 6'3"-6'3.75" nowerdays he is still hanging on to the very tall range still but just barely 6'36'3.25" neesan was 6'4" legit though in that picture he was dropping height though
he was never a legit 6'4" he used to stand at 6'3"-6'3.75" nowerdays he is still hanging on to the very tall range still but just barely 6'36'3.25" neesan was 6'4" legit though in that picture he was dropping height though
Canson said on 5/Sep/16
@Arch: I agree. I can't see footwear but he looks almost (within 1/2" of Barkley) who is about 6'4 1/2. Barkley too wears higher footwear at times so could be a wash. I'd say Seagal may be 6'4 still
Click Here
@Arch: I agree. I can't see footwear but he looks almost (within 1/2" of Barkley) who is about 6'4 1/2. Barkley too wears higher footwear at times so could be a wash. I'd say Seagal may be 6'4 still
Click Here
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 20/Jul/16
Neeson would look taller than Seagal if he had the same posture in that photo. It'd be interesting to measure Neeson, Seagal, Hasselhoff and Goldblum in their prime and today. They're just a few months apart in age (all born in 1952) and looked indistinguishable height-wise peak (6ft4-4½). I find it hard imagine Liam losing height when he's in considerably better shape (but poor posture usually) than Steven who with all his weight problems hasn't been given a peak height (he can look just 6ft3 now). The other two guys look like they've lost hardly anything. Both separately looked over 1in taller than Dwayne Johnson (6ft2½-3), Hasselhoff in photos for the upcoming Baywatch movie on the beach where they're both barefoot and Goldblum on The Graham Norton Show. Goldblum also edges out Liam Hemsworth (6ft3-3½) in most photos.
Rob, what do you think?
Editor Rob
Neeson would look taller than Seagal if he had the same posture in that photo. It'd be interesting to measure Neeson, Seagal, Hasselhoff and Goldblum in their prime and today. They're just a few months apart in age (all born in 1952) and looked indistinguishable height-wise peak (6ft4-4½). I find it hard imagine Liam losing height when he's in considerably better shape (but poor posture usually) than Steven who with all his weight problems hasn't been given a peak height (he can look just 6ft3 now). The other two guys look like they've lost hardly anything. Both separately looked over 1in taller than Dwayne Johnson (6ft2½-3), Hasselhoff in photos for the upcoming Baywatch movie on the beach where they're both barefoot and Goldblum on The Graham Norton Show. Goldblum also edges out Liam Hemsworth (6ft3-3½) in most photos.
Rob, what do you think?
Editor Rob they all potentially were a little bit over 6ft 4
Shredder said on 15/Jul/16
I'm with Danimal , 6'5 ish peak , , he still looks at least 6'5 now when he wears Cowboy boots , He was at least 4 inches taller than my 6'1 cousin that took a photo with him.
I'm with Danimal , 6'5 ish peak , , he still looks at least 6'5 now when he wears Cowboy boots , He was at least 4 inches taller than my 6'1 cousin that took a photo with him.
James B said on 13/Jul/16
That's a bad pic danimal
Liam is seriously slouching
That's a bad pic danimal
Liam is seriously slouching
Danimal (176-178cm) said on 12/Jul/16
Looking close to if not a full 6'5" next to 6'4"+ Liam Neeson 20 years ago: Click Here
Looking close to if not a full 6'5" next to 6'4"+ Liam Neeson 20 years ago: Click Here
James B said on 10/Jul/16
6'5 in the morning at his peak yes but not by afternoon.
6'5 in the morning at his peak yes but not by afternoon.
Canson said on 9/Jul/16
@Arch: he looks 6'4 I agree. It's tricky with him because of his choices in footwear
@Arch: he looks 6'4 I agree. It's tricky with him because of his choices in footwear
Shredder said on 7/Jul/16
6'5 peak. He was a tall guy.
6'5 peak. He was a tall guy.
James B said on 4/Jul/16
Arch- today he might measure a fraction shy of 6ft4 at nigh time maybe?
Arch- today he might measure a fraction shy of 6ft4 at nigh time maybe?
Arch Stanton said on 2/Jul/16
@Canson Just a few years back there was a video of Seagal and Anderson Silva barefoot on the mat training and Seagal looked roughly 2.5 inches taller. By Rob's estimates and my own with others Silva is around 6'1.5, which puts Seagal still at 6'4. I don't think he's lost much at all. With some 199cm politican a year or two ago he was also still looking about that.
@Canson Just a few years back there was a video of Seagal and Anderson Silva barefoot on the mat training and Seagal looked roughly 2.5 inches taller. By Rob's estimates and my own with others Silva is around 6'1.5, which puts Seagal still at 6'4. I don't think he's lost much at all. With some 199cm politican a year or two ago he was also still looking about that.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 1/Jul/16
Neeson's lost a little bit maybe but Lundgren can look barely 6ft2 at times today which is shocking for a guy whose not even 60 and who once stood a strong 6ft4.
Editor Rob
Neeson's lost a little bit maybe but Lundgren can look barely 6ft2 at times today which is shocking for a guy whose not even 60 and who once stood a strong 6ft4.
Editor Rob physically demanding film roles may have contributed to excessive wear & tear...
Canson said on 1/Jul/16
@Arch: maybe for his prime and he may have just lost height over the years. You may be right! With seagal it was tricky because he always wore boots. I actually just watched one of my favorites (Above the Law) and also under siege and he has higher shoes on both but above the law he looks 6'4 I'll give you that. He's very tall in the movie!
@Arch: maybe for his prime and he may have just lost height over the years. You may be right! With seagal it was tricky because he always wore boots. I actually just watched one of my favorites (Above the Law) and also under siege and he has higher shoes on both but above the law he looks 6'4 I'll give you that. He's very tall in the movie!
James B said on 1/Jul/16
Arch- speaking of goldblum me and my brother were amazed how tall he looked with heeled shoes when viewing the early parts of jurrasick park the lost world.
How tall do you think those shoes boosted him to?
Arch- speaking of goldblum me and my brother were amazed how tall he looked with heeled shoes when viewing the early parts of jurrasick park the lost world.
How tall do you think those shoes boosted him to?
Arch Stanton said on 1/Jul/16
I mean peak of course, Neeson and Lundgren in particular have lost height now!
I mean peak of course, Neeson and Lundgren in particular have lost height now!
Arch Stanton said on 1/Jul/16
C'mon Canson,if there's one guy out of the 6'4 listed ones who never looked under 6'4 it was Seagal. He's one of the best examples of a proper 6'4 and how big that can look. He could really look a proper 6'5 in Out for Justice. I think Goldblum, Seagal, Neeson, Lundgren and Hasselhoff are all great examples of legit 6'4 guys, you could probably argue 6'4.5 at times for any of them in fact.
C'mon Canson,if there's one guy out of the 6'4 listed ones who never looked under 6'4 it was Seagal. He's one of the best examples of a proper 6'4 and how big that can look. He could really look a proper 6'5 in Out for Justice. I think Goldblum, Seagal, Neeson, Lundgren and Hasselhoff are all great examples of legit 6'4 guys, you could probably argue 6'4.5 at times for any of them in fact.
Shredder said on 1/Jul/16
I am not going to sit here and say that guy is 6 ft 3 , but Steven looks 6'6 there , most likely in cowboy boots and He also looked about 6'6 ( in cowboy boots ) next to my cousin who is 6'1. I have always believed Steven was 6'5 " barefoot in his prime.
I am not going to sit here and say that guy is 6 ft 3 , but Steven looks 6'6 there , most likely in cowboy boots and He also looked about 6'6 ( in cowboy boots ) next to my cousin who is 6'1. I have always believed Steven was 6'5 " barefoot in his prime.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 30/Jun/16
Rob, how tall would say that '6ft3' guy w/h Seagal really is?
I see less than 6ft1 in that photo!
Editor Rob
Rob, how tall would say that '6ft3' guy w/h Seagal really is?
I see less than 6ft1 in that photo!
Editor RobCanson said on 30/Jun/16
@Ice: I agree with Height that he isn't a legit 6'4. He has typical long limbs but has prob been 6'3 for quite some time. No way this guy is 6'5 in shoes. That is why you think 6'2 is short because so many 6'0 guys most likely claim it
@Ice: I agree with Height that he isn't a legit 6'4. He has typical long limbs but has prob been 6'3 for quite some time. No way this guy is 6'5 in shoes. That is why you think 6'2 is short because so many 6'0 guys most likely claim it
Ice said on 29/Jun/16
I would have bought 6'4" - 6'5" in his popular films .
I would have bought 6'4" - 6'5" in his popular films .
Jeff said on 25/Jun/16
Looks like a strong 6'4 in every movie he's appeared in
Looks like a strong 6'4 in every movie he's appeared in
James B said on 10/Jun/16
That guy is no 6'3
That guy is no 6'3
Johan said on 8/Jun/16
Editor Rob said on 6/Jun/16
This guy with Seagal claims 6ft 3:
Click Here
Typical 6'1" range guy claiming 6'3" . He must have thought Seagal was 6'6".
Editor Rob said on 6/Jun/16
This guy with Seagal claims 6ft 3:
Click Here
Typical 6'1" range guy claiming 6'3" . He must have thought Seagal was 6'6".
Andrea said on 7/Jun/16
Lol, this guy sure is 6'3...
Lol, this guy sure is 6'3...
miko said on 6/Jun/16
He's likely not lost much height and/or was a hair about 6'4 in his prime.
He's likely not lost much height and/or was a hair about 6'4 in his prime.
James B said on 24/May/16
The difference between seagal and Robbins would have only been slight
The difference between seagal and Robbins would have only been slight
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 24/May/16
@James B: I'm just saying he could look that range a lot in his older films. Probably was always a legit 6ft4 or maybe a fraction over. Not convinced he'd be that close to Tim Robbins at peak
@James B: I'm just saying he could look that range a lot in his older films. Probably was always a legit 6ft4 or maybe a fraction over. Not convinced he'd be that close to Tim Robbins at peak
James B said on 22/May/16
Rampage I don't think seagal was over 6'4.25 peak
Rampage I don't think seagal was over 6'4.25 peak
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 9/May/16
Consistently looked 6ft4½ range in the 90's...
Consistently looked 6ft4½ range in the 90's...
James B said on 8/Apr/16
Closer to 6'5 than 6'2
Closer to 6'5 than 6'2
Ice said on 24/Mar/16
@height barefoot 6'2 ? Youre beeing absoluteley ridicilous .
@height barefoot 6'2 ? Youre beeing absoluteley ridicilous .
Ice said on 24/Mar/16
He always had that imposing height in his movies . Legit 6'4" douring day time .
He always had that imposing height in his movies . Legit 6'4" douring day time .
berta said on 29/Feb/16
still around 193 and was probably strong 94 when he was young
still around 193 and was probably strong 94 when he was young
James B said on 17/Feb/16
6'3.75 I'd guess for seagal today
6'3.75 I'd guess for seagal today
Strale_195cm said on 12/Feb/16
Here is some more pictures which show that this guy is 199 cm..
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
So...don't doubt in height of this guy.. :D
Here is some more pictures which show that this guy is 199 cm..
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
So...don't doubt in height of this guy.. :D
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 10/Feb/16
James, don't jump to opinions. That guy might indeed be 6ft6 range.
James, don't jump to opinions. That guy might indeed be 6ft6 range.
Strale_195cm said on 9/Feb/16
@James B
He is a legit 199 cm...and I thought he was taller once I saw him in live...but later i had read that he is 199 cm...No doubt about his height, and Seagal is probably height he is listed...
@James B
He is a legit 199 cm...and I thought he was taller once I saw him in live...but later i had read that he is 199 cm...No doubt about his height, and Seagal is probably height he is listed...
James B said on 7/Feb/16
That guy probably is not 6'6 1/2
That guy probably is not 6'6 1/2
Strale_195cm said on 7/Feb/16
@Rampage(-_-_-)Clover
Yeah, he is the tallest politician in Serbia. And I stood near him, when he was once in my city...he is really that hegiht, as he said
Seagal looks 193-4 with him.
@Rampage(-_-_-)Clover
Yeah, he is the tallest politician in Serbia. And I stood near him, when he was once in my city...he is really that hegiht, as he said
Seagal looks 193-4 with him.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 3/Feb/16
Strale_195cm said on 31/Jan/16
Seagal was in Serbia..and here is photo with Premier of Serbia
He is 199 cm
Click Here
Is that guy really 6ft6½ though? If that is the case, Seagal looks near 6ft5 there
Strale_195cm said on 31/Jan/16
Seagal was in Serbia..and here is photo with Premier of Serbia
He is 199 cm
Click Here
Is that guy really 6ft6½ though? If that is the case, Seagal looks near 6ft5 there
John said on 1/Feb/16
Seagal hasn't lost any height at all. Surprised considering the fact that he's well over 60 and has been performing physical stunts in movies for decades. Was a solid 6' 4" back then, is still a solid 6' 4" today.
Seagal hasn't lost any height at all. Surprised considering the fact that he's well over 60 and has been performing physical stunts in movies for decades. Was a solid 6' 4" back then, is still a solid 6' 4" today.
Strale_195cm said on 31/Jan/16
Seagal was in Serbia..and here is photo with Premier of Serbia
He is 199 cm
Click Here
Seagal was in Serbia..and here is photo with Premier of Serbia
He is 199 cm
Click Here
Nigel said on 23/Dec/15
dmeyer, there's a link to a photo on the Arnie celebheights page of the same group of people at the same time, and Seagal looks noticeably taller
dmeyer, there's a link to a photo on the Arnie celebheights page of the same group of people at the same time, and Seagal looks noticeably taller
James B said on 24/Nov/15
To me he looked a more believable 6'4 than clint Eastwood
To me he looked a more believable 6'4 than clint Eastwood
Height said on 24/Nov/15
With cowboy boots yes 6'4" barefoot 6'2".
With cowboy boots yes 6'4" barefoot 6'2".
Andrew said on 21/Nov/15
I met steven , I'm 6'7" hes easy 6'"5
I met steven , I'm 6'7" hes easy 6'"5
Vince said on 3/Nov/15
Closer to 6'3" not 6'4" Steve, cut the bull
Closer to 6'3" not 6'4" Steve, cut the bull
Ice said on 20/Sep/15
@ Sonny Black Aikido is a highly effective martial art , as specially for fighting on the street . A 7th Dan master of ANY martial art will be able to destroy nearly anyone on the street . Try punching a 7th Dan Aikido master and your arm will be snapped before you can even registre it completeley
@ Sonny Black Aikido is a highly effective martial art , as specially for fighting on the street . A 7th Dan master of ANY martial art will be able to destroy nearly anyone on the street . Try punching a 7th Dan Aikido master and your arm will be snapped before you can even registre it completeley
Alucard said on 13/Sep/15
You have to make a clear distinction between fighters and martial artists... Majority of those you see in movies, like Bruce Lee, Jackie Chan, Jet Li, JCVD, Tony Jaa, and many others, are martial artists, actors, performers, stuntmen, not fighters... Seagal is the same, he has size and could maybe beat average joes on the streets or in a bar, but not someone who's trained in legit effective arts, like boxing, BJJ, and MMA in general... Things like Aikido or Wing Chun, for example, are not exactly applicable in real life against a resisting opponent...
You have to make a clear distinction between fighters and martial artists... Majority of those you see in movies, like Bruce Lee, Jackie Chan, Jet Li, JCVD, Tony Jaa, and many others, are martial artists, actors, performers, stuntmen, not fighters... Seagal is the same, he has size and could maybe beat average joes on the streets or in a bar, but not someone who's trained in legit effective arts, like boxing, BJJ, and MMA in general... Things like Aikido or Wing Chun, for example, are not exactly applicable in real life against a resisting opponent...
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 19/Aug/15
@James B: the average bloke in the pub, absolutely.
But he's not indestructible.
@James B: the average bloke in the pub, absolutely.
But he's not indestructible.
James B said on 18/Aug/15
Seagal in real life could beat the average man who does not do martial arts/or others forms of fighting like boxing easily in a fight. But he ain't as good as he is in his movies put it that way.
I think his height as well is a big advantage over most men.
Seagal in real life could beat the average man who does not do martial arts/or others forms of fighting like boxing easily in a fight. But he ain't as good as he is in his movies put it that way.
I think his height as well is a big advantage over most men.
Alucard said on 10/Aug/15
Something strange going on, watch him "training" on the mat with Lyoto Machida, who's billed at 6'1, both barefoot, Seagal looks a bit taller, doesn't seems close to 6'4 at all...
Something strange going on, watch him "training" on the mat with Lyoto Machida, who's billed at 6'1, both barefoot, Seagal looks a bit taller, doesn't seems close to 6'4 at all...
Jason said on 10/Aug/15
To Sonny Black: All this talk about a guy backing down from another guy just reeks of immaturity. It's like the kid in school who brags about his 'tough guy' dad being able to beat up all the other neighborhood dads. All that braggadocio....Seagal likely could 'whip' most people on this forum in a fight (even at his age). And even if he did back down from some guys in the past -- so what? Does a guy have to be able to beat everybody or fight everybody to prove himself something special? News Flash: Guys are only human. Nobody is Superman or Godzilla -- we ALL have weaknesses. But for some guys that is hard to admit.
To Sonny Black: All this talk about a guy backing down from another guy just reeks of immaturity. It's like the kid in school who brags about his 'tough guy' dad being able to beat up all the other neighborhood dads. All that braggadocio....Seagal likely could 'whip' most people on this forum in a fight (even at his age). And even if he did back down from some guys in the past -- so what? Does a guy have to be able to beat everybody or fight everybody to prove himself something special? News Flash: Guys are only human. Nobody is Superman or Godzilla -- we ALL have weaknesses. But for some guys that is hard to admit.
DJ said on 2/Aug/15
Just leave him alone
He is a legend
Back off
Just leave him alone
He is a legend
Back off
hijopotamus said on 10/Jul/15
Sonny Black, sorry but you don't have a clue about Aikido. Some schools use boxing gloves and helmets when "trying" free combat.
Sonny Black, sorry but you don't have a clue about Aikido. Some schools use boxing gloves and helmets when "trying" free combat.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 2/Jul/15
He towered over everyone in Out For Justice
He towered over everyone in Out For Justice
James B said on 29/Jun/15
Rob I did mention this before but I emailed scott l Schwartz who said to me by email that Seagal wore cow boots in the scenes they shared
Here is a link to his email Click Here
Perhaps it might be worth you emailing him and asking questions about how tall Seagal looked to him in 1997?
Rob I did mention this before but I emailed scott l Schwartz who said to me by email that Seagal wore cow boots in the scenes they shared
Here is a link to his email Click Here
Perhaps it might be worth you emailing him and asking questions about how tall Seagal looked to him in 1997?
James B said on 2/Jun/15
There was a story from 99 where Seagal was manhandled by a wrestler
There was a story from 99 where Seagal was manhandled by a wrestler
Sonny Black said on 31/May/15
Ice & Rob No offense but if you understood martial arts & combat sports in general you'd realize that the art of Akido, which Seagal is a master in, is a "demonstration only" martial art more akin to dancing than real fighting. Seagal has no real recorded fight history and has even backed down from real fights in the past, as recounted by people who know him & have worked with him. As for his height I guess I believe 6'4, but I've also heard that he wears lifts or big boots, and to be honest given this guys huge ego, I wouldn't put it past him despite his already tall stature.
Editor Rob
Ice & Rob No offense but if you understood martial arts & combat sports in general you'd realize that the art of Akido, which Seagal is a master in, is a "demonstration only" martial art more akin to dancing than real fighting. Seagal has no real recorded fight history and has even backed down from real fights in the past, as recounted by people who know him & have worked with him. As for his height I guess I believe 6'4, but I've also heard that he wears lifts or big boots, and to be honest given this guys huge ego, I wouldn't put it past him despite his already tall stature.
Editor Rob I do have a bit of Martial Arts knowledge ;) And I wouldn't want to be hit by even a half hearted Seagal punch!
Arch Stanton said on 6/May/15
I've been catching up with some of the dodgier direct to video films of late LOL.
I've been catching up with some of the dodgier direct to video films of late LOL.
Ice said on 2/May/15
A 7th Dan Master in Aikido , he would batter 99% of the guys on the street with ease .
Editor Rob
A 7th Dan Master in Aikido , he would batter 99% of the guys on the street with ease .
Editor Rob you don't want to get punched by a guy who knows what they are doing like Seagal!
James B said on 1/May/15
Rampage 194cm is possible in the 80s/90s.
In out for justice when he dressed in all black and was still fairly on the slim side he could pull of looking around 6'5.
10 years later in exit wounds looked 6'3 though.
Rampage 194cm is possible in the 80s/90s.
In out for justice when he dressed in all black and was still fairly on the slim side he could pull of looking around 6'5.
10 years later in exit wounds looked 6'3 though.
Dmeyer said on 21/Apr/15
A Guy this âge with all that weight and height should have droped 1 inch
A Guy this âge with all that weight and height should have droped 1 inch
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 10/Apr/15
Like Neeson, Goldblum and Hasselhoff, Seagal looked close to 6ft5 in the 80's and 90's.
The four of them are close in age (all born in 1952) and have probably lost a bit
Like Neeson, Goldblum and Hasselhoff, Seagal looked close to 6ft5 in the 80's and 90's.
The four of them are close in age (all born in 1952) and have probably lost a bit
cobra said on 27/Mar/15
He doesn't look this height in his older films, he looks a couple of inches shorter.
He doesn't look this height in his older films, he looks a couple of inches shorter.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 13/Mar/15
Not sure if he'd be just 6ft3...
Not sure if he'd be just 6ft3...
James B said on 12/Mar/15
Rob might you give seagal current height 6'3 (191cm) and peak 6'4.25 (194cm)?
Editor Rob
Rob might you give seagal current height 6'3 (191cm) and peak 6'4.25 (194cm)?
Editor Rob I might if I can have a look at some recent videos of him.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 11/Mar/15
He can still pull off 6ft4 now. I think it's more a case of him being a bit over that mark in his prime. Dude's far from healthy and his weight gain has possibly led to a slight dip. I call BS on the 275lbs. He'd look more like Steve Austin at that weight. We're looking at 300lbs or more
He can still pull off 6ft4 now. I think it's more a case of him being a bit over that mark in his prime. Dude's far from healthy and his weight gain has possibly led to a slight dip. I call BS on the 275lbs. He'd look more like Steve Austin at that weight. We're looking at 300lbs or more
HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 6/Mar/15
After Robs hint at Stone Cold Steve Austin site, I looked a bit up, still doing but I think it´s save to say he lost a bit and is somewhere between 6´3"-6´3.5" today...
After Robs hint at Stone Cold Steve Austin site, I looked a bit up, still doing but I think it´s save to say he lost a bit and is somewhere between 6´3"-6´3.5" today...
184.3cm said on 6/Mar/15
Actually i thought that Glimmer Man was ok. There was a fair bit of humour in that movie. "You speak Russian?" (Proceeds to slam guy's head off car) "You speak good russian!".
Under Siege and Hard To Kill were his best though imo.
"Noone beats me in the kitchen" and " Hey private get my pies out the oven".
Actually i thought that Glimmer Man was ok. There was a fair bit of humour in that movie. "You speak Russian?" (Proceeds to slam guy's head off car) "You speak good russian!".
Under Siege and Hard To Kill were his best though imo.
"Noone beats me in the kitchen" and " Hey private get my pies out the oven".
GP said on 5/Mar/15
LOL, that's funny Arch. He never felt humiliated when beating........ That's why people in Hollywood don't put him in movies. It's sad because he used to have potential 20 years ago, lol!
Editor Rob
LOL, that's funny Arch. He never felt humiliated when beating........ That's why people in Hollywood don't put him in movies. It's sad because he used to have potential 20 years ago, lol!
Editor Rob you have to be careful sometimes with accusations, just a reminder!
Arch Stanton said on 4/Mar/15
He is definitely a mass of contradictions. I recently read Seagal "recently helped Russia's government relaunch a nationwide fitness programme ". You'd think he'd be superfit to have done that and look at him. 20 stone of lard LOL. How can you promote national fitness for the world's largest country like that and not feel a little humiliated in doing so!
He is definitely a mass of contradictions. I recently read Seagal "recently helped Russia's government relaunch a nationwide fitness programme ". You'd think he'd be superfit to have done that and look at him. 20 stone of lard LOL. How can you promote national fitness for the world's largest country like that and not feel a little humiliated in doing so!
James B said on 31/Dec/14
Steven Seagal fit guy? Maybe in the 80s but he weighs near 20 stone today
Editor Rob
Steven Seagal fit guy? Maybe in the 80s but he weighs near 20 stone today
Editor Rob I mean he could still batter most guys, but the Seagal of today needs enemies to run up to him so he can knock them down.
sixfooter said on 28/Dec/14
@Arch Stanton how bout this quote 'I missed maybe because I'm a bad shot or because I just want you to meet Tyrone' lol something like that
@Arch Stanton how bout this quote 'I missed maybe because I'm a bad shot or because I just want you to meet Tyrone' lol something like that
bud said on 13/Dec/14
rob his eyelevel is 12cm?
And he is 62 why he didint lost height?
Editor Rob
rob his eyelevel is 12cm?
And he is 62 why he didint lost height?
Editor Rob it's possibly close to 12cm, I think there is a chance he's lost some...he's still a fit guy and as he aged he didn't go mad with stunts, enemies seemed to come up to him and he'd be more static and repel them. His body might not have taken a battering like a guy like chan's, who in 50's was still doing action acting that guys half his age would struggle with.
Arch Stanton said on 3/Dec/14
Haha Rob, Seagal and Alison King were actually in a movie together in Submerged. I knew the film rang a bell! She was quite bad ass in it with a gun and arm wrestling and stuff. Not great. The worst Seagal movie I've seen I think is the one where he's an archaeologist in deepest Mongolia or something in Out for a Kill I think it was. With a name like Out for a Kill it's a sorry excuse for a movie. It should be classic Seagal with a name like that!!
Haha Rob, Seagal and Alison King were actually in a movie together in Submerged. I knew the film rang a bell! She was quite bad ass in it with a gun and arm wrestling and stuff. Not great. The worst Seagal movie I've seen I think is the one where he's an archaeologist in deepest Mongolia or something in Out for a Kill I think it was. With a name like Out for a Kill it's a sorry excuse for a movie. It should be classic Seagal with a name like that!!
Arch Stanton said on 28/Nov/14
There's a good one in On Deadly Ground when he has a fight with Mike Starr who pukes up and Seagal says something like "Urgh. Is that Halibut?". Hehe.
There's a good one in On Deadly Ground when he has a fight with Mike Starr who pukes up and Seagal says something like "Urgh. Is that Halibut?". Hehe.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 9/Nov/14
Aged 50 Danimal?
Aged 50 Danimal?
Danimal said on 6/Nov/14
Met him at my dojo in 2002. Was close to if not a full 6'5" then.
Met him at my dojo in 2002. Was close to if not a full 6'5" then.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 6/Nov/14
There's no stuff of him pre-1988 other than a couple of pictures of him in some dojo in Japan training students. Nothing major to go by
There's no stuff of him pre-1988 other than a couple of pictures of him in some dojo in Japan training students. Nothing major to go by
Arch Stanton said on 6/Nov/14
He did actually look 6'5" ish in Ticker if Peter Greene is really 189.
He did actually look 6'5" ish in Ticker if Peter Greene is really 189.
Nico said on 4/Nov/14
Rost 194-195 cm
Rost 194-195 cm
Mike G said on 31/Oct/14
He was built like a basketball player back in the 80s with long limbs. He looked deceptively big. By himself he looked skinny, probably still weighing 220 or more but being as tall as he was, you could tell the difference when near other people now he's easily 300.
He was built like a basketball player back in the 80s with long limbs. He looked deceptively big. By himself he looked skinny, probably still weighing 220 or more but being as tall as he was, you could tell the difference when near other people now he's easily 300.
James B said on 11/Oct/14
Dunno Arch MMA have brock lesner at 6'3
Dunno Arch MMA have brock lesner at 6'3
Arch Stanton said on 6/Oct/14
Not sure, but MMA listings are usually quite accurate I think as they're mostly barefoot all the time anyway.
Not sure, but MMA listings are usually quite accurate I think as they're mostly barefoot all the time anyway.
Heights are barefeet estimates, derived from quotations, official websites, agency resumes, in person encounters with actors at conventions and pictures/films.
Other vital statistics like weight or shoe size measurements have been sourced from newspapers, books, resumes or social media.
Celebrity Fan Photos and Agency Pictures of stars are © to their respective owners.