Add a Comment3367 comments
Average Guess (491 Votes)
6ft 7.36in (201.6cm)
6ft 7.36in (201.6cm)
Pierre said on 12/Jun/20
@tall in the saddle= because you probably know exactly the exact help of each type of this shoes lol.It's very possible one of this shoe give a fraction more than the other!But not very important in fact because this comparisons with low camera and generous distance between both men don't show the real height of 6"6' Tyson...
@Mickie= Is Tyson tiptoeing next to Jason in your pic ?hum probably a little bit in this posture =What's going on here?Jason shrunk a lot but... = Click Here .
@tall in the saddle= because you probably know exactly the exact help of each type of this shoes lol.It's very possible one of this shoe give a fraction more than the other!But not very important in fact because this comparisons with low camera and generous distance between both men don't show the real height of 6"6' Tyson...
@Mickie= Is Tyson tiptoeing next to Jason in your pic ?hum probably a little bit in this posture =What's going on here?Jason shrunk a lot but... = Click Here .
Mickie said on 12/Jun/20
Momoa had bigger shoes than Tyson. When Tyson stands tall, 6'7"+ legitimately: Click Here
Momoa had bigger shoes than Tyson. When Tyson stands tall, 6'7"+ legitimately: Click Here
Thatch said on 12/Jun/20
This listing is fair but it’s also the highest it could be, from realistic angles he only edges out Wilder by an inch. His claims of 6’9 are absurd, Standing barefoot with a legit 6’9 man would expose Fury’s claims
This listing is fair but it’s also the highest it could be, from realistic angles he only edges out Wilder by an inch. His claims of 6’9 are absurd, Standing barefoot with a legit 6’9 man would expose Fury’s claims
Tall In The Saddle said on 12/Jun/20
@Pierre
When have you ever heard ANY boxing commentator refer to height difference during a bout and then WONDER if the taller man is possibly advantaged by a thicker sole? The answer is NEVER because they know there is no effective difference between soles. Here's a couple of pics with both men's boots in reasonable view, there is NO difference.Click Here Click Here
Now I guess you'll be pumping for a "secret" inner sole. LOL.
@Pierre
When have you ever heard ANY boxing commentator refer to height difference during a bout and then WONDER if the taller man is possibly advantaged by a thicker sole? The answer is NEVER because they know there is no effective difference between soles. Here's a couple of pics with both men's boots in reasonable view, there is NO difference.Click Here Click Here
Now I guess you'll be pumping for a "secret" inner sole. LOL.
Pierre said on 12/Jun/20
atto said on 11/Jun/20
pictured next to a uk door frame: Click Here . being the same height as the inner frame would make a person 6'5.5 without shoes.
@atto =Take in consideration Tyson stand a lot closer to the camera than the inner frame that give him logically a good advantage.
atto said on 11/Jun/20
pictured next to a uk door frame: Click Here . being the same height as the inner frame would make a person 6'5.5 without shoes.
@atto =Take in consideration Tyson stand a lot closer to the camera than the inner frame that give him logically a good advantage.
Canson said on 12/Jun/20
Duhon said on 10/Jun/20
Fury has agreed to fight Anthony Joshua will be interesting to see how they compare up. The general public would expect to see 3" between the two based on their listings.
Well said Duhon
Duhon said on 10/Jun/20
Fury has agreed to fight Anthony Joshua will be interesting to see how they compare up. The general public would expect to see 3" between the two based on their listings.
Well said Duhon
Reece said on 11/Jun/20
@Mickie
I think Fury is taller than 201 but i see why people think at times.
@Mickie
I think Fury is taller than 201 but i see why people think at times.
Reece said on 11/Jun/20
@ Canson
Wilder looks more than 6 foot 6 flat next to Vitali. He is barely below Vitali. Rob listing is good for me. Price is reasonably at least the 6 foot 8 even Rob said a little over is possible.
@ Canson
Wilder looks more than 6 foot 6 flat next to Vitali. He is barely below Vitali. Rob listing is good for me. Price is reasonably at least the 6 foot 8 even Rob said a little over is possible.
Pierre said on 11/Jun/20
Tyson Fury barefoot wearing cap / Vince Vaughn at around 0:04 /0:05 Tyson a lot closer to the camera both guys in around same postures Click Here
Click Here Stephen Merchant 6"7' wearing flat sneakers ,no cap, and sleeping on Vince,very bad posture both guys around same distance to camera Click Here
Tyson never close to 6"7' again
Tyson Fury barefoot wearing cap / Vince Vaughn at around 0:04 /0:05 Tyson a lot closer to the camera both guys in around same postures Click Here
Click Here Stephen Merchant 6"7' wearing flat sneakers ,no cap, and sleeping on Vince,very bad posture both guys around same distance to camera Click Here
Tyson never close to 6"7' again
Pierre said on 11/Jun/20
I have show here in old comments by comparisons with AJ next to others Tyson was 6"6' not 6"7'
I have show here in old comments by comparisons with AJ next to others Tyson was 6"6' not 6"7'
Pierre said on 11/Jun/20
all In The Saddle said on 11/Jun/20
@Pierre
Heels/soles of boxing shoes worn in competition are, required by DEFAULT, to be exactly the same for obvious reasons. It's your own supposition, not anyone else's, to suggest otherwise. Your supposition is obviously incorrect and seems to present as another disingenuous attempt to deny the clearly seen height advantage Fury held in the ring.
Lol where have you seen the soles of boxing shoes must have exactly the same thikness ? No mention in rules = just this shoes must not have a heel,no mention about the thikness of the sole. Lol my pics are not the pics that have a strange low angle plus both men very distant one to the other one so possibility of good advantage if the pic is just a fraction inclined ...without even talking about the different postures....
all In The Saddle said on 11/Jun/20
@Pierre
Heels/soles of boxing shoes worn in competition are, required by DEFAULT, to be exactly the same for obvious reasons. It's your own supposition, not anyone else's, to suggest otherwise. Your supposition is obviously incorrect and seems to present as another disingenuous attempt to deny the clearly seen height advantage Fury held in the ring.
Lol where have you seen the soles of boxing shoes must have exactly the same thikness ? No mention in rules = just this shoes must not have a heel,no mention about the thikness of the sole. Lol my pics are not the pics that have a strange low angle plus both men very distant one to the other one so possibility of good advantage if the pic is just a fraction inclined ...without even talking about the different postures....
Mickie said on 11/Jun/20
Yeah Fury vs AJ is billed as a 3" difference. My expectation is something like 4 - 4.5 cm. When Fury slouches the difference won't look big.
Yeah Fury vs AJ is billed as a 3" difference. My expectation is something like 4 - 4.5 cm. When Fury slouches the difference won't look big.
Tall In The Saddle said on 11/Jun/20
@Pierre
Heels/soles of boxing shoes worn in competition are, required by DEFAULT, to be exactly the same for obvious reasons. It's your own supposition, not anyone else's, to suggest otherwise. Your supposition is obviously incorrect and seems to present as another disingenuous attempt to deny the clearly seen height advantage Fury held in the ring.
@Mikie
Nice vision supplied Click Here. Just as I see it, the advantage Fury holds in the linked video appears pretty much on par with the advantage he held in the ring so I would guess their footwear is near enough to equal, just as it was in the ring.
@Pierre
Heels/soles of boxing shoes worn in competition are, required by DEFAULT, to be exactly the same for obvious reasons. It's your own supposition, not anyone else's, to suggest otherwise. Your supposition is obviously incorrect and seems to present as another disingenuous attempt to deny the clearly seen height advantage Fury held in the ring.
@Mikie
Nice vision supplied Click Here. Just as I see it, the advantage Fury holds in the linked video appears pretty much on par with the advantage he held in the ring so I would guess their footwear is near enough to equal, just as it was in the ring.
atto said on 11/Jun/20
pictured next to a uk door frame: Click Here . being the same height as the inner frame would make a person 6'5.5 without shoes.
pictured next to a uk door frame: Click Here . being the same height as the inner frame would make a person 6'5.5 without shoes.
Mickie said on 10/Jun/20
Pierre - You keep citing problems with the angle and Wilder's posture in that video that just don't exist. It's madness. Aside from the fact that you find imaginary problems with perfectly viable evidence, the other reason I can't provide you with much more diverse set of pictures and videos is because you dismiss basically anything that is outside of a boxing ring that doesn't line up with your presuppositions as "Fury was wearing lifts". Fury is almost certainly not a lift wearer - otherwise he would tend to appear shorter in the boxing ring relative to his opponents than he does outside of it (which is exactly the opposite of what Tyson Fury oddly enough) yet you insist that he is.
201 - 202 cm range.
Pierre - You keep citing problems with the angle and Wilder's posture in that video that just don't exist. It's madness. Aside from the fact that you find imaginary problems with perfectly viable evidence, the other reason I can't provide you with much more diverse set of pictures and videos is because you dismiss basically anything that is outside of a boxing ring that doesn't line up with your presuppositions as "Fury was wearing lifts". Fury is almost certainly not a lift wearer - otherwise he would tend to appear shorter in the boxing ring relative to his opponents than he does outside of it (which is exactly the opposite of what Tyson Fury oddly enough) yet you insist that he is.
201 - 202 cm range.
Duhon said on 10/Jun/20
Fury has agreed to fight Anthony Joshua will be interesting to see how they compare up. The general public would expect to see 3" between the two based on their listings.
Fury has agreed to fight Anthony Joshua will be interesting to see how they compare up. The general public would expect to see 3" between the two based on their listings.
Pierre said on 10/Jun/20
This guy in same posture as Wlad is max an inch taller than him,next to Deontay in good pics he's max same height as Deontay.He's towered by Magic 6"7.5'.Compared to Hafthor 6"7.5' sleeping on Braun Strowman Tyson never looks close to hafthor's height.All the pics show the same thing.Tyson is 198 in the best case.When he looks taller than Deontay the reason to me is simple = he wear probably lifts in his leather shoes,that is logic for this guy who claim 6"9'...Recently he was also wearing sneakers who each time were looking very big= Click Here
Click Here = here pic a lot inclined in favor to Tyson ,both guys same distance to camera same postures( neck/back ),Deontay wearing slim sneakers again=Tyson never looks taller here again.
This guy in same posture as Wlad is max an inch taller than him,next to Deontay in good pics he's max same height as Deontay.He's towered by Magic 6"7.5'.Compared to Hafthor 6"7.5' sleeping on Braun Strowman Tyson never looks close to hafthor's height.All the pics show the same thing.Tyson is 198 in the best case.When he looks taller than Deontay the reason to me is simple = he wear probably lifts in his leather shoes,that is logic for this guy who claim 6"9'...Recently he was also wearing sneakers who each time were looking very big= Click Here
Click Here = here pic a lot inclined in favor to Tyson ,both guys same distance to camera same postures( neck/back ),Deontay wearing slim sneakers again=Tyson never looks taller here again.
Canson said on 10/Jun/20
Reece said on 10/Jun/20
@Canson
Nah disagree with 201cm. Fury is not less than 202cm IMO. When he stood well he was barely shorter than the 6 foot 8 to 6 foot 8 1/2 Price in the airport picture in 2014. When he does stand tall he is over a inch taller than Wilder who is at least 6 foot 6 1/4.
@Reece: I would say not more than 202. I highly doubt Magic is 202 going by afternoon heights. David Price also I disagree on same with Wilder. I have Price as a solis 6’8” guy and Wilder as 6’6” flat.
Reece said on 10/Jun/20
@Canson
Nah disagree with 201cm. Fury is not less than 202cm IMO. When he stood well he was barely shorter than the 6 foot 8 to 6 foot 8 1/2 Price in the airport picture in 2014. When he does stand tall he is over a inch taller than Wilder who is at least 6 foot 6 1/4.
@Reece: I would say not more than 202. I highly doubt Magic is 202 going by afternoon heights. David Price also I disagree on same with Wilder. I have Price as a solis 6’8” guy and Wilder as 6’6” flat.
Mickie said on 10/Jun/20
@Reece - Fury does have a slouching habit - I think 201 or 202 cm are probably the most likely heights he'd measure (barefoot). I could see either one really. Wilder could be 6'6" flat (we can't rule that out yet).
@Reece - Fury does have a slouching habit - I think 201 or 202 cm are probably the most likely heights he'd measure (barefoot). I could see either one really. Wilder could be 6'6" flat (we can't rule that out yet).
Mickie said on 10/Jun/20
@Reece - Fury does have a slouching habit - I think 201 or 202 cm are probably the most likely heights he'd measure (barefoot). I could see either one really.
@Reece - Fury does have a slouching habit - I think 201 or 202 cm are probably the most likely heights he'd measure (barefoot). I could see either one really.
Pierre said on 10/Jun/20
@Mickie = I posted two pics in different events with good angles both guys very close one to the other one without real possibilities of advantages opposite to your example.You have always the same example with angle of camera very low that can give an advantage to the closest guy.Plus both guys at generous distance one to the other one,so if the pic is just a bit inclined by a fraction ,one of this guys has an additional advantage .And you don't take in consideration the different postures ,in your pic number 3 we can clearly see Deontay's back and neck are in a poor posture .Then finally you believe your example is the good example because both guys would wear the same thikness of boxing shoe...that is again only a supposition by the different type of boxing shoe we can buy on the market.
@Mickie = I posted two pics in different events with good angles both guys very close one to the other one without real possibilities of advantages opposite to your example.You have always the same example with angle of camera very low that can give an advantage to the closest guy.Plus both guys at generous distance one to the other one,so if the pic is just a bit inclined by a fraction ,one of this guys has an additional advantage .And you don't take in consideration the different postures ,in your pic number 3 we can clearly see Deontay's back and neck are in a poor posture .Then finally you believe your example is the good example because both guys would wear the same thikness of boxing shoe...that is again only a supposition by the different type of boxing shoe we can buy on the market.
Reece said on 10/Jun/20
@Canson
Nah disagree with 201cm. Fury is not less than 202cm IMO. When he stood well he was barely shorter than the 6 foot 8 to 6 foot 8 1/2 Price in the airport picture in 2014. When he does stand tall he is over a inch taller than Wilder who is at least 6 foot 6 1/4.
@Canson
Nah disagree with 201cm. Fury is not less than 202cm IMO. When he stood well he was barely shorter than the 6 foot 8 to 6 foot 8 1/2 Price in the airport picture in 2014. When he does stand tall he is over a inch taller than Wilder who is at least 6 foot 6 1/4.
Mickie said on 9/Jun/20
No Pierre, those are inferior pictures again. You keep reverting to those, the fact of the matter is we have evidence in the center of the ring where nobody can where lifts. The camera angle being low would only help Deontay look taller, if anything. It's easy to perceive when one is closer to the camera than the other when watching the ring stare down, and to get a perspective of their heights.
No Pierre, those are inferior pictures again. You keep reverting to those, the fact of the matter is we have evidence in the center of the ring where nobody can where lifts. The camera angle being low would only help Deontay look taller, if anything. It's easy to perceive when one is closer to the camera than the other when watching the ring stare down, and to get a perspective of their heights.
Pierre said on 9/Jun/20
@Mickie = Click Here Click Here here no low camera , no heads very distant one to the other one no Deontay shrunk a lot-back and neck-like in your example = so no possibility of real advantages /disadvantages = Tyson isn't taller than Deontay, . Tyson /Wlad same type of pics face to face = Tyson 6"6' too.
Click Here = the shoes in the first pic =Deontay only flat sneakers Tyson classic heel then Deontay had max the same help as Tyson...if one of this guy had a shoe advantage it's Tyson here.And in this first pic in fact Deontay shrunk a bit more by his neck/back...
@Mickie = Click Here Click Here here no low camera , no heads very distant one to the other one no Deontay shrunk a lot-back and neck-like in your example = so no possibility of real advantages /disadvantages = Tyson isn't taller than Deontay, . Tyson /Wlad same type of pics face to face = Tyson 6"6' too.
Click Here = the shoes in the first pic =Deontay only flat sneakers Tyson classic heel then Deontay had max the same help as Tyson...if one of this guy had a shoe advantage it's Tyson here.And in this first pic in fact Deontay shrunk a bit more by his neck/back...
Pierre said on 9/Jun/20
@Canson =Magic clearly is not straight here while Tyson's bust and legs are on the same line. Show me the pic inwhich Tyson is taller than Magic = Probably this pic... Click Here ..Then You can argue Tyson is 6"10' here...that is clearly not the case.The only possibility he looks so tall is =he's tiptoeing next to Magic, like in this video next to Deontay = Click Here ....Then=no,the guy who has a disadvantageous posture is Magic ,not Tyson Click Here Magic clearly sleep on Tyson here...fact.
@Canson =Magic clearly is not straight here while Tyson's bust and legs are on the same line. Show me the pic inwhich Tyson is taller than Magic = Probably this pic... Click Here ..Then You can argue Tyson is 6"10' here...that is clearly not the case.The only possibility he looks so tall is =he's tiptoeing next to Magic, like in this video next to Deontay = Click Here ....Then=no,the guy who has a disadvantageous posture is Magic ,not Tyson Click Here Magic clearly sleep on Tyson here...fact.
Pierre said on 9/Jun/20
@Canson =Magic clearly is not straight here while Tyson's bust and legs are on the same line. Show me the pic inwhich Tyson is taller than Magic = Probably this pic... Click Here ..Then You can argue Tyson is 6"10' here...that is clearly not the case.The only possibility he looks so tall is =he's tiptoeing next to Magic, like in this video next to Deontay = Click Here ....Then=no,the guy who has a disadvantageous posture is Magic ,not Tyson Click Here Tyson clearly sleep on Tyson here...fact.
@Canson =Magic clearly is not straight here while Tyson's bust and legs are on the same line. Show me the pic inwhich Tyson is taller than Magic = Probably this pic... Click Here ..Then You can argue Tyson is 6"10' here...that is clearly not the case.The only possibility he looks so tall is =he's tiptoeing next to Magic, like in this video next to Deontay = Click Here ....Then=no,the guy who has a disadvantageous posture is Magic ,not Tyson Click Here Tyson clearly sleep on Tyson here...fact.
Mickie said on 8/Jun/20
The video with Wilder was better for telling height than the photos with Magic. We can see in the first picture (the camera is quite fair in this one) what Fury and Wilder look like when they are in minimal footwear, have similar postures, and are standing around the same distance from the camera: Click Here
That last photo which shows them reaching about the same height has wonky proportions where Wilder's head is well bigger than Fury's and despite Fury's obviously higher shoulder level, they look the same height. I guess Pierre probably thinks this is a good representation of their heights? And that Fury's head is that small compared to Wilder's in the ring and Magic's in those photos they have together?
The video with Wilder was better for telling height than the photos with Magic. We can see in the first picture (the camera is quite fair in this one) what Fury and Wilder look like when they are in minimal footwear, have similar postures, and are standing around the same distance from the camera: Click Here
That last photo which shows them reaching about the same height has wonky proportions where Wilder's head is well bigger than Fury's and despite Fury's obviously higher shoulder level, they look the same height. I guess Pierre probably thinks this is a good representation of their heights? And that Fury's head is that small compared to Wilder's in the ring and Magic's in those photos they have together?
Canson said on 8/Jun/20
@Pierre: I’m aware of who both Magic Johnson and Tyson Fury are. Magic is clearly favored by the camera and he’s got better posture. Fury is very relaxed. You can tell because when he forces it, he was slightly taller than Magic in a different one. Not saying he is but it shows just like Reece said how poor his posture is
@Pierre: I’m aware of who both Magic Johnson and Tyson Fury are. Magic is clearly favored by the camera and he’s got better posture. Fury is very relaxed. You can tell because when he forces it, he was slightly taller than Magic in a different one. Not saying he is but it shows just like Reece said how poor his posture is
Pierre said on 8/Jun/20
Canson said on 8/Jun/20
@Pierre: that’s false. Magic’s posture is better and he’s favored
Magic is the right guy in the pic Canson !
Canson said on 8/Jun/20
@Pierre: that’s false. Magic’s posture is better and he’s favored
Magic is the right guy in the pic Canson !
Canson said on 8/Jun/20
@Pierre: that’s false. Magic’s posture is better and he’s favored
@Pierre: that’s false. Magic’s posture is better and he’s favored
Pierre said on 7/Jun/20
Lol Magic had maybe a fraction more shoe but was sleeping on Tyson ...Imagine Magic in same posture as Tyson...
Lol Magic had maybe a fraction more shoe but was sleeping on Tyson ...Imagine Magic in same posture as Tyson...
Pierre said on 7/Jun/20
@Canson = Click Here Magic's posture is = Magic sleep on Tyson Fury then even if Magic had a fraction more heel(not even sure) Magic lose easily more than a fraction in this posture! The pic is a bit inclined but both head are so close one to the other one,then even with a perfectly horizontal pic Magic still look easily taller than Tyson here!
The pic Tyson /Mike Tyson never prove Tyson is 6"7'.This pic is a recent pic Mike is in his 53 now has maybe(probably) shrunk since the pic next to Rob that was made in 2010 then a decade earlier,plus Tyson Fury wear sometimes advantageous shoes too.
Click Here = here is a recent pic Mike/Evander ,Evander(Rob guess him 6"1.25' in 2013) slouching still look around four inches taller than Mike....
@Canson = Click Here Magic's posture is = Magic sleep on Tyson Fury then even if Magic had a fraction more heel(not even sure) Magic lose easily more than a fraction in this posture! The pic is a bit inclined but both head are so close one to the other one,then even with a perfectly horizontal pic Magic still look easily taller than Tyson here!
The pic Tyson /Mike Tyson never prove Tyson is 6"7'.This pic is a recent pic Mike is in his 53 now has maybe(probably) shrunk since the pic next to Rob that was made in 2010 then a decade earlier,plus Tyson Fury wear sometimes advantageous shoes too.
Click Here = here is a recent pic Mike/Evander ,Evander(Rob guess him 6"1.25' in 2013) slouching still look around four inches taller than Mike....
Canson said on 7/Jun/20
@Mickie: Right even with the heel, Fury’s shoe is still thin and wouldn’t give him more than 3/4”. Magic’s shoe gives at least an inch. Not sold on 1.25” but still more than Fury’s. And you’re also right in that Fury is disadvantaged in the pics and his posture is not as good as Magic’s
@Mickie: Right even with the heel, Fury’s shoe is still thin and wouldn’t give him more than 3/4”. Magic’s shoe gives at least an inch. Not sold on 1.25” but still more than Fury’s. And you’re also right in that Fury is disadvantaged in the pics and his posture is not as good as Magic’s
Mickie said on 7/Jun/20
Those shoes Fury wore next to Magic do look super thin. The camera angle helped Magic look taller, too.
Those shoes Fury wore next to Magic do look super thin. The camera angle helped Magic look taller, too.
Canson said on 6/Jun/20
Pierre said on 4/Jun/20
@Canson = Tyson Fury no heels next to Magic ?! = Click Here
@Pierre: If you look at Magic’s shoe and compare the shoe to the one Fury has on it’s obvious that Magic has a footwear advantage. Look at the pic where both are standing right next to each other below. And looking at Magic’s dress shoe that’s a good heel he has whereas the one Fury has on are not that strong. Maybe I was wrong with the exact difference but Magic still has at minimum 1/4” advantage if not 3/8”.
Click Here
The camera is even tilted in Magic’s favor in this pic so there’s a fair chance that there is little to nothing between them in terms of height difference. I actually do not believe that Magic is above 6’7 or at best 6’7.25” with how he stands next to Jordan who is around 6’4.5” or maybe 6’4 5/8”. I didn’t think he’s as high as 6’7.5” today if he ever was. Of course I’m talking afternoon heights because I feel that he would easily be 6’8” in the morning. And The worse Conceiveable case is that Fury is 6’7” and Magic is 6’7.25”. And I only say that for the same reason that others before me have which is that we aren’t exactly sure how much height difference there is between Wilder and Fury. We can easily see it’s not less than 1” but it’s not more than 1.5”. We also know that Wilder isn’t a 6’5” guy. He gives a taller impression than Klitschko does and he measured 6’6.5”. Even if we want to say it’s a Very early morning height maybe 6’5 7/8 or worst case 6’5.75” but he also looks taller than Anthony Joshua who Rob met and said is around 6’5.75” which he looks. Maybe it’s very close but honestly I could see a good cm. All evidence points to Wilder being at least 6’6”
Pierre said on 4/Jun/20
@Canson = Tyson Fury no heels next to Magic ?! = Click Here
@Pierre: If you look at Magic’s shoe and compare the shoe to the one Fury has on it’s obvious that Magic has a footwear advantage. Look at the pic where both are standing right next to each other below. And looking at Magic’s dress shoe that’s a good heel he has whereas the one Fury has on are not that strong. Maybe I was wrong with the exact difference but Magic still has at minimum 1/4” advantage if not 3/8”.
Click Here
The camera is even tilted in Magic’s favor in this pic so there’s a fair chance that there is little to nothing between them in terms of height difference. I actually do not believe that Magic is above 6’7 or at best 6’7.25” with how he stands next to Jordan who is around 6’4.5” or maybe 6’4 5/8”. I didn’t think he’s as high as 6’7.5” today if he ever was. Of course I’m talking afternoon heights because I feel that he would easily be 6’8” in the morning. And The worse Conceiveable case is that Fury is 6’7” and Magic is 6’7.25”. And I only say that for the same reason that others before me have which is that we aren’t exactly sure how much height difference there is between Wilder and Fury. We can easily see it’s not less than 1” but it’s not more than 1.5”. We also know that Wilder isn’t a 6’5” guy. He gives a taller impression than Klitschko does and he measured 6’6.5”. Even if we want to say it’s a Very early morning height maybe 6’5 7/8 or worst case 6’5.75” but he also looks taller than Anthony Joshua who Rob met and said is around 6’5.75” which he looks. Maybe it’s very close but honestly I could see a good cm. All evidence points to Wilder being at least 6’6”
Canson said on 5/Jun/20
Add this pic that Tall In the Saddle posted on Mike Tyson’s page and it’s more evidence that Fury can, in fact, reach 6’7” If he stands straight. If you account for the fact that Tyson is closer to the camera than Fury
Click Here
Add this pic that Tall In the Saddle posted on Mike Tyson’s page and it’s more evidence that Fury can, in fact, reach 6’7” If he stands straight. If you account for the fact that Tyson is closer to the camera than Fury
Click Here
Canson said on 5/Jun/20
@Reece: he does probably 70% of the time with Wilder and even with Braun Strowman at times along with Hulk Hogan. It’s that other 30% of the time with Wilder and the pics with Magic and the other pics with Strowman. But some believe Hogan is even as low as 6’2” on this site which he isn’t. He has bad posture due to the injuries he’s sustained. He still looks every bit of 6’3” if you see him in a picture where he stands naturally and Fury looks comfortably at least 6’7” next to him. Probably more 201-202
@Reece: he does probably 70% of the time with Wilder and even with Braun Strowman at times along with Hulk Hogan. It’s that other 30% of the time with Wilder and the pics with Magic and the other pics with Strowman. But some believe Hogan is even as low as 6’2” on this site which he isn’t. He has bad posture due to the injuries he’s sustained. He still looks every bit of 6’3” if you see him in a picture where he stands naturally and Fury looks comfortably at least 6’7” next to him. Probably more 201-202
Pierre said on 5/Jun/20
@Tall in the saddle = Lol when I was wearing this type of sneakers with spongious sole my weight was around 110 kilograms then I'm in a good position to know the help with this type of shoes when you have a heavy weight!They was giving me 1.6 cm no more.I'm sure lot's of type of boxer shoes are giving 1.6 cm!Only Converse shoes are giving 1.6 cm!
Hey guys you always take only this pic in very low angle to argue Tyson is 6"7' or 6"7.5'...With this very low angle if Deontay is just 3 cms more distant to the camera he has a big disadvantage and it'simpossible here to prove he's exactly the same distance to the camera as Tyson...You claim both guys have the same advantage of shoes here but do you know there is a multitude of boxe shoes on the market with different soles....
@Tall in the saddle = Lol when I was wearing this type of sneakers with spongious sole my weight was around 110 kilograms then I'm in a good position to know the help with this type of shoes when you have a heavy weight!They was giving me 1.6 cm no more.I'm sure lot's of type of boxer shoes are giving 1.6 cm!Only Converse shoes are giving 1.6 cm!
Hey guys you always take only this pic in very low angle to argue Tyson is 6"7' or 6"7.5'...With this very low angle if Deontay is just 3 cms more distant to the camera he has a big disadvantage and it'simpossible here to prove he's exactly the same distance to the camera as Tyson...You claim both guys have the same advantage of shoes here but do you know there is a multitude of boxe shoes on the market with different soles....
Canson said on 5/Jun/20
Mickie said on 2/Jun/20
Pierre - you're reverting to inferior evidence. Most notably in that first pictues because Deontay is wearing significantly more footwear. Fury also just boxed 10 rounds, and isn't standing quite as well. Furthermore were other pictures taken that night that aren't as favorable to Wilder.
The second picture again is cherry picked. Fury was dropping more height than Wilder there, but because of your biases you state it's the opposite.
@Mickie: the majority of the pics Pierre uses include compromised angles, etc. he’s convinced that Fury is only 6’6”, so the angles are not bad according to him. The ones where he looks 6’7” are bad instead
Mickie said on 2/Jun/20
Pierre - you're reverting to inferior evidence. Most notably in that first pictues because Deontay is wearing significantly more footwear. Fury also just boxed 10 rounds, and isn't standing quite as well. Furthermore were other pictures taken that night that aren't as favorable to Wilder.
The second picture again is cherry picked. Fury was dropping more height than Wilder there, but because of your biases you state it's the opposite.
@Mickie: the majority of the pics Pierre uses include compromised angles, etc. he’s convinced that Fury is only 6’6”, so the angles are not bad according to him. The ones where he looks 6’7” are bad instead
Reece said on 4/Jun/20
If only Fury would stand straight more often this debate will be ended.....
If only Fury would stand straight more often this debate will be ended.....
Tall In The Saddle said on 3/Jun/20
@Pierre
Your ignoring and then rejection of Wilders obvious footwear advantage really undermines the legitimacy of your approach.
IMO 100 kg is not going to compress/diminish the shoe advantage to any factorable degree, particularly when Wilder is relatively static, not jogging, lifting heavy weights etc.or having any exerted any particular energy prior to compromise his height and posture.
Ed Rob or anyone else might be able to comment on shoe compression with greater authority and better qualifications.
I mean seriously, you recently contended that Fury standing in mere longer grass (which he wasn’t) somehow gave him advantage without any ref. to Fury’s own weight which is notably greater than that of Wilder.
You’ve also ignored/rejected the irrefutable - a lower angle advantages the shorter individual. Extreme example i could stand alongside the Eiffel Tower and with a sufficiently low angle I could be made to appear as high in the frame of reference.
We generally present pics as evidence because they are a convenient snapped moment in time but the vision of the fight I’m general, up, down, left, right etc. reflects a general 1” min. adv. to Fury that reasonably agrees with the adv. we can see in the pre fight face off still pics.
Has Deontay himself ever commented on their relative heights? I don’t Wilder necessarily wears advantage footwear to falsify his true height. It just allows him to go eye ball to eye ball with Fury or even a bit better depending on how much lift he has. For the purpose of intimidation it’s better than having to look up at your opponent so Wilder lifts in the face of Fury, something he can’t do in the ring where all things are equal, no caveats or speculations..
Same with Wlad who concedes Fury’s true advantage but still not above lifting at the pre fight pressers. When Wlad dropped the shoes to weigh in you could see a very notable drop in his own height.
@Pierre
Your ignoring and then rejection of Wilders obvious footwear advantage really undermines the legitimacy of your approach.
IMO 100 kg is not going to compress/diminish the shoe advantage to any factorable degree, particularly when Wilder is relatively static, not jogging, lifting heavy weights etc.or having any exerted any particular energy prior to compromise his height and posture.
Ed Rob or anyone else might be able to comment on shoe compression with greater authority and better qualifications.
I mean seriously, you recently contended that Fury standing in mere longer grass (which he wasn’t) somehow gave him advantage without any ref. to Fury’s own weight which is notably greater than that of Wilder.
You’ve also ignored/rejected the irrefutable - a lower angle advantages the shorter individual. Extreme example i could stand alongside the Eiffel Tower and with a sufficiently low angle I could be made to appear as high in the frame of reference.
We generally present pics as evidence because they are a convenient snapped moment in time but the vision of the fight I’m general, up, down, left, right etc. reflects a general 1” min. adv. to Fury that reasonably agrees with the adv. we can see in the pre fight face off still pics.
Has Deontay himself ever commented on their relative heights? I don’t Wilder necessarily wears advantage footwear to falsify his true height. It just allows him to go eye ball to eye ball with Fury or even a bit better depending on how much lift he has. For the purpose of intimidation it’s better than having to look up at your opponent so Wilder lifts in the face of Fury, something he can’t do in the ring where all things are equal, no caveats or speculations..
Same with Wlad who concedes Fury’s true advantage but still not above lifting at the pre fight pressers. When Wlad dropped the shoes to weigh in you could see a very notable drop in his own height.
Mickie said on 3/Jun/20
A little lesson on perspective in photos. 3 still shots of the center of the ring stare down: Click Here
First photo they are pretty close to being actually equidistant from the camera. Their heads look about the same size. This is close to the true difference between the two fighters. If Fury is as listed here, it suggests Wilder's listing on this site of 6'6.5" probably could be lowered by a fraction of an inch - although there is still some room for error or interpretation.
The second photo shows Fury closer to the camera. You can see how Fury's head is a lot larger than Wilders in this photo. The height difference between the fighters is significantly exaggerated here, although I will note you can still see Wilder is looking up at Fury.
The third photo shows Wilder closer to the camera than Fury (although not by as much as the Fury is closer in the photo immediately above). Wilder's head is significantly larger in this photo's than Fury's which is good evidence for this. If you draw a line across the top of their heads, they look very even here even though Fury's shoulders are clearly higher. That is because Fury's head is further from the camera. The proportions here don't make sense, and neither does the conclusion that the fighters are the same height.
A little lesson on perspective in photos. 3 still shots of the center of the ring stare down: Click Here
First photo they are pretty close to being actually equidistant from the camera. Their heads look about the same size. This is close to the true difference between the two fighters. If Fury is as listed here, it suggests Wilder's listing on this site of 6'6.5" probably could be lowered by a fraction of an inch - although there is still some room for error or interpretation.
The second photo shows Fury closer to the camera. You can see how Fury's head is a lot larger than Wilders in this photo. The height difference between the fighters is significantly exaggerated here, although I will note you can still see Wilder is looking up at Fury.
The third photo shows Wilder closer to the camera than Fury (although not by as much as the Fury is closer in the photo immediately above). Wilder's head is significantly larger in this photo's than Fury's which is good evidence for this. If you draw a line across the top of their heads, they look very even here even though Fury's shoulders are clearly higher. That is because Fury's head is further from the camera. The proportions here don't make sense, and neither does the conclusion that the fighters are the same height.
Pierre said on 3/Jun/20
Mickie said on 2/Jun/20
Pierre - you're reverting to inferior evidence. Most notably in that first pictues because Deontay is wearing significantly more footwear. Fury also just boxed 10 rounds, and isn't standing quite as well. Furthermore were other pictures taken that night that aren't as favorable to Wilder.
Mickie You can continue to compare both guys in a strange angle of camera and then argue Tyson looks like a giant next to Deontay not even straight.In my first pic Tyson after fight does not lose more than a fraction ,boxe is not powerlifting.You talk about their shoes=Deontay had maybe not even a fraction more shoes he was in running sneakers with spongious sole and this guy weight around 100 kilograms.....I have the same type of running sneakers they give me 1.6 cm more height than barefoot...In the video on this event you can see Tyson is tiptoeing sometimes then of course there are pics in web inwhich he looks taller than Deontay and each time he's not tiptoeing he never looks taller than Deontay... The evidence is when the angle of camera is good Tyson is 6"6' range not 6"7'.Lot's of examples I posted without strange angles show 6"6' not 6"7'.
The pic with Magic sleeping on Tyson show both guys are clearly not in the same range height...not even close...
Mickie said on 2/Jun/20
Pierre - you're reverting to inferior evidence. Most notably in that first pictues because Deontay is wearing significantly more footwear. Fury also just boxed 10 rounds, and isn't standing quite as well. Furthermore were other pictures taken that night that aren't as favorable to Wilder.
Mickie You can continue to compare both guys in a strange angle of camera and then argue Tyson looks like a giant next to Deontay not even straight.In my first pic Tyson after fight does not lose more than a fraction ,boxe is not powerlifting.You talk about their shoes=Deontay had maybe not even a fraction more shoes he was in running sneakers with spongious sole and this guy weight around 100 kilograms.....I have the same type of running sneakers they give me 1.6 cm more height than barefoot...In the video on this event you can see Tyson is tiptoeing sometimes then of course there are pics in web inwhich he looks taller than Deontay and each time he's not tiptoeing he never looks taller than Deontay... The evidence is when the angle of camera is good Tyson is 6"6' range not 6"7'.Lot's of examples I posted without strange angles show 6"6' not 6"7'.
The pic with Magic sleeping on Tyson show both guys are clearly not in the same range height...not even close...
Canson said on 3/Jun/20
@Pierre: Fury does not have a heel on his shoe. That’s as flat as can be. Magic has the heel on his and it’s significantly more pronounced
@Pierre: Fury does not have a heel on his shoe. That’s as flat as can be. Magic has the heel on his and it’s significantly more pronounced
Mickie said on 2/Jun/20
Pierre - you're reverting to inferior evidence. Most notably in that first pictues because Deontay is wearing significantly more footwear. Fury also just boxed 10 rounds, and isn't standing quite as well. Furthermore were other pictures taken that night that aren't as favorable to Wilder.
The second picture again is cherry picked. Fury was dropping more height than Wilder there, but because of your biases you state it's the opposite.
Pierre - you're reverting to inferior evidence. Most notably in that first pictues because Deontay is wearing significantly more footwear. Fury also just boxed 10 rounds, and isn't standing quite as well. Furthermore were other pictures taken that night that aren't as favorable to Wilder.
The second picture again is cherry picked. Fury was dropping more height than Wilder there, but because of your biases you state it's the opposite.
183 man said on 2/Jun/20
6'6.5" barefooted at evening
6'6.5" barefooted at evening
Mon said on 1/Jun/20
In Fury Wilder II, round two, the commentator made the point that there appears to be more that the official heights one inch of difference between them. Fury may be somewhat under his claimed height, but Wilder is WELL under his. Can't wear lifts in the ring.
In Fury Wilder II, round two, the commentator made the point that there appears to be more that the official heights one inch of difference between them. Fury may be somewhat under his claimed height, but Wilder is WELL under his. Can't wear lifts in the ring.
Pierre said on 1/Jun/20
Lol again neutral angle of camera here and Deontay has no cap.... = Click Here .Chose pic with neutral angle not strange pics that can advantage a lot one guy on the other guy....Tyson in neutral angle of camera is always max 6"6' range not 6"7'
Click Here = again neutral angle here ,Tyson with his neck more vertical /straighter posture ...but here he had probably not big shoes like sometimes (or sometimes he's tiptoeing too)
Again neutral angle of camera Tyson and Braun Strowman just before Braun backs off with a step and lose height = Click Here Click Here
Hafthor 6"7.5' nearly sleep on Braun and Braun wear a cap = Click Here and Hafthor's top of head is comfortably same height as Braun's top of cap....Tyson is never close to Hafthor's height
All this examples Plus Tyson /Wlad very close one to the other one and again neutral angle of camera and same postures(without several trophies and generous space between feet) show the same thing = Tyson is max 6"6' not 6"7' and the pic I posted recently= Magic slouching next to Tyson and again comfortably taller show again the same thing.
Lol again neutral angle of camera here and Deontay has no cap.... = Click Here .Chose pic with neutral angle not strange pics that can advantage a lot one guy on the other guy....Tyson in neutral angle of camera is always max 6"6' range not 6"7'
Click Here = again neutral angle here ,Tyson with his neck more vertical /straighter posture ...but here he had probably not big shoes like sometimes (or sometimes he's tiptoeing too)
Again neutral angle of camera Tyson and Braun Strowman just before Braun backs off with a step and lose height = Click Here Click Here
Hafthor 6"7.5' nearly sleep on Braun and Braun wear a cap = Click Here and Hafthor's top of head is comfortably same height as Braun's top of cap....Tyson is never close to Hafthor's height
All this examples Plus Tyson /Wlad very close one to the other one and again neutral angle of camera and same postures(without several trophies and generous space between feet) show the same thing = Tyson is max 6"6' not 6"7' and the pic I posted recently= Magic slouching next to Tyson and again comfortably taller show again the same thing.
Mickie said on 31/May/20
Canson was correct on his assessment of my opinion on Furys height. I believe him not to be a genuine 6'8" but more 6'7" - 6'7.5" range barefoot.
Canson was correct on his assessment of my opinion on Furys height. I believe him not to be a genuine 6'8" but more 6'7" - 6'7.5" range barefoot.
Pierre said on 31/May/20
@Canson = No, Tyson had heels next to Magic = Click Here And Magic break his posture in the pic Click Here
@Canson = No, Tyson had heels next to Magic = Click Here And Magic break his posture in the pic Click Here
Canson said on 31/May/20
Mickie said on 29/May/20
@ Harry - pictures can be deceiving.
Fury and Wilder: Click Here
Magic and Wilder: Click Here
Magic looked more than an inch taller than Fury, but only fractionally taller than Wilder. However in reality, Fury is most likely more than an inch TALLER than Wilder.
@Mickie: excellent pics and posts. And I also feel compelled to add, Lennox Lewis is in the same pic and although he’s closer to the camera, there is “less than expected” if we really believe Magic is that much taller than Fury. That proves that pics can be deceiving. I don’t mean less than expected literally but in a figurative way
Mickie said on 29/May/20
@ Harry - pictures can be deceiving.
Fury and Wilder: Click Here
Magic and Wilder: Click Here
Magic looked more than an inch taller than Fury, but only fractionally taller than Wilder. However in reality, Fury is most likely more than an inch TALLER than Wilder.
@Mickie: excellent pics and posts. And I also feel compelled to add, Lennox Lewis is in the same pic and although he’s closer to the camera, there is “less than expected” if we really believe Magic is that much taller than Fury. That proves that pics can be deceiving. I don’t mean less than expected literally but in a figurative way
Mickie said on 31/May/20
@ Pierre - you're right about one of the pictures (Fury and Wilder in ring or Fury and Magic) being of better quality for judging height than the other, you're just wrong about which one.
On the one hand we have Fury and Wilder the about the same distance from the camera and both in minimal footwear and with similar posture. You can make excuses otherwise until the cows come home, but that ring staredown is the single best piece of evidence we have for judging Wilder vs Fury's height and Fury looked taller by an inch to an inch and a half. On the other hand we have photos where Magic has a footwear advantage and his head appears far larger than Fury's. If that was all I knew about Fury, I might think he's about 6'6" too but we have better evidence available to judge by.
Secondly, we can see that Magic Johnson did not appear as tall next to Wilder as Fury did, so we know something doesn't add up. Either Wilder is looking deceptively tall next to Magic, or Fury is looking deceptively short next to Magic.
@ Pierre - you're right about one of the pictures (Fury and Wilder in ring or Fury and Magic) being of better quality for judging height than the other, you're just wrong about which one.
On the one hand we have Fury and Wilder the about the same distance from the camera and both in minimal footwear and with similar posture. You can make excuses otherwise until the cows come home, but that ring staredown is the single best piece of evidence we have for judging Wilder vs Fury's height and Fury looked taller by an inch to an inch and a half. On the other hand we have photos where Magic has a footwear advantage and his head appears far larger than Fury's. If that was all I knew about Fury, I might think he's about 6'6" too but we have better evidence available to judge by.
Secondly, we can see that Magic Johnson did not appear as tall next to Wilder as Fury did, so we know something doesn't add up. Either Wilder is looking deceptively tall next to Magic, or Fury is looking deceptively short next to Magic.
Pierre said on 31/May/20
Mickie said on 29/May/20
@ Harry - pictures can be deceiving.
No deceiving ,just take in consideration bad angle of camera very low and probably Tyson just a bit closer to the camera so big advantage with this angle of camera plus Deontay not exactly as straight as Tyson.
In the pic Tyson/Magic the camera is not as low than this famous pic on ring Deontay /Tyson plus both heads very close one to the other one this time, then the pic show around the real difference of height between Tyson and Magic ,Magic breaking his posture Click Here
Mickie said on 29/May/20
@ Harry - pictures can be deceiving.
No deceiving ,just take in consideration bad angle of camera very low and probably Tyson just a bit closer to the camera so big advantage with this angle of camera plus Deontay not exactly as straight as Tyson.
In the pic Tyson/Magic the camera is not as low than this famous pic on ring Deontay /Tyson plus both heads very close one to the other one this time, then the pic show around the real difference of height between Tyson and Magic ,Magic breaking his posture Click Here
Mickie said on 29/May/20
@ Harry - pictures can be deceiving.
Fury and Wilder: Click Here
Magic and Wilder: Click Here
Magic looked more than an inch taller than Fury, but only fractionally taller than Wilder. However in reality, Fury is most likely more than an inch TALLER than Wilder.
@ Harry - pictures can be deceiving.
Fury and Wilder: Click Here
Magic and Wilder: Click Here
Magic looked more than an inch taller than Fury, but only fractionally taller than Wilder. However in reality, Fury is most likely more than an inch TALLER than Wilder.
Canson said on 29/May/20
Harry Sachs said on 28/May/20
I find it hilariously funny how you guys constantly inflate these guys heights. Tyson Fury is clearly shorter than Magic Johnson who you people claim to be 6'7. So how could Tyson Fury be 6'8? Click Here
Editor Rob
He can look shorter than Magic. Wether their shoes were equal or their heads same distance from camera I'm not sure.
@Harry Sachs: I doubt anyone is saying he really is 6’8”. Maybe a while back on this page but none of the people in this current discussion. Mickie said he looked it in the pic he posted which he can on occasion. He didn’t say he actually is though
@Editor Rob: there was definitely a footwear advantage as Magic was in dress shoes and Fury in flats. I would like to see a pic of the two back to back to settle it as I’m not convinced Magic is really That much taller if they stood barefoot, if even
Harry Sachs said on 28/May/20
I find it hilariously funny how you guys constantly inflate these guys heights. Tyson Fury is clearly shorter than Magic Johnson who you people claim to be 6'7. So how could Tyson Fury be 6'8? Click Here
Editor Rob
He can look shorter than Magic. Wether their shoes were equal or their heads same distance from camera I'm not sure.
@Harry Sachs: I doubt anyone is saying he really is 6’8”. Maybe a while back on this page but none of the people in this current discussion. Mickie said he looked it in the pic he posted which he can on occasion. He didn’t say he actually is though
@Editor Rob: there was definitely a footwear advantage as Magic was in dress shoes and Fury in flats. I would like to see a pic of the two back to back to settle it as I’m not convinced Magic is really That much taller if they stood barefoot, if even
Pierre said on 29/May/20
Take the simplicity = both guys in same posture = Click Here no several trophies here no one of this guys shrink here camera same distance of both guys (Tyson looks even a bit straighter than Wlad but...) = Wlad max 6"5.25' give Tyson 6"6' never 6"7'
Take the simplicity = both guys in same posture = Click Here no several trophies here no one of this guys shrink here camera same distance of both guys (Tyson looks even a bit straighter than Wlad but...) = Wlad max 6"5.25' give Tyson 6"6' never 6"7'
Pierre said on 29/May/20
@Harry Sachs=Plus imagine if Magic was standing straighter in the pic.
@Harry Sachs=Plus imagine if Magic was standing straighter in the pic.
Harry Sachs said on 28/May/20
I find it hilariously funny how you guys constantly inflate these guys heights. Tyson Fury is clearly shorter than Magic Johnson who you people claim to be 6'7. So how could Tyson Fury be 6'8? Click Here
Editor Rob
I find it hilariously funny how you guys constantly inflate these guys heights. Tyson Fury is clearly shorter than Magic Johnson who you people claim to be 6'7. So how could Tyson Fury be 6'8? Click Here
Editor RobHe can look shorter than Magic. Wether their shoes were equal or their heads same distance from camera I'm not sure.
Pierre said on 28/May/20
Canson said on 28/May/20
@Pierre: I stated that, though, that it looked similar to yours. The angle was bad for both but more so on the pic you posted. Also I do get what you’re saying about level playing field, etc. but I’m not seeing how the pic with the two guys on the field is an issue because the ground level looks the same
@Canson= As I said = the postures are clearly not the same Wlad with a generous space between his own feet and wearing all this trophies clearly shrunk here.
Canson said on 28/May/20
@Pierre: I stated that, though, that it looked similar to yours. The angle was bad for both but more so on the pic you posted. Also I do get what you’re saying about level playing field, etc. but I’m not seeing how the pic with the two guys on the field is an issue because the ground level looks the same
@Canson= As I said = the postures are clearly not the same Wlad with a generous space between his own feet and wearing all this trophies clearly shrunk here.
Gman39 said on 28/May/20
In the famous picture on the field, I think Wlad holding all those belts could take a 1/4 inch from him - I remember big Rob saying those belts individually are quite heavy - just imagine holding five of them, spreading your feet, and being measured for height. I think Fury is 6'7.25 and Wlad is 6'5.5.
In the famous picture on the field, I think Wlad holding all those belts could take a 1/4 inch from him - I remember big Rob saying those belts individually are quite heavy - just imagine holding five of them, spreading your feet, and being measured for height. I think Fury is 6'7.25 and Wlad is 6'5.5.
Mickie said on 28/May/20
I'm not so sure Kugan is a legit 6'4" guy. Here he is with Wilder: Click Here Kugan looks 6'3" max there, honestly I wouldn't argue with someone who said 6'2.5".
I'm not so sure Kugan is a legit 6'4" guy. Here he is with Wilder: Click Here Kugan looks 6'3" max there, honestly I wouldn't argue with someone who said 6'2.5".
Canson said on 28/May/20
Pierre said on 23/May/20
@Canson = 🙂 My pics are not biased = your first pic (Comment on 22 May ) show the same thing as mine =
@Pierre: I stated that, though, that it looked similar to yours. The angle was bad for both but more so on the pic you posted. Also I do get what you’re saying about level playing field, etc. but I’m not seeing how the pic with the two guys on the field is an issue because the ground level looks the same
Pierre said on 23/May/20
@Canson = 🙂 My pics are not biased = your first pic (Comment on 22 May ) show the same thing as mine =
@Pierre: I stated that, though, that it looked similar to yours. The angle was bad for both but more so on the pic you posted. Also I do get what you’re saying about level playing field, etc. but I’m not seeing how the pic with the two guys on the field is an issue because the ground level looks the same
Pierre said on 27/May/20
@Mickie= Tyson is just at the limit before he can lose height with his space between his own feet .then logically Wlad with his generous space between his own feet logically lose a bit height plus slouch with his trophies.take the simplicity = both guys face to face regular floor around same posture .
In your pic on 26/05 the camera again is low with Tyson closer to the camera so good advantage and Wlad is not even straight.
@Mickie= Tyson is just at the limit before he can lose height with his space between his own feet .then logically Wlad with his generous space between his own feet logically lose a bit height plus slouch with his trophies.take the simplicity = both guys face to face regular floor around same posture .
In your pic on 26/05 the camera again is low with Tyson closer to the camera so good advantage and Wlad is not even straight.
Pierre said on 27/May/20
@Tall in the saddle = please take the good pics with guys on regular floors neutral angle of camera and same postures....
@Tall in the saddle = please take the good pics with guys on regular floors neutral angle of camera and same postures....
pov said on 26/May/20
Click Here
26 mins, roughly 6'4 kugan cassius calls tyson fury 6'6, fury corrects him and says 6'9. jason momoa has also called fury 6'6 before. It's weird how low they're estimating him. Obviously he isnt 6'9, but taller than 6'6 defo.
Click Here
26 mins, roughly 6'4 kugan cassius calls tyson fury 6'6, fury corrects him and says 6'9. jason momoa has also called fury 6'6 before. It's weird how low they're estimating him. Obviously he isnt 6'9, but taller than 6'6 defo.
Mickie said on 26/May/20
Pierre - no offense but you do tend to use a lot of pictures that aren't fair comparisons. I do my best to consider the evidence of how tall these guys look in the boxing ring. I can find pictures where Tyson LOOKS an 6'8.5" like this: Click Here but that doesn't mean he would measure that tall. Conversely, finding a photo where he LOOKS 6'6", doesn't mean he would actually measure that short.
FYI Rob has done some videos about how standing with a wide stance doesn't particularly shrink your measured height unless your feet are really quite wide apart.
I'd still go 6'7.25" - 6'7.5" as the range for Fury. 6'7" flat isn't impossible, but I would not go lower than that.
Pierre - no offense but you do tend to use a lot of pictures that aren't fair comparisons. I do my best to consider the evidence of how tall these guys look in the boxing ring. I can find pictures where Tyson LOOKS an 6'8.5" like this: Click Here but that doesn't mean he would measure that tall. Conversely, finding a photo where he LOOKS 6'6", doesn't mean he would actually measure that short.
FYI Rob has done some videos about how standing with a wide stance doesn't particularly shrink your measured height unless your feet are really quite wide apart.
I'd still go 6'7.25" - 6'7.5" as the range for Fury. 6'7" flat isn't impossible, but I would not go lower than that.
Tall In The Saddle said on 25/May/20
@Pierre
Due respect but your arguments are predetermined to reject and attempt to explain away all potential evidence in support of Tyson standing 6’7” at the least.
Hypothetically, if a new piece of evidence was produced that concretely showed Tyson barefoot as 1” taller than a barefoot Wilder you would simply assume or claim it related to a poor angle, poor posture for Wilder etc even when those conditions aren’t present. You’re putting the cart before the horse, the conclusion before the evidence. Basically, you’re not assessing the evidence objectively, The next best thing to the hypothetical example was the actual face off in the ring and you invoked the usual poor posture poor angle rug pulls when those conditions were clearly not present. You claimed a low angle to Wilders disadvantage but as already pointed out, a lower angle in fact is an advantage to the shorter man.
Latest example. Not that a few mm diff. in grass length compressed underfoot would give any advantage BUT the fact is there is NO diff. In grass length. The dark and light strips are merely a result of the direction in which the grass is deliberately cut. Alternating strips simply reflect the light differently to assist refs determining off side plays. The grass appears greener on Fury’s side but the length is the same. They are on equal footing.
Sorry but that’s really clutching at straws or actual grass in this particular instance. I mean when reasonably irrefutable evidence is ultimately produced one can always choose not to accept it and figure something must be “up” only because it doesn’t suit their preconceived conclusion.
Cuts both ways. If somehow a perfectly framed pic of Fury and Wilder side by side barefoot came to light with Wilder standing equal or even taller than Fury, then all prev, inferior evidence indicating otherwise would be rendered Invalid. In the ring Fury was clearly at least 1” taller - best quality evidence to date IMO. You’ve tried to falsely invalidate what can clearly be seen and then turn back to inferior evidence with both hidden and obvious variables open to highly subjective interpretations.
But whatever Fury’s height, the thread is active and civil and that’s a good thing.
@Pierre
Due respect but your arguments are predetermined to reject and attempt to explain away all potential evidence in support of Tyson standing 6’7” at the least.
Hypothetically, if a new piece of evidence was produced that concretely showed Tyson barefoot as 1” taller than a barefoot Wilder you would simply assume or claim it related to a poor angle, poor posture for Wilder etc even when those conditions aren’t present. You’re putting the cart before the horse, the conclusion before the evidence. Basically, you’re not assessing the evidence objectively, The next best thing to the hypothetical example was the actual face off in the ring and you invoked the usual poor posture poor angle rug pulls when those conditions were clearly not present. You claimed a low angle to Wilders disadvantage but as already pointed out, a lower angle in fact is an advantage to the shorter man.
Latest example. Not that a few mm diff. in grass length compressed underfoot would give any advantage BUT the fact is there is NO diff. In grass length. The dark and light strips are merely a result of the direction in which the grass is deliberately cut. Alternating strips simply reflect the light differently to assist refs determining off side plays. The grass appears greener on Fury’s side but the length is the same. They are on equal footing.
Sorry but that’s really clutching at straws or actual grass in this particular instance. I mean when reasonably irrefutable evidence is ultimately produced one can always choose not to accept it and figure something must be “up” only because it doesn’t suit their preconceived conclusion.
Cuts both ways. If somehow a perfectly framed pic of Fury and Wilder side by side barefoot came to light with Wilder standing equal or even taller than Fury, then all prev, inferior evidence indicating otherwise would be rendered Invalid. In the ring Fury was clearly at least 1” taller - best quality evidence to date IMO. You’ve tried to falsely invalidate what can clearly be seen and then turn back to inferior evidence with both hidden and obvious variables open to highly subjective interpretations.
But whatever Fury’s height, the thread is active and civil and that’s a good thing.
Pierre said on 23/May/20
@Canson = 🙂 My pics are not biased = your first pic (Comment on 22 May ) show the same thing as mine = Wlad 6"5'/6"5.25' Tyson 6"6' .The pics that are biased are not mine,but the pics you or some internauts post with Wlad and Tyson in Stadium,Wlad with a bigger space between his own feet and slouching by wearing all this trophies...or this pics with very low angles and Deontay slouching with his head a lot in front of his body while Tyson stand easily straighter...Wlad wearing elevator shoes is only rumour his shoes are looking very classic.but sometimes just after the weigh in the guy next to Wlad is barefoot as I show recently in a comment,then the difference of height is bigger of course,and another time the same boxer will wear shoes and then the difference will be slimer.
In your second pic in stadium the floor is probably advantageous for Tyson because you can see in a pic I posted recently wlad is on a short grass Click Here
In your pic number 3 as I explain before = Wlad with all this trophies isn't straight plus comfortable space betwen his own feet then finally of course looks easily shorter plus = Wlad is still on the short grass = Click Here then Tyson has certainly an advantage of floor here again...
@Canson = 🙂 My pics are not biased = your first pic (Comment on 22 May ) show the same thing as mine = Wlad 6"5'/6"5.25' Tyson 6"6' .The pics that are biased are not mine,but the pics you or some internauts post with Wlad and Tyson in Stadium,Wlad with a bigger space between his own feet and slouching by wearing all this trophies...or this pics with very low angles and Deontay slouching with his head a lot in front of his body while Tyson stand easily straighter...Wlad wearing elevator shoes is only rumour his shoes are looking very classic.but sometimes just after the weigh in the guy next to Wlad is barefoot as I show recently in a comment,then the difference of height is bigger of course,and another time the same boxer will wear shoes and then the difference will be slimer.
In your second pic in stadium the floor is probably advantageous for Tyson because you can see in a pic I posted recently wlad is on a short grass Click Here
In your pic number 3 as I explain before = Wlad with all this trophies isn't straight plus comfortable space betwen his own feet then finally of course looks easily shorter plus = Wlad is still on the short grass = Click Here then Tyson has certainly an advantage of floor here again...
Pierre said on 21/May/20
Mickie said on 21/May/20
Pierre - No, the angle of them in the picture in the center of the ring is not wonky. Tyson is not signifiantly closer to the camera and their postures are similar. It's just that you don't like the conclusion you'd be forced to draw.
@Mickie = Yeahhhh ....My conclusion is just = with the good angles and both men very close one to the other one Tyson does not look taller than Deontay...it's even sometimes the opposite....fact!
Mickie said on 21/May/20
Pierre - No, the angle of them in the picture in the center of the ring is not wonky. Tyson is not signifiantly closer to the camera and their postures are similar. It's just that you don't like the conclusion you'd be forced to draw.
@Mickie = Yeahhhh ....My conclusion is just = with the good angles and both men very close one to the other one Tyson does not look taller than Deontay...it's even sometimes the opposite....fact!
Mickie said on 21/May/20
Pierre - No, the angle of them in the picture in the center of the ring is not wonky. Tyson is not signifiantly closer to the camera and their postures are similar. It's just that you don't like the conclusion you'd be forced to draw.
Pierre - No, the angle of them in the picture in the center of the ring is not wonky. Tyson is not signifiantly closer to the camera and their postures are similar. It's just that you don't like the conclusion you'd be forced to draw.
Pierre said on 21/May/20
@Mickie....lWilder is straighter in the second pic but always slouch! in the second pic Tyson 's shoulder nearly touch the camera then Tyson is of course clearly closer to the camera here!And in both pics low angle of camera! with this pics you can even argue 6"8' for Tyson ....
Neutral angle of camera Tyson with advantage of cap = Click Here
Click Here = neutral angle of camera Deontay with back/neck not straight
Click Here =Deontay's neck not vertical here again Tyson again with advantage of cap
@Mickie....lWilder is straighter in the second pic but always slouch! in the second pic Tyson 's shoulder nearly touch the camera then Tyson is of course clearly closer to the camera here!And in both pics low angle of camera! with this pics you can even argue 6"8' for Tyson ....
Neutral angle of camera Tyson with advantage of cap = Click Here
Click Here = neutral angle of camera Deontay with back/neck not straight
Click Here =Deontay's neck not vertical here again Tyson again with advantage of cap
Mickie said on 20/May/20
This is how Fury looks in a picture where he is actually with a posture advantage over Wilder: Click Here
This is Fury with about the same posture as Wilder (who's not breaking his back, or hugely disadvantaged by the camera angle): Click Here
This is how Fury looks in a picture where he is actually with a posture advantage over Wilder: Click Here
This is Fury with about the same posture as Wilder (who's not breaking his back, or hugely disadvantaged by the camera angle): Click Here
Pierre said on 20/May/20
@Canson = Click Here = again Tyson /Braun Strowman both in sneakers Tyson a hair taller than Braun .
Click Here = Hafthor Click Here listed 6"7.75' apparently you guess him 6"7.5' like the average guess (6"7.48') , in a terrible posture losing lot's of height is still a bit taller than Braun's cap.... Braun had no cap next to Tyson...
@Canson = Click Here = again Tyson /Braun Strowman both in sneakers Tyson a hair taller than Braun .
Click Here = Hafthor Click Here listed 6"7.75' apparently you guess him 6"7.5' like the average guess (6"7.48') , in a terrible posture losing lot's of height is still a bit taller than Braun's cap.... Braun had no cap next to Tyson...
Pierre said on 20/May/20
@Canson = Click Here = again Tyson /Braun Strowman both in sneakers Tyson a hair taller than Braun
Click Here = Hafthor Click Here listed 6"7.75' apparently you guess him 6"7.5' like the average guess (6"7.48') , in a terrible posture losing lot's of height is still a bit taller than Braun's cap.... Braun had no cap next to Tyson...
@Canson = Click Here = again Tyson /Braun Strowman both in sneakers Tyson a hair taller than Braun
Click Here = Hafthor Click Here listed 6"7.75' apparently you guess him 6"7.5' like the average guess (6"7.48') , in a terrible posture losing lot's of height is still a bit taller than Braun's cap.... Braun had no cap next to Tyson...
Pierre said on 20/May/20
@Canson 2 inches here?! a 6"7' guy never looks as short as here ! and same posture here Click Here Wlad's eyes are not even a full inch lower than Tyson's eyes Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here = same event as your famous pic with Wlad in terible posture and here this time both same posture and Wlad is on the short grass and more distant to the camera....A 6"7' guy is a lot taller than Tyson here ,again an inch here not two!
@Canson 2 inches here?! a 6"7' guy never looks as short as here ! and same posture here Click Here Wlad's eyes are not even a full inch lower than Tyson's eyes Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here = same event as your famous pic with Wlad in terible posture and here this time both same posture and Wlad is on the short grass and more distant to the camera....A 6"7' guy is a lot taller than Tyson here ,again an inch here not two!
Canson said on 19/May/20
@Pierre:
2 inches difference ?! Yeeeeaaaahhh = but only in your famous pics with different postures ....
No. No famous pics here. That’s how they look on average. There’s never less than that and Klitschko in a good pic of them and Wlad who I think anyone on this site can look at and consider honest with his claims, said that Fury was approxaimarely the same height as Wach. He wouldn’t mistake someone who’s only an inch taller than him for being 2 or 2.5” taller. As well, keep in mind that Wlad has a brother who is around 1.5” taller or so so I don’t see why it would be an issue with him being able to determine Fury’s height. I would assume that Wlad knew that Fury was taller than Vitaly on the spot
@Pierre:
2 inches difference ?! Yeeeeaaaahhh = but only in your famous pics with different postures ....
No. No famous pics here. That’s how they look on average. There’s never less than that and Klitschko in a good pic of them and Wlad who I think anyone on this site can look at and consider honest with his claims, said that Fury was approxaimarely the same height as Wach. He wouldn’t mistake someone who’s only an inch taller than him for being 2 or 2.5” taller. As well, keep in mind that Wlad has a brother who is around 1.5” taller or so so I don’t see why it would be an issue with him being able to determine Fury’s height. I would assume that Wlad knew that Fury was taller than Vitaly on the spot
Pierre said on 19/May/20
My guess is Tyson around 6"6' ,no more, by lot's of comparisons.
My guess is Tyson around 6"6' ,no more, by lot's of comparisons.
Canson said on 18/May/20
@Movieguy12: I don’t think Pierre is saying Fury is 6’5 range, but instead saying he’s a solid 6’6”.
@Movieguy12: I don’t think Pierre is saying Fury is 6’5 range, but instead saying he’s a solid 6’6”.
Pierre said on 18/May/20
Canson said on 16/May/20
@Pierre: I know that Wlad is 6’5” range (and closer to 6’5 than 6’6). I have always had him at that. Fury is clearly 2” taller than Wlad.
2 inches difference ?! Yeeeeaaaahhh = but only in your famous pics with different postures ....
Canson said on 16/May/20
@Pierre: I know that Wlad is 6’5” range (and closer to 6’5 than 6’6). I have always had him at that. Fury is clearly 2” taller than Wlad.
2 inches difference ?! Yeeeeaaaahhh = but only in your famous pics with different postures ....
Canson said on 18/May/20
Chris Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 14/May/20
He can be 202cm but not 6'8 or 6'9. 6'8 3/4 billed height was probably height with shoes.
True 200-202 but not 198 like some are saying
Chris Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 14/May/20
He can be 202cm but not 6'8 or 6'9. 6'8 3/4 billed height was probably height with shoes.
True 200-202 but not 198 like some are saying
movieguy12 said on 17/May/20
Some of the downgrade comments are ridiculous. I'm not sure that Fury is really 6'9'' I think he's a bit less, I don't buy him being in the 6'5'' to 6'6'' range either. He is a giant man even for a heavyweight boxer.
Some of the downgrade comments are ridiculous. I'm not sure that Fury is really 6'9'' I think he's a bit less, I don't buy him being in the 6'5'' to 6'6'' range either. He is a giant man even for a heavyweight boxer.
Canson said on 16/May/20
@Pierre: I know that Wlad is 6’5” range (and closer to 6’5 than 6’6). I have always had him at that. Fury is clearly 2” taller than Wlad
@Pierre: I know that Wlad is 6’5” range (and closer to 6’5 than 6’6). I have always had him at that. Fury is clearly 2” taller than Wlad
Chris Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 14/May/20
He can be 202cm but not 6'8 or 6'9. 6'8 3/4 billed height was probably height with shoes.
He can be 202cm but not 6'8 or 6'9. 6'8 3/4 billed height was probably height with shoes.
Pierre said on 14/May/20
@Canson = Wlad is never 6"6'...he's 6"5' range and in pics in same postures not even sure there is a complete inch between Wlad and Tyson....
@Canson = Wlad is never 6"6'...he's 6"5' range and in pics in same postures not even sure there is a complete inch between Wlad and Tyson....
Canson said on 14/May/20
Pierre said on 9/May/20
@Canson = the pics talk for themselves...of course Wlad slouching with big space betwen his own feet etc looks a lot shorter than Tyson.With this type of pics you can even argue 6"8' for Tyson.... 6"6' when both men have he same posture.
They can’t be 6’6 when they have the same posture. Fury is clearly taller
Pierre said on 9/May/20
@Canson = the pics talk for themselves...of course Wlad slouching with big space betwen his own feet etc looks a lot shorter than Tyson.With this type of pics you can even argue 6"8' for Tyson.... 6"6' when both men have he same posture.
They can’t be 6’6 when they have the same posture. Fury is clearly taller
Pierre said on 11/May/20
Mickie said on 9/May/20
This gives you more of a sense of the stature difference between Fury and Wlad, as Wlad wasn't wearing lifts: Click Here
Neither guy is standing well so it is hard to be precise about the difference, but you can see Fury is a taller guy with a bigger frame. whether the true difference is 2" or 2.5" is debatable - what isn't debatable is that even Wladimir thought Fury was taller than himself (and similar in height to 202 cm listed Wach).
The postures are not the same here Wlad shrinking easily more than Tyson,Wlad with one of his shoulder a lot lower than the other/ bust not straight,while Tyson shrink only by tilting his head .Take the simplicity = The other pics face to face with both men in same posture = Tyson 6"6' range not 6"7'
Mickie said on 9/May/20
This gives you more of a sense of the stature difference between Fury and Wlad, as Wlad wasn't wearing lifts: Click Here
Neither guy is standing well so it is hard to be precise about the difference, but you can see Fury is a taller guy with a bigger frame. whether the true difference is 2" or 2.5" is debatable - what isn't debatable is that even Wladimir thought Fury was taller than himself (and similar in height to 202 cm listed Wach).
The postures are not the same here Wlad shrinking easily more than Tyson,Wlad with one of his shoulder a lot lower than the other/ bust not straight,while Tyson shrink only by tilting his head .Take the simplicity = The other pics face to face with both men in same posture = Tyson 6"6' range not 6"7'
Qui said on 11/May/20
I’d say fury would be almost identical to Greg davies
I’d say fury would be almost identical to Greg davies
Mickie said on 9/May/20
This gives you more of a sense of the stature difference between Fury and Wlad, as Wlad wasn't wearing lifts: Click Here
Neither guy is standing well so it is hard to be precise about the difference, but you can see Fury is a taller guy with a bigger frame. whether the true difference is 2" or 2.5" is debatable - what isn't debatable is that even Wladimir thought Fury was taller than himself (and similar in height to 202 cm listed Wach).
This gives you more of a sense of the stature difference between Fury and Wlad, as Wlad wasn't wearing lifts: Click Here
Neither guy is standing well so it is hard to be precise about the difference, but you can see Fury is a taller guy with a bigger frame. whether the true difference is 2" or 2.5" is debatable - what isn't debatable is that even Wladimir thought Fury was taller than himself (and similar in height to 202 cm listed Wach).
Daddy short legs said on 9/May/20
I’d say Fury is 6.7.. maybe a smidgen over. When he faced off with Otto Wallin last year the Swede remarked straight away “you’re not 6.9!” To which Fury possibly taken off guard is clearly heard to reply “I’m 6.7”. Also Jason Mamoa (Aquaman Actor) is listed on this site as a height of 6.4 .. with a photo with Rob to confirm this . Any google search of when Tyson Fury met Jason recently is easy to find . And it’s clear that there is about a 3 inch difference between the Pair 👍🏻
I’d say Fury is 6.7.. maybe a smidgen over. When he faced off with Otto Wallin last year the Swede remarked straight away “you’re not 6.9!” To which Fury possibly taken off guard is clearly heard to reply “I’m 6.7”. Also Jason Mamoa (Aquaman Actor) is listed on this site as a height of 6.4 .. with a photo with Rob to confirm this . Any google search of when Tyson Fury met Jason recently is easy to find . And it’s clear that there is about a 3 inch difference between the Pair 👍🏻
Pierre said on 9/May/20
@Canson = the pics talk for themselves...of course Wlad slouching with big space betwen his own feet etc looks a lot shorter than Tyson.With this type of pics you can even argue 6"8' for Tyson.... 6"6' when both men have he same posture.
@Canson = the pics talk for themselves...of course Wlad slouching with big space betwen his own feet etc looks a lot shorter than Tyson.With this type of pics you can even argue 6"8' for Tyson.... 6"6' when both men have he same posture.
Canson said on 8/May/20
Pierre said on 6/May/20
Canson said on 5/May/20
@Pierre: A sub 6’6” (6’5 range) Tyson Fury is about as likely (actually possible) as one of us here randomly hitting the Powerball or Mega Millions even just for the starting prize
Click Here
Click Here
Wlad slouch in second pic with all this trophies and not sure the floor is perfectly regular here in both pics .Is Tyson tiptoeing like he does sometimes .... Click Here = here around the whole bodies Wlad also shrink with a big space between his feet plus very probably slouch(bust) with all his trophies ...
Each time they are standing on a regular floor face to face Tyson never looks close to 6"7' next to Wlad
Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here = here Tyson forcing his posture does not look even a full 6"7' next to Wlad in classic posture = here again Wlad shrinking with back and neck while Tyson stand straight = Click Here Click Here
Then= no,I wouldn't bet a dollar Tyson is close to 6"7' here...6"6' range.
@Pierre: I’m not seeing how that’s possible. Klitschko’s assessment on Fury’s height lines up with the pictures, and how he guessed him (Wach’s height) and Rob’s assessment of him 6’7 and change
Pierre said on 6/May/20
Canson said on 5/May/20
@Pierre: A sub 6’6” (6’5 range) Tyson Fury is about as likely (actually possible) as one of us here randomly hitting the Powerball or Mega Millions even just for the starting prize
Click Here
Click Here
Wlad slouch in second pic with all this trophies and not sure the floor is perfectly regular here in both pics .Is Tyson tiptoeing like he does sometimes .... Click Here = here around the whole bodies Wlad also shrink with a big space between his feet plus very probably slouch(bust) with all his trophies ...
Each time they are standing on a regular floor face to face Tyson never looks close to 6"7' next to Wlad
Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here = here Tyson forcing his posture does not look even a full 6"7' next to Wlad in classic posture = here again Wlad shrinking with back and neck while Tyson stand straight = Click Here Click Here
Then= no,I wouldn't bet a dollar Tyson is close to 6"7' here...6"6' range.
@Pierre: I’m not seeing how that’s possible. Klitschko’s assessment on Fury’s height lines up with the pictures, and how he guessed him (Wach’s height) and Rob’s assessment of him 6’7 and change
Pierre said on 6/May/20
Canson said on 5/May/20
@Pierre: A sub 6’6” (6’5 range) Tyson Fury is about as likely (actually possible) as one of us here randomly hitting the Powerball or Mega Millions even just for the starting prize
Click Here
Click Here
Wlad slouch in second pic with all this trophies and not sure the floor is perfectly regular here in both pics .Is Tyson tiptoeing like he does sometimes .... Click Here = here around the whole bodies Wlad also shrink with a big space between his feet plus very probably slouch(bust) with all his trophies ...
Each time they are standing on a regular floor face to face Tyson never looks close to 6"7' next to Wlad
Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here = here Tyson forcing his posture does not look even a full 6"7' next to Wlad in classic posture = here again Wlad shrinking with back and neck while Tyson stand straight = Click Here Click Here
Then= no,I wouldn't bet a dollar Tyson is close to 6"7' here...6"6' range.
Canson said on 5/May/20
@Pierre: A sub 6’6” (6’5 range) Tyson Fury is about as likely (actually possible) as one of us here randomly hitting the Powerball or Mega Millions even just for the starting prize
Click Here
Click Here
Wlad slouch in second pic with all this trophies and not sure the floor is perfectly regular here in both pics .Is Tyson tiptoeing like he does sometimes .... Click Here = here around the whole bodies Wlad also shrink with a big space between his feet plus very probably slouch(bust) with all his trophies ...
Each time they are standing on a regular floor face to face Tyson never looks close to 6"7' next to Wlad
Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here = here Tyson forcing his posture does not look even a full 6"7' next to Wlad in classic posture = here again Wlad shrinking with back and neck while Tyson stand straight = Click Here Click Here
Then= no,I wouldn't bet a dollar Tyson is close to 6"7' here...6"6' range.
Pierre said on 4/May/20
@Mickie = Lol the sequence is cut , I only believe what I see ,it will be hard to know if Tyson had shoes or not next to Vince Vaughn...
Vince Vaughn is maybe not even 6"4' this days ....Mel Gibson who has never been a tall guy and now in his 60 big max 5"9' and probably a bit under this mark,the top of his head is around the same height as the start of Vince's nose...and Vince's nose is short.... Vince Vaughn looks around the same height as Snoop Dog himself looking easily more than four inches shorter than Magic Johnson ....
Stephen Merchant listed 6"7' in a terrible posture that make him lose nearly two inches Click Here looks again around 2 inches taller than Vince in good posture ....
@Mickie = Lol the sequence is cut , I only believe what I see ,it will be hard to know if Tyson had shoes or not next to Vince Vaughn...
Vince Vaughn is maybe not even 6"4' this days ....Mel Gibson who has never been a tall guy and now in his 60 big max 5"9' and probably a bit under this mark,the top of his head is around the same height as the start of Vince's nose...and Vince's nose is short.... Vince Vaughn looks around the same height as Snoop Dog himself looking easily more than four inches shorter than Magic Johnson ....
Stephen Merchant listed 6"7' in a terrible posture that make him lose nearly two inches Click Here looks again around 2 inches taller than Vince in good posture ....
Mickie said on 3/May/20
You can't call that 0 proof. The guy is on video putting his boxing shoes on from being barefoot when meeting the actor. And to your point about Vince Vaughn's height, I don't even think Vince Vaughn is a 6'5" guy. Actually I think he was always 6'4.5" and could be as low as 6'4" flat today or maybe 6'4.25". But with an inch of footwear advantage, he can be viewed as a 6'5" or slightly over with Tyson (who is also a natural sloucher in many scenarios).
You can't call that 0 proof. The guy is on video putting his boxing shoes on from being barefoot when meeting the actor. And to your point about Vince Vaughn's height, I don't even think Vince Vaughn is a 6'5" guy. Actually I think he was always 6'4.5" and could be as low as 6'4" flat today or maybe 6'4.25". But with an inch of footwear advantage, he can be viewed as a 6'5" or slightly over with Tyson (who is also a natural sloucher in many scenarios).
Pierre said on 2/May/20
@Mickie =Maybe barefoot maybe not....maybe ring shoes maybe not...zero proofs....but good trying...( I hope for the 6"7' claimants Tyson was barefoot if not this means he's probably under 6"6' next to Vince Vaughn)
Vince Vaughn and Mel Gibson max 5"9' wearing sneakers, Vince closer to the camera = Click Here
Mel Gibson /Danny Trejo = Click Here
Danny with Rob = Click Here
Mel wearing massive cow boy boots here = Click Here Click Here Click Here ....
@Mickie =Maybe barefoot maybe not....maybe ring shoes maybe not...zero proofs....but good trying...( I hope for the 6"7' claimants Tyson was barefoot if not this means he's probably under 6"6' next to Vince Vaughn)
Vince Vaughn and Mel Gibson max 5"9' wearing sneakers, Vince closer to the camera = Click Here
Mel Gibson /Danny Trejo = Click Here
Danny with Rob = Click Here
Mel wearing massive cow boy boots here = Click Here Click Here Click Here ....
Pierre said on 2/May/20
@Canson = Vlad slouch in your pic = Click Here =same event Tyson a bit closer to the camera....Where are two inches here? and you can see tyson's shoes are higher than Wlad's shoes probably the floor is advantageous for him here (the grass is not mowed where Tyson stand)
Click Here = here regular floor a 6"7' guy or close to 6"7' never looks as short next to a 6"5' range guy Click Here
Click Here = even here when Wlad shrink by slouching his back and neck he's not two inches shorter than Tyson
@Canson = Vlad slouch in your pic = Click Here =same event Tyson a bit closer to the camera....Where are two inches here? and you can see tyson's shoes are higher than Wlad's shoes probably the floor is advantageous for him here (the grass is not mowed where Tyson stand)
Click Here = here regular floor a 6"7' guy or close to 6"7' never looks as short next to a 6"5' range guy Click Here
Click Here = even here when Wlad shrink by slouching his back and neck he's not two inches shorter than Tyson
Mickie said on 1/May/20
@ Pierre - Nice try, but Tyson was most likely barefoot with Vince Vaughn. Here he is putting his boxing shoes seemingly after their meeting: Click Here At most, he was wearing boxing ring shoes. Likely barefoot.
@ Pierre - Nice try, but Tyson was most likely barefoot with Vince Vaughn. Here he is putting his boxing shoes seemingly after their meeting: Click Here At most, he was wearing boxing ring shoes. Likely barefoot.
Pierre said on 1/May/20
184guy2 said on 30/Apr/20
At least 2.5 inches taller then Vince Vaughn
Click Here
Tyson is clearly a lot closer to the camera here plus advantage of his cap.Plus Tyson lots of time wear comfortable sole(shoes at 2:15) Click Here
About Vince Vaughn = here next to 6"3.75' Snoop = Click Here
Snoop and Magic = Click Here Snoop easily closer to the camera other = Click Here
Vince Vaughn and Stephen Merchant listed 6"7' both men around same distance to the camera this time and Stephen shrunk a lot ,he's in a terrible posture and not advantageous cap Stephen wear flat sneakers (while you can see at 2:15 in 184 Guy's video Tyson wear again comfortable soles ) = Click Here Click Here
Click Here =Tyson a lot closer to the camera both guys shrink a bit ....
By all this comparisons no way I can claim Tyson even close to 6"7' here again...
184guy2 said on 30/Apr/20
At least 2.5 inches taller then Vince Vaughn
Click Here
Tyson is clearly a lot closer to the camera here plus advantage of his cap.Plus Tyson lots of time wear comfortable sole(shoes at 2:15) Click Here
About Vince Vaughn = here next to 6"3.75' Snoop = Click Here
Snoop and Magic = Click Here Snoop easily closer to the camera other = Click Here
Vince Vaughn and Stephen Merchant listed 6"7' both men around same distance to the camera this time and Stephen shrunk a lot ,he's in a terrible posture and not advantageous cap Stephen wear flat sneakers (while you can see at 2:15 in 184 Guy's video Tyson wear again comfortable soles ) = Click Here Click Here
Click Here =Tyson a lot closer to the camera both guys shrink a bit ....
By all this comparisons no way I can claim Tyson even close to 6"7' here again...
Canson said on 1/May/20
@Anonymous: it’s at least 2. Not to mention we don’t know the footwear that Wlad wears at times
Click Here
@Anonymous: it’s at least 2. Not to mention we don’t know the footwear that Wlad wears at times
Click Here
Pierre said on 30/Apr/20
@Tall In The Saddle = Tyson never look taller than Deontay here to me ,and Deontay is just a bit closer to the camera and not all the time,and both men are so close one to the other one plus camera not particularly low, then not a big advantage for Deontay,who does not stand always straight,and later in the video when both are face to face same thing= Tyson clearly does not look taller than Deontay even the contrary.Only when Tyson start to be on his toes he looks taller.
In your example with low camera both men more distant one to the other one (and I persist= Deontay clearly slouch/shrunk here more than Tyson),if one of this men is a bit closer to the camera he has a big advantage and to me Tyson is some centimeters closer to the camera here.
@Tall In The Saddle = Tyson never look taller than Deontay here to me ,and Deontay is just a bit closer to the camera and not all the time,and both men are so close one to the other one plus camera not particularly low, then not a big advantage for Deontay,who does not stand always straight,and later in the video when both are face to face same thing= Tyson clearly does not look taller than Deontay even the contrary.Only when Tyson start to be on his toes he looks taller.
In your example with low camera both men more distant one to the other one (and I persist= Deontay clearly slouch/shrunk here more than Tyson),if one of this men is a bit closer to the camera he has a big advantage and to me Tyson is some centimeters closer to the camera here.
Anonymouse said on 30/Apr/20
Tyson Fury, in my opinion is near 6'7, I only saw about an inch difference between him and wladimir klitschko and also with Wilder. It seems heavyweight boxing is copying WWE wrestling with this "billed height" it sounds better when you add 2 inches on!
Tyson Fury, in my opinion is near 6'7, I only saw about an inch difference between him and wladimir klitschko and also with Wilder. It seems heavyweight boxing is copying WWE wrestling with this "billed height" it sounds better when you add 2 inches on!
Canson said on 30/Apr/20
@Pierre: how tall do you have David Price? Do you think he’s grossly overlisted or somewhat close to the 6’8” listing Rob has given him here?
@Pierre: how tall do you have David Price? Do you think he’s grossly overlisted or somewhat close to the 6’8” listing Rob has given him here?
Tall In The Saddle said on 30/Apr/20
@Pierre
Thanks for your response. In the last pic I linked Wilder's posture is no worse than Fury's IMO and certainly not so bad as to explain away Fury's full advantage. Anyway, addressing the face off you've just linked 29 April 2020. As they stand in the ring, before facing off, Fury further from camera looks at least the same height if not a touch taller. There's also a lot of tip toeing on both men's part prior to facing off. See 14 sec mark when they both come down off their toes - Fury looks taller IMO. Yet, when they face off at about 19 sec mark Wilder closer to camera somehow looks a touch taller - perhaps on toes a bit, with Fury then returning in kind?
You can only catch up glimpse but Wilder appears to be wearing sneakers which could allow for up to 1.5" increase. Boxing shoes are not at all comparable to even mildly heeled sneakers. Boxing shoes are just soles and thin soles at that. Jogging in boxing shoes would be virtually like running in bare feet, no cushion from impact. A comparison between Fury in boxing shoes and Wilder in sneakers is compromised from the get go. Their actual face off prior to their fight is still the best evidence I think.
@Pierre
Thanks for your response. In the last pic I linked Wilder's posture is no worse than Fury's IMO and certainly not so bad as to explain away Fury's full advantage. Anyway, addressing the face off you've just linked 29 April 2020. As they stand in the ring, before facing off, Fury further from camera looks at least the same height if not a touch taller. There's also a lot of tip toeing on both men's part prior to facing off. See 14 sec mark when they both come down off their toes - Fury looks taller IMO. Yet, when they face off at about 19 sec mark Wilder closer to camera somehow looks a touch taller - perhaps on toes a bit, with Fury then returning in kind?
You can only catch up glimpse but Wilder appears to be wearing sneakers which could allow for up to 1.5" increase. Boxing shoes are not at all comparable to even mildly heeled sneakers. Boxing shoes are just soles and thin soles at that. Jogging in boxing shoes would be virtually like running in bare feet, no cushion from impact. A comparison between Fury in boxing shoes and Wilder in sneakers is compromised from the get go. Their actual face off prior to their fight is still the best evidence I think.
Pierre said on 29/Apr/20
@Tall in the saddle = of course in your example Deontay slouch a lot with his head a lot in front of his body while we can see Tyson in better posture.Both men more distant one to the other one in your example and low camera ,and not even sure the pic is horizontal here.
Click Here in this video there is not low angle of camera and similar postures with Deontay maybe a fraction more shoes(spongious running sneakers with a 100 kilogrames man in this sneakers ...I have this type of shoes they give me 1.6 cm more than my barefoot height in fact....I doubt boxer shoes give really less than that... ).Both men this time very close one to the other one in a classic angle of camera this time= simply with Deontay 6"6.25' or even 6"6.5'...Tyson looks all the time one hair shorter and clearly never 6"7' here...he's taller only when he start to play tiptoeing in the video...Tyson is never close to 6"7' here...Even when Deontay is not straight in the video he's again at least as tall as Tyson ...no distant men here no low camera here ...= bye bye 6"7' hello 6"6'.
@Tall in the saddle = of course in your example Deontay slouch a lot with his head a lot in front of his body while we can see Tyson in better posture.Both men more distant one to the other one in your example and low camera ,and not even sure the pic is horizontal here.
Click Here in this video there is not low angle of camera and similar postures with Deontay maybe a fraction more shoes(spongious running sneakers with a 100 kilogrames man in this sneakers ...I have this type of shoes they give me 1.6 cm more than my barefoot height in fact....I doubt boxer shoes give really less than that... ).Both men this time very close one to the other one in a classic angle of camera this time= simply with Deontay 6"6.25' or even 6"6.5'...Tyson looks all the time one hair shorter and clearly never 6"7' here...he's taller only when he start to play tiptoeing in the video...Tyson is never close to 6"7' here...Even when Deontay is not straight in the video he's again at least as tall as Tyson ...no distant men here no low camera here ...= bye bye 6"7' hello 6"6'.
Tall In The Saddle said on 27/Apr/20
@Pierre
In the photo I linked 22 April 2020 Fury is just as relaxed as Wilder and I see no way if both stood perfectly at that moment that Wilder wouldn't still be dropping at least 1". You said the face off was taken at a low angle, the pic I linked wasn't. You linked a photo yourself 26 April 2020 where Wilder's posture isn't perfect, AGREED. But why? That isn't the photo being examined and has far more variables to consider anyway, not the least being footwear. At any rate, it has a purpose. For contrast, it shows imperfect posture on Wilder's part, as clearly evidenced by the angle of the back of his neck and his ears well forward and not aligned with the middle of his shoulders. In the face off, the back of Wilder's neck is perfectly straight and his ears in line with the mid point of his shoulders. Indicative of good posture. He isn't slouching. To suggest that Wilder does slouch and then link other photos of him slouching isn't actually addressing the fact that he isn't slouching in the face off.
@Mickie
Sure. At least for most of us, whatever that's worth because weight of numbers doesn't necessarily make us right, I think we agree on a min. of 1" adv. to Fury. Beyond that, I think it's justifiably arguable from either end as to exactly how much more than 1" it may be - a fair ceiling to the argument perhaps being 1.5" max.
@Pierre
In the photo I linked 22 April 2020 Fury is just as relaxed as Wilder and I see no way if both stood perfectly at that moment that Wilder wouldn't still be dropping at least 1". You said the face off was taken at a low angle, the pic I linked wasn't. You linked a photo yourself 26 April 2020 where Wilder's posture isn't perfect, AGREED. But why? That isn't the photo being examined and has far more variables to consider anyway, not the least being footwear. At any rate, it has a purpose. For contrast, it shows imperfect posture on Wilder's part, as clearly evidenced by the angle of the back of his neck and his ears well forward and not aligned with the middle of his shoulders. In the face off, the back of Wilder's neck is perfectly straight and his ears in line with the mid point of his shoulders. Indicative of good posture. He isn't slouching. To suggest that Wilder does slouch and then link other photos of him slouching isn't actually addressing the fact that he isn't slouching in the face off.
@Mickie
Sure. At least for most of us, whatever that's worth because weight of numbers doesn't necessarily make us right, I think we agree on a min. of 1" adv. to Fury. Beyond that, I think it's justifiably arguable from either end as to exactly how much more than 1" it may be - a fair ceiling to the argument perhaps being 1.5" max.
Canson said on 27/Apr/20
@Mickie: I can certainly agree with his 1.5” estimate over Fury and Wilder being the same height or there being less than an inch between them. 1” is a possibility too but it’s certainly not less. While I was guilty at one very short period of time of suspecting less than 6’7” because of how he looked with Magic, I certainly do not now. To be fair, I don’t know if Pierre has actually watched the entire match itself or if he is just basing it off select pictures, whereas I can easily tell that both of you actually watched it and are using a visual of what you saw along with maybe a couple others here. I haven’t seen Pierre say whether he has or not but watching something on screen gives the better depiction being Fury is less likely to slouch for that extended period of time that he would be in a single picture, something that happens quite frequently being he looked shorter than Braun Strowman as well.
@Mickie: I can certainly agree with his 1.5” estimate over Fury and Wilder being the same height or there being less than an inch between them. 1” is a possibility too but it’s certainly not less. While I was guilty at one very short period of time of suspecting less than 6’7” because of how he looked with Magic, I certainly do not now. To be fair, I don’t know if Pierre has actually watched the entire match itself or if he is just basing it off select pictures, whereas I can easily tell that both of you actually watched it and are using a visual of what you saw along with maybe a couple others here. I haven’t seen Pierre say whether he has or not but watching something on screen gives the better depiction being Fury is less likely to slouch for that extended period of time that he would be in a single picture, something that happens quite frequently being he looked shorter than Braun Strowman as well.
Pierre said on 27/Apr/20
@Mickie= Lol pics in ring with Deontay slouching a lot both men distant one to the other one and low angle of camera are better to argue 6"7' for Tyson....
Tyson 6"6'
@Mickie= Lol pics in ring with Deontay slouching a lot both men distant one to the other one and low angle of camera are better to argue 6"7' for Tyson....
Tyson 6"6'
Pierre said on 26/Apr/20
@Tall in the saddle = the pic you posted on 22 April = this is not a proof Tyson is taller=apparently when Deontay stand in a natural relaxed posture (as I can imagine in your pic) he slouch generally a lot as we can see here = Click Here then of course in a pic inwhich we can see only their heads Tyson looks taller.
@Tall in the saddle = the pic you posted on 22 April = this is not a proof Tyson is taller=apparently when Deontay stand in a natural relaxed posture (as I can imagine in your pic) he slouch generally a lot as we can see here = Click Here then of course in a pic inwhich we can see only their heads Tyson looks taller.
Mickie said on 25/Apr/20
@ Tall In The Saddle - Fury being 1.5" taller than Wilder is possible. I would place my money on it being somewhere between 1-1/8" to 1-3/8", but I can see at times how it could be a little more.
@ Tall In The Saddle - Fury being 1.5" taller than Wilder is possible. I would place my money on it being somewhere between 1-1/8" to 1-3/8", but I can see at times how it could be a little more.
Mickie said on 24/Apr/20
@ Pierre - lol. There was nothing wrong with the angle in the stare down and the center of the ring.
Fury: 6'7.25" - 6'7.5"
Wilder: 6'6" - 6'6.25"
@ Pierre - lol. There was nothing wrong with the angle in the stare down and the center of the ring.
Fury: 6'7.25" - 6'7.5"
Wilder: 6'6" - 6'6.25"
jock said on 24/Apr/20
Tyson is 6 feet 8 inches.
Tyson is 6 feet 8 inches.
Canson said on 23/Apr/20
@Miko: I know Wilder is wearing boots in the picture above but I. The ring, Wilder much under 6’6” looks very suspect. Maybe somehow 197.5 is remotely possible only because of how he looked next to Carmelo but He looks too tall and long to be a simpler 6’5” range guy (195-196). Id still say 198cm. And Id have an easier time believing a guy like Audley Harrison or even Anthony Joshua are 6’5 before him and I doubt either of those guys is below 197cm
@Miko: I know Wilder is wearing boots in the picture above but I. The ring, Wilder much under 6’6” looks very suspect. Maybe somehow 197.5 is remotely possible only because of how he looked next to Carmelo but He looks too tall and long to be a simpler 6’5” range guy (195-196). Id still say 198cm. And Id have an easier time believing a guy like Audley Harrison or even Anthony Joshua are 6’5 before him and I doubt either of those guys is below 197cm
Pierre said on 23/Apr/20
@miko = chose pics in neutral angle of camera and Tyson without big heels and not tiptoeing = Click Here
Deontay 6"6' afternoon = Tyson max same height as him
@miko = chose pics in neutral angle of camera and Tyson without big heels and not tiptoeing = Click Here
Deontay 6"6' afternoon = Tyson max same height as him
miko said on 22/Apr/20
The only way Fury is 6'6 'max' is if Wilder is under 6'5.
Wilder at under 6'5 is beyond absurd.
The only way Fury is 6'6 'max' is if Wilder is under 6'5.
Wilder at under 6'5 is beyond absurd.
Tall In The Saddle said on 22/Apr/20
Personally, I would give Fury 1.5" over Wilder.
BUT the real point is that, at least IMO, Fury is inarguably at least 1"+ taller with finer calibrations required thereafter to estimate exactly how much more taller - an arguable point. I don't know that anymore can be put forward that hasn't already been put forward to support this view. Maybe this pic has already been linked, post fight embrace between Fury and Wilder. Click Here Sure, Fury is closer to camera but the guys are in tight proximity and the shot is at their head level. The true height difference was stripped down and laid bare in the ring - all references outside the ring superseded and rendered impractical.
Personally, I would give Fury 1.5" over Wilder.
BUT the real point is that, at least IMO, Fury is inarguably at least 1"+ taller with finer calibrations required thereafter to estimate exactly how much more taller - an arguable point. I don't know that anymore can be put forward that hasn't already been put forward to support this view. Maybe this pic has already been linked, post fight embrace between Fury and Wilder. Click Here Sure, Fury is closer to camera but the guys are in tight proximity and the shot is at their head level. The true height difference was stripped down and laid bare in the ring - all references outside the ring superseded and rendered impractical.
Pierre said on 22/Apr/20
Canson said on 20/Apr/20
@Pierre: fast forward to 18:00 onward around where they face off. There is no camera advantage for either guy. Fury is clearly taller by at least a solid inch. At points in the fight where they show both guys on camera, it looks 3 cm
Click Here
@Canson,your video correspond to Mickie pic,low angle of camera,Deontay slouching a lot with back and neck
With a better angle of camera when both are standing very close one to the other one with around same shoes = and Deontay here clearly in a better posture than in your example = Click Here
Tyson never can be 6"7' range here.Tyson is maybe tired here but be tired never make you lose an inch compared to your afternoon height,not even a full centimeter.Tyson 6"6' again to me
Canson said on 20/Apr/20
@Pierre: fast forward to 18:00 onward around where they face off. There is no camera advantage for either guy. Fury is clearly taller by at least a solid inch. At points in the fight where they show both guys on camera, it looks 3 cm
Click Here
@Canson,your video correspond to Mickie pic,low angle of camera,Deontay slouching a lot with back and neck
With a better angle of camera when both are standing very close one to the other one with around same shoes = and Deontay here clearly in a better posture than in your example = Click Here
Tyson never can be 6"7' range here.Tyson is maybe tired here but be tired never make you lose an inch compared to your afternoon height,not even a full centimeter.Tyson 6"6' again to me
Canson said on 20/Apr/20
@Pierre: fast forward to 18:00 onward around where they face off. There is no camera advantage for either guy. Fury is clearly taller by at least a solid inch. At points in the fight where they show both guys on camera, it looks 3 cm
Click Here
@Pierre: fast forward to 18:00 onward around where they face off. There is no camera advantage for either guy. Fury is clearly taller by at least a solid inch. At points in the fight where they show both guys on camera, it looks 3 cm
Click Here
Pierre said on 18/Apr/20
Mickie said on 16/Apr/20
@ Pierre - the angle on that picture is fine. Btw A low camera angle would be more likely to diminish Tysons height advantage, not enhance it.
With this angle of camera if Tyson stand just a bit closer to the camera than Deontay Tyson is advantaged.Plus the difference of postures.
Mickie said on 16/Apr/20
@ Pierre - the angle on that picture is fine. Btw A low camera angle would be more likely to diminish Tysons height advantage, not enhance it.
With this angle of camera if Tyson stand just a bit closer to the camera than Deontay Tyson is advantaged.Plus the difference of postures.
Mickie said on 16/Apr/20
@ Pierre - the angle on that picture is fine. Btw A low camera angle would be more likely to diminish Tysons height advantage, not enhance it.
@ Pierre - the angle on that picture is fine. Btw A low camera angle would be more likely to diminish Tysons height advantage, not enhance it.
Mickie said on 16/Apr/20
@ Pierre - the angle on that picture is fine. Btw A low camera angle would be more likely to diminish Tysons height advtanfe, not enhance it.
@ Pierre - the angle on that picture is fine. Btw A low camera angle would be more likely to diminish Tysons height advtanfe, not enhance it.
Pierre said on 16/Apr/20
Click Here =Tyson taller than Deontay depending the shoes.when he's just in his boxer shoes in the ring and Deontay maybe a fraction more sneaker,with the difference of postures plus the supposed fraction more shoe finally Tyson is max same height as Deontay ,so clearly never close to 6"7'.Guys who argue Tyson was tired after the fight= when you're tired your body can maybe lose 0.5 cm compared to your afternoon height but no more,and you can see in the video he's not a lot tired because he play to strech up a max his body while he's tiptoeing sometimes.The fact Tyson is tired will never make a Tyson close to 6"7' here.
Maybe explain why his leather shoes are looking so high under his pant as we can see here ,looking like elevator shoes = Click Here
Or why other times he wear big soles like here = Click Here
but finally even with his big soles and a bit more straight(head/neck) he does not look really taller than Deontay ...
Click Here =Tyson taller than Deontay depending the shoes.when he's just in his boxer shoes in the ring and Deontay maybe a fraction more sneaker,with the difference of postures plus the supposed fraction more shoe finally Tyson is max same height as Deontay ,so clearly never close to 6"7'.Guys who argue Tyson was tired after the fight= when you're tired your body can maybe lose 0.5 cm compared to your afternoon height but no more,and you can see in the video he's not a lot tired because he play to strech up a max his body while he's tiptoeing sometimes.The fact Tyson is tired will never make a Tyson close to 6"7' here.
Maybe explain why his leather shoes are looking so high under his pant as we can see here ,looking like elevator shoes = Click Here
Or why other times he wear big soles like here = Click Here
but finally even with his big soles and a bit more straight(head/neck) he does not look really taller than Deontay ...
Canson said on 16/Apr/20
Mickie said on 14/Apr/20
@ Pierre - Fury is not any closer to the camera here: Click Here
I think it's obvious Fury is a good 3cm taller than Wilder, anyway. Although Wilder's height is somewhat debatable.
Agreed. Probably 3cm. But no less than 1” like Rob has them listed
Mickie said on 14/Apr/20
@ Pierre - Fury is not any closer to the camera here: Click Here
I think it's obvious Fury is a good 3cm taller than Wilder, anyway. Although Wilder's height is somewhat debatable.
Agreed. Probably 3cm. But no less than 1” like Rob has them listed
Pierre said on 15/Apr/20
@Tall in the saddle = I showed by lots of comparisons in better angles than some comparisons some internauts post here than Tyson 6"6' is more the reality than 6"7' ,I even showed that by comparisons with some guys Rob has seen(Hafthor,Anthony Joshua...)...
@Tall in the saddle = I showed by lots of comparisons in better angles than some comparisons some internauts post here than Tyson 6"6' is more the reality than 6"7' ,I even showed that by comparisons with some guys Rob has seen(Hafthor,Anthony Joshua...)...
Pierre said on 15/Apr/20
Mickie said on 14/Apr/20
@ Pierre - Fury is not any closer to the camera here: Click Here
I think it's obvious Fury is a good 3cm taller than Wilder, anyway. Although Wilder's height is somewhat debatable.
@Mickie Your pic is an example of camera very low in direction to the sky and Deontay clearly shrinks with his head a lot in front of his body.
Mickie said on 14/Apr/20
@ Pierre - Fury is not any closer to the camera here: Click Here
I think it's obvious Fury is a good 3cm taller than Wilder, anyway. Although Wilder's height is somewhat debatable.
@Mickie Your pic is an example of camera very low in direction to the sky and Deontay clearly shrinks with his head a lot in front of his body.
Canson said on 15/Apr/20
Pierre said on 14/Apr/20
Canson said on 13 April=
@Pierre: yea but for every pic you post where you believe he is 6’6” I can find one where he’s 6’7+. Most of The pics where he appears 6’6 include camera angle issues or where someone else is heavily favored. But case in point is the fight with wilder where he was right in front of Wilder. Wilder measured 6’6.5” at some point in the day likely morning. So even if we say he’s 6’6” Fury is not under 6’7”. The fight mirrors the other evidence that Mickie and others have posted
Lol I still waiting for your famous "evidence" ...with a camera as low as possible you can even claim Tyson is 6"9' if you want...
Where did I say he was 6’9, Pierre? I didn’t:
Pierre said on 14/Apr/20
Canson said on 13 April=
@Pierre: yea but for every pic you post where you believe he is 6’6” I can find one where he’s 6’7+. Most of The pics where he appears 6’6 include camera angle issues or where someone else is heavily favored. But case in point is the fight with wilder where he was right in front of Wilder. Wilder measured 6’6.5” at some point in the day likely morning. So even if we say he’s 6’6” Fury is not under 6’7”. The fight mirrors the other evidence that Mickie and others have posted
Lol I still waiting for your famous "evidence" ...with a camera as low as possible you can even claim Tyson is 6"9' if you want...
Where did I say he was 6’9, Pierre? I didn’t:
Mickie said on 14/Apr/20
@ Pierre - Fury is not any closer to the camera here: Click Here
I think it's obvious Fury is a good 3cm taller than Wilder, anyway. Although Wilder's height is somewhat debatable.
@ Pierre - Fury is not any closer to the camera here: Click Here
I think it's obvious Fury is a good 3cm taller than Wilder, anyway. Although Wilder's height is somewhat debatable.
Tall In The Saddle said on 14/Apr/20
@Pierre
Due respect brother but I think you're locked into an impractical, pre supposed height for Fury. You've firmed on 6'6". You figure any new contrary evidence must be compromised. Even if new evidence shows Fury to be taller you feel that you "know" that can't be true. As such, you look to things real or not (faulty angle, poor posture etc.) to negate what can clearly be seen in order to confirm your bias. I mean, we've all probably been guilty of same at some point - locking down on what we think we "know" and ignoring or dismissing any contrary evidence thereafter because we "think" it must be illusory.
Re the face off photo. My guess is that if the physical positions of Tyson and Wilder were literally switched, with both men appearing equal in height, all else the same, proximity, angle, etc., you wouldn't be pointing to any so called "negators" - you would simply accept the resulting vision as confirmation of your bias without any attempt to reduce it down. It always comes down to opinion but, at least IMO, that face off is as good as it gets - a true depiction of the height diff. which presents as the best quality evidence. Turning back to inferior evidence that formed your pre supposed estimate doesn't cut it. Nor does hyperbole, suggesting Fury and Wilder were filmed from their ankles. Hardly.
As to face offs. They should always be squarely filmed but unfortunately they aren't. People want to see these guys face to face, make their own comparisons. Forget the tale of the tape, many of which have been proven woefully wrong when the two guys in question actually get in the ring and visual comparisons can be made. There have been some "artsy" filming efforts, literally filmed almost from the canvas up. I suppose the height of current HWs make it difficult for average sized cameramen to be in perfectly line with the fighters - maybe they should get equitably tall ex-pugs like Lewis or Klit to moonlight as pre-fight instruction cameramen. LOL.
@Pierre
Due respect brother but I think you're locked into an impractical, pre supposed height for Fury. You've firmed on 6'6". You figure any new contrary evidence must be compromised. Even if new evidence shows Fury to be taller you feel that you "know" that can't be true. As such, you look to things real or not (faulty angle, poor posture etc.) to negate what can clearly be seen in order to confirm your bias. I mean, we've all probably been guilty of same at some point - locking down on what we think we "know" and ignoring or dismissing any contrary evidence thereafter because we "think" it must be illusory.
Re the face off photo. My guess is that if the physical positions of Tyson and Wilder were literally switched, with both men appearing equal in height, all else the same, proximity, angle, etc., you wouldn't be pointing to any so called "negators" - you would simply accept the resulting vision as confirmation of your bias without any attempt to reduce it down. It always comes down to opinion but, at least IMO, that face off is as good as it gets - a true depiction of the height diff. which presents as the best quality evidence. Turning back to inferior evidence that formed your pre supposed estimate doesn't cut it. Nor does hyperbole, suggesting Fury and Wilder were filmed from their ankles. Hardly.
As to face offs. They should always be squarely filmed but unfortunately they aren't. People want to see these guys face to face, make their own comparisons. Forget the tale of the tape, many of which have been proven woefully wrong when the two guys in question actually get in the ring and visual comparisons can be made. There have been some "artsy" filming efforts, literally filmed almost from the canvas up. I suppose the height of current HWs make it difficult for average sized cameramen to be in perfectly line with the fighters - maybe they should get equitably tall ex-pugs like Lewis or Klit to moonlight as pre-fight instruction cameramen. LOL.
Pierre said on 14/Apr/20
Tyson Fury/Deontay =about Deontay's height
Deontay / Dominic Breazale both wearing sneakers= at around 26:27 shoes at around 26:22 = Click Here
Anthony Joshua big max 6"5.75' and barefoot /Dominic wearing sneakers so no less than 2 cm advantage to me = Click Here Click Here
Again Deontay with maybe a fraction more shoe than Tyson = Click Here
This comparisons can explain why Tyson Fury looks so short next to Magic eventually....
Click Here = in this video we can see at around 1:42 a guy want to give to Anthony his shoes and anthony chose to be barefoot for the face to face with Wlad(that maybe can explain why some guys claim Wlad wear lifts) Click Here = in this video at 4:16 we can see Wlad wear his sneakers before the face to face and a bit later Anthony in socks for weigh in.
So here his the difference between them when Anthony is barefoot = Click Here Click Here Click Here
And here the difference when both probably are wearing shoes = Click Here Click Here Click Here = Wlad slouching here and after more straight = Click Here Click Here = here closer to the camera
Tyson Fury/Deontay =about Deontay's height
Deontay / Dominic Breazale both wearing sneakers= at around 26:27 shoes at around 26:22 = Click Here
Anthony Joshua big max 6"5.75' and barefoot /Dominic wearing sneakers so no less than 2 cm advantage to me = Click Here Click Here
Again Deontay with maybe a fraction more shoe than Tyson = Click Here
This comparisons can explain why Tyson Fury looks so short next to Magic eventually....
Click Here = in this video we can see at around 1:42 a guy want to give to Anthony his shoes and anthony chose to be barefoot for the face to face with Wlad(that maybe can explain why some guys claim Wlad wear lifts) Click Here = in this video at 4:16 we can see Wlad wear his sneakers before the face to face and a bit later Anthony in socks for weigh in.
So here his the difference between them when Anthony is barefoot = Click Here Click Here Click Here
And here the difference when both probably are wearing shoes = Click Here Click Here Click Here = Wlad slouching here and after more straight = Click Here Click Here = here closer to the camera
Pierre said on 14/Apr/20
Canson said on 13 April=
@Pierre: yea but for every pic you post where you believe he is 6’6” I can find one where he’s 6’7+. Most of The pics where he appears 6’6 include camera angle issues or where someone else is heavily favored. But case in point is the fight with wilder where he was right in front of Wilder. Wilder measured 6’6.5” at some point in the day likely morning. So even if we say he’s 6’6” Fury is not under 6’7”. The fight mirrors the other evidence that Mickie and others have posted
Lol I still waiting for your famous "evidence" ...with a camera as low as possible you can even claim Tyson is 6"9' if you want...
Canson said on 13 April=
@Pierre: yea but for every pic you post where you believe he is 6’6” I can find one where he’s 6’7+. Most of The pics where he appears 6’6 include camera angle issues or where someone else is heavily favored. But case in point is the fight with wilder where he was right in front of Wilder. Wilder measured 6’6.5” at some point in the day likely morning. So even if we say he’s 6’6” Fury is not under 6’7”. The fight mirrors the other evidence that Mickie and others have posted
Lol I still waiting for your famous "evidence" ...with a camera as low as possible you can even claim Tyson is 6"9' if you want...
Canson said on 13/Apr/20
Pierre said on 11/Apr/20
@Canson=lots of pics I posted here in an angle sufficiently good and both guys around same distance to the camera are showing Tyson clearly around 6"6' and not around 6"7' next to Deontay or Wlad
@Pierre: yea but for every pic you post where you believe he is 6’6” I can find one where he’s 6’7+. Most of The pics where he appears 6’6 include camera angle issues or where someone else is heavily favored. But case in point is the fight with wilder where he was right in front of Wilder. Wilder measured 6’6.5” at some point in the day likely morning. So even if we say he’s 6’6” Fury is not under 6’7”. The fight mirrors the other evidence that Mickie and others have posted
Pierre said on 11/Apr/20
@Canson=lots of pics I posted here in an angle sufficiently good and both guys around same distance to the camera are showing Tyson clearly around 6"6' and not around 6"7' next to Deontay or Wlad
@Pierre: yea but for every pic you post where you believe he is 6’6” I can find one where he’s 6’7+. Most of The pics where he appears 6’6 include camera angle issues or where someone else is heavily favored. But case in point is the fight with wilder where he was right in front of Wilder. Wilder measured 6’6.5” at some point in the day likely morning. So even if we say he’s 6’6” Fury is not under 6’7”. The fight mirrors the other evidence that Mickie and others have posted
Pierre said on 13/Apr/20
One of my "bad pic" in a very "bad angle" and Deontay "a lot closer to the camera".... = Tyson Fury /Deontay on ring with Deontay maybe with a fraction more sneakers = Click Here .Tyson 6"7' here?Oh yeah...in a dream...(Deontay beeing probably more around 6"6" than 6"6.5'.....)
One of my "bad pic" in a very "bad angle" and Deontay "a lot closer to the camera".... = Tyson Fury /Deontay on ring with Deontay maybe with a fraction more sneakers = Click Here .Tyson 6"7' here?Oh yeah...in a dream...(Deontay beeing probably more around 6"6" than 6"6.5'.....)
Crane said on 13/Apr/20
Come to think of it, guys. 2 inches height lying is not that bad. There're some 6'7 guys I knew, clamming 6'10+.
However, honestly is the most important thing nowadays, it defines the person you really are.
Come to think of it, guys. 2 inches height lying is not that bad. There're some 6'7 guys I knew, clamming 6'10+.
However, honestly is the most important thing nowadays, it defines the person you really are.
Logan Dixon said on 13/Apr/20
David Price - 6’8
Tyson Fury - 6’7.5
Deontay Wilder - 6’6.5
Robert Helenius - 6’6.5
Tony Yoka - 6’6.5
Filip Hrgovic - 6’6
Anthony Joshua - 6’5.5
Joe Joyce - 6’5.5
Gerald Washington - 6’5.5
Efe Ajagba - 6’5
Daniel Dubois - 6’4
Charles Martin - 6’4
Jarrell Miller - 6’3
Joseph Parker - 6’3
Kubrat Pulev - 6’3
Dillian Whyte - 6’2.5
Oleksandr Usyk - 6’2.5
Luis Ortiz - 6’2.5
Adam Kownacki - 6’2
Chris Arreola - 6’2
Dave Allen - 6’2
Alexander Povetkin - 6’1.5
Dereck Chisora - 6’1
Michael Hunter - 6’1
Carlos Takam - 6’0.75
Andy Ruiz Jr - 6’0
Oscar Rivas - 5’11
David Price - 6’8
Tyson Fury - 6’7.5
Deontay Wilder - 6’6.5
Robert Helenius - 6’6.5
Tony Yoka - 6’6.5
Filip Hrgovic - 6’6
Anthony Joshua - 6’5.5
Joe Joyce - 6’5.5
Gerald Washington - 6’5.5
Efe Ajagba - 6’5
Daniel Dubois - 6’4
Charles Martin - 6’4
Jarrell Miller - 6’3
Joseph Parker - 6’3
Kubrat Pulev - 6’3
Dillian Whyte - 6’2.5
Oleksandr Usyk - 6’2.5
Luis Ortiz - 6’2.5
Adam Kownacki - 6’2
Chris Arreola - 6’2
Dave Allen - 6’2
Alexander Povetkin - 6’1.5
Dereck Chisora - 6’1
Michael Hunter - 6’1
Carlos Takam - 6’0.75
Andy Ruiz Jr - 6’0
Oscar Rivas - 5’11
Pierre said on 12/Apr/20
@Mickie :D of course my pics are good but my pics are not good for the people who want to argue 6"7' range for Tyson...of course Tyson looks 6"7" in the ring.... with a camera at around the same height as their ankles and very close of both men plus Tyson some centimeters closer to the camera than the other boxer .No finally my pics are not the badest pics for guessing heights but they re showing each time the real height of Tyson =max 6"6' :D
@Mickie :D of course my pics are good but my pics are not good for the people who want to argue 6"7' range for Tyson...of course Tyson looks 6"7" in the ring.... with a camera at around the same height as their ankles and very close of both men plus Tyson some centimeters closer to the camera than the other boxer .No finally my pics are not the badest pics for guessing heights but they re showing each time the real height of Tyson =max 6"6' :D
Mickie said on 11/Apr/20
@Pierre - reapectfully, no you have not posted good photos. Your photos have been mostly cherry picked to suit and adgenda of making Fury look shorter than he really is. With Fury and Wilder for example, you've ignored the best evidence we have of the two men in straight on camera angles with minimal footwear and on level surfaces together in favor of photos where that isn't the case at all.
@Pierre - reapectfully, no you have not posted good photos. Your photos have been mostly cherry picked to suit and adgenda of making Fury look shorter than he really is. With Fury and Wilder for example, you've ignored the best evidence we have of the two men in straight on camera angles with minimal footwear and on level surfaces together in favor of photos where that isn't the case at all.
FriedChicken said on 11/Apr/20
I still believe Fury needs a downgrade to 6'7 flat than 6'7.50 because he is visibly shorter than Magic Johnson in literally every pic they had together. I can't see him being taller than Lebron James either.
I still believe Fury needs a downgrade to 6'7 flat than 6'7.50 because he is visibly shorter than Magic Johnson in literally every pic they had together. I can't see him being taller than Lebron James either.
Pierre said on 11/Apr/20
@Canson=lots of pics I posted here in an angle sufficiently good and both guys around same distance to the camera are showing Tyson clearly around 6"6' and not around 6"7' next to Deontay or Wlad
@Canson=lots of pics I posted here in an angle sufficiently good and both guys around same distance to the camera are showing Tyson clearly around 6"6' and not around 6"7' next to Deontay or Wlad
Pierre said on 11/Apr/20
@ Mickie=Zero proofs Wlad wear lifts here plus his shoes next to Pulev are looking only very classics slim and flat sneakers, watch again the recent comment and pics I posted about his shoes next to Pulev on 06 April .Wlad tower over Pulev. Pulev s official height is probably measured with the same height gauge that find 6"9' to Tyson,6"5' to Tom Schwarz....or 6"0'to Snead :D
@ Mickie=Zero proofs Wlad wear lifts here plus his shoes next to Pulev are looking only very classics slim and flat sneakers, watch again the recent comment and pics I posted about his shoes next to Pulev on 06 April .Wlad tower over Pulev. Pulev s official height is probably measured with the same height gauge that find 6"9' to Tyson,6"5' to Tom Schwarz....or 6"0'to Snead :D
Canson said on 10/Apr/20
Pierre said on 9/Apr/20
:D lol In Robbe s pic just watching the postures=Anthony Joshua put his hands behind his back and clearly not as straight as Tarkam standing straighter than him.
Plus in the video of Anthony Joshua s height Rob's scale give Anthony eye at around 6'1' then AJ in same posture as Tarkam means Tarkam is 6 range! All the other Boxers Robbe talk about their heights=Rob has seen Anthony not the others guys! No Wlad was not wearing lifts lol Tyson is max 6'6' :D
@Pierre: While nothing and nobody are exact, Robbie is pretty much spot on with his assessments of the pics from his 8/April/20 post. Even leaving that post out, if we just went off the estimate that Klitschko provided for Wach, that estimate does line up. 6’7-6’8 range which also adds up in Fury’s pictures with Wlad or with Deontay Wilder.
Pierre said on 9/Apr/20
:D lol In Robbe s pic just watching the postures=Anthony Joshua put his hands behind his back and clearly not as straight as Tarkam standing straighter than him.
Plus in the video of Anthony Joshua s height Rob's scale give Anthony eye at around 6'1' then AJ in same posture as Tarkam means Tarkam is 6 range! All the other Boxers Robbe talk about their heights=Rob has seen Anthony not the others guys! No Wlad was not wearing lifts lol Tyson is max 6'6' :D
@Pierre: While nothing and nobody are exact, Robbie is pretty much spot on with his assessments of the pics from his 8/April/20 post. Even leaving that post out, if we just went off the estimate that Klitschko provided for Wach, that estimate does line up. 6’7-6’8 range which also adds up in Fury’s pictures with Wlad or with Deontay Wilder.
Pierre said on 10/Apr/20
@Tall In The Saddle I posted recently here pics in a better angle than your pic and you can see Deontay looks even taller than Tyson in some pics. In your pic the angle of the camera is very low in direction to the sky and advantage a lot the guy who is standing just a bit closer to the camera than the other guy plus to me in this posture Deontay slouch a bit more than Tyson
@Tall In The Saddle I posted recently here pics in a better angle than your pic and you can see Deontay looks even taller than Tyson in some pics. In your pic the angle of the camera is very low in direction to the sky and advantage a lot the guy who is standing just a bit closer to the camera than the other guy plus to me in this posture Deontay slouch a bit more than Tyson
Gman39 said on 10/Apr/20
For Robbe, here is a video with Pulev, Parker, and Miller all standing around, interacting together.
Click Here
To Big Rob: I'm sorry if I have not posted the link correctly, in the past I remember I did something to prep links first, but now I've forgotten what to do. Thanks
For Robbe, here is a video with Pulev, Parker, and Miller all standing around, interacting together.
Click Here
To Big Rob: I'm sorry if I have not posted the link correctly, in the past I remember I did something to prep links first, but now I've forgotten what to do. Thanks
Mickie said on 10/Apr/20
Of course Wlad wore lifts in the staredowns. I think that's pretty obvious.
Of course Wlad wore lifts in the staredowns. I think that's pretty obvious.
Canson said on 10/Apr/20
@Robbe: you were right. Do you think Wach is the legit 6’7 1/2 afternoon?
Click Here
@Robbe: you were right. Do you think Wach is the legit 6’7 1/2 afternoon?
Click Here
viper said on 9/Apr/20
He's definitely 6-7 at least from everything I've seen.
Amazingly Jason Momoa guessed him as low as 6-5
He's definitely 6-7 at least from everything I've seen.
Amazingly Jason Momoa guessed him as low as 6-5
Pierre said on 9/Apr/20
:D imagine if Anthony Joshua was standing as straight as Carlos Tarkam in Robbe 's Pic on 08 April!
By the video with scale Anthony Joshua' s eyes are 6'1'!Tyson Fury max 6'6' lol!
:D imagine if Anthony Joshua was standing as straight as Carlos Tarkam in Robbe 's Pic on 08 April!
By the video with scale Anthony Joshua' s eyes are 6'1'!Tyson Fury max 6'6' lol!
Pierre said on 9/Apr/20
:D lol In Robbe s pic just watching the postures=Anthony Joshua put his hands behind his back and clearly not as straight as Tarkam standing straighter than him.
Plus in the video of Anthony Joshua s height Rob's scale give Anthony eye at around 6'1' then AJ in same posture as Tarkam means Tarkam is 6 range! All the other Boxers Robbe talk about their heights=Rob has seen Anthony not the others guys! No Wlad was not wearing lifts lol Tyson is max 6'6' :D
:D lol In Robbe s pic just watching the postures=Anthony Joshua put his hands behind his back and clearly not as straight as Tarkam standing straighter than him.
Plus in the video of Anthony Joshua s height Rob's scale give Anthony eye at around 6'1' then AJ in same posture as Tarkam means Tarkam is 6 range! All the other Boxers Robbe talk about their heights=Rob has seen Anthony not the others guys! No Wlad was not wearing lifts lol Tyson is max 6'6' :D
Robbe said on 8/Apr/20
Carlos Takam is taller than 184cm. Looks an easy 1in taller than 183cm Andy Ruiz.
Click Here
Takam is on AJ:s eyelevel. Very good picture, same footwear, good angle.
Click Here
We have to remember AJ has very low forehead. His eyelevel to his top of head is probably no more than 10cm. Takam seems to be slightly under AJ:s eyelevel, so that's about 11cm difference. So Takam can't be as low as 184cm. More like 186-187cm.
Takam is definitely not 7cm shorter than 191cm Joseph Parker.
Click Here
188cm Chisora 1-2cm taller than Takam.
Click Here
Takam max 3cm taller than Senad.
Click Here
So Senad is as around 6ft. Tom easily 12cm taller = 195cm :D
Carlos Takam is taller than 184cm. Looks an easy 1in taller than 183cm Andy Ruiz.
Click Here
Takam is on AJ:s eyelevel. Very good picture, same footwear, good angle.
Click Here
We have to remember AJ has very low forehead. His eyelevel to his top of head is probably no more than 10cm. Takam seems to be slightly under AJ:s eyelevel, so that's about 11cm difference. So Takam can't be as low as 184cm. More like 186-187cm.
Takam is definitely not 7cm shorter than 191cm Joseph Parker.
Click Here
188cm Chisora 1-2cm taller than Takam.
Click Here
Takam max 3cm taller than Senad.
Click Here
So Senad is as around 6ft. Tom easily 12cm taller = 195cm :D
Tall In The Saddle said on 8/Apr/20
@Pierre
Thanks for your reply. The face off pic again. Click Here. I won't belabour the point beyond this post. Broken down technically. The back of Wilder's neck is straight, even ever so slightly back from vertical to "look up" at Fury. Wilder's ear is in line with the middle of his shoulder - acceptable and sufficiently straight posture. His back isn't "hunched", that's his trap muscle. That's as good as it gets - so if one doesn't recognise that to be Wilder's height at it's full potential, then they will never "see" or "believe" Wilder to be standing fully straight - which seems to be the case here with the uniform suggestion that Wilder is "breaking his back" in every shot - with no offer of contrary pictorial evidence of Wilder not in fact breaking his posture.
This is the article that quotes Wlad stating that he felt Tyson was about the same size/height as Wach.
Click Here
@Pierre
Thanks for your reply. The face off pic again. Click Here. I won't belabour the point beyond this post. Broken down technically. The back of Wilder's neck is straight, even ever so slightly back from vertical to "look up" at Fury. Wilder's ear is in line with the middle of his shoulder - acceptable and sufficiently straight posture. His back isn't "hunched", that's his trap muscle. That's as good as it gets - so if one doesn't recognise that to be Wilder's height at it's full potential, then they will never "see" or "believe" Wilder to be standing fully straight - which seems to be the case here with the uniform suggestion that Wilder is "breaking his back" in every shot - with no offer of contrary pictorial evidence of Wilder not in fact breaking his posture.
This is the article that quotes Wlad stating that he felt Tyson was about the same size/height as Wach.
Click Here
Robbe said on 8/Apr/20
Otto with 191cm listed Adam Kownacki. Adam way closer to the camera.
Click Here
That's not 1cm difference. More like 7cm. Adam's height is though debatable. Looked at least 10cm shorter than Helenius. So Adam may be 189-190 range. Anyway, 192cm for Otto is a joke.
Otto with 191cm listed Adam Kownacki. Adam way closer to the camera.
Click Here
That's not 1cm difference. More like 7cm. Adam's height is though debatable. Looked at least 10cm shorter than Helenius. So Adam may be 189-190 range. Anyway, 192cm for Otto is a joke.
Robbe said on 8/Apr/20
Lol, of course Wlad was wearing lifts with Pulev. He looks like 200cm there with minimum 193cm Pulev. Wlad is most likely wearing the same 2in shoes he wore with Tyson.
Click Here
Wlad is not even standing straight there. Here he is standing tall. Lol at this pic.
Click Here
Hughie Fury is a legit 6'5. He is only slightly taller than Pulev. So 6'2 for Pulev is a joke, obviously.
Click Here
Joseph Parker is a legit 6'3, he is 2in shorter than Hughie. Pulev is noticeable taller than Parker. There are many photos of Parker vs Hughie, and Hughie vs Pulev, just google.
Click Here
Pulev here with 6'5 listed Tony Thompson.
Click Here
Wlad (without lifts) here with Thompson.
Click Here
Click Here
So, 188cm for Pulev is bollocks of course. Pulev is noticeable taller than 191cm guys, like Parker. Otto is noticeable taller than 193cm guys. Tom Scwartz totally dwarfs 184cm listed Senad Gashi by 12cm, so he can't be 191cm lol. Like said, it's pretty hard to lower Tyson down to 6'6 range. Impossible, if you ask me. But you can always try, just like you have tried to lower Big Show down to weak 6'7 lol :D
Lol, of course Wlad was wearing lifts with Pulev. He looks like 200cm there with minimum 193cm Pulev. Wlad is most likely wearing the same 2in shoes he wore with Tyson.
Click Here
Wlad is not even standing straight there. Here he is standing tall. Lol at this pic.
Click Here
Hughie Fury is a legit 6'5. He is only slightly taller than Pulev. So 6'2 for Pulev is a joke, obviously.
Click Here
Joseph Parker is a legit 6'3, he is 2in shorter than Hughie. Pulev is noticeable taller than Parker. There are many photos of Parker vs Hughie, and Hughie vs Pulev, just google.
Click Here
Pulev here with 6'5 listed Tony Thompson.
Click Here
Wlad (without lifts) here with Thompson.
Click Here
Click Here
So, 188cm for Pulev is bollocks of course. Pulev is noticeable taller than 191cm guys, like Parker. Otto is noticeable taller than 193cm guys. Tom Scwartz totally dwarfs 184cm listed Senad Gashi by 12cm, so he can't be 191cm lol. Like said, it's pretty hard to lower Tyson down to 6'6 range. Impossible, if you ask me. But you can always try, just like you have tried to lower Big Show down to weak 6'7 lol :D
Canson said on 7/Apr/20
Robbe said on 7/Apr/20
Tom Scwartz here with Tyson, and 6'7 listed Christian Lewandowski. Angle is roughly about the same, Tom closer to the camera in both cases.
Click Here
Somebody tried to claim 191cm for Tom earlier by posting a terrible angled video where Tom wasn't even standing straight with Senad Gashi. This is better. Senad is on Tom's eyelevel. Solid 12cm difference.
Click Here
Tom and Otto are both legit 195cm boxers. Both are at least 6cm shorter than Tyson.
Click Here
There are like tons of evidence Tyson can't be 6'6. But hey, this is fun! :D
LOL. I think the safer statement may be that there is little to no evidence that he can actually be 6’6”
Robbe said on 7/Apr/20
Tom Scwartz here with Tyson, and 6'7 listed Christian Lewandowski. Angle is roughly about the same, Tom closer to the camera in both cases.
Click Here
Somebody tried to claim 191cm for Tom earlier by posting a terrible angled video where Tom wasn't even standing straight with Senad Gashi. This is better. Senad is on Tom's eyelevel. Solid 12cm difference.
Click Here
Tom and Otto are both legit 195cm boxers. Both are at least 6cm shorter than Tyson.
Click Here
There are like tons of evidence Tyson can't be 6'6. But hey, this is fun! :D
LOL. I think the safer statement may be that there is little to no evidence that he can actually be 6’6”
Canson said on 7/Apr/20
Robbe said on 6/Apr/20
@Canson, Wlad said Tyson looked the same height as Wach (6'7.5). That's the only estimation i have heard from Wlad.
I see. Guess I was wrong. But Wlad May assume both are 6’7” flat and not 6’7.5. Then again, Wlad, I’m not sure what he considers his height since he’s said that 6’6 in the morning and 6’5” in the evening
Robbe said on 6/Apr/20
@Canson, Wlad said Tyson looked the same height as Wach (6'7.5). That's the only estimation i have heard from Wlad.
I see. Guess I was wrong. But Wlad May assume both are 6’7” flat and not 6’7.5. Then again, Wlad, I’m not sure what he considers his height since he’s said that 6’6 in the morning and 6’5” in the evening
Pierre said on 7/Apr/20
Click Here = At 6:25 here is Carlos Tarkam next to Anthony Joshua both same posture = Similar soles = Click Here = Click Here = Carlos's top of head again comfortably under Anthony's eye and Anthony not perfectly straight here =difference =no less than 5.5 inches here,this means Carlos Tarkam is 6"0.25' best case.
Now Carlos and Senad(remember the guy Robbe compare with Tom Schwarz= difference 4.75 inches,let's say 5 inches) = Click Here =Senad a bit closer to the camera = Click Here = here at 2:39 Carlos shrink a lot for the selfie and the top of his head is again sometimes a bit taller than the top of Senad's hairs.... difference two good inches = this means Senad is max 5"10' = Tom Schwarz = max 6"3'
Tyson again max 6"6' :D
Click Here = At 6:25 here is Carlos Tarkam next to Anthony Joshua both same posture = Similar soles = Click Here = Click Here = Carlos's top of head again comfortably under Anthony's eye and Anthony not perfectly straight here =difference =no less than 5.5 inches here,this means Carlos Tarkam is 6"0.25' best case.
Now Carlos and Senad(remember the guy Robbe compare with Tom Schwarz= difference 4.75 inches,let's say 5 inches) = Click Here =Senad a bit closer to the camera = Click Here = here at 2:39 Carlos shrink a lot for the selfie and the top of his head is again sometimes a bit taller than the top of Senad's hairs.... difference two good inches = this means Senad is max 5"10' = Tom Schwarz = max 6"3'
Tyson again max 6"6' :D
Pierre said on 7/Apr/20
Robbe said on 7/Apr/20
Tom Scwartz here with Tyson, and 6'7 listed Christian Lewandowski. Angle is roughly about the same, Tom closer to the camera in both cases.
Click Here
Somebody tried to claim 191cm for Tom earlier by posting a terrible angled video where Tom wasn't even standing straight with Senad Gashi. This is better. Senad is on Tom's eyelevel. Solid 12cm difference.
Click Here
Tom and Otto are both legit 195cm boxers. Both are at least 6cm shorter than Tyson.
Click Here
There are like tons of evidence Tyson can't be 6'6. But hey, this is fun! :D
:D = Click Here = here is again(like my first example in my recent comment) Dereck Chisora 6"1.5' /6"2' more distant to the camera than Senad Gashi plus camera very low that advantage a lot the closest guy, plus Dereck looking the camera very low and not perfectly straight at the opposite to Robbe's pics inwich Tom Schwarz is looking up (or his head very very straight if you prefer)plus both are the same distance to the camera....Of course without counting all this parameters we could argue Tom Schwarz is a lot taller than Tom Schwarz that is not the case.
Click Here = Other comparison = both guys not face to face as you can see in the video at 3:19 Click Here because in fact Dereck is talking to the guy behind them and so only Senad stand close to the camera again very low that advantage him .Plus Dereck is clearly not as straight as Senad here,Dereck's head his looking down ...imagine both guys same distance to the camera and Dereck looking up....Bye bye 6"4'/6"5' range for Tom Schwarz...Hello max 6"3' range ... Tom is 6"4' /6"5' like Tyson is 6"8' /6"9' ...or Magic 6"10'/6"11' ...etc
Robbe said on 7/Apr/20
Tom Scwartz here with Tyson, and 6'7 listed Christian Lewandowski. Angle is roughly about the same, Tom closer to the camera in both cases.
Click Here
Somebody tried to claim 191cm for Tom earlier by posting a terrible angled video where Tom wasn't even standing straight with Senad Gashi. This is better. Senad is on Tom's eyelevel. Solid 12cm difference.
Click Here
Tom and Otto are both legit 195cm boxers. Both are at least 6cm shorter than Tyson.
Click Here
There are like tons of evidence Tyson can't be 6'6. But hey, this is fun! :D
:D = Click Here = here is again(like my first example in my recent comment) Dereck Chisora 6"1.5' /6"2' more distant to the camera than Senad Gashi plus camera very low that advantage a lot the closest guy, plus Dereck looking the camera very low and not perfectly straight at the opposite to Robbe's pics inwich Tom Schwarz is looking up (or his head very very straight if you prefer)plus both are the same distance to the camera....Of course without counting all this parameters we could argue Tom Schwarz is a lot taller than Tom Schwarz that is not the case.
Click Here = Other comparison = both guys not face to face as you can see in the video at 3:19 Click Here because in fact Dereck is talking to the guy behind them and so only Senad stand close to the camera again very low that advantage him .Plus Dereck is clearly not as straight as Senad here,Dereck's head his looking down ...imagine both guys same distance to the camera and Dereck looking up....Bye bye 6"4'/6"5' range for Tom Schwarz...Hello max 6"3' range ... Tom is 6"4' /6"5' like Tyson is 6"8' /6"9' ...or Magic 6"10'/6"11' ...etc
Sarai said on 7/Apr/20
Watch all of his photos yesterday, he's 200-201 cm max probably 200.5 cm
Magic is 201 cm
Wilder is 197-198 maybe 197.5 cm
Watch all of his photos yesterday, he's 200-201 cm max probably 200.5 cm
Magic is 201 cm
Wilder is 197-198 maybe 197.5 cm
Robbe said on 7/Apr/20
Tom Scwartz here with Tyson, and 6'7 listed Christian Lewandowski. Angle is roughly about the same, Tom closer to the camera in both cases.
Click Here
Somebody tried to claim 191cm for Tom earlier by posting a terrible angled video where Tom wasn't even standing straight with Senad Gashi. This is better. Senad is on Tom's eyelevel. Solid 12cm difference.
Click Here
Tom and Otto are both legit 195cm boxers. Both are at least 6cm shorter than Tyson.
Click Here
There are like tons of evidence Tyson can't be 6'6. But hey, this is fun! :D
Tom Scwartz here with Tyson, and 6'7 listed Christian Lewandowski. Angle is roughly about the same, Tom closer to the camera in both cases.
Click Here
Somebody tried to claim 191cm for Tom earlier by posting a terrible angled video where Tom wasn't even standing straight with Senad Gashi. This is better. Senad is on Tom's eyelevel. Solid 12cm difference.
Click Here
Tom and Otto are both legit 195cm boxers. Both are at least 6cm shorter than Tyson.
Click Here
There are like tons of evidence Tyson can't be 6'6. But hey, this is fun! :D
Pierre said on 6/Apr/20
Robbe said on 5/Apr/20
Otto here with 193cm Raphael Zumbano.
Click Here
Tyson here with Zumbano. Easy 3in difference.
Click Here
Zumbano with 194cm listed Pubrat Pulev.
Click Here
Pulev with AJ.
Click Here
Zumbano and Pulev looks about the same. Otto looks noticeable taller than Zumbano. So Otto can't be as low as 192cm. It's just impossible. AJ looks 1.75in taller than Pulev. Tyson looks once again legit 6'7 with Zumbano.
Fact is Otto Wallin next to Anthony Joshua looks easily under 6"4' and Anthony Joshua is the only guy Rob has seen here.By considering Otto is clearly 6"3.5' big max logically Zumbano is clearly shorter than him
Zumbano next to Pulev = fact is by the position of their pelvis and shoulders Zumbano is closer to the camera than Pulev here but does not look taller.But when Pulev stand around the same distance or a bit closer Pulev looks a bit taller = Click Here then Pulev is logically taller than Zumbano.But...Let's say they are same height.
Pulev face to face Anthony Joshua = fact is Anthony Joshua shrunk here = Neck and back not straight...Plus Pulev wear tuxedo = then maybe he has shoes with comfortable heels while Anthony wear sneakers ...
Now Pulev /Vlad listed 6"5.25' in this site both in sneakers= Click Here = Pulev clearly never 6"4' here or even close to 6"3' and closer to the camera Click Here = here Vlad in poor posture =if Wlad is really 6"5.25' afternoon(that I doubt but...) Pulev here is max 6"2' range....
Click Here = for guys who think Vlad was wearing lifts in his sneakers = here just after the fight ,between 20min30 /20min31 Vlad stand no distant to Kubrat Pulev at same distance to
the camera and again tower over him and Vlad slouch a lot .
As I said Otto Wallin by considering postures and distances to the camera /low camera is clearly a lot shorter than Anthony Joshua
Tyson again max 6"6'
Robbe said on 5/Apr/20
Otto here with 193cm Raphael Zumbano.
Click Here
Tyson here with Zumbano. Easy 3in difference.
Click Here
Zumbano with 194cm listed Pubrat Pulev.
Click Here
Pulev with AJ.
Click Here
Zumbano and Pulev looks about the same. Otto looks noticeable taller than Zumbano. So Otto can't be as low as 192cm. It's just impossible. AJ looks 1.75in taller than Pulev. Tyson looks once again legit 6'7 with Zumbano.
Fact is Otto Wallin next to Anthony Joshua looks easily under 6"4' and Anthony Joshua is the only guy Rob has seen here.By considering Otto is clearly 6"3.5' big max logically Zumbano is clearly shorter than him
Zumbano next to Pulev = fact is by the position of their pelvis and shoulders Zumbano is closer to the camera than Pulev here but does not look taller.But when Pulev stand around the same distance or a bit closer Pulev looks a bit taller = Click Here then Pulev is logically taller than Zumbano.But...Let's say they are same height.
Pulev face to face Anthony Joshua = fact is Anthony Joshua shrunk here = Neck and back not straight...Plus Pulev wear tuxedo = then maybe he has shoes with comfortable heels while Anthony wear sneakers ...
Now Pulev /Vlad listed 6"5.25' in this site both in sneakers= Click Here = Pulev clearly never 6"4' here or even close to 6"3' and closer to the camera Click Here = here Vlad in poor posture =if Wlad is really 6"5.25' afternoon(that I doubt but...) Pulev here is max 6"2' range....
Click Here = for guys who think Vlad was wearing lifts in his sneakers = here just after the fight ,between 20min30 /20min31 Vlad stand no distant to Kubrat Pulev at same distance to
the camera and again tower over him and Vlad slouch a lot .
As I said Otto Wallin by considering postures and distances to the camera /low camera is clearly a lot shorter than Anthony Joshua
Tyson again max 6"6'
Mickie said on 6/Apr/20
Did Wlad put a number on it, or just say that Tyson was the same size as Wach?
Did Wlad put a number on it, or just say that Tyson was the same size as Wach?
Robbe said on 6/Apr/20
@Canson, Wlad said Tyson looked the same height as Wach (6'7.5). That's the only estimation i have heard from Wlad.
@Canson, Wlad said Tyson looked the same height as Wach (6'7.5). That's the only estimation i have heard from Wlad.
Canson said on 5/Apr/20
@Robbe: I thought Wlad just said he was 6’7” range not 6’7.5 range
@Robbe: I thought Wlad just said he was 6’7” range not 6’7.5 range
Canson said on 5/Apr/20
Mickie said on 4/Apr/20
@ Pierre - their respective head sizes are highly suggestive of an angle favoring Magic.
That’s the norm with most of the pics
Mickie said on 4/Apr/20
@ Pierre - their respective head sizes are highly suggestive of an angle favoring Magic.
That’s the norm with most of the pics
Pierre said on 5/Apr/20
Mickie said on 4/Apr/20
@ Pierre - their respective head sizes are highly suggestive of an angle favoring Magic.
I posted some pics recently in this page inwhich you can see Magic even a lot more distant than other people has again a big head in the pic.Other pics = Click Here Click Here Click Here
Magic's head looks big next to Tyson because Magic's head is big imo.Then the argument of size head in the pic isn't a proof to me.
Magic and Tyson are neck to neck camera sufficiently centered and the difference of height in the pic to me is close to the reality (by counting postures of course)Maybe Magic's head is 3 cm closer to the camera,but by counting postures,if Tyson was close to 6"7' the difference in the pic would never looks so big to me .Tyson is not even close to 6"7' mark to me.
To the opposite in the pic Otto Wallin /Anthony Joshua I posted recently or Robbe's pic = Otto is a lot closer to the camera that is very low and then Otto is clearly advantaged and clearly not 6"4.5' next to him .
Mickie said on 4/Apr/20
@ Pierre - their respective head sizes are highly suggestive of an angle favoring Magic.
I posted some pics recently in this page inwhich you can see Magic even a lot more distant than other people has again a big head in the pic.Other pics = Click Here Click Here Click Here
Magic's head looks big next to Tyson because Magic's head is big imo.Then the argument of size head in the pic isn't a proof to me.
Magic and Tyson are neck to neck camera sufficiently centered and the difference of height in the pic to me is close to the reality (by counting postures of course)Maybe Magic's head is 3 cm closer to the camera,but by counting postures,if Tyson was close to 6"7' the difference in the pic would never looks so big to me .Tyson is not even close to 6"7' mark to me.
To the opposite in the pic Otto Wallin /Anthony Joshua I posted recently or Robbe's pic = Otto is a lot closer to the camera that is very low and then Otto is clearly advantaged and clearly not 6"4.5' next to him .
Canson said on 5/Apr/20
@Robbe and Miko: while Fury is undoubtedly 6’7”, I think it’s safer to say that he’s at least 6’7” rather than saying he’s over because we don’t know if he’s 6’7” flat 6’7.25 6’7.5”. I doubt he’s 6’7.75 that looks too much but I would go with something more like 6’7.25” like Mickie said and Robbe also guessed Fury at one stage. I think Wilder needs the downgrade to 6’6” flat or at best 6’6.25” and we can just write it off as a full inch. 3cm is 1.18” so better chance Wilder falls closer to 6’6”
@Robbe and Miko: while Fury is undoubtedly 6’7”, I think it’s safer to say that he’s at least 6’7” rather than saying he’s over because we don’t know if he’s 6’7” flat 6’7.25 6’7.5”. I doubt he’s 6’7.75 that looks too much but I would go with something more like 6’7.25” like Mickie said and Robbe also guessed Fury at one stage. I think Wilder needs the downgrade to 6’6” flat or at best 6’6.25” and we can just write it off as a full inch. 3cm is 1.18” so better chance Wilder falls closer to 6’6”
Robbe said on 5/Apr/20
Otto here with 193cm Raphael Zumbano.
Click Here
Tyson here with Zumbano. Easy 3in difference.
Click Here
Zumbano with 194cm listed Pubrat Pulev.
Click Here
Pulev with AJ.
Click Here
Zumbano and Pulev looks about the same. Otto looks noticeable taller than Zumbano. So Otto can't be as low as 192cm. It's just impossible. AJ looks 1.75in taller than Pulev. Tyson looks once again legit 6'7 with Zumbano.
Otto here with 193cm Raphael Zumbano.
Click Here
Tyson here with Zumbano. Easy 3in difference.
Click Here
Zumbano with 194cm listed Pubrat Pulev.
Click Here
Pulev with AJ.
Click Here
Zumbano and Pulev looks about the same. Otto looks noticeable taller than Zumbano. So Otto can't be as low as 192cm. It's just impossible. AJ looks 1.75in taller than Pulev. Tyson looks once again legit 6'7 with Zumbano.
Mickie said on 4/Apr/20
@ Pierre - their respective head sizes are highly suggestive of an angle favoring Magic.
@ Pierre - their respective head sizes are highly suggestive of an angle favoring Magic.
Canson said on 4/Apr/20
Robbe said on 3/Apr/20
BJ Flores here with 189cm Tony Bellew, and Otto Wallin.
Click Here
BJ is listed at 6'2, but is obviously way shorter. But anyway, Bellew looks 2in taller than BJ, and Otto is easily 4in taller there. So, absolutely lowest for Otto is 6'4.5 (194cm). Tyson is at least 6cm taller than Otto, which means minimum 200cm for Tyson. If AJ is really only 0.25in shorter than Tyson, that would make AJ 199.5cm. Eh?
So, we have to lower Otto down to 192cm to get Tyson 6'6 range. Problem is i haven't seen a single photo where Otto looks 192cm. He looks always at least 195cm. Here with 6'6 Zhang Zhilei Click Here
AJ is nowhere near 5'5cm taller than Otto. That would make AJ close to 200cm. I remember Otto was listed 195cm as amateur. I doubt he's much under that. I can buy AJ 3.5cm taller than Otto, at the most. Otto 194cm, and AJ 197.5cm. If Otto is 195cm, AJ is no more than 2.5cm taller. Tyson is easily +1in taller than AJ.
@Robbe: Agreed. AJ, we could argue is 197 but not any lower than that. It could be 3cm with Otto and Otto could even come down under 194 by a hair like me. I would measure near 195 after an hour of being awake so it’s possible that’s the same for him and he could be 6’4.25-.3 but 194 range is probably ok. But you stated it very well. There’s still not a freezing chance in hell that Fury is only 6’6”. If we argued a 197 cm AJ which is the lowest I would give him that means Fury is probably a solid 6’7 or maybe even 201. 201-202 range is where I have him currently
Robbe said on 3/Apr/20
BJ Flores here with 189cm Tony Bellew, and Otto Wallin.
Click Here
BJ is listed at 6'2, but is obviously way shorter. But anyway, Bellew looks 2in taller than BJ, and Otto is easily 4in taller there. So, absolutely lowest for Otto is 6'4.5 (194cm). Tyson is at least 6cm taller than Otto, which means minimum 200cm for Tyson. If AJ is really only 0.25in shorter than Tyson, that would make AJ 199.5cm. Eh?
So, we have to lower Otto down to 192cm to get Tyson 6'6 range. Problem is i haven't seen a single photo where Otto looks 192cm. He looks always at least 195cm. Here with 6'6 Zhang Zhilei Click Here
AJ is nowhere near 5'5cm taller than Otto. That would make AJ close to 200cm. I remember Otto was listed 195cm as amateur. I doubt he's much under that. I can buy AJ 3.5cm taller than Otto, at the most. Otto 194cm, and AJ 197.5cm. If Otto is 195cm, AJ is no more than 2.5cm taller. Tyson is easily +1in taller than AJ.
@Robbe: Agreed. AJ, we could argue is 197 but not any lower than that. It could be 3cm with Otto and Otto could even come down under 194 by a hair like me. I would measure near 195 after an hour of being awake so it’s possible that’s the same for him and he could be 6’4.25-.3 but 194 range is probably ok. But you stated it very well. There’s still not a freezing chance in hell that Fury is only 6’6”. If we argued a 197 cm AJ which is the lowest I would give him that means Fury is probably a solid 6’7 or maybe even 201. 201-202 range is where I have him currently
Canson said on 4/Apr/20
Pierre said on 3/Apr/20
Canson said on 2/Apr/20
@Pierre: Rob was convinced Anthony Joshua was 6’6 in person. He gave him 6’5.75 because of the footwear. That is likely closer to the least he is though. You could argue 6’5.5-.75 range or 6’5 5/8 but he isn’t something less than 6’5.5
If Rob was really convinced Anthony was around 6"6' why is he listed 6"5.75' again now? ...
Editor Rob
I had my old brown merrell sneakers (miles) which were less than his nike Air Max 90 (or One), hence he looked a good 6ft 6 guy
I also said it right there In the body of my post
“@Pierre: Rob was convinced Anthony Joshua was 6’6 in person. He gave him 6’5.75 because of the footwear.”
@Pierre: I didn’t word it properly. I should’ve said looked 6’6” in person but footwear plays into the appearance of someone’s height. Rob’s assessment was that he was at most 6’6” in person. He said that to me on Joshua’s page. As a matter of fact, Anthony Joshua was originally listed at 6’6” even after Rob met him but was dropped to 6’5.75 due to the comments and due to Rob re-evaluating it. He said himself that because of the footwear advantage Rob had on him that he felt 6’5.75” was fairer. If you see Joshua with Brazeille or Klitschko he generally looks maybe half inch taller than Wlad who is 6’5-6’5.25” and slightly shorter than the former.
Pierre said on 3/Apr/20
Canson said on 2/Apr/20
@Pierre: Rob was convinced Anthony Joshua was 6’6 in person. He gave him 6’5.75 because of the footwear. That is likely closer to the least he is though. You could argue 6’5.5-.75 range or 6’5 5/8 but he isn’t something less than 6’5.5
If Rob was really convinced Anthony was around 6"6' why is he listed 6"5.75' again now? ...
Editor Rob
I had my old brown merrell sneakers (miles) which were less than his nike Air Max 90 (or One), hence he looked a good 6ft 6 guy
I also said it right there In the body of my post
“@Pierre: Rob was convinced Anthony Joshua was 6’6 in person. He gave him 6’5.75 because of the footwear.”
@Pierre: I didn’t word it properly. I should’ve said looked 6’6” in person but footwear plays into the appearance of someone’s height. Rob’s assessment was that he was at most 6’6” in person. He said that to me on Joshua’s page. As a matter of fact, Anthony Joshua was originally listed at 6’6” even after Rob met him but was dropped to 6’5.75 due to the comments and due to Rob re-evaluating it. He said himself that because of the footwear advantage Rob had on him that he felt 6’5.75” was fairer. If you see Joshua with Brazeille or Klitschko he generally looks maybe half inch taller than Wlad who is 6’5-6’5.25” and slightly shorter than the former.
Pierre said on 4/Apr/20
Robbe said on 3/Apr/20
BJ Flores here with 189cm Tony Bellew, and Otto Wallin.
Click Here
BJ is listed at 6'2, but is obviously way shorter. But anyway, Bellew looks 2in taller than BJ, and Otto is easily 4in taller there. So, absolutely lowest for Otto is 6'4.5 (194cm). Tyson is at least 6cm taller than Otto, which means minimum 200cm for Tyson. If AJ is really only 0.25in shorter than Tyson, that would make AJ 199.5cm. Eh?
Fact is Otto Wallin next to Anthony Joshua is never 6"4.5' .And Rob has seen Anthony .Otto is a lot closer to the camera that is low and Anthony Joshua 6"5.75' shrunk a lot with a big space between his own feet and is again clearly taller than him Click Here Not even sure Otto is 6"3.75' next to Anthony.
Tyson again max 6"6'
Robbe said on 3/Apr/20
BJ Flores here with 189cm Tony Bellew, and Otto Wallin.
Click Here
BJ is listed at 6'2, but is obviously way shorter. But anyway, Bellew looks 2in taller than BJ, and Otto is easily 4in taller there. So, absolutely lowest for Otto is 6'4.5 (194cm). Tyson is at least 6cm taller than Otto, which means minimum 200cm for Tyson. If AJ is really only 0.25in shorter than Tyson, that would make AJ 199.5cm. Eh?
Fact is Otto Wallin next to Anthony Joshua is never 6"4.5' .And Rob has seen Anthony .Otto is a lot closer to the camera that is low and Anthony Joshua 6"5.75' shrunk a lot with a big space between his own feet and is again clearly taller than him Click Here Not even sure Otto is 6"3.75' next to Anthony.
Tyson again max 6"6'
miko said on 4/Apr/20
I think the vast majority of us know that Tyson is over 6'7, its just a question of how much over he is.
I still agree that standing at his tallest he is 6'7.5, although anywhere from 6'7.25 to 6'7.75 is possible.
I think the vast majority of us know that Tyson is over 6'7, its just a question of how much over he is.
I still agree that standing at his tallest he is 6'7.5, although anywhere from 6'7.25 to 6'7.75 is possible.
Robbe said on 4/Apr/20
Otto with 6'7 listed Samir Kurtagic.
Click Here
Click Here
Samir is though more like 6'6 range.
Otto looks never short standing next to 6'6 range guys, but standing next to Tyson, he really does Click Here
Like Wlad said, Tyson is 6'7.5 range, not 6'6.
Otto with 6'7 listed Samir Kurtagic.
Click Here
Click Here
Samir is though more like 6'6 range.
Otto looks never short standing next to 6'6 range guys, but standing next to Tyson, he really does Click Here
Like Wlad said, Tyson is 6'7.5 range, not 6'6.
Pierre said on 3/Apr/20
Mickie said on 2/Apr/20
@Pierre - you say Fury is closer to the camera, but there's no proof of that. The truth is it's a far, far better camera angle than your favorite pictures with Magic.
Then by following your logic no proof Magic is standing closer to the camera...
Mickie said on 2/Apr/20
@Pierre - you say Fury is closer to the camera, but there's no proof of that. The truth is it's a far, far better camera angle than your favorite pictures with Magic.
Then by following your logic no proof Magic is standing closer to the camera...
Pierre said on 3/Apr/20
Canson said on 2/Apr/20
@Pierre: Rob was convinced Anthony Joshua was 6’6 in person. He gave him 6’5.75 because of the footwear. That is likely closer to the least he is though. You could argue 6’5.5-.75 range or 6’5 5/8 but he isn’t something less than 6’5.5
If Rob was really convinced Anthony was around 6"6' why is he listed 6"5.75' again now? ...
Editor Rob
Canson said on 2/Apr/20
@Pierre: Rob was convinced Anthony Joshua was 6’6 in person. He gave him 6’5.75 because of the footwear. That is likely closer to the least he is though. You could argue 6’5.5-.75 range or 6’5 5/8 but he isn’t something less than 6’5.5
If Rob was really convinced Anthony was around 6"6' why is he listed 6"5.75' again now? ...
Editor RobI had my old brown merrell sneakers (miles) which were less than his nike Air Max 90 (or One), hence he looked a good 6ft 6 guy.
Pierre said on 3/Apr/20
Mickie said on 2/Apr/20
@Pierre - you say Fury is closer to the camera, but there's no proof of that. The truth is it's a far, far better camera angle than your favorite pictures with Magic.
Of course there is never perfect proof of that ,I just write what I see, I guess by the angle and the position of the camera and both men, Tyson's head is very probably always a bit closer to the camera than Deontay's head even when Deontay stand at his closest posture to the camera.
Click Here With Magic both guys are standing neck to neck.and camera sufficiently centered.Then even if Magic was 2/3 cm closer to the camera,with Magic in poor posture, if Tyson was 6"7' the difference at the top their heads would be around zero difference in the pic,or even Tyson looking a bit taller than Magic that is clearly not the case.
Mickie said on 2/Apr/20
@Pierre - you say Fury is closer to the camera, but there's no proof of that. The truth is it's a far, far better camera angle than your favorite pictures with Magic.
Of course there is never perfect proof of that ,I just write what I see, I guess by the angle and the position of the camera and both men, Tyson's head is very probably always a bit closer to the camera than Deontay's head even when Deontay stand at his closest posture to the camera.
Click Here With Magic both guys are standing neck to neck.and camera sufficiently centered.Then even if Magic was 2/3 cm closer to the camera,with Magic in poor posture, if Tyson was 6"7' the difference at the top their heads would be around zero difference in the pic,or even Tyson looking a bit taller than Magic that is clearly not the case.
Canson said on 3/Apr/20
@Pierre: no disrespect because I like you as a poster but Mickie is right. The pics you selected are subjective and work in favor of your argument
@Pierre: no disrespect because I like you as a poster but Mickie is right. The pics you selected are subjective and work in favor of your argument
Pierre said on 3/Apr/20
Mickie said on 1/Apr/20
@Pierre - are you for real with this one? Click Here the massive tilt there is comically obvious, come on. Don't dismiss perfectly good video of Wilder and Fury in the ring for this "evidence".
Watch again the video = fact is Deontay's back and neck are not straight like Tyson,plus camera low and 99% of the time Deontay a lot more distant to the camera than Tyson,and very probably when Deontay stand close to the camera Tyson is again a bit closer than him to the camera....
Mickie said on 1/Apr/20
@Pierre - are you for real with this one? Click Here the massive tilt there is comically obvious, come on. Don't dismiss perfectly good video of Wilder and Fury in the ring for this "evidence".
Watch again the video = fact is Deontay's back and neck are not straight like Tyson,plus camera low and 99% of the time Deontay a lot more distant to the camera than Tyson,and very probably when Deontay stand close to the camera Tyson is again a bit closer than him to the camera....
Robbe said on 3/Apr/20
BJ Flores here with 189cm Tony Bellew, and Otto Wallin.
Click Here
BJ is listed at 6'2, but is obviously way shorter. But anyway, Bellew looks 2in taller than BJ, and Otto is easily 4in taller there. So, absolutely lowest for Otto is 6'4.5 (194cm). Tyson is at least 6cm taller than Otto, which means minimum 200cm for Tyson. If AJ is really only 0.25in shorter than Tyson, that would make AJ 199.5cm. Eh?
So, we have to lower Otto down to 192cm to get Tyson 6'6 range. Problem is i haven't seen a single photo where Otto looks 192cm. He looks always at least 195cm. Here with 6'6 Zhang Zhilei Click Here
AJ is nowhere near 5'5cm taller than Otto. That would make AJ close to 200cm. I remember Otto was listed 195cm as amateur. I doubt he's much under that. I can buy AJ 3.5cm taller than Otto, at the most. Otto 194cm, and AJ 197.5cm. If Otto is 195cm, AJ is no more than 2.5cm taller. Tyson is easily +1in taller than AJ.
BJ Flores here with 189cm Tony Bellew, and Otto Wallin.
Click Here
BJ is listed at 6'2, but is obviously way shorter. But anyway, Bellew looks 2in taller than BJ, and Otto is easily 4in taller there. So, absolutely lowest for Otto is 6'4.5 (194cm). Tyson is at least 6cm taller than Otto, which means minimum 200cm for Tyson. If AJ is really only 0.25in shorter than Tyson, that would make AJ 199.5cm. Eh?
So, we have to lower Otto down to 192cm to get Tyson 6'6 range. Problem is i haven't seen a single photo where Otto looks 192cm. He looks always at least 195cm. Here with 6'6 Zhang Zhilei Click Here
AJ is nowhere near 5'5cm taller than Otto. That would make AJ close to 200cm. I remember Otto was listed 195cm as amateur. I doubt he's much under that. I can buy AJ 3.5cm taller than Otto, at the most. Otto 194cm, and AJ 197.5cm. If Otto is 195cm, AJ is no more than 2.5cm taller. Tyson is easily +1in taller than AJ.
Mickie said on 2/Apr/20
@Pierre - you say Fury is closer to the camera, but there's no proof of that. The truth is it's a far, far better camera angle than your favorite pictures with Magic.
@Pierre - you say Fury is closer to the camera, but there's no proof of that. The truth is it's a far, far better camera angle than your favorite pictures with Magic.
Pierre said on 2/Apr/20
Tall In The Saddle said on 1/Apr/20
Pierre said on 1/Apr/20
@Mickie = This never means he's 6"7' or even close to 6"7'.Fact is the angle of the camera is very bad in this videos = camera very very low and not centered ,generally closer to Tyson than to other guys...And Deontay is not even standing straight here,his neck is around 45 degrees with his head a lot in front of his body.
@Pierre
The back of Deontay's neck is perfectly straight, even ever slightly back from vertical at times to look up at Fury. You seem to be confusing Deontay's trapezium muscles for the start of his neck. The angle of the traps approximate to the 45 deg. angle you're claiming for Wilder's neck. The traps meet the neck and then the neck itself is perfectly straight.
Tell me your view on this explanation Pierre. Thanks.
I don't see the same thing as you.Deontay break his posture and Tyson is relatively straight .You can see Deontay's head is a lot in front of his body.He shrunks here and you can see his back isn't straight.( Tyson is always a bit closer to the camera and the camera is low)
Tall In The Saddle said on 1/Apr/20
Pierre said on 1/Apr/20
@Mickie = This never means he's 6"7' or even close to 6"7'.Fact is the angle of the camera is very bad in this videos = camera very very low and not centered ,generally closer to Tyson than to other guys...And Deontay is not even standing straight here,his neck is around 45 degrees with his head a lot in front of his body.
@Pierre
The back of Deontay's neck is perfectly straight, even ever slightly back from vertical at times to look up at Fury. You seem to be confusing Deontay's trapezium muscles for the start of his neck. The angle of the traps approximate to the 45 deg. angle you're claiming for Wilder's neck. The traps meet the neck and then the neck itself is perfectly straight.
Tell me your view on this explanation Pierre. Thanks.
I don't see the same thing as you.Deontay break his posture and Tyson is relatively straight .You can see Deontay's head is a lot in front of his body.He shrunks here and you can see his back isn't straight.( Tyson is always a bit closer to the camera and the camera is low)
Canson said on 2/Apr/20
@Pierre: Rob was convinced Anthony Joshua was 6’6 in person. He gave him 6’5.75 because of the footwear. That is likely closer to the least he is though. You could argue 6’5.5-.75 range or 6’5 5/8 but he isn’t something less than 6’5.5
@Pierre: Rob was convinced Anthony Joshua was 6’6 in person. He gave him 6’5.75 because of the footwear. That is likely closer to the least he is though. You could argue 6’5.5-.75 range or 6’5 5/8 but he isn’t something less than 6’5.5
Pierre said on 2/Apr/20
And Rob guess Anthony Joshua had at least 1/3 inch more shoes that him ,then 6"5.75' is more the max he can give him imo .230 votes are giving aheight closer to 6"5.5' than to 6"6'.I think he's very probably a bit under 6"5.75'.Click Here = by the scale at around 2:07 he's around 6"5.75' less his advantage of shoes ,then more 6"5.5'.
And Rob guess Anthony Joshua had at least 1/3 inch more shoes that him ,then 6"5.75' is more the max he can give him imo .230 votes are giving aheight closer to 6"5.5' than to 6"6'.I think he's very probably a bit under 6"5.75'.Click Here = by the scale at around 2:07 he's around 6"5.75' less his advantage of shoes ,then more 6"5.5'.
Pierre said on 2/Apr/20
@Robbe = but Otto Walin stand a lot closer to the camera plus camera low.And depending the postures too = Click Here =here again Otto closer to the camera plus camera low , Anthony lose a lot height by his big space between his own feet.The final difference by counting postures and advantages of camera is bigger .
Tyson 6"6' again
@Robbe = but Otto Walin stand a lot closer to the camera plus camera low.And depending the postures too = Click Here =here again Otto closer to the camera plus camera low , Anthony lose a lot height by his big space between his own feet.The final difference by counting postures and advantages of camera is bigger .
Tyson 6"6' again
Pierre said on 2/Apr/20
Mickie said on 1/Apr/20
The camera angle isn't ideal in the Wladimir one buts it's fine in the other 2. No, it's not an illusion favoring Tyson. He just actually is taller. Wilder's posture isn't really any worse than Fury's there either.
Deontay is disadvantaged by his posture here,a neck at 45 degrees make you shorter than Tyson's posture not really broken,plus Deontay 95% of the time is clearly more distant to the camera than Tyson,and even when Deontay stand close to the camera he's probably again a bit more distant than Tyson,fact is the angle of the camera is always low here and give a good advantage to the closest man so Tyson.
Tyson again 6"6' imo.
Mickie said on 1/Apr/20
The camera angle isn't ideal in the Wladimir one buts it's fine in the other 2. No, it's not an illusion favoring Tyson. He just actually is taller. Wilder's posture isn't really any worse than Fury's there either.
Deontay is disadvantaged by his posture here,a neck at 45 degrees make you shorter than Tyson's posture not really broken,plus Deontay 95% of the time is clearly more distant to the camera than Tyson,and even when Deontay stand close to the camera he's probably again a bit more distant than Tyson,fact is the angle of the camera is always low here and give a good advantage to the closest man so Tyson.
Tyson again 6"6' imo.
Tall In The Saddle said on 1/Apr/20
Pierre said on 1/Apr/20
@Mickie = This never means he's 6"7' or even close to 6"7'.Fact is the angle of the camera is very bad in this videos = camera very very low and not centered ,generally closer to Tyson than to other guys...And Deontay is not even standing straight here,his neck is around 45 degrees with his head a lot in front of his body.
@Pierre
The back of Deontay's neck is perfectly straight, even ever slightly back from vertical at times to look up at Fury. You seem to be confusing Deontay's trapezium muscles for the start of his neck. The angle of the traps approximate to the 45 deg. angle you're claiming for Wilder's neck. The traps meet the neck and then the neck itself is perfectly straight.
Tell me your view on this explanation Pierre. Thanks.
Pierre said on 1/Apr/20
@Mickie = This never means he's 6"7' or even close to 6"7'.Fact is the angle of the camera is very bad in this videos = camera very very low and not centered ,generally closer to Tyson than to other guys...And Deontay is not even standing straight here,his neck is around 45 degrees with his head a lot in front of his body.
@Pierre
The back of Deontay's neck is perfectly straight, even ever slightly back from vertical at times to look up at Fury. You seem to be confusing Deontay's trapezium muscles for the start of his neck. The angle of the traps approximate to the 45 deg. angle you're claiming for Wilder's neck. The traps meet the neck and then the neck itself is perfectly straight.
Tell me your view on this explanation Pierre. Thanks.
rikashiku said on 1/Apr/20
@Pierre said on 18/Mar/20
Then these heights on Celebheights need changing.
@Pierre said on 18/Mar/20
Then these heights on Celebheights need changing.
Mickie said on 1/Apr/20
@Pierre - are you for real with this one? Click Here the massive tilt there is comically obvious, come on. Don't dismiss perfectly good video of Wilder and Fury in the ring for this "evidence".
@Pierre - are you for real with this one? Click Here the massive tilt there is comically obvious, come on. Don't dismiss perfectly good video of Wilder and Fury in the ring for this "evidence".
FriedChicken said on 1/Apr/20
6'7" flat at most. A bit taller than Momoa but shorter than Magic Johnson. How anyone could think they're the exact same height is beyond me. Magic is clearly the bigger person who most likely shrunk since the man is 60 years old.
6'7" flat at most. A bit taller than Momoa but shorter than Magic Johnson. How anyone could think they're the exact same height is beyond me. Magic is clearly the bigger person who most likely shrunk since the man is 60 years old.
Pierre said on 1/Apr/20
@Robbe = Click Here = In your pic like in this pic Tyson strech up his pelvis by tiptoeing on one foot plus strech up all his body while Jason shrunk...
@Robbe = Click Here = In your pic like in this pic Tyson strech up his pelvis by tiptoeing on one foot plus strech up all his body while Jason shrunk...
Canson said on 1/Apr/20
Robbe said on 1/Apr/20
Jason Momoa with Tyson, and Thor.
Click Here
Jason closer to the camera with Tyson.
Magic looks about an inch taller than Wilder, compared to Shaq.
Click Here
If Tyson is 6'6, he should be only 0.25in taller than AJ. Here Otto Wallin with Tyson and AJ. I find it very hard to believe this is 0.25in difference.
Click Here
Click Here
Otto and AJ have even footwear there, both are wearing boxing shoes. But Otto have 1cm more footweat with Tyson. So, Tyson is about 6-7cm taller than Otto. AJ is about 2-3cm taller than Otto. There is ZERO chance Tyson is only 0.25in taller than AJ. Like said, if Tyson is 6'6, AJ needs a major downgrade. Editor Rob has met AJ, and says he is as listed, so here we go again. Tyson is not under 6'7.
Yea If it’s only .25” you wouldn’t see the difference. I doubt he’s only 6’6”
Robbe said on 1/Apr/20
Jason Momoa with Tyson, and Thor.
Click Here
Jason closer to the camera with Tyson.
Magic looks about an inch taller than Wilder, compared to Shaq.
Click Here
If Tyson is 6'6, he should be only 0.25in taller than AJ. Here Otto Wallin with Tyson and AJ. I find it very hard to believe this is 0.25in difference.
Click Here
Click Here
Otto and AJ have even footwear there, both are wearing boxing shoes. But Otto have 1cm more footweat with Tyson. So, Tyson is about 6-7cm taller than Otto. AJ is about 2-3cm taller than Otto. There is ZERO chance Tyson is only 0.25in taller than AJ. Like said, if Tyson is 6'6, AJ needs a major downgrade. Editor Rob has met AJ, and says he is as listed, so here we go again. Tyson is not under 6'7.
Yea If it’s only .25” you wouldn’t see the difference. I doubt he’s only 6’6”
Mickie said on 1/Apr/20
The camera angle isn't ideal in the Wladimir one buts it's fine in the other 2. No, it's not an illusion favoring Tyson. He just actually is taller. Wilder's posture isn't really any worse than Fury's there either.
The camera angle isn't ideal in the Wladimir one buts it's fine in the other 2. No, it's not an illusion favoring Tyson. He just actually is taller. Wilder's posture isn't really any worse than Fury's there either.
Pierre said on 1/Apr/20
Sorry,mistake,then Jason Momoa /6"7.5' Hafthor = Click Here
Jason Momoa /Tyson = Click Here
Sorry,mistake,then Jason Momoa /6"7.5' Hafthor = Click Here
Jason Momoa /Tyson = Click Here
Pierre said on 1/Apr/20
Mickie said on 31/Mar/20
A boxing ring provides us with a comparison on flat surface and minimal footwear.
With Tom Schwarz: Click Here
With Deontay Wilder: Click Here
With Wlad K: Click Here
We know Fury has bad posture. Occasionally he also wears very thin footwear. He can look 6'6" in photos, sometimes. But the reality is different. He's got over an inch on Wilder and over 2" on Wlad. That means he is over 6'7".
@Mickie = This never means he's 6"7' or even close to 6"7'.Fact is the angle of the camera is very bad in this videos = camera very very low and not centered ,generally closer to Tyson than to other guys...And Deontay is not even standing straight here,his neck is around 45 degrees with his head a lot in front of his body.
And by the comparisons I made on 27/March Tom Schwarz is 6"5' like Tyson is 6"9' lol,I want to say you can subtract about 3 inches of both men to be closer to the reality.The pics I posted recently Deontay /Tyson or other Wlad Tyson etc in press conference have around the same probability the floor is as regular as in the ring ...And show the same fact .Tyson again 6"6'.Lots of good pics/comparisons show that.And being in the ring doesn't mean both guys have exactly the same sole .Very possible to have around a fraction more help with a boxe shoe compared to another boxe shoe.
Mickie said on 31/Mar/20
A boxing ring provides us with a comparison on flat surface and minimal footwear.
With Tom Schwarz: Click Here
With Deontay Wilder: Click Here
With Wlad K: Click Here
We know Fury has bad posture. Occasionally he also wears very thin footwear. He can look 6'6" in photos, sometimes. But the reality is different. He's got over an inch on Wilder and over 2" on Wlad. That means he is over 6'7".
@Mickie = This never means he's 6"7' or even close to 6"7'.Fact is the angle of the camera is very bad in this videos = camera very very low and not centered ,generally closer to Tyson than to other guys...And Deontay is not even standing straight here,his neck is around 45 degrees with his head a lot in front of his body.
And by the comparisons I made on 27/March Tom Schwarz is 6"5' like Tyson is 6"9' lol,I want to say you can subtract about 3 inches of both men to be closer to the reality.The pics I posted recently Deontay /Tyson or other Wlad Tyson etc in press conference have around the same probability the floor is as regular as in the ring ...And show the same fact .Tyson again 6"6'.Lots of good pics/comparisons show that.And being in the ring doesn't mean both guys have exactly the same sole .Very possible to have around a fraction more help with a boxe shoe compared to another boxe shoe.
Robbe said on 1/Apr/20
Jason Momoa with Tyson, and Thor.
Click Here
Jason closer to the camera with Tyson.
Magic looks about an inch taller than Wilder, compared to Shaq.
Click Here
If Tyson is 6'6, he should be only 0.25in taller than AJ. Here Otto Wallin with Tyson and AJ. I find it very hard to believe this is 0.25in difference.
Click Here
Click Here
Otto and AJ have even footwear there, both are wearing boxing shoes. But Otto have 1cm more footweat with Tyson. So, Tyson is about 6-7cm taller than Otto. AJ is about 2-3cm taller than Otto. There is ZERO chance Tyson is only 0.25in taller than AJ. Like said, if Tyson is 6'6, AJ needs a major downgrade. Editor Rob has met AJ, and says he is as listed, so here we go again. Tyson is not under 6'7.
Jason Momoa with Tyson, and Thor.
Click Here
Jason closer to the camera with Tyson.
Magic looks about an inch taller than Wilder, compared to Shaq.
Click Here
If Tyson is 6'6, he should be only 0.25in taller than AJ. Here Otto Wallin with Tyson and AJ. I find it very hard to believe this is 0.25in difference.
Click Here
Click Here
Otto and AJ have even footwear there, both are wearing boxing shoes. But Otto have 1cm more footweat with Tyson. So, Tyson is about 6-7cm taller than Otto. AJ is about 2-3cm taller than Otto. There is ZERO chance Tyson is only 0.25in taller than AJ. Like said, if Tyson is 6'6, AJ needs a major downgrade. Editor Rob has met AJ, and says he is as listed, so here we go again. Tyson is not under 6'7.
Tall In The Saddle said on 1/Apr/20
@Pierre
You accidentally linked the Momoa and Hafthor pic twice (Momoa and Fury pic missing).
No matter. The photo you did link includes Iain Glen who's listed here at 6'. Something is obviously up (bad angle, unequal surface, etc.) since Momoa doesn't even appear that much taller than Glen. Not a good photo for comparison. Here's a pic of Momoa and Glen that more reasonably reflects the height difference between them. Click Here
@Pierre
You accidentally linked the Momoa and Hafthor pic twice (Momoa and Fury pic missing).
No matter. The photo you did link includes Iain Glen who's listed here at 6'. Something is obviously up (bad angle, unequal surface, etc.) since Momoa doesn't even appear that much taller than Glen. Not a good photo for comparison. Here's a pic of Momoa and Glen that more reasonably reflects the height difference between them. Click Here
Mickie said on 31/Mar/20
A boxing ring provides us with a comparison on flat surface and minimal footwear.
With Tom Schwarz: Click Here
With Deontay Wilder: Click Here
With Wlad K: Click Here
We know Fury has bad posture. Occasionally he also wears very thin footwear. He can look 6'6" in photos, sometimes. But the reality is different. He's got over an inch on Wilder and over 2" on Wlad. That means he is over 6'7".
A boxing ring provides us with a comparison on flat surface and minimal footwear.
With Tom Schwarz: Click Here
With Deontay Wilder: Click Here
With Wlad K: Click Here
We know Fury has bad posture. Occasionally he also wears very thin footwear. He can look 6'6" in photos, sometimes. But the reality is different. He's got over an inch on Wilder and over 2" on Wlad. That means he is over 6'7".
Pierre said on 31/Mar/20
Click Here = Jason Momoa /Tyson Fury
Click Here = Jason Momoa and 6"7.5' Hafthor
Click Here = Jason Momoa /Tyson Fury
Click Here = Jason Momoa and 6"7.5' Hafthor
Pierre said on 28/Mar/20
Canson said on 27/Mar/20
@Robbe and Pierre:
So this is what the camera can do and the confusion it can cause. You see below that Wilder looks taller than Fury when in reality he is shorter as we saw on video. Wilder himself is probably around 6’6” having measured 6’6.5 at some point In the day unless that was immediately after waking up. Even 6’6.5 around an hour after waking I’d still guess him to be something like 6’5 3/4 at worst case if he loses height slowly and we saw in the ring that he’s around 3 cm shorter than Fury. Wilder really looks no less than 6’6” flat more often than not. Fury is not under 6’7”
Click Here
We can see all of the pics with Magic where the camera angle is similar.
There are many pics in web that show the opposite = Deontay taller than Tyson or Tyson max same height as him(probably 6"6' range).But many times Tyson wear leather shoes (with maybe something in them)or big sneakers.I have never hear Deontay claiming an incredible height for himself,that is apparently not the case of Tyson when I read the comment here in his page above his pic....That could explain why he looks so tall sometimes depending the shoes curiously.Deontay has not the pressure to looks very tall because he does not claim 6"9' ... and you can see generally he wear poor soles or slim heels.
Click Here = here Deontay in classic jogging sneakers with maybe a fraction more soles than Tyson in boxe sneakers but this time Tyson isn't tiptoeing.Tyson here is never taller than Deontay even with a more perfect posture,and even very probably a bit shorter
Click Here = Tyson here probably in classic sneakers Deontay with classic shoes with a little heel ,max a fraction more shoes than Tyson = Deontay even in a terrible posture looks as tall as tyson here.But many times in the video Deontay place his head more distant to the camera than Tyson and with the low angle of the camera give an advantage to Tyson.
Click Here = again here = Deontay in poorer posture (neck) looks again around the same height as Tyson....
Fact is many times tyson looks a lot taller than Deontay in pics but many times he's tiptoeing too....
Others = Click Here
No it is not a random when Tyson and Magic both standing neck to neck Magic in very poor posture tower again over Tyson ...This is not a question of a supposed fraction of shoes here...and the camera is sufficently centered here= Click Here .
Canson said on 27/Mar/20
@Robbe and Pierre:
So this is what the camera can do and the confusion it can cause. You see below that Wilder looks taller than Fury when in reality he is shorter as we saw on video. Wilder himself is probably around 6’6” having measured 6’6.5 at some point In the day unless that was immediately after waking up. Even 6’6.5 around an hour after waking I’d still guess him to be something like 6’5 3/4 at worst case if he loses height slowly and we saw in the ring that he’s around 3 cm shorter than Fury. Wilder really looks no less than 6’6” flat more often than not. Fury is not under 6’7”
Click Here
We can see all of the pics with Magic where the camera angle is similar.
There are many pics in web that show the opposite = Deontay taller than Tyson or Tyson max same height as him(probably 6"6' range).But many times Tyson wear leather shoes (with maybe something in them)or big sneakers.I have never hear Deontay claiming an incredible height for himself,that is apparently not the case of Tyson when I read the comment here in his page above his pic....That could explain why he looks so tall sometimes depending the shoes curiously.Deontay has not the pressure to looks very tall because he does not claim 6"9' ... and you can see generally he wear poor soles or slim heels.
Click Here = here Deontay in classic jogging sneakers with maybe a fraction more soles than Tyson in boxe sneakers but this time Tyson isn't tiptoeing.Tyson here is never taller than Deontay even with a more perfect posture,and even very probably a bit shorter
Click Here = Tyson here probably in classic sneakers Deontay with classic shoes with a little heel ,max a fraction more shoes than Tyson = Deontay even in a terrible posture looks as tall as tyson here.But many times in the video Deontay place his head more distant to the camera than Tyson and with the low angle of the camera give an advantage to Tyson.
Click Here = again here = Deontay in poorer posture (neck) looks again around the same height as Tyson....
Fact is many times tyson looks a lot taller than Deontay in pics but many times he's tiptoeing too....
Others = Click Here
No it is not a random when Tyson and Magic both standing neck to neck Magic in very poor posture tower again over Tyson ...This is not a question of a supposed fraction of shoes here...and the camera is sufficently centered here= Click Here .
Sarai said on 28/Mar/20
@Canson
Fury 200-201, 6'7 max (real height)
@Canson
Fury 200-201, 6'7 max (real height)
Canson said on 27/Mar/20
@Robbe and Pierre:
So this is what the camera can do and the confusion it can cause. You see below that Wilder looks taller than Fury when in reality he is shorter as we saw on video. Wilder himself is probably around 6’6” having measured 6’6.5 at some point In the day unless that was immediately after waking up. Even 6’6.5 around an hour after waking I’d still guess him to be something like 6’5 3/4 at worst case if he loses height slowly and we saw in the ring that he’s around 3 cm shorter than Fury. Wilder really looks no less than 6’6” flat more often than not. Fury is not under 6’7”
Click Here
We can see all of the pics with Magic where the camera angle is similar.
@Robbe and Pierre:
So this is what the camera can do and the confusion it can cause. You see below that Wilder looks taller than Fury when in reality he is shorter as we saw on video. Wilder himself is probably around 6’6” having measured 6’6.5 at some point In the day unless that was immediately after waking up. Even 6’6.5 around an hour after waking I’d still guess him to be something like 6’5 3/4 at worst case if he loses height slowly and we saw in the ring that he’s around 3 cm shorter than Fury. Wilder really looks no less than 6’6” flat more often than not. Fury is not under 6’7”
Click Here
We can see all of the pics with Magic where the camera angle is similar.
Pierre said on 27/Mar/20
Robbe said on 26/Mar/20
197cm listed Tom Schwarz with Wach and Tyson. Tom is though probably 195-196cm range. Even a blind man can see Tyson is more than just 2-3cm taller than Tom Click Here
I can see in the left pic Mariusz slouch and in the middle pic Tom Schwarz stand closer to the camera that is very low and so advantage him a lot plus the fact he wear a helmet that give him a big additional advantage
I can also see in the video that correspond to the right pic lots of time the difference between both guys is slimer than in the pic = Click Here .I have to say it's a good video to guess their real difference because imo both are wearing regular sneakers here
Well...Now here is Dereck Chisora 6"1.5' /6"2' next to Senad Gashi Click Here at 3:10 low angle of camera and so Senad a bit closer to the camera,Dereck looking the very low camera of course slouching
And Tom Schwarz /Senad Gashi start at 0:33 .... Click Here
Tom Schwarz 6"5.5' here?!Maybe the same height gauge that has measured Tyson Fury 6"9'....not sure Tom is 6"3 by this comparisons...
Robbe said on 26/Mar/20
197cm listed Tom Schwarz with Wach and Tyson. Tom is though probably 195-196cm range. Even a blind man can see Tyson is more than just 2-3cm taller than Tom Click Here
I can see in the left pic Mariusz slouch and in the middle pic Tom Schwarz stand closer to the camera that is very low and so advantage him a lot plus the fact he wear a helmet that give him a big additional advantage
I can also see in the video that correspond to the right pic lots of time the difference between both guys is slimer than in the pic = Click Here .I have to say it's a good video to guess their real difference because imo both are wearing regular sneakers here
Well...Now here is Dereck Chisora 6"1.5' /6"2' next to Senad Gashi Click Here at 3:10 low angle of camera and so Senad a bit closer to the camera,Dereck looking the very low camera of course slouching
And Tom Schwarz /Senad Gashi start at 0:33 .... Click Here
Tom Schwarz 6"5.5' here?!Maybe the same height gauge that has measured Tyson Fury 6"9'....not sure Tom is 6"3 by this comparisons...
Robbe said on 26/Mar/20
197cm listed Tom Schwarz with Wach and Tyson. Tom is though probably 195-196cm range. Even a blind man can see Tyson is more than just 2-3cm taller than Tom Click Here
197cm listed Tom Schwarz with Wach and Tyson. Tom is though probably 195-196cm range. Even a blind man can see Tyson is more than just 2-3cm taller than Tom Click Here
Pierre said on 24/Mar/20
Click Here = Tyson Fury /Magic Johnson same distance to the camera Magic in a terrible posture again tower over Tyson.
Click Here = about Magic's big head in the pic next to Tyson some guys take like an argument to argue Magic stand closer to the camera = Magic's head even when Magic is the more distant to the camera looks big... Click Here
Click Here = about Tyson's size head next to Magic = here closer to the camera than Ricky Hatton a max 5"6' guy... not particularly big here....
Click Here = here Braun's head and Hafthor's head looking the same size so about same distance to the camera Hafthor tower over Braun's cap....
Braun in perfect posture and Baron Corbin slouching = Click Here but looks again max same height as him in this posture
Click Here = Tonight show Drw McIntyre 6"4.5' /Braun ,both without possibly advantageous wrestler shoes ,Drew's head probably a bit more distant to the camera than Braun's head = difference= about an inch ....
Click Here = here is the difference between Tyson and Braun when Braun place a foot a bit behind the other foot so lose a bit height while Tyson probably relieves a bit the heels of his feet(a bit tiptoeing)
Click Here = here is the difference when about same postures...And maybe Tyson relieves a bit his heels again here because he place a bit his weight on Braun in his posture imo....Tyson is never close to both Hafthor's height and Magic's height.
6"6'
Click Here = Tyson Fury /Magic Johnson same distance to the camera Magic in a terrible posture again tower over Tyson.
Click Here = about Magic's big head in the pic next to Tyson some guys take like an argument to argue Magic stand closer to the camera = Magic's head even when Magic is the more distant to the camera looks big... Click Here
Click Here = about Tyson's size head next to Magic = here closer to the camera than Ricky Hatton a max 5"6' guy... not particularly big here....
Click Here = here Braun's head and Hafthor's head looking the same size so about same distance to the camera Hafthor tower over Braun's cap....
Braun in perfect posture and Baron Corbin slouching = Click Here but looks again max same height as him in this posture
Click Here = Tonight show Drw McIntyre 6"4.5' /Braun ,both without possibly advantageous wrestler shoes ,Drew's head probably a bit more distant to the camera than Braun's head = difference= about an inch ....
Click Here = here is the difference between Tyson and Braun when Braun place a foot a bit behind the other foot so lose a bit height while Tyson probably relieves a bit the heels of his feet(a bit tiptoeing)
Click Here = here is the difference when about same postures...And maybe Tyson relieves a bit his heels again here because he place a bit his weight on Braun in his posture imo....Tyson is never close to both Hafthor's height and Magic's height.
6"6'
Canson said on 24/Mar/20
@Robbe: Magic could be the same height as Fury. I don’t rule out 6’7.25 for both
@Robbe: Magic could be the same height as Fury. I don’t rule out 6’7.25 for both
Robbe said on 23/Mar/20
Braun looking taller than Tyson, just because he is closer to the camera. Just like Magic is closer to the camera with Tyson.
Click Here
Pretty solid evidence Strowman can't be 6'5.5. Looks very close to Magic's height.
Tyson 6'7.25
Magic 6'7
Braun 6'6.5
Braun looking taller than Tyson, just because he is closer to the camera. Just like Magic is closer to the camera with Tyson.
Click Here
Pretty solid evidence Strowman can't be 6'5.5. Looks very close to Magic's height.
Tyson 6'7.25
Magic 6'7
Braun 6'6.5
Pierre said on 22/Mar/20
Comparisons Tyson Fury /Braun Strowman =
Now Braun Strowman next to Drew Mcintyre 6"4.5' both wearing tuxedo so without advantageous wrestling shoes = Click Here Click Here = at 3:53 / 3:54 the moment when both heads are around same distance to the camera =difference = an inch not two = Braun 6"5.5' again here
Comparisons Tyson Fury /Braun Strowman =
Now Braun Strowman next to Drew Mcintyre 6"4.5' both wearing tuxedo so without advantageous wrestling shoes = Click Here Click Here = at 3:53 / 3:54 the moment when both heads are around same distance to the camera =difference = an inch not two = Braun 6"5.5' again here
Pierre said on 21/Mar/20
Canson said on 20/Mar/20
Pierre said on 18/Mar/20
Mickie said on 17/Mar/20
I can agree with what Robbe and Canson are estimating Fury at, about 6'7.25". Standing with good posture, I think he'd actually edge out Afrojack who has also claimed 6'9" (and even 6'10") in the past.
Tyson Fury again by comparing to Haftor( 6"7.5'/6"7.75') next to Braun is never even close to Haftor'sheight.Haftor in terrible posture stand always about an inch taller than Braun's cap .Tyson in around the same posture as Braun is something like half an inch taller than him.....
Tyson 6"6'
But Pierre, Tyson also has poor posture in his pics and he’s taller than Strowman. Strowman is not under 6’6 as you’re saying. He really looks a bit over. Maybe it’s 6’6 1/4” and not half but that looks more reasonable than 6’5.5. If you see video of he and Corbin it’s evident Corbin is not taller than him he’s a touch shorter
@Canson = Hafthor is 6"7.5' / 6"7.75' range.When he stand in a terrible posture inwhich he lose no less than a good inch(then around 6"6.5' in the pic) he's again taller than Braun's cap by a good inch....
Mathematically Braun can not be over 6"5.5' ....I posted recently pics of Braun next to Baron Corbin in the ring .Braun looks as tall as Baron only when Baron is slouching a bit while Braun is standing in a very good posture....(without even talking about shoes=Baron wearing tuxedo wear logically classic shoes while Braun wear very probably his usual wrestler high shoes type Timberland...)
Tyson in around the same posture as Braun is only about half an inch taller than him as you can see in the video at 1:20 at the moment just before they rotate(I want to say when both are exactly same distance to the camera)
Click Here ,not later in the video because if you watch it you can see later in the video Braun place one foot a bit behind the other foot plus bent a bit his knees that make him lose a little bit height like here= Click Here .When both are standing straight = Click Here you can see Tyson is never even close to Hafthor height ...And Braun does not wear cap next to Tyson ...
Click Here
Braun by Baron and Hafthor is big max 6"5.5', Tyson around 6"6'
Canson said on 20/Mar/20
Pierre said on 18/Mar/20
Mickie said on 17/Mar/20
I can agree with what Robbe and Canson are estimating Fury at, about 6'7.25". Standing with good posture, I think he'd actually edge out Afrojack who has also claimed 6'9" (and even 6'10") in the past.
Tyson Fury again by comparing to Haftor( 6"7.5'/6"7.75') next to Braun is never even close to Haftor'sheight.Haftor in terrible posture stand always about an inch taller than Braun's cap .Tyson in around the same posture as Braun is something like half an inch taller than him.....
Tyson 6"6'
But Pierre, Tyson also has poor posture in his pics and he’s taller than Strowman. Strowman is not under 6’6 as you’re saying. He really looks a bit over. Maybe it’s 6’6 1/4” and not half but that looks more reasonable than 6’5.5. If you see video of he and Corbin it’s evident Corbin is not taller than him he’s a touch shorter
@Canson = Hafthor is 6"7.5' / 6"7.75' range.When he stand in a terrible posture inwhich he lose no less than a good inch(then around 6"6.5' in the pic) he's again taller than Braun's cap by a good inch....
Mathematically Braun can not be over 6"5.5' ....I posted recently pics of Braun next to Baron Corbin in the ring .Braun looks as tall as Baron only when Baron is slouching a bit while Braun is standing in a very good posture....(without even talking about shoes=Baron wearing tuxedo wear logically classic shoes while Braun wear very probably his usual wrestler high shoes type Timberland...)
Tyson in around the same posture as Braun is only about half an inch taller than him as you can see in the video at 1:20 at the moment just before they rotate(I want to say when both are exactly same distance to the camera)
Click Here ,not later in the video because if you watch it you can see later in the video Braun place one foot a bit behind the other foot plus bent a bit his knees that make him lose a little bit height like here= Click Here .When both are standing straight = Click Here you can see Tyson is never even close to Hafthor height ...And Braun does not wear cap next to Tyson ...
Click Here
Braun by Baron and Hafthor is big max 6"5.5', Tyson around 6"6'
Canson said on 20/Mar/20
@Mickie: yea I agree with everything you said. And in Merchant’s case, he can look the full 6’7”. I’ve always wondered too. If I were 6’2 I would just claim 6’2. Not inflate others just to make myself taller. But at 6’4” I agree with Merchant’s take as well. I wouldn’t want to be any taller either
@Mickie: yea I agree with everything you said. And in Merchant’s case, he can look the full 6’7”. I’ve always wondered too. If I were 6’2 I would just claim 6’2. Not inflate others just to make myself taller. But at 6’4” I agree with Merchant’s take as well. I wouldn’t want to be any taller either
Canson said on 20/Mar/20
Pierre said on 18/Mar/20
Mickie said on 17/Mar/20
I can agree with what Robbe and Canson are estimating Fury at, about 6'7.25". Standing with good posture, I think he'd actually edge out Afrojack who has also claimed 6'9" (and even 6'10") in the past.
Tyson Fury again by comparing to Haftor( 6"7.5'/6"7.75') next to Braun is never even close to Haftor'sheight.Haftor in terrible posture stand always about an inch taller than Braun's cap .Tyson in around the same posture as Braun is something like half an inch taller than him.....
Tyson 6"6'
But Pierre, Tyson also has poor posture in his pics and he’s taller than Strowman. Strowman is not under 6’6 as you’re saying. He really looks a bit over. Maybe it’s 6’6 1/4” and not half but that looks more reasonable than 6’5.5. If you see video of he and Corbin it’s evident Corbin is not taller than him he’s a touch shorter
Pierre said on 18/Mar/20
Mickie said on 17/Mar/20
I can agree with what Robbe and Canson are estimating Fury at, about 6'7.25". Standing with good posture, I think he'd actually edge out Afrojack who has also claimed 6'9" (and even 6'10") in the past.
Tyson Fury again by comparing to Haftor( 6"7.5'/6"7.75') next to Braun is never even close to Haftor'sheight.Haftor in terrible posture stand always about an inch taller than Braun's cap .Tyson in around the same posture as Braun is something like half an inch taller than him.....
Tyson 6"6'
But Pierre, Tyson also has poor posture in his pics and he’s taller than Strowman. Strowman is not under 6’6 as you’re saying. He really looks a bit over. Maybe it’s 6’6 1/4” and not half but that looks more reasonable than 6’5.5. If you see video of he and Corbin it’s evident Corbin is not taller than him he’s a touch shorter
Mickie said on 19/Mar/20
@Canson - I agree with that - take Stephen Merchant's perspective (he is about 6'7", at least I think that's his listing on this site) where he was quoted to something of the effect that 6'4" is a great height to be but 6'7" is too tall. I think once you're over 6'2" the benefits of added height start to decrease rapidly (other than if you're an athlete) but some people love the idea of being the biggest guy around.
@Canson - I agree with that - take Stephen Merchant's perspective (he is about 6'7", at least I think that's his listing on this site) where he was quoted to something of the effect that 6'4" is a great height to be but 6'7" is too tall. I think once you're over 6'2" the benefits of added height start to decrease rapidly (other than if you're an athlete) but some people love the idea of being the biggest guy around.
Pierre said on 18/Mar/20
Mickie said on 17/Mar/20
I can agree with what Robbe and Canson are estimating Fury at, about 6'7.25". Standing with good posture, I think he'd actually edge out Afrojack who has also claimed 6'9" (and even 6'10") in the past.
Tyson Fury again by comparing to Haftor( 6"7.5'/6"7.75') next to Braun is never even close to Haftor'sheight.Haftor in terrible posture stand always about an inch taller than Braun's cap .Tyson in around the same posture as Braun is something like half an inch taller than him.....
Tyson 6"6'
Mickie said on 17/Mar/20
I can agree with what Robbe and Canson are estimating Fury at, about 6'7.25". Standing with good posture, I think he'd actually edge out Afrojack who has also claimed 6'9" (and even 6'10") in the past.
Tyson Fury again by comparing to Haftor( 6"7.5'/6"7.75') next to Braun is never even close to Haftor'sheight.Haftor in terrible posture stand always about an inch taller than Braun's cap .Tyson in around the same posture as Braun is something like half an inch taller than him.....
Tyson 6"6'
Pierre said on 18/Mar/20
rikashiku said on 16/Mar/20
@Pierre said on 14/Mar/20
Randy Orton 6"3' range here
In those pictures, if using HHH's height listing on Celebheight, that still makes Randy Orton over 6'4".
Other example = Triple H and Ric Flair = Click Here
Evander strong 6"1' /Ric Flair = Click Here ....
rikashiku said on 16/Mar/20
@Pierre said on 14/Mar/20
Randy Orton 6"3' range here
In those pictures, if using HHH's height listing on Celebheight, that still makes Randy Orton over 6'4".
Other example = Triple H and Ric Flair = Click Here
Evander strong 6"1' /Ric Flair = Click Here ....
Canson said on 18/Mar/20
@Mickie: yea Afrojack is a very strange case in that he’s very possibly a 6’6-6’7 guy who claimed 6’10”. I remember Bobby3342 saying it once many years ago that he didn’t know why a celeb wanted to be taller than they were (by claiming taller). It gets too expensive after 6’3” as you’re probably aware of too being a 6’3” range guy yourself
@Mickie: yea Afrojack is a very strange case in that he’s very possibly a 6’6-6’7 guy who claimed 6’10”. I remember Bobby3342 saying it once many years ago that he didn’t know why a celeb wanted to be taller than they were (by claiming taller). It gets too expensive after 6’3” as you’re probably aware of too being a 6’3” range guy yourself
Mickie said on 17/Mar/20
I can agree with what Robbe and Canson are estimating Fury at, about 6'7.25". Standing with good posture, I think he'd actually edge out Afrojack who has also claimed 6'9" (and even 6'10") in the past.
I can agree with what Robbe and Canson are estimating Fury at, about 6'7.25". Standing with good posture, I think he'd actually edge out Afrojack who has also claimed 6'9" (and even 6'10") in the past.
Pierre said on 17/Mar/20
Comparisons Tyson Fury/Randy Orton =
Randy Orton closer to the camera /214 cm Shaq Click Here .... B-but...
Comparisons Tyson Fury/Randy Orton =
Randy Orton closer to the camera /214 cm Shaq Click Here .... B-but...
Pierre said on 17/Mar/20
Comparisons Tyson Fury/Randy Orton =
Randy /Big Show without wrestler shoes= Click Here Click Here Click Here
Big Show without wrestler shoes / 7"0' ShaQ = Click Here .....🧐 B-but...
Comparisons Tyson Fury/Randy Orton =
Randy /Big Show without wrestler shoes= Click Here Click Here Click Here
Big Show without wrestler shoes / 7"0' ShaQ = Click Here .....🧐 B-but...
rikashiku said on 16/Mar/20
@Pierre said on 14/Mar/20
Randy Orton 6"3' range here
In those pictures, if using HHH's height listing on Celebheight, that still makes Randy Orton over 6'4".
@Pierre said on 14/Mar/20
Randy Orton 6"3' range here
In those pictures, if using HHH's height listing on Celebheight, that still makes Randy Orton over 6'4".
Canson said on 16/Mar/20
@Miko: I think Pierre genuinely feels that Fury is 6’6”. It’s hard to imagine that much though. As for Orton, I would go with everything Robbe said and probably 192-192.5 range while Strowman is 199-200 Range more than likely which puts Fury at 201-202 range. I could buy 6’7.25 for him like Robbe
@Miko: I think Pierre genuinely feels that Fury is 6’6”. It’s hard to imagine that much though. As for Orton, I would go with everything Robbe said and probably 192-192.5 range while Strowman is 199-200 Range more than likely which puts Fury at 201-202 range. I could buy 6’7.25 for him like Robbe
miko said on 15/Mar/20
He lowers anybody to try and make Fury shorter.
Orton is, and always has been a very solid 6'4. Fury looks bare minimum 6'7 there, which makes sense as he's 6'7.5.
He lowers anybody to try and make Fury shorter.
Orton is, and always has been a very solid 6'4. Fury looks bare minimum 6'7 there, which makes sense as he's 6'7.5.
Canson said on 15/Mar/20
@Pierre: I would guess Orton to be 6’3.5-6’3.75 range tops. I still think He’s closer to 6’4 than 6’3 or at very least right in the middle of the two
@Pierre: I would guess Orton to be 6’3.5-6’3.75 range tops. I still think He’s closer to 6’4 than 6’3 or at very least right in the middle of the two
Robbe said on 15/Mar/20
Randy is definitely not 6'5, but he is not 6'3 either. He is somewhere between 6'3-6'4.
Here randy with Strowman, compared to Tyson.
Click Here
Strowman looks to be 7cm taller than Randy. Tyson is at least 1cm taller than Strowman. Even if Randy is only 191cm, which he aint, Tyson is still at least 199cm. Like said, it's really hard to downgrage Tyson to 6'6, cause we have to downgrade everybody else too.
What comes to Wlad, he came to the weigh in at the last minute. He probably had just laid down on sofa before entering the place. You can actually gain 0.5in just by laying down for one hour. Lol, i have tried.
So, if Wlad is 6'5.25 + extra 0.5 laying down, + 1in lifts, + 1in shoes = 6'7.75. Tyson was wearing very flat trainers, maybe only 0.5in. If he is 6'7.25 barefoot, he is like 6'7.75 with his trainers. That would explain why they looked about the same range. In the ring the difference was though noticeable, for the obvious reason.
It's also possible Wlad wasn't wearing lifts, he just wore extra thick sneakers. There are sneakers on the market with 2in heels. Wlad's shoes looked quite thick, to be honest.
Randy is definitely not 6'5, but he is not 6'3 either. He is somewhere between 6'3-6'4.
Here randy with Strowman, compared to Tyson.
Click Here
Strowman looks to be 7cm taller than Randy. Tyson is at least 1cm taller than Strowman. Even if Randy is only 191cm, which he aint, Tyson is still at least 199cm. Like said, it's really hard to downgrage Tyson to 6'6, cause we have to downgrade everybody else too.
What comes to Wlad, he came to the weigh in at the last minute. He probably had just laid down on sofa before entering the place. You can actually gain 0.5in just by laying down for one hour. Lol, i have tried.
So, if Wlad is 6'5.25 + extra 0.5 laying down, + 1in lifts, + 1in shoes = 6'7.75. Tyson was wearing very flat trainers, maybe only 0.5in. If he is 6'7.25 barefoot, he is like 6'7.75 with his trainers. That would explain why they looked about the same range. In the ring the difference was though noticeable, for the obvious reason.
It's also possible Wlad wasn't wearing lifts, he just wore extra thick sneakers. There are sneakers on the market with 2in heels. Wlad's shoes looked quite thick, to be honest.
Pierre said on 15/Mar/20
Fact is Hafthor Bjornsson 6"7.5' in a terrible posture is again taller than Braun Strowman even with his cap! Tyson 6"7' is simply impossible!
Click Here
Click Here
Braun 6"5.5' Tyson 6"6'range .
Wlad isn't wearing lifts next to his brother just slouch more in the second pic...
Fact is Hafthor Bjornsson 6"7.5' in a terrible posture is again taller than Braun Strowman even with his cap! Tyson 6"7' is simply impossible!
Click Here
Click Here
Braun 6"5.5' Tyson 6"6'range .
Wlad isn't wearing lifts next to his brother just slouch more in the second pic...
Tall In The Saddle said on 14/Mar/20
Agreed, nice post with excellent/revealing still captures from the Fury Klit weigh in.
When you watch the Fury Klit weight in live, in alignment with the before/after stills, you can see Wlad drop some significant height when he takes his shoes off. While the proximity isn't ideal, you can still also make some comparison between the barefoot boxers and IMO, Tyson has a clear adv. Later, with shoes back on, some pics indicate Klit having the slightest edge. Other pics seem to have them appear equal.
And it's true, IF Wlad's uplift was about 2", then he should stand approx. 6'7.25". His brother Vitali is next to him and IF he himself in normal heel, he maybe should be standing 6'8. That should see about .75" height diff. between Vital and Wlad in shoes but I think I see more than that, so Vitali perhaps in extra heel also. Tyson in normal heel should be standing about 6'8.5". Then comes time for the face off and maybe we could expect a 1.25" adv. to Tyson BUT not so. A lot of variables to consider, Wlad possibly a bit taller than 6'5.25", Tyson not quite a full 6'7.5", more than 2" shoe uplift for Wlad, etc. etc.
I know Wlad has apparently claimed 6'5" for himself. He has also stated that Tyson is obviously taller than himself, Wlad stating that Tyson appears about the same height as 6'7.5" Mariusz Wach. Here's a link to these comments, Click Here which were framed to reject Tyson's obviously exaggerated 6'9" claim, with Wlad adding that Tyson isn't the giant he is made out to be. Perhaps Wlad "lifted" to make the point that Tyson's adv. wasn't so great and easily negated with a bit of extra heel. Personally, I think Wlad used a lot of extra heel to make the point. The advertised height diff. between he and Fury was obviously a bit an issue for him.
Agreed, nice post with excellent/revealing still captures from the Fury Klit weigh in.
When you watch the Fury Klit weight in live, in alignment with the before/after stills, you can see Wlad drop some significant height when he takes his shoes off. While the proximity isn't ideal, you can still also make some comparison between the barefoot boxers and IMO, Tyson has a clear adv. Later, with shoes back on, some pics indicate Klit having the slightest edge. Other pics seem to have them appear equal.
And it's true, IF Wlad's uplift was about 2", then he should stand approx. 6'7.25". His brother Vitali is next to him and IF he himself in normal heel, he maybe should be standing 6'8. That should see about .75" height diff. between Vital and Wlad in shoes but I think I see more than that, so Vitali perhaps in extra heel also. Tyson in normal heel should be standing about 6'8.5". Then comes time for the face off and maybe we could expect a 1.25" adv. to Tyson BUT not so. A lot of variables to consider, Wlad possibly a bit taller than 6'5.25", Tyson not quite a full 6'7.5", more than 2" shoe uplift for Wlad, etc. etc.
I know Wlad has apparently claimed 6'5" for himself. He has also stated that Tyson is obviously taller than himself, Wlad stating that Tyson appears about the same height as 6'7.5" Mariusz Wach. Here's a link to these comments, Click Here which were framed to reject Tyson's obviously exaggerated 6'9" claim, with Wlad adding that Tyson isn't the giant he is made out to be. Perhaps Wlad "lifted" to make the point that Tyson's adv. wasn't so great and easily negated with a bit of extra heel. Personally, I think Wlad used a lot of extra heel to make the point. The advertised height diff. between he and Fury was obviously a bit an issue for him.
Pierre said on 14/Mar/20
rikashiku said on 12/Mar/20
Not looking 6'9" as he claimed next to the 6'4" listed here, 6'5" IMO Randy Orton.
Click Here
Looks more like a flat 6'7".
Randy Orton is never 6"5' or even 6"4' to me = here is Randy next to Triple H without his wrestler shoes = Click Here Click Here Click Here
Now Triple H and 6"1.25' Evander ( Click Here =average guess = 6"1.16'so a strong let's say a strong 6"1' ) = Click Here ....
Randy Orton 6"3' range here
rikashiku said on 12/Mar/20
Not looking 6'9" as he claimed next to the 6'4" listed here, 6'5" IMO Randy Orton.
Click Here
Looks more like a flat 6'7".
Randy Orton is never 6"5' or even 6"4' to me = here is Randy next to Triple H without his wrestler shoes = Click Here Click Here Click Here
Now Triple H and 6"1.25' Evander ( Click Here =average guess = 6"1.16'so a strong let's say a strong 6"1' ) = Click Here ....
Randy Orton 6"3' range here
Canson said on 14/Mar/20
rikashiku said on 12/Mar/20
Not looking 6'9" as he claimed next to the 6'4" listed here, 6'5" IMO Randy Orton.
Click Here
Looks more like a flat 6'7".
While a flat 6’7 is possible for Fury, I highly doubt that Orton is 6’5”. Id wager money based on how he looks and how people here on this site have seen and guessed him in person that it’s more of a possibility of him being slightly under 6’4” as opposed to over 6’4”. As for Fury he has times when he can look the 6’7.5” listing Rob gave him or maybe 6’7.25”
rikashiku said on 12/Mar/20
Not looking 6'9" as he claimed next to the 6'4" listed here, 6'5" IMO Randy Orton.
Click Here
Looks more like a flat 6'7".
While a flat 6’7 is possible for Fury, I highly doubt that Orton is 6’5”. Id wager money based on how he looks and how people here on this site have seen and guessed him in person that it’s more of a possibility of him being slightly under 6’4” as opposed to over 6’4”. As for Fury he has times when he can look the 6’7.5” listing Rob gave him or maybe 6’7.25”
Mon said on 14/Mar/20
I now think 6ft 7 ½ is right for Fury, but he clearly has more that an inch on Wilder in the ring.
I now think 6ft 7 ½ is right for Fury, but he clearly has more that an inch on Wilder in the ring.
Gman39 said on 13/Mar/20
Nice post Robbe. I have said from the get go that I believe Klitschko is more 6'5.25 or even 6'5.5 range, so he was possibly 6'7.5 in his sneaks + lifts at that Fury weigh-in/face-off.
Nice post Robbe. I have said from the get go that I believe Klitschko is more 6'5.25 or even 6'5.5 range, so he was possibly 6'7.5 in his sneaks + lifts at that Fury weigh-in/face-off.
Pierre said on 13/Mar/20
Canson said on 12/Mar/20
@Pierre:
Here is Baron Corbin’s combine of 6064. (6’6 1/2). Given this is in the early morning, he’s likely still 6’6 flat afternoon height. Meaning Strowman can’t be as low as 6’5.5 being he’s taller than a 6’6” Corbin. etc etc
@Canson= First= the difference between baron Corbin and Hafthor is that Rob has seen Hafthor
-Second = fact is Hafthor with his 6"7.5' / 6"7.75' in a terrible posture is again taller than Braun even with his cap= Click Here
Three= in about same postures Baron looks a bit taller than Braun = Click Here
at around 3:20 in your video Baron has a bader posture than Braun then of course he does not look really taller here Click Here = when both are slouching Baron is clearly a bit taller than Braun .
Click Here = Braun looks nearly or same height as Baron only when Braun stand very straight and Baron slouch a bit....
Canson said on 12/Mar/20
@Pierre:
Here is Baron Corbin’s combine of 6064. (6’6 1/2). Given this is in the early morning, he’s likely still 6’6 flat afternoon height. Meaning Strowman can’t be as low as 6’5.5 being he’s taller than a 6’6” Corbin. etc etc
@Canson= First= the difference between baron Corbin and Hafthor is that Rob has seen Hafthor
-Second = fact is Hafthor with his 6"7.5' / 6"7.75' in a terrible posture is again taller than Braun even with his cap= Click Here
Three= in about same postures Baron looks a bit taller than Braun = Click Here
at around 3:20 in your video Baron has a bader posture than Braun then of course he does not look really taller here Click Here = when both are slouching Baron is clearly a bit taller than Braun .
Click Here = Braun looks nearly or same height as Baron only when Braun stand very straight and Baron slouch a bit....
rikashiku said on 12/Mar/20
Not looking 6'9" as he claimed next to the 6'4" listed here, 6'5" IMO Randy Orton.
Click Here
Looks more like a flat 6'7".
Not looking 6'9" as he claimed next to the 6'4" listed here, 6'5" IMO Randy Orton.
Click Here
Looks more like a flat 6'7".
Pierre said on 12/Mar/20
Robbe said on 11/Mar/20
On the left, Wlad wearing his shoes + lifts, and on the right, without shoes and lifts. Camera angle is the same, and Wlad in the same place. Looks 2in difference to me.
Wlad is not in the same posture ,he's slouching more in the second pic.If Wlad was wearing lifts this is not logical he systematically wear lifts next to Tyson and not next to other guys(Helenius and Mariusz Wach)=again= probabilities he always wear lift only next to Tyson and never next to Helenius and Wach = 0.000001 % lol
Second pic of Robbe =Lol Helenius break his neck and his back a lot his while the 6"3' guy next to him is standing in a very good posture . Tyson and the other 6"3' guy are standing both in relaxed posture,the guy next to Tyson slouch(back and neck) and so probably lose more height than Tyson or in the worst case the guy is not advantaged by his posture.Then by this comparisons Helenius is logically clearly taller than Tyson this time too ...
Deontay in many pics looks at least as tall as Tyson then Tyson 6"6' nevers means Deontay is 6"5'...
In add to this precedent Robbe comparison ,to resume we have =
- in good comparison same distance to the camera and same posture =Tyson an half inch taller than Braun Strowman.Braun himself towered by 6"7.5' Hafthor in a terrible posture but always taller than Braun's cap
- absolutely zero proof/evidence Wlad wear lifts = then by Wlad Tyson looks clearly shorter than both Helenius /Mariusz Wach(and now by 6"3' guys the comparison of Robbe that prove Helenius looks taller than Tyson in fact here too )
- Tyson and Magic both about the same distance to the camera,Magic breaking his bust and again tower over Tyson ....
Lot's of coincidences no? :D
Robbe said on 11/Mar/20
On the left, Wlad wearing his shoes + lifts, and on the right, without shoes and lifts. Camera angle is the same, and Wlad in the same place. Looks 2in difference to me.
Wlad is not in the same posture ,he's slouching more in the second pic.If Wlad was wearing lifts this is not logical he systematically wear lifts next to Tyson and not next to other guys(Helenius and Mariusz Wach)=again= probabilities he always wear lift only next to Tyson and never next to Helenius and Wach = 0.000001 % lol
Second pic of Robbe =Lol Helenius break his neck and his back a lot his while the 6"3' guy next to him is standing in a very good posture . Tyson and the other 6"3' guy are standing both in relaxed posture,the guy next to Tyson slouch(back and neck) and so probably lose more height than Tyson or in the worst case the guy is not advantaged by his posture.Then by this comparisons Helenius is logically clearly taller than Tyson this time too ...
Deontay in many pics looks at least as tall as Tyson then Tyson 6"6' nevers means Deontay is 6"5'...
In add to this precedent Robbe comparison ,to resume we have =
- in good comparison same distance to the camera and same posture =Tyson an half inch taller than Braun Strowman.Braun himself towered by 6"7.5' Hafthor in a terrible posture but always taller than Braun's cap
- absolutely zero proof/evidence Wlad wear lifts = then by Wlad Tyson looks clearly shorter than both Helenius /Mariusz Wach(and now by 6"3' guys the comparison of Robbe that prove Helenius looks taller than Tyson in fact here too )
- Tyson and Magic both about the same distance to the camera,Magic breaking his bust and again tower over Tyson ....
Lot's of coincidences no? :D
Robbe said on 11/Mar/20
On the left, Wlad wearing his shoes + lifts, and on the right, without shoes and lifts. Camera angle is the same, and Wlad in the same place. Looks 2in difference to me.
Click Here
So Wlad was most likely wearing 1in lifts in his shoes. Problem is, if Wlad is 6'5, he should be around 6'7 in his boosted sneakers. Yet he looked slightly taller than Tyson. Go figure.
Tyson here with 6'3 Steve Cunningham. Looks exactly the same as Helenius with 6'3 Kownacki.
Click Here
Helenius and Tyson are close in heights, but im sure Tyson would measure slightly taller when both men standing straight. 6'6.5 vs 6'7.25.
Tyson at 6'6 would make no sense. That would make Wilder at 6'5 range, AJ slightly under 6'5, Otto Wallin and Tom Schwarz both under 6'4. David Price only 6'7. Not to mention numerous other athletes/celebs. 6'6 for Tyson is just impossible. But hey, this thread is alive and kicking! Thanks to a certain member. Without him, there would be like 90% less replies for the past year :D
On the left, Wlad wearing his shoes + lifts, and on the right, without shoes and lifts. Camera angle is the same, and Wlad in the same place. Looks 2in difference to me.
Click Here
So Wlad was most likely wearing 1in lifts in his shoes. Problem is, if Wlad is 6'5, he should be around 6'7 in his boosted sneakers. Yet he looked slightly taller than Tyson. Go figure.
Tyson here with 6'3 Steve Cunningham. Looks exactly the same as Helenius with 6'3 Kownacki.
Click Here
Helenius and Tyson are close in heights, but im sure Tyson would measure slightly taller when both men standing straight. 6'6.5 vs 6'7.25.
Tyson at 6'6 would make no sense. That would make Wilder at 6'5 range, AJ slightly under 6'5, Otto Wallin and Tom Schwarz both under 6'4. David Price only 6'7. Not to mention numerous other athletes/celebs. 6'6 for Tyson is just impossible. But hey, this thread is alive and kicking! Thanks to a certain member. Without him, there would be like 90% less replies for the past year :D
Mickie said on 9/Mar/20
You can see in this video there was actually some time at the weigh in years ago where Wlad and Tyson were both barefoot. Too bad they didn't do their face off then. Wlad kicks off his shoes (and lifts) at 5:26 and Tyson puts his back on at 5:45 Click Here
You can see in this video there was actually some time at the weigh in years ago where Wlad and Tyson were both barefoot. Too bad they didn't do their face off then. Wlad kicks off his shoes (and lifts) at 5:26 and Tyson puts his back on at 5:45 Click Here
Pierre said on 9/Mar/20
Canson said on 8/Mar/20
@Pierre: Fury is taller than Carmelo Anthony
Click Here
Then here I could say Tyson Fury stand a lot closer to the camera because his head is looking so big here .... Is Tyson with horizontal feet here or more tiptoeing a bit on one or even two feet like in other pics...:D
Canson said on 8/Mar/20
@Pierre: Fury is taller than Carmelo Anthony
Click Here
Then here I could say Tyson Fury stand a lot closer to the camera because his head is looking so big here .... Is Tyson with horizontal feet here or more tiptoeing a bit on one or even two feet like in other pics...:D
Pierre said on 9/Mar/20
@Canson = Click Here =Tyson's shoes are they looking particularly big here ?no =very classic not even sure he has a fraction more than Tyson = Click Here
@Canson = Click Here =Tyson's shoes are they looking particularly big here ?no =very classic not even sure he has a fraction more than Tyson = Click Here
Pierre said on 9/Mar/20
@Canson = both men are very close one to the other one and the difference between them is big,then even wby considering the pic is a bit inclined Magic again tower Tyson...As I said recently,even if Magic has a fraction more shoes(that is not even sure,Tyson's shoes have a heel there is a pic of them in web) Magic's posture is so poor compared to Tyson ,Magic lose around an inch in his posture then a fraction more shoes or not this is not very important in fact...
Tyson's shoes= Click Here = they have a heel then if Magic has more shoes it's maybe a fraction more ...
About Magic supposed closer to the camera because his head looks big = Click Here Click Here = here he's at best as close as the other guy to the camera and his head again looks big....
Click Here =here with guys even a lot closer to the camera than Magic and his head again looks big...
No Tyson Fury isn't 6"7' range.I can buy around 6"6' not 6"7' .and the recent comparison with Braun and Hafthor show the same result.Braun is max 6"5.5' next to Hafthor and Tyson is about half an inch taller than Braun = Click Here = 1:20 same distance to the camera just before both rotate .
Click Here = Hafthor slouching a lot and again taller than Braun's cap....=Tyson =6"6' max
@Canson = both men are very close one to the other one and the difference between them is big,then even wby considering the pic is a bit inclined Magic again tower Tyson...As I said recently,even if Magic has a fraction more shoes(that is not even sure,Tyson's shoes have a heel there is a pic of them in web) Magic's posture is so poor compared to Tyson ,Magic lose around an inch in his posture then a fraction more shoes or not this is not very important in fact...
Tyson's shoes= Click Here = they have a heel then if Magic has more shoes it's maybe a fraction more ...
About Magic supposed closer to the camera because his head looks big = Click Here Click Here = here he's at best as close as the other guy to the camera and his head again looks big....
Click Here =here with guys even a lot closer to the camera than Magic and his head again looks big...
No Tyson Fury isn't 6"7' range.I can buy around 6"6' not 6"7' .and the recent comparison with Braun and Hafthor show the same result.Braun is max 6"5.5' next to Hafthor and Tyson is about half an inch taller than Braun = Click Here = 1:20 same distance to the camera just before both rotate .
Click Here = Hafthor slouching a lot and again taller than Braun's cap....=Tyson =6"6' max
Pierre said on 9/Mar/20
Tall In The Saddle said on 8/Mar/20
@Pierre
Not a pile on post. Just a courteous reply, as you gave me. We're at crossed purposes. My sole ref. was to the Fury Wilder face off vision. IMO, incontrovertible evidence that Fury is about 1.5" taller. My point was/is that if there is somehow an argument that Wilder's posture is imperfect even IN THAT PHOTO, then best to supply a comparable profile pic of Wilder showing "better" posture. I don't mean pics in which Wilder is "higher" than Fury in the frame of reference with multiple variables to consider. Just a profile pic of Wilder showing straighter posture within himself. Since the face off pic, there's been a flood of linked images, turning back to inferior evidence, pics entailing skewed angles, indeterminate footwear, questionable postures, inadequate proximity, comparisons via multiple degrees of separation etc. YET, here we have Fury and Wilder, face to face, no footwear inequality or angle variables to use in argument for or against and no evidence to suggest Wilder isn't standing at his best height.
Sorry I'm french and don't understand all that you write.Fact is lots of pics are showing Deontay taller than Tyson by their postures or at least Deontay same height as Tyson(Deontay is he really 6"6.5' or more in the morning ...).By Wlad Tyson is shorter than Helenius and Mariusz Wach.By Hafthor Julius and Mark Henry Braun Strowman is 6"5.5' max and so one more time Tyson again 6"6' range.By Magic Johnson Tyson is easily shorter than him.Lots of coincidences...
Tall In The Saddle said on 8/Mar/20
@Pierre
Not a pile on post. Just a courteous reply, as you gave me. We're at crossed purposes. My sole ref. was to the Fury Wilder face off vision. IMO, incontrovertible evidence that Fury is about 1.5" taller. My point was/is that if there is somehow an argument that Wilder's posture is imperfect even IN THAT PHOTO, then best to supply a comparable profile pic of Wilder showing "better" posture. I don't mean pics in which Wilder is "higher" than Fury in the frame of reference with multiple variables to consider. Just a profile pic of Wilder showing straighter posture within himself. Since the face off pic, there's been a flood of linked images, turning back to inferior evidence, pics entailing skewed angles, indeterminate footwear, questionable postures, inadequate proximity, comparisons via multiple degrees of separation etc. YET, here we have Fury and Wilder, face to face, no footwear inequality or angle variables to use in argument for or against and no evidence to suggest Wilder isn't standing at his best height.
Sorry I'm french and don't understand all that you write.Fact is lots of pics are showing Deontay taller than Tyson by their postures or at least Deontay same height as Tyson(Deontay is he really 6"6.5' or more in the morning ...).By Wlad Tyson is shorter than Helenius and Mariusz Wach.By Hafthor Julius and Mark Henry Braun Strowman is 6"5.5' max and so one more time Tyson again 6"6' range.By Magic Johnson Tyson is easily shorter than him.Lots of coincidences...
FiveEightJake said on 8/Mar/20
Rob how tall is Tyson’s dad John and his brother Shane?
Dad looks about 6’2-6’3 and Shane could be 6’5 range, you ever looked at them?
Editor Rob
Rob how tall is Tyson’s dad John and his brother Shane?
Dad looks about 6’2-6’3 and Shane could be 6’5 range, you ever looked at them?
Editor RobNot looked that much, but Shane looks at least 6ft 5 range. You can see his Father also might have been over 6ft 2.
Canson said on 8/Mar/20
Pierre said on 7/Mar/20
Canson said on 6/Mar/20
@Pierre: But are you saying that Strowman is .75” taller than Fury or the opposite? Just based on that one pic? If you look at all of the pictures from The previous post I sent on 28 February, Fury is consistently taller than Strowman. It’s minimum 1/2” but possibly 3/4” like you said. But having seen the pics that puts Fury at 6’7.25”. Honestly, with Strowman having been listed 6’6.75 too the 6’7.5 is possible. 6’7.25 is a good listing with Magic
Canson said on 28/Feb/20
Pierre said on 27/Feb/20
Then you have not seen my pic posted recently = Click Here = here Braun is something like 4 inches taller than Mark Henry,more 6"1.5' than 6"2'.This means Braun is in fact 6"5.5'.
In the video (the video with the camera in a perfect angle not the other) with Tyson and Braun face to face,when both have their respective feet in good position(not later in the video when Braun has his foot behind his other foot and so lose height),and just before both men rotate(so when both are exactly the same distance to the camera),then the difference is something like 0.5 inch....Then do the maths = Mark Henry 6"1.5' give Braun 6"5.5' and Tyson 6"6'...not 6"7' one more time
Another comparison = Rob has seen Hafthor and guess him 6"7.75'.How can a supposed 6"6.5' Braun looking so short next to him? Click Here =Hafthor slouching a lot is again taller than Braun even with his cap!... Again Braun max 6"5.5' and so logically Tyson one more time around 6"6'...
Mickie said on 6/Mar/20
@Pierre - about Fury and Wlad in the ring... a low camera angle actually minimizes a taller guy's height advantage, not the other way around.
When the very low camera is in an angle in favor to the tallest guy and/or the camera closer to the tallest guy than the shortest guy,the tallest guy will be logically advantaged even with a very low camera and the difference will be bigger if the tallest man is tiptoeing a little bit...
Strowman is taller than 6’5.5, Pierre. If that’s the case, then how is he taller than Baron Corbin? Corbin measured 6’6.5 at the combine. Corbin is also around the same height as Undertaker. Maybe a hair taller if anything today as Taker has lost height. Now Corbin was a morning measurement but that still puts him around 6’6”. Strowman is about what Rob lists him here. As for him with Hafthor, consider that the latter is closer to the camera but that would probably be a 3cm difference if all things were equal. Realize too that Strowman and Corbin both claim 6’8” as all wrestlers (maybe except John Cena and Jack Swagger) inflate their heights. With all you said, it would make Fury 6’7 range not 6’6”. .75” makes him 6’7.25 based on Strowman’s listing
Click Here
Pierre said on 7/Mar/20
Canson said on 6/Mar/20
@Pierre: But are you saying that Strowman is .75” taller than Fury or the opposite? Just based on that one pic? If you look at all of the pictures from The previous post I sent on 28 February, Fury is consistently taller than Strowman. It’s minimum 1/2” but possibly 3/4” like you said. But having seen the pics that puts Fury at 6’7.25”. Honestly, with Strowman having been listed 6’6.75 too the 6’7.5 is possible. 6’7.25 is a good listing with Magic
Canson said on 28/Feb/20
Pierre said on 27/Feb/20
Then you have not seen my pic posted recently = Click Here = here Braun is something like 4 inches taller than Mark Henry,more 6"1.5' than 6"2'.This means Braun is in fact 6"5.5'.
In the video (the video with the camera in a perfect angle not the other) with Tyson and Braun face to face,when both have their respective feet in good position(not later in the video when Braun has his foot behind his other foot and so lose height),and just before both men rotate(so when both are exactly the same distance to the camera),then the difference is something like 0.5 inch....Then do the maths = Mark Henry 6"1.5' give Braun 6"5.5' and Tyson 6"6'...not 6"7' one more time
Another comparison = Rob has seen Hafthor and guess him 6"7.75'.How can a supposed 6"6.5' Braun looking so short next to him? Click Here =Hafthor slouching a lot is again taller than Braun even with his cap!... Again Braun max 6"5.5' and so logically Tyson one more time around 6"6'...
Mickie said on 6/Mar/20
@Pierre - about Fury and Wlad in the ring... a low camera angle actually minimizes a taller guy's height advantage, not the other way around.
When the very low camera is in an angle in favor to the tallest guy and/or the camera closer to the tallest guy than the shortest guy,the tallest guy will be logically advantaged even with a very low camera and the difference will be bigger if the tallest man is tiptoeing a little bit...
Strowman is taller than 6’5.5, Pierre. If that’s the case, then how is he taller than Baron Corbin? Corbin measured 6’6.5 at the combine. Corbin is also around the same height as Undertaker. Maybe a hair taller if anything today as Taker has lost height. Now Corbin was a morning measurement but that still puts him around 6’6”. Strowman is about what Rob lists him here. As for him with Hafthor, consider that the latter is closer to the camera but that would probably be a 3cm difference if all things were equal. Realize too that Strowman and Corbin both claim 6’8” as all wrestlers (maybe except John Cena and Jack Swagger) inflate their heights. With all you said, it would make Fury 6’7 range not 6’6”. .75” makes him 6’7.25 based on Strowman’s listing
Click Here
Robbe said on 8/Mar/20
Wlad has fought against Tyson, and Wach, and says bouth men are about the same height. He ought to know. Also, i remember Wilder described Tyson as 6'9 in some interview. Wilder himself knows he is shorter than Tyson. Seems like there is only one person on the whole planet who thinks Wilder is taller than Tyson lol :D
Btw Helenius knocked out Kownacki last night. Thre is a good chance Helenius will fight against Wilder, or AJ in near future. Maybe even against Tyson. I happen to know Helenius is exactly 199.5cm.
Tyson here with 195cm Otto Wallin, compared to Helenius with 191cm Adam Kownacki.
Click Here
Tyson looks easily an inch taller than Helenius in my opinion. Otto had also footwear advantage there. He was wearing like 3cm thick sneakers, Tyson was wearing loafers.
Wlad has fought against Tyson, and Wach, and says bouth men are about the same height. He ought to know. Also, i remember Wilder described Tyson as 6'9 in some interview. Wilder himself knows he is shorter than Tyson. Seems like there is only one person on the whole planet who thinks Wilder is taller than Tyson lol :D
Btw Helenius knocked out Kownacki last night. Thre is a good chance Helenius will fight against Wilder, or AJ in near future. Maybe even against Tyson. I happen to know Helenius is exactly 199.5cm.
Tyson here with 195cm Otto Wallin, compared to Helenius with 191cm Adam Kownacki.
Click Here
Tyson looks easily an inch taller than Helenius in my opinion. Otto had also footwear advantage there. He was wearing like 3cm thick sneakers, Tyson was wearing loafers.
Tall In The Saddle said on 8/Mar/20
@Pierre
Not a pile on post. Just a courteous reply, as you gave me. We're at crossed purposes. My sole ref. was to the Fury Wilder face off vision. IMO, incontrovertible evidence that Fury is about 1.5" taller. My point was/is that if there is somehow an argument that Wilder's posture is imperfect even IN THAT PHOTO, then best to supply a comparable profile pic of Wilder showing "better" posture. I don't mean pics in which Wilder is "higher" than Fury in the frame of reference with multiple variables to consider. Just a profile pic of Wilder showing straighter posture within himself. Since the face off pic, there's been a flood of linked images, turning back to inferior evidence, pics entailing skewed angles, indeterminate footwear, questionable postures, inadequate proximity, comparisons via multiple degrees of separation etc. YET, here we have Fury and Wilder, face to face, no footwear inequality or angle variables to use in argument for or against and no evidence to suggest Wilder isn't standing at his best height.
@Pierre
Not a pile on post. Just a courteous reply, as you gave me. We're at crossed purposes. My sole ref. was to the Fury Wilder face off vision. IMO, incontrovertible evidence that Fury is about 1.5" taller. My point was/is that if there is somehow an argument that Wilder's posture is imperfect even IN THAT PHOTO, then best to supply a comparable profile pic of Wilder showing "better" posture. I don't mean pics in which Wilder is "higher" than Fury in the frame of reference with multiple variables to consider. Just a profile pic of Wilder showing straighter posture within himself. Since the face off pic, there's been a flood of linked images, turning back to inferior evidence, pics entailing skewed angles, indeterminate footwear, questionable postures, inadequate proximity, comparisons via multiple degrees of separation etc. YET, here we have Fury and Wilder, face to face, no footwear inequality or angle variables to use in argument for or against and no evidence to suggest Wilder isn't standing at his best height.
Canson said on 7/Mar/20
Pierre said on 6/Mar/20
Click Here = here is how look a guy closer to the camera than the other = the top of his head is around the same height as Magic's top of head but his chin is lower than Magic's chin...
Click Here = here is how looks a guy taller than the other and around the same distance to the camera = all the parts of his head are looking higher than the parts of the other head ,even his chin...
@Pierre: I respect you and your opinion but the post has an array of issues. First off, you just proved Mickie’s point and contradicted many of yours in the past by using Barkley as comparison, especially in saying Fury only looks 6’6” in pics. Barkley is, in reality, nowhere near as tall as Magic yet looks as tall as him. So having said that, if it’s possible for Barkley to look as tall as Magic in, not just that pic but others, then why is it not possible for Magic to look taller than Fury? Barkley measured 6’4 5/8” during his career and if we want to be conservative he’s claimed to be 6’4 3/4 multiple times and is now listed 6’4 7/8
Yet with Fury and Magic, you also selected a pic where Magic has a significant advantage and tilt. If you’re going to argue your points fairly, you would need to use a picture that is objective. This is before we even address footwear. Take a look at this pic below that I posted of Magic and Fury and keep in mind footwear. Then you can also see Magic has a slight tilt in his favor even in this one. That said, I can’t say honestly (anymore) that Magic is clearly taller. If you reverse where they are standing in the 1st picture I am a firm believer that Fury would appear taller. There already isn’t much difference between them in that pic and You also have to remember head sizes. Magic’s is noticeably larger. This is before we address footwear
Click Here
Pierre said on 6/Mar/20
Click Here = here is how look a guy closer to the camera than the other = the top of his head is around the same height as Magic's top of head but his chin is lower than Magic's chin...
Click Here = here is how looks a guy taller than the other and around the same distance to the camera = all the parts of his head are looking higher than the parts of the other head ,even his chin...
@Pierre: I respect you and your opinion but the post has an array of issues. First off, you just proved Mickie’s point and contradicted many of yours in the past by using Barkley as comparison, especially in saying Fury only looks 6’6” in pics. Barkley is, in reality, nowhere near as tall as Magic yet looks as tall as him. So having said that, if it’s possible for Barkley to look as tall as Magic in, not just that pic but others, then why is it not possible for Magic to look taller than Fury? Barkley measured 6’4 5/8” during his career and if we want to be conservative he’s claimed to be 6’4 3/4 multiple times and is now listed 6’4 7/8
Yet with Fury and Magic, you also selected a pic where Magic has a significant advantage and tilt. If you’re going to argue your points fairly, you would need to use a picture that is objective. This is before we even address footwear. Take a look at this pic below that I posted of Magic and Fury and keep in mind footwear. Then you can also see Magic has a slight tilt in his favor even in this one. That said, I can’t say honestly (anymore) that Magic is clearly taller. If you reverse where they are standing in the 1st picture I am a firm believer that Fury would appear taller. There already isn’t much difference between them in that pic and You also have to remember head sizes. Magic’s is noticeably larger. This is before we address footwear
Click Here
Pierre said on 7/Mar/20
Canson said on 6/Mar/20
@Pierre: But are you saying that Strowman is .75” taller than Fury or the opposite? Just based on that one pic? If you look at all of the pictures from The previous post I sent on 28 February, Fury is consistently taller than Strowman. It’s minimum 1/2” but possibly 3/4” like you said. But having seen the pics that puts Fury at 6’7.25”. Honestly, with Strowman having been listed 6’6.75 too the 6’7.5 is possible. 6’7.25 is a good listing with Magic
Canson said on 28/Feb/20
Pierre said on 27/Feb/20
Then you have not seen my pic posted recently = Click Here = here Braun is something like 4 inches taller than Mark Henry,more 6"1.5' than 6"2'.This means Braun is in fact 6"5.5'.
In the video (the video with the camera in a perfect angle not the other) with Tyson and Braun face to face,when both have their respective feet in good position(not later in the video when Braun has his foot behind his other foot and so lose height),and just before both men rotate(so when both are exactly the same distance to the camera),then the difference is something like 0.5 inch....Then do the maths = Mark Henry 6"1.5' give Braun 6"5.5' and Tyson 6"6'...not 6"7' one more time
Another comparison = Rob has seen Hafthor and guess him 6"7.75'.How can a supposed 6"6.5' Braun looking so short next to him? Click Here =Hafthor slouching a lot is again taller than Braun even with his cap!... Again Braun max 6"5.5' and so logically Tyson one more time around 6"6'...
Mickie said on 6/Mar/20
@Pierre - about Fury and Wlad in the ring... a low camera angle actually minimizes a taller guy's height advantage, not the other way around.
When the very low camera is in an angle in favor to the tallest guy and/or the camera closer to the tallest guy than the shortest guy,the tallest guy will be logically advantaged even with a very low camera and the difference will be bigger if the tallest man is tiptoeing a little bit...
Canson said on 6/Mar/20
@Pierre: But are you saying that Strowman is .75” taller than Fury or the opposite? Just based on that one pic? If you look at all of the pictures from The previous post I sent on 28 February, Fury is consistently taller than Strowman. It’s minimum 1/2” but possibly 3/4” like you said. But having seen the pics that puts Fury at 6’7.25”. Honestly, with Strowman having been listed 6’6.75 too the 6’7.5 is possible. 6’7.25 is a good listing with Magic
Canson said on 28/Feb/20
Pierre said on 27/Feb/20
Then you have not seen my pic posted recently = Click Here = here Braun is something like 4 inches taller than Mark Henry,more 6"1.5' than 6"2'.This means Braun is in fact 6"5.5'.
In the video (the video with the camera in a perfect angle not the other) with Tyson and Braun face to face,when both have their respective feet in good position(not later in the video when Braun has his foot behind his other foot and so lose height),and just before both men rotate(so when both are exactly the same distance to the camera),then the difference is something like 0.5 inch....Then do the maths = Mark Henry 6"1.5' give Braun 6"5.5' and Tyson 6"6'...not 6"7' one more time
Another comparison = Rob has seen Hafthor and guess him 6"7.75'.How can a supposed 6"6.5' Braun looking so short next to him? Click Here =Hafthor slouching a lot is again taller than Braun even with his cap!... Again Braun max 6"5.5' and so logically Tyson one more time around 6"6'...
Mickie said on 6/Mar/20
@Pierre - about Fury and Wlad in the ring... a low camera angle actually minimizes a taller guy's height advantage, not the other way around.
When the very low camera is in an angle in favor to the tallest guy and/or the camera closer to the tallest guy than the shortest guy,the tallest guy will be logically advantaged even with a very low camera and the difference will be bigger if the tallest man is tiptoeing a little bit...
Pierre said on 6/Mar/20
Click Here = here is how look a guy closer to the camera than the other = the top of his head is around the same height as Magic's top of head but his chin is lower than Magic's chin...
Click Here = here is how looks a guy taller than the other and around the same distance to the camera = all the parts of his head are looking higher than the parts of the other head ,even his chin...
Click Here = here is how look a guy closer to the camera than the other = the top of his head is around the same height as Magic's top of head but his chin is lower than Magic's chin...
Click Here = here is how looks a guy taller than the other and around the same distance to the camera = all the parts of his head are looking higher than the parts of the other head ,even his chin...
WhenUSbecomeMetric said on 6/Mar/20
lol pierre have some sort of blindness, yes, Fury is definitely not a 206/6'9, but he is clearly higher than 200cm, he was clearly taller than wilder in he ring by 1.25-1.5inches(3-4cm), which puts him 6'8/203-204cm. End of debates. Fury always slouches in public, almost never stand straight, so he looked shorter than he is.
lol pierre have some sort of blindness, yes, Fury is definitely not a 206/6'9, but he is clearly higher than 200cm, he was clearly taller than wilder in he ring by 1.25-1.5inches(3-4cm), which puts him 6'8/203-204cm. End of debates. Fury always slouches in public, almost never stand straight, so he looked shorter than he is.
Mickie said on 6/Mar/20
@Pierre - about Fury and Wlad in the ring... a low camera angle actually minimizes a taller guy's height advantage, not the other way around.
@Pierre - about Fury and Wlad in the ring... a low camera angle actually minimizes a taller guy's height advantage, not the other way around.
Canson said on 6/Mar/20
@Pierre: But are you saying that Strowman is .75” taller than Fury or the opposite? Just based on that one pic? If you look at all of the pictures from The previous post I sent on 28 February, Fury is consistently taller than Strowman. It’s minimum 1/2” but possibly 3/4” like you said. But having seen the pics that puts Fury at 6’7.25”. Honestly, with Strowman having been listed 6’6.75 too the 6’7.5 is possible. 6’7.25 is a good listing with Magic
Canson said on 28/Feb/20
Pierre said on 27/Feb/20
@Pierre: But are you saying that Strowman is .75” taller than Fury or the opposite? Just based on that one pic? If you look at all of the pictures from The previous post I sent on 28 February, Fury is consistently taller than Strowman. It’s minimum 1/2” but possibly 3/4” like you said. But having seen the pics that puts Fury at 6’7.25”. Honestly, with Strowman having been listed 6’6.75 too the 6’7.5 is possible. 6’7.25 is a good listing with Magic
Canson said on 28/Feb/20
Pierre said on 27/Feb/20
Pierre said on 6/Mar/20
Robbe said on 04/Mar =
In the beginning of the fight, Fury had to bend down to look at Wlad, and laughed how he had suddenly shrunk lol :D
I have not seen this moment..Wait a minute...Oh yes,Tyson looks so tall when the camera is so low and closer to Tyson maybe tiptoeing a bit ....
I have more seen the smile of 6"7.5' Magic Johnson standing next to a supposed 6"9' Tyson Fury ,Magic trying to break a lot his posture to place his body at the same height as Tyson for the photo and finally failed,Tyson beeing a lot shorter than him :D Click Here
Funny like people are guessing Wlad wear systematically lifts when the guy who claim 6"9' is Tyson lol.This without even talking about Tyson lot's of time tiptoeing in pics.
Then Tyson is not lucky next to Wlad lol,Wlad would always wearing lifts next to Tyson and never next to another tall guy like Mariusz Wach....
Probabilities Wlad always wear lifts next to Tyson and never next to Mariusz Wach = 0.0000001%
By Wladimir=Tyson is clearly shorter than Mariusz Wach 6"7.5' and than Helenius 6"6.5'.By Magic Johnson 6"7.5' Tyson is clearly shorter by nearly two inches.By pics not inclined in favor to Tyson ,both with same soles and same distance to the camera (and around the same postures of course....) Tyson is hardly as tall as 6"6.5' Deontay ...Tyson looks taller than Mariusz Wach when Mariusz Wach isn't standing really straight and Tyson is tiptoeing on one foot to strech up his body at the maximum....
Wlad looks lots of time always shorter than his brother but of course both have not always the same posture in pics or exactly the same shoes and sometimes Wlad is standing closer to the camera too,then claim Wlad wear lifts here seems to me a bit hazardous...Again Wlad is not the guy who claim 6"9'...
Click Here =Tyson Fury /Braun Strowman = difference = 0.75 inch(the difference looks slimer before both rotate in the video like 0.5 inch,of course the difference is more important later in the video when Braun place one of his feet behind the other foot and Tyson standing always in a good posture) Braun Stowman/Mark Henry 6"1.5' = difference = 4 inches = Tyson Fury = 6"6' again this time...
Robbe said on 04/Mar =
In the beginning of the fight, Fury had to bend down to look at Wlad, and laughed how he had suddenly shrunk lol :D
I have not seen this moment..Wait a minute...Oh yes,Tyson looks so tall when the camera is so low and closer to Tyson maybe tiptoeing a bit ....
I have more seen the smile of 6"7.5' Magic Johnson standing next to a supposed 6"9' Tyson Fury ,Magic trying to break a lot his posture to place his body at the same height as Tyson for the photo and finally failed,Tyson beeing a lot shorter than him :D Click Here
Funny like people are guessing Wlad wear systematically lifts when the guy who claim 6"9' is Tyson lol.This without even talking about Tyson lot's of time tiptoeing in pics.
Then Tyson is not lucky next to Wlad lol,Wlad would always wearing lifts next to Tyson and never next to another tall guy like Mariusz Wach....
Probabilities Wlad always wear lifts next to Tyson and never next to Mariusz Wach = 0.0000001%
By Wladimir=Tyson is clearly shorter than Mariusz Wach 6"7.5' and than Helenius 6"6.5'.By Magic Johnson 6"7.5' Tyson is clearly shorter by nearly two inches.By pics not inclined in favor to Tyson ,both with same soles and same distance to the camera (and around the same postures of course....) Tyson is hardly as tall as 6"6.5' Deontay ...Tyson looks taller than Mariusz Wach when Mariusz Wach isn't standing really straight and Tyson is tiptoeing on one foot to strech up his body at the maximum....
Wlad looks lots of time always shorter than his brother but of course both have not always the same posture in pics or exactly the same shoes and sometimes Wlad is standing closer to the camera too,then claim Wlad wear lifts here seems to me a bit hazardous...Again Wlad is not the guy who claim 6"9'...
Click Here =Tyson Fury /Braun Strowman = difference = 0.75 inch(the difference looks slimer before both rotate in the video like 0.5 inch,of course the difference is more important later in the video when Braun place one of his feet behind the other foot and Tyson standing always in a good posture) Braun Stowman/Mark Henry 6"1.5' = difference = 4 inches = Tyson Fury = 6"6' again this time...
Pierre said on 5/Mar/20
@Tall in the saddle = This pics are logically inclined in favor to Tyson(My comment on 29/Feb explain that) and for the pics showing their postures watch my comment on 03/Mar .
@Tall in the saddle = This pics are logically inclined in favor to Tyson(My comment on 29/Feb explain that) and for the pics showing their postures watch my comment on 03/Mar .
Heights are barefeet estimates, derived from quotations, official websites, agency resumes, in person encounters with actors at conventions and pictures/films.
Other vital statistics like weight or shoe size measurements have been sourced from newspapers, books, resumes or social media.
Celebrity Fan Photos and Agency Pictures of stars are © to their respective owners.