Add a Comment7828 comments
Average Guess (667 Votes)
Peak: 6ft 7.86in (202.9cm)
Current: 6ft 6.91in (200.4cm)
Peak: 6ft 7.86in (202.9cm)
Current: 6ft 6.91in (200.4cm)
Riccardo89 said on 28/Jun/21
Canson@
I also think Magic Jhonson retained his peak height, but Love here seems taller including Magics posture.
Click Here
Btw i have Magic around same height as Love. Even if here he looks "short" and it was his prime.
Click Here
( ground-footwear unknow)
Canson@
I also think Magic Jhonson retained his peak height, but Love here seems taller including Magics posture.
Click Here
Btw i have Magic around same height as Love. Even if here he looks "short" and it was his prime.
Click Here
( ground-footwear unknow)
Canson said on 27/Jun/21
@Pierre: negative
@Pierre: negative
Pierre said on 25/Jun/21
@Canson= Lol Magic stands more distant to the camera than Ric Flair here,same thing as the pic Kane /Ric...
@Canson= Lol Magic stands more distant to the camera than Ric Flair here,same thing as the pic Kane /Ric...
Alex 6'0 said on 25/Jun/21
Kanes peak was easily over 6'7. Pushing 6'8 he could have looked
Kanes peak was easily over 6'7. Pushing 6'8 he could have looked
Canson said on 24/Jun/21
@Pierre: Magic has retained his height well. He isn’t under 6’7 seeing him next to Scottie Pippen. He’s probably even a hair over the mark based on how he stands. But the pictures that you selected once again are not good for comparisons. Magic has a bit of advantage and is going to naturally look taller given the distance from the camera. I believe Kane is shorter than Magic. The difference is somewhere around 1/2-1” but not as big as the picture suggests.
Magic (6’7-6’7.5 range) coworker of mine met him years back and said 6’7 or so
Kane 6’6.5 or .75 or in between
@Pierre: Magic has retained his height well. He isn’t under 6’7 seeing him next to Scottie Pippen. He’s probably even a hair over the mark based on how he stands. But the pictures that you selected once again are not good for comparisons. Magic has a bit of advantage and is going to naturally look taller given the distance from the camera. I believe Kane is shorter than Magic. The difference is somewhere around 1/2-1” but not as big as the picture suggests.
Magic (6’7-6’7.5 range) coworker of mine met him years back and said 6’7 or so
Kane 6’6.5 or .75 or in between
Alex 6'0 said on 23/Jun/21
6'6.5 for Kane is pretty fair. We go afternoon heights. At worst 6'6.25 and that's an extreme low. Peak definitely 6'7 plus
6'6.5 for Kane is pretty fair. We go afternoon heights. At worst 6'6.25 and that's an extreme low. Peak definitely 6'7 plus
Riccardo89 said on 23/Jun/21
I cant see Kane 6'6.5 "minimum" but 6'6.5 "max".
He looks to me around 2 cm taller than 197 cm underTaker but im not convinced as much as 1 inch.
With donovan around 6'5/6'5.25 and with unknow footwear(it could work both ways) I can see 1 inch for sure. Btw its not such a surprising pic and the situation there could be easily a 6'6.25 vs 6'5.25
I cant see Kane 6'6.5 "minimum" but 6'6.5 "max".
He looks to me around 2 cm taller than 197 cm underTaker but im not convinced as much as 1 inch.
With donovan around 6'5/6'5.25 and with unknow footwear(it could work both ways) I can see 1 inch for sure. Btw its not such a surprising pic and the situation there could be easily a 6'6.25 vs 6'5.25
Pierre said on 23/Jun/21
Some guys here are giving aound 6"7' to Magic.If this is the case what is the probability Kane is above 6"6' here =
Click Here
Click Here
Slim probability imo
Some guys here are giving aound 6"7' to Magic.If this is the case what is the probability Kane is above 6"6' here =
Click Here
Click Here
Slim probability imo
Canson said on 21/Jun/21
@Edwards: all things being equal this listing works for Kane. Worst case it’s maybe a lunchtime height or 6’6 5/8 is, and maybe he loses another 1/8 or 1/4” and falls to 6’6.5 which is the catch all among most of us. Being a bigger guy he may dip another 1/4” from lunch whereas someone my size or Christian’s size may lose 1/8” from there
@Edwards: all things being equal this listing works for Kane. Worst case it’s maybe a lunchtime height or 6’6 5/8 is, and maybe he loses another 1/8 or 1/4” and falls to 6’6.5 which is the catch all among most of us. Being a bigger guy he may dip another 1/4” from lunch whereas someone my size or Christian’s size may lose 1/8” from there
Canson said on 20/Jun/21
@Alex: the worst case since the 6’5 5/8 is the combine is that the higher measurement was even earlier. That said, maybe he falls to 6’5 1/4” or 3/8”. I’d call him 6’5 3/8” to keep consistent. But either way, yes that puts Kane minimum 6’6.5” seeing as how he’s got over an inch on Smith
@Edwards: yep
@Alex: the worst case since the 6’5 5/8 is the combine is that the higher measurement was even earlier. That said, maybe he falls to 6’5 1/4” or 3/8”. I’d call him 6’5 3/8” to keep consistent. But either way, yes that puts Kane minimum 6’6.5” seeing as how he’s got over an inch on Smith
@Edwards: yep
Resurrection of Edwards said on 19/Jun/21
@canson
kane is easily 1.25 inch taller than donovan or atleast bare minimum an inch taller.that is just an excuse by pierre.
@canson
kane is easily 1.25 inch taller than donovan or atleast bare minimum an inch taller.that is just an excuse by pierre.
Alex 6'0 said on 19/Jun/21
Ok so Donovan measured 6'5 7/8 and 6'5 5/8. Most likely 6'5.5 afternoon. Puts kane 6'6.5 range
Ok so Donovan measured 6'5 7/8 and 6'5 5/8. Most likely 6'5.5 afternoon. Puts kane 6'6.5 range
Alex 6'0 said on 19/Jun/21
If we're giving undertaker 6'7 peak then kane is definitely over 6'7. Maybe not 6'8 but in between
If we're giving undertaker 6'7 peak then kane is definitely over 6'7. Maybe not 6'8 but in between
Pierre said on 19/Jun/21
@Canson = Of course Kane's shoulders are looking higher than Donovan's shoulders ,because Kane wears advantageous tuxedo plus Kane clearly stands closer to the camera here.Kane lots of time wears shoes with comfortable heels when he wears tuxedo then if Donovan wears only flat sneakers....
@Canson = Of course Kane's shoulders are looking higher than Donovan's shoulders ,because Kane wears advantageous tuxedo plus Kane clearly stands closer to the camera here.Kane lots of time wears shoes with comfortable heels when he wears tuxedo then if Donovan wears only flat sneakers....
Canson said on 18/Jun/21
@Pierre: Kane’s shoulders are also clearly higher
@Pierre: Kane’s shoulders are also clearly higher
Canson said on 18/Jun/21
@Pierre: no disrespect but that sounds like an excuse. camera advantage or not, it’s obvious he’s taller by at least an inch. And he doesn’t have all that much advantage on him. I was as conservative as can be saying it’s an inch. If an inch and no footwear advantage he’s 6’6.25 absolute worst case but probably 6’6 3/8”. If not he’s as high as Rob lists him. Even if they stood back to back Kane would be the taller of the two by at least an inch. Kane’s shoulders are higher. We also don’t know who is wearing what for footwear
Click Here
@Pierre: no disrespect but that sounds like an excuse. camera advantage or not, it’s obvious he’s taller by at least an inch. And he doesn’t have all that much advantage on him. I was as conservative as can be saying it’s an inch. If an inch and no footwear advantage he’s 6’6.25 absolute worst case but probably 6’6 3/8”. If not he’s as high as Rob lists him. Even if they stood back to back Kane would be the taller of the two by at least an inch. Kane’s shoulders are higher. We also don’t know who is wearing what for footwear
Click Here
Chris n said on 17/Jun/21
@Pierre. If you look at both their outside shoulders, you can see they are both angled almost identical. There’s no real visible advantage for Kane there which may alter the view of his height making him appear taller.
@Pierre. If you look at both their outside shoulders, you can see they are both angled almost identical. There’s no real visible advantage for Kane there which may alter the view of his height making him appear taller.
Vegas' said on 16/Jun/21
Canson when I first met Wight in person I estimated ~6'11 or 7 foot in shoes. By the time I met him he was already grossly overweight it must be said even though he was just touching 30.
There is a possibility that he was taller in his early 20s looking at the college basketball photos or that barefoot shot around 96 with Savage and Hogan. I wouldn't rule out 7 foot circa 91-96.
Canson when I first met Wight in person I estimated ~6'11 or 7 foot in shoes. By the time I met him he was already grossly overweight it must be said even though he was just touching 30.
There is a possibility that he was taller in his early 20s looking at the college basketball photos or that barefoot shot around 96 with Savage and Hogan. I wouldn't rule out 7 foot circa 91-96.
Pierre said on 14/Jun/21
@Canson = Kane has the advantage of the camera next to Donovan, his head stands comfortably closer to it than him.
@Canson = Kane has the advantage of the camera next to Donovan, his head stands comfortably closer to it than him.
Canson said on 13/Jun/21
@Pierre: so what do you make of this pic? Donovan Smith measured 6’5 7/8 at his pro Day and 6’5 5/8 at the combine. Lowest possible for afternoon height is 6’5.25 but I would lean more toward 6’5 3/8”. Maybe he loses an inch with the weight he carries. 6’5.5” would likely be his listing here. No chance He’s any less than an inch shorter than Kane. So we can safely rule out anything less than 199cm for Kane. Honestly, he looks at least 6’6.5 as it may be greater than just 1”. I have it at 3cm. That proves Kane is not 6’5” range and not even as low as 6’6 just yet. Rob may have Kane listed correctly at least for his lunchtime height. The only variable is footwear since we can’t see it. If we just take what we see in the picture and use the balanced conservative approach, Smith would be 6’5 3/8 and Kane 6’6.5-.75. If we use his combine measurement, Kane is 200-200.5
Click Here
@Pierre: so what do you make of this pic? Donovan Smith measured 6’5 7/8 at his pro Day and 6’5 5/8 at the combine. Lowest possible for afternoon height is 6’5.25 but I would lean more toward 6’5 3/8”. Maybe he loses an inch with the weight he carries. 6’5.5” would likely be his listing here. No chance He’s any less than an inch shorter than Kane. So we can safely rule out anything less than 199cm for Kane. Honestly, he looks at least 6’6.5 as it may be greater than just 1”. I have it at 3cm. That proves Kane is not 6’5” range and not even as low as 6’6 just yet. Rob may have Kane listed correctly at least for his lunchtime height. The only variable is footwear since we can’t see it. If we just take what we see in the picture and use the balanced conservative approach, Smith would be 6’5 3/8 and Kane 6’6.5-.75. If we use his combine measurement, Kane is 200-200.5
Click Here
Canson said on 13/Jun/21
@Vegas: so you guess Show 6’11” peak? That’s about where I have him in his prime in the 6’11 range and 7’0” range out of bed
@Vegas: so you guess Show 6’11” peak? That’s about where I have him in his prime in the 6’11 range and 7’0” range out of bed
Pierre said on 11/Jun/21
ced said on 4/Jun/21 = Sorry ced but zero proofs imo here=
1= we don't know their shoes in both pics and probably Big Show next to Kevin Nash wears some good shoes
2= Big Show stands comfortably closer to the camera than Kevin Nash and the camera is low in direction to the ceiling so give a good advantage to Big Show.
ced said on 4/Jun/21 = Sorry ced but zero proofs imo here=
1= we don't know their shoes in both pics and probably Big Show next to Kevin Nash wears some good shoes
2= Big Show stands comfortably closer to the camera than Kevin Nash and the camera is low in direction to the ceiling so give a good advantage to Big Show.
Vegas' said on 5/Jun/21
I saw both Wight (Show) and Kane (Jacobs) out of gear 20 odd years ago. 4 inch difference not 2.5-2.75.
I saw both Wight (Show) and Kane (Jacobs) out of gear 20 odd years ago. 4 inch difference not 2.5-2.75.
ced said on 4/Jun/21
Here is some more proof that at very peak height, Kane was 6'8.5 (in the morning). About 6'8 or 6'7.75 in the afternoon.
Click Here
^Big Show and Kane without ring gear or ring boots on. Show was 6'11, has Kane only by 2.5 - 2.75 inches at best.
Click Here
^^ Nash and Big Show backstage. Looks about the same height difference between Show and Nash. Obviously today, Nash is taller than Kane, but keep in mind, Kane had more of a physical in ring career than Nash, flying off the top rope at that height and weight (300+ pounds), plus Kane had the most matches in the history of WWE of any performer.
If you take a look at him today, watch how his knees bend outward.
Kane peak: 6'8.5 (in the morning), 6'7.75-6'8 afternoon.
Big Show: 6'11.5 in the morning, 6'10.75-6'11 in the afternoon.
Nash: 6'9.25 in the morning, 6'8.5-6'8.75 in the afternoon.
Here is some more proof that at very peak height, Kane was 6'8.5 (in the morning). About 6'8 or 6'7.75 in the afternoon.
Click Here
^Big Show and Kane without ring gear or ring boots on. Show was 6'11, has Kane only by 2.5 - 2.75 inches at best.
Click Here
^^ Nash and Big Show backstage. Looks about the same height difference between Show and Nash. Obviously today, Nash is taller than Kane, but keep in mind, Kane had more of a physical in ring career than Nash, flying off the top rope at that height and weight (300+ pounds), plus Kane had the most matches in the history of WWE of any performer.
If you take a look at him today, watch how his knees bend outward.
Kane peak: 6'8.5 (in the morning), 6'7.75-6'8 afternoon.
Big Show: 6'11.5 in the morning, 6'10.75-6'11 in the afternoon.
Nash: 6'9.25 in the morning, 6'8.5-6'8.75 in the afternoon.
Hyper said on 1/Jun/21
@Pierre
Regardless, it’s more than one inch between them.
@Pierre
Regardless, it’s more than one inch between them.
Abhishek Padhan said on 31/May/21
Kane is little bit smaller than Big Show.
Kane is little bit smaller than Big Show.
Riccardo89 said on 30/May/21
Edward Mullen said on 29/May/21
I can seriously buy 6’9 peak or even more. He only looked 2 inches off a 7ft 1 big show (in shoes) in 98’.
Well 6'9"? Barefoot? Without these nice boots?Click Here
He was at most 201cm barefoot. 6'9" maybe in boots.
I think big show was 7 feet tall in boots if not a hair over in his prime. Not barefoot.
Edward Mullen said on 29/May/21
I can seriously buy 6’9 peak or even more. He only looked 2 inches off a 7ft 1 big show (in shoes) in 98’.
Well 6'9"? Barefoot? Without these nice boots?Click Here
He was at most 201cm barefoot. 6'9" maybe in boots.
I think big show was 7 feet tall in boots if not a hair over in his prime. Not barefoot.
ChaosControl 6'2.5/189.2cm said on 30/May/21
@Edward Mullen Big Show was just 7’0 peak though
@Edward Mullen Big Show was just 7’0 peak though
Pierre said on 30/May/21
Greg Davies has a good advantage in this pic next to Stephen Merchant because he's standing closer to the camera and the camera is low.
Greg Davies has a good advantage in this pic next to Stephen Merchant because he's standing closer to the camera and the camera is low.
Edward Mullen said on 29/May/21
I can seriously buy 6’9 peak or even more. He only looked 2 inches off a 7ft 1 big show (in shoes) in 98’.
I can seriously buy 6’9 peak or even more. He only looked 2 inches off a 7ft 1 big show (in shoes) in 98’.
Canson said on 29/May/21
@Hyper: yes that’s interesting. Davies is closer to the camera. If Merchant fell below 6’7” I can easily see 6’6.75 perhaps but anything less than about 6’6.5 would shock me. I only say 6’6.5 because being a taller guy the possibility for extra height loss is there. Maybe a full inch versus 3/4”. Davies in his prime may have been 6’8 and maybe 6’7.75” today.
@Hyper: yes that’s interesting. Davies is closer to the camera. If Merchant fell below 6’7” I can easily see 6’6.75 perhaps but anything less than about 6’6.5 would shock me. I only say 6’6.5 because being a taller guy the possibility for extra height loss is there. Maybe a full inch versus 3/4”. Davies in his prime may have been 6’8 and maybe 6’7.75” today.
Canson said on 29/May/21
Says here that Smith measured 6’5 7/8” at his pro day so that was earlier than his combine since it was 6’5 5/8”. For reference, Jesse James shows 6’7 1/8” here and 6’7 at the combine so it’s not much variance I guess for him but probably 2 hours versus 1 hour out of bed or somewhere along those lines. Maybe they measured at different times at the combine or James loses height quicker. I think we can consider 6’5.5” or 6’5 3/8” possible afternoon lows for Smith unless he loses the full inch due to his weight.
Click Here
Says here that Smith measured 6’5 7/8” at his pro day so that was earlier than his combine since it was 6’5 5/8”. For reference, Jesse James shows 6’7 1/8” here and 6’7 at the combine so it’s not much variance I guess for him but probably 2 hours versus 1 hour out of bed or somewhere along those lines. Maybe they measured at different times at the combine or James loses height quicker. I think we can consider 6’5.5” or 6’5 3/8” possible afternoon lows for Smith unless he loses the full inch due to his weight.
Click Here
Canson said on 29/May/21
@Hyper: yea I agree with you and Chaos Control. I can’t see a strong 6’7 peak guy maybe even weak 6’8 as Chaos suggested, all the way down to 6’5 today especially with Donovan Smith. Even if Donovan Smith is a morning height which he possibly is, I can’t see Kane being 6’5 lol. I have seen where Donovan Smith measured 6’5.75” at the combine but also 6’5 5/8” so theoretically he could be say 6’5.5” or Christian’s height +/- 1/8”. That can look 1” minimum but up to 3cm. If 3cm it aligns with what Rob lists him and close to how you perceived him depending on when it was. I’d say 6’6” is a given at least. I agree with Chaos too. 6’8.5 isn’t unreasonable for his peak height nor was 6’8.75 if he only got down to 6’7.5” being how heavy he was
Click Here
Click Here
@Hyper: yea I agree with you and Chaos Control. I can’t see a strong 6’7 peak guy maybe even weak 6’8 as Chaos suggested, all the way down to 6’5 today especially with Donovan Smith. Even if Donovan Smith is a morning height which he possibly is, I can’t see Kane being 6’5 lol. I have seen where Donovan Smith measured 6’5.75” at the combine but also 6’5 5/8” so theoretically he could be say 6’5.5” or Christian’s height +/- 1/8”. That can look 1” minimum but up to 3cm. If 3cm it aligns with what Rob lists him and close to how you perceived him depending on when it was. I’d say 6’6” is a given at least. I agree with Chaos too. 6’8.5 isn’t unreasonable for his peak height nor was 6’8.75 if he only got down to 6’7.5” being how heavy he was
Click Here
Click Here
Hyper said on 28/May/21
Also, Greg Davies with Stephen Merchant
Click Here
And people say Greg Davies should be downgraded to 6’7.5”, which would put Merchant at 6’6” or lower.
Also, Greg Davies with Stephen Merchant
Click Here
And people say Greg Davies should be downgraded to 6’7.5”, which would put Merchant at 6’6” or lower.
Hyper said on 28/May/21
@ChaosControl how much well over 6’6” is debatable. However, one thing is certain. You can easily cross out 6’5.75”-6’6” range, without doubts.
@ChaosControl how much well over 6’6” is debatable. However, one thing is certain. You can easily cross out 6’5.75”-6’6” range, without doubts.
Slim92 said on 27/May/21
@Canson That's recently, while he's old. This was rare to me too, but he said it. He said he was "6'9 legit" When he was younger and had that long hair for the kane character.
@Canson That's recently, while he's old. This was rare to me too, but he said it. He said he was "6'9 legit" When he was younger and had that long hair for the kane character.
Canson said on 27/May/21
@Slim92: I’ve only heard him claim 6’8” or about 6’8”
@Slim92: I’ve only heard him claim 6’8” or about 6’8”
Canson said on 26/May/21
@Chaos Control: yea and in his case he could have lost 3cm possibly with the combination of weight and height
@Chaos Control: yea and in his case he could have lost 3cm possibly with the combination of weight and height
Slim92 said on 26/May/21
I watched a video on YouTube where kane was doing a small interview, and I clearly remember him saying "Here I am 6 foot 9 legit, with long hair down my back, walking down the street" idr what he was talking about, but I do remember him saying that.
I watched a video on YouTube where kane was doing a small interview, and I clearly remember him saying "Here I am 6 foot 9 legit, with long hair down my back, walking down the street" idr what he was talking about, but I do remember him saying that.
James B 171.5 said on 26/May/21
But at times he does not look a great deal taller than rand orton
also he only had 2 inches on jack swagger
But at times he does not look a great deal taller than rand orton
also he only had 2 inches on jack swagger
ChaosControl 6'2.5/189.2cm said on 25/May/21
@Hyper I’ll trust you cause you’ve met, or at the very least seen him whereas Pierre hasn’t and isn’t known for reasonable guesses
@Hyper I’ll trust you cause you’ve met, or at the very least seen him whereas Pierre hasn’t and isn’t known for reasonable guesses
Hyper said on 25/May/21
@James Sorry mate. He does. Currently, he was at least an inch taller than an specific athlete who measured 6'5.75" in the morning.
Also, currently, he looked taller than Dennis Rodman with Undertaker. Obvious, 6'5" is dumb. Not to mention in person, he's taller than you would think.
@James Sorry mate. He does. Currently, he was at least an inch taller than an specific athlete who measured 6'5.75" in the morning.
Also, currently, he looked taller than Dennis Rodman with Undertaker. Obvious, 6'5" is dumb. Not to mention in person, he's taller than you would think.
Hyper said on 24/May/21
@ChaosControl
I believe it. You can take my claim with a grain of salt, but Kane is never as short as 6'5" in person as Pierre wants to claim. If you saw him in person. He's extremely imposing, more so in person than in pictures.
@ChaosControl
I believe it. You can take my claim with a grain of salt, but Kane is never as short as 6'5" in person as Pierre wants to claim. If you saw him in person. He's extremely imposing, more so in person than in pictures.
ChaosControl 6'2.5/189.2cm said on 22/May/21
The 6’8.5 would have been in the morning and he’d be 6’7.5/6’7.75 later on
The 6’8.5 would have been in the morning and he’d be 6’7.5/6’7.75 later on
James B 171.5cm said on 22/May/21
Sorry I know I have said this already but he does not look over 6’6 in recent years
Sorry I know I have said this already but he does not look over 6’6 in recent years
Pierre said on 22/May/21
Lol Vince Vaughn / Stephen Merchant 6"7' = Click Here
Kane without his wrestler shoes /Vince Vaughn = Click Here
Lol Vince Vaughn / Stephen Merchant 6"7' = Click Here
Kane without his wrestler shoes /Vince Vaughn = Click Here
Hyper said on 21/May/21
He was well over 6’6” for sure when I saw him, up close.
6’5” is a circus show. He was never as short as that, even when he tried to make himself shorter. Not even halfway close to being as short as 6’5” range, even without his footwear advantage.
Of course, I’m still enjoying the circus show in the comments. It’s obvious none (except a few) met this guy in person.
He was well over 6’6” for sure when I saw him, up close.
6’5” is a circus show. He was never as short as that, even when he tried to make himself shorter. Not even halfway close to being as short as 6’5” range, even without his footwear advantage.
Of course, I’m still enjoying the circus show in the comments. It’s obvious none (except a few) met this guy in person.
ced said on 20/May/21
I think 6'8.5 is not unreasonable.. He did look 2 inches taller than Sid in a 1995 battle royal, but - here's more proof that Kane was at least 6'8:
Here are stills from a 1999 PPV between Big Show and Kane:
Click Here
^ there are roughly 2 inches between them. And remember Show is wearing 1 inch boots too!
Click Here
That looks like 2 inches right there as well ^
Click Here
And one more for good measure^^
I think 6'8.5 is not unreasonable.. He did look 2 inches taller than Sid in a 1995 battle royal, but - here's more proof that Kane was at least 6'8:
Here are stills from a 1999 PPV between Big Show and Kane:
Click Here
^ there are roughly 2 inches between them. And remember Show is wearing 1 inch boots too!
Click Here
That looks like 2 inches right there as well ^
Click Here
And one more for good measure^^
Riccardo89 said on 18/May/21
Kane
Prime out of the bed 6'7.75.
During the day, considering him weight a little over 300, i would say 6'7".
Today 6'7 morning and 6'6.25 max during the day.
I dont see nothing that proves he was/is taller than that.
Kane
Prime out of the bed 6'7.75.
During the day, considering him weight a little over 300, i would say 6'7".
Today 6'7 morning and 6'6.25 max during the day.
I dont see nothing that proves he was/is taller than that.
Vegas' said on 18/May/21
He wasn't 6'8.5 peak
He wasn't 6'8.5 peak
Pierre said on 17/May/21
@ Edward Mullen Big Show 7"0' is probably a list a little bit rounded up.Here is Big Show without his wrestler shoes next to Shaquille = Click Here =the camera is low and a bit closer to Big Show and advantage him....
@ Edward Mullen Big Show 7"0' is probably a list a little bit rounded up.Here is Big Show without his wrestler shoes next to Shaquille = Click Here =the camera is low and a bit closer to Big Show and advantage him....
ChaosControl 6'2.5/189.2cm said on 17/May/21
Edward Mullen said on 15/May/21
Ok. Kane always looked 3 inches shorter than a 7ft big show. Now the most kanes foot wear would have been 1.25 inch at most. Kane’s weight would push the soles down anyway + anything more then 1.25 inch footwear would have been like wrestling on stilts for a 6’6* guy. So ….. this would put Kane at 6ft 8.5 range at his peak. Which I don’t think is at all unreasonable. This guy , in his prime was HUGE. Looked a foot taller than most 6,1/6,2 guys in 2000/01.
6’8.5 straight out of bed isn’t unreasonable at his peak
Edward Mullen said on 15/May/21
Ok. Kane always looked 3 inches shorter than a 7ft big show. Now the most kanes foot wear would have been 1.25 inch at most. Kane’s weight would push the soles down anyway + anything more then 1.25 inch footwear would have been like wrestling on stilts for a 6’6* guy. So ….. this would put Kane at 6ft 8.5 range at his peak. Which I don’t think is at all unreasonable. This guy , in his prime was HUGE. Looked a foot taller than most 6,1/6,2 guys in 2000/01.
6’8.5 straight out of bed isn’t unreasonable at his peak
Edward Mullen said on 15/May/21
Ok. Kane always looked 3 inches shorter than a 7ft big show. Now the most kanes foot wear would have been 1.25 inch at most. Kane’s weight would push the soles down anyway + anything more then 1.25 inch footwear would have been like wrestling on stilts for a 6’6* guy. So ….. this would put Kane at 6ft 8.5 range at his peak. Which I don’t think is at all unreasonable. This guy , in his prime was HUGE. Looked a foot taller than most 6,1/6,2 guys in 2000/01.
Ok. Kane always looked 3 inches shorter than a 7ft big show. Now the most kanes foot wear would have been 1.25 inch at most. Kane’s weight would push the soles down anyway + anything more then 1.25 inch footwear would have been like wrestling on stilts for a 6’6* guy. So ….. this would put Kane at 6ft 8.5 range at his peak. Which I don’t think is at all unreasonable. This guy , in his prime was HUGE. Looked a foot taller than most 6,1/6,2 guys in 2000/01.
Pierre said on 13/May/21
Robbe said on 11/May/21
Lol, if Triple H is max 6ft with Haffhor, why is he listed at 6'1.5 by the siteowner? Why is Show listed at 6'10, not 6'7.5/8.5 like you claim? Why is Tyson Fury listed 6'7.5, not 6'6? Why is Lennox Lewis listed at 6'4.75 not 6'3 like your rididulous claim was not so long ago. Do i need to continue? Why don't anybody ever agree with you? Maybe cause your wrong? What is this obsession of yours for downgrading everybody? Just for attention?
" Lol " have you solid arguments please ?...Plus where would the interest of this discussions about heights if all the internauts where ok with your own guesses.....
Robbe said on 11/May/21
Lol, if Triple H is max 6ft with Haffhor, why is he listed at 6'1.5 by the siteowner? Why is Show listed at 6'10, not 6'7.5/8.5 like you claim? Why is Tyson Fury listed 6'7.5, not 6'6? Why is Lennox Lewis listed at 6'4.75 not 6'3 like your rididulous claim was not so long ago. Do i need to continue? Why don't anybody ever agree with you? Maybe cause your wrong? What is this obsession of yours for downgrading everybody? Just for attention?
" Lol " have you solid arguments please ?...Plus where would the interest of this discussions about heights if all the internauts where ok with your own guesses.....
Resurrection of Edwards said on 13/May/21
@Editor rob
do you think that kane might be an inch taller than taker in 2020/21.because it looked that much the last time.undertaker might have wore cowboy boots and kane in official dress shoes and calaway looked an inch shorter.rob,is it kane who is still 6’7 or is it the undertaker who is under 6’6?which of these do you personally think is a possibility?
Editor Rob
@Editor rob
do you think that kane might be an inch taller than taker in 2020/21.because it looked that much the last time.undertaker might have wore cowboy boots and kane in official dress shoes and calaway looked an inch shorter.rob,is it kane who is still 6’7 or is it the undertaker who is under 6’6?which of these do you personally think is a possibility?
Editor RobKane might have a better chance of looking taller...but whether he really would measure near an inch taller today I wouldn't be convinced of.
Riccardo89 said on 12/May/21
The miz is 5'11.....kane around 6'6".
The miz is 5'11.....kane around 6'6".
Robbe said on 11/May/21
Lol, if Triple H is max 6ft with Haffhor, why is he listed at 6'1.5 by the siteowner? Why is Show listed at 6'10, not 6'7.5/8.5 like you claim? Why is Tyson Fury listed 6'7.5, not 6'6? Why is Lennox Lewis listed at 6'4.75 not 6'3 like your rididulous claim was not so long ago. Do i need to continue? Why don't anybody ever agree with you? Maybe cause your wrong? What is this obsession of yours for downgrading everybody? Just for attention?
Lol, if Triple H is max 6ft with Haffhor, why is he listed at 6'1.5 by the siteowner? Why is Show listed at 6'10, not 6'7.5/8.5 like you claim? Why is Tyson Fury listed 6'7.5, not 6'6? Why is Lennox Lewis listed at 6'4.75 not 6'3 like your rididulous claim was not so long ago. Do i need to continue? Why don't anybody ever agree with you? Maybe cause your wrong? What is this obsession of yours for downgrading everybody? Just for attention?
Resurrection of Edwards said on 11/May/21
kane peak 6’7.5 and 6’6.5 currently
undertaker peak 6’7 and 6’5.75 currently.
kane peak 6’7.5 and 6’6.5 currently
undertaker peak 6’7 and 6’5.75 currently.
Pierre said on 10/May/21
Robbe said on 4/May/21
Triple H appears pretty much bang on 6'1.25 with Hafthor Click Here
Your scale isn't good = Hafthor's lower nose isn't 6"1.25' he's 6"0' (at around 3:18 in the video)= Click Here .Plus Triple H looks straighter than Hafthor in the pic.
Triple h is max 6"0' by this comparison
Robbe said on 4/May/21
Triple H appears pretty much bang on 6'1.25 with Hafthor Click Here
Your scale isn't good = Hafthor's lower nose isn't 6"1.25' he's 6"0' (at around 3:18 in the video)= Click Here .Plus Triple H looks straighter than Hafthor in the pic.
Triple h is max 6"0' by this comparison
Vegas CH said on 8/May/21
Miz is similar height in person to Christian Click Here and 2011 Julian Glover Click Here
I have photos next to all three inside on level ground
Miz is similar height in person to Christian Click Here and 2011 Julian Glover Click Here
I have photos next to all three inside on level ground
Matt logan said on 5/May/21
Agree miz is 5'11.5 max ain't no way miz is 6' tall
Agree miz is 5'11.5 max ain't no way miz is 6' tall
Pierre said on 3/May/21
By Hafthor's scale Triple H isn't 6"1.25' ,he's absolute max as high as hafthor's lowe nose that is 6"0' on the scale.So Logically the Miz is shorter than 6"0'.
Click Here here is Triple H next to Dwayne slouching .
Dwayne /Shaq 7"0.25' Click Here
By Hafthor's scale Triple H isn't 6"1.25' ,he's absolute max as high as hafthor's lowe nose that is 6"0' on the scale.So Logically the Miz is shorter than 6"0'.
Click Here here is Triple H next to Dwayne slouching .
Dwayne /Shaq 7"0.25' Click Here
Resurrection of Edward said on 1/May/21
Matt logan said on 29/Apr/21
Kane is 6'6" max miz is 5'11.5 max
good joke lad.if miz is 6 feet feet then kane still looks near 6'7 or weak 6'7,miz is barely at his nose tip.
Matt logan said on 29/Apr/21
Kane is 6'6" max miz is 5'11.5 max
good joke lad.if miz is 6 feet feet then kane still looks near 6'7 or weak 6'7,miz is barely at his nose tip.
Robbe said on 30/Apr/21
Miz 6ft, Triple H 6'1.25, Mark henry 6'1, and Stephanie 5'8 with his ladies shoes, dunno what kind of heels she got there Click Here
Whole picture Click Here
Miz 6ft, Triple H 6'1.25, Mark henry 6'1, and Stephanie 5'8 with his ladies shoes, dunno what kind of heels she got there Click Here
Whole picture Click Here
Matt logan said on 29/Apr/21
Kane is 6'6" max miz is 5'11.5 max
Kane is 6'6" max miz is 5'11.5 max
Pierre said on 29/Apr/21
Ben Calimer said on 29/Apr/21
Here goes Pierre showing off those horrible photo forensics again.
Lol Ben I'm still waiting for your opinion on Magic next to Ric Flair....
Ben Calimer said on 29/Apr/21
Here goes Pierre showing off those horrible photo forensics again.
Lol Ben I'm still waiting for your opinion on Magic next to Ric Flair....
miko said on 29/Apr/21
I'm not a fan of the Miz at all but he's clearly around the 6 foot range. About half an inch shorter than 6'0.5 Cena.
I'm not a fan of the Miz at all but he's clearly around the 6 foot range. About half an inch shorter than 6'0.5 Cena.
Ben Calimer said on 29/Apr/21
Here goes Pierre showing off those horrible photo forensics again.
Here goes Pierre showing off those horrible photo forensics again.
Pierre said on 28/Apr/21
Robbe said on 28/April/21
The Miz stands a bit closer to the camera than Jimmy Kimmel here and camera a bit low that advantage him
Here is Jimmy Kimmel next to Stephen Colbert Jimmy standing closer to the camera Click Here
Here the opposite = Stephen closer to the camera = Click Here
Here is how much tall looks Stephen Colbert to Barack maybe always full 6"1' now = Click Here ....
Robbe said on 28/April/21
The Miz stands a bit closer to the camera than Jimmy Kimmel here and camera a bit low that advantage him
Here is Jimmy Kimmel next to Stephen Colbert Jimmy standing closer to the camera Click Here
Here the opposite = Stephen closer to the camera = Click Here
Here is how much tall looks Stephen Colbert to Barack maybe always full 6"1' now = Click Here ....
Robbe said on 28/Apr/21
Like Vegas said, it's just the camera angle fooling with Miz and Arnold, Miz is 6ft range for sure. Here Miz with 181cm Jimmy Kimmel Click Here
Kane looks over 6'6 with Miz on the height chart i posted earlier, so both guys are listed pretty accurate on this site i think.
Like Vegas said, it's just the camera angle fooling with Miz and Arnold, Miz is 6ft range for sure. Here Miz with 181cm Jimmy Kimmel Click Here
Kane looks over 6'6 with Miz on the height chart i posted earlier, so both guys are listed pretty accurate on this site i think.
Pierre said on 27/Apr/21
@Vegas = Agree with you Kane had an advantage due to the high camera,but he was a lot more distant t the camera than Shaq then the advantage was big.In my example The Miz stands almost same distance to the camera as Arnold.
Here is Arnold in 2013 next to his daughter listed 5"9' = Click Here Click Here
@Vegas = Agree with you Kane had an advantage due to the high camera,but he was a lot more distant t the camera than Shaq then the advantage was big.In my example The Miz stands almost same distance to the camera as Arnold.
Here is Arnold in 2013 next to his daughter listed 5"9' = Click Here Click Here
Riccardo89 said on 27/Apr/21
Peak 6'7" or 201cm but very max. Today he insnt less than 198cm. I would say 199, very similar to strowman.
Peak 6'7" or 201cm but very max. Today he insnt less than 198cm. I would say 199, very similar to strowman.
Riccardo89 said on 27/Apr/21
Canson said on 27/Apr/21
Taker 6'6.5/6'6.75
Hogan 6'4.5/6'5.
Canson said on 27/Apr/21
Taker 6'6.5/6'6.75
Hogan 6'4.5/6'5.
Canson said on 27/Apr/21
@Pierre: if Taker was under 6’7 peak height, how tall would that Make a peak Hulk Hogan? Everyone here agrees Hogan was at least 6’5” peak height end Taker seemingly had 1.5-2” on him. Kane appeared slightly taller than Taker at times
@Pierre: if Taker was under 6’7 peak height, how tall would that Make a peak Hulk Hogan? Everyone here agrees Hogan was at least 6’5” peak height end Taker seemingly had 1.5-2” on him. Kane appeared slightly taller than Taker at times
Canson said on 27/Apr/21
@Pierre: how is the pic with Mangianello not good? It shows that there clearly isn’t more than advertised
@Pierre: how is the pic with Mangianello not good? It shows that there clearly isn’t more than advertised
Vegas CH said on 23/Apr/21
4:14 Arnold has high camera angle advantage. Look at the top rope nearest camera and top rope on other side of ring... That's why Kane appears taller than Shaq here Click Here
I also doubt Arnold as low as 5'10 in 2014 given he was taller than Chris Eubank at that time whom Rob met.
Getting back to Miz your statement is completely vague. What does "not close to 6 foot" even mean. The dude was slightly taller than me and looked similar height in person to Christian Click Here
4:14 Arnold has high camera angle advantage. Look at the top rope nearest camera and top rope on other side of ring... That's why Kane appears taller than Shaq here Click Here
I also doubt Arnold as low as 5'10 in 2014 given he was taller than Chris Eubank at that time whom Rob met.
Getting back to Miz your statement is completely vague. What does "not close to 6 foot" even mean. The dude was slightly taller than me and looked similar height in person to Christian Click Here
Pierre said on 22/Apr/21
Lol Vegas without direspect to you,but Booker T isn't a lot closer to the camera here,plus he has a relaxed posture while the Miz is standing straight...that is the same thing next to Joe Manganiello.
Plus very probably the Miz had more shoe than Joe who was wearing poor soles = Click Here = Joe's sneakers first seconds of the video
The Miz at 4:14 stands closer to the camera than Arnold (looking 5"10' range this days).Is he looking close to 6'0" here?Not for me.
at 4:47 here is how tall looks the Miz(probably closer to the camera) next to Joe Manganiello standing this time in better posture than in your comparison.
Lol Vegas without direspect to you,but Booker T isn't a lot closer to the camera here,plus he has a relaxed posture while the Miz is standing straight...that is the same thing next to Joe Manganiello.
Plus very probably the Miz had more shoe than Joe who was wearing poor soles = Click Here = Joe's sneakers first seconds of the video
The Miz at 4:14 stands closer to the camera than Arnold (looking 5"10' range this days).Is he looking close to 6'0" here?Not for me.
at 4:47 here is how tall looks the Miz(probably closer to the camera) next to Joe Manganiello standing this time in better posture than in your comparison.
Pierre said on 22/Apr/21
Lol Vegas without direspect to you,but Booker T isn't a lot closer to the camera here,plus he has a relaxed posture while the Miz is standing straight...that is the same thing next to Joe Manganiello.
Lol Vegas without direspect to you,but Booker T isn't a lot closer to the camera here,plus he has a relaxed posture while the Miz is standing straight...that is the same thing next to Joe Manganiello.
Alex 6'0 said on 17/Apr/21
Public enemy, yea kane even claimed about 6'8 so i could buy 6'7.5 or this listing for his peak. Currently looks near 6'6 flat
Public enemy, yea kane even claimed about 6'8 so i could buy 6'7.5 or this listing for his peak. Currently looks near 6'6 flat
Alex 6'0 said on 17/Apr/21
Kane was slightly taller than undertaker at their peaks but it looked an inch or so at times. Kane did wear bigger boots they always said. Kane was physically bigger in size too. Was more massive in muscle in the late 90s til 2001
Kane was slightly taller than undertaker at their peaks but it looked an inch or so at times. Kane did wear bigger boots they always said. Kane was physically bigger in size too. Was more massive in muscle in the late 90s til 2001
Public Enemy said on 17/Apr/21
I can buy Kane being taller than the Undertaker by 0.5’ at peak. His sheer size and footwear also made him just look like a bigger guy overall.
Current 6’6.5-6’6.75
Peak 6’7.5
I can buy Kane being taller than the Undertaker by 0.5’ at peak. His sheer size and footwear also made him just look like a bigger guy overall.
Current 6’6.5-6’6.75
Peak 6’7.5
Dred_ said on 16/Apr/21
Rob
This is kane next to big show in their prime
Click Here
If you zoom in the photo, you Will see that kane is in clearly footwear adavantage probably even 3/4 of an inch, with a thick hair and fully standing straight, while big show is much more relaxed with his legs spread pretty wide and however big show looks significantly taller, around 3.5 inch i think. Can we defintely considering kane even a flat 6ft7 here ?
Editor Rob
Rob
This is kane next to big show in their prime
Click Here
If you zoom in the photo, you Will see that kane is in clearly footwear adavantage probably even 3/4 of an inch, with a thick hair and fully standing straight, while big show is much more relaxed with his legs spread pretty wide and however big show looks significantly taller, around 3.5 inch i think. Can we defintely considering kane even a flat 6ft7 here ?
Editor RobI'd still class Kane in the 6ft 7 range there
Hyper said on 15/Apr/21
He was certainly intimidating (just stature wise) when I was up close to him in person. He was casually walking around so he could’ve been taller. He didn’t stand with great posture. He was a lot more relaxed than forcing his posture. However, he had a footwear advantage over me, but he didn’t wear absolute lifts because he walked just fine. It’s just his footwear is big, certainly bigger than mine. However, at his size, it’s hard to find light footwear.
However, even without a footwear advantage, he’s not as short as 6’5” range. Definitely over 6’6” for sure when I met him. I believe he was a very strong 6’7”, if not 6’7.5” at peak.
He was certainly intimidating (just stature wise) when I was up close to him in person. He was casually walking around so he could’ve been taller. He didn’t stand with great posture. He was a lot more relaxed than forcing his posture. However, he had a footwear advantage over me, but he didn’t wear absolute lifts because he walked just fine. It’s just his footwear is big, certainly bigger than mine. However, at his size, it’s hard to find light footwear.
However, even without a footwear advantage, he’s not as short as 6’5” range. Definitely over 6’6” for sure when I met him. I believe he was a very strong 6’7”, if not 6’7.5” at peak.
Vegas CH said on 15/Apr/21
Pierre I met Miz in person. Don't need a video where Booker is closer to camera to determine his height lol
Click Here
Click Here
Pierre I met Miz in person. Don't need a video where Booker is closer to camera to determine his height lol
Click Here
Click Here
Pierre said on 14/Apr/21
Assumption = Taker has a bigger forehead than Kane ,Taker believe himself he's shorter than Kane because Kane's eyes are probably a fraction higher than him when he talk to him but finally Kane is max same height as Kane...
I have always in my head this famous pics on ring with both standing face to face ,Kane wearing huge shoes and a mask but who never dwarfs him Click Here Click Here
Assumption = Taker has a bigger forehead than Kane ,Taker believe himself he's shorter than Kane because Kane's eyes are probably a fraction higher than him when he talk to him but finally Kane is max same height as Kane...
I have always in my head this famous pics on ring with both standing face to face ,Kane wearing huge shoes and a mask but who never dwarfs him Click Here Click Here
Dred_ said on 13/Apr/21
Ced
There aren’t 4 cm of difference between sid and kane. In the whole match kane looked around an inch taller at most than sid. Kane like undertaker refering himself as 6ft8, big cass as 6ft9, randy orton as 6ft5, drew mcintyre as 6ft5.5, triple h and lesnar 6ft3 they probably claims their respective height with shoes, so probably 6ft7 flat isn’t out of the question for both
For sure peak kane didn’t look much different than taker and for sure taker didn’t look much taller than sid
Ced
There aren’t 4 cm of difference between sid and kane. In the whole match kane looked around an inch taller at most than sid. Kane like undertaker refering himself as 6ft8, big cass as 6ft9, randy orton as 6ft5, drew mcintyre as 6ft5.5, triple h and lesnar 6ft3 they probably claims their respective height with shoes, so probably 6ft7 flat isn’t out of the question for both
For sure peak kane didn’t look much different than taker and for sure taker didn’t look much taller than sid
ced said on 12/Apr/21
@Dred,
There is a still that I posted about 2 months back on here with Kane and Sid in a 1995 battle royal, with Kane looking 1.5 inches taller than Sid. If Sid was 6'6 1/4, in a 1995 Glen Jacobs was 6'7.75.
When he debuted as Kane, he probably dropped down to 6'7.5 or 6'7.25 due to the massive amount of weight he put on for the Kane character.
@Dred,
There is a still that I posted about 2 months back on here with Kane and Sid in a 1995 battle royal, with Kane looking 1.5 inches taller than Sid. If Sid was 6'6 1/4, in a 1995 Glen Jacobs was 6'7.75.
When he debuted as Kane, he probably dropped down to 6'7.5 or 6'7.25 due to the massive amount of weight he put on for the Kane character.
Pierre said on 12/Apr/21
The Miz isn't 6"0' or close to 6"0' ,watch this video and do pause at around 3:27 /3:30 when Booker T stands very close to him = Click Here
The Miz isn't 6"0' or close to 6"0' ,watch this video and do pause at around 3:27 /3:30 when Booker T stands very close to him = Click Here
Vegas CH said on 12/Apr/21
6'5 range Kane would make Miz 5'10 range which is not correct
6'5 range Kane would make Miz 5'10 range which is not correct
Resurrection of Edwards said on 11/Apr/21
my bad.i mean taker was atleast 6'7 peak.he was possibly and likely 6'7.25 at his tallest.i'd buy rob's listing for both taker and kane.rob has nailed the listing.
my bad.i mean taker was atleast 6'7 peak.he was possibly and likely 6'7.25 at his tallest.i'd buy rob's listing for both taker and kane.rob has nailed the listing.
Resurrection of Edwards said on 11/Apr/21
kane just recently looked 7 inch taller than the miz who is listed 6 feet and 3 inches taller than damian priest yet some people are joking around.lmfao.miz out of gear wasn’t even at kane’s nose tip and priest who is 6’4 was 3 inches shorter than kane.go on,i’m enjoying this joke.taker was 6’7 atleast at his peak and possibly even 6’6.25 and kane was 6’7.5 guy at peak.rob has nailed the listing.go on,i’m enjoying.
kane just recently looked 7 inch taller than the miz who is listed 6 feet and 3 inches taller than damian priest yet some people are joking around.lmfao.miz out of gear wasn’t even at kane’s nose tip and priest who is 6’4 was 3 inches shorter than kane.go on,i’m enjoying this joke.taker was 6’7 atleast at his peak and possibly even 6’6.25 and kane was 6’7.5 guy at peak.rob has nailed the listing.go on,i’m enjoying.
Canson said on 10/Apr/21
@Pierre: maybe 6’7” flat but he was at least that in his prime. 6’5.5” is remotely possible but that’s the lowest he would be today and I doubt he’s really that low. He could still be 6’6” flat in the afternoon but perhaps even 6’5.75” would be a better fit than 6’5.5”
@Pierre: maybe 6’7” flat but he was at least that in his prime. 6’5.5” is remotely possible but that’s the lowest he would be today and I doubt he’s really that low. He could still be 6’6” flat in the afternoon but perhaps even 6’5.75” would be a better fit than 6’5.5”
Dred_ said on 10/Apr/21
Editor Rob
yeah Kane has a thicker boot, maybe even an extra 3/4 of an inch over the Giant Khali
@edward
So maybe he doensn’t even looks a full 6ft7 back to 2007
Editor Rob
yeah Kane has a thicker boot, maybe even an extra 3/4 of an inch over the Giant Khali
@edward
So maybe he doensn’t even looks a full 6ft7 back to 2007
Pierre said on 10/Apr/21
Resurrection of Edwards said on 10/Apr/21
@pierrie
undertaker was a legit solid 6’7 guy at peak.there are enough evidence to support the idea.
@edouarda I’m not gonna be so adamant I'm gonna say around 6"7'.Imo no more.And now struggles with 6"5.5' imo
Resurrection of Edwards said on 10/Apr/21
@pierrie
undertaker was a legit solid 6’7 guy at peak.there are enough evidence to support the idea.
@edouarda I’m not gonna be so adamant I'm gonna say around 6"7'.Imo no more.And now struggles with 6"5.5' imo
Dred_ said on 10/Apr/21
@edwards
I see the photo of kane and mamum and yeah he probably looks 6ft7 1/2 but do you have any idea how big is kane footwear in that moment ? I have no idea
But with ben who is 6ft5
Click Here
He looks 2.5 inch taller but he is in wrestling gear that moment so i doubt he is over 6ft7 flat
@edwards
I see the photo of kane and mamum and yeah he probably looks 6ft7 1/2 but do you have any idea how big is kane footwear in that moment ? I have no idea
But with ben who is 6ft5
Click Here
He looks 2.5 inch taller but he is in wrestling gear that moment so i doubt he is over 6ft7 flat
Dred_ said on 10/Apr/21
Rob
This is the difference of footwear between khali and kane
Click Here
Are you still sure on 6ft7 1/2 peak height ? I mean after all sid was 6ft6 flat, you change the list because said “hair over 6ft6” but i mean even if you are 6ft5 1/2 the hair are probably over 6ft6 especially if your hair as thick as sid hair. Considering him 198 cm there is no chance for kane being 202 cm
Editor Rob
Rob
This is the difference of footwear between khali and kane
Click Here
Are you still sure on 6ft7 1/2 peak height ? I mean after all sid was 6ft6 flat, you change the list because said “hair over 6ft6” but i mean even if you are 6ft5 1/2 the hair are probably over 6ft6 especially if your hair as thick as sid hair. Considering him 198 cm there is no chance for kane being 202 cm
Editor Robyeah Kane has a thicker boot, maybe even an extra 3/4 of an inch over the Giant Khali
Dred_ said on 10/Apr/21
@pierre
I’m not sure but i think kane and sid have both a similar type of boots this day! And yes if you watch the whole match sid isn’t in tiptoeing he dumb his knee. Kane really doesn’t look much over an inch taller here, and he doesn’t look much taller than taker who probably is half to an inch taller than prime sid
@pierre
I’m not sure but i think kane and sid have both a similar type of boots this day! And yes if you watch the whole match sid isn’t in tiptoeing he dumb his knee. Kane really doesn’t look much over an inch taller here, and he doesn’t look much taller than taker who probably is half to an inch taller than prime sid
Resurrection of Edwards said on 10/Apr/21
@dred
on the episode of broken skull sessions, Taker says Kane he wasn't that much taller than me. you don't say someone 'isn't that much taller than me' if he isn't actually taller.i don’t think there are any eye opening evidence than this,taker on his own words admitted of being shorter.if you are intrested than you can see the photo of kane next to legit 5’8 mamun which rob has posted recently
@pierrie
undertaker was a legit solid 6’7 guy at peak.there are enough evidence to support the idea.
@dred
on the episode of broken skull sessions, Taker says Kane he wasn't that much taller than me. you don't say someone 'isn't that much taller than me' if he isn't actually taller.i don’t think there are any eye opening evidence than this,taker on his own words admitted of being shorter.if you are intrested than you can see the photo of kane next to legit 5’8 mamun which rob has posted recently
@pierrie
undertaker was a legit solid 6’7 guy at peak.there are enough evidence to support the idea.
Canson said on 9/Apr/21
@Alex: probably still at least 6’6.5
@Alex: probably still at least 6’6.5
Dred_ said on 9/Apr/21
@edward
I don’t think kane was taller than taker but i think that undertaker have a lower eyelevel than kane, not by much but probably around 1/4 of an inch.
Click Here
So when they went face to face kane looked to have a higher eyelevel even if he was as tall as taker, then undertaker said “he wasn’t much taller than me”. Like many people when you see a guy you base his height according to the eyelevel because you don’t see where your top head is. If kane was half inch taller than taker, taker eyelevel was probably around 3/4 of an inch under kane eyelevel therefore just over the middle of kane nose (considering a nose lenght like 2 inch generally) and man they were pretty near eye to eye in his prime
Click Here
6ft7 flat for both
@edward
I don’t think kane was taller than taker but i think that undertaker have a lower eyelevel than kane, not by much but probably around 1/4 of an inch.
Click Here
So when they went face to face kane looked to have a higher eyelevel even if he was as tall as taker, then undertaker said “he wasn’t much taller than me”. Like many people when you see a guy you base his height according to the eyelevel because you don’t see where your top head is. If kane was half inch taller than taker, taker eyelevel was probably around 3/4 of an inch under kane eyelevel therefore just over the middle of kane nose (considering a nose lenght like 2 inch generally) and man they were pretty near eye to eye in his prime
Click Here
6ft7 flat for both
Alex 6'0 said on 8/Apr/21
About 6'8 meaning 6'7.5 range. Definitely looked it. Today looks still easily 6'6
About 6'8 meaning 6'7.5 range. Definitely looked it. Today looks still easily 6'6
Pierre said on 8/Apr/21
@resurrection of Edward= But Taker himself is maybe not exactly as tall as his list...Sid isn't tiptoeing the guy just steps back and in fact does not look really straight here.Who knows what type of shoe Kane was wearing this day ...
About Taker's height watch Ben Bell's comment and pics comparison with Kevin/Taker in Kevin Nash's page here Click Here (comment on 21/Feb/2020).Taker here never looks 6"7' by Kevin 6"8.75'.Some guys even guess Kevin more like 6"8' ...
@resurrection of Edward= But Taker himself is maybe not exactly as tall as his list...Sid isn't tiptoeing the guy just steps back and in fact does not look really straight here.Who knows what type of shoe Kane was wearing this day ...
About Taker's height watch Ben Bell's comment and pics comparison with Kevin/Taker in Kevin Nash's page here Click Here (comment on 21/Feb/2020).Taker here never looks 6"7' by Kevin 6"8.75'.Some guys even guess Kevin more like 6"8' ...
Resurrection of Edwards said on 7/Apr/21
@dred
dude,in the second photo,sid is tip toeing a bit and kane is still noticeably taller.that is more than an inch.what is even surprising is that undertaker has himself admitted to be bit shorter than kane at peak."well kane,he wasnt much taller than me".taker admitted in stone cold podcast lmao.at this point,taker has kane been similar height at peak might be null at this point.taker has sid by 0.75 but kane had him by 1.25 lmfao.but these guys were really close in height though.
@dred
dude,in the second photo,sid is tip toeing a bit and kane is still noticeably taller.that is more than an inch.what is even surprising is that undertaker has himself admitted to be bit shorter than kane at peak."well kane,he wasnt much taller than me".taker admitted in stone cold podcast lmao.at this point,taker has kane been similar height at peak might be null at this point.taker has sid by 0.75 but kane had him by 1.25 lmfao.but these guys were really close in height though.
Alex 6'0 said on 6/Apr/21
Lunchtime height as in 12-1pm? Typically by 1-2pm you should be very close or even at your low. It depends on physical activities that day. On work days I'm up 5-6am and on my feet type of job. By Midday I'm at my low.
Lunchtime height as in 12-1pm? Typically by 1-2pm you should be very close or even at your low. It depends on physical activities that day. On work days I'm up 5-6am and on my feet type of job. By Midday I'm at my low.
Pierre said on 6/Apr/21
@Canson I use multiple pics /comparisons and even with guys Rob has seen ...And this pics are lots of time in an angle sufficiently good plus guys very close one to the other one = so the probability this guys are shorter than your guesses is logically big.For an example Kane by Triple H and Hafthor looks clearly under 6"6' ...Same thing compared to Magic /Ric Flair.
@Canson I use multiple pics /comparisons and even with guys Rob has seen ...And this pics are lots of time in an angle sufficiently good plus guys very close one to the other one = so the probability this guys are shorter than your guesses is logically big.For an example Kane by Triple H and Hafthor looks clearly under 6"6' ...Same thing compared to Magic /Ric Flair.
Canson said on 5/Apr/21
@Christian: that’s reasonable. Rob could justify his current and peak as lunchtimes being he’s a bigger guy. I guarantee he loses an inch especially with the combination of height and weight. I agree more with what you have listed as his heights today. Maybe when Hyper met him a few years back he still pushed 6’7” or 6’6.75” or maybe had slightly more footwear or that his height loss has accelerated since. I know Vegas said years back that he saw Kane and that he didn’t look over 6’7” in 2004.
@Christian: that’s reasonable. Rob could justify his current and peak as lunchtimes being he’s a bigger guy. I guarantee he loses an inch especially with the combination of height and weight. I agree more with what you have listed as his heights today. Maybe when Hyper met him a few years back he still pushed 6’7” or 6’6.75” or maybe had slightly more footwear or that his height loss has accelerated since. I know Vegas said years back that he saw Kane and that he didn’t look over 6’7” in 2004.
Canson said on 5/Apr/21
Pierre said on 20/Mar/21
@Canson = Next to Hafthor Triple H clearly looks max 6"0' to me.Just look at Hafthor's scale.I believe you have not idea about what are "Hollywood heights" and the real reality.People are tall at Hollywood :)
Yes I do have reality of them Pierre. If you don’t already realize, I tend to guess below Rob’s estimate (for an afternoon height) somewhat more often than I agree with his listing. So that right there should tell you something. While I respect your estimates, they are usually not believable (far too low) when we actually use multiple pics. I’m not saying Triple H can’t look 6’0”. Hulk Hogan looks 6’1” to some people here but that doesn’t mean he is does it? He’s still 6’3” as he’s listed
Pierre said on 20/Mar/21
@Canson = Next to Hafthor Triple H clearly looks max 6"0' to me.Just look at Hafthor's scale.I believe you have not idea about what are "Hollywood heights" and the real reality.People are tall at Hollywood :)
Yes I do have reality of them Pierre. If you don’t already realize, I tend to guess below Rob’s estimate (for an afternoon height) somewhat more often than I agree with his listing. So that right there should tell you something. While I respect your estimates, they are usually not believable (far too low) when we actually use multiple pics. I’m not saying Triple H can’t look 6’0”. Hulk Hogan looks 6’1” to some people here but that doesn’t mean he is does it? He’s still 6’3” as he’s listed
Pierre said on 4/Apr/21
Around 6'7 " peak now max 6'5.5"
Around 6'7 " peak now max 6'5.5"
Dred__ said on 3/Apr/21
@edward
You still think than prime kane is almost 6ft8, but kane like undertaker were never over 6ft7 mark
Here is sid and kane back to 1995
Click Here
This is even less than an inch to me but i give at most an inch. Like undertaker even kane is around the 6ft7 mark
@edward
You still think than prime kane is almost 6ft8, but kane like undertaker were never over 6ft7 mark
Here is sid and kane back to 1995
Click Here
This is even less than an inch to me but i give at most an inch. Like undertaker even kane is around the 6ft7 mark
Christian 6'5 3/8" said on 2/Apr/21
6'7.25" peak and 6'6.5" today.
6'7.25" peak and 6'6.5" today.
Resurrection of Edwards said on 2/Apr/21
i would give peak taker around 6’7 flat,kane at 6’7.25/6’7.5 and matt morgan at 6’8.25/6’8.5 and big cass at 6’7.75
i would give peak taker around 6’7 flat,kane at 6’7.25/6’7.5 and matt morgan at 6’8.25/6’8.5 and big cass at 6’7.75
dewie 5ft9 175cm said on 31/Mar/21
Back in 2006 taker measured better in staredown than kane khali height comparison.
Back in 2006 taker measured better in staredown than kane khali height comparison.
Resurrection of Edwards said on 29/Mar/21
Dred__ said on 24/Mar/21
Editor Rob
He could be looking just over Kane's head, so maybe between 5-6 range
So Rob kane can looks 6ft7 1/2 in this case but if you see the different type of boots, i mean in that photo we clearly see that kane was in footwear advantage. Don’t you think that kane doesn’t looks over 6ft7 flat ?
In my opinion kane or undertaker were never much over 6ft7 flat, after sid says he is only 6ft6 i doubt over 6ft7 for both. I remeber kane with sid back to 1995 battle royal and doesn’t seem much bigger than him, an inch at very most
Editor Rob
if Kane has footwear advantage of more than a few mm, then at that moment you could say he doesn't seem much above 6ft 7
@Dred
if you’re talking about 1995 rumble then i have to disagree.kane comfortably looks more than syco sid.the difference was 1.25 to 1.5 between kane and sid.kane looked weak 6’8 at that match.
Dred__ said on 24/Mar/21
Editor Rob
He could be looking just over Kane's head, so maybe between 5-6 range
So Rob kane can looks 6ft7 1/2 in this case but if you see the different type of boots, i mean in that photo we clearly see that kane was in footwear advantage. Don’t you think that kane doesn’t looks over 6ft7 flat ?
In my opinion kane or undertaker were never much over 6ft7 flat, after sid says he is only 6ft6 i doubt over 6ft7 for both. I remeber kane with sid back to 1995 battle royal and doesn’t seem much bigger than him, an inch at very most
Editor Rob
if Kane has footwear advantage of more than a few mm, then at that moment you could say he doesn't seem much above 6ft 7
@Dred
if you’re talking about 1995 rumble then i have to disagree.kane comfortably looks more than syco sid.the difference was 1.25 to 1.5 between kane and sid.kane looked weak 6’8 at that match.
miko said on 27/Mar/21
A prime Kane would obviously cleared 6'8 out of bed and likely been 6'8 range for some of the morning so it's not unreasonable for him to believe he is that height, he's likely not been measured in a long time.
A prime Kane would obviously cleared 6'8 out of bed and likely been 6'8 range for some of the morning so it's not unreasonable for him to believe he is that height, he's likely not been measured in a long time.
Njp said on 25/Mar/21
On Stone Colds podcast Steve asked Kane what his “shoot” weight and height is - shoot meaning actual/legitimate. Kane describes himself as 6’8” and 290lbs. The height loss is always more dramatic on someone over 6’6” so I’d guess he’s lost an inch but there’s every chance if he stood tall he’d scrape 6’8” out of bed.
On Stone Colds podcast Steve asked Kane what his “shoot” weight and height is - shoot meaning actual/legitimate. Kane describes himself as 6’8” and 290lbs. The height loss is always more dramatic on someone over 6’6” so I’d guess he’s lost an inch but there’s every chance if he stood tall he’d scrape 6’8” out of bed.
Philip McMullin said on 24/Mar/21
Again not height related, Congrats Glenn Jacobs AKA Kane, on your Hall Of Fame induction, Much love big man!
Again not height related, Congrats Glenn Jacobs AKA Kane, on your Hall Of Fame induction, Much love big man!
Dred__ said on 24/Mar/21
Editor Rob
He could be looking just over Kane's head, so maybe between 5-6 range
So Rob kane can looks 6ft7 1/2 in this case but if you see the different type of boots, i mean in that photo we clearly see that kane was in footwear advantage. Don’t you think that kane doesn’t looks over 6ft7 flat ?
In my opinion kane or undertaker were never much over 6ft7 flat, after sid says he is only 6ft6 i doubt over 6ft7 for both. I remeber kane with sid back to 1995 battle royal and doesn’t seem much bigger than him, an inch at very most
Editor Rob
Editor Rob
He could be looking just over Kane's head, so maybe between 5-6 range
So Rob kane can looks 6ft7 1/2 in this case but if you see the different type of boots, i mean in that photo we clearly see that kane was in footwear advantage. Don’t you think that kane doesn’t looks over 6ft7 flat ?
In my opinion kane or undertaker were never much over 6ft7 flat, after sid says he is only 6ft6 i doubt over 6ft7 for both. I remeber kane with sid back to 1995 battle royal and doesn’t seem much bigger than him, an inch at very most
Editor Robif Kane has footwear advantage of more than a few mm, then at that moment you could say he doesn't seem much above 6ft 7
Pierre said on 23/Mar/21
@Ben Calimer = Oh yeah in your pic Kane stands straight just tilt a bit his head on a side and so does not really lose height while Hafthor looks like he leans a lot next to Ric.
here is Magic (whom some guys here are guessing around 6"7' current height ) in better posture than Hafthor next to Ric Flair Click Here
I eagerly await your analysis too
@Ben Calimer = Oh yeah in your pic Kane stands straight just tilt a bit his head on a side and so does not really lose height while Hafthor looks like he leans a lot next to Ric.
here is Magic (whom some guys here are guessing around 6"7' current height ) in better posture than Hafthor next to Ric Flair Click Here
I eagerly await your analysis too
Philip McMullin said on 22/Mar/21
A star like Kane is the only page you could post this to, I know nothing height related, but The Fiend's Fastlane look is closer 'intimidation' wise than anything has come to equalling the debut of Kane! The Stance, The Mask, The Monsterness, Bray is the best evil character since Kane and Taker. I bloody love that guy!
A star like Kane is the only page you could post this to, I know nothing height related, but The Fiend's Fastlane look is closer 'intimidation' wise than anything has come to equalling the debut of Kane! The Stance, The Mask, The Monsterness, Bray is the best evil character since Kane and Taker. I bloody love that guy!
Ben Calimer said on 22/Mar/21
Pierre, use those infamous photo forensics to explain these photos:
Kane and Flair Click Here
Photo 64 of 65 in this WWE gallery — Hafthor and Flair: Click Here
I eagerly await your analysis
Pierre, use those infamous photo forensics to explain these photos:
Kane and Flair Click Here
Photo 64 of 65 in this WWE gallery — Hafthor and Flair: Click Here
I eagerly await your analysis
Pierre said on 20/Mar/21
@Canson = Next to Hafthor Triple H clearly looks max 6"0' to me.Just look at Hafthor's scale.I believe you have not idea about what are "Hollywood heights" and the real reality.People are tall at Hollywood :)
@Canson = Next to Hafthor Triple H clearly looks max 6"0' to me.Just look at Hafthor's scale.I believe you have not idea about what are "Hollywood heights" and the real reality.People are tall at Hollywood :)
Canson said on 20/Mar/21
Homsa said on 18/Mar/21
Can i just say, I’ve met kane back in 02’ and back in 09’. I am now 37 and stand around 195cm. I mainly wear flat shoes because lifts are very uncomfortable for me. In 02’ i met Kane and took a picture with him. I can tell you right now, he was wearing flat shoes and stood around 6cm taller than me. I met him in 09’ and he signed my replica kane mask. He remembered me and i took another photo with him. He stood around 5cm taller than me at that time. I predict Kane Glenn Jacobs stood around 202 6’8. But now he stands around 199cm 6’7
Those are good estimates
201 and 199-200 today maybe a bit over 201 peak
Homsa said on 18/Mar/21
Can i just say, I’ve met kane back in 02’ and back in 09’. I am now 37 and stand around 195cm. I mainly wear flat shoes because lifts are very uncomfortable for me. In 02’ i met Kane and took a picture with him. I can tell you right now, he was wearing flat shoes and stood around 6cm taller than me. I met him in 09’ and he signed my replica kane mask. He remembered me and i took another photo with him. He stood around 5cm taller than me at that time. I predict Kane Glenn Jacobs stood around 202 6’8. But now he stands around 199cm 6’7
Those are good estimates
201 and 199-200 today maybe a bit over 201 peak
Chaos Control 6'2.5 said on 19/Mar/21
@Homsa your rounding as a little dodgy but I agree with your guesses
@Homsa your rounding as a little dodgy but I agree with your guesses
Pierre said on 19/Mar/21
Here is Triple H next to Hulk Hogan = Click Here Click Here
Here is (oups) Triple H next to 6"7.5' Hafthor Click Here
Here is Hulk Hogan next to Matt Morgan = Click Here
Here is Triple H next to Hulk Hogan = Click Here Click Here
Here is (oups) Triple H next to 6"7.5' Hafthor Click Here
Here is Hulk Hogan next to Matt Morgan = Click Here
Pierre said on 19/Mar/21
Chaos Control 6'2.5 said on 16/Mar/21
@Pierre if you knew anything about WWE you’d know that Triple H is actually 5’8, but they use camera angles to make him look taller
In fact he's 6"7' ,but he was probably sitting on a chair next to Hafthor ....
Philip McMullin said on 17/Mar/21
I watched the match between Kane and Morgan, I can confirm Kane was wearing his half mask LOW heeled boots for both the match and the BS seg. Morgan was the one around 2003 who was wearing munsters
I agree Kane's shoes were not looking huge like in some other events.But Matt Morgan's shoes are not looking really more advantageous .After that It remains to be seen what the true size is Matt Morgan.
Chaos Control 6'2.5 said on 16/Mar/21
@Pierre if you knew anything about WWE you’d know that Triple H is actually 5’8, but they use camera angles to make him look taller
In fact he's 6"7' ,but he was probably sitting on a chair next to Hafthor ....
Philip McMullin said on 17/Mar/21
I watched the match between Kane and Morgan, I can confirm Kane was wearing his half mask LOW heeled boots for both the match and the BS seg. Morgan was the one around 2003 who was wearing munsters
I agree Kane's shoes were not looking huge like in some other events.But Matt Morgan's shoes are not looking really more advantageous .After that It remains to be seen what the true size is Matt Morgan.
Canson said on 19/Mar/21
@Pierre: HHH is over 6’0”. He’s at least 6’1”. I’m one of the ones along with Vincent Caleb as a matter of fact, who does not inflate celebs. Typically we both guess less than Rob lists them so if you’re accusing him of that, you’re off on that one
@Pierre: HHH is over 6’0”. He’s at least 6’1”. I’m one of the ones along with Vincent Caleb as a matter of fact, who does not inflate celebs. Typically we both guess less than Rob lists them so if you’re accusing him of that, you’re off on that one
Dred__ said on 18/Mar/21
Rob
How is the difference between kane and khali here in your opinion
Click Here
The camera tilted on kane favour but i think kane is a good 6 inch shorter here, he is clearly under khali eyelevel and his boots seems even bigger than khali boots
Editor Rob
Rob
How is the difference between kane and khali here in your opinion
Click Here
The camera tilted on kane favour but i think kane is a good 6 inch shorter here, he is clearly under khali eyelevel and his boots seems even bigger than khali boots
Editor RobHe could be looking just over Kane's head, so maybe between 5-6 range
Homsa said on 18/Mar/21
Can i just say, I’ve met kane back in 02’ and back in 09’. I am now 37 and stand around 195cm. I mainly wear flat shoes because lifts are very uncomfortable for me. In 02’ i met Kane and took a picture with him. I can tell you right now, he was wearing flat shoes and stood around 6cm taller than me. I met him in 09’ and he signed my replica kane mask. He remembered me and i took another photo with him. He stood around 5cm taller than me at that time. I predict Kane Glenn Jacobs stood around 202 6’8. But now he stands around 199cm 6’7
Can i just say, I’ve met kane back in 02’ and back in 09’. I am now 37 and stand around 195cm. I mainly wear flat shoes because lifts are very uncomfortable for me. In 02’ i met Kane and took a picture with him. I can tell you right now, he was wearing flat shoes and stood around 6cm taller than me. I met him in 09’ and he signed my replica kane mask. He remembered me and i took another photo with him. He stood around 5cm taller than me at that time. I predict Kane Glenn Jacobs stood around 202 6’8. But now he stands around 199cm 6’7
Philip McMullin said on 17/Mar/21
I watched the match between Kane and Morgan, I can confirm Kane was wearing his half mask LOW heeled boots for both the match and the BS seg. Morgan was the one around 2003 who was wearing munsters
I watched the match between Kane and Morgan, I can confirm Kane was wearing his half mask LOW heeled boots for both the match and the BS seg. Morgan was the one around 2003 who was wearing munsters
Chaos Control 6'2.5 said on 16/Mar/21
@Pierre if you knew anything about WWE you’d know that Triple H is actually 5’8, but they use camera angles to make him look taller
@Pierre if you knew anything about WWE you’d know that Triple H is actually 5’8, but they use camera angles to make him look taller
Vegas CH said on 16/Mar/21
Thor much closer to camera and not flat ground
Better comparison Click Here
Thor much closer to camera and not flat ground
Better comparison Click Here
Pierre said on 15/Mar/21
Vincent Caleb said on 14/Mar/21
@Chaos Control:
This is basically every Pierre comment:
All the internauts are big uprgaders lol Tyson Fury= 6”4’ or 6”3’ here is a photo for proof:
Click Here
I buy 6"0' max for Triple H here
Well I'm waiting for your famous pics !
Vincent Caleb said on 14/Mar/21
@Chaos Control:
This is basically every Pierre comment:
All the internauts are big uprgaders lol Tyson Fury= 6”4’ or 6”3’ here is a photo for proof:
Click Here
I buy 6"0' max for Triple H here
Well I'm waiting for your famous pics !
Dred__ said on 15/Mar/21
Guys peak kane is around 6ft7 flat. He is even billed 6ft7 when he was isaac yankem. A quickly comparison with nash when kane was in monster big boots and he looks a good inch shorter
Click Here
Considering that kane was fully stand straight and nash in relaxed posture i doubt kane was over the 6ft7 flat mark
Guys peak kane is around 6ft7 flat. He is even billed 6ft7 when he was isaac yankem. A quickly comparison with nash when kane was in monster big boots and he looks a good inch shorter
Click Here
Considering that kane was fully stand straight and nash in relaxed posture i doubt kane was over the 6ft7 flat mark
Vincent Caleb said on 14/Mar/21
@Chaos Control:
This is basically every Pierre comment:
All the internauts are big uprgaders lol Tyson Fury= 6”4’ or 6”3’ here is a photo for proof:
Click Here
@Chaos Control:
This is basically every Pierre comment:
All the internauts are big uprgaders lol Tyson Fury= 6”4’ or 6”3’ here is a photo for proof:
Click Here
Pierre said on 14/Mar/21
Chaos Control 6'2.5 said on 13/Mar/21
Pierre your guesses are cringe and wrong and you mix up the feel and inches and I’m gonna guess Kane as 6’9 to spite you
Oh yeah I know ,my guesses are wrong and your guesses are good ....that is probably the poorest argument I've read .
Chaos Control 6'2.5 said on 13/Mar/21
Pierre your guesses are cringe and wrong and you mix up the feel and inches and I’m gonna guess Kane as 6’9 to spite you
Oh yeah I know ,my guesses are wrong and your guesses are good ....that is probably the poorest argument I've read .
Chaos Control 6'2.5 said on 13/Mar/21
Pierre your guesses are cringe and wrong and you mix up the feel and inches and I’m gonna guess Kane as 6’9 to spite you
Pierre your guesses are cringe and wrong and you mix up the feel and inches and I’m gonna guess Kane as 6’9 to spite you
Pierre said on 13/Mar/21
Resurrection of Edwards said on 12/Mar/21
@pierrie
yeah son,is it problem to stick with personal opinion.you're just an downgrader poster who has likely nothing going on.you're much more talented in attacking others rather than proving your point boy.there are some of the few credible posters in the site gaving met kane and got a photo to prove their point.kane's boot has been widely exaggerated and blown out of the proportion by poster like you to find excuse in making him shorter.go on man,at this point all of your arguments are at null lmao.there are guys like mamun who met him around peak and pegged him at 6'8,he has got photographic evidence to prove his point.what evidence do you got my man?a cherrypicked photo with a pile of excuse.thanks dude.
some of the downgrading police in this site has caught me lmfao
Oh yeah Edwardo, "Kane's boot has been widely exaggerated " ....have you some other "concrete" arguments dad?....
Resurrection of Edwards said on 12/Mar/21
@pierrie
yeah son,is it problem to stick with personal opinion.you're just an downgrader poster who has likely nothing going on.you're much more talented in attacking others rather than proving your point boy.there are some of the few credible posters in the site gaving met kane and got a photo to prove their point.kane's boot has been widely exaggerated and blown out of the proportion by poster like you to find excuse in making him shorter.go on man,at this point all of your arguments are at null lmao.there are guys like mamun who met him around peak and pegged him at 6'8,he has got photographic evidence to prove his point.what evidence do you got my man?a cherrypicked photo with a pile of excuse.thanks dude.
some of the downgrading police in this site has caught me lmfao
Oh yeah Edwardo, "Kane's boot has been widely exaggerated " ....have you some other "concrete" arguments dad?....
miko said on 13/Mar/21
Morgan would have had at the bare minimum 1' on a prime Kane barefoot.
Morgan would have had at the bare minimum 1' on a prime Kane barefoot.
Vegas' said on 12/Mar/21
Slim92, Morgan 100% was taller in person
Slim92, Morgan 100% was taller in person
Vincent Caleb said on 12/Mar/21
@Ethan99:
Those are a lot of good guesses! I have a few small disagreements, but nothing more than a centimeter or two really. One thing I am confused about though, you mixed up the height of the last two right?
@Ethan99:
Those are a lot of good guesses! I have a few small disagreements, but nothing more than a centimeter or two really. One thing I am confused about though, you mixed up the height of the last two right?
Resurrection of Edwards said on 12/Mar/21
@pierrie
yeah son,is it problem to stick with personal opinion.you're just an downgrader poster who has likely nothing going on.you're much more talented in attacking others rather than proving your point boy.there are some of the few credible posters in the site gaving met kane and got a photo to prove their point.kane's boot has been widely exaggerated and blown out of the proportion by poster like you to find excuse in making him shorter.go on man,at this point all of your arguments are at null lmao.there are guys like mamun who met him around peak and pegged him at 6'8,he has got photographic evidence to prove his point.what evidence do you got my man?a cherrypicked photo with a pile of excuse.thanks dude.
some of the downgrading police in this site has caught me lmfao
@pierrie
yeah son,is it problem to stick with personal opinion.you're just an downgrader poster who has likely nothing going on.you're much more talented in attacking others rather than proving your point boy.there are some of the few credible posters in the site gaving met kane and got a photo to prove their point.kane's boot has been widely exaggerated and blown out of the proportion by poster like you to find excuse in making him shorter.go on man,at this point all of your arguments are at null lmao.there are guys like mamun who met him around peak and pegged him at 6'8,he has got photographic evidence to prove his point.what evidence do you got my man?a cherrypicked photo with a pile of excuse.thanks dude.
some of the downgrading police in this site has caught me lmfao
Pierre said on 11/Mar/21
@Samson = Imo take this comparisons with tongues,Kane had very probably some famous wrestler shoes next to Matt Morgan.
@Samson = Imo take this comparisons with tongues,Kane had very probably some famous wrestler shoes next to Matt Morgan.
Slim92 said on 11/Mar/21
The vid of Kane and Morgan has been explained before. Kane is in his flat boots and Morgan is obviously in his lifted boots. Both barefoot I'd say Kane is, was, taller.
The vid of Kane and Morgan has been explained before. Kane is in his flat boots and Morgan is obviously in his lifted boots. Both barefoot I'd say Kane is, was, taller.
Vegas' said on 10/Mar/21
Kane was noticeably shorter in person than Morgan out of gear.
That video doesn't show Kane taller either. Extremely low camera angle makes it look closer
Kane was noticeably shorter in person than Morgan out of gear.
That video doesn't show Kane taller either. Extremely low camera angle makes it look closer
samson said on 8/Mar/21
Heres kane at ovw with matt morgan, they did the segment it looks like kane had a inch on matt morgan Click Here
Heres kane at ovw with matt morgan, they did the segment it looks like kane had a inch on matt morgan Click Here
Chaos Control 6'2.5 said on 6/Mar/21
@Ethan99 I’d give an extra quarter to Braun, Taker and Andre and take a quarter off Cesaro and HHH
@Ethan99 I’d give an extra quarter to Braun, Taker and Andre and take a quarter off Cesaro and HHH
Pierre said on 6/Mar/21
Triple H badest posture max same distance to the camera as Kane = Click Here Kane max a complete forehead taller than Triple H
Triple H /6"7.5' Hafthor = Click Here Triple H two inches under hafthor's forehead.
For the internauts who are skeptical about the pic Triple H /Hafthor and this big difference of height between them= Click Here Triple H /Arnold Click Here
Arnold as straight as possible /Hafthor not perfectly straight Click Here
Kane again around 2 inches shorter than 6"7.5' Hafthor.But here no ring ,no real show ,and so probability close to zero that one of this guys wear some lifts.
Triple H badest posture max same distance to the camera as Kane = Click Here Kane max a complete forehead taller than Triple H
Triple H /6"7.5' Hafthor = Click Here Triple H two inches under hafthor's forehead.
For the internauts who are skeptical about the pic Triple H /Hafthor and this big difference of height between them= Click Here Triple H /Arnold Click Here
Arnold as straight as possible /Hafthor not perfectly straight Click Here
Kane again around 2 inches shorter than 6"7.5' Hafthor.But here no ring ,no real show ,and so probability close to zero that one of this guys wear some lifts.
Resurrection of Edwards said on 6/Mar/21
he isnt 6'6 when he stand straight.he looked 3 inches or nearly 3 inches taller than 6'4 damian priest.he is nearly an inch taller than undertaker or corbin.he is taller than braun strowman.the miz isnt even at his nose tip.he didnt looked much shorter than kevin nash and also big show.he is more than 5" taller than hhh.still too tall next to these guys.so 6'6 looks too low.if he is 6'6 then how tall is taker and corbin 6'5.25?
he isnt 6'6 when he stand straight.he looked 3 inches or nearly 3 inches taller than 6'4 damian priest.he is nearly an inch taller than undertaker or corbin.he is taller than braun strowman.the miz isnt even at his nose tip.he didnt looked much shorter than kevin nash and also big show.he is more than 5" taller than hhh.still too tall next to these guys.so 6'6 looks too low.if he is 6'6 then how tall is taker and corbin 6'5.25?
James B 171.5 said on 5/Mar/21
He’s been looking 6’6 for years now.
He’s been looking 6’6 for years now.
Ethan99 said on 5/Mar/21
@vincent,
here are my guesses:
Hulk Hogan 6'5 peak 6'2 1/4 currently
Kane 6'7.5 peak 6'6-6'6.25 currently
Baron Corbin 6'5 3/4
Roman Reigns 6'2
Kevin Nash 6'9 peak 6'8 currently
Triple H 6'2 peak currently 6'1.5
Andre the Giant 6'10.5 peak 6'9 death
Viscera peak 6'6
Braun Strowman 6'6
Dwayne Johnson 6'2.5- 6'2.75 peak 6'2 1/4- 6'2.5 current
Brock Lesnar 6'2
John Cena 6'0 1/4
Stone Cold 6'1 peak 6'0 current maybe a little lower
Big Show 6'11 peak Current 6'9
Undertaker 6'6.5-6'7 peak 6'5 1/4-6'5.5 current
Luke Harper 6'4.5 (RIP)
Drew Mcintyre 6'4 1/4-6'4.5
Randy Orton 6'4
Khali 7'0 peak 6'10 current
Jinder 6'3 3/4
Cesaro 6'3.5
Titus O Neil 6'3
Sheamus 6'2.5
Ric Flair 5'11 peak 5'9 current
Roddy Piper 6'0-6'0.5 peak 5'9 death
Enzo Amore 5'8.5
Big Cass 6'7 1/4
Finn Balor 5'9 1/4
Adam Cole 5'9
AJ Styles 5'8
Omos 7'1.5-7'2
Daniel Bryan 5'7.5
Hornswoggle 7'7
Giant Gonzalez 4'4
@vincent,
here are my guesses:
Hulk Hogan 6'5 peak 6'2 1/4 currently
Kane 6'7.5 peak 6'6-6'6.25 currently
Baron Corbin 6'5 3/4
Roman Reigns 6'2
Kevin Nash 6'9 peak 6'8 currently
Triple H 6'2 peak currently 6'1.5
Andre the Giant 6'10.5 peak 6'9 death
Viscera peak 6'6
Braun Strowman 6'6
Dwayne Johnson 6'2.5- 6'2.75 peak 6'2 1/4- 6'2.5 current
Brock Lesnar 6'2
John Cena 6'0 1/4
Stone Cold 6'1 peak 6'0 current maybe a little lower
Big Show 6'11 peak Current 6'9
Undertaker 6'6.5-6'7 peak 6'5 1/4-6'5.5 current
Luke Harper 6'4.5 (RIP)
Drew Mcintyre 6'4 1/4-6'4.5
Randy Orton 6'4
Khali 7'0 peak 6'10 current
Jinder 6'3 3/4
Cesaro 6'3.5
Titus O Neil 6'3
Sheamus 6'2.5
Ric Flair 5'11 peak 5'9 current
Roddy Piper 6'0-6'0.5 peak 5'9 death
Enzo Amore 5'8.5
Big Cass 6'7 1/4
Finn Balor 5'9 1/4
Adam Cole 5'9
AJ Styles 5'8
Omos 7'1.5-7'2
Daniel Bryan 5'7.5
Hornswoggle 7'7
Giant Gonzalez 4'4
Anthony T said on 5/Mar/21
Vince vaughan and the rock, just proves that photo with vince and kane looking similar in height was due to angles
Click Here
Vince vaughan and the rock, just proves that photo with vince and kane looking similar in height was due to angles
Click Here
Resurrection of Edwards said on 4/Mar/21
@Editor rob
rob,you have listed peak mick foley at 6’3 flat.here is a peak glen jacobs with peak mick foley out of gear.i personally think this photo was taken somewhere in 1995/96.glen jacobs wasn’t known by his gimmick kane.he was known as isaac yankem back then and he was a jobber.he wasn’t even a active wrestler in wwe.therefore,you could suppose that he was at peak.he might not have wrestle much or say he wasn’t an active wrestler.i believe he was at his tallest in this photo.how tall peak glen jacobs looks here next to peak foley.remember,both guy’s are around their peak and tallest.how much difference here rob.Click Here
Editor Rob
@Editor rob
rob,you have listed peak mick foley at 6’3 flat.here is a peak glen jacobs with peak mick foley out of gear.i personally think this photo was taken somewhere in 1995/96.glen jacobs wasn’t known by his gimmick kane.he was known as isaac yankem back then and he was a jobber.he wasn’t even a active wrestler in wwe.therefore,you could suppose that he was at peak.he might not have wrestle much or say he wasn’t an active wrestler.i believe he was at his tallest in this photo.how tall peak glen jacobs looks here next to peak foley.remember,both guy’s are around their peak and tallest.how much difference here rob.Click Here
Editor Robat that moment you could say he looks over 6ft 9!
Riky said on 3/Mar/21
My logic is this one.... Kane lost less height compare to Taker, its visible. It means that if Undertaker was 6'7" and now 6'5.5 (no shorter) Kane can't be as short as a 6'5/5.5 too. It's impossible the 6'5 range for him, at least 6'6".
However he isn't taller than 199cm barefoot either, and most of all no way he was above 201cm peak
My logic is this one.... Kane lost less height compare to Taker, its visible. It means that if Undertaker was 6'7" and now 6'5.5 (no shorter) Kane can't be as short as a 6'5/5.5 too. It's impossible the 6'5 range for him, at least 6'6".
However he isn't taller than 199cm barefoot either, and most of all no way he was above 201cm peak
Chaos Control 6'2.5 said on 2/Mar/21
@Pierre your argument is far from concrete. It’s maybe wet tissue paper tier
@Pierre your argument is far from concrete. It’s maybe wet tissue paper tier
Pierre said on 2/Mar/21
:D said on 1/Mar/21
@pierrie You have no arguments nor perception of angles or depth.
Probably more perception than you.And in my case when I post pics I generally specify when a guy has a potential advantage of camera ...
:D said on 1/Mar/21
@pierrie You have no arguments nor perception of angles or depth.
Probably more perception than you.And in my case when I post pics I generally specify when a guy has a potential advantage of camera ...
:D said on 1/Mar/21
@pierrie You have no arguments nor perception of angles or depth.And 6'8 for big show is absolute trolling (plenty of which this site accumulated over the last few years)
@pierrie You have no arguments nor perception of angles or depth.And 6'8 for big show is absolute trolling (plenty of which this site accumulated over the last few years)
Pierre said on 28/Feb/21
Resurrection of Edwards said on 27/Feb/21
@pierrie
if kane was 6’5-5.5 and big show was 6’8 then rob could have downgraded those folks.like me,canson and everyone else,ron believe’s that neither kane nor show is tall as you estimated.sorry dude.
Well edwarde so I note you don’t have any concrete arguments against my arguments.
Resurrection of Edwards said on 27/Feb/21
@pierrie
if kane was 6’5-5.5 and big show was 6’8 then rob could have downgraded those folks.like me,canson and everyone else,ron believe’s that neither kane nor show is tall as you estimated.sorry dude.
Well edwarde so I note you don’t have any concrete arguments against my arguments.
Resurrection of Edwards said on 27/Feb/21
@canson
agreed dude.i think you and christian can agree with me that undertaker might be 6’5.75 currently.dude,i fully agree with you that undertaker has looked 6’6 with dan trojan.but again,taker looks shorter now than how he looked with dan.i feel he looses 1/4 every year.i wouldn’t be surprised if taker is in same boat with hogan and in losing height dramatically.i don’t rule out 6’6 for him but it seems that he could be shy of 6’6 currently.but i agree with you and christian that taker could be 6’5.75/6’6 currently though.you,me and christian has always advocated 6’5.75/6’6 since the past.i fully agree with you dude.
@pierrie
if kane was 6’5-5.5 and big show was 6’8 then rob could have downgraded those folks.like me,canson and everyone else,ron believe’s that neither kane nor show is tall as you estimated.sorry dude.
@canson
agreed dude.i think you and christian can agree with me that undertaker might be 6’5.75 currently.dude,i fully agree with you that undertaker has looked 6’6 with dan trojan.but again,taker looks shorter now than how he looked with dan.i feel he looses 1/4 every year.i wouldn’t be surprised if taker is in same boat with hogan and in losing height dramatically.i don’t rule out 6’6 for him but it seems that he could be shy of 6’6 currently.but i agree with you and christian that taker could be 6’5.75/6’6 currently though.you,me and christian has always advocated 6’5.75/6’6 since the past.i fully agree with you dude.
@pierrie
if kane was 6’5-5.5 and big show was 6’8 then rob could have downgraded those folks.like me,canson and everyone else,ron believe’s that neither kane nor show is tall as you estimated.sorry dude.
Canson said on 27/Feb/21
@Edward: yea it could be 3/4”. Kane could be in that 6’6.5-.75 range and Taker 6’6” or Taker 6’5.75 and Kane 6’6.5”. I would lean more toward Kane being 6’6.5 in the afternoon too so maybe Taker falls into the 6’5.75-6’6 range like you and Christian both said.
@Edward: yea it could be 3/4”. Kane could be in that 6’6.5-.75 range and Taker 6’6” or Taker 6’5.75 and Kane 6’6.5”. I would lean more toward Kane being 6’6.5 in the afternoon too so maybe Taker falls into the 6’5.75-6’6 range like you and Christian both said.
Pierre said on 26/Feb/21
@ced =Pic 23/Feb = Undertaker isn't straight here= he slouches to the opposite side to the camera
Pic Resurrection of Edwards on 14/Feb 21 = this lines for comparisons are false because = 1) Alberto isn't straight 2) all the pic is inclined in favor to Kane =Kaneand other people are inclined,the door behind them is a lot inclined etc.
Click Here here is Alberto next to Kane,but this time Kane logically wear his huge wrestler shoes and Alberto isn't straight. Click Here = here at the start of the video you can see his shoes that are looking huge.
@ced =Pic 23/Feb = Undertaker isn't straight here= he slouches to the opposite side to the camera
Pic Resurrection of Edwards on 14/Feb 21 = this lines for comparisons are false because = 1) Alberto isn't straight 2) all the pic is inclined in favor to Kane =Kaneand other people are inclined,the door behind them is a lot inclined etc.
Click Here here is Alberto next to Kane,but this time Kane logically wear his huge wrestler shoes and Alberto isn't straight. Click Here = here at the start of the video you can see his shoes that are looking huge.
Resurrection of Edwards said on 25/Feb/21
Canson said on 24/Feb/21
@Public Enemy: I agree with your estimates for Kane. He may still lose 1” today or may just be 3/4”. I know Rob said the older you get the less your variance becomes from morning to evening. In Kane’s case, he may not be of that age yet. I would say 6’6.5 afternoon now. But Taker may still be the full 6’6” but I doubt above it. He did look 6’6” in the pic Dan Trojan posted with both of them. 6’5.75 is a good estimate for him too. 6’5.5” is a stretch but it’s the absolute lowest I could see.
@canson
i do agree with you but if taker has place in full 6’6 than i can see the chances of kane measuring 6’6.75 easily given that he looked 0.75 or 3/4 difference between taker and kane recently.i personally don’t see just half inch between taker and kane,its more than half inch between taker and kane.but i personally have kane st 6’6.5 and taker at 6’5.75,a 3/4 difference between these guys.
Canson said on 24/Feb/21
@Public Enemy: I agree with your estimates for Kane. He may still lose 1” today or may just be 3/4”. I know Rob said the older you get the less your variance becomes from morning to evening. In Kane’s case, he may not be of that age yet. I would say 6’6.5 afternoon now. But Taker may still be the full 6’6” but I doubt above it. He did look 6’6” in the pic Dan Trojan posted with both of them. 6’5.75 is a good estimate for him too. 6’5.5” is a stretch but it’s the absolute lowest I could see.
@canson
i do agree with you but if taker has place in full 6’6 than i can see the chances of kane measuring 6’6.75 easily given that he looked 0.75 or 3/4 difference between taker and kane recently.i personally don’t see just half inch between taker and kane,its more than half inch between taker and kane.but i personally have kane st 6’6.5 and taker at 6’5.75,a 3/4 difference between these guys.
ced said on 25/Feb/21
@Pierre.. please look at Resurrection of Edwards picture he just posted. This is without wrestling gear on. Undertaker is standing straight, Kane has his head hunched forward and there’s an at least an inch between them.
Imagine if Kane had his head straight, there would be 1.25 inches between them.
Current Undertaker 6’5.75 (wakes up a 6’6)
Current Kane: 6’6.75-6’7 (wakes up around 6’7.25)
@Pierre.. please look at Resurrection of Edwards picture he just posted. This is without wrestling gear on. Undertaker is standing straight, Kane has his head hunched forward and there’s an at least an inch between them.
Imagine if Kane had his head straight, there would be 1.25 inches between them.
Current Undertaker 6’5.75 (wakes up a 6’6)
Current Kane: 6’6.75-6’7 (wakes up around 6’7.25)
Canson said on 24/Feb/21
@Public Enemy: I agree with your estimates for Kane. He may still lose 1” today or may just be 3/4”. I know Rob said the older you get the less your variance becomes from morning to evening. In Kane’s case, he may not be of that age yet. I would say 6’6.5 afternoon now. But Taker may still be the full 6’6” but I doubt above it. He did look 6’6” in the pic Dan Trojan posted with both of them. 6’5.75 is a good estimate for him too. 6’5.5” is a stretch but it’s the absolute lowest I could see.
@Public Enemy: I agree with your estimates for Kane. He may still lose 1” today or may just be 3/4”. I know Rob said the older you get the less your variance becomes from morning to evening. In Kane’s case, he may not be of that age yet. I would say 6’6.5 afternoon now. But Taker may still be the full 6’6” but I doubt above it. He did look 6’6” in the pic Dan Trojan posted with both of them. 6’5.75 is a good estimate for him too. 6’5.5” is a stretch but it’s the absolute lowest I could see.
Chaos Control 6'2.5 said on 24/Feb/21
How tall would he be out of bed peak?
Editor Rob
How tall would he be out of bed peak?
Editor Robmaybe not far off brushing the 6ft 9 mark after a good 10 hour kip
Chris n said on 23/Feb/21
Imagine Rob organised a celebheights event and Kane attended. And all the regulars on this page pinned him up against the wall and measured him barefoot once and for all.
Editor Rob
Imagine Rob organised a celebheights event and Kane attended. And all the regulars on this page pinned him up against the wall and measured him barefoot once and for all.
Editor Robthere would probably still be arguments...
Resurrection of Edwards said on 23/Feb/21
i personally think he could still hit 6’7 at earlier part of the day.he might still measure over 6’7 easily enough immediately after waking up.he looked almost an inch taller than undertaker in 2020 given that taker is losing height drastically.kane might be lucky if he measured 6’6.5 after a wrestling match.
i personally think he could still hit 6’7 at earlier part of the day.he might still measure over 6’7 easily enough immediately after waking up.he looked almost an inch taller than undertaker in 2020 given that taker is losing height drastically.kane might be lucky if he measured 6’6.5 after a wrestling match.
Resurrection of Edwards said on 23/Feb/21
if you love to see,then here is undertaker and kane in 2020.
Click Here
if you love to see,then here is undertaker and kane in 2020.
Click Here
Public Enemy said on 22/Feb/21
@Resurrection of Edwards
Thanks. I used to think Undertaker was 6’6 still but now believe he is 6’5.75 now . Kane yes at 6.6.5 at a low today. Probably wakes up in the 6’7.25 to 6’7.5 range. Both still very tall guys even today.
@Resurrection of Edwards
Thanks. I used to think Undertaker was 6’6 still but now believe he is 6’5.75 now . Kane yes at 6.6.5 at a low today. Probably wakes up in the 6’7.25 to 6’7.5 range. Both still very tall guys even today.
Chaos Control 6'2.5 said on 22/Feb/21
About 2 metres currently
About 2 metres currently
Pierre said on 21/Feb/21
Chris n said on 20/Feb/21
Pierre it’s the same difference because they are both equally tilting there head! 🤦🏻🤦🏻🤦🏻🤦🏻
You’re a pest
Lol Chris = you have to watch again the pic = Big Show is leaning with all his bust here!
Chris n said on 20/Feb/21
Pierre it’s the same difference because they are both equally tilting there head! 🤦🏻🤦🏻🤦🏻🤦🏻
You’re a pest
Lol Chris = you have to watch again the pic = Big Show is leaning with all his bust here!
Resurrection of Edwards said on 21/Feb/21
@public enemy
very good estimation dude.
@public enemy
very good estimation dude.
Riky said on 20/Feb/21
I bet that if you would measure Kane around 3 pm he would not exceed 199cm or 6'6"1/4 barefoot. Around an inch more in his prime, thoughts?
I bet that if you would measure Kane around 3 pm he would not exceed 199cm or 6'6"1/4 barefoot. Around an inch more in his prime, thoughts?
Public Enemy said on 20/Feb/21
@Chris n
Agree. I can see how he looks tall in the ring but his boots are always generous. Big guy today fir sure but cannot see him above 6’6.5 max tbh.
@Chris n
Agree. I can see how he looks tall in the ring but his boots are always generous. Big guy today fir sure but cannot see him above 6’6.5 max tbh.
Chris n said on 20/Feb/21
Pierre it’s the same difference because they are both equally tilting there head! 🤦🏻🤦🏻🤦🏻🤦🏻
You’re a pest
Pierre it’s the same difference because they are both equally tilting there head! 🤦🏻🤦🏻🤦🏻🤦🏻
You’re a pest
Resurrection of Edwards said on 19/Feb/21
damian priest is described as 6’5 range.he looks similar to guy’s like randy orton.kane looks 3 inch taller than priest lasttimes.kane still seems to pull near 6’7.
damian priest is described as 6’5 range.he looks similar to guy’s like randy orton.kane looks 3 inch taller than priest lasttimes.kane still seems to pull near 6’7.
Public Enemy said on 18/Feb/21
Out of gear i.e. without his wrestling boots Glen Jacobs is a strong 6’6. Max 6’6.5 at a low.
Today I now believe Mark Calloway is 6’5.75 at a low.
Jacobs was always had the edge and has lost less height from his peak as compared to Calloway.
Jacobs 6’6.5 today
Calloway 6’5.75 today
Out of gear i.e. without his wrestling boots Glen Jacobs is a strong 6’6. Max 6’6.5 at a low.
Today I now believe Mark Calloway is 6’5.75 at a low.
Jacobs was always had the edge and has lost less height from his peak as compared to Calloway.
Jacobs 6’6.5 today
Calloway 6’5.75 today
Pierre said on 18/Feb/21
Click Here Lol Big Show slouching Kane just tilting a bit his head....Always the same difference.
Reread my second comment and watch the video on 22/jan/2021 and then explain me again Kane is more than 6"5.5' lol
Click Here Lol Big Show slouching Kane just tilting a bit his head....Always the same difference.
Reread my second comment and watch the video on 22/jan/2021 and then explain me again Kane is more than 6"5.5' lol
Resurrection of Edwards said on 18/Feb/21
i spitted my coffee when i saw the 6’5.5 argument for kane.he looked 3 inches taller than 6’4 damian priest,he looked 5 inch taller than del rio out of gear.he didn’t looked much shorter than nash yet some people are insisting he is 6’5.5 and big show 6’8 lmfao.
i spitted my coffee when i saw the 6’5.5 argument for kane.he looked 3 inches taller than 6’4 damian priest,he looked 5 inch taller than del rio out of gear.he didn’t looked much shorter than nash yet some people are insisting he is 6’5.5 and big show 6’8 lmfao.
Chris n said on 18/Feb/21
Public Enemy he should of hung up his boots 5 years ago. I love the character Kane, but that character was gone along time ago. It’s ridiculous how he is still there.
Providing he stands dead straight, I think he still is 6’6.75 - 6’7
Relaxed posture or a slight lean in photos can easily take 0.5-1 inch off your actual height.
Public Enemy he should of hung up his boots 5 years ago. I love the character Kane, but that character was gone along time ago. It’s ridiculous how he is still there.
Providing he stands dead straight, I think he still is 6’6.75 - 6’7
Relaxed posture or a slight lean in photos can easily take 0.5-1 inch off your actual height.
Resurrection of Edwards said on 17/Feb/21
Canson said on 15/Feb/21
@Pierre: I didn’t make fun of any of your pics. I simply told the truth about them
@canson
well said dude.
Canson said on 15/Feb/21
@Pierre: I didn’t make fun of any of your pics. I simply told the truth about them
@canson
well said dude.
Chaos Control 6'2.5 said on 17/Feb/21
How tall is Damian Priest then? 6’5?
How tall is Damian Priest then? 6’5?
Chaos Control 6'2.5 said on 17/Feb/21
@Canson yeah making fun of pics is my thing
@Canson yeah making fun of pics is my thing
Pierre said on 16/Feb/21
Canson said on 15/Feb/21
@Pierre: I didn’t make fun of any of your pics. I simply told the truth about them
Oh yeah of course Canson...Me too.
Canson said on 15/Feb/21
@Pierre: I didn’t make fun of any of your pics. I simply told the truth about them
Oh yeah of course Canson...Me too.
Resurrection of Edwards said on 16/Feb/21
typical excuse by pierre.whenever kane looks taller,the dude either says either kane is closer to camera or he has footwear advantage.he doesn’t accept the fact that kane is already tall.
@canson
dude.i wouldn’t estimate kane under 6’6.5,atleast not in the afternoon.honestly,kane might have problems in his knees.his knees looks to bow dramatically.he looks noticeably or almost an inch taller than corbin or undertaker.he edges out strowman noticeably out of gear.what is even surprising is that he looks almost 3 inches taller than 6’4 damian priest who is described as 6’5 or over by wwe.he had almost 3 inch on priest.he didn’t looked 2 inch shorter than nash.more like1.5/1.75 roughly.miz isn’t even at his nose top when he stood fully straight.maybe,he might look certain height to certain people due to his bad knees.i personally don’t think it’s only an inch between donovan and kane,more like 1.25even in donovan photo,he looked weak 6’7.i dont think there is anymore left to be said.that’s a smoking gun evidence yet some people refuse to accept.
typical excuse by pierre.whenever kane looks taller,the dude either says either kane is closer to camera or he has footwear advantage.he doesn’t accept the fact that kane is already tall.
@canson
dude.i wouldn’t estimate kane under 6’6.5,atleast not in the afternoon.honestly,kane might have problems in his knees.his knees looks to bow dramatically.he looks noticeably or almost an inch taller than corbin or undertaker.he edges out strowman noticeably out of gear.what is even surprising is that he looks almost 3 inches taller than 6’4 damian priest who is described as 6’5 or over by wwe.he had almost 3 inch on priest.he didn’t looked 2 inch shorter than nash.more like1.5/1.75 roughly.miz isn’t even at his nose top when he stood fully straight.maybe,he might look certain height to certain people due to his bad knees.i personally don’t think it’s only an inch between donovan and kane,more like 1.25even in donovan photo,he looked weak 6’7.i dont think there is anymore left to be said.that’s a smoking gun evidence yet some people refuse to accept.
Canson said on 15/Feb/21
@Pierre: I didn’t make fun of any of your pics. I simply told the truth about them
@Pierre: I didn’t make fun of any of your pics. I simply told the truth about them
Public Enemy said on 15/Feb/21
He looked very out of shape at the rumble and was eliminated quite shortly after arriving by Damien Priest. Given that he is no longer an active member of the wwe roster maybe it’s time for him to hang up his boots fir good. He looks 6’6 range max 6’6.5 today.
He looked very out of shape at the rumble and was eliminated quite shortly after arriving by Damien Priest. Given that he is no longer an active member of the wwe roster maybe it’s time for him to hang up his boots fir good. He looks 6’6 range max 6’6.5 today.
Pierre said on 14/Feb/21
i'm sure Kane has an advantage of camera next to Donovan
i'm sure Kane has an advantage of camera next to Donovan
Canson said on 14/Feb/21
@Edward: I would say Donovan is probably 6’5 3/8” but close enough. Especially if Rob uses lunchtime that’s would it would be 6’5.5”. I agree with you Kane has at least an inxh
@Edward: I would say Donovan is probably 6’5 3/8” but close enough. Especially if Rob uses lunchtime that’s would it would be 6’5.5”. I agree with you Kane has at least an inxh
Resurrection of Edward said on 14/Feb/21
@Editor rob
since people keeps bringing kane’s photo’s with alberto delrio.rob,you’re one of the few people who has met alberto and pegged him at 6’2 flat.how tall does he looks with post prime kane,this was just few years ago.dont you think this is solid 5 inch difference between del rio and kane.Click Here
i personally think he is much taller than braun strowman.
Editor Rob
@Editor rob
since people keeps bringing kane’s photo’s with alberto delrio.rob,you’re one of the few people who has met alberto and pegged him at 6’2 flat.how tall does he looks with post prime kane,this was just few years ago.dont you think this is solid 5 inch difference between del rio and kane.Click Here
i personally think he is much taller than braun strowman.
Editor RobIn that photo it could seem he's near 6ft 8
Resurrection of Edwards said on 14/Feb/21
i can see the argument but i disagree that strowman is as tall as kane.in my eyes,kane even today is much taller than braun strowman.
i can see the argument but i disagree that strowman is as tall as kane.in my eyes,kane even today is much taller than braun strowman.
Pierre said on 13/Feb/21
Canson said on 12/Feb/21
Philip McMullin said on 10/Feb/21
@Pierre Why do you consistently use awful photos? Show is BEHIND Del Rio and Del Rio is actually 6'3, Kane has terrible posture in that pic of him and show.
Yet he accused me on a different page of doing that
Canson you make fun of my pics in this site ....No real problem with that.But after that I feel obliged to say you that your own photos sometimes are far from always perfect!
Canson said on 12/Feb/21
Philip McMullin said on 10/Feb/21
@Pierre Why do you consistently use awful photos? Show is BEHIND Del Rio and Del Rio is actually 6'3, Kane has terrible posture in that pic of him and show.
Yet he accused me on a different page of doing that
Canson you make fun of my pics in this site ....No real problem with that.But after that I feel obliged to say you that your own photos sometimes are far from always perfect!
Vincent Caleb said on 13/Feb/21
@Philip:
I sorta agree with Pierre on Del Rio’s height. No way 6’3”, max 6’2”. However the picture was rather awful.
@Philip:
I sorta agree with Pierre on Del Rio’s height. No way 6’3”, max 6’2”. However the picture was rather awful.
Resurrection of Edwards said on 13/Feb/21
@canson
dude,if donovan is 6’5.5,then kane might easily be 6’6.5 or even his listed height.i personally think the difference is around 1.25 between kane and donovan.i personally think its more than inch if both were asked to stand straight and Bust a Gut.
@canson
dude,if donovan is 6’5.5,then kane might easily be 6’6.5 or even his listed height.i personally think the difference is around 1.25 between kane and donovan.i personally think its more than inch if both were asked to stand straight and Bust a Gut.
Resurrection of Edwards said on 13/Feb/21
if you’d look at the royal rumble match recently,kane did enter the match.glen jacobs towered almost every one in the royal rumble.he did towered every one in the roster.he looked near 6’7 in the royal rumble match.damian priest is billied as 6’5 but i think he is around 6’4.he looks very similar to guy’s like randy orton.when kane stood fully straight,kane had almost 3 inch on 6’4 priest.kane looked near 6’7 in the royal rumble match.bad knees possibly might be reason he looks shorter.i’ll be honest,kane looked 6’6.75/6’7 in the royal rumble.people might disagree with me but its okay and its up yo them.i usually estimation under rob’s listing but honestly 6’5 range for kane is crap.he looked almost 3 inch taller than someone like damian priest.
if you’d look at the royal rumble match recently,kane did enter the match.glen jacobs towered almost every one in the royal rumble.he did towered every one in the roster.he looked near 6’7 in the royal rumble match.damian priest is billied as 6’5 but i think he is around 6’4.he looks very similar to guy’s like randy orton.when kane stood fully straight,kane had almost 3 inch on 6’4 priest.kane looked near 6’7 in the royal rumble match.bad knees possibly might be reason he looks shorter.i’ll be honest,kane looked 6’6.75/6’7 in the royal rumble.people might disagree with me but its okay and its up yo them.i usually estimation under rob’s listing but honestly 6’5 range for kane is crap.he looked almost 3 inch taller than someone like damian priest.
Pierre said on 12/Feb/21
Philip McMullin said on 10/Feb/21
@Pierre Why do you consistently use awful photos?
@ Philip McMullin I'm waiting for your wonderful pics
Philip McMullin said on 10/Feb/21
@Pierre Why do you consistently use awful photos?
@ Philip McMullin I'm waiting for your wonderful pics
Canson said on 12/Feb/21
@Vegas: I wouldn’t put Donovan Smith any less than 6’5 3/8 or 6’5 1/4” max 6’5.5 perhaps but there are times when combine measurements are way off. Thereve been a couple that have been pointed out here on CH. kyler Murray is definitely one of them
@Vegas: I wouldn’t put Donovan Smith any less than 6’5 3/8 or 6’5 1/4” max 6’5.5 perhaps but there are times when combine measurements are way off. Thereve been a couple that have been pointed out here on CH. kyler Murray is definitely one of them
Canson said on 12/Feb/21
Philip McMullin said on 10/Feb/21
@Pierre Why do you consistently use awful photos? Show is BEHIND Del Rio and Del Rio is actually 6'3, Kane has terrible posture in that pic of him and show.
Yet he accused me on a different page of doing that
Philip McMullin said on 10/Feb/21
@Pierre Why do you consistently use awful photos? Show is BEHIND Del Rio and Del Rio is actually 6'3, Kane has terrible posture in that pic of him and show.
Yet he accused me on a different page of doing that
Pierre said on 12/Feb/21
This pic with Alberto closer to the camera than Big Show isn't made particularly in a low angle of camera,and both heads are very close one to the other one.Then I really doubt Alberto has a big advantage here. If the guy standing behind the other guy has a big advantage in the pic then how explain Alberto max 6"2' (pic with Rob) looks around same height as Randy Orton who is supposed taller than him ?I can understand there is a difference of postures but...
This pic with Alberto closer to the camera than Big Show isn't made particularly in a low angle of camera,and both heads are very close one to the other one.Then I really doubt Alberto has a big advantage here. If the guy standing behind the other guy has a big advantage in the pic then how explain Alberto max 6"2' (pic with Rob) looks around same height as Randy Orton who is supposed taller than him ?I can understand there is a difference of postures but...
Genau 5ft9 7/8 said on 12/Feb/21
I think he is a bit below 2m nowadays
I think he is a bit below 2m nowadays
Leon11 said on 11/Feb/21
Kitchi: In His Attitude Era Boots yes.
Kitchi: In His Attitude Era Boots yes.
Vegas' said on 10/Feb/21
Once again if Kane is 6'5 range what does that make Miz Click Here
Edge and Miz this past Monday 2 minute mark Click Here
Edge and Rob Click Here
Pierre, Donovans barefoot height is documented.
Once again if Kane is 6'5 range what does that make Miz Click Here
Edge and Miz this past Monday 2 minute mark Click Here
Edge and Rob Click Here
Pierre, Donovans barefoot height is documented.
Philip McMullin said on 10/Feb/21
@Pierre Why do you consistently use awful photos? Show is BEHIND Del Rio and Del Rio is actually 6'3, Kane has terrible posture in that pic of him and show.
@Pierre Why do you consistently use awful photos? Show is BEHIND Del Rio and Del Rio is actually 6'3, Kane has terrible posture in that pic of him and show.
ced said on 10/Feb/21
@Pierre -
Alberto looks about 1cm taller than Randy Orton there. No chance be is as low as 6’2.
Now, imyself have met Orton on several occassions. I am 6’4, and was .5 inches taller than Orton, which puts Orton at 6’3.5 and puts Del Rio at 6’3.75.
So no, Del Rio is definitely over 6’3.
@Pierre -
Alberto looks about 1cm taller than Randy Orton there. No chance be is as low as 6’2.
Now, imyself have met Orton on several occassions. I am 6’4, and was .5 inches taller than Orton, which puts Orton at 6’3.5 and puts Del Rio at 6’3.75.
So no, Del Rio is definitely over 6’3.
KITCHI said on 9/Feb/21
Kane's about six eight
Kane's about six eight
Philip McMullin said on 8/Feb/21
Ali Theres more like 3" minimum on priest here.
Ali Theres more like 3" minimum on priest here.
Pierre said on 8/Feb/21
@Canson = Here is Alberto Del Rio next to Rob with probably advantageous shoes plus advantageous posture = Click Here = 6"2' is even probably a bit generous for him .
Now Alberto next to Big Show = Click Here
Again Kane /Big Show = Click Here
The probability Kane is over 6"5.5' seems slim to me
@Canson = Here is Alberto Del Rio next to Rob with probably advantageous shoes plus advantageous posture = Click Here = 6"2' is even probably a bit generous for him .
Now Alberto next to Big Show = Click Here
Again Kane /Big Show = Click Here
The probability Kane is over 6"5.5' seems slim to me
Pierre said on 6/Feb/21
@Canson Then probably his guy Donovan is shorter than 6"5' range or Kane has the advantage of the camera.Look at again my comments on 22 /Jan/21 (particularly the second comment)= Kane by this comparisons isn't taller than 6"5.5'.
@Canson Then probably his guy Donovan is shorter than 6"5' range or Kane has the advantage of the camera.Look at again my comments on 22 /Jan/21 (particularly the second comment)= Kane by this comparisons isn't taller than 6"5.5'.
Ali said on 4/Feb/21
tinyurl.com/vaa8sc4l
At the recent Royal Rumble, Kane looked to have 1.75 inches over Damian Priest, who is listed at 6'5.
Based on that shot, how tall would you estimate both guys Rob?
tinyurl.com/vaa8sc4l
At the recent Royal Rumble, Kane looked to have 1.75 inches over Damian Priest, who is listed at 6'5.
Based on that shot, how tall would you estimate both guys Rob?
Canson said on 3/Feb/21
Pierre said on 1/Feb/21
@Canson Yeah Kane is an inch taller than 6"5.5'...with his sneakers.
How? The athlete here (Donovan Smith) measured 6’5.75 (likely earlier in the day) but that puts him best case 6’5.5 worst 6’5 3/8 perhaps. Absolute worst 6’5.25”. I’ll go with 3/8”. So somewhere in that range. Kane has at least an inch on him. Even 1” makes it 6’6 3/8 worst case but the full 6’6.5 I think is realistic.
Click Here
Pierre said on 1/Feb/21
@Canson Yeah Kane is an inch taller than 6"5.5'...with his sneakers.
How? The athlete here (Donovan Smith) measured 6’5.75 (likely earlier in the day) but that puts him best case 6’5.5 worst 6’5 3/8 perhaps. Absolute worst 6’5.25”. I’ll go with 3/8”. So somewhere in that range. Kane has at least an inch on him. Even 1” makes it 6’6 3/8 worst case but the full 6’6.5 I think is realistic.
Click Here
ChaosControl 6'2 1/2 said on 2/Feb/21
He’s lost shape in his muscles lately. He appeared at the Royal Rumble and had a serious pit belly. I wouldn’t be surprised if he’s closer to 320lbs now
He’s lost shape in his muscles lately. He appeared at the Royal Rumble and had a serious pit belly. I wouldn’t be surprised if he’s closer to 320lbs now
Pierre said on 1/Feb/21
@Canson Yeah Kane is an inch taller than 6"5.5'...with his sneakers.
@Canson Yeah Kane is an inch taller than 6"5.5'...with his sneakers.
Hyper said on 31/Jan/21
Pierre
Current Vince Vaughn is actually taller than Snoop Dogg — Click Here and Click Here
Plus, the pictures I showed, Kane is really taller than Undertaker.
Pierre
Current Vince Vaughn is actually taller than Snoop Dogg — Click Here and Click Here
Plus, the pictures I showed, Kane is really taller than Undertaker.
Canson said on 31/Jan/21
Pierre said on 28/Jan/21
Lol
All this guys without their advantageous wrestler shoes=
Triple H /6"7.5' Hafthor = Click Here
Triple H / Big Show Click Here
Kane /Big Show Click Here
Oh yeah Kane is a lot taller than 6"5.5'(lol)
You’ve got that right! He’s about an inch taller than 6’5.5!
Pierre said on 28/Jan/21
Lol
All this guys without their advantageous wrestler shoes=
Triple H /6"7.5' Hafthor = Click Here
Triple H / Big Show Click Here
Kane /Big Show Click Here
Oh yeah Kane is a lot taller than 6"5.5'(lol)
You’ve got that right! He’s about an inch taller than 6’5.5!
Lyle said on 30/Jan/21
I've just come across this,the guy claims 6'3 but it seems obvious the guy isn't 6'3, even if the guy was 6' flat that would put Kane at 6'6
Click Here
I've just come across this,the guy claims 6'3 but it seems obvious the guy isn't 6'3, even if the guy was 6' flat that would put Kane at 6'6
Click Here
Pierre said on 28/Jan/21
Lol
All this guys without their advantageous wrestler shoes=
Triple H /6"7.5' Hafthor = Click Here
Triple H / Big Show Click Here
Kane /Big Show Click Here
Oh yeah Kane is a lot taller than 6"5.5'(lol)
Lol
All this guys without their advantageous wrestler shoes=
Triple H /6"7.5' Hafthor = Click Here
Triple H / Big Show Click Here
Kane /Big Show Click Here
Oh yeah Kane is a lot taller than 6"5.5'(lol)
Resurrection of Edwards said on 28/Jan/21
@canson
dude,here is undertaker’s footwear.looks around 1.75/2 inches.Click Here
here is love’s footwear.seems normal to me.maybe an 1 inch.Click Here
even with super footwear advantage,undertaker looks to be towered by love.
@canson
dude,here is undertaker’s footwear.looks around 1.75/2 inches.Click Here
here is love’s footwear.seems normal to me.maybe an 1 inch.Click Here
even with super footwear advantage,undertaker looks to be towered by love.
Resurrection of Edwards said on 28/Jan/21
@canson
undertaker had a footwear advantage over kevin love.that photo was already posted by sotiris.sotiris has posted both undertaker and kevin love footwear and undertaker had a footwear advantage over love.
@canson
undertaker had a footwear advantage over kevin love.that photo was already posted by sotiris.sotiris has posted both undertaker and kevin love footwear and undertaker had a footwear advantage over love.
Hyper said on 28/Jan/21
@Vincent Caleb
He’s easily well over 6’6” in person. I would’ve thought over 6’7” but he had a significant footwear advantage over me.
He was the tallest in Galaxycon, as far as I can remember.
@Vincent Caleb
He’s easily well over 6’6” in person. I would’ve thought over 6’7” but he had a significant footwear advantage over me.
He was the tallest in Galaxycon, as far as I can remember.
Pierre said on 27/Jan/21
Canson said on 26/Jan/21
@Pierre: the fact you had to have Malone closer to the camera shows your bias. The pic i posted with them side by side is more indicative. Rodman was not 2” shorter. He was maybe 1.5” in his career if not a little less. And what you’re saying otherwise makes no sense. If you watched the show (Apprentice) Rodman edged Brian McKnight by a few inches too. I have McKnight as weak 6’4 and it was clear. Rodman also edged Trace Adkins and others on the show during the different seasons. Safe to say he wasn’t less than 6’6” and still doesn’t look it today with Trump
My bias?!Lol you want to say "YOUR bias"= why don't you talk about the second pic I posted with both face to face exactly same distance to the camera....Your arguments ring false...Imo you 're a bit short in arguments on this point...(In my case generally when I post pics with possible advantages of camera I mention it....)
Canson said on 26/Jan/21
@Pierre: the fact you had to have Malone closer to the camera shows your bias. The pic i posted with them side by side is more indicative. Rodman was not 2” shorter. He was maybe 1.5” in his career if not a little less. And what you’re saying otherwise makes no sense. If you watched the show (Apprentice) Rodman edged Brian McKnight by a few inches too. I have McKnight as weak 6’4 and it was clear. Rodman also edged Trace Adkins and others on the show during the different seasons. Safe to say he wasn’t less than 6’6” and still doesn’t look it today with Trump
My bias?!Lol you want to say "YOUR bias"= why don't you talk about the second pic I posted with both face to face exactly same distance to the camera....Your arguments ring false...Imo you 're a bit short in arguments on this point...(In my case generally when I post pics with possible advantages of camera I mention it....)
Pierre said on 27/Jan/21
Lol welcome to the magic world of billed heights /real heights.
Lol welcome to the magic world of billed heights /real heights.
Resurrection of Edwards said on 26/Jan/21
@vincent caleb
yeah dude.i can agree with hyper.kane still edges braun strowman easily today.out of gear,kane looked 1/2 taller than braun strowman.
@vincent caleb
yeah dude.i can agree with hyper.kane still edges braun strowman easily today.out of gear,kane looked 1/2 taller than braun strowman.
Resurrection of Edwards said on 26/Jan/21
Dred__ said on 24/Jan/21
Rob
I see you put Kane as tall as 6ft6 3/4 today. I mean obviously he doesn’t pull off the 6ft7 1/2 mark this days, but if you watch him with strowman, in several segment, Braun doesn’t looks shorter in my opinion.
Click Here
Click Here
In the second video the commentator even said: “ he (strowman) looks even bigger than Kane”
Do you still think that kane today edge strowman out or you can see an argument for the same height ?
Editor Rob
could kane be a fraction less than this current listing now? Maybe.
@Editor rob
but strowman had a footwear advantage in the first photo.out of gear,kane still edges him by 1/2 inch.have a look rob Click Here
if kane isn’t near 6’7 then undertaker is probably 6’5.5 today because he is “almost an inch” shorter than kanekane is easily taller than strowman out of gear.
Dred__ said on 24/Jan/21
Rob
I see you put Kane as tall as 6ft6 3/4 today. I mean obviously he doesn’t pull off the 6ft7 1/2 mark this days, but if you watch him with strowman, in several segment, Braun doesn’t looks shorter in my opinion.
Click Here
Click Here
In the second video the commentator even said: “ he (strowman) looks even bigger than Kane”
Do you still think that kane today edge strowman out or you can see an argument for the same height ?
Editor Rob
could kane be a fraction less than this current listing now? Maybe.
@Editor rob
but strowman had a footwear advantage in the first photo.out of gear,kane still edges him by 1/2 inch.have a look rob Click Here
if kane isn’t near 6’7 then undertaker is probably 6’5.5 today because he is “almost an inch” shorter than kanekane is easily taller than strowman out of gear.
Resurrection of Edwards said on 26/Jan/21
@canson
agreed with everything you said.love “might” have a footwear advantage over taker but if i highly doubt it.i personally have them 1.5” apart at that time when they met but i personally dont think it was footwear to blame though.like you and christian,i have taker and love 1.5 inch that tome if taker would have stood in same posture.i don’t think taker has a footwear advantage,to love’s advantage ,taker had a footwear advantage and that was posted by sotiris.what i’m saying is that love might have been at his morning height or say he might not have been active that day while i can say taker might have been at his “extreme low” when he met love.i have them 1.5 inch apart that time.what i’m saying is in the video clips,love is much closer to camera while taker isn’t so,that might favor kevin love.camera sngles can easily fool us and make someone shorter than they really are dude.
@canson
agreed with everything you said.love “might” have a footwear advantage over taker but if i highly doubt it.i personally have them 1.5” apart at that time when they met but i personally dont think it was footwear to blame though.like you and christian,i have taker and love 1.5 inch that tome if taker would have stood in same posture.i don’t think taker has a footwear advantage,to love’s advantage ,taker had a footwear advantage and that was posted by sotiris.what i’m saying is that love might have been at his morning height or say he might not have been active that day while i can say taker might have been at his “extreme low” when he met love.i have them 1.5 inch apart that time.what i’m saying is in the video clips,love is much closer to camera while taker isn’t so,that might favor kevin love.camera sngles can easily fool us and make someone shorter than they really are dude.
Dred__ said on 26/Jan/21
Editor Rob: could kane be a fraction less than this current listing now? Maybe.
I don’t know but strowman doesn’t look shorter than him i think and this was back in 2015... the question is if strowman is over 6ft6 1/2 or kane under than 6ft6 3/4
Editor Rob
Editor Rob: could kane be a fraction less than this current listing now? Maybe.
I don’t know but strowman doesn’t look shorter than him i think and this was back in 2015... the question is if strowman is over 6ft6 1/2 or kane under than 6ft6 3/4
Editor Robif I think he's now a fraction shorter I would go with a lower figure...
Canson said on 26/Jan/21
@Pierre: the fact you had to have Malone closer to the camera shows your bias. The pic i posted with them side by side is more indicative. Rodman was not 2” shorter. He was maybe 1.5” in his career if not a little less. And what you’re saying otherwise makes no sense. If you watched the show (Apprentice) Rodman edged Brian McKnight by a few inches too. I have McKnight as weak 6’4 and it was clear. Rodman also edged Trace Adkins and others on the show during the different seasons. Safe to say he wasn’t less than 6’6” and still doesn’t look it today with Trump
@Pierre: the fact you had to have Malone closer to the camera shows your bias. The pic i posted with them side by side is more indicative. Rodman was not 2” shorter. He was maybe 1.5” in his career if not a little less. And what you’re saying otherwise makes no sense. If you watched the show (Apprentice) Rodman edged Brian McKnight by a few inches too. I have McKnight as weak 6’4 and it was clear. Rodman also edged Trace Adkins and others on the show during the different seasons. Safe to say he wasn’t less than 6’6” and still doesn’t look it today with Trump
Vegas' said on 26/Jan/21
Rodman 6'5 with little luck lol. Let me guess Michael Jordan was 6'3 with little luck..
Click Here
Penn Jillette height isn't subject to controversy. When we met him it was late at night 11pm and they had been standing on stage for 2 hours and still at minimum I would say 6'5 1/2 (6'6 1/2) in shoes. He was noticeably taller than my 6'4 friend.
Rodman 6'5 with little luck lol. Let me guess Michael Jordan was 6'3 with little luck..
Click Here
Penn Jillette height isn't subject to controversy. When we met him it was late at night 11pm and they had been standing on stage for 2 hours and still at minimum I would say 6'5 1/2 (6'6 1/2) in shoes. He was noticeably taller than my 6'4 friend.
Canson said on 26/Jan/21
@Edward: yea it has been a while! I hope you’re doing well! In addition, Love may have had a footwear advantage
@Edward: yea it has been a while! I hope you’re doing well! In addition, Love may have had a footwear advantage
Hyper said on 25/Jan/21
Dennis Rodman is not under 6’6” by any means.
It’s just that 6’5” for Kane is ridiculous, since Kane looks taller than Dennis Rodman, in a few comparisons.
Dennis Rodman is not under 6’6” by any means.
It’s just that 6’5” for Kane is ridiculous, since Kane looks taller than Dennis Rodman, in a few comparisons.
Resurrection of Edwards said on 25/Jan/21
@hyper
well said dude.i have to agree,he is still near 6'7.he still edges braun strowman and stacks well with guy's like show or nash.he recentlty edged a measured 6'6 dude.the dude has afro and kane wasnt standing straight with him and still was noticeably taller than him.he looked much taller next to combined measured dude.what is even surprising is kane only looked 2 shorter than a 6'9 guy who edged someone like nash.folk havent seen him stacking with legit big guys.
@hyper
well said dude.i have to agree,he is still near 6'7.he still edges braun strowman and stacks well with guy's like show or nash.he recentlty edged a measured 6'6 dude.the dude has afro and kane wasnt standing straight with him and still was noticeably taller than him.he looked much taller next to combined measured dude.what is even surprising is kane only looked 2 shorter than a 6'9 guy who edged someone like nash.folk havent seen him stacking with legit big guys.
Pierre said on 24/Jan/21
@Canson = Lol Penn Jilette's height is subject to controversies,plus the camera is low here and Dennis Rodman is probably the one who stands a bit closer to the camera here...plus helped by his advantageous cap....
Opposite to my recent pic Dennis/Magic,in your pics Dennis/Magic we don't see the postures and I guess Magic is the one who has the poorer posture here....Then yeah ...You could claim 6"6' or around by your pics...In mine he clearly does not look close to 6"6'.
Here is the same pic as your but with the whole bodies this time = Click Here
Now explain me Donald( you suppose him 6"1' in this period...) stands in a good posture here ....
Click Here Here is Dennis Rodman at same distance to the camera as Karl Malone(supposed 6"8'...) ,Karl who visibly is the one who stands in the poorer posture here,slouching a lot ,and does not wear advantageous cap....
Click Here Karl Malone visibly in a better posture this time,( a bit closer to the camera than Dennis Rodman)
Dennis 6"6' ?! Oh yeah...Why not...
@Canson = Lol Penn Jilette's height is subject to controversies,plus the camera is low here and Dennis Rodman is probably the one who stands a bit closer to the camera here...plus helped by his advantageous cap....
Opposite to my recent pic Dennis/Magic,in your pics Dennis/Magic we don't see the postures and I guess Magic is the one who has the poorer posture here....Then yeah ...You could claim 6"6' or around by your pics...In mine he clearly does not look close to 6"6'.
Here is the same pic as your but with the whole bodies this time = Click Here
Now explain me Donald( you suppose him 6"1' in this period...) stands in a good posture here ....
Click Here Here is Dennis Rodman at same distance to the camera as Karl Malone(supposed 6"8'...) ,Karl who visibly is the one who stands in the poorer posture here,slouching a lot ,and does not wear advantageous cap....
Click Here Karl Malone visibly in a better posture this time,( a bit closer to the camera than Dennis Rodman)
Dennis 6"6' ?! Oh yeah...Why not...
Dred__ said on 24/Jan/21
Rob
I see you put Kane as tall as 6ft6 3/4 today. I mean obviously he doesn’t pull off the 6ft7 1/2 mark this days, but if you watch him with strowman, in several segment, Braun doesn’t looks shorter in my opinion.
Click Here
Click Here
In the second video the commentator even said: “ he (strowman) looks even bigger than Kane”
Do you still think that kane today edge strowman out or you can see an argument for the same height ?
Editor Rob
Rob
I see you put Kane as tall as 6ft6 3/4 today. I mean obviously he doesn’t pull off the 6ft7 1/2 mark this days, but if you watch him with strowman, in several segment, Braun doesn’t looks shorter in my opinion.
Click Here
Click Here
In the second video the commentator even said: “ he (strowman) looks even bigger than Kane”
Do you still think that kane today edge strowman out or you can see an argument for the same height ?
Editor Robcould kane be a fraction less than this current listing now? Maybe.
Resurrection of Edwards said on 22/Jan/21
@canson
how are you my man,havent interacted with you for a while.as usual
i fully agree with you dude.he might fall to 6'6 at extreme low because undertaker might fall to 6'5 or 6'5.5 at extreme low. he looked that mark next to kevin love and rest of the cavaliers,i suppose taker was at his "extreme low" with love and rest of cavaliers.taker looked 6'5 flat in particular love photo.you are right and i highly agree with your estimation.also kane didnt looked only half inch,he looked 0.75 taller than undertaker.he didnt looked much shorter than nash.even today,he is taller than strowman if anything.as i have said before,i have undertaker at 6'5.75,corbin at 6'5 7/8,strowman at 6'6.25 and kane at 6'6.50 afternoon height or considering afternoon.
@canson
how are you my man,havent interacted with you for a while.as usual
i fully agree with you dude.he might fall to 6'6 at extreme low because undertaker might fall to 6'5 or 6'5.5 at extreme low. he looked that mark next to kevin love and rest of the cavaliers,i suppose taker was at his "extreme low" with love and rest of cavaliers.taker looked 6'5 flat in particular love photo.you are right and i highly agree with your estimation.also kane didnt looked only half inch,he looked 0.75 taller than undertaker.he didnt looked much shorter than nash.even today,he is taller than strowman if anything.as i have said before,i have undertaker at 6'5.75,corbin at 6'5 7/8,strowman at 6'6.25 and kane at 6'6.50 afternoon height or considering afternoon.
Pierre said on 22/Jan/21
Click Here = here is again at 0:3 seconds of the video the difference of height between Kane and Triple H,and you can see triple H isn't particularly straight = Triple H's top of head comfortably same height as Kane's HIGHER ears or Kane's HIGHER nose.
again Triple H / Hafthor 6"7.5' = Click Here
6"5.5' absolute max.Pics on ring are only pics on ring.The ring is the show and respective shoes are not systematically similar on ring.
Later in the video at 0:40 = Click Here
Click Here = here is again at 0:3 seconds of the video the difference of height between Kane and Triple H,and you can see triple H isn't particularly straight = Triple H's top of head comfortably same height as Kane's HIGHER ears or Kane's HIGHER nose.
again Triple H / Hafthor 6"7.5' = Click Here
6"5.5' absolute max.Pics on ring are only pics on ring.The ring is the show and respective shoes are not systematically similar on ring.
Later in the video at 0:40 = Click Here
Pierre said on 22/Jan/21
Nothing above 6"5.5' to me =
Triple H /Kane(Kane a lot closer to the camera but...)= Click Here same postures= good space between their own feet ,Kane tilting a bit his head.
Click Here = both guys looking straight around same distance to the camera this time = triple H 's top of head is as high as Kane's higher ears or Kane's higher nose ,same thing in the first pic.
Triple H /Hafthor 6"7.5' = Click Here = Triple H's top of head as high as Hafthor's LOWER ears /LOWER nose
Kane by this comparison isn't only an inch shorter than Hafthor.There is two good inches between both guys.
Nothing above 6"5.5' to me =
Triple H /Kane(Kane a lot closer to the camera but...)= Click Here same postures= good space between their own feet ,Kane tilting a bit his head.
Click Here = both guys looking straight around same distance to the camera this time = triple H 's top of head is as high as Kane's higher ears or Kane's higher nose ,same thing in the first pic.
Triple H /Hafthor 6"7.5' = Click Here = Triple H's top of head as high as Hafthor's LOWER ears /LOWER nose
Kane by this comparison isn't only an inch shorter than Hafthor.There is two good inches between both guys.
Hyper said on 21/Jan/21
@Resurrection of Edwards
He even looks a bit taller than Lebron James, too.
6’5” is such bullsh!t, I can promise you he’s over 6’6” and likely close to 6’7” currently, when I met him in person.
@Resurrection of Edwards
He even looks a bit taller than Lebron James, too.
6’5” is such bullsh!t, I can promise you he’s over 6’6” and likely close to 6’7” currently, when I met him in person.
Vincent Caleb said on 21/Jan/21
@Edwards:
I’m pretty sure Hyper has seen him up close too, and he said he was definitely over 6’6”.
@Edwards:
I’m pretty sure Hyper has seen him up close too, and he said he was definitely over 6’6”.
ced said on 21/Jan/21
Kane and Sid.. 1995 Royal Rumble. Kane looks about 1.5 - 2 inches taller than Sid.
Click Here
Kane and Sid.. 1995 Royal Rumble. Kane looks about 1.5 - 2 inches taller than Sid.
Click Here
Canson said on 20/Jan/21
@Edward: there’s a chance of him falling to 6’6 at an extreme low but that’s a huge stretch. That would essentially make him a 6’6.25” guy. I agree with your estimate of 6’6.25 being his extreme low and 6’6.5 being his normal height (afternoon) making him essentially a 6’6.5 guy. If anything he’s lost maybe 2cm or so from his peak
@Edward: there’s a chance of him falling to 6’6 at an extreme low but that’s a huge stretch. That would essentially make him a 6’6.25” guy. I agree with your estimate of 6’6.25 being his extreme low and 6’6.5 being his normal height (afternoon) making him essentially a 6’6.5 guy. If anything he’s lost maybe 2cm or so from his peak
Resurrection of Edwards said on 20/Jan/21
6’6.25 is the “absolute lowest” or “extreme low” that i fell i’ll attempt to argue about kane currently.i personally still feel near 6’7 is very very likely.i have him around 6’6.5 which still could be considered to be near 6’7.still too tall next to guy’s like miz.even today with perfect posture can stack with guys like show or nash and doesn’t look much shorter than them.he is easily much taller than rodman or deontay wilder.
6’6.25 is the “absolute lowest” or “extreme low” that i fell i’ll attempt to argue about kane currently.i personally still feel near 6’7 is very very likely.i have him around 6’6.5 which still could be considered to be near 6’7.still too tall next to guy’s like miz.even today with perfect posture can stack with guys like show or nash and doesn’t look much shorter than them.he is easily much taller than rodman or deontay wilder.
Pierre said on 19/Jan/21
Leon11 said on 19/Jan/21
That's the problem with posts and pictures here.
Pierre: That pic with Magic and Rodman, look at it one more time. Magic Johnson is closer to the camera, camera angle is everything. Guys please, stop posting pictures with bad angles.
As for Taker right now 6'6, Peak over 6'7.
Lol Magic stands maybe just a bit closer by the position of his shoes in the pic ,but he's slouching on the opposite side of the camera,that finally means his head stands at around the same distance to the camera as Dennis Rodman's head! Just = in my pic both have a very similar posture opposite to the other pic in which probably Magic is the only one who slouchs!
Leon11 said on 19/Jan/21
That's the problem with posts and pictures here.
Pierre: That pic with Magic and Rodman, look at it one more time. Magic Johnson is closer to the camera, camera angle is everything. Guys please, stop posting pictures with bad angles.
As for Taker right now 6'6, Peak over 6'7.
Lol Magic stands maybe just a bit closer by the position of his shoes in the pic ,but he's slouching on the opposite side of the camera,that finally means his head stands at around the same distance to the camera as Dennis Rodman's head! Just = in my pic both have a very similar posture opposite to the other pic in which probably Magic is the only one who slouchs!
Hyper said on 19/Jan/21
Stings, doesn’t it?
Taker does look as tall as Magic at times, with better camera angle.
Shows that angles are everywhere and can vary at times.
Stings, doesn’t it?
Taker does look as tall as Magic at times, with better camera angle.
Shows that angles are everywhere and can vary at times.
Leon11 said on 19/Jan/21
That's the problem with posts and pictures here.
Pierre: That pic with Magic and Rodman, look at it one more time. Magic Johnson is closer to the camera, camera angle is everything. Guys please, stop posting pictures with bad angles.
As for Taker right now 6'6, Peak over 6'7.
That's the problem with posts and pictures here.
Pierre: That pic with Magic and Rodman, look at it one more time. Magic Johnson is closer to the camera, camera angle is everything. Guys please, stop posting pictures with bad angles.
As for Taker right now 6'6, Peak over 6'7.
Pierre said on 18/Jan/21
Hyper's pics = pic number 3 = Undertaker straight here?!He slouch as much as Kane here!Taker slouchs here,his back and neck are not straight.I guess also his legs are not even straight here!
Here is another pic Dennis Rodman /Magic this time both around same posture = Click Here = even his big hat isn't as high as Magic's top of head here...(some guys believe Magic is now more 6"7' mark than 6"7.5'...)
About comparisons with Vince Vaughn = here is Vince Vaughn next to Mel Gibson big max 5"9' = Click Here
Here is Vince Vaughn next to Stephen Merchant listed 6"7' standing in a terrible posture = Click Here
Vince Vaughn and Snoop Dog Click Here
Snoop /Magic Click Here ...
Of course Taker has an advantage in the pic number 1 = alot closer to the camera plus advantage of posture.
Hyper's pics = pic number 3 = Undertaker straight here?!He slouch as much as Kane here!Taker slouchs here,his back and neck are not straight.I guess also his legs are not even straight here!
Here is another pic Dennis Rodman /Magic this time both around same posture = Click Here = even his big hat isn't as high as Magic's top of head here...(some guys believe Magic is now more 6"7' mark than 6"7.5'...)
About comparisons with Vince Vaughn = here is Vince Vaughn next to Mel Gibson big max 5"9' = Click Here
Here is Vince Vaughn next to Stephen Merchant listed 6"7' standing in a terrible posture = Click Here
Vince Vaughn and Snoop Dog Click Here
Snoop /Magic Click Here ...
Of course Taker has an advantage in the pic number 1 = alot closer to the camera plus advantage of posture.
ChaosControl 6'2 1/2 said on 18/Jan/21
@Matt Logan who is this 6’6 man named Max you speak of
@Matt Logan who is this 6’6 man named Max you speak of
Dred__ said on 18/Jan/21
Rob
Considering how tall looks erick Rowan with the rock
Click Here
Can we considerer erick Rowan taller than Kane today ?
Editor Rob
Rob
Considering how tall looks erick Rowan with the rock
Click Here
Can we considerer erick Rowan taller than Kane today ?
Editor Robin that segment it was tricky to tell, but I suppose you could make a case for him edging Kane.
Heights are barefeet estimates, derived from quotations, official websites, agency resumes, in person encounters with actors at conventions and pictures/films.
Other vital statistics like weight or shoe size measurements have been sourced from newspapers, books, resumes or social media.
Celebrity Fan Photos and Agency Pictures of stars are © to their respective owners.