Add a Comment7824 comments
Average Guess (664 Votes)
Peak: 6ft 7.86in (202.9cm)
Current: 6ft 6.91in (200.4cm)
Peak: 6ft 7.86in (202.9cm)
Current: 6ft 6.91in (200.4cm)
NR said on 8/Feb/20
Kane standing side by side with Test Click Here
Definitely a big difference in height between the 2
A couple other Kane/Test photos Click Here
Click Here
Kane standing side by side with Test Click Here
Definitely a big difference in height between the 2
A couple other Kane/Test photos Click Here
Click Here
Roderick said on 8/Feb/20
@Dan Trojan I didn't know that photo was fake, that was my fault.
I think Sting is 6'1.5" and Undertaker is 6'5", so there is a 3.5" gap. Maybe it could be 4 if Undertaker is really 6'5.5". So yeah, Undertaker is quite a bit taller.
The video of Albert and Test with Kane is muuuuuch better than the photo NR posted. At least in my opinion.
Click Here
Go to 1:45 on that video. Remember, Test was MAX 6'5", and I am not sure if he was shorter than that or not. He might have been 6'4.5".
There is NO WAY Kane is over 6'7" there!
Also on YouTube, there was a perfect staredown of Kane and Albert but I lost it and will post it when I find it, but they looked the same height.
I seriously don't understand the 6'7"+ estimates for Kane.
@ced Thank you! I also am a huge Kane fan but I disagree that he was in the best shape in 1999. My theory is he got sick and lost a lot of weight around that time. I would say in 2001-2002 he was in the best shape of his career, especially when he came back from his bicep injury. He was really fast and athletic around that time!
@Dan Trojan I didn't know that photo was fake, that was my fault.
I think Sting is 6'1.5" and Undertaker is 6'5", so there is a 3.5" gap. Maybe it could be 4 if Undertaker is really 6'5.5". So yeah, Undertaker is quite a bit taller.
The video of Albert and Test with Kane is muuuuuch better than the photo NR posted. At least in my opinion.
Click Here
Go to 1:45 on that video. Remember, Test was MAX 6'5", and I am not sure if he was shorter than that or not. He might have been 6'4.5".
There is NO WAY Kane is over 6'7" there!
Also on YouTube, there was a perfect staredown of Kane and Albert but I lost it and will post it when I find it, but they looked the same height.
I seriously don't understand the 6'7"+ estimates for Kane.
@ced Thank you! I also am a huge Kane fan but I disagree that he was in the best shape in 1999. My theory is he got sick and lost a lot of weight around that time. I would say in 2001-2002 he was in the best shape of his career, especially when he came back from his bicep injury. He was really fast and athletic around that time!
Canson said on 7/Feb/20
@Roderick: I can’t see Kane under 6’7 peak. Maybe 6’7.25 but I doubt under. Today while I don’t believe 200 I could see 199cm or 198.5-199 range
@Roderick: I can’t see Kane under 6’7 peak. Maybe 6’7.25 but I doubt under. Today while I don’t believe 200 I could see 199cm or 198.5-199 range
Dan Trojan said on 7/Feb/20
Roderick so typical of you to make excuses everytime kane appears taller bit meanwhile you support a video that proves nothing it's laughable and honestly you're one to talk about posting questionable photo when not too long ago you posted a photoshopped photo of the undertaker and sting trying to pass it off as legitimate i've met both and i can say with certainty that taker is significantly taller
Roderick so typical of you to make excuses everytime kane appears taller bit meanwhile you support a video that proves nothing it's laughable and honestly you're one to talk about posting questionable photo when not too long ago you posted a photoshopped photo of the undertaker and sting trying to pass it off as legitimate i've met both and i can say with certainty that taker is significantly taller
Public Enemy said on 6/Feb/20
Peak 6’7.5
Current 6’6.75
Peak 6’7.5
Current 6’6.75
NR said on 6/Feb/20
Here’s a picture of Kane with a guy 2 inches taller than him and is the same height as Kevin Nash, which would mean The current listings for Kane and Nash are perfect. Click Here
Now this guy was messing around and having fun with people who asked him how tall he is, he said he was 7’2 and Kane was 7’0 and then said yes when somebody said he was 6’10
Here’s a picture of Kane with a guy 2 inches taller than him and is the same height as Kevin Nash, which would mean The current listings for Kane and Nash are perfect. Click Here
Now this guy was messing around and having fun with people who asked him how tall he is, he said he was 7’2 and Kane was 7’0 and then said yes when somebody said he was 6’10
Tom123 said on 5/Feb/20
ced: Undertaker was taller than both of them noticeable, there's a video from 2001
Click Here 5:47
Undertaker was like 6'7.25-6'7.5 peak
Kronik guys at best 6'6 even bit less i think
ced: Undertaker was taller than both of them noticeable, there's a video from 2001
Click Here 5:47
Undertaker was like 6'7.25-6'7.5 peak
Kronik guys at best 6'6 even bit less i think
ced said on 5/Feb/20
I hate to say it because I am the biggest Kane fan but I think Roderick might be right on the money.
Bruce Prichard is on record as saying taht both Undertaker and Kane wore lifts. Meaning, most likely Undertaker wore internal lifts.
A peak 6'6.5 Undertaker with a one inch lift in his boot is a 6'7.5 Individual.
A peak 6'7 Kane with 2 inch external lifts is a 6'9 individual.
I also agree that Sid was taller than Taker.
Now, Kane was listed in college as being 6'8 on his basket ball team (probably in shoes), so he might have been 6'7.5 and by the time he became Kane, he dropped height by a little (which would be realistic as he put on at least 30-35 extra pounds for the gimmick).
Notice the difference in Kane in 1998 and 1999 (when he had a staredown with Big Show).. Kane looked a little taller in 1999 because he was around 270-280 and was probably in the best shape of his life.
I hate to say it because I am the biggest Kane fan but I think Roderick might be right on the money.
Bruce Prichard is on record as saying taht both Undertaker and Kane wore lifts. Meaning, most likely Undertaker wore internal lifts.
A peak 6'6.5 Undertaker with a one inch lift in his boot is a 6'7.5 Individual.
A peak 6'7 Kane with 2 inch external lifts is a 6'9 individual.
I also agree that Sid was taller than Taker.
Now, Kane was listed in college as being 6'8 on his basket ball team (probably in shoes), so he might have been 6'7.5 and by the time he became Kane, he dropped height by a little (which would be realistic as he put on at least 30-35 extra pounds for the gimmick).
Notice the difference in Kane in 1998 and 1999 (when he had a staredown with Big Show).. Kane looked a little taller in 1999 because he was around 270-280 and was probably in the best shape of his life.
Roderick said on 5/Feb/20
@Dan Trojan The camera angle is hugely in favor of Kane. Kane was no way in hell over 2 inches taller than Test. That's ridiculous.
I just can't see how Kane was ever taller than max 6'7".
@Dan Trojan The camera angle is hugely in favor of Kane. Kane was no way in hell over 2 inches taller than Test. That's ridiculous.
I just can't see how Kane was ever taller than max 6'7".
Tarinator 6'3.5" said on 5/Feb/20
I thought he might have been 6’8 1/4-8 1/2” in his peak along with a 6’7.75-8” tall The Undertaker. I am 6’3.5” and 237 pounds so I would probably look 4-5 inches shorter than Kane. I doubt Kane is only 6’7”. He looks around 6’8.5-8.75” He probably lost half an inch by now. Kevin Nash was probably 6’10 1/4” in his prime and 6’9.5” now. Matt Morgan in Royal Rumble 2004 was 6’9”. He is probably half an inch taller than Kane. Maybe not a full inch. I am usually 6’4.25-4.5” during the day and 6’5” in the morning. I lose about an inch and a half (1.5”) throughout the day. So I just go with my evening height to be honest with people. People think I look 5’11-6’0” but I am much taller than that.
I thought he might have been 6’8 1/4-8 1/2” in his peak along with a 6’7.75-8” tall The Undertaker. I am 6’3.5” and 237 pounds so I would probably look 4-5 inches shorter than Kane. I doubt Kane is only 6’7”. He looks around 6’8.5-8.75” He probably lost half an inch by now. Kevin Nash was probably 6’10 1/4” in his prime and 6’9.5” now. Matt Morgan in Royal Rumble 2004 was 6’9”. He is probably half an inch taller than Kane. Maybe not a full inch. I am usually 6’4.25-4.5” during the day and 6’5” in the morning. I lose about an inch and a half (1.5”) throughout the day. So I just go with my evening height to be honest with people. People think I look 5’11-6’0” but I am much taller than that.
Vegas' said on 5/Feb/20
Powerslam a non kayfabe UK wrestling mag had Crush down as 6'4 and Clarke at 6'5. Crush was slightly taller than Hulk Hogan in 1997..
Clarke and Kevin Nash so ~6'5 looks about right if Nash was ~6'9 in 1990s @ 2 minutes 44 Click Here
Roderick, Taker looked taller than 6'5 flat just a few months ago. John Pollack guy in middle was measured 6'2 1/8 barefoot Click Here
Powerslam a non kayfabe UK wrestling mag had Crush down as 6'4 and Clarke at 6'5. Crush was slightly taller than Hulk Hogan in 1997..
Clarke and Kevin Nash so ~6'5 looks about right if Nash was ~6'9 in 1990s @ 2 minutes 44 Click Here
Roderick, Taker looked taller than 6'5 flat just a few months ago. John Pollack guy in middle was measured 6'2 1/8 barefoot Click Here
Dan Trojan said on 4/Feb/20
Roderick btw if i knew how to post photos trust me i would post plenty
Roderick btw if i knew how to post photos trust me i would post plenty
Roderick said on 4/Feb/20
John, if you are real, these are my estimates
Kane: 6'7" then, 6'5.5"-6'6" now
Undertaker 6'6.5" then, 6'5" now
I could be wrong and Undertaker was 6'7" peak but he did look shorter than Sid. He really did.
John, if you are real, these are my estimates
Kane: 6'7" then, 6'5.5"-6'6" now
Undertaker 6'6.5" then, 6'5" now
I could be wrong and Undertaker was 6'7" peak but he did look shorter than Sid. He really did.
Dan Trojan said on 4/Feb/20
Roderick it's funny you should say that because a poster by the name of nr posted photos where kane looks at least 2 inches taller than test either you didn't see it or you chose to ignore it
Roderick it's funny you should say that because a poster by the name of nr posted photos where kane looks at least 2 inches taller than test either you didn't see it or you chose to ignore it
ced said on 4/Feb/20
Rob, how tall do you think Brian Clark (Wrath) was? I wonder if there is a staredown between Kronik and BOD from when they came to the WWF in 2001 to feud.
I know Brian Clark has said in an interview that they were both 6'6 (Kronik) but I feel as if Clark was a smidge taller than Adams (.25-.5) inches.
How do you think they compare to Taker and Kane (I imagine both were still at their peak in 2001)
Rob, how tall do you think Brian Clark (Wrath) was? I wonder if there is a staredown between Kronik and BOD from when they came to the WWF in 2001 to feud.
I know Brian Clark has said in an interview that they were both 6'6 (Kronik) but I feel as if Clark was a smidge taller than Adams (.25-.5) inches.
How do you think they compare to Taker and Kane (I imagine both were still at their peak in 2001)
John wilson brown said on 4/Feb/20
kane and taker both being 6’7 or under it is completely laughable.taker was 6’7.25 and kane was 6’7.5.i am surprised and shocked at the same time how some posters have underestimated both of the guys height.
kane and taker both being 6’7 or under it is completely laughable.taker was 6’7.25 and kane was 6’7.5.i am surprised and shocked at the same time how some posters have underestimated both of the guys height.
Riccardo5'7" said on 3/Feb/20
I think he is no more than 198.8 at lunch time, no way 200cm.
As for his peak 6'7".
Outside the wwe circle he is same size as strowman barefoot. Probably strowman 6'6'1/2 and Kane 6'6' 1/4
I think he is no more than 198.8 at lunch time, no way 200cm.
As for his peak 6'7".
Outside the wwe circle he is same size as strowman barefoot. Probably strowman 6'6'1/2 and Kane 6'6' 1/4
Roderick said on 3/Feb/20
@Dan Trojan Dude, you keep saying that and you have no evidence to back it up. Kane has never looked over 6'7" with Test, ever. Show me where and when Kane has looked over 6'7" and exclude any staredown with The Big Show. It's a good challenge.
@Dan Trojan Dude, you keep saying that and you have no evidence to back it up. Kane has never looked over 6'7" with Test, ever. Show me where and when Kane has looked over 6'7" and exclude any staredown with The Big Show. It's a good challenge.
Dan Trojan said on 3/Feb/20
Does anyone remember seeing that smallville episode where kane was on it there's a few photos and google of tom welling and kane standing side by side and kane easily has 5 inches on him and rob has tom listed at 6'2.5" figure it out people this 6'5" crap is ridiculous
Editor Rob
Does anyone remember seeing that smallville episode where kane was on it there's a few photos and google of tom welling and kane standing side by side and kane easily has 5 inches on him and rob has tom listed at 6'2.5" figure it out people this 6'5" crap is ridiculous
Editor RobThis shot he didn't look as tall Ones like this
Dan Trojan said on 2/Feb/20
That video is a terrible comparison it doesn't prove anything i thought it would show a staredown between kane and test but all it showed was kane walking by test and it was a bad camera angle kane was over 6'7" in his prime
That video is a terrible comparison it doesn't prove anything i thought it would show a staredown between kane and test but all it showed was kane walking by test and it was a bad camera angle kane was over 6'7" in his prime
Roderick said on 2/Feb/20
I could be wrong but I feel like edwards is commenting under John wilson Brown.
@edwards Go back to all of Sotiris's old posts. He has shown that Kane can't be as tall as you think.
Editor Rob
I could be wrong but I feel like edwards is commenting under John wilson Brown.
@edwards Go back to all of Sotiris's old posts. He has shown that Kane can't be as tall as you think.
Editor RobI would always urge people to stick with one name, edwards included 🧐
Canson said on 2/Feb/20
@John Wilson Brown: very good estimates!
@John Wilson Brown: very good estimates!
John wilson brown said on 2/Feb/20
@ canson
i personally have peak taker around 6’7.25 and peak kane at 6’7.5.i think this looks accurate.
@ canson
i personally have peak taker around 6’7.25 and peak kane at 6’7.5.i think this looks accurate.
Sam Tyson said on 1/Feb/20
Judging a persons height using that example is completely vague and inconclusive. Test and Kane would have around a 2inch difference in height, just say, so viewing them from angles that far away will always show one or the other looking either the same height, taller, or shorter.
Judging a persons height using that example is completely vague and inconclusive. Test and Kane would have around a 2inch difference in height, just say, so viewing them from angles that far away will always show one or the other looking either the same height, taller, or shorter.
edwards said on 1/Feb/20
when kane appears shorter in 1-2 photo’s ,some trolls insist he is shorter but when he is appearing really taller,they they are claiming he is either wearing lift or appearing closer to camera.if no excuses work’s then they’ll say the photo is outdated or the guy with whom kane is standing is not taller as listed.a big lol to these childish people’s.go on as i have already said,1-2 people disagreeing dosent change the fact.
when kane appears shorter in 1-2 photo’s ,some trolls insist he is shorter but when he is appearing really taller,they they are claiming he is either wearing lift or appearing closer to camera.if no excuses work’s then they’ll say the photo is outdated or the guy with whom kane is standing is not taller as listed.a big lol to these childish people’s.go on as i have already said,1-2 people disagreeing dosent change the fact.
Lyle said on 1/Feb/20
@Ced @Roderick He looks like he's looking up at Albert too in that video, but i just can't see him at 6'5-6'6 barefoot it just seems to low, he's a very strange one
@Ced @Roderick He looks like he's looking up at Albert too in that video, but i just can't see him at 6'5-6'6 barefoot it just seems to low, he's a very strange one
Canson said on 1/Feb/20
@John Wilson Brown: I doubt he was under 6’7” peak. In fact I’d guess him as 6’7.25 and guess Taker around the same. Today, it’s evident that he’s lost height. Don’t know which degree. Could be a strong 6’6” or weak 6’7” range. Strong 6’6 more than likely (6’6-6’6.5)
@John Wilson Brown: I doubt he was under 6’7” peak. In fact I’d guess him as 6’7.25 and guess Taker around the same. Today, it’s evident that he’s lost height. Don’t know which degree. Could be a strong 6’6” or weak 6’7” range. Strong 6’6 more than likely (6’6-6’6.5)
Roderick said on 31/Jan/20
To be honest, Test does look taller than Kane there. It's funny how often Kane can look 6'5", and yet some people want to insist he was close to 6'8" peak, lol.
To be honest, Test does look taller than Kane there. It's funny how often Kane can look 6'5", and yet some people want to insist he was close to 6'8" peak, lol.
ced said on 31/Jan/20
@Lyle, wow, I do agree.. It doesn't look like that much difference, it almost looks as if Test is taller in some instances.. (And we know that Kane is wearing his lift boots here)..
@Lyle, wow, I do agree.. It doesn't look like that much difference, it almost looks as if Test is taller in some instances.. (And we know that Kane is wearing his lift boots here)..
Lyle said on 29/Jan/20
@Ced I'm not trying to troll, I'm a huge kane fan, please do check it out and also check out this video Click Here
Pause at 2.47, there's not a lot between them
@Ced I'm not trying to troll, I'm a huge kane fan, please do check it out and also check out this video Click Here
Pause at 2.47, there's not a lot between them
John wilson brown said on 29/Jan/20
currently:6’6.5
peak:6’6.5/6’6.75
currently:6’6.5
peak:6’6.5/6’6.75
Canson said on 28/Jan/20
@Roderick: I can buy 6’7.5 peak.
@Roderick: I can buy 6’7.5 peak.
edwards said on 28/Jan/20
anybody can say whatever they want but it dosent change the fact that peak kane was 6’7.5 which is near 6’8 or can be considered as weak 6’8.kane today is still 6’6.5 which can be considered as weak 6’7.only 1/2 people disagreeing dosent change fact.go on
anybody can say whatever they want but it dosent change the fact that peak kane was 6’7.5 which is near 6’8 or can be considered as weak 6’8.kane today is still 6’6.5 which can be considered as weak 6’7.only 1/2 people disagreeing dosent change fact.go on
Canson said on 27/Jan/20
@Vegas: I’ve seen Babatunde listed as high as 6’10”. He measured 6’8” at his Pro Day. Whether that is his afternoon height is the question
Click Here
@Vegas: I’ve seen Babatunde listed as high as 6’10”. He measured 6’8” at his Pro Day. Whether that is his afternoon height is the question
Click Here
DFens said on 27/Jan/20
This guy says he is 6'9.
Comparing him to Kevin Nash, he's possibly 6'7. Making Kane 6'6 or less
Click Here
Click Here Bad posture
Click Here
Click Here
This guy says he is 6'9.
Comparing him to Kevin Nash, he's possibly 6'7. Making Kane 6'6 or less
Click Here
Click Here Bad posture
Click Here
Click Here
ced said on 26/Jan/20
@Lyle, come one.. Kane has never looked shorter than Test, ever. Test was a huge dude, but Kane always looked taller.. I'll check out the 03 Rumble and see if I could take a few snapshots but Test always looked about 2.5-3 inches smaller than Kane
@Lyle, come one.. Kane has never looked shorter than Test, ever. Test was a huge dude, but Kane always looked taller.. I'll check out the 03 Rumble and see if I could take a few snapshots but Test always looked about 2.5-3 inches smaller than Kane
Roderick said on 26/Jan/20
Kane was definitely not 6'8.5" peak height. For sure 6'7" at most IMO. That picture with Foley is weird, Foley is looking shorter than normal.
Kane was definitely not 6'8.5" peak height. For sure 6'7" at most IMO. That picture with Foley is weird, Foley is looking shorter than normal.
Vegas' said on 25/Jan/20
Ced I met Test out of gear in 2008 at a show. He was shorter out of gear than Heidenreich so not 6'6. I saw Albert twice in person first time in March 2004 and he didn't look more than 6'5 out of gear. Today he is looking shorter next to 6'9 NFL listed Babatunde Aiyegbusi and 7'3 college basketball listed Jordan Omogbehin
Click Here
Ced I met Test out of gear in 2008 at a show. He was shorter out of gear than Heidenreich so not 6'6. I saw Albert twice in person first time in March 2004 and he didn't look more than 6'5 out of gear. Today he is looking shorter next to 6'9 NFL listed Babatunde Aiyegbusi and 7'3 college basketball listed Jordan Omogbehin
Click Here
edwards said on 24/Jan/20
@ canson
I too saw his listing during his entrance on Smackdown, and it said 7'0" 323 lbs which is kinda weird and this isnt the 90s no more.
@ canson
I too saw his listing during his entrance on Smackdown, and it said 7'0" 323 lbs which is kinda weird and this isnt the 90s no more.
Canson said on 23/Jan/20
@Christian: he’s still listed at 7’?
@Christian: he’s still listed at 7’?
Lyle said on 23/Jan/20
I'm watching Royal Rumble from 2003 and Kane (in his smallest boots) looks shorter than Test and also in a match from 2001 he looks shorter, he's a really hard one to pin a height on at times
I'm watching Royal Rumble from 2003 and Kane (in his smallest boots) looks shorter than Test and also in a match from 2001 he looks shorter, he's a really hard one to pin a height on at times
remo said on 21/Jan/20
Heres kane after he took off his mask, he's looking close in height to big show. Heres the video Click Here
Heres kane after he took off his mask, he's looking close in height to big show. Heres the video Click Here
Christian 6'5 3/8" said on 19/Jan/20
It baffles my mind that he's still listed 7'0" by WWE in 2020. I saw his listing during his entrance on Smackdown, and it said 7'0" 323 lbs.
@Mikey97
He's probably one of the most athletic and in shape wrestler for his age. He looks and moves better in the ring than Undertaker and Chris Jericho does, and they're all around 49-54.
It baffles my mind that he's still listed 7'0" by WWE in 2020. I saw his listing during his entrance on Smackdown, and it said 7'0" 323 lbs.
@Mikey97
He's probably one of the most athletic and in shape wrestler for his age. He looks and moves better in the ring than Undertaker and Chris Jericho does, and they're all around 49-54.
Mikey97 said on 19/Jan/20
That's a very weird photo. Kane looks 6'9+" there which is impossible.
That's a very weird photo. Kane looks 6'9+" there which is impossible.
Mikey97 said on 18/Jan/20
Kane was on Smackdown and he still has gorilla arms and tree trunk legs. He's a huge guy still.
He actually looked 6'7" with Daniel Bryan but maybe had slight footwear advantage.
Kane is aging great. I would love to see him in the Rumble
Kane was on Smackdown and he still has gorilla arms and tree trunk legs. He's a huge guy still.
He actually looked 6'7" with Daniel Bryan but maybe had slight footwear advantage.
Kane is aging great. I would love to see him in the Rumble
Lyle said on 18/Jan/20
@NR Easily 6'8 there, Foley was at least 6'2
@NR Easily 6'8 there, Foley was at least 6'2
NR said on 17/Jan/20
It’s been posted before but Kane in the mid 90’s with Mick Foley and Al Snow in regular clothing Click Here I think he definitely looks 6’8 there?
It’s been posted before but Kane in the mid 90’s with Mick Foley and Al Snow in regular clothing Click Here I think he definitely looks 6’8 there?
Taryn said on 17/Jan/20
Click Here
Puts question marks on his peak height and how big those lifts were and bare in mind show is wearing lifts too
Click Here
Puts question marks on his peak height and how big those lifts were and bare in mind show is wearing lifts too
remo said on 16/Jan/20
Riccardo 5'7m No he didnt have lifts as issac yankem, only when he became kane
Riccardo 5'7m No he didnt have lifts as issac yankem, only when he became kane
Riccardo 5'7" said on 15/Jan/20
Martin 6'1" said on 11/Jan/20
I have a question, does anybody know if Kane wore lifts back in the 90s? I know he had 1.5 or 2 inch soles, but did he also have lifts inside as well?
No one knows, we can suppose he did.
Kane's character was built to be bigger than undertaker and very close to big show.
He sure, with Jake the snake Roberts, wore the biggest boots in WWE. So it means that glann jacobs was sure a big guy but not as big as they(WWE) would.
Martin 6'1" said on 11/Jan/20
I have a question, does anybody know if Kane wore lifts back in the 90s? I know he had 1.5 or 2 inch soles, but did he also have lifts inside as well?
No one knows, we can suppose he did.
Kane's character was built to be bigger than undertaker and very close to big show.
He sure, with Jake the snake Roberts, wore the biggest boots in WWE. So it means that glann jacobs was sure a big guy but not as big as they(WWE) would.
Caldonio said on 11/Jan/20
7ft. Lol insanely stupid wwe again. 6-8 max.
7ft. Lol insanely stupid wwe again. 6-8 max.
Martin 6'1" said on 11/Jan/20
I have a question, does anybody know if Kane wore lifts back in the 90s? I know he had 1.5 or 2 inch soles, but did he also have lifts inside as well?
I have a question, does anybody know if Kane wore lifts back in the 90s? I know he had 1.5 or 2 inch soles, but did he also have lifts inside as well?
MYBrawler said on 8/Jan/20
He’s not under 6’7 imo
He’s not under 6’7 imo
Riccardo 5'7" said on 8/Jan/20
Vegas
Only 1.25 1.5 inches boots for kane in that picture? Hmmm, if he is in gear as I think I would say 1.5 minimum.
Vegas
Only 1.25 1.5 inches boots for kane in that picture? Hmmm, if he is in gear as I think I would say 1.5 minimum.
remo said on 8/Jan/20
Heres a segment with big show and kane, kane and show where there peaks, show only looked 3'5 inches taller then kane. Check it out Click Here
Heres a segment with big show and kane, kane and show where there peaks, show only looked 3'5 inches taller then kane. Check it out Click Here
edwards said on 8/Jan/20
Still minimum 6'6 and maximum 6'6.5 but 6'6.25 is looking likely.
Still minimum 6'6 and maximum 6'6.5 but 6'6.25 is looking likely.
Creeper said on 8/Jan/20
@Mikey97
I personally wouldnt go as low as 6'6.5 as I still think hes around 6'7 still but probably just shy of it. Hes likely 6'6.75. As for Strowman? Hes 6'6.5
Corbin i agree he was measured 6'6.5 early so 6'6 afternoon
Undertaker is 6'6-6'6.25 but no more, i can't see under 6'6 if he stands his tallest
How tall do you think they were at their peaks? Id say Kane was 6'7.75-6'8 and Undertaker 6'7.5 or maybe 6'7.25
@Mikey97
I personally wouldnt go as low as 6'6.5 as I still think hes around 6'7 still but probably just shy of it. Hes likely 6'6.75. As for Strowman? Hes 6'6.5
Corbin i agree he was measured 6'6.5 early so 6'6 afternoon
Undertaker is 6'6-6'6.25 but no more, i can't see under 6'6 if he stands his tallest
How tall do you think they were at their peaks? Id say Kane was 6'7.75-6'8 and Undertaker 6'7.5 or maybe 6'7.25
NR said on 7/Jan/20
Kane and Stone Cold last week. Kane’s about 6.5 inches taller there. Probably be 7 inches with impeccable posture Click Here
Kane and Stone Cold last week. Kane’s about 6.5 inches taller there. Probably be 7 inches with impeccable posture Click Here
Canson said on 7/Jan/20
@Vegas: peak Kane could’ve been a bit over 6’7”. Today tho he can look under the mark by a bit. Still a strong 6’6”/weak 6’7” not 6’5” like some are saying.
@Vegas: peak Kane could’ve been a bit over 6’7”. Today tho he can look under the mark by a bit. Still a strong 6’6”/weak 6’7” not 6’5” like some are saying.
viper said on 7/Jan/20
Too bad 6-7 Max Starks didn't have a pic with Kane at that same event
Too bad 6-7 Max Starks didn't have a pic with Kane at that same event
viper said on 7/Jan/20
Kane looks maybe 6-7.5 with Big Ben.
Kane looks maybe 6-7.5 with Big Ben.
edwards said on 7/Jan/20
@ roderick
its ok dude,i wasnt pointing you or anyone.
@ roderick
its ok dude,i wasnt pointing you or anyone.
Mikey97 said on 6/Jan/20
First, I would like to wish everybody a happy new year.
Second, Creeper your guesses are pretty good but I'd lower Undertaker just a little bit and Kane as well.
I'd say Kane is 6'6.5" and if he's under it he's not under it by much.
Strowman is likely close to Kane, I'd say he's 6'6.5" as well.
Corbin was measured 6'6.5" early in the day so chances are he is only about 6'6".
Undertaker is probably not the full 6'6" and more like 6'5.75".
I'd say the person who has the chances of being the tallest is Strowman even though in 2015/2016 Kane was clearly taller than Strowman it appeared Kane dropped a fraction in 2017/2018 when he faced Strowman again and looked a little taller but with a footwear advantage. I'd say if Strowman is taller he is taller by .25" no more
Of course a peak Kane would be obviously taller than Strowman in a staredown
First, I would like to wish everybody a happy new year.
Second, Creeper your guesses are pretty good but I'd lower Undertaker just a little bit and Kane as well.
I'd say Kane is 6'6.5" and if he's under it he's not under it by much.
Strowman is likely close to Kane, I'd say he's 6'6.5" as well.
Corbin was measured 6'6.5" early in the day so chances are he is only about 6'6".
Undertaker is probably not the full 6'6" and more like 6'5.75".
I'd say the person who has the chances of being the tallest is Strowman even though in 2015/2016 Kane was clearly taller than Strowman it appeared Kane dropped a fraction in 2017/2018 when he faced Strowman again and looked a little taller but with a footwear advantage. I'd say if Strowman is taller he is taller by .25" no more
Of course a peak Kane would be obviously taller than Strowman in a staredown
Vegas' said on 6/Jan/20
It's possible Kane is in gear there yes but his boots around that time were 1.25-1.5 inch soles. If Roethlisberger was in similar size sneakers to his appearance on Raw in 2009 footwear difference wouldn't have been that noticeable.
It's possible Kane is in gear there yes but his boots around that time were 1.25-1.5 inch soles. If Roethlisberger was in similar size sneakers to his appearance on Raw in 2009 footwear difference wouldn't have been that noticeable.
Roderick said on 6/Jan/20
Kane looks 6'7" there Vegas for sure
@edwards I happen to think Flair walks around at 5'8" which puts Kane at 6'6" there. I don't downgrade Kane on purpose, I just really doubt he's as tall as people think he is. I'd say 6'5.5"-6'6" for Kane.
@Creeper Kane and Strowman are too high. I'd lower Strowman to 6'6.25", and Kane to 6'6".
Kane looks 6'7" there Vegas for sure
@edwards I happen to think Flair walks around at 5'8" which puts Kane at 6'6" there. I don't downgrade Kane on purpose, I just really doubt he's as tall as people think he is. I'd say 6'5.5"-6'6" for Kane.
@Creeper Kane and Strowman are too high. I'd lower Strowman to 6'6.25", and Kane to 6'6".
Riccardo 5'7" said on 6/Jan/20
Vegas' said on 5/Jan/20
Been a while but seeing as there are many new posters here since this was last posted
Kane and 6'4 7/8 barefoot measured Ben Roethlisberger circa 2006
Click Here
Kane is in wrestling gear there
Vegas' said on 5/Jan/20
Been a while but seeing as there are many new posters here since this was last posted
Kane and 6'4 7/8 barefoot measured Ben Roethlisberger circa 2006
Click Here
Kane is in wrestling gear there
Vegas' said on 5/Jan/20
Been a while but seeing as there are many new posters here since this was last posted
Kane and 6'4 7/8 barefoot measured Ben Roethlisberger circa 2006
Click Here
Been a while but seeing as there are many new posters here since this was last posted
Kane and 6'4 7/8 barefoot measured Ben Roethlisberger circa 2006
Click Here
edwards said on 5/Jan/20
i agree that kane is probably 6'6.25 or max 6'6.5 today .but with ric flair,there is no way in hell kane looked only 6'6.a 6'7 guy has full head on 5'9 guy.but that photo is outdated though as it was taken some years ago and kane havent shrink much at that time.i cant get why some people want taker/kane to be certain height childish asf. i also agree he is no longer over 6'6.5,6'6.5 is max and 6'6.25 is likely.
i agree that kane is probably 6'6.25 or max 6'6.5 today .but with ric flair,there is no way in hell kane looked only 6'6.a 6'7 guy has full head on 5'9 guy.but that photo is outdated though as it was taken some years ago and kane havent shrink much at that time.i cant get why some people want taker/kane to be certain height childish asf. i also agree he is no longer over 6'6.5,6'6.5 is max and 6'6.25 is likely.
Creeper said on 5/Jan/20
Kane 6'6.75
Strowman 6'6.5
Undertaker 6'6
Corbin 6'6
Seems accurate to me
Kane 6'6.75
Strowman 6'6.5
Undertaker 6'6
Corbin 6'6
Seems accurate to me
edwards said on 4/Jan/20
@ Editor rob
when the poster sotiris gravas said falir was 5’8,you said that when you seen him,he was 5’9 and was taller than most of 5’9 guy’s.you said flair being under 5’9 is hard to stomach.i remember if my memory serves well.
Editor Rob
@ Editor rob
when the poster sotiris gravas said falir was 5’8,you said that when you seen him,he was 5’9 and was taller than most of 5’9 guy’s.you said flair being under 5’9 is hard to stomach.i remember if my memory serves well.
Editor RobFlair was taller than a con guy who was at least 5ft 9.
Funnily at Wales Comic Con I saw him again and he looked 5ft 9.5, taller than 5ft 9 flat for sure, so somehow Flair managed to look 5ft 10 range with him...a couple of years ago.
Funnily at Wales Comic Con I saw him again and he looked 5ft 9.5, taller than 5ft 9 flat for sure, so somehow Flair managed to look 5ft 10 range with him...a couple of years ago.
Riccardo 5'7 said on 4/Jan/20
@Rob
It wasn't a picture, if I remember correctly you saw him or someone you know met him.
But sorry probably i understood completely wrong 😅
Editor Rob
@Rob
It wasn't a picture, if I remember correctly you saw him or someone you know met him.
But sorry probably i understood completely wrong 😅
Editor RobYes, it wasn't me, but other con friends who have got photos with him. It was surprising to see Flair manage to look in 5ft 10 range with a guy I know now is over 5ft 9 flat.
remo said on 3/Jan/20
Heres kane interview at his wrestlng school, both kane and the interviewer stood, kane looked 6'6
Heres kane interview at his wrestlng school, both kane and the interviewer stood, kane looked 6'6
Riccardo 5'7 said on 3/Jan/20
@Rob
Rob you met Flair of I'm not wrong, and I know for sure that you can't mistake his height.
Now Flair is someone who does wear always the same kind of shoes.
How Kane looks next to Flair? Considering that both are in footwear?
I agree with Roderick, 6'6" no more
Editor Rob
@Rob
Rob you met Flair of I'm not wrong, and I know for sure that you can't mistake his height.
Now Flair is someone who does wear always the same kind of shoes.
How Kane looks next to Flair? Considering that both are in footwear?
I agree with Roderick, 6'6" no more
Editor RobI don't know where that was picked up, I never got a photo with Flair!
Canson said on 3/Jan/20
@Roderick: he probably is somewhere 6’6-6’6.5 today the more I’ve seen
@Roderick: he probably is somewhere 6’6-6’6.5 today the more I’ve seen
Roderick said on 2/Jan/20
I personally think Ric Flair walks around at 5'8", and I'm not sure if he can measure taller when he's measured. In my opinion, Kane doesn't look over 6'6" with Flair.
He looks 6'6" there, but not over
I personally think Ric Flair walks around at 5'8", and I'm not sure if he can measure taller when he's measured. In my opinion, Kane doesn't look over 6'6" with Flair.
He looks 6'6" there, but not over
Riccardo 5'7" said on 1/Jan/20
If Someone like editor Rob guess someone else at 5'9" sure he is right being him self 5'8". He can't be wrong on Ric Flairs height even if I remember Rob saying something closer to 5'10" than 5'9".
But doesn't change a lot... Kane isn't 6'7" and if he does look like a 6'7" guy sometimes is because of the footwear.
From the other hand, if sometimes he does look just 6'5" it's also probably wrong because of the angles or other things.
Kane is somewhere between 6'5.75 and 6'6"1/4, no way he is taller than that.
And I just saw a video of him eyes to eyes with Undertaker back at their peaks...... But even a kid know why kane did look taller than taker during his career.
If Someone like editor Rob guess someone else at 5'9" sure he is right being him self 5'8". He can't be wrong on Ric Flairs height even if I remember Rob saying something closer to 5'10" than 5'9".
But doesn't change a lot... Kane isn't 6'7" and if he does look like a 6'7" guy sometimes is because of the footwear.
From the other hand, if sometimes he does look just 6'5" it's also probably wrong because of the angles or other things.
Kane is somewhere between 6'5.75 and 6'6"1/4, no way he is taller than that.
And I just saw a video of him eyes to eyes with Undertaker back at their peaks...... But even a kid know why kane did look taller than taker during his career.
edwards said on 1/Jan/20
@ roderick
here is kane with ric flair,rob has met flair and pegged him in 5’9.
kane has full head on ric flair. Click Here
now,its obvious you’ll downgrade flair height to make kane shorter but rob has met flair and said he is in 5’9 range.this is not even a peak kane.dude, sorry,i cant can’t see him as low as 6’5.5/6’6 ” just as you can’t see him as high as 6’6.5 or over 6’6.
@ roderick
here is kane with ric flair,rob has met flair and pegged him in 5’9.
kane has full head on ric flair. Click Here
now,its obvious you’ll downgrade flair height to make kane shorter but rob has met flair and said he is in 5’9 range.this is not even a peak kane.dude, sorry,i cant can’t see him as low as 6’5.5/6’6 ” just as you can’t see him as high as 6’6.5 or over 6’6.
Roderick said on 31/Dec/19
@edwards Dude, no offense, but that is a terrible camera angle to compare with! First off, Viscera is actually more like 6'6" flat than 6'6.5", and there is another photo that is much better for comparison.
Click Here
Kane not looking 6'7.5" there.
Also, there is NO way Kane lost that much height. He's obviously max 6'6" now.
Kane is max 1" taller than Viscera, and Viscera is more like 6'6" than 6'6.5".
@edwards Dude, no offense, but that is a terrible camera angle to compare with! First off, Viscera is actually more like 6'6" flat than 6'6.5", and there is another photo that is much better for comparison.
Click Here
Kane not looking 6'7.5" there.
Also, there is NO way Kane lost that much height. He's obviously max 6'6" now.
Kane is max 1" taller than Viscera, and Viscera is more like 6'6" than 6'6.5".
edwards said on 31/Dec/19
peak taker at 6'7.25 and peak kane at 6'7.5 looks likely imho.
peak taker at 6'7.25 and peak kane at 6'7.5 looks likely imho.
Roderick said on 30/Dec/19
@viper Yeah, but if you and I agree that he is 6'6" today, don't you think a 1.5" loss is a little too much? He looked much closer to 6'7" flat than 6'7.5" anyway.
The staredown he had with Test in 1999 screams max 6'7" to me.
@viper Yeah, but if you and I agree that he is 6'6" today, don't you think a 1.5" loss is a little too much? He looked much closer to 6'7" flat than 6'7.5" anyway.
The staredown he had with Test in 1999 screams max 6'7" to me.
Canson said on 30/Dec/19
@Viper: that’s the max I buy for his peak. 6’7.25 is possible too
@Viper: that’s the max I buy for his peak. 6’7.25 is possible too
edwards said on 30/Dec/19
@ roderick have a look pal.this was in 2006/7 and isnt even a peak kane.kane wasnt even in his prime.he was past his prime.with 6’6.5 big daddy v aka viscera. Click Here ,Click Here
looks 1.5 inches taller than viscera who is 6’6.5,now i know you’ll find excuses sayin’ kane is closer to camera or he is wearing lift.i already know what you are going to say lol.
@ roderick have a look pal.this was in 2006/7 and isnt even a peak kane.kane wasnt even in his prime.he was past his prime.with 6’6.5 big daddy v aka viscera. Click Here ,Click Here
looks 1.5 inches taller than viscera who is 6’6.5,now i know you’ll find excuses sayin’ kane is closer to camera or he is wearing lift.i already know what you are going to say lol.
viper said on 30/Dec/19
Maybe, maybe 6-7.5 peak
It's not totally out of the question
Maybe, maybe 6-7.5 peak
It's not totally out of the question
Roderick said on 29/Dec/19
@edwards He always looked max 6'7". Look at him with Test in 1999. Before their match, they had a staredown and Kane looked absolutely max 2 inches taller. If Test was 6'5", Kane was 6'7".
Post a picture of Kane looking 6'7.5" in his prime
@edwards He always looked max 6'7". Look at him with Test in 1999. Before their match, they had a staredown and Kane looked absolutely max 2 inches taller. If Test was 6'5", Kane was 6'7".
Post a picture of Kane looking 6'7.5" in his prime
edwards said on 28/Dec/19
@ roderick
most wouldnt agree with me on this one but for me personally,i have hard time on seeing peak kane less than 6'7.5,give or take few cm's,peak kane has always looked weak 6'8 to me.he was 6'9 in close to it in normal shoes.and maybe 6'10 in boots.
@ roderick
most wouldnt agree with me on this one but for me personally,i have hard time on seeing peak kane less than 6'7.5,give or take few cm's,peak kane has always looked weak 6'8 to me.he was 6'9 in close to it in normal shoes.and maybe 6'10 in boots.
Mikey97 said on 27/Dec/19
Forgot to add that he claims he was 6'4" in the 8th grade and his brother was 6'8" by then.
@Rob Interesting add?
Editor Rob
Forgot to add that he claims he was 6'4" in the 8th grade and his brother was 6'8" by then.
@Rob Interesting add?
Editor RobI'd need to see the exact quotes
Mikey97 said on 27/Dec/19
Fyi, in his new book, he said he weighed 230 pounds coming out of high school. He mentioned how it was slim for his "Six-eight" frame.
Fyi, in his new book, he said he weighed 230 pounds coming out of high school. He mentioned how it was slim for his "Six-eight" frame.
Martin 6'1" said on 27/Dec/19
NCL, They look exactly the same to me there in that footage, before Kane had his huge boots, and before Undertaker had all his surgeries.
NCL, They look exactly the same to me there in that footage, before Kane had his huge boots, and before Undertaker had all his surgeries.
Roderick said on 27/Dec/19
@edwards To me, I think Kane was 6'7" peak height. So in an inch sneaker he probably measured 6'8" at the doctor. In his thick soled boots, he was probably 6'8.5"-6'9". I don't think he ever hit 6'10" in his boots. I feel like they added 2" MAX to his height.
@NCL Kane and Undertaker look identical there. Both around 6'7" give or take a quarter inch.
@edwards To me, I think Kane was 6'7" peak height. So in an inch sneaker he probably measured 6'8" at the doctor. In his thick soled boots, he was probably 6'8.5"-6'9". I don't think he ever hit 6'10" in his boots. I feel like they added 2" MAX to his height.
@NCL Kane and Undertaker look identical there. Both around 6'7" give or take a quarter inch.
NCL said on 27/Dec/19
I found me a gem! Pause at 6:06 Click Here
Merry Christmas and happy New Year everyone!
I found me a gem! Pause at 6:06 Click Here
Merry Christmas and happy New Year everyone!
edwards said on 27/Dec/19
@ roderick
no way he was only 6'8 in shoes.he was 6'8.5/6'9 in normal shoes and maybe 6'10 in monster boots.he was 6'10 in those very thick boots so wwe could billed him 2" more than his boot height at 7 feet.
@ roderick
no way he was only 6'8 in shoes.he was 6'8.5/6'9 in normal shoes and maybe 6'10 in monster boots.he was 6'10 in those very thick boots so wwe could billed him 2" more than his boot height at 7 feet.
Roderick said on 26/Dec/19
I think his 6'8" claim is his morning or shoe height (in his prime). The doctors office probably read him off as 6'8" in shoes and he hasn't bothered to check his height since.
Also Kane was max 6'7.25" peak IMO
I think his 6'8" claim is his morning or shoe height (in his prime). The doctors office probably read him off as 6'8" in shoes and he hasn't bothered to check his height since.
Also Kane was max 6'7.25" peak IMO
Lyle said on 25/Dec/19
I've got Kanes new book for Xmas, he states a few times "6ft8" and when he was teaming up with Bradshaw (JBL) In Germany before WWE that the tag team name translated to "the six-foot-6 team"
I'm sure they'll be more mentions of his height later on
I've got Kanes new book for Xmas, he states a few times "6ft8" and when he was teaming up with Bradshaw (JBL) In Germany before WWE that the tag team name translated to "the six-foot-6 team"
I'm sure they'll be more mentions of his height later on
Riccardo 5'7 said on 25/Dec/19
Kane prime at 6'7.5 is a bit generous. I would give him more 200cm/200.5cm and today 198cm/198.5 even if sometimes he does look shorter than that. If one of the B. O. D. was ever 6'7"25(max) that one was Kane.
Kane prime at 6'7.5 is a bit generous. I would give him more 200cm/200.5cm and today 198cm/198.5 even if sometimes he does look shorter than that. If one of the B. O. D. was ever 6'7"25(max) that one was Kane.
Canson said on 24/Dec/19
@Edwards: agreed. I think 6’7/6’7.25 for Taker prime and 6’7.5 for Kane too. Then 6’5.5-6’6 Taker today 6’6.25 or .5 for Kane
@Edwards: agreed. I think 6’7/6’7.25 for Taker prime and 6’7.5 for Kane too. Then 6’5.5-6’6 Taker today 6’6.25 or .5 for Kane
Christian 6'5 3/8" said on 23/Dec/19
@Edwards
Kane and Taker were the same height at peak IMO, both at 6'7.25"
@Edwards
Kane and Taker were the same height at peak IMO, both at 6'7.25"
Mikey97 said on 22/Dec/19
Masters I've met and he did look around 6'2" give or take half an inch in shoes. Kane looks 6'7.5" there for sure and it's not like he's standing tall or anything.
In my opinion Kane is still 6'6.5" or over. Some of you guys haven't seen him with perfect posture.
Peak: 6'7.75"
Now: 6'6.75" is my guess
Masters I've met and he did look around 6'2" give or take half an inch in shoes. Kane looks 6'7.5" there for sure and it's not like he's standing tall or anything.
In my opinion Kane is still 6'6.5" or over. Some of you guys haven't seen him with perfect posture.
Peak: 6'7.75"
Now: 6'6.75" is my guess
edwards said on 21/Dec/19
@ canson and christian
the more we looks at these guy’s specially undertaker and kane,the more i believe that they are not as tall as most of the people thinks.it looks like taker has shrink 2” from the peak but ofcource i could be wrong.either taker or kane has shrunk a ton especially taker or they weren’t tall as most of us have thought.i say 6’7.25 for a peak taker and 6’7.5 for peak kane.
6’5.75 for undertaker today and 6’6.25 for kane today.max height for them are 6’6 for taker and 6’6.5 for kane but that’s maximum.i say 6’5.75 for taker and 6’6.25 for kane today is likely and believable imho.
@ canson and christian
the more we looks at these guy’s specially undertaker and kane,the more i believe that they are not as tall as most of the people thinks.it looks like taker has shrink 2” from the peak but ofcource i could be wrong.either taker or kane has shrunk a ton especially taker or they weren’t tall as most of us have thought.i say 6’7.25 for a peak taker and 6’7.5 for peak kane.
6’5.75 for undertaker today and 6’6.25 for kane today.max height for them are 6’6 for taker and 6’6.5 for kane but that’s maximum.i say 6’5.75 for taker and 6’6.25 for kane today is likely and believable imho.
Canson said on 21/Dec/19
@Christian and Edwards: the more pics that I see of Kane, the more I’m agreeing with Christian too. I used to think he was still 6’7”ish but not anymore. He looks max 6’6.5 the more I see
@Christian and Edwards: the more pics that I see of Kane, the more I’m agreeing with Christian too. I used to think he was still 6’7”ish but not anymore. He looks max 6’6.5 the more I see
Christian 6'5 3/8" said on 21/Dec/19
@Riccardo
Maybe. I really can't see him losing any more than an inch since his peak. If he's 6'6.25" today (which also happens to be my guess for him), then I can see him at 6'7.25" peak, but no taller.
@Riccardo
Maybe. I really can't see him losing any more than an inch since his peak. If he's 6'6.25" today (which also happens to be my guess for him), then I can see him at 6'7.25" peak, but no taller.
NR said on 20/Dec/19
It’s all in the camera angle. Here’s Kane and Vince in 07. The difference between them is similar but not quite as big as 10 years previous Click Here
It’s all in the camera angle. Here’s Kane and Vince in 07. The difference between them is similar but not quite as big as 10 years previous Click Here
Riccardo 5'7 said on 20/Dec/19
Kane has been easily a 6'7" guy during all his life and now probably lost 0.75 in height is possible for him.
Kane has been easily a 6'7" guy during all his life and now probably lost 0.75 in height is possible for him.
Troy Harrison said on 20/Dec/19
You would be surprised how much posture makes a difference in photos. Am referring to the Kane and Vince photos. But also camera angles as well, of course.
You would be surprised how much posture makes a difference in photos. Am referring to the Kane and Vince photos. But also camera angles as well, of course.
ced said on 19/Dec/19
@Vegas, I know it seems crazy for someone to lose that much height in just 6 years, but here.. Take a look at what I'm talking about.. Vince in 98 comes up to Kane's chin.. In 04, the top of Vince's head is by Kane's eyebrows.. (I know, Kane was leaning on one leg there more but it truly does not make any sense.. How is he THAT MUCH Taller than Vince in 98 and we know he wore lifts at both times)
Look:
Click Here
@Vegas, I know it seems crazy for someone to lose that much height in just 6 years, but here.. Take a look at what I'm talking about.. Vince in 98 comes up to Kane's chin.. In 04, the top of Vince's head is by Kane's eyebrows.. (I know, Kane was leaning on one leg there more but it truly does not make any sense.. How is he THAT MUCH Taller than Vince in 98 and we know he wore lifts at both times)
Look:
Click Here
Canson said on 18/Dec/19
@Vegas: I misunderstood
@Vegas: I misunderstood
Creeper said on 17/Dec/19
In my opinion, I feel like Kane is boosting his bench a bit. I feel like a prime Kane could hit 495 on a good day nothing more.
A 6'8-6'8.5 guy who weighs around 320 is going to be a big strong guy but not a powerlifter.
In my opinion, I feel like Kane is boosting his bench a bit. I feel like a prime Kane could hit 495 on a good day nothing more.
A 6'8-6'8.5 guy who weighs around 320 is going to be a big strong guy but not a powerlifter.
Vegas' said on 17/Dec/19
Just to post correction, I never met Cesaro. I did however see him and Kane in lobby of hotel standing together talking out of gear and it looking less than that photo. I was maybe 25-30 feet away from them though.
Those interview segments they have interviewer often stand barefoot or spread-legged to make wrestler look taller Click Here
Ced are you suggesting Kane list a tin of height between 98 and 2004?
Just to post correction, I never met Cesaro. I did however see him and Kane in lobby of hotel standing together talking out of gear and it looking less than that photo. I was maybe 25-30 feet away from them though.
Those interview segments they have interviewer often stand barefoot or spread-legged to make wrestler look taller Click Here
Ced are you suggesting Kane list a tin of height between 98 and 2004?
Johan 185 cm said on 16/Dec/19
Roderick said on 4/Dec/19
Kane has mentioned multiple times that he benched 525 before when he was younger.
I believe it. He had gigantic triceps.
If thats true then thats truly freakish, my PR is 310 pounds. I consider myself a strong guy as well wtf.
Roderick said on 4/Dec/19
Kane has mentioned multiple times that he benched 525 before when he was younger.
I believe it. He had gigantic triceps.
If thats true then thats truly freakish, my PR is 310 pounds. I consider myself a strong guy as well wtf.
Christian 6'5 3/8 said on 16/Dec/19
@Rob
Do you have a pic with Cesaro standing together?
Editor Rob
@Rob
Do you have a pic with Cesaro standing together?
Editor RobCheck back in 2020 🤞
Roderick said on 16/Dec/19
Does anybody find it interesting that WWE bills Karl Anderson at 6'0.5"?
I feel like the height difference there between Kane and Cesaro is not reality. Kane looks 6'8" there which is impossible
Does anybody find it interesting that WWE bills Karl Anderson at 6'0.5"?
I feel like the height difference there between Kane and Cesaro is not reality. Kane looks 6'8" there which is impossible
Canson said on 15/Dec/19
@Christian: Vegas also met Cesaro and said he’s 6’3” so I could believe with the combination of the pictures and that that 6’3 is closer to reality than 6’3.5. It’s possible when Ced met him that there was a footwear advantage or that Ced is less than that in the afternoon
@Christian: Vegas also met Cesaro and said he’s 6’3” so I could believe with the combination of the pictures and that that 6’3 is closer to reality than 6’3.5. It’s possible when Ced met him that there was a footwear advantage or that Ced is less than that in the afternoon
Canson said on 15/Dec/19
@Rob and Christian: Cesaro could be 6’2.75” if Kane is 6’6.75. That’s s solid 4” between them pending footwear of course. That’s the only reason I say could be. I agree with Christian that Cesaro is max 6’3”. A weak 6’3” isn’t completely out of the question either based on the pic
@Rob and Christian: Cesaro could be 6’2.75” if Kane is 6’6.75. That’s s solid 4” between them pending footwear of course. That’s the only reason I say could be. I agree with Christian that Cesaro is max 6’3”. A weak 6’3” isn’t completely out of the question either based on the pic
TheBat said on 15/Dec/19
Good downgrade for Kane. I thinks he's definitely about this listing as of today.
Good downgrade for Kane. I thinks he's definitely about this listing as of today.
ced said on 14/Dec/19
Here is a comparison of Kevin Nash and Kane on the ring apron, (I tried to crop both pohtos as best as I can to get them to where the top rope is the same in both and they are comparable to each other in size as best as I can but if anything, we can at least get an idea as to how tall they both are from the top rope). What do you guys think? Whose is taller? Nash, or Kane in his lifts?
Click Here
Here is a comparison of Kevin Nash and Kane on the ring apron, (I tried to crop both pohtos as best as I can to get them to where the top rope is the same in both and they are comparable to each other in size as best as I can but if anything, we can at least get an idea as to how tall they both are from the top rope). What do you guys think? Whose is taller? Nash, or Kane in his lifts?
Click Here
ced said on 14/Dec/19
Rob, just a correction. Cesaro is 6'3.5. I also stood next to him (i was an extra for a WWE Raw taping in September of 2014), I am 6'4. Had Cesaro by .5 inches nothing more. Had Randy Orton by .25 inches (he's 6'3.75)
Editor Rob
Rob, just a correction. Cesaro is 6'3.5. I also stood next to him (i was an extra for a WWE Raw taping in September of 2014), I am 6'4. Had Cesaro by .5 inches nothing more. Had Randy Orton by .25 inches (he's 6'3.75)
Editor Robas I mentioned in previous comment, that is the mark he's given, but I'm just saying Kane in that moment makes him look at most 6ft 3.
James B said on 14/Dec/19
Rob do you think cesaro is under 6’3.5?
Editor Rob
Rob do you think cesaro is under 6’3.5?
Editor RobI wouldn't give him 6ft 3 flat, he's been on 6ft 3.5 and in person when I shook the guy's hand he looked 6ft 3 range, although had less footwear than myself, so I have no problem seeing him above 6ft 3 flat.
Christian 6'5 3/8" said on 14/Dec/19
@NR
I've always thought that Cesaro wasn't over 6'3", rather than his listed 6'3.5"
@NR
I've always thought that Cesaro wasn't over 6'3", rather than his listed 6'3.5"
NR said on 12/Dec/19
Kane and Cesaro in dress shoes a couple years ago. 4 inches difference. So how tall is Cesaro? Click Here
Editor Rob
Kane and Cesaro in dress shoes a couple years ago. 4 inches difference. So how tall is Cesaro? Click Here
Editor RobCan make cesaro at most 6ft 3 there.
edwards said on 12/Dec/19
@ roderick
idk about now but when editer rob met henry,he was comfortably over 6’1 and maybe flat 6’2.today he could be 6’1 range tho,maybe like 6’1.5
@ roderick
idk about now but when editer rob met henry,he was comfortably over 6’1 and maybe flat 6’2.today he could be 6’1 range tho,maybe like 6’1.5
Canson said on 12/Dec/19
@Christian: I think taking everything in as a whole with the pictures I think the same a strong 6’6 or a very weak 6’7” 6’6.5 like you mentioned 199 cm range. 6’5 though is still too low for him
@Christian: I think taking everything in as a whole with the pictures I think the same a strong 6’6 or a very weak 6’7” 6’6.5 like you mentioned 199 cm range. 6’5 though is still too low for him
edwards said on 11/Dec/19
@ christian
yes agreed on what you said.i agree and i have to add that even 6’6.75 looks high for kane currently if you ask me.6’6.5 would be better listing.same goes to undertaker.he is max 6’6 with the chance of being fraction or shy under 6’6 for taker today is likely.i feel kane has chance of measuring 6’6.5 and taker 6’6 but i personally think undertaker is 6’5.75 and kane 6’6.25 after looking enough of both guy’s.
@ christian
yes agreed on what you said.i agree and i have to add that even 6’6.75 looks high for kane currently if you ask me.6’6.5 would be better listing.same goes to undertaker.he is max 6’6 with the chance of being fraction or shy under 6’6 for taker today is likely.i feel kane has chance of measuring 6’6.5 and taker 6’6 but i personally think undertaker is 6’5.75 and kane 6’6.25 after looking enough of both guy’s.
ced said on 11/Dec/19
Kevin Nash - McMahon:
Click Here
Now compare to previous post of Kane and McMahon
Kevin Nash - McMahon:
Click Here
Now compare to previous post of Kane and McMahon
ced said on 11/Dec/19
Something I came across that is really interesting. I think Kane has lost tremendous height since his peak.
In 1998, there was an in ring segment with Kane and Vince McMahon when Kane first spoke with his voice box. There was a difference of height between him and McMahon that looked like the same difference of height between Kevin Nash and McMahon in 1995. (There looked to have been a 7-8 inch difference. If McMahon was 6'1.5, Kane had to have been 6'9.5 in his lifts here, meaning without them, he was 6'7.75-6'8.
Then, 2004 - There was a segment between McMahon and Kane when Undertaker was coming back. Kane interupted McMahon (when he was wearing a towel on his head), and I don't know if it was due to Kane's posture, but he was hunched as if almost on purpose to try to be face to face with McMahon, but man, he looked to have McMahon by only about 5 inches.
Something I came across that is really interesting. I think Kane has lost tremendous height since his peak.
In 1998, there was an in ring segment with Kane and Vince McMahon when Kane first spoke with his voice box. There was a difference of height between him and McMahon that looked like the same difference of height between Kevin Nash and McMahon in 1995. (There looked to have been a 7-8 inch difference. If McMahon was 6'1.5, Kane had to have been 6'9.5 in his lifts here, meaning without them, he was 6'7.75-6'8.
Then, 2004 - There was a segment between McMahon and Kane when Undertaker was coming back. Kane interupted McMahon (when he was wearing a towel on his head), and I don't know if it was due to Kane's posture, but he was hunched as if almost on purpose to try to be face to face with McMahon, but man, he looked to have McMahon by only about 5 inches.
Johnny John said on 11/Dec/19
He was & still is today as a 50 something plus a very big guy. If he said about 6'8 & 300lbs, then a little under 6'8 bare feet is close enough to called 6'8.
He was & still is today as a 50 something plus a very big guy. If he said about 6'8 & 300lbs, then a little under 6'8 bare feet is close enough to called 6'8.
Jim Garrett said on 10/Dec/19
If Kane also stood erect, which he hardly does, I can see still see him at 6’7 there.
If Kane also stood erect, which he hardly does, I can see still see him at 6’7 there.
Christian 6'5 3/8" said on 9/Dec/19
Didn't notice it until now, but Kane's now lowered to 6'6.75". I think he's max 6'6.5" though, but it's a better listing than 6'7" nevertheless.
Didn't notice it until now, but Kane's now lowered to 6'6.75". I think he's max 6'6.5" though, but it's a better listing than 6'7" nevertheless.
Mikey97 said on 9/Dec/19
Kane w/ Mark Henry this weekend Click Here
So Henry I met (got photos, you can check them out on his page) and I thought he looked 6'1"-6'1.5", so let's just say 6'1.5" since he's standing pretty erect, and might even be on a little tippy toe there.
Kane looks around 5 inches taller to me, which places Kane at 6'6.5", but just barely.
It's becoming more and more obvious however that he's not 6'7".
Lowering him from 6'7" to 6'6.75" was a great move.
I personally put him in the 6'6.5"-6'6.75" range
Kane w/ Mark Henry this weekend Click Here
So Henry I met (got photos, you can check them out on his page) and I thought he looked 6'1"-6'1.5", so let's just say 6'1.5" since he's standing pretty erect, and might even be on a little tippy toe there.
Kane looks around 5 inches taller to me, which places Kane at 6'6.5", but just barely.
It's becoming more and more obvious however that he's not 6'7".
Lowering him from 6'7" to 6'6.75" was a great move.
I personally put him in the 6'6.5"-6'6.75" range
Tammy Saachs said on 8/Dec/19
There is a new pic of Kane standing next to Mark Henry who is listed at 6’2. I am not sure how to post a picture here. Look up Glen Jacobs On Instagram. Anyways point is, Kane still looks every bit of 6’7 there.
There is a new pic of Kane standing next to Mark Henry who is listed at 6’2. I am not sure how to post a picture here. Look up Glen Jacobs On Instagram. Anyways point is, Kane still looks every bit of 6’7 there.
Xpac99 said on 8/Dec/19
Click Here
How tall is tyson tomko in your opinion? I think he’s about the same range of randy orton
Editor Rob
Click Here
How tall is tyson tomko in your opinion? I think he’s about the same range of randy orton
Editor RobHe might be in that range, never as tall as 6ft 5-6 though
Mikey97 said on 7/Dec/19
I weigh 150 and I can squat 340. But remember Kane supposedly has never had great knees so squatting was probably never his favorite. In bench Kane for sure beats all of us.
Kane height loss is kinda exaggerated. He was always in that 6'7" range give or take half an inch. 6'8" isn't impossible but kind of unlikely.
Kane is 6'6.5" or 6'6.75" today, but probably not 6'7".
I weigh 150 and I can squat 340. But remember Kane supposedly has never had great knees so squatting was probably never his favorite. In bench Kane for sure beats all of us.
Kane height loss is kinda exaggerated. He was always in that 6'7" range give or take half an inch. 6'8" isn't impossible but kind of unlikely.
Kane is 6'6.5" or 6'6.75" today, but probably not 6'7".
edwards said on 6/Dec/19
i personally feel “almost 6’8 “is possible for a peak kane.
i personally feel “almost 6’8 “is possible for a peak kane.
Emre T?rk said on 5/Dec/19
Kane peak height 203 cm
Kane peak height 203 cm
Roderick said on 5/Dec/19
From a comment I saw on YouTube. I actually lost it so I tried to copy it as best as I could.
----------------------
I used to workout with Glenn in college before he hurt his knee and quit football. He was one of the biggest, strongest dudes on the team for sure. He actually had legit long hair, and he used to play basketball before he got too heavy. He was actually 300-310 pounds, and he was benching 315 on the incline for reps like nothing. He was remarkable.
He was a very strong dude. He had big legs, but he had a bad squat for some reason, like really bad. I think he could hit like somewhere in the low 400s, which is bad for his size. Even in college when I weighed 250 I could hit 525 on squat for 2 reps.
I think, he measured 6'5 at 19. He did look noticeably taller years later when he started wrestling. He probably was 6'7-6'9.
From a comment I saw on YouTube. I actually lost it so I tried to copy it as best as I could.
----------------------
I used to workout with Glenn in college before he hurt his knee and quit football. He was one of the biggest, strongest dudes on the team for sure. He actually had legit long hair, and he used to play basketball before he got too heavy. He was actually 300-310 pounds, and he was benching 315 on the incline for reps like nothing. He was remarkable.
He was a very strong dude. He had big legs, but he had a bad squat for some reason, like really bad. I think he could hit like somewhere in the low 400s, which is bad for his size. Even in college when I weighed 250 I could hit 525 on squat for 2 reps.
I think, he measured 6'5 at 19. He did look noticeably taller years later when he started wrestling. He probably was 6'7-6'9.
Creeper said on 4/Dec/19
I feel like when he stands with good posture he can still look 6'7. He certainly looked 6'7 with Edge back in 2012. Even during his run with the authority he looked 6'7 in dress shoes next to Randy Orton, Big Show, Rollins, etc.
It's possible he's dropped a quarter since and is now 6'6.75, but you never know if he still hits 6'7 when he measures against a wall, nice posture with head titled back.
6'6 is too low, forget 6'5 range
Personally i thought the 6'7 listing was fine
I feel like when he stands with good posture he can still look 6'7. He certainly looked 6'7 with Edge back in 2012. Even during his run with the authority he looked 6'7 in dress shoes next to Randy Orton, Big Show, Rollins, etc.
It's possible he's dropped a quarter since and is now 6'6.75, but you never know if he still hits 6'7 when he measures against a wall, nice posture with head titled back.
6'6 is too low, forget 6'5 range
Personally i thought the 6'7 listing was fine
Roderick said on 4/Dec/19
Kane has mentioned multiple times that he benched 525 before when he was younger.
I believe it. He had gigantic triceps.
Kane has mentioned multiple times that he benched 525 before when he was younger.
I believe it. He had gigantic triceps.
ced said on 3/Dec/19
Watching Monday Night Raw last night, Drew McIntyre and Randy Orton staredown. I know for a fact that Randy is not taller than 6'3.75. (I am 6'4, and had Randy by .25 inches when we stood next to each other), Drew did not look taller than Rnady at all (on TV, the guy looks 6'4.75 but he clearly is not).
Judging from these 2 and their staredowns with Kane, I think Kane is 6'6 today with a peak height of 6'7.25.
Undertaker - Peak: 6'6.75 | Now: 6'5.75.
Sycho Sid - Peak: 6'6.75 | Now: 6'5.5.
Kevin Nash - Peak: 6'9 | Now: 6'7.25
Watching Monday Night Raw last night, Drew McIntyre and Randy Orton staredown. I know for a fact that Randy is not taller than 6'3.75. (I am 6'4, and had Randy by .25 inches when we stood next to each other), Drew did not look taller than Rnady at all (on TV, the guy looks 6'4.75 but he clearly is not).
Judging from these 2 and their staredowns with Kane, I think Kane is 6'6 today with a peak height of 6'7.25.
Undertaker - Peak: 6'6.75 | Now: 6'5.75.
Sycho Sid - Peak: 6'6.75 | Now: 6'5.5.
Kevin Nash - Peak: 6'9 | Now: 6'7.25
dewie 5ft9 175cm said on 3/Dec/19
Peak kane 202cm taker 201cm current height kane 200cm taker 199cm.
Peak kane 202cm taker 201cm current height kane 200cm taker 199cm.
Chris K said on 2/Dec/19
That’s just Lilian Garcia making a mistake. She’s done it before. She once accidentally announced him as 426lbs. I love Lilian
That’s just Lilian Garcia making a mistake. She’s done it before. She once accidentally announced him as 426lbs. I love Lilian
Roderick said on 2/Dec/19
To be honest, he's been looking very physically tall recently. While I see believe he's 6'6", I can easily see how people can mistake him for 6'7" in person.
To be honest, he's been looking very physically tall recently. While I see believe he's 6'6", I can easily see how people can mistake him for 6'7" in person.
Canson said on 1/Dec/19
@Rob: I see you lowered him. Wasn’t expecting that.
@Rob: I see you lowered him. Wasn’t expecting that.
Roderick said on 1/Dec/19
Weird how Kane is announced at 267lb here Click Here
Is it possible maybe Kane weighed in earlier that night just to check his weight and somebody told the announcer that's what she needed to call out? Weird
Weird how Kane is announced at 267lb here Click Here
Is it possible maybe Kane weighed in earlier that night just to check his weight and somebody told the announcer that's what she needed to call out? Weird
Mikey97 said on 29/Nov/19
I just watched the first See No Evil which is a horror movie with Kane playing the main slasher and Kane looked 7 inches taller than 6 foot Luke Pegler for sure. Kane was probably a 6'7" guy in the 2000s. Maybe close to 6'8" in his 20s
I just watched the first See No Evil which is a horror movie with Kane playing the main slasher and Kane looked 7 inches taller than 6 foot Luke Pegler for sure. Kane was probably a 6'7" guy in the 2000s. Maybe close to 6'8" in his 20s
Chris Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 29/Nov/19
@Chris Nehm Nathan Jones was never 6'10 maybe not even a proper 6'9 peak if any injuiry makes him shorter now. Jones is close to 6'8 1/2 looks it with 6'0 1/2 Michael Jai White nothing up. 6'10 claim was always with a standard shoes(1") or military boots heels (1.5") height.
@Chris Nehm Nathan Jones was never 6'10 maybe not even a proper 6'9 peak if any injuiry makes him shorter now. Jones is close to 6'8 1/2 looks it with 6'0 1/2 Michael Jai White nothing up. 6'10 claim was always with a standard shoes(1") or military boots heels (1.5") height.
Mikey97 said on 28/Nov/19
He isn't 6'7" because he looked around the same height as Braun Strowman in their photo with 6'9" Big Show last year, and we all know Strowman is 6'6.25"-6'6.5" range.
Kane is 6'6.5"
He isn't 6'7" because he looked around the same height as Braun Strowman in their photo with 6'9" Big Show last year, and we all know Strowman is 6'6.25"-6'6.5" range.
Kane is 6'6.5"
Chris Nehm said on 27/Nov/19
Good pic there! If Nathan Jones stood straight I can see about 3 inches separating them. I think Kane is still 6’7
Good pic there! If Nathan Jones stood straight I can see about 3 inches separating them. I think Kane is still 6’7
Roderick said on 27/Nov/19
Rob, there is no way Kane can be 6'6.75" and Nathan Jones can be 6'10" in that pic.... just no way.
I think Kane is max 6'6" which makes Jones max 6'8" in that pic. Def not 6'10"
Rob, there is no way Kane can be 6'6.75" and Nathan Jones can be 6'10" in that pic.... just no way.
I think Kane is max 6'6" which makes Jones max 6'8" in that pic. Def not 6'10"
edwards said on 27/Nov/19
i feel peak kane is similar and very awfully closed with big cass who is billied as 7 feet but is 6'8 flat in really.a peak kane would has pushed almost 6'8 at peak in a good day.
i feel peak kane is similar and very awfully closed with big cass who is billied as 7 feet but is 6'8 flat in really.a peak kane would has pushed almost 6'8 at peak in a good day.
Kane Fan said on 26/Nov/19
Where's sotiris now?
Where's sotiris now?
FMExTREME said on 26/Nov/19
Yes Chris Junior Nathan Jones at 6’10 is a joke considering he’s shorter than Nash who’s listed at 6’9, Jones is 6’7.5 at the very most or Nash is 6’11 and Kane 6’9.
Yes Chris Junior Nathan Jones at 6’10 is a joke considering he’s shorter than Nash who’s listed at 6’9, Jones is 6’7.5 at the very most or Nash is 6’11 and Kane 6’9.
Vegas' said on 24/Nov/19
He isn't as low as 6'5.5 because he looked over 6'6 in dress-shoes with Ron Killings just a few weeks ago.
He isn't as low as 6'5.5 because he looked over 6'6 in dress-shoes with Ron Killings just a few weeks ago.
Roderick said on 23/Nov/19
I feel like these pages are dying... most arguments seem settled. I haven't seen a lot of familiar posters comment in awhile maybe because the arguments seemed repetitive and there is no point of posting especially when you will never convince someone.
My final thoughts are Kane is 6'6" today and 6'7" peak. Pinning him at 6'6" to play it safe because if I say 6'5.5" that is possible but he still looks 6'6" a lot of the time with good posture.
At his peak, he did look 6'8" range a lot ESPECIALLY during like the late 98/early 99 era, but you can't forgot those thick-soled boots he wore with his attire. I can see easily see why people pegged him closer to 6'8", and if I'm wrong and he really didn't get much of a boost from his boots, then maybe he really was a 6'7.5"-6'7.75" guy that could maybe push 6'8" on a good day, but my first gut instinct makes much more sense IMO, and I also don't think he lost that much height. So 6'7" flat is accurate enough to me.
Kudos, CH
I feel like these pages are dying... most arguments seem settled. I haven't seen a lot of familiar posters comment in awhile maybe because the arguments seemed repetitive and there is no point of posting especially when you will never convince someone.
My final thoughts are Kane is 6'6" today and 6'7" peak. Pinning him at 6'6" to play it safe because if I say 6'5.5" that is possible but he still looks 6'6" a lot of the time with good posture.
At his peak, he did look 6'8" range a lot ESPECIALLY during like the late 98/early 99 era, but you can't forgot those thick-soled boots he wore with his attire. I can see easily see why people pegged him closer to 6'8", and if I'm wrong and he really didn't get much of a boost from his boots, then maybe he really was a 6'7.5"-6'7.75" guy that could maybe push 6'8" on a good day, but my first gut instinct makes much more sense IMO, and I also don't think he lost that much height. So 6'7" flat is accurate enough to me.
Kudos, CH
Johan 185 cm said on 23/Nov/19
I have him today at 6'6.5", he was barely taller than taker at the charity event this year. 6'7.5" max peak.
I have him today at 6'6.5", he was barely taller than taker at the charity event this year. 6'7.5" max peak.
Mikey97 said on 20/Nov/19
Not lower than 6'6.5"
Not lower than 6'6.5"
Chris Ne said on 18/Nov/19
Shrivelling old fella.
He will always be the 6’8 monster to me 😁
Shrivelling old fella.
He will always be the 6’8 monster to me 😁
Roderick said on 17/Nov/19
Thank you Rob!!
I agree with you that I also seen enough to put Kane in 6'6" range. And yes it's a big website and I understand how its hard to keep track of everybody especially the tall guys.
Thank you Rob!!
I agree with you that I also seen enough to put Kane in 6'6" range. And yes it's a big website and I understand how its hard to keep track of everybody especially the tall guys.
Xpac99 said on 16/Nov/19
6ft6 3/4 seems reasonible for kane today. He still taller than strowman in my opinion but not half an inch taller
6ft6 3/4 seems reasonible for kane today. He still taller than strowman in my opinion but not half an inch taller
Roderick said on 16/Nov/19
@Rob I think all of us can agree that lowering Kane to 6'6" range is a good move that would make lots of posters happy.
Editor Rob
@Rob I think all of us can agree that lowering Kane to 6'6" range is a good move that would make lots of posters happy.
Editor RobUltimately it's whether I feel the guess is fair (from what I've seen) - remember I may not have seen enough of somebody to change a listing, but over time I see more and more and my opinion could change and I feel another listing might be nearer.
The more entries you have in a database, and with time (and people shrinking) it can become time-consuming trying to keep on top of everything ;)
Today I've probably seen enough to class Kane as a bit shy of 6ft 7, just how much exactly...
The more entries you have in a database, and with time (and people shrinking) it can become time-consuming trying to keep on top of everything ;)
Today I've probably seen enough to class Kane as a bit shy of 6ft 7, just how much exactly...
Xpac99 said on 15/Nov/19
Editor Rob
Kane still seems somewhere in 6ft 6 range, though maybe not 6ft 7
You said that in randy orton’s page
Editor Rob
Editor Rob
Kane still seems somewhere in 6ft 6 range, though maybe not 6ft 7
You said that in randy orton’s page
Editor RobYes, possible now weak 6ft 7, I haven't decided to put his current under 6ft 7 yet though.
Public Enemy said on 15/Nov/19
Peak 6’7.5
Current 6’6.75
Peak 6’7.5
Current 6’6.75
Pierre said on 14/Nov/19
FMExTREME said on 13/Nov/19
Come on peak Kane was at least in the high 6’7 range, maybe 202cm, all this talk of him being barely 6’6 I don’t buy, even today he is at least 6’7 flat, in all the shots next to Strowman Kane looked taller apart from the first time they were face to face, maybe the ring was slightly tilted or Strowman wearing extreme lifts but all other times Kane looked like he had the edge sometimes an inch or more, so if Kane is only 6’6 flat then Strowman is what? 6’5? High makes the Undertaker 6’4 with change? Orton 6’2 and half? Rollins 6’0? Triple H 5’11 1/2?
Reality is Kane is still 6’7 today and maybe even 6’8 in his prime, Undertaker 6’6 today and Strowman 6’6 1/2, Fury 6’7 1/4, Big Show 6’9 1/2 with a peak of 6’11 1/2.
@FMExTREME = Here is Undertaker next to Kane = Click Here = Kane looks max the same height as undertaker here,probably a bit under.
Here is Tyson Fury next to Magic Johnson 6"7.5' = Click Here Click Here =Tyson never looks 6"7' range here
Braun Strowman /Tyson Fury = Click Here
Click Here = Kane /Brown Strauman when probably around the same heels
FMExTREME said on 13/Nov/19
Come on peak Kane was at least in the high 6’7 range, maybe 202cm, all this talk of him being barely 6’6 I don’t buy, even today he is at least 6’7 flat, in all the shots next to Strowman Kane looked taller apart from the first time they were face to face, maybe the ring was slightly tilted or Strowman wearing extreme lifts but all other times Kane looked like he had the edge sometimes an inch or more, so if Kane is only 6’6 flat then Strowman is what? 6’5? High makes the Undertaker 6’4 with change? Orton 6’2 and half? Rollins 6’0? Triple H 5’11 1/2?
Reality is Kane is still 6’7 today and maybe even 6’8 in his prime, Undertaker 6’6 today and Strowman 6’6 1/2, Fury 6’7 1/4, Big Show 6’9 1/2 with a peak of 6’11 1/2.
@FMExTREME = Here is Undertaker next to Kane = Click Here = Kane looks max the same height as undertaker here,probably a bit under.
Here is Tyson Fury next to Magic Johnson 6"7.5' = Click Here Click Here =Tyson never looks 6"7' range here
Braun Strowman /Tyson Fury = Click Here
Click Here = Kane /Brown Strauman when probably around the same heels
Carls110 said on 14/Nov/19
6'6.5 MAX Right now, some people are saying that Undertaker is 6'5.5 or Even 6'5 LOL,
And at the same time there are people saying that Kane is still 6'7 or over LOL,
Undertaker 6'6-6'6.25 MAX, Kane 6'6.25-6'6.5 MAX
6'6.5 MAX Right now, some people are saying that Undertaker is 6'5.5 or Even 6'5 LOL,
And at the same time there are people saying that Kane is still 6'7 or over LOL,
Undertaker 6'6-6'6.25 MAX, Kane 6'6.25-6'6.5 MAX
FMExTREME said on 13/Nov/19
Come on peak Kane was at least in the high 6’7 range, maybe 202cm, all this talk of him being barely 6’6 I don’t buy, even today he is at least 6’7 flat, in all the shots next to Strowman Kane looked taller apart from the first time they were face to face, maybe the ring was slightly tilted or Strowman wearing extreme lifts but all other times Kane looked like he had the edge sometimes an inch or more, so if Kane is only 6’6 flat then Strowman is what? 6’5? High makes the Undertaker 6’4 with change? Orton 6’2 and half? Rollins 6’0? Triple H 5’11 1/2?
Reality is Kane is still 6’7 today and maybe even 6’8 in his prime, Undertaker 6’6 today and Strowman 6’6 1/2, Fury 6’7 1/4, Big Show 6’9 1/2 with a peak of 6’11 1/2.
Come on peak Kane was at least in the high 6’7 range, maybe 202cm, all this talk of him being barely 6’6 I don’t buy, even today he is at least 6’7 flat, in all the shots next to Strowman Kane looked taller apart from the first time they were face to face, maybe the ring was slightly tilted or Strowman wearing extreme lifts but all other times Kane looked like he had the edge sometimes an inch or more, so if Kane is only 6’6 flat then Strowman is what? 6’5? High makes the Undertaker 6’4 with change? Orton 6’2 and half? Rollins 6’0? Triple H 5’11 1/2?
Reality is Kane is still 6’7 today and maybe even 6’8 in his prime, Undertaker 6’6 today and Strowman 6’6 1/2, Fury 6’7 1/4, Big Show 6’9 1/2 with a peak of 6’11 1/2.
ced said on 13/Nov/19
@ Roderick, yes, he has wore hige boots all of his career, but, i truly bekieve the man was 6’7.25 - 6’7.5 in his peak height.
There are several pictures on line when he was unmasked as Kane from 98-99, and the man looks every bit of that height outside his ring gear. (If you go on Youtube and type in “Kane with long hair unmasked” the guy was a tower.
Undertaker - I think he was 6’6.75 at his peak, and today he’s at 6’5.5-.75
Refer to Undertaker Vs Isaac Yankem when Kane wore flat boots (and according to Bruce Prichard, Taker did wear internal lifts), Glen still had him by .5 inches.
Today i see Kane at 6’6 - 6’6.25.
Kane with his huge lifts was about 6’9.25
@ Roderick, yes, he has wore hige boots all of his career, but, i truly bekieve the man was 6’7.25 - 6’7.5 in his peak height.
There are several pictures on line when he was unmasked as Kane from 98-99, and the man looks every bit of that height outside his ring gear. (If you go on Youtube and type in “Kane with long hair unmasked” the guy was a tower.
Undertaker - I think he was 6’6.75 at his peak, and today he’s at 6’5.5-.75
Refer to Undertaker Vs Isaac Yankem when Kane wore flat boots (and according to Bruce Prichard, Taker did wear internal lifts), Glen still had him by .5 inches.
Today i see Kane at 6’6 - 6’6.25.
Kane with his huge lifts was about 6’9.25
Kane Fan said on 13/Nov/19
Josue Still more than 5 inches there and kane wasnt standing straight
Josue Still more than 5 inches there and kane wasnt standing straight
Mikey97 said on 12/Nov/19
I think Kane is still 6'6.5". But I do agree that 6'7" is too high.
I think Kane is still 6'6.5". But I do agree that 6'7" is too high.
Riccardo 5'7" said on 11/Nov/19
Roderick
Many people don't want to admit that hey are influenced by the fact that for all his career he wore big boots, but very big. This gave a wrong perception of his real height.
Even to me, because I thought in the past he was easily 6'9".
Roderick
Many people don't want to admit that hey are influenced by the fact that for all his career he wore big boots, but very big. This gave a wrong perception of his real height.
Even to me, because I thought in the past he was easily 6'9".
tony t. said on 11/Nov/19
When Kane took his mask off he turned into Aristotle Nostradamus "Bull" Shannon from Night Court.
When Kane took his mask off he turned into Aristotle Nostradamus "Bull" Shannon from Night Court.
Tarinator 6'1.5" or 187 cm said on 11/Nov/19
I highly doubt he was anything under 6’8.25” in his prime. Looked only 3.5” shorter than Big Show and 4.5” inches shorter than Khali. He was probably only taller than the Undertaker by 0.5”. I doubt that he is much shorter than Matt Morgan. I could only see half an inch between the two in the Royal Rumble. Seth Rollins looked 6-7” shorter than Kane. Some could argue 5-6” but I highly doubt Kane is shorter than 6’7.5” now. Maybe he would have been 6’8” in the mid to late 2000s. But 6’7” is too short for him when he is clearly at least half an inch taller than that.
I highly doubt he was anything under 6’8.25” in his prime. Looked only 3.5” shorter than Big Show and 4.5” inches shorter than Khali. He was probably only taller than the Undertaker by 0.5”. I doubt that he is much shorter than Matt Morgan. I could only see half an inch between the two in the Royal Rumble. Seth Rollins looked 6-7” shorter than Kane. Some could argue 5-6” but I highly doubt Kane is shorter than 6’7.5” now. Maybe he would have been 6’8” in the mid to late 2000s. But 6’7” is too short for him when he is clearly at least half an inch taller than that.
James B said on 10/Nov/19
Kane looks 6’6 tops next too Braun strowman
Kane looks 6’6 tops next too Braun strowman
Roderick said on 10/Nov/19
@Riccardo Dude I completely agree. There is NO solid evidence of this guy looking 6'7" now. Every potential "evidence" that proves Kane is still 6'7" is usually very sloppy or very favored towards Kane.
People ignore the 99% of the pictures where Kane looks obviously max 6'6".
I don't get it either
@Riccardo Dude I completely agree. There is NO solid evidence of this guy looking 6'7" now. Every potential "evidence" that proves Kane is still 6'7" is usually very sloppy or very favored towards Kane.
People ignore the 99% of the pictures where Kane looks obviously max 6'6".
I don't get it either
Pierre said on 10/Nov/19
Click Here Click Here = here is how tall looks Kane next to Braun Strowman
Click Here = here is how tall looks Braun next to Big Show from 1.35 to 2:40
Click Here = here is how tall looks Big Show next to Shaquille(listed 7"0.25' here) when Big Show isn't wearing catch shoes
Click Here Click Here = here is how tall looks Kane next to Braun Strowman
Click Here = here is how tall looks Braun next to Big Show from 1.35 to 2:40
Click Here = here is how tall looks Big Show next to Shaquille(listed 7"0.25' here) when Big Show isn't wearing catch shoes
Timothy Mohammad said on 9/Nov/19
If Kane stood stiffly straight, with his head held as high as he could, he would be 6’7, maybe even a little over.
If Kane stood stiffly straight, with his head held as high as he could, he would be 6’7, maybe even a little over.
Riccardo 5'7" said on 9/Nov/19
I don't completely get why many here, probably even Rob, in the doubts prefere to give half inch more rather than half inch less...
I mean, undertaker looks and probably is barely above 6'5" but since the moment that it's not sure you give him 6'6" more than 6'5.5.
Kane looks clearly not above 6'6" 99% of the times if not 100%, but lets list him 6'7" in the doubt...
I don't get it. Should be the opposite maybe.
Here on this site there are 0 proves, 0, that Kane is 6'7" today. Just 0.
I want that someone show me why these guys are supposed to be that tall. I wait :)
I don't completely get why many here, probably even Rob, in the doubts prefere to give half inch more rather than half inch less...
I mean, undertaker looks and probably is barely above 6'5" but since the moment that it's not sure you give him 6'6" more than 6'5.5.
Kane looks clearly not above 6'6" 99% of the times if not 100%, but lets list him 6'7" in the doubt...
I don't get it. Should be the opposite maybe.
Here on this site there are 0 proves, 0, that Kane is 6'7" today. Just 0.
I want that someone show me why these guys are supposed to be that tall. I wait :)
viper said on 9/Nov/19
Kane is probably bang on 6-6
Kane is probably bang on 6-6
Roderick said on 8/Nov/19
@Chris Nope. I have been guessed at 6'3" before, although it's common for me to get guessed at 6'0" too.
@Viper Maybe a month back I'd guess, you said 6'5" range for Kane is too low, and said he was minimum 6'6". You also insist he is max 6'6". Are you saying the only possible height for Kane is 6'6"?
My personal estimation is 6'6" max/6'5.5", and 6'7" peak with a slim chance of 6'7.25". How tall do you think a peak Kane was?
@Chris Nope. I have been guessed at 6'3" before, although it's common for me to get guessed at 6'0" too.
@Viper Maybe a month back I'd guess, you said 6'5" range for Kane is too low, and said he was minimum 6'6". You also insist he is max 6'6". Are you saying the only possible height for Kane is 6'6"?
My personal estimation is 6'6" max/6'5.5", and 6'7" peak with a slim chance of 6'7.25". How tall do you think a peak Kane was?
Roderick said on 5/Nov/19
I put a story on here but I guess it didn't go through.
I said it was a girl who was 4'10" I guess and she guessed me at 6'3".
Also, as far as the 6'5" guys at the liquor store, they weren't screwing with me. I asked, "man, how tall are you guys?" and the black guy said "I'm 6'5", you're what like 6'5" too?" And the white guy said, "yeah".
They were friends
I put a story on here but I guess it didn't go through.
I said it was a girl who was 4'10" I guess and she guessed me at 6'3".
Also, as far as the 6'5" guys at the liquor store, they weren't screwing with me. I asked, "man, how tall are you guys?" and the black guy said "I'm 6'5", you're what like 6'5" too?" And the white guy said, "yeah".
They were friends
Chris Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 5/Nov/19
@Roderick You mean 6'0? 6'3 is way too high. lol
@Roderick You mean 6'0? 6'3 is way too high. lol
Roderick said on 4/Nov/19
@Riccardo Yeah, I used to work as a personal trainer at a gym and I was coaching this woman who was 4'10" range I'd guess, and while I don't remember the conversation entirely, she said, "You're what, like 6'3"?.
Was totally blown by it
@Riccardo Yeah, I used to work as a personal trainer at a gym and I was coaching this woman who was 4'10" range I'd guess, and while I don't remember the conversation entirely, she said, "You're what, like 6'3"?.
Was totally blown by it
viper said on 3/Nov/19
I'm 6-3. I don't get guessed anything crazy unless it's by really short girls.
They could have been screwing with you and were really 6-6
I'm 6-3. I don't get guessed anything crazy unless it's by really short girls.
They could have been screwing with you and were really 6-6
Canson said on 3/Nov/19
@Viper: 6’6.5 for Fury is too low. Minimum 6’7 better chance 6’7.25” or so
@Viper: 6’6.5 for Fury is too low. Minimum 6’7 better chance 6’7.25” or so
Riccardo 5'7" said on 2/Nov/19
Roderick @
6'3"?!lol
Roderick @
6'3"?!lol
Roderick said on 1/Nov/19
I was in line at a liquor store the other day and these two guys in front of me looked huge and I swear I thought they were 6'7" minimum, so I asked and they each responded with 6'5"...
I'm 5'10" which isn't that tall but just goes to show the accuracy of guessing tall peoples heights. I would have totally believed the white guy if he said 6'8"....
@Christian @Canson @Ced @Sotiris @Viper
You guys are all 6'4" and 6'7" guys, right? What's the craziest anybody has estimated you guys at?
For me, as a 5'10" guy, it was 6'3".
I was in line at a liquor store the other day and these two guys in front of me looked huge and I swear I thought they were 6'7" minimum, so I asked and they each responded with 6'5"...
I'm 5'10" which isn't that tall but just goes to show the accuracy of guessing tall peoples heights. I would have totally believed the white guy if he said 6'8"....
@Christian @Canson @Ced @Sotiris @Viper
You guys are all 6'4" and 6'7" guys, right? What's the craziest anybody has estimated you guys at?
For me, as a 5'10" guy, it was 6'3".
Pierre said on 1/Nov/19
@Viper = Click Here watch the difference between the Rock and Randy Orton here= since 5:40 to 5:50 . The Rock and Barack = Click Here .Randy Orton 6"4' peak...Hum...Maybe...Maybe not...
@Viper = Click Here watch the difference between the Rock and Randy Orton here= since 5:40 to 5:50 . The Rock and Barack = Click Here .Randy Orton 6"4' peak...Hum...Maybe...Maybe not...
viper said on 1/Nov/19
Wilder is 6-6, Fury is maybe 6-7.
Rob isn't THAT off with these guys
Wilder is 6-6, Fury is maybe 6-7.
Rob isn't THAT off with these guys
viper said on 1/Nov/19
I think Magic is just 6-7 and not 6-7.5
But Fury at 6-5.5 puts Randy Orton at
6-2.5 at best. Puts Momoa at 6-2.5
Lowest I could go for Fury is 6-6.5
The Magic pic is just a weird pic where Magic looks way taller than 6-7
I think Magic is just 6-7 and not 6-7.5
But Fury at 6-5.5 puts Randy Orton at
6-2.5 at best. Puts Momoa at 6-2.5
Lowest I could go for Fury is 6-6.5
The Magic pic is just a weird pic where Magic looks way taller than 6-7
Pierre said on 31/Oct/19
Comparisons Kane
If Tyson Fury looks so short next to Magic Johnson,one of the reason is maybe =Magic is taller than 6"7.5' or Tyson is clearly not 6"7' range.he looks a bit taller than Wladimir Klitchko listed 6"5.25'...but is Wladimir exactly 6"5.25'...And Tyson looks taller than Deontay when Deontay wear his flat golden sneakers and Tyson wear leather shoes with comfortable heel and eventually something in his shoes...other event= watch the 20 first seconds and do pauses at 0:20 0:21....= Click Here
If Magic is really 6"7.5' this means to me =
Tyson Fury around 6"5.5'
Wladimir Klitchko around 6"4.75'
Deontay Wilder around 6"6'
Deontay next to Magic Magic ,Magic a lot closer to the camera = Click Here
Tyson next to Magic Magic maybe just a little bit closer to the camera but slouching a bit particularly in the first pic= Click Here Click Here
Comparisons Kane
If Tyson Fury looks so short next to Magic Johnson,one of the reason is maybe =Magic is taller than 6"7.5' or Tyson is clearly not 6"7' range.he looks a bit taller than Wladimir Klitchko listed 6"5.25'...but is Wladimir exactly 6"5.25'...And Tyson looks taller than Deontay when Deontay wear his flat golden sneakers and Tyson wear leather shoes with comfortable heel and eventually something in his shoes...other event= watch the 20 first seconds and do pauses at 0:20 0:21....= Click Here
If Magic is really 6"7.5' this means to me =
Tyson Fury around 6"5.5'
Wladimir Klitchko around 6"4.75'
Deontay Wilder around 6"6'
Deontay next to Magic Magic ,Magic a lot closer to the camera = Click Here
Tyson next to Magic Magic maybe just a little bit closer to the camera but slouching a bit particularly in the first pic= Click Here Click Here
Riccardo 5'7" said on 29/Oct/19
@Roderick
I agree, but I can't explain why he looks so short next to Johnson.
@Roderick
I agree, but I can't explain why he looks so short next to Johnson.
Riccardo 5'7" said on 29/Oct/19
@Roderick
I agree, but I can't explain why he looks so short next to Johnson.
@Roderick
I agree, but I can't explain why he looks so short next to Johnson.
Roderick said on 29/Oct/19
Fury being a weak 6'5" range guy claiming 6'9" and getting listed as 6'8.75" is hard to swallow. I think Fury is at least 6'6.5"
Editor Rob
Fury being a weak 6'5" range guy claiming 6'9" and getting listed as 6'8.75" is hard to swallow. I think Fury is at least 6'6.5"
Editor RobHe's surely got a foot on someone like 5ft 6 Hatton and not exactly standing at his best.
I think with Momoa, when you have 2 tall guys and a low camera, sometimes the difference doesn't seem as much compared to if you were filming it from 6ft 2 range.
I think with Momoa, when you have 2 tall guys and a low camera, sometimes the difference doesn't seem as much compared to if you were filming it from 6ft 2 range.
Roderick said on 29/Oct/19
I feel like with new guys especially in the old days they almost always put down their actual heights in billings. I was watching a match with Sting and Kane in WCW and Kane looked about 6'7" with Sting if Sting was 6'1.5"-6'2".
I feel like with new guys especially in the old days they almost always put down their actual heights in billings. I was watching a match with Sting and Kane in WCW and Kane looked about 6'7" with Sting if Sting was 6'1.5"-6'2".
Riccardo 5'7" said on 29/Oct/19
Vegas
Closer to the camera or not, the pictures with magic Johnson are very telling. Fury there looks weak 6'5" which is shocking.
Vegas
Closer to the camera or not, the pictures with magic Johnson are very telling. Fury there looks weak 6'5" which is shocking.
viper said on 28/Oct/19
He was never close to 6-8.
He was billed at 6-7 and Vegas met him over a decade ago and said he was absolutely no taller than 6-7
He was never close to 6-8.
He was billed at 6-7 and Vegas met him over a decade ago and said he was absolutely no taller than 6-7
Mikey97 said on 27/Oct/19
I feel like if Kane stands with super good posture at 12:00 PM he is still 6'7" but barely. Maybe more like 6'6.5" is probably what Kane measures now.
I feel like he was super close to 6'8" at his peak and hasn't bothered to measure himself in probably years which is why he claims it still.
I feel like if Kane stands with super good posture at 12:00 PM he is still 6'7" but barely. Maybe more like 6'6.5" is probably what Kane measures now.
I feel like he was super close to 6'8" at his peak and hasn't bothered to measure himself in probably years which is why he claims it still.
Riccardo 5'7" said on 26/Oct/19
Tucks3294 said on 24/Oct/19
How accurate are the basketball stats for college basketball players in the USA? There’s a new pic on Glenn’s Insta with him stood next too a girl listed as 6,5 and she’s in her basketball gear. Glenn’s noticeably taller in his normal smart shoes.
Dude I saw the picture, I think that girl isn't 6'5 barefoot. I guess her around 6'3.5 or something like that.
Kane there looks near 6'8" wich is absolutely impossible
Tucks3294 said on 24/Oct/19
How accurate are the basketball stats for college basketball players in the USA? There’s a new pic on Glenn’s Insta with him stood next too a girl listed as 6,5 and she’s in her basketball gear. Glenn’s noticeably taller in his normal smart shoes.
Dude I saw the picture, I think that girl isn't 6'5 barefoot. I guess her around 6'3.5 or something like that.
Kane there looks near 6'8" wich is absolutely impossible
viper said on 26/Oct/19
That picture just confirms Kane is MAX 6-6.
Those players arnt their listed heights, obviously.
That picture just confirms Kane is MAX 6-6.
Those players arnt their listed heights, obviously.
Canson said on 26/Oct/19
@Dream and Roderick: if they’re listed 6’3 and 6’5” they really aren’t that tall barefoot. I wouldn’t be surprised if they’re 6’1” or 6’2 and 6’3 or 6’4” barefoot
@Dream and Roderick: if they’re listed 6’3 and 6’5” they really aren’t that tall barefoot. I wouldn’t be surprised if they’re 6’1” or 6’2 and 6’3 or 6’4” barefoot
Canson said on 26/Oct/19
@NM: I think Kane can still look 6’7” at times and may still be but using a comparison of two basketball players’ listed heights is not a good one. Having played ball myself through college I was always listed taller than I actually was. They’re always listed in shoes and it’s not just men. even the women are. A girl I dated in high school played and she was listed 6’1” on the roster but she is actually 5’11” at best. Actually was 5’10.75 then. Lisa Leslie is not 6’5”. She’s a very weak 6’4” barefoot
@NM: I think Kane can still look 6’7” at times and may still be but using a comparison of two basketball players’ listed heights is not a good one. Having played ball myself through college I was always listed taller than I actually was. They’re always listed in shoes and it’s not just men. even the women are. A girl I dated in high school played and she was listed 6’1” on the roster but she is actually 5’11” at best. Actually was 5’10.75 then. Lisa Leslie is not 6’5”. She’s a very weak 6’4” barefoot
Roderick said on 25/Oct/19
Some people as low as 6'2" flat have been listed as 6'5" in college. Just saying.
Some people as low as 6'2" flat have been listed as 6'5" in college. Just saying.
Pierre said on 25/Oct/19
But it seems to me very hard to compare the height of this Basketball woman with other celebrities(not a lot of pics of her) to know if 6"5' is her real height.She's listed 6"4' in web too
But it seems to me very hard to compare the height of this Basketball woman with other celebrities(not a lot of pics of her) to know if 6"5' is her real height.She's listed 6"4' in web too
edwards said on 25/Oct/19
@ NM
there ,kane looks easy 6'7.bad posture is the reason why he looks sub 6'7
@ NM
there ,kane looks easy 6'7.bad posture is the reason why he looks sub 6'7
Carls said on 24/Oct/19
@NM those womans must have wear thick basketball sneakers. No doubt about that. Also, the woman on his left has a thick hair which makes reduce the height difference. If she's a legit 6'5, then Glenn would be around 6'75 , the height which Chris Jericho mentioned in one of his interview.
@NM those womans must have wear thick basketball sneakers. No doubt about that. Also, the woman on his left has a thick hair which makes reduce the height difference. If she's a legit 6'5, then Glenn would be around 6'75 , the height which Chris Jericho mentioned in one of his interview.
viper said on 24/Oct/19
Kane looks 6-6 If those players are only inflated by an inch
Kane looks 6-6 If those players are only inflated by an inch
viper said on 24/Oct/19
Chances of them being their listed height are zero
Chances of them being their listed height are zero
Roderick said on 24/Oct/19
@NM Like I said, Kane usually looks a solid 6'6" with good posture even today.
But those are listed heights. They are probably shorter in reality.
@NM Like I said, Kane usually looks a solid 6'6" with good posture even today.
But those are listed heights. They are probably shorter in reality.
Philip McMullin said on 24/Oct/19
NM Kane is looking 6ft8 there
NM Kane is looking 6ft8 there
Dream said on 24/Oct/19
@NM
From what i've seen in person, up close, that's how he looked, minimum, minus his footwear advantage. People would be surprised to see him. Maybe he shrunk more, after i met him, but he looked like someone similar to Richard Osman, in person. (Kinda like the imposing type.)
His shoulders were much too high to be guessed at just 6'6" in person. Looked sky north of it, when I saw him at Galaxycon, months ago. Again he looked close 6'8", but his footwear was certainly bigger than mine. Without the footwear advantage, 6'7.25" would've been what he probably looked. It was the afternoon, so he could go down to 6'7" flat. 6'6.25" is too low.
@NM
From what i've seen in person, up close, that's how he looked, minimum, minus his footwear advantage. People would be surprised to see him. Maybe he shrunk more, after i met him, but he looked like someone similar to Richard Osman, in person. (Kinda like the imposing type.)
His shoulders were much too high to be guessed at just 6'6" in person. Looked sky north of it, when I saw him at Galaxycon, months ago. Again he looked close 6'8", but his footwear was certainly bigger than mine. Without the footwear advantage, 6'7.25" would've been what he probably looked. It was the afternoon, so he could go down to 6'7" flat. 6'6.25" is too low.
NM said on 24/Oct/19
Here is Kane recently with a 6’5 and a 6’3 womens basketball players Click Here
Looks 6’7 there?
Here is Kane recently with a 6’5 and a 6’3 womens basketball players Click Here
Looks 6’7 there?
Pierre said on 24/Oct/19
@Vegas =then explain this video at 0:20 / 0:21 (when Tyson is not tiptoeing ) Click Here ....Tyson is shorter than Deontay Wilder here.... In your video Deontay has flat sneakers and Tyson to me something with his shoes....
@Vegas =then explain this video at 0:20 / 0:21 (when Tyson is not tiptoeing ) Click Here ....Tyson is shorter than Deontay Wilder here.... In your video Deontay has flat sneakers and Tyson to me something with his shoes....
Tucks3294 said on 24/Oct/19
How accurate are the basketball stats for college basketball players in the USA? There’s a new pic on Glenn’s Insta with him stood next too a girl listed as 6,5 and she’s in her basketball gear. Glenn’s noticeably taller in his normal smart shoes.
How accurate are the basketball stats for college basketball players in the USA? There’s a new pic on Glenn’s Insta with him stood next too a girl listed as 6,5 and she’s in her basketball gear. Glenn’s noticeably taller in his normal smart shoes.
NM said on 24/Oct/19
Kane in dress shoes with Ryback Click Here
Kane in dress shoes with Roman Reigns Click Here
Kane in dress shoes with Ryback Click Here
Kane in dress shoes with Roman Reigns Click Here
Mikey97 said on 23/Oct/19
Probably closer to 6'6" than 6'7" now that I think about it
Click Here He's shorter than Braun Strowman
Probably closer to 6'6" than 6'7" now that I think about it
Click Here He's shorter than Braun Strowman
Vegas' said on 23/Oct/19
If Fury is 6'5.25 then Wilder is sub 6'4 Click Here
Strowman is taller than Wilder next to Fury Click Here
Magic is closer to the camera there with Fury. There are other photo comparisons you could have used like
Rob and Thor Hafthor-Julius-Bjornsson-48697.html" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Click Here
Strowman and Thor Click Here
Does that make Strowman over 6'7? Not really because you can't trust photos. Strowman is closer to 6'7 than 6'4 though.
If Fury is 6'5.25 then Wilder is sub 6'4 Click Here
Strowman is taller than Wilder next to Fury Click Here
Magic is closer to the camera there with Fury. There are other photo comparisons you could have used like
Rob and Thor Hafthor-Julius-Bjornsson-48697.html" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Click Here
Strowman and Thor Click Here
Does that make Strowman over 6'7? Not really because you can't trust photos. Strowman is closer to 6'7 than 6'4 though.
Pierre said on 20/Oct/19
Click Here = Kane / Braun Strowan / Big Show this time probably in classic shoes
Click Here = here at 1:45 =Braun Strowman imo a bit shorter than Tyson Fury by around 0.75 inch shoes by looking similar heels
Click Here = Tyson Fury next to Magic Johnson listed 6"7.5' = difference = two strong inches imo = That means Tyson Fury around 6"5.25' Braun Strowman around 6"4.5' by this comparisons .I don't see Kane really taller than Brown in the first pic ( by considering Kane is a bit more distant to the camera and Brauwn standing a bit straighter than Kane).
Is Magic really 6"7.5' ?...
Click Here = Kane / Braun Strowan / Big Show this time probably in classic shoes
Click Here = here at 1:45 =Braun Strowman imo a bit shorter than Tyson Fury by around 0.75 inch shoes by looking similar heels
Click Here = Tyson Fury next to Magic Johnson listed 6"7.5' = difference = two strong inches imo = That means Tyson Fury around 6"5.25' Braun Strowman around 6"4.5' by this comparisons .I don't see Kane really taller than Brown in the first pic ( by considering Kane is a bit more distant to the camera and Brauwn standing a bit straighter than Kane).
Is Magic really 6"7.5' ?...
DFens said on 20/Oct/19
I believe Kane is minimun 6'6.
He's old, tired, busy man, he won't be stretched all day long.
90% of pictures posted here he is in bad posture. The others he is good posture, show's he still above 6'5.
I believe Kane is minimun 6'6.
He's old, tired, busy man, he won't be stretched all day long.
90% of pictures posted here he is in bad posture. The others he is good posture, show's he still above 6'5.
Carls said on 19/Oct/19
The interview where he said he was 6'8 was from 5 years ago, but here's another interview with Stone Cold where Kane mentioned he's 6'8 and weighted 295 these days while he's around 320 at his peak . So he's obviously less heavier than some years ago but he still mentioned the same height. I doubt he actually cares about his actual height, so he probably just mention his height during his peak which probably at least very close to that if not more.
Click Here
The interview where he said he was 6'8 was from 5 years ago, but here's another interview with Stone Cold where Kane mentioned he's 6'8 and weighted 295 these days while he's around 320 at his peak . So he's obviously less heavier than some years ago but he still mentioned the same height. I doubt he actually cares about his actual height, so he probably just mention his height during his peak which probably at least very close to that if not more.
Click Here
Roderick said on 18/Oct/19
A good bet for Kane is 6'6" flat today. Agree with Viper. Good posture Kane looks 6'6" most of the time and not less.
I don't think he's over it on the other hand
A good bet for Kane is 6'6" flat today. Agree with Viper. Good posture Kane looks 6'6" most of the time and not less.
I don't think he's over it on the other hand
Roderick said on 16/Oct/19
I'm noticing a pattern that whenever Kane stands straight and tall he can look 6'6" pretty easily. I would say pressing for a measurement, Kane can easily still be 6'6" but not over it. Not even 1/8" over.
I'm noticing a pattern that whenever Kane stands straight and tall he can look 6'6" pretty easily. I would say pressing for a measurement, Kane can easily still be 6'6" but not over it. Not even 1/8" over.
Sotiris Gravas said on 15/Oct/19
Ric Flair w/ maybe 6'5" Travis Browne (listed 6'7", but isn't) in 2016... Click Here
Flair w/ Kane (listed 6'7", but isn't) in 2018 Click Here , Click Here
Flair w/ 6'7" Magic... Click Here
Travis Browne w/ maybe 6'4" Shad Gaspard... Click Here
W/ listed 6'3" Derrick Lewis (2017)... Click Here
W/ 6'1" Vinnie Jones (2017)... Click Here
Interestingly, Travis Browne w/ maybe 6'6" Braun Strowman (2018)... Click Here
W/ maybe 6'6.5" Brian Shaw (2015)... Click Here
W/ maybe 6'9" Stefan Struve (listed 7'0") in 2011... Click Here
Listed 6'4" Fabricio Werdum w/ Travis Browne (2014)... Click Here
W/ Kevin Nash (2013)... Click Here
W/ listed 6'7" Alexander Volkov (2014)... Click Here
W/ Brian Shaw (2014)... Click Here
W/ maybe 6'5" Tony Robbins (2019)... Click Here
6'7" Magic w/ Tony Robbins (2014)... Click Here , Click Here
W/ 6'3" Jon Jones (2012)... Click Here
W/ 6'1" Cristiano Ronaldo (2012)... Click Here
Ric Flair w/ maybe 6'5" Travis Browne (listed 6'7", but isn't) in 2016... Click Here
Flair w/ Kane (listed 6'7", but isn't) in 2018 Click Here , Click Here
Flair w/ 6'7" Magic... Click Here
Travis Browne w/ maybe 6'4" Shad Gaspard... Click Here
W/ listed 6'3" Derrick Lewis (2017)... Click Here
W/ 6'1" Vinnie Jones (2017)... Click Here
Interestingly, Travis Browne w/ maybe 6'6" Braun Strowman (2018)... Click Here
W/ maybe 6'6.5" Brian Shaw (2015)... Click Here
W/ maybe 6'9" Stefan Struve (listed 7'0") in 2011... Click Here
Listed 6'4" Fabricio Werdum w/ Travis Browne (2014)... Click Here
W/ Kevin Nash (2013)... Click Here
W/ listed 6'7" Alexander Volkov (2014)... Click Here
W/ Brian Shaw (2014)... Click Here
W/ maybe 6'5" Tony Robbins (2019)... Click Here
6'7" Magic w/ Tony Robbins (2014)... Click Here , Click Here
W/ 6'3" Jon Jones (2012)... Click Here
W/ 6'1" Cristiano Ronaldo (2012)... Click Here
Sotiris Gravas said on 15/Oct/19
@Mikey and Riccardo
I should have posted this on Taker's page, but it can still give us an idea about Kane...
This was 6'5.5" Tommy Kelly w/ Stone Cold... Click Here
Bret Hart w/ maybe 5'11.5" Stone Cold... Click Here
Bret w/ around 6'0" (NOT 6'0.75") Cody Rhodes (2010)... Click Here
Again, compare this to Taker/Hart... Click Here
Look at how short Stone Cold looks here w/ MAX 6'2.5" Titus and The Rock... Click Here
Titus w/ 6'3.5" (listed 6'4") Jameis Winston... Click Here
Titus w/ max 6'6.5" (listed 6'7") Aaron Judge... Click Here
Jameis Winston w/ 6'7" Magic (2014)... Click Here
Look how short Bret Hart looks here:
W/ 6'0" John Cena... Click Here
W/ MAX 5'10" Ted Cruz... Click Here
Ric Flair w/ 5'8" Ludacris... Click Here
W/ 6'0.25" (listed 6'1") Todd Gurley (2018)... Click Here
W/ Stone Cold (2018)... Click Here
W/ Bret Hart... Click Here
W/ poster The Ben, aka Ben Bell (2017)... Click Here (He claims 6'0.25", but isn't.)
Ben Bell w/ Undertaker (2019)... Click Here
Bret Hart is definitely not over 5'10".
@Mikey and Riccardo
I should have posted this on Taker's page, but it can still give us an idea about Kane...
This was 6'5.5" Tommy Kelly w/ Stone Cold... Click Here
Bret Hart w/ maybe 5'11.5" Stone Cold... Click Here
Bret w/ around 6'0" (NOT 6'0.75") Cody Rhodes (2010)... Click Here
Again, compare this to Taker/Hart... Click Here
Look at how short Stone Cold looks here w/ MAX 6'2.5" Titus and The Rock... Click Here
Titus w/ 6'3.5" (listed 6'4") Jameis Winston... Click Here
Titus w/ max 6'6.5" (listed 6'7") Aaron Judge... Click Here
Jameis Winston w/ 6'7" Magic (2014)... Click Here
Look how short Bret Hart looks here:
W/ 6'0" John Cena... Click Here
W/ MAX 5'10" Ted Cruz... Click Here
Ric Flair w/ 5'8" Ludacris... Click Here
W/ 6'0.25" (listed 6'1") Todd Gurley (2018)... Click Here
W/ Stone Cold (2018)... Click Here
W/ Bret Hart... Click Here
W/ poster The Ben, aka Ben Bell (2017)... Click Here (He claims 6'0.25", but isn't.)
Ben Bell w/ Undertaker (2019)... Click Here
Bret Hart is definitely not over 5'10".
Riccardo 5'7" said on 14/Oct/19
Sotiris Gravas
I think Bret Hart is always been around 5'11" and I doubt he lost a lot.
Click Here
Here with Austin who in my opinion was never a full 6'1" but always in the 6'.0 range (today 5'11")
The miz is about 5'11"?
Click Here
I say 5'10" 1/2 for Hart today. Here with Kane who has his boots on. Click Here
Sotiris Gravas
I think Bret Hart is always been around 5'11" and I doubt he lost a lot.
Click Here
Here with Austin who in my opinion was never a full 6'1" but always in the 6'.0 range (today 5'11")
The miz is about 5'11"?
Click Here
I say 5'10" 1/2 for Hart today. Here with Kane who has his boots on. Click Here
Pierre said on 14/Oct/19
@Sotiris= Click Here = Michael Strahan next to Shaquille O'Neal 7"0.25' camera very low and Michael a bit closer to the camera= difference about a complete head imo.What is the size of Shaq's head?No less than 10 inches no?
@Sotiris= Click Here = Michael Strahan next to Shaquille O'Neal 7"0.25' camera very low and Michael a bit closer to the camera= difference about a complete head imo.What is the size of Shaq's head?No less than 10 inches no?
Johan 185 cm said on 14/Oct/19
Bret Hart was near 6' peak, Rob met him but I agree today he can look 5'10". Taker looks near 8" taller than him so 5'11" for hart today seem s a bit too much.
Bret Hart was near 6' peak, Rob met him but I agree today he can look 5'10". Taker looks near 8" taller than him so 5'11" for hart today seem s a bit too much.
Pierre said on 14/Oct/19
@Soriris= Michael Strahan is very close to the camera in your pic while Magic slouch at the opposite side of the camera =Michael has a good advantage here imo.
Click Here = here both at same distance to the camera neutral angle of the camera and we can better watch the postures = Michael Strahan by this comparison is not even 6"3'
@Soriris= Michael Strahan is very close to the camera in your pic while Magic slouch at the opposite side of the camera =Michael has a good advantage here imo.
Click Here = here both at same distance to the camera neutral angle of the camera and we can better watch the postures = Michael Strahan by this comparison is not even 6"3'
Mikey97 said on 14/Oct/19
@Sotiris Gravas
Wow.... i might be wrong.
So I'll say Bret is 5'10" for this picture.
He seems to come around the upper lip-nose region of Undertaker's head.
If Undertaker has a 10 1/2 inch long head, and his distance to his chin to the bottom of his nose is.... i dont know, 3 inches? Just guessing.
But if that's the case, then Undertaker looks only 7.5 inches taller than Bret there, putting Undertaker at 6'5.5".
Id say anywhere from 6'5.5" to 6'6" is ok for Taker
When I met Bret, he was wearing dress shoes that didnt appear to have lifts in them. I was likely just 5'5.5" when I met Bret and he looked 5'9" at best. Now I was wearing thick Adidas slippers that day so maybe I had the footwear advantage but there's no way he's 6'0" like people say that's hilarious.
I think Bret is 5'9", but can wear lifts to look 5'11~".
@Sotiris Gravas
Wow.... i might be wrong.
So I'll say Bret is 5'10" for this picture.
He seems to come around the upper lip-nose region of Undertaker's head.
If Undertaker has a 10 1/2 inch long head, and his distance to his chin to the bottom of his nose is.... i dont know, 3 inches? Just guessing.
But if that's the case, then Undertaker looks only 7.5 inches taller than Bret there, putting Undertaker at 6'5.5".
Id say anywhere from 6'5.5" to 6'6" is ok for Taker
When I met Bret, he was wearing dress shoes that didnt appear to have lifts in them. I was likely just 5'5.5" when I met Bret and he looked 5'9" at best. Now I was wearing thick Adidas slippers that day so maybe I had the footwear advantage but there's no way he's 6'0" like people say that's hilarious.
I think Bret is 5'9", but can wear lifts to look 5'11~".
viper said on 14/Oct/19
Strahan edges out other 6-4 guys like Tony Gonzales and Vince Vaughn.
So 6-3.75 for him would be surprising
Strahan edges out other 6-4 guys like Tony Gonzales and Vince Vaughn.
So 6-3.75 for him would be surprising
viper said on 14/Oct/19
IMO, smart money for Kane today is 6-6
IMO, smart money for Kane today is 6-6
edwards said on 13/Oct/19
@ roderick
i’m sorry lad,its rather hard to change my mind.he may no longer be 6’7 but def not in 6’5 range.you see,and at the same time when a guy(kane )looks taller than 6’6.5/6’7 guys like pen jillete then you will say either kane is wearing lifts or appearing closer to camera.and if some excuses didn’t work then saying it is a old photo or outdated.and if kane looks taller and looked only max 3 inch shorter than big show ,you’ll say he is near to camera,big show isnt standing straight and blah blah blah.i’m tired of those excuses.same goes to taker pal,dont get me wrong pal,you are sticking to your opinion like i’m sticking to mine.
@ roderick
i’m sorry lad,its rather hard to change my mind.he may no longer be 6’7 but def not in 6’5 range.you see,and at the same time when a guy(kane )looks taller than 6’6.5/6’7 guys like pen jillete then you will say either kane is wearing lifts or appearing closer to camera.and if some excuses didn’t work then saying it is a old photo or outdated.and if kane looks taller and looked only max 3 inch shorter than big show ,you’ll say he is near to camera,big show isnt standing straight and blah blah blah.i’m tired of those excuses.same goes to taker pal,dont get me wrong pal,you are sticking to your opinion like i’m sticking to mine.
Roderick said on 13/Oct/19
Kellie said on 3/Oct/07
I've met Kane - He falls in at about 6'6" on a good day. I'm a 6'2" female (yes, that tall and yes, all female). My brother is 6'6" and they're are equal in height.
Interesting, back in 2007.
Kellie said on 3/Oct/07
I've met Kane - He falls in at about 6'6" on a good day. I'm a 6'2" female (yes, that tall and yes, all female). My brother is 6'6" and they're are equal in height.
Interesting, back in 2007.
Pierre said on 13/Oct/19
edwards said on 12/Oct/19
kane loks half inch taller than taker and you can see footwear Click Here
@Edwards=Yes you can watch their shoes here and i'm 100% sure Kane has a big advantage of shoes! Do a pause at 4:44 with full screen = Click Here = watch how much vertical are looking Kane's feet in this shoes! i want to say = Undertaker's shoes are looking very flat and Kane's shoes have a big angle over his feet!I'm sure Kane is tiptoeing in this shoes!
In classic sneakers watch Undertaker's posture to talk to Kane = Click Here = in reality Undertaker is the tallest to me.Here = Click Here even by slouching a lot he looks again at least as tall as Kane!
edwards said on 12/Oct/19
kane loks half inch taller than taker and you can see footwear Click Here
@Edwards=Yes you can watch their shoes here and i'm 100% sure Kane has a big advantage of shoes! Do a pause at 4:44 with full screen = Click Here = watch how much vertical are looking Kane's feet in this shoes! i want to say = Undertaker's shoes are looking very flat and Kane's shoes have a big angle over his feet!I'm sure Kane is tiptoeing in this shoes!
In classic sneakers watch Undertaker's posture to talk to Kane = Click Here = in reality Undertaker is the tallest to me.Here = Click Here even by slouching a lot he looks again at least as tall as Kane!
Sotiris Gravas said on 13/Oct/19
@Mikey
While I still think Bret Hart is max 5'10" now (5'11" peak), you (5'6") met him and feel he's max 5'9"... Another 5'6" guy, Dan Trojan, insists he's 5'11"...
What do you give Taker judging by what he looks next to Hart? Click Here
Here's an interesting pic of Taker w/ Stone Cold... Click Here
@Pierre
Here's a different look at Strahan w/ Magic (2013)... Click Here
@Canson
Agreed.
@Mikey
While I still think Bret Hart is max 5'10" now (5'11" peak), you (5'6") met him and feel he's max 5'9"... Another 5'6" guy, Dan Trojan, insists he's 5'11"...
What do you give Taker judging by what he looks next to Hart? Click Here
Here's an interesting pic of Taker w/ Stone Cold... Click Here
@Pierre
Here's a different look at Strahan w/ Magic (2013)... Click Here
@Canson
Agreed.
Creeper said on 13/Oct/19
I think Kane is 6'7 just my opinion
I think Kane is 6'7 just my opinion
Pierre said on 13/Oct/19
edwards said on 12/Oct/19
i can see people always using vaughn and kane photo to make kane shorter,when i post kane appearing taller,all those photos are ignored.
@edwards = but you seem to ignore this famous pics and the pics of Sotiris and other
edwards said on 12/Oct/19
i can see people always using vaughn and kane photo to make kane shorter,when i post kane appearing taller,all those photos are ignored.
@edwards = but you seem to ignore this famous pics and the pics of Sotiris and other
Roderick said on 13/Oct/19
@edwards Posting pics of Kane with other celebrities is waaaaay more efficient than posting Kane with other wrestlers. We don't know how tall Big Show or Miz is for sure, why use them as an accurate benchmark for Kane's height? No offense, but that's a horrible strategy. We DO know that Vince Vaughn is in the 6'4" range and does Kane look 6'7", 6'6.5" or even a flat 6'6" next to him? Heck no. In fact, he looks 6'4.5".
There is no way Kane can still "pull" off 6'7". If he can, then he would be the shortest looking 6'7" person in the world.
@edwards Posting pics of Kane with other celebrities is waaaaay more efficient than posting Kane with other wrestlers. We don't know how tall Big Show or Miz is for sure, why use them as an accurate benchmark for Kane's height? No offense, but that's a horrible strategy. We DO know that Vince Vaughn is in the 6'4" range and does Kane look 6'7", 6'6.5" or even a flat 6'6" next to him? Heck no. In fact, he looks 6'4.5".
There is no way Kane can still "pull" off 6'7". If he can, then he would be the shortest looking 6'7" person in the world.
Canson said on 13/Oct/19
@Sotiris: that’s also an example of how Watt can look taller. He honestly can look 6’5.25”. Strahan May only be 6’3.75”
@Sotiris: that’s also an example of how Watt can look taller. He honestly can look 6’5.25”. Strahan May only be 6’3.75”
Mikey97 said on 12/Oct/19
I can argue 6'6.5". He does struggle for 6'7" flat especially now. I think somewhere around the 6'6.75" mark is better than 6'7". So yeah, I basically am taking back what I said. I think Kane is in the high 6'6" range.
I can argue 6'6.5". He does struggle for 6'7" flat especially now. I think somewhere around the 6'6.75" mark is better than 6'7". So yeah, I basically am taking back what I said. I think Kane is in the high 6'6" range.
edwards said on 12/Oct/19
i can see people always using vaughn and kane photo to make kane shorter,when i post kane appearing taller,all those photos are ignored.
i can see people always using vaughn and kane photo to make kane shorter,when i post kane appearing taller,all those photos are ignored.
Pierre said on 12/Oct/19
@Sotiris = Vince Vaughn and Michael Strahan very close one to the other one =
Click Here i'm not even sure Vince is as tall as Michael (Michael has very short hairs apparently).In your pic Vince's head seems to me to be standing a bit closer to the camera than Michael's head that give him an advantage of height on Michael in the pic imo.
Click Here = now Michael Strahan /Magic Johnson listed 6"7.5',Magic in poor posture=by this comparison Michael is even under 6"3'
Click Here Click Here =Michael Strahan/Dwayne Johnson
Dwayne Johnson / 6"0.75' Barack(Dwayne imo is the straighest guy in the pic) =
Click Here ....
@Sotiris = Vince Vaughn and Michael Strahan very close one to the other one =
Click Here i'm not even sure Vince is as tall as Michael (Michael has very short hairs apparently).In your pic Vince's head seems to me to be standing a bit closer to the camera than Michael's head that give him an advantage of height on Michael in the pic imo.
Click Here = now Michael Strahan /Magic Johnson listed 6"7.5',Magic in poor posture=by this comparison Michael is even under 6"3'
Click Here Click Here =Michael Strahan/Dwayne Johnson
Dwayne Johnson / 6"0.75' Barack(Dwayne imo is the straighest guy in the pic) =
Click Here ....
Sotiris Gravas said on 11/Oct/19
6'5" JJ Watt w/ max 6'4" Michael Strahan... Click Here
6'4.75" Kobe w/ Strahan... (2017) Click Here , Click Here
Strahan/Vaughn (2013)... Click Here
Vaughn/Kane (2013)... Click Here
Kane is definitely not more than 6'6", and may be as low as 6'5.5" now.
Watt w/ Jose Altuve ... Click Here , Click Here Editor Rob gives him 5'5", yet others say max 5'4".
Kane w/ 5'6" Rand Paul... Click Here Kane looked like a 6'5" guy w/ him. Even w/o perfect posture, that is NOT what a 6'7" guy looks like next to someone so small.
His current listing is a joke.
6'5" JJ Watt w/ max 6'4" Michael Strahan... Click Here
6'4.75" Kobe w/ Strahan... (2017) Click Here , Click Here
Strahan/Vaughn (2013)... Click Here
Vaughn/Kane (2013)... Click Here
Kane is definitely not more than 6'6", and may be as low as 6'5.5" now.
Watt w/ Jose Altuve ... Click Here , Click Here Editor Rob gives him 5'5", yet others say max 5'4".
Kane w/ 5'6" Rand Paul... Click Here Kane looked like a 6'5" guy w/ him. Even w/o perfect posture, that is NOT what a 6'7" guy looks like next to someone so small.
His current listing is a joke.
edwards said on 11/Oct/19
@johan 185cm
agreed dude
@roderick
those photos of kane and big show and kane and miz was in 2017-2018 not long ago.it has just become 1-2 years,how can someone shrink 1.5 inch in 2 years.i know you dont sgree with me and you have your personal opinion but me,i myself personally,its very unlikely i will change my mind.the lowest i see for kane currently is 6'6.5 but i would place him at 6'6.75 today not lower and idc whether other agrees or not.people who says kane is 6'5.5 or 6'6 dosent or havent seen him in military posture.standing straight tallest in military posture,he is max 3 inch shorter than big show and i wouldnt be surprised if he is same as ike catcher.i will not change my mind dude whether anyone agrees or not.
@johan 185cm
agreed dude
@roderick
those photos of kane and big show and kane and miz was in 2017-2018 not long ago.it has just become 1-2 years,how can someone shrink 1.5 inch in 2 years.i know you dont sgree with me and you have your personal opinion but me,i myself personally,its very unlikely i will change my mind.the lowest i see for kane currently is 6'6.5 but i would place him at 6'6.75 today not lower and idc whether other agrees or not.people who says kane is 6'5.5 or 6'6 dosent or havent seen him in military posture.standing straight tallest in military posture,he is max 3 inch shorter than big show and i wouldnt be surprised if he is same as ike catcher.i will not change my mind dude whether anyone agrees or not.
viper said on 11/Oct/19
The pic with Vince Vaughn really opened my eyes that Kane isn't 6-7
The pic with Vince Vaughn really opened my eyes that Kane isn't 6-7
Mikey97 said on 10/Oct/19
@Roderick He was sitting down behind a table, but I seen him stand from the distance and he looked 6'4" to me. I was very shocked to see it. He looked similar to Billy Gunn in person.
@Roderick He was sitting down behind a table, but I seen him stand from the distance and he looked 6'4" to me. I was very shocked to see it. He looked similar to Billy Gunn in person.
Heights are barefeet estimates, derived from quotations, official websites, agency resumes, in person encounters with actors at conventions and pictures/films.
Other vital statistics like weight or shoe size measurements have been sourced from newspapers, books, resumes or social media.
Celebrity Fan Photos and Agency Pictures of stars are © to their respective owners.