Add a Comment7599 comments
Average Guess (748 Votes)
Peak: 7ft 0.06in (213.5cm)
Current: 6ft 10.39in (209.3cm)
Peak: 7ft 0.06in (213.5cm)
Current: 6ft 10.39in (209.3cm)
Danimal said on 18/May/09
alex_scandinavia says on 17/May/09
Paul Wight was billed as 7'4 and in one match back in the WCW days the announcers gave him 7'4
alex_scandinavia says on 17/May/09
Paul Wight was billed as 7'4 and in one match back in the WCW days the announcers gave him 7'4
Alex said on 18/May/09
Danimal, maybe buts its tough to say whether he was 6'11 or 6'11.5 so I'll just say in the 6'11 range.
Danimal, maybe buts its tough to say whether he was 6'11 or 6'11.5 so I'll just say in the 6'11 range.
Danimal said on 17/May/09
Alex, could you see Andre as tall as 6'11.5" at his peak?
Alex, could you see Andre as tall as 6'11.5" at his peak?
alex_scandinavia said on 17/May/09
Paul Wight was billed as 7'4 and in one match back in the WCW days the announcers gave him 7'4
Paul Wight was billed as 7'4 and in one match back in the WCW days the announcers gave him 7'4
Boss said on 17/May/09
Boss says on 14/May/09
Big Show's wrestling boots.Click Here Look at the souls. If wrestlers are getting 1-1.25 inches from their boots on average how much would Big Show gain from these boots. Any Big Show Andre comparison in wrestling gear you would have to add an inch to Andre's height because of Big Show's footware advantage. Also Big Show has much better posture than Andre and this is also a factor when comparing the 2 giants.Click Here
Boss says on 14/May/09
Big Show's wrestling boots.Click Here Look at the souls. If wrestlers are getting 1-1.25 inches from their boots on average how much would Big Show gain from these boots. Any Big Show Andre comparison in wrestling gear you would have to add an inch to Andre's height because of Big Show's footware advantage. Also Big Show has much better posture than Andre and this is also a factor when comparing the 2 giants.Click Here
jens peter said on 17/May/09
and big show is bald now. andre had a afro
and big show is bald now. andre had a afro
Alex said on 17/May/09
I've seen Big Show on Conan 3 times. He stated 7'0 twice and 7'1 once.
Topdweeb, I do agree that Big Show is taller than Andre at Andre's peak but only by slightly though since I believe Andre was 6'11 at his peak.
I've seen Big Show on Conan 3 times. He stated 7'0 twice and 7'1 once.
Topdweeb, I do agree that Big Show is taller than Andre at Andre's peak but only by slightly though since I believe Andre was 6'11 at his peak.
topdweeb said on 16/May/09
aaron says on 15/May/09
"you guys forget that when big show fought haystacks, he was most likely wearing shoes that increased his height. he had giant soles already but who knwos what other footwear advantage he had inside his shoes, since they were billing him as 7'4" at the time"
Big Show was way too tall against Haystacks for it to be all attributed to lifts. Show was simply taller than Andre plain and simple. Andre doesn't look tall in any pics except for when he is either standing on something, or when he stood next to Wilt. And that's honestly all I can think of.
aaron says on 15/May/09
"you guys forget that when big show fought haystacks, he was most likely wearing shoes that increased his height. he had giant soles already but who knwos what other footwear advantage he had inside his shoes, since they were billing him as 7'4" at the time"
Big Show was way too tall against Haystacks for it to be all attributed to lifts. Show was simply taller than Andre plain and simple. Andre doesn't look tall in any pics except for when he is either standing on something, or when he stood next to Wilt. And that's honestly all I can think of.
KingNick said on 15/May/09
topdweeb says on 15/May/09
KingNick: Big Show might have been a legit 7' 1 in WCW. I remember once on TV, Lex Luger referred to the Giant as 7' 1, and he was of course billed as 7' 4 at that time. And I have heard that he claimed that he was 7' 1 on Leno while it WCW too. I think possibly with his massive weight gain, he might have lost an inch or so. Although it is possible that 7' 1 was in shoes and he was a legit 7' barefoot. Which to me is more believable since I think he is only around 6' 11.5" today.
Good points, very possible.
Boss says on 14/May/09
Big Show's wrestling boots.Click Here Look at the souls. If wrestlers are getting 1-1.25 inches from their boots on average how much would Big Show gain from these boots. Any Big Show Andre comparison in wrestling gear you would have to add an inch to Andre's height because of Big Show's footware advantage. Also Big Show has much better posture than Andre and this is also a factor when comparing the 2 giants.Click Here
Links didn't work for me, could you post again?
topdweeb says on 15/May/09
KingNick: Big Show might have been a legit 7' 1 in WCW. I remember once on TV, Lex Luger referred to the Giant as 7' 1, and he was of course billed as 7' 4 at that time. And I have heard that he claimed that he was 7' 1 on Leno while it WCW too. I think possibly with his massive weight gain, he might have lost an inch or so. Although it is possible that 7' 1 was in shoes and he was a legit 7' barefoot. Which to me is more believable since I think he is only around 6' 11.5" today.
Good points, very possible.
Boss says on 14/May/09
Big Show's wrestling boots.Click Here Look at the souls. If wrestlers are getting 1-1.25 inches from their boots on average how much would Big Show gain from these boots. Any Big Show Andre comparison in wrestling gear you would have to add an inch to Andre's height because of Big Show's footware advantage. Also Big Show has much better posture than Andre and this is also a factor when comparing the 2 giants.Click Here
Links didn't work for me, could you post again?
aaron said on 15/May/09
you guys forget that when big show fought haystacks, he was most likely wearing shoes that increased his height. he had giant soles already but who knwos what other footwear advantage he had inside his shoes, since they were billing him as 7'4" at the time
you guys forget that when big show fought haystacks, he was most likely wearing shoes that increased his height. he had giant soles already but who knwos what other footwear advantage he had inside his shoes, since they were billing him as 7'4" at the time
topdweeb said on 15/May/09
KingNick: Big Show might have been a legit 7' 1 in WCW. I remember once on TV, Lex Luger referred to the Giant as 7' 1, and he was of course billed as 7' 4 at that time. And I have heard that he claimed that he was 7' 1 on Leno while it WCW too. I think possibly with his massive weight gain, he might have lost an inch or so. Although it is possible that 7' 1 was in shoes and he was a legit 7' barefoot. Which to me is more believable since I think he is only around 6' 11.5" today.
KingNick: Big Show might have been a legit 7' 1 in WCW. I remember once on TV, Lex Luger referred to the Giant as 7' 1, and he was of course billed as 7' 4 at that time. And I have heard that he claimed that he was 7' 1 on Leno while it WCW too. I think possibly with his massive weight gain, he might have lost an inch or so. Although it is possible that 7' 1 was in shoes and he was a legit 7' barefoot. Which to me is more believable since I think he is only around 6' 11.5" today.
Anonymous said on 14/May/09
I say Big Show is 6'11.5" today, 7'0.5" peak, there, case closed.
I say Big Show is 6'11.5" today, 7'0.5" peak, there, case closed.
KingNick said on 14/May/09
Danimal says on 12/May/09
"Big Show has been on Conan SEVERAL times since 1998. His first appearance he stated... 7'3.5" and 7'4" with his hair... the 3rd time he stated he was almost 7'1" (that was when he came to the WWE)"
I can't find it on youtube, but I remember Big Show being on Jay Leno back when he was in WCW still. And he referred to himself as something like that.
Danimal says on 12/May/09
"Big Show has been on Conan SEVERAL times since 1998. His first appearance he stated... 7'3.5" and 7'4" with his hair... the 3rd time he stated he was almost 7'1" (that was when he came to the WWE)"
I can't find it on youtube, but I remember Big Show being on Jay Leno back when he was in WCW still. And he referred to himself as something like that.
Boss said on 14/May/09
Big Show's wrestling boots.Click Here Look at the souls. If wrestlers are getting 1-1.25 inches from their boots on average how much would Big Show gain from these boots. Any Big Show Andre comparison in wrestling gear you would have to add an inch to Andre's height because of Big Show's footware advantage. Also Big Show has much better posture than Andre and this is also a factor when comparing the 2 giants.Click Here
Big Show's wrestling boots.Click Here Look at the souls. If wrestlers are getting 1-1.25 inches from their boots on average how much would Big Show gain from these boots. Any Big Show Andre comparison in wrestling gear you would have to add an inch to Andre's height because of Big Show's footware advantage. Also Big Show has much better posture than Andre and this is also a factor when comparing the 2 giants.Click Here
Danimal said on 14/May/09
Seems like my posts aren't going through.
Seems like my posts aren't going through.
topdweeb said on 13/May/09
Danimal says on 12/May/09
"Big Show has been on Conan SEVERAL times since 1998. His first appearance he stated... 7'3.5" and 7'4" with his hair... the 3rd time he stated he was almost 7'1" (that was when he came to the WWE)"
Guess he never stops to think about how ridiculous he sounds when he keeps stating himself as shorter and shorter. Pretty much whatever wrestlers are billed at, they try to pass that off as their real height when questioned. WWE could start billing Big Show at 6' 5 and he'd probably just go on there and say, "Over 6' 5 is my height" or something like that.
Danimal says on 12/May/09
"Big Show has been on Conan SEVERAL times since 1998. His first appearance he stated... 7'3.5" and 7'4" with his hair... the 3rd time he stated he was almost 7'1" (that was when he came to the WWE)"
Guess he never stops to think about how ridiculous he sounds when he keeps stating himself as shorter and shorter. Pretty much whatever wrestlers are billed at, they try to pass that off as their real height when questioned. WWE could start billing Big Show at 6' 5 and he'd probably just go on there and say, "Over 6' 5 is my height" or something like that.
Boss said on 13/May/09
Anonymous says on 12/May/09
Well for starters hogan was several inches taller when he faced a non peak Andre and Hogan a footware advantage on Andre whereas Hogan was shorter from surgery when he faced a prime Big Show and Big Show wears huge souls on his wrestling boots giving Show a footware advantage on Hogan. This would have to be taken in to consideration when comparing them to Hogan.
any proof of any of this
*hogan several inches taller in 1987 compared to 1995
*Hogan a footware advantage on Andre
*Hogan was shorter from surgery (what surgery??)
*Big Show wears huge souls on his wrestling boots giving Show a footware advantage on Hogan (this one is pure bullcrap, hogan wore 2 inch cowboy boots in the ring with big show in 1995, any footwear advantage was with hogan go watch their match at Halloween Havoc in 1995 and see who has the footwear advantage)
Yes there is lots of proof to support all thesse claims. Hogan had surgeries and lost height. Big show wore huge soulled boots. Hogan's in ring boots were alot thicker than Andre's. Don't just question things we already know and why don't you actually try to provide some evidence instead of being biased.
Anonymous says on 12/May/09
Well for starters hogan was several inches taller when he faced a non peak Andre and Hogan a footware advantage on Andre whereas Hogan was shorter from surgery when he faced a prime Big Show and Big Show wears huge souls on his wrestling boots giving Show a footware advantage on Hogan. This would have to be taken in to consideration when comparing them to Hogan.
any proof of any of this
*hogan several inches taller in 1987 compared to 1995
*Hogan a footware advantage on Andre
*Hogan was shorter from surgery (what surgery??)
*Big Show wears huge souls on his wrestling boots giving Show a footware advantage on Hogan (this one is pure bullcrap, hogan wore 2 inch cowboy boots in the ring with big show in 1995, any footwear advantage was with hogan go watch their match at Halloween Havoc in 1995 and see who has the footwear advantage)
Yes there is lots of proof to support all thesse claims. Hogan had surgeries and lost height. Big show wore huge soulled boots. Hogan's in ring boots were alot thicker than Andre's. Don't just question things we already know and why don't you actually try to provide some evidence instead of being biased.
Marble said on 13/May/09
right hogan and andre wear huge souls all the time yet big show never ever has according to some people :/
right hogan and andre wear huge souls all the time yet big show never ever has according to some people :/
Anonymous said on 12/May/09
Well for starters hogan was several inches taller when he faced a non peak Andre and Hogan a footware advantage on Andre whereas Hogan was shorter from surgery when he faced a prime Big Show and Big Show wears huge souls on his wrestling boots giving Show a footware advantage on Hogan. This would have to be taken in to consideration when comparing them to Hogan.
any proof of any of this
*hogan several inches taller in 1987 compared to 1995
*Hogan a footware advantage on Andre
*Hogan was shorter from surgery (what surgery??)
*Big Show wears huge souls on his wrestling boots giving Show a footware advantage on Hogan (this one is pure bullcrap, hogan wore 2 inch cowboy boots in the ring with big show in 1995, any footwear advantage was with hogan go watch their match at Halloween Havoc in 1995 and see who has the footwear advantage)
Well for starters hogan was several inches taller when he faced a non peak Andre and Hogan a footware advantage on Andre whereas Hogan was shorter from surgery when he faced a prime Big Show and Big Show wears huge souls on his wrestling boots giving Show a footware advantage on Hogan. This would have to be taken in to consideration when comparing them to Hogan.
any proof of any of this
*hogan several inches taller in 1987 compared to 1995
*Hogan a footware advantage on Andre
*Hogan was shorter from surgery (what surgery??)
*Big Show wears huge souls on his wrestling boots giving Show a footware advantage on Hogan (this one is pure bullcrap, hogan wore 2 inch cowboy boots in the ring with big show in 1995, any footwear advantage was with hogan go watch their match at Halloween Havoc in 1995 and see who has the footwear advantage)
Danimal said on 12/May/09
Big Show has been on Conan SEVERAL times since 1998. His first appearance he stated his weight at 505 pounds and 7'3.5" and 7'4" with his hair. His second time he stated he was 501 pounds, just like the jeans. the 3rd time he stated he was 420 or 430 pounds and almost 7'1" (that was when he came to the WWE)...
NEVER heard him state he was 6'11". If he did, the it's possible he DID drop almost 2".
Big Show has been on Conan SEVERAL times since 1998. His first appearance he stated his weight at 505 pounds and 7'3.5" and 7'4" with his hair. His second time he stated he was 501 pounds, just like the jeans. the 3rd time he stated he was 420 or 430 pounds and almost 7'1" (that was when he came to the WWE)...
NEVER heard him state he was 6'11". If he did, the it's possible he DID drop almost 2".
topdweeb said on 12/May/09
Boss says on 12/May/09
"Well for starters hogan was several inches taller when he faced a non peak Andre"
Which is precisely why I said Big Show has more height on people who WERE Hogan's height, i.e. Hogan's prime height. So I had already taken his height loss into consideration. Also, as I have already pointed out, there is a match between the two from the 70's in Japan when Andre was still in decent shape. I had already taken a non-peak Andre into consideration.
Still, Andre does not seem like he was a legit 7'. I don't think Big Show is a legit 7' today, and I used to adamantly defend that he was.
Boss says on 12/May/09
"Well for starters hogan was several inches taller when he faced a non peak Andre"
Which is precisely why I said Big Show has more height on people who WERE Hogan's height, i.e. Hogan's prime height. So I had already taken his height loss into consideration. Also, as I have already pointed out, there is a match between the two from the 70's in Japan when Andre was still in decent shape. I had already taken a non-peak Andre into consideration.
Still, Andre does not seem like he was a legit 7'. I don't think Big Show is a legit 7' today, and I used to adamantly defend that he was.
Boss said on 12/May/09
Also besides Big Show's footware advantage, Show has much better posture than Andre and that would also make a big difference when comparing the two.
Click Here
Also besides Big Show's footware advantage, Show has much better posture than Andre and that would also make a big difference when comparing the two.
Click Here
Boss said on 12/May/09
topdweeb says on 12/May/09
Danimal says on 11/May/09
"PROOF? NO ONE has proof of ANYTHING at all. If we did, there wouldn't be celebheights.... ;).. You also don't believe that Hogan lost height either and that Andre was never over 6'10". You obviously are in the minority."
Well, let me rephrase, does anyone have any reason to believe that Big Show lost height? As far as Hogan, I do think he did, I think he was more 6' 5ish when he was his peak, and is now about 6' 3.5". As for Andre, he just didn't seem to be as tall as the Big Show to me. In the majority of the pictures I see Andre in, he does't look like a 7-footer to me. Even when I seen him wrestler Hogan back in Japan, he just doesn't have the height over Hogan as the Big Show does on people who were around Hogan's height.
Well for starters hogan was several inches taller when he faced a non peak Andre and Hogan a footware advantage on Andre whereas Hogan was shorter from surgery when he faced a prime Big Show and Big Show wears huge souls on his wrestling boots giving Show a footware advantage on Hogan. This would have to be taken in to consideration when comparing them to Hogan.
topdweeb says on 12/May/09
Danimal says on 11/May/09
"PROOF? NO ONE has proof of ANYTHING at all. If we did, there wouldn't be celebheights.... ;).. You also don't believe that Hogan lost height either and that Andre was never over 6'10". You obviously are in the minority."
Well, let me rephrase, does anyone have any reason to believe that Big Show lost height? As far as Hogan, I do think he did, I think he was more 6' 5ish when he was his peak, and is now about 6' 3.5". As for Andre, he just didn't seem to be as tall as the Big Show to me. In the majority of the pictures I see Andre in, he does't look like a 7-footer to me. Even when I seen him wrestler Hogan back in Japan, he just doesn't have the height over Hogan as the Big Show does on people who were around Hogan's height.
Well for starters hogan was several inches taller when he faced a non peak Andre and Hogan a footware advantage on Andre whereas Hogan was shorter from surgery when he faced a prime Big Show and Big Show wears huge souls on his wrestling boots giving Show a footware advantage on Hogan. This would have to be taken in to consideration when comparing them to Hogan.
Alex said on 12/May/09
I do agree that Big Show did edge out Andre a bit at his peak but I think Andre was no less than 6'11 at his peak though. And Big Show may have always been 7'0.
I do agree that Big Show did edge out Andre a bit at his peak but I think Andre was no less than 6'11 at his peak though. And Big Show may have always been 7'0.
topdweeb said on 12/May/09
Danimal says on 11/May/09
"PROOF? NO ONE has proof of ANYTHING at all. If we did, there wouldn't be celebheights.... ;).. You also don't believe that Hogan lost height either and that Andre was never over 6'10". You obviously are in the minority."
Well, let me rephrase, does anyone have any reason to believe that Big Show lost height? As far as Hogan, I do think he did, I think he was more 6' 5ish when he was his peak, and is now about 6' 3.5". As for Andre, he just didn't seem to be as tall as the Big Show to me. In the majority of the pictures I see Andre in, he does't look like a 7-footer to me. Even when I seen him wrestler Hogan back in Japan, he just doesn't have the height over Hogan as the Big Show does on people who were around Hogan's height.
Danimal says on 11/May/09
"PROOF? NO ONE has proof of ANYTHING at all. If we did, there wouldn't be celebheights.... ;).. You also don't believe that Hogan lost height either and that Andre was never over 6'10". You obviously are in the minority."
Well, let me rephrase, does anyone have any reason to believe that Big Show lost height? As far as Hogan, I do think he did, I think he was more 6' 5ish when he was his peak, and is now about 6' 3.5". As for Andre, he just didn't seem to be as tall as the Big Show to me. In the majority of the pictures I see Andre in, he does't look like a 7-footer to me. Even when I seen him wrestler Hogan back in Japan, he just doesn't have the height over Hogan as the Big Show does on people who were around Hogan's height.
MK said on 12/May/09
Big Show says on 12/May/09
MIKESOWELL says on 12/May/09
On Conan O'Brien a few years ago he gave his height as 6-11 and said that he had recently dropped down to 480lbs from 550lbs.
That's the first time I'm hearing this. What year was this? It would have to be after his temporarily retirement in late 2006 when he was at his heaviest and before his come-back in February 2006 (as he was weighed-in a few weeks later at 441 lbs).
I'm asumimg mean't to type Febuary 2008, that was indeed when he went on Conan in the run up with Mayweather at wm24, dont seem to recall those quotes though MIKESOWELL. I do remember a spot he did with Richard Blackwood(UK presenter) in 2001 in which he gave 7'1'' and about(direct quote) 450lbs. Wish i could find it.
Big Show says on 12/May/09
MIKESOWELL says on 12/May/09
On Conan O'Brien a few years ago he gave his height as 6-11 and said that he had recently dropped down to 480lbs from 550lbs.
That's the first time I'm hearing this. What year was this? It would have to be after his temporarily retirement in late 2006 when he was at his heaviest and before his come-back in February 2006 (as he was weighed-in a few weeks later at 441 lbs).
I'm asumimg mean't to type Febuary 2008, that was indeed when he went on Conan in the run up with Mayweather at wm24, dont seem to recall those quotes though MIKESOWELL. I do remember a spot he did with Richard Blackwood(UK presenter) in 2001 in which he gave 7'1'' and about(direct quote) 450lbs. Wish i could find it.
Big Show said on 12/May/09
MIKESOWELL says on 12/May/09
On Conan O'Brien a few years ago he gave his height as 6-11 and said that he had recently dropped down to 480lbs from 550lbs.
That's the first time I'm hearing this. What year was this? It would have to be after his temporarily retirement in late 2006 when he was at his heaviest and before his come-back in February 2006 (as he was weighed-in a few weeks later at 441 lbs).
MIKESOWELL says on 12/May/09
On Conan O'Brien a few years ago he gave his height as 6-11 and said that he had recently dropped down to 480lbs from 550lbs.
That's the first time I'm hearing this. What year was this? It would have to be after his temporarily retirement in late 2006 when he was at his heaviest and before his come-back in February 2006 (as he was weighed-in a few weeks later at 441 lbs).
MIKESOWELL said on 12/May/09
On Conan O'Brien a few years ago he gave his height as 6-11 and said that he had recently dropped down to 480lbs from 550lbs.
On Conan O'Brien a few years ago he gave his height as 6-11 and said that he had recently dropped down to 480lbs from 550lbs.
Danimal said on 11/May/09
topdweeb says on 11/May/09
I still question whether or not Big Show actually shrunk. Does anyone have any proof that he did?
PROOF? NO ONE has proof of ANYTHING at all. If we did, there wouldn't be celebheights.... ;).. You also don't believe that Hogan lost height either and that Andre was never over 6'10". You obviously are in the minority.
topdweeb says on 11/May/09
I still question whether or not Big Show actually shrunk. Does anyone have any proof that he did?
PROOF? NO ONE has proof of ANYTHING at all. If we did, there wouldn't be celebheights.... ;).. You also don't believe that Hogan lost height either and that Andre was never over 6'10". You obviously are in the minority.
KingNick said on 11/May/09
Danimal suggested I share this here, I like the idea:
KingNick says on 8/May/09
Ok, here we go. This is all from WWE UNSCRIPTED copyright 2003.
Since we've been talking about 'Taker's weight, here's some highlights:
P. 105 Undertaker: "When I hurt my pecs ... I was 350 pounds, heaviest I've ever been. I was training like an animal, with heavy weights, but Sara was feeding me so well I was enormous."
Not sure if he was 350 here but he looks well over 300 to me when he debuted as the biker: Click Here
Here's a reference to his height and weight from early in his career:
P. 39 Undertaker in reference to a guy speaking to him about becoming a wrestler: "You fill out a little bit at 6'8", you could go someplace."
Here's Undertaker talking about Mabel on P. 104 "I was wrestling Mabel, who was 6'8" and 450, 500 pounds, maybe more."
And here are some other wrestlers talking out of kayfabe:
P. 12-13 Big Show: "The summer after my sophomore year, I put on 40lbs of muscle and I walked in as a junior at 6'11" and 300 pounds."
P. 73 Big Show: "I'M SEVEN feet tall in my bare feet and I weigh 453 pounds ... At 12, I was 6'2", 220 pounds, at 14, I was 6'8", about 235."
P. 21 Edge: "I was 17 years old, 6'2" or 6'3", about 180 pounds."
P. 61 Nathan Jones: "I'm 6'10". I was always big for my age; I was always a foot taller than the rest of the kids."
P. 195 Stone Cold talking about Jake the Snake: "There was Jake "The Snake" Roberts, 6'4", 6'5", but an A frame ..."
These are all direct quotes.
Danimal suggested I share this here, I like the idea:
KingNick says on 8/May/09
Ok, here we go. This is all from WWE UNSCRIPTED copyright 2003.
Since we've been talking about 'Taker's weight, here's some highlights:
P. 105 Undertaker: "When I hurt my pecs ... I was 350 pounds, heaviest I've ever been. I was training like an animal, with heavy weights, but Sara was feeding me so well I was enormous."
Not sure if he was 350 here but he looks well over 300 to me when he debuted as the biker: Click Here
Here's a reference to his height and weight from early in his career:
P. 39 Undertaker in reference to a guy speaking to him about becoming a wrestler: "You fill out a little bit at 6'8", you could go someplace."
Here's Undertaker talking about Mabel on P. 104 "I was wrestling Mabel, who was 6'8" and 450, 500 pounds, maybe more."
And here are some other wrestlers talking out of kayfabe:
P. 12-13 Big Show: "The summer after my sophomore year, I put on 40lbs of muscle and I walked in as a junior at 6'11" and 300 pounds."
P. 73 Big Show: "I'M SEVEN feet tall in my bare feet and I weigh 453 pounds ... At 12, I was 6'2", 220 pounds, at 14, I was 6'8", about 235."
P. 21 Edge: "I was 17 years old, 6'2" or 6'3", about 180 pounds."
P. 61 Nathan Jones: "I'm 6'10". I was always big for my age; I was always a foot taller than the rest of the kids."
P. 195 Stone Cold talking about Jake the Snake: "There was Jake "The Snake" Roberts, 6'4", 6'5", but an A frame ..."
These are all direct quotes.
Danimal said on 11/May/09
Daniel_Sweden says on 11/May/09
back in the WCW days i rembember in one match that he was build as 7'4 and 552 pounds..*lol* i think it was back in the nWo days 1998-1999..
two true giants and there real heights and weights according to me:)
Paul Wight peak: 7'0 465 pounds
Andre the Giant: 7'0 500 pounds
That's nice. Peak weight huh? What does that actually mean to you? Big Show was about 375 pounds in 1995 and by 2006-2007 he was around 550. Today he's 485.
Andre started out at 300 pounds and climbed up to 565 pounds at his heaviest...
You should specify what you mean by peak and realize that these men's weight has gone up and down. Andre wrestled for 29 years and so he wasn't always 500 pounds.
Daniel_Sweden says on 11/May/09
back in the WCW days i rembember in one match that he was build as 7'4 and 552 pounds..*lol* i think it was back in the nWo days 1998-1999..
two true giants and there real heights and weights according to me:)
Paul Wight peak: 7'0 465 pounds
Andre the Giant: 7'0 500 pounds
That's nice. Peak weight huh? What does that actually mean to you? Big Show was about 375 pounds in 1995 and by 2006-2007 he was around 550. Today he's 485.
Andre started out at 300 pounds and climbed up to 565 pounds at his heaviest...
You should specify what you mean by peak and realize that these men's weight has gone up and down. Andre wrestled for 29 years and so he wasn't always 500 pounds.
topdweeb said on 11/May/09
I still question whether or not Big Show actually shrunk. Does anyone have any proof that he did?
I still question whether or not Big Show actually shrunk. Does anyone have any proof that he did?
Daniel_Sweden said on 11/May/09
back in the WCW days i rembember in one match that he was build as 7'4 and 552 pounds..*lol* i think it was back in the nWo days 1998-1999..
two true giants and there real heights and weights according to me:)
Paul Wight peak: 7'0 465 pounds
Andre the Giant: 7'0 500 pounds
back in the WCW days i rembember in one match that he was build as 7'4 and 552 pounds..*lol* i think it was back in the nWo days 1998-1999..
two true giants and there real heights and weights according to me:)
Paul Wight peak: 7'0 465 pounds
Andre the Giant: 7'0 500 pounds
said on 10/May/09
Big Show was still billed 440-441 lbs. in the first quarter of 2009.
Big Show was still billed 440-441 lbs. in the first quarter of 2009.
MK said on 10/May/09
Danimal says on 9/May/09
He's been gaining weight since his return. He'll be 600 pounds in a few years, mark my words.
Sad but true, alot of people predicted this after seeing his impressive new shape at wm24, in which he hardly broke a sweat, and then just about 14 months later he's sweating bucketloads within minuites(even seconds). IMO he's got 5 years max as a pro-wrestler(if he's smart). Any guy over 40 would struggle for stamina in any proffesional sport, and in Big Shows case it would be 5 fold.
Danimal says on 9/May/09
He's been gaining weight since his return. He'll be 600 pounds in a few years, mark my words.
Sad but true, alot of people predicted this after seeing his impressive new shape at wm24, in which he hardly broke a sweat, and then just about 14 months later he's sweating bucketloads within minuites(even seconds). IMO he's got 5 years max as a pro-wrestler(if he's smart). Any guy over 40 would struggle for stamina in any proffesional sport, and in Big Shows case it would be 5 fold.
topdweeb said on 9/May/09
Derek says on 9/May/09
"topdweeb- It wasn't a matter of Ola disagreeing with us. He ripped anyone that disagreed with him. He also bashed Christianity."
I guess I never experienced this side of Ola for myself. Why would Christianity ever be brought up on a height forum?
Anonymous says on 9/May/09
"what's the deal with this? First Big Show was listed 440 lbs. at wrestlemania 24, now Big Show has said he's 485 lbs. a while ago on WWE? I don't know what to believe anymore."
What's there not to understand? WM 24 was over a year ago and he weighed 441 lbs. Currently, he weighs 485 lbs. So obviously he gained weight since WM 24. Seems pretty obvious and straight forward to me.
Derek says on 9/May/09
"topdweeb- It wasn't a matter of Ola disagreeing with us. He ripped anyone that disagreed with him. He also bashed Christianity."
I guess I never experienced this side of Ola for myself. Why would Christianity ever be brought up on a height forum?
Anonymous says on 9/May/09
"what's the deal with this? First Big Show was listed 440 lbs. at wrestlemania 24, now Big Show has said he's 485 lbs. a while ago on WWE? I don't know what to believe anymore."
What's there not to understand? WM 24 was over a year ago and he weighed 441 lbs. Currently, he weighs 485 lbs. So obviously he gained weight since WM 24. Seems pretty obvious and straight forward to me.
James S said on 9/May/09
weather show is 6ft 11 7ft 2 or even 10ft 5, Its almost upsetting watching him now, in the 90s he was a mean mean looking dude and was very well built but now hes just fat and unhealthy. Show do something before its to late :(
weather show is 6ft 11 7ft 2 or even 10ft 5, Its almost upsetting watching him now, in the 90s he was a mean mean looking dude and was very well built but now hes just fat and unhealthy. Show do something before its to late :(
Danimal said on 9/May/09
Anonymous says on 9/May/09
what's the deal with this? First Big Show was listed 440 lbs. at wrestlemania 24, now Big Show has said he's 485 lbs. a while ago on WWE? I don't know what to believe anymore.
He's been gaining weight since his return. He'll be 600 pounds in a few years, mark my words.
Anonymous says on 9/May/09
what's the deal with this? First Big Show was listed 440 lbs. at wrestlemania 24, now Big Show has said he's 485 lbs. a while ago on WWE? I don't know what to believe anymore.
He's been gaining weight since his return. He'll be 600 pounds in a few years, mark my words.
Anonymous said on 9/May/09
what's the deal with this? First Big Show was listed 440 lbs. at wrestlemania 24, now Big Show has said he's 485 lbs. a while ago on WWE? I don't know what to believe anymore.
what's the deal with this? First Big Show was listed 440 lbs. at wrestlemania 24, now Big Show has said he's 485 lbs. a while ago on WWE? I don't know what to believe anymore.
Derek said on 9/May/09
topdweeb- It wasn't a matter of Ola disagreeing with us. He ripped anyone that disagreed with him. He also bashed Christianity.
topdweeb- It wasn't a matter of Ola disagreeing with us. He ripped anyone that disagreed with him. He also bashed Christianity.
Boss said on 9/May/09
The camera angle is of Andre Haystacks is very similar to this Undertaker Big Show pic. As you can clearly see Undertaker looks around the same height as Big Show which as we know is just wrong.Click Here So what's the difference with Andre Haystacks there is none. The pics both have the low camera angle and one favours Undertaker and the other favours Haystacks and this is why they look taller in comparison than they actually are. Here is what Andre and Haystacks would have looked like and Andre's in wrestling gear so footware advantage to Haystcks.Click Here
The camera angle is of Andre Haystacks is very similar to this Undertaker Big Show pic. As you can clearly see Undertaker looks around the same height as Big Show which as we know is just wrong.Click Here So what's the difference with Andre Haystacks there is none. The pics both have the low camera angle and one favours Undertaker and the other favours Haystacks and this is why they look taller in comparison than they actually are. Here is what Andre and Haystacks would have looked like and Andre's in wrestling gear so footware advantage to Haystcks.Click Here
topdweeb said on 8/May/09
Well, I guess you guys must have gotten him Banned because I don't see any of his posts anymore. Glad to see that disagreeing with the regulars on this site automatically marks someone as a "troll" which eventually leads to a ban.
Rob, are you serious? What exactly did the guy do that was just so offensive that you decided to cave and ban him? If people don't like his comments, they don't have to read them. It's called freedom of speech.
Editor Rob
Well, I guess you guys must have gotten him Banned because I don't see any of his posts anymore. Glad to see that disagreeing with the regulars on this site automatically marks someone as a "troll" which eventually leads to a ban.
Rob, are you serious? What exactly did the guy do that was just so offensive that you decided to cave and ban him? If people don't like his comments, they don't have to read them. It's called freedom of speech.
Editor Rob a while back when I first Banned him he had the audacity to threaten the site.
sometimes I just like to let people think they have the upper hand, but I rarely forget.
sometimes I just like to let people think they have the upper hand, but I rarely forget.
topdweeb said on 8/May/09
Danimal: I remember Cyclops, he was pretty annoying. I don't know. I just don't find anything Ola does or says all that annoying I guess.
Danimal: I remember Cyclops, he was pretty annoying. I don't know. I just don't find anything Ola does or says all that annoying I guess.
Danimal said on 8/May/09
Sorry, but I have to say it. There is some serious favoritism on this site and long-timers like myself don't get the respect I deserve. I may not provide 100's of pics like some on here do, but the blatant ignoring of my requests is not cool.
Zack81, rodman was not listed at 6'6" in the NBA. He has been listed at 6'7" and 6'8". He describes himself as being 6'6", but the THEN 6'4.75" Hogan (late 80's) was more than 1" shorter than him.
Sorry, but I have to say it. There is some serious favoritism on this site and long-timers like myself don't get the respect I deserve. I may not provide 100's of pics like some on here do, but the blatant ignoring of my requests is not cool.
Zack81, rodman was not listed at 6'6" in the NBA. He has been listed at 6'7" and 6'8". He describes himself as being 6'6", but the THEN 6'4.75" Hogan (late 80's) was more than 1" shorter than him.
Derek said on 8/May/09
Danimal has a valid point. Rob lets Ola do whatever the hell he wants. I never had a problem with Viper.
Danimal has a valid point. Rob lets Ola do whatever the hell he wants. I never had a problem with Viper.
Anonymous said on 8/May/09
Zack81 = viper
Zack81 = viper
Danimal said on 8/May/09
topweed, Jason was a troll, but he was intelligent and he didn't have two different personalities (the arrogant aggressor/the helpless victim), the way Ola does. Ola has been a thorn in MANY people's side for a long time. It's not the fact that he lowers people's height and then raises them and then lowers them again, forgetting that he raised them only months before, but acts like her never did. It's his blatant lack of knowledge of the sport and of the wrestlers. I LOVE the sport of wrestling and always have. I have more respect for the wrestlers. When guys/girls like Ola just spew out claims in a close-minded and arrogant manner and laughs in the face of those who don't agree, I take offense. I don't think my claims are outlandish. I've been posting on here regularly for 4.5 years and there was only one other person who used to be as ignorant as Ola and that wasn't Jason, or Viper (who I had NOTHING against). The users name was Cyclops. Ola seems to be built out of the same kind as he was. I think I'll just ignore Ola from now on. I have nothing against anyone on here other than him and most on here respect me, as I do them.
topweed, Jason was a troll, but he was intelligent and he didn't have two different personalities (the arrogant aggressor/the helpless victim), the way Ola does. Ola has been a thorn in MANY people's side for a long time. It's not the fact that he lowers people's height and then raises them and then lowers them again, forgetting that he raised them only months before, but acts like her never did. It's his blatant lack of knowledge of the sport and of the wrestlers. I LOVE the sport of wrestling and always have. I have more respect for the wrestlers. When guys/girls like Ola just spew out claims in a close-minded and arrogant manner and laughs in the face of those who don't agree, I take offense. I don't think my claims are outlandish. I've been posting on here regularly for 4.5 years and there was only one other person who used to be as ignorant as Ola and that wasn't Jason, or Viper (who I had NOTHING against). The users name was Cyclops. Ola seems to be built out of the same kind as he was. I think I'll just ignore Ola from now on. I have nothing against anyone on here other than him and most on here respect me, as I do them.
Zack81 said on 8/May/09
Why would the NBA list Rodman at 6-6 though? Ive never heard of the NBA actually downgrading players.
Why would the NBA list Rodman at 6-6 though? Ive never heard of the NBA actually downgrading players.
Danimal said on 7/May/09
topdweeb says on 7/May/09
Danimal: when you claim that Big Show looks 6" taller than a 6' 7" Haystacks back in WCW, and then you point out that he only looks 3" taller than 6' 7" Rodman, and attribute the difference being due to height loss, that does indeed imply that you are saying Big Show lost 3" of height. Since you're now saying Big Show has not lost so much as 3", then care to explain? Because if Big Show is 6' 11 like you say, then he should have 4" on Rodman.
Thing is, I can't explain it. I think Rodman is at least 6'7" and may even be closer to 6'8". No way is he only 6'6". I do believe that Big Show was between 7'0" and 7'1" in the WCW and is hovering around 6'11" today. He probably does have 4" on Rodman if both men stood straight.
topdweeb says on 7/May/09
Danimal: when you claim that Big Show looks 6" taller than a 6' 7" Haystacks back in WCW, and then you point out that he only looks 3" taller than 6' 7" Rodman, and attribute the difference being due to height loss, that does indeed imply that you are saying Big Show lost 3" of height. Since you're now saying Big Show has not lost so much as 3", then care to explain? Because if Big Show is 6' 11 like you say, then he should have 4" on Rodman.
Thing is, I can't explain it. I think Rodman is at least 6'7" and may even be closer to 6'8". No way is he only 6'6". I do believe that Big Show was between 7'0" and 7'1" in the WCW and is hovering around 6'11" today. He probably does have 4" on Rodman if both men stood straight.
MK said on 7/May/09
Rodman looked around 6'8'' every time he stepped into the ring in wcw, Haystacks could have been as low as 6'6'' by 1996, and dont forget Shows boots.
Click Here
Rodman looked around 6'8'' every time he stepped into the ring in wcw, Haystacks could have been as low as 6'6'' by 1996, and dont forget Shows boots.
Click Here
KingNick said on 7/May/09
Big Show says on 7/May/09
KingNick says on 6/May/09
My issue with the pic is that I think Haystacks has a bit of a camera advantage. Here's a match with Andre and Haystacks tag teaming together Click Here there's no distinct staredown though so it's hard to tell.
Kingnick the Haystacks in the video is Haystacks Calhoun, not Giant Haystacks. Andre would've been a lot taller than Calhoun because Calhoun was 'billed' at 6'4". Don't know if he really was that tall as I've not seen enough material on him to make an accurate judgment.
Wow sorry man I totally didn't realize they were different people. I just looked it up and you're right lol my bad.
JT, I forgot about that other pic with Rodman and that 6'10" guy. If that guy really is 6'10", then Rodman has got to be closer to 6'8". No way there's a 4 inch difference there: Click Here
And I don't doubt he towered over Vegas' 6'4" friend and I don't doubt he had 3"-4" on Akebono. My point is I think he may have lost height during his hiatus when he dropped the ECW title. I'm not solid on that though. It's hard to tell with his posture.
Big Show says on 7/May/09
KingNick says on 6/May/09
My issue with the pic is that I think Haystacks has a bit of a camera advantage. Here's a match with Andre and Haystacks tag teaming together Click Here there's no distinct staredown though so it's hard to tell.
Kingnick the Haystacks in the video is Haystacks Calhoun, not Giant Haystacks. Andre would've been a lot taller than Calhoun because Calhoun was 'billed' at 6'4". Don't know if he really was that tall as I've not seen enough material on him to make an accurate judgment.
Wow sorry man I totally didn't realize they were different people. I just looked it up and you're right lol my bad.
JT, I forgot about that other pic with Rodman and that 6'10" guy. If that guy really is 6'10", then Rodman has got to be closer to 6'8". No way there's a 4 inch difference there: Click Here
And I don't doubt he towered over Vegas' 6'4" friend and I don't doubt he had 3"-4" on Akebono. My point is I think he may have lost height during his hiatus when he dropped the ECW title. I'm not solid on that though. It's hard to tell with his posture.
topdweeb said on 7/May/09
Danimal: when you claim that Big Show looks 6" taller than a 6' 7" Haystacks back in WCW, and then you point out that he only looks 3" taller than 6' 7" Rodman, and attribute the difference being due to height loss, that does indeed imply that you are saying Big Show lost 3" of height. Since you're now saying Big Show has not lost so much as 3", then care to explain? Because if Big Show is 6' 11 like you say, then he should have 4" on Rodman.
Danimal: when you claim that Big Show looks 6" taller than a 6' 7" Haystacks back in WCW, and then you point out that he only looks 3" taller than 6' 7" Rodman, and attribute the difference being due to height loss, that does indeed imply that you are saying Big Show lost 3" of height. Since you're now saying Big Show has not lost so much as 3", then care to explain? Because if Big Show is 6' 11 like you say, then he should have 4" on Rodman.
Danimal said on 7/May/09
I never claimed he lost 3". I have maintained that he was 7'0.5"-7'1" in his WCW days and looks to be no more than 6'11" today. I was REFERENCING his pic with RODMAN, THAT'S ALL.
ROB, can you do something about OLA. He is like a disease on this site. You Banned Viper, yet to let Ola get away with whatever he wants. It's like a kindergarten in here at this stage. Don't you want this site to be taken seriously???
I never claimed he lost 3". I have maintained that he was 7'0.5"-7'1" in his WCW days and looks to be no more than 6'11" today. I was REFERENCING his pic with RODMAN, THAT'S ALL.
ROB, can you do something about OLA. He is like a disease on this site. You Banned Viper, yet to let Ola get away with whatever he wants. It's like a kindergarten in here at this stage. Don't you want this site to be taken seriously???
Danimal said on 7/May/09
I never claimed he lost 3". I have maintained that he was 7'0.5"-7'1" in his WCW days and looks to be no more than 6'11" today. I was REFERENCING his pic with RODMAN, THAT'S ALL.
ROB, can you do something about OLA. He is like a disease on this site. You Banned Viper, yet to let Ola get away with whatever he wants. It's like a kindergarten in here at this stage. Don't you want this site to be taken seriously???
I never claimed he lost 3". I have maintained that he was 7'0.5"-7'1" in his WCW days and looks to be no more than 6'11" today. I was REFERENCING his pic with RODMAN, THAT'S ALL.
ROB, can you do something about OLA. He is like a disease on this site. You Banned Viper, yet to let Ola get away with whatever he wants. It's like a kindergarten in here at this stage. Don't you want this site to be taken seriously???
Big Show said on 7/May/09
JT says on 7/May/09
Big Show says on 7/May/09
....How tall does everyone think Haystacks is? From his staredown with Big Show a while back, I'd say 6'7". Could he have been a 6'8" peak? I know he was billed 6'11".
That was still part of KingNick's message. I forgot to delete it and didn't realize this until after I saw my message appear on the board.
However my estimates on Haystacks are close to KingNick's. I think Haystacks was 6'7.5-6'8 peak (he looked it in a 1982 next to legit 6'4.5" Pat Roach). In 1996 he was probably a weak 6'7.
JT says on 7/May/09
Big Show says on 7/May/09
....How tall does everyone think Haystacks is? From his staredown with Big Show a while back, I'd say 6'7". Could he have been a 6'8" peak? I know he was billed 6'11".
That was still part of KingNick's message. I forgot to delete it and didn't realize this until after I saw my message appear on the board.
However my estimates on Haystacks are close to KingNick's. I think Haystacks was 6'7.5-6'8 peak (he looked it in a 1982 next to legit 6'4.5" Pat Roach). In 1996 he was probably a weak 6'7.
mike said on 7/May/09
big show is 7'0" minamal 6'11".
big show is 7'0" minamal 6'11".
JT said on 7/May/09
Big Show says on 7/May/09
....How tall does everyone think Haystacks is? From his staredown with Big Show a while back, I'd say 6'7". Could he have been a 6'8" peak? I know he was billed 6'11".
Hard to say. IMO, probably in the 6
Big Show says on 7/May/09
....How tall does everyone think Haystacks is? From his staredown with Big Show a while back, I'd say 6'7". Could he have been a 6'8" peak? I know he was billed 6'11".
Hard to say. IMO, probably in the 6
Big Show said on 7/May/09
KingNick says on 6/May/09
My issue with the pic is that I think Haystacks has a bit of a camera advantage. Here's a match with Andre and Haystacks tag teaming together Click Here there's no distinct staredown though so it's hard to tell.
Kingnick the Haystacks in the video is Haystacks Calhoun, not Giant Haystacks. Andre would've been a lot taller than Calhoun because Calhoun was 'billed' at 6'4". Don't know if he really was that tall as I've not seen enough material on him to make an accurate judgment.
How tall does everyone think Haystacks is? From his staredown with Big Show a while back, I'd say 6'7". Could he have been a 6'8" peak? I know he was billed 6'11".
KingNick says on 6/May/09
My issue with the pic is that I think Haystacks has a bit of a camera advantage. Here's a match with Andre and Haystacks tag teaming together Click Here there's no distinct staredown though so it's hard to tell.
Kingnick the Haystacks in the video is Haystacks Calhoun, not Giant Haystacks. Andre would've been a lot taller than Calhoun because Calhoun was 'billed' at 6'4". Don't know if he really was that tall as I've not seen enough material on him to make an accurate judgment.
How tall does everyone think Haystacks is? From his staredown with Big Show a while back, I'd say 6'7". Could he have been a 6'8" peak? I know he was billed 6'11".
JT said on 7/May/09
KingNick says on 7/May/09
....I have to admit, I've been questioning Big Show's height lately. What's everyone think of that pic? Here it is again: Click Here....
There is a camera tilt in favor of Rodman though, who IMO is an easy 6'7". I've posted this before Click Here on how Rodman measures up to Big Show and 6'10" minimum John Salley. Hig huge head, including forehead, again makes him appear shorter than he really is. I can always post the barefoot pics of Big Show and Akebono, which are about the best evidence we have as to his height. We also have the pic of Big Show with Vegas's 6'4" friend....
KingNick says on 7/May/09
....I have to admit, I've been questioning Big Show's height lately. What's everyone think of that pic? Here it is again: Click Here....
There is a camera tilt in favor of Rodman though, who IMO is an easy 6'7". I've posted this before Click Here on how Rodman measures up to Big Show and 6'10" minimum John Salley. Hig huge head, including forehead, again makes him appear shorter than he really is. I can always post the barefoot pics of Big Show and Akebono, which are about the best evidence we have as to his height. We also have the pic of Big Show with Vegas's 6'4" friend....
Halb said on 7/May/09
Ola. Post a pic of Akira Maeda and Karelin
Ola. Post a pic of Akira Maeda and Karelin
KingNick said on 7/May/09
MK says on 6/May/09
daniel_Sweden says on 5/May/09
i just find a picture of dennis rodman and paul wight together..wight dosn't seems lika a legit 7 foot man..dennis rodman claims he is 6'6 but was listed by NBL as 6'8.here he's listed as 6'6.5 so if rodman is 6'6 as he claims or 6'6.5 then paul wight is maybe 6'9.5 or 6'10. no way paul wight is 7 feet if rodman is 6'6 or 6'6.5..please check it out and search for dennis rodman paul wight on google images and you'll find at once a picture where both stands next to each other and shaking hans where rodman wears a red shirt.
This one i'm sure you mean. Click Here
I have to admit, I've been questioning Big Show's height lately. What's everyone think of that pic? Here it is again: Click Here
Big Show wears CHUNKY shoes in the ring today (see pic 25!!) Click Here
I know in the past I've pointed this out and people have said they don't give much height but I seriously doubt that. They're as big, if not bigger, than Kane's boots (see pic 3) Click Here
I definitely think Big Show was a full 7' during his WCW days and very early WWE days. But could he be 6'10" now?
Here's a nice shot of Undertaker's current boots btw Click Here
MK says on 6/May/09
daniel_Sweden says on 5/May/09
i just find a picture of dennis rodman and paul wight together..wight dosn't seems lika a legit 7 foot man..dennis rodman claims he is 6'6 but was listed by NBL as 6'8.here he's listed as 6'6.5 so if rodman is 6'6 as he claims or 6'6.5 then paul wight is maybe 6'9.5 or 6'10. no way paul wight is 7 feet if rodman is 6'6 or 6'6.5..please check it out and search for dennis rodman paul wight on google images and you'll find at once a picture where both stands next to each other and shaking hans where rodman wears a red shirt.
This one i'm sure you mean. Click Here
I have to admit, I've been questioning Big Show's height lately. What's everyone think of that pic? Here it is again: Click Here
Big Show wears CHUNKY shoes in the ring today (see pic 25!!) Click Here
I know in the past I've pointed this out and people have said they don't give much height but I seriously doubt that. They're as big, if not bigger, than Kane's boots (see pic 3) Click Here
I definitely think Big Show was a full 7' during his WCW days and very early WWE days. But could he be 6'10" now?
Here's a nice shot of Undertaker's current boots btw Click Here
Danimal said on 6/May/09
How is it that Big Show looked to be 3" taller than 6'7" Rodman in 2007, yet seemed to be about 6" taller than 6'7" Haystacks in 1995? HEIGHT LOSS friends.
How is it that Big Show looked to be 3" taller than 6'7" Rodman in 2007, yet seemed to be about 6" taller than 6'7" Haystacks in 1995? HEIGHT LOSS friends.
topdweeb said on 6/May/09
KingNick: That camera angle isn't that bad. To get an accurate idea of how two people compare, you don't need them to be PERFECTLY aligned. And no one shrinks 6" every time they are in mid-stride. LOL people would look pretty weird if they did that. BTW, Big Show had WAY more than 2 inches on Haystacks. This all supports my theory that Andre was never as tall as Big Show. I bet even the Big Show today who I think lost an inch since WCW, would be taller than a peak Andre. I remember when I was a kid and used to believe just about everything they threw at me in pro wrestling (I even thought their names were real, like I thought the Ultimate Warrior's real name was "the Ultimate Warrior). But the thing I never believed was Andre being 7' 4 even though I wanted to so bad. He couldn't even fool me as a kid at 8 that he was 7' 4 and I was pretty darn gullible.
KingNick: That camera angle isn't that bad. To get an accurate idea of how two people compare, you don't need them to be PERFECTLY aligned. And no one shrinks 6" every time they are in mid-stride. LOL people would look pretty weird if they did that. BTW, Big Show had WAY more than 2 inches on Haystacks. This all supports my theory that Andre was never as tall as Big Show. I bet even the Big Show today who I think lost an inch since WCW, would be taller than a peak Andre. I remember when I was a kid and used to believe just about everything they threw at me in pro wrestling (I even thought their names were real, like I thought the Ultimate Warrior's real name was "the Ultimate Warrior). But the thing I never believed was Andre being 7' 4 even though I wanted to so bad. He couldn't even fool me as a kid at 8 that he was 7' 4 and I was pretty darn gullible.
KingNick said on 6/May/09
Ola says on 6/May/09
KingNick, how much taller do u believe andre would been if he didnt bend his legs?
I'm really not sure, but I would think Andre had a minimum of 2" on him from that camera angle if he stood straight.
My issue with the pic is that I think Haystacks has a bit of a camera advantage. Here's a match with Andre and Haystacks tag teaming together Click Here there's no distinct staredown though so it's hard to tell.
That video makes me lean more towards a 3" difference tho. So my idea is this:
We've got plenty of great photoshop experts on here. Can someone straighten Andre out in the photo and see how tall he would be? And be honest, don't make him 6" taller.
How tall does everyone think Haystacks is? From his staredown with Big Show a while back, I'd say 6'7". Could he have been a 6'8" peak? I know he was billed 6'11".
Ola says on 6/May/09
KingNick, how much taller do u believe andre would been if he didnt bend his legs?
I'm really not sure, but I would think Andre had a minimum of 2" on him from that camera angle if he stood straight.
My issue with the pic is that I think Haystacks has a bit of a camera advantage. Here's a match with Andre and Haystacks tag teaming together Click Here there's no distinct staredown though so it's hard to tell.
That video makes me lean more towards a 3" difference tho. So my idea is this:
We've got plenty of great photoshop experts on here. Can someone straighten Andre out in the photo and see how tall he would be? And be honest, don't make him 6" taller.
How tall does everyone think Haystacks is? From his staredown with Big Show a while back, I'd say 6'7". Could he have been a 6'8" peak? I know he was billed 6'11".
kinggollum said on 6/May/09
Ola says on 5/May/09
Danimal what have friends to do with the(from your point of view) HORRIBLE truth? the truth that andre and haystacks were in same ring and andre was just a tad taller?! iam not here to make friends. iam here to put the guys at their correct height! YOU on the other hand is here to put them even OVER their BILLED heights AND weights...
but to answer your question, yes i have alot of friends. have u? ... i doubt! since u seems to LIVE at this site
Ola, like you can talk, at least Danimal has his on opinion and not sounding like a broken record like you for the last two years.
Ola says on 5/May/09
Danimal what have friends to do with the(from your point of view) HORRIBLE truth? the truth that andre and haystacks were in same ring and andre was just a tad taller?! iam not here to make friends. iam here to put the guys at their correct height! YOU on the other hand is here to put them even OVER their BILLED heights AND weights...
but to answer your question, yes i have alot of friends. have u? ... i doubt! since u seems to LIVE at this site
Ola, like you can talk, at least Danimal has his on opinion and not sounding like a broken record like you for the last two years.
Alex said on 6/May/09
Hogan at 6'5-6'5.5 in 1987 does put Andre at no more than 6'10 I agree on. That was no more than a 5 inch difference between the 2. I still find it funny how they wanted us to believe it was 9 inches! LOL
Hogan at 6'5-6'5.5 in 1987 does put Andre at no more than 6'10 I agree on. That was no more than a 5 inch difference between the 2. I still find it funny how they wanted us to believe it was 9 inches! LOL
MK said on 6/May/09
daniel_Sweden says on 5/May/09
i just find a picture of dennis rodman and paul wight together..wight dosn't seems lika a legit 7 foot man..dennis rodman claims he is 6'6 but was listed by NBL as 6'8.here he's listed as 6'6.5 so if rodman is 6'6 as he claims or 6'6.5 then paul wight is maybe 6'9.5 or 6'10. no way paul wight is 7 feet if rodman is 6'6 or 6'6.5..please check it out and search for dennis rodman paul wight on google images and you'll find at once a picture where both stands next to each other and shaking hans where rodman wears a red shirt.
This one i'm sure you mean. Click Here
daniel_Sweden says on 5/May/09
i just find a picture of dennis rodman and paul wight together..wight dosn't seems lika a legit 7 foot man..dennis rodman claims he is 6'6 but was listed by NBL as 6'8.here he's listed as 6'6.5 so if rodman is 6'6 as he claims or 6'6.5 then paul wight is maybe 6'9.5 or 6'10. no way paul wight is 7 feet if rodman is 6'6 or 6'6.5..please check it out and search for dennis rodman paul wight on google images and you'll find at once a picture where both stands next to each other and shaking hans where rodman wears a red shirt.
This one i'm sure you mean. Click Here
topdweeb said on 5/May/09
LOL people at this site are just insane if they think that slight stride of Andre is going to shrink him down that much. He is standing straight enough to tell that he isn't that much taller than Haystacks. And the camera angle isn't any worse off than any other picture. It seems that so many people here are so blind because they think Andre is a legend and his status must be protected at all costs.
LOL people at this site are just insane if they think that slight stride of Andre is going to shrink him down that much. He is standing straight enough to tell that he isn't that much taller than Haystacks. And the camera angle isn't any worse off than any other picture. It seems that so many people here are so blind because they think Andre is a legend and his status must be protected at all costs.
daniel_Sweden said on 5/May/09
i just find a picture of dennis rodman and paul wight together..wight dosn't seems lika a legit 7 foot man..dennis rodman claims he is 6'6 but was listed by NBL as 6'8.here he's listed as 6'6.5 so if rodman is 6'6 as he claims or 6'6.5 then paul wight is maybe 6'9.5 or 6'10. no way paul wight is 7 feet if rodman is 6'6 or 6'6.5..please check it out and search for dennis rodman paul wight on google images and you'll find at once a picture where both stands next to each other and shaking hans where rodman wears a red shirt.
i just find a picture of dennis rodman and paul wight together..wight dosn't seems lika a legit 7 foot man..dennis rodman claims he is 6'6 but was listed by NBL as 6'8.here he's listed as 6'6.5 so if rodman is 6'6 as he claims or 6'6.5 then paul wight is maybe 6'9.5 or 6'10. no way paul wight is 7 feet if rodman is 6'6 or 6'6.5..please check it out and search for dennis rodman paul wight on google images and you'll find at once a picture where both stands next to each other and shaking hans where rodman wears a red shirt.
Danimal said on 5/May/09
Ola says on 5/May/09
Boss haha! we have a pic of them both in the SAME RING but you cant accept that, same goes for you danimal! why put two pics together where we dont have a clue of the angle, camera height, distance, etc. INSTEAD of a pic when both are in the same ring?! ridiculous!
you two cant accept the reality as it is
You must not have many friends in the real world, because you sure don't know how to make them on here.
Ola says on 5/May/09
Boss haha! we have a pic of them both in the SAME RING but you cant accept that, same goes for you danimal! why put two pics together where we dont have a clue of the angle, camera height, distance, etc. INSTEAD of a pic when both are in the same ring?! ridiculous!
you two cant accept the reality as it is
You must not have many friends in the real world, because you sure don't know how to make them on here.
Marble said on 5/May/09
Uhm because the picture is unclear and andre is nowhere near standing straight ? alot of comparisons are done of people who are already in the same picture together just to see if the picture isnt misleading .
Uhm because the picture is unclear and andre is nowhere near standing straight ? alot of comparisons are done of people who are already in the same picture together just to see if the picture isnt misleading .
The Ben said on 4/May/09
My first wrestling show in 1991 i saw Andre come to the ring with davey boy smith and he wasn't as tall as i expected (i was 15 at the time and probably expected 7'5).. I remember him not seeming much taller if any then the undertaker... I can believe Andre as low as 6'9 when he passed away.. I think if you take all evidence into account then 7ft seems a good estimate for peak height...
My first wrestling show in 1991 i saw Andre come to the ring with davey boy smith and he wasn't as tall as i expected (i was 15 at the time and probably expected 7'5).. I remember him not seeming much taller if any then the undertaker... I can believe Andre as low as 6'9 when he passed away.. I think if you take all evidence into account then 7ft seems a good estimate for peak height...
Boss said on 4/May/09
Here is what Andre & Haystacks would have looked like. Ola you refer to a pic with a horrible camera angle and the fact that Andre is in mid stride with his knees bent during the pic you keep reffering to. Here is Andre & Haystacks with the same guy and Andre is in wrestling gear so any footware advantage would go to Haystacks.
Click Here
Here is what Andre & Haystacks would have looked like. Ola you refer to a pic with a horrible camera angle and the fact that Andre is in mid stride with his knees bent during the pic you keep reffering to. Here is Andre & Haystacks with the same guy and Andre is in wrestling gear so any footware advantage would go to Haystacks.
Click Here
marble said on 4/May/09
why should we do the math when everything you say is biased and wrong as can be ola ?
why should we do the math when everything you say is biased and wrong as can be ola ?
Danimal said on 4/May/09
Ola says on 4/May/09
Andre wasnt much taller than haystacks, and haystacks had 10 inches on 5'6-5'7 mean gene. so do the math...
He was. Have you not seen the comparison pic of both of them with that Japanese man? andre had INCHES on Haystacks.
Ola says on 4/May/09
Andre wasnt much taller than haystacks, and haystacks had 10 inches on 5'6-5'7 mean gene. so do the math...
He was. Have you not seen the comparison pic of both of them with that Japanese man? andre had INCHES on Haystacks.
Derek said on 3/May/09
Assuming Hogan was 6'5"-6'5.5" in 1987, Andre was tops 6'10" at that point. I can believe he was 6'9" when he died.
Assuming Hogan was 6'5"-6'5.5" in 1987, Andre was tops 6'10" at that point. I can believe he was 6'9" when he died.
Alex said on 3/May/09
Danimal, Andre did look 6'10 max in the early 90's right before he died.
Danimal, Andre did look 6'10 max in the early 90's right before he died.
Danimal said on 3/May/09
I have read measurements of him being between 6'9"-6'10" at his autopsy, but until there are LEGAL MEDICAL documents, it's all just heresy and speculation.
I do believe a peak Andre stood NO less than 6'11.5"-7'0.25" and later on in life went down to about 6'10.5"-6'11" and towards the very end may have dipped to a FLAT 6'10" or just under that, but no less.
I have read measurements of him being between 6'9"-6'10" at his autopsy, but until there are LEGAL MEDICAL documents, it's all just heresy and speculation.
I do believe a peak Andre stood NO less than 6'11.5"-7'0.25" and later on in life went down to about 6'10.5"-6'11" and towards the very end may have dipped to a FLAT 6'10" or just under that, but no less.
Alex said on 3/May/09
A peak Andre was probably the same height as Big SHow today. Andre I put at 6'11ish at his peak.
A peak Andre was probably the same height as Big SHow today. Andre I put at 6'11ish at his peak.
kinggollum said on 3/May/09
topdweeb says on 30/Apr/09
kinggollum says on 30/Apr/09
"Then your blind Ola....oops I mean topdweeb."
You're implying that I am Ola? This is something that can be easily refuted as Rob can probably check our IP addresses and find that Ola and I are NOT the same person.
How about develop a brain before making such an asinine assertion.
How about you develop a brain before you make remarks stating andre was 6'9-10 peak, ola!
topdweeb says on 30/Apr/09
kinggollum says on 30/Apr/09
"Then your blind Ola....oops I mean topdweeb."
You're implying that I am Ola? This is something that can be easily refuted as Rob can probably check our IP addresses and find that Ola and I are NOT the same person.
How about develop a brain before making such an asinine assertion.
How about you develop a brain before you make remarks stating andre was 6'9-10 peak, ola!
Jake said on 2/May/09
Big Show is obese, and he has a hunched back and his height is now around 6'11" IMO. Standing toe to toe with The Great Khali on a number of occasions, with neither wearing lifts, its obvious there is a 1.5 inch height difference in favor of Khali.
Big Show is obese, and he has a hunched back and his height is now around 6'11" IMO. Standing toe to toe with The Great Khali on a number of occasions, with neither wearing lifts, its obvious there is a 1.5 inch height difference in favor of Khali.
topdweeb said on 2/May/09
hs2009 says on 1/May/09
"Wasn't there a measurement of Andre after he passed away?"
I don't know if this is true or not, but I heard he was measured at 6' 9.75" at death. He certainly only looked that tall to me.
hs2009 says on 1/May/09
"Wasn't there a measurement of Andre after he passed away?"
I don't know if this is true or not, but I heard he was measured at 6' 9.75" at death. He certainly only looked that tall to me.
Boss said on 2/May/09
hs2009 says on 1/May/09
Ola says on 29/Apr/09
Just saying the way it is, he was just barely taller than haystacks... who was tops 6'6 so i started to believe that andre's 6'9 3/4 measurment must have been in shoes? i can live with 6'10
I agree, 6'10" for Andre seems fair. PowerSlam said in this months issue that they believed him to be 6'10" also.
Wasn't there a measurement of Andre after he passed away?
Yes he was measured at 6'10 when he died in France.
hs2009 says on 1/May/09
Ola says on 29/Apr/09
Just saying the way it is, he was just barely taller than haystacks... who was tops 6'6 so i started to believe that andre's 6'9 3/4 measurment must have been in shoes? i can live with 6'10
I agree, 6'10" for Andre seems fair. PowerSlam said in this months issue that they believed him to be 6'10" also.
Wasn't there a measurement of Andre after he passed away?
Yes he was measured at 6'10 when he died in France.
hs2009 said on 1/May/09
Ola says on 29/Apr/09
Just saying the way it is, he was just barely taller than haystacks... who was tops 6'6 so i started to believe that andre's 6'9 3/4 measurment must have been in shoes? i can live with 6'10
I agree, 6'10" for Andre seems fair. PowerSlam said in this months issue that they believed him to be 6'10" also.
Wasn't there a measurement of Andre after he passed away?
Ola says on 29/Apr/09
Just saying the way it is, he was just barely taller than haystacks... who was tops 6'6 so i started to believe that andre's 6'9 3/4 measurment must have been in shoes? i can live with 6'10
I agree, 6'10" for Andre seems fair. PowerSlam said in this months issue that they believed him to be 6'10" also.
Wasn't there a measurement of Andre after he passed away?
Bobby said on 1/May/09
Wow at the pic of Shaq towering of the Rock...Rocks like 6'4.I think Big Show looks a couple inches shorter than he was in WCW..I know the shaved head makes him look shorter..but I'd guess he is about 6'11..maybe a tad taller..but he looked a legit 7' in WCW.
Wow at the pic of Shaq towering of the Rock...Rocks like 6'4.I think Big Show looks a couple inches shorter than he was in WCW..I know the shaved head makes him look shorter..but I'd guess he is about 6'11..maybe a tad taller..but he looked a legit 7' in WCW.
Smarty said on 30/Apr/09
Big Show has always been taller then Andre and always will be by about .50 or an inch.
Big Show has always been taller then Andre and always will be by about .50 or an inch.
topdweeb said on 30/Apr/09
kinggollum says on 30/Apr/09
"Then your blind Ola....oops I mean topdweeb."
You're implying that I am Ola? This is something that can be easily refuted as Rob can probably check our IP addresses and find that Ola and I are NOT the same person.
How about develop a brain before making such an asinine assertion.
kinggollum says on 30/Apr/09
"Then your blind Ola....oops I mean topdweeb."
You're implying that I am Ola? This is something that can be easily refuted as Rob can probably check our IP addresses and find that Ola and I are NOT the same person.
How about develop a brain before making such an asinine assertion.
kinggollum said on 30/Apr/09
topdweeb says on 28/Apr/09
Anonymous says on 28/Apr/09
"a peak Andre was taller than a peak Big Show by about an inch."
lol whatever. I'm willing to bet that a non-peak, current Big Show is taller than a peak Andre. Andre I think was at best 6' 10.
Then your blind Ola....oops I mean topdweeb.
topdweeb says on 28/Apr/09
Anonymous says on 28/Apr/09
"a peak Andre was taller than a peak Big Show by about an inch."
lol whatever. I'm willing to bet that a non-peak, current Big Show is taller than a peak Andre. Andre I think was at best 6' 10.
Then your blind Ola....oops I mean topdweeb.
kinggollum said on 29/Apr/09
topdweeb says on 28/Apr/09
Ola says on 28/Apr/09
"Big show would have dwarf andre the giant totaly exacly like he did with haystacks"
Hmmm... I'm not quite prepared to say that, but I do think Big Show is taller than Andre ever was. That pic with Haystacks.. I don't really know what to make of that.
Then your blind Ola....oops I mean topdweeb.
topdweeb says on 28/Apr/09
Ola says on 28/Apr/09
"Big show would have dwarf andre the giant totaly exacly like he did with haystacks"
Hmmm... I'm not quite prepared to say that, but I do think Big Show is taller than Andre ever was. That pic with Haystacks.. I don't really know what to make of that.
Then your blind Ola....oops I mean topdweeb.
kinggollum said on 29/Apr/09
Big Show says on 29/Apr/09
Click Here
Click Here
Here's a tag-team match between Giant Baba & John Tenta vs. 2 Japanese Wrestlers. One of Tenta's first stints in Pro-Wrestling and he looks about a 100 lbs lighter than what he did 2 1/2 years later in the WWF.
Although there's not a perfect comparison between Baba & Tenta, you don't have to be an expert to see that Baba is clearly the taller of two. My guess is by around 2 inches.
I've Always heard that Baba was 6'8 and this vid proves it.
Big Show says on 29/Apr/09
Click Here
Click Here
Here's a tag-team match between Giant Baba & John Tenta vs. 2 Japanese Wrestlers. One of Tenta's first stints in Pro-Wrestling and he looks about a 100 lbs lighter than what he did 2 1/2 years later in the WWF.
Although there's not a perfect comparison between Baba & Tenta, you don't have to be an expert to see that Baba is clearly the taller of two. My guess is by around 2 inches.
I've Always heard that Baba was 6'8 and this vid proves it.
Big Show said on 29/Apr/09
Ola says on 29/Apr/09
Andre was no way near 6'10
6'10 would be the shortest I would go for. But I think in his prime he was closer to 6'11. If you think Andre is no where near 6'10 I wonder how tall you think Tyler Mane is? Tyler Mane looked closer in height to Kevin Nash than The Undertaker, whom I believe you think to be 6'8.
Ola says on 29/Apr/09
Andre was no way near 6'10
6'10 would be the shortest I would go for. But I think in his prime he was closer to 6'11. If you think Andre is no where near 6'10 I wonder how tall you think Tyler Mane is? Tyler Mane looked closer in height to Kevin Nash than The Undertaker, whom I believe you think to be 6'8.
Big Show said on 29/Apr/09
Click Here
Click Here
Here's a tag-team match between Giant Baba & John Tenta vs. 2 Japanese Wrestlers. One of Tenta's first stints in Pro-Wrestling and he looks about a 100 lbs lighter than what he did 2 1/2 years later in the WWF.
Although there's not a perfect comparison between Baba & Tenta, you don't have to be an expert to see that Baba is clearly the taller of two. My guess is by around 2 inches.
Click Here
Click Here
Here's a tag-team match between Giant Baba & John Tenta vs. 2 Japanese Wrestlers. One of Tenta's first stints in Pro-Wrestling and he looks about a 100 lbs lighter than what he did 2 1/2 years later in the WWF.
Although there's not a perfect comparison between Baba & Tenta, you don't have to be an expert to see that Baba is clearly the taller of two. My guess is by around 2 inches.
hs2009 said on 29/Apr/09
Ola was being fair not that long ago, I guess he's slipped back to his irrational downgrading.
Ola was being fair not that long ago, I guess he's slipped back to his irrational downgrading.
topdweeb said on 29/Apr/09
Ola: I really can't go any lower than that for Andre. He measured up way too well with Wilt Chamberlain. If Chamberlain is 7' 1, which he is, then there is absolutely no way that Andre would be that tall next to him if he was as short as your making him out to be.
Ola: I really can't go any lower than that for Andre. He measured up way too well with Wilt Chamberlain. If Chamberlain is 7' 1, which he is, then there is absolutely no way that Andre would be that tall next to him if he was as short as your making him out to be.
mike said on 29/Apr/09
ola Andre at wrestlemania had at least 4-5 inches on hogan who imo in his prime stood around 6'5".Andre was at least 6'10" then ,and 7'0" in his prime.
ola Andre at wrestlemania had at least 4-5 inches on hogan who imo in his prime stood around 6'5".Andre was at least 6'10" then ,and 7'0" in his prime.
topdweeb said on 28/Apr/09
Anonymous says on 28/Apr/09
"a peak Andre was taller than a peak Big Show by about an inch."
lol whatever. I'm willing to bet that a non-peak, current Big Show is taller than a peak Andre. Andre I think was at best 6' 10.
Anonymous says on 28/Apr/09
"a peak Andre was taller than a peak Big Show by about an inch."
lol whatever. I'm willing to bet that a non-peak, current Big Show is taller than a peak Andre. Andre I think was at best 6' 10.
Anonymous said on 28/Apr/09
Ola says on 28/Apr/09
Big show would have dwarf andre the giant totaly exacly like he did with haystacks
a peak Andre was taller than a peak Big Show by about an inch. Andre was around the same height as Khali and shaq. The only wrestlers I see having height on Andre is, Silva, Silo, Gonzales.
Ola says on 28/Apr/09
Big show would have dwarf andre the giant totaly exacly like he did with haystacks
a peak Andre was taller than a peak Big Show by about an inch. Andre was around the same height as Khali and shaq. The only wrestlers I see having height on Andre is, Silva, Silo, Gonzales.
topdweeb said on 28/Apr/09
Ola says on 28/Apr/09
"Big show would have dwarf andre the giant totaly exacly like he did with haystacks"
Hmmm... I'm not quite prepared to say that, but I do think Big Show is taller than Andre ever was. That pic with Haystacks.. I don't really know what to make of that.
Ola says on 28/Apr/09
"Big show would have dwarf andre the giant totaly exacly like he did with haystacks"
Hmmm... I'm not quite prepared to say that, but I do think Big Show is taller than Andre ever was. That pic with Haystacks.. I don't really know what to make of that.
mike said on 28/Apr/09
wcw big show 7'0" wwe big show 6'11".
wcw big show 7'0" wwe big show 6'11".
JT said on 27/Apr/09
Click Here The soles on Kane's boots look a little bigger than Big Show's but they don't look like the Munsters he has worn in the past.
Click Here The soles on Kane's boots look a little bigger than Big Show's but they don't look like the Munsters he has worn in the past.
Danimal said on 27/Apr/09
Seemed to be close to 7'1" in the WCW and seems to be under 7'0" today.
Seemed to be close to 7'1" in the WCW and seems to be under 7'0" today.
mike said on 27/Apr/09
test was at least 6'5" imo.
test was at least 6'5" imo.
James S said on 26/Apr/09
7ft now and 7ft 1 or a tad over when he was in his prime, I mean when he was with Taker, Test, Kane ect ect. in the 90s he looked every bit of 7ft 1 and I could belive 7ft 2 aswell and now a days next to Khali he looks the same height as Khali when he wants to, anything under 7ft is out of the question.
7ft now and 7ft 1 or a tad over when he was in his prime, I mean when he was with Taker, Test, Kane ect ect. in the 90s he looked every bit of 7ft 1 and I could belive 7ft 2 aswell and now a days next to Khali he looks the same height as Khali when he wants to, anything under 7ft is out of the question.
Atoadaso said on 25/Apr/09
Yeah, OOFatman Big Show was amazing when he 1st came to WWE(F). Probably the strongest wrestler ever in those days. No way could Brock Lesnar do a massive delayed chokeslam to a guy the size of Test. It's a shame he put on so much weight and lost the muscle from that video he had.
Yeah, OOFatman Big Show was amazing when he 1st came to WWE(F). Probably the strongest wrestler ever in those days. No way could Brock Lesnar do a massive delayed chokeslam to a guy the size of Test. It's a shame he put on so much weight and lost the muscle from that video he had.
Steven said on 25/Apr/09
Paul Wight looks 6'10" max here...
Paul Wight looks 6'10" max here...
topdweeb said on 24/Apr/09
OOFatman: Big Show is by far the best "giant" the WWE has ever seen in my opinion.
OOFatman: Big Show is by far the best "giant" the WWE has ever seen in my opinion.
Big Show said on 24/Apr/09
OOFatman says on 24/Apr/09
Just had to post this vid..Big Show showing just how agile he was back in his prime, or close to it at least...not sure how tall Test was?? RIP
I'd say Test was around 6'5", maybe 6'5.5".
OOFatman says on 24/Apr/09
Just had to post this vid..Big Show showing just how agile he was back in his prime, or close to it at least...not sure how tall Test was?? RIP
I'd say Test was around 6'5", maybe 6'5.5".
OOFatman said on 24/Apr/09
Just had to post this vid..Big Show showing just how agile he was back in his prime, or close to it at least...not sure how tall Test was?? RIP
Click Here
Just had to post this vid..Big Show showing just how agile he was back in his prime, or close to it at least...not sure how tall Test was?? RIP
Click Here
kinggollum said on 22/Apr/09
Ola says on 21/Apr/09
Vegas no **** :D but due to the fact that shaq is closer to camera, and his big heels... i would say he is tops 9 inches taller not 10
i still believe his 7'1 must have been in shoes
get a life, troll
Ola says on 21/Apr/09
Vegas no **** :D but due to the fact that shaq is closer to camera, and his big heels... i would say he is tops 9 inches taller not 10
i still believe his 7'1 must have been in shoes
get a life, troll
Alex said on 21/Apr/09
And Rock doesn't look nothing over 6'3 there with Shaq. Shaq is a bit closer to the camera, could make up to an inch looking more but he'd still have Rock by at least 10 inches since his head has gotta be at least 10 inches long.
And Rock doesn't look nothing over 6'3 there with Shaq. Shaq is a bit closer to the camera, could make up to an inch looking more but he'd still have Rock by at least 10 inches since his head has gotta be at least 10 inches long.
Atoadaso said on 21/Apr/09
not true at all... NBA players are given the option to be measured with or without shoes, and it's usually stated with which option the measurement represents.
not true at all... NBA players are given the option to be measured with or without shoes, and it's usually stated with which option the measurement represents.
kinggollum said on 19/Apr/09
mike says on 18/Apr/09
i would say paul wight is 6 ft 10 barefeet. i can't see 7 ft, that he claims to be. i would say dalip singh is 6 ft 11 1/2.
I would say.....your crazy!
mike says on 18/Apr/09
i would say paul wight is 6 ft 10 barefeet. i can't see 7 ft, that he claims to be. i would say dalip singh is 6 ft 11 1/2.
I would say.....your crazy!
Danimal said on 19/Apr/09
Alex says on 19/Apr/09
Nash is 6'9 max today
Not when ha had a face-off with 6'6" A-Train. He looked to still be all of 6'10".
Alex says on 19/Apr/09
Nash is 6'9 max today
Not when ha had a face-off with 6'6" A-Train. He looked to still be all of 6'10".
Alex said on 19/Apr/09
Nash is 6'9 max today.
Nash is 6'9 max today.
Clay said on 18/Apr/09
More like 7'0-7'0.25 at peak and 6'11.5 now. He hasnt lost much height IMO, just posture and he struts around without an inch of hair on his head anymore.
More like 7'0-7'0.25 at peak and 6'11.5 now. He hasnt lost much height IMO, just posture and he struts around without an inch of hair on his head anymore.
mike said on 18/Apr/09
i would say paul wight is 6 ft 10 barefeet. i can't see 7 ft, that he claims to be. i would say dalip singh is 6 ft 11 1/2.
i would say paul wight is 6 ft 10 barefeet. i can't see 7 ft, that he claims to be. i would say dalip singh is 6 ft 11 1/2.
dicksock said on 18/Apr/09
Has anyone seen this video on youtube? "Masked Kane and The Big Show backstage
"
There certainly doesn't appear to be more than an inch between them. What is up with that? Even in lifts, Glen Jacobs would be 6'10 at the most. This video certainly doesn't make Big Show look 7'. More like 6'11 at the most and thats assuming Kane was 6'10" in lifts! The staredown is strangly similar to that of Big John Studd and Bill Fralic. Also, anything above 375lbs for Show during that era is absurd. (and that is being generous)
Has anyone seen this video on youtube? "Masked Kane and The Big Show backstage
"
There certainly doesn't appear to be more than an inch between them. What is up with that? Even in lifts, Glen Jacobs would be 6'10 at the most. This video certainly doesn't make Big Show look 7'. More like 6'11 at the most and thats assuming Kane was 6'10" in lifts! The staredown is strangly similar to that of Big John Studd and Bill Fralic. Also, anything above 375lbs for Show during that era is absurd. (and that is being generous)
ancient Aztec Guy said on 17/Apr/09
I'll give show 7'1" at his prime and 7ft now. I highly doubt that at age 37 big show could have lost any more than 1 inch. Also I highly doubt Nash was under 6'10" at his peak.
I'll give show 7'1" at his prime and 7ft now. I highly doubt that at age 37 big show could have lost any more than 1 inch. Also I highly doubt Nash was under 6'10" at his peak.
ancient Aztec Guy said on 17/Apr/09
Saying goldberg is only 6'3" in shoes is impossible.
Saying goldberg is only 6'3" in shoes is impossible.
James S said on 17/Apr/09
I think that since he has been compared to Khali and when then started a rivalry Big Show has been using bigger boots which make him look more 7ft 2 than the old 7ft story, he must be atleast 6ft 11 barefoot and 7ft in casual footware.
I think that since he has been compared to Khali and when then started a rivalry Big Show has been using bigger boots which make him look more 7ft 2 than the old 7ft story, he must be atleast 6ft 11 barefoot and 7ft in casual footware.
Alex said on 17/Apr/09
Almost 7'0 can certainly mean as low as 6'11 flat but more likely its 6'11 and change. yet you'll have people saying 6'9-6'10 is close to 7'0. It may seem kinda true but 2-3 inches in height is a good difference.
Almost 7'0 can certainly mean as low as 6'11 flat but more likely its 6'11 and change. yet you'll have people saying 6'9-6'10 is close to 7'0. It may seem kinda true but 2-3 inches in height is a good difference.
Anonymous said on 16/Apr/09
Big show was then around 6'11 1/2 and nash just over 6'9... those peak height seems right on to me, Dan, the 7'1 listings for big shows must have been in shoes, same as the rock got a 6'4 listing, goldberg 6'3... and so on
Big show was then around 6'11 1/2 and nash just over 6'9... those peak height seems right on to me, Dan, the 7'1 listings for big shows must have been in shoes, same as the rock got a 6'4 listing, goldberg 6'3... and so on
kinggollum said on 16/Apr/09
Big Show says on 16/Apr/09
JT says on 15/Apr/09
An in-shape Big Show with DDP (closer to the camera) and Billy Gunn, whom I believe it as least 6
Big Show says on 16/Apr/09
JT says on 15/Apr/09
An in-shape Big Show with DDP (closer to the camera) and Billy Gunn, whom I believe it as least 6
Big Show said on 16/Apr/09
Danimal says on 15/Apr/09
That being said, Big Show DID have 3" on a LEGIT 6'10" Kevin Nash, who has also been described as having been as tall as 6'11".
Yeah, but that was in wrestling boots and Big Show did have a slight shoewear advantage over Nash. I'd say a 0.75" advantage, which would put Big Show at around 7'.
Danimal says on 15/Apr/09
That being said, Big Show DID have 3" on a LEGIT 6'10" Kevin Nash, who has also been described as having been as tall as 6'11".
Yeah, but that was in wrestling boots and Big Show did have a slight shoewear advantage over Nash. I'd say a 0.75" advantage, which would put Big Show at around 7'.
Big Show said on 16/Apr/09
topdweeb says on 15/Apr/09
Do you have any reason to believe that their foot wear or the ground isn't level? No, so until otherwise proven, it'd be best to assume that all things are equal. So like I said, unless there is further photographic evidence suggesting otherwise, I peg Khali and Shaq at the exact same height.
So the nutritionist says Show is just shy of 7', and you say that you'd peg Khali as much as 1.5" taller than Big Show. So if Show is 6' 11.5, which is "nearly 7-foot", guess what, Khali is still 7' 1 then. So exactly what is your contention with what I said?
The fact that you see one half-body shot pic as superior evidence over 5 staredowns with Big Show and Khali that pretty much leave no room for debate other than any footwear advantage that Big Show might
topdweeb says on 15/Apr/09
Do you have any reason to believe that their foot wear or the ground isn't level? No, so until otherwise proven, it'd be best to assume that all things are equal. So like I said, unless there is further photographic evidence suggesting otherwise, I peg Khali and Shaq at the exact same height.
So the nutritionist says Show is just shy of 7', and you say that you'd peg Khali as much as 1.5" taller than Big Show. So if Show is 6' 11.5, which is "nearly 7-foot", guess what, Khali is still 7' 1 then. So exactly what is your contention with what I said?
The fact that you see one half-body shot pic as superior evidence over 5 staredowns with Big Show and Khali that pretty much leave no room for debate other than any footwear advantage that Big Show might
topdweeb said on 16/Apr/09
Alex: it could mean higher than that, it could be literally 6' 11.9" But I think I'll stick with 6' 11.5" for Big Show.
Danimal: I know Wight was listed as 7' 1 in college basketball, I think he lost an inch or so since being in the WCW. I'd place him at 6' 11 minimum today.
Alex: it could mean higher than that, it could be literally 6' 11.9" But I think I'll stick with 6' 11.5" for Big Show.
Danimal: I know Wight was listed as 7' 1 in college basketball, I think he lost an inch or so since being in the WCW. I'd place him at 6' 11 minimum today.
Da Man said on 16/Apr/09
There's a lot of weight being placed on a very ambiguous comment from the nutritionist. "Almost 7 feet" could very well be 6'11-3/4" or 6'11-15/16" for all we know. I don't see how people are getting a flat 6'11" or any other number out of that comment.
There's a lot of weight being placed on a very ambiguous comment from the nutritionist. "Almost 7 feet" could very well be 6'11-3/4" or 6'11-15/16" for all we know. I don't see how people are getting a flat 6'11" or any other number out of that comment.
Alex said on 16/Apr/09
Nearly 7'0 could mean as low as 6'11 to as high as 6'11.5-6'11.75.
Nearly 7'0 could mean as low as 6'11 to as high as 6'11.5-6'11.75.
Alex said on 16/Apr/09
Topdweeb, I agree. Because Shaq is 7'1 barefoot and Khali was no taller than him. Exactly the same height I'd say. He is 1.5 inches max taller than Big Show and if Big Show is nearly 7'0 like 6'11.5 then it fits Khali at 7'1 or just under.
Topdweeb, I agree. Because Shaq is 7'1 barefoot and Khali was no taller than him. Exactly the same height I'd say. He is 1.5 inches max taller than Big Show and if Big Show is nearly 7'0 like 6'11.5 then it fits Khali at 7'1 or just under.
Big Show said on 16/Apr/09
JT says on 15/Apr/09
An in-shape Big Show with DDP (closer to the camera) and Billy Gunn, whom I believe it as least 6
JT says on 15/Apr/09
An in-shape Big Show with DDP (closer to the camera) and Billy Gunn, whom I believe it as least 6
Danimal said on 15/Apr/09
No one can, or should deny the fact Big Show was listed at 7'1" in college basketball. If he was measured in his shoes, he was never even a full 7'0", seeing his shoes would have been MINIMUM 1 1/4" and at most 2". So, if he would have been measured in his shoes, he would have been between 6'11"-6'11 3/4" barefoot. That being said, Big Show DID have 3" on a LEGIT 6'10" Kevin Nash, who has also been described as having been as tall as 6'11". SO, we have a situation where either Big Show was wearing some type of inner lift in the WCW, or he WAS a LEGIT 7'0.5"-7'1 1/4" who has since shrunk. I stand by the fact that he was once AROUND 7'1" BAREFOOT and has NOTICEABLY lost height and appears to be a guy who is close to 7'0", but most likely only 6'11" these days. I account this height loss to the fact that he put on more than 200 pounds in just a few years and he his poor posture (which only became poor when he started getting heavier) has done some serious damage to his height at a relatively young age (late 30's). Again, I can live with him having been as low as 7'0.5" at his tallest, but today I think he is floating around 6'11". He was just taller in the WCW and even when he first came to the WWF. He seems to be going down the same road as Andre the Giant, even though Big Show's disease was cured, where as Andre's just kept getting worse.. A 1995 Big Show would have been Khali's height, or at most .5" shorter than him.
No one can, or should deny the fact Big Show was listed at 7'1" in college basketball. If he was measured in his shoes, he was never even a full 7'0", seeing his shoes would have been MINIMUM 1 1/4" and at most 2". So, if he would have been measured in his shoes, he would have been between 6'11"-6'11 3/4" barefoot. That being said, Big Show DID have 3" on a LEGIT 6'10" Kevin Nash, who has also been described as having been as tall as 6'11". SO, we have a situation where either Big Show was wearing some type of inner lift in the WCW, or he WAS a LEGIT 7'0.5"-7'1 1/4" who has since shrunk. I stand by the fact that he was once AROUND 7'1" BAREFOOT and has NOTICEABLY lost height and appears to be a guy who is close to 7'0", but most likely only 6'11" these days. I account this height loss to the fact that he put on more than 200 pounds in just a few years and he his poor posture (which only became poor when he started getting heavier) has done some serious damage to his height at a relatively young age (late 30's). Again, I can live with him having been as low as 7'0.5" at his tallest, but today I think he is floating around 6'11". He was just taller in the WCW and even when he first came to the WWF. He seems to be going down the same road as Andre the Giant, even though Big Show's disease was cured, where as Andre's just kept getting worse.. A 1995 Big Show would have been Khali's height, or at most .5" shorter than him.
JT said on 15/Apr/09
An in-shape Big Show with DDP (closer to the camera) and Billy Gunn, whom I believe it as least 6
An in-shape Big Show with DDP (closer to the camera) and Billy Gunn, whom I believe it as least 6
kinggollum said on 15/Apr/09
Big Show says on 15/Apr/09
topdweeb says on 15/Apr/09
I still maintain that Khali is 7' 1 even if Big Show is 6' 11. I've said many times that I only see an inch between the two, and sometimes not even that. But, Khali's 7' 1 status is pretty much cemented in stone for me because he is dead on with Shaq. And unless there are further pictures between the two that proves Khali is shorter than Shaq, I call him 7' 1. So, if Big Show is 6' 11, then I'm simply wrong in saying that Khali is only 1" taller than Show. Either that, or Show is actually so close to 7' that he's virtually indiscernible from 7' without actually measuring him.
So one picture of Khali & Shaq where we don't see their footwear or the ground level for that matter means more to you than about 5 staredowns between Big Show and Khali where we see close-ups from all angles possible, footwear of both men, ground level, wether or not someone has a camera advantage or not, etc?
Whatever height Big Show is, I'd say Khali is maybe 1 inch taller or at the most 1.5" if Big Show had a considerable footwear advantage. I'll take that evidence above one pic with Shaq anytime.
Big Show, is only around an inch and a half shorter than Khali and I still feel Show stands roughly 7 feet. Is he gaining weight again? I still say there have only been 2 7 foot giants in wrestling history Andre and Show, all others are just really tall bad wrestlers.
Big Show says on 15/Apr/09
topdweeb says on 15/Apr/09
I still maintain that Khali is 7' 1 even if Big Show is 6' 11. I've said many times that I only see an inch between the two, and sometimes not even that. But, Khali's 7' 1 status is pretty much cemented in stone for me because he is dead on with Shaq. And unless there are further pictures between the two that proves Khali is shorter than Shaq, I call him 7' 1. So, if Big Show is 6' 11, then I'm simply wrong in saying that Khali is only 1" taller than Show. Either that, or Show is actually so close to 7' that he's virtually indiscernible from 7' without actually measuring him.
So one picture of Khali & Shaq where we don't see their footwear or the ground level for that matter means more to you than about 5 staredowns between Big Show and Khali where we see close-ups from all angles possible, footwear of both men, ground level, wether or not someone has a camera advantage or not, etc?
Whatever height Big Show is, I'd say Khali is maybe 1 inch taller or at the most 1.5" if Big Show had a considerable footwear advantage. I'll take that evidence above one pic with Shaq anytime.
Big Show, is only around an inch and a half shorter than Khali and I still feel Show stands roughly 7 feet. Is he gaining weight again? I still say there have only been 2 7 foot giants in wrestling history Andre and Show, all others are just really tall bad wrestlers.
topdweeb said on 15/Apr/09
Big Show says on 15/Apr/09
"So one picture of Khali & Shaq where we don't see their footwear or the ground level for that matter means more to you than about 5 staredowns between Big Show and Khali where we see close-ups from all angles possible, footwear of both men, ground level, wether or not someone has a camera advantage or not, etc?
Whatever height Big Show is, I'd say Khali is maybe 1 inch taller or at the most 1.5" if Big Show had a considerable footwear advantage. I'll take that evidence above one pic with Shaq anytime."
Do you have any reason to believe that their foot wear or the ground isn't level? No, so until otherwise proven, it'd be best to assume that all things are equal. So like I said, unless there is further photographic evidence suggesting otherwise, I peg Khali and Shaq at the exact same height.
So the nutritionist says Show is just shy of 7', and you say that you'd peg Khali as much as 1.5" taller than Big Show. So if Show is 6' 11.5, which is "nearly 7-foot", guess what, Khali is still 7' 1 then. So exactly what is your contention with what I said?
If by chance Show is taller than 6' 11.5 and is more like 6' 11.75", then it is possible that Khali could still be just 1.25" taller than him, and still be 7' 1. Show being nearly 7' does not at all contradict a 7' 1 Khali.
Big Show says on 15/Apr/09
"So one picture of Khali & Shaq where we don't see their footwear or the ground level for that matter means more to you than about 5 staredowns between Big Show and Khali where we see close-ups from all angles possible, footwear of both men, ground level, wether or not someone has a camera advantage or not, etc?
Whatever height Big Show is, I'd say Khali is maybe 1 inch taller or at the most 1.5" if Big Show had a considerable footwear advantage. I'll take that evidence above one pic with Shaq anytime."
Do you have any reason to believe that their foot wear or the ground isn't level? No, so until otherwise proven, it'd be best to assume that all things are equal. So like I said, unless there is further photographic evidence suggesting otherwise, I peg Khali and Shaq at the exact same height.
So the nutritionist says Show is just shy of 7', and you say that you'd peg Khali as much as 1.5" taller than Big Show. So if Show is 6' 11.5, which is "nearly 7-foot", guess what, Khali is still 7' 1 then. So exactly what is your contention with what I said?
If by chance Show is taller than 6' 11.5 and is more like 6' 11.75", then it is possible that Khali could still be just 1.25" taller than him, and still be 7' 1. Show being nearly 7' does not at all contradict a 7' 1 Khali.
Big Show said on 15/Apr/09
topdweeb says on 15/Apr/09
I still maintain that Khali is 7' 1 even if Big Show is 6' 11. I've said many times that I only see an inch between the two, and sometimes not even that. But, Khali's 7' 1 status is pretty much cemented in stone for me because he is dead on with Shaq. And unless there are further pictures between the two that proves Khali is shorter than Shaq, I call him 7' 1. So, if Big Show is 6' 11, then I'm simply wrong in saying that Khali is only 1" taller than Show. Either that, or Show is actually so close to 7' that he's virtually indiscernible from 7' without actually measuring him.
So one picture of Khali & Shaq where we don't see their footwear or the ground level for that matter means more to you than about 5 staredowns between Big Show and Khali where we see close-ups from all angles possible, footwear of both men, ground level, wether or not someone has a camera advantage or not, etc?
Whatever height Big Show is, I'd say Khali is maybe 1 inch taller or at the most 1.5" if Big Show had a considerable footwear advantage. I'll take that evidence above one pic with Shaq anytime.
topdweeb says on 15/Apr/09
I still maintain that Khali is 7' 1 even if Big Show is 6' 11. I've said many times that I only see an inch between the two, and sometimes not even that. But, Khali's 7' 1 status is pretty much cemented in stone for me because he is dead on with Shaq. And unless there are further pictures between the two that proves Khali is shorter than Shaq, I call him 7' 1. So, if Big Show is 6' 11, then I'm simply wrong in saying that Khali is only 1" taller than Show. Either that, or Show is actually so close to 7' that he's virtually indiscernible from 7' without actually measuring him.
So one picture of Khali & Shaq where we don't see their footwear or the ground level for that matter means more to you than about 5 staredowns between Big Show and Khali where we see close-ups from all angles possible, footwear of both men, ground level, wether or not someone has a camera advantage or not, etc?
Whatever height Big Show is, I'd say Khali is maybe 1 inch taller or at the most 1.5" if Big Show had a considerable footwear advantage. I'll take that evidence above one pic with Shaq anytime.
topdweeb said on 15/Apr/09
I still maintain that Khali is 7' 1 even if Big Show is 6' 11. I've said many times that I only see an inch between the two, and sometimes not even that. But, Khali's 7' 1 status is pretty much cemented in stone for me because he is dead on with Shaq. And unless there are further pictures between the two that proves Khali is shorter than Shaq, I call him 7' 1. So, if Big Show is 6' 11, then I'm simply wrong in saying that Khali is only 1" taller than Show. Either that, or Show is actually so close to 7' that he's virtually indiscernible from 7' without actually measuring him.
I still maintain that Khali is 7' 1 even if Big Show is 6' 11. I've said many times that I only see an inch between the two, and sometimes not even that. But, Khali's 7' 1 status is pretty much cemented in stone for me because he is dead on with Shaq. And unless there are further pictures between the two that proves Khali is shorter than Shaq, I call him 7' 1. So, if Big Show is 6' 11, then I'm simply wrong in saying that Khali is only 1" taller than Show. Either that, or Show is actually so close to 7' that he's virtually indiscernible from 7' without actually measuring him.
topdweeb said on 15/Apr/09
JT: I seriously doubt that the nutritionist did not weigh and measure Show himself. I worked with nutritionists, and even if a BMI wasn't going to be calculated, they always weighed and measured their patients to be able to accurately estimate what a healthy weight would be for the patient. Quite simply, if a nutritionist who worked with the Big Show says that he was just shy of 7-foot, then that is about as reliable of a source as you're going to get.
I've never seen a nutritionist simply ask their patients how tall they are and just take their word for it. It would be like simply asking the patient how much they weigh and take their word for it. It would be a very sloppy nutritionist who did that.
Therefore, I see the Big Show being minimum 6' 11, but could be literally a hair under 7' which for every day purposes, would make him simply 7'. Khali still remains at 7' 1.
JT: I seriously doubt that the nutritionist did not weigh and measure Show himself. I worked with nutritionists, and even if a BMI wasn't going to be calculated, they always weighed and measured their patients to be able to accurately estimate what a healthy weight would be for the patient. Quite simply, if a nutritionist who worked with the Big Show says that he was just shy of 7-foot, then that is about as reliable of a source as you're going to get.
I've never seen a nutritionist simply ask their patients how tall they are and just take their word for it. It would be like simply asking the patient how much they weigh and take their word for it. It would be a very sloppy nutritionist who did that.
Therefore, I see the Big Show being minimum 6' 11, but could be literally a hair under 7' which for every day purposes, would make him simply 7'. Khali still remains at 7' 1.
JT said on 14/Apr/09
Click Here
That could just be the nutritionist's own estimate. I doubt Big Show actually told him he was under 7 feet. As we know by now, Big Show's height is deceiving given his posture and the size of his head. Big Show at only 310 lbs. would be considered obese per the BMI, so I doubt the nutritionist was concerned about any BMI number as the calculator really does not apply to an acromegalic giant with a huge frame or a muscular person. If he really is under 7 feet, I would not go below 6'11" for him.
Click Here
That could just be the nutritionist's own estimate. I doubt Big Show actually told him he was under 7 feet. As we know by now, Big Show's height is deceiving given his posture and the size of his head. Big Show at only 310 lbs. would be considered obese per the BMI, so I doubt the nutritionist was concerned about any BMI number as the calculator really does not apply to an acromegalic giant with a huge frame or a muscular person. If he really is under 7 feet, I would not go below 6'11" for him.
Clay said on 14/Apr/09
''Nearly 7 feet'' has gotta mean 6'11.5-6'11.75 which leaves Khali at a solid 7'1.
''Nearly 7 feet'' has gotta mean 6'11.5-6'11.75 which leaves Khali at a solid 7'1.
topdweeb said on 14/Apr/09
Alex: Yeah, I changed my mind. I see how reason for a nutritionist to lie, especially since he probably has no reason to care how tall the Big Show is. I'm assuming as a nutritionist, that guy measured the Big Show and took his weight to get an accurate BMI. I don't know what he thinks "near 7 foot" is, for all we know it could be that Show is just a hair under it, or it could mean he is 6' 10 or something. But for now, I'll stick with 6' 11 for Show and Khali I would say could be as tall as 7' 1 still, but nothing more. I say that because he looks dead on with Shaq.
Alex: Yeah, I changed my mind. I see how reason for a nutritionist to lie, especially since he probably has no reason to care how tall the Big Show is. I'm assuming as a nutritionist, that guy measured the Big Show and took his weight to get an accurate BMI. I don't know what he thinks "near 7 foot" is, for all we know it could be that Show is just a hair under it, or it could mean he is 6' 10 or something. But for now, I'll stick with 6' 11 for Show and Khali I would say could be as tall as 7' 1 still, but nothing more. I say that because he looks dead on with Shaq.
Alex said on 14/Apr/09
Actually Big Show was 420lbs in 1999 his year in WWE and was 430lbs in early 2000. Not saying Big Show has lost 108lbs but for someone Big Show's size to lose 108lbs it wont be as noticeable if someone a lot smaller lost that much weight. Hes so big losing 50lbs isn't that much and wont be that noticeable.
Topdweeb, yea could be 6'11 but I wouldn't go under that. 6'11-6'11 1/2 is possbile and if so then Khali is no more than 7'0 1/2 which he was referred to as by gerweck.com.
Actually Big Show was 420lbs in 1999 his year in WWE and was 430lbs in early 2000. Not saying Big Show has lost 108lbs but for someone Big Show's size to lose 108lbs it wont be as noticeable if someone a lot smaller lost that much weight. Hes so big losing 50lbs isn't that much and wont be that noticeable.
Topdweeb, yea could be 6'11 but I wouldn't go under that. 6'11-6'11 1/2 is possbile and if so then Khali is no more than 7'0 1/2 which he was referred to as by gerweck.com.
topdweeb said on 13/Apr/09
Big Show: oh that just may have changed my mind about Show's height. Maybe he is more like 6' 11.
Big Show: oh that just may have changed my mind about Show's height. Maybe he is more like 6' 11.
Big Show said on 13/Apr/09
Clay says on 13/Apr/09
Ola - they wouldn't bother to change his weight billing because he is gaining weight, I can guarantee you that. Hell, they have said he's ''441 pounds'' a nice EXACT listing for a year now, lol. When clearly he hasnt always been exactly that weight.
His weight on WWE.com has now officially been changed to 485 lbs.
Clay says on 13/Apr/09
Ola - they wouldn't bother to change his weight billing because he is gaining weight, I can guarantee you that. Hell, they have said he's ''441 pounds'' a nice EXACT listing for a year now, lol. When clearly he hasnt always been exactly that weight.
His weight on WWE.com has now officially been changed to 485 lbs.
Clay said on 13/Apr/09
Ola - they wouldn't bother to change his weight billing because he is gaining weight, I can guarantee you that. Hell, they have said he's ''441 pounds'' a nice EXACT listing for a year now, lol. When clearly he hasnt always been exactly that weight.
Ola - they wouldn't bother to change his weight billing because he is gaining weight, I can guarantee you that. Hell, they have said he's ''441 pounds'' a nice EXACT listing for a year now, lol. When clearly he hasnt always been exactly that weight.
Big Show said on 13/Apr/09
Click Here
According to this article Big Show was 530 lbs in March 2007 according to nutritionist Artie Artwell. He also referred to Big Show as near 7 foot.
Click Here
According to this article Big Show was 530 lbs in March 2007 according to nutritionist Artie Artwell. He also referred to Big Show as near 7 foot.
Red said on 13/Apr/09
Ola, so explain why they first reduce his billed height from 7
Ola, so explain why they first reduce his billed height from 7
topdweeb said on 13/Apr/09
Ola, that's a pretty good point, if they are billing Big Show as the largest athlete in the world, it wouldn't make sense for him to be billed much lighter than he really was.
Him saying he lost 108 lbs doesn't mean jack crap. Wrestlers always stretch the truth or flat out lie. That's what the pro-wrestling business is all about. Show saying he lost 108 lbs, should be taken no more seriously than Hogan claiming he was once 6' 7.
Ola, that's a pretty good point, if they are billing Big Show as the largest athlete in the world, it wouldn't make sense for him to be billed much lighter than he really was.
Him saying he lost 108 lbs doesn't mean jack crap. Wrestlers always stretch the truth or flat out lie. That's what the pro-wrestling business is all about. Show saying he lost 108 lbs, should be taken no more seriously than Hogan claiming he was once 6' 7.
Danimal said on 12/Apr/09
Big Show came back at 441 pounds and claimed to have lost 108 pounds, which would have put him at 549 pounds before he left, which he DEFINITELY looked to be. Big Show has not been less than 420-430 pounds since his WCW days (A decade)...
Big Show came back at 441 pounds and claimed to have lost 108 pounds, which would have put him at 549 pounds before he left, which he DEFINITELY looked to be. Big Show has not been less than 420-430 pounds since his WCW days (A decade)...
Anonymous said on 12/Apr/09
Edge once said Big Show is 450 pounds on a light day, I think Big Show looks barely 400 lbs. he said he lost 108 lbs. by 2008 so he must be in the lower 400's. I bought that he weighed 399/400 lbs. before Wrestlemania 24
Edge once said Big Show is 450 pounds on a light day, I think Big Show looks barely 400 lbs. he said he lost 108 lbs. by 2008 so he must be in the lower 400's. I bought that he weighed 399/400 lbs. before Wrestlemania 24
Anonymous said on 11/Apr/09
I hope Big Show isn't going to gain a load of weight back on. A guy his size really shouldn't be carrying 500 lbs around.
I hope Big Show isn't going to gain a load of weight back on. A guy his size really shouldn't be carrying 500 lbs around.
Alex said on 10/Apr/09
Jerome James is looking taller than Show and Khali there but his head isn't long like theirs which you have to take into account.
Jerome James is looking taller than Show and Khali there but his head isn't long like theirs which you have to take into account.
Alex said on 10/Apr/09
Now they are slowly billing Show's weight closer to 500lbs. I think he's def a legit 450lber. In late 2006 he was at least 525lbs I think.
Now they are slowly billing Show's weight closer to 500lbs. I think he's def a legit 450lber. In late 2006 he was at least 525lbs I think.
jens peter said on 10/Apr/09
this is just a guuss but i will say 7 7,1. in a match agenst hbk they say he is 7,1
this is just a guuss but i will say 7 7,1. in a match agenst hbk they say he is 7,1
kinggollum said on 8/Apr/09
Anonymous says on 5/Apr/09
press-conference photo of edge and show, big shows posture is worse now than andres at the very end (1992), i would like to see what a 1996 fully erect paul wight would have looked next to edge, i can see why people think big show has lost height though, that posture he is adopting is losing him at least 2 inches there Click Here
Big Show,s posture is no where near as bad as Andre's was. I don't see Big Show being that much taller than he was in 1996, just alot skinnier then. Khali in that pic seems shorter than normal, I agree BShow poster but I think he has an inch on a peak show.
Anonymous says on 5/Apr/09
press-conference photo of edge and show, big shows posture is worse now than andres at the very end (1992), i would like to see what a 1996 fully erect paul wight would have looked next to edge, i can see why people think big show has lost height though, that posture he is adopting is losing him at least 2 inches there Click Here
Big Show,s posture is no where near as bad as Andre's was. I don't see Big Show being that much taller than he was in 1996, just alot skinnier then. Khali in that pic seems shorter than normal, I agree BShow poster but I think he has an inch on a peak show.
JT said on 7/Apr/09
Click Here This is Big Show and Edge both standing tall next to the same podium. Edge may have cowboy boots on as well, as he comes up to about the same point on Big Show as Vegas
Click Here This is Big Show and Edge both standing tall next to the same podium. Edge may have cowboy boots on as well, as he comes up to about the same point on Big Show as Vegas
Anonymous said on 7/Apr/09
Show does look enormous in that video from December 2006. Easily 540 lbs at that time.
He does look heavier now than he did a year ago, but still nowhere what he was in late '06. I'd say around 460-470 these days.
Show does look enormous in that video from December 2006. Easily 540 lbs at that time.
He does look heavier now than he did a year ago, but still nowhere what he was in late '06. I'd say around 460-470 these days.
Clay said on 7/Apr/09
Ola says on 3/Apr/09
Big show was at his heaviest when he faced akebono, almost 500 lbs. he has never been above 500 and will never be
Negative. He was pushin 550 by late 2006.
Ola says on 3/Apr/09
Big show was at his heaviest when he faced akebono, almost 500 lbs. he has never been above 500 and will never be
Negative. He was pushin 550 by late 2006.
Big Show said on 6/Apr/09
Here are a few pics of a guy who owns a shoe-store for big people. He's got his picture taken with several large individuals. Here are a few I've capped from his site (There were 20 pages of pics, so there might be more good ones among them).
With Big Show: Click Here
With The Great Khali: Click Here
With 6'5 listed NFL Calvin Johnson: Click Here
With 7'1 listed NBA Jerome James: Click Here
With 6'10 listed NBA Al Horford: Click Here
Khali is looking a little short there, maybe this guy Marty Atkins is standing on higher ground?
Here are a few pics of a guy who owns a shoe-store for big people. He's got his picture taken with several large individuals. Here are a few I've capped from his site (There were 20 pages of pics, so there might be more good ones among them).
With Big Show: Click Here
With The Great Khali: Click Here
With 6'5 listed NFL Calvin Johnson: Click Here
With 7'1 listed NBA Jerome James: Click Here
With 6'10 listed NBA Al Horford: Click Here
Khali is looking a little short there, maybe this guy Marty Atkins is standing on higher ground?
Anonymous said on 5/Apr/09
press-conference photo of edge and show, big shows posture is worse now than andres at the very end (1992), i would like to see what a 1996 fully erect paul wight would have looked next to edge, i can see why people think big show has lost height though, that posture he is adopting is losing him at least 2 inches there Click Here
press-conference photo of edge and show, big shows posture is worse now than andres at the very end (1992), i would like to see what a 1996 fully erect paul wight would have looked next to edge, i can see why people think big show has lost height though, that posture he is adopting is losing him at least 2 inches there Click Here
Big Show said on 5/Apr/09
Ola says on 3/Apr/09
Big show was at his heaviest when he faced akebono, almost 500 lbs. he has never been above 500 and will never be
April 2005: Click Here
December 2006: Click Here
It's clear as day that Big Show was much heavier in December 2006 than what he was when he faced Akebono.
Big Show weighed in at 493 lbs when he faced nowadays. Last week on RAW Michael Cole said Big Show weighed in at 485 lbs. He's still nowhere near his size from late 2006 (luckily for him). He was well over 500 lbs at the time and had to quit wrestling because of the health issues he was having at the time (which were mostly caused by his severe overweight).
Ola says on 3/Apr/09
Big show was at his heaviest when he faced akebono, almost 500 lbs. he has never been above 500 and will never be
April 2005: Click Here
December 2006: Click Here
It's clear as day that Big Show was much heavier in December 2006 than what he was when he faced Akebono.
Big Show weighed in at 493 lbs when he faced nowadays. Last week on RAW Michael Cole said Big Show weighed in at 485 lbs. He's still nowhere near his size from late 2006 (luckily for him). He was well over 500 lbs at the time and had to quit wrestling because of the health issues he was having at the time (which were mostly caused by his severe overweight).
Danimal said on 4/Apr/09
Ola says on 3/Apr/09
Big show was at his heaviest when he faced akebono, almost 500 lbs. he has never been above 500 and will never be
Troll
Ola says on 3/Apr/09
Big show was at his heaviest when he faced akebono, almost 500 lbs. he has never been above 500 and will never be
Troll
Anonymous said on 4/Apr/09
Show was over 500lbs in 2006.
Show was over 500lbs in 2006.
Danimal said on 3/Apr/09
Rob, why aren't you updating?
Editor Rob
Rob, why aren't you updating?
Editor Rob I'm in New York so only sporadically checking and can't upload the new comments.html page although I will moderate some comments as I find time.
Hugh 190cm said on 2/Apr/09
Okay realistically I think the Big Show is 6ft11-7ft in boots.
Okay realistically I think the Big Show is 6ft11-7ft in boots.
nick said on 1/Apr/09
maybe if mike was 5'1.5
maybe if mike was 5'1.5
James S said on 1/Apr/09
Lets say that Khali is 7ft 1, I think 90% of people agree with that, look at this picture, take away Khali's hair so they're both bald, Big Show looks exactly the same height so this tells me that Big Show is 7ft 1 and 7ft at the VERY least
Lets say that Khali is 7ft 1, I think 90% of people agree with that, look at this picture, take away Khali's hair so they're both bald, Big Show looks exactly the same height so this tells me that Big Show is 7ft 1 and 7ft at the VERY least
topdweeb said on 1/Apr/09
Danimal says on 23/Mar/09
"Big Show (the poster) imo is probably the most OBJECTIVE and likable guy on celebheights. He always provides evidence and is ALWAYS open minded. I really enjoy his knowledgeable posts. NO ONE should be bashing him for being biased. That honor goes to others I won't mention."
I agree, I think Big Show (the poster) is one of the best posters on here. I don't think anyone really deserves to be bashed, but I do think that there have been some new users (will go unnamed) that are quickly becoming unwelcome.
I usually don't post in forums where I don't have a solid opinion of someone's height. And I usually am not interested in "average" sized guys, only giants. I think my posts are about as accurate as it's gonna get.
Danimal says on 23/Mar/09
"Big Show (the poster) imo is probably the most OBJECTIVE and likable guy on celebheights. He always provides evidence and is ALWAYS open minded. I really enjoy his knowledgeable posts. NO ONE should be bashing him for being biased. That honor goes to others I won't mention."
I agree, I think Big Show (the poster) is one of the best posters on here. I don't think anyone really deserves to be bashed, but I do think that there have been some new users (will go unnamed) that are quickly becoming unwelcome.
I usually don't post in forums where I don't have a solid opinion of someone's height. And I usually am not interested in "average" sized guys, only giants. I think my posts are about as accurate as it's gonna get.
hs2009 said on 1/Apr/09
Edge & Big Show face off at WM25 press conference:
Click Here
Angle favours Edge a bit here, but's it the best I could find.
Edge & Big Show face off at WM25 press conference:
Click Here
Angle favours Edge a bit here, but's it the best I could find.
Danimal said on 1/Apr/09
Alex says on 31/Mar/09
Hugh 182-183cm for Big Show????? What?
I was looking at a bit of WM 22 in 2006 and Big Show was just as probably his heaviest in 2006 and honestly he could have been pushing 550lbs then.
Exactly, because when he came back he said he lost 109 pounds and was down to 441 pounds, so yeah, he weighed 550 pounds at his heaviest. I think all that weight KILLED his posture and knocked off a solid inch.
He was listed at 7'1" in college basketball and had 3" on listed 6'10" Kevin Nash. Maybe he was 7'1" in SHOES. No idea. Today doesn't seem to be over 6'11".
Alex says on 31/Mar/09
Hugh 182-183cm for Big Show????? What?
I was looking at a bit of WM 22 in 2006 and Big Show was just as probably his heaviest in 2006 and honestly he could have been pushing 550lbs then.
Exactly, because when he came back he said he lost 109 pounds and was down to 441 pounds, so yeah, he weighed 550 pounds at his heaviest. I think all that weight KILLED his posture and knocked off a solid inch.
He was listed at 7'1" in college basketball and had 3" on listed 6'10" Kevin Nash. Maybe he was 7'1" in SHOES. No idea. Today doesn't seem to be over 6'11".
KingNick said on 31/Mar/09
I think Big Show was billed 485lbs last night. Not sure if he gained the weight or if they're just exaggerating him for Mania.
I think Big Show was billed 485lbs last night. Not sure if he gained the weight or if they're just exaggerating him for Mania.
Big Show said on 31/Mar/09
Alex says on 31/Mar/09
I was looking at a bit of WM 22 in 2006 and Big Show was just as probably his heaviest in 2006 and honestly he could have been pushing 550lbs then.
Yesterday at RAW Michael Cole said Big Show was weighed in at 485 lbs. It is kinda stupid that they're still billing him at 441 lbs. He was weighed at that before last year's Wrestlemania and clearly gained some weight back again.
Btw Alex I don't have every televised match of Big Show. 1999 is my only completed year thusfar. Still have a long way to go to get every single televised match he's ever been in.
Alex says on 31/Mar/09
I was looking at a bit of WM 22 in 2006 and Big Show was just as probably his heaviest in 2006 and honestly he could have been pushing 550lbs then.
Yesterday at RAW Michael Cole said Big Show was weighed in at 485 lbs. It is kinda stupid that they're still billing him at 441 lbs. He was weighed at that before last year's Wrestlemania and clearly gained some weight back again.
Btw Alex I don't have every televised match of Big Show. 1999 is my only completed year thusfar. Still have a long way to go to get every single televised match he's ever been in.
Alex said on 31/Mar/09
Hugh 182-183cm for Big Show????? What?
I was looking at a bit of WM 22 in 2006 and Big Show was just as probably his heaviest in 2006 and honestly he could have been pushing 550lbs then.
Hugh 182-183cm for Big Show????? What?
I was looking at a bit of WM 22 in 2006 and Big Show was just as probably his heaviest in 2006 and honestly he could have been pushing 550lbs then.
Alex said on 31/Mar/09
Big Show, I remember that too. Cole said Big Show was 7'1 just one time. Other than that he was billed at 7'0 and 7'2 off and on then by the end of 1999 he was billed at 7'2 from there on until late 2002 where he's been billed at 7'0 since. So you have every televised match Big Show was in? Must be a huge fan then. I am a big fan of him myself.
Big Show, I remember that too. Cole said Big Show was 7'1 just one time. Other than that he was billed at 7'0 and 7'2 off and on then by the end of 1999 he was billed at 7'2 from there on until late 2002 where he's been billed at 7'0 since. So you have every televised match Big Show was in? Must be a huge fan then. I am a big fan of him myself.
Hugh 190cm said on 31/Mar/09
I'd say 182cm-183cm in that pic with Mike lol!
I'd say 182cm-183cm in that pic with Mike lol!
KingNick said on 31/Mar/09
Big Show says on 31/Mar/09
MK says on 31/Mar/09
Big Show says on 31/Mar/09
Big Show's peak was 7 feet. I don't think he was ever any taller than that because he was billed at 7 feet when he arrived in the WWE in 1999
Such forgetfulness ;)He was billed 7'2'' on his wwf arrival, and a few years back went down to 7'0''(bizarrly)
Not really. He was billed 7'0" at arrival. I have every televised Big Show match from 1999. Apart from one occasional 7'1 referral by Michael Cole he was being described as 7', 500lbs nearly every match. His billing was changed to 7'2" when he started fueding with the likes of Undertaker and Kane, which was a few months after he made his debut.
The point is that I think we all can agree on is that it's so weird how they downgraded his height. He could easily pass for 7'2", especially if Khali is billed 7'3". I know I've made this point before but I just don't get it.
On a side note, anyone see Raw last night? Show DOMINATED Cena and beat him CLEANLY in the ring, it was great!
Big Show says on 31/Mar/09
MK says on 31/Mar/09
Big Show says on 31/Mar/09
Big Show's peak was 7 feet. I don't think he was ever any taller than that because he was billed at 7 feet when he arrived in the WWE in 1999
Such forgetfulness ;)He was billed 7'2'' on his wwf arrival, and a few years back went down to 7'0''(bizarrly)
Not really. He was billed 7'0" at arrival. I have every televised Big Show match from 1999. Apart from one occasional 7'1 referral by Michael Cole he was being described as 7', 500lbs nearly every match. His billing was changed to 7'2" when he started fueding with the likes of Undertaker and Kane, which was a few months after he made his debut.
The point is that I think we all can agree on is that it's so weird how they downgraded his height. He could easily pass for 7'2", especially if Khali is billed 7'3". I know I've made this point before but I just don't get it.
On a side note, anyone see Raw last night? Show DOMINATED Cena and beat him CLEANLY in the ring, it was great!
Big Show said on 31/Mar/09
MK says on 31/Mar/09
Big Show says on 31/Mar/09
Big Show's peak was 7 feet. I don't think he was ever any taller than that because he was billed at 7 feet when he arrived in the WWE in 1999
Such forgetfulness ;)He was billed 7'2'' on his wwf arrival, and a few years back went down to 7'0''(bizarrly)
Not really. He was billed 7'0" at arrival. I have every televised Big Show match from 1999. Apart from one occasional 7'1 referral by Michael Cole he was being described as 7', 500lbs nearly every match. His billing was changed to 7'2" when he started fueding with the likes of Undertaker and Kane, which was a few months after he made his debut.
MK says on 31/Mar/09
Big Show says on 31/Mar/09
Big Show's peak was 7 feet. I don't think he was ever any taller than that because he was billed at 7 feet when he arrived in the WWE in 1999
Such forgetfulness ;)He was billed 7'2'' on his wwf arrival, and a few years back went down to 7'0''(bizarrly)
Not really. He was billed 7'0" at arrival. I have every televised Big Show match from 1999. Apart from one occasional 7'1 referral by Michael Cole he was being described as 7', 500lbs nearly every match. His billing was changed to 7'2" when he started fueding with the likes of Undertaker and Kane, which was a few months after he made his debut.
MK said on 31/Mar/09
Big Show says on 31/Mar/09
Big Show's peak was 7 feet. I don't think he was ever any taller than that because he was billed at 7 feet when he arrived in the WWE in 1999
Such forgetfulness ;)He was billed 7'2'' on his wwf arrival, and a few years back went down to 7'0''(bizarrly)
Big Show says on 31/Mar/09
Big Show's peak was 7 feet. I don't think he was ever any taller than that because he was billed at 7 feet when he arrived in the WWE in 1999
Such forgetfulness ;)He was billed 7'2'' on his wwf arrival, and a few years back went down to 7'0''(bizarrly)
Big Show said on 31/Mar/09
Boss says on 29/Mar/09
Big Show , what is your estimate for a peak Paul Wight and a peak Andre. My opinion Wight 7' peak and Andre between 6'11-7' peak. Andre actual real height is the a great debate because there are pics , articles and such supporting both sides of the debate. We have posture and height loss issues with Andre how much height did he actually lose or how big was his head exactly(some will say 12 inches some will say 12.5 inches and maybe 13 inches) either side you pic that is a massive head. Anyway it's all in good fun and informative for us all. In light of the book you posted I've posted a link on the Andre page for The Rivalry and it does state that Wilt was measured in 1980 while lying down and the only other time he would let someone measure him was high school so I assume that's where he got 7'1 1/16. So in turn I don't beleive Andre looked 7' with Wilt 6'11.5 yes but not 7'. With the proper information I am willing to change my stance on things but not because of a certain comparison although they are very interesting.
Actually our estimates are close to the same. Big Show's peak was 7 feet. I don't think he was ever any taller than that because he was billed at 7 feet when he arrived in the WWE in 1999. I've read somewhere that he was also billed 7 feet in his first professional match ever (so that would be in early 1995), but have yet to see the wrestling mag that covered this match.
Andre I'd say was around 6'11 peak. Lot's of 6'10 2/3 listings of him in the 60's, plus he's referred to as 6'11 in 3 different Non-WWE sources.
Boss says on 29/Mar/09
Big Show , what is your estimate for a peak Paul Wight and a peak Andre. My opinion Wight 7' peak and Andre between 6'11-7' peak. Andre actual real height is the a great debate because there are pics , articles and such supporting both sides of the debate. We have posture and height loss issues with Andre how much height did he actually lose or how big was his head exactly(some will say 12 inches some will say 12.5 inches and maybe 13 inches) either side you pic that is a massive head. Anyway it's all in good fun and informative for us all. In light of the book you posted I've posted a link on the Andre page for The Rivalry and it does state that Wilt was measured in 1980 while lying down and the only other time he would let someone measure him was high school so I assume that's where he got 7'1 1/16. So in turn I don't beleive Andre looked 7' with Wilt 6'11.5 yes but not 7'. With the proper information I am willing to change my stance on things but not because of a certain comparison although they are very interesting.
Actually our estimates are close to the same. Big Show's peak was 7 feet. I don't think he was ever any taller than that because he was billed at 7 feet when he arrived in the WWE in 1999. I've read somewhere that he was also billed 7 feet in his first professional match ever (so that would be in early 1995), but have yet to see the wrestling mag that covered this match.
Andre I'd say was around 6'11 peak. Lot's of 6'10 2/3 listings of him in the 60's, plus he's referred to as 6'11 in 3 different Non-WWE sources.
Anonymous said on 30/Mar/09
It makes since that a peak Big Show was just about 7'0.
It makes since that a peak Big Show was just about 7'0.
Boss said on 29/Mar/09
Big Show , what is your estimate for a peak Paul Wight and a peak Andre. My opinion Wight 7' peak and Andre between 6'11-7' peak. Andre actual real height is the a great debate because there are pics , articles and such supporting both sides of the debate. We have posture and height loss issues with Andre how much height did he actually lose or how big was his head exactly(some will say 12 inches some will say 12.5 inches and maybe 13 inches) either side you pic that is a massive head. Anyway it's all in good fun and informative for us all. In light of the book you posted I've posted a link on the Andre page for The Rivalry and it does state that Wilt was measured in 1980 while lying down and the only other time he would let someone measure him was high school so I assume that's where he got 7'1 1/16. So in turn I don't beleive Andre looked 7' with Wilt 6'11.5 yes but not 7'. With the proper information I am willing to change my stance on things but not because of a certain comparison although they are very interesting.
Big Show , what is your estimate for a peak Paul Wight and a peak Andre. My opinion Wight 7' peak and Andre between 6'11-7' peak. Andre actual real height is the a great debate because there are pics , articles and such supporting both sides of the debate. We have posture and height loss issues with Andre how much height did he actually lose or how big was his head exactly(some will say 12 inches some will say 12.5 inches and maybe 13 inches) either side you pic that is a massive head. Anyway it's all in good fun and informative for us all. In light of the book you posted I've posted a link on the Andre page for The Rivalry and it does state that Wilt was measured in 1980 while lying down and the only other time he would let someone measure him was high school so I assume that's where he got 7'1 1/16. So in turn I don't beleive Andre looked 7' with Wilt 6'11.5 yes but not 7'. With the proper information I am willing to change my stance on things but not because of a certain comparison although they are very interesting.
Big Show said on 29/Mar/09
Boss says on 28/Mar/09
The photbucket account is Goliath777 so get your facts straight. Second Big Show is only 6'11 ish nowadays and 7' for a absolute peak and will be 6'10ish in a couple years. Sounds an awful lot like Andre to me except for that the fact Big Show has and always has had better posture than Andre. Yes , he looks every bit of 6'11' with 6'7 Akebono since he was 6'8 peak and had a sumo career and weighed over 500 pounds for most of his adult life.
Unless you have proof that Akebono is 6'7", don't go claiming so just to downgrade Big Show. Akebono still looked every bit of his 6'8" against 6'6" Albert (1 year after his staredown with Big Show).
Whether it's Goliath777 or Nova's photobucket account is irrelevant. Both accounts give a very one-sided (read: biased) view on Andre's height.
Boss says on 28/Mar/09
The photbucket account is Goliath777 so get your facts straight. Second Big Show is only 6'11 ish nowadays and 7' for a absolute peak and will be 6'10ish in a couple years. Sounds an awful lot like Andre to me except for that the fact Big Show has and always has had better posture than Andre. Yes , he looks every bit of 6'11' with 6'7 Akebono since he was 6'8 peak and had a sumo career and weighed over 500 pounds for most of his adult life.
Unless you have proof that Akebono is 6'7", don't go claiming so just to downgrade Big Show. Akebono still looked every bit of his 6'8" against 6'6" Albert (1 year after his staredown with Big Show).
Whether it's Goliath777 or Nova's photobucket account is irrelevant. Both accounts give a very one-sided (read: biased) view on Andre's height.
Boss said on 28/Mar/09
The photbucket account is Goliath777 so get your facts straight. Second Big Show is only 6'11 ish nowadays and 7' for a absolute peak and will be 6'10ish in a couple years. Sounds an awful lot like Andre to me except for that the fact Big Show has and always has had better posture than Andre. Yes , he looks every bit of 6'11' with 6'7 Akebono since he was 6'8 peak and had a sumo career and weighed over 500 pounds for most of his adult life.
The photbucket account is Goliath777 so get your facts straight. Second Big Show is only 6'11 ish nowadays and 7' for a absolute peak and will be 6'10ish in a couple years. Sounds an awful lot like Andre to me except for that the fact Big Show has and always has had better posture than Andre. Yes , he looks every bit of 6'11' with 6'7 Akebono since he was 6'8 peak and had a sumo career and weighed over 500 pounds for most of his adult life.
JT said on 28/Mar/09
Boss says on 27/Mar/09
Big Show with 6'5 but billed 6'6 to 6'7 Shad of Cryme Tyme. Also Show with Michaels. In both pics Show isn't looking near 7'. Click Here
When he's slouching or you can't see the full postures, of course you can try to make such a claim. Comes out a little different when he's standing straight. Click Here Click Here Michaels had some chunky boots on as well. Make sure to add these to your (Nova's) photobucket account.
Boss says on 27/Mar/09
Big Show with 6'5 but billed 6'6 to 6'7 Shad of Cryme Tyme. Also Show with Michaels. In both pics Show isn't looking near 7'. Click Here
When he's slouching or you can't see the full postures, of course you can try to make such a claim. Comes out a little different when he's standing straight. Click Here Click Here Michaels had some chunky boots on as well. Make sure to add these to your (Nova's) photobucket account.
willy79 said on 27/Mar/09
Paul Wight says on 22/Mar/09
alright "Big Show" wannabe, I am 6'11 and a half these days, 7 ft. peak. got it?
Now quit using my stage name! or else.
This is funny. Come on dude, that is crazy. I know I feel that Big Show is bias at times but like Danimal says he does give great resourses to all his post. As much as he gets on my nerves at times he, Danimal and Vegas are corner stones to these pages. Ok, Paul Wight, lol!!!! Please.
Paul Wight says on 22/Mar/09
alright "Big Show" wannabe, I am 6'11 and a half these days, 7 ft. peak. got it?
Now quit using my stage name! or else.
This is funny. Come on dude, that is crazy. I know I feel that Big Show is bias at times but like Danimal says he does give great resourses to all his post. As much as he gets on my nerves at times he, Danimal and Vegas are corner stones to these pages. Ok, Paul Wight, lol!!!! Please.
Vegas said on 27/Mar/09
cm punk wrestled the most wwe matches in 2008, 174, Kane next at 162.
Click Here
big show is correct, since the brand extension wwe stars are wrestling much less days, show with raw stars take place 4 days a week, smackdown 3 days a week (sometimes 4), prior to the draft many stars wrestled 5 days a week sometimes 6 days a week
cm punk wrestled the most wwe matches in 2008, 174, Kane next at 162.
Click Here
big show is correct, since the brand extension wwe stars are wrestling much less days, show with raw stars take place 4 days a week, smackdown 3 days a week (sometimes 4), prior to the draft many stars wrestled 5 days a week sometimes 6 days a week
Boss said on 27/Mar/09
Big Show with 6'5 but billed 6'6 to 6'7 Shad of Cryme Tyme. Also Show with Michaels. In both pics Show isn't looking near 7'. Click Here
Big Show with 6'5 but billed 6'6 to 6'7 Shad of Cryme Tyme. Also Show with Michaels. In both pics Show isn't looking near 7'. Click Here
Big Show said on 27/Mar/09
Halb says on 27/Mar/09
I think they do Big Show. I cannot quote exactly from what I read in PowerSlam the regular routine of WWE wrestlers (the ones that can't negotiate lower schedules) is of the 300 mark. Can any reader of PowerSlam give a number here?
Click Here
Click Here
This is an excellent site for WWE match results (I always use it when I'm trying to locate a match). By looking at 2009 thusfar a wrestler would now had to have wrestled 70 matches. By random checking a few names (the main-eventers as well as mid-carters to jobbers) no one comes even close to that amount. Most are around 25-35 matches so far.
Halb says on 27/Mar/09
I think they do Big Show. I cannot quote exactly from what I read in PowerSlam the regular routine of WWE wrestlers (the ones that can't negotiate lower schedules) is of the 300 mark. Can any reader of PowerSlam give a number here?
Click Here
Click Here
This is an excellent site for WWE match results (I always use it when I'm trying to locate a match). By looking at 2009 thusfar a wrestler would now had to have wrestled 70 matches. By random checking a few names (the main-eventers as well as mid-carters to jobbers) no one comes even close to that amount. Most are around 25-35 matches so far.
tuga said on 27/Mar/09
What are people talking about...edge is way to much shorter than big show to make any fair comparisons, someone so much taller than other will never look his true height because he will be slouching or looking down...
The fact is that khali is AT LEAST same height as 7'1 shaq and big show is 1 inch shorter than khali and also big show is BAREFEET 4 inches taller than 6'8 measured akebono making him a legit 7 footer.
Big show will only look below 7' due to posture imo.
What are people talking about...edge is way to much shorter than big show to make any fair comparisons, someone so much taller than other will never look his true height because he will be slouching or looking down...
The fact is that khali is AT LEAST same height as 7'1 shaq and big show is 1 inch shorter than khali and also big show is BAREFEET 4 inches taller than 6'8 measured akebono making him a legit 7 footer.
Big show will only look below 7' due to posture imo.
Hugh 190cm said on 27/Mar/09
6ft11/7ft in boots.
6ft11/7ft in boots.
Halb said on 27/Mar/09
"I don't think any wrestler actually wrestles 300 matches a year these days (at least not in the WWE). In the old days there were many wrestlers that wrestled 300+ matches a year. But since the coming of weekly tv-shows more and more time is being spend in creating storylines for the big PPV matches."
I think they do Big Show. I cannot quote exactly from what I read in PowerSlam the regular routine of WWE wrestlers (the ones that can't negotiate lower schedules) is of the 300 mark. Can any reader of PowerSlam give a number here?
"I don't think any wrestler actually wrestles 300 matches a year these days (at least not in the WWE). In the old days there were many wrestlers that wrestled 300+ matches a year. But since the coming of weekly tv-shows more and more time is being spend in creating storylines for the big PPV matches."
I think they do Big Show. I cannot quote exactly from what I read in PowerSlam the regular routine of WWE wrestlers (the ones that can't negotiate lower schedules) is of the 300 mark. Can any reader of PowerSlam give a number here?
gazz said on 26/Mar/09
Big show dead on 7 foot i reckon maybe 7'1 in WCW he just slouches so much these days which i dont understand, you would of thought as hes billed as a heel they would tell him to make himself as big as possible
Big show dead on 7 foot i reckon maybe 7'1 in WCW he just slouches so much these days which i dont understand, you would of thought as hes billed as a heel they would tell him to make himself as big as possible
Vegas said on 26/Mar/09
if big show was 7'1 in wcw he would have had 7.5 inches on john tenta, i don't see 7.5 inches in that staredown, i don't see 7 either
if big show was 7'1 in wcw he would have had 7.5 inches on john tenta, i don't see 7.5 inches in that staredown, i don't see 7 either
Danimal said on 25/Mar/09
I believe that Big Show is around 6'11"-6'11.5" today and 7'0.5"-7'1" in his WCW days.
I believe that Big Show is around 6'11"-6'11.5" today and 7'0.5"-7'1" in his WCW days.
Big Show said on 25/Mar/09
Danimal says on 23/Mar/09
Big Show (the poster) imo is probably the most OBJECTIVE and likable guy on celebheights. He always provides evidence and is ALWAYS open minded. I really enjoy his knowledgeable posts. NO ONE should be bashing him for being biased. That honor goes to others I won't mention.
Thanks for the support!
Danimal says on 23/Mar/09
Big Show (the poster) imo is probably the most OBJECTIVE and likable guy on celebheights. He always provides evidence and is ALWAYS open minded. I really enjoy his knowledgeable posts. NO ONE should be bashing him for being biased. That honor goes to others I won't mention.
Thanks for the support!
Big Show said on 25/Mar/09
Halb says on 25/Mar/09
Difference is that bodybuilders don't take the beating tyhat wrestlers do, njor do any other competitors in sport. No-one in sport is competitive for more than 300 days a year. I would say the amount of steds a wrestler takes on avg) exceeds that of any other professional sports person.
I don't think any wrestler actually wrestles 300 matches a year these days (at least not in the WWE). In the old days there were many wrestlers that wrestled 300+ matches a year. But since the coming of weekly tv-shows more and more time is being spend in creating storylines for the big PPV matches.
Halb says on 25/Mar/09
Difference is that bodybuilders don't take the beating tyhat wrestlers do, njor do any other competitors in sport. No-one in sport is competitive for more than 300 days a year. I would say the amount of steds a wrestler takes on avg) exceeds that of any other professional sports person.
I don't think any wrestler actually wrestles 300 matches a year these days (at least not in the WWE). In the old days there were many wrestlers that wrestled 300+ matches a year. But since the coming of weekly tv-shows more and more time is being spend in creating storylines for the big PPV matches.
Halb said on 25/Mar/09
TBS may have been the full 7 feet once, he seemed it in his WCW days. He seems 1 inch lower than Singh, so if Singh is 7'
TBS may have been the full 7 feet once, he seemed it in his WCW days. He seems 1 inch lower than Singh, so if Singh is 7'
MK said on 25/Mar/09
JT says on 24/Mar/09
End of debate:
Click Here
Hardly the end of the debate, but thats as good as it gets.
JT says on 24/Mar/09
End of debate:
Click Here
Hardly the end of the debate, but thats as good as it gets.
Anonymous said on 25/Mar/09
Anonymous says on 24/Mar/09
willy79 says on 24/Mar/09
I watched RAW tonight and can not help but notice that Edge and Big Show looked about the height difference as Andre and Hogan from WM3.
at mania 3 hogan came to andres eyebrows, so edge is the same height as dennis rodman who we saw had about 3 inches himself on hogan in wcw
edge is also basically as tall as akebono
Did you even watch Raw. Edge seemed as tall as Hogan did to Andre at WM3. Just watch and you will see that, if not your blind.
Anonymous says on 24/Mar/09
willy79 says on 24/Mar/09
I watched RAW tonight and can not help but notice that Edge and Big Show looked about the height difference as Andre and Hogan from WM3.
at mania 3 hogan came to andres eyebrows, so edge is the same height as dennis rodman who we saw had about 3 inches himself on hogan in wcw
edge is also basically as tall as akebono
Did you even watch Raw. Edge seemed as tall as Hogan did to Andre at WM3. Just watch and you will see that, if not your blind.
Anonymous said on 24/Mar/09
willy79 says on 24/Mar/09
I watched RAW tonight and can not help but notice that Edge and Big Show looked about the height difference as Andre and Hogan from WM3.
at mania 3 hogan came to andres eyebrows, so edge is the same height as dennis rodman who we saw had about 3 inches himself on hogan in wcw Click Here|1&axs=0|79128494%2c79131254%2c74843779%2c79727633%2c81669723%2c79131310%2c74843777%2c74843771%2c79131261%2c81669730%2c74843780%2c74843790%2c74843788%2c74843787|0
edge is also basically as tall as akebono
willy79 says on 24/Mar/09
I watched RAW tonight and can not help but notice that Edge and Big Show looked about the height difference as Andre and Hogan from WM3.
at mania 3 hogan came to andres eyebrows, so edge is the same height as dennis rodman who we saw had about 3 inches himself on hogan in wcw Click Here|1&axs=0|79128494%2c79131254%2c74843779%2c79727633%2c81669723%2c79131310%2c74843777%2c74843771%2c79131261%2c81669730%2c74843780%2c74843790%2c74843788%2c74843787|0
edge is also basically as tall as akebono
willy79 said on 24/Mar/09
I watched RAW tonight and can not help but notice that Edge and Big Show looked about the height difference as Andre and Hogan from WM3.
I watched RAW tonight and can not help but notice that Edge and Big Show looked about the height difference as Andre and Hogan from WM3.
Danimal said on 23/Mar/09
Big Show (the poster) imo is probably the most OBJECTIVE and likable guy on celebheights. He always provides evidence and is ALWAYS open minded. I really enjoy his knowledgeable posts. NO ONE should be bashing him for being biased. That honor goes to others I won't mention.
Big Show (the poster) imo is probably the most OBJECTIVE and likable guy on celebheights. He always provides evidence and is ALWAYS open minded. I really enjoy his knowledgeable posts. NO ONE should be bashing him for being biased. That honor goes to others I won't mention.
Danimal said on 23/Mar/09
Marble says on 22/Mar/09
Wow jt you sure arent biased :S you just cant accept that andre might have been the same height as show can you ?
You don't know the half of it... JT will NEVER admit that Andre was over 6'10".
Marble says on 22/Mar/09
Wow jt you sure arent biased :S you just cant accept that andre might have been the same height as show can you ?
You don't know the half of it... JT will NEVER admit that Andre was over 6'10".
Anonymous said on 23/Mar/09
willy79 says on 22/Mar/09
Show was or has never been 8 inches taller than Edge.
posture is key, go to the end of this video you might be surprised Click Here
willy79 says on 22/Mar/09
Show was or has never been 8 inches taller than Edge.
posture is key, go to the end of this video you might be surprised Click Here
Clay said on 23/Mar/09
What is gerweck.com?
What is gerweck.com?
Alex said on 23/Mar/09
I guess its possible Big Show lost a bit of height, maybe an inch at most. If Big Show is 6'11 then Khali is closer to 7'0 than 7'1. And on Gerweck.com it was reported that Khali is a legit 7'0.5 which would put Big Show in the 6'11-6'11.5 range.
I guess its possible Big Show lost a bit of height, maybe an inch at most. If Big Show is 6'11 then Khali is closer to 7'0 than 7'1. And on Gerweck.com it was reported that Khali is a legit 7'0.5 which would put Big Show in the 6'11-6'11.5 range.
willy79 said on 22/Mar/09
Show was or has never been 8 inches taller than Edge. 6'11 sounds about right for Snow considering how much taller a 7'1 Khali is.
Lol!!!!!! I have over 40 dvd's of Andre, several rare Japanese magazines and dozens of other magazines. Yeah I guess that makes me an Andre hater. What does your Andre collection consists of?
Judging from the Andre board where you have never posted anything new regarding pics or vids, I think I know the answer to that question: ABSOLUTELY NOTHING!!!
You're so-called interest in Andre stops at Andre's size, which apparently has to be at least 7 feet in order for you to still be interested with him.
If you claim you're an Andre fan you're insulting every true Andre fan, the ones who don't just like him for his size but also for his abilities inside the ring.
Blah, blah, blah, blah!!!! Next time just write this Big Show and maybe your Bias want show as much. MAYBE!
Show was or has never been 8 inches taller than Edge. 6'11 sounds about right for Snow considering how much taller a 7'1 Khali is.
Lol!!!!!! I have over 40 dvd's of Andre, several rare Japanese magazines and dozens of other magazines. Yeah I guess that makes me an Andre hater. What does your Andre collection consists of?
Judging from the Andre board where you have never posted anything new regarding pics or vids, I think I know the answer to that question: ABSOLUTELY NOTHING!!!
You're so-called interest in Andre stops at Andre's size, which apparently has to be at least 7 feet in order for you to still be interested with him.
If you claim you're an Andre fan you're insulting every true Andre fan, the ones who don't just like him for his size but also for his abilities inside the ring.
Blah, blah, blah, blah!!!! Next time just write this Big Show and maybe your Bias want show as much. MAYBE!
willy79 said on 22/Mar/09
Big Show says on 21/Mar/09
willy79 says on 21/Mar/09
another example of how big show hates Andre!!!!lol!!!!!
Lol!!!!!! I have over 40 dvd's of Andre, several rare Japanese magazines and dozens of other magazines. Yeah I guess that makes me an Andre hater. What does your Andre collection consists of?
Judging from the Andre board where you have never posted anything new regarding pics or vids, I think I know the answer to that question: ABSOLUTELY NOTHING!!!
You're so-called interest in Andre stops at Andre's size, which apparently has to be at least 7 feet in order for you to still be interested with him.
If you claim you're an Andre fan you're insulting every true Andre fan, the ones who don't just like him for his size but also for his abilities inside the ring.
Blah, blah, blah, blah!!!! Next time just write this Big Show and maybe your Bias want show as much. MAYBE!
Big Show says on 21/Mar/09
willy79 says on 21/Mar/09
another example of how big show hates Andre!!!!lol!!!!!
Lol!!!!!! I have over 40 dvd's of Andre, several rare Japanese magazines and dozens of other magazines. Yeah I guess that makes me an Andre hater. What does your Andre collection consists of?
Judging from the Andre board where you have never posted anything new regarding pics or vids, I think I know the answer to that question: ABSOLUTELY NOTHING!!!
You're so-called interest in Andre stops at Andre's size, which apparently has to be at least 7 feet in order for you to still be interested with him.
If you claim you're an Andre fan you're insulting every true Andre fan, the ones who don't just like him for his size but also for his abilities inside the ring.
Blah, blah, blah, blah!!!! Next time just write this Big Show and maybe your Bias want show as much. MAYBE!
Paul Wight said on 22/Mar/09
alright "Big Show" wannabe, I am 6'11 and a half these days, 7 ft. peak. got it?
Now quit using my stage name! or else.
alright "Big Show" wannabe, I am 6'11 and a half these days, 7 ft. peak. got it?
Now quit using my stage name! or else.
dicksock said on 22/Mar/09
Dicksock, the shorter you try to make Big Show, the shorter Andre ends up being. Andre never came close to having a head size on guys like Vince McMahon or Roddy Piper, whereas Big Show did.
That is nonsense and you know it. Andre pretty much had a full head on Piper and McMahon.
Dicksock, the shorter you try to make Big Show, the shorter Andre ends up being. Andre never came close to having a head size on guys like Vince McMahon or Roddy Piper, whereas Big Show did.
That is nonsense and you know it. Andre pretty much had a full head on Piper and McMahon.
Ray said on 22/Mar/09
Show is no less than 6'11" barefoot today IMO. He probably is 7' our darn close to it if not.
Show is no less than 6'11" barefoot today IMO. He probably is 7' our darn close to it if not.
Marble said on 22/Mar/09
Wow jt you sure arent biased :S you just cant accept that andre might have been the same height as show can you ?
Wow jt you sure arent biased :S you just cant accept that andre might have been the same height as show can you ?
nick said on 22/Mar/09
all posture, edge is around 6'3.5 -6'3.75 but in his boots he is 6'5. show is about 8 inches taller but he displays loose posture which makes him look about 7 inch taller
all posture, edge is around 6'3.5 -6'3.75 but in his boots he is 6'5. show is about 8 inches taller but he displays loose posture which makes him look about 7 inch taller
hs2009 said on 22/Mar/09
Big Show has a footwear advantage over Edge in that pic & is still only about 7" taller than a guy who most peg at 6'3" on this site. I personally think he's more 6'4" but Show still looks shy of 7'0".
Big Show has a footwear advantage over Edge in that pic & is still only about 7" taller than a guy who most peg at 6'3" on this site. I personally think he's more 6'4" but Show still looks shy of 7'0".
JT said on 21/Mar/09
Big Show in dress shoes; Edge in tennis shoes (possibly Converse All-Stars) Click Here If so, that's still only a ~ 0.75" footwear advantage at most for Big Show.
Dicksock, the shorter you try to make Big Show, the shorter Andre ends up being. Andre never came close to having a head size on guys like Vince McMahon or Roddy Piper, whereas Big Show did.
Big Show in dress shoes; Edge in tennis shoes (possibly Converse All-Stars) Click Here If so, that's still only a ~ 0.75" footwear advantage at most for Big Show.
Dicksock, the shorter you try to make Big Show, the shorter Andre ends up being. Andre never came close to having a head size on guys like Vince McMahon or Roddy Piper, whereas Big Show did.
MK said on 21/Mar/09
Big Show seems to be a lone curusader on this page, why dont some of us try to read IN FULL what he says.
Big Show seems to be a lone curusader on this page, why dont some of us try to read IN FULL what he says.
Big Show said on 21/Mar/09
dicksock says on 21/Mar/09
I'm not surprised you once again ignore the evidence. Why not show the cap from 9:57? That would show a 7" difference. And it's pathetic how you try to say Edge has any kind of footware advantage. What about Big Show's giant boots? Show looks about 6'11. And that is assuming Edge is 6'4. I'll admit that I underestimated the length of the Big Show's head. I was off by about an inch. But, the Tenta pic you posted does show about 6" between them. I'll give Paul Wight 7' at THE ABSOLUTE MOST in his prime. Now, around 6'11.
I capped that part because it was one of the few parts where they had somewhat of a similar posture. I've added the entire match aswell so everyone can make their own judgment of what they think the height difference is. Plus I wasn't saying Edge had a footwear advantage. I just said Edge wears some chunky boots aswell so I doubt Big Show is having a shoewear advantage there.
dicksock says on 21/Mar/09
I'm not surprised you once again ignore the evidence. Why not show the cap from 9:57? That would show a 7" difference. And it's pathetic how you try to say Edge has any kind of footware advantage. What about Big Show's giant boots? Show looks about 6'11. And that is assuming Edge is 6'4. I'll admit that I underestimated the length of the Big Show's head. I was off by about an inch. But, the Tenta pic you posted does show about 6" between them. I'll give Paul Wight 7' at THE ABSOLUTE MOST in his prime. Now, around 6'11.
I capped that part because it was one of the few parts where they had somewhat of a similar posture. I've added the entire match aswell so everyone can make their own judgment of what they think the height difference is. Plus I wasn't saying Edge had a footwear advantage. I just said Edge wears some chunky boots aswell so I doubt Big Show is having a shoewear advantage there.
Big Show said on 21/Mar/09
willy79 says on 21/Mar/09
another example of how big show hates Andre!!!!lol!!!!!
Lol!!!!!! I have over 40 dvd's of Andre, several rare Japanese magazines and dozens of other magazines. Yeah I guess that makes me an Andre hater. What does your Andre collection consists of?
Judging from the Andre board where you have never posted anything new regarding pics or vids, I think I know the answer to that question: ABSOLUTELY NOTHING!!!
You're so-called interest in Andre stops at Andre's size, which apparently has to be at least 7 feet in order for you to still be interested with him.
If you claim you're an Andre fan you're insulting every true Andre fan, the ones who don't just like him for his size but also for his abilities inside the ring.
willy79 says on 21/Mar/09
another example of how big show hates Andre!!!!lol!!!!!
Lol!!!!!! I have over 40 dvd's of Andre, several rare Japanese magazines and dozens of other magazines. Yeah I guess that makes me an Andre hater. What does your Andre collection consists of?
Judging from the Andre board where you have never posted anything new regarding pics or vids, I think I know the answer to that question: ABSOLUTELY NOTHING!!!
You're so-called interest in Andre stops at Andre's size, which apparently has to be at least 7 feet in order for you to still be interested with him.
If you claim you're an Andre fan you're insulting every true Andre fan, the ones who don't just like him for his size but also for his abilities inside the ring.
willy79 said on 21/Mar/09
Big Show says on 21/Mar/09
dicksock says on 21/Mar/09
Anyone see smackdown? Well, Big Show certainly didn't appear to have more than 6" on Edge. He must have forgotten his lifts or something. I used to think that Wight was about 7'1 peak and 7' now. But now a 6'11" peak sounds better. He only had 6'6" tenta by 6" AT THE MOST in WCW with those giant boots. And he may be as low as 6'10 now. Even with his big heels, he is not that much taller than 6'4" MAX Edge. The episode of Smackdown was from March 20 at the end of the show.
Click Here
I'm surprised you're not mentioning Edge's spaceboots there!
Click Here
You're claiming this is a 6" difference:
Click Here
Click Here
Yet this is supposed to be a 5" difference???
Click Here
Click Here
Here are a few videos of Big Show from 1996 where he's not wearing his giant boots but normal shoes. He must be wearing lifts in them too or else it sure as hell doesn't look good for Hogan, Piper and Nash. If Big Show was 6'11" peak he would need a 2" shoewear advantage over Nash, which I highly doubt.
Click Here
another example of how big show hates Andre!!!!lol!!!!!
Big Show says on 21/Mar/09
dicksock says on 21/Mar/09
Anyone see smackdown? Well, Big Show certainly didn't appear to have more than 6" on Edge. He must have forgotten his lifts or something. I used to think that Wight was about 7'1 peak and 7' now. But now a 6'11" peak sounds better. He only had 6'6" tenta by 6" AT THE MOST in WCW with those giant boots. And he may be as low as 6'10 now. Even with his big heels, he is not that much taller than 6'4" MAX Edge. The episode of Smackdown was from March 20 at the end of the show.
Click Here
I'm surprised you're not mentioning Edge's spaceboots there!
Click Here
You're claiming this is a 6" difference:
Click Here
Click Here
Yet this is supposed to be a 5" difference???
Click Here
Click Here
Here are a few videos of Big Show from 1996 where he's not wearing his giant boots but normal shoes. He must be wearing lifts in them too or else it sure as hell doesn't look good for Hogan, Piper and Nash. If Big Show was 6'11" peak he would need a 2" shoewear advantage over Nash, which I highly doubt.
Click Here
another example of how big show hates Andre!!!!lol!!!!!
willy79 said on 21/Mar/09
dicksock says on 21/Mar/09
Anyone see smackdown? Well, Big Show certainly didn't appear to have more than 6" on Edge. He must have forgotten his lifts or something. I used to think that Wight was about 7'1 peak and 7' now. But now a 6'11" peak sounds better. He only had 6'6" tenta by 6" AT THE MOST in WCW with those giant boots. And he may be as low as 6'10 now. Even with his big heels, he is not that much taller than 6'4" MAX Edge. The episode of Smackdown was from March 20 at the end of the show.
I agree dicksock, like I said Kurrgan was just as tall to Tenta as Big Show. Kurrgan is about 6'10.5-11
dicksock says on 21/Mar/09
Anyone see smackdown? Well, Big Show certainly didn't appear to have more than 6" on Edge. He must have forgotten his lifts or something. I used to think that Wight was about 7'1 peak and 7' now. But now a 6'11" peak sounds better. He only had 6'6" tenta by 6" AT THE MOST in WCW with those giant boots. And he may be as low as 6'10 now. Even with his big heels, he is not that much taller than 6'4" MAX Edge. The episode of Smackdown was from March 20 at the end of the show.
I agree dicksock, like I said Kurrgan was just as tall to Tenta as Big Show. Kurrgan is about 6'10.5-11
willy79 said on 21/Mar/09
Funny thing was I remember edge being 6'2 in a wwf mag about developing wrestlers. Also Tiger Ali, Val Venis and Kurgan were in the article too.
Funny thing was I remember edge being 6'2 in a wwf mag about developing wrestlers. Also Tiger Ali, Val Venis and Kurgan were in the article too.
Danimal said on 21/Mar/09
dicksock says on 21/Mar/09
Anyone see smackdown? Well, Big Show certainly didn't appear to have more than 6" on Edge. He must have forgotten his lifts or something. I used to think that Wight was about 7'1 peak and 7' now. But now a 6'11" peak sounds better. He only had 6'6" tenta by 6" AT THE MOST in WCW with those giant boots. And he may be as low as 6'10 now. Even with his big heels, he is not that much taller than 6'4" MAX Edge. The episode of Smackdown was from March 20 at the end of the show.
IF he was only 6'11" PEAK, then Kevin Nash was only 6'7" PEAK, seeing Big Show had 3" on a PRIME Nash and Big Show's college must have inflated his height by 2", seeing he was listed at 7'1".
He's LOST HEIGHT over the years and it's obvious to my eyes. We was minimum 7'0" in the WCW and probably closer to 7'1". Today I believe he is struggling with 6'11". That tremendous weight has killed his posture (neck and back) and buckled his legs.
dicksock says on 21/Mar/09
Anyone see smackdown? Well, Big Show certainly didn't appear to have more than 6" on Edge. He must have forgotten his lifts or something. I used to think that Wight was about 7'1 peak and 7' now. But now a 6'11" peak sounds better. He only had 6'6" tenta by 6" AT THE MOST in WCW with those giant boots. And he may be as low as 6'10 now. Even with his big heels, he is not that much taller than 6'4" MAX Edge. The episode of Smackdown was from March 20 at the end of the show.
IF he was only 6'11" PEAK, then Kevin Nash was only 6'7" PEAK, seeing Big Show had 3" on a PRIME Nash and Big Show's college must have inflated his height by 2", seeing he was listed at 7'1".
He's LOST HEIGHT over the years and it's obvious to my eyes. We was minimum 7'0" in the WCW and probably closer to 7'1". Today I believe he is struggling with 6'11". That tremendous weight has killed his posture (neck and back) and buckled his legs.
dicksock said on 21/Mar/09
I'm not surprised you once again ignore the evidence. Why not show the cap from 9:57? That would show a 7" difference. And it's pathetic how you try to say Edge has any kind of footware advantage. What about Big Show's giant boots? Show looks about 6'11. And that is assuming Edge is 6'4. I'll admit that I underestimated the length of the Big Show's head. I was off by about an inch. But, the Tenta pic you posted does show about 6" between them. I'll give Paul Wight 7' at THE ABSOLUTE MOST in his prime. Now, around 6'11. As far as the Andre post goes. Again, I know said 5" and I'll admit I was wrong. But there is about 4" between them. And again, Andre is FAR from being in his prime in that pic. So, I wouldn't expect him to be above 6'11.
I'm not surprised you once again ignore the evidence. Why not show the cap from 9:57? That would show a 7" difference. And it's pathetic how you try to say Edge has any kind of footware advantage. What about Big Show's giant boots? Show looks about 6'11. And that is assuming Edge is 6'4. I'll admit that I underestimated the length of the Big Show's head. I was off by about an inch. But, the Tenta pic you posted does show about 6" between them. I'll give Paul Wight 7' at THE ABSOLUTE MOST in his prime. Now, around 6'11. As far as the Andre post goes. Again, I know said 5" and I'll admit I was wrong. But there is about 4" between them. And again, Andre is FAR from being in his prime in that pic. So, I wouldn't expect him to be above 6'11.
hs2009 said on 21/Mar/09
Edge wears sneakers to the ring these days with kickpads over the top, has done since about 2005.
They're no chunkier than John Cena's trainers or chunkier than a standard wrestling boot I would imagine.
Edge wears sneakers to the ring these days with kickpads over the top, has done since about 2005.
They're no chunkier than John Cena's trainers or chunkier than a standard wrestling boot I would imagine.
Big Show said on 21/Mar/09
dicksock says on 21/Mar/09
Anyone see smackdown? Well, Big Show certainly didn't appear to have more than 6" on Edge. He must have forgotten his lifts or something. I used to think that Wight was about 7'1 peak and 7' now. But now a 6'11" peak sounds better. He only had 6'6" tenta by 6" AT THE MOST in WCW with those giant boots. And he may be as low as 6'10 now. Even with his big heels, he is not that much taller than 6'4" MAX Edge. The episode of Smackdown was from March 20 at the end of the show.
Click Here
I'm surprised you're not mentioning Edge's spaceboots there!
Click Here
You're claiming this is a 6" difference:
Click Here
Click Here
Yet this is supposed to be a 5" difference???
Click Here
Click Here
Here are a few videos of Big Show from 1996 where he's not wearing his giant boots but normal shoes. He must be wearing lifts in them too or else it sure as hell doesn't look good for Hogan, Piper and Nash. If Big Show was 6'11" peak he would need a 2" shoewear advantage over Nash, which I highly doubt.
Click Here
Click Here
dicksock says on 21/Mar/09
Anyone see smackdown? Well, Big Show certainly didn't appear to have more than 6" on Edge. He must have forgotten his lifts or something. I used to think that Wight was about 7'1 peak and 7' now. But now a 6'11" peak sounds better. He only had 6'6" tenta by 6" AT THE MOST in WCW with those giant boots. And he may be as low as 6'10 now. Even with his big heels, he is not that much taller than 6'4" MAX Edge. The episode of Smackdown was from March 20 at the end of the show.
Click Here
I'm surprised you're not mentioning Edge's spaceboots there!
Click Here
You're claiming this is a 6" difference:
Click Here
Click Here
Yet this is supposed to be a 5" difference???
Click Here
Click Here
Here are a few videos of Big Show from 1996 where he's not wearing his giant boots but normal shoes. He must be wearing lifts in them too or else it sure as hell doesn't look good for Hogan, Piper and Nash. If Big Show was 6'11" peak he would need a 2" shoewear advantage over Nash, which I highly doubt.
Click Here
Click Here
dicksock said on 21/Mar/09
Anyone see smackdown? Well, Big Show certainly didn't appear to have more than 6" on Edge. He must have forgotten his lifts or something. I used to think that Wight was about 7'1 peak and 7' now. But now a 6'11" peak sounds better. He only had 6'6" tenta by 6" AT THE MOST in WCW with those giant boots. And he may be as low as 6'10 now. Even with his big heels, he is not that much taller than 6'4" MAX Edge. The episode of Smackdown was from March 20 at the end of the show.
Anyone see smackdown? Well, Big Show certainly didn't appear to have more than 6" on Edge. He must have forgotten his lifts or something. I used to think that Wight was about 7'1 peak and 7' now. But now a 6'11" peak sounds better. He only had 6'6" tenta by 6" AT THE MOST in WCW with those giant boots. And he may be as low as 6'10 now. Even with his big heels, he is not that much taller than 6'4" MAX Edge. The episode of Smackdown was from March 20 at the end of the show.
Alex said on 19/Mar/09
When I was in middle school there were a few kids in the 5'10-6'0 range but not until the 8th grade though.
When I was in middle school there were a few kids in the 5'10-6'0 range but not until the 8th grade though.
JT said on 18/Mar/09
Alex says on 16/Mar/09
From what I read and heard on TV and radio talk shows. Big Show was
6'2 at 12
6'5 at 13
6'8 at 14
6'11 at 16
7'0 at 18
I've heard Big Show say he was 7'1" at age 18. I still don't think he was ever quite that tall, however.
Alex says on 16/Mar/09
From what I read and heard on TV and radio talk shows. Big Show was
6'2 at 12
6'5 at 13
6'8 at 14
6'11 at 16
7'0 at 18
I've heard Big Show say he was 7'1" at age 18. I still don't think he was ever quite that tall, however.
topdweeb said on 17/Mar/09
Big Show: what do you mean it was a fluke that he violated the wellness policy?
Yeah, I don't know how tall that guy who was 12 and 6' in my 6th grade class. But I know that the 3rd tallest in the class was 5' 7 at the time, and he topped off at 6' 5.
Big Show: what do you mean it was a fluke that he violated the wellness policy?
Yeah, I don't know how tall that guy who was 12 and 6' in my 6th grade class. But I know that the 3rd tallest in the class was 5' 7 at the time, and he topped off at 6' 5.
Danimal said on 16/Mar/09
Alex says on 16/Mar/09
From what I read and heard on TV and radio talk shows. Big Show was
6'2 at 12
6'5 at 13
6'8 at 14
6'11 at 16
7'0 at 18
So he was probably in the 5'11-6'0 range at 11. Imagine that graduating grammar school at 5'11-6'0.
A guy I went to grammar school and high school with was 5'6" at 11 years old and 6'3" at 14 and was 6'8" at our 10 year high school reunion. Skinny as a rake.
Alex says on 16/Mar/09
From what I read and heard on TV and radio talk shows. Big Show was
6'2 at 12
6'5 at 13
6'8 at 14
6'11 at 16
7'0 at 18
So he was probably in the 5'11-6'0 range at 11. Imagine that graduating grammar school at 5'11-6'0.
A guy I went to grammar school and high school with was 5'6" at 11 years old and 6'3" at 14 and was 6'8" at our 10 year high school reunion. Skinny as a rake.
topdweeb said on 16/Mar/09
Alex: when I was in 6th grade, the tallest and biggest kid in my class (and my school in fact) was 6' 220 lbs. Don't know how tall he turned out though, as I have ever seen him since.
Alex: when I was in 6th grade, the tallest and biggest kid in my class (and my school in fact) was 6' 220 lbs. Don't know how tall he turned out though, as I have ever seen him since.
Alex said on 16/Mar/09
From what I read and heard on TV and radio talk shows. Big Show was
6'2 at 12
6'5 at 13
6'8 at 14
6'11 at 16
7'0 at 18
So he was probably in the 5'11-6'0 range at 11. Imagine that graduating grammar school at 5'11-6'0.
From what I read and heard on TV and radio talk shows. Big Show was
6'2 at 12
6'5 at 13
6'8 at 14
6'11 at 16
7'0 at 18
So he was probably in the 5'11-6'0 range at 11. Imagine that graduating grammar school at 5'11-6'0.
topdweeb said on 16/Mar/09
fan says on 16/Mar/09
"is it true that the big show was only 6.1-6.3 at the age 23"
Big Show was 23 when he was in WCW. Did he look only 6' 1 to 6' 3 to you?
fan says on 16/Mar/09
"is it true that the big show was only 6.1-6.3 at the age 23"
Big Show was 23 when he was in WCW. Did he look only 6' 1 to 6' 3 to you?
fan said on 16/Mar/09
confirm it.
is it true that the big show was only 6.1-6.3 at the age 23
confirm it.
is it true that the big show was only 6.1-6.3 at the age 23
willy79 said on 16/Mar/09
JT says on 14/Mar/09
dicksock says on 13/Mar/09
I just saw Paul Wight vs max 6'6 Earthquake and he didn't appear to have much height at all on him. I'd say 4.5-5.5" max. There is no way he was over 7'. Usually the "Giant" looked pretty tall. But, I must say he was very unimpressive looking.
JT says on 14/Mar/09
dicksock says on 13/Mar/09
I just saw Paul Wight vs max 6'6 Earthquake and he didn't appear to have much height at all on him. I'd say 4.5-5.5" max. There is no way he was over 7'. Usually the "Giant" looked pretty tall. But, I must say he was very unimpressive looking.
Right... Click Here Click Here
This is 4 inches tops Click Here Click Here
Show and Andre look the same height there, JT.
circa 2003-04 Click Here
Great Find Vegas and sometimes Kurrgan seemed that tall to Tenta, too.
JT says on 14/Mar/09
dicksock says on 13/Mar/09
I just saw Paul Wight vs max 6'6 Earthquake and he didn't appear to have much height at all on him. I'd say 4.5-5.5" max. There is no way he was over 7'. Usually the "Giant" looked pretty tall. But, I must say he was very unimpressive looking.
JT says on 14/Mar/09
dicksock says on 13/Mar/09
I just saw Paul Wight vs max 6'6 Earthquake and he didn't appear to have much height at all on him. I'd say 4.5-5.5" max. There is no way he was over 7'. Usually the "Giant" looked pretty tall. But, I must say he was very unimpressive looking.
Right... Click Here Click Here
This is 4 inches tops Click Here Click Here
Show and Andre look the same height there, JT.
circa 2003-04 Click Here
Great Find Vegas and sometimes Kurrgan seemed that tall to Tenta, too.
willy79 said on 16/Mar/09
Vegas says on 15/Mar/09
there is a staredown between tenta and big show in this match from 1996, funny thing is its about the same difference as between big show and giant haystacks and big show and tenta in that photo i posted and big show is also wearing same boots as with haystacks
1996 Click Here
circa 2003-04 Click Here
Great Find Vegas and sometimes Kurrgan seemed that tall to Tenta, too.
Vegas says on 15/Mar/09
there is a staredown between tenta and big show in this match from 1996, funny thing is its about the same difference as between big show and giant haystacks and big show and tenta in that photo i posted and big show is also wearing same boots as with haystacks
1996 Click Here
circa 2003-04 Click Here
Great Find Vegas and sometimes Kurrgan seemed that tall to Tenta, too.
willy79 said on 16/Mar/09
Yeah that was terrible, about Test and only 33. Yes, Big Show Test was a great talent and was awesome in singles comp. I always thought when he had long hair he looked like a Nash clone. Andrew Test Martin was a great wrestler, he could've carried ECW to great heights as their Champion if WWE would have let him. Something, William Regal, Finlay and Christian also could do. Shame
Yeah that was terrible, about Test and only 33. Yes, Big Show Test was a great talent and was awesome in singles comp. I always thought when he had long hair he looked like a Nash clone. Andrew Test Martin was a great wrestler, he could've carried ECW to great heights as their Champion if WWE would have let him. Something, William Regal, Finlay and Christian also could do. Shame
topdweeb said on 16/Mar/09
Big Show: no I had no idea... do you know what happened? Crap, that sucks. And only 33??
Big Show: no I had no idea... do you know what happened? Crap, that sucks. And only 33??
Clay said on 16/Mar/09
Kane and Undertaker are still both referred to as ''a shade under 7 feet tall'' by the announcer, when even the little kids know that isnt the case because they see legit 7 foot giants like Show and Khali towering both of them.
Kane and Undertaker are still both referred to as ''a shade under 7 feet tall'' by the announcer, when even the little kids know that isnt the case because they see legit 7 foot giants like Show and Khali towering both of them.
Big Show said on 15/Mar/09
Did any of you hear about the sad death of Test this past weekend. The guy was only 33 years old and is new addition to the list of wrestlers who passed away before their 50th birthday. It sucks, I always thought of Test to be a huge talent within the WWE in the late 90's and early 00's.
Did any of you hear about the sad death of Test this past weekend. The guy was only 33 years old and is new addition to the list of wrestlers who passed away before their 50th birthday. It sucks, I always thought of Test to be a huge talent within the WWE in the late 90's and early 00's.
Danimal said on 15/Mar/09
James says on 14/Mar/09
i would say
Silva 7ft 2
Khali 7ft 0.5 (7ft 2 in lifts)
Reis 7ft 1 (haha i can remember when he was claimed to be 7ft 8)
Big Show 7ft 1 (but I do think he was a solid 7ft 2 or 3 in the 90s upto 02.
Big Show was listed at 7'1" in College Basketball. He was NEVER taller than that height. MAYBE by 1/4", but that's it. I do believe he's lost height since the 1990's FOR SURE... When he reached around 550 pounds in 2006-2007, I think it definitely messed up his spine, knees and ankles, resulting in height lost. Remember, he came back a year later claiming to be down to 441 pounds and having lost 109 pounds, meaning he was high as 550 pounds, which he looked to be JUST BEFORE he left the WWE. That obesity and maybe some injuries resulted in height loss. I say he was right around that 7'1" mark at one point and has lost at least an inch, even though he is only in his late 30's.
James says on 14/Mar/09
i would say
Silva 7ft 2
Khali 7ft 0.5 (7ft 2 in lifts)
Reis 7ft 1 (haha i can remember when he was claimed to be 7ft 8)
Big Show 7ft 1 (but I do think he was a solid 7ft 2 or 3 in the 90s upto 02.
Big Show was listed at 7'1" in College Basketball. He was NEVER taller than that height. MAYBE by 1/4", but that's it. I do believe he's lost height since the 1990's FOR SURE... When he reached around 550 pounds in 2006-2007, I think it definitely messed up his spine, knees and ankles, resulting in height lost. Remember, he came back a year later claiming to be down to 441 pounds and having lost 109 pounds, meaning he was high as 550 pounds, which he looked to be JUST BEFORE he left the WWE. That obesity and maybe some injuries resulted in height loss. I say he was right around that 7'1" mark at one point and has lost at least an inch, even though he is only in his late 30's.
topdweeb said on 15/Mar/09
dicksock says on 14/Mar/09
"I could find still shots of Andre giving John Studd a headbut where he looks 8" taller than him. And his feet remain on the ground."
Oh really??? I'm calling you out: provide a pic of where Andre looks 8" taller than Studd and both of their feet are on level ground.
dicksock says on 14/Mar/09
"I could find still shots of Andre giving John Studd a headbut where he looks 8" taller than him. And his feet remain on the ground."
Oh really??? I'm calling you out: provide a pic of where Andre looks 8" taller than Studd and both of their feet are on level ground.
hs2009 said on 15/Mar/09
I really don't know why WWE persist with billing Kane at 7'0". For years Jim Ross & Paul Heymanh described him as 6'10"-6'10.5" on commentary plus he looks about 3.5"-4" shorter than Big Show.
If I were WWE I'd bill Taker at 6'8" & Kane & 6'9".
I really don't know why WWE persist with billing Kane at 7'0". For years Jim Ross & Paul Heymanh described him as 6'10"-6'10.5" on commentary plus he looks about 3.5"-4" shorter than Big Show.
If I were WWE I'd bill Taker at 6'8" & Kane & 6'9".
Alex said on 15/Mar/09
Thats more like 6 inches between Big Show and Earthquake but I am unsure on Earthquakes height.
With Khali at 7'3 at least bill Big Show at 7'1 because it can sometimes look closer to 2 inches difference with angles but I never seen 3 inches difference even with camera angles making him look taller. Yet they still have Kane at 7'0 though sometimes say he's 6'10.
Thats more like 6 inches between Big Show and Earthquake but I am unsure on Earthquakes height.
With Khali at 7'3 at least bill Big Show at 7'1 because it can sometimes look closer to 2 inches difference with angles but I never seen 3 inches difference even with camera angles making him look taller. Yet they still have Kane at 7'0 though sometimes say he's 6'10.
Vegas said on 15/Mar/09
there is a staredown between tenta and big show in this match from 1996, funny thing is its about the same difference as between big show and giant haystacks and big show and tenta in that photo i posted and big show is also wearing same boots as with haystacks
1996 Click Here
circa 2003-04 Click Here
there is a staredown between tenta and big show in this match from 1996, funny thing is its about the same difference as between big show and giant haystacks and big show and tenta in that photo i posted and big show is also wearing same boots as with haystacks
1996 Click Here
circa 2003-04 Click Here
Marble said on 14/Mar/09
comparing those pictures it seems to me like show was one inch taller than andre maybe 1.5 but not more than that . And it doesnt really work to post in ring pictures where their not even standing straight
comparing those pictures it seems to me like show was one inch taller than andre maybe 1.5 but not more than that . And it doesnt really work to post in ring pictures where their not even standing straight
dicksock said on 14/Mar/09
I don't care what kind of stupid pointless slides you show. Every single one of the "comparisons" are worthless. I saw the match between them and there was less than a 6" difference for sure. Talk about using the most bogus pics possible. I could find still shots of Andre giving John Studd a headbut where he looks 8" taller than him. And his feet remain on the ground.
I don't care what kind of stupid pointless slides you show. Every single one of the "comparisons" are worthless. I saw the match between them and there was less than a 6" difference for sure. Talk about using the most bogus pics possible. I could find still shots of Andre giving John Studd a headbut where he looks 8" taller than him. And his feet remain on the ground.
topdweeb said on 14/Mar/09
Vegas: Tatanka definitely isn't tall. Watch his matches with Shawn Michaels, Michaels is clearly the taller of the two. Unless you want to argue that Michaels is now 6' 3 or 6' 4, there is no way Tatanka is 6' 2. Also, I doubt Rikishi is 6' 1. I've seen him up close (enough to shake his hand) and he wasn't much taller than I am.
Vegas: Tatanka definitely isn't tall. Watch his matches with Shawn Michaels, Michaels is clearly the taller of the two. Unless you want to argue that Michaels is now 6' 3 or 6' 4, there is no way Tatanka is 6' 2. Also, I doubt Rikishi is 6' 1. I've seen him up close (enough to shake his hand) and he wasn't much taller than I am.
JT said on 14/Mar/09
dicksock says on 13/Mar/09
I just saw Paul Wight vs max 6'6 Earthquake and he didn't appear to have much height at all on him. I'd say 4.5-5.5" max. There is no way he was over 7'. Usually the "Giant" looked pretty tall. But, I must say he was very unimpressive looking.
Right... Click Here Click Here
This is 4 inches tops Click Here Click Here
dicksock says on 13/Mar/09
I just saw Paul Wight vs max 6'6 Earthquake and he didn't appear to have much height at all on him. I'd say 4.5-5.5" max. There is no way he was over 7'. Usually the "Giant" looked pretty tall. But, I must say he was very unimpressive looking.
Right... Click Here Click Here
This is 4 inches tops Click Here Click Here
Heights are barefeet estimates, derived from quotations, official websites, agency resumes, in person encounters with actors at conventions and pictures/films.
Other vital statistics like weight or shoe size measurements have been sourced from newspapers, books, resumes or social media.
Celebrity Fan Photos and Agency Pictures of stars are © to their respective owners.