Add a Comment6858 comments
Average Guess (1424 Votes)
5ft 10.62in (179.4cm)
5ft 10.62in (179.4cm)
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 17/Mar/16
Pitt looks 180/181cm
Pitt looks 180/181cm
TJE said on 17/Mar/16
If Gosling's just a strong 6'0 then Pitt's 5'11 tops. Not far off from 5'11, but no more.
If Gosling's just a strong 6'0 then Pitt's 5'11 tops. Not far off from 5'11, but no more.
Jen said on 17/Mar/16
I just found one article about height which supposedly came from some height site. Here is what i read there:
Tom Cruise is 170 cm
Jeorge Clooney 177.5 cm
Jason statham 175 cm
all of this sounds pretty believable, isnt it?
And then i read this:
Brad Pitt 188 cm
Woah, looks like his tricks really make some people believe him been really tall.
I just found one article about height which supposedly came from some height site. Here is what i read there:
Tom Cruise is 170 cm
Jeorge Clooney 177.5 cm
Jason statham 175 cm
all of this sounds pretty believable, isnt it?
And then i read this:
Brad Pitt 188 cm
Woah, looks like his tricks really make some people believe him been really tall.
Alucard said on 16/Mar/16
5'9-5'9.5 for Brad Pitt, nothing more, the picture with Paltrow is pretty clear... Without lifts he's not taller than Clooney who himself is 5'10 at best, probably less, Matt Damon being the shorter of the bunch at around 5'7-5'8 max...
5'9-5'9.5 for Brad Pitt, nothing more, the picture with Paltrow is pretty clear... Without lifts he's not taller than Clooney who himself is 5'10 at best, probably less, Matt Damon being the shorter of the bunch at around 5'7-5'8 max...
Appe 6ft 0.5 said on 16/Mar/16
If Gosling is 183cm as I think Brad Pitt can be easily 181cm (not under).
I am not very well informed about Clooney height, but I ve seen he is listed here 180cm and it surprised me ( he always appeared me as a tipical 178cm guy. He's infact an inch shorter than Brad Pitt (Clooney talked about Pitt as a "tall guy").
If Gosling is 183cm as I think Brad Pitt can be easily 181cm (not under).
I am not very well informed about Clooney height, but I ve seen he is listed here 180cm and it surprised me ( he always appeared me as a tipical 178cm guy. He's infact an inch shorter than Brad Pitt (Clooney talked about Pitt as a "tall guy").
Dmeyer said on 15/Mar/16
i thaught i read someWere pitt claimed he was almost 6ft
i thaught i read someWere pitt claimed he was almost 6ft
pauly e said on 14/Mar/16
Dmeyer said on 9/Mar/16
Click Here , rare shot similar distance from camera similar shoes foot pose is normal for both and pitt is not standing as good as clooney and yet looks 2cm over clooney , you could argue 181cm from this shot , 180cm is fair
I would argue that Clooney isn't anything over 5'10, so I would say that 180 cm is fair for Pitt.
Dmeyer said on 9/Mar/16
Click Here , rare shot similar distance from camera similar shoes foot pose is normal for both and pitt is not standing as good as clooney and yet looks 2cm over clooney , you could argue 181cm from this shot , 180cm is fair
I would argue that Clooney isn't anything over 5'10, so I would say that 180 cm is fair for Pitt.
Noah said on 12/Mar/16
Rob, do you find it strange that Brad Pitt only claims 5'11? Most men that are 5'11 would claim 6 foot, especially actors.
Editor Rob
Rob, do you find it strange that Brad Pitt only claims 5'11? Most men that are 5'11 would claim 6 foot, especially actors.
Editor Rob he claimed it early in his career when he was D-list. As an A-lister I've not heard him say his height!
Pitch_Fork said on 11/Mar/16
Rob, you cant ignore the pic from Dmeyer, really
Editor Rob
Rob, you cant ignore the pic from Dmeyer, really
Editor Rob sometimes Pitt will look an inch taller. How often Clooney really stands as tall posture-wise as Pitt is another matter.
curious said on 11/Mar/16
He looks between 5' 10'' - 5' 11'', could be 179 cm.
He looks between 5' 10'' - 5' 11'', could be 179 cm.
Silent_D said on 8/Mar/16
5 foot 10.
5 foot 10.
Johno said on 8/Mar/16
Will Ferrell has about 4 inches on Brad and Will although he claims 6'3, is between 6'1-6'2 tall.
Will Ferrell has about 4 inches on Brad and Will although he claims 6'3, is between 6'1-6'2 tall.
YAY said on 8/Mar/16
do all actors add an inch or 2 to their height when they become A-listers?
do all actors add an inch or 2 to their height when they become A-listers?
Dan said on 6/Mar/16
A 5-10 man would wear lifts so he can be 5-11 if he claims 5-11.
A 5-10 man would wear lifts so he can be 5-11 if he claims 5-11.
Dejavu said on 4/Mar/16
He looks 6'0 with Ryan Gosling
He looks 6'0 with Ryan Gosling
LOL2 said on 4/Mar/16
why does a 5'11 man feel the need to wear lifts?
he can be as short as 5'10 but no taller than 5'11
why does a 5'11 man feel the need to wear lifts?
he can be as short as 5'10 but no taller than 5'11
mrtguy said on 28/Feb/16
I don't know about legit 5'11'' for pitt
I don't know about legit 5'11'' for pitt
Johno said on 27/Feb/16
@Kurtz, yeh i think in real life a height between 5'11 - 6'1 might be the best.
@Kurtz, yeh i think in real life a height between 5'11 - 6'1 might be the best.
Sam said on 27/Feb/16
Having a bigger head isn't always a bad thing if you have longer limbs. The one disadvantage is eye level.
Having a bigger head isn't always a bad thing if you have longer limbs. The one disadvantage is eye level.
richie said on 27/Feb/16
Solid 5'11" for Pitt, probably 6' in shoes...
Solid 5'11" for Pitt, probably 6' in shoes...
Rich Hall said on 26/Feb/16
@ Johno and Dan, good points regarding height perception in movies vs real life. Here's an interesting quote from Alan Ladd : "I have the face of an aging choirboy and the build of an undernourished featherweight. If you can figure out my success on the screen you're a better man than I."
Dude was super popular throughout the 40s. Turned down the role of Giant played by James Dean. Interesting that both Neymar & Messi seem to be more popular with kids than the likes of Ronaldo or Bale. Maybe it's that identification factor that you guys mentioned... Still think Brad is 5'11" though. lol
@ Johno and Dan, good points regarding height perception in movies vs real life. Here's an interesting quote from Alan Ladd : "I have the face of an aging choirboy and the build of an undernourished featherweight. If you can figure out my success on the screen you're a better man than I."
Dude was super popular throughout the 40s. Turned down the role of Giant played by James Dean. Interesting that both Neymar & Messi seem to be more popular with kids than the likes of Ronaldo or Bale. Maybe it's that identification factor that you guys mentioned... Still think Brad is 5'11" though. lol
kurtz said on 25/Feb/16
best height for a man is btwn 5 11 and 6 1 not a mm. more, not a mm. less.
if we could ask to people what is best height, that would be in this range 99.9 % of times.
no way, no arguments against this, nada de nada
best height for a man is btwn 5 11 and 6 1 not a mm. more, not a mm. less.
if we could ask to people what is best height, that would be in this range 99.9 % of times.
no way, no arguments against this, nada de nada
Johno said on 25/Feb/16
Don't get me wrong 191-193 cm, tall aswell as a short height are secondary to character and everyone should learn to embrace their height. Non of us, well maybe just me, are supermodels. I am speaking generally.
In terms if muscle mass, "too much" muscle is relative, sure not many women drool over your average height Mr Olympias but nor would they with a huge muscular tall guy ----- that has got more to do with relativity and proportions.
I believe the entertainment industry is more a niche area and image plays a large part in entry and popularity. I believe the fact that there are less tall people in the World should not effect the representation of heights in peak popularity and brand ie there is only one Tom Cruise. It is so hard to get a break in popular entertainment that you would expect a higher number of taller entertainers but i generally believe that these taller entertainers are filtered out over time because the audience and in particular the female audience take a greater liking to the shorter entertainer and the versatility of the shorter entertainer as opposed to the taller entertainer who is usually type-cast. The shorter entertainer or the image of the shorter entertainer may lend itself more well to the audience's perceived notion of emotion and empathy, the ability to gain trust and the ability to relate and these traits greatly effect or are related to the laws of attraction. For me, the taller individuals just at times seem a bit awkward and maybe our characters and emotions are moulded in how they are physically judged in society as they grew up.
For me a height of 6'3 even is where you have start to have this stretched look, even when someone is in the 6'2-range you tend to ask about their height. I can a few tall guys with good looks who are or were popular with the ladies such as Chris Hemsworth, Jason Mamoa, Joe Manganiello, Christopher Reeves but are the comparable to say the Young Brad Pitt or Tom Cruise? Leonardo Dicaprio or Johnny Depp? Even the ultimate female magnets such Elvis and arguably Michael Jackson, who even guys like Beckham or Pitt could not compare to when it came to total and ultimate female attention did not even touch 6'0.
This begs the question, what is tall and what is short? ------ where is the cut-off point? Everything 6'0 to 5'7 ----- short? Everything 6'0 to 6'4 ----- tall?
Don't get me wrong 191-193 cm, tall aswell as a short height are secondary to character and everyone should learn to embrace their height. Non of us, well maybe just me, are supermodels. I am speaking generally.
In terms if muscle mass, "too much" muscle is relative, sure not many women drool over your average height Mr Olympias but nor would they with a huge muscular tall guy ----- that has got more to do with relativity and proportions.
I believe the entertainment industry is more a niche area and image plays a large part in entry and popularity. I believe the fact that there are less tall people in the World should not effect the representation of heights in peak popularity and brand ie there is only one Tom Cruise. It is so hard to get a break in popular entertainment that you would expect a higher number of taller entertainers but i generally believe that these taller entertainers are filtered out over time because the audience and in particular the female audience take a greater liking to the shorter entertainer and the versatility of the shorter entertainer as opposed to the taller entertainer who is usually type-cast. The shorter entertainer or the image of the shorter entertainer may lend itself more well to the audience's perceived notion of emotion and empathy, the ability to gain trust and the ability to relate and these traits greatly effect or are related to the laws of attraction. For me, the taller individuals just at times seem a bit awkward and maybe our characters and emotions are moulded in how they are physically judged in society as they grew up.
For me a height of 6'3 even is where you have start to have this stretched look, even when someone is in the 6'2-range you tend to ask about their height. I can a few tall guys with good looks who are or were popular with the ladies such as Chris Hemsworth, Jason Mamoa, Joe Manganiello, Christopher Reeves but are the comparable to say the Young Brad Pitt or Tom Cruise? Leonardo Dicaprio or Johnny Depp? Even the ultimate female magnets such Elvis and arguably Michael Jackson, who even guys like Beckham or Pitt could not compare to when it came to total and ultimate female attention did not even touch 6'0.
This begs the question, what is tall and what is short? ------ where is the cut-off point? Everything 6'0 to 5'7 ----- short? Everything 6'0 to 6'4 ----- tall?
hijopotamus said on 25/Feb/16
Poor Hall, Sly Stallone reaches the 5'10" mark, same as Cruise. No big deal. Brad can reach the 6' ish mark easily, even when he is only 5'10"
Poor Hall, Sly Stallone reaches the 5'10" mark, same as Cruise. No big deal. Brad can reach the 6' ish mark easily, even when he is only 5'10"
Rich Hall said on 24/Feb/16
ok folks, looks like Rob had it right all these years lol. 5'11" for Pitt does look right. Check out this vid where he's pretty much taller than everyone
Click Here
Granted, many of them are old but still... Not saying he only eats sweet peas and that he secretly is the Greeeen Giant HO HO HO but no way a 5'10" guy would look like that. Also take note of his height relative to the door at the 4.25 mark. That's similar to mine. Were it not for his shorter limbs, I'd say he could easily pass for 6' guy
and @ Dan, well to the Dan with the weird rants, in what parallel dimension is 5'10" the perfect height? Dude, that's such a weird statement. If so, why are most male models 6'2" and up? Daniel Craig who is 5'10" took a lot of flack for being "too short" to play Bond. I'm 6'1" and no way would I wanna be 5'10". Dunno if you're trolling when you say that girls don't like tall guys because their head is too long or too distant. Srs you sound like a Beta misc
Most ladies I've been with are pretty tall and love wearing heels but I dated some small ladies as well and they just loved to cuddle up to my waist when we take a romantic stroll. But hey, you sound so convinced that I doubt you'll ever get it. No biggie, to each their own I guess :^)
ok folks, looks like Rob had it right all these years lol. 5'11" for Pitt does look right. Check out this vid where he's pretty much taller than everyone
Click Here
Granted, many of them are old but still... Not saying he only eats sweet peas and that he secretly is the Greeeen Giant HO HO HO but no way a 5'10" guy would look like that. Also take note of his height relative to the door at the 4.25 mark. That's similar to mine. Were it not for his shorter limbs, I'd say he could easily pass for 6' guy
and @ Dan, well to the Dan with the weird rants, in what parallel dimension is 5'10" the perfect height? Dude, that's such a weird statement. If so, why are most male models 6'2" and up? Daniel Craig who is 5'10" took a lot of flack for being "too short" to play Bond. I'm 6'1" and no way would I wanna be 5'10". Dunno if you're trolling when you say that girls don't like tall guys because their head is too long or too distant. Srs you sound like a Beta misc
Most ladies I've been with are pretty tall and love wearing heels but I dated some small ladies as well and they just loved to cuddle up to my waist when we take a romantic stroll. But hey, you sound so convinced that I doubt you'll ever get it. No biggie, to each their own I guess :^)
Dan said on 23/Feb/16
Julian, I don't know how you're referring to, but it definitely ain't me. I never mentioned anything about girls or dating. That's not me. But I stick to my opinion that Pitt is 5-10. And he wears lifts. It's clear as day. It's not a big deal.
Julian, I don't know how you're referring to, but it definitely ain't me. I never mentioned anything about girls or dating. That's not me. But I stick to my opinion that Pitt is 5-10. And he wears lifts. It's clear as day. It's not a big deal.
191-193 said on 21/Feb/16
@Johno
Why are Hollywood pretty boys usually under 6 foot? For the same reason why most Miss Universes are brunettes; there are just so much more of them on this planet.
That head size and body propotion issue is also somewhat individual, usually you start to have that "stretched look" if you're closer to 2 meters tall. Besides, you could as well say that a larger head and shorter limbs are not ideal either, and if you gain a significant amount of muscle mass, it will make your limbs look even shorter. Taller guys don't have that problem. 190-195 cm is perfect for a 180 cm supermodel, just ask Gisele Bundchen.
@Johno
Why are Hollywood pretty boys usually under 6 foot? For the same reason why most Miss Universes are brunettes; there are just so much more of them on this planet.
That head size and body propotion issue is also somewhat individual, usually you start to have that "stretched look" if you're closer to 2 meters tall. Besides, you could as well say that a larger head and shorter limbs are not ideal either, and if you gain a significant amount of muscle mass, it will make your limbs look even shorter. Taller guys don't have that problem. 190-195 cm is perfect for a 180 cm supermodel, just ask Gisele Bundchen.
Julian said on 20/Feb/16
I agree with the listed height; 5'11" for Pitt and he often looks taller. Dan maybe consider anger management. Sorry to hear about your lack of game with girls but doesn't mean you need to downgrade everyone under the sun so as to feel better about yourself _ smh
I agree with the listed height; 5'11" for Pitt and he often looks taller. Dan maybe consider anger management. Sorry to hear about your lack of game with girls but doesn't mean you need to downgrade everyone under the sun so as to feel better about yourself _ smh
Heylo said on 20/Feb/16
@5ft 9.25: Brad has one of the most proportioned faces I've seen. I don't know where you get that he has a small head from?
Anyway. I agree with one of the Dans. That you can't pull off looking 6ft like Brad Pitt if you're under 5'10, it's impossible without looking suspicious.
What we should discuss is wether Brad is 178, 179 or 180cm and provide photos with celebrities around 5'10 to 6ft. We know that he barefoot next to Paltrow looked about 5'10 (everyone doesn't agree with me but for me it's crystal clear, If Gwyneth is 5'9, then Brad looked at least 5'10).
Brad also looks taller than every celebrity around 5'10. He often looks a small bit taller than people around 5'11 except for a few times, and those few times is the times where we assume that he skipped the lifts? In any case, he can't be under 5'10.
@5ft 9.25: Brad has one of the most proportioned faces I've seen. I don't know where you get that he has a small head from?
Anyway. I agree with one of the Dans. That you can't pull off looking 6ft like Brad Pitt if you're under 5'10, it's impossible without looking suspicious.
What we should discuss is wether Brad is 178, 179 or 180cm and provide photos with celebrities around 5'10 to 6ft. We know that he barefoot next to Paltrow looked about 5'10 (everyone doesn't agree with me but for me it's crystal clear, If Gwyneth is 5'9, then Brad looked at least 5'10).
Brad also looks taller than every celebrity around 5'10. He often looks a small bit taller than people around 5'11 except for a few times, and those few times is the times where we assume that he skipped the lifts? In any case, he can't be under 5'10.
Johno said on 19/Feb/16
Click Here
A better comparison of Matt Damon and Pitt; the difference betweem them is not more the 1-inch and most likely less thus, you need to keep Damon's height within an inch of Brad's ---- these 1.5-inch or 2-inch differences are just silly assumptions and only achieved by lifts, Damon seldom wears lifts as comoared to Brad.
Click Here
A better comparison of Matt Damon and Pitt; the difference betweem them is not more the 1-inch and most likely less thus, you need to keep Damon's height within an inch of Brad's ---- these 1.5-inch or 2-inch differences are just silly assumptions and only achieved by lifts, Damon seldom wears lifts as comoared to Brad.
Johno said on 19/Feb/16
Dan, whilst i can agree Pitt could be 5'10, i would not put him in the 5'10-range. 5'10 for me, is his ceiling. Whatever height Pitt maybe ---- Damon is not more then an inch below and more rather 0.75 inches. Damon can often look max 5'9 and often in the 5'8-range. Pitt is visibly shorter then the elderly Harrison Ford and Clint Eastwood. He did not even have more then 1-inch Shia. As i said before, Pitt right is up there with the 24/7 lift wearers. He is nearly as bad RDJ. You do at times see guys like Leonardo is normal footwear, aswell guys such as Matt Damon but hardly ever Pitt.
Pitt 5'10 max
Dan, whilst i can agree Pitt could be 5'10, i would not put him in the 5'10-range. 5'10 for me, is his ceiling. Whatever height Pitt maybe ---- Damon is not more then an inch below and more rather 0.75 inches. Damon can often look max 5'9 and often in the 5'8-range. Pitt is visibly shorter then the elderly Harrison Ford and Clint Eastwood. He did not even have more then 1-inch Shia. As i said before, Pitt right is up there with the 24/7 lift wearers. He is nearly as bad RDJ. You do at times see guys like Leonardo is normal footwear, aswell guys such as Matt Damon but hardly ever Pitt.
Pitt 5'10 max
hijopotamus said on 19/Feb/16
Jeff, most celebrities lie about height, weight, plastic surgeries, fake hair, fake teeth, etc. They are pros of image. This site is about debunking some of these "perfect" people. Some people might be insecure and have height issues, thats obvious. Celebrities and regular people.
Jeff, most celebrities lie about height, weight, plastic surgeries, fake hair, fake teeth, etc. They are pros of image. This site is about debunking some of these "perfect" people. Some people might be insecure and have height issues, thats obvious. Celebrities and regular people.
Spike said on 19/Feb/16
5 '11 (180cm) in his prime sounds perfectly legit, but considering the fact that he's over 50, he's probably more like 5'10.25 (178.4) to 5'10.5 (179).
What do you think Rob?
5 '11 (180cm) in his prime sounds perfectly legit, but considering the fact that he's over 50, he's probably more like 5'10.25 (178.4) to 5'10.5 (179).
What do you think Rob?
Jeff said on 18/Feb/16
@Dan: When you constantly downgrade every singe celebrity here, don't you think your perception of height might be a little biased? This comment goes for all the "serial downgraders" here. Use your intellect, not your height complex
@Dan: When you constantly downgrade every singe celebrity here, don't you think your perception of height might be a little biased? This comment goes for all the "serial downgraders" here. Use your intellect, not your height complex
The_Punisher said on 17/Feb/16
5'10'' barefoot
5'10'' barefoot
Dan said on 16/Feb/16
Pitt is definitely in the 5-10 range. No taller. Damon is probably about 5-9 or a smidge shorter. I think clooney is a solid 5-10. Dicaprio is definitely no shorter than 5-11. I stood right next to Don Cheadle and he is 5-8. I am 1000% sure that Dicaprio is about an inch taller than Pitt.
Pitt is definitely in the 5-10 range. No taller. Damon is probably about 5-9 or a smidge shorter. I think clooney is a solid 5-10. Dicaprio is definitely no shorter than 5-11. I stood right next to Don Cheadle and he is 5-8. I am 1000% sure that Dicaprio is about an inch taller than Pitt.
177-178 cm guy said on 16/Feb/16
@Johno Leo is clearly at least an inch taller than Damon in this picture:
Click Here
@Johno Leo is clearly at least an inch taller than Damon in this picture:
Click Here
Dan said on 15/Feb/16
Johno, try Stallone, Robert Downey Jr., there are way too many to count. They all wear lifts
Johno, try Stallone, Robert Downey Jr., there are way too many to count. They all wear lifts
Johno said on 15/Feb/16
@177-178cm? 5'10.75 minimum? Exactly how tall do you think Damon is and what is the difference between him and Pitt? Give me some estimates and let us deal with it.
@177-178cm? 5'10.75 minimum? Exactly how tall do you think Damon is and what is the difference between him and Pitt? Give me some estimates and let us deal with it.
Rich Hall said on 13/Feb/16
yo dan, you're gonna give yourself a stroke lol
sure, Hijodude sees Pitt as a bit smaller than most here but I think he's on to something. Check out Jolie next to dustin & jack black, She looks no more than 5'5"! don't get bummed out hijo.Even if you're in the minority, stay true to your opinions and accept what you see in ze mirror !!! --> Click Here
yo dan, you're gonna give yourself a stroke lol
sure, Hijodude sees Pitt as a bit smaller than most here but I think he's on to something. Check out Jolie next to dustin & jack black, She looks no more than 5'5"! don't get bummed out hijo.Even if you're in the minority, stay true to your opinions and accept what you see in ze mirror !!! --> Click Here
177-178 cm guy said on 13/Feb/16
@Johno Leo is 5'10.75" at worst. He never looks under 5'10". And Brad is at least 5'10". Deal with it.
@Johno Leo is 5'10.75" at worst. He never looks under 5'10". And Brad is at least 5'10". Deal with it.
Johno said on 12/Feb/16
I cannot think of many male A-listers who wear lifts more then Pitt does
I cannot think of many male A-listers who wear lifts more then Pitt does
MarcusTheSwede said on 12/Feb/16
Dan: You are wrong in all youre rambling about. Hijopotamus is correct. Pitt hasnt by a fantasy wizard grown its called height insoles and special build footwear. Dont listen to Dan. Cuz he is dead wrong in all his jibberish. Bye.
Dan: You are wrong in all youre rambling about. Hijopotamus is correct. Pitt hasnt by a fantasy wizard grown its called height insoles and special build footwear. Dont listen to Dan. Cuz he is dead wrong in all his jibberish. Bye.
Sam said on 12/Feb/16
Btw I peg Leo 181cm and Pitt more 5'10 range than the full 5'11.
Btw I peg Leo 181cm and Pitt more 5'10 range than the full 5'11.
Sam said on 12/Feb/16
Actually, even though some won't agree, I have confidence that Dicaprio could possibly be a full inch taller than a liftless Pitt.
Actually, even though some won't agree, I have confidence that Dicaprio could possibly be a full inch taller than a liftless Pitt.
Mathew Robinson (190 cm) said on 12/Feb/16
5ft 9.25 said on 12/Feb/16
Gosling 6'.25
Pitt 5'10.5
We all know he uses lifts (at lest .75"). The small head makes him appear taller...
---
Knock Gosling down another quarter inch and I'm on board.
5ft 9.25 said on 12/Feb/16
Gosling 6'.25
Pitt 5'10.5
We all know he uses lifts (at lest .75"). The small head makes him appear taller...
---
Knock Gosling down another quarter inch and I'm on board.
5ft 9.25 said on 12/Feb/16
Gosling 6'.25
Pitt 5'10.5
We all know he uses lifts (at lest .75"). The small head makes him appear taller...
Gosling 6'.25
Pitt 5'10.5
We all know he uses lifts (at lest .75"). The small head makes him appear taller...
TJE said on 11/Feb/16
@hijopotamus
What brand of tin foil do you use to fashion your hats out of? I'm going to a Reptilians did 9/11 convention this weekend and I need something that can last for a few days. The sooner the better; Thanks!
@hijopotamus
What brand of tin foil do you use to fashion your hats out of? I'm going to a Reptilians did 9/11 convention this weekend and I need something that can last for a few days. The sooner the better; Thanks!
thething said on 11/Feb/16
@ johno
You are using logic and not just going with what people say.bravo. Proportions are a sign of healthy genes and are way more attractive to women than height plus Statistically very tall men live shorter lives and have way more health problems after 40.tell me a logical reason why women should want these kind of genes for their offsprings?Women are more attracted to men with normal or short limbs compared to torso, long limbs are not sexy to ladies.The most beautful face is not a long,short or large face,it's a normal face.not too long ,not too large or too short.That goes for height too.Average height is the best to get the girls.i'd say 5'8 to 6'1 is good for a man,ideal would be 5'9 to 6'1
@ johno
You are using logic and not just going with what people say.bravo. Proportions are a sign of healthy genes and are way more attractive to women than height plus Statistically very tall men live shorter lives and have way more health problems after 40.tell me a logical reason why women should want these kind of genes for their offsprings?Women are more attracted to men with normal or short limbs compared to torso, long limbs are not sexy to ladies.The most beautful face is not a long,short or large face,it's a normal face.not too long ,not too large or too short.That goes for height too.Average height is the best to get the girls.i'd say 5'8 to 6'1 is good for a man,ideal would be 5'9 to 6'1
Dan said on 11/Feb/16
Dude, I am the original Dan here. Now there are two other Dans. I'm definitely not a Dan that suffers from height insecurity, and I'm not
The Dan who says that women prefer six footers. Change your names guys, I've been here a long time.
Dude, I am the original Dan here. Now there are two other Dans. I'm definitely not a Dan that suffers from height insecurity, and I'm not
The Dan who says that women prefer six footers. Change your names guys, I've been here a long time.
Dan said on 11/Feb/16
Amen Johno
Amen Johno
hijopotamus said on 11/Feb/16
Dan, show me Pitt is whatever height you claim or just prove he is not a certain height.
If you cant, dont spread missinformation.
...
Dan, show me Pitt is whatever height you claim or just prove he is not a certain height.
If you cant, dont spread missinformation.
...
hijopotamus said on 11/Feb/16
Dan, you don't know **** about shoes.
And I mean "this type" of shoes.
Get educated and come back.
Dan, you don't know **** about shoes.
And I mean "this type" of shoes.
Get educated and come back.
Jeff said on 10/Feb/16
Rob, on the Michael Vartan page, I saw that you used to have Pitt at 181. Why did you downgrade him? Is it related to your discovery of his 5'11 claim on the teen magazine profile?
Editor Rob
Rob, on the Michael Vartan page, I saw that you used to have Pitt at 181. Why did you downgrade him? Is it related to your discovery of his 5'11 claim on the teen magazine profile?
Editor Rob he could pull off looking over 5ft 11 at times, but then in his early 20's he did put down 5'11 in his own handwriting on a profile sheet.
Dan said on 10/Feb/16
There are new pictures of Pitt on set of War Machine. He is on the street jogging in short shorts and running sneakers. You can see his legs really well and it's very obvious how much help he's getting from his sneakers. Not that much.
There are new pictures of Pitt on set of War Machine. He is on the street jogging in short shorts and running sneakers. You can see his legs really well and it's very obvious how much help he's getting from his sneakers. Not that much.
Johno said on 9/Feb/16
How can most women prefer guys who are 6'0 + when guys like Beckham, Pitt, Cruise, Depp, Clooney, Brando, Dean, Dicaprio and not to forget all your typical teen idols such as Bieber and all your typical boybands have all been largely under 6'0 and nothing more then average? All these males have had normal dimensions and proportions. A relatively smaller head and long legs are not all that appealing. Taller guys tend to have these features. Also when the head is to far up, it is hard to emphaise with the individual ---- women usually have a lower centre of gravity. Also the facial bone structure of the shorter guy has been less susceptible for excess bone growth and it is more aqualine and can be quite angelic and metrosexual.
Women believe they prefer tall guys because all their idols overlist their heights. Pitt and Dicaprio would be lucky to average 5'10 or over but their body proportions are good as they are, they are ideal for the big screen.
How can most women prefer guys who are 6'0 + when guys like Beckham, Pitt, Cruise, Depp, Clooney, Brando, Dean, Dicaprio and not to forget all your typical teen idols such as Bieber and all your typical boybands have all been largely under 6'0 and nothing more then average? All these males have had normal dimensions and proportions. A relatively smaller head and long legs are not all that appealing. Taller guys tend to have these features. Also when the head is to far up, it is hard to emphaise with the individual ---- women usually have a lower centre of gravity. Also the facial bone structure of the shorter guy has been less susceptible for excess bone growth and it is more aqualine and can be quite angelic and metrosexual.
Women believe they prefer tall guys because all their idols overlist their heights. Pitt and Dicaprio would be lucky to average 5'10 or over but their body proportions are good as they are, they are ideal for the big screen.
Dan said on 8/Feb/16
hijopotamus, your constant efforts to cling on to your fantastic claims that Brad Pitt is under 5'10" is simply baffling. At least the other Dan who suffers from height insecurity follows a logical train of thought when it comes to assessing heights. You on the other hand make no sense at allr. It is perfectly clear without the shadow of any doubt that Brad would still be taller than the regular joe even if he didn't lift, and seriously dan, it's not the lifts you insist on wearing that will help you finally get a date. It's how you carry yourself. Brad Pitt is 5-10 and yes he's often seen wearing boots, big heels and the occasional lift but think about it. If he really was under 5-10, he would never look 6-0, which he often does in movies.
and to the other dan, 5-10 is the perfect height for film. If you're having issues with girls, believe me, it's not because of your height.
hijopotamus, your constant efforts to cling on to your fantastic claims that Brad Pitt is under 5'10" is simply baffling. At least the other Dan who suffers from height insecurity follows a logical train of thought when it comes to assessing heights. You on the other hand make no sense at allr. It is perfectly clear without the shadow of any doubt that Brad would still be taller than the regular joe even if he didn't lift, and seriously dan, it's not the lifts you insist on wearing that will help you finally get a date. It's how you carry yourself. Brad Pitt is 5-10 and yes he's often seen wearing boots, big heels and the occasional lift but think about it. If he really was under 5-10, he would never look 6-0, which he often does in movies.
and to the other dan, 5-10 is the perfect height for film. If you're having issues with girls, believe me, it's not because of your height.
Dmeyer said on 8/Feb/16
Shoes that give 2-2,25in have a dodgy look And yet they make you look just 1-1,25in taller than you are Pitt shoes arnt as big And hé can look near 6ft so 5'11 it is
Shoes that give 2-2,25in have a dodgy look And yet they make you look just 1-1,25in taller than you are Pitt shoes arnt as big And hé can look near 6ft so 5'11 it is
Dan said on 8/Feb/16
Hijopotamus, show me one pair of tricky shoes Brad Pitt has ever worn. Show me one pair. If you can't, then don't spread missinformation.
Hijopotamus, show me one pair of tricky shoes Brad Pitt has ever worn. Show me one pair. If you can't, then don't spread missinformation.
Abode46 said on 8/Feb/16
Strong 5'10" barefoot, but has perfect posture and can look 6'0" or over.
Strong 5'10" barefoot, but has perfect posture and can look 6'0" or over.
hijopotamus said on 7/Feb/16
Dan, Pitt wears lifts or custom tricky shoes 24/7.
So, nothing to do with having to look taller in movies.
We all saw those pics getting off a private jet with friends Clooney and Damon. Pitt looked shorter than Clooney...
Wonder why haha.
Dan, Pitt wears lifts or custom tricky shoes 24/7.
So, nothing to do with having to look taller in movies.
We all saw those pics getting off a private jet with friends Clooney and Damon. Pitt looked shorter than Clooney...
Wonder why haha.
Sam said on 7/Feb/16
My assumption is that some women just hear what they want to hear. Would a 5'10 guy that claims 6 foot honestly have a better chance than another guy that is 182cm and says he's under 6 foot, all things being equal? I think its dependant on how tall you look in the flesh because eye level, shoes, posture, hair and build all add to illusion of more height. I doubt any legit 5'10+ guy should have dating issues even if those "illusions" go against him. But your right about 5'10 not sounding very impressive on paper even though its a good height. Just not as ideal as say 6 foot but there's nothing wrong with that.
My assumption is that some women just hear what they want to hear. Would a 5'10 guy that claims 6 foot honestly have a better chance than another guy that is 182cm and says he's under 6 foot, all things being equal? I think its dependant on how tall you look in the flesh because eye level, shoes, posture, hair and build all add to illusion of more height. I doubt any legit 5'10+ guy should have dating issues even if those "illusions" go against him. But your right about 5'10 not sounding very impressive on paper even though its a good height. Just not as ideal as say 6 foot but there's nothing wrong with that.
Myth Buster said on 4/Feb/16
He has got the body structure of a short man (5' 8'') despite being 5' 11'', same as David Beckham.
He has got the body structure of a short man (5' 8'') despite being 5' 11'', same as David Beckham.
kurtz said on 3/Feb/16
5' 11'' or 180 cm. spot on
in my opinion btwn 5' 11'' and 6' 1'' (180-185 cm.) best height range for man
5' 11'' or 180 cm. spot on
in my opinion btwn 5' 11'' and 6' 1'' (180-185 cm.) best height range for man
Dan said on 2/Feb/16
@dan, Guys Johnny Depp and Brad Pitt lift because they're movie stars and have a certain look they need to have. It has nothing to do with their height insecurity. I'm pretty sure neither of them would lift it they were regular joes. If you're s legit barefoot 5-10 and you're lifting, you got issues. Barefoot 5-10 is the perfect movie star Hollywood height. There should be no reason to lift, and I seriously can't imagine any woman not being satisfied with a 5-10 guy unless of course, the woman is 5-9,5-10 or taller. I'm basically saying that if you're a barefoot 5-10 guy dating a woman anywhere from 5-3 all the way up to 5-8 and she's telling you she prefers guys 6-0 and up, then there's probably something else going on there. When a woman and man go out and she wears heels, even a height difference of 1 inch between a man and woman is enough. Two inch difference is probably ideal, but 1 inch difference is still acceptable. If the guy is too much taller than the woman, she's basically a shrimp. And ideally, a couple shouldn't have such a drastic difference in height. That's why John Mayer and Jennifer aniston looked like ****.
@dan, Guys Johnny Depp and Brad Pitt lift because they're movie stars and have a certain look they need to have. It has nothing to do with their height insecurity. I'm pretty sure neither of them would lift it they were regular joes. If you're s legit barefoot 5-10 and you're lifting, you got issues. Barefoot 5-10 is the perfect movie star Hollywood height. There should be no reason to lift, and I seriously can't imagine any woman not being satisfied with a 5-10 guy unless of course, the woman is 5-9,5-10 or taller. I'm basically saying that if you're a barefoot 5-10 guy dating a woman anywhere from 5-3 all the way up to 5-8 and she's telling you she prefers guys 6-0 and up, then there's probably something else going on there. When a woman and man go out and she wears heels, even a height difference of 1 inch between a man and woman is enough. Two inch difference is probably ideal, but 1 inch difference is still acceptable. If the guy is too much taller than the woman, she's basically a shrimp. And ideally, a couple shouldn't have such a drastic difference in height. That's why John Mayer and Jennifer aniston looked like ****.
Dmeyer said on 2/Feb/16
Ok mat , relax men i just said girls told me that they préfère 6'0-6'4 wich means 5'10,5-6'2 in reality , i dont have the problème anyway i am 5'11,5 And most girls guess me 6'0-6'1 or even more so whi would i lie , also 5ft 10,25 is à very décent height its not like you are 5'7-8in , in the US the height is à réal problem ,
Ok mat , relax men i just said girls told me that they préfère 6'0-6'4 wich means 5'10,5-6'2 in reality , i dont have the problème anyway i am 5'11,5 And most girls guess me 6'0-6'1 or even more so whi would i lie , also 5ft 10,25 is à very décent height its not like you are 5'7-8in , in the US the height is à réal problem ,
Tunman said on 1/Feb/16
@Dan
Really no average man should have height complex,just think that I'm 5'9.5 and almost never wore anything over 0.5" for years.Missing a hottie just because you're thinking about your lifts is a pity.
Okay the only case where I could agree with you is if an average man is attracted by a very tall woman,say in the 5'11-6' range.Here it's true that women may prefer taller guys like 6'0-4 range,so yeah average men chances are indeed very weak.But just think that when I was in NY I saw a guy who was probably 175 with a 188 or so girlfriend and in Montreal a 165 guy with a 186-7 girl.Quite genuine girls who never had the kind of thoughts like"he will need a ladder to kiss me".Height should never be a condition for love whether for men or women in my opinion.If one starts to quantify sexuality in terms of inches,then what about other issues which happen to be much more important actually?(personnality,behaviour,kindness,respect...)just ask Rob,after all Jenny could be near 5'11 in heels,hmmm?
@Dan
Really no average man should have height complex,just think that I'm 5'9.5 and almost never wore anything over 0.5" for years.Missing a hottie just because you're thinking about your lifts is a pity.
Okay the only case where I could agree with you is if an average man is attracted by a very tall woman,say in the 5'11-6' range.Here it's true that women may prefer taller guys like 6'0-4 range,so yeah average men chances are indeed very weak.But just think that when I was in NY I saw a guy who was probably 175 with a 188 or so girlfriend and in Montreal a 165 guy with a 186-7 girl.Quite genuine girls who never had the kind of thoughts like"he will need a ladder to kiss me".Height should never be a condition for love whether for men or women in my opinion.If one starts to quantify sexuality in terms of inches,then what about other issues which happen to be much more important actually?(personnality,behaviour,kindness,respect...)just ask Rob,after all Jenny could be near 5'11 in heels,hmmm?
Dan said on 31/Jan/16
Heylo says: "I think insecure men are more likely to be with shallow and stupid women."
Yeah true dat. I've always dated models or tanned gym bunnies. Except for high school, I've never been with a "normal" down to earth girl. Probably a reflection of my own issues. Even though my friends point out that I'm taller than average, somehow I can't seem to feel good about my height unless I wear lifts. Except when doing sports. Like on the beach, I suddenly don't care which really shows it depends on my state of mind.
I know it sounds ridiculous but I've tried not to wear lifts for 1 day and it was torture! There was this hot girl who was flirting with me but I couldn't even enjoy it. All I was thinking about was put my lifts back on. Sigh
Mat, don't forget that celebrity is a huge turn on for girls. Besides, Johnny Depp lifts all the time as well so it's pretty clear he too wished he was taller. Not saying he's insecure like me though
Heylo says: "I think insecure men are more likely to be with shallow and stupid women."
Yeah true dat. I've always dated models or tanned gym bunnies. Except for high school, I've never been with a "normal" down to earth girl. Probably a reflection of my own issues. Even though my friends point out that I'm taller than average, somehow I can't seem to feel good about my height unless I wear lifts. Except when doing sports. Like on the beach, I suddenly don't care which really shows it depends on my state of mind.
I know it sounds ridiculous but I've tried not to wear lifts for 1 day and it was torture! There was this hot girl who was flirting with me but I couldn't even enjoy it. All I was thinking about was put my lifts back on. Sigh
Mat, don't forget that celebrity is a huge turn on for girls. Besides, Johnny Depp lifts all the time as well so it's pretty clear he too wished he was taller. Not saying he's insecure like me though
NBAer said on 31/Jan/16
dan said on 27/Jan/16
I don't get your height problem,and i also don't get how you think height is such a big factor when it comes to girls and dating...As long as you're atleast abit taller than your girl(in most cases anyway),you won't have a problem.Besides,when meeting people,you don't dudge them by their physical appearance,but from their character and height is sth MAYBE secondary(i'm talking about myself).Also,i can't get it how mostly everyone on this website claiming to be under 5'11 but over 5'7 feel short and subhuman,just because they're not 6ft++ with broad shoulders,6packs,good looks and loads of money...I'm barely 5'11 myself barefoot,and i never ever ever feel short or undersized wherever i go.On the worst case, i may feel average,and i rarely meet taller women with or without heels.And i'm supposedly living in a country where men are about 5'9 on average and women 5'4...By the way,Brad looks 5'11 and rarely below in most of his pics with other celebrities,and closer to 6 feet when he's lifting
dan said on 27/Jan/16
I don't get your height problem,and i also don't get how you think height is such a big factor when it comes to girls and dating...As long as you're atleast abit taller than your girl(in most cases anyway),you won't have a problem.Besides,when meeting people,you don't dudge them by their physical appearance,but from their character and height is sth MAYBE secondary(i'm talking about myself).Also,i can't get it how mostly everyone on this website claiming to be under 5'11 but over 5'7 feel short and subhuman,just because they're not 6ft++ with broad shoulders,6packs,good looks and loads of money...I'm barely 5'11 myself barefoot,and i never ever ever feel short or undersized wherever i go.On the worst case, i may feel average,and i rarely meet taller women with or without heels.And i'm supposedly living in a country where men are about 5'9 on average and women 5'4...By the way,Brad looks 5'11 and rarely below in most of his pics with other celebrities,and closer to 6 feet when he's lifting
hijopotamus said on 31/Jan/16
Dan, relax dude! I understand you have some kind of weird issues in the ladies department and that must suck pretty much. If you are cool enough, alfa and have some power you shouldnt have.any problems even if you are short.
The Paltrow pics are the ONLY reliable source we have which is a guy barefoot besides another person barefoot. You don't need a brain surgery to get it.
Pitt 5'10" in the 90s.
Dan, relax dude! I understand you have some kind of weird issues in the ladies department and that must suck pretty much. If you are cool enough, alfa and have some power you shouldnt have.any problems even if you are short.
The Paltrow pics are the ONLY reliable source we have which is a guy barefoot besides another person barefoot. You don't need a brain surgery to get it.
Pitt 5'10" in the 90s.
Emil 183 cm said on 30/Jan/16
@dmeyer
those girls have no idea how tall a genuine 6'0 guy is - let alone 6'4 lol.
And why even bother chasing girls who are so narrowminded? Height shouldn't play a factor
@dmeyer
those girls have no idea how tall a genuine 6'0 guy is - let alone 6'4 lol.
And why even bother chasing girls who are so narrowminded? Height shouldn't play a factor
Mat said on 30/Jan/16
@dmeyer
Dan i totaly understand you , i use to live in us and girls anywere 5'0-5'11 all told me they wouldnt date a Guy shorter than me about 6'0 ,and most of them prefer 6'0-6'4 with normal looks than 5'9-10in with perfect looks ,they father date ed norton than tom cruise
First of all, Edward Norton is better looking than Cruise in my opinion. Secondly, who do you think women would rather date, Johnny Depp (5'9) or Norton (6') ? Johnny Depp of course. So what you are saying abut the 5'9-5'10 guys is BS. From my experience, women have absolutely no problem dating an average height man. Being average is neither a pros nor a con. It's just neutral. It doesn't matter. If a guy is on the short side, it starts becoming a con, if he is on the taller side it becomes a pros.
Any woman would rather date a 5'9 guy with perfect looks than a 6+ with average looks. Just because you don't have any luck with the ladies doesn't mean that applies to all of us. I am actually described as tallish by most girls, and my height has never been a deal breaker. I'm 5'10.25 by the way.
@dmeyer
Dan i totaly understand you , i use to live in us and girls anywere 5'0-5'11 all told me they wouldnt date a Guy shorter than me about 6'0 ,and most of them prefer 6'0-6'4 with normal looks than 5'9-10in with perfect looks ,they father date ed norton than tom cruise
First of all, Edward Norton is better looking than Cruise in my opinion. Secondly, who do you think women would rather date, Johnny Depp (5'9) or Norton (6') ? Johnny Depp of course. So what you are saying abut the 5'9-5'10 guys is BS. From my experience, women have absolutely no problem dating an average height man. Being average is neither a pros nor a con. It's just neutral. It doesn't matter. If a guy is on the short side, it starts becoming a con, if he is on the taller side it becomes a pros.
Any woman would rather date a 5'9 guy with perfect looks than a 6+ with average looks. Just because you don't have any luck with the ladies doesn't mean that applies to all of us. I am actually described as tallish by most girls, and my height has never been a deal breaker. I'm 5'10.25 by the way.
Heylo said on 30/Jan/16
My experience is that girls tend to sound disappointed when hearing that I'm barely 5'10 but I could have said 5'11 and get away with it cause people in general are pretty bad at estimating heights. Also, 5'10 sounds shorter in paper than what it looks like in reality. With this said, I'm not saying that girls wouldn't prefer a 6'2 version of me, I'm just saying that average isn't that bad in reality.
And I think we all have certain preferences that suddenly don't mean much if you meet the right person. I've had girls around my height (5'10) that were interested and these are very tall girls. I also had girls who thought I was pretty short. I definitely don't think you're doomed in any way if you're around average in height.
It's when the height goes to extreme differences compared to your own ideals, that's where problems arises. If a girl wants a 6'2 man but starts to like a 5'5 man, she may actually think about leaving him because of his height, because of that extreme difference from heir ideals. There are exceptions of course but honestly, to every average man out there, you don't have to look like a model to get attractive girls. It's kind of sad how everyone wants to look like a greek god, nature wouldn't make sense if everyone looked like a tall Brad Pitt. Diversity is necessary.
Keep in mind that you only have to be taller than the girl and as long as you make the best of what you have and are a genteman, you should make it. A girl who disses someone for being some inches smaller than her ideal, then she may be nothing to have. At least I feel like mature and intelligent women are more attractive. I think insecure men are more likely to be with shallow and stupid women.
My experience is that girls tend to sound disappointed when hearing that I'm barely 5'10 but I could have said 5'11 and get away with it cause people in general are pretty bad at estimating heights. Also, 5'10 sounds shorter in paper than what it looks like in reality. With this said, I'm not saying that girls wouldn't prefer a 6'2 version of me, I'm just saying that average isn't that bad in reality.
And I think we all have certain preferences that suddenly don't mean much if you meet the right person. I've had girls around my height (5'10) that were interested and these are very tall girls. I also had girls who thought I was pretty short. I definitely don't think you're doomed in any way if you're around average in height.
It's when the height goes to extreme differences compared to your own ideals, that's where problems arises. If a girl wants a 6'2 man but starts to like a 5'5 man, she may actually think about leaving him because of his height, because of that extreme difference from heir ideals. There are exceptions of course but honestly, to every average man out there, you don't have to look like a model to get attractive girls. It's kind of sad how everyone wants to look like a greek god, nature wouldn't make sense if everyone looked like a tall Brad Pitt. Diversity is necessary.
Keep in mind that you only have to be taller than the girl and as long as you make the best of what you have and are a genteman, you should make it. A girl who disses someone for being some inches smaller than her ideal, then she may be nothing to have. At least I feel like mature and intelligent women are more attractive. I think insecure men are more likely to be with shallow and stupid women.
dan said on 27/Jan/16
dmeyer is spot on. The shorter the guy, the more he has to "work" and make up for it. It's a permanent curse and that's a fact. And if there's one thing females hate more than a short dude, it's a short smiling dude with a high pitched voice. In that case, we're not even talking about mere preference, for 99% of ladies, this combo is a deal breaker with no hope of rescue. You could take the ideal man with perfect features and personality and shrink him to say 5'5", women would still pick an average or even ugly looking 6'2" dude. We live in a No Country for Short Men world and short dudes are the equivalent of fat, really ugly chicks with bad breath and chlamydia. Some may say it's not fair or politically correct but it's the plain truth and that's just the way the cookie crumbles. And even in cases where some girls actually dig short guys physically or aren't planning on having kids, they'd still give preferences to taller guys because of the status appeal and what society paints as the image of a cool boyfriend or husband. A short boyfriend is not exactly show off material, and often, it's seen as an embarrassment so if a dude is short, he better be minted. Why do you figure so many short dudes are nerds? That's because money is the great equalizer. Evolution 101
Sorry to burst your bubble hijopota but you're wrong about Pitt being my height. He's 5'11" minimum and he wasn't just barely taller than Redford. I dunno why you keep bringing up the Paltrow pics. He's not short. Get over it dude
Editor Rob
dmeyer is spot on. The shorter the guy, the more he has to "work" and make up for it. It's a permanent curse and that's a fact. And if there's one thing females hate more than a short dude, it's a short smiling dude with a high pitched voice. In that case, we're not even talking about mere preference, for 99% of ladies, this combo is a deal breaker with no hope of rescue. You could take the ideal man with perfect features and personality and shrink him to say 5'5", women would still pick an average or even ugly looking 6'2" dude. We live in a No Country for Short Men world and short dudes are the equivalent of fat, really ugly chicks with bad breath and chlamydia. Some may say it's not fair or politically correct but it's the plain truth and that's just the way the cookie crumbles. And even in cases where some girls actually dig short guys physically or aren't planning on having kids, they'd still give preferences to taller guys because of the status appeal and what society paints as the image of a cool boyfriend or husband. A short boyfriend is not exactly show off material, and often, it's seen as an embarrassment so if a dude is short, he better be minted. Why do you figure so many short dudes are nerds? That's because money is the great equalizer. Evolution 101
Sorry to burst your bubble hijopota but you're wrong about Pitt being my height. He's 5'11" minimum and he wasn't just barely taller than Redford. I dunno why you keep bringing up the Paltrow pics. He's not short. Get over it dude
Editor Rob many women are quite happy to overlook shortness in stature for tallness in bank balance.
Johno said on 26/Jan/16
An average height guy. Him, Clooney and Damon are all within 1-inch of another although, Clooney and Damon wear lifts alot less then Pitt does; both seem to be more comfortable with their average heights.
Brad Pitt (Average height man)
An average height guy. Him, Clooney and Damon are all within 1-inch of another although, Clooney and Damon wear lifts alot less then Pitt does; both seem to be more comfortable with their average heights.
Brad Pitt (Average height man)
hijopotamus said on 26/Jan/16
Dan, Pitt was wearing massive heels in Spy Games and barely taller than Redford. Dude, you are weird!
Dan, Pitt was wearing massive heels in Spy Games and barely taller than Redford. Dude, you are weird!
dmeyer said on 26/Jan/16
Dan i totaly understand you , i use to live in us and girls anywere 5'0-5'11 all told me they wouldnt date a Guy shorter than me about 6'0 ,and most of them prefer 6'0-6'4 with normal looks than 5'9-10in with perfect looks ,they father date ed norton than tom cruise
Dan i totaly understand you , i use to live in us and girls anywere 5'0-5'11 all told me they wouldnt date a Guy shorter than me about 6'0 ,and most of them prefer 6'0-6'4 with normal looks than 5'9-10in with perfect looks ,they father date ed norton than tom cruise
Dan said on 26/Jan/16
Well I ended up dating them anyways but when the conversation turned to height, they confirmed they'd have preferred a taller version of me. I don't know how tall you are but I've never met a 5'10 dude who wouldn't rather be 6'2" or vice versa, a 6'2" dude who'd wanna be shorter. I'm 5'10 barefoot and I often feel short when I'm not lifting.I guess it's because I've gotten too used to them. Wish there was a minimal shoes rehab program. Detox could wreck my self-esteem but coming out of it, I wouldn't be dependant on lifts anymore. In my post, I said I've had a height complex for years so you telling me there's something wrong with me or my girlfriends is kinda redundant, don't you think? Of course there's something wrong! I'm an insecure dude with a height complex and they're tall lanky beauties with eating issues.
Anyways truthfully, most girls I know would rather date tall guys. Not just the models. In fact, in my experience, it's the smaller girls who crave really tall boyfriends. Weird, I know, but that's what I've observed.
Pitt towered over Robert Redford in Spy Games. In that movie, he actually looked like he a 6'2" dude. Peace out
Well I ended up dating them anyways but when the conversation turned to height, they confirmed they'd have preferred a taller version of me. I don't know how tall you are but I've never met a 5'10 dude who wouldn't rather be 6'2" or vice versa, a 6'2" dude who'd wanna be shorter. I'm 5'10 barefoot and I often feel short when I'm not lifting.I guess it's because I've gotten too used to them. Wish there was a minimal shoes rehab program. Detox could wreck my self-esteem but coming out of it, I wouldn't be dependant on lifts anymore. In my post, I said I've had a height complex for years so you telling me there's something wrong with me or my girlfriends is kinda redundant, don't you think? Of course there's something wrong! I'm an insecure dude with a height complex and they're tall lanky beauties with eating issues.
Anyways truthfully, most girls I know would rather date tall guys. Not just the models. In fact, in my experience, it's the smaller girls who crave really tall boyfriends. Weird, I know, but that's what I've observed.
Pitt towered over Robert Redford in Spy Games. In that movie, he actually looked like he a 6'2" dude. Peace out
Dan said on 24/Jan/16
Brad Pitt doesn't always look 6-1. No way. He has looked anywhere from 5-11 to 6-1 depending on the role. In moneyball and basterds he looked really tall. And 5-10 flat barefoot is definitely not short. If a girl tells you you'd be a hottie if you were 2 inches taller than sorry bud, but there's either something wrong with you or those girls. I've never ever met a girl who requires a man above 5-10 unless they're 5-9 or 5-10 themselves.
Brad Pitt doesn't always look 6-1. No way. He has looked anywhere from 5-11 to 6-1 depending on the role. In moneyball and basterds he looked really tall. And 5-10 flat barefoot is definitely not short. If a girl tells you you'd be a hottie if you were 2 inches taller than sorry bud, but there's either something wrong with you or those girls. I've never ever met a girl who requires a man above 5-10 unless they're 5-9 or 5-10 themselves.
Alex said on 23/Jan/16
If Pitt use some lift, he could be less than 180 cm.
If Pitt use some lift, he could be less than 180 cm.
Smith said on 21/Jan/16
Brad is 183 cm tall. And in those pictures that he looks shorter than others it's because they are wearing lifts and he is not. You think he is the only one who wears lifts?
Brad is 183 cm tall. And in those pictures that he looks shorter than others it's because they are wearing lifts and he is not. You think he is the only one who wears lifts?
Dmeyer said on 19/Jan/16
Relooking at pics dicaprio could look easily as tall if not 1/4 in taller , its à shame there is à récent pic of leo And Pitt but they are not side by side
Relooking at pics dicaprio could look easily as tall if not 1/4 in taller , its à shame there is à récent pic of leo And Pitt but they are not side by side
Dmeyer said on 18/Jan/16
pitt looks taller than dicaprio near 5'10 innaritu and dicaprio looks taller than brad near tarantino , and thats counting footwear , wich means they are similar heights
pitt looks taller than dicaprio near 5'10 innaritu and dicaprio looks taller than brad near tarantino , and thats counting footwear , wich means they are similar heights
Dmeyer said on 16/Jan/16
gosling isnt less than 183-4cm pitt has to be 179-80cm tu pull off this tall near him in shoes that dont look like big elevators
gosling isnt less than 183-4cm pitt has to be 179-80cm tu pull off this tall near him in shoes that dont look like big elevators
a said on 14/Jan/16
Pitt is 180 max. Gosling is 184 max. I doubt Gosling wears lifts but Pitt def does. In some films he can look over 183cm and yet in others he can look much shorter next to a taller actor
Pitt is 180 max. Gosling is 184 max. I doubt Gosling wears lifts but Pitt def does. In some films he can look over 183cm and yet in others he can look much shorter next to a taller actor
pauly e said on 14/Jan/16
Dmeyer said on 13/Jan/16
They look close enaugh to wath Gosling has if anithing Gosling heels are a few mm thicker but but could have a 0,5-6in lifts anyway hé manages to look just 0,75-1in smaller while in max 1-1,5cm more shoes hé has to be max 3-4cm under Gosling who isnt under 6'0,25
so 6'0.25 is 183.5 cm....so if Pitt is 3-4 cm under him, then that is 179.5-180.5 or just a bit over 5'10.5 - just a bit over 5'11. I think that is reasonable.
Dmeyer said on 13/Jan/16
They look close enaugh to wath Gosling has if anithing Gosling heels are a few mm thicker but but could have a 0,5-6in lifts anyway hé manages to look just 0,75-1in smaller while in max 1-1,5cm more shoes hé has to be max 3-4cm under Gosling who isnt under 6'0,25
so 6'0.25 is 183.5 cm....so if Pitt is 3-4 cm under him, then that is 179.5-180.5 or just a bit over 5'10.5 - just a bit over 5'11. I think that is reasonable.
Dmeyer said on 14/Jan/16
Cobsidering how Pitt looks near Gosling even cobsidering very slightly more shoes as they dont look that suspicions he has to be max 3-4cm shorter no more And Gosling is in the 183-4cm no less so Pitt 180cm anyone 179 or less couldnt pull that off
Cobsidering how Pitt looks near Gosling even cobsidering very slightly more shoes as they dont look that suspicions he has to be max 3-4cm shorter no more And Gosling is in the 183-4cm no less so Pitt 180cm anyone 179 or less couldnt pull that off
Mathew Robinson (190 cm) said on 14/Jan/16
jtm said on 13/Jan/16
hasn't there been enough evidence gosling isn't even 6'0? still sticking with under 5'10 for pitt.
---
Gosling isn't over 6'0". But as for Pitt, I really don't think he's less than 5'10". I think 5'10.25" - 5'10.5" is likely what he'd measure. I see a strong 5'10"-er who likes thick heels and at times puts lifts in them.
jtm said on 13/Jan/16
hasn't there been enough evidence gosling isn't even 6'0? still sticking with under 5'10 for pitt.
---
Gosling isn't over 6'0". But as for Pitt, I really don't think he's less than 5'10". I think 5'10.25" - 5'10.5" is likely what he'd measure. I see a strong 5'10"-er who likes thick heels and at times puts lifts in them.
Adam said on 14/Jan/16
Yeah, good spot, definite elevators from Pitt there. Even with those and Goslings somewhat slouching posture Pitt still looks a little shorter...still think 5'11 about right for him, though it does prove Gosling is no less than 6.25.
Yeah, good spot, definite elevators from Pitt there. Even with those and Goslings somewhat slouching posture Pitt still looks a little shorter...still think 5'11 about right for him, though it does prove Gosling is no less than 6.25.
hijopotamus said on 14/Jan/16
Guys, Brad is wearing elevators!
How como Tom Cruise be as tall as Cameron Diaz in high heels? We all have seen it. Well, we all know how...
Why some people deny the true facts? Why Brad cannot be just average height?
Guys, Brad is wearing elevators!
How como Tom Cruise be as tall as Cameron Diaz in high heels? We all have seen it. Well, we all know how...
Why some people deny the true facts? Why Brad cannot be just average height?
jasperwazup said on 13/Jan/16
Brad's 5'9.75'' at shortest time of day.Ryan is an actual 5'11.5'' tall but looks 6 foot most of the time.
Brad's 5'9.75'' at shortest time of day.Ryan is an actual 5'11.5'' tall but looks 6 foot most of the time.
mickey said on 13/Jan/16
i guess we can safely say that he hasn't lost any height through the years. Strong 5'11, maybe at morning with perfect posture he can scratch 6ft.
i guess we can safely say that he hasn't lost any height through the years. Strong 5'11, maybe at morning with perfect posture he can scratch 6ft.
Dmeyer said on 13/Jan/16
They look close enaugh to wath Gosling has if anithing Gosling heels are a few mm thicker but but could have a 0,5-6in lifts anyway hé manages to look just 0,75-1in smaller while in max 1-1,5cm more shoes hé has to be max 3-4cm under Gosling who isnt under 6'0,25
They look close enaugh to wath Gosling has if anithing Gosling heels are a few mm thicker but but could have a 0,5-6in lifts anyway hé manages to look just 0,75-1in smaller while in max 1-1,5cm more shoes hé has to be max 3-4cm under Gosling who isnt under 6'0,25
jtm said on 13/Jan/16
hasn't there been enough evidence gosling isn't even 6'0? still sticking with under 5'10 for pitt.
hasn't there been enough evidence gosling isn't even 6'0? still sticking with under 5'10 for pitt.
Tom said on 12/Jan/16
If you zoom in on his shoes they look very questionable. Look at how the tongue/lace area are almost flat on Gosling's shoes yet on Brad's it looks up to a 45 degree angle. Very much how elevator shoes such as Don's look. Because of the extra heel height it is like wearing a small pair of heels like those that females wear and it is clear how that changes the angle of the foot. Much like when you stand on your tip toes.
Click Here
If you zoom in on his shoes they look very questionable. Look at how the tongue/lace area are almost flat on Gosling's shoes yet on Brad's it looks up to a 45 degree angle. Very much how elevator shoes such as Don's look. Because of the extra heel height it is like wearing a small pair of heels like those that females wear and it is clear how that changes the angle of the foot. Much like when you stand on your tip toes.
Click Here
Josh said on 12/Jan/16
doc you need an eye doc for not seeing Pitt same height as Paltrow. telling other commentors "stupid" does not make Pitt any taller than Platrow. You need to learn some manners that in such websites people only argue about their own opinions not insulting others like 14 year old kids.
doc you need an eye doc for not seeing Pitt same height as Paltrow. telling other commentors "stupid" does not make Pitt any taller than Platrow. You need to learn some manners that in such websites people only argue about their own opinions not insulting others like 14 year old kids.
HeightObsession said on 12/Jan/16
Can be either 5'11 to 5'11.5. He is virtually the same height as my boyfriend who I have constantly measured as 5'11.5. I had my boyfriend stand next to the Madame Tussauds London Eye Brad Pitt wax model. Even though my boyfriend was did not have the best posture next to him, it looked like they were almost the same height. However, I suspect that Brad Pitt's heels were .25 inch taller than my boyfriend's. It could be possible Pitt was wearing lifts in his shoes, but I would confidently say 5'11.25 looks accurate.
Can be either 5'11 to 5'11.5. He is virtually the same height as my boyfriend who I have constantly measured as 5'11.5. I had my boyfriend stand next to the Madame Tussauds London Eye Brad Pitt wax model. Even though my boyfriend was did not have the best posture next to him, it looked like they were almost the same height. However, I suspect that Brad Pitt's heels were .25 inch taller than my boyfriend's. It could be possible Pitt was wearing lifts in his shoes, but I would confidently say 5'11.25 looks accurate.
6ft-on-a-good-day said on 12/Jan/16
closer look at the shoes. Click Here surpisingly the heel looks about a cm more than regular dress shoes for both. But i think this puts to bed the below 5"10 claims unless they're both shorter than claimed. I'd say the listing was there or there abouts.
closer look at the shoes. Click Here surpisingly the heel looks about a cm more than regular dress shoes for both. But i think this puts to bed the below 5"10 claims unless they're both shorter than claimed. I'd say the listing was there or there abouts.
Keith said on 12/Jan/16
Am I the only one who watched the video all the way through and noticed that any time Brad straightened up, he was at least as tall as Ryan? 0:20, 0:25, 0:30, 0:53 etc. Look at 0:57 to see Brad looking taller. Then 1:10 Brad goes full height and he just looks visibly bigger.
Am I the only one who watched the video all the way through and noticed that any time Brad straightened up, he was at least as tall as Ryan? 0:20, 0:25, 0:30, 0:53 etc. Look at 0:57 to see Brad looking taller. Then 1:10 Brad goes full height and he just looks visibly bigger.
Dejavu said on 12/Jan/16
In that video brad Pitt looked an inch shorter than Gosling
In that video brad Pitt looked an inch shorter than Gosling
TJE said on 11/Jan/16
@Jed
Brad has a camera advantage later in the video, but in the beginning he doesn't. Also in the beginning, Ryan looks barely an inch taller than Brad when their posture is equal. Brad's shoes is questionable though; they look close to 2 inches thick.
@Jed
Brad has a camera advantage later in the video, but in the beginning he doesn't. Also in the beginning, Ryan looks barely an inch taller than Brad when their posture is equal. Brad's shoes is questionable though; they look close to 2 inches thick.
Josh said on 11/Jan/16
Maybe Gosling had threatened Brad that if he wears his massive lifts he will do the same and dwarf Brad by billions of inches lol
Maybe Gosling had threatened Brad that if he wears his massive lifts he will do the same and dwarf Brad by billions of inches lol
Doc said on 11/Jan/16
Such a good looking man as Brad Pitt can't have a perfectly good height.., no no. Some people just want to downgrade him because they can. Jealous ****s.
And if you think Brad looks the same height as Paltrow barefoot then you're stupid, I've been looking at those photos now and any person with a slight hint of intelligence should be able to see that Brad is taller.
Such a good looking man as Brad Pitt can't have a perfectly good height.., no no. Some people just want to downgrade him because they can. Jealous ****s.
And if you think Brad looks the same height as Paltrow barefoot then you're stupid, I've been looking at those photos now and any person with a slight hint of intelligence should be able to see that Brad is taller.
Jed said on 11/Jan/16
This video at the golden globes is interesting. He's standing next to Gosling and looks an inch or so shorter, but then he straightens up a couple of times and looks pretty much the same height. You'd think that if he was that height conscious he wouldn't slouch next to a taller dude for the bulk of the time he was standing next to him. He could have lifts in his shoes, but the shoes themselves look pretty standard.
Click Here
I don't think he could be under 5'11. 5'10 and below claims are a little silly.
This video at the golden globes is interesting. He's standing next to Gosling and looks an inch or so shorter, but then he straightens up a couple of times and looks pretty much the same height. You'd think that if he was that height conscious he wouldn't slouch next to a taller dude for the bulk of the time he was standing next to him. He could have lifts in his shoes, but the shoes themselves look pretty standard.
Click Here
I don't think he could be under 5'11. 5'10 and below claims are a little silly.
whoa said on 10/Jan/16
Pitt is either 5'11 or 5'10. No taller, no shorter.
But honestly if he was 5'11 why would he desire to wear 2 or 3 inch lifts? Is he that insecure
Pitt is either 5'11 or 5'10. No taller, no shorter.
But honestly if he was 5'11 why would he desire to wear 2 or 3 inch lifts? Is he that insecure
Sam said on 10/Jan/16
I bet Pitt measures around the same height as Big Josh would, upper 5'10 range, maybe 179cm but no more.
I bet Pitt measures around the same height as Big Josh would, upper 5'10 range, maybe 179cm but no more.
Filippo said on 10/Jan/16
hijopotamus said on 27/Dec/15
Dan, if his height varies between 2 it means he is definetly the lowest, hello!
By far the most clever thing I read around here in a while!
hijopotamus said on 27/Dec/15
Dan, if his height varies between 2 it means he is definetly the lowest, hello!
By far the most clever thing I read around here in a while!
Matt179 said on 9/Jan/16
Hes probaly 179cm out of bed, Hes defenetly Height concious, he wear Lift and big heel dress shoes.
I got a dress shoes generic brand(Not elevator) That got 1.25 heel, they look perfectly normal. I can stuff a 1 Inch lift inside the shoes and walk completly normal. Im 178cm midday, With these shoes it take me to 183cm(6 feet).
At 6 feet i dont tower Anyone i meet everywhere i go, But also i dont get tower by anyone. Feels good.
Hes probaly 179cm out of bed, Hes defenetly Height concious, he wear Lift and big heel dress shoes.
I got a dress shoes generic brand(Not elevator) That got 1.25 heel, they look perfectly normal. I can stuff a 1 Inch lift inside the shoes and walk completly normal. Im 178cm midday, With these shoes it take me to 183cm(6 feet).
At 6 feet i dont tower Anyone i meet everywhere i go, But also i dont get tower by anyone. Feels good.
Josh said on 9/Jan/16
Brad Pitt is even shorter than Matt Damon. Search Matt Damon and Gwyneth Platrow and you will see that she's taller a little bit than Matt with heels and Matt has no height boost. As we have seen before Brad is the same height as Paltrow barefeet.
Brad Pitt is even shorter than Matt Damon. Search Matt Damon and Gwyneth Platrow and you will see that she's taller a little bit than Matt with heels and Matt has no height boost. As we have seen before Brad is the same height as Paltrow barefeet.
mickey said on 9/Jan/16
5'11 seems correct. though he can appear to be 6ft with his good posture.
5'11 seems correct. though he can appear to be 6ft with his good posture.
Aaron Zamora said on 8/Jan/16
He looked huge in the movie The big Short he looked much bigger than Finn Whitrock who you have listed here as 5'9. Brad really does give the impression of a 6'1 or taller man as Clooney states. His height is actually irritating!
He looked huge in the movie The big Short he looked much bigger than Finn Whitrock who you have listed here as 5'9. Brad really does give the impression of a 6'1 or taller man as Clooney states. His height is actually irritating!
John said on 8/Jan/16
I'm going to say he is about 5'10. He is as tall as Michelle Forbes and shorter than David Duchovny. I don't think he was allowed to wear lifts in Kalifornia.
I'm going to say he is about 5'10. He is as tall as Michelle Forbes and shorter than David Duchovny. I don't think he was allowed to wear lifts in Kalifornia.
Celebheights 6'1.75/187 CM said on 7/Jan/16
Or if I offer him a few billion dollars, and some classes to grow taller lol.
Or if I offer him a few billion dollars, and some classes to grow taller lol.
hijopotamus said on 7/Jan/16
Mat, because he is not 5'11"! It's so obvious he is shorter than Willis and Geena Davis in flats while Pitt in COWBOYS! If Geena is 6' and Brad 5'11" Brad should have looked same height or even taller as cowboys are 5 cm heel....2 inches!
Anyone has seen Brad barefoot? Not even in the beach! Only in that pic with Paltrow where they look same height.
Mat, because he is not 5'11"! It's so obvious he is shorter than Willis and Geena Davis in flats while Pitt in COWBOYS! If Geena is 6' and Brad 5'11" Brad should have looked same height or even taller as cowboys are 5 cm heel....2 inches!
Anyone has seen Brad barefoot? Not even in the beach! Only in that pic with Paltrow where they look same height.
Mat said on 5/Jan/16
Rob, why wouldn't Brad let anyone measure him? He is supposed to be honest about his height since he is listed everywhere as 5'11. It's not like he claims a bigger height or the public believes he is taller. Since you estimate him a legit 5'11, he shouldn't have any objections. Unless... he is not that tall ;)
Editor Rob
Rob, why wouldn't Brad let anyone measure him? He is supposed to be honest about his height since he is listed everywhere as 5'11. It's not like he claims a bigger height or the public believes he is taller. Since you estimate him a legit 5'11, he shouldn't have any objections. Unless... he is not that tall ;)
Editor Rob to retain an air of mystery.
Josh said on 5/Jan/16
Mat the second picture of yours shows Brad having a smaller bone structure than Norton! It's obvious.
Mat the second picture of yours shows Brad having a smaller bone structure than Norton! It's obvious.
Collin said on 5/Jan/16
unless he was 5'3+ LOL
unless he was 5'3+ LOL
176.2 said on 4/Jan/16
@Kim Jansson
Next time please measure the most important part of his body haha
@Kim Jansson
Next time please measure the most important part of his body haha
Celebheights 6'1.75/187 CM said on 3/Jan/16
There's no way that Brad Pitt would EVER let somebody measure him (unless he was 6'0"+).
Editor Rob
There's no way that Brad Pitt would EVER let somebody measure him (unless he was 6'0"+).
Editor Rob the only way you'll get to measure Brad Pitt is if you agree to do it blindfolded.
Aaron zamora said on 2/Jan/16
Rob, do you personally believe that Brad Pitt wears lifts or not?
Editor Rob
Rob, do you personally believe that Brad Pitt wears lifts or not?
Editor Rob I think he's obviously at times worn a bigger heel like a 1.5 range shoe. Other times I think he may well have used a 1/2 inch lift, the kind that fits in a dress shoe and really is harder to spot.
brendan said on 2/Jan/16
Rob did you check The Big Short premiere photos?
Brad Pitt and Ryan Gosling was there.
I think they seemed same height or may be Gosling was just 1 cm taller.
What do you think Rob?
Editor Rob
Rob did you check The Big Short premiere photos?
Brad Pitt and Ryan Gosling was there.
I think they seemed same height or may be Gosling was just 1 cm taller.
What do you think Rob?
Editor Rob Ryan could look no more than 6ft with Pitt, whose footwear really didn't look anything that suspicious!
Collin said on 1/Jan/16
You measured each other last year? Hahahaha! Are you sure he was Brad Pitt himself? lol. I think someone was trying to seduce you! lmfao
and if you think people have nothing good to do with their lives for posting here then you have found this website all of a sudden and out of nowhere I suppose? Who ever you are you made us laugh!
You measured each other last year? Hahahaha! Are you sure he was Brad Pitt himself? lol. I think someone was trying to seduce you! lmfao
and if you think people have nothing good to do with their lives for posting here then you have found this website all of a sudden and out of nowhere I suppose? Who ever you are you made us laugh!
Josh said on 31/Dec/15
@Kim Jansson
LOL
I can't stop laughing. You're the funniest of all!
What did you think before posting exactly? Even if you were an A List superstar, Brad wouldn't let you wipe his back for him LOL
@Kim Jansson
LOL
I can't stop laughing. You're the funniest of all!
What did you think before posting exactly? Even if you were an A List superstar, Brad wouldn't let you wipe his back for him LOL
Derian said on 30/Dec/15
Honestly if he is short how is he standing taller than Claudia Schiffer. Even if he is using lifts he has to be tall enough to stand 6'0 or taller. That depends on Schiffer's real height though.
Honestly if he is short how is he standing taller than Claudia Schiffer. Even if he is using lifts he has to be tall enough to stand 6'0 or taller. That depends on Schiffer's real height though.
Kim Jansson said on 30/Dec/15
This is soo weird to read,havnt you people got better things to do? None of you knows **** and are just guessing and dissing each other. Im a danish actor,who are a friend of Brad. Im 180 cm and Brad is 177. We measured each other last year.
This is soo weird to read,havnt you people got better things to do? None of you knows **** and are just guessing and dissing each other. Im a danish actor,who are a friend of Brad. Im 180 cm and Brad is 177. We measured each other last year.
Mat said on 30/Dec/15
Rob, is it safe to say there's an inch between Pitt and Norton here? Click Here
Also look at that: Click Here
It's safe to say that Pitt had at least a 0.5 inch advantage on Norton shoe-wise in the film, and always came 0.5 shorter than Norton (who was slouching). Is 5'10.5 possible?
Editor Rob
Rob, is it safe to say there's an inch between Pitt and Norton here? Click Here
Also look at that: Click Here
It's safe to say that Pitt had at least a 0.5 inch advantage on Norton shoe-wise in the film, and always came 0.5 shorter than Norton (who was slouching). Is 5'10.5 possible?
Editor Rob stationery photos can be easier to judge than when people are in motion, but at times Pitt could look less than Norton, other times closer in height. Generally though, Pitt has the better posture out of the two.
Dmeyer said on 30/Dec/15
Just to let know , at telma and louise première Pitt has à shoes in the 1in type low cut and Witt almost no room for lifts also hé wasnt à list so no reason for , and hé looks close enaugh d'avis height like 1in smaller max and not more than 3,5-4in smaller than mac Donald whom i met met and was near 6ft3 10 years back
Just to let know , at telma and louise première Pitt has à shoes in the 1in type low cut and Witt almost no room for lifts also hé wasnt à list so no reason for , and hé looks close enaugh d'avis height like 1in smaller max and not more than 3,5-4in smaller than mac Donald whom i met met and was near 6ft3 10 years back
Josh said on 28/Dec/15
In the picture that he is naked it is obvious that he has the legs of a 5'7-5'8 perosn. If you wanna claim 5'9 or 5'10 then his torso has to be unnaturally long! LOL
In the picture that he is naked it is obvious that he has the legs of a 5'7-5'8 perosn. If you wanna claim 5'9 or 5'10 then his torso has to be unnaturally long! LOL
MarcusTheSwede said on 28/Dec/15
Hijopotamus: AGREE finally somebody seeing thru all crap. Brad hasnt magicly grown since movie with Geena Davis yeez and also liten to LEN below, Thanks hijopotamus
Hijopotamus: AGREE finally somebody seeing thru all crap. Brad hasnt magicly grown since movie with Geena Davis yeez and also liten to LEN below, Thanks hijopotamus
MarcusTheSwede said on 28/Dec/15
Hijopotamus: AGREE finally somebody seeing thru all crap. Brad hasnt magicly grown since movie with Geena Davis yeez Thanks hijopotamus
Hijopotamus: AGREE finally somebody seeing thru all crap. Brad hasnt magicly grown since movie with Geena Davis yeez Thanks hijopotamus
Dan said on 28/Dec/15
Geena Davis is 6 feet tall. Of course she's gonna look taller than him. And Bruce Willis had to be taller than him in 12 monkeys. It's the characters they were playing. I think Bruce Willis is easily 5-11, but could also be a little over 5-10. Brad Pitt is 5-10 and wears boots, big heeled shoes and sometimes lifts. That's why Pitt can near 6-0.
Geena Davis is 6 feet tall. Of course she's gonna look taller than him. And Bruce Willis had to be taller than him in 12 monkeys. It's the characters they were playing. I think Bruce Willis is easily 5-11, but could also be a little over 5-10. Brad Pitt is 5-10 and wears boots, big heeled shoes and sometimes lifts. That's why Pitt can near 6-0.
hijopotamus said on 27/Dec/15
Dan, if his height varies between 2 it means he is definetly the lowest, hello!
Shorter than Bruce Willies and shorter than Geena Davis even Pitt wearing cowboy boots! Pic with Paltrow, slightly taller than Redford. Too much evidence! PITT was never 5'11" in the 90s so theres no way he grew up in the 00s.
Dont you guys feel weird claiming 5'11"??
Jesus!
Dan, if his height varies between 2 it means he is definetly the lowest, hello!
Shorter than Bruce Willies and shorter than Geena Davis even Pitt wearing cowboy boots! Pic with Paltrow, slightly taller than Redford. Too much evidence! PITT was never 5'11" in the 90s so theres no way he grew up in the 00s.
Dont you guys feel weird claiming 5'11"??
Jesus!
Dan said on 27/Dec/15
I'm anywhere from 5'10.5 to 5'11 and people assume I'm 6'0 to 6'1. I guess I would say Pitt is in the 5'10-11 range. I wouldn't pin a specific height on him since it always seems to change through his various roles.
I'm anywhere from 5'10.5 to 5'11 and people assume I'm 6'0 to 6'1. I guess I would say Pitt is in the 5'10-11 range. I wouldn't pin a specific height on him since it always seems to change through his various roles.
hijopotamus said on 25/Dec/15
Under 5'10" for sure and 6' with his tricks.
Merry Xmas.
Under 5'10" for sure and 6' with his tricks.
Merry Xmas.
Blink said on 25/Dec/15
This is my take on it: Brad is 5'11 late night, which means throughout the day he ranges from 5'11.5-5'11. With shoes with an inch-an inch an a half (which isn't unreasonable at all), he would be at 6'0-6'1, which makes a lot of sense to me.
This is my take on it: Brad is 5'11 late night, which means throughout the day he ranges from 5'11.5-5'11. With shoes with an inch-an inch an a half (which isn't unreasonable at all), he would be at 6'0-6'1, which makes a lot of sense to me.
TJE said on 24/Dec/15
Emil, you're being WAY TOO GENEROUS!
Brad's MAYBE a weak 5'4....in the morning.....on a perfect day......in his platforms....and on his tiptoes.
Emil, you're being WAY TOO GENEROUS!
Brad's MAYBE a weak 5'4....in the morning.....on a perfect day......in his platforms....and on his tiptoes.
Emil 183 cm said on 24/Dec/15
Haha, Rob, true that. But for real, Pitt being anything under than 5'10 is hysterical
Haha, Rob, true that. But for real, Pitt being anything under than 5'10 is hysterical
Josh said on 24/Dec/15
Strong 5'10"? Who ONLY enjoys lifts? LOL!
Strong 5'10"? Who ONLY enjoys lifts? LOL!
Mathew Robinson (190 cm) said on 23/Dec/15
177-178 cm guy said on 23/Dec/15
I've said it before and i'll say it again: Strong 5'10" guy who enjoys lifts.
---
Bingo.
177-178 cm guy said on 23/Dec/15
I've said it before and i'll say it again: Strong 5'10" guy who enjoys lifts.
---
Bingo.
Idk said on 23/Dec/15
I think listing is accurate. A 5'10 guy would have a much harder time pulling off 6 footer look which Pitt has
I think listing is accurate. A 5'10 guy would have a much harder time pulling off 6 footer look which Pitt has
177-178 cm guy said on 23/Dec/15
I've said it before and i'll say it again: Strong 5'10" guy who enjoys lifts.
I've said it before and i'll say it again: Strong 5'10" guy who enjoys lifts.
Emil 183 cm said on 22/Dec/15
Brad Pitt is actually 5'7. He's just wearing lifts and has photoshopped every picture of himself
Editor Rob
Brad Pitt is actually 5'7. He's just wearing lifts and has photoshopped every picture of himself
Editor Rob in the future there may be some form of virtualization technology that projects a realistic holographic 'overlay', so the wearer can program their desired height.
you won't need photoshop, you'll have guys like Justin Bieber looking 6ft 8 in public in 50 years time!
you won't need photoshop, you'll have guys like Justin Bieber looking 6ft 8 in public in 50 years time!
Len said on 21/Dec/15
Pitt isn't over 5'10".
Plenty of pics with him not looking more than about 4" taller than ex Jennifer Aniston (who's about 5' 4.5", and in heels would have 1.5" of footwear over Pitt in dress shoes).
Pitt isn't over 5'10".
Plenty of pics with him not looking more than about 4" taller than ex Jennifer Aniston (who's about 5' 4.5", and in heels would have 1.5" of footwear over Pitt in dress shoes).
Dmeyer said on 21/Dec/15
There are plenty of pics were Pitt looks 5cm taller than paltow while Pitt has shoes with no lifts
There are plenty of pics were Pitt looks 5cm taller than paltow while Pitt has shoes with no lifts
Simon said on 20/Dec/15
Rob, is 5'11 peak and 5'10.3/4 now possible?
Editor Rob
Rob, is 5'11 peak and 5'10.3/4 now possible?
Editor Rob Pitt is a pretty fit guy. Was he a smoker for a while? If so that would increase the risks of disc degeneration.
I think he's held his height well though, I doubt he's lost anything noticeable.
I think he's held his height well though, I doubt he's lost anything noticeable.
Dan said on 20/Dec/15
5'5 you don't know what you're taking about. No one is saying Brad is a bad person, but everyone in Hollywood lies about their height. It's part of the job to appear taller and better looking. It's a fact.
5'5 you don't know what you're taking about. No one is saying Brad is a bad person, but everyone in Hollywood lies about their height. It's part of the job to appear taller and better looking. It's a fact.
RisingForce said on 20/Dec/15
People definitely make too much of the Paltrow pic. Remember, it's ONE pic. As Rob has shown many times, height differences can easily look bigger or smaller than they are in pics. Where did people get the idea that a pic will reflect the exact measured difference between two people? Plus, Pitt is still taller in the pic going by eye level, hairline and how much of his head his cut off by the frame. No, he doesn't look 2 inches taller, but it's not a perfect straight on angle anyway and probably taken from a distance. Looking 5'10" max in one pic doesn't mean he is.
People definitely make too much of the Paltrow pic. Remember, it's ONE pic. As Rob has shown many times, height differences can easily look bigger or smaller than they are in pics. Where did people get the idea that a pic will reflect the exact measured difference between two people? Plus, Pitt is still taller in the pic going by eye level, hairline and how much of his head his cut off by the frame. No, he doesn't look 2 inches taller, but it's not a perfect straight on angle anyway and probably taken from a distance. Looking 5'10" max in one pic doesn't mean he is.
dmeyer said on 20/Dec/15
All the pics were clooney is taller than brad have bad agles or clooney is Closer to camera
All the pics were clooney is taller than brad have bad agles or clooney is Closer to camera
S.J.H said on 18/Dec/15
I know pitt could be 5'10 or 5'10.5 in reality as i have just seen the barefeet picture with a 5'9 gwyneth paltrow. Unless paltrow was 5'9.25 there pitt could comfortably hit 5'11. Added that clooney was not over 5'10 and maybe dipping few mm below 178cm and Damon 5'9.25
I know pitt could be 5'10 or 5'10.5 in reality as i have just seen the barefeet picture with a 5'9 gwyneth paltrow. Unless paltrow was 5'9.25 there pitt could comfortably hit 5'11. Added that clooney was not over 5'10 and maybe dipping few mm below 178cm and Damon 5'9.25
sebs said on 17/Dec/15
5'11 for the last time
5'11 for the last time
MJKoP said on 17/Dec/15
5'11", plain and simple.
5'11", plain and simple.
Dan said on 17/Dec/15
If Brad Pitt was 5-8 ( my height ), how do you explain him standing at 5-11 in flat Vans sneakers. Not tricky shoes like you guys say. Actual Vans sneakers. Sneakers that I own. Cole haan boots that I also own. Guidi boots. A 5-8 guy CANNOT pull of 5-11 to 6-0 in regular shoes or boots. You cannot fit two inch lift in a pair of normal fitting boots. It's impossible. The boot won't close. I've tried it before with an inch lift. Your feet start hurting like crazy. I've made countless posts on here tell you guys the specific brand and model of the shoes and boots he's worn for about ten years now. The only time Brad Pitt wears true elevator shoes is during major premiers when he's standing next tall celebs.
If Brad Pitt was 5-8 ( my height ), how do you explain him standing at 5-11 in flat Vans sneakers. Not tricky shoes like you guys say. Actual Vans sneakers. Sneakers that I own. Cole haan boots that I also own. Guidi boots. A 5-8 guy CANNOT pull of 5-11 to 6-0 in regular shoes or boots. You cannot fit two inch lift in a pair of normal fitting boots. It's impossible. The boot won't close. I've tried it before with an inch lift. Your feet start hurting like crazy. I've made countless posts on here tell you guys the specific brand and model of the shoes and boots he's worn for about ten years now. The only time Brad Pitt wears true elevator shoes is during major premiers when he's standing next tall celebs.
Dan said on 17/Dec/15
Lmao!!! 5-8!!! Now he's short. So now Pitt is as tall as Johnny Depp and Downey Jr. Hilarious bro.
Lmao!!! 5-8!!! Now he's short. So now Pitt is as tall as Johnny Depp and Downey Jr. Hilarious bro.
nathaniel said on 16/Dec/15
5'10''.75 or 5'11''
5'10''.75 or 5'11''
hijopotamus said on 16/Dec/15
Dmeyer, we all saw pics of Clooney taller than Brad...
Dmeyer, we all saw pics of Clooney taller than Brad...
dmeyer said on 16/Dec/15
Clloney is not less than 179 peak at least and damon not less than 177 so its hard to see brad under 179.5-180 , in the sleepers pic up you can tell his foot is not lifted and that he get max 0,5-0,75 out of those and look 182cm with them on
Clloney is not less than 179 peak at least and damon not less than 177 so its hard to see brad under 179.5-180 , in the sleepers pic up you can tell his foot is not lifted and that he get max 0,5-0,75 out of those and look 182cm with them on
Josh said on 15/Dec/15
Mat, you are no one to say anything EXACT and CERTAIN about his height. saying " no, he's nowhere near 5'9." is stupid. You haven't seen him to be this certain. I have a friend who saw him while filming moneyball and he said that Brad is around 5'9 or 5'8. Yes he is short. And yes you are fooled.
Mat, you are no one to say anything EXACT and CERTAIN about his height. saying " no, he's nowhere near 5'9." is stupid. You haven't seen him to be this certain. I have a friend who saw him while filming moneyball and he said that Brad is around 5'9 or 5'8. Yes he is short. And yes you are fooled.
Mat said on 15/Dec/15
lil steve said on 13/Dec/15
Brad Pitt is exactly 5 feet 9 inches tall which is not bad at all. met him in Los An a while back. he's a cool dude. we were at the exact same eye level so I am almost more than certain. pretty average height. average sized man. I am a super big fan of his acting ability too. brad is an astonishing actor. very outstanding. his movies are obviously awesome. everybody loves this man and his high caliber performances. whatta great guy.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
It's really funny how these downgraders are trying to mask their hate for actors saying a bunch of nice things along with their 2 inch donwngrade to make it sound believable. No, Pitt is nowhere near 5'9. If want to argue a lower height, argue 5'10 for him. Anything below 5'10 is nonsense. Pitt is somewhere in the 5'10-5'11 range for sure. A legit 5'10.5 at night sounds really probable to me, at that height you can appear tall with the right pair of shoes and posture to almost everyone.
lil steve said on 13/Dec/15
Brad Pitt is exactly 5 feet 9 inches tall which is not bad at all. met him in Los An a while back. he's a cool dude. we were at the exact same eye level so I am almost more than certain. pretty average height. average sized man. I am a super big fan of his acting ability too. brad is an astonishing actor. very outstanding. his movies are obviously awesome. everybody loves this man and his high caliber performances. whatta great guy.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
It's really funny how these downgraders are trying to mask their hate for actors saying a bunch of nice things along with their 2 inch donwngrade to make it sound believable. No, Pitt is nowhere near 5'9. If want to argue a lower height, argue 5'10 for him. Anything below 5'10 is nonsense. Pitt is somewhere in the 5'10-5'11 range for sure. A legit 5'10.5 at night sounds really probable to me, at that height you can appear tall with the right pair of shoes and posture to almost everyone.
Jim said on 14/Dec/15
Why does he look taller then eddie redmayne? Either eddie is 5'9 or Brad 6'1
Why does he look taller then eddie redmayne? Either eddie is 5'9 or Brad 6'1
Collin said on 14/Dec/15
Paltrow is not standing straight in that photo.
Paltrow is not standing straight in that photo.
hijopotamus said on 14/Dec/15
Heylo, Rob had Brad at 6' not so long ago...
ok, lets asume Brad is taller than Paltrow, ok, but 2 inches??? are you crazy? half an inch at the very most! 5'9" Paltrow, under 5'10" Brad....under 5'10"...
Editor Rob
Heylo, Rob had Brad at 6' not so long ago...
ok, lets asume Brad is taller than Paltrow, ok, but 2 inches??? are you crazy? half an inch at the very most! 5'9" Paltrow, under 5'10" Brad....under 5'10"...
Editor Rob 10 years is a long time, he's been holding 5ft 11 for a long time now, he doesn't want to lose it...
TJE said on 13/Dec/15
You'll find more lift wearers on the General Height page than in Hollywood...Just sayin...
You'll find more lift wearers on the General Height page than in Hollywood...Just sayin...
lil steve said on 13/Dec/15
I am an average sized guy too. "lil steve" just sounds better than plain ol "steve"
I am an average sized guy too. "lil steve" just sounds better than plain ol "steve"
lil steve said on 13/Dec/15
Brad Pitt is exactly 5 feet 9 inches tall which is not bad at all. met him in Los An a while back. he's a cool dude. we were at the exact same eye level so I am almost more than certain. pretty average height. average sized man. I am a super big fan of his acting ability too. brad is an astonishing actor. very outstanding. his movies are obviously awesome. everybody loves this man and his high caliber performances. whatta great guy.
Brad Pitt is exactly 5 feet 9 inches tall which is not bad at all. met him in Los An a while back. he's a cool dude. we were at the exact same eye level so I am almost more than certain. pretty average height. average sized man. I am a super big fan of his acting ability too. brad is an astonishing actor. very outstanding. his movies are obviously awesome. everybody loves this man and his high caliber performances. whatta great guy.
Josh said on 10/Dec/15
Heylo, You think you're good at counting? you're not that good at it my friend. I saw your comments from very long ago that you argued with people and insisted on Brad's height being tall. Ok dude, just don't hurt yourself. I know the truth yes but I don't care if you'll accept it or not. Everything about Hollywood actors is fake. Brad's height is fake as well. He is short. End of story.
Heylo, You think you're good at counting? you're not that good at it my friend. I saw your comments from very long ago that you argued with people and insisted on Brad's height being tall. Ok dude, just don't hurt yourself. I know the truth yes but I don't care if you'll accept it or not. Everything about Hollywood actors is fake. Brad's height is fake as well. He is short. End of story.
hijopotamus said on 10/Dec/15
Heylo, show us how he is 2,54 cm taller than 5'9 Paltrow.
What is obvious is that he is not 5'11"
so bad listing, Rob!
Heylo, show us how he is 2,54 cm taller than 5'9 Paltrow.
What is obvious is that he is not 5'11"
so bad listing, Rob!
Heylo said on 9/Dec/15
Josh, yeah yeah yeah, keep talking like you know the truth. "no way on earth that he is taller than 5'9" lol. He can't be 5'9, it's impossible. Weak 5'10 maybe but as low as 5'9.. no.
Everyone who can count in angles and head tilting on photos know that Brad looks taller than Gwyneth by at least an inch. He's 5'10+.
Josh, yeah yeah yeah, keep talking like you know the truth. "no way on earth that he is taller than 5'9" lol. He can't be 5'9, it's impossible. Weak 5'10 maybe but as low as 5'9.. no.
Everyone who can count in angles and head tilting on photos know that Brad looks taller than Gwyneth by at least an inch. He's 5'10+.
RisingForce said on 9/Dec/15
I agree, bam, or at least I think he has to be between 5'10.5" and 5'11". Usually looks more 5'11.5"-6' due to boots and posture. Heylo, nobody has posted a direct 6 ft claim from Brad. He seemed to still be listed 5'11" at the time of Interview with the Vampire, but seemed to start getting 6 ft listings mid to late 90's. But for claims from Brad himself, the only one anyone has posted here is the 5'11" claim from 1987.
I agree, bam, or at least I think he has to be between 5'10.5" and 5'11". Usually looks more 5'11.5"-6' due to boots and posture. Heylo, nobody has posted a direct 6 ft claim from Brad. He seemed to still be listed 5'11" at the time of Interview with the Vampire, but seemed to start getting 6 ft listings mid to late 90's. But for claims from Brad himself, the only one anyone has posted here is the 5'11" claim from 1987.
Josh said on 8/Dec/15
and Paltrow was listed 172 before all these 175 claims. These people trying to prove that Brad is 5'10 are either Brad Pitt himself commenting with different names or they are highly paid to close their eyes on the facts LOL
and Paltrow was listed 172 before all these 175 claims. These people trying to prove that Brad is 5'10 are either Brad Pitt himself commenting with different names or they are highly paid to close their eyes on the facts LOL
Josh said on 8/Dec/15
@Jason
what does it have to do with other people wearing shoes. What I said is easily understandable. No 5'10 guy is in need of huge lifts! There is no way on earth that he is taller than 5'9. those lifts give him at least 12 cm height boost.
@Jason
what does it have to do with other people wearing shoes. What I said is easily understandable. No 5'10 guy is in need of huge lifts! There is no way on earth that he is taller than 5'9. those lifts give him at least 12 cm height boost.
Dan said on 8/Dec/15
Brad was about 1-2 inches shorter than Geena Davis at the Thelma and Louise premiere. He was in flat rockabilly wing tip shoes. No way Geena Davis is under 6-0, when she's looked taller than Bruce Willis and about the same height as Tom Hanks and Sam Jackson. I think that Thelma and Louise is a big part of why people can think Pitt is in the 5-9 range. And guy 5-10 is gonna look small next to Davis.
Brad was about 1-2 inches shorter than Geena Davis at the Thelma and Louise premiere. He was in flat rockabilly wing tip shoes. No way Geena Davis is under 6-0, when she's looked taller than Bruce Willis and about the same height as Tom Hanks and Sam Jackson. I think that Thelma and Louise is a big part of why people can think Pitt is in the 5-9 range. And guy 5-10 is gonna look small next to Davis.
dmeyer said on 8/Dec/15
Brad looks same height as Chris pine if You compare him to cumberbatch
Brad looks same height as Chris pine if You compare him to cumberbatch
bam said on 7/Dec/15
the guy is 5'11. Perfect height to look both tall or average. why debate this?
the guy is 5'11. Perfect height to look both tall or average. why debate this?
hijopotamus said on 7/Dec/15
Josh, you are so right!! a guy that stands 5'11" as this site states, should be 6 feet with regular dress shoes. I'm 182 and I reach 188 with army boots plus an extra insole (not even a lift).
Why we never see Pitt barefoot? why he was the only one wearing boots in Troy??? hhmmm....a bit strange, huh? Brad is 5'10" max and after a good morning stretch. 5'9"ish in the evening. Too much evidence. Paltrow pic should should shut up everyone that disagrees with me.
Josh, you are so right!! a guy that stands 5'11" as this site states, should be 6 feet with regular dress shoes. I'm 182 and I reach 188 with army boots plus an extra insole (not even a lift).
Why we never see Pitt barefoot? why he was the only one wearing boots in Troy??? hhmmm....a bit strange, huh? Brad is 5'10" max and after a good morning stretch. 5'9"ish in the evening. Too much evidence. Paltrow pic should should shut up everyone that disagrees with me.
Jason said on 7/Dec/15
@Josh You don't look 181 cm when you're 178 because you wear shoes, unless people are standing in socks. No way, he's not below 5' 9". He is 5' 10" at his lowest in my opinion, as stated in the audition form. Pretty average guy.
@Josh You don't look 181 cm when you're 178 because you wear shoes, unless people are standing in socks. No way, he's not below 5' 9". He is 5' 10" at his lowest in my opinion, as stated in the audition form. Pretty average guy.
Joe said on 6/Dec/15
@Dejavu
Brad Pitt actually looks the same height as Tarantino in his custom shoes: Click Here
I think this just confirms that Brad Pitt uses enormous lifts at times. Tarantino seems pretty secure about his height. He's a director, not an actor, and he seems to be truly 6'1'' with a broad frame as well. Gosling also strikes me as a pretty tall actor who is confident about his height. Brad Pitt is the one who feels insecure about his height because his stature doesn't match his ego. His listing at 5'11'' throws everything else off because it simply isn't true.
@Dejavu
Brad Pitt actually looks the same height as Tarantino in his custom shoes: Click Here
I think this just confirms that Brad Pitt uses enormous lifts at times. Tarantino seems pretty secure about his height. He's a director, not an actor, and he seems to be truly 6'1'' with a broad frame as well. Gosling also strikes me as a pretty tall actor who is confident about his height. Brad Pitt is the one who feels insecure about his height because his stature doesn't match his ego. His listing at 5'11'' throws everything else off because it simply isn't true.
Dmeyer said on 6/Dec/15
The shortest i have seen Brad looks is with Tarantino and Paltrow but with can also look 5'11+
The shortest i have seen Brad looks is with Tarantino and Paltrow but with can also look 5'11+
Dan said on 6/Dec/15
Guys, Brad Pitt is 5-10 and wears lifts to get up to 6-0 for premieres or anywhere that he'll be photographed with actors who are over 5-10. No mystery. He has very small feet ( he mentioned it in his 20's ) which allow him to wear inserts and elevator shoes and still appear to have regular feet. He has thick calves and thick ankles so when he wears shorts his legs don't look abnormally long with lifts.
Guys, Brad Pitt is 5-10 and wears lifts to get up to 6-0 for premieres or anywhere that he'll be photographed with actors who are over 5-10. No mystery. He has very small feet ( he mentioned it in his 20's ) which allow him to wear inserts and elevator shoes and still appear to have regular feet. He has thick calves and thick ankles so when he wears shorts his legs don't look abnormally long with lifts.
Josh said on 5/Dec/15
to all these genius people claiming that Brad is 178! every 178 cm guy on this planet EASILY looks 181 cm with NORMAL shoes on! So he CLEARLY is short! and CLEARLY shorter than 5'9!
to all these genius people claiming that Brad is 178! every 178 cm guy on this planet EASILY looks 181 cm with NORMAL shoes on! So he CLEARLY is short! and CLEARLY shorter than 5'9!
Dejavu said on 5/Dec/15
Something doesn't add up here. Brad Pitt could look up to 3 inches shorter than 6'1 Tarantino yet he could look similar to Ryan Gosling. Either Ryan Gosling is not as listed or Brad Pitt occasionally wears lifts.
Click Here
Click Here
Something doesn't add up here. Brad Pitt could look up to 3 inches shorter than 6'1 Tarantino yet he could look similar to Ryan Gosling. Either Ryan Gosling is not as listed or Brad Pitt occasionally wears lifts.
Click Here
Click Here
Heylo said on 4/Dec/15
Well no surprise here about the lifts and the special designed shoes at certain premieres (not taking away anything from ABCs great explanation). But this doesn't change the fact that he just can't be 5'9 and then get taller than 6ft in those shoes.
IF there's anything wrong with this 5'11 listing, then it's not by much. As we said earlier, anywhere around 5'10 to 5'11 is possible.
I have to make this clear though: Brad's 5'11 listing is from his 80s days, his "official" height that he claimed in interviews since he became famous is 6ft. This has to be added into the description Rob. For some reason, the 5'11 listing has stuck and been his official height on the internet(which is good of course) but he always claims 6ft. So the 5'11 claim probably came from a more honest Brad back when he wasn't famous.
Well no surprise here about the lifts and the special designed shoes at certain premieres (not taking away anything from ABCs great explanation). But this doesn't change the fact that he just can't be 5'9 and then get taller than 6ft in those shoes.
IF there's anything wrong with this 5'11 listing, then it's not by much. As we said earlier, anywhere around 5'10 to 5'11 is possible.
I have to make this clear though: Brad's 5'11 listing is from his 80s days, his "official" height that he claimed in interviews since he became famous is 6ft. This has to be added into the description Rob. For some reason, the 5'11 listing has stuck and been his official height on the internet(which is good of course) but he always claims 6ft. So the 5'11 claim probably came from a more honest Brad back when he wasn't famous.
Dmeyer said on 4/Dec/15
@ Jeff , one of the best comment on hère , i have expérience with lifts Even à 1in lifts plus 1,4in heel might give barely 1.9-2in as the feet is not on the 2,4in total heel and especialy with the thin front dress shoes have Pitt is likely getting 1,4-1,7in
@ Jeff , one of the best comment on hère , i have expérience with lifts Even à 1in lifts plus 1,4in heel might give barely 1.9-2in as the feet is not on the 2,4in total heel and especialy with the thin front dress shoes have Pitt is likely getting 1,4-1,7in
Dmeyer said on 3/Dec/15
Even if its not easy to walk with 1in lifts inside 1in low cut shoes is possible
Even if its not easy to walk with 1in lifts inside 1in low cut shoes is possible
dmeyer said on 3/Dec/15
In by the sea premiere in many look 1in taller than jole but in some 2in or almost pitt has barely 0.8-1in and jolie could have 0.5-0.75 in bigger than usual as we dont see her feet
In by the sea premiere in many look 1in taller than jole but in some 2in or almost pitt has barely 0.8-1in and jolie could have 0.5-0.75 in bigger than usual as we dont see her feet
Sam said on 3/Dec/15
From what I can see from the outside of their footwear Pitt has more heel on his shoes than Ryan Gosling does.
From what I can see from the outside of their footwear Pitt has more heel on his shoes than Ryan Gosling does.
Collin said on 3/Dec/15
Yeah, you can tell by the way he stands that those lifts are massive. If you compare the size of his feet to Gosling's. You can obviously notice how petite Pitt is.
Yeah, you can tell by the way he stands that those lifts are massive. If you compare the size of his feet to Gosling's. You can obviously notice how petite Pitt is.
Jeff said on 3/Dec/15
@Abc
+1. I agree with what you say. I'm not part of the "elevator-shoe conspirationists" but there's no denial that Pitt's wearing lifts in those shoes at the premiere.
However, I don't think they add as much as 6cm. Heels + lifts add 4-4,5cm max to his barefoot height. That means 184,5cm but considering the other people at the event are obviously also wearing shoes that makes him 182,5. Considering his excellent posture, he looks an easy 6ft
@Abc
+1. I agree with what you say. I'm not part of the "elevator-shoe conspirationists" but there's no denial that Pitt's wearing lifts in those shoes at the premiere.
However, I don't think they add as much as 6cm. Heels + lifts add 4-4,5cm max to his barefoot height. That means 184,5cm but considering the other people at the event are obviously also wearing shoes that makes him 182,5. Considering his excellent posture, he looks an easy 6ft
Abc said on 2/Dec/15
In this pic of the "By the sea" premiere you can see the difference to his taylor made elevator shoes. In this case, it is a normal dress shoe with a small insole (foot only slightly pressed against the laces) and the "bridge" of the sole has a complete different angle compared to the shoes he was wearing at the premiere of "The big short".
Click Here
By the way, at this event he was only about 1 inch taller than Jolie, while at other events he has about 2 inches on her when she is in heels and he is in elevators.
It is like I said, 4 cm with a regular dress shoe with insole no problem, height boost of his elevator shoes are easy 6 cm.
In this pic of the "By the sea" premiere you can see the difference to his taylor made elevator shoes. In this case, it is a normal dress shoe with a small insole (foot only slightly pressed against the laces) and the "bridge" of the sole has a complete different angle compared to the shoes he was wearing at the premiere of "The big short".
Click Here
By the way, at this event he was only about 1 inch taller than Jolie, while at other events he has about 2 inches on her when she is in heels and he is in elevators.
It is like I said, 4 cm with a regular dress shoe with insole no problem, height boost of his elevator shoes are easy 6 cm.
Abc said on 2/Dec/15
I think some guys here really underestimate the boost the shoes give him which he is wearing at such premieres.
ALL of them are taylor made elevators, unlike i.e. Robert Downey Jr. who buys regular branded shoes (i.e. Gucci sneakers) and simply puts insoles in them.
There is a quite simple reason why Pitt´s shoes never look that bulky. Just take a look at the steep angle of the shoes "bridge" of their soles. If you take a regular dress shoe with a normal "bridge" and put insoles in them, the shoe will look the bulkier the bigger the insoles are you put in them as they are not designed to fit an insole. It is comparable to tiptoeing. Pitt is more or less tiptoeing in these shoes, and they are designed like a tiptoeing foot.
I don´t know on which devices people watch this site, but on smartphones and tablets you can perfectly zoom in and even see the outlines of his feet on some shots. Just to make it clear I adapted the two pics that I posted some days ago to show what i mean:
Click Here
Click Here
The best way to get a feeling for the height boosting effect is if you compare the angle of Pitt`s foot with the angle of the woman`s foot in highheels in the background. You can easily call his shoes "men heels", even though he wears them mainly at premieres and not every time.
There is absolutely no problem to gain an overall height boost of 4 cm with a regular 1 - 1.25 inch dress shoe and an insole. You only see that the foot is slightly pushed against the laces, but as long as the higher position of the ankle is hidden it is hard to tell. The harder the foot is pushed against the front of the shoe, the bigger is its lifting effect, all despite of the outside heel´s size, since the lift can be hidden inside
I think some guys here really underestimate the boost the shoes give him which he is wearing at such premieres.
ALL of them are taylor made elevators, unlike i.e. Robert Downey Jr. who buys regular branded shoes (i.e. Gucci sneakers) and simply puts insoles in them.
There is a quite simple reason why Pitt´s shoes never look that bulky. Just take a look at the steep angle of the shoes "bridge" of their soles. If you take a regular dress shoe with a normal "bridge" and put insoles in them, the shoe will look the bulkier the bigger the insoles are you put in them as they are not designed to fit an insole. It is comparable to tiptoeing. Pitt is more or less tiptoeing in these shoes, and they are designed like a tiptoeing foot.
I don´t know on which devices people watch this site, but on smartphones and tablets you can perfectly zoom in and even see the outlines of his feet on some shots. Just to make it clear I adapted the two pics that I posted some days ago to show what i mean:
Click Here
Click Here
The best way to get a feeling for the height boosting effect is if you compare the angle of Pitt`s foot with the angle of the woman`s foot in highheels in the background. You can easily call his shoes "men heels", even though he wears them mainly at premieres and not every time.
There is absolutely no problem to gain an overall height boost of 4 cm with a regular 1 - 1.25 inch dress shoe and an insole. You only see that the foot is slightly pushed against the laces, but as long as the higher position of the ankle is hidden it is hard to tell. The harder the foot is pushed against the front of the shoe, the bigger is its lifting effect, all despite of the outside heel´s size, since the lift can be hidden inside
Dmeyer said on 2/Dec/15
Pitt shoes looks smaller than thé 2,3in dons rob has so they should give max 1.6-7in
Pitt shoes looks smaller than thé 2,3in dons rob has so they should give max 1.6-7in
Josh said on 1/Dec/15
Abc is right
it is obvious I mean the way his shoes are designed ! They are up in the air. His feet ain't reaching the ground obviously! very well said, he is walking on his shoes! I have never met a 5'11 or 5'10 guy wearing these kind of shoes to look taller! He is obviously around 5'8!
Abc is right
it is obvious I mean the way his shoes are designed ! They are up in the air. His feet ain't reaching the ground obviously! very well said, he is walking on his shoes! I have never met a 5'11 or 5'10 guy wearing these kind of shoes to look taller! He is obviously around 5'8!
Dmeyer said on 1/Dec/15
Many shoes of Brad that looked suspicious after relooking well they looked normal
Many shoes of Brad that looked suspicious after relooking well they looked normal
dmeyer said on 1/Dec/15
Abc you are right the other Guy has about 2.5cm shoe and Pitt dont got Much more but the foot pose is defenetly not normal but he wouldnt as Much as 5-6cm more 4cm since even a full in lifts wish Is unlikeky with the room he has would give only 0.6in extra as the foot Will be very curved and Will make a 6cm shoes become 4-4.5cm
Abc you are right the other Guy has about 2.5cm shoe and Pitt dont got Much more but the foot pose is defenetly not normal but he wouldnt as Much as 5-6cm more 4cm since even a full in lifts wish Is unlikeky with the room he has would give only 0.6in extra as the foot Will be very curved and Will make a 6cm shoes become 4-4.5cm
dmeyer said on 1/Dec/15
@ abc your pic of his shoed do show the heel is more on the 1,2-1.3in than 0.8-1in and There isnt Much room for lifts so defenetly could be a small elevator the dons dress type That are 5cm total heel and lifts include That Will give near 1.5-1.6in 4cm because of pivoting since the shoe has a very thin front unlike sneakers or boots , or simply build in a way he could wear a 0.5in lifts plus 1.25in heel that should give him 1.5in near 4cm wish is enaugh to get an advantage over a typical 0.9in dress shoes 2.3cm style it could turn a 5'11 men into a 5'11.75 or 6ft because of impecable posture
@ abc your pic of his shoed do show the heel is more on the 1,2-1.3in than 0.8-1in and There isnt Much room for lifts so defenetly could be a small elevator the dons dress type That are 5cm total heel and lifts include That Will give near 1.5-1.6in 4cm because of pivoting since the shoe has a very thin front unlike sneakers or boots , or simply build in a way he could wear a 0.5in lifts plus 1.25in heel that should give him 1.5in near 4cm wish is enaugh to get an advantage over a typical 0.9in dress shoes 2.3cm style it could turn a 5'11 men into a 5'11.75 or 6ft because of impecable posture
camel said on 1/Dec/15
After the first pictures of Brad and Ryan I thought that Brad is min 5-11 but after seeing the pictures of their shoes and especially comparing them and seeing that Brad has just like I have dress shoes that give you 2-3 inches over barefoot height. Now I'm more and more comfirmed that Brad is more in the 5-10 region.
After the first pictures of Brad and Ryan I thought that Brad is min 5-11 but after seeing the pictures of their shoes and especially comparing them and seeing that Brad has just like I have dress shoes that give you 2-3 inches over barefoot height. Now I'm more and more comfirmed that Brad is more in the 5-10 region.
Celebheights 6'1.75/187 CM said on 30/Nov/15
It's impossible to tell how tall one is while sitting down (dead serious). I'm 187-188 CM, and most people are roughly the same as me while sitting down (if not taller), but then I tower over or dwarf the same people on average. A friend of mine who is 5'7" is barely taller than me while sitting down.
It's impossible to tell how tall one is while sitting down (dead serious). I'm 187-188 CM, and most people are roughly the same as me while sitting down (if not taller), but then I tower over or dwarf the same people on average. A friend of mine who is 5'7" is barely taller than me while sitting down.
Joe said on 30/Nov/15
@Abc
His proportions look quite unnatural there. Long legs, short torso, short arms. Compare him to Gosling who looks much more naturally tall. It seems odd that one of the obvious lift wearers on this site is listed at his official height, instead of lower. You don't wear lifts if you aren't going to lie about your height.
@Abc
His proportions look quite unnatural there. Long legs, short torso, short arms. Compare him to Gosling who looks much more naturally tall. It seems odd that one of the obvious lift wearers on this site is listed at his official height, instead of lower. You don't wear lifts if you aren't going to lie about your height.
hijopotamus said on 30/Nov/15
guys, its way easier!! look at Brad with no shoes on besides a 5'9" girl also barefoot. Oh wait...
guys, its way easier!! look at Brad with no shoes on besides a 5'9" girl also barefoot. Oh wait...
Heylo said on 30/Nov/15
Joe, I agree about that he probably gets more from his shoes than Gosling gets, about an inch more. There's no denying in that Brad mostly have slightly bigger heels and potentially a small lift in his shoes but those shoes were still nothing extreme and it looked quite normal considering most people don't analyse shoes like we do.
Also, I want to add a thing or two about his "hollywood height". Yes, he is for some reasons popularly listed at 5'11 on the internet but in most of his magazine interviews, tv-shows, he has claimed 6ft. On Oprah, he claimed 6ft and in various magazines, his height is listed at 6ft. Brad probably knows that he can easily look 6ft in shoes. So a strong 5'10 to a weak 5'11 is the best guess on his height IMO.
And Dan, Hollywood has always been crazy about heights, James Dean(5'7) and Marlon Brando(5'8) were both adding one or two inches to their heights in their heydays. But you may be right that it's even more crazy today, I just go by what I've read, there could some misinformation here and there.
Joe, I agree about that he probably gets more from his shoes than Gosling gets, about an inch more. There's no denying in that Brad mostly have slightly bigger heels and potentially a small lift in his shoes but those shoes were still nothing extreme and it looked quite normal considering most people don't analyse shoes like we do.
Also, I want to add a thing or two about his "hollywood height". Yes, he is for some reasons popularly listed at 5'11 on the internet but in most of his magazine interviews, tv-shows, he has claimed 6ft. On Oprah, he claimed 6ft and in various magazines, his height is listed at 6ft. Brad probably knows that he can easily look 6ft in shoes. So a strong 5'10 to a weak 5'11 is the best guess on his height IMO.
And Dan, Hollywood has always been crazy about heights, James Dean(5'7) and Marlon Brando(5'8) were both adding one or two inches to their heights in their heydays. But you may be right that it's even more crazy today, I just go by what I've read, there could some misinformation here and there.
Dan said on 30/Nov/15
I think at the big short premiere he's wearing legit elevator shoes which give him a total boost of 2" - 2.5". That's all I can give considering the shoes don't have a big heel and the shoes are not super bulky. I've seen big elevator shoes before and they don't look like this.
I think at the big short premiere he's wearing legit elevator shoes which give him a total boost of 2" - 2.5". That's all I can give considering the shoes don't have a big heel and the shoes are not super bulky. I've seen big elevator shoes before and they don't look like this.
Dmeyer said on 30/Nov/15
the shoe look normal but the lace area looks weird so 0.5in lifts is possible
the shoe look normal but the lace area looks weird so 0.5in lifts is possible
Dan said on 29/Nov/15
I've always said it. Pitt can't be shorter than 5-10. It's the perfect height. A solid 5-10 with his bone structure is perfect. He's always been too fit and muscular to be any taller. If he were 6-0 he would've probably been some kind of athlete. If you look at the pics of Pitt and Gosling sitting down at a screening of big short in New York, you'll see that by their proportions sitting down, gosling is indeed an inch or two taller than Pitt. Gosling's legs are longer. It would be reasonable to assume that Gosling is indeed 6-0 or close to because Hollywood has become a lot more height conscious on the time he's been an a-list actor. In contrast to twenty years ago when Pitt became famous, an actor could still be about 5-9 and considered tall. Now, everyone has to lift for movies. Example is Robert Downey Jr and his 5 inch heels for iron man.
I've always said it. Pitt can't be shorter than 5-10. It's the perfect height. A solid 5-10 with his bone structure is perfect. He's always been too fit and muscular to be any taller. If he were 6-0 he would've probably been some kind of athlete. If you look at the pics of Pitt and Gosling sitting down at a screening of big short in New York, you'll see that by their proportions sitting down, gosling is indeed an inch or two taller than Pitt. Gosling's legs are longer. It would be reasonable to assume that Gosling is indeed 6-0 or close to because Hollywood has become a lot more height conscious on the time he's been an a-list actor. In contrast to twenty years ago when Pitt became famous, an actor could still be about 5-9 and considered tall. Now, everyone has to lift for movies. Example is Robert Downey Jr and his 5 inch heels for iron man.
Joe said on 29/Nov/15
Pitt's shoes alone are probably giving him .75 inches over Gosling, plus an additional .75 or more from his lifts. Gosling is clearly the taller and larger-framed person.
I would know because when I shop for shoes, I always get ones with the highest heels. The difference between a generously heeled shoe and more modest one can be up to an inch, especially for dress shoes. That's also why I hate being barefoot around my friends because the relative advantage I have from my shoes is eliminated. Pitt is the same way, only to a more extreme degree since he uses lifts in addition to very high-heeled shoes. Isn't it odd that there isn't a single picture of him barefoot next to someone (except Gwyneth Paltrow in which he barely looks taller)? Also, given that he uses favorable footwear, wouldn't he do it in order to have his Hollywood listing (5'11'') be greater than his actual height? If he were 5'11'' barefoot at night, then of course he'd claim 6'0'' or 6'1''.
Pitt's shoes alone are probably giving him .75 inches over Gosling, plus an additional .75 or more from his lifts. Gosling is clearly the taller and larger-framed person.
I would know because when I shop for shoes, I always get ones with the highest heels. The difference between a generously heeled shoe and more modest one can be up to an inch, especially for dress shoes. That's also why I hate being barefoot around my friends because the relative advantage I have from my shoes is eliminated. Pitt is the same way, only to a more extreme degree since he uses lifts in addition to very high-heeled shoes. Isn't it odd that there isn't a single picture of him barefoot next to someone (except Gwyneth Paltrow in which he barely looks taller)? Also, given that he uses favorable footwear, wouldn't he do it in order to have his Hollywood listing (5'11'') be greater than his actual height? If he were 5'11'' barefoot at night, then of course he'd claim 6'0'' or 6'1''.
Abc said on 29/Nov/15
This is a revealing shot of his shoes of this event which clearly shows that they are not ordinary dress shoes
Click Here
If you zoom closely to his left shoe you can clearly see the side of his foot pushed against it and how massively elevated its position is. He is more or less walking on his shoes, not in them
Editor Rob
This is a revealing shot of his shoes of this event which clearly shows that they are not ordinary dress shoes
Click Here
If you zoom closely to his left shoe you can clearly see the side of his foot pushed against it and how massively elevated its position is. He is more or less walking on his shoes, not in them
Editor Rob some small lifts or small elevators are hard to tell. A half inch internal lift and a 1.2 heel and suddenly it can give a decent boost over another guy with a 1 inch heel...
Abc said on 29/Nov/15
Sorry dmeyer, but once again you prove that you are absolutely clueless regarding height enhancing footwear.
Click Here
The guy next to Pitt wears a regular dress shoe that gives about 2,5 - 3 cm.
Compare the position of their feet and how the front of pitt's foot is massively pushed against the laces, he is basically tiptoeing in this shoes. They give 5-6 cm minimum
Sorry dmeyer, but once again you prove that you are absolutely clueless regarding height enhancing footwear.
Click Here
The guy next to Pitt wears a regular dress shoe that gives about 2,5 - 3 cm.
Compare the position of their feet and how the front of pitt's foot is massively pushed against the laces, he is basically tiptoeing in this shoes. They give 5-6 cm minimum
Blink said on 29/Nov/15
I've said it once and I'll say it again: Brad will never measure below 5'11 flat in my honest opinion and there's a strong chance he's a bit above that mark, 5'11.25-5'11.5.
I've said it once and I'll say it again: Brad will never measure below 5'11 flat in my honest opinion and there's a strong chance he's a bit above that mark, 5'11.25-5'11.5.
Dmeyer said on 29/Nov/15
considering pitt shoes look normal he pulls off easy 5'11.75 near gosling
considering pitt shoes look normal he pulls off easy 5'11.75 near gosling
Dmeyer said on 29/Nov/15
those shoes he wore near gosling dont even look more than 3cm so he barely has 0.5-1cm more shoes max and yet look very close in height with a guy who is aleast 186cm in shoes or maybe gosling is just a 182.5-183cm guy
those shoes he wore near gosling dont even look more than 3cm so he barely has 0.5-1cm more shoes max and yet look very close in height with a guy who is aleast 186cm in shoes or maybe gosling is just a 182.5-183cm guy
hijopotamus said on 28/Nov/15
heylo, are you kidding??? those are very tricky shoes!!
heylo, are you kidding??? those are very tricky shoes!!
Elias said on 28/Nov/15
Brad Pitt looks 6ft - 6'0.5 next to Ryan Gosling. It's impossible for Pitt to be under 5'11. He is definitely a very strong 5'11,or even a week 6ft.My guess for him is 182 cm.
Brad Pitt looks 6ft - 6'0.5 next to Ryan Gosling. It's impossible for Pitt to be under 5'11. He is definitely a very strong 5'11,or even a week 6ft.My guess for him is 182 cm.
Allie said on 27/Nov/15
5'10-5'11. I wouldn't guess anything over or below that range imo..
5'10-5'11. I wouldn't guess anything over or below that range imo..
Joe said on 27/Nov/15
@Heylo
Brad Pitt looks like he's wearing some serious lifts next to Gosling, who would clearly be the taller person if they were both barefoot.
Also, the way he's bending in the last picture looks a lot more like a woman wearing high heels than a man wearing normal dress shoes.
@Heylo
Brad Pitt looks like he's wearing some serious lifts next to Gosling, who would clearly be the taller person if they were both barefoot.
Also, the way he's bending in the last picture looks a lot more like a woman wearing high heels than a man wearing normal dress shoes.
Heylo said on 27/Nov/15
Ted, yes, he looks to have some cm on Gosling on some of the photos but I actually think Gosling was a bit taller if you look at more photos... Not much though. Looked like a 181cm vs 183cm situation.
Ted, yes, he looks to have some cm on Gosling on some of the photos but I actually think Gosling was a bit taller if you look at more photos... Not much though. Looked like a 181cm vs 183cm situation.
Ted said on 27/Nov/15
Guys, I really think he is doing some kind of magic. I mean, look, just check out the photos of his latest appearance for the movie By the Sea. He looks the same height as Jolie, maybe a cm taller. Although most of the time we see him having 2 inches over her. How is that?
I was curious to see him standing next to 6ft Gosling and Bale in The Big Short. And was surprised to him having 1 or 2 cm over Gosling. And he was not wearing boots or anything.
I mean this guy is clearly over 5'11. That's for sure.
Guys, I really think he is doing some kind of magic. I mean, look, just check out the photos of his latest appearance for the movie By the Sea. He looks the same height as Jolie, maybe a cm taller. Although most of the time we see him having 2 inches over her. How is that?
I was curious to see him standing next to 6ft Gosling and Bale in The Big Short. And was surprised to him having 1 or 2 cm over Gosling. And he was not wearing boots or anything.
I mean this guy is clearly over 5'11. That's for sure.
Heylo said on 27/Nov/15
Dan, haha maybe that's just the way he likes to stand, who knows? I know that people sometimes comments on my very straight posture and I have always had that very straight posture... It's not something I've thought of just too look taller or anything, I've done it since I was a kid. Brad could obviously be height conscious but also have that posture "naturally". I know myself that I feel very weird changing my posture so it looks more "relaxed", It's just not me. I could imagine the same for a lot of other people so why not for Brad.
I saw those pictures with Gosling. Brad certainly looks his listed height, depending on angle, even taller than 5'11, more like 5'11.5.
But Gosling often had a more relaxed neck and shoulder posture which made him very close to Brad's height in some photos. When they both looked completely straight, you could see that one inch difference pretty clearly.
Here's photos:
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Keep in mind that Ryan may look taller than usual because of his facial structure difference in compared to Brad. Brad has a very wide face, Ryan, quite rectangle like which makes him look slimmer overall.
Here's photos of their shoes:
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Doesn't look like anything special to me, he could not get a massive amount of height from those but I'm certainly no expert. I could imagine at most two inches from those shoes (including potential small lifts will say).
We will probably see Brad next to Christian Bale in the upcoming weeks as well?
Dan, haha maybe that's just the way he likes to stand, who knows? I know that people sometimes comments on my very straight posture and I have always had that very straight posture... It's not something I've thought of just too look taller or anything, I've done it since I was a kid. Brad could obviously be height conscious but also have that posture "naturally". I know myself that I feel very weird changing my posture so it looks more "relaxed", It's just not me. I could imagine the same for a lot of other people so why not for Brad.
I saw those pictures with Gosling. Brad certainly looks his listed height, depending on angle, even taller than 5'11, more like 5'11.5.
But Gosling often had a more relaxed neck and shoulder posture which made him very close to Brad's height in some photos. When they both looked completely straight, you could see that one inch difference pretty clearly.
Here's photos:
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Keep in mind that Ryan may look taller than usual because of his facial structure difference in compared to Brad. Brad has a very wide face, Ryan, quite rectangle like which makes him look slimmer overall.
Here's photos of their shoes:
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Doesn't look like anything special to me, he could not get a massive amount of height from those but I'm certainly no expert. I could imagine at most two inches from those shoes (including potential small lifts will say).
We will probably see Brad next to Christian Bale in the upcoming weeks as well?
Mathew Robinson (190 cm) said on 26/Nov/15
Dan said on 23/Nov/15
So Brad just showed up to the premiere of the big short and was photographed next to Gosling. He looks about the same height but also looks about an inch shorter in a few pics. The guy obviously really knows how to look 5-11
---
Barefooted Gosling is 6'0" even, Pitt is - at the very most - 5'10.5". His footwear and posture can give that strong 5'11" impression at times though, for sure.
Dan said on 23/Nov/15
So Brad just showed up to the premiere of the big short and was photographed next to Gosling. He looks about the same height but also looks about an inch shorter in a few pics. The guy obviously really knows how to look 5-11
---
Barefooted Gosling is 6'0" even, Pitt is - at the very most - 5'10.5". His footwear and posture can give that strong 5'11" impression at times though, for sure.
Dan said on 23/Nov/15
Brad Pitt's posture will always be impeccable because if know anything about him, you'll know the guy has an extremely strong core. His lower back and abdominal muscles are made of iron.
Brad Pitt's posture will always be impeccable because if know anything about him, you'll know the guy has an extremely strong core. His lower back and abdominal muscles are made of iron.
Dan said on 23/Nov/15
So Brad just showed up to the premiere of the big short and was photographed next to Gosling. He looks about the same height but also looks about an inch shorter in a few pics. The guy obviously really knows how to look 5-11
So Brad just showed up to the premiere of the big short and was photographed next to Gosling. He looks about the same height but also looks about an inch shorter in a few pics. The guy obviously really knows how to look 5-11
Joe said on 23/Nov/15
I find it very hard to believe there are only 2 inches between a barefoot Brad Pitt and a barefoot Barack Obama.
I find it very hard to believe there are only 2 inches between a barefoot Brad Pitt and a barefoot Barack Obama.
Dan said on 19/Nov/15
Heylo, that's what i believe. 5-10' or only a tiny unnoticeable amount under.
Heylo, that's what i believe. 5-10' or only a tiny unnoticeable amount under.
Heylo said on 19/Nov/15
Hijopotamus, You can't say that "I bet he have lifts inside" when we don't know. In those regular sneakers he may pull off a very small lift but it's really pointless to discuss that since we don't know. Better are the photos where we know that he have lifts.
I don't think you have to be delusional believing Brad to be 5'11, he could really be some mm off the 5'11 mark and closer to 5'10 but how does that make a 5'11 guess "delusional"? It's not the easiest thing to do, getting someone's height by the dot just by looking at photos. I believe like many says here, that he can be anywhere between 5'10 and 5'11, he doesn't look 5'9 like you might believe. Majority of photos with decent angles (very important to note since some weird camera angle can distort everything and give crazy illusions) counting in paltrow photos = 5'10-5'11.
The lowest I personally could go for him is slightly under 5'10 but that is really pushing it, perhaps way too low actually.
Hijopotamus, You can't say that "I bet he have lifts inside" when we don't know. In those regular sneakers he may pull off a very small lift but it's really pointless to discuss that since we don't know. Better are the photos where we know that he have lifts.
I don't think you have to be delusional believing Brad to be 5'11, he could really be some mm off the 5'11 mark and closer to 5'10 but how does that make a 5'11 guess "delusional"? It's not the easiest thing to do, getting someone's height by the dot just by looking at photos. I believe like many says here, that he can be anywhere between 5'10 and 5'11, he doesn't look 5'9 like you might believe. Majority of photos with decent angles (very important to note since some weird camera angle can distort everything and give crazy illusions) counting in paltrow photos = 5'10-5'11.
The lowest I personally could go for him is slightly under 5'10 but that is really pushing it, perhaps way too low actually.
Mathew Robinson (190 cm) said on 18/Nov/15
hijopotamus said on 18/Nov/15
Brad is wearing THICK shoes and I bet have lifts inside. Lads that think hes 5'11" you are delusional
---
Yeah, I think at most he's 5'10.5".
hijopotamus said on 18/Nov/15
Brad is wearing THICK shoes and I bet have lifts inside. Lads that think hes 5'11" you are delusional
---
Yeah, I think at most he's 5'10.5".
hijopotamus said on 18/Nov/15
Brad is wearing THICK shoes and I bet have lifts inside. Lads that think hes 5'11" you are delusional
Brad is wearing THICK shoes and I bet have lifts inside. Lads that think hes 5'11" you are delusional
sebs said on 16/Nov/15
Pitt is clearly 5'11, literally every film hes in he always appears above average, with good posture and footwear he appears taller, stop trying to bring the man down to appear shorter than he is.
Pitt is clearly 5'11, literally every film hes in he always appears above average, with good posture and footwear he appears taller, stop trying to bring the man down to appear shorter than he is.
Aaron zamora said on 16/Nov/15
I have a question is 5'11 his peak height or the height that you believe that he is at this age? I also wanted to ask if your estimates of heights like Brad's 5'11 height for example, if it's his maximum height or the lowest height that he might be.
Editor Rob
I have a question is 5'11 his peak height or the height that you believe that he is at this age? I also wanted to ask if your estimates of heights like Brad's 5'11 height for example, if it's his maximum height or the lowest height that he might be.
Editor Rob for guys who are fit like Pitt, I think many will reach 50 without much of a loss that you would see (a small few mm maybe) so I'd think he was 5ft 11 or near it for last 20 years.
Dan said on 15/Nov/15
In the Fallon break dancing video Pitt is wearing vans sneakers. Hardly a tricky shoe
In the Fallon break dancing video Pitt is wearing vans sneakers. Hardly a tricky shoe
hijopotamus said on 15/Nov/15
177guy, ridiculous or not is irrelevant. Face the fact and have a look at those pics with Paltrow.
Aaron Zamora, Brad is shorter than Fallon and Brad IS wearing lifts or tricky shoes AS USUAL, I mean a guy who wears boots on the beach is very strange unless he hides something ➖his real height!
177guy, ridiculous or not is irrelevant. Face the fact and have a look at those pics with Paltrow.
Aaron Zamora, Brad is shorter than Fallon and Brad IS wearing lifts or tricky shoes AS USUAL, I mean a guy who wears boots on the beach is very strange unless he hides something ➖his real height!
Aaron zamora said on 14/Nov/15
There's a video on Jimmy Fallon's YouTube account with Brad Bitt and him dance battling. If you forward towards the end of the video they are back to back. Jimmy Fallon beats him by like half an inch to an inch. You should check that out Rob. I'm not saying that Brad Pitt is short I'm just saying that he might be 5'10 1/2-3/4 at this age now or Jimmy Fallon might have a shoe advantage.
There's a video on Jimmy Fallon's YouTube account with Brad Bitt and him dance battling. If you forward towards the end of the video they are back to back. Jimmy Fallon beats him by like half an inch to an inch. You should check that out Rob. I'm not saying that Brad Pitt is short I'm just saying that he might be 5'10 1/2-3/4 at this age now or Jimmy Fallon might have a shoe advantage.
Josh said on 14/Nov/15
Brad's barefeet photo is a very good evidence to show that he ain't any taller than 5'9. Also a friend of mine knew Brad in person and he said he's 5'9 with normal shoes on!
Brad's barefeet photo is a very good evidence to show that he ain't any taller than 5'9. Also a friend of mine knew Brad in person and he said he's 5'9 with normal shoes on!
177cmGuy said on 14/Nov/15
I say 5'10 2/3 is an arguable range but 5'9 is ridiculous. With good posture, thick footwear and thick hair a strong 5'10 guy can easily look 6'0-6'1.
I say 5'10 2/3 is an arguable range but 5'9 is ridiculous. With good posture, thick footwear and thick hair a strong 5'10 guy can easily look 6'0-6'1.
plus said on 13/Nov/15
No less than 181 cm, just look at the pic with Claudia Schiffer 5.11, even if he has 2.5 cm advantage in shoes and posture, he must be like 1 cm taller easily
No less than 181 cm, just look at the pic with Claudia Schiffer 5.11, even if he has 2.5 cm advantage in shoes and posture, he must be like 1 cm taller easily
Mr175 said on 12/Nov/15
180 is actually a very good shout. Theres no way he's going around day to day with lifts in his trainers, certainly not more than 0.5 because it would damage his posture. I reckon he does have short legs, maybe 30 inseam but a longish torso that makes up for it. Even when bulked he didn't look stocky ever...even with lifts you can observe someone's body dimensions and judge height pretty accurately. If Brad had slightly longer limbs he'd be a 6 foot 1 man and he knows it...that's his frustration I think, because otherwise 5 11 is a very decent height
180 is actually a very good shout. Theres no way he's going around day to day with lifts in his trainers, certainly not more than 0.5 because it would damage his posture. I reckon he does have short legs, maybe 30 inseam but a longish torso that makes up for it. Even when bulked he didn't look stocky ever...even with lifts you can observe someone's body dimensions and judge height pretty accurately. If Brad had slightly longer limbs he'd be a 6 foot 1 man and he knows it...that's his frustration I think, because otherwise 5 11 is a very decent height
ElDuderino said on 12/Nov/15
Pitt can look 6 feet, I'd guess 5'11.5
Pitt can look 6 feet, I'd guess 5'11.5
Ryan Fiveten said on 10/Nov/15
Yeah, 5'11" seems about right for Brad.
Yeah, 5'11" seems about right for Brad.
Dan said on 10/Nov/15
I saw Pitt in person at the TCL Chinese theater in Hollywood for the AFI premiere of By the Sea. He and Angelina walked into the theater and she presented the film, he was in a tuxedo and she was in a gown with heels. I have the video and photos taken on my phone. Whatever shoes they were both wearing, Pitt was only 1-1.5" taller than her. You can see the images from that night all over the Internet.
I saw Pitt in person at the TCL Chinese theater in Hollywood for the AFI premiere of By the Sea. He and Angelina walked into the theater and she presented the film, he was in a tuxedo and she was in a gown with heels. I have the video and photos taken on my phone. Whatever shoes they were both wearing, Pitt was only 1-1.5" taller than her. You can see the images from that night all over the Internet.
Sam said on 9/Nov/15
Would be interested to see if Pitt stands by Ryan Gosling and Christian Bale promoting their upcoming film together. Of course, Pitt is rather more likely to sport bigger footwear than the other two guys, Bale seems especially indifferent to standing or looking tall at events.
Would be interested to see if Pitt stands by Ryan Gosling and Christian Bale promoting their upcoming film together. Of course, Pitt is rather more likely to sport bigger footwear than the other two guys, Bale seems especially indifferent to standing or looking tall at events.
dmeyer said on 8/Nov/15
In bettween 179-181 for pitt , he coulnt look 5'11.5-6ft if he was less than 179 since he is not wearing the rdj style , and if he was 181+ he would have looked taller with the cubans and exelant posture
In bettween 179-181 for pitt , he coulnt look 5'11.5-6ft if he was less than 179 since he is not wearing the rdj style , and if he was 181+ he would have looked taller with the cubans and exelant posture
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 8/Nov/15
5ft10 is too low
5ft10 is too low
Allie said on 6/Nov/15
Brad being as short as 5'9? come on people..
Brad being as short as 5'9? come on people..
Paleman said on 6/Nov/15
Anything under 5'10" is a joke, and even that seems unlikely low. He looks like he's standing AT LEAST 5'10.5" to 5'10.75".
In my opinion, a solid 5'11" is a good shout. I guess 5'11.25" could be possible as well, but still unlikely... Definitely not above that. I think the man looks as 5'11" as a 5'11" guy can look.
Anything under 5'10" is a joke, and even that seems unlikely low. He looks like he's standing AT LEAST 5'10.5" to 5'10.75".
In my opinion, a solid 5'11" is a good shout. I guess 5'11.25" could be possible as well, but still unlikely... Definitely not above that. I think the man looks as 5'11" as a 5'11" guy can look.
6'1 Joe said on 4/Nov/15
He's certainly more of 5'11" than 5'10". He can be anywhere between 5'10.5" and 5'11.25".
He's certainly more of 5'11" than 5'10". He can be anywhere between 5'10.5" and 5'11.25".
Mathew Robinson (190 cm) said on 31/Oct/15
He's probably either 178 - 179 cm I'd say. An outside chance he's only 177. But he's certainly not as short as 175 imo.
He's probably either 178 - 179 cm I'd say. An outside chance he's only 177. But he's certainly not as short as 175 imo.
V said on 30/Oct/15
Haha 5'9 is a joke... Hippo please keep your nonsensical comments to yourself.
Haha 5'9 is a joke... Hippo please keep your nonsensical comments to yourself.
hijopotamus said on 29/Oct/15
He looks, he looks, he looks...all comments are irrelevant unless you see him barefoot. This guy is obviously shorter than we all think. Why would you wear customs-lifts-heels ALL THE TIME??
If Gwyneth is 5'9" this guy is 5'9"
He looks, he looks, he looks...all comments are irrelevant unless you see him barefoot. This guy is obviously shorter than we all think. Why would you wear customs-lifts-heels ALL THE TIME??
If Gwyneth is 5'9" this guy is 5'9"
Celebheights 6'1.75"/187 CM said on 26/Oct/15
He looks to be about 5'11" by Jim Carrey, who was 6'1 1/4"-6'1 1/2" in person.
He looks to be about 5'11" by Jim Carrey, who was 6'1 1/4"-6'1 1/2" in person.
dmeyer said on 23/Oct/15
With carrey looking at all pics he looks a solid 4cm smaller while he has near 2cm more shoes so 5'11 again
With carrey looking at all pics he looks a solid 4cm smaller while he has near 2cm more shoes so 5'11 again
amaterasu said on 22/Oct/15
His footwear will make any 5'10" guy look 6'0" easily. I'm personally okay with 5'11" for him, but he's wearing custom made dress shoes with huge heels, and he doesn't even need to pack lifts inside to look close to 6'1" with those heels.
His footwear will make any 5'10" guy look 6'0" easily. I'm personally okay with 5'11" for him, but he's wearing custom made dress shoes with huge heels, and he doesn't even need to pack lifts inside to look close to 6'1" with those heels.
dmeyer said on 22/Oct/15
Here same floor and pitt has slight more footwear like 0.3in he looks 5'11 as clooney is 5"10.5-10.75 and clooney has less shoes , in several pic when pitt and clooney have similar shoes and posture there is max 1cm between them
Here same floor and pitt has slight more footwear like 0.3in he looks 5'11 as clooney is 5"10.5-10.75 and clooney has less shoes , in several pic when pitt and clooney have similar shoes and posture there is max 1cm between them
dmeyer said on 22/Oct/15
To me he looks 5'11.5-11.75 alot because of his 0.5in footwaer advantage and good posture near 6ft , when in mormal shoes he can look 5'10.5-11 and with thin shoes can look 179ish , all indicates a 5'11 guy
To me he looks 5'11.5-11.75 alot because of his 0.5in footwaer advantage and good posture near 6ft , when in mormal shoes he can look 5'10.5-11 and with thin shoes can look 179ish , all indicates a 5'11 guy
Heights are barefeet estimates, derived from quotations, official websites, agency resumes, in person encounters with actors at conventions and pictures/films.
Other vital statistics like weight or shoe size measurements have been sourced from newspapers, books, resumes or social media.
Celebrity Fan Photos and Agency Pictures of stars are © to their respective owners.