Add a Comment522 comments
Average Guess (113 Votes)
6ft 6.61in (199.7cm)
6ft 6.61in (199.7cm)
Sam said on 6/Aug/14
Rob did he look taller than Clive Russell in person?
Editor Rob
Rob did he look taller than Clive Russell in person?
Editor Rob with effectively 0.4in less footwear than Clive, Cudmore still came across taller.
DaDang said on 5/Aug/14
he look's 6'5.5'' to 6'6''
he look's 6'5.5'' to 6'6''
KROC said on 28/Jul/14
Looks 6'6.5 to me. Probably explains why he rounds down on occasion in interviews.
Looks 6'6.5 to me. Probably explains why he rounds down on occasion in interviews.
Mathew said on 23/Jul/14
Somewhere 199 - 200 cm range. People often forget how tall that really is!
Somewhere 199 - 200 cm range. People often forget how tall that really is!
Josh said on 19/Jul/14
Looks 6´6
Looks 6´6
Alex 6'0 said on 7/Jun/14
Rob, you said his head is 10 inches long? Well it looks just over a head difference with the small footwear advantage. Lowest I could say he looks is 6'6.5
Rob, you said his head is 10 inches long? Well it looks just over a head difference with the small footwear advantage. Lowest I could say he looks is 6'6.5
Rhonda said on 30/May/14
Looks not quite a head taller but considering footwear, say he has 10 inch head above Rob then 6ft 6 he is.
Looks not quite a head taller but considering footwear, say he has 10 inch head above Rob then 6ft 6 he is.
Mathew said on 19/May/14
berta says on 8/May/14
Click Here he says that he is 6 foot 6 in this interview afgter 6 minutes and 55 seconds. i think he is a very very strong 6'6 , weak 6'7 . 199,5-200 cmv
---
I agree 6'6.5" would be a good listing for him. He doesn't look a strong 6'7" in the photo but he's also claimed 6'7" so I think it would be fair to list him between the two heights he claimed.
berta says on 8/May/14
Click Here he says that he is 6 foot 6 in this interview afgter 6 minutes and 55 seconds. i think he is a very very strong 6'6 , weak 6'7 . 199,5-200 cmv
---
I agree 6'6.5" would be a good listing for him. He doesn't look a strong 6'7" in the photo but he's also claimed 6'7" so I think it would be fair to list him between the two heights he claimed.
Andrea said on 18/May/14
Rob, i saw your old friend G met him and Daniel told him to be 6'6 too... He's said to be 6'6 too many times to be no less than 6'7 in my opinion. Of course, i doubt he's 6'6 flat but he's not 6'7 either!! 6'6.5 could be on the money...
Editor Rob
Rob, i saw your old friend G met him and Daniel told him to be 6'6 too... He's said to be 6'6 too many times to be no less than 6'7 in my opinion. Of course, i doubt he's 6'6 flat but he's not 6'7 either!! 6'6.5 could be on the money...
Editor Rob hah, I wonder if anybody would believe G would think that he looked 6ft 5 in person!
all the 6ft 5 guys want to be 6ft 6 and Cudmore, a guy near 6ft 7 wants to be 6ft 6...must be the magic number with casting directors!
all the 6ft 5 guys want to be 6ft 6 and Cudmore, a guy near 6ft 7 wants to be 6ft 6...must be the magic number with casting directors!
berta said on 8/May/14
Click Here he says that he is 6 foot 6 in this interview afgter 6 minutes and 55 seconds. i think he is a very very strong 6'6 , weak 6'7 . 199,5-200 cm
Click Here he says that he is 6 foot 6 in this interview afgter 6 minutes and 55 seconds. i think he is a very very strong 6'6 , weak 6'7 . 199,5-200 cm
Alex 6'0 said on 30/Apr/14
His head looks more than the average 9.5. Id say 10-10.5 inches. Really at worst he would be 6'6.5.
At 6'0 I think I'd come up to bottom of his nose
His head looks more than the average 9.5. Id say 10-10.5 inches. Really at worst he would be 6'6.5.
At 6'0 I think I'd come up to bottom of his nose
Arch Stanton said on 26/Apr/14
I really think 6'6.5" is the lowest you could really argue. He looked roughly 200cm in the comparison I did.
I really think 6'6.5" is the lowest you could really argue. He looked roughly 200cm in the comparison I did.
Arch Stanton said on 26/Apr/14
6 ft 6 flat is impossible, I did a comparison with Challenger 15 and there's absolutely no way he only had 3/4 on inch on him.
6 ft 6 flat is impossible, I did a comparison with Challenger 15 and there's absolutely no way he only had 3/4 on inch on him.
Matthieus said on 18/Apr/14
He looks like a giant! And I'm a bit shorter than you, Rob.
He looks like a giant! And I'm a bit shorter than you, Rob.
Mathew said on 14/Apr/14
[Editor Rob: it's not impossible, but much more than a little shy of 6ft 7 I'd find hard to believe.]
---
Maybe a 199 - 200 cm listing to split the difference would be fair. Sounds like you'd lean more towards 200 cm having seen him in person.
[Editor Rob: it's not impossible, but much more than a little shy of 6ft 7 I'd find hard to believe.]
---
Maybe a 199 - 200 cm listing to split the difference would be fair. Sounds like you'd lean more towards 200 cm having seen him in person.
Andrea said on 13/Apr/14
In fact, i said 6'6 flat is hard to believe but you yourself said 6'6.5 is not impossible so he could have measured near it on a bad day and just went with 6'6... The same way Lance Reddick claimed 6'2...
Editor Rob
In fact, i said 6'6 flat is hard to believe but you yourself said 6'6.5 is not impossible so he could have measured near it on a bad day and just went with 6'6... The same way Lance Reddick claimed 6'2...
Editor Rob it's not impossible, but much more than a little shy of 6ft 7 I'd find hard to believe.
Andrea said on 13/Apr/14
Well, if he claimed 6'6, he must have measured that mark! Probably got measured between 6'6 and 6'7 and claimed both heights! Still doubt he's 6'6 flat, but he's not a full 6'7 either (or that claim wouldnt make any sense). 6'6.5-6'7 is definitely his range, over 6'6 but not quite 6'7...
Editor Rob
Well, if he claimed 6'6, he must have measured that mark! Probably got measured between 6'6 and 6'7 and claimed both heights! Still doubt he's 6'6 flat, but he's not a full 6'7 either (or that claim wouldnt make any sense). 6'6.5-6'7 is definitely his range, over 6'6 but not quite 6'7...
Editor Rob he's downplayed it with a 6ft 6 claim (or he could have measured just under 6ft 7 and has dropped the 7/8ths!)...at his height getting roles is a tough business.
I would be shocked beyond belief if he was only 6ft 6 flat...I mean he looked over 6ft 6 and with less footwear I believe the 6ft 7 claim is real.
I would be shocked beyond belief if he was only 6ft 6 flat...I mean he looked over 6ft 6 and with less footwear I believe the 6ft 7 claim is real.
Pedro said on 12/Apr/14
In this video-interview he actually said that he is 6'6": Click Here
So he was either understating his height or he is maybe more like 6'6.5".
Editor Rob
In this video-interview he actually said that he is 6'6": Click Here
So he was either understating his height or he is maybe more like 6'6.5".
Editor Rob I do think he really is 6ft 7.
Emmett said on 10/Apr/14
He's very handsome and well proportioned for a man this huge. He's very well built, so he avoids looking lanky, but he's also doesn't give off a 'giant' impression.
He's very handsome and well proportioned for a man this huge. He's very well built, so he avoids looking lanky, but he's also doesn't give off a 'giant' impression.
avi said on 14/Feb/14
@Lorne
Not a full head but close A 6'6.5 listing is fair but 6'7 is close. There's about 10.25 inches here factor in the .4 advantage for Rob then we are talking 6'6.75 almost. That's his real listing I think.
@Lorne
Not a full head but close A 6'6.5 listing is fair but 6'7 is close. There's about 10.25 inches here factor in the .4 advantage for Rob then we are talking 6'6.75 almost. That's his real listing I think.
176,2Tunman said on 9/Feb/14
At least a strong 10in taller than Rob,without footwear disadvantage I would say 10.5.Since Rob is a little over 5'8, Daniel is probably very close to 6'7 maybe 6'6.75 would suit him better.Great actor anyways.
At least a strong 10in taller than Rob,without footwear disadvantage I would say 10.5.Since Rob is a little over 5'8, Daniel is probably very close to 6'7 maybe 6'6.75 would suit him better.Great actor anyways.
carl199cm said on 7/Feb/14
im 110 kgs for 199 he has to be around that too.
im 110 kgs for 199 he has to be around that too.
Colossus said on 19/Jan/14
Hey Rob How much do you think he weighs on this photo:
Click Here at least 100kg,no?
Is he a nice guy?
Editor Rob
Hey Rob How much do you think he weighs on this photo:
Click Here at least 100kg,no?
Is he a nice guy?
Editor Rob yes he was a cool guy to meet and I'd say yeah at least a bit over 100kg, maybe nearer 110 there.
Chris said on 18/Jan/14
I am 6'4 ft (193-194), where do you think the edge of my head would be at, Rob?
Editor Rob
I am 6'4 ft (193-194), where do you think the edge of my head would be at, Rob?
Editor Rob normally I would look around the mouth of a 6ft 4 man, even sometimes under his mouth if the camera angle favoured the tall man.
in your case a 6ft 4 man would look about a good inch above daniel's eyebrows
in your case a 6ft 4 man would look about a good inch above daniel's eyebrows
avi said on 13/Jan/14
@Rob
Would I get to the middle of his nose?
Editor Rob
@Rob
Would I get to the middle of his nose?
Editor Rob at 6ft you'd probably be end of his nose.
Arch Stanton said on 12/Jan/14
In the comparison with #15 I guessed Cudmore at 200cm. I think he'd measure very close to the 6'7" mark if not on the nose earlier in the day.
In the comparison with #15 I guessed Cudmore at 200cm. I think he'd measure very close to the 6'7" mark if not on the nose earlier in the day.
Arch Stanton said on 12/Jan/14
Trust me, I did a sheet comparison during the 15 people contest and Cudmore DEFINITELY had over an inch on Challenger 15 accounting for the footwear. I know #15 can look like 6'7-6'8 at first glance but the lowest you could argue for Cudmore is really 6'6.5".
Trust me, I did a sheet comparison during the 15 people contest and Cudmore DEFINITELY had over an inch on Challenger 15 accounting for the footwear. I know #15 can look like 6'7-6'8 at first glance but the lowest you could argue for Cudmore is really 6'6.5".
sigge said on 10/Jan/14
10 inches taller than rob+about 0.5 for shoe disadvantage. He is 6'6.5.
10 inches taller than rob+about 0.5 for shoe disadvantage. He is 6'6.5.
Mathew said on 8/Jan/14
Lorne says on 19/Dec/13
No less than 2 meters. People saying the 196cm challenger looks taller just don't understand height works, Rob is a full head shorter, and the guy is in Converse. People who understand that, you can trust they're estimates ;)
---
Not to be picky, but challenger 15 also appeared a head taller than Rob. I do think Cudmore would measure over 6'6", but in the photo he doesn't look it.
Lorne says on 19/Dec/13
No less than 2 meters. People saying the 196cm challenger looks taller just don't understand height works, Rob is a full head shorter, and the guy is in Converse. People who understand that, you can trust they're estimates ;)
---
Not to be picky, but challenger 15 also appeared a head taller than Rob. I do think Cudmore would measure over 6'6", but in the photo he doesn't look it.
Mathew said on 12/Dec/13
Looking at this photo you see about a 24 cm difference in height (25 including footware), rather than 28. But people can look a little bit taller or shorter than they really are in one photo, especially because I'm sure he's not a guy who is trying to look extra tall for photos.
Looking at this photo you see about a 24 cm difference in height (25 including footware), rather than 28. But people can look a little bit taller or shorter than they really are in one photo, especially because I'm sure he's not a guy who is trying to look extra tall for photos.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 11/Dec/13
I'm beginning to lean more toward 199-200cm range for Cudmore.
But, let me say this, being 6ft5 to 6ft7 has more pros than cons.
I'm beginning to lean more toward 199-200cm range for Cudmore.
But, let me say this, being 6ft5 to 6ft7 has more pros than cons.
Manza said on 1/Dec/13
He looks like 6.5
He looks like 6.5
Arch Stanton said on 19/Nov/13
When you look at Cudmore standing it really is difficult to imagine he's practically the same height as Peter Crouch. Crouch's proportions make him look 6 ft 9, Cudmore's make him look 6'5"-6'6". I wouldn't bet on Cudmore measuring under 200cm, although it is possible his low is 199.
When you look at Cudmore standing it really is difficult to imagine he's practically the same height as Peter Crouch. Crouch's proportions make him look 6 ft 9, Cudmore's make him look 6'5"-6'6". I wouldn't bet on Cudmore measuring under 200cm, although it is possible his low is 199.
Arch Stanton said on 16/Nov/13
6 ft 7 would generally be a negative height I think but some guys like Cudmore/Peter Jones etc who are good looking and well proportioned for their height it could be a positive thing in the work place and walking in public. Every guy I know at this height though gets negative attention for being lanky, and they don't like being this tall. I still think 6'5" would be a more comfortable very tall height. 6'7" really is excessive.
6 ft 7 would generally be a negative height I think but some guys like Cudmore/Peter Jones etc who are good looking and well proportioned for their height it could be a positive thing in the work place and walking in public. Every guy I know at this height though gets negative attention for being lanky, and they don't like being this tall. I still think 6'5" would be a more comfortable very tall height. 6'7" really is excessive.
Matt 184.7-186.7cm said on 3/Oct/13
If his head is 10 inches, he looks 6ft 6 with rob here +the shoe disadvantage 6ft 6.5, definitely 6ft 7+ at an earlier time of day
If his head is 10 inches, he looks 6ft 6 with rob here +the shoe disadvantage 6ft 6.5, definitely 6ft 7+ at an earlier time of day
Lorne??? said on 26/Sep/13
Considering he is in Converse, I think he looks. Just as tall as Kristen Nairn!!! Seriously, make a line, then Knock half an inch off. Okay, do Nairn's head is bigger, but still, to me he doesn't look more than an inch shorter.
Considering he is in Converse, I think he looks. Just as tall as Kristen Nairn!!! Seriously, make a line, then Knock half an inch off. Okay, do Nairn's head is bigger, but still, to me he doesn't look more than an inch shorter.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 17/Sep/13
Could very well be a 199cm guy. But for sure nothing 6ft6.
Could very well be a 199cm guy. But for sure nothing 6ft6.
Mathew said on 12/Sep/13
Lo sgozzatore says on 26/Aug/13
At worst he's 6'6.5, but 6'7 is spot on in my opinion. Noway in hell he's just 197!
---
He isn't 197, but he sure does look 197 cm with Rob above. He's gotta be at least 199 - 200 cm in reality though.
Lo sgozzatore says on 26/Aug/13
At worst he's 6'6.5, but 6'7 is spot on in my opinion. Noway in hell he's just 197!
---
He isn't 197, but he sure does look 197 cm with Rob above. He's gotta be at least 199 - 200 cm in reality though.
avi said on 4/Sep/13
@Lo sgozzatore says on 26/Aug/13
I think he dips into the 6'6.5 area most of day if not by evening at the worst. Still could be weak 6'7.
@Lo sgozzatore says on 26/Aug/13
I think he dips into the 6'6.5 area most of day if not by evening at the worst. Still could be weak 6'7.
Lo sgozzatore said on 26/Aug/13
At worst he's 6'6.5, but 6'7 is spot on in my opinion. Noway in hell he's just 197!
At worst he's 6'6.5, but 6'7 is spot on in my opinion. Noway in hell he's just 197!
Sixseven said on 23/Aug/13
Daniel Cudmore is 197cm tall(6'5.6")
Daniel Cudmore is 197cm tall(6'5.6")
Dean 5ft 9.25 said on 19/Aug/13
Rob what would you rather be 6ft 7 or 5ft 10?
Editor Rob
Rob what would you rather be 6ft 7 or 5ft 10?
Editor Rob 6ft 7 would be interesting if i was doing a height site like this, but living day to day 5ft 10 would be non stand out, nowhere near as many look at or notice you compared to giant heights...
avi said on 11/Aug/13
@[Editor Rob: cudmore is very tall guy, I can believe he would measure 6ft 7 barefoot]
Theres no doubt hes a very tall guy but i was merely asking if its psosible hes in the 6'6.5 range at night at least. sssuming you are n par with his chin theres no way his head is 11 inches! his head must be 10 inches and he must be a 6'6.5 range. Jenny seems to come 1/4 below his chin or equal with it so about 10.25 difference here.
Editor Rob
@[Editor Rob: cudmore is very tall guy, I can believe he would measure 6ft 7 barefoot]
Theres no doubt hes a very tall guy but i was merely asking if its psosible hes in the 6'6.5 range at night at least. sssuming you are n par with his chin theres no way his head is 11 inches! his head must be 10 inches and he must be a 6'6.5 range. Jenny seems to come 1/4 below his chin or equal with it so about 10.25 difference here.
Editor Rob I think his head is a decent 10 inch, so 6ft 6.5 isn't impossible but I think measuring him you'd get 6ft 7
avi said on 1/Aug/13
@Rob
Rob you may have been too busy to answer this:
"@Rob
im confused a bit. assuming his head is 10 inches and you are at his chin wouldnt this make him 6'6 range?? i think you may be 7.5 inch above his chin.i know you have .4 inch thicker shoe but even so would you consider him a weak 6'7.i mean his head could be 9.5 then difference wouldn't be a solid 10 inches. i see 10 inches here..."
rob can you maybe show me a picture of him next to a 5'10 guy and to 6'1 guy? it may be easier to see the difference there
Editor Rob
@Rob
Rob you may have been too busy to answer this:
"@Rob
im confused a bit. assuming his head is 10 inches and you are at his chin wouldnt this make him 6'6 range?? i think you may be 7.5 inch above his chin.i know you have .4 inch thicker shoe but even so would you consider him a weak 6'7.i mean his head could be 9.5 then difference wouldn't be a solid 10 inches. i see 10 inches here..."
rob can you maybe show me a picture of him next to a 5'10 guy and to 6'1 guy? it may be easier to see the difference there
Editor Rob cudmore is very tall guy, I can believe he would measure 6ft 7 barefoot
avi said on 17/Jul/13
@Rob
im confused a bit. assuming his head is 10 inches and you are at his chin wouldnt this make him 6'6 range?? i think you may be 7.5 inch above his chin.i know you have .4 inch thicker shoe but even so would you consider him a weak 6'7.i mean his head could be 9.5 then difference wouldn't be a solid 10 inches. i see 10 inches here...
@Rob
im confused a bit. assuming his head is 10 inches and you are at his chin wouldnt this make him 6'6 range?? i think you may be 7.5 inch above his chin.i know you have .4 inch thicker shoe but even so would you consider him a weak 6'7.i mean his head could be 9.5 then difference wouldn't be a solid 10 inches. i see 10 inches here...
Connor 184cm said on 22/Jun/13
Rob do you think 6ft 7 is a bad height?
Editor Rob
Rob do you think 6ft 7 is a bad height?
Editor Rob it's a standout height. More eyes are on you than the average man...for some people that would be a bad thing, but others would like the feeling of that and also taller people are given more leeway in work and are thought of in a better sense than the smaller man.
There can be advantages and disadvantages in general day to day living. Imagine going on the tube/buses/flights/cars regularly - it's more physically challenging being extremely tall than being average in situations like that.
There can be advantages and disadvantages in general day to day living. Imagine going on the tube/buses/flights/cars regularly - it's more physically challenging being extremely tall than being average in situations like that.
lelman said on 14/Jun/13
Rob, is he the tallest guy you and Jenny have gotten a photo with?
Real big guy, easily 6'7"
Editor Rob
Rob, is he the tallest guy you and Jenny have gotten a photo with?
Real big guy, easily 6'7"
Editor Rob there's ian whyte who is tallest so far.
avi said on 7/Jun/13
the difference between me and my mom is like this so 10 inches probably.
the difference between me and my mom is like this so 10 inches probably.
Thor/Johno said on 30/May/13
I rest my point, ian is so tall that i could not tell the difference between 6'11, 7'0, 7'1 or 7'2
I rest my point, ian is so tall that i could not tell the difference between 6'11, 7'0, 7'1 or 7'2
Thor/Johno said on 30/May/13
Jimmy, ok compared to challenger 15. 6'5.2 challenger 15 comes about 0.5 inches below ian's eyeline and ian's eyeline seems about 5.5 inches so i would say about 6 - 6'5 inches taller challenger 15 ie 6'11.5 (But that isn't set in stone)
Compare the pictures yourself.
Jimmy, ok compared to challenger 15. 6'5.2 challenger 15 comes about 0.5 inches below ian's eyeline and ian's eyeline seems about 5.5 inches so i would say about 6 - 6'5 inches taller challenger 15 ie 6'11.5 (But that isn't set in stone)
Compare the pictures yourself.
Thor said on 30/May/13
Jimmy, i have no idea. He is to tall and the difference between rob, jenny and him is far to great.
Put it this way, if rob measured him at 7'1, i would say cool he looks it, if measured him at 7'0, i would say cool he looks it and if rob measured him at 7'2 or 7'3, i would say cool he looks it.
You see, if rob was at least 6'5, i could reasonably deduce ian's height but he isn't. The only way round it would be to compared challenger 15 with rob and ian with rob and work out the difference and even then it wouldn't be accurate.
In real life if i saw a 6'7 contender or 6'8, 6.8.5 i would not able to tell. I cannot tell the difference between 6'9 - 7'0 honestly. Similarly, i cannot tell if some is 4'10, 4'11 or 5'0? or eg 3'3 - 3'8 - the height's are just to far out from my height. I doubt those individuals would be able to tell how tall i am but if someone was 5'0 or above, could reasonably predict my height, or someone that was upto 6'5, probably could deduce my height to.
I can tell the difference between someone who is 5'0 - 6'6, those parameters.
Ian is massive guy, i'll leave him at his listed height of 7'1
Jimmy, i have no idea. He is to tall and the difference between rob, jenny and him is far to great.
Put it this way, if rob measured him at 7'1, i would say cool he looks it, if measured him at 7'0, i would say cool he looks it and if rob measured him at 7'2 or 7'3, i would say cool he looks it.
You see, if rob was at least 6'5, i could reasonably deduce ian's height but he isn't. The only way round it would be to compared challenger 15 with rob and ian with rob and work out the difference and even then it wouldn't be accurate.
In real life if i saw a 6'7 contender or 6'8, 6.8.5 i would not able to tell. I cannot tell the difference between 6'9 - 7'0 honestly. Similarly, i cannot tell if some is 4'10, 4'11 or 5'0? or eg 3'3 - 3'8 - the height's are just to far out from my height. I doubt those individuals would be able to tell how tall i am but if someone was 5'0 or above, could reasonably predict my height, or someone that was upto 6'5, probably could deduce my height to.
I can tell the difference between someone who is 5'0 - 6'6, those parameters.
Ian is massive guy, i'll leave him at his listed height of 7'1
jimmy said on 17/May/13
So Cudmore looked at least 1.25" taller than #15 who is 6'5.2" at his lowest having 0.4" less footwear than Rob.So he can't be under 6'6.75".And as Rob has said #15 looks taller than he measures.Rob have you seen Joe again? I doubt that he is legit 6'5",but with a tad more footwear he looks closer to 6'5" than 6'3" or 6'4" as Johno insists.He looks clearly taller than a guy like Kevin Sorbo.
So Cudmore looked at least 1.25" taller than #15 who is 6'5.2" at his lowest having 0.4" less footwear than Rob.So he can't be under 6'6.75".And as Rob has said #15 looks taller than he measures.Rob have you seen Joe again? I doubt that he is legit 6'5",but with a tad more footwear he looks closer to 6'5" than 6'3" or 6'4" as Johno insists.He looks clearly taller than a guy like Kevin Sorbo.
johno said on 15/May/13
Cool - if cudmore appeared in the region of 1 - 1.5 inches taller then challenger 15 then i can't argue.
As i said before because he is so tall, even a slight slouch can make him look shorter by 0.5 inches. I was purely using the picture above and considering footwear disadvantage and comparing with challenger 15's picture and cudmore came out a fraction shorter but that's probably due to posture and you can't tell his true length by bit. Yes, cudmore could realistically be 6'6.5 .
rob 5'8
challenger 15 6'5.25
cudmore 6'6.25 - 6.6.75 (but it's pretty hard to tell since the difference between him and rob is great )
Cool - if cudmore appeared in the region of 1 - 1.5 inches taller then challenger 15 then i can't argue.
As i said before because he is so tall, even a slight slouch can make him look shorter by 0.5 inches. I was purely using the picture above and considering footwear disadvantage and comparing with challenger 15's picture and cudmore came out a fraction shorter but that's probably due to posture and you can't tell his true length by bit. Yes, cudmore could realistically be 6'6.5 .
rob 5'8
challenger 15 6'5.25
cudmore 6'6.25 - 6.6.75 (but it's pretty hard to tell since the difference between him and rob is great )
johno said on 15/May/13
Cool - if cudmore appeared in the region of 1 - 1.5 inches taller then challenger 15 then i can't argue.
As i said before because he is so tall, even a slight slouch can make him look shorter by 0.5 inches. I was purely using the picture above and considering footwear disadvantage and comparing with challenger 15's picture and cudmore came out a fraction shorter but that's probably due to posture and you can't tell his true length by bit. Yes, cudmore could realistically be 6'6.5 .
rob 5'8
challenger 15 6'5.25
cudmore 6'6.25 - 6.6.75 (but it's pretty to tell since the difference between him and robbis great)
Cool - if cudmore appeared in the region of 1 - 1.5 inches taller then challenger 15 then i can't argue.
As i said before because he is so tall, even a slight slouch can make him look shorter by 0.5 inches. I was purely using the picture above and considering footwear disadvantage and comparing with challenger 15's picture and cudmore came out a fraction shorter but that's probably due to posture and you can't tell his true length by bit. Yes, cudmore could realistically be 6'6.5 .
rob 5'8
challenger 15 6'5.25
cudmore 6'6.25 - 6.6.75 (but it's pretty to tell since the difference between him and robbis great)
johno said on 14/May/13
Jimmy my point is, joe looked a strong 6'3 range with rob rather then strong 6'4 so effectively he could be around 6'3.75 aswell not neccessarily at 6'3.25 in the evening.
With cudmore i put him at upper 6'5 range, lower 6'6 judging by the above picture. Taller then challenger 15 as rob stated. As stated earlier, cudmore is one head length taller then rob ie 9 - 9.5 inches plus shoe deficit. Another approach is to compare this picture with challnger 15's and you will see that he comes a fraction shorter with a footwear disadvantage but obviously taller without. Even from an overall profile perspective, cudmore gives me 6'5 indication but taking account of footwear, a weak 6'6 profile man.
Sure he could measure 6'7 or 6'6.5 by the measuring tape but since he is so tall a 0.75 inches margin of error becomes irrelevant in the context of things. If i didn't have rob's guideline of 6'7 and using challenger 15's picture, head length and general overview i would have put cudmore at a weak 6'6 evening time. I would pretty nervou with a 6'7 or 6'6.5 bet and that's the criteria i go by and it is not fullproof but i am comfortable with my estimation.
joe strong 6'3 range or weak 6'4 (sound better)
cudmore 6'5.75 - 6'6
Editor Rob
Jimmy my point is, joe looked a strong 6'3 range with rob rather then strong 6'4 so effectively he could be around 6'3.75 aswell not neccessarily at 6'3.25 in the evening.
With cudmore i put him at upper 6'5 range, lower 6'6 judging by the above picture. Taller then challenger 15 as rob stated. As stated earlier, cudmore is one head length taller then rob ie 9 - 9.5 inches plus shoe deficit. Another approach is to compare this picture with challnger 15's and you will see that he comes a fraction shorter with a footwear disadvantage but obviously taller without. Even from an overall profile perspective, cudmore gives me 6'5 indication but taking account of footwear, a weak 6'6 profile man.
Sure he could measure 6'7 or 6'6.5 by the measuring tape but since he is so tall a 0.75 inches margin of error becomes irrelevant in the context of things. If i didn't have rob's guideline of 6'7 and using challenger 15's picture, head length and general overview i would have put cudmore at a weak 6'6 evening time. I would pretty nervou with a 6'7 or 6'6.5 bet and that's the criteria i go by and it is not fullproof but i am comfortable with my estimation.
joe strong 6'3 range or weak 6'4 (sound better)
cudmore 6'5.75 - 6'6
Editor Rob I saw the big height challenger the other day in the supermarket and he definitely gives a bigger look than joe does, but Cudmore is taller in person, at least 1-1.5 inches
jimmy said on 13/May/13
@Johno Manganiello at 6'.3.25" this guy at 6'5.5".I think u are underestimating heights a big time.
@Johno Manganiello at 6'.3.25" this guy at 6'5.5".I think u are underestimating heights a big time.
Johno said on 5/May/13
Jimmy, i was scaling the picture of rob with challenger 15 and cudmore comes out a bit shorter. The fact that cudmore has footwear disadvantage would make cudmore about the same height as challenger 15. I have given cudmore an extra 0.5 inches for assurance.
Further, cudmore skull is not any longer then rob's ie 9-9.5 inches. Rob is around his chin level, which would make cudmore about 6'5.5 - 6'6 taking footwear into account. Thats why i put cudmore in the upper 6'5 range.
Rob 5'8
challenger 15 6'5.25
cudmore 6'5.75 - 6'6 (pretty fair)
Jimmy, i was scaling the picture of rob with challenger 15 and cudmore comes out a bit shorter. The fact that cudmore has footwear disadvantage would make cudmore about the same height as challenger 15. I have given cudmore an extra 0.5 inches for assurance.
Further, cudmore skull is not any longer then rob's ie 9-9.5 inches. Rob is around his chin level, which would make cudmore about 6'5.5 - 6'6 taking footwear into account. Thats why i put cudmore in the upper 6'5 range.
Rob 5'8
challenger 15 6'5.25
cudmore 6'5.75 - 6'6 (pretty fair)
jimmy said on 28/Apr/13
Johno says on 26/Apr/13
Compared to challenger 15 (6.5.25) not much difference, i give cudmore 6'5.75 taking footwear disadvantage into consideration
Daniel has longer head than 15.And the angle of the photo makes 15 look taller than he really is.
Johno says on 26/Apr/13
Compared to challenger 15 (6.5.25) not much difference, i give cudmore 6'5.75 taking footwear disadvantage into consideration
Daniel has longer head than 15.And the angle of the photo makes 15 look taller than he really is.
Johno said on 26/Apr/13
Compared to challenger 15 (6.5.25) not much difference, i give cudmore 6'5.75 taking footwear disadvantage into consideration
Compared to challenger 15 (6.5.25) not much difference, i give cudmore 6'5.75 taking footwear disadvantage into consideration
John said on 25/Apr/13
Well, at last someone taller then me...
Well, at last someone taller then me...
wiltonstilts said on 25/Apr/13
He does appear to be 6'6
He does appear to be 6'6
jimmy said on 8/Apr/13
His head looks quite long.10"-10.5" Rob?
Editor Rob
His head looks quite long.10"-10.5" Rob?
Editor Rob not more than 10 inches
jimmy said on 2/Apr/13
He looks at least 10.5' taller than Rob who is 5'8.2" and with 0.4 advantage.Minimum flat 6'7".
He looks at least 10.5' taller than Rob who is 5'8.2" and with 0.4 advantage.Minimum flat 6'7".
Arch Stanton said on 16/Mar/13
A legit 6'7" barefoot is just a huge body frame to be carrying around. I feel pretty tall at my height and if I hold a mirror up and see where 6'7" is on my door I always find it amazing how a guy could be that big or more barefoot. Guys like Cudmore must feel extremely tall wherever they go. To the point of being awkward i think. A legit 6'7" and over is an extreme height for a human being, without a doubt!
A legit 6'7" barefoot is just a huge body frame to be carrying around. I feel pretty tall at my height and if I hold a mirror up and see where 6'7" is on my door I always find it amazing how a guy could be that big or more barefoot. Guys like Cudmore must feel extremely tall wherever they go. To the point of being awkward i think. A legit 6'7" and over is an extreme height for a human being, without a doubt!
Elijah said on 10/Mar/13
Legit listing. You two look like his children. lol
Legit listing. You two look like his children. lol
Fern194cm-192cm said on 18/Feb/13
No guys, He looks a legit 6,7. First off, Rob is really 5,8 and change (not just 5,8 flat) and second my brother is 6,6.5 at night and beside a 5,8.5 guy he looks about the same!
No guys, He looks a legit 6,7. First off, Rob is really 5,8 and change (not just 5,8 flat) and second my brother is 6,6.5 at night and beside a 5,8.5 guy he looks about the same!
Nick 189 said on 15/Feb/13
Looks 6'6
Looks 6'6
Ramsay said on 21/Jan/13
Aragorn, why do you think you can estimate his height so precisely? Have you stood with him next to a stadiometer?
Aragorn, why do you think you can estimate his height so precisely? Have you stood with him next to a stadiometer?
Aragorn 5'11 said on 17/Jan/13
Legit 200 cm. (6'6.75) Just a little bit under 6'7.
Legit 200 cm. (6'6.75) Just a little bit under 6'7.
John said on 9/Jan/13
Tim, well I'd definitely prefer to not be that tall if thats what you mean
Tim, well I'd definitely prefer to not be that tall if thats what you mean
Mathew said on 31/Dec/12
Looks 6'5.5" - 6'6" in the picture, although with the 1 cm footware disadvantage. He could be 6'6.5" - 6'6.75" rather than the full 6'7".
Looks 6'5.5" - 6'6" in the picture, although with the 1 cm footware disadvantage. He could be 6'6.5" - 6'6.75" rather than the full 6'7".
truth said on 30/Dec/12
a solid 6ft7. Gigantic.
a solid 6ft7. Gigantic.
Lo sgozzatore said on 17/Dec/12
Legit 6'7 guy, i doubt he's anything less than 2 metres
Legit 6'7 guy, i doubt he's anything less than 2 metres
J.J. said on 10/Dec/12
@Larc-186.7-188.6cm I'd say 6'7" or exactly 200cm/2m is when people start to appear extremely tall. because that is over 99.9% on the growth chart
@Larc-186.7-188.6cm I'd say 6'7" or exactly 200cm/2m is when people start to appear extremely tall. because that is over 99.9% on the growth chart
Tim said on 8/Dec/12
Is 6'7" past the point of being reasonably tall? Seems like with that height you'd have a lot of trouble just doing usual things like driving or showering
Is 6'7" past the point of being reasonably tall? Seems like with that height you'd have a lot of trouble just doing usual things like driving or showering
mId said on 25/Nov/12
Hmm.. I'm 183 cm and have a friend that's 202 cm and somehow this difference between Rob/Jenny and this guy doesn't shock me? I remember me and my friend stood next to eachother in a shopping-mall mirror and I looked like a kid next to him. Rob/Jenny is supposed to be 4" shorter than me.. so adding 4" on them in this photo and they wouldn't look that "towered".. but I thought I did with my friend.. weird :/ I would have guessed maybe 194-195 for this guy based on this pic.
Hmm.. I'm 183 cm and have a friend that's 202 cm and somehow this difference between Rob/Jenny and this guy doesn't shock me? I remember me and my friend stood next to eachother in a shopping-mall mirror and I looked like a kid next to him. Rob/Jenny is supposed to be 4" shorter than me.. so adding 4" on them in this photo and they wouldn't look that "towered".. but I thought I did with my friend.. weird :/ I would have guessed maybe 194-195 for this guy based on this pic.
James said on 19/Nov/12
6'6.5. Its not that shocking seeing this guy next too 2 5'8ers.
I think if you stood this guy next too peter crouch there would be a good 1 inch between the 2.
6'6.5. Its not that shocking seeing this guy next too 2 5'8ers.
I think if you stood this guy next too peter crouch there would be a good 1 inch between the 2.
runt said on 19/Nov/12
Not a hair over 6'6.875"
Not a hair over 6'6.875"
getting_taller said on 17/Nov/12
So this is what a 6'7" looks like standing beside 5'8" footers whew. Clearly taller than Manganiello,Mcpartlin,Momoa.
So this is what a 6'7" looks like standing beside 5'8" footers whew. Clearly taller than Manganiello,Mcpartlin,Momoa.
The Exorcist said on 12/Nov/12
Very tall!
Very tall!
Larc-186.7-188.6cm said on 7/Nov/12
6'6-6'7 starts to appear extremely tall.
He's 6'7 for sure.
6'6-6'7 starts to appear extremely tall.
He's 6'7 for sure.
Caren said on 5/Nov/12
It's nice to see such a tall person stand up so straight! So many of them slouch!
It's nice to see such a tall person stand up so straight! So many of them slouch!
Shaun said on 19/Sep/12
Looking again that right photo of the Challenger 15 he looks MASSIVE. At first glance you think he's near 6 ft 8.
Looking again that right photo of the Challenger 15 he looks MASSIVE. At first glance you think he's near 6 ft 8.
Shaun said on 19/Sep/12
That's right I think Cudmore had an inch on #15 and adjusting for Rob's shoe advantage I added half an inch and pretty much got 200 cm for him in comparison
That's right I think Cudmore had an inch on #15 and adjusting for Rob's shoe advantage I added half an inch and pretty much got 200 cm for him in comparison
Shaun said on 19/Sep/12
Click Here
Here he is next to Jackman. Jackman's posture isn't the best and Cudmore's is almost Stallone like but Cudmore actually makes Jackman looks a 6'1"er here. In that photo its difficult to see him even a hair under 6 ft 7 even accounting for posture differences.
Click Here
Here he is next to Jackman. Jackman's posture isn't the best and Cudmore's is almost Stallone like but Cudmore actually makes Jackman looks a 6'1"er here. In that photo its difficult to see him even a hair under 6 ft 7 even accounting for posture differences.
Shaun said on 19/Sep/12
Mathew says on 19/Aug/12
It'd be interesting to see a comparison between Cudmore and Challenger 15. Because Cudmore honestly doesn't look taller to me in this picture for some reason.
[Editor Rob: in person cudmore is definitely a taller guy, although maybe cos the challenger is shot from a different angle it makes him imposing]
I did the comparison Mathew when we were doing the Challenges. Cudmore had about 1.5 inches on Challenger 15 accounting for Rob's footwear advantage. If the big guy is just shy of 6'5.5" Cudmore is pretty much around 6'7" as he claims legitimately. Cudmore does look more 6'6" to the eye here but I think the lowest he could possibly be in comparison to #15 is 199.5-200cm. Cudmore could be 2 metres flat which is virtually 6'7" but for sure he's nothing under 6'6.5".
Mathew says on 19/Aug/12
It'd be interesting to see a comparison between Cudmore and Challenger 15. Because Cudmore honestly doesn't look taller to me in this picture for some reason.
[Editor Rob: in person cudmore is definitely a taller guy, although maybe cos the challenger is shot from a different angle it makes him imposing]
I did the comparison Mathew when we were doing the Challenges. Cudmore had about 1.5 inches on Challenger 15 accounting for Rob's footwear advantage. If the big guy is just shy of 6'5.5" Cudmore is pretty much around 6'7" as he claims legitimately. Cudmore does look more 6'6" to the eye here but I think the lowest he could possibly be in comparison to #15 is 199.5-200cm. Cudmore could be 2 metres flat which is virtually 6'7" but for sure he's nothing under 6'6.5".
TNTinFL said on 23/Aug/12
Can't argue with that height. I actually thought he was taller; 6'8". When I first saw him on X2 was during that scene where they were raiding the mansion. He was barefoot and still towered over 6'2" (and change) Jackman.
Can't argue with that height. I actually thought he was taller; 6'8". When I first saw him on X2 was during that scene where they were raiding the mansion. He was barefoot and still towered over 6'2" (and change) Jackman.
Mathew said on 19/Aug/12
It'd be interesting to see a comparison between Cudmore and Challenger 15. Because Cudmore honestly doesn't look taller to me in this picture for some reason.
Editor Rob
It'd be interesting to see a comparison between Cudmore and Challenger 15. Because Cudmore honestly doesn't look taller to me in this picture for some reason.
Editor Rob in person cudmore is definitely a taller guy, although maybe cos the challenger is shot from a different angle it makes him imposing
Shaun said on 10/Aug/12
@Hob. Steven = LanJiao =" I'm 6'5"" . Average height in China didn't you know?
@Hob. Steven = LanJiao =" I'm 6'5"" . Average height in China didn't you know?
Hob said on 7/Aug/12
"Shaun says on 27/Jan/12
Does that mean we can downgrade you to at least 6'4.5" then Steven?"
shuan, i don't get you. i did not claim 6'5 by you were think 0.5" shape off to 6'4.5 my height? im tall and not far to reach cudmore claim but i choose not to claim height here. thankful shuan.. by the way cudmore does't not look 6'7 even to pity to him without shoe advantage next to 5'8.25 rob in 1 inch shoe. my guess still 6'6.5 for cudmore or max 6'6.75
"Shaun says on 27/Jan/12
Does that mean we can downgrade you to at least 6'4.5" then Steven?"
shuan, i don't get you. i did not claim 6'5 by you were think 0.5" shape off to 6'4.5 my height? im tall and not far to reach cudmore claim but i choose not to claim height here. thankful shuan.. by the way cudmore does't not look 6'7 even to pity to him without shoe advantage next to 5'8.25 rob in 1 inch shoe. my guess still 6'6.5 for cudmore or max 6'6.75
matt789 said on 27/Jul/12
he looks a solid 6 foot 6 and a weak 6 foot 7
he looks a solid 6 foot 6 and a weak 6 foot 7
Mathew said on 7/Feb/12
Shaun says on 27/Jan/12
Rob what's the lowest you think he could possibly be? I can see 200cm as possible but he is does look minimum inch and a half taller than Challenger #15 right?
---
I don't think he looks an inch and a half taller than Challenger 15, I know he's loosing a cm to footware though so it becomes closer to that. 6'6.5" is okay to me, but 6'7" is kind of pushing it.
Shaun says on 27/Jan/12
Rob what's the lowest you think he could possibly be? I can see 200cm as possible but he is does look minimum inch and a half taller than Challenger #15 right?
---
I don't think he looks an inch and a half taller than Challenger 15, I know he's loosing a cm to footware though so it becomes closer to that. 6'6.5" is okay to me, but 6'7" is kind of pushing it.
Shaun said on 28/Jan/12
6'6.5" is 199.5 cm right? Yeah I can buy about that or 200cm but I cant see him as a flat 6'6" guy or lower, he looks a couple of inches taller than somebody of Ryan McPartlin's height, as you say Cudmore looks extremely tall and McPartlin a more modest "very tall". He does look close enough to 6'7" to round up half an inch as is common amongst taller guys in Hollywood and in general. He looks well proportioned at this height though, compared to several other English lamposts I can think over LOL...
6'6.5" is 199.5 cm right? Yeah I can buy about that or 200cm but I cant see him as a flat 6'6" guy or lower, he looks a couple of inches taller than somebody of Ryan McPartlin's height, as you say Cudmore looks extremely tall and McPartlin a more modest "very tall". He does look close enough to 6'7" to round up half an inch as is common amongst taller guys in Hollywood and in general. He looks well proportioned at this height though, compared to several other English lamposts I can think over LOL...
Shaun said on 27/Jan/12
Rob what's the lowest you think he could possibly be? I can see 200cm as possible but he is does look minimum inch and a half taller than Challenger #15 right?
Editor Rob
Rob what's the lowest you think he could possibly be? I can see 200cm as possible but he is does look minimum inch and a half taller than Challenger #15 right?
Editor Rob well he looked in the 6ft 6 range, and the challenger 15 looked 6ft 5 range, but cudmore of course had converse while i had an inch, so I would doubt he'd measure under 6ft 6.5.
Shaun said on 27/Jan/12
If you compare this guy to Challenger 15 and then take into account Rob's footwear he's close enough to 6'7" if not on the mark. I can see 200c, but I doubt he under that.
If you compare this guy to Challenger 15 and then take into account Rob's footwear he's close enough to 6'7" if not on the mark. I can see 200c, but I doubt he under that.
Shaun said on 27/Jan/12
Does that mean we can downgrade you to at least 6'4.5" then Steven?
Does that mean we can downgrade you to at least 6'4.5" then Steven?
steven said on 18/Jan/12
rob, cudmore should be downgrade at least 6'6.5. #15 guy does't look much on 1" shorter than cudmore look.
rob, cudmore should be downgrade at least 6'6.5. #15 guy does't look much on 1" shorter than cudmore look.
steven said on 14/Jan/12
i see daniel cudmore here is 6'6 and 6'7 in shoe 6'6.75 in sneakers. i usually think 6'3 for ryan mcpartlin , but after some reason i convince he is about 6'4 and looks it with rob. from here we see daniel cudmore had less footwear by 1cm than rob he look full almost 10" taller than rob which could have make him 6'6.25 and 6'6 flat min. he had regular size head ,does't had over 10" head so 6'6 would't be wrong.
i see daniel cudmore here is 6'6 and 6'7 in shoe 6'6.75 in sneakers. i usually think 6'3 for ryan mcpartlin , but after some reason i convince he is about 6'4 and looks it with rob. from here we see daniel cudmore had less footwear by 1cm than rob he look full almost 10" taller than rob which could have make him 6'6.25 and 6'6 flat min. he had regular size head ,does't had over 10" head so 6'6 would't be wrong.
JM9 said on 13/Jan/12
I would agree Witchdoctor, but there are three other things: Rob has a 1 cm footwear advantage here, and he is standing nearer to the camera than Cudmore. Plus, Cudmore appears to have a longer head (maybe 2-3cm) than the man in that challenge. Put that together and I can see 4-5 cm.
I would agree Witchdoctor, but there are three other things: Rob has a 1 cm footwear advantage here, and he is standing nearer to the camera than Cudmore. Plus, Cudmore appears to have a longer head (maybe 2-3cm) than the man in that challenge. Put that together and I can see 4-5 cm.
Witchdoctor said on 13/Jan/12
if Challenge 15 is 1.96m than Daniel cudmore is around 1.99m,chances that daniel is 5cm taller are just really slim!
if Challenge 15 is 1.96m than Daniel cudmore is around 1.99m,chances that daniel is 5cm taller are just really slim!
ANDREA[ITA] said on 2/Jan/12
Rob, what about around 199 before bed? You said that very tall guys loose more height during the day! So if 202-203 out of bed and 199 before bed is a possibility? Or he never dips below 200?
Rob, what about around 199 before bed? You said that very tall guys loose more height during the day! So if 202-203 out of bed and 199 before bed is a possibility? Or he never dips below 200?
ChiasmataX said on 24/Dec/11
He looked a legit 6'6 in this picture. It is easy to tell because a legit 6'6 will have a full head over 5'8-5'8.5 people.
He looked a legit 6'6 in this picture. It is easy to tell because a legit 6'6 will have a full head over 5'8-5'8.5 people.
avi said on 24/Dec/11
@[Editor Rob: cudmore is at least 2 inches taller in person than ryan is, ryan is very tall but daniel is extremely tall and had 0.4 inch less sneaker than me.]
yes maybe you feel that way but the evidence points to Cudmore being about 1.5 inches taller than Mcpartlin. but lets say you are right and it is 2 inches then Cudmore should be a weak 6'6.5 dipping into the 6'6 .25 zone. plus Mcpartlin could be 6'4.25. So you should drop Cudmore down to 6'6.5 he looks a weak 6'6 with you BUT like you said you have .4 advantage. So 6'6 is very generous. Not a 6'7er...
@[Editor Rob: cudmore is at least 2 inches taller in person than ryan is, ryan is very tall but daniel is extremely tall and had 0.4 inch less sneaker than me.]
yes maybe you feel that way but the evidence points to Cudmore being about 1.5 inches taller than Mcpartlin. but lets say you are right and it is 2 inches then Cudmore should be a weak 6'6.5 dipping into the 6'6 .25 zone. plus Mcpartlin could be 6'4.25. So you should drop Cudmore down to 6'6.5 he looks a weak 6'6 with you BUT like you said you have .4 advantage. So 6'6 is very generous. Not a 6'7er...
Mathew said on 23/Dec/11
He looks about 197 cm in the picture. Factor in the footware disadvantage and he looks 6'6".
He looks about 197 cm in the picture. Factor in the footware disadvantage and he looks 6'6".
Shaun said on 18/Dec/11
I think at some point in the day he might measure 200cm barefoot. He's clearly very close to 6'7".
I think at some point in the day he might measure 200cm barefoot. He's clearly very close to 6'7".
anonim said on 15/Nov/11
Up to 192 I think this guy does not stop 2 meters!
Up to 192 I think this guy does not stop 2 meters!
Physics Enemy said on 13/Nov/11
For me 6' 2" evening is the start of very tall.
For me 6' 2" evening is the start of very tall.
Tom101 said on 13/Nov/11
id say around 6-7" here,my friend is 6-7" and im 6-2.5" so i think knowing my other friends around 5-8" mark so to me hes that height.
id say around 6-7" here,my friend is 6-7" and im 6-2.5" so i think knowing my other friends around 5-8" mark so to me hes that height.
Lucoso said on 26/Oct/11
very tall almost 2m
very tall almost 2m
Shaun said on 25/Oct/11
Na a legit 6 ft 6 barefoot guy will usually be considered extremely tall. A 6'5" guy though very tall. I'd agree on 6 ft 10 for a giant though.
Na a legit 6 ft 6 barefoot guy will usually be considered extremely tall. A 6'5" guy though very tall. I'd agree on 6 ft 10 for a giant though.
Alex said on 22/Oct/11
Solid tall is 6'1-6'3. Very tall 6'4-6'6. 6'7-6'9 extremely tall then 6'10 plus is a giant
Solid tall is 6'1-6'3. Very tall 6'4-6'6. 6'7-6'9 extremely tall then 6'10 plus is a giant
Legend said on 20/Oct/11
He's close to 6'7 whatever he is...I think I've guessed 6'6.5 before.
He's close to 6'7 whatever he is...I think I've guessed 6'6.5 before.
george555 said on 16/Oct/11
he looks at least 6'6-probably 6'6.5, 6'7 is too big of a height, he doesn't have 11 inches on Mamun.
he looks at least 6'6-probably 6'6.5, 6'7 is too big of a height, he doesn't have 11 inches on Mamun.
Triplescrew said on 16/Oct/11
@ Vegas
Sorry I didn't see your request. Here it is:
Daniel Cudmore (6'7") vs Michael Kingma (6'9.5") vs Ian Whyte (7'1")
Click Here
@ Vegas
Sorry I didn't see your request. Here it is:
Daniel Cudmore (6'7") vs Michael Kingma (6'9.5") vs Ian Whyte (7'1")
Click Here
Shaun said on 16/Oct/11
Yeah if you never dip under 6'3" barefoot all day and are a strong 6'3" that's what I'd consider the start of the very tall range. Extremely tall 6'5.5"-6'8" range, Virtual/borderline giant 6'8"-6'10", true giant 6'10" +??
Yeah if you never dip under 6'3" barefoot all day and are a strong 6'3" that's what I'd consider the start of the very tall range. Extremely tall 6'5.5"-6'8" range, Virtual/borderline giant 6'8"-6'10", true giant 6'10" +??
Shaun said on 16/Oct/11
Yeah if you never dip under 6'3" barefoot all day and are a strong 6'3" that's what I'd consider the start of the very tall range. Extremely tall 6'5.5"-6'8" ramge
Yeah if you never dip under 6'3" barefoot all day and are a strong 6'3" that's what I'd consider the start of the very tall range. Extremely tall 6'5.5"-6'8" ramge
Shaun said on 16/Oct/11
For me a legit 6'3" evening height is the start of very tall.
For me a legit 6'3" evening height is the start of very tall.
Shaun said on 16/Oct/11
Yeah I'd probably agree with you on that Alex. A true giant has to be over 6'10" really but anything over 6'8" for me is the "mark". Cudmore I'd describe as extremely tall but not a "giant". Kim Kardashians husband Chris Humphries at 6'9" to me at times looks a giant or a borderline one.
Yeah I'd probably agree with you on that Alex. A true giant has to be over 6'10" really but anything over 6'8" for me is the "mark". Cudmore I'd describe as extremely tall but not a "giant". Kim Kardashians husband Chris Humphries at 6'9" to me at times looks a giant or a borderline one.
Alex said on 8/Oct/11
Could be 6'6 1/2 compared to Ryan but 6'7 is very possible too.
Could be 6'6 1/2 compared to Ryan but 6'7 is very possible too.
avi said on 6/Oct/11
Rob, looks more like 6'6. especially if compared to 6'4 and change Mcpartlin...
Editor Rob
Rob, looks more like 6'6. especially if compared to 6'4 and change Mcpartlin...
Editor Rob cudmore is at least 2 inches taller in person than ryan is, ryan is very tall but daniel is extremely tall and had 0.4 inch less sneaker than me.
Moke said on 3/Oct/11
So his head is 11 inches long then? wow!
So his head is 11 inches long then? wow!
James said on 2/Oct/11
® says on 29/Sep/11
Jack swagger is 6'5 and he looks normal,james.
Swagger looks very bioo me and can even look bigger than 6'5 with his hairstyle like 6'6-6'7.
® says on 29/Sep/11
Jack swagger is 6'5 and he looks normal,james.
Swagger looks very bioo me and can even look bigger than 6'5 with his hairstyle like 6'6-6'7.
Alex said on 30/Sep/11
I would say
5'11-6'0- above average/tall
6'1-6'3- solid tall
6'4-6'6- very tall
6'7-6'9- extreme tall
6'10 plus- giant
I would say
5'11-6'0- above average/tall
6'1-6'3- solid tall
6'4-6'6- very tall
6'7-6'9- extreme tall
6'10 plus- giant
Alex said on 30/Sep/11
6'7-6'9 is the extreme tall range I could agree on. When I think of giant I'd think of 6'10 or taller. Usually people think of 7'0 or more as a giant.
6'7-6'9 is the extreme tall range I could agree on. When I think of giant I'd think of 6'10 or taller. Usually people think of 7'0 or more as a giant.
Vegas said on 30/Sep/11
triplescrew those are really good, can you do one for cudmore, ian whyte and michael kingma (three tallest men photographed next to rob)
triplescrew those are really good, can you do one for cudmore, ian whyte and michael kingma (three tallest men photographed next to rob)
LAN Jiao said on 30/Sep/11
Mr.awesome would be 5-6cm under cudmore. 6'7 flat cudmore also look awesome.
Mr.awesome would be 5-6cm under cudmore. 6'7 flat cudmore also look awesome.
® said on 29/Sep/11
Jack swagger is 6'5 and he looks normal,james.
Jack swagger is 6'5 and he looks normal,james.
LAN Jiao said on 28/Sep/11
up here rob mention cudmore wore 0.6 converse but i did believe it is less than 0.6 while cumore is a very big guy probably 230pounds so his heavy after wore in the converse could be 0.35-0.4(1cm flat or under) therefore i can tell a giant 200cm daniel cudmore is easily over 2inch taller than armie hammer. because armie not 6ft5 , if you compare him to "6ft" leo di caprio he was big 4inch taller.
Editor Rob
up here rob mention cudmore wore 0.6 converse but i did believe it is less than 0.6 while cumore is a very big guy probably 230pounds so his heavy after wore in the converse could be 0.35-0.4(1cm flat or under) therefore i can tell a giant 200cm daniel cudmore is easily over 2inch taller than armie hammer. because armie not 6ft5 , if you compare him to "6ft" leo di caprio he was big 4inch taller.
Editor Rob I doubt they shrinked much
James said on 23/Sep/11
Shaun says on 19/Sep/11
A well-built 6'5" though generally looks normal. I mean you see pictures of Armie Hammer and he doesn't look freaky, far from it. Sometimes 6'5" can even look only tall rather than super tall. Even Cudmore here looks normal. Peter Crouch on the other hand does look freaky because he is extremely skinny.
Well Armmie could be 1 or 2cm less than 6'5 in my opinion. certainly tim robbins looks not normal height in photos. If you look at Ralf Moller who is 6'5-6'6 he looks far from normal sized in pics as well.
i think 6'4 is normal too a degree but i am not sure i would give 6'5 that label? i would defenintnly call 6'5 'super tall'. even 6'3 or 6'4 be branded as super sized.
Shaun says on 19/Sep/11
A well-built 6'5" though generally looks normal. I mean you see pictures of Armie Hammer and he doesn't look freaky, far from it. Sometimes 6'5" can even look only tall rather than super tall. Even Cudmore here looks normal. Peter Crouch on the other hand does look freaky because he is extremely skinny.
Well Armmie could be 1 or 2cm less than 6'5 in my opinion. certainly tim robbins looks not normal height in photos. If you look at Ralf Moller who is 6'5-6'6 he looks far from normal sized in pics as well.
i think 6'4 is normal too a degree but i am not sure i would give 6'5 that label? i would defenintnly call 6'5 'super tall'. even 6'3 or 6'4 be branded as super sized.
xyz.reg(6 ft 1.5 in) said on 20/Sep/11
A legit 6ft 7in person..
@Balthier Hahahahahahaha..man dat was a gud 1..rofl..!!!
A legit 6ft 7in person..
@Balthier Hahahahahahaha..man dat was a gud 1..rofl..!!!
Shaun said on 19/Sep/11
A well-built 6'5" though generally looks normal. I mean you see pictures of Armie Hammer and he doesn't look freaky, far from it. Sometimes 6'5" can even look only tall rather than super tall. Even Cudmore here looks normal. Peter Crouch on the other hand does look freaky because he is extremely skinny.
A well-built 6'5" though generally looks normal. I mean you see pictures of Armie Hammer and he doesn't look freaky, far from it. Sometimes 6'5" can even look only tall rather than super tall. Even Cudmore here looks normal. Peter Crouch on the other hand does look freaky because he is extremely skinny.
James said on 18/Sep/11
Shaun says on 13/Sep/11
If you are a legitimiate 6 ft 8 I think that is the start of where your proportions would literally start to look giant like so you could argue anything over 6'8" is a giant. But a true giant in the sense of not human like and looking like something from a circus show or children's story has to be 6'10" at least. Cudmore I would place in extremely tall range.
I have heard people describe '6'5' as being circus show material. Although 6'5 is super tall i don't know about circus material? I know 6'4 is 'big' but it is defenintly not circus like since i had friends who were that tall. the thing is i rarely see legit 6'5 guys around and i don't have any friends who are that tall either.
Shaun says on 13/Sep/11
If you are a legitimiate 6 ft 8 I think that is the start of where your proportions would literally start to look giant like so you could argue anything over 6'8" is a giant. But a true giant in the sense of not human like and looking like something from a circus show or children's story has to be 6'10" at least. Cudmore I would place in extremely tall range.
I have heard people describe '6'5' as being circus show material. Although 6'5 is super tall i don't know about circus material? I know 6'4 is 'big' but it is defenintly not circus like since i had friends who were that tall. the thing is i rarely see legit 6'5 guys around and i don't have any friends who are that tall either.
Kostas said on 14/Sep/11
Cranberries,I know for sure that i do NOT,even if he is around a foot taller than me
i prefer being able to fit in cars and airplane seats
Cranberries,I know for sure that i do NOT,even if he is around a foot taller than me
i prefer being able to fit in cars and airplane seats
Shaun said on 13/Sep/11
If you are a legitimiate 6 ft 8 I think that is the start of where your proportions would literally start to look giant like so you could argue anything over 6'8" is a giant. But a true giant in the sense of not human like and looking like something from a circus show or children's story has to be 6'10" at least. Cudmore I would place in extremely tall range.
If you are a legitimiate 6 ft 8 I think that is the start of where your proportions would literally start to look giant like so you could argue anything over 6'8" is a giant. But a true giant in the sense of not human like and looking like something from a circus show or children's story has to be 6'10" at least. Cudmore I would place in extremely tall range.
Shaun said on 13/Sep/11
A true giant I'd agree is 6'10" or over. But if you measure 6'9" barefoot last thing at night hard to deny that's a giant...
A true giant I'd agree is 6'10" or over. But if you measure 6'9" barefoot last thing at night hard to deny that's a giant...
Shaun said on 13/Sep/11
Balthier says on 11/Sep/11
It's hillarious to see how much smaller Rob and Jenny are compared to Daniel. They look like his kids.
And Jenny's a tall woman too, sure she towers a lot of short women.
Balthier says on 11/Sep/11
It's hillarious to see how much smaller Rob and Jenny are compared to Daniel. They look like his kids.
And Jenny's a tall woman too, sure she towers a lot of short women.
James said on 11/Sep/11
Greenbolt says on 10/Sep/11
People keep debating as to where "very tall" ends and where "giant" begins. Personally, I think there's a category in between very tall and giant. Maybe like "extremely tall", where you're out of the norm, but not quite tall enough to be considered a giant. Here's my tall chart:
6'0'' to 6'1''- typical tall
6'2 to 6'3''- solid tall
6'4'' to 6'5'' very tall
6'6'' to 6'9''- extremely tall
6'10''+ giant
Cudmore is in the "extremely tall" range in my opinion.
Actually i would label 6'7-6'9 range as gigantic
Greenbolt says on 10/Sep/11
People keep debating as to where "very tall" ends and where "giant" begins. Personally, I think there's a category in between very tall and giant. Maybe like "extremely tall", where you're out of the norm, but not quite tall enough to be considered a giant. Here's my tall chart:
6'0'' to 6'1''- typical tall
6'2 to 6'3''- solid tall
6'4'' to 6'5'' very tall
6'6'' to 6'9''- extremely tall
6'10''+ giant
Cudmore is in the "extremely tall" range in my opinion.
Actually i would label 6'7-6'9 range as gigantic
Balthier said on 11/Sep/11
It's hillarious to see how much smaller Rob and Jenny are compared to Daniel. They look like his kids.
It's hillarious to see how much smaller Rob and Jenny are compared to Daniel. They look like his kids.
Greenbolt said on 10/Sep/11
People keep debating as to where "very tall" ends and where "giant" begins. Personally, I think there's a category in between very tall and giant. Maybe like "extremely tall", where you're out of the norm, but not quite tall enough to be considered a giant. Here's my tall chart:
6'0'' to 6'1''- typical tall
6'2 to 6'3''- solid tall
6'4'' to 6'5'' very tall
6'6'' to 6'9''- extremely tall
6'10''+ giant
Cudmore is in the "extremely tall" range in my opinion.
People keep debating as to where "very tall" ends and where "giant" begins. Personally, I think there's a category in between very tall and giant. Maybe like "extremely tall", where you're out of the norm, but not quite tall enough to be considered a giant. Here's my tall chart:
6'0'' to 6'1''- typical tall
6'2 to 6'3''- solid tall
6'4'' to 6'5'' very tall
6'6'' to 6'9''- extremely tall
6'10''+ giant
Cudmore is in the "extremely tall" range in my opinion.
James said on 7/Sep/11
Alex says on 6/Sep/11
6'7 is very tall. I dont think its in the giant range yet. I'd not wanna be 6'7. 6'7 is the height where it'll tower over guys 6'2-6'3 and show you how tall it really is.
I think 6'7 is a little more than just 'very tall'. although you could say that 6'7 flat is right at the upper end off very tall. I mean come on alex a 6'7-6'8 man would tower over a 6'2-6'3 guy so i don't see whats wrong about 202cm being the start off a giant. just look at peter crouch.
Alex says on 6/Sep/11
6'7 is very tall. I dont think its in the giant range yet. I'd not wanna be 6'7. 6'7 is the height where it'll tower over guys 6'2-6'3 and show you how tall it really is.
I think 6'7 is a little more than just 'very tall'. although you could say that 6'7 flat is right at the upper end off very tall. I mean come on alex a 6'7-6'8 man would tower over a 6'2-6'3 guy so i don't see whats wrong about 202cm being the start off a giant. just look at peter crouch.
lan jiao said on 7/Sep/11
i think in mall thats less chance to see someone tall as daniel cudmore 199-200cm. as skinny 160pounds and 195cm with a regular 1.2in boots on a day shop in a mall im greatly tall in the mall by a few would stare at me in a day im use to it. cudmore walks in the mall would get more attention for sure.
i think in mall thats less chance to see someone tall as daniel cudmore 199-200cm. as skinny 160pounds and 195cm with a regular 1.2in boots on a day shop in a mall im greatly tall in the mall by a few would stare at me in a day im use to it. cudmore walks in the mall would get more attention for sure.
Legend said on 7/Sep/11
6'7 is a giant. Why is 6'7 not a giant? It has to be when you are that much taller than tall guys.
6'7 is a giant. Why is 6'7 not a giant? It has to be when you are that much taller than tall guys.
Alex said on 6/Sep/11
6'7 is very tall. I dont think its in the giant range yet. I'd not wanna be 6'7. 6'7 is the height where it'll tower over guys 6'2-6'3 and show you how tall it really is.
6'7 is very tall. I dont think its in the giant range yet. I'd not wanna be 6'7. 6'7 is the height where it'll tower over guys 6'2-6'3 and show you how tall it really is.
Alex said on 6/Sep/11
Looks more 6'6 and change. Still a very tall guy.
Looks more 6'6 and change. Still a very tall guy.
James said on 2/Sep/11
6'7 1/2 in my opinion is the true start off a giant and i agree 6'7 is too tall.
6'1-6'2 range is optimum perfect height for men and 6ft and 6'3 are good as well although not quite the perfect heights. A lot of people think 6'3 is too tall so obviously A LOT more people will think 6'7 is too big.
A 6'7 man would tower over a 6'3 man too give you an idea of just how big it is.
6'7 1/2 in my opinion is the true start off a giant and i agree 6'7 is too tall.
6'1-6'2 range is optimum perfect height for men and 6ft and 6'3 are good as well although not quite the perfect heights. A lot of people think 6'3 is too tall so obviously A LOT more people will think 6'7 is too big.
A 6'7 man would tower over a 6'3 man too give you an idea of just how big it is.
Hansen said on 1/Sep/11
i think 6ft7 is too tall while hits a giant range. 6ft6 were huge. im 6ft5 and always quoted by people that im in the very tall range. cudmore is probably strong 6ft6.5 if not 6ft7 hes in e huge range. 6ft7 could mean 200cm or 201cm, im sure morning he easily hit each.
i think 6ft7 is too tall while hits a giant range. 6ft6 were huge. im 6ft5 and always quoted by people that im in the very tall range. cudmore is probably strong 6ft6.5 if not 6ft7 hes in e huge range. 6ft7 could mean 200cm or 201cm, im sure morning he easily hit each.
Hansen said on 22/Aug/11
thanks mamun! :)
but if mamun you wore 0.5in here and he is 173.5cm added about 1.25cm makes you 5ft8.75 , so mamun about 174.75cm next to a solid 10in under cudmore estimated. cudmore was only 200cm in converse. emm...so he could be under 200cm in reality possible??!.. maybe he hover 198.5~199cm barefoot and was measure out 200(6ft7-flat)-201(6ft7.25) morning.
thanks mamun! :)
but if mamun you wore 0.5in here and he is 173.5cm added about 1.25cm makes you 5ft8.75 , so mamun about 174.75cm next to a solid 10in under cudmore estimated. cudmore was only 200cm in converse. emm...so he could be under 200cm in reality possible??!.. maybe he hover 198.5~199cm barefoot and was measure out 200(6ft7-flat)-201(6ft7.25) morning.
Mamun said on 18/Aug/11
I do ! Hansen , my boots don't give me 1.2 inchs ! They only give me .5 inchs ! Please check out my picture with WILLIAM FORSTY ! Regards SUPERMUN
I do ! Hansen , my boots don't give me 1.2 inchs ! They only give me .5 inchs ! Please check out my picture with WILLIAM FORSTY ! Regards SUPERMUN
Cranberries (18m, 193cm) said on 17/Aug/11
Perfect male height... Do any other guys envy him?
Perfect male height... Do any other guys envy him?
leo said on 17/Aug/11
solid 6ft 6.75 inches max. Basically hits 200cm right on dot.
solid 6ft 6.75 inches max. Basically hits 200cm right on dot.
Hansen said on 17/Aug/11
he does look a full 10inch on mamun. i believe mamun stand 173-173.5 added 1.2inch boots/shoe so mamun abt max 176.5cm with shoe disadvantge than daniel 1.5cm converse style. roughly daniel stand at 201.5cm w shoe. so 200cm barefoot for him is greatly fair. he hover 200cm. ;)
he does look a full 10inch on mamun. i believe mamun stand 173-173.5 added 1.2inch boots/shoe so mamun abt max 176.5cm with shoe disadvantge than daniel 1.5cm converse style. roughly daniel stand at 201.5cm w shoe. so 200cm barefoot for him is greatly fair. he hover 200cm. ;)
FiveNine said on 15/Aug/11
On the Subject of Towering.....And who said you can't take it with You!!!
On the Subject of Towering.....And who said you can't take it with You!!!
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 15/Aug/11
6ft5 is a bit low. Up against 5ft8, the height difference wouldn't be as lengthy as it is in these pics.
However he could be 199cm-200cm instead of the full 6ft7(201cm) because with Rob and Jenny he only looks 6ft6(198cm) and is only bending a little.
6ft5 is a bit low. Up against 5ft8, the height difference wouldn't be as lengthy as it is in these pics.
However he could be 199cm-200cm instead of the full 6ft7(201cm) because with Rob and Jenny he only looks 6ft6(198cm) and is only bending a little.
Mathew said on 31/Jul/11
I can't help but look at the pic w/ Rob and see a hair under 6'6".
I can't help but look at the pic w/ Rob and see a hair under 6'6".
5'8.56784 said on 28/Jul/11
199.9999999cm, nothing more. Max 200,999999999999cm. Lol
199.9999999cm, nothing more. Max 200,999999999999cm. Lol
James said on 7/Jul/11
No way over 6'7.
No way over 6'7.
Candyman said on 3/Jul/11
Very long neck on this guy.
Very long neck on this guy.
5'8.18758596 said on 2/Jul/11
He might even be slightly taller than 6'7.
He might even be slightly taller than 6'7.
Terryman said on 30/Jun/11
1,99.5 meters nothing more!
1,99.5 meters nothing more!
Mathew said on 23/Jun/11
He can look barely 6'6" or the full 6'7". With Rob he looks 6'6" max.
He can look barely 6'6" or the full 6'7". With Rob he looks 6'6" max.
micheal said on 17/Jun/11
very tall guy looks about 10 inches taller than Rob in the photo and considering the shoes he is at least 6'6.5 and could very well be 6'7"
very tall guy looks about 10 inches taller than Rob in the photo and considering the shoes he is at least 6'6.5 and could very well be 6'7"
James said on 15/Jun/11
6'7 for sure next to 6'1-6'2 Hugh Jackman
6'7 for sure next to 6'1-6'2 Hugh Jackman
Shaun said on 14/Jun/11
Looks 6'7" next to Seagal. Looks 6'7" next to Jackman. Yeah pretty much. Not under 2 metres anyway.
Looks 6'7" next to Seagal. Looks 6'7" next to Jackman. Yeah pretty much. Not under 2 metres anyway.
Collossus from Russia said on 12/Jun/11
HEY ROB, could you be 100% sure this guy is a full 6'7" out of bed, with great posture
Editor Rob
HEY ROB, could you be 100% sure this guy is a full 6'7" out of bed, with great posture
Editor Rob I would bet he was at least 6ft 7 out of bed, but very likely more.
James said on 11/Jun/11
Shaun would you agree he can look 6'7 in pics?
Shaun would you agree he can look 6'7 in pics?
Shaun said on 10/Jun/11
Based on rough gauge of Rob and Mamun 6 foot level is around his top lip area I would estimate. There's got to be a good 7 inches to the top of the head from there.
Based on rough gauge of Rob and Mamun 6 foot level is around his top lip area I would estimate. There's got to be a good 7 inches to the top of the head from there.
Shaun said on 10/Jun/11
Way I look at it is imagine a 6 ft line roughly level with the top of the h on "Twlight" in the background. If you try to visualise 2 inches and then another two inches based on that level , 6'2", 6'4", 6'6" etc then he has to be 6'7" range. He could be 200cm, but no lower than 2 metres however much he can look more 6'6".
Way I look at it is imagine a 6 ft line roughly level with the top of the h on "Twlight" in the background. If you try to visualise 2 inches and then another two inches based on that level , 6'2", 6'4", 6'6" etc then he has to be 6'7" range. He could be 200cm, but no lower than 2 metres however much he can look more 6'6".
James said on 8/Jun/11
i think 6'6.5 would be accurate
i think 6'6.5 would be accurate
James said on 8/Jun/11
6'8 in big shoes?
6'8 in big shoes?
avi said on 7/Jun/11
the thing is he ins't looking 6'7 next to Mamun. looks 6'6. definitely strong 6'6. maybe he is stating his height in shoes??
the thing is he ins't looking 6'7 next to Mamun. looks 6'6. definitely strong 6'6. maybe he is stating his height in shoes??
Dave said on 7/Jun/11
I'd say 202 cm
I'd say 202 cm
Shaun said on 3/Jun/11
Well to me he does look 10 inches taller than Rob he says he has footwear advantange so if he isn't the full 6'7" he is not under 6'6.5". Yes he doesn't give off a freak impression like Peter Crouch or somebody and looks two inches shorter but because he is so well proportioned it doesn't like freakish. To the casual eye he looks like a 6'5"-6'6" guy but if you really imagine a height chart next to Rob who is at least 5'9" in formal shoes then he is not under 2 metres and pretty much as tall as he claims.
Editor Rob
Well to me he does look 10 inches taller than Rob he says he has footwear advantange so if he isn't the full 6'7" he is not under 6'6.5". Yes he doesn't give off a freak impression like Peter Crouch or somebody and looks two inches shorter but because he is so well proportioned it doesn't like freakish. To the casual eye he looks like a 6'5"-6'6" guy but if you really imagine a height chart next to Rob who is at least 5'9" in formal shoes then he is not under 2 metres and pretty much as tall as he claims.
Editor Rob yeah I have a 1-inch boot on, he had a converse so definitely had around 0.4 inches less footwear than me.
James said on 31/May/11
remember with daniel rob has footware advantage. thats probably how tall daniel would look next to a 5'9 man.
remember with daniel rob has footware advantage. thats probably how tall daniel would look next to a 5'9 man.
James said on 31/May/11
I am not sure if Swagger is over 6'5 cuase he looked smaller than the Undertaker
I am not sure if Swagger is over 6'5 cuase he looked smaller than the Undertaker
Vegas said on 31/May/11
@people says on 28/May/11
Yh but i don't beleive jack swagger is just 6'5 vegas, he looks 6'5 1/2-6'6 to me, are you sure you can judge these big heights vegas, perhaps your perception of what 6'5 looks like is wrong?,
__________
i know what 6'5 looks like, 3 of my best friends are 6'4 and i was in college every day with a legit 6'5 rugby player for 2 years, also swagger was clearly shorter in person compared to jon heidenreich who himself was listed 6'6 in pro-football
d wade says on 27/May/11
in the second picture he looks 3 inches taller than 6,5 schwagger
__________
didn't you only see one inch Click Here but 3 inches between kane and swagger??
@people says on 28/May/11
Yh but i don't beleive jack swagger is just 6'5 vegas, he looks 6'5 1/2-6'6 to me, are you sure you can judge these big heights vegas, perhaps your perception of what 6'5 looks like is wrong?,
__________
i know what 6'5 looks like, 3 of my best friends are 6'4 and i was in college every day with a legit 6'5 rugby player for 2 years, also swagger was clearly shorter in person compared to jon heidenreich who himself was listed 6'6 in pro-football
d wade says on 27/May/11
in the second picture he looks 3 inches taller than 6,5 schwagger
__________
didn't you only see one inch Click Here but 3 inches between kane and swagger??
James said on 30/May/11
Swagger looks 195cm to me
Swagger looks 195cm to me
Mohammed said on 29/May/11
Doubt he's any taller than 6'6
Doubt he's any taller than 6'6
Derek d said on 26/May/11
Vegas says on 25/May/11
i have met glen jacobs a number of times and he isn't taller than 6'7 in fact with ~6'5 people like jack swagger in photos he looks shorter (i have also met swagger) Click Here i would be very surprised if jacobs is taller than cudmore let alone 1.5-2 inches taller
He does not look shorter than 6'5 Swagger in that photo, especially in the others. You are counting Swagger's hair. Height ends where the top of your head ends, not where your spikey hair ends. Jacobs a good 2 inches taller in both pics considering he's also further away from the camera. Other than that good post, I agree Jacobs is the same height as Cudmore.
Vegas says on 25/May/11
i have met glen jacobs a number of times and he isn't taller than 6'7 in fact with ~6'5 people like jack swagger in photos he looks shorter (i have also met swagger) Click Here i would be very surprised if jacobs is taller than cudmore let alone 1.5-2 inches taller
He does not look shorter than 6'5 Swagger in that photo, especially in the others. You are counting Swagger's hair. Height ends where the top of your head ends, not where your spikey hair ends. Jacobs a good 2 inches taller in both pics considering he's also further away from the camera. Other than that good post, I agree Jacobs is the same height as Cudmore.
James said on 26/May/11
LOL glenn jacobs does not look to happy in your photo Vegas
LOL glenn jacobs does not look to happy in your photo Vegas
TruebloodFan said on 25/May/11
more of a 6'6''.
more of a 6'6''.
James said on 23/May/11
i doubt he's the full 201cm.
i doubt he's the full 201cm.
J.J. said on 23/May/11
Looks 6'6" I think he isn't as tall as 6'7"
Looks 6'6" I think he isn't as tall as 6'7"
James said on 21/May/11
I agree 6'7 does seem kinda extreme for Cudmore
I agree 6'7 does seem kinda extreme for Cudmore
Mathew said on 20/May/11
Compare Cudmore with Rob and Mamun. Who does he look nearer in height to?
George Hertzberg (194 - 195 cm):
Click Here
Or Kane (202 cm):
Click Here
He looks like he'd fall about dead on between the two at best, if anything I think he looks closer to George Hertzberg's height; so that would suggest 6'6" max. Counting a .4" footware disadvantage above, he's no more than 199 cm.
Compare Cudmore with Rob and Mamun. Who does he look nearer in height to?
George Hertzberg (194 - 195 cm):
Click Here
Or Kane (202 cm):
Click Here
He looks like he'd fall about dead on between the two at best, if anything I think he looks closer to George Hertzberg's height; so that would suggest 6'6" max. Counting a .4" footware disadvantage above, he's no more than 199 cm.
Mathew said on 20/May/11
He doesn't look like he'd only be .5" shorter than 6'7.5" Kane to me, comparing the pics. Especially with Rob and Jenny.
He doesn't look like he'd only be .5" shorter than 6'7.5" Kane to me, comparing the pics. Especially with Rob and Jenny.
runt said on 19/May/11
I don't see 11". Isn't bottom of chin @ top of head only 8-9"? Maybe his head is abnormally long, it's certainly a lot longer than Mamun's.
I don't see 11". Isn't bottom of chin @ top of head only 8-9"? Maybe his head is abnormally long, it's certainly a lot longer than Mamun's.
James said on 18/May/11
maybe a bit ecto/meso? still for a 6'7 man he's built well and has good proportions.
maybe a bit ecto/meso? still for a 6'7 man he's built well and has good proportions.
Cranberries (6 ft. 3.25 evening, 17 years) said on 18/May/11
I think he's more of an endomorph. His face tells me he's been fat at some point during his life.
I think he's more of an endomorph. His face tells me he's been fat at some point during his life.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 17/May/11
That is not a mesomorph!
That is not a mesomorph!
PatB said on 16/May/11
You have three staff who get photographed next to the celebrities - but they are all almost exactly the same height!!! Surely you could have at least one large person and one short person. You need someone about 6'4" for the tall guys and someone about 5'0" for the small women.
You have three staff who get photographed next to the celebrities - but they are all almost exactly the same height!!! Surely you could have at least one large person and one short person. You need someone about 6'4" for the tall guys and someone about 5'0" for the small women.
James said on 14/May/11
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 14/May/11
This guy looks on the skinny side aswell...
Disagree he actually looks quite mesomorphic too me. i mean he's has not got the build of say Scott L Schwartz and is by no means a classic mesomorph but i'd say he's medium build not a full blown ectomorph like peter crouch.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 14/May/11
This guy looks on the skinny side aswell...
Disagree he actually looks quite mesomorphic too me. i mean he's has not got the build of say Scott L Schwartz and is by no means a classic mesomorph but i'd say he's medium build not a full blown ectomorph like peter crouch.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 14/May/11
This guy looks on the skinny side aswell...
This guy looks on the skinny side aswell...
James said on 12/May/11
He might 'look' 2 inches taller becuase crouch is super skinny and lanky at 6'7. I mean LOL Crouch only weighs like 175 lbs. and with him being slightly taller than cudmore could easily give o fthe illusion of being 2 inches bigger. i know a guy who is 6'2.25 (189cm) who is built like peter crouch and looks 6'4. i know someone as well who apprently is 6'3.5 who is fat and out of shape and looks 6'2 becuase of his build.
So
Peter Crouch 6'7.5 (202cm)
Daniel Cudmore 6'6.75 (200cm)
He might 'look' 2 inches taller becuase crouch is super skinny and lanky at 6'7. I mean LOL Crouch only weighs like 175 lbs. and with him being slightly taller than cudmore could easily give o fthe illusion of being 2 inches bigger. i know a guy who is 6'2.25 (189cm) who is built like peter crouch and looks 6'4. i know someone as well who apprently is 6'3.5 who is fat and out of shape and looks 6'2 becuase of his build.
So
Peter Crouch 6'7.5 (202cm)
Daniel Cudmore 6'6.75 (200cm)
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 11/May/11
201cm is fine...and Shaun WTF are you saying?
If Crouch is 2 inches taller than Cudmore that makes him 6"9
201cm is fine...and Shaun WTF are you saying?
If Crouch is 2 inches taller than Cudmore that makes him 6"9
Shaun said on 10/May/11
Peter Crouch looks two inches taller than Cudmore..
Peter Crouch looks two inches taller than Cudmore..
James said on 9/May/11
Yeah Shaun i agree. I think Daniel is like Stephen Merchant 'barely' 6'7 unlike Peter Crouch who is close to 6'8 and has very lanky proportions.
Yeah Shaun i agree. I think Daniel is like Stephen Merchant 'barely' 6'7 unlike Peter Crouch who is close to 6'8 and has very lanky proportions.
Shaun said on 6/May/11
Does look 199cm in Rob's picture I agree.
Does look 199cm in Rob's picture I agree.
Shaun said on 6/May/11
To me James he looks around 200cm, weak 6'7".
To me James he looks around 200cm, weak 6'7".
James said on 3/May/11
looks about 2 inches shorter than 6'8 in the photos. in reality though he might be 3cm under the 6'8 mark.
looks about 2 inches shorter than 6'8 in the photos. in reality though he might be 3cm under the 6'8 mark.
James said on 2/May/11
Vegas says on 2/May/11
cudmore is 6 inches taller than jackman in that photo james
Yeah he does look 6'8 in comparison.
In Reality maybe
Daniel Cudmore 6'6.75 (200cm)
Hugh Jackman 6'1.5 (187cm)
Vegas says on 2/May/11
cudmore is 6 inches taller than jackman in that photo james
Yeah he does look 6'8 in comparison.
In Reality maybe
Daniel Cudmore 6'6.75 (200cm)
Hugh Jackman 6'1.5 (187cm)
Vegas said on 2/May/11
cudmore is 6 inches taller than jackman in that photo james
cudmore is 6 inches taller than jackman in that photo james
Lenad said on 2/May/11
Looks 6'6-ish to me
Looks 6'6-ish to me
James said on 1/May/11
Mathew says on 30/Apr/11
James says on 28/Apr/11
I still think there is a chance he is slightly under 6'7.
I agree, in fact I think it's a good chance.
with hugh jackman who is not over 6'2 daniel does look a very solid 6'7 but then again hugh is slouching.
Click Here
Mathew says on 30/Apr/11
James says on 28/Apr/11
I still think there is a chance he is slightly under 6'7.
I agree, in fact I think it's a good chance.
with hugh jackman who is not over 6'2 daniel does look a very solid 6'7 but then again hugh is slouching.
Click Here
Mathew said on 30/Apr/11
James says on 28/Apr/11
I still think there is a chance he is slightly under 6'7.
I agree, in fact I think it's a good chance.
James says on 28/Apr/11
I still think there is a chance he is slightly under 6'7.
I agree, in fact I think it's a good chance.
James said on 28/Apr/11
I still think there is a chance he is slightly under 6'7.
I still think there is a chance he is slightly under 6'7.
James said on 24/Apr/11
to be fair to daniel he is nodding his head down just slightly with rob and probably not standing at his tallest so appearing 6'6 with relaxed posture.
in photos he does not look 6'7 to me.
to be fair to daniel he is nodding his head down just slightly with rob and probably not standing at his tallest so appearing 6'6 with relaxed posture.
in photos he does not look 6'7 to me.
Candyman said on 17/Apr/11
I see 6'7"....Who want some??
I see 6'7"....Who want some??
James said on 15/Apr/11
Who cares if he's 1 inch taller there both giants
Who cares if he's 1 inch taller there both giants
James R said on 14/Apr/11
he is an inch taller than his brother Canadian international rugby Jamie Cudmore who is 6 ft 6 in
he is an inch taller than his brother Canadian international rugby Jamie Cudmore who is 6 ft 6 in
James said on 13/Apr/11
Well there only pics if rob said he looked 6'7 then he is. but yes i agree 6'6 is what i see with rob.
Well there only pics if rob said he looked 6'7 then he is. but yes i agree 6'6 is what i see with rob.
LG69 said on 12/Apr/11
6'7" is right on the nose. To "123" who said he looks 6'5" at best--please, he is taller than 6'5".
6'7" is right on the nose. To "123" who said he looks 6'5" at best--please, he is taller than 6'5".
fair assessment said on 12/Apr/11
He is a legit 6' 6 in these photos, definitely not 6'7. He is 6'7 with 1 inch shoes and 6' 6 barefoot.
He is a legit 6' 6 in these photos, definitely not 6'7. He is 6'7 with 1 inch shoes and 6' 6 barefoot.
Legend said on 9/Apr/11
He looks 6'6 to me.
He looks 6'6 to me.
Mathew said on 9/Apr/11
I think Cudimore isn't looking more than 6'6" range with Rob. Compare that picture to Josh Homme who is 6'4" standing beside Brody Dalle who like Rob is 5'8" for comparison.
Click Here
It's clear Cudmore would be the taller of the two but I don't think by as much as 3". Next to Mamun, he's nearing 6'7" but maybe not quite even still.
I think Cudimore isn't looking more than 6'6" range with Rob. Compare that picture to Josh Homme who is 6'4" standing beside Brody Dalle who like Rob is 5'8" for comparison.
Click Here
It's clear Cudmore would be the taller of the two but I don't think by as much as 3". Next to Mamun, he's nearing 6'7" but maybe not quite even still.
James said on 4/Apr/11
Well 6'7 it is then even though he does look more 6'6 in the photos.
Rob please don't take offense but since you are 5'8 it cannot be easy to figure an exact estimate for someone so tall like Daniel even if you meet them in person.....?
Editor Rob
Well 6'7 it is then even though he does look more 6'6 in the photos.
Rob please don't take offense but since you are 5'8 it cannot be easy to figure an exact estimate for someone so tall like Daniel even if you meet them in person.....?
Editor Rob well, there's a lot you can do to improve guessing. The further away the harder it can be but what I've tried to do over the years of this site is to 'program' the old noggin to better recognise 5ft 10, 11, 6ft 3,4 etc. I've used the stadiometer and people I know as the basis for that. I have measured many family/friends whose height I know exactly and this all helps reinforce what certain heights look like from my perspective.
Add in other people whose height I know who also stand beside a celebrity and this helps a bit aswell.
Add in other people whose height I know who also stand beside a celebrity and this helps a bit aswell.
James said on 2/Apr/11
Rob could 6'6.75 (200cm) be a possiblitly for Daniel?
Editor Rob
Rob could 6'6.75 (200cm) be a possiblitly for Daniel?
Editor Rob 6ft 7 is pretty fair for him I think
Legend said on 31/Mar/11
Looks more like 6'6 to be honest.
Looks more like 6'6 to be honest.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 26/Mar/11
More like 198-199cm or a solid 6ft6 with Rob and Jenny
More like 198-199cm or a solid 6ft6 with Rob and Jenny
James said on 24/Mar/11
similar to how big ralf moellear would look if he had a photo taken with rob
similar to how big ralf moellear would look if he had a photo taken with rob
Mathew said on 19/Mar/11
I think he looks more 6'6" than 6'5" next to Rob. Although he certainly doesn't look as tall as 6'7". He looks like he's a weak 6'6" next to Rob, and maybe a weak 6'7" next to Mamun, not a legitimate 6'7" in any of these pics.
I think he looks more 6'6" than 6'5" next to Rob. Although he certainly doesn't look as tall as 6'7". He looks like he's a weak 6'6" next to Rob, and maybe a weak 6'7" next to Mamun, not a legitimate 6'7" in any of these pics.
James said on 17/Mar/11
i thought he looked 6'5 in the pic
shaun yes 6'4 is a legit very tall height indeed.
i thought he looked 6'5 in the pic
shaun yes 6'4 is a legit very tall height indeed.
Matt said on 17/Mar/11
rob this guy really looks near 6ft 7 with you, yet the photo compasison thing shows 6ft 5 and a bit?
Click Here
have i done something wrong or is he really in the 6ft 5 range
Editor Rob
rob this guy really looks near 6ft 7 with you, yet the photo compasison thing shows 6ft 5 and a bit?
Click Here
have i done something wrong or is he really in the 6ft 5 range
Editor Rob in a photo thing he would come in near 6ft 6, then add on 0.4 inches for footwear.
He looked at least 2 inches taller in person than romero does without considering footwear.
He looked at least 2 inches taller in person than romero does without considering footwear.
Shaun said on 16/Mar/11
Well I normally think anybody over 6'4" legit barefoot is in the excessively tall range. A true 6 ft 4 is very tall indeed but 6'7" is insane..
Well I normally think anybody over 6'4" legit barefoot is in the excessively tall range. A true 6 ft 4 is very tall indeed but 6'7" is insane..
Mathew said on 8/Mar/11
Yeah, judging by the pics with Rob and Mamun and his interview (he really hesitated before saying 6'7") I'm thinking he's close to the full 6'7" but a little under it, like 199 - 200 cm.
Yeah, judging by the pics with Rob and Mamun and his interview (he really hesitated before saying 6'7") I'm thinking he's close to the full 6'7" but a little under it, like 199 - 200 cm.
James said on 7/Mar/11
Peter Crouch looks taller probably as well becuase he is dispraportionate. Trust me some 6'2 guys with Peter Crouches build can look very tall whereas other 6'2 guys with a build like Mick Foleys just look tall, tallish or only a few inches above average.
It could the case with Cudmore and Crouch since Daniel is better proportioned.
Peter Crouch looks taller probably as well becuase he is dispraportionate. Trust me some 6'2 guys with Peter Crouches build can look very tall whereas other 6'2 guys with a build like Mick Foleys just look tall, tallish or only a few inches above average.
It could the case with Cudmore and Crouch since Daniel is better proportioned.
Matt said on 5/Mar/11
did he look 6ft 7 in person?
Editor Rob
did he look 6ft 7 in person?
Editor Rob I think he looked at least 6ft 6-6.5 range so add 0.4 inch and if he's not 6ft 7 I'd be surprised.
lillo thomas said on 4/Mar/11
In the pics with rob and mamum he look 6-6 .
In the pics with rob and mamum he look 6-6 .
Mathew said on 3/Mar/11
Vegas says on 1/Mar/11
mathew you have barkley at 6'4.5, if thats right then novoselic ain't 6'7 Click Here
I agree Barkley looks a minnimum of 6'5.5" there I just wish we could see the floor, he side closer to Krsit at one point and looses like .75".
Vegas says on 1/Mar/11
mathew you have barkley at 6'4.5, if thats right then novoselic ain't 6'7 Click Here
I agree Barkley looks a minnimum of 6'5.5" there I just wish we could see the floor, he side closer to Krsit at one point and looses like .75".
SolidSnake said on 3/Mar/11
For a 6'7 he looks well built. Probably like 220 or 230 pounds
For a 6'7 he looks well built. Probably like 220 or 230 pounds
Vegas said on 1/Mar/11
mathew you have barkley at 6'4.5, if thats right then novoselic ain't 6'7 Click Here
mathew you have barkley at 6'4.5, if thats right then novoselic ain't 6'7 Click Here
Mathew said on 27/Feb/11
He looks under 6'7" to me in all three pictures. I'd buy 6'6" - 6'6.5" though. A couple of legitimate 6'7" guys are Peter Crouch and Krist Novoselic, they would be taller than this dude for sure.
He looks under 6'7" to me in all three pictures. I'd buy 6'6" - 6'6.5" though. A couple of legitimate 6'7" guys are Peter Crouch and Krist Novoselic, they would be taller than this dude for sure.
James said on 26/Feb/11
Daniel is 6'6.5 (199cm). he would be the height of peter crouch in shoes.
Daniel is 6'6.5 (199cm). he would be the height of peter crouch in shoes.
SolidSnake said on 26/Feb/11
He is at the height where you have to duck under virtually every door frame in the world. Sucks lol
He is at the height where you have to duck under virtually every door frame in the world. Sucks lol
Moke said on 25/Feb/11
As he has exactly one full head on Rob he should be around 6'6.5 max. Like 173cm+25cm (?)
As he has exactly one full head on Rob he should be around 6'6.5 max. Like 173cm+25cm (?)
James said on 25/Feb/11
Anonymous says on 24/Feb/11
He puts peter crouch to shame, 6'7 doen't look so bad now after looking at this, it's hard just hard to believe he and crouch are the same height
If Crouch had equal footware to rob i am sure peter would appear 1.5 inches taller than daniel in the pic because crouch could be 6'7 1/2. Anyway Cudmore does not look over 6'6 in the photo. I think 199cm is Daniels real height.
Anonymous says on 24/Feb/11
He puts peter crouch to shame, 6'7 doen't look so bad now after looking at this, it's hard just hard to believe he and crouch are the same height
If Crouch had equal footware to rob i am sure peter would appear 1.5 inches taller than daniel in the pic because crouch could be 6'7 1/2. Anyway Cudmore does not look over 6'6 in the photo. I think 199cm is Daniels real height.
Shaun said on 24/Feb/11
Yeah but he does not look a giant does he. He looks pretty normal, even if he's a lot higher than the majority.
Yeah but he does not look a giant does he. He looks pretty normal, even if he's a lot higher than the majority.
SolidSnake said on 23/Feb/11
Very tall. NBA Average is 6 ft 7
Very tall. NBA Average is 6 ft 7
MD said on 23/Feb/11
Shaun, I noticed the same thing. He looks perfectly proportioned.
Shaun, I noticed the same thing. He looks perfectly proportioned.
James said on 22/Feb/11
A giant begins at 6'7 in my opinon.
With rob looks 199cm or 200cm with footware disadvantage. 6'7 guy but no more.
A giant begins at 6'7 in my opinon.
With rob looks 199cm or 200cm with footware disadvantage. 6'7 guy but no more.
Guy Who Normally Comments with Anonymous said on 22/Feb/11
Well wait charts only go up to 6'4. I consider anyone over 6'4-6'4 1/2 "out of normal human height range" Giant would be 6'6 because coming across someone more than 6'5-6'5 is a rarity. Even people above 6'3 is pretty rare. 6'6 + is freak height. come on we are not meant to be this tall. the problems these people will get will reflect that. This guy looks about 6'6 1/2.
Well wait charts only go up to 6'4. I consider anyone over 6'4-6'4 1/2 "out of normal human height range" Giant would be 6'6 because coming across someone more than 6'5-6'5 is a rarity. Even people above 6'3 is pretty rare. 6'6 + is freak height. come on we are not meant to be this tall. the problems these people will get will reflect that. This guy looks about 6'6 1/2.
Bob said on 22/Feb/11
basketball player height a strong 6'7" with shoes. 6'6"- 6'6.5" barefoot.
basketball player height a strong 6'7" with shoes. 6'6"- 6'6.5" barefoot.
Shaun said on 22/Feb/11
Ian Whyte looks a giant. Cudmore just looks very tall I think, maybe a giant begins at 6'8"...
Ian Whyte looks a giant. Cudmore just looks very tall I think, maybe a giant begins at 6'8"...
Shaun said on 22/Feb/11
The thing is he looks a perfectly normal size, even if he is very tall. I mean you see pictures of Peter Crouch and Stephen Merchant and you think human lampost. I think it must be because he is well proportioned and well built so he doesn't look like he's been stretched but he really doesn't look as tall as Crouch or Merchant. Usually I think of anybody over 6'6" as a giant but he really doesn't look it.
The thing is he looks a perfectly normal size, even if he is very tall. I mean you see pictures of Peter Crouch and Stephen Merchant and you think human lampost. I think it must be because he is well proportioned and well built so he doesn't look like he's been stretched but he really doesn't look as tall as Crouch or Merchant. Usually I think of anybody over 6'6" as a giant but he really doesn't look it.
Shaun said on 22/Feb/11
Did you look a legitimate 6 ft 7 to you Rob? As he'd be standing close to 6'8" right in footwear?
Editor Rob
Did you look a legitimate 6 ft 7 to you Rob? As he'd be standing close to 6'8" right in footwear?
Editor Rob for a tall guy he stood tall with quite a few girls in front of us and Jenny commented after our photo she noticed he was standing tall...I think he is what he claims, not as tall as 6ft 8, but not 6ft 6. Look at Ian Whyte, he is 7ft 1 and I'm 5 inches under his chin...and whyte has a 2cm longer head.
He appeared - taking account 0.4 inch less footwear than me - 2 inches taller in comparison to how actors like Tony Todd or Tom Noonan looked.
He appeared - taking account 0.4 inch less footwear than me - 2 inches taller in comparison to how actors like Tony Todd or Tom Noonan looked.
Shaun said on 22/Feb/11
Looks about 11 inches taller than Rob accounting for his relaxed posture and footwear disadvantage. 6'7" would seem correct.
Looks about 11 inches taller than Rob accounting for his relaxed posture and footwear disadvantage. 6'7" would seem correct.
Heights are barefeet estimates, derived from quotations, official websites, agency resumes, in person encounters with actors at conventions and pictures/films.
Other vital statistics like weight or shoe size measurements have been sourced from newspapers, books, resumes or social media.
Celebrity Fan Photos and Agency Pictures of stars are © to their respective owners.