Hugh Jackman's Height
6ft 1 ½ (186.7 cm)
Peak height was 6ft 2 (188 cm)
Australian actor best known for his role as The Wolverine in the X-Men series of movies. Other notable films include The Prestige, The Greatest Showman, Les Miserables, Australia, Prisoners and Swordfish.
The problem is my Height. I'm 6ft 2in and lean, but in the books [Wolverine is] 5ft 3in and stocky...James Marsden, who played Cyclops, who is only 10cm shorter than me, was put on boxes and platforms in our scenes together. You'll notice that every character in X-Men looked taller than me.
Nicole Kidman & Hugh / Photos by PRPhotos
Before I had any kind of acting profile I was encouraged to lie about my height. I was told to say I was about six foot [1.83m] tall. I was worried about it when I first had my audition because pleasing fans of the franchise is important.. My height was brought up on the Internet. They didn't think it was right. A lot of people who never met me think I'm very short.
If someone's going to spend their time saying, 'You're really not 6' 2"; you're 5' 10",' I'll tell them once, 'I am 6' 2".' Then, whatever you want to believe, it's up to you. Am I going to waste energy going, 'I'm so mad that this person says I'm 5'10"? We really only get mad when there's an element of truth, right?
-- Good Housekeeping, 2013
You May Be Interested
Russell Crowe
5ft 10 ½ (179 cm)
5ft 10 ½ (179 cm)
Gerard Butler
6ft 1 ¼ (186 cm)
6ft 1 ¼ (186 cm)
Ben Affleck
6ft 2 ¼ (189 cm)
6ft 2 ¼ (189 cm)
Ryan Reynolds
6ft 2 (188 cm)
6ft 2 (188 cm)
Add a Comment1281 comments
Average Guess (392 Votes)
Peak: 6ft 2.02in (188cm)
Current: 6ft 1.44in (186.5cm)
Peak: 6ft 2.02in (188cm)
Current: 6ft 1.44in (186.5cm)
MaskDeMasque 5'9.5 said on 1/Oct/24
I think 6'1.5 is too low but I could buy 6'1.75 peak. He was either 6'2 or 6'1.75.
I think 6'1.5 is too low but I could buy 6'1.75 peak. He was either 6'2 or 6'1.75.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 27/Apr/24
He never stands with good posture. I think he can still pull off a decent 187cm....
Peak - no less than 188cm
He never stands with good posture. I think he can still pull off a decent 187cm....
Peak - no less than 188cm
viper said on 26/Nov/23
He was never taller than 6-1.5 imo
He was never taller than 6-1.5 imo
5'7 and a fraction said on 26/Nov/23
Really can't see any less than 6'1 1/2 even today. In recent photos of him with Ryan Reynolds he can actually still pull off looking 6'2. He can definitely look shorter at times with bad posture but other times absolutely nothing under 186.5.
Really can't see any less than 6'1 1/2 even today. In recent photos of him with Ryan Reynolds he can actually still pull off looking 6'2. He can definitely look shorter at times with bad posture but other times absolutely nothing under 186.5.
Slim1.75m said on 23/Nov/23
@Rob has Jackman shrunk anymore he's had 6'1½ for some years now.
Editor Rob
@Rob has Jackman shrunk anymore he's had 6'1½ for some years now.
Editor RobSome people lose a fraction and stabilise. I feel Jackman is in that group. He still seems near 6ft 1.5 if standing tall.
Lenad 5ft9.75ins said on 27/Sep/23
186.7cm today. 187.8cm at peak. Something like that.
186.7cm today. 187.8cm at peak. Something like that.
Lenad 5ft9.75ins said on 19/Sep/23
If anything James B, 6'1 1/2 could be bang on for hugh today. I can buy a full 6'2 for when younger, but probably not more than that.
If anything James B, 6'1 1/2 could be bang on for hugh today. I can buy a full 6'2 for when younger, but probably not more than that.
Ares said on 11/Sep/23
I always thought he was 1.90 m when I was little kid. After seen multiple sources saying he's 1.88 m i wasn't so much of surprised. Definitely 6-7 cm taller than Jake on Prisoners if not more.
I always thought he was 1.90 m when I was little kid. After seen multiple sources saying he's 1.88 m i wasn't so much of surprised. Definitely 6-7 cm taller than Jake on Prisoners if not more.
James B 172cm said on 5/Sep/23
Yeah could be creeping under 6’1 1/2 today
Yeah could be creeping under 6’1 1/2 today
Lenad 5ft9.75ins said on 2/Sep/23
Today a strong 186cm or weak 187cm very believable. I wouldn't go lower than the estimated 186.5cm here though.
Today a strong 186cm or weak 187cm very believable. I wouldn't go lower than the estimated 186.5cm here though.
Canson said on 2/Jun/23
@Rampage: something like 186 today is feasible. Maybe peak height 187-188
@Rampage: something like 186 today is feasible. Maybe peak height 187-188
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 31/May/23
6ft1 flat is ridiculous....
6ft1 flat is ridiculous....
Lenad 5ft9.75ins said on 29/May/23
He's not as low as 6'1 (185cm).
He's not as low as 6'1 (185cm).
Cnowmz said on 22/May/23
6'1
6'1
Tawehret said on 22/May/23
Tall guy alright, rob in the 1950s what do u think was the average height of an Australian man ages 18-30?
Tall guy alright, rob in the 1950s what do u think was the average height of an Australian man ages 18-30?
6'3.75" said on 30/Apr/23
He could pass 5'11" though that's it.
He could pass 5'11" though that's it.
Lenad 5ft9.75ins said on 29/Apr/23
pov I think floating between 187 and 188cm is spot on for younger Jackman. A full 188cm I can definitley buy, not the 189cm he's been listed at though. His lean and muscular physique can give that impression though.
pov I think floating between 187 and 188cm is spot on for younger Jackman. A full 188cm I can definitley buy, not the 189cm he's been listed at though. His lean and muscular physique can give that impression though.
Lenad 5ft9.75ins said on 27/Apr/23
Slim 1.75m I know where you're coming from, he can pull off 189cm (I don't think he's quite that high but) not 190cm, thats a push.
Slim 1.75m I know where you're coming from, he can pull off 189cm (I don't think he's quite that high but) not 190cm, thats a push.
besolo said on 25/Apr/23
My guess
Peak-6'1.5
Current-Solid 6'1
My guess
Peak-6'1.5
Current-Solid 6'1
Lenad 5ft9.75ins said on 24/Apr/23
He's not as low as 6'1. He'd be at least a fraction over that mark.
He's not as low as 6'1. He'd be at least a fraction over that mark.
Slim1.75m said on 18/Apr/23
Really thought he looked 1.89 in Logan
Really thought he looked 1.89 in Logan
5'10.25" said on 9/Apr/23
How can he loose so much height at barely over 50? My dad is 65 and lost maybe half an inch at most, still is comfortably a few mm over 180 cm. 188 cm peak maybe now 187 cm.
How can he loose so much height at barely over 50? My dad is 65 and lost maybe half an inch at most, still is comfortably a few mm over 180 cm. 188 cm peak maybe now 187 cm.
Alex 6'0 said on 4/Apr/23
Looked 6'1 with 5'11.5 Famke Jansen
Looked 6'1 with 5'11.5 Famke Jansen
Lenad 5ft9.75in said on 22/Mar/23
Ares 02 if anything, a weak 187cm.could be bang on for hugh jackman's height today. I think more 188 when younger but more likely a weak 6'2 than strong one.
Ares 02 if anything, a weak 187cm.could be bang on for hugh jackman's height today. I think more 188 when younger but more likely a weak 6'2 than strong one.
Ares_02 said on 20/Mar/23
I believe Hugh might have being 6'3'' or 1.90 m in his prime. I mean his description fits that he at his 30s was 30 cm taller than Wolverine who is 1.60 m. Maybe now Hugh is like 1.87 m but he always looked a lot taller than legit 6 foot actors.
I believe Hugh might have being 6'3'' or 1.90 m in his prime. I mean his description fits that he at his 30s was 30 cm taller than Wolverine who is 1.60 m. Maybe now Hugh is like 1.87 m but he always looked a lot taller than legit 6 foot actors.
Lenad 5ft9.75ins said on 12/Mar/23
I think 187-188cm peak and more 186-187cm range now. 185cm is too low but.
I think 187-188cm peak and more 186-187cm range now. 185cm is too low but.
QM6'1.5"QM said on 1/Mar/23
6'1.5" peak max and about 6'1" today.
He did a funny Lipton commercial! :)
6'1.5" peak max and about 6'1" today.
He did a funny Lipton commercial! :)
185 Tim.Will_son_T said on 1/Mar/23
I'm sure he had 188.2 cm straight at his peak
In these days, however, he looks about 186 cm with Ryan Reynolds.
So Hugh is solid 6'1.25 guy in these days
I'm sure he had 188.2 cm straight at his peak
In these days, however, he looks about 186 cm with Ryan Reynolds.
So Hugh is solid 6'1.25 guy in these days
5'7 and a fraction said on 28/Jan/23
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 23/Jan/23
Looked 189cm in the first X-Men and Swordfish.
Isn't this the umpteenth time you've said this? No offence.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 23/Jan/23
Looked 189cm in the first X-Men and Swordfish.
Isn't this the umpteenth time you've said this? No offence.
Lenad 5ft9.75in said on 24/Jan/23
Berta if anything 6'1.75 could be bang on for hughs peak height.
Berta if anything 6'1.75 could be bang on for hughs peak height.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 23/Jan/23
Looked 189cm in the first X-Men and Swordfish.
Looked 189cm in the first X-Men and Swordfish.
berta said on 23/Jan/23
not a milimeter over 6´2 peak. i think he was 6´2 on good days but maybe closer to 6´1 3/4 most days. He may have lost height now because dont look more than 186-187 beside ryan reynold (188,5). Its strange that he lost muscles because he dont lift that heavy weights but if you look closely on his build then you see he is small boned, Not genetically gifted to build muscles. The height loss could also be from steroids if he looked in reality like in the movies. But i dont think he looked close to that in reality. In his gym videos he posted during the same time as the later wolverine movies he looked ripped with lots of veines but not mutch muscles. SO its not imposible that he didnt take anything to build muscles if he looked like that in reality. But if he looked like he did in the movies, then ofcourse he took alot of stuff and that could be the reason for around 1,5 cm height loss. I think he benched about 120 kg at his strongest. No one need steroids to do that, but to get his bodyfat down that low at his age, well then you need to have blessed genetics and pretty mutch be a proffesional bodybuilder. I personally think getting bodyfat under 10 procent and still have most muscles left is mutch harder than just get strong and big. TO get big you just need to eat all the time and lift heavy heavt heavy. What do you guys think did he look like in the movies in real life and took alot of drugs or was it a bit of cgi like hemsworth in last thor movie?
not a milimeter over 6´2 peak. i think he was 6´2 on good days but maybe closer to 6´1 3/4 most days. He may have lost height now because dont look more than 186-187 beside ryan reynold (188,5). Its strange that he lost muscles because he dont lift that heavy weights but if you look closely on his build then you see he is small boned, Not genetically gifted to build muscles. The height loss could also be from steroids if he looked in reality like in the movies. But i dont think he looked close to that in reality. In his gym videos he posted during the same time as the later wolverine movies he looked ripped with lots of veines but not mutch muscles. SO its not imposible that he didnt take anything to build muscles if he looked like that in reality. But if he looked like he did in the movies, then ofcourse he took alot of stuff and that could be the reason for around 1,5 cm height loss. I think he benched about 120 kg at his strongest. No one need steroids to do that, but to get his bodyfat down that low at his age, well then you need to have blessed genetics and pretty mutch be a proffesional bodybuilder. I personally think getting bodyfat under 10 procent and still have most muscles left is mutch harder than just get strong and big. TO get big you just need to eat all the time and lift heavy heavt heavy. What do you guys think did he look like in the movies in real life and took alot of drugs or was it a bit of cgi like hemsworth in last thor movie?
Lenad 5ft9.75in said on 17/Jan/23
Solid 188cm for hugh not improbable at peak. Solid 187cm seems more likely. But truely I do believe he was closer to 6'2 than guys like jim carrey and will smith who get claimed at 6'2 but were more in the 6'1 range.
Solid 188cm for hugh not improbable at peak. Solid 187cm seems more likely. But truely I do believe he was closer to 6'2 than guys like jim carrey and will smith who get claimed at 6'2 but were more in the 6'1 range.
Celebheights 6'1.5" said on 14/Jan/23
He appeared no taller than Obama.
He appeared no taller than Obama.
Lenad 5ft9.75in said on 10/Jan/23
He probably was/is a strong 187cm. Just look at him next to kidman when she's in those heels.
He probably was/is a strong 187cm. Just look at him next to kidman when she's in those heels.
QM6'1.5"QM said on 28/Dec/22
viper said on 25/Dec/22
Yep, totally agreed.
Barely 6'1.5" at peak max. Right now he's about 6'1" and Ryan is 3/4" taller than him!
Really doubt he's taller than Cristiano Ronaldo any mm, no saying about 1cms.
viper said on 25/Dec/22
Yep, totally agreed.
Barely 6'1.5" at peak max. Right now he's about 6'1" and Ryan is 3/4" taller than him!
Really doubt he's taller than Cristiano Ronaldo any mm, no saying about 1cms.
Jawilder said on 27/Dec/22
I was 18 at the time so cant say for sure but he looked close enough to 6’1. He was signing autographs next to Drew Brees and looked a bit taller.
I was 18 at the time so cant say for sure but he looked close enough to 6’1. He was signing autographs next to Drew Brees and looked a bit taller.
Jawilder said on 27/Dec/22
AP is 6’1 I seen him up close in person at training camp.
AP is 6’1 I seen him up close in person at training camp.
viper said on 25/Dec/22
Adrian Peterson is 6-1 at most.
Hugh was never 6-2
Adrian Peterson is 6-1 at most.
Hugh was never 6-2
nextup said on 9/Nov/22
his peak was 188.2 half an hour after waking up, and 187.7 before bed
his peak was 188.2 half an hour after waking up, and 187.7 before bed
Pranav Gaikwad said on 5/Oct/22
Rob, how much difference can u see between him and reynolds?
Editor Rob
Rob, how much difference can u see between him and reynolds?
Editor RobCan seem 1/2 to 1 inch range...but will be interesting how they square up in Deadpool 3.
Hong said on 14/Sep/22
Click Here Here's Ryan Reynolds joking around with Hugh,these two guys are very similar in height.
Click Here Here's Ryan Reynolds joking around with Hugh,these two guys are very similar in height.
Hong said on 14/Sep/22
Click Here Here's Hugh with 6ft2.5 listed Brendan Fraser,they look the same height?
Editor Rob
Click Here Here's Hugh with 6ft2.5 listed Brendan Fraser,they look the same height?
Editor RobFraser losing half inch by now is looking likelier.
Lenad 5ft9.75in said on 11/Sep/22
187/188cm guy at peak
187/188cm guy at peak
Ravi kathiresan said on 22/Aug/22
Mr rob he look like a inch shorter than Ryan Reynolds and couple of inches than chris Hemsworth who are of 6'2" and 6'3" so i think he is 6'1" and now 6'0"
Mr rob he look like a inch shorter than Ryan Reynolds and couple of inches than chris Hemsworth who are of 6'2" and 6'3" so i think he is 6'1" and now 6'0"
Most Legit 6'3 said on 13/Aug/22
When I met him a few years ago we were quite close in height, but he was wearing some thicker shoes that gave him more height. He’s probably still a solid 6’1.5.
When I met him a few years ago we were quite close in height, but he was wearing some thicker shoes that gave him more height. He’s probably still a solid 6’1.5.
CDS said on 27/Jul/22
In the 2008 film, "Deception ", his character is described as 6'1"
In the 2008 film, "Deception ", his character is described as 6'1"
Lenad 5ft9.75in said on 14/Jul/22
If you watch that video at the tony awards from 2011 when he was a duet with neil patrick harris, the height difference of them varied as they were dancing, but when they stood next to each other there looked to be a good 2 inches between them. And he is definitley similar in height to ryan reynolds, but reynolds always seems to be marginally, 1/4-1/2 an inch taller than hugh. I suspect 187cm is bang on for hugh's height. I'm a weak 5'10 guy myself and if I ever get a photo with hugh, I'll post it and I bet my estimate is right.
If you watch that video at the tony awards from 2011 when he was a duet with neil patrick harris, the height difference of them varied as they were dancing, but when they stood next to each other there looked to be a good 2 inches between them. And he is definitley similar in height to ryan reynolds, but reynolds always seems to be marginally, 1/4-1/2 an inch taller than hugh. I suspect 187cm is bang on for hugh's height. I'm a weak 5'10 guy myself and if I ever get a photo with hugh, I'll post it and I bet my estimate is right.
Lenad 5ft9.75in said on 11/Jul/22
He consistintley looks tall in movies, I don't think he'd ever be over 6'2 realistically, but not below the 6'1 range. Measured by a doctor when younger, he probably would've been 6 ft 1 and 3/4 of an inch. Might even have been a strong 6'2, but my genuine feeling is a weak 6'2 is more likely. 187cm or at least nipping it these days.
He consistintley looks tall in movies, I don't think he'd ever be over 6'2 realistically, but not below the 6'1 range. Measured by a doctor when younger, he probably would've been 6 ft 1 and 3/4 of an inch. Might even have been a strong 6'2, but my genuine feeling is a weak 6'2 is more likely. 187cm or at least nipping it these days.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 6/Jul/22
Prime woke up at 6ft3
Prime woke up at 6ft3
Space said on 7/Jun/22
I’m going to have to agree with viper on this one and say he was a strong 6-1.5” peak and solid 6-1 today.
I’m going to have to agree with viper on this one and say he was a strong 6-1.5” peak and solid 6-1 today.
Tech noir said on 19/May/22
6-2 peak. Now looks just over 6-1.25?
6-2 peak. Now looks just over 6-1.25?
Miss Sandy Cowell said on 8/May/22
I saw Hugh in the movie Prisoners last night, and it was worthy of every one of its 4 stars. It was about child abduction and the outcome was really unexpected.
Hugh played the father of a missing little girl. I didn’t catch the beginning, but this film is definitely worth adding to my
collection to watch at my leisure, and see any bonus features.
Hugh looked very tall, so he can have 6ft2 for his peak and half-an-inch less for today.
I saw Hugh in the movie Prisoners last night, and it was worthy of every one of its 4 stars. It was about child abduction and the outcome was really unexpected.
Hugh played the father of a missing little girl. I didn’t catch the beginning, but this film is definitely worth adding to my
collection to watch at my leisure, and see any bonus features.
Hugh looked very tall, so he can have 6ft2 for his peak and half-an-inch less for today.
Rukmini Singh said on 7/May/22
He has good height 6'1.7
He has good height 6'1.7
Leesheff1985 said on 30/Apr/22
please add the greatest showman to his credits
please add the greatest showman to his credits
Msmith said on 15/Apr/22
@Celebheights 6'1.5"
Nicholas is closer to camera and seems to be leaning
@Celebheights 6'1.5"
Nicholas is closer to camera and seems to be leaning
Celebheights 6'1.5" said on 15/Apr/22
With Nicholas Hoult:
Click Here
They both could be dropping height..
With Nicholas Hoult:
Click Here
They both could be dropping height..
IceCold said on 13/Apr/22
@viper, it could be possible
@viper, it could be possible
Jawilder said on 12/Apr/22
@viper yeah I think he’s always been 6’1.5 also
@viper yeah I think he’s always been 6’1.5 also
Progking184 said on 11/Apr/22
6'1.5 sounds right, close to 6'3 in shoes. Still quite tall though looked kind of standout when younger. His 6'2 claim though is still honest and at worst just a roundup
6'1.5 sounds right, close to 6'3 in shoes. Still quite tall though looked kind of standout when younger. His 6'2 claim though is still honest and at worst just a roundup
viper said on 11/Apr/22
Doubt he's lost anything.
Always been 6-1.5
Doubt he's lost anything.
Always been 6-1.5
Jawilder said on 11/Apr/22
I think at worst he has lost 1/4 an inch , but I still don’t even know about that.
I think at worst he has lost 1/4 an inch , but I still don’t even know about that.
QM6'1.5"QM said on 5/Apr/22
6'1.5" peak.
6'1 today.
I talk about evening heights (8hrs after the bed).
6'1.5" peak.
6'1 today.
I talk about evening heights (8hrs after the bed).
IceCold said on 30/Mar/22
In the movie with Christian Bale, he surely looked easy 6'2. But peak probably more weak 6'2
In the movie with Christian Bale, he surely looked easy 6'2. But peak probably more weak 6'2
Lenad 5ft9.75in said on 24/Mar/22
I think a weak 6'2 is bang on for a younger hugh. I could see him even as a solid 188cm when younger, but more likely scraping the full 6'2, like 187.8cm or so.
I think a weak 6'2 is bang on for a younger hugh. I could see him even as a solid 188cm when younger, but more likely scraping the full 6'2, like 187.8cm or so.
Kxbxk said on 15/Mar/22
185
185
Ian Momo 'Questionable 5'10' said on 7/Feb/22
@Editor Rob Rob, in your opinion what year do you think Hugh Jackman start to look below 6'2? cause he became big star only in the last 2 decade, which is the time when he met and being photographed with other celebs
Editor Rob
@Editor Rob Rob, in your opinion what year do you think Hugh Jackman start to look below 6'2? cause he became big star only in the last 2 decade, which is the time when he met and being photographed with other celebs
Editor RobWhen he got into mid to late 40's I thought he started to lose a small fraction
Ian Momo 'Questionable 5'10' said on 3/Feb/22
@Wehrmacht180 pls sir don't downgrade too many people here
@Rampage he maybe a weak 6'2 and now a little above 6'1 (186 area), i still trying to figure out why he's shrinking a good 1/2 inch on his 40's, like many people benched heavier and work harder than him, i can't see that as the main factor, but he did, he look noticably shorter in the last 10 year
@Wehrmacht180 pls sir don't downgrade too many people here
@Rampage he maybe a weak 6'2 and now a little above 6'1 (186 area), i still trying to figure out why he's shrinking a good 1/2 inch on his 40's, like many people benched heavier and work harder than him, i can't see that as the main factor, but he did, he look noticably shorter in the last 10 year
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 2/Feb/22
He’s naturally a very skinny guy by his own admission
Still think peak was nothing below 6ft2
He’s naturally a very skinny guy by his own admission
Still think peak was nothing below 6ft2
RJ MacReady said on 26/Dec/21
@K.A188
I think Hugh Jackman weight max in his career is on 200 lbs, not more. is very defined, so it looks bigger
@K.A188
I think Hugh Jackman weight max in his career is on 200 lbs, not more. is very defined, so it looks bigger
Wehrmacht180 said on 26/Nov/21
185 cm now and before.
185 cm now and before.
Jawilder said on 12/Nov/21
Would get edged by Reynolds at his peak by a fraction.
Would get edged by Reynolds at his peak by a fraction.
berta said on 30/Oct/21
peak he could look 187-189. I think 188 i good peak but if i peronally would guess i think i would have guessed 187,5. Today beside a guy like john cena he didnt even look 1 inch taller. I starting to think he could be down to 186 efter a hard workout. And 196,5 on a better day. Almost 6´1 3/8
peak he could look 187-189. I think 188 i good peak but if i peronally would guess i think i would have guessed 187,5. Today beside a guy like john cena he didnt even look 1 inch taller. I starting to think he could be down to 186 efter a hard workout. And 196,5 on a better day. Almost 6´1 3/8
Shat said on 28/Oct/21
184.8 now
6'0 75
184.8 now
6'0 75
Crixus said on 21/Oct/21
Still looks pretty tall,he has a great frame. A weak 6'1 most likely. Nothing over 6'2 peak however.
Still looks pretty tall,he has a great frame. A weak 6'1 most likely. Nothing over 6'2 peak however.
Slim 6'1.75 said on 2/Oct/21
Add to the marvel page, he played Wolverine in the x men movies
Fantastic actor love his movies
There’s nothing girly about dancing, it’s cool as 👍
Add to the marvel page, he played Wolverine in the x men movies
Fantastic actor love his movies
There’s nothing girly about dancing, it’s cool as 👍
MichaelMyers said on 1/Oct/21
Around 6'2" now, was maybe like 6'2.25" peak.
Around 6'2" now, was maybe like 6'2.25" peak.
Lenad 5ft9.75in said on 28/Sep/21
I think he was a very solid 187 or weak 188cm when younger. Nowadays, a weak 187.
I think he was a very solid 187 or weak 188cm when younger. Nowadays, a weak 187.
Slim 6'1.75 said on 24/Sep/21
Bana would edge out peak Jackman
Bana would edge out peak Jackman
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 23/Sep/21
Solid 6ft2 peak, arguably could have cleared by like an eighth.
I don’t think just 187cm peak does him justice. Currently I think he’s that though
Solid 6ft2 peak, arguably could have cleared by like an eighth.
I don’t think just 187cm peak does him justice. Currently I think he’s that though
ChaosControl said on 12/Sep/21
Chris Rob said on 10/Sep/21
Google decided to take it upon themselves to inflate Hugh Jackman for some odd reason. Now he’s “ 6’3” LOLL
I think they did that so they could say he’s a foot taller than Wolverine
Chris Rob said on 10/Sep/21
Google decided to take it upon themselves to inflate Hugh Jackman for some odd reason. Now he’s “ 6’3” LOLL
I think they did that so they could say he’s a foot taller than Wolverine
Chris Rob said on 10/Sep/21
Google decided to take it upon themselves to inflate Hugh Jackman for some odd reason. Now he’s “ 6’3” LOLL
Google decided to take it upon themselves to inflate Hugh Jackman for some odd reason. Now he’s “ 6’3” LOLL
Stinky 186 cm said on 29/Aug/21
This guy never quite looked like a legit 6’ 2” I think he was 6’ 1 1/2” peak and is now a weak 6’ 1”
This guy never quite looked like a legit 6’ 2” I think he was 6’ 1 1/2” peak and is now a weak 6’ 1”
Elene said on 9/Aug/21
6’1.75
6’1.75
177cm said on 16/Jun/21
6’2” flat peak 6’1.5” now
6’2” flat peak 6’1.5” now
Slim 6'1.5 said on 1/Jun/21
Ethan Wolf said on 22/May/21
Funny how Wolverine is supposed to be a short 5'3".
~~~~~~~~
Hilarious!
———
@Rob, how much longer till hugh shrinks to the flat 6’1”?
Ethan Wolf said on 22/May/21
Funny how Wolverine is supposed to be a short 5'3".
~~~~~~~~
Hilarious!
———
@Rob, how much longer till hugh shrinks to the flat 6’1”?
Ethan Wolf said on 22/May/21
Funny how Wolverine is supposed to be a short 5'3".
Funny how Wolverine is supposed to be a short 5'3".
Slim 6'1.5 said on 11/May/21
I’m willing to bet Reynolds would edge Jackman peak
I’m willing to bet Reynolds would edge Jackman peak
Hyper said on 9/May/21
@Slim
I wouldn’t say 6’1.75”. At times, Hugh (without lifts) did look a bit taller than Ryan Reynolds (who I also think could be 6’2 1/8”).
I think 6’2 1/8” are arguable figures for both men, but I wouldn’t put them at 6’2.5”.
@Slim
I wouldn’t say 6’1.75”. At times, Hugh (without lifts) did look a bit taller than Ryan Reynolds (who I also think could be 6’2 1/8”).
I think 6’2 1/8” are arguable figures for both men, but I wouldn’t put them at 6’2.5”.
viper said on 8/May/21
Don't see any evidence of height loss.
Waaaaay too young for that
Don't see any evidence of height loss.
Waaaaay too young for that
Slim 6'1.5 said on 8/May/21
6’1.75 is likelier than 6’2.25 imho
6’1.75 is likelier than 6’2.25 imho
Hyper said on 6/May/21
I have a different opinion, I think Hugh could’ve been 6’2 1/8”.
However, I don’t know about 6’2.75” because Brandon Routh is clearly taller than Jackman.
I have a different opinion, I think Hugh could’ve been 6’2 1/8”.
However, I don’t know about 6’2.75” because Brandon Routh is clearly taller than Jackman.
Yharnamman said on 3/May/21
You guys shouldn't worry about working out will make you lose height. Rob said earlier that Hugh is a unique situation, he was really beating himself up to get in shape for roles.
Theres tons of people around Hugh's age that have lifted a lot more than Hugh and haven't had height loss. People always bring up Jay Culter and how he still looks like hes in pristine condition, hes done tons of exercises with 600-700 lbs.
You guys shouldn't worry about working out will make you lose height. Rob said earlier that Hugh is a unique situation, he was really beating himself up to get in shape for roles.
Theres tons of people around Hugh's age that have lifted a lot more than Hugh and haven't had height loss. People always bring up Jay Culter and how he still looks like hes in pristine condition, hes done tons of exercises with 600-700 lbs.
Slim 6'1.5 said on 2/May/21
It won’t be too long till he shrinks to the flat 6’1
It won’t be too long till he shrinks to the flat 6’1
Eusebiu - 6'1" (185 cm) said on 29/Apr/21
In his younger years he was definitely a legit 6'2" (188 cm) and eye-to-eye level with Ryan Reynolds (listed 188 cm).
Also, it is very rare to start losing height in your 40s but I guess this is the result of training based on weight lifting.
Peak - 188 cm
Current - 187 cm
In his younger years he was definitely a legit 6'2" (188 cm) and eye-to-eye level with Ryan Reynolds (listed 188 cm).
Also, it is very rare to start losing height in your 40s but I guess this is the result of training based on weight lifting.
Peak - 188 cm
Current - 187 cm
eng6'3 said on 12/Mar/21
@Slim 6'1.5
slim,would you tell me how old you are?it seems you've grown a half inch.
@Slim 6'1.5
slim,would you tell me how old you are?it seems you've grown a half inch.
Slim 6'1.5 said on 12/Mar/21
I doubt he’ll edge Andy Murray
I doubt he’ll edge Andy Murray
Sulu2021 said on 9/Mar/21
Could certain older people in their mid to late 50s still be at their peak height today while Hugh is now a cm below his peak?
Editor Rob
Could certain older people in their mid to late 50s still be at their peak height today while Hugh is now a cm below his peak?
Editor Roba good proportion can still make it through to mid 50's without any noticeable loss.
Allie said on 5/Mar/21
Seen a few articles describe him as being 1.9 m/6'3. But that's obviously too much.
This listing seems spot on imo.
Seen a few articles describe him as being 1.9 m/6'3. But that's obviously too much.
This listing seems spot on imo.
Hunter Kendall said on 3/Mar/21
Saw him in Wolverine X-Men Origins with Ryan Reynolds and Liev Schreiber and thought man this dude is tall
Saw him in Wolverine X-Men Origins with Ryan Reynolds and Liev Schreiber and thought man this dude is tall
Chaos Control 6'2.5 said on 27/Feb/21
I think he looks legit 6’2 in the first few X-men films
I think he looks legit 6’2 in the first few X-men films
Vsquad said on 13/Feb/21
Rob, how would you say Hugh Jackman holds up next to Chris Hemsworth in this video? It's from 2015. Hemsworth is wearing flats while Jackman's in dress shoes -
Click Here
There's a quick shot of them at the end (without the wigs) and Hemsworth seems to edge him.
Editor Rob
Rob, how would you say Hugh Jackman holds up next to Chris Hemsworth in this video? It's from 2015. Hemsworth is wearing flats while Jackman's in dress shoes -
Click Here
There's a quick shot of them at the end (without the wigs) and Hemsworth seems to edge him.
Editor Roblooks under 6ft 2 I'd say, with Chris having what looked a thinnish sneaker.
Genau 5ft9 7/8 said on 11/Feb/21
I think a lot of people underestimate hughs peak he often slouched a bit, so from me he gets the full 188 Peak and 186.5 current
I think a lot of people underestimate hughs peak he often slouched a bit, so from me he gets the full 188 Peak and 186.5 current
berta said on 10/Feb/21
i really think he never was taller than at best 187,5. probably 187 flat and today 186,5-187
i really think he never was taller than at best 187,5. probably 187 flat and today 186,5-187
slim 6'1 said on 9/Feb/21
Peak Jackman would not edge out Andy Murray
Peak Jackman would not edge out Andy Murray
Rapha said on 3/Feb/21
Hi Rob
It seems that he started early to loose height. Do you know the reason for that ?
Editor Rob
Hi Rob
It seems that he started early to loose height. Do you know the reason for that ?
Editor RobI believe through into mid 40's range his years of heavy lifting might have compressed him a cm or so.
slim 6'1 said on 31/Jan/21
Berta 187 is an excellent guess for his peak.
I reckon he’s just 186 maybe a few more years to dip to the flat 6’1”
Berta 187 is an excellent guess for his peak.
I reckon he’s just 186 maybe a few more years to dip to the flat 6’1”
slim 6'1 said on 31/Jan/21
No berta due to his weightlifting his discs in his back degenerated and he shrunk a little bit. The sort of weightlifting Hugh Jackman has done isn’t healthy for height health
No berta due to his weightlifting his discs in his back degenerated and he shrunk a little bit. The sort of weightlifting Hugh Jackman has done isn’t healthy for height health
Genau said on 30/Jan/21
187.5-188 peak current 186.5-187
187.5-188 peak current 186.5-187
berta said on 30/Jan/21
maybe the guy always was and still is 187 but measured 188 in the morning.
maybe the guy always was and still is 187 but measured 188 in the morning.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 28/Jan/21
I think 187cm now
I think 187cm now
slim 6'1 said on 28/Jan/21
Current is alright but imho he was 187cm max during prime 👍
Current is alright but imho he was 187cm max during prime 👍
Vincent Caleb said on 23/Jan/21
6’2” is the absolute most I would guess for his peak. Current is 186ish.
6’2” is the absolute most I would guess for his peak. Current is 186ish.
Yharnamman said on 21/Jan/21
If anyone is curious, this is what Hugh looks like when people estimate him at 90/91 KG: Click Here
He looks very aesthetic as a late 40s older lifter. And he could easily look like that again if he went back on the TRT.
If anyone is curious, this is what Hugh looks like when people estimate him at 90/91 KG: Click Here
He looks very aesthetic as a late 40s older lifter. And he could easily look like that again if he went back on the TRT.
Yharnamman said on 19/Jan/21
@grizz Thats a very recent photo, might be like a couple months old. Hes likely off TRT and lost a lot of muscle since hes not doing any roles right now. Given a guy in his early 50s might naturally produce around 400 ng/dl compared to men under 35 producing 500-900 ng/dl.
@grizz Thats a very recent photo, might be like a couple months old. Hes likely off TRT and lost a lot of muscle since hes not doing any roles right now. Given a guy in his early 50s might naturally produce around 400 ng/dl compared to men under 35 producing 500-900 ng/dl.
ChaosControl 6'2 1/2 said on 18/Jan/21
@grizz that guy looks strange. Like his chest is too big for the rest of him. If not for his weird looking pecs he’s look like an ectomorph
@grizz that guy looks strange. Like his chest is too big for the rest of him. If not for his weird looking pecs he’s look like an ectomorph
grizz said on 16/Jan/21
With all due respect, that's not how a 90+ kg 6'1.5 guy looks like Click Here
He's close to that listed weight (82-85). As Wolverine he probably was in 90 kg ballpark, but not anymore.
With all due respect, that's not how a 90+ kg 6'1.5 guy looks like Click Here
He's close to that listed weight (82-85). As Wolverine he probably was in 90 kg ballpark, but not anymore.
ChaosControl 6'2.5 said on 14/Jan/21
@Rampage wouldn’t go as high as 95+, more 93-95. I hover around that range myself (currently 94.3kg) so I’ve got a very good picture of how it looks
@Rampage wouldn’t go as high as 95+, more 93-95. I hover around that range myself (currently 94.3kg) so I’ve got a very good picture of how it looks
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 13/Jan/21
When training for Wolverine I wouldn't surprised if he was 95kg+....
When training for Wolverine I wouldn't surprised if he was 95kg+....
Yharnamman said on 12/Jan/21
@K.A Yes hes definitely not 82 KG, thats what an average 6'2" guy would weigh. I think he usually hovers around 90 or 91 KG, but when you see those screenshots of him insanely lean at 7% body fat, hes likely 86 KG there.
@K.A Yes hes definitely not 82 KG, thats what an average 6'2" guy would weigh. I think he usually hovers around 90 or 91 KG, but when you see those screenshots of him insanely lean at 7% body fat, hes likely 86 KG there.
ChaosControl 6'2.5 said on 11/Jan/21
@K.A I can see him being over 93kg during his Wolverine days
@K.A I can see him being over 93kg during his Wolverine days
Vincent Caleb said on 10/Jan/21
Agree with slim. Weak 6’2” peak, 6’1.25” current.
Agree with slim. Weak 6’2” peak, 6’1.25” current.
slim 6'1 said on 8/Jan/21
He’d definitely edge Gerard butler
He’d definitely edge Gerard butler
K.A said on 7/Jan/21
Rob,any idea of his weight??,I often see 82kg or 85kg but I am sure as wolverine he weighed closer to 90 kg ,I mean he looks more muscular than a guy like CR7 and they both are close to each other heigh wise.
Editor Rob
Rob,any idea of his weight??,I often see 82kg or 85kg but I am sure as wolverine he weighed closer to 90 kg ,I mean he looks more muscular than a guy like CR7 and they both are close to each other heigh wise.
Editor RobI could believe 90kg at times
Slim 6'1" said on 30/Dec/20
Weak 6’2 prime and now 186 current 👍
Weak 6’2 prime and now 186 current 👍
Lenad 5ft9.75in said on 27/Dec/20
187/188cm range peak.
187/188cm range peak.
Animus said on 23/Dec/20
Rob, I wasn’t really thinking of herniated discs. To my understanding activity makes you feel worse when you have a herniated disc. When I have “popped” my lower back doing deadlifts, usually activity has made my back feel better, so I don’t think I have a herniated disc. I was just wondering whether I could have lost 1/8th of an inch. I am usually 182.6cm at night (just shy of 6’0). I really hope I’m not creeping towards 182cm flat already, I’m only 25!
Editor Rob
Rob, I wasn’t really thinking of herniated discs. To my understanding activity makes you feel worse when you have a herniated disc. When I have “popped” my lower back doing deadlifts, usually activity has made my back feel better, so I don’t think I have a herniated disc. I was just wondering whether I could have lost 1/8th of an inch. I am usually 182.6cm at night (just shy of 6’0). I really hope I’m not creeping towards 182cm flat already, I’m only 25!
Editor Roban MRI could tell if the discs had any sort of change like thinning or degeneration, which can happen through regular heavy lifting for years.
Animus said on 22/Dec/20
Rob, how significant does an injury have to be for someone to lose as little as say 1/8th of an inch? Can a guy in his 20s that has messed up and popped his back a few times lifting weights expect to have lost a slight amount of height? We're not talking massive injuries, just "pops" in the lower back that causes some pain and stiffness for a few weeks, which then disappears. What do you think?
Editor Rob
Rob, how significant does an injury have to be for someone to lose as little as say 1/8th of an inch? Can a guy in his 20s that has messed up and popped his back a few times lifting weights expect to have lost a slight amount of height? We're not talking massive injuries, just "pops" in the lower back that causes some pain and stiffness for a few weeks, which then disappears. What do you think?
Editor Robwith some herniation small fractions could be lost.
Slim 6'1" said on 16/Dec/20
Agree aj, the full 6’2” is a tad too high for Jackman
Long overdue for a 187 downgrade. He wouldn’t edge out the likes of Ben Affleck or Chris pratt
Agree aj, the full 6’2” is a tad too high for Jackman
Long overdue for a 187 downgrade. He wouldn’t edge out the likes of Ben Affleck or Chris pratt
Aj06 said on 14/Dec/20
I think when he was younger he was defently a weak 6'2 now I would say 6'1.5 as of now.
I think when he was younger he was defently a weak 6'2 now I would say 6'1.5 as of now.
Sean95 said on 13/Dec/20
Hiya Rob I was wondering in your opinion apart from Deadlifts and back exercises are there any other barbel lifts that risk height loss and in your opinion what do you think the limit you can weight train without sacrificing any height? Thanks for reading
Editor Rob
Hiya Rob I was wondering in your opinion apart from Deadlifts and back exercises are there any other barbel lifts that risk height loss and in your opinion what do you think the limit you can weight train without sacrificing any height? Thanks for reading
Editor RobIt's more forms of lifting that are putting tremendous strains on the spinal discs...repeated over many years raises the risk of damage occuring.
Slim 6'1" said on 9/Dec/20
187 max never the solid 6’2” like bana and Reynolds
187 max never the solid 6’2” like bana and Reynolds
Vsquad said on 26/Nov/20
Rob, do you think Hugh had already fallen to 6'1.5 by 2013/when he filmed Prisoners?
There just doesn't seem to be 3 inches between himself and Gyllenhaal, both in the movie and during press rounds.
Editor Rob
Rob, do you think Hugh had already fallen to 6'1.5 by 2013/when he filmed Prisoners?
There just doesn't seem to be 3 inches between himself and Gyllenhaal, both in the movie and during press rounds.
Editor Roba fraction maybe by then yeah
Leesheff85 said on 25/Nov/20
Does hugh have the edge on nicole Kidman in the photo rob? If hes 6ft 2-3 in the shoes hes wearing and her heels are only small here shouldn't she look shorter next to him than she does?
Editor Rob
Does hugh have the edge on nicole Kidman in the photo rob? If hes 6ft 2-3 in the shoes hes wearing and her heels are only small here shouldn't she look shorter next to him than she does?
Editor Robyeah I'd have said Hugh looks taller than Nicole in heels
Genau said on 25/Nov/20
6ft1.75 Peak
6ft1.25 now
6ft1.75 Peak
6ft1.25 now
Slim 6'1" said on 11/Nov/20
187 prime
186 current
187 prime
186 current
VitoCheng said on 8/Nov/20
Current:6'1.5”
Peak:6’2.5"
Current:6'1.5”
Peak:6’2.5"
Slim 6'1@ said on 4/Nov/20
6’1.25” current
6’1.25” current
Canson said on 25/Oct/20
@6’2 5/8: yep Rob assumes Lunch or afternoon. I feel Goldblum would be very similar with me. I’m around 6’5 or a (mm) over the Mark and 6’4.25 or a (mm) over in the afternoon. If anything maybe I’d have a mm on him or around that. I use my afternoon height too and I also just claim 6’4 like I mentioned for Goldblum only saying he was 6’4”. At an extreme low I’m a mm over 6’4 usually and got all the way down there once when I measured to a flat 6’4”
@6’2 5/8: yep Rob assumes Lunch or afternoon. I feel Goldblum would be very similar with me. I’m around 6’5 or a (mm) over the Mark and 6’4.25 or a (mm) over in the afternoon. If anything maybe I’d have a mm on him or around that. I use my afternoon height too and I also just claim 6’4 like I mentioned for Goldblum only saying he was 6’4”. At an extreme low I’m a mm over 6’4 usually and got all the way down there once when I measured to a flat 6’4”
Slim 6'1" said on 25/Oct/20
187 better peak listing now 185.5-186
187 better peak listing now 185.5-186
6'2 5/8ths said on 24/Oct/20
@Canson that's true, and yes Goldblum was probably a bit over 6'4. But isn't this website based on afternoon/evening heights? I always use my afternoon height after a busy day, otherwise I'd be claiming the 6'3 mark that I clear in the morning. Btw I'm the same guy who you responded to below, just changed my name since I got my measurement slightly wrong.
@Canson that's true, and yes Goldblum was probably a bit over 6'4. But isn't this website based on afternoon/evening heights? I always use my afternoon height after a busy day, otherwise I'd be claiming the 6'3 mark that I clear in the morning. Btw I'm the same guy who you responded to below, just changed my name since I got my measurement slightly wrong.
Canson said on 22/Oct/20
@6’2 and 3/5ths: not necessarily. If he were say 6’2.25” he would be 188.6 and may just be rounded to 189 from there. Some guys if they measure later in the day may stick with 6’2” if they are 6’2.25”. I can see that being the case with a peak Jeff Goldblum.
@6’2 and 3/5ths: not necessarily. If he were say 6’2.25” he would be 188.6 and may just be rounded to 189 from there. Some guys if they measure later in the day may stick with 6’2” if they are 6’2.25”. I can see that being the case with a peak Jeff Goldblum.
6'2 3/5ths 189.5 said on 22/Oct/20
@wiles190 why on earth would women care whether he's 188 or 189 lol? Also 189cm is 6'2, most people don't use fractions. Most people do round up to at least the nearest inch though, so maybe if be was 189 he'd claim 6'3.
@wiles190 why on earth would women care whether he's 188 or 189 lol? Also 189cm is 6'2, most people don't use fractions. Most people do round up to at least the nearest inch though, so maybe if be was 189 he'd claim 6'3.
Eric W. Tam said on 13/Oct/20
He's been listed as 6'4 before if I wasn't going crazy. He was then listed as 6'2 which seems right, hell that's what he claims, but now he magically shot up to 6'3 smh. Lol, wonder if Jackman ever claimed 6'3, probably did once or twice during his peak. Probably was 6'3 during his prime in the morning. But he's no taller than 6'2 ever now.
He's been listed as 6'4 before if I wasn't going crazy. He was then listed as 6'2 which seems right, hell that's what he claims, but now he magically shot up to 6'3 smh. Lol, wonder if Jackman ever claimed 6'3, probably did once or twice during his peak. Probably was 6'3 during his prime in the morning. But he's no taller than 6'2 ever now.
Miss Sandy Cowell said on 12/Oct/20
🎊🎈🎁🎂 Happy Birthday Hugh! 🎂🎁🎈🎊
Wishing popular actor Hugh Jackman a fantastic 52nd Birthday today. BTW, I just found all of 190cm for Hugh; the man himself admits to 6ft2.
He's a bit young to have already suffered height loss for a fit specimen like himself, but I guess it happens.
Peak - 6ft2
Today - 6ft1.5 😄👍🍻
🎊🎈🎁🎂🎊🎈🎁🎂🎊🎈🎁🎂🎊🎈🎁🎂
🎊🎈🎁🎂 Happy Birthday Hugh! 🎂🎁🎈🎊
Wishing popular actor Hugh Jackman a fantastic 52nd Birthday today. BTW, I just found all of 190cm for Hugh; the man himself admits to 6ft2.
He's a bit young to have already suffered height loss for a fit specimen like himself, but I guess it happens.
Peak - 6ft2
Today - 6ft1.5 😄👍🍻
🎊🎈🎁🎂🎊🎈🎁🎂🎊🎈🎁🎂🎊🎈🎁🎂
Brandon(Aspiring 7 Footer) said on 9/Oct/20
@rob why is google listing Jackman as high as 190 cm now? Was he ever 6'2¾" in his life?
Editor Rob
@rob why is google listing Jackman as high as 190 cm now? Was he ever 6'2¾" in his life?
Editor Robthere's several quotes from Hugh saying he was 6ft 2, so I wouldn't list him 190cm when he never seemed that tall.
Slim 6'1" said on 27/Sep/20
187.5cm prime
186cm today
Will ur guess is reasonable & close enough to the truth but I still think Jackman was 187 instead of solid 6’2”
187.5cm prime
186cm today
Will ur guess is reasonable & close enough to the truth but I still think Jackman was 187 instead of solid 6’2”
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 27/Sep/20
187cm now, 188-188.5cm peak
187cm now, 188-188.5cm peak
Fede187 said on 24/Sep/20
I think Hugh Jackman is 6’, maybe his peak height was 6’1”. If he was 6’2”, he wouldn’t look a couple of centimeters shorter than Obama, who is 6’1”, or around 4 centimeters shorter than Dev Patel, who is a weak 6’2”.
I think Hugh Jackman is 6’, maybe his peak height was 6’1”. If he was 6’2”, he wouldn’t look a couple of centimeters shorter than Obama, who is 6’1”, or around 4 centimeters shorter than Dev Patel, who is a weak 6’2”.
TheDon1528 said on 24/Sep/20
around 6'1.5"
around 6'1.5"
QM6'1QM said on 23/Sep/20
He still standing tall maximum at 6'1.25" as his evening height. Something taller else ?! Stay be funny on tip toes!
P.S. He did really badass commercial for a "Lipton" :)
He still standing tall maximum at 6'1.25" as his evening height. Something taller else ?! Stay be funny on tip toes!
P.S. He did really badass commercial for a "Lipton" :)
berta said on 20/Sep/20
i think maybe 187-187,5 peak and 186,5-187 now
i think maybe 187-187,5 peak and 186,5-187 now
Slim 6'1" said on 20/Sep/20
He would edge Gerard butler
He would edge Gerard butler
Slim 6'1" said on 20/Sep/20
Jackman peak was 187.5-187.8max
Jackman peak was 187.5-187.8max
6'4'' Guy! said on 5/Sep/20
Alexander Skarsgård and 192cm Danilo Gentili: Click Here
Hugh Jackman and 192cm Danilo Gentili: Click Here
Zachary Levi and 192cm Danilo Gentili: Click Here
Alexander Skarsgård and 192cm Danilo Gentili: Click Here
Hugh Jackman and 192cm Danilo Gentili: Click Here
Zachary Levi and 192cm Danilo Gentili: Click Here
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 26/Aug/20
Ian555, both looked like very solid 6ft2 guys peak hard to tell really...but I think Reynolds height is getting a little overestimated.
Jackman in the first X-Men and Swordfish looked more 189cm than 187cm, IMO.
Ian555, both looked like very solid 6ft2 guys peak hard to tell really...but I think Reynolds height is getting a little overestimated.
Jackman in the first X-Men and Swordfish looked more 189cm than 187cm, IMO.
Ian555 said on 22/Aug/20
Rob who do you think may have a greater chance of measuring taller: Hugh Jackman peak or Ryan Reynolds?
Editor Rob
Rob who do you think may have a greater chance of measuring taller: Hugh Jackman peak or Ryan Reynolds?
Editor RobCould be a slightly better chance for Ryan, but really I think it is quite close.
Lenad 5ft9.75in stud said on 22/Aug/20
In a video with neil patrick harris he looked no less than 2 inches taller and no more than 3 inches taller than neil. I'm betting before spine problems etc, hugh generally was a weak 6ft2.
In a video with neil patrick harris he looked no less than 2 inches taller and no more than 3 inches taller than neil. I'm betting before spine problems etc, hugh generally was a weak 6ft2.
Mehmer said on 14/Aug/20
He looks shorter than Ryan Reynolds
He looks shorter than Ryan Reynolds
Slim 6'1" said on 9/Aug/20
will, jackman is tall but proably same heigt as andy murray 187.5 before spine degeneration
will, jackman is tall but proably same heigt as andy murray 187.5 before spine degeneration
Slim 6'1 said on 8/Aug/20
@Rob, who have the edge between andy murray and this guy
Editor Rob
@Rob, who have the edge between andy murray and this guy
Editor RobToday I think Murray measures taller, but at peak he may well have just smidged Murray, however Andy can pass for 6ft 2 with most folk anyway.
Slim 6'1" said on 6/Aug/20
185cm today is possible
185cm today is possible
Slim 6'1" said on 6/Aug/20
6 1 7/8 downgrade necessary even 6 1 3/4
6 1 7/8 downgrade necessary even 6 1 3/4
TheBat said on 5/Aug/20
Definitely 6'2" peak, 6'1.5" at a low today.
Definitely 6'2" peak, 6'1.5" at a low today.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 5/Aug/20
@Slim 6’1”: I think now he can look that range
@Slim 6’1”: I think now he can look that range
Slim 6'1" said on 3/Aug/20
Rampage I’m no downgrader but he may have been 187.75
Rampage I’m no downgrader but he may have been 187.75
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 9/Jul/20
Ian, I think in his prime years he had a better chance at a little over 6ft2 than under
Ian, I think in his prime years he had a better chance at a little over 6ft2 than under
Ian555 said on 6/Jul/20
Rob for Jackman’s peak height, if he stood as straight and tall as he could on the stadiometer, would you not be shocked if he measured 6’ 2 1/8” or 6’ 2 1/4”? He generally never looks under 6’ 2” back in the day.
Editor Rob
Rob for Jackman’s peak height, if he stood as straight and tall as he could on the stadiometer, would you not be shocked if he measured 6’ 2 1/8” or 6’ 2 1/4”? He generally never looks under 6’ 2” back in the day.
Editor RobI think right around the 6ft 2 mark in his 20's and 30's is believable for him, I mean at 10-11am he may well have got a little over the mark. I don't think Hugh is a guy who poses 'tall' like your Stallone's, he tends to drop height...but I do think he's lost half inch over last 5 years or so.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 2/Jul/20
His legs wouldn’t look disproportionate on a 6ft4 guy so yeah I can appreciate he can look taller than he really is
His legs wouldn’t look disproportionate on a 6ft4 guy so yeah I can appreciate he can look taller than he really is
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 2/Jul/20
6ft2 at his absolute low peak
6ft2 at his absolute low peak
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 2/Jul/20
Strong 187cm currently
Strong 187cm currently
Tall Sam said on 1/Jul/20
I think Hugh held up surprisingly well doing a silly bit with Chris Hemsworth, maybe the latter is standing a little looser but Jackman still looks comfortably in the 6'2" range.
Click Here
I think Hugh held up surprisingly well doing a silly bit with Chris Hemsworth, maybe the latter is standing a little looser but Jackman still looks comfortably in the 6'2" range.
Click Here
Lenad 5ft9.75in said on 31/May/20
I think generally he was a weak 188cm at peak.
I think generally he was a weak 188cm at peak.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 20/May/20
I don't see it, Canson.
I don't see it, Canson.
Canson said on 20/May/20
@Rampage: peak yes but today is actually possible. I’ve seen pics with other actors like Ryan Reynolds etc where he looks smaller than he used to
@Rampage: peak yes but today is actually possible. I’ve seen pics with other actors like Ryan Reynolds etc where he looks smaller than he used to
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 19/May/20
185cm is a joke today forget peak.
185cm is a joke today forget peak.
Val. said on 19/May/20
@HeightRealist
Definitely not, you have not done any analysis or measurements properly. Look up Zac Efron and Jackman in same footwear standing both with perfect posture side by side on even footing and same angle, Efron is 5'8 minimum,and looked that with a strong 6'2 Jackman, that was at least 6 inches there,possibly even 7. Not claiming Jackman is 6'3,more likely Efron is shy of 5'8 perhaps,but Jackman is a strong 6'2 in the evening. He has looked same height as Reynolds in the 2009 film and at premieres consistently,and Reynolds is a shade over 6'2. Jackman was taller than Obama by a strong inch at least, and that angling of that photo you saw was obvious in Obamas favor,tilted. You can't judge height. You have no idea what 1 inch or 5 centimeters(2 inches) actually is side by side.
@HeightRealist
Definitely not, you have not done any analysis or measurements properly. Look up Zac Efron and Jackman in same footwear standing both with perfect posture side by side on even footing and same angle, Efron is 5'8 minimum,and looked that with a strong 6'2 Jackman, that was at least 6 inches there,possibly even 7. Not claiming Jackman is 6'3,more likely Efron is shy of 5'8 perhaps,but Jackman is a strong 6'2 in the evening. He has looked same height as Reynolds in the 2009 film and at premieres consistently,and Reynolds is a shade over 6'2. Jackman was taller than Obama by a strong inch at least, and that angling of that photo you saw was obvious in Obamas favor,tilted. You can't judge height. You have no idea what 1 inch or 5 centimeters(2 inches) actually is side by side.
HeightRealist said on 16/May/20
Hi Rob.I'm pretty convinced that Hugh Jackman is not as tall as listed. He is clearly and inch or more shorter than Ryan Reynolds. Ryan actually never stands completely straight so he might be slightly taller than 6'2. 188-189cm for Ryan and 184cm for Hugh. Hugh was shorter than Obama who is 185-186.
Peak 185, nowadays 184 for mr Jackman. Mr Jackman never looked 6'2.
Hi Rob.I'm pretty convinced that Hugh Jackman is not as tall as listed. He is clearly and inch or more shorter than Ryan Reynolds. Ryan actually never stands completely straight so he might be slightly taller than 6'2. 188-189cm for Ryan and 184cm for Hugh. Hugh was shorter than Obama who is 185-186.
Peak 185, nowadays 184 for mr Jackman. Mr Jackman never looked 6'2.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 9/May/20
I think more 187-187.5cm now and 188-188.5cm peak
I think more 187-187.5cm now and 188-188.5cm peak
berta said on 8/May/20
his small head can make him look legit 6´2 when standign alone but in reality i think barely 188 peak maybe 187,5 and today he can looks 186-187
his small head can make him look legit 6´2 when standign alone but in reality i think barely 188 peak maybe 187,5 and today he can looks 186-187
6footTom said on 6/May/20
@jano
Reynolds is easily taller than Jackman these days.
@jano
Reynolds is easily taller than Jackman these days.
Nik said on 5/May/20
He can come across as being under 6'1.5" in the above photo!
He can come across as being under 6'1.5" in the above photo!
HypoMarkeble said on 4/May/20
@Ulf Jonas Hiller
Hugh is 51 what are you on about?
@Ulf Jonas Hiller
Hugh is 51 what are you on about?
jano said on 2/May/20
He is taller than ryan reynolds or at least the same height, there is something wrong with these two listings.
He is taller than ryan reynolds or at least the same height, there is something wrong with these two listings.
Ulf Jonas Hiller said on 28/Apr/20
The guy has shrunk remarkably considering he's not even 50! A full inch, I believe.
Just compare pictures of him next to Ryan Reynolds, who too is over 40, but I don't believe he's lost a millimeter.
The guy has shrunk remarkably considering he's not even 50! A full inch, I believe.
Just compare pictures of him next to Ryan Reynolds, who too is over 40, but I don't believe he's lost a millimeter.
James B 172cm said on 26/Apr/20
i dont see anything wrong with erics comment
i dont see anything wrong with erics comment
K.A 188.4! said on 21/Apr/20
@Eric W. Tam
Your last phrase was very unnecessary
@Eric W. Tam
Your last phrase was very unnecessary
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 17/Apr/20
Eric W Tam silly statement
Eric W Tam silly statement
Eric W. Tam said on 1/Mar/20
6'2 is a perfect height for men, I know a 6'2 son of a gun who thinks he is a wax figure while I'm a peasant (despite me not being much shorter than him, stronger and more intelligent than him, but that's a conversation for another day) because he has that extra couple inches and change on me. So yeah don't get why Jackman is encouraged to lie about his height. Anyway, I swear he was once listed as 6'3 or 6'4. 6'3 would have been a white lie though 6'4+ would definitely be an embellishment. 6'1.5 now, 6'2 in his prime, has yet to lose a lot of height since he's in his early 50s, it would be interesting to see if he still stands over 6'0 in his eighties. I'd say he'd be 1.81 to 1.84 during Jackman's final, peaceful days.
6'2 is a perfect height for men, I know a 6'2 son of a gun who thinks he is a wax figure while I'm a peasant (despite me not being much shorter than him, stronger and more intelligent than him, but that's a conversation for another day) because he has that extra couple inches and change on me. So yeah don't get why Jackman is encouraged to lie about his height. Anyway, I swear he was once listed as 6'3 or 6'4. 6'3 would have been a white lie though 6'4+ would definitely be an embellishment. 6'1.5 now, 6'2 in his prime, has yet to lose a lot of height since he's in his early 50s, it would be interesting to see if he still stands over 6'0 in his eighties. I'd say he'd be 1.81 to 1.84 during Jackman's final, peaceful days.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 26/Feb/20
VitoCheng, yeah those aren’t impossible
VitoCheng, yeah those aren’t impossible
VitoCheng said on 21/Feb/20
Current:187.3cm
Peak:188.6cm
Current:187.3cm
Peak:188.6cm
Jkiller said on 4/Feb/20
188cm peak, 187cm nowadays
188cm peak, 187cm nowadays
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 28/Dec/19
Definitely not an inch between him and Ryan
Definitely not an inch between him and Ryan
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 28/Dec/19
Peak: 6ft2⅛
Current: 6ft1⅝
Peak: 6ft2⅛
Current: 6ft1⅝
185vietnamese said on 23/Dec/19
@Johan 185 cm
That’s one of just some picture of him and Ryan that i can rely on. Others picture that posted here is just Hugh standing further from the camera which can easily tell cuz his head look obviously smaller than Ryan. In the movie, he can olso look as tall as Ryan. And i don’t think that arm over shoulder should make Ryan lose any height unless he’s leaning or something.
Ryan Reynolds has a really good posture most of the time.
But probably that he maybe a little shorter than Ryan.
@Johan 185 cm
That’s one of just some picture of him and Ryan that i can rely on. Others picture that posted here is just Hugh standing further from the camera which can easily tell cuz his head look obviously smaller than Ryan. In the movie, he can olso look as tall as Ryan. And i don’t think that arm over shoulder should make Ryan lose any height unless he’s leaning or something.
Ryan Reynolds has a really good posture most of the time.
But probably that he maybe a little shorter than Ryan.
Johan 185 cm said on 23/Dec/19
185 Vietnamese said on 22/Dec/19
As tall as Ryan Reynolds
Click Here
------------
Its obvious from that pic that he is holding Ryan down as some celebs do at times in pics. Ofc I don't think that is Hugh's intention but you can see from his arm that this is the case.
185 Vietnamese said on 22/Dec/19
As tall as Ryan Reynolds
Click Here
------------
Its obvious from that pic that he is holding Ryan down as some celebs do at times in pics. Ofc I don't think that is Hugh's intention but you can see from his arm that this is the case.
Animus said on 18/Dec/19
Rob, you say that doing heavy deadlifts causes greater levels of height loss than would otherwise be expected. Is that statement based on research? I see where you are coming from, especially if the lift is executed with bad form (too much rounding in the back). However, if someone practices good form and refrains from doing overly strenuous squats and deadlifts, is it possible/likely to avoid that kind of height loss?
Editor Rob
Rob, you say that doing heavy deadlifts causes greater levels of height loss than would otherwise be expected. Is that statement based on research? I see where you are coming from, especially if the lift is executed with bad form (too much rounding in the back). However, if someone practices good form and refrains from doing overly strenuous squats and deadlifts, is it possible/likely to avoid that kind of height loss?
Editor Robthere have been a couple of studies I've seen in the past on athletes which suggest weightlifting is one discipline which increases risk of damage and disc issues.
James B said on 16/Dec/19
6ft2 peak and maybe 6ft1.25 today
6ft2 peak and maybe 6ft1.25 today
viper said on 26/Nov/19
Don't think he was ever more than
6-1.25-6-1.5
Don't think he was ever more than
6-1.25-6-1.5
Big dave said on 24/Nov/19
He's been looking 186 cm range these days , used to be a strong 6'2"
He's been looking 186 cm range these days , used to be a strong 6'2"
TheBat said on 22/Nov/19
6'2" peak, currently 6'1.5"
6'2" peak, currently 6'1.5"
Nearly 180cm guy said on 14/Nov/19
Here are photos of Jackman next to Claudia Karvan from 1999: Click Here Click Here Click Here
Jackman looked like a giant then. Rob, isn't there really a chance for Jackman's peak height to be a fraction of over 6'2"?
Editor Rob
Here are photos of Jackman next to Claudia Karvan from 1999: Click Here Click Here Click Here
Jackman looked like a giant then. Rob, isn't there really a chance for Jackman's peak height to be a fraction of over 6'2"?
Editor RobHe did look a more solid 6ft 2 earlier in his career like 15-20 years ago.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 4/Nov/19
Jackman actually looked 189-190cm in The Prestige beside Bale and Caine..
Jackman actually looked 189-190cm in The Prestige beside Bale and Caine..
Uriel said on 30/Oct/19
Kidman wears 10 cm heels while men shoes heel around 2-3 cm. So if Kidman height 180 cm Jackman's height suppose to be around 187-188 cm at that picture. Michael Caine listed at the same height with Jackman but if you see them at the Prestige Jackman suppose to be 5-7cm taller than Caine (listed as 188 cm), but I think Jackman can't be more than 193 cm.
Kidman wears 10 cm heels while men shoes heel around 2-3 cm. So if Kidman height 180 cm Jackman's height suppose to be around 187-188 cm at that picture. Michael Caine listed at the same height with Jackman but if you see them at the Prestige Jackman suppose to be 5-7cm taller than Caine (listed as 188 cm), but I think Jackman can't be more than 193 cm.
Tessa Van Nunen said on 24/Oct/19
Dev Patel looks more atleast 2-3cm taller than him. Dev Patel has a very similar build to me, I am 189cm and skinny. I think Hugh Jackman is 186cm max, and Dev patel is 188-189cm
Dev Patel looks more atleast 2-3cm taller than him. Dev Patel has a very similar build to me, I am 189cm and skinny. I think Hugh Jackman is 186cm max, and Dev patel is 188-189cm
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 12/Oct/19
Jackman would’ve beaten out a guy like Brosnan by a couple of centimeters. Personally I think Brosnan was near 187cm and Jackman near 189cm
Jackman would’ve beaten out a guy like Brosnan by a couple of centimeters. Personally I think Brosnan was near 187cm and Jackman near 189cm
Miss Sandy Cowell said on 12/Oct/19
🎁🎈🕯️🎂 Happy Birthday Hugh! 🎂🕯️🎈🎁
Many Happy Returns to Hugh Jackman, who turns 51 today.
6ft2 peak; 6ft1.5 today.
🎁🎈🕯️🎂🎁🎈🕯️🎂🎁🎈🕯️🎂🎁🎈🕯️🎂
🎁🎈🕯️🎂 Happy Birthday Hugh! 🎂🕯️🎈🎁
Many Happy Returns to Hugh Jackman, who turns 51 today.
6ft2 peak; 6ft1.5 today.
🎁🎈🕯️🎂🎁🎈🕯️🎂🎁🎈🕯️🎂🎁🎈🕯️🎂
pov said on 11/Oct/19
I think hugh jackman and piers brosnan were the same height peak. Solid 6”1
I think hugh jackman and piers brosnan were the same height peak. Solid 6”1
viper said on 23/Sep/19
Titus looks 6-2 a lot
Titus looks 6-2 a lot
viper said on 23/Sep/19
Where did Titus measure 6-4?
Where did Titus measure 6-4?
Sotiris Gravas said on 23/Sep/19
@185
Actually, it looks like Titus is under 6'3", given that this is him next to Jameis Winston:
Click Here , Click Here Jameis is listed 6'4", but I'm told is 6'3.5". Titus might be 6'2.5".
@185
Actually, it looks like Titus is under 6'3", given that this is him next to Jameis Winston:
Click Here , Click Here Jameis is listed 6'4", but I'm told is 6'3.5". Titus might be 6'2.5".
Gaspergoo said on 21/Sep/19
After seeing the picture of him next to David Beckman, I would say s fair height is 6'1"....the person who is comparing them in height is allowing Beckman a higher height with hair.... stilly... obvious 2" differences
After seeing the picture of him next to David Beckman, I would say s fair height is 6'1"....the person who is comparing them in height is allowing Beckman a higher height with hair.... stilly... obvious 2" differences
185 said on 16/Sep/19
@Sotiris Gravas
How do you know Titus O'Neil is just 6'3. He listed at 6'6 and measured at 6'4.
@Sotiris Gravas
How do you know Titus O'Neil is just 6'3. He listed at 6'6 and measured at 6'4.
Tall Sam said on 11/Sep/19
Jackman does look like he's quickly heading for the 6'1" mark, more than a decade ago he could look taller to be sure.
Jackman does look like he's quickly heading for the 6'1" mark, more than a decade ago he could look taller to be sure.
Christian 6'5 3/8" said on 11/Sep/19
@Sotiris
Hugh looks 6'0"-6'0.5" in that pic to be honest.
@Sotiris
Hugh looks 6'0"-6'0.5" in that pic to be honest.
Meltdown said on 6/Sep/19
I'd give Hugh a solid 6'1.75" peak height and 6'1"flat now at 50.
I'd give Hugh a solid 6'1.75" peak height and 6'1"flat now at 50.
Jackson said on 6/Sep/19
Looked 6’2” to me his entire career. You can maybe argue he’s 6’1.75” these days. Nothing under.
Looked 6’2” to me his entire career. You can maybe argue he’s 6’1.75” these days. Nothing under.
185 said on 4/Sep/19
I have an inseam of about 34-45 inches. Is that can considered long.
I have an inseam of about 34-45 inches. Is that can considered long.
Chris Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 4/Sep/19
6'1 1/2 with 6'3-6'4 guys legs it seem rare.
6'1 1/2 with 6'3-6'4 guys legs it seem rare.
185 said on 2/Sep/19
I really doubt that his leg could be as long as conan’s leg
Click Here
His leg obviously longer than ryan reynolds and liev
I really doubt that his leg could be as long as conan’s leg
Click Here
His leg obviously longer than ryan reynolds and liev
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 23/Aug/19
He does have very long legs. They wouldn’t look out of place on a 6ft4 guy
He does have very long legs. They wouldn’t look out of place on a 6ft4 guy
Ian555 said on 18/Aug/19
Rob I’m curious but when did you think Jackman started shrinking and what would be the highest you would estimate him at?
Editor Rob
Rob I’m curious but when did you think Jackman started shrinking and what would be the highest you would estimate him at?
Editor RobSomewhere in 40's, the years of weight lifting I think have effected his back. As mentioned before, he's dead lifting massive weights...you don't magically get up to that range without years of doing it, and you are lucky by mid 40's not to have done some disc damage.
Jammes said on 11/Aug/19
If he was a legit 6'2 twenty years ago,I wonder if Famke is actually 5'10 or a very weak 5'11
It seems like there is a bit more than 2.5 inches between them like a full 3 or 4 unless his footwear gave him some more height.
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
I feel like here Famke can be in the 5'10 range
Click Here
If he was a legit 6'2 twenty years ago,I wonder if Famke is actually 5'10 or a very weak 5'11
It seems like there is a bit more than 2.5 inches between them like a full 3 or 4 unless his footwear gave him some more height.
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
I feel like here Famke can be in the 5'10 range
Click Here
Importer said on 7/Aug/19
He looked atleast 6'2" in swordfish.
He looked atleast 6'2" in swordfish.
185 said on 6/Aug/19
he's really about ryan reynolds and liev schreibe in movie, not sure in picture. I still think the list is spot on.
he's really about ryan reynolds and liev schreibe in movie, not sure in picture. I still think the list is spot on.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 23/Jul/19
6ft1 is too low and 6ft is just nonsense
6ft1 is too low and 6ft is just nonsense
Blahhh said on 11/Jul/19
Jackman looked hardly any taller than 5’10.5” Jake gylenhaal, and decently shorter than 6’1.75” Ryan Reynolds.
I thought Jackman always cleared 6’1” easily until I saw that picture with gylenhaal and reynolds. Jackman looks 6’0” flat now...
Jackman looked hardly any taller than 5’10.5” Jake gylenhaal, and decently shorter than 6’1.75” Ryan Reynolds.
I thought Jackman always cleared 6’1” easily until I saw that picture with gylenhaal and reynolds. Jackman looks 6’0” flat now...
berta said on 6/Jul/19
dosent look a mm over 186 today beside weak 189 Ryan reynolds. COuld be like 3,5 cm beetween them
dosent look a mm over 186 today beside weak 189 Ryan reynolds. COuld be like 3,5 cm beetween them
Alex 6'3.25 said on 29/Jun/19
He's just 50, he didn't lose even an half centimeter, he never was a real 188 cm as they said, but more like 186-187 cm. Simply enough.
He's just 50, he didn't lose even an half centimeter, he never was a real 188 cm as they said, but more like 186-187 cm. Simply enough.
Laura Buckley-Bertolissi said on 15/Jun/19
I honestly believe Hugh Jackman when he was told to lie about his height earlier on in his Career and I believe him when he says his real Height is 6'2.
As for the for the photo with Nicole they aren't even standing exactly side by side if anything Hugh is a little more forward than Nicole.
I honestly believe Hugh Jackman when he was told to lie about his height earlier on in his Career and I believe him when he says his real Height is 6'2.
As for the for the photo with Nicole they aren't even standing exactly side by side if anything Hugh is a little more forward than Nicole.
Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 11/Jun/19
I can see 188.3cm peak and still keeping 187cm now.
I can see 188.3cm peak and still keeping 187cm now.
Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 3/Jun/19
@Dream Peak he can. But he doesn't look much over 6'1.5" nowadays.
@Dream Peak he can. But he doesn't look much over 6'1.5" nowadays.
Aus said on 5/May/19
189cm at peak, he seems masive in the prestige
189cm at peak, he seems masive in the prestige
Miss Sandy Cowell said on 28/Apr/19
⭐️ Sorry guys! I should have mentioned that the film was 'Asylum'.
⭐️ Sorry guys! I should have mentioned that the film was 'Asylum'.
Miss Sandy Cowell said on 28/Apr/19
I could see going on for 6ft2 for this sturdily-built actor when I had the first chance to view him again properly since I saw him in 'Swordfish' eons ago!
Hugh gets 6ft2 peak and half-an-inch less now. 💪
I could see going on for 6ft2 for this sturdily-built actor when I had the first chance to view him again properly since I saw him in 'Swordfish' eons ago!
Hugh gets 6ft2 peak and half-an-inch less now. 💪
Dream said on 26/Apr/19
Honestly, I can see a case of 6’2 1/8th” for Jackman.
Honestly, I can see a case of 6’2 1/8th” for Jackman.
Dante said on 26/Apr/19
@Jammes. 5’11 is still too tall for wolverine, he is supposed to be even shorter than an average man, Marvel needs to find someone who is under 5’7 or 5’8, and quite grizzled looking dude, Hugh Jackman imo was way too tall and too much of a pretty boy to play wolverine, who is supposed to be short, ridiculously hairy and not very good looking?
I think Scott Caan would be a better fit for the character he is short, young, kinda good looking but not pretty boy level of looks.
@Jammes. 5’11 is still too tall for wolverine, he is supposed to be even shorter than an average man, Marvel needs to find someone who is under 5’7 or 5’8, and quite grizzled looking dude, Hugh Jackman imo was way too tall and too much of a pretty boy to play wolverine, who is supposed to be short, ridiculously hairy and not very good looking?
I think Scott Caan would be a better fit for the character he is short, young, kinda good looking but not pretty boy level of looks.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 24/Apr/19
181-182cm is just stupid talk
181-182cm is just stupid talk
Jammes said on 21/Apr/19
Sadly I doubt we will ever get a wolverine actor thats 5'3,but they shouldn't go taller than 5'11 imo.
Sadly I doubt we will ever get a wolverine actor thats 5'3,but they shouldn't go taller than 5'11 imo.
Sceptic said on 21/Apr/19
186 cm is too much for Jackman.
On this photo Jackman and Kidman have the same heels, and Hugh looks only 3 cm taller than Nicole, who is claimed to be 178-179 cm - Click Here
So Jackman can't be more than 181-182 cm.
And according to alternative estimation Kidman may be only 175-177 cm - Click Here
186 cm is too much for Jackman.
On this photo Jackman and Kidman have the same heels, and Hugh looks only 3 cm taller than Nicole, who is claimed to be 178-179 cm - Click Here
So Jackman can't be more than 181-182 cm.
And according to alternative estimation Kidman may be only 175-177 cm - Click Here
mohammad said on 16/Apr/19
Age 25 = 188 cm
Age 51 = 187 cm
Age 25 = 188 cm
Age 51 = 187 cm
Bora said on 7/Apr/19
Sure in this photo Nicole Kidman has a little bit high heels but not even 3 inches, and they look equal, that's why lets say Jackman's peak height is 186 cm
Sure in this photo Nicole Kidman has a little bit high heels but not even 3 inches, and they look equal, that's why lets say Jackman's peak height is 186 cm
Edgar Ignacio Sanchez said on 27/Mar/19
Do long legs make you look feminine???
Editor Rob
Do long legs make you look feminine???
Editor RobI am not sure, but on women I'm sure they are seen as more attractive.
Heights are barefeet estimates, derived from quotations, official websites, agency resumes, in person encounters with actors at conventions and pictures/films.
Other vital statistics like weight or shoe size measurements have been sourced from newspapers, books, resumes or social media.
Celebrity Fan Photos and Agency Pictures of stars are © to their respective owners.