Add a Comment1282 comments
Average Guess (394 Votes)
Peak: 6ft 2.02in (188cm)
Current: 6ft 1.44in (186.5cm)
Peak: 6ft 2.02in (188cm)
Current: 6ft 1.44in (186.5cm)
Edgar Ignacio Sanchez said on 27/Mar/19
Do long legs make you look feminine???
Editor Rob
Do long legs make you look feminine???
Editor RobI am not sure, but on women I'm sure they are seen as more attractive.
billionaireslayer said on 20/Mar/19
Good 6'1 peak
Good 6'1 peak
James Brett 172cm said on 9/Mar/19
Rob the majority of votes have the rock at a peak height of 6ft2 1/8.......
Editor Rob
Rob the majority of votes have the rock at a peak height of 6ft2 1/8.......
Editor RobWell 6ft 3 and 1/8th yeah, it's believable.
GRIT said on 6/Mar/19
I think he just about about made up 6ft2 at his peak, maybe 6ft1.5 or a bit aover now
I think he just about about made up 6ft2 at his peak, maybe 6ft1.5 or a bit aover now
Sceptic said on 1/Mar/19
Hugh Jackman is about 5'11.5". He is only a half inch taller then David Beckham, who is listed as 5'11" here - Click Here
Hugh Jackman is about 5'11.5". He is only a half inch taller then David Beckham, who is listed as 5'11" here - Click Here
Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 19/Feb/19
Deadpool had current Wolverine by 1.25 inch. Can't denied it. Click Here Click Here 2" difference from those pictures but probably 1.25" in reality. I can buy Jackman being 6'1 1/2 now but 6'2 flat for Reynolds is out.
Deadpool had current Wolverine by 1.25 inch. Can't denied it. Click Here Click Here 2" difference from those pictures but probably 1.25" in reality. I can buy Jackman being 6'1 1/2 now but 6'2 flat for Reynolds is out.
Christian 6'5 3/8 said on 13/Feb/19
@Rob
I don't believe he has shrunk as much as like someone like The Rock did though. I can maybe see a 1cm loss for Hugh but I believe 2cm for Rock.
Editor Rob
@Rob
I don't believe he has shrunk as much as like someone like The Rock did though. I can maybe see a 1cm loss for Hugh but I believe 2cm for Rock.
Editor RobRock potentially can look like he's shrunk more, especially as many have him a peak height of 6f 3.25
Fred994 said on 12/Feb/19
Hi rob..how did you notice he shrink?? Do you think that most of us will shrink around 50 years old or there is a chance it is possible to keep height even after 60 if exercising everyday?
Editor Rob
Hi rob..how did you notice he shrink?? Do you think that most of us will shrink around 50 years old or there is a chance it is possible to keep height even after 60 if exercising everyday?
Editor RobJackman I believe is an exception due to his physical roles and his weight-lifting. Doing deadlifts to the point of getting over 400 pounds, puts tremendous strain on the discs for the years of working out to get to that stage..
Bobby 5'10 (178cm) said on 7/Feb/19
Brett got to meet Hugh Jackman? That's awesome sauce! Yeah, Hugh still looks pretty much 6'2 with Brett.
Brett got to meet Hugh Jackman? That's awesome sauce! Yeah, Hugh still looks pretty much 6'2 with Brett.
Brett said on 15/Jan/19
Sorry guys,
Just saw the questions re my height... I usually say 185cm... I can still hit around that at night, so maybe im technically more... but ive never done the full morning to evening measure-athon to try 😂
The picture of Hugh and me is from maybe 3-4 years ago, so I think he has shrunk more since then - from what Rob says... I was looking at some older shots of him, and he defintely looked taller a few years ago... eg this shot with Ryan Reynolds, he actually looks taller than Ryan here, but in more recent years, he tends to look shorter.
Click Here
Sorry guys,
Just saw the questions re my height... I usually say 185cm... I can still hit around that at night, so maybe im technically more... but ive never done the full morning to evening measure-athon to try 😂
The picture of Hugh and me is from maybe 3-4 years ago, so I think he has shrunk more since then - from what Rob says... I was looking at some older shots of him, and he defintely looked taller a few years ago... eg this shot with Ryan Reynolds, he actually looks taller than Ryan here, but in more recent years, he tends to look shorter.
Click Here
GRIT said on 5/Jan/19
Weak 6ft2 peak, 6ft1.5 now
Weak 6ft2 peak, 6ft1.5 now
Rising - 174 cm said on 2/Jan/19
It's not "haters", it's Ryan himself who said 6'1"-6'2". And come on, Ryan is definitely not 190 cm. He's definitely not taller than 6'2"-6'2 1/8" measured Brett Favre and he's shorter than Terry Crews, who is also a legit 6'2", maybe 6'2.25" as listed. If Ryan were 6'2.5"+, that would mean the NFL draft downplayed Favre and Crews. As for Hugh, he did look taller early to mid 2000's and could look a good 6'2" at times. Now he often looks closer to 6'1", but some of that seems to be how he stands.
It's not "haters", it's Ryan himself who said 6'1"-6'2". And come on, Ryan is definitely not 190 cm. He's definitely not taller than 6'2"-6'2 1/8" measured Brett Favre and he's shorter than Terry Crews, who is also a legit 6'2", maybe 6'2.25" as listed. If Ryan were 6'2.5"+, that would mean the NFL draft downplayed Favre and Crews. As for Hugh, he did look taller early to mid 2000's and could look a good 6'2" at times. Now he often looks closer to 6'1", but some of that seems to be how he stands.
Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 24/Dec/18
@Avillax True. Reynolds had Jackman by 3cm and Peak Jackman is legit 188cm. 185cm Samuel L.Jackman had clearly 5cm lower than Reynolds in Hitmans Bodyguard but haters will keep denied it with every excuses to make Deadpool guy 6'2 even. Lol.
@Avillax True. Reynolds had Jackman by 3cm and Peak Jackman is legit 188cm. 185cm Samuel L.Jackman had clearly 5cm lower than Reynolds in Hitmans Bodyguard but haters will keep denied it with every excuses to make Deadpool guy 6'2 even. Lol.
Jordan87 said on 19/Dec/18
Brett,
Anyway for you to confirm your height for us?
Rob can he do a height measuring video?
Editor Rob
Brett,
Anyway for you to confirm your height for us?
Rob can he do a height measuring video?
Editor RobI think he had claimed his height over a decade ago and hasn't really given reason to think he wasn't.
hridoyham58 said on 18/Dec/18
he is 6'0" tall and nothing
he is 6'0" tall and nothing
Celebheights 6'1.5" said on 7/Dec/18
@Brett I’ll take your word that he’s leaning, but even considering that, he certainly doesn’t look to be 6’2” there.
@Brett I’ll take your word that he’s leaning, but even considering that, he certainly doesn’t look to be 6’2” there.
6'2" gamer said on 4/Dec/18
He looks shorter than 6'2 right now but not shorter than 6'1 for sure.
He looks shorter than 6'2 right now but not shorter than 6'1 for sure.
Michael, 5'10" 178 cm said on 27/Nov/18
He was undeniably 6’2”, he looks that tall next to everybody else in the X-Men movies. He also looked to be that tall in the Greatest Showman and the Prestige. Whoever that guy was who said he was 5’10” was full of rubbish. Hugh was definitely 6’2” at peak, maybe a little bit shorter than that now.
He was undeniably 6’2”, he looks that tall next to everybody else in the X-Men movies. He also looked to be that tall in the Greatest Showman and the Prestige. Whoever that guy was who said he was 5’10” was full of rubbish. Hugh was definitely 6’2” at peak, maybe a little bit shorter than that now.
Tall Sam said on 22/Nov/18
Rob already has his height-loss represented in Hugh's listing, and the recent photos with Reynolds may have had Jackman at some sort of slight disadvantage. At this time I'd doubt the current listing should be any lower unless there's a lot more proof.
Rob already has his height-loss represented in Hugh's listing, and the recent photos with Reynolds may have had Jackman at some sort of slight disadvantage. At this time I'd doubt the current listing should be any lower unless there's a lot more proof.
Brett said on 21/Nov/18
Guys,
I sent Rob a picture with me and Hugh, in a gym together... I'm 185-186cm, and he probably had a cm or so on me... I think if he stood up super straight he may still be 187-188cm.
Happy for Rob to show the pic, if he wants :)
Editor Rob
Guys,
I sent Rob a picture with me and Hugh, in a gym together... I'm 185-186cm, and he probably had a cm or so on me... I think if he stood up super straight he may still be 187-188cm.
Happy for Rob to show the pic, if he wants :)
Editor RobHere is a link to your Photo.
Sotiris Gravas said on 17/Nov/18
Here's "Wolvie" next to his pal, Ryan Reynolds, from May of this year... Click Here , Click Here
Jackman just turned 50 and suffice it to say, I was shocked by these height-loss pics (assuming both had equal footwear).
Maybe it's time for a downgrade...
Here's "Wolvie" next to his pal, Ryan Reynolds, from May of this year... Click Here , Click Here
Jackman just turned 50 and suffice it to say, I was shocked by these height-loss pics (assuming both had equal footwear).
Maybe it's time for a downgrade...
TheBat said on 27/Oct/18
Definitely 6'2" peak and I can agree with his current height at 6'1.5".
Definitely 6'2" peak and I can agree with his current height at 6'1.5".
Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 11/Sep/18
Ryan Reynolds is 100% not under 189cm and peak Jackman 100% 188cm.
Ryan Reynolds is 100% not under 189cm and peak Jackman 100% 188cm.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 9/Sep/18
Today looks a strong 187cm
Today looks a strong 187cm
Lenad 5ft9.75in said on 27/Aug/18
The shortest Id ever give hugh, would be a weak 187cm.
The shortest Id ever give hugh, would be a weak 187cm.
Animus said on 22/Aug/18
Down below there was a discussion of the relationship between lifting "massive" weights and height loss, specifically that lifting massive weight could cause either premature or above-average height loss.
The thing to take into consideration is that what constitutes massive weight differ depending on body frame and various other factors. As a weightlifter it's hard to know when one has crossed the line of lifting "normal" weights into lifting "massive" weights.
Rob, do you have any suggestions as to how can ascertain for oneself where that line is?
Editor Rob
Down below there was a discussion of the relationship between lifting "massive" weights and height loss, specifically that lifting massive weight could cause either premature or above-average height loss.
The thing to take into consideration is that what constitutes massive weight differ depending on body frame and various other factors. As a weightlifter it's hard to know when one has crossed the line of lifting "normal" weights into lifting "massive" weights.
Rob, do you have any suggestions as to how can ascertain for oneself where that line is?
Editor RobI think pushing things that you are just managing to lift, and doing that over the course of years to build up to bigger and very heavy weights might cause more issues than lifting weights that are hard but you have a fair bit left in the tank.
vinny said on 7/Aug/18
Monkey knees she is pushing 6'0 theres a 2' shoes and there are a lot of pics with they together and Nicole always look at least 2 inches smaller with similar shoes they wearing on that photo. But thats 10 years ago today i think he is in the spot Rob put him.
Monkey knees she is pushing 6'0 theres a 2' shoes and there are a lot of pics with they together and Nicole always look at least 2 inches smaller with similar shoes they wearing on that photo. But thats 10 years ago today i think he is in the spot Rob put him.
Dejavu said on 5/Aug/18
He has definitely lost height. He looked the same height as Ryan Reynolds in the first Wolverine premiere.
He has definitely lost height. He looked the same height as Ryan Reynolds in the first Wolverine premiere.
berta said on 2/Aug/18
to me, a guy like ryan reynolds is 100 procent taller than peak jackman
to me, a guy like ryan reynolds is 100 procent taller than peak jackman
Monkey knees said on 15/Jul/18
Almost exact same, top of head, height as Kidman in the above pic. She is pushing 5'11 and he is wearing big heels there, and almost level. Claims of 6'2.5 and above are ridiculous.
Almost exact same, top of head, height as Kidman in the above pic. She is pushing 5'11 and he is wearing big heels there, and almost level. Claims of 6'2.5 and above are ridiculous.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 5/Jul/18
Junior, I think those estimates could be spot on. Hugh still looks no less than 187cm today
Junior, I think those estimates could be spot on. Hugh still looks no less than 187cm today
Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 28/Jun/18
Posture do apart in deceiving someones height. I still think Rob under list Jackman peak and now. He still look solid 187cm when standing straight on Jimmy Fallon show and look a wee bit over 6'2 peak with John Travolta and Halle Berry.
6'2 1/8 peak
6'1 5/8 now
Posture do apart in deceiving someones height. I still think Rob under list Jackman peak and now. He still look solid 187cm when standing straight on Jimmy Fallon show and look a wee bit over 6'2 peak with John Travolta and Halle Berry.
6'2 1/8 peak
6'1 5/8 now
Warren said on 18/Jun/18
First time I saw this page and little shocked 6’2" was his peak height!
First time I saw this page and little shocked 6’2" was his peak height!
Robinson said on 8/Jun/18
Actually he looks 187 cm top in his peak for me.
Actually he looks 187 cm top in his peak for me.
MAD SAM said on 4/Jun/18
I don’t disagree to the fact that he would had been 188-189 cm in the past, sadly now though he’s lost almost an inch of it gonna give him 186 cm presently
I don’t disagree to the fact that he would had been 188-189 cm in the past, sadly now though he’s lost almost an inch of it gonna give him 186 cm presently
Westworlder said on 3/Jun/18
John Cena (self-claimed and pretty much confirmed 6ft/184 guy) looked barely an inch shorter than Jackman on James Corden's show, and other pictures they've taken together recently. I think Jackman is definitely in the 186-187 range these days.
John Cena (self-claimed and pretty much confirmed 6ft/184 guy) looked barely an inch shorter than Jackman on James Corden's show, and other pictures they've taken together recently. I think Jackman is definitely in the 186-187 range these days.
Christian-6'5 3/8" said on 1/Jun/18
@Andrea
I agree with you on this one.
@Andrea
I agree with you on this one.
Gracian said on 1/Jun/18
Many people want to argue at 6'2.25" for peak height Jackman. I think it really is fired." Rob, look at this picture from 1995: Click Here
I believe in that 6'2.25" was the peak height of Hugh before any loss height of Jackman. Rob, what do you think about it?
Many people want to argue at 6'2.25" for peak height Jackman. I think it really is fired." Rob, look at this picture from 1995: Click Here
I believe in that 6'2.25" was the peak height of Hugh before any loss height of Jackman. Rob, what do you think about it?
Andrea said on 28/May/18
He certainly doesn't look over 6'0.5 in that picture with Ryan. How much of that is due to posture and/or footwear is harder to say, but Hugh can certainly look barely 6'1 a lot in the last years...
He certainly doesn't look over 6'0.5 in that picture with Ryan. How much of that is due to posture and/or footwear is harder to say, but Hugh can certainly look barely 6'1 a lot in the last years...
gian said on 27/May/18
Rob, How tall is the girl?: Click Here Click Here
Here the heels: Click Here Click Here
Here with Mel Gibson : Click Here
Editor Rob
Rob, How tall is the girl?: Click Here Click Here
Here the heels: Click Here Click Here
Here with Mel Gibson : Click Here
Editor RobShe might be close to 5ft 9
Christian-6'5 3/8" said on 26/May/18
@SHANTANU
Ryan's posture isn't that great either. No way that's only a 1.5cm difference. At worst I can see 3cm but no less. That doesn't mean I believe Hugh's only 185cm, maybe he had less shoes than Ryan.
@SHANTANU
Ryan's posture isn't that great either. No way that's only a 1.5cm difference. At worst I can see 3cm but no less. That doesn't mean I believe Hugh's only 185cm, maybe he had less shoes than Ryan.
SHANTANU SANJAY 156 said on 24/May/18
Those who are getting confused about ryan and hugh pic, hugh posture was horribly bad in that pic and camera angle could tell the difference. Ryan is 188.5 cm and hugh is almost 187 cm . That is my assumption so dont get confused about that pic.
Those who are getting confused about ryan and hugh pic, hugh posture was horribly bad in that pic and camera angle could tell the difference. Ryan is 188.5 cm and hugh is almost 187 cm . That is my assumption so dont get confused about that pic.
Christian-6'5 3/8" said on 24/May/18
Looks about 6'0.5" with 6'2" listed Ryan Reynolds Click Here I don't know how Rampage can say the difference doesn't even look an inch.
Looks about 6'0.5" with 6'2" listed Ryan Reynolds Click Here I don't know how Rampage can say the difference doesn't even look an inch.
Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 22/May/18
Wolverine 6'1 5/8
Deadpool 6'2 5/8
Hawkeye 5'8 1/8
Thor from Asgard 6'2 7/8
Hulk 5'7 3/8 before turning green
Spiderboy Tom 5'7
Ant Man in its real form 5'8 1/2
Thanos and Cable 5'8 7/8
Captain America 5'11 7/8
Iron Man 5'7 3/4
Loki 6'1 3/4
Nick Fury 6'1
Falcon 5'10.5"
Black Widow 5'3
Scarlet Witch 5'4
Wolverine 6'1 5/8
Deadpool 6'2 5/8
Hawkeye 5'8 1/8
Thor from Asgard 6'2 7/8
Hulk 5'7 3/8 before turning green
Spiderboy Tom 5'7
Ant Man in its real form 5'8 1/2
Thanos and Cable 5'8 7/8
Captain America 5'11 7/8
Iron Man 5'7 3/4
Loki 6'1 3/4
Nick Fury 6'1
Falcon 5'10.5"
Black Widow 5'3
Scarlet Witch 5'4
berta said on 21/May/18
yeh in that photo with reynolds there is alot beetween them but it looks like ryan is standing afraction better. but still ryan looks his 189 cm as usuall and Hugh is looking 6 foot 1 flat alot. I dont believe hugh is that short but he never looks 188 anymore, not in one single photo it really start to look like minimum half inch loss.
yeh in that photo with reynolds there is alot beetween them but it looks like ryan is standing afraction better. but still ryan looks his 189 cm as usuall and Hugh is looking 6 foot 1 flat alot. I dont believe hugh is that short but he never looks 188 anymore, not in one single photo it really start to look like minimum half inch loss.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 21/May/18
There's definitely is not as much as 2in Reynolds and Jackman, not even 1in...
There's definitely is not as much as 2in Reynolds and Jackman, not even 1in...
JB - 5'9 said on 17/May/18
@editor rob: on Ryan Reynold’s instagram profile, a recent picture of him a Hugh shows a 2 inch difference in my eyes. So, either Ryan had thick boots on or one of these two are under/overlisted.
Your thoughts?
Editor Rob
@editor rob: on Ryan Reynold’s instagram profile, a recent picture of him a Hugh shows a 2 inch difference in my eyes. So, either Ryan had thick boots on or one of these two are under/overlisted.
Your thoughts?
Editor RobIt's possible Jackman is dropping height on his hip (which he does do a bit) and the camera is more on Ryan's side, these might help explain extra difference.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 8/May/18
In the 90’s-00’s he probably was 188-188.5cm
In the 90’s-00’s he probably was 188-188.5cm
Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 6/May/18
I atually found out more chance Jackman is atually 6'2 1/8 peak (188.3) and current height 6'1 5/8 (187), i remember when very first time i visit this site 13years ago i saw Jackman was listed at 6'2.5" and he don't look far from it.
I atually found out more chance Jackman is atually 6'2 1/8 peak (188.3) and current height 6'1 5/8 (187), i remember when very first time i visit this site 13years ago i saw Jackman was listed at 6'2.5" and he don't look far from it.
Dejavu said on 30/Apr/18
He was a strong 6’2 10 years ago. Check out his photos with Justin Timberlake who is a bit over 5’11. He looked 3 inches taller. Nowadays he probably lost height due to the constant weight lifting.
He was a strong 6’2 10 years ago. Check out his photos with Justin Timberlake who is a bit over 5’11. He looked 3 inches taller. Nowadays he probably lost height due to the constant weight lifting.
Dream(5'9.5 said on 30/Apr/18
Rob, could I make a case for 6'2 1/8ths" for Hugh Jackman.
Editor Rob
Rob, could I make a case for 6'2 1/8ths" for Hugh Jackman.
Editor RobHe had a chance in the 90's of that figure, though I'm happy with 6ft 2 flat for him.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 28/Mar/18
Jackman was a very solid 6ft2 at least 15-20 years ago. He looked more like a 6ft3 guy in Swordfish standing w/h Travolta and Vinnie Jones.
Jackman was a very solid 6ft2 at least 15-20 years ago. He looked more like a 6ft3 guy in Swordfish standing w/h Travolta and Vinnie Jones.
Berta said on 16/Mar/18
Yeah rob i agree that dwayne could have been 191 but i think your listings is good. He cant really lost more than half inch at this age with no real injuries. Jackman also is fair to have at 188 peak its either that or very strong 187. If you look at the clip with him and john cenå dancing, its reålly haŕd to see moŕe thån 2 cm beetween them .
Yeah rob i agree that dwayne could have been 191 but i think your listings is good. He cant really lost more than half inch at this age with no real injuries. Jackman also is fair to have at 188 peak its either that or very strong 187. If you look at the clip with him and john cenå dancing, its reålly haŕd to see moŕe thån 2 cm beetween them .
berta said on 14/Mar/18
i just realized that its now possible to see every old post since the celeb was added. jackman was listed 189 in the beginning. And dwayne johnson was listed 192 for a short period.I think like this before internet had all those photos we could compare their exact height with others it was probably easy to think they were those heights. Now in 2018 its easier. dwayne at best 191 peak and hugh jackman at best 188 probably 187,5 and now a fraction shorter because he is pretty skinny. He have muscles but it looks like he have very small bones and i think that makes people lose height easier than a guy like john cena.
Editor Rob
i just realized that its now possible to see every old post since the celeb was added. jackman was listed 189 in the beginning. And dwayne johnson was listed 192 for a short period.I think like this before internet had all those photos we could compare their exact height with others it was probably easy to think they were those heights. Now in 2018 its easier. dwayne at best 191 peak and hugh jackman at best 188 probably 187,5 and now a fraction shorter because he is pretty skinny. He have muscles but it looks like he have very small bones and i think that makes people lose height easier than a guy like john cena.
Editor RobIn Rock's case, it's not entirely implausible he might have over 6ft 3, although Jackman was pretty consistant with saying 6ft 2.
Gracian said on 7/Mar/18
Hey Rob! Here are Jackman's pictures from 6'1.25" Gerard Butler: Click Here
Butler looks taller than Jackman, maybe Jackman has lost more than half an inch? What do you think about Rob? Please answer me.
Hey Rob! Here are Jackman's pictures from 6'1.25" Gerard Butler: Click Here
Butler looks taller than Jackman, maybe Jackman has lost more than half an inch? What do you think about Rob? Please answer me.
Canson said on 27/Feb/18
@Rampage: yea Junior definitely isn’t downgrading if he’s calling Ryan Reynolds 6’2.5 possibly. Reynolds himself claimed 6’1/6’2” before and is listed 6’2”. The verdict is out on Reynolds to be honest. I think he’s an honest 6’2” but if he said 6’1/6’2 that raises eyebrows honestly and now 6’3 when he’s famous. That points to shoes
@Rampage: yea Junior definitely isn’t downgrading if he’s calling Ryan Reynolds 6’2.5 possibly. Reynolds himself claimed 6’1/6’2” before and is listed 6’2”. The verdict is out on Reynolds to be honest. I think he’s an honest 6’2” but if he said 6’1/6’2 that raises eyebrows honestly and now 6’3 when he’s famous. That points to shoes
Snowman said on 19/Feb/18
Rob, do you think doing compressive exercises like squats or deadlifts two times per week at normal weights would make one lose height over time? Or do you think only professional weightlifters (or people who lift massive weights in general, as Hugh Jackman) will have a noticeable height loss?
Editor Rob
Rob, do you think doing compressive exercises like squats or deadlifts two times per week at normal weights would make one lose height over time? Or do you think only professional weightlifters (or people who lift massive weights in general, as Hugh Jackman) will have a noticeable height loss?
Editor RobNormal weights at a lower frequency may not do as much damage as trying for massive weights.
Psychedelic Earth said on 3/Feb/18
No rampage, junior competed to upgrade Leto and Macht. (Who are both a tad underlisted imo).
No rampage, junior competed to upgrade Leto and Macht. (Who are both a tad underlisted imo).
Christian-6'5 3/8 said on 2/Feb/18
@Rampage
I don't think Junior's trying to downgrade anyone. He just sees it from a different perspective than yours most likely.
@Rampage
I don't think Junior's trying to downgrade anyone. He just sees it from a different perspective than yours most likely.
Junior Hernandez said on 2/Feb/18
@Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 7/Jan/18
Junior, I back up my statements...You just love to downgrade people
No rampage i'm not. I going with logic we could see Reynolds is an easy 189cm guy not flat 6'2 just because he claim it so 6'2.5" and Jackman peak 6'2 and 6'1.5" now is fine and there is at least half inch different when Reynolds wear converse with Jackman in dress shoes and the shoe heels differences is not under half inch you should know it. Disadvantage shoes and the half inch added up is obviously 6'2.5" fine for Reynolds unless you insist they were eye to eye same height i would go for 6'1 for Jackman nothing more. Then we call Reynolds as honest 6'2 so everyone were half inch down.
@Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 7/Jan/18
Junior, I back up my statements...You just love to downgrade people
No rampage i'm not. I going with logic we could see Reynolds is an easy 189cm guy not flat 6'2 just because he claim it so 6'2.5" and Jackman peak 6'2 and 6'1.5" now is fine and there is at least half inch different when Reynolds wear converse with Jackman in dress shoes and the shoe heels differences is not under half inch you should know it. Disadvantage shoes and the half inch added up is obviously 6'2.5" fine for Reynolds unless you insist they were eye to eye same height i would go for 6'1 for Jackman nothing more. Then we call Reynolds as honest 6'2 so everyone were half inch down.
popo said on 10/Jan/18
Peak was definitely 6.2 ft no doubt.....currently is between 6.1-6.175 ft he looked almost an inch taller than John cena who's definitely almost 6.1 ft
Peak was definitely 6.2 ft no doubt.....currently is between 6.1-6.175 ft he looked almost an inch taller than John cena who's definitely almost 6.1 ft
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 7/Jan/18
Junior, I back up my statements...You just love to downgrade people
Junior, I back up my statements...You just love to downgrade people
Tremo Kapast said on 30/Dec/17
His shoe size is 12, no doubt, he is definitely in the 6'2 - 6'1 range
His shoe size is 12, no doubt, he is definitely in the 6'2 - 6'1 range
alex953 said on 27/Dec/17
If he was in WWE they would say he was 6'5
So I'd say he is still about 6'2
If he was in WWE they would say he was 6'5
So I'd say he is still about 6'2
Mike said on 24/Dec/17
I doubt he was ever over 6ft 2, and more likely 6ft 1.5 or 6ft 1.75 peak and 6ft 1, 6ft 1.25 today.
I doubt he was ever over 6ft 2, and more likely 6ft 1.5 or 6ft 1.75 peak and 6ft 1, 6ft 1.25 today.
berta said on 23/Dec/17
he was 2- cm taller than cena in james corden show. lets say cena is 184,8 . i guess about 187 seems right for him today.
he was 2- cm taller than cena in james corden show. lets say cena is 184,8 . i guess about 187 seems right for him today.
Johno said on 17/Dec/17
Hmmm, Huge Jacked'man seemed to have a edge on John Cena on the James Corden show, 6'1 might cover most ranges.
Hmmm, Huge Jacked'man seemed to have a edge on John Cena on the James Corden show, 6'1 might cover most ranges.
Elektrafans said on 14/Dec/17
He is in the full 1.87-1.88 area, big guy.
Examples:
Click Here
Click Here
I would say he's current height is 6'1.5 but he recovers the strong 6'2 for some times, same range than Reynolds.
He is in the full 1.87-1.88 area, big guy.
Examples:
Click Here
Click Here
I would say he's current height is 6'1.5 but he recovers the strong 6'2 for some times, same range than Reynolds.
Junior said on 13/Dec/17
@Rampage(-_-_-)Clover
Stop lying. Reynolds with converse still edge out Jackman with dress shoes on. Just accept the truth.
@Rampage(-_-_-)Clover
Stop lying. Reynolds with converse still edge out Jackman with dress shoes on. Just accept the truth.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 12/Dec/17
Back to back he'd probably have the edge over DDL (who might be 6ft1 flat now)
6ft1 max nevermind barely over 6ft is just rubbish Jackman. He looked practically eye to eye with Reynolds at Comic Con...
Back to back he'd probably have the edge over DDL (who might be 6ft1 flat now)
6ft1 max nevermind barely over 6ft is just rubbish Jackman. He looked practically eye to eye with Reynolds at Comic Con...
FatBoySlim185 said on 10/Dec/17
Hi, Rob. What do you make of this? Click Here
Editor Rob
Hi, Rob. What do you make of this? Click Here
Editor Rob Jackman at times doesn't look over 6ft 1, sometimes even not that much over 6ft, but I don't beleive he is always standing that good in photos.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 1/Dec/17
I think he's currently a weak 6ft2 down from a strong 6ft2 at peak , I stick by that that.
I think he's currently a weak 6ft2 down from a strong 6ft2 at peak , I stick by that that.
Sam said on 22/Nov/17
Googling Daniel Craig with Jackman can show what a difference perspective can make, in some Jackman can seem over 4 inches taller, in others where the angle favors Craig, it can look like barely 2 inches between them, which is just not the case.
Click Here
Googling Daniel Craig with Jackman can show what a difference perspective can make, in some Jackman can seem over 4 inches taller, in others where the angle favors Craig, it can look like barely 2 inches between them, which is just not the case.
Click Here
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 12/Nov/17
At least 1in taller than Michael Caine (probably still at least 6ft1 then) in The Prestige
At least 1in taller than Michael Caine (probably still at least 6ft1 then) in The Prestige
Edimar1.84 said on 9/Nov/17
In movies I can see him at 6ft2.5/6ft3 range some times... But In real life always looks 6ft2 for me at Past. Now no more than a 6ft1.5 guy, in the picture with Mrs Kidman he looks at weak 6ft1.
In movies I can see him at 6ft2.5/6ft3 range some times... But In real life always looks 6ft2 for me at Past. Now no more than a 6ft1.5 guy, in the picture with Mrs Kidman he looks at weak 6ft1.
Jack said on 6/Nov/17
6'2 peak and 6'1.5 now but returns to 6'2 for moments.
6'2 peak and 6'1.5 now but returns to 6'2 for moments.
Edimar1.84 said on 1/Nov/17
6ft2.25 at peak, now 6ft1.5.
6ft2.25 at peak, now 6ft1.5.
Kurtz said on 27/Oct/17
a bilion of "fake" 6 2 that is the most "abused" height ever.
6 1 now and his prime.
a bilion of "fake" 6 2 that is the most "abused" height ever.
6 1 now and his prime.
Slim 6' said on 25/Oct/17
Rob, I don't mean to sound pressuring, but we added x-men universe Reynolds to the marvel page, can we please do the same for Jackman?
As listed.
Editor Rob
Rob, I don't mean to sound pressuring, but we added x-men universe Reynolds to the marvel page, can we please do the same for Jackman?
As listed.
Editor Rob yesterday I was doing another category, but I will look at the marvel universe soon and put more people in it from X-Men...
Joshua said on 25/Oct/17
He is still 6’2 now!!
He is still 6’2 now!!
Grit said on 25/Oct/17
Reynolds would have edged out a prime jackman
Reynolds would have edged out a prime jackman
Slim 6' said on 22/Oct/17
Please add to marvel universe. Like we did for Reynolds.
Please add to marvel universe. Like we did for Reynolds.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 20/Oct/17
I think a prime Jackman (pre X-Men days) would have been pretty much bang on the same as Reynolds
I think a prime Jackman (pre X-Men days) would have been pretty much bang on the same as Reynolds
Slim 6' said on 20/Oct/17
Checkmate, go to the "general page" and announce your new and old username. @mark5'9.5" changed to dreampuffe and did it. My suggestion of course. 👍🏻
Checkmate, go to the "general page" and announce your new and old username. @mark5'9.5" changed to dreampuffe and did it. My suggestion of course. 👍🏻
Checkmate said on 17/Oct/17
He could have been 188cm max in his youth but i wouldnt go over it. Today in his 50s and after a lifetime of unhealthy lifting a 1-1.5cm height loss isnt shooking.
Rob, is my ban permenent? I would like to use my original username but take away 188
I feel like my behavior has been explained, it was a once in a lift time crazy rant after a really bad week, and comments truley getting under my skin. I defenitly see why the reactions were so strong... Im sorry if anyone got offended.
Editor Rob
He could have been 188cm max in his youth but i wouldnt go over it. Today in his 50s and after a lifetime of unhealthy lifting a 1-1.5cm height loss isnt shooking.
Rob, is my ban permenent? I would like to use my original username but take away 188
I feel like my behavior has been explained, it was a once in a lift time crazy rant after a really bad week, and comments truley getting under my skin. I defenitly see why the reactions were so strong... Im sorry if anyone got offended.
Editor Rob no, just stick with Checkmate and if we stick away from politics, it makes it simpler.
Some Guy said on 14/Oct/17
Rob, I don't think this downgrade is really that necessary. I just watched Logan and he was an inch taller than Boyd Holbrook. I think he was around the same height as Richard E. Grant.
Rob, I don't think this downgrade is really that necessary. I just watched Logan and he was an inch taller than Boyd Holbrook. I think he was around the same height as Richard E. Grant.
Junior said on 14/Oct/17
Jackman must be 188.5cm peak and still at least myabe a few mm overr 187cm now. 186.7cm sound abit too low.
Jackman must be 188.5cm peak and still at least myabe a few mm overr 187cm now. 186.7cm sound abit too low.
Dejavu said on 30/Sep/17
He still looks above 6'1 for sure.
He looked similar height to Ryan Reynolds maybe at most a tad shorter. He also looks above 6'1 with Channing Tatum. I think he is 186 or 187 still.
He still looks above 6'1 for sure.
He looked similar height to Ryan Reynolds maybe at most a tad shorter. He also looks above 6'1 with Channing Tatum. I think he is 186 or 187 still.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 26/Sep/17
HHH possibly by a hair. He could look a solid 189cm guy in the 90's.
HHH possibly by a hair. He could look a solid 189cm guy in the 90's.
Dejavu said on 18/Sep/17
He looked closer to 189cm next to John Travolta.
He looked closer to 189cm next to John Travolta.
John Cena said on 17/Sep/17
Rob who will win the stadiometer. Peak Jackman or Triple h?
Editor Rob
Rob who will win the stadiometer. Peak Jackman or Triple h?
Editor Rob couldn't pick one.
Raza said on 9/Sep/17
Come on guys, I really don't think Jackman has dropped from 188. His pictures with Ryan Reynolds, Ben Affleck and more recently Boyd Holbrook (in Logan) prove it. 188 AT LEAST.
Come on guys, I really don't think Jackman has dropped from 188. His pictures with Ryan Reynolds, Ben Affleck and more recently Boyd Holbrook (in Logan) prove it. 188 AT LEAST.
Mark(5'9.5") said on 7/Sep/17
@Lol, going by your logic, I would have been 6'0.75" since in one photo, I managed to appear taller than a 6'0.5" best friend of mine. (While he's clearly taller than me in person.) At times, I managed to look only 1-2 inches shorter than someone who edged out Barack Obama in several pictures. (I won't post pictures of him and Obama out of respect.)
Don't focus everything on one picture.
@Lol, going by your logic, I would have been 6'0.75" since in one photo, I managed to appear taller than a 6'0.5" best friend of mine. (While he's clearly taller than me in person.) At times, I managed to look only 1-2 inches shorter than someone who edged out Barack Obama in several pictures. (I won't post pictures of him and Obama out of respect.)
Don't focus everything on one picture.
Slim said on 5/Sep/17
Hi rob, I've compared jackman to Crowe and Kidman,
They're less than 3 inches apart. This would make Jackman 6'1.25" or crowe and Kidman 5'10.75"
This is current btw not peak.
Hi rob, I've compared jackman to Crowe and Kidman,
They're less than 3 inches apart. This would make Jackman 6'1.25" or crowe and Kidman 5'10.75"
This is current btw not peak.
Mark(5'9.5") said on 31/Aug/17
I honestly think Jackman is a solid legit 6'2" maybe a fraction over it at peak. He sometimes looked taller than Ryan Reynolds back then.
I honestly think Jackman is a solid legit 6'2" maybe a fraction over it at peak. He sometimes looked taller than Ryan Reynolds back then.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 26/Aug/17
Looked similar to Reynolds at comic con, maybe at worst Ryan edged him slightly but in other photos Hugh actually looked taller! Can't be more than a centimetre between them. 10-20 years ago Jackman would have been no shorter than Reynolds.
Looked similar to Reynolds at comic con, maybe at worst Ryan edged him slightly but in other photos Hugh actually looked taller! Can't be more than a centimetre between them. 10-20 years ago Jackman would have been no shorter than Reynolds.
Junior said on 13/Aug/17
He can't be shrining over 1 cm. Maybe at peak he is really 6'2 and closer to 6'1.75" now.
He can't be shrining over 1 cm. Maybe at peak he is really 6'2 and closer to 6'1.75" now.
Slim 182 cm said on 9/Aug/17
Michael, nope, he wore out his body with excessive bodybuilding, I'm sure by 60 he'll be 185 or less.
Hopefully I'll see him at the airport one day...
He actually does look 186 next to Russ and Nicole.
Michael, nope, he wore out his body with excessive bodybuilding, I'm sure by 60 he'll be 185 or less.
Hopefully I'll see him at the airport one day...
He actually does look 186 next to Russ and Nicole.
Michael said on 9/Aug/17
Looks like he is shrinking with age.
Looks like he is shrinking with age.
The Man said on 4/Aug/17
Willies188
Ikr
Willies188
Ikr
Kal-El said on 29/Jul/17
Big Rob did some investigation
Click Here (Garrett Hedlund and Hugh Jackman)
Click Here
Garrett is listed 6ft 1.25in and he towers Hugh. Thoughts?
Editor Rob
Big Rob did some investigation
Click Here (Garrett Hedlund and Hugh Jackman)
Click Here
Garrett is listed 6ft 1.25in and he towers Hugh. Thoughts?
Editor Rob they both could be the same height, though you could find a photo like that with Hugh seeming a bit taller, just like you can find Hedlund looking taller.
Celebheights 6'1.5 said on 29/Jul/17
A better photo of Jake by Ryan Reynolds:
Click Here
Ryan is definitely taller than Hugh Jackman today.
A better photo of Jake by Ryan Reynolds:
Click Here
Ryan is definitely taller than Hugh Jackman today.
Celebheights 6'1.5 said on 29/Jul/17
Stephen Curry with Jake Gylenhall:
Click Here
Ryan Reynolds with Jake Gylenhall:
Click Here
Hugh Jackman with Jake Gylenhall:
Click Here (Hugh is standing up a bit straighter, and he's closer to the camera)
Ryan Reynolds looks to be the tallest one of the bunch.
Stephen Curry with Jake Gylenhall:
Click Here
Ryan Reynolds with Jake Gylenhall:
Click Here
Hugh Jackman with Jake Gylenhall:
Click Here (Hugh is standing up a bit straighter, and he's closer to the camera)
Ryan Reynolds looks to be the tallest one of the bunch.
TheMan said on 28/Jul/17
He is 185-186 at most!He may look 6'2 with Jake Gyllenhall but that's because Jake is closer to 5'10 and he looks 3 inches shorter than conan.He may have been a strong 187 in his younger days and that's it.Stop with those ridiculous 190-189 claims.
He is 185-186 at most!He may look 6'2 with Jake Gyllenhall but that's because Jake is closer to 5'10 and he looks 3 inches shorter than conan.He may have been a strong 187 in his younger days and that's it.Stop with those ridiculous 190-189 claims.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 26/Jul/17
190.5cm out of bed
190.5cm out of bed
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 26/Jul/17
Peak: 188-189cm
Today: 187-188cm
Peak: 188-189cm
Today: 187-188cm
USER said on 24/Jul/17
@Lol Troll.
@Lol Troll.
Slim 182 cm said on 17/Jul/17
The irony of @lols comment is, if Jackman lives to 90 he may reach that height.
The irony of @lols comment is, if Jackman lives to 90 he may reach that height.
Hijopotamus said on 17/Jul/17
@Lol, the pic with Nadal means nothing. Maybe Jack is bending his knees as he is holding the mobile or camera with his right hand.
@Lol, the pic with Nadal means nothing. Maybe Jack is bending his knees as he is holding the mobile or camera with his right hand.
Slim 182 cm said on 17/Jul/17
Rob, I'm a really skinny weak guy(nowhere near jackmans peak weight and strength), but will calisthenics(push-ups and pull-ups etc) shrink my height like this guy?
Editor Rob
Rob, I'm a really skinny weak guy(nowhere near jackmans peak weight and strength), but will calisthenics(push-ups and pull-ups etc) shrink my height like this guy?
Editor Rob those are good exercises, they won't effect your height negatively.
spainmen192cm said on 16/Jul/17
Rob, this cannot be good for height health x)
Click Here
Editor Rob
Rob, this cannot be good for height health x)
Click Here
Editor Rob yes, as I say, he's lifting massive weights. The pressures on the spine with these lifts will increase likelihood of damage.
To get to those ranges takes years of weight lifting efforts.
To get to those ranges takes years of weight lifting efforts.
Slim 181 cm said on 16/Jul/17
TBH, rob and the visitors, what caused Jackman to shrink? He seems healthy to me, was it excessive bodybuilding and H.G.H.? That's what my money's on.
or an injury from stunts.
Editor Rob
TBH, rob and the visitors, what caused Jackman to shrink? He seems healthy to me, was it excessive bodybuilding and H.G.H.? That's what my money's on.
or an injury from stunts.
Editor Rob look up some of Jackman's videos on deadlifts...you don't get to the weight Jackson can lift, without years of building up to massive weights.
I think he's compressed his discs and possibly has a few issues and degeneration in them.
I think he's compressed his discs and possibly has a few issues and degeneration in them.
Lol said on 15/Jul/17
You guys are fokin crazy if you think this guy is 6'2 lol.
Take a look at his pic with 6'0 Nadal confirmed by full body picture with 5'8 serrena williams on the same day and event.
This guy is wearing high heel shoes.
There's even a picture with him beside a bmw x5 which is 5'8 in height when he was wearing sports shoes which didnt have high heels o it.
You guys are fokin crazy to think this man is 6'2.
He is 5'10.5 max at his current age.
You place him barefoot with a real 6'2 like andy murray, he'll have to climb a ladder.
You guys are fokin crazy if you think this guy is 6'2 lol.
Take a look at his pic with 6'0 Nadal confirmed by full body picture with 5'8 serrena williams on the same day and event.
This guy is wearing high heel shoes.
There's even a picture with him beside a bmw x5 which is 5'8 in height when he was wearing sports shoes which didnt have high heels o it.
You guys are fokin crazy to think this man is 6'2.
He is 5'10.5 max at his current age.
You place him barefoot with a real 6'2 like andy murray, he'll have to climb a ladder.
RichardSpain said on 15/Jul/17
Sometimes he looks 189 cm/190 cm in screen but in real life is other history so.. I am going agree with Rob 187cm barefoot to Jackman nowadays is believable. I think he is that.
Sometimes he looks 189 cm/190 cm in screen but in real life is other history so.. I am going agree with Rob 187cm barefoot to Jackman nowadays is believable. I think he is that.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 14/Jul/17
I think a 30-year old Jackman would give Reynolds a run for his money under a stadiometer.
I think a 30-year old Jackman would give Reynolds a run for his money under a stadiometer.
S.J.H said on 12/Jul/17
I see Jackman is 6'1.25 now and close to 6'2 peak.
I see Jackman is 6'1.25 now and close to 6'2 peak.
Slim 181 cm said on 12/Jul/17
What if: 188 cm prime, 188 cm today? What if he hasn't shrunk?
What if: 188 cm prime, 188 cm today? What if he hasn't shrunk?
Celebheights 6'1.5 said on 10/Jul/17
Rob, do you think that Tom Hiddleston would edge out Hugh Jackman nowadays?
Editor Rob
Rob, do you think that Tom Hiddleston would edge out Hugh Jackman nowadays?
Editor Rob he might, though I think in a photo of them barefoot you might struggle to tell much difference.
Slim 181 cm said on 8/Jul/17
@S.J.H, I can't decide between if that was a troll or a simpleton, or both??
188-188.5, aged 22
186.5-187 ATM.
@S.J.H, I can't decide between if that was a troll or a simpleton, or both??
188-188.5, aged 22
186.5-187 ATM.
S.J.H said on 7/Jul/17
Jackman is not under 6'0.75 at worse. 5'10 sounds complete nutcase. Lol
Jackman is not under 6'0.75 at worse. 5'10 sounds complete nutcase. Lol
Jack said on 7/Jul/17
He used to be 189
He used to be 189
Slim 182 cm said on 6/Jul/17
@lol
The "Hugh Jackman Wimbledon" selfie with Nadal isn't efficient proof, we can't even see their full body's! they're most likely slouching to get in the photo or sitting down. 😂
@lol
The "Hugh Jackman Wimbledon" selfie with Nadal isn't efficient proof, we can't even see their full body's! they're most likely slouching to get in the photo or sitting down. 😂
Mark(5'9.5 said on 5/Jul/17
Rob, is it me or do I find the Jackman being 5'10" in the comment section beyond insanity?
Editor Rob
Rob, is it me or do I find the Jackman being 5'10" in the comment section beyond insanity?
Editor Rob well there's those who attempt a troll estimate and those who genuinely believe it.
The further you guess from a kind of believable range, the more obvious it can be that you ain't so genuine.
The further you guess from a kind of believable range, the more obvious it can be that you ain't so genuine.
Lol said on 4/Jul/17
@hijopotamus they're both standing up.
Look at serrena williams with jackman and nadal with jackman.
Serenna is 5'8.5
Nadal is 6'0.5
Jackman is 5'10.5 to 5'11 max.. he just wears elevator shoes most of the time.
@hijopotamus they're both standing up.
Look at serrena williams with jackman and nadal with jackman.
Serenna is 5'8.5
Nadal is 6'0.5
Jackman is 5'10.5 to 5'11 max.. he just wears elevator shoes most of the time.
Hijopotamus said on 3/Jul/17
@lol, dude, are you sure Jackman is standing up beside Rafa Nadal?
@lol, dude, are you sure Jackman is standing up beside Rafa Nadal?
Lol said on 2/Jul/17
@mark they were both standing up confirmed by serena williams who is 5'8 and jackman is 5'10.5.the man forgot to wear his elevator shoes lol.
@mark they were both standing up confirmed by serena williams who is 5'8 and jackman is 5'10.5.the man forgot to wear his elevator shoes lol.
Headman said on 1/Jul/17
He has bee said to have a small head, about what would his head length be, Rob?
Editor Rob
He has bee said to have a small head, about what would his head length be, Rob?
Editor Rob certainly not a 10-incher, but maybe not that much over 9 inch.
Majid said on 1/Jul/17
He is 6 feet 1 at max.
He is 6 feet 1 at max.
Mark(5'9.25") said on 29/Jun/17
@lol Jackman was actually sitting down while Nadal stood up. Also, That would mean Federer is 6'3"
@lol Jackman was actually sitting down while Nadal stood up. Also, That would mean Federer is 6'3"
Lak said on 27/Jun/17
He doesn't look 187 in the pic with Kidman considering she's 179 cm a her hills are maybe 1,5 inch
He doesn't look 187 in the pic with Kidman considering she's 179 cm a her hills are maybe 1,5 inch
Lol said on 27/Jun/17
@tom @mark
Look at Nadal and jackman again.
Lol jackman is 5'10 max
Nadal is not even 6'1 just under it and that is his real height because tennis players don't overestimate their heights.
@tom @mark
Look at Nadal and jackman again.
Lol jackman is 5'10 max
Nadal is not even 6'1 just under it and that is his real height because tennis players don't overestimate their heights.
Mark(5'9.25") said on 26/Jun/17
hugh jackman 5'10"? In your dreams.
hugh jackman 5'10"? In your dreams.
Tom said on 25/Jun/17
@Lol Hugh Jackman at 5'10" is a joke, you're basing that off one picture.
@Lol Hugh Jackman at 5'10" is a joke, you're basing that off one picture.
Lol said on 25/Jun/17
Have you seen Nadal and Jackman?
Nadal is 185cm Jackman is 178-179cm max although at a younger age and not lifting heavy weights yet, he was probably 180-181cm and ofcourse with shoes for the figures here.
Have you seen Nadal and Jackman?
Nadal is 185cm Jackman is 178-179cm max although at a younger age and not lifting heavy weights yet, he was probably 180-181cm and ofcourse with shoes for the figures here.
Celebheights 6'1.5" said on 17/Jun/17
Hugh Jackman:
Peak out of bed: 6'3"
Peak-6'2 1/4" (I've seen enough evidence to believe this. He coulc appear 187 CM at times in his peak).
Today-Out of bed-6'2 1/2"
Before bed: 6'1 3/4" (maybe 6'1 1/2" after a workout)
Garrett Hedlund: Out of bed-6'2 1/2"
Before bed: 6'1 1/2"
Gerard Butler: Out of bed 6'2"-6'2 1/4"
Before bed: 6'1 1/4"-6'1 1/2"
Ryan Reynolds:
Before bed-6'2 1/2"-6'2 3/4"
Hugh Jackman:
Peak out of bed: 6'3"
Peak-6'2 1/4" (I've seen enough evidence to believe this. He coulc appear 187 CM at times in his peak).
Today-Out of bed-6'2 1/2"
Before bed: 6'1 3/4" (maybe 6'1 1/2" after a workout)
Garrett Hedlund: Out of bed-6'2 1/2"
Before bed: 6'1 1/2"
Gerard Butler: Out of bed 6'2"-6'2 1/4"
Before bed: 6'1 1/4"-6'1 1/2"
Ryan Reynolds:
Before bed-6'2 1/2"-6'2 3/4"
Mark(5'9.25 said on 7/Jun/17
6'2.25" in his glory days. Nearly 6'2" is fine today.
6'2.25" in his glory days. Nearly 6'2" is fine today.
Namor said on 4/Jun/17
Least he doesn't add on an inch or two or a few lol and 200 pounds isn't that much tbh. I'm a little bit taller than 5'11 and I weigh about 192 pounds but I look like I weigh 100-110 kilos lol
Least he doesn't add on an inch or two or a few lol and 200 pounds isn't that much tbh. I'm a little bit taller than 5'11 and I weigh about 192 pounds but I look like I weigh 100-110 kilos lol
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 3/Jun/17
Again it's all about bone structure. People see The Rock as overweight or over bulked...wrong...he's naturally a big-framed guy and was heavier in his college football years when he was on the cusp of an NFL career. Today he's close enough to that weight but much more cut.
Again it's all about bone structure. People see The Rock as overweight or over bulked...wrong...he's naturally a big-framed guy and was heavier in his college football years when he was on the cusp of an NFL career. Today he's close enough to that weight but much more cut.
King of the hill 91 said on 3/Jun/17
He said six foot two and 170lbs would he be skinney or leane Rob or any one could some one
Editor Rob
He said six foot two and 170lbs would he be skinney or leane Rob or any one could some one
Editor Rob 170lbs on a six-two frame is pretty slim.
berta said on 2/Jun/17
i guess hugh doesnt have that big bones, have he? He have built up his body really great but i think his body from the beginninge looked tall and pretty skinny. But i can be wrong. I think people with big bones like john cena shrink at a very old age and guys like ryan reynolds and hugh jackman shrink early.
i guess hugh doesnt have that big bones, have he? He have built up his body really great but i think his body from the beginninge looked tall and pretty skinny. But i can be wrong. I think people with big bones like john cena shrink at a very old age and guys like ryan reynolds and hugh jackman shrink early.
Celebheights 6'1.5" said on 1/Jun/17
200 pounds is a normal weight for one who is 6'1"-6'2". One wouldn't be overweight in this height range until they weigh in at like 225 pounds.
200 pounds is a normal weight for one who is 6'1"-6'2". One wouldn't be overweight in this height range until they weigh in at like 225 pounds.
berta said on 30/May/17
hehe yeah 200 pounds is pretty nomral for that height. I think i said it out wrong. What i meant was if you weight about 200 pounds like him and maybe bench 260 pounds in benchpress i relly dont think that is enough weights to make you shrink over 1 cm at that age.
hehe yeah 200 pounds is pretty nomral for that height. I think i said it out wrong. What i meant was if you weight about 200 pounds like him and maybe bench 260 pounds in benchpress i relly dont think that is enough weights to make you shrink over 1 cm at that age.
ceilan said on 22/May/17
@berta : lol no, 200 pound for 1,88 is not "pretty low" it's totally ok.
@berta : lol no, 200 pound for 1,88 is not "pretty low" it's totally ok.
Mark(5'9.25 said on 20/May/17
Not many people were taller than a peak Hugh Jackman except a few.
Not many people were taller than a peak Hugh Jackman except a few.
berta said on 18/May/17
i remmeber back in 2005 or something like that everyone was guessing him to be 189 and said 188 was to low. i still think this weight lift thing is little overrated. He looks to me to be 188 at best and proibably is 187,4 in evenig an still is.( can have lost 4 mm by now) But dont really think so. He seems to weight about 200 pounds and that is pretty light for a guy his height. And he lifts pretty normal weight in his vidoes. No way he have lost any real height because of lifting those weight. If he would have been 250 pounds muscle and lifted 600 pounds in deadlift then i can believe that he could have lost a fraction by now. I thill stand by my about 187,5 guy then and maybe still now
i remmeber back in 2005 or something like that everyone was guessing him to be 189 and said 188 was to low. i still think this weight lift thing is little overrated. He looks to me to be 188 at best and proibably is 187,4 in evenig an still is.( can have lost 4 mm by now) But dont really think so. He seems to weight about 200 pounds and that is pretty light for a guy his height. And he lifts pretty normal weight in his vidoes. No way he have lost any real height because of lifting those weight. If he would have been 250 pounds muscle and lifted 600 pounds in deadlift then i can believe that he could have lost a fraction by now. I thill stand by my about 187,5 guy then and maybe still now
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 6/May/17
186cm looks too low even today. Nothing below a solid 187cm...
186cm looks too low even today. Nothing below a solid 187cm...
James B said on 4/May/17
Rob do you think he probably would have lost no height though if was 5ft7 (even if he lifted big weights)
Editor Rob
Rob do you think he probably would have lost no height though if was 5ft7 (even if he lifted big weights)
Editor Rob no, he wouldn't have lost as much with a spine a few inches smaller in length.
King of the hill 91 said on 4/May/17
189cm peak 187cm flat know as he is taller then What i believed with ben affleck
189cm peak 187cm flat know as he is taller then What i believed with ben affleck
Johan said on 30/Apr/17
Wrs567 said on 28/Apr/17
Hugh is taller than Cena, but not by much though
Cena needs a bit of an upgrade to 6'0.75'', since he is actually taller than Dean Ambrose!
He needs to be put to Deans listed height at the very least.
I think he definitely is bit more than just 184cm
OR maybe Hugh isn't as tall as you think? Cena claims to be 6 feet , 6 foot 1 in shoes so he isn't a weak 6'1' barefoot. He would have a 6'2" claim if that was true. Hugh does indeed look 6'1.25" (186) alot nowadays. I am also in the camp that believes he was no more than 6'1.75" (187) peak.
Wrs567 said on 28/Apr/17
Hugh is taller than Cena, but not by much though
Cena needs a bit of an upgrade to 6'0.75'', since he is actually taller than Dean Ambrose!
He needs to be put to Deans listed height at the very least.
I think he definitely is bit more than just 184cm
OR maybe Hugh isn't as tall as you think? Cena claims to be 6 feet , 6 foot 1 in shoes so he isn't a weak 6'1' barefoot. He would have a 6'2" claim if that was true. Hugh does indeed look 6'1.25" (186) alot nowadays. I am also in the camp that believes he was no more than 6'1.75" (187) peak.
Jug said on 30/Apr/17
He's not even 50 yet. You think he lost height? Why? I would say 6'2 for sure.
Editor Rob
He's not even 50 yet. You think he lost height? Why? I would say 6'2 for sure.
Editor Rob he spent 15+ years lifting big weights, doing a lot of deadlifting...long-term that can impact discs. I still think he has lost 1cm since his early 30's.
Wrs567 said on 28/Apr/17
Hugh is taller than Cena, but not by much though
Cena needs a bit of an upgrade to 6'0.75'', since he is actually taller than Dean Ambrose!
He needs to be put to Deans listed height at the very least.
I think he definitely is bit more than just 184cm
Hugh is taller than Cena, but not by much though
Cena needs a bit of an upgrade to 6'0.75'', since he is actually taller than Dean Ambrose!
He needs to be put to Deans listed height at the very least.
I think he definitely is bit more than just 184cm
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 27/Apr/17
188/189cm 20 years ago
188/189cm 20 years ago
TheMan said on 27/Apr/17
Peak 187,5 and now 186,5 I'm pretty sure what do you say rob?
Peak 187,5 and now 186,5 I'm pretty sure what do you say rob?
Christian-196.5cm (6ft5 3/8) said on 26/Apr/17
@berta
You're right. Jackman could be 186.5cm (about 6ft1.5) today. I doubt he was a solid 6ft2 peak though. I can't see a half inch height loss, a quarter inch maybe.
@berta
You're right. Jackman could be 186.5cm (about 6ft1.5) today. I doubt he was a solid 6ft2 peak though. I can't see a half inch height loss, a quarter inch maybe.
berta said on 26/Apr/17
i think in the photo where they look at eachother and both stand tall you can see that jackman is taller about half inch.i cant see cena taller than 185 that means that jackman could be down to 186,5 today. but its just one photo its hard to judge height on only that. i believe jckman still is 187-187,5
i think in the photo where they look at eachother and both stand tall you can see that jackman is taller about half inch.i cant see cena taller than 185 that means that jackman could be down to 186,5 today. but its just one photo its hard to judge height on only that. i believe jckman still is 187-187,5
anon said on 25/Apr/17
can someone explain to me how he can be six one plus if he's shorter than John Cena??
Editor Rob
When Jackman poses, a lot of the time he drops height in hip and spine...Here.
can someone explain to me how he can be six one plus if he's shorter than John Cena??
Editor RobWhen Jackman poses, a lot of the time he drops height in hip and spine...Here.
Chris said on 23/Apr/17
Admitted to Ryan Reynolds in an interview for Eddie the eagle that he has used lifts in wolverine movies to look taller .
Admitted to Ryan Reynolds in an interview for Eddie the eagle that he has used lifts in wolverine movies to look taller .
shiva 181 cms said on 17/Apr/17
@Mark a fraction over 6'2 for Hugh places Brandon routh a fraction over 6'3 which is unlikely to be safe Hugh peaked at 6'1.75 and routh 6'2.5
@Mark a fraction over 6'2 for Hugh places Brandon routh a fraction over 6'3 which is unlikely to be safe Hugh peaked at 6'1.75 and routh 6'2.5
Mark(5'9.25 said on 15/Apr/17
a fraction over 6'2" is fine for Jackman.
a fraction over 6'2" is fine for Jackman.
shiva 181 cms said on 14/Apr/17
He was 187-188 10 years ago now 186-187
He was 187-188 10 years ago now 186-187
Matthieu said on 14/Apr/17
He looks tall
He looks tall
M1M said on 12/Apr/17
I think he is shorter.
I think he is shorter.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 10/Apr/17
187cm today but 10-20 years ago he was 188-189cm
187cm today but 10-20 years ago he was 188-189cm
Christian-196.2cm (6ft5.25) said on 10/Apr/17
Hugh is and has always been 187. I don't think he has lost height tbh.
Hugh is and has always been 187. I don't think he has lost height tbh.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 8/Apr/17
I think he's still close to 6ft2 today when measured
I think he's still close to 6ft2 today when measured
shiva 181 cms said on 6/Apr/17
@Berta I agree with you, he hasn't lost much may be a cm i depends much on genetics too
@Berta I agree with you, he hasn't lost much may be a cm i depends much on genetics too
Cameron said on 5/Apr/17
Peak height???? I don't think he's lost any height but maybe he has.
Peak height???? I don't think he's lost any height but maybe he has.
180 said on 4/Apr/17
He looks 189cm
He looks 189cm
berta said on 4/Apr/17
shiva yes he lifts heavy( in some peoples eyes) but i can tell you as a carpenter and also bodybuilder/strongman that lifting, lets say deadlift 8 sets start easy at 100 kg and work his way up to maybe at best 170 kg if he does not try to max.You lift for about o total time of maybe 4 minues at most. Ore lets say lift up 30 plasterboards 5 stairs up for a total time of 1 hour and all of them wight about 35 kg each. And then rest of the day you lift to but just as a example. its only 35 kg but you lift non stop 1 hour that day and then 1/3 of the time rest of the day ore lift 150 kg for 4 minutes. :P i think you guys see what i mean.its when you lift for that long periods of time you start to hurt your back and it start to really hurt. FOr me trainig is a play in the park even if i lift weight up at 250 kg. I only lift it for a couple sekunds each time with a belt around my back. Jackman as a carpenter woudl have been 185 cm today If this is the case he have lost height. Most of the time in the gym you actuyally just rest for the next set.
shiva yes he lifts heavy( in some peoples eyes) but i can tell you as a carpenter and also bodybuilder/strongman that lifting, lets say deadlift 8 sets start easy at 100 kg and work his way up to maybe at best 170 kg if he does not try to max.You lift for about o total time of maybe 4 minues at most. Ore lets say lift up 30 plasterboards 5 stairs up for a total time of 1 hour and all of them wight about 35 kg each. And then rest of the day you lift to but just as a example. its only 35 kg but you lift non stop 1 hour that day and then 1/3 of the time rest of the day ore lift 150 kg for 4 minutes. :P i think you guys see what i mean.its when you lift for that long periods of time you start to hurt your back and it start to really hurt. FOr me trainig is a play in the park even if i lift weight up at 250 kg. I only lift it for a couple sekunds each time with a belt around my back. Jackman as a carpenter woudl have been 185 cm today If this is the case he have lost height. Most of the time in the gym you actuyally just rest for the next set.
Mike said on 31/Mar/17
Lol at the people saying minimum 189 peak, when he was clearly almost a inch shorter than legit 6ft 2.5 Brandon Routh over 10 years ago... I can buy 6ft 2 peak, but definitely not over.
Lol at the people saying minimum 189 peak, when he was clearly almost a inch shorter than legit 6ft 2.5 Brandon Routh over 10 years ago... I can buy 6ft 2 peak, but definitely not over.
shiva 181 cms said on 31/Mar/17
Hugh jackman's height
peak height: 6'2.5-75(189-190cms) out of bed ,6'1.7 (187-
188cms) before bed
Current height :6'2--25 (188-189cms) out of bed
6'1.25-(186cms) before bed
Hugh jackman's height
peak height: 6'2.5-75(189-190cms) out of bed ,6'1.7 (187-
188cms) before bed
Current height :6'2--25 (188-189cms) out of bed
6'1.25-(186cms) before bed
Namor said on 28/Mar/17
Berta* Dammit I do part time labouring haha I better not lose height haha
Berta* Dammit I do part time labouring haha I better not lose height haha
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 28/Mar/17
Comfortably 188cm range at peak with a decent shot at measuring 189cm on a good day. You need to go back to Aussie stuff from the 90's before he became a big star. He could even give a 190/191cm impression at times. He was very lanky and reminded me a bit of Ashton Kutcher frame-wise.
Comfortably 188cm range at peak with a decent shot at measuring 189cm on a good day. You need to go back to Aussie stuff from the 90's before he became a big star. He could even give a 190/191cm impression at times. He was very lanky and reminded me a bit of Ashton Kutcher frame-wise.
shiva 181 cms said on 28/Mar/17
@ berta Hugh lifts much heavier weights than a carpenter even if for a hour that causes much strain on back bone
@ berta Hugh lifts much heavier weights than a carpenter even if for a hour that causes much strain on back bone
berta said on 27/Mar/17
barely 188 peak and today little over 187 i dont believe this 1/2 loss. its mutch harder to work as a carpeneter all days than lift heavy 1 hour a day i promise you i should now who do both. and if you los this just from working out then every carpenter out there should have lost 1 inch at the age of 45
barely 188 peak and today little over 187 i dont believe this 1/2 loss. its mutch harder to work as a carpeneter all days than lift heavy 1 hour a day i promise you i should now who do both. and if you los this just from working out then every carpenter out there should have lost 1 inch at the age of 45
Huge Jackedman said on 25/Mar/17
@grizz He started a dehydration routine when shooting his anorexic shirtless scenes for Les Miserables and his shirtless scenes for every X-Men film from The Wolverine onwards. It causes his body fat to compress inwards and leave only muscle, as well as causing his veins to flare up and bloat. This is the cause for his thin appearance.
@grizz He started a dehydration routine when shooting his anorexic shirtless scenes for Les Miserables and his shirtless scenes for every X-Men film from The Wolverine onwards. It causes his body fat to compress inwards and leave only muscle, as well as causing his veins to flare up and bloat. This is the cause for his thin appearance.
Shiva182cms said on 25/Mar/17
189cms for a peak jackman sounds impossible look at him with Brandon routh. Who's a real 189cms guy
Hugh hackman peak height is 187-188cms probably closer to 187cms
Now he's more 186cms and a few change
189cms for a peak jackman sounds impossible look at him with Brandon routh. Who's a real 189cms guy
Hugh hackman peak height is 187-188cms probably closer to 187cms
Now he's more 186cms and a few change
grizz said on 23/Mar/17
He surprisingly held its own next to 6'7 behemoth Merchant in Logan. But he lost some muscle compared to his early 2010 days. Sure, shredded he is, but way thinner.
He surprisingly held its own next to 6'7 behemoth Merchant in Logan. But he lost some muscle compared to his early 2010 days. Sure, shredded he is, but way thinner.
Chris said on 23/Mar/17
Pretty much bang on 6"2 5 years ago and always had good posture so could maybe look like on the verge of 6"3 . When I watched the wolverine (2013) he looked noticeable shorter than his roles in the years before. Though at time of filming he would have been only 44 but the weightlifting for the wolverine roles does looking ensue as it is for most superhero roles now he has done a good 15 years for. He certainly did not look the full 6"2 in Eddie the eagle so I think he is a rare case of early height loss. I think the listing is spot on or either he was always a smudge under and is now 6"1.5
Pretty much bang on 6"2 5 years ago and always had good posture so could maybe look like on the verge of 6"3 . When I watched the wolverine (2013) he looked noticeable shorter than his roles in the years before. Though at time of filming he would have been only 44 but the weightlifting for the wolverine roles does looking ensue as it is for most superhero roles now he has done a good 15 years for. He certainly did not look the full 6"2 in Eddie the eagle so I think he is a rare case of early height loss. I think the listing is spot on or either he was always a smudge under and is now 6"1.5
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 21/Mar/17
Jackman looked 6ft3 in Swordfish
Jackman looked 6ft3 in Swordfish
S.J.H said on 21/Mar/17
@Dejavu said on 16/Mar/17
There is something call camera angle. Lol. Opposite way ryan reynolds is half inch taller than peak jackman
@Dejavu said on 16/Mar/17
There is something call camera angle. Lol. Opposite way ryan reynolds is half inch taller than peak jackman
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 20/Mar/17
I think you'd need to toss a coin, Lorne. Both guys in their 30's could look 189cm zone at times
I think you'd need to toss a coin, Lorne. Both guys in their 30's could look 189cm zone at times
Lorne??? said on 18/Mar/17
Ron, cards on the table: they were likely within a half cm, so too close to call, really, but still:
Who would measure taller under the stadiometer:
Hugh Jackman, young, or a peak Michael Madsen?
I think Madsen maybe, but we can't be sure really.
Still, I would appreciate you're opinion
Ron, cards on the table: they were likely within a half cm, so too close to call, really, but still:
Who would measure taller under the stadiometer:
Hugh Jackman, young, or a peak Michael Madsen?
I think Madsen maybe, but we can't be sure really.
Still, I would appreciate you're opinion
Shredder said on 18/Mar/17
Rob , how tall does this guy look with him?
Click Here
Same guy with Mike Tyson.
Click Here
Editor Rob
Rob , how tall does this guy look with him?
Click Here
Same guy with Mike Tyson.
Click Here
Editor Rob might appear only a couple of inches difference between those pictures, the guy could be in 5ft 5 range and Hugh a lot of time doesn't stand as tall as he can.
Dejavu said on 16/Mar/17
At peak he is a strong 6'2. There were pics where he edged Ryan reynolds
At peak he is a strong 6'2. There were pics where he edged Ryan reynolds
TheMan said on 13/Mar/17
I would not be surprised if he would measure near 6'1 flat today
I would not be surprised if he would measure near 6'1 flat today
Sam said on 13/Mar/17
He does look pretty tall in Logan. He's probably aided with favorable angles but does pull off looking bigger on screen than Boyd Hoydbrook and Eriq La Salle (who may have lost a smidge with age too) and not looking much under Stephen Merchant, who did have a noticeable slouch in their scenes together.
He does look pretty tall in Logan. He's probably aided with favorable angles but does pull off looking bigger on screen than Boyd Hoydbrook and Eriq La Salle (who may have lost a smidge with age too) and not looking much under Stephen Merchant, who did have a noticeable slouch in their scenes together.
Chris said on 10/Mar/17
Next to Stephen merchant in Logan he could look pretty much 6"2 but was wearing boots
Next to Stephen merchant in Logan he could look pretty much 6"2 but was wearing boots
Chris said on 10/Mar/17
I think peak 6"1.75 and now 6"1.5. Boots could make him look taller
I think peak 6"1.75 and now 6"1.5. Boots could make him look taller
Shredder said on 10/Mar/17
Rob , Even though your not into Comics anymore , do you think 195 lbs at 5'3 for Wolverine is an unbelievable figure by looking at the shape of character? At 5'3 he seems like he'd be like 150 - 160.
Editor Rob
Rob , Even though your not into Comics anymore , do you think 195 lbs at 5'3 for Wolverine is an unbelievable figure by looking at the shape of character? At 5'3 he seems like he'd be like 150 - 160.
Editor Rob it's not that unbelievable if he has a ton of muscle, which from what I remember, the comic character did have...
I do watch a lot of comic movies of course...but, they are over-saturated now...it was inevitable because with the advance in film and cgi effects, it became easier to create great looking comic book films...
I do watch a lot of comic movies of course...but, they are over-saturated now...it was inevitable because with the advance in film and cgi effects, it became easier to create great looking comic book films...
Logan said on 9/Mar/17
He edged out 6ft 1.5 Boyd Holbrook in Logan by at least a half inch, so either Jackman is still 6ft 2 or Holbrook needs a downgrade to a flat 6ft 1. Both were wearing similar heel boots in the scenes they shared together.
He edged out 6ft 1.5 Boyd Holbrook in Logan by at least a half inch, so either Jackman is still 6ft 2 or Holbrook needs a downgrade to a flat 6ft 1. Both were wearing similar heel boots in the scenes they shared together.
sadboyz said on 9/Mar/17
how come he lost height at such an early age?
Editor Rob
how come he lost height at such an early age?
Editor Rob Jackman has done a lot of heavy weights over 15 years, I believe it effected him half an inch.
Shredder said on 9/Mar/17
Same here , he doesn't have to be a 5'3 Actor , but Maybe about 5'7.
Same here , he doesn't have to be a 5'3 Actor , but Maybe about 5'7.
Peterson188cm said on 7/Mar/17
Danilo Gentili (192cm) Alexander Skarsgård (194cm): Click Here
Danilo Gentili (192cm) Hugh Jackman (187cm): Click Here
Danilo Gentili (192cm) Alexander Skarsgård (194cm): Click Here
Danilo Gentili (192cm) Hugh Jackman (187cm): Click Here
Shredder said on 6/Mar/17
Rob , Why do these Comic Book heights not add up?
Click Here
Editor Rob
Rob , Why do these Comic Book heights not add up?
Click Here
Editor Rob I don't pay as much attention to comics these days, but one thing with Wolverine...I would like the next incarnation of the character to be a shorter guy.
Lenad 5ft9.75in said on 6/Mar/17
187cm now, 188 peak. I agree with this listing
187cm now, 188 peak. I agree with this listing
Dejavu said on 5/Mar/17
Rob, has him right at 6'1.5. He looks the same height as Dev Patel. He did look taller 10 years ago though.
Rob, has him right at 6'1.5. He looks the same height as Dev Patel. He did look taller 10 years ago though.
mister_lennon said on 4/Mar/17
6'1 in the worst of the cases nowadays. I think he was a solid 6'2 guy at peak or very close. A strong 6'1 or weak 6'2 is possible too.
6'1 in the worst of the cases nowadays. I think he was a solid 6'2 guy at peak or very close. A strong 6'1 or weak 6'2 is possible too.
Normal tall guy said on 3/Mar/17
6 foot at best im mean look at pic with nichole kidman
6 foot at best im mean look at pic with nichole kidman
berta said on 21/Feb/17
johan and S.J.H i think you are right about 187 peak. that is what he always have looked
johan and S.J.H i think you are right about 187 peak. that is what he always have looked
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 20/Feb/17
Peak: 6ft2-6ft2½
Today: 6ft1½-6ft2
Peak: 6ft2-6ft2½
Today: 6ft1½-6ft2
S.J.H said on 16/Feb/17
@Johan
Yes truely fact goes it. Jackman is more 6'1.5 peak and 6'1 now
@Johan
Yes truely fact goes it. Jackman is more 6'1.5 peak and 6'1 now
Johan said on 13/Feb/17
That moment when people realise Rob has met Brandon Routh ( a legit 189 cm) and actually care to look at pics of him with Hugh 10 YEARS AGO.
He didn't even look over 6'1.5" 10 YEARS AGO ahahA.
That moment when people realise Rob has met Brandon Routh ( a legit 189 cm) and actually care to look at pics of him with Hugh 10 YEARS AGO.
He didn't even look over 6'1.5" 10 YEARS AGO ahahA.
mister_lennon said on 11/Feb/17
I think:
peak hugh: 188-189
Hugh now: 187-188
I think:
peak hugh: 188-189
Hugh now: 187-188
Wiles189 said on 9/Feb/17
Yes 6'2.25 in the 80s 90s
Yes 6'2.25 in the 80s 90s
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 8/Feb/17
Always saw him as the picture perfect 6ft2 minimum guy with excellent posture.
Minimum 6ft2¼(189cm) 15 years ago.
Always saw him as the picture perfect 6ft2 minimum guy with excellent posture.
Minimum 6ft2¼(189cm) 15 years ago.
S.J.H said on 2/Feb/17
@Peter 179cm
The picture with lebron james couldn't view their footwear and standing ground and atually jackman look more than 7" shorter minus a hair not 15-16cm and there is impossible lebron is 6'9 and not even a proper 6'7. In fact 6'4.75 Kobe bryant look at most 2" shorter than lebron james in real comparison. To me i have seem hugh jackman look 5.5" shorter than 6'6.5 daniel cudmore
Click Here full frame could tell a person height and more i look a jackman he does look 6'1 and at least 6'2 with shoes but if 187 peak like you say he can't be lower than 186cm his not even 50 years old yet at most he lost 1cm
@Peter 179cm
The picture with lebron james couldn't view their footwear and standing ground and atually jackman look more than 7" shorter minus a hair not 15-16cm and there is impossible lebron is 6'9 and not even a proper 6'7. In fact 6'4.75 Kobe bryant look at most 2" shorter than lebron james in real comparison. To me i have seem hugh jackman look 5.5" shorter than 6'6.5 daniel cudmore
Click Here full frame could tell a person height and more i look a jackman he does look 6'1 and at least 6'2 with shoes but if 187 peak like you say he can't be lower than 186cm his not even 50 years old yet at most he lost 1cm
Peter 179cm said on 1/Feb/17
He's about 185cm.Just look at pictures of him with Lebron James who absolutely dwarfed him,atleast 15-16cm and Lebron was measured 201cm flat on the draft combine and could barely be 200cm at night.Kaka at 186 is also taller,what else do you need?He's NOT 6'1.5-6'2 imo...Maybe 187 peak and 185 now anything more is inaccuate.
He's about 185cm.Just look at pictures of him with Lebron James who absolutely dwarfed him,atleast 15-16cm and Lebron was measured 201cm flat on the draft combine and could barely be 200cm at night.Kaka at 186 is also taller,what else do you need?He's NOT 6'1.5-6'2 imo...Maybe 187 peak and 185 now anything more is inaccuate.
S.J.H said on 25/Jan/17
@6 foot 17 yrs still growing
Maybe jackman only loss a fraction not 0.5" more in 6'1.75
Click Here with kelly and 6'4.5 michael strahan
Click Here 186cm Kaka is much closer to camera
@6 foot 17 yrs still growing
Maybe jackman only loss a fraction not 0.5" more in 6'1.75
Click Here with kelly and 6'4.5 michael strahan
Click Here 186cm Kaka is much closer to camera
berta said on 23/Jan/17
i think he was 1/4 under 62 in his peak and stil is. never looks a true 188 guy to me
i think he was 1/4 under 62 in his peak and stil is. never looks a true 188 guy to me
6 foot 17 yrs still growing said on 17/Jan/17
Saw him next to kaka 6 ft 1.25 and then next 5 ft 11 at best david Beckham... and really got surprised he was shorter than 6 ft 1.25 kaka and not much taller than beckham
Saw him next to kaka 6 ft 1.25 and then next 5 ft 11 at best david Beckham... and really got surprised he was shorter than 6 ft 1.25 kaka and not much taller than beckham
Dick curtis said on 14/Jan/17
I am 36 and havent lost a millimeter. If hugh is 1.87 right now then he probably was that 15 years ago as well. If he really was 1.88 back then, than he probably still is right now. Het is physically in ideal condition
I am 36 and havent lost a millimeter. If hugh is 1.87 right now then he probably was that 15 years ago as well. If he really was 1.88 back then, than he probably still is right now. Het is physically in ideal condition
dicky curtis said on 10/Jan/17
he is still quite young and in peak condition, lean and ideal weight. I would be surprised If he really already lost a half inch in height.
he is still quite young and in peak condition, lean and ideal weight. I would be surprised If he really already lost a half inch in height.
King of the hill 91 said on 25/Dec/16
189cm peak
189cm peak
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 17/Dec/16
Peak: 188.5cm
Today: 187.5cm
Peak: 188.5cm
Today: 187.5cm
Jay said on 4/Dec/16
He's been with Affleck and they really look to be on the same eye level. Same with Reynolds, although last I checked you guys were a bit conflicted with him.
He's been with Affleck and they really look to be on the same eye level. Same with Reynolds, although last I checked you guys were a bit conflicted with him.
shiva 181 cms said on 8/Nov/16
He's a 6'1.75 guy in his prime now hes no more than 6'1.25 maybe on a good day he might measure 6'1.5
His peak out of bed height estimate would be 189-190 cms and evening height would be187-188cms he has a short torso he wouldn't have shrunk more than 2cms
He's a 6'1.75 guy in his prime now hes no more than 6'1.25 maybe on a good day he might measure 6'1.5
His peak out of bed height estimate would be 189-190 cms and evening height would be187-188cms he has a short torso he wouldn't have shrunk more than 2cms
Bobby said on 7/Nov/16
He can easily look 6'3 even today when he's nearing 50 years old. So 6'2 seems about right, but it's strange, he can look 6'4 at times. He looked especially tall in The Wolverine. Maybe he was wearing special shoes, who knows. Even the taller actors are known for wearing shoe lifts, but Hugh seems very honest about his height.
He can easily look 6'3 even today when he's nearing 50 years old. So 6'2 seems about right, but it's strange, he can look 6'4 at times. He looked especially tall in The Wolverine. Maybe he was wearing special shoes, who knows. Even the taller actors are known for wearing shoe lifts, but Hugh seems very honest about his height.
Celebheights 6'1.5 said on 3/Nov/16
6'2" in his peak.
6'2" in his peak.
King of the hill 91 said on 3/Nov/16
Its hard because he gives the impreshion of 187 cm at most but as well he can 188 to 189 cm peake and know 187 to 188 now 189 peak no more
Its hard because he gives the impreshion of 187 cm at most but as well he can 188 to 189 cm peake and know 187 to 188 now 189 peak no more
Celebheights 6'1.5 said on 29/Oct/16
I'm surprised, but he appeared to be almost the same as Ben Affleck. Maybe he is taller than I thought.
I'm surprised, but he appeared to be almost the same as Ben Affleck. Maybe he is taller than I thought.
Brett said on 27/Oct/16
Rob... Hope you are well... I saw Jackman not so long ago, in a Gym in Bondi.
I have a picture of him and I... he was slightly bigger... I'd peg him at 6'2" for sure.
Happy to send it through :)
Editor Rob
Rob... Hope you are well... I saw Jackman not so long ago, in a Gym in Bondi.
I have a picture of him and I... he was slightly bigger... I'd peg him at 6'2" for sure.
Happy to send it through :)
Editor Rob it's definitely worth linking to, why not use imgur.com or something to upload and add a comment.
Johan said on 20/Oct/16
Yes and Brandon Routh is easily 6'3".
No wait he is 6'2.5". Next to Beckham also looks this listing ( 6'1.5") max. I can even see an argument for 6'1.25".
Yes and Brandon Routh is easily 6'3".
No wait he is 6'2.5". Next to Beckham also looks this listing ( 6'1.5") max. I can even see an argument for 6'1.25".
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 18/Oct/16
Still near 6ft2 today.
Still near 6ft2 today.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 16/Oct/16
Every inch of 6ft2 peak and no less.
Every inch of 6ft2 peak and no less.
Brandon said on 2/Oct/16
Almost 50, heavy weight lifting for quite a few years, and possibly just bad genetics when it comes to his skeleton, height loss for him isn't insane or anything.
6'2" peak
6'1.25"ish today
Almost 50, heavy weight lifting for quite a few years, and possibly just bad genetics when it comes to his skeleton, height loss for him isn't insane or anything.
6'2" peak
6'1.25"ish today
Roy said on 1/Oct/16
Is he old enough to have a peak height? Must be all the weight lifting shrinking him down.
Is he old enough to have a peak height? Must be all the weight lifting shrinking him down.
S.J.H said on 30/Sep/16
Theres a celebrity forum discussion about hugh jackman physics and height. An aussie teen who claim 6'1-1/4 barefoot saying no way jackman was taller than him and post a full picture with jackman a year ago , aussie teen looking 2cm taller jackman with similar footwear that makes jackman 6'0.5 but i don't buy that since this guy doesn't post a picture he get measure and he could be growing taller since he was only 18 as he mention on that forum. He could be grow out a bit at 6'2 with jackman. I think jackman is not quite 6'1.5 maybe 6'1.25 sticking my oldest guessing
Theres a celebrity forum discussion about hugh jackman physics and height. An aussie teen who claim 6'1-1/4 barefoot saying no way jackman was taller than him and post a full picture with jackman a year ago , aussie teen looking 2cm taller jackman with similar footwear that makes jackman 6'0.5 but i don't buy that since this guy doesn't post a picture he get measure and he could be growing taller since he was only 18 as he mention on that forum. He could be grow out a bit at 6'2 with jackman. I think jackman is not quite 6'1.5 maybe 6'1.25 sticking my oldest guessing
Celebheights 6'1.5 said on 26/Sep/16
He's no taller than 187 CM Gerard Butler.
He's no taller than 187 CM Gerard Butler.
James B said on 22/Sep/16
I don't think Bale is a legit 6ft
I don't think Bale is a legit 6ft
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 20/Sep/16
Looking 6ft3 w/h Travolta
Click Here
Click Here
...and again w/h Bale
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
at least 1in taller than Dominic Purcell
Click Here
Click Here
189cm is hardly a joke...
Looking 6ft3 w/h Travolta
Click Here
Click Here
...and again w/h Bale
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
at least 1in taller than Dominic Purcell
Click Here
Click Here
189cm is hardly a joke...
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 20/Sep/16
In the 2000's he was usually labelled as 6ft2, 6ft2½ and occasionally 6ft3.
In the 2000's he was usually labelled as 6ft2, 6ft2½ and occasionally 6ft3.
Andrea said on 18/Sep/16
6'2.5 is a big joke for Hugh... You can see him with Brandon Routh, who IS a legit 6'2.5 guy and looks at least an inch taller! And Daniel too... Btw, in case you don't know, Daniel himself did claim to have been measured at 6'6.5... So, no, he's not 200-202! Hugh has never been a full 6'2, let alone over that mark! Today, there's more than one picture where he can look BARELY 6'1!
6'2.5 is a big joke for Hugh... You can see him with Brandon Routh, who IS a legit 6'2.5 guy and looks at least an inch taller! And Daniel too... Btw, in case you don't know, Daniel himself did claim to have been measured at 6'6.5... So, no, he's not 200-202! Hugh has never been a full 6'2, let alone over that mark! Today, there's more than one picture where he can look BARELY 6'1!
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 14/Sep/16
Anything under 6ft2 peak is a joke. Just look at him w/h Travolta in Swordfish.
Anything under 6ft2 peak is a joke. Just look at him w/h Travolta in Swordfish.
Celebheights 6'1.5 said on 12/Sep/16
Ryan Reynolds is known for almost never standing up straight, so he generally has looser posture than Hugh Jackman does.
Ryan Reynolds is known for almost never standing up straight, so he generally has looser posture than Hugh Jackman does.
Celebheights 6'1.5 said on 12/Sep/16
Ryan Reynolds is known for almost never standing up straight, so he generally has looser posture than Hugh Jackman does.
Ryan Reynolds is known for almost never standing up straight, so he generally has looser posture than Hugh Jackman does.
shiva 181 cms said on 8/Sep/16
Hugh jackman's peak height is (6'1.75) and now (6'1.25) he appeared very tall in all x-men series and all his movies but he appears tall because of his long limbs and average torso a small head for his height one need not be a strong 6'2 guy to be tall or appaer tall his stature is pretty tall if he had a head size like reynolds to his high shoulders he could have been an easy 189 cms guy in his peak , there a cm b/w them
Hugh jackman's peak height is (6'1.75) and now (6'1.25) he appeared very tall in all x-men series and all his movies but he appears tall because of his long limbs and average torso a small head for his height one need not be a strong 6'2 guy to be tall or appaer tall his stature is pretty tall if he had a head size like reynolds to his high shoulders he could have been an easy 189 cms guy in his peak , there a cm b/w them
josh jeffords said on 5/Sep/16
Funny I remember him being listed 6 4 at the time the first xmen came out comic geeks will notice that is a full foot taller than the canon one.
He looked quite tall in those flicks but was likely wearing boots think he tends to favor them.
In photos he looks 6 7 next to the hobbit reject macavoy and tall next to fassbender.
he is not 5 10 but after all the weird diets and bodybuilding he is likely 6 1 or so now.
Funny I remember him being listed 6 4 at the time the first xmen came out comic geeks will notice that is a full foot taller than the canon one.
He looked quite tall in those flicks but was likely wearing boots think he tends to favor them.
In photos he looks 6 7 next to the hobbit reject macavoy and tall next to fassbender.
he is not 5 10 but after all the weird diets and bodybuilding he is likely 6 1 or so now.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 31/Aug/16
Looked more 6ft2-2½ range than 6ft1½-2 in the early 2000's.
Looked more 6ft2-2½ range than 6ft1½-2 in the early 2000's.
gian92 said on 14/Aug/16
In recent photo near Ryan Reynolds he looks 186 cm max
In recent photo near Ryan Reynolds he looks 186 cm max
Dmeyer said on 13/Aug/16
rob is 6 1.75 peak and 6 ft 1.25 now possible
Editor Rob
rob is 6 1.75 peak and 6 ft 1.25 now possible
Editor Rob it's arguable for him yes.
Mike said on 7/Aug/16
I'm still thinking he was 6ft 2 at one point. I strictly remember In X-Men Origins: Wolverine in a scene with 187 Danny Huston, he looked to have 0.5 to 1 inch on him, which would make him 189 cm...
I'm still thinking he was 6ft 2 at one point. I strictly remember In X-Men Origins: Wolverine in a scene with 187 Danny Huston, he looked to have 0.5 to 1 inch on him, which would make him 189 cm...
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 27/Jul/16
Looked nothing under 6ft2 10-15 years ago and more often could appear 189cm zone
Looked nothing under 6ft2 10-15 years ago and more often could appear 189cm zone
Celebheights 6'1.5 said on 20/Jul/16
Rob, would you say that the difference between Nicole Kidman's eye level to the top of the head is likely more signifcant than Hugh Jackman's? The eye level difference between the two looks to be 4 CM, but I see 2 CM tops between them in that photo.
Editor Rob
Rob, would you say that the difference between Nicole Kidman's eye level to the top of the head is likely more signifcant than Hugh Jackman's? The eye level difference between the two looks to be 4 CM, but I see 2 CM tops between them in that photo.
Editor Rob a slight downtilt from Nicole and it will make her eyelevel look bigger, which I think is happening...although she too has what I would believe is half inch of hair.
Arron said on 19/Jul/16
Click Here
Rob what do you think of them photos. I think he looked 189cm early 2000s but now a bit shorter probably around 187cm.
Editor Rob
Click Here
Rob what do you think of them photos. I think he looked 189cm early 2000s but now a bit shorter probably around 187cm.
Editor Rob the daily mail site is very resource intensive, so I don't visit it much, but Jackman I don't think was more than 188 15 years ago.
jajamen said on 17/Jul/16
Rob, Would 6'1.75 would be his maximum height at the age he is right now?
Editor Rob
Rob, Would 6'1.75 would be his maximum height at the age he is right now?
Editor Rob somewhere around 187cm range I think today, but 15 years ago I do think he was nearer 188cm.
Heights are barefeet estimates, derived from quotations, official websites, agency resumes, in person encounters with actors at conventions and pictures/films.
Other vital statistics like weight or shoe size measurements have been sourced from newspapers, books, resumes or social media.
Celebrity Fan Photos and Agency Pictures of stars are © to their respective owners.