Add a Comment2047 comments
Average Guess (841 Votes)
5ft 10.62in (179.4cm)
5ft 10.62in (179.4cm)
viper said on 13/Apr/23
Jordan87 said on 11/Apr/23
@ Height Analysis
I agree. I can tell you Most white males and black males I encounter in NY , NJ and PA that are Gen X or Millennial are taller than 5'10". Most people ( men especially) inflate their height by 1 to 2" but I know my height and I know alot of these younger folk are over 5'10. White Men and Black Men under the age of 40 now are most certainly taller than 5'10 on average. If folks tell you otherwise, they are likely manlets.
Huh? In New York City the average seems to be only 5-8-5-9, even with the younger population thrown in . Most white and black men under 40 are over 5-10 in that area?
Bro, put down the pipe. If what you said was true it would resemble to near Nordic levels.
Jordan87 said on 11/Apr/23
@ Height Analysis
I agree. I can tell you Most white males and black males I encounter in NY , NJ and PA that are Gen X or Millennial are taller than 5'10". Most people ( men especially) inflate their height by 1 to 2" but I know my height and I know alot of these younger folk are over 5'10. White Men and Black Men under the age of 40 now are most certainly taller than 5'10 on average. If folks tell you otherwise, they are likely manlets.
Huh? In New York City the average seems to be only 5-8-5-9, even with the younger population thrown in . Most white and black men under 40 are over 5-10 in that area?
Bro, put down the pipe. If what you said was true it would resemble to near Nordic levels.
viper said on 13/Apr/23
5-7 and a fraction, do you think height analyzer is trolling?
The average height at the University of Miami is no more than 5-10 max.
And I think Gen Z has gotten a little shorter overall. I'm an older millennial and I see more 5-5-5-6 guys than back in the early 2000's at college
5-7 and a fraction, do you think height analyzer is trolling?
The average height at the University of Miami is no more than 5-10 max.
And I think Gen Z has gotten a little shorter overall. I'm an older millennial and I see more 5-5-5-6 guys than back in the early 2000's at college
5'7 and a fraction said on 13/Apr/23
Height Analyzer 2 said on 12/Apr/23
I'm nearly 6'5 (195) so all good, I just know Jake isn't near 6'0 from all the evidence I've seen. Ben, it just seems you're the only dude who tries to inflate this kid's height beyond reason lmao, almost like you're a Jake Paul simp or something LOL
Yeah, its a height guessing website, but people should try and stick to a person's height range based on pure facts and evidence, whether that be 179 - 181 range or 176 - 178 range etc. But that doesn't mean we should start inflating or downgrading people to unrealistic levels based on faulty evidence or warped perceptions. Like unrealistically claiming Jake might be 6'0 tall 🤦. I agree, Jake looks at the absolute best, 181 but I would put him at that height out of bed.
Height Analyzer 2 said on 12/Apr/23
I'm nearly 6'5 (195) so all good, I just know Jake isn't near 6'0 from all the evidence I've seen. Ben, it just seems you're the only dude who tries to inflate this kid's height beyond reason lmao, almost like you're a Jake Paul simp or something LOL
Yeah, its a height guessing website, but people should try and stick to a person's height range based on pure facts and evidence, whether that be 179 - 181 range or 176 - 178 range etc. But that doesn't mean we should start inflating or downgrading people to unrealistic levels based on faulty evidence or warped perceptions. Like unrealistically claiming Jake might be 6'0 tall 🤦. I agree, Jake looks at the absolute best, 181 but I would put him at that height out of bed.
GERAD HOKJH said on 13/Apr/23
If KSI is about 5’10 ½ then Jake is definitely 5’11.
If KSI is about 5’10 ½ then Jake is definitely 5’11.
Philip550 said on 12/Apr/23
@Height Analyzer 2
I mostly agree with you, but one thing I need to point out is, the border between average range and tall is 5'10. Anything above that is tallish until 6'0, from 6'0 and above it's tall range, from 6'3 and above it's very tall, and once you pass 6'5 you're entering the giant category. It's been like this, and still is, in most countries across Europe, UK, US and Canada. Exceptions are some Scandinavian and Balkan countries with local regions averaging up to 6'1.
I've been monitoring Jakes height since early 2018 when he had a fight with Deji, and watched some of his videos during Team 10 era. He always ends up between 179-181 cm as you said. Clearly 5'11 range. This guy is insanely good at height manipulation with various footwear. He often likes to wear thick shoes, sneakers that add at least 1.25 inches and boots with at least 1.5 inch heels.
Also, I would like to point out the phenomenon of 5'10. This is the perfect height for manipulation. Take a pair of Air Max LTD's and you will appear as a typical 6 footer in public. Take a pair of Tims and you will be even slightly taller, with good athletic body, you would appear as a typical 6'1 guy.
Jake appears indeed tall in public, even though he's 5'11. So I can see how he managed to fool so many people by thinking he's actually 6'1 as officially listed.
I can't wait for this guy to confront KSI once again when he's going to fight him. KSI has been measured at around 5'10 ½ (without hair) on a stadiometer. So now we can guess him more precisely. I'm sure Jake is just a fraction taller than him though.
@Height Analyzer 2
I mostly agree with you, but one thing I need to point out is, the border between average range and tall is 5'10. Anything above that is tallish until 6'0, from 6'0 and above it's tall range, from 6'3 and above it's very tall, and once you pass 6'5 you're entering the giant category. It's been like this, and still is, in most countries across Europe, UK, US and Canada. Exceptions are some Scandinavian and Balkan countries with local regions averaging up to 6'1.
I've been monitoring Jakes height since early 2018 when he had a fight with Deji, and watched some of his videos during Team 10 era. He always ends up between 179-181 cm as you said. Clearly 5'11 range. This guy is insanely good at height manipulation with various footwear. He often likes to wear thick shoes, sneakers that add at least 1.25 inches and boots with at least 1.5 inch heels.
Also, I would like to point out the phenomenon of 5'10. This is the perfect height for manipulation. Take a pair of Air Max LTD's and you will appear as a typical 6 footer in public. Take a pair of Tims and you will be even slightly taller, with good athletic body, you would appear as a typical 6'1 guy.
Jake appears indeed tall in public, even though he's 5'11. So I can see how he managed to fool so many people by thinking he's actually 6'1 as officially listed.
I can't wait for this guy to confront KSI once again when he's going to fight him. KSI has been measured at around 5'10 ½ (without hair) on a stadiometer. So now we can guess him more precisely. I'm sure Jake is just a fraction taller than him though.
DaVinki said on 12/Apr/23
Can't we all get along and be nice?
I'm genuinely curious to see his height next to his new smoking hot gf! They're probably within 1-2 cm of each other
Can't we all get along and be nice?
I'm genuinely curious to see his height next to his new smoking hot gf! They're probably within 1-2 cm of each other
viper said on 12/Apr/23
Jdubbz, 6-3 may not be quite 99 on a college campus but close enough. 6-0-6-2 is obviously tall on a college campus. Not sure If height analyzer is trolling or what.
If what he said was true college campuses would resemble the Nordic area 🤣
5-10 is the absolute highest I see on many college campuses. That UNC-Charlotte example was just 1 example
Jdubbz, 6-3 may not be quite 99 on a college campus but close enough. 6-0-6-2 is obviously tall on a college campus. Not sure If height analyzer is trolling or what.
If what he said was true college campuses would resemble the Nordic area 🤣
5-10 is the absolute highest I see on many college campuses. That UNC-Charlotte example was just 1 example
Height Analyzer 2 said on 12/Apr/23
But suffice to say, Jake Paul is at best 181, reasonably 180, and arguably 179.5. Any further discussion of his height being less than 179 or more than 181 is pointless imo. Rob has nailed this listing perfectly! A young man of above average (tallish) stature :)
But suffice to say, Jake Paul is at best 181, reasonably 180, and arguably 179.5. Any further discussion of his height being less than 179 or more than 181 is pointless imo. Rob has nailed this listing perfectly! A young man of above average (tallish) stature :)
Height Analyzer 2 said on 12/Apr/23
I'm nearly 6'5 (195) so all good, I just know Jake isn't near 6'0 from all the evidence I've seen. Ben, it just seems you're the only dude who tries to inflate this kid's height beyond reason lmao, almost like you're a Jake Paul simp or something LOL
I'm nearly 6'5 (195) so all good, I just know Jake isn't near 6'0 from all the evidence I've seen. Ben, it just seems you're the only dude who tries to inflate this kid's height beyond reason lmao, almost like you're a Jake Paul simp or something LOL
Ben - 6'1 said on 12/Apr/23
Lol I go off this site for one day and this dude has gone on an absolute rampage. I’m sorry if it’s my fault for triggering this by thinking Jake might be taller than this listing, but your responses here really aren’t necessary.
I never claimed that if Jake were 6 feet it would make him tall - I just think he might be that height, and since this is a height guessing website I don’t see why that’s an issue. Maybe you really hate Jake for whatever reason and are mad at anyone who you think is implying that Jake might be a taller guy, or maybe you’re short and want to make yourself feel better by lumping taller guys (6’0+) in the same category as you. Or maybe it’s a bit of both. But you really need to chill man. I’m sorry if I’ve upset you but that really wasn’t my intention lmao.
Lol I go off this site for one day and this dude has gone on an absolute rampage. I’m sorry if it’s my fault for triggering this by thinking Jake might be taller than this listing, but your responses here really aren’t necessary.
I never claimed that if Jake were 6 feet it would make him tall - I just think he might be that height, and since this is a height guessing website I don’t see why that’s an issue. Maybe you really hate Jake for whatever reason and are mad at anyone who you think is implying that Jake might be a taller guy, or maybe you’re short and want to make yourself feel better by lumping taller guys (6’0+) in the same category as you. Or maybe it’s a bit of both. But you really need to chill man. I’m sorry if I’ve upset you but that really wasn’t my intention lmao.
Mr. Potato Head said on 12/Apr/23
I also find it funny how all the “tall” arguments allowed this thread to be saved from Ben’s constant claims that Jake must be at least 6 foot 😂
I also find it funny how all the “tall” arguments allowed this thread to be saved from Ben’s constant claims that Jake must be at least 6 foot 😂
Mr. Potato Head said on 12/Apr/23
Now the real question is how big is Jake’s head? It seems to be a fair bit bigger than his brother’s?
Now the real question is how big is Jake’s head? It seems to be a fair bit bigger than his brother’s?
Gian 181cm said on 12/Apr/23
@Approximator
In this case it wasn't arbitrary but there was a choice, they could have put another height like 6ft3.
The essence of the argument is still valid, it's not because they defined the minimum height to be considered tall that they are right.
@Height Analyzer 2
Interesting, I'll read more about it, overall I think your comments are good.
I won't go any further either.
You're right about 1.80m, , although 180cm isn't tall either.
It is a height that visually "distances" from the average, 17xcm to 18xcm, as well as 5ftx to 6ftx.
And of course Jake Paul is 5ft11 and no taller than that lol
@Approximator
In this case it wasn't arbitrary but there was a choice, they could have put another height like 6ft3.
The essence of the argument is still valid, it's not because they defined the minimum height to be considered tall that they are right.
@Height Analyzer 2
Interesting, I'll read more about it, overall I think your comments are good.
I won't go any further either.
You're right about 1.80m, , although 180cm isn't tall either.
It is a height that visually "distances" from the average, 17xcm to 18xcm, as well as 5ftx to 6ftx.
And of course Jake Paul is 5ft11 and no taller than that lol
Height Analyzer 2 said on 12/Apr/23
@Emil I’m only talking about height in the USA. Of course, anything greater than 1.80 M (5’11ish) is considered quite tall worldwide. That study is a bit outdated though, having last been updated in 2019. But nevertheless, your point still stands.
Jake is no more than 5’11-range, let’s call it a day at that
@Emil I’m only talking about height in the USA. Of course, anything greater than 1.80 M (5’11ish) is considered quite tall worldwide. That study is a bit outdated though, having last been updated in 2019. But nevertheless, your point still stands.
Jake is no more than 5’11-range, let’s call it a day at that
Height Analyzer 2 said on 12/Apr/23
@Glacierr As someone who knows plenty of math and statistics, i think I know a fair bit more about height than most people ;)
@Glacierr As someone who knows plenty of math and statistics, i think I know a fair bit more about height than most people ;)
Height Analyzer 2 said on 12/Apr/23
All this boils down to semantics and assuming height is normally distributed (which it isn't).
If we consider the average height of a male to be around 5'9.5, with anything 4.5 inches above to be the minimum cutoff tall (2 SD above the mean), then I would normally agree that anything 4.5 inches below (2 SD below the mean) would be short. But the thing is, the distribution of height isn't symmetric or normal - it's log-normally distributed and slightly skewed, which is why the logic of symmetry doesn't quite work. At the end of the day, almost no one (except people very near that height range) is debating whether someone under 5'7 is below average or short; it's all arbitrary. People start debating whether 6'2 is tallish or tall because it's a "desirable" height.
I think the minimum height that's required for someone to be tall should be 2 standard deviations above the mean, but the minimum height required to be short doesn't necessarily have to be 2 standard deviations below the mean because height isn't symmetrically distributed (we only approximate it as that so as to derive these percentiles more easily).
To not derail this thread anymore, I'll just say this: even if Jake Paul were 6'0, 6'1, or 6'1.5 like his brother Logan, it still wouldn't mean he's tall - just taller than average (or tallish, if you will). I don't see why so many people are trying to list his height as higher than 5'11-5'11.25 when he's clearly not any taller than that in midday/afternoon or evening. An above-average height (of 5'11ish) is still quite tall; as Gian pointed out, he's taller than ~70% of men in his age demographic.
tl;dr It's all relative. Many people in the world consider 180 cm (5'11) or 6'0 to be cutoffs for tall
All this boils down to semantics and assuming height is normally distributed (which it isn't).
If we consider the average height of a male to be around 5'9.5, with anything 4.5 inches above to be the minimum cutoff tall (2 SD above the mean), then I would normally agree that anything 4.5 inches below (2 SD below the mean) would be short. But the thing is, the distribution of height isn't symmetric or normal - it's log-normally distributed and slightly skewed, which is why the logic of symmetry doesn't quite work. At the end of the day, almost no one (except people very near that height range) is debating whether someone under 5'7 is below average or short; it's all arbitrary. People start debating whether 6'2 is tallish or tall because it's a "desirable" height.
I think the minimum height that's required for someone to be tall should be 2 standard deviations above the mean, but the minimum height required to be short doesn't necessarily have to be 2 standard deviations below the mean because height isn't symmetrically distributed (we only approximate it as that so as to derive these percentiles more easily).
To not derail this thread anymore, I'll just say this: even if Jake Paul were 6'0, 6'1, or 6'1.5 like his brother Logan, it still wouldn't mean he's tall - just taller than average (or tallish, if you will). I don't see why so many people are trying to list his height as higher than 5'11-5'11.25 when he's clearly not any taller than that in midday/afternoon or evening. An above-average height (of 5'11ish) is still quite tall; as Gian pointed out, he's taller than ~70% of men in his age demographic.
tl;dr It's all relative. Many people in the world consider 180 cm (5'11) or 6'0 to be cutoffs for tall
5'7 and a fraction said on 12/Apr/23
Height Analysis said on 10/Apr/23
@5’7 and a fraction:
I wouldn’t consider anything under 6’2 to be tall for someone in Gen Z.
I must respectfully disagree with your statement there. Whilst I agree with you on Jake's height, I cannot agree with you on your analysis of gen z height, coming from someone who is part of that generation themselves. Most of my friends I went to primary school with are today either 5'8 or under (with the exception of 2 who happen to be "the tallest", 5'11 and 6'2 respectively). Also the tallest guy in college is around 6'3 and literally looks massive around everyone who's of average stature and many guess him taller, like 6'6. I'll also say most of my college friends are on average around 5'9. In general, 4 of them around 5'7 - 5'8, 5 of them around 5'9 - 5'10 and only 2 actually surpass 5'11 flat, with the tallest one of the group, I've actually measured at 6'1 1/4. And what does he look around them? Tall. He literally towers over all them in the group and they consider him "tall". There is only like, 3 guys in my college year who as tall as 6'1 range and are the tallest of the year being taller than everyone else in there and thus tall. You do not need to be as high as something as 6'3 in gen z to truly be considered tall🤦.
Height Analysis said on 10/Apr/23
@5’7 and a fraction:
I wouldn’t consider anything under 6’2 to be tall for someone in Gen Z.
I must respectfully disagree with your statement there. Whilst I agree with you on Jake's height, I cannot agree with you on your analysis of gen z height, coming from someone who is part of that generation themselves. Most of my friends I went to primary school with are today either 5'8 or under (with the exception of 2 who happen to be "the tallest", 5'11 and 6'2 respectively). Also the tallest guy in college is around 6'3 and literally looks massive around everyone who's of average stature and many guess him taller, like 6'6. I'll also say most of my college friends are on average around 5'9. In general, 4 of them around 5'7 - 5'8, 5 of them around 5'9 - 5'10 and only 2 actually surpass 5'11 flat, with the tallest one of the group, I've actually measured at 6'1 1/4. And what does he look around them? Tall. He literally towers over all them in the group and they consider him "tall". There is only like, 3 guys in my college year who as tall as 6'1 range and are the tallest of the year being taller than everyone else in there and thus tall. You do not need to be as high as something as 6'3 in gen z to truly be considered tall🤦.
Jdubbz said on 11/Apr/23
@Viper:
6'3 99th percentile on a college campus? Either UNC Charlotte is the shortest campus in the US, or more likely, you overestimate how tall you are relative to to other people. College campuses in the US average 5'10 at least, so 99th percentile is 6'5+.
@Viper:
6'3 99th percentile on a college campus? Either UNC Charlotte is the shortest campus in the US, or more likely, you overestimate how tall you are relative to to other people. College campuses in the US average 5'10 at least, so 99th percentile is 6'5+.
Duhon said on 11/Apr/23
There's no real data to back up that American Gen Zs are taller than previous generations. Also focusing on "white american" Gen Zs is silly as only about 50% of American Gen Zs are white.
There's no real data to back up that American Gen Zs are taller than previous generations. Also focusing on "white american" Gen Zs is silly as only about 50% of American Gen Zs are white.
Gian 181cm said on 11/Apr/23
@Height Analyzer 2
6ft2 is a height arbitrarily chosen by a club, its statement is an appeal to authority fallacy, it is not because tall people determine a minimum height to be tall that makes it correct.
The CDC does not define tall stature from what I've researched, but to be fair, a height percentile calculator does consider tall stature 95, but note that it says "more stringent definitions of short or tall stature are used" and so it may be that the 97th or 99th percentile may be considered due to BMI and pharmacotherapeutic issues.
Click Here
However, tall stature and short stature are antagonistic concepts, right? Something tall can only be tall because it has something shorter to compare it to, it seems reasonable to assume that the same criteria used to define tall stature also define short stature, in this case 2SD, if you consider 97º to consider tall stature should also consider 3º for short stature, so 5ft5- 5ft6 (under 5ft7) which in your criteria would be short is still considered normal stature.
The same calculator site you listed leaves the term open ended
Click Here but it is said that in the medical field the percentile can vary.
However, I also see no problem with considering the 97th percentile and the 3rd percentile to define tall and short stature, but what I want to leave open is that this is not an end point of the discussion.
@Height Analyzer 2
6ft2 is a height arbitrarily chosen by a club, its statement is an appeal to authority fallacy, it is not because tall people determine a minimum height to be tall that makes it correct.
The CDC does not define tall stature from what I've researched, but to be fair, a height percentile calculator does consider tall stature 95, but note that it says "more stringent definitions of short or tall stature are used" and so it may be that the 97th or 99th percentile may be considered due to BMI and pharmacotherapeutic issues.
Click Here
However, tall stature and short stature are antagonistic concepts, right? Something tall can only be tall because it has something shorter to compare it to, it seems reasonable to assume that the same criteria used to define tall stature also define short stature, in this case 2SD, if you consider 97º to consider tall stature should also consider 3º for short stature, so 5ft5- 5ft6 (under 5ft7) which in your criteria would be short is still considered normal stature.
The same calculator site you listed leaves the term open ended
Click Here but it is said that in the medical field the percentile can vary.
However, I also see no problem with considering the 97th percentile and the 3rd percentile to define tall and short stature, but what I want to leave open is that this is not an end point of the discussion.
Glacierr said on 11/Apr/23
@Height Analyzer 2 Wow, you really don’t know what you are talking abou,
@Height Analyzer 2 Wow, you really don’t know what you are talking abou,
179.9guy said on 11/Apr/23
In his latest Youtube video Tommy fury referred to Jake paul as: " A big guy he was 14 stone and a half, 6'2 in the ring with me". HAHAHA Lets just ty and meet in the middle guys. Jake gets a strong 5'11 vote from me.
In his latest Youtube video Tommy fury referred to Jake paul as: " A big guy he was 14 stone and a half, 6'2 in the ring with me". HAHAHA Lets just ty and meet in the middle guys. Jake gets a strong 5'11 vote from me.
Emil said on 11/Apr/23
@Height Analyzer 2
What you're alluding is 'tall stature' which medical professionals use as a benchmark to assess if there are any underlying causes for the tall height that could raise concern - such as marfan syndrome i.e.. You're still considered tall by most people even if you're "just" 1 SD above average height.
I think globally, 6'1" is closer to the 97.5% percentile, whereas 6'2" is around the 99% percentile, and 6'4" is 1 out 1000 men territory. The global average height for young men is 5'7.5 according to this study: Click Here
It's vastly dragged down by third world countries where people have lived under wretched conditions, such as malnutrition and hard physical labour.
@Height Analyzer 2
What you're alluding is 'tall stature' which medical professionals use as a benchmark to assess if there are any underlying causes for the tall height that could raise concern - such as marfan syndrome i.e.. You're still considered tall by most people even if you're "just" 1 SD above average height.
I think globally, 6'1" is closer to the 97.5% percentile, whereas 6'2" is around the 99% percentile, and 6'4" is 1 out 1000 men territory. The global average height for young men is 5'7.5 according to this study: Click Here
It's vastly dragged down by third world countries where people have lived under wretched conditions, such as malnutrition and hard physical labour.
Approximator said on 11/Apr/23
Click Here
For the mathematically minded (Gian 181), this is a pretty cool read.
tl;dr Cutoff for "tall" begins at 6'2 assuming a normal distribution, 6'3 assuming a log-normal distribution. Doesn't really matter, we know neither of the Paul brothers fits the bill, though I'll let Logan get the "tall" pass and Jake get the "6'1 but really 5'11" pass ;)
Click Here
For the mathematically minded (Gian 181), this is a pretty cool read.
tl;dr Cutoff for "tall" begins at 6'2 assuming a normal distribution, 6'3 assuming a log-normal distribution. Doesn't really matter, we know neither of the Paul brothers fits the bill, though I'll let Logan get the "tall" pass and Jake get the "6'1 but really 5'11" pass ;)
Height Analyzer 2 said on 11/Apr/23
0 SD 1 Above Average
1 SD 2 Kinda Tall (Tallish)
2 SD 3 Tall
3 SD Extremely Tall
Assuming a normal distribution, this is how the CDC designates their height classification. To be considered tall, at the minimum, you have to be two standard deviations above the mean (which would be 95th percentile if you assume a normal distribution, but is actually closer to 97.5 percentile since height isn’t normally distributed and slightly skewed). Thus, the cutoff for tall begins at 6’2 (if you assume a normal distribution) or 6’3 (if you work with the slightly skewed distribution that height really takes). One thing to note is these heights may very well be morning heights, as opposed to mid-day measurements, which is when most people are measured when they visit the doctor.
0 SD 1 Above Average
1 SD 2 Kinda Tall (Tallish)
2 SD 3 Tall
3 SD Extremely Tall
Assuming a normal distribution, this is how the CDC designates their height classification. To be considered tall, at the minimum, you have to be two standard deviations above the mean (which would be 95th percentile if you assume a normal distribution, but is actually closer to 97.5 percentile since height isn’t normally distributed and slightly skewed). Thus, the cutoff for tall begins at 6’2 (if you assume a normal distribution) or 6’3 (if you work with the slightly skewed distribution that height really takes). One thing to note is these heights may very well be morning heights, as opposed to mid-day measurements, which is when most people are measured when they visit the doctor.
Height Analyzer 2 said on 11/Apr/23
@Gian-181cm
To be considered tall, if you consider heights to be closely normally distributed (it’s not but go with me), then a height that’s 95th percentile is two standard definitions above the mean. That height, as you listed, is 6’2 - which is the minimum start of tall. Of course, the CDC lists 6’2 as tallish, but that’s a matter of semantics really. Regardless, any height in the 5’11-6’1 range would be considered above average. Since Logan is a weak 6’2, you could make an argument to call him tall, but tallish would be more accurate :)
@Gian-181cm
To be considered tall, if you consider heights to be closely normally distributed (it’s not but go with me), then a height that’s 95th percentile is two standard definitions above the mean. That height, as you listed, is 6’2 - which is the minimum start of tall. Of course, the CDC lists 6’2 as tallish, but that’s a matter of semantics really. Regardless, any height in the 5’11-6’1 range would be considered above average. Since Logan is a weak 6’2, you could make an argument to call him tall, but tallish would be more accurate :)
Height Analyzer 2 said on 11/Apr/23
As someone who is a flat 6’4, I can guarantee 6’3 is closer to being taller than 97.5% than 99% of students. Students at my campus, are much taller than previous generations (due to the influx of European students coming from Baltic and Nordic regions).
Schools with stronger athletic departments tend to draw in taller than average students as well.
Click Here
As someone who is a flat 6’4, I can guarantee 6’3 is closer to being taller than 97.5% than 99% of students. Students at my campus, are much taller than previous generations (due to the influx of European students coming from Baltic and Nordic regions).
Schools with stronger athletic departments tend to draw in taller than average students as well.
Click Here
Height Analyzer 2 said on 11/Apr/23
@viper, 6’3 is the cutoff for being tall in the USA, if you’re between 6’1 and 6’3 (185-190 cm) that’s tallish (kinda tall). Not that it really matters, but these are the stats posted by the CDC - to be considered tall, you have to be taller than 97.5% of your gender + age demographic. Right now, that height happens to be 6’3 in the USA and 6’2 worldwide - it’s not some arbitrary number made up, it’s the height that correlates to over 2 standard deviations from the mean height of 5’9.3-5’9.5 (mind you, a caucasian white male in Gen Z is closer to 179 cm or 5’10.5)
Look at the calculator posted, or more easily, take a look at this:
Click Here (Internationally, the cutoff for men to be tall is 6’2, which I can agree with is fine).
If you want some perspective on height, check out r/tall on Reddit while you’re at it.
@viper, 6’3 is the cutoff for being tall in the USA, if you’re between 6’1 and 6’3 (185-190 cm) that’s tallish (kinda tall). Not that it really matters, but these are the stats posted by the CDC - to be considered tall, you have to be taller than 97.5% of your gender + age demographic. Right now, that height happens to be 6’3 in the USA and 6’2 worldwide - it’s not some arbitrary number made up, it’s the height that correlates to over 2 standard deviations from the mean height of 5’9.3-5’9.5 (mind you, a caucasian white male in Gen Z is closer to 179 cm or 5’10.5)
Look at the calculator posted, or more easily, take a look at this:
Click Here (Internationally, the cutoff for men to be tall is 6’2, which I can agree with is fine).
If you want some perspective on height, check out r/tall on Reddit while you’re at it.
Height Analyzer 2 said on 11/Apr/23
Click Here
@Ben 6’1 - Idk where you live, but most people are don’t overestimate their height by two inches or more - unless we’re talking about online dating lol. Where I’m at, most people around my age (20s) usually state their morning or afternoon height.
If you look at this calculator, which has the latest statistics posted by the CDC, you will see that the height bins posted are consistent with what was posted previously. In other words, 6’1 is not tall; it’s taller than average though (tallish). You have to be somewhere in the strong 6’2 range to be considered tall - though I suppose it really doesn’t make a difference at the end of the day.
But please stop calling Jake 6’0. Maybe your perception of height is skewed, but the dude barely passes for 181 on a good day. Until and unless he’s measured on a stadiometer like KSI, there’s no point trying to list him any higher than 5’11-range. Even if Jake were 6’0 or 6’1, he still wouldn’t be considered tall - only tallish at best, which is fine.
Click Here
@Ben 6’1 - Idk where you live, but most people are don’t overestimate their height by two inches or more - unless we’re talking about online dating lol. Where I’m at, most people around my age (20s) usually state their morning or afternoon height.
If you look at this calculator, which has the latest statistics posted by the CDC, you will see that the height bins posted are consistent with what was posted previously. In other words, 6’1 is not tall; it’s taller than average though (tallish). You have to be somewhere in the strong 6’2 range to be considered tall - though I suppose it really doesn’t make a difference at the end of the day.
But please stop calling Jake 6’0. Maybe your perception of height is skewed, but the dude barely passes for 181 on a good day. Until and unless he’s measured on a stadiometer like KSI, there’s no point trying to list him any higher than 5’11-range. Even if Jake were 6’0 or 6’1, he still wouldn’t be considered tall - only tallish at best, which is fine.
viper said on 11/Apr/23
Sorry height analysis but I don't think you have an eye for height.
Most students at Miami at the max I could maybe buy 5-10-5-11, maybe.
Most being 5-11-6-1 is outlandish. That would be borderline Nordic
Sorry height analysis but I don't think you have an eye for height.
Most students at Miami at the max I could maybe buy 5-10-5-11, maybe.
Most being 5-11-6-1 is outlandish. That would be borderline Nordic
viper said on 11/Apr/23
The younger generation looks shorter, not taller. I went to a college football game earlier last year at UNC-Charlotte and at
6-3 I was taller than all the students I was walking with towards the stadium, and it was a lot of them.
6-3 is taller than 99 percent on a college campus. Lol at just "tallish"
The younger generation looks shorter, not taller. I went to a college football game earlier last year at UNC-Charlotte and at
6-3 I was taller than all the students I was walking with towards the stadium, and it was a lot of them.
6-3 is taller than 99 percent on a college campus. Lol at just "tallish"
viper said on 11/Apr/23
I definitely disagree with you on the average height of Gen Z. Most college campuses I've been on the average looks at the very maximum 5-10. More 5-9 on other campuses. A legit 6-0 barefoot is tall, and to me I see more 5-5-5-6 Caucasian students than I saw when I was in college.
I definitely disagree with you on the average height of Gen Z. Most college campuses I've been on the average looks at the very maximum 5-10. More 5-9 on other campuses. A legit 6-0 barefoot is tall, and to me I see more 5-5-5-6 Caucasian students than I saw when I was in college.
viper said on 11/Apr/23
IMO Rob had him right at 5-10.5
IMO Rob had him right at 5-10.5
Gian 181cm said on 11/Apr/23
@Height Analysis
I think your sample size is small and without a formal research, therefore biased, mostly with confirmation bias and hasty generalization.
By the way, even with a formal research, it is not free to be biased and of course not necessarily when I say biased I mean that it is something intentional.
Don't get me wrong, your comments are good, but the more we discuss, the closer to the truth we can get.
I can agree with the premise that Gen Z is taller and 5ft 11-6ft 1 is a relatively common height range, however the premise that only 5% of people would earn the tall label needs more support.
First we have to define what it means to be "tall", according to the dictionary it is a descriptive adjective of "above average height", we have 4 categories, 75th, 90th, 95th and 97th percentiles and an average of 176.8 cm for young people of 20 years (based on the CDC USA that concluded this average and these percentiles), and from there it is possible to discuss these categories. The 95th percentile is curiously 188.5cm, the 75th percentile is 181.6cm and the 90th percentile is 186cm
I tend to consider the 80-85th percentile as the start of tall height, probably somewhere around 6 feet.
Perhaps for white youth the average is higher, like 177-178cm, but overall 176-177cm seems believable to me.
I would put Jake Paul in the above average range, 70th percentile I think, and his brother is in the +90th percentile, so his brother is tall in my opinion.
@Height Analysis
I think your sample size is small and without a formal research, therefore biased, mostly with confirmation bias and hasty generalization.
By the way, even with a formal research, it is not free to be biased and of course not necessarily when I say biased I mean that it is something intentional.
Don't get me wrong, your comments are good, but the more we discuss, the closer to the truth we can get.
I can agree with the premise that Gen Z is taller and 5ft 11-6ft 1 is a relatively common height range, however the premise that only 5% of people would earn the tall label needs more support.
First we have to define what it means to be "tall", according to the dictionary it is a descriptive adjective of "above average height", we have 4 categories, 75th, 90th, 95th and 97th percentiles and an average of 176.8 cm for young people of 20 years (based on the CDC USA that concluded this average and these percentiles), and from there it is possible to discuss these categories. The 95th percentile is curiously 188.5cm, the 75th percentile is 181.6cm and the 90th percentile is 186cm
I tend to consider the 80-85th percentile as the start of tall height, probably somewhere around 6 feet.
Perhaps for white youth the average is higher, like 177-178cm, but overall 176-177cm seems believable to me.
I would put Jake Paul in the above average range, 70th percentile I think, and his brother is in the +90th percentile, so his brother is tall in my opinion.
Jordan87 said on 11/Apr/23
@ Height Analysis
I agree. I can tell you Most white males and black males I encounter in NY , NJ and PA that are Gen X or Millennial are taller than 5'10". Most people ( men especially) inflate their height by 1 to 2" but I know my height and I know alot of these younger folk are over 5'10. White Men and Black Men under the age of 40 now are most certainly taller than 5'10 on average. If folks tell you otherwise, they are likely manlets.
Now as far as physical strength..I will tell you we are taller and heavier than we were in the 80's but alot of those Folks back then were naturally stronger. More Manuel Labor jobs...They were tougher also. We are " bigger" and " taller" now....But not stronger or healthier my friend.
@ Height Analysis
I agree. I can tell you Most white males and black males I encounter in NY , NJ and PA that are Gen X or Millennial are taller than 5'10". Most people ( men especially) inflate their height by 1 to 2" but I know my height and I know alot of these younger folk are over 5'10. White Men and Black Men under the age of 40 now are most certainly taller than 5'10 on average. If folks tell you otherwise, they are likely manlets.
Now as far as physical strength..I will tell you we are taller and heavier than we were in the 80's but alot of those Folks back then were naturally stronger. More Manuel Labor jobs...They were tougher also. We are " bigger" and " taller" now....But not stronger or healthier my friend.
randomdude2021 said on 11/Apr/23
I have to agree with Ben here, @height analysis, most men including gen z have a warped perception of how tall a legit 6 foot person is. In reality only 20 percent of men in the US(maybe less) are 6 foot or taller. Most men inflate their height by 1-2 inches either wilfully or unintentionally. I can attest to Bens claim, I’m about 6’0.5 and I’m taller than about 7-8/10 men I see on a daily basis including gen z
I have to agree with Ben here, @height analysis, most men including gen z have a warped perception of how tall a legit 6 foot person is. In reality only 20 percent of men in the US(maybe less) are 6 foot or taller. Most men inflate their height by 1-2 inches either wilfully or unintentionally. I can attest to Bens claim, I’m about 6’0.5 and I’m taller than about 7-8/10 men I see on a daily basis including gen z
7272 said on 10/Apr/23
I could argue Jake is 181 after KSIs listing of 178.8
I could argue Jake is 181 after KSIs listing of 178.8
Glacierr said on 10/Apr/23
@Jake Paul is 5’11 where did those statistics come from?
@Jake Paul is 5’11 where did those statistics come from?
Height Analysis said on 10/Apr/23
@5’7 and a fraction:
I wouldn’t consider anything under 6’2 to be tall for someone in Gen Z.
I suppose it boils down to age demographics, but younger men in their late teens and early 20s seem to have an average height of around 5’10.5+ (in the 179-range), at least here in the United States. In my college for example (U Miami), most young men are somewhere in the 5’11-6’1 range. I don’t think it’s fair to consider 6’1 tall when that’s barely above average in some Nordic countries. Even the worldwide tall club has a cutoff at 6’2 for men.
Most people in my age demographic would agree the tall cutoff starts at 6’2, but for white men like Jake, you could argue it’s even higher than that (closer to 6’3 or 190 cm). Only about 5% of the population should be designated as tall.
For men of my age demographic (Gen Z) in the USA, I consider anything shorter than 5’7 to be short, 5’7-5’9 to be below average, 5’9-5’11 to be average, 5’11-6’1 to be above average, 6’1-6’3 to be tallish, and 6’3+ to be tall.
Jake would probably fall in the above average range, while his brother Logan would definitely be in the tallish category. As long as you’re in the upper end of average or above, height isn’t much of a factor anymore when it comes to dating haha
@5’7 and a fraction:
I wouldn’t consider anything under 6’2 to be tall for someone in Gen Z.
I suppose it boils down to age demographics, but younger men in their late teens and early 20s seem to have an average height of around 5’10.5+ (in the 179-range), at least here in the United States. In my college for example (U Miami), most young men are somewhere in the 5’11-6’1 range. I don’t think it’s fair to consider 6’1 tall when that’s barely above average in some Nordic countries. Even the worldwide tall club has a cutoff at 6’2 for men.
Most people in my age demographic would agree the tall cutoff starts at 6’2, but for white men like Jake, you could argue it’s even higher than that (closer to 6’3 or 190 cm). Only about 5% of the population should be designated as tall.
For men of my age demographic (Gen Z) in the USA, I consider anything shorter than 5’7 to be short, 5’7-5’9 to be below average, 5’9-5’11 to be average, 5’11-6’1 to be above average, 6’1-6’3 to be tallish, and 6’3+ to be tall.
Jake would probably fall in the above average range, while his brother Logan would definitely be in the tallish category. As long as you’re in the upper end of average or above, height isn’t much of a factor anymore when it comes to dating haha
Ben - 6'1 said on 10/Apr/23
@Jake Paul is 5’11
Disagree. I can go into a grocery store of like a hundred men and there might be 3 or 4 guys noticeably taller than me. I get called tall by pretty much everyone in my life.
The reason you think that is because most people have a distorted perception of height - typically overestimating others - so while some people may hear the number 6’1 and not consider it tall, it’s probably because they think 6’1 is 5’11, due to the amount of 5’11 guys claiming 6’1. Even when I was barely 6 foot I was getting guessed as high as 6’2, and now that I’m 6’1 they’d probably think I’m 6’3. So while 6’3 might be what sounds tall on the internet (especially to girls), most of these people think 6’3 is like 6’1.
@Jake Paul is 5’11
Disagree. I can go into a grocery store of like a hundred men and there might be 3 or 4 guys noticeably taller than me. I get called tall by pretty much everyone in my life.
The reason you think that is because most people have a distorted perception of height - typically overestimating others - so while some people may hear the number 6’1 and not consider it tall, it’s probably because they think 6’1 is 5’11, due to the amount of 5’11 guys claiming 6’1. Even when I was barely 6 foot I was getting guessed as high as 6’2, and now that I’m 6’1 they’d probably think I’m 6’3. So while 6’3 might be what sounds tall on the internet (especially to girls), most of these people think 6’3 is like 6’1.
5'7 and a fraction said on 10/Apr/23
@Jake Paul is 5'11
I would still consider 6'1 - 6'2 as proper tall range though. I know a guy at 6'1 1/2 - 3/4 and in the public streets he was literally taller than everyone. There was only one guy who was taller than him. So no, I would still most certainly consider 6'1 - 6'3 to be proper tall as apposed to tallish. Its not like an everyday occurrence for me personally to see a group of guys all over 6'0, under 6'3 on a regular basis.
As far as Jake is concerned, I agree the guy is not 6'0. I have no clue where this ludicrous obsession of making him that tall comes from. Any sane estimates for Jake is anywhere from 179 - 181, but anything below or over those is absurd.
@Jake Paul is 5'11
I would still consider 6'1 - 6'2 as proper tall range though. I know a guy at 6'1 1/2 - 3/4 and in the public streets he was literally taller than everyone. There was only one guy who was taller than him. So no, I would still most certainly consider 6'1 - 6'3 to be proper tall as apposed to tallish. Its not like an everyday occurrence for me personally to see a group of guys all over 6'0, under 6'3 on a regular basis.
As far as Jake is concerned, I agree the guy is not 6'0. I have no clue where this ludicrous obsession of making him that tall comes from. Any sane estimates for Jake is anywhere from 179 - 181, but anything below or over those is absurd.
Emil said on 10/Apr/23
I think Jake and Jutta are probably the same height - 179-180 cm in the afternoon. Looking at the pictures where they're together, I don't really see anything above 180 cm for Jutta tbh.
I think Jake and Jutta are probably the same height - 179-180 cm in the afternoon. Looking at the pictures where they're together, I don't really see anything above 180 cm for Jutta tbh.
Jake Paul is 5'11 said on 9/Apr/23
@Ben 6'1 - Watch just 30 seconds after the time stamp you listed, and Jake refers to "his girl" as slightly taller than him. And considering she's listed at 181-182 on most sites (though I personally think she's weak 5'11-range but whatever), that means Jake is 180-181. I don't get the obsession with making him 6 feet. There is barely any difference between a guy that is 5'11 and 6'0. He's above average, but not tall. Even if he was 6'0 or 6'1 (like yourself), he still wouldn't be tall - just the upper end of average for a white American male. Tallish starts at 6'1-6'3 and only when a male is 6'3+ are they truly considered tall.
@Ben 6'1 - Watch just 30 seconds after the time stamp you listed, and Jake refers to "his girl" as slightly taller than him. And considering she's listed at 181-182 on most sites (though I personally think she's weak 5'11-range but whatever), that means Jake is 180-181. I don't get the obsession with making him 6 feet. There is barely any difference between a guy that is 5'11 and 6'0. He's above average, but not tall. Even if he was 6'0 or 6'1 (like yourself), he still wouldn't be tall - just the upper end of average for a white American male. Tallish starts at 6'1-6'3 and only when a male is 6'3+ are they truly considered tall.
Glacierr said on 9/Apr/23
@Ben - 6'1 Jake is definitely not 6’0
@Ben - 6'1 Jake is definitely not 6’0
6'0.5king said on 8/Apr/23
Should def downgrade back to 5’10.5 at the absolute most 5’10.75 and that’s being generous
Should def downgrade back to 5’10.5 at the absolute most 5’10.75 and that’s being generous
Debunker said on 8/Apr/23
@ManKo
She looks 5'10-range, maybe around 179-180. She has good posture, wouldn't say she's hot tho (I guess that's subjective). Would love to see a side-by-side of her and Jake, I'm sure Jake would edge her by about 1 cm (no way his fragile ego could handle a girl the same height or taller than him)
@ManKo
She looks 5'10-range, maybe around 179-180. She has good posture, wouldn't say she's hot tho (I guess that's subjective). Would love to see a side-by-side of her and Jake, I'm sure Jake would edge her by about 1 cm (no way his fragile ego could handle a girl the same height or taller than him)
Debunker said on 8/Apr/23
@Duhon: Even if you wear thick shoes, there's a chance he could be using a 1 inch insole lift inside (which I highly suspect he does). By the way, some shoes can be deceptive thick and give less than an inch (like the Nike Blazer Mid for example).
@Duhon: Even if you wear thick shoes, there's a chance he could be using a 1 inch insole lift inside (which I highly suspect he does). By the way, some shoes can be deceptive thick and give less than an inch (like the Nike Blazer Mid for example).
Glacierr said on 8/Apr/23
Edit: Wade is usually listed around 6’2-6’3
Edit: Wade is usually listed around 6’2-6’3
Glacierr said on 8/Apr/23
Here is a video of Jake Paul standing next to Wade who is usually listed at around 6’2.
Jake doesn’t look over 5’11 next to Wade.
Click Here at 1:29:08
Here is a video of Jake Paul standing next to Wade who is usually listed at around 6’2.
Jake doesn’t look over 5’11 next to Wade.
Click Here at 1:29:08
Joopa said on 8/Apr/23
In the wade plem stream the question was why do u lie about ur height and he said when I goto thr doctors I’m bang on 6ft and I say I’m 6’1 cos that’s what I am in shoes
In the wade plem stream the question was why do u lie about ur height and he said when I goto thr doctors I’m bang on 6ft and I say I’m 6’1 cos that’s what I am in shoes
Jtm said on 8/Apr/23
are we sure he's 5'11? he seems more 5'9.5-5'10 to me.
are we sure he's 5'11? he seems more 5'9.5-5'10 to me.
Johan 185 cm said on 8/Apr/23
Has taken a page out of Mayweathers playbook. Is in lifts ALOT nowadays. His height is all over the place. Can look a fraction under 5'11" at times and other times near 6'0. I am going for 5'10 3/4. His brother is 6'1.5" almost 100% sure and he can look 3" shorter at times.
Has taken a page out of Mayweathers playbook. Is in lifts ALOT nowadays. His height is all over the place. Can look a fraction under 5'11" at times and other times near 6'0. I am going for 5'10 3/4. His brother is 6'1.5" almost 100% sure and he can look 3" shorter at times.
Emil said on 8/Apr/23
@ManKo
Lol I think it's impossible to tell how tall she really is.
In this pictures she looks around 2 inches shorter - problem is you can't see footwear. Either way, she's super hot 🔥
Click Here
Click Here
@ManKo
Lol I think it's impossible to tell how tall she really is.
In this pictures she looks around 2 inches shorter - problem is you can't see footwear. Either way, she's super hot 🔥
Click Here
Click Here
Glacierr said on 7/Apr/23
Even Jake acknowledges that he is not 6’1, he stated it in a livestream with WadeConcept. Seeing him next to Wade he is definitely in the 5’10.5-5’11 range
Even Jake acknowledges that he is not 6’1, he stated it in a livestream with WadeConcept. Seeing him next to Wade he is definitely in the 5’10.5-5’11 range
Duhon said on 7/Apr/23
He's 5'11" but can appear 6' because he wears thick shoes. Which btw doesn't mean he uses lifts or boosters in them, thick/chunky heeled shoes for men is actually fashionable now for younger men.
He's 5'11" but can appear 6' because he wears thick shoes. Which btw doesn't mean he uses lifts or boosters in them, thick/chunky heeled shoes for men is actually fashionable now for younger men.
5'7 and a fraction said on 7/Apr/23
@The Truth Hurts
You are completely right. I've never seen anything more inaccurate than the delusional people on here claiming he's 6'0 or near it. It's absolutely laughable. The most Jake physically looks is 181, but its most likely he's at best 5'11. He's probably in that 179 - 180 range.
@The Truth Hurts
You are completely right. I've never seen anything more inaccurate than the delusional people on here claiming he's 6'0 or near it. It's absolutely laughable. The most Jake physically looks is 181, but its most likely he's at best 5'11. He's probably in that 179 - 180 range.
ManKo said on 7/Apr/23
@emil @the truth hurts
Yeah, Jutta has been listed at 181,182 and even 183cm.
Jutta forner boyfriend, another skater is listed at 182cm. His name is Koen Verweij. Some pics of them together:
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
There are also some pics of Jutta with the king of the Netherlands. He is around 190cm.
Click Here
@emil @the truth hurts
Yeah, Jutta has been listed at 181,182 and even 183cm.
Jutta forner boyfriend, another skater is listed at 182cm. His name is Koen Verweij. Some pics of them together:
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
There are also some pics of Jutta with the king of the Netherlands. He is around 190cm.
Click Here
FriedChicken said on 6/Apr/23
@Neel bAKE
I think an actual 6 footer like Jensen Ackles, Peak Tom Hanks, or Chris Evans would still have at least half an inch on him if barefoot and back to back.
Also isn't Ricegum at least an inch taller than Jake?
I can agree Jake looks at least 5 ft 11 recently but idk if he's as tall as 5'11 1/2, I can see maybe at most 5'11 1/4.
@Neel bAKE
I think an actual 6 footer like Jensen Ackles, Peak Tom Hanks, or Chris Evans would still have at least half an inch on him if barefoot and back to back.
Also isn't Ricegum at least an inch taller than Jake?
I can agree Jake looks at least 5 ft 11 recently but idk if he's as tall as 5'11 1/2, I can see maybe at most 5'11 1/4.
The Truth Hurts said on 6/Apr/23
Nah I'm sorry, he's not 5'11.5
Do you all seriously think Rob would underlist his height by a whole inch before the half-inch upgrade? Like him all you want, defend him all you want, he is not 5'11.5 during a midday (4-6 hrs after waking up) measurement. The best (and I mean absolute best) case scenario is 181 for a midday height.
Jake's typical range is between 180-182, with 179.5 being an absolute low. Jake has great posture, but I don't doubt he wears shoe lifts when he takes photos. His current hookup (much like Drake, I refuse to call that chick his gf) is listed at 181-182, but she's probably 5'10 range barefoot. So, Jake isn't 5'10 range, but he certainly isn't 5'11.5-6'0 either. Since Rob lists all heights within a 1/4 inch confidence, the current listing is fine. At the most, he's 5'11.25.
Enough with this near 6'0 nonsense. Until I see him barefoot (or with socks) standing next to someone who is a legit 182+ guy, I have Jake in the 180-181 range. His brother is comfortably 6 cm taller than him (just over 2 inches), so Logan is in the 186-187 range.
Nah I'm sorry, he's not 5'11.5
Do you all seriously think Rob would underlist his height by a whole inch before the half-inch upgrade? Like him all you want, defend him all you want, he is not 5'11.5 during a midday (4-6 hrs after waking up) measurement. The best (and I mean absolute best) case scenario is 181 for a midday height.
Jake's typical range is between 180-182, with 179.5 being an absolute low. Jake has great posture, but I don't doubt he wears shoe lifts when he takes photos. His current hookup (much like Drake, I refuse to call that chick his gf) is listed at 181-182, but she's probably 5'10 range barefoot. So, Jake isn't 5'10 range, but he certainly isn't 5'11.5-6'0 either. Since Rob lists all heights within a 1/4 inch confidence, the current listing is fine. At the most, he's 5'11.25.
Enough with this near 6'0 nonsense. Until I see him barefoot (or with socks) standing next to someone who is a legit 182+ guy, I have Jake in the 180-181 range. His brother is comfortably 6 cm taller than him (just over 2 inches), so Logan is in the 186-187 range.
5'7 and a fraction said on 6/Apr/23
Andrej jessen said on 3/Apr/23
He look like he have been taking hgh for some time, especially looking at the size of his head and face, so he may have grown some 2 inches from the photos we look at. He actually look like a pretty tall guy now. 6 f 0.5 to 6 1 I think he is now.
Well, I suppose Logan is 6'4 then.
Andrej jessen said on 3/Apr/23
He look like he have been taking hgh for some time, especially looking at the size of his head and face, so he may have grown some 2 inches from the photos we look at. He actually look like a pretty tall guy now. 6 f 0.5 to 6 1 I think he is now.
Well, I suppose Logan is 6'4 then.
Neel Beke said on 5/Apr/23
I think he's really taller than 179cm, 185cm seems exaggerated but 182-183cm seems fair.
I think he's really taller than 179cm, 185cm seems exaggerated but 182-183cm seems fair.
5'7 and a fraction said on 5/Apr/23
@Ben
I find it fairy interesting how you initially claimed Jake and Tommy Fury were the exact same height. Then after Rob wisely downgraded Tommy to 5'11 flat, that seems to hurt the "Jake Paul being nearly 6 foot" narrative, so now your claiming Jake is edging him just to continue the 5'11 1/2 claim?
And as far as KSI is concerned, I actually think Jake looked slightly shorter than KSI, and i only really said they looked about the same in fear you would come after me again 😂. And, no, no 5'11 1/2 guy is ever going to look slightly shorter than a 5'10 1/4 - 5'10 1/2 regardless of having a slight footwear disadvantage which doesn't seem as much as an inch to me. Maybe not the best one, but here's a brief moment of KSI walking past Jake and they look to me around the same height, excluding Jake's camera advantage Click Here. Now, do I think Jake would edge out KSI? Sure, but I highly doubt that edge would bring Jake anywhere near 5'11 1/2 to 6'0.
I don't think I've seen anyone more determined to defend a celebrity as much as this Ben guy 😂.
@Ben
I find it fairy interesting how you initially claimed Jake and Tommy Fury were the exact same height. Then after Rob wisely downgraded Tommy to 5'11 flat, that seems to hurt the "Jake Paul being nearly 6 foot" narrative, so now your claiming Jake is edging him just to continue the 5'11 1/2 claim?
And as far as KSI is concerned, I actually think Jake looked slightly shorter than KSI, and i only really said they looked about the same in fear you would come after me again 😂. And, no, no 5'11 1/2 guy is ever going to look slightly shorter than a 5'10 1/4 - 5'10 1/2 regardless of having a slight footwear disadvantage which doesn't seem as much as an inch to me. Maybe not the best one, but here's a brief moment of KSI walking past Jake and they look to me around the same height, excluding Jake's camera advantage Click Here. Now, do I think Jake would edge out KSI? Sure, but I highly doubt that edge would bring Jake anywhere near 5'11 1/2 to 6'0.
I don't think I've seen anyone more determined to defend a celebrity as much as this Ben guy 😂.
Glacierr said on 4/Apr/23
@Ben Jake never edged Tommy, he always either looked the same height or shorter than him I would give Jake 5’10.5 -5’11 range
@Ben Jake never edged Tommy, he always either looked the same height or shorter than him I would give Jake 5’10.5 -5’11 range
James (179cm) Jones said on 4/Apr/23
Jake is definitely 5'10 ¾ or 5'11, and at the absolute max, 5'11 ¼, since KSI has been confirmed from the latest Sidemen Sunday video to be in the weak 5'10 ½ range.
Jake is definitely 5'10 ¾ or 5'11, and at the absolute max, 5'11 ¼, since KSI has been confirmed from the latest Sidemen Sunday video to be in the weak 5'10 ½ range.
Zander - 6'6" said on 3/Apr/23
@Ben - 6'1 That's true, I'd personally put Jake at 5'11.5" bang on barefoot. He probably reaches 6'0" or slightly more in shoes, which is why Showtime's Tale of The Tape's have him at that exact height, rather than his 6'1" listing.
@Ben - 6'1 That's true, I'd personally put Jake at 5'11.5" bang on barefoot. He probably reaches 6'0" or slightly more in shoes, which is why Showtime's Tale of The Tape's have him at that exact height, rather than his 6'1" listing.
Andrej jessen said on 3/Apr/23
He look like he have been taking hgh for some time, especially looking at the size of his head and face, so he may have grown some 2 inches from the photos we look at. He actually look like a pretty tall guy now. 6 f 0.5 to 6 1 I think he is now.
He look like he have been taking hgh for some time, especially looking at the size of his head and face, so he may have grown some 2 inches from the photos we look at. He actually look like a pretty tall guy now. 6 f 0.5 to 6 1 I think he is now.
ManKo said on 3/Apr/23
He is now dating a dutch athlete calle Jutta Leerdam. She is listed at 181cm, would be fun to see who is taller.
Click Here
He is now dating a dutch athlete calle Jutta Leerdam. She is listed at 181cm, would be fun to see who is taller.
Click Here
Ben - 6'1 said on 3/Apr/23
@5’7
He’s not the same height as KSI. In their only face to face encounter Jake is in boxing flats after just exerting all his energy in a fight, and KSI is in his favoured 1+ inch running shoes after being sat down for an hour. The fact they were around the same despite KSI’s advantages means Jake is at least an inch taller than him.
5’11.5 is all but confirmed after that KSI measurement.
@5’7
He’s not the same height as KSI. In their only face to face encounter Jake is in boxing flats after just exerting all his energy in a fight, and KSI is in his favoured 1+ inch running shoes after being sat down for an hour. The fact they were around the same despite KSI’s advantages means Jake is at least an inch taller than him.
5’11.5 is all but confirmed after that KSI measurement.
5'7 and a fraction said on 2/Apr/23
He looked the same height as 5'10 1/2 KSI, so him being near 6'0 is just a fantasy.
He looked the same height as 5'10 1/2 KSI, so him being near 6'0 is just a fantasy.
viper said on 2/Apr/23
Jordan Poyer measured 5-11.7
Jake looks 5-10.5-5-11
Jordan Poyer measured 5-11.7
Jake looks 5-10.5-5-11
Philip550 said on 31/Mar/23
@179.9guy
Nice caught. Too far away to make an accurate guess, but they have similar footwear, and he looks anywhere from 5'10 ½ to 6'0, if Jordon is a legit 6 footer ofcourse.
@179.9guy
Nice caught. Too far away to make an accurate guess, but they have similar footwear, and he looks anywhere from 5'10 ½ to 6'0, if Jordon is a legit 6 footer ofcourse.
Ben - 6'1 said on 31/Mar/23
Also, Chisora is probably a flat 6’1 at most.
Jake looks 1.5 inches shorter than him, so 5’11.5 could be bang on.
Also, Chisora is probably a flat 6’1 at most.
Jake looks 1.5 inches shorter than him, so 5’11.5 could be bang on.
Ben - 6'1 said on 31/Mar/23
@Zander
I agree that Jake is probably closer to six feet than most people think based on how he looks with most of the people you mentioned, but Tommy Fury probably isn’t a weak 6’0. If you look on his page you’ll see him standing next to 5’6 Ricky Hatton in the photo. He looks maybe 5 inches taller than him. I’d say Tommy is 5’11 flat. Jake seems to just about edge him, putting him somewhere in the 5’11.25-5’11.5 range.
@Zander
I agree that Jake is probably closer to six feet than most people think based on how he looks with most of the people you mentioned, but Tommy Fury probably isn’t a weak 6’0. If you look on his page you’ll see him standing next to 5’6 Ricky Hatton in the photo. He looks maybe 5 inches taller than him. I’d say Tommy is 5’11 flat. Jake seems to just about edge him, putting him somewhere in the 5’11.25-5’11.5 range.
Zander - 6'6" said on 30/Mar/23
@7272 I agree, they 100% deserve their own pages.
I think that Garcia is bang on 5'8" ½. Meanwhile Tank is exactly 4 inches shorter at 5'4" ½ in my opinion. They both surpass 5'9" and 5'5" respectively while wearing any type of regular shoes, and even boxing shoes.
@7272 I agree, they 100% deserve their own pages.
I think that Garcia is bang on 5'8" ½. Meanwhile Tank is exactly 4 inches shorter at 5'4" ½ in my opinion. They both surpass 5'9" and 5'5" respectively while wearing any type of regular shoes, and even boxing shoes.
Mystery Solved Today said on 28/Mar/23
Since every height in CelebHeights is within 1/4 inch at most of someone's afternoon (mid-day) height, 180 is perfect for Jake. He is definitely not above 5'11.5, and could be argued for a weak 5'11. The max he should get is 181. Claiming any taller than that wouldn't be realistic. I personally have him in the 179.5-181 range, with him possibly hitting close to 182 right out of bed. He's not a bad height at all, above average (tallish) with impeccable posture
Since every height in CelebHeights is within 1/4 inch at most of someone's afternoon (mid-day) height, 180 is perfect for Jake. He is definitely not above 5'11.5, and could be argued for a weak 5'11. The max he should get is 181. Claiming any taller than that wouldn't be realistic. I personally have him in the 179.5-181 range, with him possibly hitting close to 182 right out of bed. He's not a bad height at all, above average (tallish) with impeccable posture
Cooper Clarke said on 28/Mar/23
@Britney Spears fan 2000 Nah, Jake is definitely taller than KSI. No chance of 5’9 to 5’10. He's gotta be about 5’11 and JJ around 5’10.
@Britney Spears fan 2000 Nah, Jake is definitely taller than KSI. No chance of 5’9 to 5’10. He's gotta be about 5’11 and JJ around 5’10.
7272 said on 27/Mar/23
I think Ryan Garcia and Gervonta deserve pages.
172.7 for Ryan Garcia
Solid 5'4 for Gervonta
I think Ryan Garcia and Gervonta deserve pages.
172.7 for Ryan Garcia
Solid 5'4 for Gervonta
Joopa said on 27/Mar/23
He wears a lot of bigger footwear to appear taller it’s easy for a strong 5’10, weak 5’11 to look 6’0 in bigger shoes .
He wears a lot of bigger footwear to appear taller it’s easy for a strong 5’10, weak 5’11 to look 6’0 in bigger shoes .
James (179cm) Jones said on 27/Mar/23
I think jake might be a flat 5'11. Or 5'10 ¾ at the lowest.
I think jake might be a flat 5'11. Or 5'10 ¾ at the lowest.
Philip550 said on 26/Mar/23
@Ben - 6'1
Firstly, the footwear isn't quite similar, Jake has slightly thicker. Secondly.. Ashton is bending, and thirdly, the camera angle isn't really the best either. This is really similar how I looked next to my 6'1 ½ friend, and i'm about 5'10 ½ in the evening.
@Ben - 6'1
Firstly, the footwear isn't quite similar, Jake has slightly thicker. Secondly.. Ashton is bending, and thirdly, the camera angle isn't really the best either. This is really similar how I looked next to my 6'1 ½ friend, and i'm about 5'10 ½ in the evening.
Britney Spears fan 2000 said on 26/Mar/23
He's 5"9-5"10 he's shorter than ksi and ksi made a vid measuring himself and he was clearly under 6 foot I think ksi is 5"10-5"11
He's 5"9-5"10 he's shorter than ksi and ksi made a vid measuring himself and he was clearly under 6 foot I think ksi is 5"10-5"11
5'7 and a fraction said on 26/Mar/23
Ashton Kutcher is clearly slouching badly in that picture whilst Jake has upright posture. A very similar incident like this occured with 5'10 KSI and 6'2 Louis Theroux. Click Here Would have thought an incident like this would teach someone a thing or two there. The small minority of people who are saying Jake is as tall or nearly as tall as 6'0 barefoot need to get a reality check through and through. Not trying to be mean but I've just simply never seen such vastly wildly inaccurate claims as this one.
Ashton Kutcher is clearly slouching badly in that picture whilst Jake has upright posture. A very similar incident like this occured with 5'10 KSI and 6'2 Louis Theroux. Click Here Would have thought an incident like this would teach someone a thing or two there. The small minority of people who are saying Jake is as tall or nearly as tall as 6'0 barefoot need to get a reality check through and through. Not trying to be mean but I've just simply never seen such vastly wildly inaccurate claims as this one.
Philip550 said on 25/Mar/23
@Duhon
Bad camera angle, plus it's too far away. Try again...
@Duhon
Bad camera angle, plus it's too far away. Try again...
Zander - 6'6" said on 25/Mar/23
I'm really thinking he might be a legit 6 footer now, even barefoot.
If not 6'0", the absolute minimum would be 5'11" ½ to 5'11" ¾.
It's just that in the past couple years, he's been looking 6'0" next to his 6'1" ½ brother, 6'4" Ngannou, 6'3" - 6'3" ¼ Stipe, 5'11" ½ - weak 6'0" Fury, 6'1" ½ Chisora, and other athletes and fighters.
I'm really thinking he might be a legit 6 footer now, even barefoot.
If not 6'0", the absolute minimum would be 5'11" ½ to 5'11" ¾.
It's just that in the past couple years, he's been looking 6'0" next to his 6'1" ½ brother, 6'4" Ngannou, 6'3" - 6'3" ¼ Stipe, 5'11" ½ - weak 6'0" Fury, 6'1" ½ Chisora, and other athletes and fighters.
Ben - 6'1 said on 24/Mar/23
Rob look at this (second picture) Click Here=
No way is Jake not near 6 feet. Look how close he is to Ashton Kutcher in similar footwear.
Editor Rob
Rob look at this (second picture) Click Here=
No way is Jake not near 6 feet. Look how close he is to Ashton Kutcher in similar footwear.
Editor RobIs Ashton's posture looser...to me it looks like he's a bit looser there.
Also, the Wolf in the 6th photo is quite wise and suspicious of Jake's boots...might be untying those laces and looking for lifts 😋
Also, the Wolf in the 6th photo is quite wise and suspicious of Jake's boots...might be untying those laces and looking for lifts 😋
Ben - 186cm said on 21/Mar/23
Well the guy in the white shirt to his immediate left is his coach BJ Flores who is around 6ft based on how he looks with Tony Bellew Click Here
Jake looks the same height as him, so if he’s 5’11 he must have like an inch extra footwear over Flores to look the same height.
Well the guy in the white shirt to his immediate left is his coach BJ Flores who is around 6ft based on how he looks with Tony Bellew Click Here
Jake looks the same height as him, so if he’s 5’11 he must have like an inch extra footwear over Flores to look the same height.
Ben - 186cm said on 20/Mar/23
Rob, what shoes is Jake wearing here? They look kinda suspect Click Here
The front part of the shoes don’t even touch the ground.
Editor Rob
Rob, what shoes is Jake wearing here? They look kinda suspect Click Here
The front part of the shoes don’t even touch the ground.
Editor RobI don't know the exact model, but they are over an inch.
5'7 and a fraction said on 19/Mar/23
@Ben - 186cm
Are you Jake's personal bodyguard or something?
@Ben - 186cm
Are you Jake's personal bodyguard or something?
Ben - 186cm said on 19/Mar/23
Duhon gets it.
Duhon gets it.
5'7 and a fraction said on 16/Mar/23
I would certainly be interested to see Jake pictured next to more of the mainstream kind of celebrities, like actors perhaps. Some of the people I've seen him being compared to I've never heard of in my life and those same people never been pictured next to people's height that I really know of, thus it doesn't really mean that much to me.
I would certainly be interested to see Jake pictured next to more of the mainstream kind of celebrities, like actors perhaps. Some of the people I've seen him being compared to I've never heard of in my life and those same people never been pictured next to people's height that I really know of, thus it doesn't really mean that much to me.
Duhon said on 15/Mar/23
For those who try to say Jake is dwarfed by his brother Logan, he's really not. Couple inches difference maybe Click Here
For those who try to say Jake is dwarfed by his brother Logan, he's really not. Couple inches difference maybe Click Here
Glacierrr said on 14/Mar/23
@ 179.9guy I highly doubt Bo Nickal is actually 6’1
@ 179.9guy I highly doubt Bo Nickal is actually 6’1
5'10-Abdul. said on 14/Mar/23
178 cm.
178 cm.
Ben - 186cm said on 14/Mar/23
@179.9guy
The first pic is misleading because of the angle, but if you swipe across to the 5th pic you can see them face to face. If you take into account Jake’s hair I’d say there’s a 1.5 inch difference between them. If the guy is really 6’1 then Jake can look between 5’11 and 6’0 for sure.
@179.9guy
The first pic is misleading because of the angle, but if you swipe across to the 5th pic you can see them face to face. If you take into account Jake’s hair I’d say there’s a 1.5 inch difference between them. If the guy is really 6’1 then Jake can look between 5’11 and 6’0 for sure.
Gian 181cm said on 14/Mar/23
@179.9cm guy
From this angle, it looks like weak 6ft. But other photos bring him closer to 5ft11.
Although Nickal is not fully erect.
@179.9cm guy
From this angle, it looks like weak 6ft. But other photos bring him closer to 5ft11.
Although Nickal is not fully erect.
Glacierrr said on 14/Mar/23
@ Ben - 186cm to be fair in the photo Mr.Beast is wearing flat shoes
@ Ben - 186cm to be fair in the photo Mr.Beast is wearing flat shoes
179.9guy said on 13/Mar/23
I see a strong 5´11/ weak 6'0 with 6'1 listed Bo nickal. what do you think rob? Click Here
I see a strong 5´11/ weak 6'0 with 6'1 listed Bo nickal. what do you think rob? Click Here
5'7 and a fraction said on 13/Mar/23
Beast looks 6’2 ½ as listed, especially next to Gordon Ramsay. We can’t just go randomly upgrading celebs to make another one taller. Jake was in his 20s in that video with Beast and was already fully grown. No amount of training or stretches is going to trigger a permanent magical growth in the spine. If that were true, every person should be walking out the gym getting taller every year. We seem to be making excuse after excuse to uplift Jake’s height.
Beast looks 6’2 ½ as listed, especially next to Gordon Ramsay. We can’t just go randomly upgrading celebs to make another one taller. Jake was in his 20s in that video with Beast and was already fully grown. No amount of training or stretches is going to trigger a permanent magical growth in the spine. If that were true, every person should be walking out the gym getting taller every year. We seem to be making excuse after excuse to uplift Jake’s height.
Joopa said on 12/Mar/23
Rob, here’s a pic of Logan and Jake u can see footwear same angle
Click Here just zoom in
Editor Rob
Rob, here’s a pic of Logan and Jake u can see footwear same angle
Click Here just zoom in
Editor RobThey're both standing well, he doesn't seem less than 5ft 11.
Ben - 186cm said on 12/Mar/23
@Hyper
Beast is probably 6’3. I think Jake has squeezed out a half inch too since that video. All the training and stretching he’s been doing could have encouraged slight spinal expansion. Here’s a photo of them more recently on instagram Click Here=
Looks closer to 3 ins there than 4, but Beast tilting his head up making his eye level look higher makes it more difficult to be sure.
@Hyper
Beast is probably 6’3. I think Jake has squeezed out a half inch too since that video. All the training and stretching he’s been doing could have encouraged slight spinal expansion. Here’s a photo of them more recently on instagram Click Here=
Looks closer to 3 ins there than 4, but Beast tilting his head up making his eye level look higher makes it more difficult to be sure.
Ben - 186cm said on 11/Mar/23
@5’7 and a fraction
I said he’s 2ins taller than strong 5’9 guys. That’s not 6 feet lol.
I think he’s close to 6 feet, maybe 5’11.5. He’s no shorter than Ariel Helwani, that’s for sure.
@5’7 and a fraction
I said he’s 2ins taller than strong 5’9 guys. That’s not 6 feet lol.
I think he’s close to 6 feet, maybe 5’11.5. He’s no shorter than Ariel Helwani, that’s for sure.
Darksol64 said on 11/Mar/23
I find 5'11 hard to believe just from his body proportions alone. A strong 5'11 has a tallish look where he does not. Has a slightly above average 5'10 range look to me.
6'2 and even 6'1 claim is atrocious, really man? I'm weak 6'2 No wonder people look at me like I'm crazy when I tell them I'm just a little over 6'1
I'll guess 5'10.5. If he looks taller in pics he probably wears thick shoes and/or inserts, given that he can exaggerate his actual height so much.
I find 5'11 hard to believe just from his body proportions alone. A strong 5'11 has a tallish look where he does not. Has a slightly above average 5'10 range look to me.
6'2 and even 6'1 claim is atrocious, really man? I'm weak 6'2 No wonder people look at me like I'm crazy when I tell them I'm just a little over 6'1
I'll guess 5'10.5. If he looks taller in pics he probably wears thick shoes and/or inserts, given that he can exaggerate his actual height so much.
Hyper said on 11/Mar/23
Jake at 6’0” would make Mr. Beast 6’4” since Beast has him by 4 inches.
Jake at 6’0” would make Mr. Beast 6’4” since Beast has him by 4 inches.
J (5'10) said on 10/Mar/23
Looks a mid-strong 5'10, Maybe 5'10.5 at a stretch. Anything above 5'11 is out of the question though.
I guess 5'10.25
Looks a mid-strong 5'10, Maybe 5'10.5 at a stretch. Anything above 5'11 is out of the question though.
I guess 5'10.25
5'7 and a fraction said on 10/Mar/23
@Phillip550
It's pointless trying to reason with him. He's determined to get Jake up to 6 feet tall.
@Phillip550
It's pointless trying to reason with him. He's determined to get Jake up to 6 feet tall.
Ben - 186cm said on 9/Mar/23
Rob, how tall does Jake look here with Stipe Miocic? Click Here
Editor Rob
Rob, how tall does Jake look here with Stipe Miocic? Click Here
Editor RobCould pass for 6ft there.
Philip550 said on 7/Mar/23
@Ben - 186cm
"He always has near 2 inches on strong 5’9 guys like Mike Tyson and Ben Askren."
- Where did you see Mike Tyson being 2 inches shorter than Jake with the same footwear, camera angle and posture? I didn't. Most pictures I saw Jake being 1-1.5 inches taller is when Jake had thick sneakers or boots and Mike was in flipflops.
If you have some good ones, send it so I can see...
Jake has been anywhere from as low as 5'10 ½ and up to 5'11 ¼ at absolute max (179-181 cm).
@Ben - 186cm
"He always has near 2 inches on strong 5’9 guys like Mike Tyson and Ben Askren."
- Where did you see Mike Tyson being 2 inches shorter than Jake with the same footwear, camera angle and posture? I didn't. Most pictures I saw Jake being 1-1.5 inches taller is when Jake had thick sneakers or boots and Mike was in flipflops.
If you have some good ones, send it so I can see...
Jake has been anywhere from as low as 5'10 ½ and up to 5'11 ¼ at absolute max (179-181 cm).
Hyper said on 7/Mar/23
Mr. Beast had 4 inches on Jake at 11:41 seconds.
Click Here
Beast also had 1.25 inches on Logan Paul at 0:43 seconds.
Click Here
Truth hurts. Jake doesn’t look anywhere near 6’0” and Mr. Beast beats out Logan by 1.25 inches.
Mr. Beast had 4 inches on Jake at 11:41 seconds.
Click Here
Beast also had 1.25 inches on Logan Paul at 0:43 seconds.
Click Here
Truth hurts. Jake doesn’t look anywhere near 6’0” and Mr. Beast beats out Logan by 1.25 inches.
Vertical fact said on 7/Mar/23
5'11 absolute maximum I think he looks, but there's a lot of photos being posted here of him looking rather 5'10 ish. I just don't understand the 6'1 claim though
5'11 absolute maximum I think he looks, but there's a lot of photos being posted here of him looking rather 5'10 ish. I just don't understand the 6'1 claim though
Eusebiu - 6'1" (185 cm) said on 7/Mar/23
All of his claims are ridiculously inflated and out of the question !
He is visibly shorter than his brother Logan (listed 187 cm) by 7-8 cm and around the same height as Tommy Fury (listed 180 cm).
So, I am pretty sure that his real height is 180 cm.
All of his claims are ridiculously inflated and out of the question !
He is visibly shorter than his brother Logan (listed 187 cm) by 7-8 cm and around the same height as Tommy Fury (listed 180 cm).
So, I am pretty sure that his real height is 180 cm.
Arsalan said on 6/Mar/23
I don't believe he is 5'11 , he was formally measured by UK doctors, who indicated he was 5'10.
Here are some proofs: if you compare his height to Kyle from Nelk Boys, there is only about an inch difference, and the same Kyle appears considerably smaller with Khabib Nurmagomedov.
Kyle with Khabib
Click Here
Kyle with Jake Paul
Click Here
I don't believe he is 5'11 , he was formally measured by UK doctors, who indicated he was 5'10.
Here are some proofs: if you compare his height to Kyle from Nelk Boys, there is only about an inch difference, and the same Kyle appears considerably smaller with Khabib Nurmagomedov.
Kyle with Khabib
Click Here
Kyle with Jake Paul
Click Here
Ben - 186cm said on 6/Mar/23
He isn’t under 5’11. Period. No estimates below 5’11 should be taken seriously. He always has near 2 inches on strong 5’9 guys like Mike Tyson and Ben Askren.
He isn’t under 5’11. Period. No estimates below 5’11 should be taken seriously. He always has near 2 inches on strong 5’9 guys like Mike Tyson and Ben Askren.
Polychrom said on 6/Mar/23
Even with the footwear advantage, Logan wouldn't dwarf Jake like he did in this Click Here if he was only 2 inches taller. Logan consistently looks 3 inches taller than Jake and for everytime the difference looks less, there are times like the one above where it looks like more than 3. I think Logan is a legit 6'1.5", he sometimes looks over and sometimes looks under it. Same for Jake there might be times where he looks 5'11" or even a bit more but other times he seems nothing more than 5'10" flat. I think 180cm range for Jake is a good listing.
Even with the footwear advantage, Logan wouldn't dwarf Jake like he did in this Click Here if he was only 2 inches taller. Logan consistently looks 3 inches taller than Jake and for everytime the difference looks less, there are times like the one above where it looks like more than 3. I think Logan is a legit 6'1.5", he sometimes looks over and sometimes looks under it. Same for Jake there might be times where he looks 5'11" or even a bit more but other times he seems nothing more than 5'10" flat. I think 180cm range for Jake is a good listing.
Mickie said on 6/Mar/23
Agree exactly with Viper on Brad Pitt being 5'10.25" - 5'10.5". I would move Jakes range up by like a quarter inch to 5'10.5" - 5'10.75", but we are kind of splitting hairs at that point.
Agree exactly with Viper on Brad Pitt being 5'10.25" - 5'10.5". I would move Jakes range up by like a quarter inch to 5'10.5" - 5'10.75", but we are kind of splitting hairs at that point.
Ben - 186cm said on 6/Mar/23
@Discord
I seek the truth brother. I will never stop fighting for the truth.
@Discord
I seek the truth brother. I will never stop fighting for the truth.
Discord said on 6/Mar/23
That Ben guy might as well be Jake Himself lmao, the way he always tries to uplift his height.
That Ben guy might as well be Jake Himself lmao, the way he always tries to uplift his height.
Jawilder said on 5/Mar/23
@Ben Nah, it’s not max 2 inches apart. More like 2.5. Logan is 6’1.5 also. So 5’11 is a good listing
@Ben Nah, it’s not max 2 inches apart. More like 2.5. Logan is 6’1.5 also. So 5’11 is a good listing
5'7 and a fraction said on 5/Mar/23
@Ben - 186
I don't understand how you could use a photo like that. The camera is angled from Jake's feet, so obviously he's going to have camera advantage there. Look at the size of their heads. This photo has already been debunked before by someone else. Take a look at the video I posted, where the camera is pretty level, Jake looks around 3 inches shorter than Logan, not 2 max. Give it up buddy, not everyone is going to agree with you.
@Ben - 186
I don't understand how you could use a photo like that. The camera is angled from Jake's feet, so obviously he's going to have camera advantage there. Look at the size of their heads. This photo has already been debunked before by someone else. Take a look at the video I posted, where the camera is pretty level, Jake looks around 3 inches shorter than Logan, not 2 max. Give it up buddy, not everyone is going to agree with you.
5'7 and a fraction said on 5/Mar/23
@Ben - 186
I don't understand how you could use a photo like that. The camera is angled from Jake's feet, so obviously he's going to have camera advantage there. Look at the size of their heads. Take a look at the video I posted, where the camera is pretty level, Jake looks around 3 inches shorter than Logan, not 2 max. Give it up buddy, not everyone is going to agree with you.
@Ben - 186
I don't understand how you could use a photo like that. The camera is angled from Jake's feet, so obviously he's going to have camera advantage there. Look at the size of their heads. Take a look at the video I posted, where the camera is pretty level, Jake looks around 3 inches shorter than Logan, not 2 max. Give it up buddy, not everyone is going to agree with you.
Ben - 186cm said on 5/Mar/23
@viper
Jake’s legs are also spread apart lol.
But if that’s not good enough here’s another pic Click Here
Same stance, max 2 inches apart.
Your 5’10 guess is terrible, and seeing you’re someone’s who’s been here from pretty much the beginning, it’s a tad disappointing.
@viper
Jake’s legs are also spread apart lol.
But if that’s not good enough here’s another pic Click Here
Same stance, max 2 inches apart.
Your 5’10 guess is terrible, and seeing you’re someone’s who’s been here from pretty much the beginning, it’s a tad disappointing.
5'7 and a fraction said on 5/Mar/23
jacken1 said on 3/Mar/23
I am almost 100% certain that his height twin is Leonardo Dicaprio
He is a solid 5ft 11 ¼ (181 cm)
I disagree. DiCaprio has pulled off looking like a textbook 5'11 guy, while Jake only pulls off 5'11+ when he has footwear advantage and 179cm several other times. Even if Jake IS 5'11 mark, he's definitely not over it. My money is on DiCaprio edging him 100%. If you compare DiCaprio with 6'1 1/2 listed Dijmon Hounso and then Jake with 6'1 1/2 Logan, the difference between the latter looks slightly bigger to me.
jacken1 said on 3/Mar/23
I am almost 100% certain that his height twin is Leonardo Dicaprio
He is a solid 5ft 11 ¼ (181 cm)
I disagree. DiCaprio has pulled off looking like a textbook 5'11 guy, while Jake only pulls off 5'11+ when he has footwear advantage and 179cm several other times. Even if Jake IS 5'11 mark, he's definitely not over it. My money is on DiCaprio edging him 100%. If you compare DiCaprio with 6'1 1/2 listed Dijmon Hounso and then Jake with 6'1 1/2 Logan, the difference between the latter looks slightly bigger to me.
179.9guy said on 4/Mar/23
is somebody here willing to admit that he is a strong 5´11 or are we still on the ¨he uses lifts¨ conversation haha
is somebody here willing to admit that he is a strong 5´11 or are we still on the ¨he uses lifts¨ conversation haha
Emil said on 4/Mar/23
I think his curly hair and possible use of lifts make him look over 5'11", but I seriously doubt he is. I think his former listings of 5'10.5 & 5'10.75 were closer to the truth. Above average height for an American man but not by much
I think his curly hair and possible use of lifts make him look over 5'11", but I seriously doubt he is. I think his former listings of 5'10.5 & 5'10.75 were closer to the truth. Above average height for an American man but not by much
viper said on 3/Mar/23
Ben, that's not a good pic since Logan's legs are spread so wide.
Jake is 5-10 range
Ben, that's not a good pic since Logan's legs are spread so wide.
Jake is 5-10 range
jacken1 said on 3/Mar/23
I am almost 100% certain that his height twin is Leonardo Dicaprio
He is a solid 5ft 11 ¼ (181 cm)
I am almost 100% certain that his height twin is Leonardo Dicaprio
He is a solid 5ft 11 ¼ (181 cm)
5'7 and a fraction said on 3/Mar/23
In this video with Logan, it's hard to argue Jake looks like a strong 5'11 here tbh. The difference looks closer to 3 than it does 2. Sometimes it's bang on 3. They both have fairly similar posture here as well and I'm just not getting a 5'11+ vibe from Jake. Looks 5'10 1/2 if I'm going to be completely honest. Click Here
In this video with Logan, it's hard to argue Jake looks like a strong 5'11 here tbh. The difference looks closer to 3 than it does 2. Sometimes it's bang on 3. They both have fairly similar posture here as well and I'm just not getting a 5'11+ vibe from Jake. Looks 5'10 1/2 if I'm going to be completely honest. Click Here
Pro Height Inspector said on 3/Mar/23
He is definitely 5’11 range, I could buy anywhere between 179.5-181, so 180 is a good compromise. Definitely think he’s a solid 180, but sometimes he looks 181 (5’11.25). Tommy Fury is probably the same range too. I think if Jake gets an upgrade, it shouldn’t be more than 181 though. Anything greater than that is just being too optimistic.
He is definitely 5’11 range, I could buy anywhere between 179.5-181, so 180 is a good compromise. Definitely think he’s a solid 180, but sometimes he looks 181 (5’11.25). Tommy Fury is probably the same range too. I think if Jake gets an upgrade, it shouldn’t be more than 181 though. Anything greater than that is just being too optimistic.
7272 said on 2/Mar/23
@Chayze
Jake was super duper fatigued and he managed to have a solid inch on JJ during the faceoff. I wouldn't be surprised if Jake was 5'11.25 at this point.
@Chayze
Jake was super duper fatigued and he managed to have a solid inch on JJ during the faceoff. I wouldn't be surprised if Jake was 5'11.25 at this point.
Joy Krish said on 2/Mar/23
After watching the fight, I'd say Jake is a solid 181 because of his curly hair and posture. Tommy is also 181, though Jake probably has a few mm on him because of his hair. I'll bet with flat hair, Tommy would edge Jake out by a few mm. I have Jake and Tommy both at 181, with anything under 180 (like 179.5) being an absolute low. Jake is probably 182-180, close enough to 6 feet to pull it off. 181 is the best listing for him.
After watching the fight, I'd say Jake is a solid 181 because of his curly hair and posture. Tommy is also 181, though Jake probably has a few mm on him because of his hair. I'll bet with flat hair, Tommy would edge Jake out by a few mm. I have Jake and Tommy both at 181, with anything under 180 (like 179.5) being an absolute low. Jake is probably 182-180, close enough to 6 feet to pull it off. 181 is the best listing for him.
Jawilder said on 1/Mar/23
Yeah with Logan you can’t make the case Jake is over 5’11. He’s 5’11 max if Logan is 6’1.5. 5’11 is a great listing for Jake after all I’ve seen so far.
Yeah with Logan you can’t make the case Jake is over 5’11. He’s 5’11 max if Logan is 6’1.5. 5’11 is a great listing for Jake after all I’ve seen so far.
Duhon said on 1/Mar/23
People have to admit he looks closer to 6' than 5'10". I can't believe there is still debate after the Fury fight and all the time they right next to each other? Some could argue he's actually 5'11.5" but Rob's present listing is a good compromise.
People have to admit he looks closer to 6' than 5'10". I can't believe there is still debate after the Fury fight and all the time they right next to each other? Some could argue he's actually 5'11.5" but Rob's present listing is a good compromise.
Ben - 186cm said on 1/Mar/23
@Viper
Except he isn’t though, it’s closer to 2 inches than 3 Click Here=
The problem with you Viper with all due respect, is you see one picture when someone looks shorter and you stick to that forever regardless of new evidence. Yes, there are a couple of photos where it looks 3 inches when he’s not standing straight. But when both Jake and Logan are straining their postures like in my pic, it’s two inches.
Also if Jake were “max 5’10.5” then what would that make Tyson Fury? 6’5 range? Click Here=
@Viper
Except he isn’t though, it’s closer to 2 inches than 3 Click Here=
The problem with you Viper with all due respect, is you see one picture when someone looks shorter and you stick to that forever regardless of new evidence. Yes, there are a couple of photos where it looks 3 inches when he’s not standing straight. But when both Jake and Logan are straining their postures like in my pic, it’s two inches.
Also if Jake were “max 5’10.5” then what would that make Tyson Fury? 6’5 range? Click Here=
viper said on 1/Mar/23
Not 5-11 because it doesn't match up with his 6-1.25-6-1.5 brother.
5-10.25-5-10.5 is what he is, just like Brad Pitt
Not 5-11 because it doesn't match up with his 6-1.25-6-1.5 brother.
5-10.25-5-10.5 is what he is, just like Brad Pitt
Philip550 said on 1/Mar/23
@Alex scho
Nobody grows after 22. He was barely 2 inches taller than 5'8 Nate Robinson, and 2 inches taller (in 1.5 inch boots) than 5'10 Ben Askren (who had flops).
He's also always 2-3 inches shorter than his brother who is 6'1 ½.
He is around 5'11. Sometimes looks 5'10 ¼, sometimes 5'11 ½ depending on footwear, camera angles and ground.
@Alex scho
Nobody grows after 22. He was barely 2 inches taller than 5'8 Nate Robinson, and 2 inches taller (in 1.5 inch boots) than 5'10 Ben Askren (who had flops).
He's also always 2-3 inches shorter than his brother who is 6'1 ½.
He is around 5'11. Sometimes looks 5'10 ¼, sometimes 5'11 ½ depending on footwear, camera angles and ground.
(Billythetreesurgeon) said on 28/Feb/23
Robs listing is spot on, he gotta be close to 5.11
Robs listing is spot on, he gotta be close to 5.11
viper said on 28/Feb/23
The guy is 3 inches shorter than his 6-1-6-1.5 brother
Hes 5-10.5 MAX
The guy is 3 inches shorter than his 6-1-6-1.5 brother
Hes 5-10.5 MAX
Alex scho said on 28/Feb/23
I think after really thinking about this , Jake is closer to 6ft then 5 10.75 anything he’s all of 5 11.4-5 11.7 if Tommy is 5 11.5 or even 5 11 then I see Jake at 5 ft 11.7 which surprises me looks like Jake Paul grew a hood .65-75 inches in his 20’s
I think after really thinking about this , Jake is closer to 6ft then 5 10.75 anything he’s all of 5 11.4-5 11.7 if Tommy is 5 11.5 or even 5 11 then I see Jake at 5 ft 11.7 which surprises me looks like Jake Paul grew a hood .65-75 inches in his 20’s
Joopa said on 27/Feb/23
Didn’t look shorter than fury lol looked the same height durinh the fight jake looked the taller man just look at them in the clinch .
Didn’t look shorter than fury lol looked the same height durinh the fight jake looked the taller man just look at them in the clinch .
Vertical fact said on 27/Feb/23
I'd give jake 5'11 after seeing that fight, but only if Tommy Fury is a legit 5'11. They looked the same height tbh, I still think it's funny though jake claimed 6'2 at some stage🤷♂️😂
I'd give jake 5'11 after seeing that fight, but only if Tommy Fury is a legit 5'11. They looked the same height tbh, I still think it's funny though jake claimed 6'2 at some stage🤷♂️😂
Jawilder said on 27/Feb/23
If I had to give the edge it would be Tommy. I’d be willing to make that bet.
If I had to give the edge it would be Tommy. I’d be willing to make that bet.
Plissken said on 27/Feb/23
Bro what? I always thought the previous listing was ridiculous, has he been upgraded? I actually expected him to go down to 5'10 and a half, why is he upgraded? The dude is 5'10.
Editor Rob
Bro what? I always thought the previous listing was ridiculous, has he been upgraded? I actually expected him to go down to 5'10 and a half, why is he upgraded? The dude is 5'10.
Editor RobThe more people he's stood beside, the less I can imagine him measuring under 5ft 11.
Chayze said on 27/Feb/23
He is atleast 5’10 1/2 like ksis height because some angles tommy fury looks a tiny bit taller
He is atleast 5’10 1/2 like ksis height because some angles tommy fury looks a tiny bit taller
Jawilder said on 27/Feb/23
@Rob 100% agree with you. They could very well be the same height. Both Tommy and Jake look 5’11 flat at best next to Logan. To be honest, I really couldn’t tell the difference during the fight. Post match also, they looked identical. Tommy does look 5’11 flat the more I have seen of him. I had him just about 6 feet before, but that is clearly not the case. Jake and and Tommy at 5’11 is perfect.
@Rob 100% agree with you. They could very well be the same height. Both Tommy and Jake look 5’11 flat at best next to Logan. To be honest, I really couldn’t tell the difference during the fight. Post match also, they looked identical. Tommy does look 5’11 flat the more I have seen of him. I had him just about 6 feet before, but that is clearly not the case. Jake and and Tommy at 5’11 is perfect.
Gian 181cm said on 27/Feb/23
I agree with Glacierr, it's ridiculous some comments saying Paul is 0.5 - 1.5 inches taller, may have given the impression of being the same height but Fury is a more solid 5ft11 flat, or 5ft11 1/4.
Jake Paul is 5ft 11 (maybe 5ft 11 1/8 in a good day).
Tommy Fury is 5ft 11 - 5ft 11 1/4
I agree with Glacierr, it's ridiculous some comments saying Paul is 0.5 - 1.5 inches taller, may have given the impression of being the same height but Fury is a more solid 5ft11 flat, or 5ft11 1/4.
Jake Paul is 5ft 11 (maybe 5ft 11 1/8 in a good day).
Tommy Fury is 5ft 11 - 5ft 11 1/4
Mickie said on 27/Feb/23
I thought Jake looked shorter than Tommy in the ring. At least a half inch difference.
I thought Jake looked shorter than Tommy in the ring. At least a half inch difference.
5'7 and a fraction said on 27/Feb/23
Oh Jake was definitely slightly shorter than Tommy Fury, no way was he taller. Obviously during the fight, there heights could vary at times but then again fights are never good indications of two people's heights anyway. Especially if those two people aren't that far apart in height, they most likely will look virtually the same, yet Fury still seemed the taller one to me. The 182 guesses are just as absurd as the flat 5'10 guesses imo.
I thought the downgrade for Tommy fury was "okay", a wiser decision than giving Jake an upgrade, although I will say, one person's height (Tommy Fury) doesn't suddenly sum up Jake's height in it's entirety. It's not as though Tommy's ever been measured before.
Must admit, feeling kind of sorry for Jake Paul after that fight last night. At least he got his knockout though.
Oh Jake was definitely slightly shorter than Tommy Fury, no way was he taller. Obviously during the fight, there heights could vary at times but then again fights are never good indications of two people's heights anyway. Especially if those two people aren't that far apart in height, they most likely will look virtually the same, yet Fury still seemed the taller one to me. The 182 guesses are just as absurd as the flat 5'10 guesses imo.
I thought the downgrade for Tommy fury was "okay", a wiser decision than giving Jake an upgrade, although I will say, one person's height (Tommy Fury) doesn't suddenly sum up Jake's height in it's entirety. It's not as though Tommy's ever been measured before.
Must admit, feeling kind of sorry for Jake Paul after that fight last night. At least he got his knockout though.
Skandinavian178 said on 27/Feb/23
UEDO, I agree with you, during the fight I though Jake Paul was taller than Tommy Fury. Not sure about the heights, but imo hard to think that they could be under 180 cm, but who knows.
UEDO, I agree with you, during the fight I though Jake Paul was taller than Tommy Fury. Not sure about the heights, but imo hard to think that they could be under 180 cm, but who knows.
Glacierrr said on 27/Feb/23
Hi Rob who do you think is taller in this photo I believe it’s Tommy but Jake Paul has the camera advantage and posture
Click Here=
Hi Rob who do you think is taller in this photo I believe it’s Tommy but Jake Paul has the camera advantage and posture
Click Here=
Glacierr said on 27/Feb/23
Jake Paul never looked taller than Tommy Fury especially after the fight when Tommy was talking to him, he looked shorter
Jake Paul never looked taller than Tommy Fury especially after the fight when Tommy was talking to him, he looked shorter
Alphaheight said on 27/Feb/23
@rob
Yeah you're right
After i watched the fight i'm now believing he's 5'11 range
@rob
Yeah you're right
After i watched the fight i'm now believing he's 5'11 range
7272 said on 27/Feb/23
Wouldn't be mad at a fraction upgrade. H
Wouldn't be mad at a fraction upgrade. H
Lozzer1 said on 27/Feb/23
1.25 inches shorted than Fury, 5’10.75”
1.25 inches shorted than Fury, 5’10.75”
Hyper said on 26/Feb/23
Jake bit off more than he could chew in that fight.
Jake bit off more than he could chew in that fight.
ZDA said on 26/Feb/23
After seeing the fight today, there’s no question that now I believe Jake Paul is 5 ft 11.
After seeing the fight today, there’s no question that now I believe Jake Paul is 5 ft 11.
Ben - 186cm said on 26/Feb/23
@philly
Well you were wrong because they were the same height. 😂😂😂
@philly
Well you were wrong because they were the same height. 😂😂😂
Joopa said on 26/Feb/23
Rob, in the fight jake looked the same height as Tommy without the footwear this time so I think this listing spot on
Rob, in the fight jake looked the same height as Tommy without the footwear this time so I think this listing spot on
Joshua1241241 said on 26/Feb/23
@vertical fact Lmfao still no video or proof of a medical measuring jake at 5'10 like you said. Wouldn't be shocked if he is that height tho. He does look 5'10 without those lifts.
@vertical fact Lmfao still no video or proof of a medical measuring jake at 5'10 like you said. Wouldn't be shocked if he is that height tho. He does look 5'10 without those lifts.
viper said on 26/Feb/23
Jake needs a downgrade to 5-10.5
His 6-1.5 listed brother has at least 3 inches on him
Jake needs a downgrade to 5-10.5
His 6-1.5 listed brother has at least 3 inches on him
Alphaheight said on 26/Feb/23
I think the old listing was good for jake
And i can see 5'10.5
Editor Rob
I think the old listing was good for jake
And i can see 5'10.5
Editor RobI think after 18 he did put on a little bit extra, I can't see him any less than 5ft 11 range nowadays.
Alex scho said on 26/Feb/23
I think it’s safe to say this dude is a lot closer to 6ft then 5 10.75 range and it’s pretty crazy how much y’all can guess his height I’m going with 5 11.5 cause he looked taller then Tommy ! Even when Tommy had more footwear the only time Tommy looked taller was when he had more footwear and Jake had boxing shoes and just fought !
I think it’s safe to say this dude is a lot closer to 6ft then 5 10.75 range and it’s pretty crazy how much y’all can guess his height I’m going with 5 11.5 cause he looked taller then Tommy ! Even when Tommy had more footwear the only time Tommy looked taller was when he had more footwear and Jake had boxing shoes and just fought !
Vertical fact said on 26/Feb/23
@joshua Calm down there buddy, glacier posted the video of the statement so I obviously didn't pull it out of nowhere🤷♂️😂😂, even weller said they looked close in height and he's actually stood face to face with Jake, unlike you @joshua
@joshua Calm down there buddy, glacier posted the video of the statement so I obviously didn't pull it out of nowhere🤷♂️😂😂, even weller said they looked close in height and he's actually stood face to face with Jake, unlike you @joshua
Jake wearing lifts said on 26/Feb/23
@Joshua1241241
Here is the clip of the Jake vs Gib fight. Essentially they say that they've already had a weigh in behind closed doors with doctors and that they asked Jake for his height and he said 6'1 yet the medical record that ended up being sent in said he was 5'10.
56:20 in the video
Click Here
@Joshua1241241
Here is the clip of the Jake vs Gib fight. Essentially they say that they've already had a weigh in behind closed doors with doctors and that they asked Jake for his height and he said 6'1 yet the medical record that ended up being sent in said he was 5'10.
56:20 in the video
Click Here
philly said on 26/Feb/23
I can’t wait to see you lot eat your words when jake and Tommy are in the ring with boxing shoes on. Tommy is going to have 2 inches on him.
I can’t wait to see you lot eat your words when jake and Tommy are in the ring with boxing shoes on. Tommy is going to have 2 inches on him.
simon L said on 25/Feb/23
Jake's height really is all over the place. The fact of the matter is that Jake looks taller in situations where he would be more likely to wear some sort of lifts (attending big events), and shorter in situations where he would be less likely (while boxing/training). There is definitely a chance he's getting a .5-1 inch boost from some sort of insole - even if it's just for an intimidation factor on his opponent. It's just too much of a coincidence that he goes out of his way to make sure his shoes are on when he goes faces off with an opponent, and otherwise doesn't seem to care. I'd still give him 5'11, but he really can look up to 6' with Tommy at times and I think it's due to insoles.
Jake's height really is all over the place. The fact of the matter is that Jake looks taller in situations where he would be more likely to wear some sort of lifts (attending big events), and shorter in situations where he would be less likely (while boxing/training). There is definitely a chance he's getting a .5-1 inch boost from some sort of insole - even if it's just for an intimidation factor on his opponent. It's just too much of a coincidence that he goes out of his way to make sure his shoes are on when he goes faces off with an opponent, and otherwise doesn't seem to care. I'd still give him 5'11, but he really can look up to 6' with Tommy at times and I think it's due to insoles.
Joshua1241241 said on 25/Feb/23
@glacierrr I'm not saying jake isn't 5'10.5 but vertical fact said that a medical measured Jake before the gib fight at 5'10.5 and yet there is no video of that or proof. He made it up.
@glacierrr I'm not saying jake isn't 5'10.5 but vertical fact said that a medical measured Jake before the gib fight at 5'10.5 and yet there is no video of that or proof. He made it up.
Joshua1241241 said on 25/Feb/23
@glacierrr "It's real" Ok show me the proof then. Like I said I think jake is like 5'10.5 or 5'10.75 too but there's literally no video or proof that he got measured at that height.
@glacierrr "It's real" Ok show me the proof then. Like I said I think jake is like 5'10.5 or 5'10.75 too but there's literally no video or proof that he got measured at that height.
7272 said on 25/Feb/23
@ZDA
Jake is probably barefoot or wearing socks. He looks super fatigued too. He was just fresh out of a boxing match in that clip.
@ZDA
Jake is probably barefoot or wearing socks. He looks super fatigued too. He was just fresh out of a boxing match in that clip.
Jawilder said on 25/Feb/23
@Ben Jake isn’t a 6 footer, he’s 5’11, possibly under.
@Ben Jake isn’t a 6 footer, he’s 5’11, possibly under.
7272 said on 25/Feb/23
Jake had the most upgrades on this site.
5'10.5 to 5'10.75 then to 5'11 and maybe even 5'11.25.
Jake had the most upgrades on this site.
5'10.5 to 5'10.75 then to 5'11 and maybe even 5'11.25.
Glacierrr said on 25/Feb/23
@ZDA I can see Jake Paul being in the 5’10.5 - 5’11 range butI honestly think it’s less likely that he is a flat 5’11 but that’s probably his morning height though. It’s still crazy that he can get away with claiming 6’1
@ZDA I can see Jake Paul being in the 5’10.5 - 5’11 range butI honestly think it’s less likely that he is a flat 5’11 but that’s probably his morning height though. It’s still crazy that he can get away with claiming 6’1
Philip550 said on 25/Feb/23
@Ben - 186cm
You got the heights and weight both wrong for the two. 😂
@Ben - 186cm
You got the heights and weight both wrong for the two. 😂
5'7 and a fraction said on 25/Feb/23
I'm sorry but Tommy Fury is clearly the taller of the two, not sure what some of the claims that he's shorter are on about. I think people are getting confused by Jake's curly hair. Believe me, I can pass for 5'8 with most people because I have curly hair as well. I stand by my estimate that Jake is a strong 5'10, weak 5'11 guy.
Can't deny, I'm pretty impressed with the way Jake has changed his image in the last few years.
I'm sorry but Tommy Fury is clearly the taller of the two, not sure what some of the claims that he's shorter are on about. I think people are getting confused by Jake's curly hair. Believe me, I can pass for 5'8 with most people because I have curly hair as well. I stand by my estimate that Jake is a strong 5'10, weak 5'11 guy.
Can't deny, I'm pretty impressed with the way Jake has changed his image in the last few years.
ZDA said on 25/Feb/23
Jake paul looks barely taller than Joe weller who is in the 5 ft 8 range.
Click Here
Jake paul looks barely taller than Joe weller who is in the 5 ft 8 range.
Click Here
Ben - 186cm said on 25/Feb/23
On a side note I’m pretty excited for this fight. Two young six foot 200lbs guys putting it all on the line for their legacy. Gotta root with Jake. Come on lad, show Tommy what real fighters are made of. God bless.
On a side note I’m pretty excited for this fight. Two young six foot 200lbs guys putting it all on the line for their legacy. Gotta root with Jake. Come on lad, show Tommy what real fighters are made of. God bless.
Polychrom said on 25/Feb/23
I don't see Jake being close to 6' like some people here suggest. For a 6 footer Jake just looks too short next to 6'1.5" Logan and he wasn't really much taller than Joe Weller, who is 5'9" at best either. Then again i don't see him being as low as 5'10.5" anymore because he looked too tall compared to guys like Anderson Silva, Tommy Fury or Mike Tyson. I think 5'11" is just fair.
I don't see Jake being close to 6' like some people here suggest. For a 6 footer Jake just looks too short next to 6'1.5" Logan and he wasn't really much taller than Joe Weller, who is 5'9" at best either. Then again i don't see him being as low as 5'10.5" anymore because he looked too tall compared to guys like Anderson Silva, Tommy Fury or Mike Tyson. I think 5'11" is just fair.
Glacierrr said on 25/Feb/23
But in this video Joe Weller looks a lot shorter than Jake Paul
Click Here
But in this video Joe Weller looks a lot shorter than Jake Paul
Click Here
Glacierrr said on 25/Feb/23
@Joshua1241241 It’s real and Joe Weller is right because when they went face to face him and Jake almost looked the same height
Click Here
@Joshua1241241 It’s real and Joe Weller is right because when they went face to face him and Jake almost looked the same height
Click Here
Glacierrr said on 25/Feb/23
It’s strange that in this face off both Jake Paul and Tommy Fury are wearing shoes but Tommy is noticably taller this time.
Click Here (53:58)
Editor Rob
It’s strange that in this face off both Jake Paul and Tommy Fury are wearing shoes but Tommy is noticably taller this time.
Click Here (53:58)
Editor RobI think the idea of lifts can be ruled out there, but one thing I notice with Tommy is that he appears to have quite rounded shoulders, like early kyphosis!
Antonhy999 said on 25/Feb/23
I think 181 is the best listing for him at the moment, can't see him anything under that
I think 181 is the best listing for him at the moment, can't see him anything under that
7272 said on 24/Feb/23
@Ben - 186cm
Jake has to be wearing lifts. He looks 2.5 inches shorter than his brother, who's a super strong 6'1. The most I could argue with Jake is 181.
@Ben - 186cm
Jake has to be wearing lifts. He looks 2.5 inches shorter than his brother, who's a super strong 6'1. The most I could argue with Jake is 181.
Duhon said on 24/Feb/23
Jake is a ~5'11" guy who wears favorable shoes to give the appearance of being 6'+ like he claims to be. No way he's 5'10" though, he doesn't actually wear Vin Diesel or RDJ level platforms like they do.
Jake is a ~5'11" guy who wears favorable shoes to give the appearance of being 6'+ like he claims to be. No way he's 5'10" though, he doesn't actually wear Vin Diesel or RDJ level platforms like they do.
Joshua1241241 said on 24/Feb/23
@vertical fact Where is your proof of that? I think jake is 5-10.5 too but I feel like you just pulled that out of nowhere tbh.
@vertical fact Where is your proof of that? I think jake is 5-10.5 too but I feel like you just pulled that out of nowhere tbh.
Glacierr said on 24/Feb/23
Hey Rob Here is a video of Jake Paul and Slim:
Click Here
This is a picture of Slim and Jake Paul:
Click Here
How come in the video they look the same height but in the picture Jake kinda edges Slim
Editor Rob
Hey Rob Here is a video of Jake Paul and Slim:
Click Here
This is a picture of Slim and Jake Paul:
Click Here
How come in the video they look the same height but in the picture Jake kinda edges Slim
Editor RobMaybe Slim had the looser posture at the moment of the photo as he didn't seem shorter in the little clip.
Emil said on 24/Feb/23
Jake is 5'10.5
He was an inch shorter when he faced off Tommy Fury one year ago, and all of a sudden he's 1 inch taller? Insole lifts
Jake is 5'10.5
He was an inch shorter when he faced off Tommy Fury one year ago, and all of a sudden he's 1 inch taller? Insole lifts
Glacierrr said on 24/Feb/23
I’m pretty sure Jake Paul’s footwear was much larger than Slim’s footwear thats why he was able to edge him out a little bit.
I’m pretty sure Jake Paul’s footwear was much larger than Slim’s footwear thats why he was able to edge him out a little bit.
Philip550 said on 24/Feb/23
@Ben - 186cm
No chance for Jake being close to 6 foot. There have been too many situations where he proved himself being between 5'10 ½ and 5'11. 5'11 ¼ is the absolute max possible if he stands really straight barefoot.
Cuz' if you think Jake is 6 foot or even close to it, that would make:
Logan = 6'2 ½
KSI = 5'11 ¼
Nate Robinson = 5'10
Ben Askren = 5'11 ¼
Jorge Masvidal = 5'11 ½
Deji = 5'9
Trump = 6'1 ½
Mike Tyson = 5'11
RiceGum = 6'1
MrBeast = 6'3 ½
Tyrone Woodley = 5'10
And we all know this doesn't hold up.
@Ben - 186cm
No chance for Jake being close to 6 foot. There have been too many situations where he proved himself being between 5'10 ½ and 5'11. 5'11 ¼ is the absolute max possible if he stands really straight barefoot.
Cuz' if you think Jake is 6 foot or even close to it, that would make:
Logan = 6'2 ½
KSI = 5'11 ¼
Nate Robinson = 5'10
Ben Askren = 5'11 ¼
Jorge Masvidal = 5'11 ½
Deji = 5'9
Trump = 6'1 ½
Mike Tyson = 5'11
RiceGum = 6'1
MrBeast = 6'3 ½
Tyrone Woodley = 5'10
And we all know this doesn't hold up.
Chowline said on 24/Feb/23
Jakes height is not making sense at all, Nate Robinson who is listed at 5,7.5 in their face off looked no more then 2 inches shorter then Jake both barefoot, but now in shoes jake is looking like a solid 5,11-6 foot guy I think this is clear evidence of small lifts in my opinion.
Jakes height is not making sense at all, Nate Robinson who is listed at 5,7.5 in their face off looked no more then 2 inches shorter then Jake both barefoot, but now in shoes jake is looking like a solid 5,11-6 foot guy I think this is clear evidence of small lifts in my opinion.
Vertical fact said on 24/Feb/23
When jake fought gib, which wasn't so long ago really, a medical before the fight measured him at 5'10.5. If it isn't lifts or chunky footwear then what is it? I've never heard of anyone growing in height after the age of 23
When jake fought gib, which wasn't so long ago really, a medical before the fight measured him at 5'10.5. If it isn't lifts or chunky footwear then what is it? I've never heard of anyone growing in height after the age of 23
Ben - 186cm said on 24/Feb/23
@Jake wearing lifts
He doesn’t look the same as Miniminter with Slim though. Miniminter has 2+ inches on him whereas Jake is barely an inch taller at best. He’s tilting his head up so the eye levels look further apart than they are, but the top of their heads are less than an inch apart if you ignore Jake’s hair. Slim is probably 5’11 or a tad over, and Jake near 6 feet. We don’t know Slims footwear so we can’t know for sure, but they could be close to the same height.
Jake isn’t wearing lifts though, as much as you want to think he is.
@Jake wearing lifts
He doesn’t look the same as Miniminter with Slim though. Miniminter has 2+ inches on him whereas Jake is barely an inch taller at best. He’s tilting his head up so the eye levels look further apart than they are, but the top of their heads are less than an inch apart if you ignore Jake’s hair. Slim is probably 5’11 or a tad over, and Jake near 6 feet. We don’t know Slims footwear so we can’t know for sure, but they could be close to the same height.
Jake isn’t wearing lifts though, as much as you want to think he is.
Jake wearing lifts said on 24/Feb/23
Jake Paul is very insecure about his height. His height is all over the place. Remember when Jake was barely taller than Nate Robinson in their final face off? That is perhaps the only time we have seen Jake Paul barefoot and he looked underwhelming.
After that he never faced off without putting on his shoes.
Miniminter and Logan Paul are roughly the same height. Some would say that Miniminter is slightly taller but that’s besides the point. We know Logan is roughly 3 inches taller than Jake. Therefore Miniminter would also be around 3 inches taller than Jake.
Click Here
There you have Miniminter and slim.
Click Here=
Here you have Jake Paul and Slim after Jake Paul vs Tommy Fury press conference. It’s obvious Jake is either wearing massive shoes or he is putting in shoe lifts to look taller cause there is no way Jake and Miniminter are suddenly the same height.
Jake Paul is very insecure about his height. His height is all over the place. Remember when Jake was barely taller than Nate Robinson in their final face off? That is perhaps the only time we have seen Jake Paul barefoot and he looked underwhelming.
After that he never faced off without putting on his shoes.
Miniminter and Logan Paul are roughly the same height. Some would say that Miniminter is slightly taller but that’s besides the point. We know Logan is roughly 3 inches taller than Jake. Therefore Miniminter would also be around 3 inches taller than Jake.
Click Here
There you have Miniminter and slim.
Click Here=
Here you have Jake Paul and Slim after Jake Paul vs Tommy Fury press conference. It’s obvious Jake is either wearing massive shoes or he is putting in shoe lifts to look taller cause there is no way Jake and Miniminter are suddenly the same height.
Jawilder said on 23/Feb/23
Jake footwear actually did look super sketch. I’d guess 2 inches, could have easily been wearing small lifts. Tommy 100% taller no questions
Jake footwear actually did look super sketch. I’d guess 2 inches, could have easily been wearing small lifts. Tommy 100% taller no questions
UEDO said on 23/Feb/23
@Editor Rob,
Do you think Jake needs an upgrade? Or Tommy needs a downgrade?
Here is their face-off. Both are wearing virtually the same footwear. Jake edges out Tommy clearly, maybe 0.5-1 inch.
Click Here
Jake may possibly be 5'11 1/2, and Tommy may need a downgrade to 5'11 flat.
Editor Rob
@Editor Rob,
Do you think Jake needs an upgrade? Or Tommy needs a downgrade?
Here is their face-off. Both are wearing virtually the same footwear. Jake edges out Tommy clearly, maybe 0.5-1 inch.
Click Here
Jake may possibly be 5'11 1/2, and Tommy may need a downgrade to 5'11 flat.
Editor RobWell he didn't look shorter than Tommy there and doubt there's anything up with footwear, quite close.
Ben - 186cm said on 23/Feb/23
Jake looks 6’0 here with Slim Click Here
Even if Slim is only 5’11, Jake is still looking near 6 feet with him.
Jake looks 6’0 here with Slim Click Here
Even if Slim is only 5’11, Jake is still looking near 6 feet with him.
Ben - 186cm said on 23/Feb/23
I don’t think I’ve ever seen two guys more identical in height in my life Click Here
Both 5’11.25-5’11.5.
Give him a quarter inch Rob, he deserves it.
I don’t think I’ve ever seen two guys more identical in height in my life Click Here
Both 5’11.25-5’11.5.
Give him a quarter inch Rob, he deserves it.
Jawilder said on 23/Feb/23
Anything under 5’10.5 is a complete joke. Will not be taken seriously.
Anything under 5’10.5 is a complete joke. Will not be taken seriously.
Jawilder said on 23/Feb/23
Click Here=
Click Here=
Click Here=
Similar footwear. Jake had a fraction more if I had to guess. If Tommy is 5’11.5 then Jake is a legit 5’11 easy.
Click Here=
Jake with 5’11.75 Slim, quite obvious Slim had way less footwear.
Click Here=
Click Here=
Click Here=
Similar footwear. Jake had a fraction more if I had to guess. If Tommy is 5’11.5 then Jake is a legit 5’11 easy.
Click Here=
Jake with 5’11.75 Slim, quite obvious Slim had way less footwear.
Masterguesser said on 23/Feb/23
Jake needs a massive upgrade , he’s looking down at Tommy fury around 0.25 inches he’s got a footwear disadvantage.
Jake - Jordan 4 2.5cm
Tommy - Nike waffle runners easily of 3cm
I’m predicating Jake has grown or fixed his posture … easily 5ft 11.25+
Jake and Tommy face to face
Click Here=
Jake with 5ft 11 slim - Click Here=
Even if slim was barefoot they would just be around the same height
Jake needs a massive upgrade , he’s looking down at Tommy fury around 0.25 inches he’s got a footwear disadvantage.
Jake - Jordan 4 2.5cm
Tommy - Nike waffle runners easily of 3cm
I’m predicating Jake has grown or fixed his posture … easily 5ft 11.25+
Jake and Tommy face to face
Click Here=
Jake with 5ft 11 slim - Click Here=
Even if slim was barefoot they would just be around the same height
Glacierr said on 23/Feb/23
Tommy Fury edges Jake Paul out at the face off but we can’t see footwear so probably at the weigh in (if Jake Paul doesn’t keep his footwear on) we will find out who is taller.
Click Here
1:48:45
Jake Paul even tries to puff his chest out
Tommy Fury edges Jake Paul out at the face off but we can’t see footwear so probably at the weigh in (if Jake Paul doesn’t keep his footwear on) we will find out who is taller.
Click Here
1:48:45
Jake Paul even tries to puff his chest out
Savagetez said on 22/Feb/23
Jake can look 5'10.5 but his posture is never all that good so he can actually be perhaps 5'11 maybe even a little over like 5'11.25. I am not even a fan of Jake I actually hate him but I think he is is around 5'10.75-5'11.25. I think the Jake Paul haters are trying to say he is 5'10. He is in the 5'10.75-5'11.25 range.
Jake can look 5'10.5 but his posture is never all that good so he can actually be perhaps 5'11 maybe even a little over like 5'11.25. I am not even a fan of Jake I actually hate him but I think he is is around 5'10.75-5'11.25. I think the Jake Paul haters are trying to say he is 5'10. He is in the 5'10.75-5'11.25 range.
Vertical fact said on 21/Feb/23
Jake claims he was "looking down" at Tommy Fury during their face off, interestingly enough height was one of the first things he brought up while being interviewed. Jake is definetly very height conscious and if I'd guess anyone to be wearing a sly lift it would be him
Jake claims he was "looking down" at Tommy Fury during their face off, interestingly enough height was one of the first things he brought up while being interviewed. Jake is definetly very height conscious and if I'd guess anyone to be wearing a sly lift it would be him
viper said on 21/Feb/23
Rob had him at his correct height of 5-10.5
Rob had him at his correct height of 5-10.5
400R said on 21/Feb/23
180cm or 5’10 max.
180cm or 5’10 max.
Pat m said on 20/Feb/23
5ft10.5 and nothing more, every single shoe I’ve seen him wear looks so suspicious, remember when he put his shoes back on to do a face off? Yeah exactly
5ft10.5 and nothing more, every single shoe I’ve seen him wear looks so suspicious, remember when he put his shoes back on to do a face off? Yeah exactly
5'7 and a fraction said on 20/Feb/23
7272 said on 18/Feb/23
Ryan Garcia can't get away with that 5'11 claim, barely looks taller than Canelo and both of them are slouching. Click Here
Look at this photo of him and Jake Paul in identical footwear. Click Here
Jake has like 3 inches on despite wearing sandals and Ryan wearing running shoes Click Here 0:05
Ryan Garcia is not more than 5'8.25
The difference looks far more like 2 inches than 3 tbh. Agree with Ryan being 5'8.25 max. Can look barely taller than 5'7 1/2 Canelo Alvarez. His 5'11 claim is laughable. Jake Paul is way closer to that than he is.
7272 said on 18/Feb/23
Ryan Garcia can't get away with that 5'11 claim, barely looks taller than Canelo and both of them are slouching. Click Here
Look at this photo of him and Jake Paul in identical footwear. Click Here
Jake has like 3 inches on despite wearing sandals and Ryan wearing running shoes Click Here 0:05
Ryan Garcia is not more than 5'8.25
The difference looks far more like 2 inches than 3 tbh. Agree with Ryan being 5'8.25 max. Can look barely taller than 5'7 1/2 Canelo Alvarez. His 5'11 claim is laughable. Jake Paul is way closer to that than he is.
Ben - 186cm said on 19/Feb/23
It’s nice to see a couple comments with common sense.
Somewhere between 5’11 and 6’0 for sure.
It’s nice to see a couple comments with common sense.
Somewhere between 5’11 and 6’0 for sure.
5'7 and a fraction said on 19/Feb/23
Jrod said on 18/Feb/23
I’m sorry but Jake is easily 6 ft man, I’m a flat 181 cm out of bed and I don’t see myself edging him out at all.
No.
Jrod said on 18/Feb/23
I’m sorry but Jake is easily 6 ft man, I’m a flat 181 cm out of bed and I don’t see myself edging him out at all.
No.
7272 said on 19/Feb/23
I think Jake made his name as a boxer now. I think you should try to put him in that category.
I think Jake made his name as a boxer now. I think you should try to put him in that category.
7272 said on 18/Feb/23
Ryan Garcia can't get away with that 5'11 claim, barely looks taller than Canelo and both of them are slouching. Click Here
Look at this photo of him and Jake Paul in identical footwear. Click Here
Jake has like 3 inches on despite wearing sandals and Ryan wearing running shoes Click Here 0:05
Ryan Garcia is not more than 5'8.25
Ryan Garcia can't get away with that 5'11 claim, barely looks taller than Canelo and both of them are slouching. Click Here
Look at this photo of him and Jake Paul in identical footwear. Click Here
Jake has like 3 inches on despite wearing sandals and Ryan wearing running shoes Click Here 0:05
Ryan Garcia is not more than 5'8.25
179.9guy said on 18/Feb/23
People on here will say he has lifts inside his boxing shoes haha dude is a strong 5´11 get over it.
People on here will say he has lifts inside his boxing shoes haha dude is a strong 5´11 get over it.
Jrod said on 18/Feb/23
I’m sorry but Jake is easily 6 ft man, I’m a flat 181 cm out of bed and I don’t see myself edging him out at all.
I’m sorry but Jake is easily 6 ft man, I’m a flat 181 cm out of bed and I don’t see myself edging him out at all.
5'7 and a fraction said on 16/Feb/23
Considering how he consistently looked 5'10 - 11 range not long ago, then started wearing thick shoes and boots, is clearly insecure about his height seen as he's claimed 6'0 +, it's probably not impossible he's been sneaking in subtle lifts to look more convincingly taller lately. It's definitely a possibility. I just think he's looked 179cm too many times to be considered a strong 5'11+ zone. It's just common sense.
Considering how he consistently looked 5'10 - 11 range not long ago, then started wearing thick shoes and boots, is clearly insecure about his height seen as he's claimed 6'0 +, it's probably not impossible he's been sneaking in subtle lifts to look more convincingly taller lately. It's definitely a possibility. I just think he's looked 179cm too many times to be considered a strong 5'11+ zone. It's just common sense.
Ben - 186cm said on 16/Feb/23
Oh nvm you said Tommy, my bad… 😬
Oh nvm you said Tommy, my bad… 😬
Ben - 186cm said on 16/Feb/23
@Duhon
Unfortunately I won’t be facing off with him. Maybe one day!
I’d probably have like 1.5 inches on him and people here will still say he’s 5’10 range! 😂
@Duhon
Unfortunately I won’t be facing off with him. Maybe one day!
I’d probably have like 1.5 inches on him and people here will still say he’s 5’10 range! 😂
Duhon said on 15/Feb/23
Tommy and Jake are both going to be facing off in thin soled boxing shoes for the actual fight. I wouldn't put it past some here to try to say Jake puts lifts in his boxing shoes...
Tommy and Jake are both going to be facing off in thin soled boxing shoes for the actual fight. I wouldn't put it past some here to try to say Jake puts lifts in his boxing shoes...
Duhon said on 15/Feb/23
Tommy and Ben are both going to be facing off in thin soled boxing shoes for the actual fight. I wouldn't put it past some here to try to say Jake puts lifts in his boxing shoes...
Tommy and Ben are both going to be facing off in thin soled boxing shoes for the actual fight. I wouldn't put it past some here to try to say Jake puts lifts in his boxing shoes...
Glacierr said on 14/Feb/23
@Ben - 186cm It would be interesting to see Jake Paul and Tommy Fury go face to face with each other without footware, I do believe Tommy will edge him out a little bit though
@Ben - 186cm It would be interesting to see Jake Paul and Tommy Fury go face to face with each other without footware, I do believe Tommy will edge him out a little bit though
Savagetez said on 14/Feb/23
I got some better photos where they are both more equally closer to the camera than this photo right.
hereClick Here
Some better that shows that Jake and Jey Uso is equally close to camera.
Click Here
Click Here
What you say the comparison is? Jey Uso looks to have an inch on Paul in both photos that are better than the 1st photo?
Jey Uso is looking 6'0 with 5'11 Jake Paul.
What would you say Rob Paul?
Editor Rob
I got some better photos where they are both more equally closer to the camera than this photo right.
hereClick Here
Some better that shows that Jake and Jey Uso is equally close to camera.
Click Here
Click Here
What you say the comparison is? Jey Uso looks to have an inch on Paul in both photos that are better than the 1st photo?
Jey Uso is looking 6'0 with 5'11 Jake Paul.
What would you say Rob Paul?
Editor RobHe could be taller, but 6ft is most I could imagine there.
Savagetez said on 12/Feb/23
Click Here
How tall would you say Jey USO can look next to 5'11 Jake Paul?
Jey USO looks noticeably taller but he has a bit of camera advantage.
Jey in my opinion looks 6'0 .
Editor Rob
Click Here
How tall would you say Jey USO can look next to 5'11 Jake Paul?
Jey USO looks noticeably taller but he has a bit of camera advantage.
Jey in my opinion looks 6'0 .
Editor RobHe could edge Jake, but really I think you'd need more footage to get a better sense.
Ben - 186cm said on 12/Feb/23
@Glacier
Weak 5’10.5-75 guys don’t look that tall with 6’1 guys. They just don’t. He’s somewhere between 5’11 and 6’0. At the moment I’m thinking 5’11.5, but I’d like to see him and Tommy in the ring first before I can be sure.
Here’s Derek with Usyk Click Here
Usyk is around 6’2 based on how he looks with Joshua, so 6’1 for Derek is probably bang on. That puts Jake weak 6’0 in the face off with Derek, but he does seem to strain his posture once he’s in front of Derek, whereas Derek appears to maintain a more regular posture throughout. They’re clearly within 2 inches of each other though, so Jake’s gotta be in the 5’11 range at least.
@Glacier
Weak 5’10.5-75 guys don’t look that tall with 6’1 guys. They just don’t. He’s somewhere between 5’11 and 6’0. At the moment I’m thinking 5’11.5, but I’d like to see him and Tommy in the ring first before I can be sure.
Here’s Derek with Usyk Click Here
Usyk is around 6’2 based on how he looks with Joshua, so 6’1 for Derek is probably bang on. That puts Jake weak 6’0 in the face off with Derek, but he does seem to strain his posture once he’s in front of Derek, whereas Derek appears to maintain a more regular posture throughout. They’re clearly within 2 inches of each other though, so Jake’s gotta be in the 5’11 range at least.
Vertical fact said on 12/Feb/23
@Duhon how do you know he doesn't wear lifts? His height changes like the weather to be fair so I think it's quite a high possibility
@Duhon how do you know he doesn't wear lifts? His height changes like the weather to be fair so I think it's quite a high possibility
Glacierr said on 11/Feb/23
@Ben - 186cm 6’0 is too much for Jake the most I’d go for him is 5’11 but I believe he is in the 5’10.5 - 5’10.75 range
@Ben - 186cm 6’0 is too much for Jake the most I’d go for him is 5’11 but I believe he is in the 5’10.5 - 5’10.75 range
Glacierr said on 9/Feb/23
@Ben - 186cm I feel like if Derek Chisora took off his hat the height difference would be clearer but he still looks like he edges Jake Paul
@Ben - 186cm I feel like if Derek Chisora took off his hat the height difference would be clearer but he still looks like he edges Jake Paul
Duhon said on 9/Feb/23
Jake tends to wear thick shoes but the man does not wear platforms or lifts like some here are saying, he's looking 5'11.5" in that face off with Chisora.
Jake tends to wear thick shoes but the man does not wear platforms or lifts like some here are saying, he's looking 5'11.5" in that face off with Chisora.
5'7 and a fraction said on 9/Feb/23
Ben - 186cm said on 8/Feb/23
Hey Rob. Here’s Jake facing off with Derek Chisora, perhaps slight footwear advantage Click Here
Pretty close in height; looks less than an inch between them.
Derek could be as low as 184cm but I can’t see much less than that.
Unless there’s lifts in Jake’s shoes he’s looking like a 6’0 guy, gotta be honest. I can’t believe I used to think he wasn’t even 5’11.
That looks far more like a solid inch between them, than less than an inch, judging by the top of their heads.
Ben - 186cm said on 8/Feb/23
Hey Rob. Here’s Jake facing off with Derek Chisora, perhaps slight footwear advantage Click Here
Pretty close in height; looks less than an inch between them.
Derek could be as low as 184cm but I can’t see much less than that.
Unless there’s lifts in Jake’s shoes he’s looking like a 6’0 guy, gotta be honest. I can’t believe I used to think he wasn’t even 5’11.
That looks far more like a solid inch between them, than less than an inch, judging by the top of their heads.
Ben - 186cm said on 9/Feb/23
Couple of interesting photos of Jake and Logan looking closer in height
Click Here
Click Here
Maybe 6’0 isn’t that insane for Jake.
Couple of interesting photos of Jake and Logan looking closer in height
Click Here
Click Here
Maybe 6’0 isn’t that insane for Jake.
Ben - 186cm said on 8/Feb/23
Hey Rob. Here’s Jake facing off with Derek Chisora, perhaps slight footwear advantage Click Here
Pretty close in height; looks less than an inch between them.
Derek could be as low as 184cm but I can’t see much less than that.
Unless there’s lifts in Jake’s shoes he’s looking like a 6’0 guy, gotta be honest. I can’t believe I used to think he wasn’t even 5’11.
Hey Rob. Here’s Jake facing off with Derek Chisora, perhaps slight footwear advantage Click Here
Pretty close in height; looks less than an inch between them.
Derek could be as low as 184cm but I can’t see much less than that.
Unless there’s lifts in Jake’s shoes he’s looking like a 6’0 guy, gotta be honest. I can’t believe I used to think he wasn’t even 5’11.
Abdulrahman said on 5/Feb/23
@Rob
Why have you listed Jake to be 5’11, when he clearly looks as tall as KSI who is 5’10 1/4?
I would have listed Jake at 5’10.5 instead…
Editor Rob
@Rob
Why have you listed Jake to be 5’11, when he clearly looks as tall as KSI who is 5’10 1/4?
I would have listed Jake at 5’10.5 instead…
Editor RobI feel he has a good chance measuring 5ft 11 when he stands tall.
Vertical fact said on 5/Feb/23
@185vietnamese I'll tell you how he does it, he inserts lifts into his shoes to appear taller. Also tyson isn't 6'9, he's more 6'7. I've never met anyone thats gotten taller after the age of 23 so I'm guessing jake might be partial to a little lift in his runners
@185vietnamese I'll tell you how he does it, he inserts lifts into his shoes to appear taller. Also tyson isn't 6'9, he's more 6'7. I've never met anyone thats gotten taller after the age of 23 so I'm guessing jake might be partial to a little lift in his runners
5'7 and a fraction said on 2/Feb/23
@ZDA
Agreed, thank goodness someone here has some intelligence.
@ZDA
Agreed, thank goodness someone here has some intelligence.
5'7 and a fraction said on 2/Feb/23
@Ben - 186cm
You're clearly a delusional troll, goodbye.
@Ben - 186cm
You're clearly a delusional troll, goodbye.
Ben - 186cm said on 2/Feb/23
@ZDA
In that clip Jake has boxing flats and Tommy has thick trainers, yet it was still only like 3/4 of an inch. They’re the same height man, haters need to give it a rest. His shoes in the latest face off are air force, which give 1.2 inch. Tommy has running shoes that look at least an inch. The footwear is practically the same.
@ZDA
In that clip Jake has boxing flats and Tommy has thick trainers, yet it was still only like 3/4 of an inch. They’re the same height man, haters need to give it a rest. His shoes in the latest face off are air force, which give 1.2 inch. Tommy has running shoes that look at least an inch. The footwear is practically the same.
Duhon said on 1/Feb/23
He's a solid 5'11" and he really does pull off looking 6' to the casual not height noticing crowd. The hair and shoes help him with that of course.
He's a solid 5'11" and he really does pull off looking 6' to the casual not height noticing crowd. The hair and shoes help him with that of course.
ZDA said on 1/Feb/23
Tommy fury defo taller than Jake Paul. Jake Paul had a massive footwear advantage. Let’s see when they meet face to face bare feet.
Tommy fury probably a strong 5 ‘11 guy 181cm. Jake probably around 178-179 cm 5 ft 10-10.5 without his footwear advantage.
In this video, Tommy fury looks at least an inch taller than Jake Paul:
Click Here
Tommy fury defo taller than Jake Paul. Jake Paul had a massive footwear advantage. Let’s see when they meet face to face bare feet.
Tommy fury probably a strong 5 ‘11 guy 181cm. Jake probably around 178-179 cm 5 ft 10-10.5 without his footwear advantage.
In this video, Tommy fury looks at least an inch taller than Jake Paul:
Click Here
Ben - 186cm said on 1/Feb/23
@5’7
Clarkson is 6’4, Bisping is 5’11, and Logan is pushing 6’2.
Sorry I have a keener eye than you mate, and that it offends you in some way.
Goodbye indeed brother, and god bless.
@5’7
Clarkson is 6’4, Bisping is 5’11, and Logan is pushing 6’2.
Sorry I have a keener eye than you mate, and that it offends you in some way.
Goodbye indeed brother, and god bless.
(Billythetreesurgeon) said on 31/Jan/23
Fury would edge jake, but they are pretty similar in height I think
Fury would edge jake, but they are pretty similar in height I think
179.9guy said on 30/Jan/23
guys jake is wearing air force 1's do some research on this site and you will find out that they only give 1.18 inches which is really normal now a days. Jake is a strong 5'11 and so is Tommy.
guys jake is wearing air force 1's do some research on this site and you will find out that they only give 1.18 inches which is really normal now a days. Jake is a strong 5'11 and so is Tommy.
Jawilder said on 30/Jan/23
Logan is 2.5 inches taller minimum. Logan is 6’1.5. He even got listed that before and definitely looks it.
That puts Jake 5’11 max. Jake is probably 5’10.75.
Logan is 2.5 inches taller minimum. Logan is 6’1.5. He even got listed that before and definitely looks it.
That puts Jake 5’11 max. Jake is probably 5’10.75.
Vertical fact said on 30/Jan/23
The average guess is is 5'10 and a half, but the guy claims 6'2😂, does he think everyone is blind or something
The average guess is is 5'10 and a half, but the guy claims 6'2😂, does he think everyone is blind or something
Ben - 186cm said on 30/Jan/23
@5’7 and a fraction
He doesn’t have a “major footwear advantage”. Both of their shoes are likely around an inch thick. If Jake has any advantage we’re talking like a quarter of an inch. He’s at least 5’11, and I wouldn’t be surprised if he measured more than that. 5’10.5 is a joke of an estimate. He pulls off looking 6 feet way too often to be 5’10 range.
@5’7 and a fraction
He doesn’t have a “major footwear advantage”. Both of their shoes are likely around an inch thick. If Jake has any advantage we’re talking like a quarter of an inch. He’s at least 5’11, and I wouldn’t be surprised if he measured more than that. 5’10.5 is a joke of an estimate. He pulls off looking 6 feet way too often to be 5’10 range.
Big T said on 30/Jan/23
Click Here
He looks no more than 3” shorter than 6’1.5” Chisora in BARE FEET.
Definitely looks 5’11”+ and you can’t blame his footwear
Click Here
He looks no more than 3” shorter than 6’1.5” Chisora in BARE FEET.
Definitely looks 5’11”+ and you can’t blame his footwear
jonas said on 30/Jan/23
Jake was clearly taller then Fury without the hair. So he might have shoe advantage
Jake was clearly taller then Fury without the hair. So he might have shoe advantage
Bjska184 said on 29/Jan/23
Footwear might be in favour of jake in the recent face-off against Tommy
Footwear might be in favour of jake in the recent face-off against Tommy
Emil said on 29/Jan/23
He looked taller than Tommy Fury because of his puffy hair. Fury would edge him out if measured
He looked taller than Tommy Fury because of his puffy hair. Fury would edge him out if measured
Heights are barefeet estimates, derived from quotations, official websites, agency resumes, in person encounters with actors at conventions and pictures/films.
Other vital statistics like weight or shoe size measurements have been sourced from newspapers, books, resumes or social media.
Celebrity Fan Photos and Agency Pictures of stars are © to their respective owners.