Jim Parrack's Height
6ft 4 (193 cm)
American Actor best known for playing Hoyt on tv series True Blood. In film he can be seen in Battle: Los Angeles. He has said he was '6-4'. This photo is from Massive Events true blood convention in Northampton, 2010. In this photo I'm wearing Converse Thin, and Jim had nearly 0.5 inch more footwear.
5ft 8 Jenny, Jim, 5ft 8 Rob
Height Comparison Chart
Height Comparison Chart
You May Be Interested
Joe Manganiello
6ft 4 ¾ (195 cm)
6ft 4 ¾ (195 cm)
Sam Trammell
5ft 8 ½ (174 cm)
5ft 8 ½ (174 cm)
Nelsan Ellis
5ft 9 ¼ (176 cm)
5ft 9 ¼ (176 cm)
Stephen Moyer
5ft 9 ½ (177 cm)
5ft 9 ½ (177 cm)
Add a Comment241 comments
Average Guess (74 Votes)
6ft 3.9in (192.8cm)
6ft 3.9in (192.8cm)
reteel said on 3/Dec/24
193
193
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 30/Apr/22
Solid 192cm more like. I don't think he's a guy who maintains the 6ft4 mark in the evening like other guys Rob has met.
Solid 192cm more like. I don't think he's a guy who maintains the 6ft4 mark in the evening like other guys Rob has met.
Andrey200 said on 29/Apr/22
Solid 193, don't think he falls below it
Solid 193, don't think he falls below it
Wehrmacht180 said on 17/Mar/22
193 cm
193 cm
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 14/Feb/22
Seems comfortably shorter than Joe Mangeniello based on both photos of them with Rob...
Seems comfortably shorter than Joe Mangeniello based on both photos of them with Rob...
Ian Momo 'Questionable 5'10' said on 31/Dec/21
@Keep Walking Tall Like Rop Baul not really, he's on 6'4 range on both photo but not above that, it seems like 6'4 is his max when standing next to Joe Manganiello
@Keep Walking Tall Like Rop Baul not really, he's on 6'4 range on both photo but not above that, it seems like 6'4 is his max when standing next to Joe Manganiello
slothee said on 2/Nov/21
He has a low eye level of at least 5 inches from top to eyes. So 6β4β sounds quite accurate and he looks nearly 8 inches taller than Rob.
He has a low eye level of at least 5 inches from top to eyes. So 6β4β sounds quite accurate and he looks nearly 8 inches taller than Rob.
Keep Walking Tall Like Rop Baul said on 6/Sep/21
6'3.5-6'4 flat when standing next to rob, but the photo with jenny he looks 6'5
6'3.5-6'4 flat when standing next to rob, but the photo with jenny he looks 6'5
ALEXIZ/180cm said on 13/Apr/21
193 cm
193 cm
Alex 6'0 said on 13/Apr/21
6'3.75 possible
6'3.75 possible
OriginalAnon said on 10/Mar/21
Chris, I will concede he may not look the full 193cm, but he is not lower than 192cm. He is definitely "well" over 6'3'' flat. In the morning the guy will be over 193cm, maybe 194cm out of bed. I will withdraw that he is "clearly a 193cm guy", on the basis of afternoon height, he may be 192cm, but 190cm is too low.
Chris, I will concede he may not look the full 193cm, but he is not lower than 192cm. He is definitely "well" over 6'3'' flat. In the morning the guy will be over 193cm, maybe 194cm out of bed. I will withdraw that he is "clearly a 193cm guy", on the basis of afternoon height, he may be 192cm, but 190cm is too low.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 1/Feb/21
No he's definitely closer to 6ft4 than 6ft3...but may fall a tad shy of it at worst. He wouldn't be a solid 6ft4 guy. He could measure similar to Ed Quinn or Lee Pace
No he's definitely closer to 6ft4 than 6ft3...but may fall a tad shy of it at worst. He wouldn't be a solid 6ft4 guy. He could measure similar to Ed Quinn or Lee Pace
Chris Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 3/Sep/20
Not even sure Ed Quinn is shorter than Jim.
Not even sure Ed Quinn is shorter than Jim.
Matt6'5" said on 18/Aug/20
I did the same thing, and went "No way he's 6'4! " However, I stopped to think of the way I stand. The more I think about it, the more I realized that I do alot of slouching to make conversations easier. I don't know that I usually stand my tallest in family photos either. I probably lose a good 1.5-2 in due to posture. So I think 6'3.4-6'4 is quite possible for Jim.
I did the same thing, and went "No way he's 6'4! " However, I stopped to think of the way I stand. The more I think about it, the more I realized that I do alot of slouching to make conversations easier. I don't know that I usually stand my tallest in family photos either. I probably lose a good 1.5-2 in due to posture. So I think 6'3.4-6'4 is quite possible for Jim.
Chris Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 18/May/20
@OriginalAnon
He isn't looking 6'4 with Rob. Rob had 0.5" less footwear but making him 6'3.5" max. He look 6'3 in picture with Rob itself, it's confuse whether he is 6'4 in real hardly think about it. At least Jason Momoa look 6'3.75" with Rob in comparison with similar footwear.
@OriginalAnon
He isn't looking 6'4 with Rob. Rob had 0.5" less footwear but making him 6'3.5" max. He look 6'3 in picture with Rob itself, it's confuse whether he is 6'4 in real hardly think about it. At least Jason Momoa look 6'3.75" with Rob in comparison with similar footwear.
OriginalAnon said on 6/May/20
People must be on some good stuff to even contemplate the fact that he could be 190cm. He is clearly 193cm.
People must be on some good stuff to even contemplate the fact that he could be 190cm. He is clearly 193cm.
Jkiller said on 8/Apr/20
Feel like he's 6'3.5
Feel like he's 6'3.5
Jdubbz said on 28/Feb/20
Looks 6'4 in the left picture, but taking into account the footwear difference, 6'3.5.
Looks 6'4 in the left picture, but taking into account the footwear difference, 6'3.5.
berta said on 10/Feb/20
i think like this: he is never ever taller than 193 and never under 191,5 that why i think the best listing would be a littel over 192
i think like this: he is never ever taller than 193 and never under 191,5 that why i think the best listing would be a littel over 192
Miss Sandy Cowell said on 14/Nov/19
I saw this tall Jim come up as a random celeb, so I seized upon the opportunity to see how tall the average Jim is. He's over 6ft, but if I told my own personal boyfriend, Jim, he wouldn't give two hoots! π€·ββοΈ
Six foot four.
I saw this tall Jim come up as a random celeb, so I seized upon the opportunity to see how tall the average Jim is. He's over 6ft, but if I told my own personal boyfriend, Jim, he wouldn't give two hoots! π€·ββοΈ
Six foot four.
Christian 6'5 3/8" said on 8/Oct/19
@Canson
True
@Canson
True
Canson said on 8/Oct/19
The most he looks is 6β3.5β. He does not look a proper 6β4β
The most he looks is 6β3.5β. He does not look a proper 6β4β
Chris Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 11/Aug/19
6'3.25" seem too low. But i'm not convincing if Jim is right at 6'4 in person like Jared Padalecki did.
6'3.25" seem too low. But i'm not convincing if Jim is right at 6'4 in person like Jared Padalecki did.
Alex 6'3.25 said on 4/Jul/19
He's more like 6'3.25
He's more like 6'3.25
Nik said on 13/Jun/19
@ Sandy Cowell - Too true there are a lot of tall Jim's on celebheights! πΌ!
ππππΌ Fascinating Fact Time! πΌπππ!
Here are some fascinating facts about the Jim's on celebheights:
A) 12/20 Jim's are 6'0" or over!
B) 18/20 Jim's are 5'10" or over!
C) 19/20 Jim's are above average height!
D) I went onto the Jim Heights page and guess who popped up as a random celeb at the bottom of the screen?
@ Sandy Cowell - Too true there are a lot of tall Jim's on celebheights! πΌ!
ππππΌ Fascinating Fact Time! πΌπππ!
Here are some fascinating facts about the Jim's on celebheights:
A) 12/20 Jim's are 6'0" or over!
B) 18/20 Jim's are 5'10" or over!
C) 19/20 Jim's are above average height!
D) I went onto the Jim Heights page and guess who popped up as a random celeb at the bottom of the screen?
Miss Sandy Cowell said on 30/May/19
The average Jim is over 6ft! That's really rather toweringly tall! πΌ
This particular Jim gets 6ft4. ππ
The average Jim is over 6ft! That's really rather toweringly tall! πΌ
This particular Jim gets 6ft4. ππ
Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 5/Apr/19
@Oneiroi Jim only look max 6'3 1/2 with 173cm Rob on the top right picture. How could he be 6'4? Jim had 0.4" more footwear. We can argue Rob head closer to camera makes Jim look little shorter than 6'4. From my perspective i suspect he is only 192cm in person maybe 6'3.75" like Jason Momoa looks it with Rob.
@Oneiroi Jim only look max 6'3 1/2 with 173cm Rob on the top right picture. How could he be 6'4? Jim had 0.4" more footwear. We can argue Rob head closer to camera makes Jim look little shorter than 6'4. From my perspective i suspect he is only 192cm in person maybe 6'3.75" like Jason Momoa looks it with Rob.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 8/Mar/19
I think Jared Padalecki would edge this guy
I think Jared Padalecki would edge this guy
Nik said on 9/Dec/18
Jim Parrack looks under 6'4" in the photograph on the right, in Northampton!
Jim Parrack looks under 6'4" in the photograph on the right, in Northampton!
Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 23/Aug/18
I would have go with 6'3 5/8 (192) more i look at his work. Manganiello i would go for 6'4 1/2.
I would have go with 6'3 5/8 (192) more i look at his work. Manganiello i would go for 6'4 1/2.
Christian 6'5 3/8" said on 14/Jul/18
@Tunman
I agree, he should get a 6'3.5" listing at the most, maybe even 6'3.25"
@Tunman
I agree, he should get a 6'3.5" listing at the most, maybe even 6'3.25"
Tunman said on 5/Jul/18
Rob,the more pics I watch of him with Leven Rambin the less I'm convinced he's the full 6'4 listed at.Maybe time to consider a 6'3.5"listing?The odds are that he dips under the 6'4 mark (but comfortably cleans it out of bed,hence the claim)
Rob,the more pics I watch of him with Leven Rambin the less I'm convinced he's the full 6'4 listed at.Maybe time to consider a 6'3.5"listing?The odds are that he dips under the 6'4 mark (but comfortably cleans it out of bed,hence the claim)
Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 30/Jun/18
@Christian-6'5 3/8" Top right picture maybe he was 6'3 3/4, trick on Rob's head closer to camera? Remember Rob is not a flat 5'8 and sometimes hold a strong 5'8 1/4 before noon.
@Christian-6'5 3/8" Top right picture maybe he was 6'3 3/4, trick on Rob's head closer to camera? Remember Rob is not a flat 5'8 and sometimes hold a strong 5'8 1/4 before noon.
Tunman said on 4/Jun/18
Well Christian he indeed looks only 191 in these pics when counting footwear but Rob insisted he's not under 6'3.5"possibly the full 6'4.But if I had to give a bet I would have said there is a good inch between him and Manganiello and might fall more in the weak 6'4 like Momoa
Well Christian he indeed looks only 191 in these pics when counting footwear but Rob insisted he's not under 6'3.5"possibly the full 6'4.But if I had to give a bet I would have said there is a good inch between him and Manganiello and might fall more in the weak 6'4 like Momoa
Christian-6'5 3/8" said on 29/May/18
@Junior
There's nothing wrong with the camera angle. And Rob said that Jim had shoe advantage so I have no reason to believe he's lying.
@Junior
There's nothing wrong with the camera angle. And Rob said that Jim had shoe advantage so I have no reason to believe he's lying.
Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 28/May/18
@Christian-6'5 3/8 Maybe Rob hiding something i don't know or the camera angle is just bad..
@Christian-6'5 3/8 Maybe Rob hiding something i don't know or the camera angle is just bad..
Christian-6'5 3/8 said on 4/May/18
@Junior
You sure Jim's not under 6'3.75"? He honestly looks about 6'3.25" here accounting for the footwear advantage.
@Junior
You sure Jim's not under 6'3.75"? He honestly looks about 6'3.25" here accounting for the footwear advantage.
Christian-6'5 3/8 said on 4/May/18
@Junior
You sure Jim's not under 6'3.75"? He honestly looks about 6'3.25" here accounting for the footwear advantage.
@Junior
You sure Jim's not under 6'3.75"? He honestly looks about 6'3.25" here accounting for the footwear advantage.
Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 2/May/18
@Christian-6'5 3/8 True. I thought the same. Jared more like the decent 6'4 for lwoest of the day for a measurement and Jim give me an impression deep a little weak 6'4 but maybe not be under 6'3 3/4 for low from watching some of his film.
@Christian-6'5 3/8 True. I thought the same. Jared more like the decent 6'4 for lwoest of the day for a measurement and Jim give me an impression deep a little weak 6'4 but maybe not be under 6'3 3/4 for low from watching some of his film.
Christian-6'5 3/8 said on 24/Apr/18
@Junior
Yeah, Padalecki would very likely edge both of them out. Solid 6'4" for him I but can't say the same for the latter.
@Junior
Yeah, Padalecki would very likely edge both of them out. Solid 6'4" for him I but can't say the same for the latter.
Junior Hernandez said on 7/Feb/18
I will truely surprise if Jared Padalecki doesn't edge Jim out 1/4 and i feel no way Adam Baldwin will stand the same height barefoot as Jared.
I will truely surprise if Jared Padalecki doesn't edge Jim out 1/4 and i feel no way Adam Baldwin will stand the same height barefoot as Jared.
Christian-6'5 3/8 said on 2/Feb/18
@Rob
It's strange though that Parrack doesn't look 6'4" especially when you account for his shoe advantage. He looks 6'3.25" at the most.
@Rob
It's strange though that Parrack doesn't look 6'4" especially when you account for his shoe advantage. He looks 6'3.25" at the most.
Junior Hernandez said on 1/Feb/18
Rob, Jim is no way taller than Lee Pace and Ed Quinn. If Pace is 6'3.75" then Jim need a downgrade.
Editor Rob
Rob, Jim is no way taller than Lee Pace and Ed Quinn. If Pace is 6'3.75" then Jim need a downgrade.
Editor RobJim is the same height in person as Adam Baldwin and Jared Padalecki.
Christian-6'5 3/8 said on 3/Jan/18
@Jason
Jim had footwear advantage over Rob and Jenny, so he looks 191cm.
@Jason
Jim had footwear advantage over Rob and Jenny, so he looks 191cm.
Jason said on 2/Jan/18
@Alex he looks 191.5cm minimum, but more likely 192cm.
@Alex he looks 191.5cm minimum, but more likely 192cm.
Alex 6'3 said on 1/Jan/18
He's more like 190.5-191 cm, 192 at best.
He's more like 190.5-191 cm, 192 at best.
Felix said on 26/Dec/17
Solid 6'4"
Solid 6'4"
Jann said on 22/Dec/17
If rob is 5'8" then Jim is 6'2" or max 6'3"
If rob is 5'8" then Jim is 6'2" or max 6'3"
Junior said on 12/Dec/17
Yay he look max 191cm with rob but he could be 6'3.5" in person.
Yay he look max 191cm with rob but he could be 6'3.5" in person.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 1/Dec/17
Why is this guy still at 6ft4, Rob?
Looks 191-192cm max
Why is this guy still at 6ft4, Rob?
Looks 191-192cm max
Junior said on 7/Nov/17
I believe Jim Parrack is 6'4 in person maybe a later morning since Rob did not downgrade him. A few hour after this photo taken is assurd that he may not be higher than 6'3.5-6'3.6" although he look 6'3.25" with Rob.
I believe Jim Parrack is 6'4 in person maybe a later morning since Rob did not downgrade him. A few hour after this photo taken is assurd that he may not be higher than 6'3.5-6'3.6" although he look 6'3.25" with Rob.
Christian-6'5 3/8 said on 2/Oct/17
Looks 6'3" and change.
Looks 6'3" and change.
even said on 20/Jul/17
6 foot 4 out of bed
6 foot 4 out of bed
S.J.H said on 25/Jun/17
Lol. At most 6'3.5 in the morning and down at lowest 6'3 , 6'4 out of bed no problem
Lol. At most 6'3.5 in the morning and down at lowest 6'3 , 6'4 out of bed no problem
Ted said on 20/Jun/17
There really is no denying this guy is a solid 6' 4'' in the morning.
There really is no denying this guy is a solid 6' 4'' in the morning.
S.J.H said on 9/Jun/17
I still don't think Ed Quinn is shorter than parrack. Parrack needs a downgrade.
I still don't think Ed Quinn is shorter than parrack. Parrack needs a downgrade.
berta said on 19/May/17
1/4 less than listing could be better listing.dont think skarsgΓ₯rd is only a fraction taller
1/4 less than listing could be better listing.dont think skarsgΓ₯rd is only a fraction taller
184guy said on 11/May/17
6'3 is very low but 6'3.5 is a good shot
6'3 is very low but 6'3.5 is a good shot
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 29/Mar/17
A dimestore-quality 6ft4
A dimestore-quality 6ft4
berta said on 21/Feb/17
maybe he is little under 6 foot 4?
maybe he is little under 6 foot 4?
S.J.H said on 4/Feb/17
@shiva181cms
He even look just 6'3 , look at the picture alone with rob standing properly and precisely jim had 0.4" more shoe than rob. 190cm guy claiming 6'4 is not uncommon in hollywood
@shiva181cms
He even look just 6'3 , look at the picture alone with rob standing properly and precisely jim had 0.4" more shoe than rob. 190cm guy claiming 6'4 is not uncommon in hollywood
shiva181cms said on 26/Jan/17
This guy is no more than 6'3.5 , with 0.4 inch advantage he still doesn't look quite 6'4
In the above pic jenny's top of head comes just below Jim's nose which gives 7.5" for an normal guy , given Jim has a big forehead add a 3/8". It gives almost 8" and jenny's 5'8 at that time so 6'4 with 0.5-0.6" more shoe, this guy is 6'3.4-5 at his most
Need for a downgrade
This guy is no more than 6'3.5 , with 0.4 inch advantage he still doesn't look quite 6'4
In the above pic jenny's top of head comes just below Jim's nose which gives 7.5" for an normal guy , given Jim has a big forehead add a 3/8". It gives almost 8" and jenny's 5'8 at that time so 6'4 with 0.5-0.6" more shoe, this guy is 6'3.4-5 at his most
Need for a downgrade
S.J.H said on 11/Jan/17
If Ed quinn can be 6'3.75 i don't think jim parrack is much higher than 6'3.5 and probably same height as joel mchale and ed quinn
If Ed quinn can be 6'3.75 i don't think jim parrack is much higher than 6'3.5 and probably same height as joel mchale and ed quinn
Josh Jeffords said on 17/Nov/16
Looks a weak 6 2 in stuff I've seen maybe perfect posture maybe 6 2.5.
No idea where 6 4 is coming from subtract 2 inches for being on tb.
They are all over listed and can't act he was not the tallest on battle la.
Had a few on eckhart so weak 6 2 or maybe full 6 2 like butler.
Looks a weak 6 2 in stuff I've seen maybe perfect posture maybe 6 2.5.
No idea where 6 4 is coming from subtract 2 inches for being on tb.
They are all over listed and can't act he was not the tallest on battle la.
Had a few on eckhart so weak 6 2 or maybe full 6 2 like butler.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 14/Nov/16
I think he'd be at least 1in below someone like Joe Mangeniello...
I think he'd be at least 1in below someone like Joe Mangeniello...
S.J.H said on 20/Sep/16
It's time to get jim downgrade at 6'3.5 which too much of evidence around
It's time to get jim downgrade at 6'3.5 which too much of evidence around
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 24/Jul/16
Rob, how likely is 6ft3 flat?
Editor Rob
Rob, how likely is 6ft3 flat?
Editor Rob wouldn't go that low, but 6ft 3.5 is arguable - he is in an episode of supernatural with a scene near jared, although it isn't a great comparison though.
Alex said on 4/Jul/16
I would say, considering Jenny's posture, which is better than Rob, no more then 189,5/190 cm. With that kind of shoes almost 193 cm, or more like 192,5. Surely he's not a legit 6'4.
I would say, considering Jenny's posture, which is better than Rob, no more then 189,5/190 cm. With that kind of shoes almost 193 cm, or more like 192,5. Surely he's not a legit 6'4.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 4/Jul/16
It certainly does not support this guy's case of being a full 6ft4...
It certainly does not support this guy's case of being a full 6ft4...
Arch Stanton said on 4/Jul/16
Same height as Clint Eastwood and John Wayne, 6'3.75 imo.
Same height as Clint Eastwood and John Wayne, 6'3.75 imo.
Alex said on 27/Jun/16
He look more around 192 cm in this photo.
He look more around 192 cm in this photo.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 17/Jun/16
Rob, O'Dowd is slouching, has a shaven head and looks Β½-1in taller than Parrack.
Editor Rob
Rob, O'Dowd is slouching, has a shaven head and looks Β½-1in taller than Parrack.
Editor Rob it depends on the angle of that photo, you could say This angle helps Jim's side the same as the other might help Chris's side, but I belive barefoot they would be quite close.
Aza said on 13/Jun/16
In the left pic Rob is not standing at his tallest. A better comparison would be with Jenny who has better posture. Based on this he looks like a strong 6'3 to 6'5 max but no more as he is standing at his tallest with Rob and Jenny.
In the left pic Rob is not standing at his tallest. A better comparison would be with Jenny who has better posture. Based on this he looks like a strong 6'3 to 6'5 max but no more as he is standing at his tallest with Rob and Jenny.
SomeGuy said on 9/Jun/16
Parrack seems to be no taller than Chris O'dowd: Click Here
What do you think Rob?
Editor Rob
Parrack seems to be no taller than Chris O'dowd: Click Here
What do you think Rob?
Editor Rob the photo is taken quite high up, but they could be very close in height.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 29/May/16
Looks near 2in shorter than Joe Mangeniello does w/h a Rob. Not a solid 6ft4 at all.
Looks near 2in shorter than Joe Mangeniello does w/h a Rob. Not a solid 6ft4 at all.
James B said on 20/May/16
Maybe not a legit 6'4
Maybe not a legit 6'4
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 10/Apr/16
192cm...final offer
192cm...final offer
S.J.H said on 2/Feb/16
He look similar height as zachary levi or at most fraction taller. Max 191cm
He look similar height as zachary levi or at most fraction taller. Max 191cm
Alex said on 25/Jan/16
In these photos he seems 193/194 cm and he had 2,5 cm of footwear. So, he should be 191-192 cm barefoot.
In these photos he seems 193/194 cm and he had 2,5 cm of footwear. So, he should be 191-192 cm barefoot.
John said on 18/Jan/16
Parrack looks a strong 6'3" in the second photo for some reason.
Parrack looks a strong 6'3" in the second photo for some reason.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 9/Nov/15
Very weak 6ft4 range if not 192cm flat.
Very weak 6ft4 range if not 192cm flat.
Grant said on 11/Sep/15
Do you think he would be edged out by Alexander skΓ€sgarth
Editor Rob
Do you think he would be edged out by Alexander skΓ€sgarth
Editor Rob I think Skarsgard falls into the strong 6ft 4, or fraction over, but Jim I wouldn't have guessed him as falling over 6ft 4.
S.J.H said on 31/Aug/15
Hes 6'3 , 190.5cm solid
Hes 6'3 , 190.5cm solid
pablo77bar(184cm) said on 15/Aug/15
6FT 3.75 At least
6FT 3.75 At least
Modeus said on 30/Jun/15
6 ft3,5 seems possible.
6 ft3,5 seems possible.
Tunman said on 2/Jun/15
Jim Parrack is 5'8, at most 5'8.25.Rob is so modest,he's dropping about 8" to let him look tall.In fact they are the same height give or take a fraction
Jim Parrack is 5'8, at most 5'8.25.Rob is so modest,he's dropping about 8" to let him look tall.In fact they are the same height give or take a fraction
Maximus said on 30/May/15
He does not look 6'1" or 6'2"...give me a break...in these pictures he easily looks 6'4"...he towers of Rob!!!!
He does not look 6'1" or 6'2"...give me a break...in these pictures he easily looks 6'4"...he towers of Rob!!!!
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 2/Mar/15
Rob, you need to bring this guy down a wee bit.
Howabout a weak 6ft4?
Rob, you need to bring this guy down a wee bit.
Howabout a weak 6ft4?
S.J.H said on 2/Mar/15
Rob know well he can't be much taller than a real 190cm guy like Tom welling. Jim is about 6'3 and nothing more. So no way he could be 6'4
Rob know well he can't be much taller than a real 190cm guy like Tom welling. Jim is about 6'3 and nothing more. So no way he could be 6'4
AlexMahone said on 8/Dec/14
Well, I can't recognize 1cm height difference, I know somebody can... but in the new David Ayer movie "Fury" Brad Henke and Parrack heights was very similar. Henke is a legit 6'4 (193cm), so Parrack can be the same...
Well, I can't recognize 1cm height difference, I know somebody can... but in the new David Ayer movie "Fury" Brad Henke and Parrack heights was very similar. Henke is a legit 6'4 (193cm), so Parrack can be the same...
Katatonia said on 1/Dec/14
i can tell you right now this guy is probably 6'3.5 flat at his low. Would be mindblown if he was really 6'4 legit. (just like jason momoa, and about 40% of the guys listed as 6'4 on this site)
i can tell you right now this guy is probably 6'3.5 flat at his low. Would be mindblown if he was really 6'4 legit. (just like jason momoa, and about 40% of the guys listed as 6'4 on this site)
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 25/Oct/14
If he was a real 6ft4 guy, he'd be clearing 6ft5 in that picture with his shoes. He's maybe a hair of 6ft4 with Rob. He's definitely 6ft3 range
If he was a real 6ft4 guy, he'd be clearing 6ft5 in that picture with his shoes. He's maybe a hair of 6ft4 with Rob. He's definitely 6ft3 range
BorkLaser said on 22/Sep/14
Legit 6'4" IMO. Made Chris Bauer (listed at 1.87m online) look more like 1.83m give or take a cm on the last episode of True Blood.
Editor Rob
Legit 6'4" IMO. Made Chris Bauer (listed at 1.87m online) look more like 1.83m give or take a cm on the last episode of True Blood.
Editor Rob I think bauer's somewhere in 6ft range, or nearer 183 than 187
Sam said on 6/Aug/14
Recently learned he is BFFs with James Franco. Franco looks a solid 6 inches shorter IMO.
Click Here
Recently learned he is BFFs with James Franco. Franco looks a solid 6 inches shorter IMO.
Click Here
mike said on 28/Jun/14
he looks 6ft 4-6ft 5 could he be 194 cm!?
he looks 6ft 4-6ft 5 could he be 194 cm!?
176,2Tunman said on 23/May/14
Rob,did he look 1"taller than HC13 with the shoe advantage?Seems unlikely.I think 19-20cms is the actual difference here so 18-19 with same footwear.I'm sure a guy like Padalecki will easily be 0.5"taller
Editor Rob
Rob,did he look 1"taller than HC13 with the shoe advantage?Seems unlikely.I think 19-20cms is the actual difference here so 18-19 with same footwear.I'm sure a guy like Padalecki will easily be 0.5"taller
Editor Rob he could be 6ft 3.5, although Parrack was in an episode of Supernatural with Jared, I'm not sure how great the angles were for comparison though...
Realist said on 23/May/14
Seems correct looks 6'5 in this pic. Rob for the first time on this website your looking below 173. I think its the pic. But usually you are almost 174 or a strong 173.
Editor Rob
Seems correct looks 6'5 in this pic. Rob for the first time on this website your looking below 173. I think its the pic. But usually you are almost 174 or a strong 173.
Editor Rob I wasn't standing well on purpose, because say Jenny wasn't in the double photo - would people be able to tell I dropped a good 4cm in my back...It's an example to show that sometimes spotting height loss in photos can be hard :)
Andrea said on 10/May/14
Naa, avi. Remember Rob himself said he dropped 4 cms in posture plus 1 cm for shoe disadvantage... Which means Jim should appear something like 25 cms taller than Rob in the double shot! Just no way!!! I still wouldn't put him under 6'3 but 6'4 really seems too much... Maybe 6'3.5 could be bang on
Naa, avi. Remember Rob himself said he dropped 4 cms in posture plus 1 cm for shoe disadvantage... Which means Jim should appear something like 25 cms taller than Rob in the double shot! Just no way!!! I still wouldn't put him under 6'3 but 6'4 really seems too much... Maybe 6'3.5 could be bang on
avi said on 1/May/14
he is actually close to joe manganiello in difference here. 6'4 may be possible, 6'3.75. i think people think the difference is supposed to be more between 6'4 and 5'8, after all its barely 8 inches!
he is actually close to joe manganiello in difference here. 6'4 may be possible, 6'3.75. i think people think the difference is supposed to be more between 6'4 and 5'8, after all its barely 8 inches!
Lillo thomas said on 16/Apr/14
Nope . The isn't a way that jim is only 6'2 . He is atleast 6'3 and 6'3.5 is very likely. I'm not sure about a legit 6'4.
Nope . The isn't a way that jim is only 6'2 . He is atleast 6'3 and 6'3.5 is very likely. I'm not sure about a legit 6'4.
Antas said on 4/Apr/14
looks 6'2"
looks 6'2"
176,2Tunman said on 18/Feb/14
Rob,in the right pic,he looks nothing more than 6'3.75 max, rather 6'3.25-3.5 considering footwear.I trust your judgement when you say he's no more than 1in shorter than Manganiello.But you said Parrack could look both 6'3 and 6'4.Maybe 6'4.5 for Manganiello and 6'3.5 for Parrack is safer?The more I look this guy the less I'm convinced he's a solid 6'4 say like Padalecki,O'Brien and others.
Rob,in the right pic,he looks nothing more than 6'3.75 max, rather 6'3.25-3.5 considering footwear.I trust your judgement when you say he's no more than 1in shorter than Manganiello.But you said Parrack could look both 6'3 and 6'4.Maybe 6'4.5 for Manganiello and 6'3.5 for Parrack is safer?The more I look this guy the less I'm convinced he's a solid 6'4 say like Padalecki,O'Brien and others.
sigge said on 4/Feb/14
6'4 seems fair. 192-193 cm.
6'4 seems fair. 192-193 cm.
ice said on 20/Dec/13
Looking at the pics again, and realizing he has the shoe advantage, I think he's 6'3.5", which makes it understandable why he would claim 6'4."
Looking at the pics again, and realizing he has the shoe advantage, I think he's 6'3.5", which makes it understandable why he would claim 6'4."
Alex 6ft 0 1/8 said on 21/Nov/13
He looks to be a bit taller in the left photo than the right. Prob the camera angle. Either way I think 6'4 is fair. Maybe at worst 6'3.75
Editor Rob
He looks to be a bit taller in the left photo than the right. Prob the camera angle. Either way I think 6'4 is fair. Maybe at worst 6'3.75
Editor Rob it's just me slouching
Lo sgozzatore said on 4/Nov/13
He was in an episode of supernatural and, even if the scenes weren't the best to compare him with Jared Padalecki, i'd say he looked a bit shorter than him. That doesn't surprise me at all! Maybe 6'3.5 is closer, he really doenst look a big 6'4 guy on here.
He was in an episode of supernatural and, even if the scenes weren't the best to compare him with Jared Padalecki, i'd say he looked a bit shorter than him. That doesn't surprise me at all! Maybe 6'3.5 is closer, he really doenst look a big 6'4 guy on here.
ice said on 17/Oct/13
I just realized that there is another "ice" on this site. I'm a bit perturbed because we don't agree in terms of height at all. This guy is clearly 6'4 ish. Hey Rob, is there any way to differentiate me from this other person?
Editor Rob
I just realized that there is another "ice" on this site. I'm a bit perturbed because we don't agree in terms of height at all. This guy is clearly 6'4 ish. Hey Rob, is there any way to differentiate me from this other person?
Editor Rob maybe change to Ice Man or some letter?
Jimmy said on 16/Oct/13
This is EXACTLY how I look next to my mom, this guy is a solid 6'4 footer.
This is EXACTLY how I look next to my mom, this guy is a solid 6'4 footer.
Arch Stanton said on 11/Oct/13
Funny how people say this guy looks anything from 6'2-6'5"!! I think you could argue 192, but 6'3" or under, I wouldn't bet on it!
Funny how people say this guy looks anything from 6'2-6'5"!! I think you could argue 192, but 6'3" or under, I wouldn't bet on it!
Lo sgozzatore said on 30/Aug/13
Considering he has 0.6 inches advantage on Jenny, he should look like a big 6'4.5 in the pic! He just doesnt! Im not sure he's a 6'3 flat guy, but he's not a full 6'4 for sure. Yeah, Larc is right about Rampage but in this case he might be right! 191-192 is closer than 6'4 for sure
Considering he has 0.6 inches advantage on Jenny, he should look like a big 6'4.5 in the pic! He just doesnt! Im not sure he's a 6'3 flat guy, but he's not a full 6'4 for sure. Yeah, Larc is right about Rampage but in this case he might be right! 191-192 is closer than 6'4 for sure
Rusty said on 28/Aug/13
Hes looking more 6'5" on the left photo
Editor Rob
Hes looking more 6'5" on the left photo
Editor Rob This was taken shortly before our photoshoots...
illustrating that I can drop 4cm of height without it being obvious.
illustrating that I can drop 4cm of height without it being obvious.
Larc 74in said on 26/Aug/13
@Rampage Clover:
Still upgrading the celebrities shorter than you and downgrading the taller ones? What's the point of that?
What do you intend to achieve with your weird estimates?
The guy is nothing less than 6'4.
@Rampage Clover:
Still upgrading the celebrities shorter than you and downgrading the taller ones? What's the point of that?
What do you intend to achieve with your weird estimates?
The guy is nothing less than 6'4.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 14/Aug/13
"Jim Parrack's height is 6ft 3.5in (192cm)"
I don't rule out 191cm either. Really does look more like a solid 6ft3.
"Jim Parrack's height is 6ft 3.5in (192cm)"
I don't rule out 191cm either. Really does look more like a solid 6ft3.
Blaze said on 10/Aug/13
In the first pic he looks full 193cm, but in the second pic he looks 192 cm. I think he's actually 6'4 because I'm 6'4.75 and i look about an inch taller with 5'8 ppl
In the first pic he looks full 193cm, but in the second pic he looks 192 cm. I think he's actually 6'4 because I'm 6'4.75 and i look about an inch taller with 5'8 ppl
avi said on 23/Jul/13
@BEASTMAN says on 19/Jul/13
Why do you upgrade everyone? And its clear if Rob didn't have the disadvantage he'd be almost .5 inch taller. Theres ALMOST 8 inches here in the pictures but if Rob had normal shoes then this guy is 6'3.5.
@BEASTMAN says on 19/Jul/13
Why do you upgrade everyone? And its clear if Rob didn't have the disadvantage he'd be almost .5 inch taller. Theres ALMOST 8 inches here in the pictures but if Rob had normal shoes then this guy is 6'3.5.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 20/Jul/13
He's 6ft4.25/194cm in the photo. Which means he's 192cm on his best day because a real 6ft4 who stands next to a legit 5ft8 and has 1in more shoe should easily clear 6ft5 and maybe even get mistaken for 6ft6.
He's 6ft4.25/194cm in the photo. Which means he's 192cm on his best day because a real 6ft4 who stands next to a legit 5ft8 and has 1in more shoe should easily clear 6ft5 and maybe even get mistaken for 6ft6.
Lo sgozzatore said on 20/Jul/13
He doesnt downgrade anyone. This guy has about 0.5 inches of advantage and he should appear like a 6'4.5. Just noway he looks that tall in these pics. He's probably a bit over 6'3, not a full 6'4 for sure...
He doesnt downgrade anyone. This guy has about 0.5 inches of advantage and he should appear like a 6'4.5. Just noway he looks that tall in these pics. He's probably a bit over 6'3, not a full 6'4 for sure...
BEASTMAN said on 19/Jul/13
@avi: Do you downgrade everyone?
@avi: Do you downgrade everyone?
avi said on 17/Jul/13
not a true 6'4 more like 6'3 and change.
not a true 6'4 more like 6'3 and change.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 3/Jul/13
Max 6ft3.5/192cm. With shoe advantage is about 193-194cm
Max 6ft3.5/192cm. With shoe advantage is about 193-194cm
J.Lee said on 28/May/13
Rob for a long time you said Jenny was taller, she was listed at 5 ft 8 1/4 and you were listed 5 ft 8 flat. Did you both re-measure and find out that to not be so?
Editor Rob
Rob for a long time you said Jenny was taller, she was listed at 5 ft 8 1/4 and you were listed 5 ft 8 flat. Did you both re-measure and find out that to not be so?
Editor Rob I didn't really measure that much in 2007 and rarely at night or after a hard day's work. In late 2008 I knew she could hit 5ft 8 exactly on the stadiometer as her lowest measurement.
But putting all 3 contributors mamun/me/jenny exactly the same fraction over 5ft 8 in height? That's a conspiracy ;) so I left her with the fraction over 5ft 8 for a while and didn't bother with my few mm over 5ft 8 although I did put 1/8th for a time, but thought maybe it's best from 2010 putting 5ft 8 without any tiny fraction.
This moment I took a quick measurement as I haven't done in a while and this is a day were she wasn't working so wouldn't be at her absolute low, so a better day without as much strain on her back - the video was shot just after 4pm: Click Here...I think she bashed the bar down on my head a bit more than I did on hers ;)
But putting all 3 contributors mamun/me/jenny exactly the same fraction over 5ft 8 in height? That's a conspiracy ;) so I left her with the fraction over 5ft 8 for a while and didn't bother with my few mm over 5ft 8 although I did put 1/8th for a time, but thought maybe it's best from 2010 putting 5ft 8 without any tiny fraction.
This moment I took a quick measurement as I haven't done in a while and this is a day were she wasn't working so wouldn't be at her absolute low, so a better day without as much strain on her back - the video was shot just after 4pm: Click Here...I think she bashed the bar down on my head a bit more than I did on hers ;)
J.Lee said on 27/May/13
Rob, even though you may be taller than Jenny now in hindsight, is her eyes higher than yours by a little bit
Editor Rob
Rob, even though you may be taller than Jenny now in hindsight, is her eyes higher than yours by a little bit
Editor Rob she has around 4.2 inch eyes, mine can be between 4.5-4.6 range.
the higher your eyes and the smaller the head gives people a false sense of height - your brain sees one eyelevel higher, a chin higher and thinks compared to the other person they are higher. It's an optical illusion.
the higher your eyes and the smaller the head gives people a false sense of height - your brain sees one eyelevel higher, a chin higher and thinks compared to the other person they are higher. It's an optical illusion.
J.Lee said on 26/May/13
Rob are you taller than Jenny? You always said she was 1/4 inch taller or so, but in the video you were taller than her. How tall is she listed if you are 5 ft 8?
Editor Rob
Rob are you taller than Jenny? You always said she was 1/4 inch taller or so, but in the video you were taller than her. How tall is she listed if you are 5 ft 8?
Editor Rob she drops lower than me, I don't hit 5ft 8 or 2mm below, but she can.
Arch Stanton said on 25/Mar/13
Agree with James, I'd probably guess 192cm barefoot.
Agree with James, I'd probably guess 192cm barefoot.
James said on 28/Feb/13
6'3.5-6'4
6'3.5-6'4
Rikashiku said on 15/Feb/13
Possibly 6'3.5"? He always was a tall guy on film and tv.
Possibly 6'3.5"? He always was a tall guy on film and tv.
thorterr said on 31/Jan/13
hmmm you seem taller on the right pic rob,,no tiptoeing allowed!!!
Editor Rob
hmmm you seem taller on the right pic rob,,no tiptoeing allowed!!!
Editor Rob it's plain to a blind man that I dropped 4cm height on purpose on the double shot :) Of course I didn't drop as much in the group shot, which the right photo is from ;)
tom said on 24/Jan/13
id say that 6-4" is pretty good here.
id say that 6-4" is pretty good here.
Alex said on 16/Jan/13
Rob,do you think it's possible that he is around 194 cm? He does look very tall.
Editor Rob
Rob,do you think it's possible that he is around 194 cm? He does look very tall.
Editor Rob he didn't look that tall
ice said on 6/Jan/13
looks like 190 cm to me
looks like 190 cm to me
Lo sgozzatore said on 29/Dec/12
6'1-6'2 are just crazy. Anyway he doesnt look 6'4 in these pics. With Jenny i can see 6'3.5 at best but she does have 0.6 inches less than him! I wouldnt go under 6'3 but he doesnt look a legit 6'4. Maybe a strong 6'3?
6'1-6'2 are just crazy. Anyway he doesnt look 6'4 in these pics. With Jenny i can see 6'3.5 at best but she does have 0.6 inches less than him! I wouldnt go under 6'3 but he doesnt look a legit 6'4. Maybe a strong 6'3?
Arch Stanton said on 19/Nov/12
I cannot believe people are claiming 6'1" or 6'2" for this guy LOL!! He looks every bit of 6'4" to me.
I cannot believe people are claiming 6'1" or 6'2" for this guy LOL!! He looks every bit of 6'4" to me.
Dave618 said on 11/Oct/12
I don't understand why anyone would doubt this guy is at least 6'4". Seriously, no offense to Rob, but Rob looks like he's this dude's child based on the height difference. And I notice again Jenny looks slightly taller than Rob, although that could just be a result of how/where they are standing. Is Jenny you're Girlfriend, Rob? If so, job well done, my man, she's quite pretty.
Editor Rob
I don't understand why anyone would doubt this guy is at least 6'4". Seriously, no offense to Rob, but Rob looks like he's this dude's child based on the height difference. And I notice again Jenny looks slightly taller than Rob, although that could just be a result of how/where they are standing. Is Jenny you're Girlfriend, Rob? If so, job well done, my man, she's quite pretty.
Editor Rob of course I'm dropping posture, what else did you think was happening? A bogeyman stealing height?
after alll I am regularly taller than Jenny...so maybe it proves the point of me dropping height on purpose ;)
but wait, just to hammer home that point: here's a full body shot taken the same morning as we got the Jim double shot - Click Here...if you're still struggling to comprehend that, sorry, I can't help you any further.
I adjust my posture/position in photos a lot more than people realise, sometimes in a photo if I see a celebrity drop some height just before the click I can adjust my height quickly, although half the time can be hard to tell.
after alll I am regularly taller than Jenny...so maybe it proves the point of me dropping height on purpose ;)
but wait, just to hammer home that point: here's a full body shot taken the same morning as we got the Jim double shot - Click Here...if you're still struggling to comprehend that, sorry, I can't help you any further.
I adjust my posture/position in photos a lot more than people realise, sometimes in a photo if I see a celebrity drop some height just before the click I can adjust my height quickly, although half the time can be hard to tell.
Mathew said on 30/Sep/12
Probably 6'3" and a bit of change.
Probably 6'3" and a bit of change.
Alex said on 9/Sep/12
Strong 6'4 guy for sure
Strong 6'4 guy for sure
ANDREA[ITA] said on 14/Aug/12
He looks almost 6'4 with shoe advantage. Maybe he'd measure a strong 6'3 or 6'3.5... As Rob said, he looks in the 6'3-6'4 range!
He looks almost 6'4 with shoe advantage. Maybe he'd measure a strong 6'3 or 6'3.5... As Rob said, he looks in the 6'3-6'4 range!
Hob said on 6/Aug/12
troll spirit.. legit 192? andrea don't forget jim had advantage shoe with rob. i doubt this guy was not taller than weak 6'3 idris elba , tom welling. i was thinking 6'3 once before i knew he got footwear advantage. the less possible max 6'3
troll spirit.. legit 192? andrea don't forget jim had advantage shoe with rob. i doubt this guy was not taller than weak 6'3 idris elba , tom welling. i was thinking 6'3 once before i knew he got footwear advantage. the less possible max 6'3
ANDREA[ITA] said on 4/Aug/12
Rampage, if hes a legit 192 guy as you, hes at least 194-195 out of bed! I think that its impossible to find a guy who is 192 before bed and just 193 out of bed!
Rampage, if hes a legit 192 guy as you, hes at least 194-195 out of bed! I think that its impossible to find a guy who is 192 before bed and just 193 out of bed!
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 2/Aug/12
His shoulders are quite high up.
Legit 192cm guy and for sure 193cm
out of bed.
His shoulders are quite high up.
Legit 192cm guy and for sure 193cm
out of bed.
Hob said on 28/Jul/12
6'6 no problem. only in thick cuban heels.
6'6 no problem. only in thick cuban heels.
ali said on 23/Jul/12
Δ± thought he is 6'6
Δ± thought he is 6'6
Hob said on 13/Jun/12
i bet he was the same height as adam baldwin
i bet he was the same height as adam baldwin
ANDREA[ITA] said on 6/Feb/12
Did he look one inch taller than Challenge #13 (considering he has 0.5 inches more than you, in shoes)?
Editor Rob
Did he look one inch taller than Challenge #13 (considering he has 0.5 inches more than you, in shoes)?
Editor Rob when I saw him at breakfast I thought he was 6ft 3 range, although on his own he can look anywhere 6ft 3-4 range.
Josh B said on 30/Jan/12
@ChiasmataX
I'm not sure that would help, you'd have to take into account his footwear advantage as well as Rob's drop in posture.
@ChiasmataX
I'm not sure that would help, you'd have to take into account his footwear advantage as well as Rob's drop in posture.
ChiasmataX said on 29/Jan/12
Triplescrew or Rob should do a comparison of Jim Parrack and the guy from challenge 13. Jim Parrack will look about 6'3 for sure.
Triplescrew or Rob should do a comparison of Jim Parrack and the guy from challenge 13. Jim Parrack will look about 6'3 for sure.
Kezza67 said on 24/Jan/12
Just saw Jim in Supernatural. Standing next to 6ft 4 Jared Padalecki he looks 6ft 3 and a half.
Just saw Jim in Supernatural. Standing next to 6ft 4 Jared Padalecki he looks 6ft 3 and a half.
steven said on 14/Jan/12
yeh 193cm at night in 1.5" shoe before bed.
yeh 193cm at night in 1.5" shoe before bed.
goal height 6 foot said on 12/Jan/12
193 at night 193.9 rest of the day
193 at night 193.9 rest of the day
andy said on 11/Jan/12
If you think this guys less than 6'4" check Mamun with Richard Anderson whos listed here as 6'3". Either this guys as listed or Anderson aint 6'3". Know which listin im goin for.
If you think this guys less than 6'4" check Mamun with Richard Anderson whos listed here as 6'3". Either this guys as listed or Anderson aint 6'3". Know which listin im goin for.
andy said on 11/Jan/12
Tall dude, the footwear advantage makes it debatable but the guy looks 6'4" to me
Tall dude, the footwear advantage makes it debatable but the guy looks 6'4" to me
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 4/Jan/12
Looks 191cm(6"3) with Rob
but might be 192-193cm up
straight?
Editor Rob
Looks 191cm(6"3) with Rob
but might be 192-193cm up
straight?
Editor Rob that is him upstraight, he's standing better than me ;)
Lillo thomas said on 31/Dec/11
Considering all factors he is 6-3 max . The guy is claiming his height in shoes.
Considering all factors he is 6-3 max . The guy is claiming his height in shoes.
Shaun said on 4/Dec/11
I'm not sure how somebody could think this guy was the same height as Justin Hartley. Look at the head levels! No posture or footwear difference would make this guy look as much taller. If he's not 6'4" he's surely an easy 6'3".
I'm not sure how somebody could think this guy was the same height as Justin Hartley. Look at the head levels! No posture or footwear difference would make this guy look as much taller. If he's not 6'4" he's surely an easy 6'3".
Shaun said on 4/Dec/11
Rob did he look taller in person than #5?
Editor Rob
Rob did he look taller in person than #5?
Editor Rob yeah I think he's taller than #5
Shaun said on 4/Dec/11
ChiasmataX says on 1/Dec/11
Nice picture Triplescrew, it really proves my point that without his 1.1 inch shoes Barrack will be about 189 cm + or - 1cm at most. 193cm is kind of off.
What? First of all he only has 0.5 inches foot advantage over Rob. He's looking 192cm range in Triplescrew's comparison. Accounting for footwear he's still 6 ft 3. The chances of this guy measuring the same or shorter than #5. Can't see it, unless he is wearing big lifts.
ChiasmataX says on 1/Dec/11
Nice picture Triplescrew, it really proves my point that without his 1.1 inch shoes Barrack will be about 189 cm + or - 1cm at most. 193cm is kind of off.
What? First of all he only has 0.5 inches foot advantage over Rob. He's looking 192cm range in Triplescrew's comparison. Accounting for footwear he's still 6 ft 3. The chances of this guy measuring the same or shorter than #5. Can't see it, unless he is wearing big lifts.
Sean73 said on 1/Dec/11
The new Toxic Avenger!
The new Toxic Avenger!
ChiasmataX said on 1/Dec/11
Nice picture Triplescrew, it really proves my point that without his 1.1 inch shoes Barrack will be about 189 cm + or - 1cm at most. 193cm is kind of off.
Nice picture Triplescrew, it really proves my point that without his 1.1 inch shoes Barrack will be about 189 cm + or - 1cm at most. 193cm is kind of off.
Josh B said on 29/Nov/11
I thought he was the tall man from Dragon's Den for a moment, then realized he's not an actor and is much taller than Jim as well. :)
I thought he was the tall man from Dragon's Den for a moment, then realized he's not an actor and is much taller than Jim as well. :)
Physics Enemy said on 25/Nov/11
Rob lists Parrack 6' 4" because he claimed it, but Rob said he thought Parrack looked the same height as Bruno/Sorbo; both listed 6' 3". Parrack is a weak 6' 2" in reality. With Jenny he's scraping 6' 2" and 1-2 mm shy if his posture is beating Jenny's (likely).
Yes, he 'looks' taller due to posture, footwear, arms on shoulders to push Rob/Jenny down; usual tricks height conscious celebrities use to look taller.
Rob lists Parrack 6' 4" because he claimed it, but Rob said he thought Parrack looked the same height as Bruno/Sorbo; both listed 6' 3". Parrack is a weak 6' 2" in reality. With Jenny he's scraping 6' 2" and 1-2 mm shy if his posture is beating Jenny's (likely).
Yes, he 'looks' taller due to posture, footwear, arms on shoulders to push Rob/Jenny down; usual tricks height conscious celebrities use to look taller.
ChiasmataX said on 24/Nov/11
@ Rob I think he's as tall as height challenge # 5 guy without shoes, he's definitely taller than # 8 dude by a few cm.
Editor Rob
@ Rob I think he's as tall as height challenge # 5 guy without shoes, he's definitely taller than # 8 dude by a few cm.
Editor Rob the number 8 guy is a tall guy with good posture generally.
and if a celebrity would probably fool some to think he's 6ft 3.
and if a celebrity would probably fool some to think he's 6ft 3.
Shaun said on 24/Nov/11
ChiasmataX says on 24/Nov/11
If he's barefoot he's more or less near the height of the dude from height challenge # 8 as seen here.
Click Here
Again the question is why does Rob have this guy at 6 ft 4 if he's way off it?
Editor Rob
ChiasmataX says on 24/Nov/11
If he's barefoot he's more or less near the height of the dude from height challenge # 8 as seen here.
Click Here
Again the question is why does Rob have this guy at 6 ft 4 if he's way off it?
Editor Rob he's taller than #8 is, how much though is the question.
ChiasmataX said on 24/Nov/11
Click Here Is the alternative link just in case. I messed up a bit as Rob is a few cm with Parrack compare to the Rob with the height challenge # 8 dude who is 186.8cm. The point is Parrack is about 188cm without the shoes.
Click Here Is the alternative link just in case. I messed up a bit as Rob is a few cm with Parrack compare to the Rob with the height challenge # 8 dude who is 186.8cm. The point is Parrack is about 188cm without the shoes.
ChiasmataX said on 24/Nov/11
If he's barefoot he's more or less near the height of the dude from height challenge # 8 as seen here.
Click Here
If he's barefoot he's more or less near the height of the dude from height challenge # 8 as seen here.
Click Here
Shaun said on 23/Nov/11
The whole point of this website though is to expose the "magic two inches" and list celebrities as they likely are BAREFOOT.
The whole point of this website though is to expose the "magic two inches" and list celebrities as they likely are BAREFOOT.
Physics Enemy said on 22/Nov/11
Exactly ChiasmataX, he's 6' 2" MAX, might even be 1-2 mm below. Rob's stadiometer pic with Jenny shows he's just over 6' 3" in his shoes + stadiometer error. Knock that all off and he's barely 6' 2". Everyone's height gets inflated.
Exactly ChiasmataX, he's 6' 2" MAX, might even be 1-2 mm below. Rob's stadiometer pic with Jenny shows he's just over 6' 3" in his shoes + stadiometer error. Knock that all off and he's barely 6' 2". Everyone's height gets inflated.
Shaun said on 22/Nov/11
But if you look at most listings Rob picks up on the "magic two inches" like George Lazenby etc. Remember Rob has met loads of 6'2" guys Physics and I think he is used to knowing how a legit 6'2" looks on him.
But if you look at most listings Rob picks up on the "magic two inches" like George Lazenby etc. Remember Rob has met loads of 6'2" guys Physics and I think he is used to knowing how a legit 6'2" looks on him.
Shaun said on 22/Nov/11
I honestly don't know though Physics how tall this guy often looks. But in these photos to me he does appear to be around 194cm. I don't know I haven't checked him against charts but he looks about 8 inches taller than Rob. I'm sorry but that's how he appears to me. Remember Physics I've mostly been within 1 cm on all the height challenges so I'm not the worst estimator of height either, I think I'm very good with my estimates generally and I'm sure Rob would agree with me on that one. Yes, I can be fooled occaisonally by footwear and posture but I honestly can't see this guy as low as a flat 6'2". What I want to know though is why he has him at 6'4" when he said he looked the same height as Frank Bruno??
I honestly don't know though Physics how tall this guy often looks. But in these photos to me he does appear to be around 194cm. I don't know I haven't checked him against charts but he looks about 8 inches taller than Rob. I'm sorry but that's how he appears to me. Remember Physics I've mostly been within 1 cm on all the height challenges so I'm not the worst estimator of height either, I think I'm very good with my estimates generally and I'm sure Rob would agree with me on that one. Yes, I can be fooled occaisonally by footwear and posture but I honestly can't see this guy as low as a flat 6'2". What I want to know though is why he has him at 6'4" when he said he looked the same height as Frank Bruno??
ChiasmataX said on 22/Nov/11
Just compare this guy to Brandon Routh who is listed at 189cm on this site and you guys won't see much difference. In fact, the 186.8cm guy from height challenge # 8 is about as tall as Routh and Parrack.
Just compare this guy to Brandon Routh who is listed at 189cm on this site and you guys won't see much difference. In fact, the 186.8cm guy from height challenge # 8 is about as tall as Routh and Parrack.
ChiasmataX said on 22/Nov/11
@Shaun people always over-estimate once you are about 178cm legit bare-feet and above. They thought a legit 178cm guy 6 feet, a 6 feet guy a 6 feet 2 guy and so on. I think Jim Parrack is a legit BARE-FEET 6 feet 2 guy (188cm) so once again Rob is probably over-estimated him by that magic 2 inches. Just compare this guy to the legit 186.8cm guy from height challenge # 8 and you will see.
Shaun says on 20/Nov/11
@Physics and Alex. If Parrack was 6'2" flat why does Rob have him at 6'4"?
@Shaun people always over-estimate once you are about 178cm legit bare-feet and above. They thought a legit 178cm guy 6 feet, a 6 feet guy a 6 feet 2 guy and so on. I think Jim Parrack is a legit BARE-FEET 6 feet 2 guy (188cm) so once again Rob is probably over-estimated him by that magic 2 inches. Just compare this guy to the legit 186.8cm guy from height challenge # 8 and you will see.
Shaun says on 20/Nov/11
@Physics and Alex. If Parrack was 6'2" flat why does Rob have him at 6'4"?
ChiasmataX said on 22/Nov/11
You guys are way off he's not 193cm consider his shoes advantage. In the pic he's about 189cm (so he's 188cm barefeet) guy considered that Rob dropped his posture a bit (that's why Rob is shorter than Jenny). Just compare this guy and Jenny(not Rob because he dropped his posture) with the legit 186.8cm guy and Rob from the height challenge.
You guys are way off he's not 193cm consider his shoes advantage. In the pic he's about 189cm (so he's 188cm barefeet) guy considered that Rob dropped his posture a bit (that's why Rob is shorter than Jenny). Just compare this guy and Jenny(not Rob because he dropped his posture) with the legit 186.8cm guy and Rob from the height challenge.
Physics Enemy said on 21/Nov/11
Shaun, Romero is a strong 6' 3" (see my comment on his page). Using Matt's stadiometer pic, he's 6' 3.75" (after deducting 2 mm error); in shoes. So 6' 2.75" barefoot. Add a little for posture and he's strong 6' 3" (1-2 mm over). He's got just over an inch on Parrack.
Shaun, Romero is a strong 6' 3" (see my comment on his page). Using Matt's stadiometer pic, he's 6' 3.75" (after deducting 2 mm error); in shoes. So 6' 2.75" barefoot. Add a little for posture and he's strong 6' 3" (1-2 mm over). He's got just over an inch on Parrack.
Physics Enemy said on 21/Nov/11
Shaun - I've just looked at the George Romero pic with Rob. That's an interesting one, it's almost the exact opposite of Parrack. He's got loose, hunched posture with no footwear advantage, with Rob standing tall. I can't state his height.
Shaun - I've just looked at the George Romero pic with Rob. That's an interesting one, it's almost the exact opposite of Parrack. He's got loose, hunched posture with no footwear advantage, with Rob standing tall. I can't state his height.
Physics Enemy said on 21/Nov/11
LOL, that height chart with Jenny and Parrack was made by Rob, not me Shaun. I was just linking you to Rob's pic. I'd rather trust someone who uses height charts since it's accurate.
The reason Mamoa is easily taller than Parrack is because Mamoa towers Rob with smallish footwear and no posture advantage. Parrack knows what he's doing with his posture and arms, he's trying to look as tall as possible.
He's a 6' 2" MAX guy 'looking' taller at a glance in these pics. Also, Alex agrees with me that Parrack is 6' 2" and Alex is a great estimator of height.
LOL, that height chart with Jenny and Parrack was made by Rob, not me Shaun. I was just linking you to Rob's pic. I'd rather trust someone who uses height charts since it's accurate.
The reason Mamoa is easily taller than Parrack is because Mamoa towers Rob with smallish footwear and no posture advantage. Parrack knows what he's doing with his posture and arms, he's trying to look as tall as possible.
He's a 6' 2" MAX guy 'looking' taller at a glance in these pics. Also, Alex agrees with me that Parrack is 6' 2" and Alex is a great estimator of height.
Physics Enemy said on 21/Nov/11
He's 6' 2" MAX, I already proved it (Rob did). Just look at the pic I linked. He's just over 6' 3" in footwear inc stadiometer error, so he's 6Β΄ 2" tops.
You're the one coming across as arrogant because you were telling people they were miles out when he's barely 6' 2". Yes, you got fooled by posture, footwear, etc. But he's nowhere near 6' 4".
I'm not sure why you think/state Rob is the best height estimator. From the height challenges he's been pretty close on most, but he hasn't been the best. Infact, I mentioned that he upgraded all of the volunteers by a little.
Rob said he looked the same height as Frank Bruno. That's 6' 3". But in reality once you deduct footwear advantage, posture advantage and look at the pic I linked, he's 6' 2" MAX.
Rob comes up to his moustache area because Rob is losing height in posture and footwear. If you read my posts you'd have understood that by now, it's obvious.
He's 6' 2" MAX, I already proved it (Rob did). Just look at the pic I linked. He's just over 6' 3" in footwear inc stadiometer error, so he's 6Β΄ 2" tops.
You're the one coming across as arrogant because you were telling people they were miles out when he's barely 6' 2". Yes, you got fooled by posture, footwear, etc. But he's nowhere near 6' 4".
I'm not sure why you think/state Rob is the best height estimator. From the height challenges he's been pretty close on most, but he hasn't been the best. Infact, I mentioned that he upgraded all of the volunteers by a little.
Rob said he looked the same height as Frank Bruno. That's 6' 3". But in reality once you deduct footwear advantage, posture advantage and look at the pic I linked, he's 6' 2" MAX.
Rob comes up to his moustache area because Rob is losing height in posture and footwear. If you read my posts you'd have understood that by now, it's obvious.
Tman said on 21/Nov/11
1,91m Rob thought he could be nearer to 1,89-90m kevin Sorbo
1,91m Rob thought he could be nearer to 1,89-90m kevin Sorbo
Shaun said on 20/Nov/11
@Physics and Alex. If Parrack was 6'2" flat why does Rob have him at 6'4"? Doesn't the fact that the best height estimater on here has stood right next to this guy and thinks he's near 6'4"? If you didn't think he was 6'4" Rob, you would have listed him at 191-2cm? Maybe 192cm would be more accurate?
@Physics and Alex. If Parrack was 6'2" flat why does Rob have him at 6'4"? Doesn't the fact that the best height estimater on here has stood right next to this guy and thinks he's near 6'4"? If you didn't think he was 6'4" Rob, you would have listed him at 191-2cm? Maybe 192cm would be more accurate?
Shaun said on 20/Nov/11
Try looking at a George Romero height chart with Rob and try telling me he is 6'2" flat.
Try looking at a George Romero height chart with Rob and try telling me he is 6'2" flat.
Shaun said on 20/Nov/11
Rob comes up to his moustache area. Given that I don't compare people to the precise mm on height charts as you do Physics I was judging by the George Romero picture in which Rob is about that level on him and he's 6'4.5". Parrack, illusion or not looks 6'4.5" to me here, maybe its his big ass head and build that makes it seem so but accounting for footwear advantage he seemed 6'4". He certainly doesn't look shoter in this picture to Jason Mamoa who you agreed physics was 6'3.5"-6'4". Lowest I could buy is 6'3".
Rob comes up to his moustache area. Given that I don't compare people to the precise mm on height charts as you do Physics I was judging by the George Romero picture in which Rob is about that level on him and he's 6'4.5". Parrack, illusion or not looks 6'4.5" to me here, maybe its his big ass head and build that makes it seem so but accounting for footwear advantage he seemed 6'4". He certainly doesn't look shoter in this picture to Jason Mamoa who you agreed physics was 6'3.5"-6'4". Lowest I could buy is 6'3".
Shaun said on 19/Nov/11
Physics you are starting to come across as an arrogant, obnoxious ****. I think he's a genuine 6'4" and even if he was 6'2" that's hardly "absolutely miles out". Rob, what are the chances of him being a flat 6'2" as Physics seems to be certain of? I could buy 6'3" but 6'2" does look extreme. To me he has the frame of a strong 6'3" guy and close to 6'4".
Editor Rob
Physics you are starting to come across as an arrogant, obnoxious ****. I think he's a genuine 6'4" and even if he was 6'2" that's hardly "absolutely miles out". Rob, what are the chances of him being a flat 6'2" as Physics seems to be certain of? I could buy 6'3" but 6'2" does look extreme. To me he has the frame of a strong 6'3" guy and close to 6'4".
Editor Rob I saw jim up close the first time at breakfast and didn't think he was as tall as he said, but on his own he did look nearer 6ft 4 than 2.
Alex said on 19/Nov/11
6'2 to maybe 6'2.5 max taking account his 1/2 inch footwear and posture.
6'2 to maybe 6'2.5 max taking account his 1/2 inch footwear and posture.
Physics Enemy said on 18/Nov/11
Any tall guy can 'look' 6' 4" with a big footwear advantage and a big posture advantage. Smoke and mirrors. Knock all of that off and use the stadiometer pics of Jenny/Rob for reference and he's not a mm over 6' 2". Rob already proved that when he created the pic of what a 6' 4" guy with 0.5" footwear should 'look like' next to a 5' 8" Jenny in flat sneakers. Parrack was miles short. And he had 0.7" over Jenny, not 0.5". He's a flat 6' 2" and may even be a mm under.
The right photo is even more deceptive, where he props himself up whilst pushing Rob downwards using his arm, stands military, AND has 0.5" shoe advantage. This guy obviously took tips from Stallone and has an inflated 6' 4" claim to match.
6' 2" or even a mm under 6' 2".
Any tall guy can 'look' 6' 4" with a big footwear advantage and a big posture advantage. Smoke and mirrors. Knock all of that off and use the stadiometer pics of Jenny/Rob for reference and he's not a mm over 6' 2". Rob already proved that when he created the pic of what a 6' 4" guy with 0.5" footwear should 'look like' next to a 5' 8" Jenny in flat sneakers. Parrack was miles short. And he had 0.7" over Jenny, not 0.5". He's a flat 6' 2" and may even be a mm under.
The right photo is even more deceptive, where he props himself up whilst pushing Rob downwards using his arm, stands military, AND has 0.5" shoe advantage. This guy obviously took tips from Stallone and has an inflated 6' 4" claim to match.
6' 2" or even a mm under 6' 2".
Physics Enemy said on 18/Nov/11
Shaun, I'm laughing. You're telling people they can't judge height! This guy is a flat 6' 2". Rob is dropping a boatload of height in both pics, especially the left pic. Parrack is propping himself up in the right pic. He also has a BIG footwear advantage over both, especially Jenny.
As usual, Matt is up to his old tricks by assuming Jenny/Rob's barefoot heights are equal to their in-shoe heights. He also ignores Parrack's posture advantage relative to Rob's (as Parrack props himself up) in the right pic he uses.
This guy is a flat 6' 2". Matt got 191 cm; he forgot 0.6" for Rob's footwear and another 0.6" or so for Parrack propping himself up/posture advantage in the right pic (moreso propping). Deduct that and you get 6' 2" flat.
Also; Rob created a pic comparing Parrack to a legit 6' 4" guy with 0.5" extra footwear next to the stadiometer vs Jenny. Based on that, Parrack is a shade over 6' 2" reading off from the stadiometer. BUT, he has 0.7" footwear over Jenny, not 0.5"; giving him 6' 2" flat.
I also can't believe Rob got insulted when he was called shorter than Jenny and 'face it' etc when he's clearly always a fraction taller than Jenny. Fools.
Shaun, I'm laughing. You're telling people they can't judge height! This guy is a flat 6' 2". Rob is dropping a boatload of height in both pics, especially the left pic. Parrack is propping himself up in the right pic. He also has a BIG footwear advantage over both, especially Jenny.
As usual, Matt is up to his old tricks by assuming Jenny/Rob's barefoot heights are equal to their in-shoe heights. He also ignores Parrack's posture advantage relative to Rob's (as Parrack props himself up) in the right pic he uses.
This guy is a flat 6' 2". Matt got 191 cm; he forgot 0.6" for Rob's footwear and another 0.6" or so for Parrack propping himself up/posture advantage in the right pic (moreso propping). Deduct that and you get 6' 2" flat.
Also; Rob created a pic comparing Parrack to a legit 6' 4" guy with 0.5" extra footwear next to the stadiometer vs Jenny. Based on that, Parrack is a shade over 6' 2" reading off from the stadiometer. BUT, he has 0.7" footwear over Jenny, not 0.5"; giving him 6' 2" flat.
I also can't believe Rob got insulted when he was called shorter than Jenny and 'face it' etc when he's clearly always a fraction taller than Jenny. Fools.
Physics Enemy said on 18/Nov/11
He's doing a good job of standing tall whilst making sure Rob can't stand straight. He has 0.7" footwear over Jenny; judge height against Jenny rather than Rob. Rob's dropping a boatload in the left pic and medium amount in the right pic. These are very flattering photos for the guy, height-wise.
He's doing a good job of standing tall whilst making sure Rob can't stand straight. He has 0.7" footwear over Jenny; judge height against Jenny rather than Rob. Rob's dropping a boatload in the left pic and medium amount in the right pic. These are very flattering photos for the guy, height-wise.
LAN Jiao said on 8/Nov/11
johno, 2nd picture rob standing tall with jim standing straight thought if we use by math which for rob 173.3 add on his converse 1.5cm rob is 174.8cm(5'8.75) and if you look closer jim had rob by 18cm. 18 add 174.8cm which is straight to flat 6'4. assume his dress shoe is 3cm deducted out he is about 190cm so 6'2.75 , he could be 6'2.5 dip into evening. 6'2 is too low unless he wore hidden lifts dress shoe with jenny rob he could be 6'2 a chances.
rob 5'8-1/8
jim 6'2.5-6'2.75
johno, 2nd picture rob standing tall with jim standing straight thought if we use by math which for rob 173.3 add on his converse 1.5cm rob is 174.8cm(5'8.75) and if you look closer jim had rob by 18cm. 18 add 174.8cm which is straight to flat 6'4. assume his dress shoe is 3cm deducted out he is about 190cm so 6'2.75 , he could be 6'2.5 dip into evening. 6'2 is too low unless he wore hidden lifts dress shoe with jenny rob he could be 6'2 a chances.
rob 5'8-1/8
jim 6'2.5-6'2.75
johno said on 5/Nov/11
Matt says on 9/Nov/10
when i used the picture on the right, jim came up to 191cm on the height comparison photo
[Editor Rob: Maybe This is how a 6ft 4 guy would look, considering he had 0.5 inch more footwear.]
The above picture proves my point. He would be luck to be 6'3. 6.2.5 is closer to the truth
Matt says on 9/Nov/10
when i used the picture on the right, jim came up to 191cm on the height comparison photo
[Editor Rob: Maybe This is how a 6ft 4 guy would look, considering he had 0.5 inch more footwear.]
The above picture proves my point. He would be luck to be 6'3. 6.2.5 is closer to the truth
johno said on 5/Nov/11
The first picture is an example of when someone has an over you, thus reducing the others height. First picture rob reaches the bottom lip of parrack which wouldn't automatically mean 8 inches since, parrack has smaller head plus, 0.5 inch shoe advantage. 6'4 would be only appliable there if parrack head was the same length as robs and the shoe advantage wasn't there plus if rob wasn't being pushed down. To man 'ifs' for a 6'4
The second picture is more fair, taking footwear into consideration, he looks 6 - 6.5 inches taller then you rob
Rob 5'8.25
jim 6'2 - 6'2.5
The first picture is an example of when someone has an over you, thus reducing the others height. First picture rob reaches the bottom lip of parrack which wouldn't automatically mean 8 inches since, parrack has smaller head plus, 0.5 inch shoe advantage. 6'4 would be only appliable there if parrack head was the same length as robs and the shoe advantage wasn't there plus if rob wasn't being pushed down. To man 'ifs' for a 6'4
The second picture is more fair, taking footwear into consideration, he looks 6 - 6.5 inches taller then you rob
Rob 5'8.25
jim 6'2 - 6'2.5
LAN Jiao said on 31/Oct/11
padalecki is dead on 6'4.25 max. 6'4 flat jeff goldblum is above 3/4in taller than parrack. so he came nothing above 6'3-1/4 at best.
padalecki is dead on 6'4.25 max. 6'4 flat jeff goldblum is above 3/4in taller than parrack. so he came nothing above 6'3-1/4 at best.
Triplescrew said on 27/Oct/11
Padalecki was taller than him in supernatural by a little bit.
Padalecki was taller than him in supernatural by a little bit.
Michael said on 23/Oct/11
He has a long forehead.
He has a long forehead.
LAN Jiao said on 14/Oct/11
Thanks chameleon. I would have gave jim fraction under 191cm also.
Thanks chameleon. I would have gave jim fraction under 191cm also.
Chameleon said on 12/Oct/11
LAN you are right again, he is 191 no more.
LAN you are right again, he is 191 no more.
LAN Jiao said on 28/Sep/11
ignore the shoe advantage and bare parrack with rob without shoe , i cant imagine parrack could reach up over 191cm at best. he stand pretty straight here that account him not taller than 6ft3 and could be shorter than adam baldwin next to jenny alone.
ignore the shoe advantage and bare parrack with rob without shoe , i cant imagine parrack could reach up over 191cm at best. he stand pretty straight here that account him not taller than 6ft3 and could be shorter than adam baldwin next to jenny alone.
Shaun said on 26/Sep/11
James says on 4/May/11
[Editor Rob: he is similar size to kevin sorbo and frank bruno in person, but he says 6ft 4.]
Rob sorry don't mean to be annoying but he probably did lie when he claimed 6'4. even 6'3 guys can round and claim 6'4 heck i knew a 6'3 guy in college who claimed he was 6'5.......
The lowest he could possibly be is 6'3.5" barefoot.
[Editor Rob: but I could always be wrong, height estimates are never a certainty ;)
you only have to look at the estimates or how tall actors look to different users, sometimes you have people seeing one guy at 5ft 11 while others think he is 6ft 0.5!]
James says on 4/May/11
[Editor Rob: he is similar size to kevin sorbo and frank bruno in person, but he says 6ft 4.]
Rob sorry don't mean to be annoying but he probably did lie when he claimed 6'4. even 6'3 guys can round and claim 6'4 heck i knew a 6'3 guy in college who claimed he was 6'5.......
The lowest he could possibly be is 6'3.5" barefoot.
[Editor Rob: but I could always be wrong, height estimates are never a certainty ;)
you only have to look at the estimates or how tall actors look to different users, sometimes you have people seeing one guy at 5ft 11 while others think he is 6ft 0.5!]
Shaun said on 26/Sep/11
Actually looks close to 6'5", 6'4.5" with footwear advantage, this guy looks a legit 6'4", he's big.
Actually looks close to 6'5", 6'4.5" with footwear advantage, this guy looks a legit 6'4", he's big.
ANDREA[ITA] said on 19/Sep/11
He looks around 6'4 with shoe advantage, barefoot he's goota be around 6'3.5!
He looks around 6'4 with shoe advantage, barefoot he's goota be around 6'3.5!
Deuce said on 18/Sep/11
He looks 6'4(193) to me
He looks 6'4(193) to me
lan_jiao said on 12/Sep/11
rampage, 6ft4.25 was 193cm so 194 you mention jim 6"4.5 but speaking honest, next to rob on right picture up here he only look 6ft3.25
barefoot probably still 6ft3.25 despite up here rob was abit closer to camera.
rampage, 6ft4.25 was 193cm so 194 you mention jim 6"4.5 but speaking honest, next to rob on right picture up here he only look 6ft3.25
barefoot probably still 6ft3.25 despite up here rob was abit closer to camera.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 8/Sep/11
Actually he looks 6"4.25(194cm) in the picture.
Barefoot is probably between 6"3.5-6"3.75?
Actually he looks 6"4.25(194cm) in the picture.
Barefoot is probably between 6"3.5-6"3.75?
Alex said on 4/Sep/11
192cm considering the slight footwear advantage
192cm considering the slight footwear advantage
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 2/Sep/11
Looks 6"4(193cm) with Rob but has a shoe advantage. Somewhere between 6"3-6"4 barefoot I reckon, probably 192cm.
Looks 6"4(193cm) with Rob but has a shoe advantage. Somewhere between 6"3-6"4 barefoot I reckon, probably 192cm.
Shaun said on 16/Aug/11
Anybody who thinks this guy is only 191cm really cannot judge height. This is how a legit 6'4" looks next to a legit 5'8". Looks 6'4.5" in comparison here but hr has footwear advantage cancels out to 6'4" flat.
Anybody who thinks this guy is only 191cm really cannot judge height. This is how a legit 6'4" looks next to a legit 5'8". Looks 6'4.5" in comparison here but hr has footwear advantage cancels out to 6'4" flat.
Hansen said on 1/Aug/11
after rob stand straight up i don see 18cm under jim. between rob and jim 17-17.5cm. if rob was about 5ft8-1/4 in picture here therefore jim could be close 6ft3.25 , then about a 1.5cm shoe advantage he should be only 6ft2.5 barefoot in photo.
after rob stand straight up i don see 18cm under jim. between rob and jim 17-17.5cm. if rob was about 5ft8-1/4 in picture here therefore jim could be close 6ft3.25 , then about a 1.5cm shoe advantage he should be only 6ft2.5 barefoot in photo.
Chameleon said on 30/Jun/11
Correct, he looks 191cm in the fotos.
Correct, he looks 191cm in the fotos.
Ali said on 28/Jun/11
Rob it looks like he has 7-8 inches on you.
So 6'3-6'4 seems correct, but he has 0.5 inch footwear
advantage. So I guess he is 6'3-6'3.5. 191cm seems correct.
Rob it looks like he has 7-8 inches on you.
So 6'3-6'4 seems correct, but he has 0.5 inch footwear
advantage. So I guess he is 6'3-6'3.5. 191cm seems correct.
Teffy said on 27/Jun/11
Rob, why jenny always looks a little taller than you....??
Editor Rob
Rob, why jenny always looks a little taller than you....??
Editor Roblook at the link at top of page, that is thirty minutes before this double shot, she is smaller at that moment...if jenny appears taller either I have a worse stance, she is nearer the camera, and most of the time she has thicker hair aswell, sometimes about 2cm more ;-)
Terryman said on 26/Jun/11
Parrack: 1,92 meters
Parrack: 1,92 meters
Chameleon said on 22/Jun/11
Looks 191cm
Looks 191cm
James said on 12/Jun/11
Looks 6'4 in pics
Looks 6'4 in pics
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 27/May/11
His long head makes him look 6ft5...
His long head makes him look 6ft5...
thebad7 said on 23/May/11
I hope to see him in more projects after his success on TRUE BLOOD. Like other posters mentioned, he looks to be just a bit shorter than Alexander Skarsgard. I would say more of a weak 6'4"--6'3 1/2" sounds about right for him, but in the morning hours, I would bet he scrapes 6'4". I think you've got it, Rob.
tb7
I hope to see him in more projects after his success on TRUE BLOOD. Like other posters mentioned, he looks to be just a bit shorter than Alexander Skarsgard. I would say more of a weak 6'4"--6'3 1/2" sounds about right for him, but in the morning hours, I would bet he scrapes 6'4". I think you've got it, Rob.
tb7
James said on 4/May/11
does that mean rob that you might be wrong on your estimate for daniel cudmore being a legit 6'7 since other users think he looks more 6'6 in the photos?
No offense either but I could imagine it would be very hard for a 5'8 individual to estimate the height of someone who is over 6'5.
Editor Rob
does that mean rob that you might be wrong on your estimate for daniel cudmore being a legit 6'7 since other users think he looks more 6'6 in the photos?
No offense either but I could imagine it would be very hard for a 5'8 individual to estimate the height of someone who is over 6'5.
Editor Rob I've said before if I know 6ft 3 and 6ft 5 men (having measured some) then it can help with trying to guage how tall others look.
Cudmore remember had 0.4 inches less footwear when I saw him but still looked taller than how 6ft 5 men look from my viewpoint.
Cudmore remember had 0.4 inches less footwear when I saw him but still looked taller than how 6ft 5 men look from my viewpoint.
James said on 4/May/11
[Editor Rob: he is similar size to kevin sorbo and frank bruno in person, but he says 6ft 4.]
Rob sorry don't mean to be annoying but he probably did lie when he claimed 6'4. even 6'3 guys can round and claim 6'4 heck i knew a 6'3 guy in college who claimed he was 6'5.......
Editor Rob
[Editor Rob: he is similar size to kevin sorbo and frank bruno in person, but he says 6ft 4.]
Rob sorry don't mean to be annoying but he probably did lie when he claimed 6'4. even 6'3 guys can round and claim 6'4 heck i knew a 6'3 guy in college who claimed he was 6'5.......
Editor Rob but I could always be wrong, height estimates are never a certainty ;)
you only have to look at the estimates or how tall actors look to different users, sometimes you have people seeing one guy at 5ft 11 while others think he is 6ft 0.5!
you only have to look at the estimates or how tall actors look to different users, sometimes you have people seeing one guy at 5ft 11 while others think he is 6ft 0.5!
Chameleon said on 4/May/11
191cm for this guy
191cm for this guy
James said on 3/May/11
okay rob so did he appear taller in person than he does in the picture?
Editor Rob
okay rob so did he appear taller in person than he does in the picture?
Editor Rob he is similar size to kevin sorbo and frank bruno in person, but he says 6ft 4.
James said on 28/Apr/11
maybe 191-192cm range and 6'3.75 max.
so he might be either 6'3.25 (191cm), 6'3.5 (192cm) or 6'3.75 (192cm).
maybe 191-192cm range and 6'3.75 max.
so he might be either 6'3.25 (191cm), 6'3.5 (192cm) or 6'3.75 (192cm).
Chameleon said on 25/Apr/11
Looks 1.91
Looks 1.91
James said on 24/Apr/11
Yeah this guy has got a long head for sure and most 6'4 guys have a higher eye level than him so i bet he walks around feeling 6'2 or 6'3 most of the time.
I agree he does look 6'4 (193cm) in the photo but that is only with footware advantage.
I think his real true height is 6ft3.75 (192cm) does not look a legit 6'4 to me.
Yeah this guy has got a long head for sure and most 6'4 guys have a higher eye level than him so i bet he walks around feeling 6'2 or 6'3 most of the time.
I agree he does look 6'4 (193cm) in the photo but that is only with footware advantage.
I think his real true height is 6ft3.75 (192cm) does not look a legit 6'4 to me.
Lenad said on 23/Apr/11
Looks 6'4ish to me
Looks 6'4ish to me
Aaron (6\'5\ said on 21/Apr/11
Take into account the footware advantage, and then check out the height advantage. Rob's head comes up to the middle of Jim's chin, and Jim's face is probably around 9 inches tall. Going by that, Jim only has about a 7.5 inch height advantage, but pictures aren't perfectly accurate; I'd say 6'4" midday, 6'4.5" or even a hair over that upon waking up. So 6'4".
Editor Rob
what about Jenny in this photo and the one on the right where I'm not dropping 3cm of posture like the left.
I guess she's invisible :)
Take into account the footware advantage, and then check out the height advantage. Rob's head comes up to the middle of Jim's chin, and Jim's face is probably around 9 inches tall. Going by that, Jim only has about a 7.5 inch height advantage, but pictures aren't perfectly accurate; I'd say 6'4" midday, 6'4.5" or even a hair over that upon waking up. So 6'4".
Editor Robwhat about Jenny in this photo and the one on the right where I'm not dropping 3cm of posture like the left.
I guess she's invisible :)
Max said on 21/Apr/11
You are so worried about a miniscule footware difference. You make it sound like you would be the same height as this person if only you were all barefoot.
You are so worried about a miniscule footware difference. You make it sound like you would be the same height as this person if only you were all barefoot.
James said on 14/Apr/11
yeah maybe 190cm with rob. 189cm at worst in the photo.
yeah maybe 190cm with rob. 189cm at worst in the photo.
Chameleon said on 13/Apr/11
Looks 1.90.
Looks 1.90.
Candyman said on 13/Apr/11
Very tall. If not 6'4", he is razor thin close.
Very tall. If not 6'4", he is razor thin close.
James said on 11/Apr/11
Well he does look 6'2.5 with footware in the right pic.
Well he does look 6'2.5 with footware in the right pic.
Observant said on 7/Apr/11
@Ray: what are you talking about? hes 191 barefeet, the height chart is lined up with rob in shoes the same as his barefoot height therefore it is a barefoot measurement minus any advantage in this case he has a .4 advantage so it ends up being 190 cm
@Ray: what are you talking about? hes 191 barefeet, the height chart is lined up with rob in shoes the same as his barefoot height therefore it is a barefoot measurement minus any advantage in this case he has a .4 advantage so it ends up being 190 cm
Ray said on 30/Mar/11
"Matt" has proved that he is no more than 191cm assuming shoes on, so 188cm barefeet.
"Matt" has proved that he is no more than 191cm assuming shoes on, so 188cm barefeet.
flash_of_eden said on 27/Mar/11
Looks more like 6'5"-6'6".
Looks more like 6'5"-6'6".
songoku211 said on 17/Mar/11
Looks taller than 6"4.
Looks taller than 6"4.
James said on 24/Feb/11
If he had footware advantage then i'd go as far as saying he looks 189cm in the right pic with rob and 188cm if he did not have footware advantage.
In the left pic appears 192cm in comparison to rob (only because rob is losing an 3cm of height with his posture).
Looks 1cm shorter than adam baldwin in comparison to rob.
If he had footware advantage then i'd go as far as saying he looks 189cm in the right pic with rob and 188cm if he did not have footware advantage.
In the left pic appears 192cm in comparison to rob (only because rob is losing an 3cm of height with his posture).
Looks 1cm shorter than adam baldwin in comparison to rob.
SolidSnake said on 17/Feb/11
looks like a weak 6 foot 4
looks like a weak 6 foot 4
James said on 31/Jan/11
6'4 morning
6'4 morning
James said on 21/Jan/11
i think his true height is 6ft2.75 inches (190cm) barefoot without shoes. 6ft3.5 in the pic with slight footware advantage. 6'4 shoes.
so 6'3 max for this guy he has a big build which probably makes him give of a bigger and taller impression.
So he is a solid 6'3 guy in my eyes not 6'4.
A big 6'4 guy like tim robbins would have 1.5-2 inches on him for sure.
i think his true height is 6ft2.75 inches (190cm) barefoot without shoes. 6ft3.5 in the pic with slight footware advantage. 6'4 shoes.
so 6'3 max for this guy he has a big build which probably makes him give of a bigger and taller impression.
So he is a solid 6'3 guy in my eyes not 6'4.
A big 6'4 guy like tim robbins would have 1.5-2 inches on him for sure.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 19/Jan/11
Dunno, I see 6"4-6"4.5
Dunno, I see 6"4-6"4.5
xyz.reg said on 6/Jan/11
A solid 6ft 4in guy..clearly..!
A solid 6ft 4in guy..clearly..!
James said on 10/Nov/10
He's a big dude but 6'4 is a stretch.
He's a big dude but 6'4 is a stretch.
Matt said on 10/Nov/10
yeah this guy is more like a solid 6'3 maximum in reality.
yeah this guy is more like a solid 6'3 maximum in reality.
Shaun said on 29/Oct/10
Accounting for footwear then, he looks a solid 6'4".
Accounting for footwear then, he looks a solid 6'4".
Shaun said on 29/Oct/10
Mandilo you need glasses., he looks a very solid 6'4". If you imagine a height chart behind Rob you can imagine where 4 inches above at 6' would be. Well he looks mininmum 4 inches heigher than that. Looks 6'4"-6'4.5" range.
Mandilo you need glasses., he looks a very solid 6'4". If you imagine a height chart behind Rob you can imagine where 4 inches above at 6' would be. Well he looks mininmum 4 inches heigher than that. Looks 6'4"-6'4.5" range.
Heights are barefeet estimates, derived from quotations, official websites, agency resumes, in person encounters with actors at conventions and pictures/films.
Other vital statistics like weight or shoe size measurements have been sourced from newspapers, books, resumes or social media.
Celebrity Fan Photos and Agency Pictures of stars are © to their respective owners.