Luke Mitchell's Height
6ft 1 (185.4 cm)
Australian actor, best known for playing Romeo Smith in Home and Away, Lincoln Campbell in Marvel's Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D and John Young in The Tomorrow People. In this photo, I was wearing 0.75in Skechers, whilst Luke's sneakers seemed to give him a 0.5 inch footwear advantage over mine. On twitter he mentioned he was "6'1 actually" and "I’m about 6’2".
5ft 8 Rob and Luke @ MCM Comic Con, 2016
I am about 185cm which is just under 6'2". The only thing I wanted to do growing up was to be a professional tennis player.
You May Be Interested
Brett Dalton
6ft 2 (188 cm)
6ft 2 (188 cm)
Rebecca Breeds
5ft 2 (157 cm)
5ft 2 (157 cm)
Robbie Amell
5ft 11 (180 cm)
5ft 11 (180 cm)
Chloe Bennet
5ft 5 ½ (166 cm)
5ft 5 ½ (166 cm)
Add a Comment104 comments
Average Guess (51 Votes)
6ft 1.1in (185.7cm)
6ft 1.1in (185.7cm)
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 28/Apr/23
Holds 6ft1 at his low. It wouldn't be a massive surprise if he did measure a little over it
6ft2 straight out of bed is a certainty
Holds 6ft1 at his low. It wouldn't be a massive surprise if he did measure a little over it
6ft2 straight out of bed is a certainty
Rsingh said on 2/Dec/22
He might measure a bit over 6'1.
He might measure a bit over 6'1.
Darksol64 said on 24/Sep/22
Jordan I agree looks really near 6'2.
Suggests a very strong 6'1 to me. Maybe even something like 6'1.25 before bed.
Jordan I agree looks really near 6'2.
Suggests a very strong 6'1 to me. Maybe even something like 6'1.25 before bed.
Jordan87 said on 26/Jul/22
Looks 6'2 with Rob, but accounting for footwear he would be around 6'1.5. Easy 6'1.
Looks 6'2 with Rob, but accounting for footwear he would be around 6'1.5. Easy 6'1.
Jake: 1.84 m - 1.85 m said on 3/Jul/22
Looks a very legit 6ft 1 to me. Perfect listing.
Looks a very legit 6ft 1 to me. Perfect listing.
Chaoscontrol. said on 29/Oct/21
I would’ve said 6’1.5 based on the picture but there is footwear advantage
I would’ve said 6’1.5 based on the picture but there is footwear advantage
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 3/Jun/21
185.5-186cm I think, same as Gatiss and Reardon
185.5-186cm I think, same as Gatiss and Reardon
OriginalAnon said on 30/Apr/21
6'1'' seems right. He could be a bit over, but he does have the footwear advantage.
6'1'' seems right. He could be a bit over, but he does have the footwear advantage.
slim 6'1 said on 13/Jan/21
185-186cm
185-186cm
Jake: 1.84 m - 1.85 m said on 19/Oct/20
He appeared a solid 6ft 1in in the flick 'Black Water: Abyss' - an absorbing little croc-centric suspenser.
He appeared a solid 6ft 1in in the flick 'Black Water: Abyss' - an absorbing little croc-centric suspenser.
Lenad 5ft9.75in said on 22/May/20
Looks a strong 6'1 and 186cm is probably closer to the truth.
Looks a strong 6'1 and 186cm is probably closer to the truth.
Chris Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 10/Oct/19
I don't see him above 185cm a low. At times he can look like 185.5cm zone. 186cm is a fanboys talk. His latest 6'2 claim was probably counted shoes in.
I don't see him above 185cm a low. At times he can look like 185.5cm zone. 186cm is a fanboys talk. His latest 6'2 claim was probably counted shoes in.
Polsonhart said on 8/Aug/19
True he seems like a tall dude in the tv show Blindspot, his eyes leveled with Sullivan's
True he seems like a tall dude in the tv show Blindspot, his eyes leveled with Sullivan's
Importer said on 14/Jul/19
@Chris Junior Hernandez 1990 I know this site is all about accurate measurements down to 1/8s but I think rounding up 1cm is plausible even by celebheight standards.
Editor Rob
@Chris Junior Hernandez 1990 I know this site is all about accurate measurements down to 1/8s but I think rounding up 1cm is plausible even by celebheight standards.
Editor RobThe 1/8ths were introduced to accommodate the rare instances of heights being given to that accuracy. Generally I think going to 1/4 or 3/4 is enough, but sometimes maybe the odd 1/8th is thrown in, but it's a tiny amount really.
Chris Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 5/Jul/19
185cm is 6'0 7/8th inch not even 6'1. Lots of 185cm guy just round up that little 4mm to claim 6'1 and some even came below a lowest mark 184-184.5cm depends what time they get measure their 185cm claim.
185cm is 6'0 7/8th inch not even 6'1. Lots of 185cm guy just round up that little 4mm to claim 6'1 and some even came below a lowest mark 184-184.5cm depends what time they get measure their 185cm claim.
Importer said on 8/May/19
@Bobby 185cm = 6'1" which is (an inch) under 6'2". Happy now?
@Bobby 185cm = 6'1" which is (an inch) under 6'2". Happy now?
Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 7/May/19
I don't think Mitchell is taller than Obama.
I don't think Mitchell is taller than Obama.
Nik said on 21/Mar/19
Easily 6'1" range!
Easily 6'1" range!
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 21/Jan/19
Out of bed: 187.6-188cm
Before bed: 185.4-185.7cm
Out of bed: 187.6-188cm
Before bed: 185.4-185.7cm
Bobby said on 28/Nov/18
185cm is just under 6'2? No, it's not.
185cm is just under 6'2? No, it's not.
Dream(5'9.5 said on 11/Oct/18
If you were doing 1/8ths, would you personally give Mitchell 6'1 1/8th" than 6'0 7/8ths"?
Editor Rob
If you were doing 1/8ths, would you personally give Mitchell 6'1 1/8th" than 6'0 7/8ths"?
Editor RobPossibly a bit over than under
Edimar184 said on 2/Oct/18
Rob, do you think that day he looked close to the 6ft2 mark?
Editor Rob
Rob, do you think that day he looked close to the 6ft2 mark?
Editor RobCould look over 6ft 1 flat, but not 6ft 2.
Edimar184 said on 24/Sep/18
Do you think he is taller than Shawn Mendes, Rob?
Editor Rob
Do you think he is taller than Shawn Mendes, Rob?
Editor RobI think he could be.
Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 23/Aug/18
Luke said: I am about 185cm which is just under 6'2". The only thing I wanted to do growing up was to be a professional tennis player.
Well that literally tells all he is 6'0 3/4 (184.8) at a low. I would put Brett Dalton 187cm in mind.
Luke said: I am about 185cm which is just under 6'2". The only thing I wanted to do growing up was to be a professional tennis player.
Well that literally tells all he is 6'0 3/4 (184.8) at a low. I would put Brett Dalton 187cm in mind.
Nik said on 5/Aug/18
Solid 6'1"!
Solid 6'1"!
Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 10/May/18
187cm out of bed and 185cm before bed.
187cm out of bed and 185cm before bed.
Canson said on 3/May/18
Easy 6’1” with rob despite the footwear.
@Rob: take a look at his footwear though. That’s exactly what I told you about the pic with Boris and Kobe as his sneakers would give about the same as what Boris had on
Easy 6’1” with rob despite the footwear.
@Rob: take a look at his footwear though. That’s exactly what I told you about the pic with Boris and Kobe as his sneakers would give about the same as what Boris had on
Zampo said on 27/Apr/18
Solid 6'1.
Solid 6'1.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 20/Apr/18
Luke Mitchell: 6ft1⅛(185.7cm)
Brett Dalton: 6ft1⅞(187.6cm)
Luke Mitchell: 6ft1⅛(185.7cm)
Brett Dalton: 6ft1⅞(187.6cm)
Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 19/Apr/18
I think of the footwear making Luke Mitchell look 186ish with rob, but he def hit 185cm lowest of the day than greater. Brett Dalton more i look at him kinda 187cm guy not a full inch taller than Mitchell.
I think of the footwear making Luke Mitchell look 186ish with rob, but he def hit 185cm lowest of the day than greater. Brett Dalton more i look at him kinda 187cm guy not a full inch taller than Mitchell.
Dream(5'9.5 said on 8/Apr/18
I think 6'1 1/8ths" would be better for Mitchell than 6'0 7/8ths"
I think 6'1 1/8ths" would be better for Mitchell than 6'0 7/8ths"
Redwing said on 20/Feb/18
What's yours and his footwear in cm rob?
Editor Rob
What's yours and his footwear in cm rob?
Editor RobI'd have said 3-3.5cm range and mine are 2cm.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 2/Jan/18
He'd probably be 187.5-188cm first thing like Gatiss...
He'd probably be 187.5-188cm first thing like Gatiss...
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 2/Jan/18
A fraction over 6ft1 is more likely than a fraction under.
I think he just may have wrongly converted centimetres to feet.
A fraction over 6ft1 is more likely than a fraction under.
I think he just may have wrongly converted centimetres to feet.
Edimar1.84 said on 28/Nov/17
If you not say he has more footwear I will say he is 6ft1 3/8, but now, just 6ft1 flat.
If you not say he has more footwear I will say he is 6ft1 3/8, but now, just 6ft1 flat.
Junior said on 7/Nov/17
Rob, is 186cm possible for Luke in person?
Editor Rob
Rob, is 186cm possible for Luke in person?
Editor Rob I think he measured somewhere in the 185cm zone, of course he looked a decent 6ft 1 range in person as he had more sneakers.
Mark(5'9.5 said on 16/Sep/17
What was he like in person, Rob?
Editor Rob
What was he like in person, Rob?
Editor Rob didn't speak to him much, so couldn't say beyond that he seemed friendly with people from what I did see.
S.J.H said on 8/Jun/17
Compare to his co-star , Mitchell does look 6'1.25 with them. Maybe they're all 0.25 down and Mitchell is much an honest 185cm guy.
Compare to his co-star , Mitchell does look 6'1.25 with them. Maybe they're all 0.25 down and Mitchell is much an honest 185cm guy.
Mark(5'9.25 said on 21/May/17
He's an easy 6'1"er. I settle my case for 6'1.25".
He's an easy 6'1"er. I settle my case for 6'1.25".
S.J.H said on 28/Mar/17
Mitchell is 6'0.75 not 6'1, he had like 1.5cm footwear advantage than rob flat sneakers
Mitchell is 6'0.75 not 6'1, he had like 1.5cm footwear advantage than rob flat sneakers
Mark(5'9.25") said on 23/Mar/17
186 cm for Mitchell.
186 cm for Mitchell.
dpp said on 20/Mar/17
Who's taller Ronaldo and Mitchell?
Editor Rob
Who's taller Ronaldo and Mitchell?
Editor Rob both probably would measure similar
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 7/Mar/17
Amell is roughly about 6ft1. Rob confirmed it. This guy though could edge him slightly and be more 186cm.
Editor Rob
Amell is roughly about 6ft1. Rob confirmed it. This guy though could edge him slightly and be more 186cm.
Editor Rob Mitchell certainly looks taller in person, albeit, footwear helped him achieve a taller look.
S.J.H said on 24/Feb/17
Def taller than stephen amell who always look 6'0-6'0.25 range. Mitchell is 6'0.75 since he say about 185cm
Def taller than stephen amell who always look 6'0-6'0.25 range. Mitchell is 6'0.75 since he say about 185cm
Mark(5'9.25") said on 6/Feb/17
Mitchell would likely beat out Amell in a measurement showdown.
edit* Rob, I think another arguable 186 cm person is Joe Alwyn.
Mitchell would likely beat out Amell in a measurement showdown.
edit* Rob, I think another arguable 186 cm person is Joe Alwyn.
Mark(5'9.25") said on 6/Feb/17
Mitchell would likely beat out Amell in a measurement showdown.
Mitchell would likely beat out Amell in a measurement showdown.
Mark(5'9.25 said on 3/Feb/17
Rob, How would Mitchell compare to Obama and Mark Gatiss? I'd say they're all arguably 186 cm in a good day.
Editor Rob
Rob, How would Mitchell compare to Obama and Mark Gatiss? I'd say they're all arguably 186 cm in a good day.
Editor Rob earlier in the day, yes they have a chance of measuring 186, but through afternoon I think around 6ft 1. Probably a guy like Mitchell would measure taller than say Stephen Amell.
Peter 179cm said on 29/Jan/17
Is a fraction under 6'1 possible,Rob? Still close enough to 185cm though.
Editor Rob
Is a fraction under 6'1 possible,Rob? Still close enough to 185cm though.
Editor Rob I think there are others more worthy of a weak 6ft 1 listing than Mitchell.
Victor Surratt said on 30/Dec/16
Maybe 1.86 is also reasonable
Maybe 1.86 is also reasonable
Mark(5'9.25") said on 19/Dec/16
6'1.25" is more reasonable.
6'1.25" is more reasonable.
phil said on 2/Dec/16
right around 6"1, he has more shoe so i wouldnt say hes over it
right around 6"1, he has more shoe so i wouldnt say hes over it
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 29/Nov/16
He could easily pass for 6ft2. I'd definitely make a case for 186cm range.
He could easily pass for 6ft2. I'd definitely make a case for 186cm range.
Mark(5'9.25 said on 18/Nov/16
@S.J.H It should be taken into account that Luke is actually leaning more while rob is standing with better posture, yet he gives a slightly taller impression than Stephen Amell.
Normally I would sometimes agree with you, but this is an exception. He would be 187-188 cm if he stood straight in the picture with rob. Take the footwear away and I would totally believe his 185 cm claim.
@S.J.H It should be taken into account that Luke is actually leaning more while rob is standing with better posture, yet he gives a slightly taller impression than Stephen Amell.
Normally I would sometimes agree with you, but this is an exception. He would be 187-188 cm if he stood straight in the picture with rob. Take the footwear away and I would totally believe his 185 cm claim.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 14/Nov/16
186cm on a good day is possible. Hits 187-188cm zone out of bed...
186cm on a good day is possible. Hits 187-188cm zone out of bed...
S.J.H said on 4/Nov/16
Up here he had 0.6" more heel than rob. 6'0.5 without them and he say hes about 185cm 6'0.75 sounds a morning height
Up here he had 0.6" more heel than rob. 6'0.5 without them and he say hes about 185cm 6'0.75 sounds a morning height
Mark said on 10/Oct/16
186 cm fits better for Mitchell.
186 cm fits better for Mitchell.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 29/Sep/16
Mark could be a strong 6ft1 but also doesn't stand his tallest
Mark could be a strong 6ft1 but also doesn't stand his tallest
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 27/Sep/16
Gatiss definitely, Reardon I'd have thought could look slightly under at times but his posture isn't great. Mark Pellegrino and Todd Stashwick are the other two guys I think would be in there
Editor Rob
Gatiss definitely, Reardon I'd have thought could look slightly under at times but his posture isn't great. Mark Pellegrino and Todd Stashwick are the other two guys I think would be in there
Editor Rob yes Pellegrino could be an arguable 186cm.
Mark said on 26/Sep/16
Rob, who else could measure a solid 6'1" other than Luke Mitchell?
Editor Rob
Rob, who else could measure a solid 6'1" other than Luke Mitchell?
Editor Rob I think a guy like Mark Gatiss would fall into that range.
Guys like John Reardon in person looked a real 6ft 1 I thought.
Guys like John Reardon in person looked a real 6ft 1 I thought.
Mark said on 19/Sep/16
Agreed Rob. Actually, the comment section in Brett Dalton's page is ridiculous since the majority thinks Dalton is shorter than 6'1" while Dalton clearly has an edge on Mitchell.
Editor Rob
Agreed Rob. Actually, the comment section in Brett Dalton's page is ridiculous since the majority thinks Dalton is shorter than 6'1" while Dalton clearly has an edge on Mitchell.
Editor Rob if I only looked at the photos of Luke and Brett I could see how they appear very close in height.
but in person and watching Brett pose with others, I can see how he isn't a guy who stands tall when posing.
I was going to ask to do a back to back pose but I seen a girl do it and he still didn't stand tall, hence a salute pose was the best option to see him stand decent.
but in person and watching Brett pose with others, I can see how he isn't a guy who stands tall when posing.
I was going to ask to do a back to back pose but I seen a girl do it and he still didn't stand tall, hence a salute pose was the best option to see him stand decent.
Mark said on 15/Sep/16
I agree. Mitchell isn't towered by Brett though Brett is taller.
I can easily buy 6'1.25" for this guy since he looks 187 cm here, but since the footwear was there. 185.5 is fine for Mitchell.
Editor Rob
I agree. Mitchell isn't towered by Brett though Brett is taller.
I can easily buy 6'1.25" for this guy since he looks 187 cm here, but since the footwear was there. 185.5 is fine for Mitchell.
Editor Rob one thing is, there was a big swing in footwear between meeting Dalton and Mitchell.
0.8 inch in total in Luke's favour, yet he certainly didn't look taller...
0.8 inch in total in Luke's favour, yet he certainly didn't look taller...
Brandon said on 14/Sep/16
6'1.25" is highly likely imo
6'1.25" is highly likely imo
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 14/Sep/16
Rob, could 186cm be closer then for this guy?
Editor Rob
Rob, could 186cm be closer then for this guy?
Editor Rob at mid-day he might measure it, but he really wasn't any taller than 6ft 1.5 up close, knock off a noticeable footwear advantage and I can believe the 6ft 1 as he says.
Mark said on 13/Sep/16
Would Federer look similar to Mitchell or would Mitchell edge out Federer with slight footwear advantage.
Editor Rob
Would Federer look similar to Mitchell or would Mitchell edge out Federer with slight footwear advantage.
Editor Rob I think Mitchell would probably be the more solid of a 6ft 1 versus Federer.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 18/Jul/16
...and he had considerably less shoe, so near 6ft2 is still ok for him but I'd wouldn't rule out a fraction over 6ft1 for this guy
...and he had considerably less shoe, so near 6ft2 is still ok for him but I'd wouldn't rule out a fraction over 6ft1 for this guy
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 17/Jul/16
Rob, was Brett taller than this guy?
Editor Rob
Rob, was Brett taller than this guy?
Editor Rob he gave a taller impression.
slothee said on 15/Jul/16
Spot on listing, might even be a fraction over 6'1" (186 cm?)
Spot on listing, might even be a fraction over 6'1" (186 cm?)
Alex said on 4/Jul/16
185 cm is still a tall height for sure. Just people who is influenced by watching the NBA would think 185 is a short height. In the real world you're tall.
185 cm is still a tall height for sure. Just people who is influenced by watching the NBA would think 185 is a short height. In the real world you're tall.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 20/Jun/16
Out of bed: 187-188cm
Before bed: 185-186cm
Out of bed: 187-188cm
Before bed: 185-186cm
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 17/Jun/16
"Luke Mithcell's Height is 6ft 1¼in (186.055cm)"
"Luke Mithcell's Height is 6ft 1¼in (186.055cm)"
Mark said on 14/Jun/16
Mitchel is slouching and looks 186. He would measure 188 cm if he was standing straight in the picture above. 185 cm no doubt and even over it barefoot.
Mitchel is slouching and looks 186. He would measure 188 cm if he was standing straight in the picture above. 185 cm no doubt and even over it barefoot.
mrtguy said on 13/Jun/16
I see a strong 6'1'' guy maybe more, despite the footwear difference!
I see a strong 6'1'' guy maybe more, despite the footwear difference!
Allie said on 13/Jun/16
Not into blondes but I can make an exception haha. Also one of the few actors wise I've seen who can rock many different hairstyles.
Anyways, this seems close to right. I wouldn't guess anything under 6'1.
Not into blondes but I can make an exception haha. Also one of the few actors wise I've seen who can rock many different hairstyles.
Anyways, this seems close to right. I wouldn't guess anything under 6'1.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 12/Jun/16
I think 186cm might in fact be closer for him...
I think 186cm might in fact be closer for him...
Josh said on 11/Jun/16
Besides the Netherlands, 6' 1" is tall in all countries in the world. In Asia and Africa at 6' 1" a man towers above everybody. And in the western world (US/Canada/Europe) a 6' 1" is taller than 80% of other men. I live in Switzerland where the average is 179 cm (5' 10.5"), I am 192 and I almost never see a man taller than me. Maybe once a day or something.
Besides the Netherlands, 6' 1" is tall in all countries in the world. In Asia and Africa at 6' 1" a man towers above everybody. And in the western world (US/Canada/Europe) a 6' 1" is taller than 80% of other men. I live in Switzerland where the average is 179 cm (5' 10.5"), I am 192 and I almost never see a man taller than me. Maybe once a day or something.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 10/Jun/16
Rob, is it more likely he measured just under 6ft2 but mistakenly converted it into 185cm instead of 188cm OR he measured 185cm and converted that into almost 6ft2 instead of 6ft1?
Editor Rob
most likely he said "185cm.....just under 6ft 1" because it is when you look at the stadiometer...
I would have thought the person transcribing the interview might have put 2 instead of 1, which when you see he said 6ft 1 on twitter adds to that.
Rob, is it more likely he measured just under 6ft2 but mistakenly converted it into 185cm instead of 188cm OR he measured 185cm and converted that into almost 6ft2 instead of 6ft1?
Editor Robmost likely he said "185cm.....just under 6ft 1" because it is when you look at the stadiometer...
I would have thought the person transcribing the interview might have put 2 instead of 1, which when you see he said 6ft 1 on twitter adds to that.
Mark said on 10/Jun/16
Rob, do you think 186 cm is possible in the morning barefoot?
Editor Rob
Rob, do you think 186 cm is possible in the morning barefoot?
Editor Rob I would have thought 187 and evening 185 for him.
Mark said on 10/Jun/16
Looks over 6'1" when standing straight.
Looks over 6'1" when standing straight.
RXH said on 9/Jun/16
From the picture, he looks at least 6'1. Nothing under that.
From the picture, he looks at least 6'1. Nothing under that.
Moke said on 9/Jun/16
Of course 6'1 is "still" tall...If it is tall in the western world it's more than just tall in other countries.
Luke Mitchell - decent 6'1! Good one Rob!
Of course 6'1 is "still" tall...If it is tall in the western world it's more than just tall in other countries.
Luke Mitchell - decent 6'1! Good one Rob!
shiva 181 cms said on 9/Jun/16
Hes a good example how 6'1 is still a tall height
Hes a good example how 6'1 is still a tall height
John said on 8/Jun/16
He looks 6ft1
He looks 6ft1
werwer said on 8/Jun/16
i would definitely give him the 6'2.
i would definitely give him the 6'2.
Andrea said on 7/Jun/16
He certainly doesn't look near 6'2 (or just under it) with Rob...
He's tilting his head down so it's a bit hard to say where the top of it really is but i'd say he can look somewhere between 186 and 187 here... Take away the shoe advantage and he is what he says: 185! He himself says 185 so this listing is perfect!
If he met Jensen, J wouldn't be much happy to hear he's just 6'1 :)
He certainly doesn't look near 6'2 (or just under it) with Rob...
He's tilting his head down so it's a bit hard to say where the top of it really is but i'd say he can look somewhere between 186 and 187 here... Take away the shoe advantage and he is what he says: 185! He himself says 185 so this listing is perfect!
If he met Jensen, J wouldn't be much happy to hear he's just 6'1 :)
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 7/Jun/16
He does look a strong 6ft1 at times.
He does look a strong 6ft1 at times.
berta said on 7/Jun/16
By loking at the photo i would have guessed 187
By loking at the photo i would have guessed 187
Danimal (176-178cm) said on 6/Jun/16
He's just under 6'2" and gave 185 because he clearly got confused with the conversion rate.
Editor Rob
Australian's would usually get measured and use metric, 185cm is just under 6ft 1. 187 nearly half inch under 6ft 2.
In any case if he is just under 6ft 2 he would have looked nearly 6ft 2.5 in person. I would say he didn't look that tall to me.
But then he said on twitter "6'1 actually".
He's just under 6'2" and gave 185 because he clearly got confused with the conversion rate.
Editor RobAustralian's would usually get measured and use metric, 185cm is just under 6ft 1. 187 nearly half inch under 6ft 2.
In any case if he is just under 6ft 2 he would have looked nearly 6ft 2.5 in person. I would say he didn't look that tall to me.
But then he said on twitter "6'1 actually".
Andrea said on 6/Jun/16
Yeah, i don't watch the show but he certainly seems much more honest than the other guy Brett Dalton, who claims 6'2 and doesn't look much different than him in photos... Does he really look an inch taller than Luke on the show?
Editor Rob
Yeah, i don't watch the show but he certainly seems much more honest than the other guy Brett Dalton, who claims 6'2 and doesn't look much different than him in photos... Does he really look an inch taller than Luke on the show?
Editor Rob only seen season 2, I don't remember them together although Dalton did at times look between 2-3 inches taller when Paxton was on the show.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 6/Jun/16
I'd stick with 185/186cm.
I'd stick with 185/186cm.
ly said on 6/Jun/16
Perfect example why 6ft1 is still legit tall height.
Perfect example why 6ft1 is still legit tall height.
Josh said on 6/Jun/16
Big dude. Honest 6'1. Maybe even a a tad bit more!
Big dude. Honest 6'1. Maybe even a a tad bit more!
Arch Stanton said on 6/Jun/16
Ah but he has half an inch footwear advantage I see, I was going to say he could 187.
Ah but he has half an inch footwear advantage I see, I was going to say he could 187.
Arch Stanton said on 6/Jun/16
Yes, clearly very honest 185 as he can given a 187 impression here.
Yes, clearly very honest 185 as he can given a 187 impression here.
Crypto139 said on 5/Jun/16
Looks 186-187 cm but I saw the footwear thing. Yeah 185 is right.
Looks 186-187 cm but I saw the footwear thing. Yeah 185 is right.
spainmen191cm said on 5/Jun/16
Rob, fantastic photo! And pretty interesting did he look a legit 6ft1 to you?
Rob, fantastic photo! And pretty interesting did he look a legit 6ft1 to you?
the Slav said on 5/Jun/16
6'1.25 doesn't seem out of question
6'1.25 doesn't seem out of question
travis said on 5/Jun/16
he look taller than that rob
he look taller than that rob
Andrea said on 5/Jun/16
He can look a strong 6'1 in this pic, take away 0.5 inches and i'd say he's near enough 6'1... 6'0.75 at worst! He seems an honest 185, even if i really don't know him...
Editor Rob
He can look a strong 6'1 in this pic, take away 0.5 inches and i'd say he's near enough 6'1... 6'0.75 at worst! He seems an honest 185, even if i really don't know him...
Editor Rob you don't get many guys giving cm, it's mainly from Euro or countries like Australia where they'd predominantly get measured in metric.
This guy can safely fall into the 'as tall as he claims' category.
This guy can safely fall into the 'as tall as he claims' category.
BEASTMAN said on 6/Apr/13
Charles Cottier has a page that says he's 178cm, and he looks exactly that next to Luke Mitchell.
Click Here (Luke and Charles)
Click Here (Charles' page)
Charles Cottier has a page that says he's 178cm, and he looks exactly that next to Luke Mitchell.
Click Here (Luke and Charles)
Click Here (Charles' page)
Jake: 1.82 m-- 1.83 m-- 1.84 m said on 2/Sep/12
A 6ft 0.75 listing makes more sense.
A 6ft 0.75 listing makes more sense.
Beastman said on 6/Feb/12
I'm Australian. And i think the only error some people here make is they think an inch is just 2.5 cm, not 2.54 cm, which ruins the final calculation when they multiply it by a number of inches. But if that were the case, he'd be exactly 6'2 in his mind. I personally think he knows the measurements but just wishes he reached the 6'2 mark. Like maybe i can be 18 years, 11 months old for example, where i'd be almost 19. But i don't care about reaching 19, i care about reaching 20. So i say i'm just under 20 years of age. I think that's the case with him.
I'm Australian. And i think the only error some people here make is they think an inch is just 2.5 cm, not 2.54 cm, which ruins the final calculation when they multiply it by a number of inches. But if that were the case, he'd be exactly 6'2 in his mind. I personally think he knows the measurements but just wishes he reached the 6'2 mark. Like maybe i can be 18 years, 11 months old for example, where i'd be almost 19. But i don't care about reaching 19, i care about reaching 20. So i say i'm just under 20 years of age. I think that's the case with him.
Cindy said on 3/Feb/12
Most people here in Oz dont have a clue when it comes to inches and feet, so the height he said in cm would be correct.
Most people here in Oz dont have a clue when it comes to inches and feet, so the height he said in cm would be correct.
SAK said on 31/Dec/11
"I am about 185cm which is just under 6'2".
Well 185cm is in fact just under 6ft1.
"I am about 185cm which is just under 6'2".
Well 185cm is in fact just under 6ft1.
Beastman said on 30/Dec/11
No, 185 cm is just under 6'1" because it is just under 185.42 cm which is a full 6'1". But obviously he doesn't appreciate his height.
No, 185 cm is just under 6'1" because it is just under 185.42 cm which is a full 6'1". But obviously he doesn't appreciate his height.
Heights are barefeet estimates, derived from quotations, official websites, agency resumes, in person encounters with actors at conventions and pictures/films.
Other vital statistics like weight or shoe size measurements have been sourced from newspapers, books, resumes or social media.
Celebrity Fan Photos and Agency Pictures of stars are © to their respective owners.