Pierce Brosnan's Height
6ft ¾ in (184.8 cm)
Peak height was 6ft 1 ¼ (186.1 cm)
Irish Actor best known for playing James Bond in Goldeneye, Die Another Day and for roles in films such as The Thomas Crown Affair, Mamma Mia!, Mrs. Doubtfire, Dantes Peak and The Matador. He has claimed "195lbs, 6ft 2 on a good day." and in his Spotlight casting directory page in the 1980's, gave Height 6 feet 1 inch.
Photo by PR Photos
You May Be Interested
Sean Connery
6ft 2 (188 cm)
6ft 2 (188 cm)
Roger Moore
6ft 1 ¼ (186 cm)
6ft 1 ¼ (186 cm)
Colin Firth
6ft 1 (185 cm)
6ft 1 (185 cm)
Daniel Craig
5ft 10 ¼ (178 cm)
5ft 10 ¼ (178 cm)
Add a Comment1958 comments
Average Guess (193 Votes)
Peak: 6ft 1.42in (186.5cm)
Current: 6ft 0.74in (184.8cm)
Peak: 6ft 1.42in (186.5cm)
Current: 6ft 0.74in (184.8cm)
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 19/Nov/24
I think he can still pull off 6ft1 today....current mark is a low range and that 6ft1½ as a peak is still a strong possibility. On Remington Steele he generally looked right between 6ft and 6ft3 guys who appeared on the show
I think he can still pull off 6ft1 today....current mark is a low range and that 6ft1½ as a peak is still a strong possibility. On Remington Steele he generally looked right between 6ft and 6ft3 guys who appeared on the show
Kpu said on 1/Oct/24
Rob, Brosnan should be added to the Irish Actors tag
Editor Rob
Rob, Brosnan should be added to the Irish Actors tag
Editor RobDidn't realise he wasn't. He is now!
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 7/Mar/23
I respectfully disagree, Andrew. I think Pierce still comfortably clears the 6ft mark and can possibly still make 6ft1. Pulled it with The Rock
I respectfully disagree, Andrew. I think Pierce still comfortably clears the 6ft mark and can possibly still make 6ft1. Pulled it with The Rock
Andrey Lykov said on 6/Mar/23
He is closer to 6 feet flat today. A quite normal height loss for his age.
He is closer to 6 feet flat today. A quite normal height loss for his age.
5'7 and a fraction said on 20/Feb/23
Interesting that picture with Rock, didn't even know they'd met before. Looks 6'1 there though. Rock is closer to 6'2 flat, 6'2.25.
Interesting that picture with Rock, didn't even know they'd met before. Looks 6'1 there though. Rock is closer to 6'2 flat, 6'2.25.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 4/Feb/23
Clearly looks 6ft1 range with The Rock. His current height is the absolute lowest I’d try to argue. Really I’d give him the same stats as Firth (6ft1½ peak, 6ft1 flat today)
Clearly looks 6ft1 range with The Rock. His current height is the absolute lowest I’d try to argue. Really I’d give him the same stats as Firth (6ft1½ peak, 6ft1 flat today)
Philip Z said on 25/Jan/23
Next to 6ft 2.5 listed The Rock: Click Here
Brosnan has a slight footwear advantage, but even if Johnson only were 6ft 2 flat, I can't see Brosnan below 6ft 1 still. Since a half inch height loss at almost 70 is plausible, his peak may be closer to 6ft 1.5, too.
Next to 6ft 2.5 listed The Rock: Click Here
Brosnan has a slight footwear advantage, but even if Johnson only were 6ft 2 flat, I can't see Brosnan below 6ft 1 still. Since a half inch height loss at almost 70 is plausible, his peak may be closer to 6ft 1.5, too.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 10/Oct/22
berta, surprisingly Brosnan holds up well with Rock.
berta, surprisingly Brosnan holds up well with Rock.
berta said on 8/Oct/22
look at new photos of him and dwayne johnson. there really is very small chanse for pierce to be under 185 cm still. Dwayne looke only 3,5 cm taller. Maybe brosnan really was 186,5 peak?
look at new photos of him and dwayne johnson. there really is very small chanse for pierce to be under 185 cm still. Dwayne looke only 3,5 cm taller. Maybe brosnan really was 186,5 peak?
ZDA said on 30/Sep/22
Peak 6 ft 1.5.
Peak 6 ft 1.5.
Tall Sam said on 17/Sep/22
Interesting, Pierce makes Gary Oldman look closer to 5’8” than 5’9” there.
Interesting, Pierce makes Gary Oldman look closer to 5’8” than 5’9” there.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 26/Aug/22
He's what I would call "solid tall". Not "very tall" range but also not merely "above average" either
He's what I would call "solid tall". Not "very tall" range but also not merely "above average" either
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 26/Aug/22
@Tallernot: Ridiculous, he had 3in on Sean Bean and a good 2in on Janssen. Under 6ft1 is a joke for his peak, still stand by 6ft1½.
He's in a new movie with The Rock
Click Here
This is just one still though.
@Tallernot: Ridiculous, he had 3in on Sean Bean and a good 2in on Janssen. Under 6ft1 is a joke for his peak, still stand by 6ft1½.
He's in a new movie with The Rock
Click Here
This is just one still though.
Tallernot said on 22/Aug/22
Pierce is above average in height, but he is never really tall. I don't think he was 6'1 peak. Maybe 6'0.5. 6 feet nowadays.
Rob in the movie golden eye in the sauna scene he was I would say exactly the same height as Femke Janssen who is a weak 6 ft.
Another thing that is noticeable is that his kneecap is often very high and his legs look abnormally long. Very likely he wore and wears lifts to look taller.
He was about an inch shorter than Timothy Dalton who is about 6'1.5.
I'm going with 184cm max. Very likely 183cm peak and 182cm nowadays.
Him wearing lifts and the fact that he has a small head and narrow build makes him look taller than he is.
Pierce is above average in height, but he is never really tall. I don't think he was 6'1 peak. Maybe 6'0.5. 6 feet nowadays.
Rob in the movie golden eye in the sauna scene he was I would say exactly the same height as Femke Janssen who is a weak 6 ft.
Another thing that is noticeable is that his kneecap is often very high and his legs look abnormally long. Very likely he wore and wears lifts to look taller.
He was about an inch shorter than Timothy Dalton who is about 6'1.5.
I'm going with 184cm max. Very likely 183cm peak and 182cm nowadays.
Him wearing lifts and the fact that he has a small head and narrow build makes him look taller than he is.
Rory said on 23/Jun/22
@Hong Hmm no I'd say he still looks over six foot there with Dylan,I'd say at least 6ft0.25 there..that's not a full 5 inch difference imo.
@Hong Hmm no I'd say he still looks over six foot there with Dylan,I'd say at least 6ft0.25 there..that's not a full 5 inch difference imo.
Hong said on 3/May/22
Click Here= Here's Pierce with his son he's looking 6ft flat if his son is 6ft5.
Click Here= Here's Pierce with his son he's looking 6ft flat if his son is 6ft5.
Sushmit said on 28/Mar/22
In the 80s-90s, he peaked around almost 6ft1½ (187cm) and then from 1990s to 2000s,Bond era, he still looked over 6ft1 (186cm) and after that he lost little height and his posture was good.... currently I think he is 183-184cm... i.e, solid 6ft, not below that
In the 80s-90s, he peaked around almost 6ft1½ (187cm) and then from 1990s to 2000s,Bond era, he still looked over 6ft1 (186cm) and after that he lost little height and his posture was good.... currently I think he is 183-184cm... i.e, solid 6ft, not below that
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 14/Dec/21
Weak 6ft2 in Lawnmower Man with Jeff Fahey
Weak 6ft2 in Lawnmower Man with Jeff Fahey
Stavro said on 10/Dec/21
He’s more like 6’0” these days… check out premiere pics of him next to 5’8” Olga Kurylenko. She has 2” of footwear on him at most, yet he looks only 2” taller.
Peak?… yeah he probably was 6’1” or close back in the day.
He’s more like 6’0” these days… check out premiere pics of him next to 5’8” Olga Kurylenko. She has 2” of footwear on him at most, yet he looks only 2” taller.
Peak?… yeah he probably was 6’1” or close back in the day.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 23/Nov/21
I think Pierce would edge Roger both at peak
I think Pierce would edge Roger both at peak
T.M. said on 22/Nov/21
Similar height to Roger Moore. Agree with Rob's listing.
Similar height to Roger Moore. Agree with Rob's listing.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 21/Nov/21
Costner: 185.7cm
Brosnan: 186.4cm
Costner: 185.7cm
Brosnan: 186.4cm
Original said on 20/Nov/21
Peak 186cm (6'1.25")
Current 184cm (6'0.5")
Peak 186cm (6'1.25")
Current 184cm (6'0.5")
Eusebiu - 6'1" (185 cm) said on 20/Nov/21
As for peak, I believe that 186 cm might have been possible but as for current height, I simply can not see him taller then 184 cm.
Don't get me wrong, he is a tall guy nonetheless but his current posture is bad and his son Dylan (196 cm) towers him in almost all pictures together by at least 12 cm - that would lead to the fact that Pierce is around 183-184 cm today.
So, my guess is:
Peak - 186 cm
Current - 184 cm
As for peak, I believe that 186 cm might have been possible but as for current height, I simply can not see him taller then 184 cm.
Don't get me wrong, he is a tall guy nonetheless but his current posture is bad and his son Dylan (196 cm) towers him in almost all pictures together by at least 12 cm - that would lead to the fact that Pierce is around 183-184 cm today.
So, my guess is:
Peak - 186 cm
Current - 184 cm
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 19/Nov/21
Brosnan would have edged out Costner
Brosnan would have edged out Costner
berta said on 17/Nov/21
it owuld have been interesting to see pierce and cosnter stand back to back in the 80s. it oculd have been hard to see any difference. but i feel Brosnan 186 Costner 185,5.
it owuld have been interesting to see pierce and cosnter stand back to back in the 80s. it oculd have been hard to see any difference. but i feel Brosnan 186 Costner 185,5.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 24/Oct/21
I think strong 186cm minimum/max strong 187cm for his peak can be argued. His current height looks about right though
I think strong 186cm minimum/max strong 187cm for his peak can be argued. His current height looks about right though
berta said on 21/Oct/21
he can look 184 alot recently. He is max 185 today. Probably around 184,5. He is 68 years old. I guess average height loss by then is 1,5-2 cm? That puts him at 186-186,5 peak. I think that is what he looked most of the time. A very legit 186 guy. But never over 186,5
he can look 184 alot recently. He is max 185 today. Probably around 184,5. He is 68 years old. I guess average height loss by then is 1,5-2 cm? That puts him at 186-186,5 peak. I think that is what he looked most of the time. A very legit 186 guy. But never over 186,5
recapa said on 3/Oct/21
186-186.5 peak, 184-184.5 nowdays.
186-186.5 peak, 184-184.5 nowdays.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 4/Sep/21
Those angles are awkward. Amitabh at 64 may not have lost much if any height still been about 6ft2 (peak minimum that). He’s still looking 6ft1 today at 77! Brosnan is bending a little bit as well...I would give the edge to Amitabh overall though. Brosnan I doubt had lost anything at that point
Buchanan: 187.5-188cm (peak maybe 188.5cm)
Brosnan: 186.5cm
Those angles are awkward. Amitabh at 64 may not have lost much if any height still been about 6ft2 (peak minimum that). He’s still looking 6ft1 today at 77! Brosnan is bending a little bit as well...I would give the edge to Amitabh overall though. Brosnan I doubt had lost anything at that point
Buchanan: 187.5-188cm (peak maybe 188.5cm)
Brosnan: 186.5cm
ammy said on 3/Sep/21
I meant to say 64
I meant to say 64
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 18/Aug/21
Yeah he looked 6ft1½ range in Remember Me...
Yeah he looked 6ft1½ range in Remember Me...
Ishaan Chetri said on 17/Aug/21
Compard to pattinson Broanan looks like a legit 6ft 1 guy next to him.
Compard to pattinson Broanan looks like a legit 6ft 1 guy next to him.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 30/Jul/21
He's done better than most guys his age. He was still looking a solid 6ft1 5-6 years ago
There are guys in their 70's that have lost less than an inch.
He's done better than most guys his age. He was still looking a solid 6ft1 5-6 years ago
There are guys in their 70's that have lost less than an inch.
David Tang said on 23/Jul/21
rob, do you think brosnan will end up losing lot of height?
Editor Rob
rob, do you think brosnan will end up losing lot of height?
Editor RobI think he has begun losing height...and by the time he's 70 will have lost a bit more. Whether he loses more than you'd expect I don't know, our genetics, lifestyle, diet and exercise regime all play some part in how much we lose.
David Tang said on 3/Jul/21
may be he woke up 6'2, and claimed that. I guess he isn't being dishonest.
may be he woke up 6'2, and claimed that. I guess he isn't being dishonest.
Arch Stanton said on 18/May/21
Haven't seen Pierce in a new photo for well over a year but the least time I saw him he was looking nearer 6 ft. Saw Huey lewis "Stuck With You" video earlier, his wife was gorgeous back in the 80s and 90s. Huey was clearly besotted with her! I would say she looked about 5 ft 8 with Huey, no more. Did his lanky son stop growing after? He was looking 6'5.5 last I looked!
Haven't seen Pierce in a new photo for well over a year but the least time I saw him he was looking nearer 6 ft. Saw Huey lewis "Stuck With You" video earlier, his wife was gorgeous back in the 80s and 90s. Huey was clearly besotted with her! I would say she looked about 5 ft 8 with Huey, no more. Did his lanky son stop growing after? He was looking 6'5.5 last I looked!
viper said on 17/May/21
Ferrell is 6-2-6-2.5
Ferrell is 6-2-6-2.5
Joey Diaz said on 16/May/21
You have this pretty spot on. 6’1 prime and 6’0 now.
You have this pretty spot on. 6’1 prime and 6’0 now.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 16/May/21
5ft11 is a joke
5ft11 is a joke
RAZA KHAN said on 13/May/21
I disagree because will Ferrell is supposedly 191 cm or 6'3" and next to him pierce Brosnan looks 5'11" to 6'0 max and both are wearing dress shoes!
I disagree because will Ferrell is supposedly 191 cm or 6'3" and next to him pierce Brosnan looks 5'11" to 6'0 max and both are wearing dress shoes!
viper said on 8/May/21
If he was really 6-1 then he has somehow shrunk a ton.
He barely looked 6-0 on stage with Will Ferrell
If he was really 6-1 then he has somehow shrunk a ton.
He barely looked 6-0 on stage with Will Ferrell
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 6/May/21
Slim 6'1.5 said on 5/May/21
The full 6’2 is pushing it but 187cm is a goer
He could look it at times but then he was also edged by guys in the Bond movies who really were 6ft2 like Joe Don Baker, Gottfried John and even Michael Madsen (then probably still at peak)...so yeah a bit below that is likelier but not a flat 6ft1 either. For me not under a strong 186cm/not over strong 187cm. Brosnan, Butler and Day-Lewis I think are guys that all fall into that grey area between 6ft1-2
Slim 6'1.5 said on 5/May/21
The full 6’2 is pushing it but 187cm is a goer
He could look it at times but then he was also edged by guys in the Bond movies who really were 6ft2 like Joe Don Baker, Gottfried John and even Michael Madsen (then probably still at peak)...so yeah a bit below that is likelier but not a flat 6ft1 either. For me not under a strong 186cm/not over strong 187cm. Brosnan, Butler and Day-Lewis I think are guys that all fall into that grey area between 6ft1-2
Slim 6'1.5 said on 5/May/21
186.0 is also a great guess for this guy
186.0 is also a great guess for this guy
Slim 6'1.5 said on 5/May/21
The full 6’2 is pushing it but 187cm is a goer
The full 6’2 is pushing it but 187cm is a goer
Sushmit said on 1/May/21
At peak I think he was around 186 cm at most.....in James Bond films he looked like 183-185 cm.... don't know why many ar arguing he was 187-188 cm....he never looked that tall and his proportions doesn't match either....Big Rob's listing is perfect
At peak I think he was around 186 cm at most.....in James Bond films he looked like 183-185 cm.... don't know why many ar arguing he was 187-188 cm....he never looked that tall and his proportions doesn't match either....Big Rob's listing is perfect
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 9/Mar/21
6ft1 flat peak is too low
6ft1 flat peak is too low
James B 171.5 said on 8/Mar/21
I don’t see 6’1.5 for pierce more like 6’1
I don’t see 6’1.5 for pierce more like 6’1
Chaos Control 6'2.5 said on 7/Mar/21
He gives off 6’1.5 vibes
He gives off 6’1.5 vibes
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 1/Mar/21
Murray has always looked a solid 6ft2 guy, that 187.5cm figure came out of left field
Pretty sure he started here at 6ft3!
Murray has always looked a solid 6ft2 guy, that 187.5cm figure came out of left field
Pretty sure he started here at 6ft3!
slim 6'1 said on 18/Feb/21
I think Andy Murray would give him the edge
6’1.5-6’1.75”
I think Andy Murray would give him the edge
6’1.5-6’1.75”
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 16/Feb/21
Anywhere 186.5-187.5cm I think is debatable
Anywhere 186.5-187.5cm I think is debatable
slim 6'1 said on 12/Feb/21
Agree with rampage on this one
Brosnan peak was closer to 6’2 than 6’1
Agree with rampage on this one
Brosnan peak was closer to 6’2 than 6’1
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 8/Feb/21
Disagree berta, I think he looked a legit 187cm guy in the 80’s-90’s. 186.5cm is the shortest I can see peak. At 67 it is common to lose close to an inch. 185cm peak is too low, but 188cm is pushing it aswell. Only time he saw that was in the morning. Out of bed could have brushed near 189cm.
Just my opinion. Today he can look 184cm
Disagree berta, I think he looked a legit 187cm guy in the 80’s-90’s. 186.5cm is the shortest I can see peak. At 67 it is common to lose close to an inch. 185cm peak is too low, but 188cm is pushing it aswell. Only time he saw that was in the morning. Out of bed could have brushed near 189cm.
Just my opinion. Today he can look 184cm
berta said on 6/Feb/21
he looks to short today to have ever been 187. i think 186 is best listing. he could look 185-186,5 peak. 186 is best listing. probably woke up at 188.
he looks to short today to have ever been 187. i think 186 is best listing. he could look 185-186,5 peak. 186 is best listing. probably woke up at 188.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 4/Feb/21
Slim, I think in the past Carrey has looked solid 187cm range and occasionally managed to pulled off 188cm. But then other times has looked more 186cm. I suppose he’s fine where he is currently and we should exclude him from the list...Will Smith who didn’t include I think is in the same boat. I feel overall 6ft1½ is fair for Brosnan...like Jim and Will could look either side of that...Caine I think it’s been argued for years was maybe a little shy of the 6ft2 mark.
Slim, I think in the past Carrey has looked solid 187cm range and occasionally managed to pulled off 188cm. But then other times has looked more 186cm. I suppose he’s fine where he is currently and we should exclude him from the list...Will Smith who didn’t include I think is in the same boat. I feel overall 6ft1½ is fair for Brosnan...like Jim and Will could look either side of that...Caine I think it’s been argued for years was maybe a little shy of the 6ft2 mark.
slim 6'1 said on 3/Feb/21
Rampage pretty good estimates, except I’d give Matthew fox the full 6’2” , mark gatiss 186 and Jim Carey was most likely 186 over 187 at peak
And definitely give cr7 a solid 186cm
Rampage pretty good estimates, except I’d give Matthew fox the full 6’2” , mark gatiss 186 and Jim Carey was most likely 186 over 187 at peak
And definitely give cr7 a solid 186cm
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 2/Feb/21
Ok then...
Mark Gatiss - 6ft1⅛
Kevin Costner - 6ft1⅛
Quentin Tarantino - 6ft1⅛
Christiano Ronaldo - 6ft1⅛
Bill Murray - 6ft1¼
Josh Holloway - 6ft1¼
Bill Pullman - 6ft1¼
Brendan Gleeson - 6ft1¼
Gerard Butler - 6ft1⅜
LL Cool J - 6ft1⅜
Daniel Day Lewis - 6ft1⅜
Roger Moore - 6ft1⅜
Pierce Brosnan - 6ft1½
Garrett Hedlund - 6ft1½
Jim Caviezel - 6ft1½
Mark Strong - 6ft1⅝
Chris Noth - 6ft1⅝
Jeff Bridges - 6ft1⅝
Jim Carrey - 6ft1⅝
David Letterman - 6ft1⅝
Jeremy Irons - 6ft1¾
James Earl Jones - 6ft1¾
Michael Caine - 6ft1¾
Matthew Fox - 6ft1⅞
Clive Owen - 6ft1⅞
Timothy Dalton - 6ft1⅞
Paul Walker - 6ft1⅞
Rob, how arguable are these?
Ok then...
Mark Gatiss - 6ft1⅛
Kevin Costner - 6ft1⅛
Quentin Tarantino - 6ft1⅛
Christiano Ronaldo - 6ft1⅛
Bill Murray - 6ft1¼
Josh Holloway - 6ft1¼
Bill Pullman - 6ft1¼
Brendan Gleeson - 6ft1¼
Gerard Butler - 6ft1⅜
LL Cool J - 6ft1⅜
Daniel Day Lewis - 6ft1⅜
Roger Moore - 6ft1⅜
Pierce Brosnan - 6ft1½
Garrett Hedlund - 6ft1½
Jim Caviezel - 6ft1½
Mark Strong - 6ft1⅝
Chris Noth - 6ft1⅝
Jeff Bridges - 6ft1⅝
Jim Carrey - 6ft1⅝
David Letterman - 6ft1⅝
Jeremy Irons - 6ft1¾
James Earl Jones - 6ft1¾
Michael Caine - 6ft1¾
Matthew Fox - 6ft1⅞
Clive Owen - 6ft1⅞
Timothy Dalton - 6ft1⅞
Paul Walker - 6ft1⅞
Rob, how arguable are these?
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 30/Jan/21
Joe Don Baker edged both Brosnan and Dalton so no less than 6ft2 for him, probably a bit over. To be honest. Only time Brosnan and Dalton have been shown together was at the Goldeneye premiere. I'd probably overall give the edge to Tim but by no more than half an inch. He had a reasonably good chance of 6ft2
Click Here weird angles
Joe Don Baker edged both Brosnan and Dalton so no less than 6ft2 for him, probably a bit over. To be honest. Only time Brosnan and Dalton have been shown together was at the Goldeneye premiere. I'd probably overall give the edge to Tim but by no more than half an inch. He had a reasonably good chance of 6ft2
Click Here weird angles
The5'11Dude said on 30/Jan/21
Overall I'd say 6'1-6'.25 in his peak, he looked that height in his 4 Bond films.
Overall I'd say 6'1-6'.25 in his peak, he looked that height in his 4 Bond films.
slim 6'1 said on 29/Jan/21
@ Arch Stanton, very precise I think we can all agree brosnan is underlisted a quarter to half of an inch
@ Arch Stanton, very precise I think we can all agree brosnan is underlisted a quarter to half of an inch
Rory said on 29/Jan/21
I think 6ft1.25 or 6ft1.5 max peak. Remember in the 90s he wasnt significantly taller than Jonathan Pryce and was clearly shorter than Don Baker. A solid 187 makes him the same as Dalton which i dont think he was, i think he was a bit shorter than Dalton. Weak 6ft2 range for Dalton and strong 6ft1 range for Brosnsn makes sense.
I think 6ft1.25 or 6ft1.5 max peak. Remember in the 90s he wasnt significantly taller than Jonathan Pryce and was clearly shorter than Don Baker. A solid 187 makes him the same as Dalton which i dont think he was, i think he was a bit shorter than Dalton. Weak 6ft2 range for Dalton and strong 6ft1 range for Brosnsn makes sense.
Arch Stanton said on 29/Jan/21
186.8 is precise Rampage!! Sure he would have measured it at one point in the day.
186.8 is precise Rampage!! Sure he would have measured it at one point in the day.
slim 6'1 said on 28/Jan/21
Today he’s a strong 184 but back in the day easy 187cm
Today he’s a strong 184 but back in the day easy 187cm
slim 6'1 said on 27/Jan/21
Nearer 6’2” than 6’1” at peak for sure
Nearer 6’2” than 6’1” at peak for sure
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 26/Jan/21
I'd maybe place Brosnan's peak at a high 186cm (like 186.8cm or something) - that's exactly 6ft1½
I'd maybe place Brosnan's peak at a high 186cm (like 186.8cm or something) - that's exactly 6ft1½
slim 6'1 said on 21/Jan/21
Rampage, correct
Pierce shouldn’t be listed anything under 6’1.5”
Rampage, correct
Pierce shouldn’t be listed anything under 6’1.5”
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 11/Jan/21
slim 6'1, 6ft2 at 9:00am is possible...
slim 6'1, 6ft2 at 9:00am is possible...
slim 6'1 said on 8/Jan/21
To reach 6’2” on a good day he must’ve been 187cm or close to it...
To reach 6’2” on a good day he must’ve been 187cm or close to it...
slim 6'1 said on 1/Jan/21
Rampage I’ll go with ur guess being better than mine 👍
Rampage I’ll go with ur guess being better than mine 👍
Slim 6'1" said on 31/Dec/20
Yeah rampage somewhere between 187cm range for peak and
184.5/185 for today
Yeah rampage somewhere between 187cm range for peak and
184.5/185 for today
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 26/Dec/20
Really going for 187.5cm peak Slim? Interesting choice...
In something like Remington Steele, Taffin or Mister Johnson he could look that but I'm not so sure it's a mark he'd have held afternoon/evening. Of course we're talking less than a centimeter but just generally someone like Jeff Bridges, Tom Hiddleston, Chris Noth, Clive Owen or Mahershala Ali come more to mind when I think of almost 6ft2...but you can't dismiss it, I haven't really looked at most of his pre-Bond stuff as it's pretty forgettable. He did edge both Colin Firth and Gerard Butler in two separate movies though when he was in his 50's.
Really going for 187.5cm peak Slim? Interesting choice...
In something like Remington Steele, Taffin or Mister Johnson he could look that but I'm not so sure it's a mark he'd have held afternoon/evening. Of course we're talking less than a centimeter but just generally someone like Jeff Bridges, Tom Hiddleston, Chris Noth, Clive Owen or Mahershala Ali come more to mind when I think of almost 6ft2...but you can't dismiss it, I haven't really looked at most of his pre-Bond stuff as it's pretty forgettable. He did edge both Colin Firth and Gerard Butler in two separate movies though when he was in his 50's.
Slim 6'1" said on 25/Dec/20
187-187.5 peak
184.5/185 current
187-187.5 peak
184.5/185 current
Slim 6'1" said on 20/Dec/20
Rampage, u should post in the general page, u seem very interesting 🤔
Rampage, u should post in the general page, u seem very interesting 🤔
Slim 6'1" said on 20/Dec/20
I live in Melbourne, any other aussies on this forum?
I live in Melbourne, any other aussies on this forum?
Slim 6'1" said on 20/Dec/20
I’m with you rampage
I’m with you rampage
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 18/Dec/20
Slim, peak absolutely
Slim, peak absolutely
Slim 6'1" said on 18/Dec/20
Is 187cm possible?
Is 187cm possible?
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 16/Nov/20
Remington/007 era Brosnan and Saint/007 era Moore would be about even peak
Remington/007 era Brosnan and Saint/007 era Moore would be about even peak
Canson said on 3/Nov/20
He actually looks a lot like Moore in many scenes
He actually looks a lot like Moore in many scenes
recapa said on 2/Nov/20
186-187cm peak,184-185cm now.how tall does paris look here rob .he looks like he can be the full 6ft2 Click Here or maybe around his father peak height.
Editor Rob
186-187cm peak,184-185cm now.how tall does paris look here rob .he looks like he can be the full 6ft2 Click Here or maybe around his father peak height.
Editor Robyeah 187cm range there
Brendon() said on 2/Nov/20
I worked at a luxury golf resort in CA and my coworker who was about 5'9 said Pierce Brosnan was a guest there and the first thing he thought when he saw him was "wow he's really tall" My guess is 6'1 without shoes, probably 6'2.5-6'3 with dress shoe
I worked at a luxury golf resort in CA and my coworker who was about 5'9 said Pierce Brosnan was a guest there and the first thing he thought when he saw him was "wow he's really tall" My guess is 6'1 without shoes, probably 6'2.5-6'3 with dress shoe
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 28/Oct/20
He can look 184cm at times now but then other times can still pull off 185cm with ease.
I think the current listing is fine and peak was almost 187cm
He can look 184cm at times now but then other times can still pull off 185cm with ease.
I think the current listing is fine and peak was almost 187cm
Slim 6'1" said on 25/Oct/20
187 peak
184 today
187 peak
184 today
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 23/Sep/20
Rory, overall I’d still give a 60’s-70’s Caine the edge over 80’s Brosnan but I think they weren’t too far dissimilar. Caine and Roger Moore could look similar aswell
Rory, overall I’d still give a 60’s-70’s Caine the edge over 80’s Brosnan but I think they weren’t too far dissimilar. Caine and Roger Moore could look similar aswell
Rory said on 20/Sep/20
Not seen the movie but in that picture it looks as if Brosnan has better posture, more footwear and is nearer to the camera, a triple advantage. So it's not surprising he looks taller. There's certainly zero chance he was taller than a peak Caine.
The most you could ever argue for Brosnan is 6ft1.5 whereas 6ft1.5 is the lowest you could ever argue for Caine.I think personally Brosnan 6ft1.25 and Caine 6ft1.75.
Not seen the movie but in that picture it looks as if Brosnan has better posture, more footwear and is nearer to the camera, a triple advantage. So it's not surprising he looks taller. There's certainly zero chance he was taller than a peak Caine.
The most you could ever argue for Brosnan is 6ft1.5 whereas 6ft1.5 is the lowest you could ever argue for Caine.I think personally Brosnan 6ft1.25 and Caine 6ft1.75.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 18/Sep/20
Fourth Protocol, in the movie they look about the same...and I highly doubt Caine had lost anything significant by then at 50
Fourth Protocol, in the movie they look about the same...and I highly doubt Caine had lost anything significant by then at 50
Hong said on 15/Sep/20
Click Here Here's a young Brosnan with 6ft2 listed Michael caine,Interesting Brosnan looks taller.
Click Here Here's a young Brosnan with 6ft2 listed Michael caine,Interesting Brosnan looks taller.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 25/Aug/20
Barely shorter than 6ft3 guys like Patrick Bergin in Taffin and Daragh O’Malley in The Long Good Friday (swimming pool scene - his first appearance onscreen). So I think 6ft1 flat as a peak is too low.
Barely shorter than 6ft3 guys like Patrick Bergin in Taffin and Daragh O’Malley in The Long Good Friday (swimming pool scene - his first appearance onscreen). So I think 6ft1 flat as a peak is too low.
Sinclair said on 24/Aug/20
Rob, who would you say was taller, a Saint era Roger Moore or a Remington Steele era Pierce Brosnan?
Editor Rob
Rob, who would you say was taller, a Saint era Roger Moore or a Remington Steele era Pierce Brosnan?
Editor RobI find them hard to pick apart really, it could be a toss up.
Sinclair said on 9/Aug/20
Pierce Brosnan edges out 6’1” listed Robbie Coltrane in The World Is Not Enough. Therefore, unless Brosnan was wearing lifts in that film, he would have been at least a solid 6’1”. 6’2” listed James Read gave a taller impression than Brosnan did in Remington Steele. The difference between their heights was probably close to an inch. I agree with the 6’1.25” listing for Brosnan, it seems very logical.
Rampage, Brosnan may have edged out Roger Moore when both men were at their peak heights, it is not out of the question. In any case, it would have been a close call. Both men exercised brilliant posture, but I thought Brosnan’s posture was slightly superior to Moore’s. I feel Brosnan was probably taller than Moore if we go by their heights when they played James Bond. Moore was not much over 6’1” by the time of Live and Let Die. I know Brosnan eventually overtook Moore in height.
Pierce Brosnan edges out 6’1” listed Robbie Coltrane in The World Is Not Enough. Therefore, unless Brosnan was wearing lifts in that film, he would have been at least a solid 6’1”. 6’2” listed James Read gave a taller impression than Brosnan did in Remington Steele. The difference between their heights was probably close to an inch. I agree with the 6’1.25” listing for Brosnan, it seems very logical.
Rampage, Brosnan may have edged out Roger Moore when both men were at their peak heights, it is not out of the question. In any case, it would have been a close call. Both men exercised brilliant posture, but I thought Brosnan’s posture was slightly superior to Moore’s. I feel Brosnan was probably taller than Moore if we go by their heights when they played James Bond. Moore was not much over 6’1” by the time of Live and Let Die. I know Brosnan eventually overtook Moore in height.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 9/Aug/20
That being said I’d add a fraction to his peak and leave his current height alone
That being said I’d add a fraction to his peak and leave his current height alone
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 9/Aug/20
Slim 6’1’, i don’t think it’s fair
Slim 6’1’, i don’t think it’s fair
Slim 6'1" said on 8/Aug/20
lost 2cm at least now hes an old man
lost 2cm at least now hes an old man
Slim 6'1" said on 8/Aug/20
quarter inch upgrade would be fulfilling
quarter inch upgrade would be fulfilling
Black Fish 123 said on 6/Aug/20
He's looking more 6'0 1/2 now.
He's looking more 6'0 1/2 now.
Hulk.23 said on 5/Aug/20
I think he was for sure 6’1.25/186cm at peak. Today I think he’s still in the 6’1 range, maybe a solid 185cm man I think he has lost just a small fraction
I think he was for sure 6’1.25/186cm at peak. Today I think he’s still in the 6’1 range, maybe a solid 185cm man I think he has lost just a small fraction
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 29/Jul/20
Berta, I think it’s possible Ferrell at 53 hasn’t lost really anything and was always around 190cm. On the other hand Pierce at 67 is at an age where guys lose an inch but not so much in his case!
I think 186.5-187cm peak, 185cm today
Berta, I think it’s possible Ferrell at 53 hasn’t lost really anything and was always around 190cm. On the other hand Pierce at 67 is at an age where guys lose an inch but not so much in his case!
I think 186.5-187cm peak, 185cm today
berta said on 25/Jul/20
hm if well ferrell is 190 cm then pierce is 185 today but if will is the 189 current that he is listed now then maybe pierce is down to 184 today. i see 5 cm beetween them. its hard to believe pierce could have been 187 when he looks that mutch shorter than will today i cant see pierce have lost more than max 2 cm, he have great posture.
hm if well ferrell is 190 cm then pierce is 185 today but if will is the 189 current that he is listed now then maybe pierce is down to 184 today. i see 5 cm beetween them. its hard to believe pierce could have been 187 when he looks that mutch shorter than will today i cant see pierce have lost more than max 2 cm, he have great posture.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 10/Jul/20
You’re right Viper, he was 6ft1½
:)
You’re right Viper, he was 6ft1½
:)
viper said on 26/Jun/20
Pierce looks 6-0 at most next to Will
He was never 6-1
Pierce looks 6-0 at most next to Will
He was never 6-1
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 26/Jun/20
He looks a weak 6ft1 w/h Ferrell but 20 years ago on SNL looked less than 2in shorter and Will was likely 6ft3 then
He looks a weak 6ft1 w/h Ferrell but 20 years ago on SNL looked less than 2in shorter and Will was likely 6ft3 then
Vsquad said on 25/Jun/20
Wow just saw Pierce next to Will Ferrell. Not sure he looked as strong as 6'0.75 next to him, definitely 2 full inches between them
Wow just saw Pierce next to Will Ferrell. Not sure he looked as strong as 6'0.75 next to him, definitely 2 full inches between them
James roy said on 22/Jun/20
He looked a solid 2 inches next to Owen Wilson in No Escape
He looked a solid 2 inches next to Owen Wilson in No Escape
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 18/Jun/20
There’s another interview Ross did with Brosnsn years before for Goldeneye where Pierce was taller
There’s another interview Ross did with Brosnsn years before for Goldeneye where Pierce was taller
berta said on 16/Jun/20
how was jonathan ross maybe 2 cm taller than him over 10 years back when both still was at peak. and ross is listed at 185 ? i think both those guys was 186 and ross maybe had shoe advantage.
how was jonathan ross maybe 2 cm taller than him over 10 years back when both still was at peak. and ross is listed at 185 ? i think both those guys was 186 and ross maybe had shoe advantage.
Jam Cherry said on 6/Jun/20
I would say peak is 186.5 cm and currently 185 cm on a good day
I would say peak is 186.5 cm and currently 185 cm on a good day
houss said on 17/May/20
Hi rob , how tall do you think is the guy next to pierce , he's a Syrian actor
Click Here
Editor Rob
Hi rob , how tall do you think is the guy next to pierce , he's a Syrian actor
Click Here
Editor RobCould be between 5ft 10 and 11
Miss Sandy Cowell said on 16/May/20
🎁🎂🎈🎉 Happy Birthday Pierce 🎉🎈🎂🎁
Many Happy Returns of the Day to Pierce Brosnan, who celebrates his 67th Birthday today!
6ft1.25 peak and 6ft0.75 today. He's maintained his height very well.
🎁🎂🎈🎉🎁🎂🎈🎉🎁🎂🎈🎉🎁🎂🎈🎉
🎁🎂🎈🎉 Happy Birthday Pierce 🎉🎈🎂🎁
Many Happy Returns of the Day to Pierce Brosnan, who celebrates his 67th Birthday today!
6ft1.25 peak and 6ft0.75 today. He's maintained his height very well.
🎁🎂🎈🎉🎁🎂🎈🎉🎁🎂🎈🎉🎁🎂🎈🎉
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 9/May/20
Rob, how tall do you think his stand-in is?
Click Here
I think he might actually be 6ft2. Looks a bit taller than Pierce!
Editor Rob
Rob, how tall do you think his stand-in is?
Click Here
I think he might actually be 6ft2. Looks a bit taller than Pierce!
Editor RobThe lookalike could be 6ft 2
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 28/Apr/20
there was barely anything between him and Read...
there was barely anything between him and Read...
Tecno said on 24/Apr/20
First episode of Remington Steele, next to James Read (6.2) he's clearly shorter by a big margin, possibly 2 inches.
First episode of Remington Steele, next to James Read (6.2) he's clearly shorter by a big margin, possibly 2 inches.
Rich137 said on 23/Apr/20
After watching the movie Foreigner 2017. I would say he looks 6ft. But his co-star Rory Fleck Byrne looks taller than him. Yet he only claims 5.11ft. Unless heels are used for him of course?
After watching the movie Foreigner 2017. I would say he looks 6ft. But his co-star Rory Fleck Byrne looks taller than him. Yet he only claims 5.11ft. Unless heels are used for him of course?
QM6'1QM said on 13/Apr/20
Maybe real 6'1 at his peak and 183.5 cm/ 6'0.25" today for sure. Should be honest!
Maybe real 6'1 at his peak and 183.5 cm/ 6'0.25" today for sure. Should be honest!
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 10/Apr/20
Berta, I think in the 80’s-90’s (I.e. Remington Steele, Taffin, Lawnmower Man etc.) he could pull look 188cm. But then in something like Thomas Crown Affair looked more 185cm.
6ft1½ could be on the money peak. That’s actually 186.7cm
Berta, I think in the 80’s-90’s (I.e. Remington Steele, Taffin, Lawnmower Man etc.) he could pull look 188cm. But then in something like Thomas Crown Affair looked more 185cm.
6ft1½ could be on the money peak. That’s actually 186.7cm
berta said on 9/Apr/20
guys we all know he never was 187-188 thats just extreme, but 186-187 isnt imposiblle he looked 186,5 range alot when he was skinny. But at the same time he could llok 6´1 flat alot to i think the listing is good and can see argument for a tinnt fraction over thart
guys we all know he never was 187-188 thats just extreme, but 186-187 isnt imposiblle he looked 186,5 range alot when he was skinny. But at the same time he could llok 6´1 flat alot to i think the listing is good and can see argument for a tinnt fraction over thart
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 4/Apr/20
Vitocheng, wouldn’t rule that out entirely. Has looked a weak 6ft2 in the past
Vitocheng, wouldn’t rule that out entirely. Has looked a weak 6ft2 in the past
VitoCheng said on 22/Mar/20
Current:185cm
Peak:187~188cm
Current:185cm
Peak:187~188cm
Jkiller said on 12/Mar/20
Peak 186cm, nowadays 185cm (6'1).
Peak 186cm, nowadays 185cm (6'1).
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 15/Jan/20
No I think Brosnan was taller than Ross...
No I think Brosnan was taller than Ross...
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 10/Jan/20
Dylan really needs to up his game style wise...hit the gym and cut that ridiculous hair. .Paris takes more after his dad
Dylan really needs to up his game style wise...hit the gym and cut that ridiculous hair. .Paris takes more after his dad
James B 172c, said on 9/Jan/20
Rob shorter than Jonathan Ross?
Click Here
Editor Rob
Rob shorter than Jonathan Ross?
Click Here
Editor RobHe did look it when Ross stood tall, like 184 range, today I think the last few years he's been struggling to look above 184 from what I've seen. You can see with His Son, it's a fair difference, albeit he doesn't have as big a head as a 6ft 5 man might normally have.
Arch Stanton said on 8/Jan/20
Paris looks more like you'd expect a son of his to look like, Dylan didn't get that polished look.
Paris looks more like you'd expect a son of his to look like, Dylan didn't get that polished look.
viper said on 5/Jan/20
If Will Ferrell was 6-3 this would still be too high of a listing.
In all honesty Ferrell looked to have 2.5-3 inches on him.
If Will Ferrell was 6-3 this would still be too high of a listing.
In all honesty Ferrell looked to have 2.5-3 inches on him.
viper said on 5/Jan/20
Saw him at the Golden Globes on stage with Will Ferrell.
This is way too much even If you believe Ferrell's 6-2.5 listing.
Absolutely no taller than 6-0.
Saw him at the Golden Globes on stage with Will Ferrell.
This is way too much even If you believe Ferrell's 6-2.5 listing.
Absolutely no taller than 6-0.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 16/Nov/19
No I definitely see at least 4in between them. Brosnan could still be about 6ft1 today. The son looks a good 6ft5
No I definitely see at least 4in between them. Brosnan could still be about 6ft1 today. The son looks a good 6ft5
Chris Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 13/Nov/19
Click Here If Pierce is 6'0 3/4 now then Dylan is 6'4 1/4 max. Click Here 1/4 more footwear than Dylan makes a 3.25" height difference here.
Click Here If Pierce is 6'0 3/4 now then Dylan is 6'4 1/4 max. Click Here 1/4 more footwear than Dylan makes a 3.25" height difference here.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 19/Oct/19
Yeah Rob, I think Paris could close to 6ft2. He’s looks a bit taller than his dad in other photos
Yeah Rob, I think Paris could close to 6ft2. He’s looks a bit taller than his dad in other photos
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 17/Oct/19
Well Christian, you can tell that to Rob because it’s HIS idea, not mine...besides I don’t see what’s so offensive about it. If it was skin colour, religion or sexual orientation then yes there’d be a problem
Anyway let’s not steer the discussion away...I still stand by 6ft1½ peak for the Broz
Editor Rob
Well Christian, you can tell that to Rob because it’s HIS idea, not mine...besides I don’t see what’s so offensive about it. If it was skin colour, religion or sexual orientation then yes there’d be a problem
Anyway let’s not steer the discussion away...I still stand by 6ft1½ peak for the Broz
Editor RobIf the pages never got viewed or provided value, then it would be a bad idea from my view. There's lots of good options a site might implement, but many are too resource intensive (and thus raise costs) or time-intensive.
Anyway here is Pierce and Paris brosnan, I wonder if paris is now into 6ft 1-2 range!
Anyway here is Pierce and Paris brosnan, I wonder if paris is now into 6ft 1-2 range!
K.A 188 ! said on 11/Oct/19
@CHRISTIAN
I agree
@CHRISTIAN
I agree
Christian 6'5 3/8" said on 7/Oct/19
@Rampage
Categorizing actors and other celebs here by nationality isn't a good idea anyway IMO.
@Rampage
Categorizing actors and other celebs here by nationality isn't a good idea anyway IMO.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 6/Oct/19
Rob, how come Pierce isn’t listed under “Irish Actors”?
Editor Rob
Rob, how come Pierce isn’t listed under “Irish Actors”?
Editor RobI probably assumed he was already there, but I shall rectify it and it raises the irish actor's average a little bit.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 26/Sep/19
Importer, it's fair to say that he was. He made it to 60 without any noticeable loss...in fact I think today he's no more than 2cm from his peak height (which I still think was closer to 187cm). He can still look 6ft1 now.
Importer, it's fair to say that he was. He made it to 60 without any noticeable loss...in fact I think today he's no more than 2cm from his peak height (which I still think was closer to 187cm). He can still look 6ft1 now.
Importer said on 22/Sep/19
On screen Pierce Brosnan seem to get towered by John Cleese. Yet offscreen pics with him looked taller. Was he peak height in his bond films ?
On screen Pierce Brosnan seem to get towered by John Cleese. Yet offscreen pics with him looked taller. Was he peak height in his bond films ?
Importer said on 21/Aug/19
@Juniour Hernandez 1990 That’s the shortest I seen his son look in a photo. This is the tallest I see him look
Click Here
Click Here
@Juniour Hernandez 1990 That’s the shortest I seen his son look in a photo. This is the tallest I see him look
Click Here
Click Here
Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 5/Jun/19
Click Here Dylan's height have over estimated to be 6'5 and here next to his dad (closer to camera) they look 2.25" difference.
Click Here Dylan's height have over estimated to be 6'5 and here next to his dad (closer to camera) they look 2.25" difference.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 27/May/19
I just around to Taffin and he’s barely shorter than Patrick Bergin (solid 6ft3) and towers over Allison Doody (5ft8-9). Also about 2in on Jeff Fahey in Lawnmower Man. Really I think anywhere from 6ft1¼-6ft1¾ is debatable for his peak and nowadays might still hit 6ft1 on a good day, definitely not lower than the current height
I just around to Taffin and he’s barely shorter than Patrick Bergin (solid 6ft3) and towers over Allison Doody (5ft8-9). Also about 2in on Jeff Fahey in Lawnmower Man. Really I think anywhere from 6ft1¼-6ft1¾ is debatable for his peak and nowadays might still hit 6ft1 on a good day, definitely not lower than the current height
Miss Sandy Cowell said on 16/May/19
🎁🕵️🎂 Happy Birthday Pierce! 🎂🕵️🎁
Have a great 66th Birthday today, Pierce!
My favourite of this guy's films are 'Lawnmower Man' and 'The Long Good Friday'. Both movies show Pierce at his peak height.
6ft1.5 optimum and 6ft0.75 nowadays.
🎁🕵️🎂 Happy Birthday Pierce! 🎂🕵️🎁
Have a great 66th Birthday today, Pierce!
My favourite of this guy's films are 'Lawnmower Man' and 'The Long Good Friday'. Both movies show Pierce at his peak height.
6ft1.5 optimum and 6ft0.75 nowadays.
Truth Seeker said on 26/Apr/19
I shook his hand backstage at a premiere in 1997, and he was changing from one pair of dress shoes into dress boots, and was barely 5’10” in his stocking feet.
I shook his hand backstage at a premiere in 1997, and he was changing from one pair of dress shoes into dress boots, and was barely 5’10” in his stocking feet.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 23/Apr/19
Rob, I think what you were saying in 05’ is still on point today
Rob, I think what you were saying in 05’ is still on point today
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 17/Apr/19
Nah, “tall, dark and handsome” was the trademark. Anywhere from 6ft1 to 6ft3 is ideal. Before Craig, they all ticked that box. He’s meant to be taller than most but still able to blend in and obviously be put in siuations where he’s outsized and has to use brains rather than brawn. If a 6ft4-5 guy played Bond it would start to look ridiculous. For instance Liam Neeson would have been an awful Bond. But at the same time he’s meant to have a certain presence physically...that’s why Connery was brilliant.
Nah, “tall, dark and handsome” was the trademark. Anywhere from 6ft1 to 6ft3 is ideal. Before Craig, they all ticked that box. He’s meant to be taller than most but still able to blend in and obviously be put in siuations where he’s outsized and has to use brains rather than brawn. If a 6ft4-5 guy played Bond it would start to look ridiculous. For instance Liam Neeson would have been an awful Bond. But at the same time he’s meant to have a certain presence physically...that’s why Connery was brilliant.
Johan 185 cm said on 13/Apr/19
Rick said on 3/Jan/18
For a character like Bond average height would make far more sense than above average. Bond isn't supposed to be a physical brute, he's a spy. His specialty is blending in, his combat ability is primarily in firearms and even when he does fight hand to hand he relies on skill rather than strength. I think the original character in the novels is trained in Judo.
I'm pretty sure in the novels he was described as average in looks and stature too. An ordinary man caught up in extraordinary situations.
Bond was described as 6 foot in the books and the average male height in the 50's was 5'8". So Bond was the equivalent of a 6'1" -6'2" guy today. Nothing to do with average at all. Master tactician/hand to hand specialist what you smoking man? Bond is a male power fantasy haha.
Alot of the actors were 6'1" or near 6'2" who played him in film, Daniel craig was certainly the shortest and with modern height standards a guy who is indeed plain average.
Rick said on 3/Jan/18
For a character like Bond average height would make far more sense than above average. Bond isn't supposed to be a physical brute, he's a spy. His specialty is blending in, his combat ability is primarily in firearms and even when he does fight hand to hand he relies on skill rather than strength. I think the original character in the novels is trained in Judo.
I'm pretty sure in the novels he was described as average in looks and stature too. An ordinary man caught up in extraordinary situations.
Bond was described as 6 foot in the books and the average male height in the 50's was 5'8". So Bond was the equivalent of a 6'1" -6'2" guy today. Nothing to do with average at all. Master tactician/hand to hand specialist what you smoking man? Bond is a male power fantasy haha.
Alot of the actors were 6'1" or near 6'2" who played him in film, Daniel craig was certainly the shortest and with modern height standards a guy who is indeed plain average.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 7/Apr/19
Peak: 188.6cm/186.7cm
Today: 187cm/185.1cm
Peak: 188.6cm/186.7cm
Today: 187cm/185.1cm
billionaireslayer said on 23/Mar/19
Weak 6'1 peak
Weak 6'1 peak
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 2/Jan/19
He’s not as low as 6ft today
He’s not as low as 6ft today
Michael 5'10", 178 cm said on 31/Dec/18
He looked 6'1" in the Bond movies and about 6'0" in the Foreigner with Jackie Chan. 6'1" sounds right for Pierce, he apparently reached his full height at 11 years old, he's barely 6 foot today.
He looked 6'1" in the Bond movies and about 6'0" in the Foreigner with Jackie Chan. 6'1" sounds right for Pierce, he apparently reached his full height at 11 years old, he's barely 6 foot today.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 7/Dec/18
Peter O’Toole was gawky
Peter O’Toole was gawky
Sandy Cowell said on 19/Nov/18
@ Arch Stanton:
Re: Sean Connery - I couldn't agree more! There is NOTHING WHATSOEVER gawky about Sean Connery; not now, not then, not ever! 😊👍
@ Arch Stanton:
Re: Sean Connery - I couldn't agree more! There is NOTHING WHATSOEVER gawky about Sean Connery; not now, not then, not ever! 😊👍
Rising - 174 cm said on 19/Nov/18
Pierce was barely taller than a 68 year old Roger Moore so I doubt he was more than Rob lists him. I mean if he was listed 6'1" early then it's doubtful he was much, if any, taller.
Pierce was barely taller than a 68 year old Roger Moore so I doubt he was more than Rob lists him. I mean if he was listed 6'1" early then it's doubtful he was much, if any, taller.
Arch Stanton said on 18/Nov/18
Connery gawky Lol??? Not even slightly. Nicholas Lyndhurst or Jarvis Cocker maybe.
Connery gawky Lol??? Not even slightly. Nicholas Lyndhurst or Jarvis Cocker maybe.
Arch Stanton said on 18/Nov/18
Stallone is 72 now though but I know what you mean!
Stallone is 72 now though but I know what you mean!
TheBat said on 15/Nov/18
@Spencer
I agree with you Spencer, Pierce currently looks 6'1" as of now.
@Spencer
I agree with you Spencer, Pierce currently looks 6'1" as of now.
Spencer said on 11/Nov/18
6'1.75" peak
6'1" today
6'1.75" peak
6'1" today
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 6/Nov/18
Berta alternatively just give him 186.7cm. That's exactly 6ft1½ and he looked it consistently in the 80's-90's, that or a weak 6ft2. I don't think a 30 year old Brosnan was any shorter than a peak Colin Firth, if anything he had the edge
I'd tweak his current height to 6ft0⅞(185.1cm), not convinced he's just 184cm.
Berta alternatively just give him 186.7cm. That's exactly 6ft1½ and he looked it consistently in the 80's-90's, that or a weak 6ft2. I don't think a 30 year old Brosnan was any shorter than a peak Colin Firth, if anything he had the edge
I'd tweak his current height to 6ft0⅞(185.1cm), not convinced he's just 184cm.
berta said on 3/Nov/18
sometimes today he can look only 184. i dont know if its just posture. But he always have good posture to it cant be it. Sometimes i think 186,5 range is possible for peak but i at the same time dont believe he have lost more than 1-1,5 cm in height max. 186 peak and 184,5 today is good estimate
sometimes today he can look only 184. i dont know if its just posture. But he always have good posture to it cant be it. Sometimes i think 186,5 range is possible for peak but i at the same time dont believe he have lost more than 1-1,5 cm in height max. 186 peak and 184,5 today is good estimate
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 9/Sep/18
Out of bed: 188.6cm
Before bed: 186.7cm
Out of bed: 188.6cm
Before bed: 186.7cm
MAD SAM said on 13/Aug/18
Has anyone seen his pics with Roger Federer ? I don’t understand he just looks 5’10” in those ?
Has anyone seen his pics with Roger Federer ? I don’t understand he just looks 5’10” in those ?
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 2/Aug/18
I think it's fair to say that Brosnan may lost a tiny bit more than Firth because he's 8 years older. I agree with Berta that he could still measure around 185cm. I can't see him at just 184cm though.
Brosnan: 6ft1½ peak, 6ft0⅞ today
Firth: 6ft1⅜ peak, 6ft1 today
Didn't really think there was much between them in Mamma Mia 2, certainly not 1in anyway
Editor Rob
I think it's fair to say that Brosnan may lost a tiny bit more than Firth because he's 8 years older. I agree with Berta that he could still measure around 185cm. I can't see him at just 184cm though.
Brosnan: 6ft1½ peak, 6ft0⅞ today
Firth: 6ft1⅜ peak, 6ft1 today
Didn't really think there was much between them in Mamma Mia 2, certainly not 1in anyway
Editor RobI was walking by daniel naprous table the other day at film con and saw he had a photo beside Pierce - he must have been a henchman for a scene, but I can't remember which Bond...would be interesting to see how Daniel looked with Pierce if there is indeed a scene.
CDS said on 1/Aug/18
@rampage: In the 1st mamma mia 10 yrs ago, I could've sworn Colin edged out pierce then too, it just didn't seem by as much? I was surprised honestly, especially since I didn't actually think firth was that tall. So that confirms firth to be the 6'1" he claims?
@rampage: In the 1st mamma mia 10 yrs ago, I could've sworn Colin edged out pierce then too, it just didn't seem by as much? I was surprised honestly, especially since I didn't actually think firth was that tall. So that confirms firth to be the 6'1" he claims?
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 1/Aug/18
10 years ago Brosnan edged out Firth
10 years ago Brosnan edged out Firth
CDS said on 30/Jul/18
Just seen mamma Mia here we go again. And was surprised to see now that Colin firth consistently edged out pierce throughout the entire film by a good inch. I think pierce in his prime was a solid 6'1" (6'2" in shoes). So if Colin in 6'1" as he's listed here, is it possible pierce has dropped to a flat 6' these days? 6'2" skellan skarsgard also looked noticeably taller than pierce the entire film..
Editor Rob
Just seen mamma Mia here we go again. And was surprised to see now that Colin firth consistently edged out pierce throughout the entire film by a good inch. I think pierce in his prime was a solid 6'1" (6'2" in shoes). So if Colin in 6'1" as he's listed here, is it possible pierce has dropped to a flat 6' these days? 6'2" skellan skarsgard also looked noticeably taller than pierce the entire film..
Editor RobBrosnan is in the last few years looking under 6ft 1 at times, he may well be 6ft 0.5-0.75 range now.
Some guys can reach 60's with minimal loss. But once you hit the 'Sly zone', that 65-70 range, that is when many men will begin to lose more noticeable height.
Some guys can reach 60's with minimal loss. But once you hit the 'Sly zone', that 65-70 range, that is when many men will begin to lose more noticeable height.
berta said on 28/Jul/18
i i think brosnan was one of the few 6 foot 1 3/8 at peak. today maybe 185 cm flat. He can sometimes look 184 today. but i believe he is over that when measured
i i think brosnan was one of the few 6 foot 1 3/8 at peak. today maybe 185 cm flat. He can sometimes look 184 today. but i believe he is over that when measured
Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 9/Jul/18
Look more like 6'0 1/2 to 6'0 5/8 with his 6'5 son Dylan Brosnan.
Look more like 6'0 1/2 to 6'0 5/8 with his 6'5 son Dylan Brosnan.
James B 171.5cm said on 21/Jun/18
In the bond films really didnt look that tall.
Maybe because he has such a big head makes him look shorter?
In the bond films really didnt look that tall.
Maybe because he has such a big head makes him look shorter?
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 11/Jun/18
I think peak was at least the same as Firth (186.4cm)
I think peak was at least the same as Firth (186.4cm)
diavolo said on 29/Apr/18
Terry: Right. Ian Fleming initially disliked the casting of Connery as Bond in Dr. No, because he thought he's too tall and too dark for the role. Later, when he saw Connery's portrayal, he changed his mind and grew to like his Bond persona despite the apparent difference between the literary and the film character's physical appearance. After Connery's success, the filmmakers opted to cast actors of similar height and appearance until Daniel Craig came along and they kinda returned to the original character in the novels.
Terry: Right. Ian Fleming initially disliked the casting of Connery as Bond in Dr. No, because he thought he's too tall and too dark for the role. Later, when he saw Connery's portrayal, he changed his mind and grew to like his Bond persona despite the apparent difference between the literary and the film character's physical appearance. After Connery's success, the filmmakers opted to cast actors of similar height and appearance until Daniel Craig came along and they kinda returned to the original character in the novels.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 7/Apr/18
Both guys generally looked 186-187cm zone in their primes but I personally would give Brosnan the edge
Both guys generally looked 186-187cm zone in their primes but I personally would give Brosnan the edge
Rory said on 7/Apr/18
I think in the 90s Brosnan looked 2cms taller than Moore, so Brosnan 186cm and a 67 year old Moore 184cm. At his peak though in the 1960s Moore would have been indistinguishable from Brosnan
I think in the 90s Brosnan looked 2cms taller than Moore, so Brosnan 186cm and a 67 year old Moore 184cm. At his peak though in the 1960s Moore would have been indistinguishable from Brosnan
QM6'1QM said on 4/Apr/18
I think, he's completely honest with the statement "6'2 on a good day". Definitely he was not above this in the morning (at his peak). Peak height: 6'1.25"/ 186 cm.
Height nowadays: 6'0.5-.75"/ 184 cm range.
I think, he's completely honest with the statement "6'2 on a good day". Definitely he was not above this in the morning (at his peak). Peak height: 6'1.25"/ 186 cm.
Height nowadays: 6'0.5-.75"/ 184 cm range.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 3/Apr/18
Rob, is it possible you temporarily had Pierce at 6ft2 back in 05'?
Certainly seems he was once down here at 6ft1½ looking at the archives
Editor Rob
Rob, is it possible you temporarily had Pierce at 6ft2 back in 05'?
Certainly seems he was once down here at 6ft1½ looking at the archives
Editor RobHe was at 6ft 1.5 for a while, but I believe he was first given 6ft 1 flat at least in late 2004.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 3/Apr/18
I reckon Moore was still at least 6ft range in the 90's so Brosnan does look to be 6ft1½ in comparison
I reckon Moore was still at least 6ft range in the 90's so Brosnan does look to be 6ft1½ in comparison
Erik9012 said on 31/Mar/18
Pierce and Roger looked close in height. This picture is from 1995 when Goldeneye was premiered. Pierce has a slight advantage so I'd guess he was about 1/4 inch less of 6ft2.
Click Here
Pierce and Roger looked close in height. This picture is from 1995 when Goldeneye was premiered. Pierce has a slight advantage so I'd guess he was about 1/4 inch less of 6ft2.
Click Here
Terry said on 26/Mar/18
The real James Bond types are short!so to all the people commenting on here saying Daniel Craig is too short to be Bond are just uneducated. Back to Pierce Brosnan's height then, yes he is tall, about 187cm.
The real James Bond types are short!so to all the people commenting on here saying Daniel Craig is too short to be Bond are just uneducated. Back to Pierce Brosnan's height then, yes he is tall, about 187cm.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 13/Feb/18
His son is actually 6ft5, possibly even a bit more
His son is actually 6ft5, possibly even a bit more
jonas said on 10/Feb/18
His son is listed 6"4 but looks 4.5 inches taller
His son is listed 6"4 but looks 4.5 inches taller
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 31/Jan/18
Of course, we shouldn't just hand them out blindly
Of course, we shouldn't just hand them out blindly
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 30/Jan/18
Rob, how about tweaking this to 6ft1⅜?
That's if you're still unsure of giving him 6ft1½
Editor Rob
Rob, how about tweaking this to 6ft1⅜?
That's if you're still unsure of giving him 6ft1½
Editor RobI need to be careful with the 1/8ths. I won't rule it out though.
Psychedelic Earth 187 said on 16/Jan/18
Probably has dipped to 184cm by 2018. But 187cm is arguable in prime.
Probably has dipped to 184cm by 2018. But 187cm is arguable in prime.
James B said on 4/Jan/18
Rick- that could be why they chose Daniel Craig as bond.
Average in looks and height
Rick- that could be why they chose Daniel Craig as bond.
Average in looks and height
Z186 said on 4/Jan/18
Also, we don't need to debate the ideal height for Bond actor... As the writer actually decided his measurements so we don't have to .... In the novel From Russia With Love he clearly describes Bond as 183cm and 76kg (whether that is in shoes or not, I don't know, so I suppose the least he could be is 5'11 / 75 kg.... and he is described as having a swimmers physique, though not in the same novel if I remember correctly.
I'm not sure if @Rob knows but I think average height might have gone up by half an inch in 50 years, so you could factor that in if you wanted to be picky, but according to Northwestern University anthropologist William Leonard “We’ve pretty well maxed out in terms of stature” for humans
Editor Rob
Also, we don't need to debate the ideal height for Bond actor... As the writer actually decided his measurements so we don't have to .... In the novel From Russia With Love he clearly describes Bond as 183cm and 76kg (whether that is in shoes or not, I don't know, so I suppose the least he could be is 5'11 / 75 kg.... and he is described as having a swimmers physique, though not in the same novel if I remember correctly.
I'm not sure if @Rob knows but I think average height might have gone up by half an inch in 50 years, so you could factor that in if you wanted to be picky, but according to Northwestern University anthropologist William Leonard “We’ve pretty well maxed out in terms of stature” for humans
Editor Rob 6ft when that novel was written is certainly like a solid 6ft 1 range man today in the UK.
Z186 said on 4/Jan/18
@Ramage seems different to most who would downgrade celebs - he wants them to be taller than they actually are!
IMO Pierce would have written 6'2 in the directory is he was that or just below (187)... just seems strange that actors seem to grow an inch or two miraculously after becoming famous.
No way was Connery 188 without shoes, he is never really a head taller than many of his female co-stars- and domino (in thunderbolt) who might be five-ten in heels, is nearly as tall as him!
Women tend to tell the truth about their height more than men (because they aren't bothered) so it's often better to compare men with with known female celebs.
@Ramage seems different to most who would downgrade celebs - he wants them to be taller than they actually are!
IMO Pierce would have written 6'2 in the directory is he was that or just below (187)... just seems strange that actors seem to grow an inch or two miraculously after becoming famous.
No way was Connery 188 without shoes, he is never really a head taller than many of his female co-stars- and domino (in thunderbolt) who might be five-ten in heels, is nearly as tall as him!
Women tend to tell the truth about their height more than men (because they aren't bothered) so it's often better to compare men with with known female celebs.
Rick said on 3/Jan/18
For a character like Bond average height would make far more sense than above average. Bond isn't supposed to be a physical brute, he's a spy. His specialty is blending in, his combat ability is primarily in firearms and even when he does fight hand to hand he relies on skill rather than strength. I think the original character in the novels is trained in Judo.
I'm pretty sure in the novels he was described as average in looks and stature too. An ordinary man caught up in extraordinary situations.
For a character like Bond average height would make far more sense than above average. Bond isn't supposed to be a physical brute, he's a spy. His specialty is blending in, his combat ability is primarily in firearms and even when he does fight hand to hand he relies on skill rather than strength. I think the original character in the novels is trained in Judo.
I'm pretty sure in the novels he was described as average in looks and stature too. An ordinary man caught up in extraordinary situations.
Rick said on 3/Jan/18
Peak would have been not too far off 6'2.
Current I would say a flat 6'1.
Peak would have been not too far off 6'2.
Current I would say a flat 6'1.
Christian-6'5 3/8 said on 3/Jan/18
@Rampage
Any height for 007 is fine as long as the actor's above average in height. I wouldn't call 6'0" too short for any action role.
@Rampage
Any height for 007 is fine as long as the actor's above average in height. I wouldn't call 6'0" too short for any action role.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 1/Jan/18
6ft3 is fine but not over. Connery at a strong 6ft2 did not look gawky at all. He looked the most masculine. I think 6ft is to low for 007.
185cm-190cm perfect range...now let's get back to Pierces height
6ft3 is fine but not over. Connery at a strong 6ft2 did not look gawky at all. He looked the most masculine. I think 6ft is to low for 007.
185cm-190cm perfect range...now let's get back to Pierces height
avi said on 30/Dec/17
I think the perfect Bond height is 6'1.
6'3 (legit 6'3) is too tall.
Connery at 6'2 was even looking a bit gawky at times.
I'd even go as far as agreeing with grizz that a strong 5'11 guy who is trim can pull it off.
Daniel Craig must be 5'10 flat. His build is too muscular too. Not sure what was going through their head the day he was cast as Bond.
I think the perfect Bond height is 6'1.
6'3 (legit 6'3) is too tall.
Connery at 6'2 was even looking a bit gawky at times.
I'd even go as far as agreeing with grizz that a strong 5'11 guy who is trim can pull it off.
Daniel Craig must be 5'10 flat. His build is too muscular too. Not sure what was going through their head the day he was cast as Bond.
grizz said on 27/Dec/17
I agree with Rory- 5'11-6'3 is the perfect range for playing Bond. Over 6'3 and you're entering the henchman territory,as someone mentioned (it's a common practice in the movies that the good guy is always shorter or weaker than the bad guy, some David and Goliath metaphor,I guess).
And yes, Fleming's Bond is described as a 6footer,but bear in mind that the book was written in the 50s when UK's national average was 0.5-1in shorter than today. So,IMO, 6'0.5-6'1 is the perfect height to play Bond nowadays.
Cavill is bang-on perfect for that role, even 10 years after his 1st audition. He even doesn't have to get shredded for the role, Craig's muscular physique worked out perfectly for Bond's box office performance
I agree with Rory- 5'11-6'3 is the perfect range for playing Bond. Over 6'3 and you're entering the henchman territory,as someone mentioned (it's a common practice in the movies that the good guy is always shorter or weaker than the bad guy, some David and Goliath metaphor,I guess).
And yes, Fleming's Bond is described as a 6footer,but bear in mind that the book was written in the 50s when UK's national average was 0.5-1in shorter than today. So,IMO, 6'0.5-6'1 is the perfect height to play Bond nowadays.
Cavill is bang-on perfect for that role, even 10 years after his 1st audition. He even doesn't have to get shredded for the role, Craig's muscular physique worked out perfectly for Bond's box office performance
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 26/Dec/17
No he claimed 6ft2 on a good day which to me implies 6ft1½ range peak and looking at Bond, pre-Bond it's plausible. Even in Remember Me just 7 years ago he looked a good inch taller than Robert Pattinson.
He's still close to 6ft1 today
No he claimed 6ft2 on a good day which to me implies 6ft1½ range peak and looking at Bond, pre-Bond it's plausible. Even in Remember Me just 7 years ago he looked a good inch taller than Robert Pattinson.
He's still close to 6ft1 today
The Shredder said on 25/Dec/17
He was always just 6'1 and even claimed , 6'0.5 now is correct but no lower.
He was always just 6'1 and even claimed , 6'0.5 now is correct but no lower.
Kevin said on 25/Dec/17
6'0.5 at best nowadays. 6'1.25 peak
btw Bond in Fleming's novels is said to be 183cm, so 6'0 is really be the ideal height for Bond not 6'1-6'3 like many people think.
6'0.5 at best nowadays. 6'1.25 peak
btw Bond in Fleming's novels is said to be 183cm, so 6'0 is really be the ideal height for Bond not 6'1-6'3 like many people think.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 24/Dec/17
I strongly disagree Rob. I think at worst a fraction under 6ft1 today
I strongly disagree Rob. I think at worst a fraction under 6ft1 today
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 24/Dec/17
I think Pierce still looks around 6ft1 today
I think Pierce still looks around 6ft1 today
Animus said on 24/Dec/17
Rob, what do you think his current height is? He looks to me like he is in the six-foot range. His arms look disproportionately long, which could indicate he has lost a lot of height.
Editor Rob
Rob, what do you think his current height is? He looks to me like he is in the six-foot range. His arms look disproportionately long, which could indicate he has lost a lot of height.
Editor Rob he could be 6ft 0.5 at most now, he is starting to look like he has lost more than just a small fraction, but it's natural.
For many men, that 60-65 range is where the body begins to suffer a little with disc changes/shrinkage.
For many men, that 60-65 range is where the body begins to suffer a little with disc changes/shrinkage.
Allie said on 23/Dec/17
Rob how do you think is his son, Dylan now? Surely he can't be just 6'4 like google claims.
Editor Rob
Rob how do you think is his son, Dylan now? Surely he can't be just 6'4 like google claims.
Editor Rob it's what is on his model agency, but then maybe he is worth a page now he has hit age 20...he does tower above Pierce, but then Pierce isn't really looking 6ft 1 range these days.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 20/Dec/17
Psychedelic, I think 6ft1-2 is the most ideal 007 height but up to 6ft3 is acceptable aswell. A guy Joe Mangeniello's size would look ridiculous in the role though...he'd start to look like a henchman
Psychedelic, I think 6ft1-2 is the most ideal 007 height but up to 6ft3 is acceptable aswell. A guy Joe Mangeniello's size would look ridiculous in the role though...he'd start to look like a henchman
Psychedelic Earth 187 said on 18/Dec/17
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 17/Dec/17
I think 6ft1 to 6ft3 is the ideal height for 007
***************
I’d like more 6’1”-6’2”. 6’3” is pushing it.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 17/Dec/17
I think 6ft1 to 6ft3 is the ideal height for 007
***************
I’d like more 6’1”-6’2”. 6’3” is pushing it.
jason said on 18/Dec/17
Dear Rob before I ask my question I want to tell you that I'm a big fan of yours.and I'm new at this site. rob this question may be off topic but only an height expert like you can ans this.my question is that a person only looks tall at a height of 6 feet 1.agreed by the majoroty .and when ever I see legit tall person and I ask him his height the claim is mostly 6 feet 1, and mostly everybody now days lie about their height.thus do you think the people who we think are genuinely tall are and I'm only talking about 6 feet 1 men.are one inch shorter then their real height making them 6 feet in reality . and thus making the traditional 6 feet mark tall or maybe it was always tall because all of the 6 feet people claiming 6 feet 1 and all the 5 10 and 511 claiming 6 feet and making that mark short thus do you think all the 6 foot people are genuinely tall and claim 6 feet 1 because of the 5 feet 11 men rob plz ans this question I need your opinion. And by the way I think rob has Pierce height bang on .
Dear Rob before I ask my question I want to tell you that I'm a big fan of yours.and I'm new at this site. rob this question may be off topic but only an height expert like you can ans this.my question is that a person only looks tall at a height of 6 feet 1.agreed by the majoroty .and when ever I see legit tall person and I ask him his height the claim is mostly 6 feet 1, and mostly everybody now days lie about their height.thus do you think the people who we think are genuinely tall are and I'm only talking about 6 feet 1 men.are one inch shorter then their real height making them 6 feet in reality . and thus making the traditional 6 feet mark tall or maybe it was always tall because all of the 6 feet people claiming 6 feet 1 and all the 5 10 and 511 claiming 6 feet and making that mark short thus do you think all the 6 foot people are genuinely tall and claim 6 feet 1 because of the 5 feet 11 men rob plz ans this question I need your opinion. And by the way I think rob has Pierce height bang on .
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 17/Dec/17
I think 6ft1 to 6ft3 is the ideal height for 007
I think 6ft1 to 6ft3 is the ideal height for 007
Rory said on 16/Dec/17
Bond I think should really be minimum 5ft11 and maximum 6ft3 and age wise no younger than 35 and no older than 50. In that sense Brosnan and Dalton were the perfect age and heights as Bond.
Bond I think should really be minimum 5ft11 and maximum 6ft3 and age wise no younger than 35 and no older than 50. In that sense Brosnan and Dalton were the perfect age and heights as Bond.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 13/Dec/17
I'm not a Craig fan...I'm sorry. I'm a traditionalist and Brosnan brought the most authenticity to the role after Connery. Dalton and Moore were on the extreme ends...one too serious the other too comical
I'm not a Craig fan...I'm sorry. I'm a traditionalist and Brosnan brought the most authenticity to the role after Connery. Dalton and Moore were on the extreme ends...one too serious the other too comical
James B said on 13/Dec/17
Him being blonde didn't effect the box office either
Him being blonde didn't effect the box office either
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 12/Dec/17
In shoes he should be near 6ft3
In shoes he should be near 6ft3
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 12/Dec/17
I can believe 6ft2 in the morning
I can believe 6ft2 in the morning
James B said on 11/Dec/17
Rob i have seen all the bond films with Roger Moore recently and I must say pierce brosnan pales in comparison too Moore as 007.
Connery and Moore were the best as bond but Daniel craig and Pierce are tedious.
Editor Rob
Rob i have seen all the bond films with Roger Moore recently and I must say pierce brosnan pales in comparison too Moore as 007.
Connery and Moore were the best as bond but Daniel craig and Pierce are tedious.
Editor Rob I think having slightly different Bond's was good for the longevity. And it was also great that they put a 5ft 10ish guy in the role. Had zero effect on the box-office.
Grit said on 9/Dec/17
6'1.5 peak maybe 6'1" now
6'1.5 peak maybe 6'1" now
TheManWithNoName said on 8/Dec/17
Rob, do you think the 6'2" claim is with shoes on?
Editor Rob
Rob, do you think the 6'2" claim is with shoes on?
Editor Rob early morning type claim I think.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 6/Dec/17
Tom King because he was clearly standing closer to the camera...
Tom King because he was clearly standing closer to the camera...
Tom King said on 4/Dec/17
I have seen Roger Federer more times and i`m 6 ft.1.5 and i was a this 0.5 in taller. I also have seen later the photos with Roger and Pierce standing on grass, not the best ground. But i think Roger is about 0.5 in taller then Pierce, and Roger is a 6ft 1in, so Pierce must be 6ft maybe out of bed in his youth a bit more, but never more than 6ft 0.25in.
I have seen Roger Federer more times and i`m 6 ft.1.5 and i was a this 0.5 in taller. I also have seen later the photos with Roger and Pierce standing on grass, not the best ground. But i think Roger is about 0.5 in taller then Pierce, and Roger is a 6ft 1in, so Pierce must be 6ft maybe out of bed in his youth a bit more, but never more than 6ft 0.25in.
John said on 2/Dec/17
Peak 6' (183 cm) with the help of his hair.
Today around 5'10 and a half (179 cm).
Peak 6' (183 cm) with the help of his hair.
Today around 5'10 and a half (179 cm).
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 29/Nov/17
Before, then so is Firth
Before, then so is Firth
Bego said on 26/Nov/17
Today about 6ft.
Today about 6ft.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 26/Nov/17
James, look at him w/h Robbie Coltrane (probably still 6ft1 then). Easily 1in taller
James, look at him w/h Robbie Coltrane (probably still 6ft1 then). Easily 1in taller
James B said on 22/Nov/17
Watching world is not enough right now and seriously 6'2 seems impossible too believe in that particular film.
Unless of course they hired a tall cast?
Watching world is not enough right now and seriously 6'2 seems impossible too believe in that particular film.
Unless of course they hired a tall cast?
Starlo said on 16/Nov/17
6'1.5 minimum prime. Definitely always gave me a 6'2 impression.
6'1.5 minimum prime. Definitely always gave me a 6'2 impression.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 8/Nov/17
Out of bed: 188.7cm
Before bed: 186.8cm
Out of bed: 188.7cm
Before bed: 186.8cm
Scoobydoo said on 4/Nov/17
Between 186-187 was his peak, not more.
Now maybe 184/185 cm barefoot.
Between 186-187 was his peak, not more.
Now maybe 184/185 cm barefoot.
Original said on 28/Oct/17
185.5/186 peak, current 184.
185.5/186 peak, current 184.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 28/Oct/17
I reckon he's about the same as Firth even though the latter is slouching
Click Here
I reckon he's about the same as Firth even though the latter is slouching
Click Here
JJAK said on 27/Oct/17
Listing seems accurate looked over 6 1 in 80s maybe very early 90s.
By his bond days had already started shrinking, he looked tiny in the horrible 3rd.
He often looks a weak to strong 6 foot now but he is getting up there.
Listing seems accurate looked over 6 1 in 80s maybe very early 90s.
By his bond days had already started shrinking, he looked tiny in the horrible 3rd.
He often looks a weak to strong 6 foot now but he is getting up there.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 25/Oct/17
Remember 6ft1½ is usually rounded up to 187cm (it's really 186.7cm) so it's not a huge leap to give him it. That and still roughly 6ft1 today, not convinced he's 184cm range.
Remember 6ft1½ is usually rounded up to 187cm (it's really 186.7cm) so it's not a huge leap to give him it. That and still roughly 6ft1 today, not convinced he's 184cm range.
berta said on 19/Oct/17
186,5 peak and 185,5 current
186,5 peak and 185,5 current
Lucy said on 15/Oct/17
Rob how tall would you say Pierce Brosnan wife Keeley Shaye Smith is she is listed at 5"8 by she looks taller!
Editor Rob
Rob how tall would you say Pierce Brosnan wife Keeley Shaye Smith is she is listed at 5"8 by she looks taller!
Editor Rob between 5ft 7-8 is possible, but she might actually have lost half inch or so with weight gains.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 13/Oct/17
6ft2 on a good day to me implies a solid 6ft1½ which I think he pulled off maybe a bit more often than Roger...
6ft2 on a good day to me implies a solid 6ft1½ which I think he pulled off maybe a bit more often than Roger...
Mister lennon said on 13/Oct/17
Strong 6'1 peak. Could look 6'2 too.
Strong 6'1 peak. Could look 6'2 too.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 11/Oct/17
Rob, is 6ft1½ peak still arguable for Pierce?
Editor Rob
Rob, is 6ft1½ peak still arguable for Pierce?
Editor Rob that's the most I think I'd probably argue for him.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 10/Oct/17
Could look a weak 6ft2 guy when he was younger
Could look a weak 6ft2 guy when he was younger
Anonymous said on 7/Oct/17
I think he is exactly exactly 6'1 nowdays, maybe nearly of the 6'2 mark when he was young.
Nice blue eyes this man
I think he is exactly exactly 6'1 nowdays, maybe nearly of the 6'2 mark when he was young.
Nice blue eyes this man
coco said on 3/Oct/17
Johan said on 20/Jul/17
Click Here
I agree, 6' tops there with 6'4" Liam Neeson :)
-------------
I bet you never saw a 6'4 guy then, because 6 foot near a 6'4 is towered, in the link you provide, brosnan is not much shorter, around 6cm.
Johan said on 20/Jul/17
Click Here
I agree, 6' tops there with 6'4" Liam Neeson :)
-------------
I bet you never saw a 6'4 guy then, because 6 foot near a 6'4 is towered, in the link you provide, brosnan is not much shorter, around 6cm.
Slim said on 1/Oct/17
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 30/Sep/17
Agreed, Slim..
******
Thanks. 😉 👍🏻
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 30/Sep/17
Agreed, Slim..
******
Thanks. 😉 👍🏻
Rory said on 1/Oct/17
I suppose it's possible guys like Dalton and Brosnan might have rounded down in an attempt to avoid being typecast, they may have been trying to avoid going down an action hero type career so were trying to play their height down. Having said that you can't rule out the chance that actually were just 6ft1 range. I think tbf to Brosnan in some of those 90s pictures with Dalton and Moore he might have been stood on uneven ground.
I suppose it's possible guys like Dalton and Brosnan might have rounded down in an attempt to avoid being typecast, they may have been trying to avoid going down an action hero type career so were trying to play their height down. Having said that you can't rule out the chance that actually were just 6ft1 range. I think tbf to Brosnan in some of those 90s pictures with Dalton and Moore he might have been stood on uneven ground.
Rory said on 30/Sep/17
Yh those pictures from the 90s of Dalton,Moore and Brosnan are quite bizarre. Moore you'd have expected to have lost maybe 0.75 inch by then so he naturally would have looked around 184cm but Dalton looks 6ft2 and strangest of all Brosnan looks 6foot there, no more.
Editor Rob
Yh those pictures from the 90s of Dalton,Moore and Brosnan are quite bizarre. Moore you'd have expected to have lost maybe 0.75 inch by then so he naturally would have looked around 184cm but Dalton looks 6ft2 and strangest of all Brosnan looks 6foot there, no more.
Editor Rob well ultimately both Dalton and Pierce were happy to put out 6ft 1 flat to casting agents in the 80's, Pierce came out with his 6ft 2 on a good day, much like Roger Moore's out of bed 6ft 2, although Moore actually put 6ft 2 in the casting directory.
I suspect Connery once had a 6ft 3 listing associated with him, but I'm not 100% certain as I haven't found it.
I suspect Connery once had a 6ft 3 listing associated with him, but I'm not 100% certain as I haven't found it.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 30/Sep/17
Agreed, Slim...
Agreed, Slim...
Slim said on 28/Sep/17
Needs a quarter inch upgrade for both peak and current.
Needs a quarter inch upgrade for both peak and current.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 25/Sep/17
Interesting Brett, similar to Jackman?
I still think he looks 6ft1 today and was taller peak
Interesting Brett, similar to Jackman?
I still think he looks 6ft1 today and was taller peak
Anonymous said on 25/Sep/17
I think he is still a strong 6'1 / 185 cm.
I think he is still a strong 6'1 / 185 cm.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 21/Sep/17
@Original: wrong on both...
@Original: wrong on both...
Original said on 19/Sep/17
Peak at 6'1, now about 6'0.25".
Peak at 6'1, now about 6'0.25".
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 18/Sep/17
Peak: 186.8cm
Today: 185.2cm
Peak: 186.8cm
Today: 185.2cm
Axal559 said on 12/Sep/17
Back in his prime (GoldenEye, James Bond days) no doubt 6'1". In GoldenEye he only looked near an inch taller if that than Famke Janssen. Definitely 6ft range now. My father met him 5 years ago in Hawaii. My old man is a weak 6ft and Pierce had about a quarter of an inch on him. He has that tall appearance about him as well so I'm not surprised people would think the lad is taller than he is.
Back in his prime (GoldenEye, James Bond days) no doubt 6'1". In GoldenEye he only looked near an inch taller if that than Famke Janssen. Definitely 6ft range now. My father met him 5 years ago in Hawaii. My old man is a weak 6ft and Pierce had about a quarter of an inch on him. He has that tall appearance about him as well so I'm not surprised people would think the lad is taller than he is.
Anon said on 5/Sep/17
Never over 6', if that.
Never over 6', if that.
Ted said on 2/Sep/17
For some reason he never looked tall to me. Years ago, I was surprised to hear he was this height. A solid 6' 2'' is definitely pushing it.
186cm.
For some reason he never looked tall to me. Years ago, I was surprised to hear he was this height. A solid 6' 2'' is definitely pushing it.
186cm.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 10/Aug/17
He looked no shorter than Letterman
He looked no shorter than Letterman
Jug said on 8/Aug/17
His peak was 6'1. David Letterman edged him out a little in 1995. Strong 6'1 but not more. Now looks closer to 6'0.5.
His peak was 6'1. David Letterman edged him out a little in 1995. Strong 6'1 but not more. Now looks closer to 6'0.5.
RichardSpain said on 8/Aug/17
Maybe he was 187/188 cm in the morning is plausible but not nowadays. Today seems a strong 184-185 barefoot.
Brosnan was not more than 187cm but not less than 185cm
Maybe he was 187/188 cm in the morning is plausible but not nowadays. Today seems a strong 184-185 barefoot.
Brosnan was not more than 187cm but not less than 185cm
James said on 7/Aug/17
1.87 is too much in my opinion. Never looked so tall to me.
1.87 is too much in my opinion. Never looked so tall to me.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 6/Aug/17
187cm isn't too much but 188cm might be pushing it though.
187cm isn't too much but 188cm might be pushing it though.
James said on 6/Aug/17
No more than 1.86... and no less. Solid 1.86 at peak. 1.87 is too much honestly.
No more than 1.86... and no less. Solid 1.86 at peak. 1.87 is too much honestly.
Mister lennon said on 1/Aug/17
No less than 6'1 peak.
No less than 6'1 peak.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 28/Jul/17
I think 6ft1½ is more than fair, considering it's actually not 187cm but 186.7cm. Wouldn't be a huge leap for him
I think 6ft1½ is more than fair, considering it's actually not 187cm but 186.7cm. Wouldn't be a huge leap for him
Heights are barefeet estimates, derived from quotations, official websites, agency resumes, in person encounters with actors at conventions and pictures/films.
Other vital statistics like weight or shoe size measurements have been sourced from newspapers, books, resumes or social media.
Celebrity Fan Photos and Agency Pictures of stars are © to their respective owners.