Add a Comment1690 comments
Average Guess (319 Votes)
Peak: 6ft 1.11in (185.7cm)
Current: 6ft 0.48in (184.1cm)
Peak: 6ft 1.11in (185.7cm)
Current: 6ft 0.48in (184.1cm)
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 5/Aug/15
Vince was pretty close to 6ft2 in the 80's.
Vince was pretty close to 6ft2 in the 80's.
Height183 said on 4/Aug/15
@Alex 6'0: I couldn't put it better, I 100% agree!
@Alex 6'0: I couldn't put it better, I 100% agree!
Alex 6'0 said on 3/Aug/15
Vegas, Austin at 6'0.5 I an see during his peak days. Today he's not more than 6'0
Vegas, Austin at 6'0.5 I an see during his peak days. Today he's not more than 6'0
miko said on 31/Jul/15
Vince was 6'1/6'1.25 prime, 5'11.5 range today.
Rock is 6'3 range, if he's lost anything its not even noticeable.
Austin has always looked around 6'0.75/6'1 range, might have lost a fraction.
Vince was 6'1/6'1.25 prime, 5'11.5 range today.
Rock is 6'3 range, if he's lost anything its not even noticeable.
Austin has always looked around 6'0.75/6'1 range, might have lost a fraction.
Vegas said on 29/Jul/15
Danimal says on 1/Jul/15
Vince close to 2" on Austin in the late 90's
____________
austin is leaning to one side thus losing height there...
vince 2 inches taller than austin doesn't make sense given rock had about 2.5 inches on vince in the late 90s and rock didn't have 4-4.5 inches on austin around that time.
i met austin a number of times between 2002 and 2008 (admittedly after his neck fusion surgery which cost him a full year of his career) but he looked around 184cm in person..that would place vince around 185cm in late 90s
Danimal says on 1/Jul/15
Vince close to 2" on Austin in the late 90's
____________
austin is leaning to one side thus losing height there...
vince 2 inches taller than austin doesn't make sense given rock had about 2.5 inches on vince in the late 90s and rock didn't have 4-4.5 inches on austin around that time.
i met austin a number of times between 2002 and 2008 (admittedly after his neck fusion surgery which cost him a full year of his career) but he looked around 184cm in person..that would place vince around 185cm in late 90s
Dmeyer said on 28/Jul/15
6'0.75-1in peak and now 6'0.5-0.75 seems believable from video and pics i saw of him , if he is 6ft flat then seagal is is 6ft2-2.25 not possible
6'0.75-1in peak and now 6'0.5-0.75 seems believable from video and pics i saw of him , if he is 6ft flat then seagal is is 6ft2-2.25 not possible
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 27/Jul/15
Shane McMahon is about 6ft2. Taller than Vince and similar to Triple H
Shane McMahon is about 6ft2. Taller than Vince and similar to Triple H
Height183 said on 25/Jul/15
Rob, What's your take on Shane Mcmahons height?
Click Here
Editor Rob
Rob, What's your take on Shane Mcmahons height?
Click Here
Editor Rob he can look near 6ft 2
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 23/Jul/15
Danimal: He's got big arms. Could work on the other parts. Kevin Nash is pretty jacked for 56 and 6ft9.
Danimal: He's got big arms. Could work on the other parts. Kevin Nash is pretty jacked for 56 and 6ft9.
MrTBlack said on 21/Jul/15
One of the scare honest 6'1"ers.
One of the scare honest 6'1"ers.
Danimal said on 7/Jul/15
Not height related, but Austin's looking buffed/ripped for a 50 year old guy: Click Here
Not height related, but Austin's looking buffed/ripped for a 50 year old guy: Click Here
Danimal said on 1/Jul/15
Austin says on his podcast that he was 6'1" (at 1:27): Click Here
I still say he's rounding up to 6'1"
Austin says on his podcast that he was 6'1" (at 1:27): Click Here
I still say he's rounding up to 6'1"
Height183 said on 30/Jun/15
At his absolute peak he could've been 6'0.5'', he was always the same height as Vince in the 90's. Today he is no taller than 6'0'' Max.
At his absolute peak he could've been 6'0.5'', he was always the same height as Vince in the 90's. Today he is no taller than 6'0'' Max.
Danimal said on 30/Jun/15
He was closer to 6'0" than 6'1".
He was closer to 6'0" than 6'1".
Matthew said on 25/Jun/15
In the 90s he was probably a legit 6'1". Could be between 6'0" and 6'1" today.
In the 90s he was probably a legit 6'1". Could be between 6'0" and 6'1" today.
mId said on 25/Jun/15
Granted I don't follow wrestling anymore, but am I the only one who sees cena as taller than Austin when Austin isn't in his big boots? Clearly Cena is an inch taller here in this video. Click Here 0:45 - 0:57.
Granted I don't follow wrestling anymore, but am I the only one who sees cena as taller than Austin when Austin isn't in his big boots? Clearly Cena is an inch taller here in this video. Click Here 0:45 - 0:57.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 11/May/15
There was less than 1in between Austin and McMahon but the latter may have had a slight edge.
There was less than 1in between Austin and McMahon but the latter may have had a slight edge.
Attitude said on 7/May/15
Shorter by about an inch compared to Vince McMahon in his 50s (circa 1997/1998).
Shorter by about an inch compared to Vince McMahon in his 50s (circa 1997/1998).
Mrverve said on 24/Apr/15
Austin's a legit 6ft 1" guy today, 6ft 2" in his prime. How can you say he's 6ft back in the AE is beyond me
Austin's a legit 6ft 1" guy today, 6ft 2" in his prime. How can you say he's 6ft back in the AE is beyond me
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 22/Apr/15
Austin's a little closer to the camera and The Rock is bending slightly.
Austin's a little closer to the camera and The Rock is bending slightly.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 3/Apr/15
No less than 6ft1
No less than 6ft1
Austin said on 27/Feb/15
On an episode of WWE Warehouse it was stated that the Undertaker's cross was 6 feet wide. Which means Steve Austin must have been 6'0-6'0.5" in this photo.
Click Here
On an episode of WWE Warehouse it was stated that the Undertaker's cross was 6 feet wide. Which means Steve Austin must have been 6'0-6'0.5" in this photo.
Click Here
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 22/Feb/15
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Rob, look at these!
Editor Rob
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Rob, look at these!
Editor Rob I've yet to watch that dvd, but I mentioned before it could be an indication that Seagal has shrunk an inch today.
Austin said on 17/Feb/15
I think he was a legitimate 6'2" in the 80s and early 90s. I think his posture made him look a lot shorter, he had a terrible slouch.
I think he was a legitimate 6'2" in the 80s and early 90s. I think his posture made him look a lot shorter, he had a terrible slouch.
HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 10/Feb/15
Click Here
Yeah, how low could Seagal be today 6´3" ?
Even if, Austin looks not 3 inches shorter
Click Here
Yeah, how low could Seagal be today 6´3" ?
Even if, Austin looks not 3 inches shorter
HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 9/Feb/15
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YmRgoe7TSy0
5min onwards
For all who think Austin is 6´flat - how tall is the Miz there? 5´10.5"?
I say at worst Austin is 6´0.75" and the Miz is 5´11.5"-5´11.75"
Editor Rob
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YmRgoe7TSy0
5min onwards
For all who think Austin is 6´flat - how tall is the Miz there? 5´10.5"?
I say at worst Austin is 6´0.75" and the Miz is 5´11.5"-5´11.75"
Editor Rob if anybody braves to watch Stone Cold in the film Maximum Conviction with Seagal let us know, as it would be interesting to see if Steven was 3 inches taller or if he's shrunk!
Scotty said on 6/Feb/15
He said on one of his recent podcasts he was 6'2 1/2 but after the neck surgery in 2000 he was 6'1 1/2.
He said on one of his recent podcasts he was 6'2 1/2 but after the neck surgery in 2000 he was 6'1 1/2.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 11/Jan/15
In boots
Steve Austin - 6ft3
The Rock - 6ft5
In boots
Steve Austin - 6ft3
The Rock - 6ft5
The Ben said on 27/Dec/14
I think Rob has Austin right here at 6'1
I think Rob has Austin right here at 6'1
Omid said on 27/Dec/14
@Heightcrazyred6f: Austin always wears big boots, you never catch him at least on WWE programming and on his own shows wearing anything other than them and If you go back to the photo I posted earlier, those boots give Austin at least a sweet 1.5 inch....I believe Austin always was 6f maybe a strong one and after his injury I think he could have lost a fraction so today, 6'0 to 5'11.75 is a great possibility in my opinion.
@Heightcrazyred6f: Austin always wears big boots, you never catch him at least on WWE programming and on his own shows wearing anything other than them and If you go back to the photo I posted earlier, those boots give Austin at least a sweet 1.5 inch....I believe Austin always was 6f maybe a strong one and after his injury I think he could have lost a fraction so today, 6'0 to 5'11.75 is a great possibility in my opinion.
Alex 6'0 said on 25/Dec/14
If anything Cena prob would measure 6'0.25 exactly. Strong 6'0 guy
If anything Cena prob would measure 6'0.25 exactly. Strong 6'0 guy
HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 24/Dec/14
Still looks about an inch taller than Cena, Cena is not under 6´0.25".
Austin has often horrible slouch like the Rock
Still looks about an inch taller than Cena, Cena is not under 6´0.25".
Austin has often horrible slouch like the Rock
Danimal said on 14/Dec/14
Height182 says on 14/Dec/14
It's amazing how much Vince has shrunk from those days. He is still fairly tall today though.
Yes, he has shrunk a lot. Was easily over 6'1" at his peak, but just look at poor Roddy Piper. He was at least 6'1" himself at his peak and today, due to having part of his spine removed and hip replacements, he's looking MAX 5'8" today. Wrestling is a brutal game. There are no winners. Only survivors.
Height182 says on 14/Dec/14
It's amazing how much Vince has shrunk from those days. He is still fairly tall today though.
Yes, he has shrunk a lot. Was easily over 6'1" at his peak, but just look at poor Roddy Piper. He was at least 6'1" himself at his peak and today, due to having part of his spine removed and hip replacements, he's looking MAX 5'8" today. Wrestling is a brutal game. There are no winners. Only survivors.
Height182 said on 14/Dec/14
It's amazing how much Vince has shrunk from those days. He is still fairly tall today though.
It's amazing how much Vince has shrunk from those days. He is still fairly tall today though.
Omid said on 12/Dec/14
Yes He can look a weak 6'1 but Austin always wore some "big boots" like these:
Click Here
Unless, Mike Tyson uses heels, Austin has a 0/5 inch advantage over Tyson, You saw him once, the question is does he use heels?
and we don't know what shoes Vince had on, were them like these?
Click Here
but I agree Vince could have been a strong 6'1 in his peak, but above that? I don't know.....
Yes He can look a weak 6'1 but Austin always wore some "big boots" like these:
Click Here
Unless, Mike Tyson uses heels, Austin has a 0/5 inch advantage over Tyson, You saw him once, the question is does he use heels?
and we don't know what shoes Vince had on, were them like these?
Click Here
but I agree Vince could have been a strong 6'1 in his peak, but above that? I don't know.....
Omid said on 11/Dec/14
sorry, I forgot to post the link, its this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L5abDK1j5IE
Editor Rob
sorry, I forgot to post the link, its this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L5abDK1j5IE
Editor Rob I think Vince could clear the 6ft 1 mark in the clip, Austin can look at times a weak 6ft 1 though.
Omid said on 11/Dec/14
Rob, this is the video from Raw in which Mike Tyson (listed 5'10 here), Steve Austin (listed 6'1 here) and Vince Mcmahon (listed 6'1.5 here) and is after Austin's nasty neck injury, aside from that all three guys are in good shape, watching this video do you still think Austin is 3 inches taller than Tyson?
or Vince is 3.5 taller than Tyson?
Rob, this is the video from Raw in which Mike Tyson (listed 5'10 here), Steve Austin (listed 6'1 here) and Vince Mcmahon (listed 6'1.5 here) and is after Austin's nasty neck injury, aside from that all three guys are in good shape, watching this video do you still think Austin is 3 inches taller than Tyson?
or Vince is 3.5 taller than Tyson?
Omid said on 3/Dec/14
He may have been 6'1 (that I'm not sure about) but that nasty neck and spine injury have definitely had a toll on his overall height, so 6 foot or just below 6 foot could be the spot on for Austin provided that he was 6'1, so was he 6'1 barefoot before his incident?
He may have been 6'1 (that I'm not sure about) but that nasty neck and spine injury have definitely had a toll on his overall height, so 6 foot or just below 6 foot could be the spot on for Austin provided that he was 6'1, so was he 6'1 barefoot before his incident?
Tallone said on 12/Nov/14
I did the math on that mugshot, and 10 units looks like 10 cm or about 4 inches, since it covers about half his head. It looks like his 193 cm in that shot, which is 75.98", or just under 6'4". That seems a little tall. I guess he is wearing boots of some sort. They couldn't add more than 2", so I'm thinking at least 6'2" flat-footed. The units to the right of the pic, with the labels hidden from view, are inches. Since the metric units are in increments of 2, 2 cm = 0.79 in, which is consistent with the proportions in the picture. Inches have bold lines every three units, which is consistent with 12 inches in a foot, or quarter foot increments. The shot just happens to be centered more towards the metric side of a dual measurement wall.
I did the math on that mugshot, and 10 units looks like 10 cm or about 4 inches, since it covers about half his head. It looks like his 193 cm in that shot, which is 75.98", or just under 6'4". That seems a little tall. I guess he is wearing boots of some sort. They couldn't add more than 2", so I'm thinking at least 6'2" flat-footed. The units to the right of the pic, with the labels hidden from view, are inches. Since the metric units are in increments of 2, 2 cm = 0.79 in, which is consistent with the proportions in the picture. Inches have bold lines every three units, which is consistent with 12 inches in a foot, or quarter foot increments. The shot just happens to be centered more towards the metric side of a dual measurement wall.
Alex 6'0 said on 7/Nov/14
Some wrestlers get inflated more than others. 5'11 getting billed at 6'4 would be insane. Angle at 5'10 getting billed at 6'2 was crazy but he was only listed 6'2 on WWF.com back then but was always referred to as 6'0 on TV.
Some wrestlers get inflated more than others. 5'11 getting billed at 6'4 would be insane. Angle at 5'10 getting billed at 6'2 was crazy but he was only listed 6'2 on WWF.com back then but was always referred to as 6'0 on TV.
Vegas said on 31/Oct/14
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 29/Oct/14
Nowadays what they're doing is incomprehensible. You'll get 5ft11 guys being put at 6ft4!
___________
its a much in a muchness actually. i don't know any 5'11 guy today getting billed 6'4. kurt angle was getting billed 6'2 back in 2000-02, whereas dave finlay was getting billed 6'2 between 2005-08..both 5'10, remember glen jacobs jumped from being billed at 6'9 in 95 to 7ft in late 97.
i doubt austin was walking around 6'3 in those boots either, they don't even look an inch to me and clearly smaller than takers Click Here
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 29/Oct/14
Nowadays what they're doing is incomprehensible. You'll get 5ft11 guys being put at 6ft4!
___________
its a much in a muchness actually. i don't know any 5'11 guy today getting billed 6'4. kurt angle was getting billed 6'2 back in 2000-02, whereas dave finlay was getting billed 6'2 between 2005-08..both 5'10, remember glen jacobs jumped from being billed at 6'9 in 95 to 7ft in late 97.
i doubt austin was walking around 6'3 in those boots either, they don't even look an inch to me and clearly smaller than takers Click Here
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 29/Oct/14
@Pingu
Yeah those boots. In those days, the billed heights weren't quite as ridiculous as they are now. Any of those guys who were 1-2in below a billed height would in the flesh appear at least their billed heights. Nowadays what they're doing is incomprehensible. You'll get 5ft11 guys being put at 6ft4!
@Pingu
Yeah those boots. In those days, the billed heights weren't quite as ridiculous as they are now. Any of those guys who were 1-2in below a billed height would in the flesh appear at least their billed heights. Nowadays what they're doing is incomprehensible. You'll get 5ft11 guys being put at 6ft4!
Pingu said on 28/Oct/14
To "Rampage(-_-_-)Clover": What kind of boots you specifically mean? The ones they wrestle in?
To "Rampage(-_-_-)Clover": What kind of boots you specifically mean? The ones they wrestle in?
Mathew said on 27/Oct/14
I don't think The Rock had him by a full 2". More like 1.5". But then again, I don't believe The Rock is 6'3".
I don't think The Rock had him by a full 2". More like 1.5". But then again, I don't believe The Rock is 6'3".
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 27/Oct/14
Attitude Era Austin was easily walking around at 6ft3 in boots. The Rock would have been near 6ft5 in his boots and Triple H about 6ft4.
No less than 6ft1 then and now
Attitude Era Austin was easily walking around at 6ft3 in boots. The Rock would have been near 6ft5 in his boots and Triple H about 6ft4.
No less than 6ft1 then and now
Alex 6'0 said on 25/Oct/14
Attitude with a 6'0 Austin those heights make sense pretty much. a 6'2 peak HHH makes Rock no less than 6'2.5 back then. At about 50 Austin had to have lost a bit of height
Attitude with a 6'0 Austin those heights make sense pretty much. a 6'2 peak HHH makes Rock no less than 6'2.5 back then. At about 50 Austin had to have lost a bit of height
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 25/Oct/14
187-188cm in The Longest Yard
187-188cm in The Longest Yard
Attitude said on 25/Oct/14
That does seem right. It would put McMahon at 6'1, HHH at 6'2 and a bit, HBK at 5'10, Bret Hart at a weak 6 feet more like a 5'11.75, and Owen Hart at a weak 5'9.
Though that's by memory of how I picture the others with Austin.
That does seem right. It would put McMahon at 6'1, HHH at 6'2 and a bit, HBK at 5'10, Bret Hart at a weak 6 feet more like a 5'11.75, and Owen Hart at a weak 5'9.
Though that's by memory of how I picture the others with Austin.
Alex 6'0 said on 24/Oct/14
That's a low angle camera shot and will make the difference look a bit more. From most faceoffs between Rock and Austin back then Rock looked a good 2 inches taller but they billed them 3 inches apart.
That's a low angle camera shot and will make the difference look a bit more. From most faceoffs between Rock and Austin back then Rock looked a good 2 inches taller but they billed them 3 inches apart.
Height182 said on 24/Oct/14
@Pingu: Very good picture. Just shows Austin was never ever 6'1''. That was the best hell in a cell match too in my opinion.
@Pingu: Very good picture. Just shows Austin was never ever 6'1''. That was the best hell in a cell match too in my opinion.
Kourosh said on 23/Oct/14
6'0 no more
6'0 no more
Pingu said on 22/Oct/14
So I was watching WWE highlight videos at Youtube and came across this one match where Rock and Austin come face to face. "6 man hell in a cell" match from Armageddon 2000.
Here's picture of it: Click Here
Rock seems to be leaning forward, if he stood straight, looks to be about 3 inch difference? Both seem to have very similar footwear. If Rock was 6'3 in 2000 during his wrestling days, this would put Austin around 6ft back then.
So I was watching WWE highlight videos at Youtube and came across this one match where Rock and Austin come face to face. "6 man hell in a cell" match from Armageddon 2000.
Here's picture of it: Click Here
Rock seems to be leaning forward, if he stood straight, looks to be about 3 inch difference? Both seem to have very similar footwear. If Rock was 6'3 in 2000 during his wrestling days, this would put Austin around 6ft back then.
Alex 6'0 said on 21/Oct/14
Austin could have been 6'2 in boots if he was 6'0.5 peak. Even if he wasn't 6'2 in boots he was very close so passed for 6'2 range but I agree no more than 6'0 today.
Austin could have been 6'2 in boots if he was 6'0.5 peak. Even if he wasn't 6'2 in boots he was very close so passed for 6'2 range but I agree no more than 6'0 today.
Height182 said on 17/Oct/14
I don't even think Austin looked tall as 6'2'' in boots, he was definitely shorter. I don't think he has ever been taller than 6'0.25'' in his life. Last 15 years and today no taller than 6'0''.
I don't even think Austin looked tall as 6'2'' in boots, he was definitely shorter. I don't think he has ever been taller than 6'0.25'' in his life. Last 15 years and today no taller than 6'0''.
Alex 6'0 said on 14/Oct/14
Rampage, I agree he can def. look that range but he's not. Legit 6'0 in boots and good posture you can look 6'1.5-6'2. Im one of those guys so I know Lol
Rampage, I agree he can def. look that range but he's not. Legit 6'0 in boots and good posture you can look 6'1.5-6'2. Im one of those guys so I know Lol
Alex 6'0 said on 14/Oct/14
I know can't always go by backstage videos but he generally always looked 6'0 with 5'10 Kurt Angle.
Click Here
I know can't always go by backstage videos but he generally always looked 6'0 with 5'10 Kurt Angle.
Click Here
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 10/Oct/14
He looked 6ft1½-6ft2 in The Condemned
He looked 6ft1½-6ft2 in The Condemned
Alex 6'0 said on 9/Oct/14
If Austin looked 6'2ish in boots that means he's more 6'0.5 and this was during his peak days. Boots give 1.5 range. Today no more than 6'0
If Austin looked 6'2ish in boots that means he's more 6'0.5 and this was during his peak days. Boots give 1.5 range. Today no more than 6'0
Pingu181 said on 4/Oct/14
I believe 6'1 was his height prior to breaking his neck, today probably around 6ft
I believe 6'1 was his height prior to breaking his neck, today probably around 6ft
mike said on 2/Oct/14
Peak: 6ft 1.5in 187 cm
Today: 6ft 1in 185 cm
Peak: 6ft 1.5in 187 cm
Today: 6ft 1in 185 cm
Height181 said on 23/Sep/14
I'm with you Alex, he's never looked a proper 6'1'' guy to me. Of course in his boots he can pull off looking a little over 6'1''. I think he has always been around 6'0''. Maybe 6'0.5'' in his peak as you say.
I'm with you Alex, he's never looked a proper 6'1'' guy to me. Of course in his boots he can pull off looking a little over 6'1''. I think he has always been around 6'0''. Maybe 6'0.5'' in his peak as you say.
Alex 6'0 said on 22/Sep/14
Peak 6'0.5, today 6'0. Even at his peak The Rock looked to have 2 inches on him still. They billed them 3 inches apart but back then even as a teen I always didn't think it looked 3 inches apart.
Peak 6'0.5, today 6'0. Even at his peak The Rock looked to have 2 inches on him still. They billed them 3 inches apart but back then even as a teen I always didn't think it looked 3 inches apart.
miko said on 10/Sep/14
He was a 6'1 guy who in boots could look close to 6'2. Today he could be more 6'0.5.
He was a 6'1 guy who in boots could look close to 6'2. Today he could be more 6'0.5.
Guy B said on 9/Sep/14
Stone Cold is no taller than 6'1". Austin always did look taller than that when standing alone because you don't see too many guys with a 250+ pound build on someone of his height. However, when he stands next to Vince Mcmahon or Bret Hart, you realize the 6'2" label is a little off.
Stone Cold is no taller than 6'1". Austin always did look taller than that when standing alone because you don't see too many guys with a 250+ pound build on someone of his height. However, when he stands next to Vince Mcmahon or Bret Hart, you realize the 6'2" label is a little off.
BorkLaser said on 8/Sep/14
As a wrestler becomes more and more popular, they get billed at a height really close to their real one (well except for Hogan lol) due to all the appearances and comparison opportunities. Cena (who is 6'0.5") is billed at 6'1", and Austin was billed at 6'2", so at least 6'1" for Austin at peak height. 6'1.5"-6'2" is also very likely.
As a wrestler becomes more and more popular, they get billed at a height really close to their real one (well except for Hogan lol) due to all the appearances and comparison opportunities. Cena (who is 6'0.5") is billed at 6'1", and Austin was billed at 6'2", so at least 6'1" for Austin at peak height. 6'1.5"-6'2" is also very likely.
Kourosh177cm said on 2/Sep/14
Stone Cold Steve Austin height: 6ft0.25in (183cm)
Stone Cold Steve Austin height: 6ft0.25in (183cm)
Tony B said on 31/Aug/14
I met Stone Cold in Vegas 2 years ago. Iam 6.1 & Austin clearly had an inch over me.
I met Stone Cold in Vegas 2 years ago. Iam 6.1 & Austin clearly had an inch over me.
James B said on 30/Aug/14
He does look no taller than 6ft here with 5'11.25 shawn michaels
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=mok5Egx1074
He does look no taller than 6ft here with 5'11.25 shawn michaels
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=mok5Egx1074
Alex 6'0 said on 29/Aug/14
6'0.5 peak today 6'0 seems possible? He is turning 50 and his last few years making appearances in WWE he looks 6'0 is all.
6'0.5 peak today 6'0 seems possible? He is turning 50 and his last few years making appearances in WWE he looks 6'0 is all.
Clay said on 28/Aug/14
SaveUsY2J says on 27/Aug/14
Just showed hes struggling mightily with 6'0 with a 6'2 measured guy* in 2014. Nice try Saveus.
*6'4 measured guy whom Viper pretends has been measured 6'2 for his own convenience
LMAO.
SaveUsY2J says on 27/Aug/14
Just showed hes struggling mightily with 6'0 with a 6'2 measured guy* in 2014. Nice try Saveus.
*6'4 measured guy whom Viper pretends has been measured 6'2 for his own convenience
LMAO.
Height181 said on 27/Aug/14
Austin has always been 6'0'' even before he became popular. I still don't know if he was taller before the Piledriver incident though.
Austin has always been 6'0'' even before he became popular. I still don't know if he was taller before the Piledriver incident though.
SaveUsY2J said on 27/Aug/14
Just showed hes struggling mightily with 6'0 with a 6'2 measured guy* in 2014. Nice try Saveus.
*6'4 measured guy whom Viper pretends has been measured 6'2 for his own convenience
Just showed hes struggling mightily with 6'0 with a 6'2 measured guy* in 2014. Nice try Saveus.
*6'4 measured guy whom Viper pretends has been measured 6'2 for his own convenience
James B said on 27/Aug/14
6'0.5? In ring gear looked between 6'1-6'2 in the attitude era I'd say.
6'1 is fine for stone cold
6'0.5? In ring gear looked between 6'1-6'2 in the attitude era I'd say.
6'1 is fine for stone cold
Alex 6'0 said on 21/Aug/14
Clay, Austin was in footwear compared to me barefoot in the comparison and was taller but barefoot me and Austin are very similar in height. A small fraction is prob the difference.
Clay, Austin was in footwear compared to me barefoot in the comparison and was taller but barefoot me and Austin are very similar in height. A small fraction is prob the difference.
BCD said on 20/Aug/14
Just showed hes struggling mightily with 6'0 with a 6'2 measured guy in 2014. Nice try Saveus.
Hes 5'11 range today, 6'0 peak.
Just showed hes struggling mightily with 6'0 with a 6'2 measured guy in 2014. Nice try Saveus.
Hes 5'11 range today, 6'0 peak.
SaveUsY2J said on 20/Aug/14
Alex, I believe and have ever since watching Beyond the Mat, where he looked short next to the Rock (backstage), that he's 6'0". Not taller than that. He wore big clunky boots a lot of the time, that gave him the 6'1"-6'2" impression, but take those boots off, and he's 6'0" (or at least was when he wrestled).
----
Miz is 6'0" and he was shorter than Austin on a 2011 episode of Raw when he was in boots and Austin in sneakers.
Also, Bret Hart, a proven 6ft, was consistently shorter than him in 1997.
Guy's never been under 6'1" in his life. It'll be about 8-10 years yet before 6'0" starts to look like a possibility.
Alex, I believe and have ever since watching Beyond the Mat, where he looked short next to the Rock (backstage), that he's 6'0". Not taller than that. He wore big clunky boots a lot of the time, that gave him the 6'1"-6'2" impression, but take those boots off, and he's 6'0" (or at least was when he wrestled).
----
Miz is 6'0" and he was shorter than Austin on a 2011 episode of Raw when he was in boots and Austin in sneakers.
Also, Bret Hart, a proven 6ft, was consistently shorter than him in 1997.
Guy's never been under 6'1" in his life. It'll be about 8-10 years yet before 6'0" starts to look like a possibility.
texastoast said on 19/Aug/14
Hes struggling with 6'0 these days with 6'2 measured Merriman. Click Here
Does look 5'11ish now.
Hes struggling with 6'0 these days with 6'2 measured Merriman. Click Here
Does look 5'11ish now.
Alex 6'0 said on 14/Aug/14
Danimal, yea I saw beyond the mat. I think his peak could have been 6'0.5 but today not over 6'0. He's turning 50 so he's lost a bit of height as well. Or do you think his peak was always just 6'0 and today maybe 5'11.5ish?
Danimal, yea I saw beyond the mat. I think his peak could have been 6'0.5 but today not over 6'0. He's turning 50 so he's lost a bit of height as well. Or do you think his peak was always just 6'0 and today maybe 5'11.5ish?
Danimal said on 12/Aug/14
Alex 6'0 says on 11/Aug/14
Here is a comparison pic. This is 5'8 Mamun who use to post on this site a lot. Pic of me 6'0-6'0 1/8 and him barefoot compared to him and Austin in 1 inch shoes. Austin is taller than me in the comparison but in footwear. Barefoot puts me him at 6'0 same as me.
Click Here
Alex, I believe and have ever since watching Beyond the Mat, where he looked short next to the Rock (backstage), that he's 6'0". Not taller than that. He wore big clunky boots a lot of the time, that gave him the 6'1"-6'2" impression, but take those boots off, and he's 6'0" (or at least was when he wrestled).
Alex 6'0 says on 11/Aug/14
Here is a comparison pic. This is 5'8 Mamun who use to post on this site a lot. Pic of me 6'0-6'0 1/8 and him barefoot compared to him and Austin in 1 inch shoes. Austin is taller than me in the comparison but in footwear. Barefoot puts me him at 6'0 same as me.
Click Here
Alex, I believe and have ever since watching Beyond the Mat, where he looked short next to the Rock (backstage), that he's 6'0". Not taller than that. He wore big clunky boots a lot of the time, that gave him the 6'1"-6'2" impression, but take those boots off, and he's 6'0" (or at least was when he wrestled).
Alex 6'0 said on 11/Aug/14
Here is a comparison pic. This is 5'8 Mamun who use to post on this site a lot. Pic of me 6'0-6'0 1/8 and him barefoot compared to him and Austin in 1 inch shoes. Austin is taller than me in the comparison but in footwear. Barefoot puts me him at 6'0 same as me.
Click Here
Here is a comparison pic. This is 5'8 Mamun who use to post on this site a lot. Pic of me 6'0-6'0 1/8 and him barefoot compared to him and Austin in 1 inch shoes. Austin is taller than me in the comparison but in footwear. Barefoot puts me him at 6'0 same as me.
Click Here
Alex 6'0 said on 30/Jul/14
Attitude, Austin peak 6'0.5 very possible. Today 6'0 flat Id say. Bret Hart at 6'0 I can see. Looked 5'11-5'11.25 with Rob but that's not peak. HBK I'd give 5'11 peak and today 5'10-5'10.5
Height181, injuries may have caused a bit of height but he's turning 50 this year. A bit of natural height loss has happened but only a fraction. Id be surprised if he has lost a full inch
Attitude, Austin peak 6'0.5 very possible. Today 6'0 flat Id say. Bret Hart at 6'0 I can see. Looked 5'11-5'11.25 with Rob but that's not peak. HBK I'd give 5'11 peak and today 5'10-5'10.5
Height181, injuries may have caused a bit of height but he's turning 50 this year. A bit of natural height loss has happened but only a fraction. Id be surprised if he has lost a full inch
Alex 6'0 said on 30/Jul/14
Height181, HBK I'd give 5'11 peak. Today 5'10-5'10.5. At WM 21 looked a bit taller than 5'9.75-5'10 Kurt Angle. HBK looked a bit shorter or about the same as Bret Hart in the 90's. Not sure on Bret hart's height either
Height181, HBK I'd give 5'11 peak. Today 5'10-5'10.5. At WM 21 looked a bit taller than 5'9.75-5'10 Kurt Angle. HBK looked a bit shorter or about the same as Bret Hart in the 90's. Not sure on Bret hart's height either
SaveUsY2J said on 28/Jul/14
At his peak he was never under 6'1 and I doubt he's much under that today, if at all. A peak Bret "Hitman" Hart was 6'0 as seen next to Rob, and Austin was noticeably taller than him. He had more than an inch on 5'11" Shawn Michaels in 1998 as well, and HBK always wore boots that would give a similar height boost to those of Austin.
Even in recent photos, he isn't much shorter than Goldberg, who was a legit 6'2.5 in his prime though may be down to 6'2 flat nowadays.
At his peak he was never under 6'1 and I doubt he's much under that today, if at all. A peak Bret "Hitman" Hart was 6'0 as seen next to Rob, and Austin was noticeably taller than him. He had more than an inch on 5'11" Shawn Michaels in 1998 as well, and HBK always wore boots that would give a similar height boost to those of Austin.
Even in recent photos, he isn't much shorter than Goldberg, who was a legit 6'2.5 in his prime though may be down to 6'2 flat nowadays.
Attitude said on 28/Jul/14
Hey Alex, if Austin was 6 feet or a bit above, what would that make Bret and Shawn? Since Bret looked to be about half an inch to an inch shorter and Shawn looked easily 2 inches smaller. Shawn was an avid wearer of high heeled boots and Bret wore sneakers.
Hey Alex, if Austin was 6 feet or a bit above, what would that make Bret and Shawn? Since Bret looked to be about half an inch to an inch shorter and Shawn looked easily 2 inches smaller. Shawn was an avid wearer of high heeled boots and Bret wore sneakers.
Alex 6'0 said on 27/Jul/14
Austin was a constant boot wearer so that would give a bit more height. He could pull off 6'1 legit but was he ever 6'1? I don't know. Probably not. He is turning 50 this year so at least a fraction he's lost. But in his wrestling career 6'0-6'0.5 looks right. Whatever he was Rock was 2 inches taller, HHH 1-1.5 inches taller during their days in WWF/WWE. 6'0 Austin puts Rock 6'2 range and HHH 6'1.5 range
Austin was a constant boot wearer so that would give a bit more height. He could pull off 6'1 legit but was he ever 6'1? I don't know. Probably not. He is turning 50 this year so at least a fraction he's lost. But in his wrestling career 6'0-6'0.5 looks right. Whatever he was Rock was 2 inches taller, HHH 1-1.5 inches taller during their days in WWF/WWE. 6'0 Austin puts Rock 6'2 range and HHH 6'1.5 range
Alex 6'0 said on 25/Jul/14
Peak maybe 6'0.5 today 6'0. At turning 50 this year a bit of height loss has happened
Peak maybe 6'0.5 today 6'0. At turning 50 this year a bit of height loss has happened
Alex 6'0 said on 14/Jul/14
I think at most he's 6'0.5 today.
I think at most he's 6'0.5 today.
willom said on 14/Jul/14
peak 6'1.75
today 6'0.75
peak 6'1.75
today 6'0.75
SaveUsY2J said on 9/Jul/14
Alex, yeah I don't believe he's suffered any natural height loss yet but I believe he may have been 6'1.5 before Owen Hart's botched piledriver broke his neck at Summerslam '97. He still looks a good 6'1 nowadays, back in 2011 he made a guest appearance on an episode of Raw and was an inch taller than The Miz who's 6-foot even.
Alex, yeah I don't believe he's suffered any natural height loss yet but I believe he may have been 6'1.5 before Owen Hart's botched piledriver broke his neck at Summerslam '97. He still looks a good 6'1 nowadays, back in 2011 he made a guest appearance on an episode of Raw and was an inch taller than The Miz who's 6-foot even.
Alex 6'0 said on 4/Jun/14
Austin is going to be 50 end of the year so he's not old enough to lose much height. A fraction I can see but he's also had some surgeries so could have lost a bit more.
Austin is going to be 50 end of the year so he's not old enough to lose much height. A fraction I can see but he's also had some surgeries so could have lost a bit more.
SaveUsY2J said on 30/May/14
Rob, maybe 6'1.5 peak? He did break his neck, that's got to have had some noticeable effect on his stature. He looked more than an inch taller than Bret Hart back in 1997 anyway....
Rob, maybe 6'1.5 peak? He did break his neck, that's got to have had some noticeable effect on his stature. He looked more than an inch taller than Bret Hart back in 1997 anyway....
Hell Yeah said on 22/May/14
If Hogan was around 6'3.5-6'4 max in boots at wrestlemania 30 that will put Austin with his nike airmax concidering his high shoes advantage at no more than
6'1, 6'1.5 at best, I think now austin is probably a legit 6'0 without shoes on.
If Hogan was around 6'3.5-6'4 max in boots at wrestlemania 30 that will put Austin with his nike airmax concidering his high shoes advantage at no more than
6'1, 6'1.5 at best, I think now austin is probably a legit 6'0 without shoes on.
Clay said on 4/May/14
Yeah, I would agree. Similar in weight probably as well, it's eery.
Yeah, I would agree. Similar in weight probably as well, it's eery.
Alex 6'0 said on 3/May/14
Clay, Cena def didn't shrink at all. Austin is turning 50 later this year so a fraction lost is pretty possible. Cena I give 6'0.25-6'0.5 and Austin the same at his peak. Today Austin I give 6'0. Its very close
Clay, Cena def didn't shrink at all. Austin is turning 50 later this year so a fraction lost is pretty possible. Cena I give 6'0.25-6'0.5 and Austin the same at his peak. Today Austin I give 6'0. Its very close
Clay said on 2/May/14
Alex who do you think was taller Cena or Austin, in their primes? I think they're really, really close.
Alex who do you think was taller Cena or Austin, in their primes? I think they're really, really close.
Alex 6'0 said on 30/Apr/14
I don't buy him at 6'1. 6'0-6'0.5 range. He didn't look any taller than Cena who is listed 6'0.5 on here
I don't buy him at 6'1. 6'0-6'0.5 range. He didn't look any taller than Cena who is listed 6'0.5 on here
Mario said on 22/Apr/14
He is no less than 185cm at night, closer to 186 would be fair. 187/188 morning.
He is no less than 185cm at night, closer to 186 would be fair. 187/188 morning.
BorkLaser said on 10/Apr/14
Looked 6'0.75" - 6'1" next to Hogan at WrestleMania
Looked 6'0.75" - 6'1" next to Hogan at WrestleMania
James B said on 9/Apr/14
6'05 maybe today?
6'05 maybe today?
rhaegar said on 7/Apr/14
Looked less than 6ft on Wrestlemania next to Hogan, like 4.5 inches shorter in maybe 0.5-1 inch less footwear so if Hogan is 6'3 then Austin is 5'11.5 max.
Looked less than 6ft on Wrestlemania next to Hogan, like 4.5 inches shorter in maybe 0.5-1 inch less footwear so if Hogan is 6'3 then Austin is 5'11.5 max.
WHAT? said on 29/Jan/14
Who measures and tells people they're 6'7/8"? Are you kidding me?
Who measures and tells people they're 6'7/8"? Are you kidding me?
James B said on 20/Jan/14
RVD for sure looks 5'11
RVD for sure looks 5'11
Lorne said on 13/Jan/14
I'm aware Punk is listed 5ft11.75, but I think 5ft11.5 max(I'm splitting hairs, I know) yeah, 181cm is my "official" listing for RVD, but I wouldn't rule out flat 5'11(but not less). I was just saying that I think both listings are generous, if only a quarter or half inch. I think Austin is legit 6'1 though:) (and yeah, glad Goldberg was upgraded, that had bothered me for years!)
I'm aware Punk is listed 5ft11.75, but I think 5ft11.5 max(I'm splitting hairs, I know) yeah, 181cm is my "official" listing for RVD, but I wouldn't rule out flat 5'11(but not less). I was just saying that I think both listings are generous, if only a quarter or half inch. I think Austin is legit 6'1 though:) (and yeah, glad Goldberg was upgraded, that had bothered me for years!)
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 12/Jan/14
Punk is actually listed 5ft11.75, Lorne. Austin could look about 2in taller. I wouldn't put RVD less
than a solid 5ft11 and a fraction over that is more likely. Goldberg edged out Lesnar so I agree with you there that he's 6ft2.5 minimum. Austin looked shorter during that match but was in sneakers.
Also, I just came across old an old 90s clip. Do any of you guys remember a wrestler by the name of Brian Pillman? He was billed 6ft by WWF but in football was listed 5ft10, which is probably closer. Austin always towered over him.
Punk is actually listed 5ft11.75, Lorne. Austin could look about 2in taller. I wouldn't put RVD less
than a solid 5ft11 and a fraction over that is more likely. Goldberg edged out Lesnar so I agree with you there that he's 6ft2.5 minimum. Austin looked shorter during that match but was in sneakers.
Also, I just came across old an old 90s clip. Do any of you guys remember a wrestler by the name of Brian Pillman? He was billed 6ft by WWF but in football was listed 5ft10, which is probably closer. Austin always towered over him.
Lorne said on 9/Jan/14
Rampage: CM Punk is no more than 5ft11.5, look at him with Shawn Michaels, who certainly isn't over 5'11 today. And I think better chance 5ft11 for RVD than the 5ft11.5 listing, I give him 5ft11.25 at best. So 6'1 for Austin is fair, but I still can't see Goldberg less than 6ft2.5, he doesn't as well as Austin. For everyone else: How can you say Austin hasn't lost height at 49, but say for sure Rock has at 41? Just saying...
Rampage: CM Punk is no more than 5ft11.5, look at him with Shawn Michaels, who certainly isn't over 5'11 today. And I think better chance 5ft11 for RVD than the 5ft11.5 listing, I give him 5ft11.25 at best. So 6'1 for Austin is fair, but I still can't see Goldberg less than 6ft2.5, he doesn't as well as Austin. For everyone else: How can you say Austin hasn't lost height at 49, but say for sure Rock has at 41? Just saying...
James said on 5/Jan/14
I always thought he looked more 6ft but if he's 6'1 the he is.
I always thought he looked more 6ft but if he's 6'1 the he is.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 2/Jan/14
He's actually talking about the first time he wrestled The Undertaker, Rob
He's actually talking about the first time he wrestled The Undertaker, Rob
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 2/Jan/14
He's 49. I'd be surprised if he lost anything yet.
Maybe 186-187cm?
He's 49. I'd be surprised if he lost anything yet.
Maybe 186-187cm?
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 31/Dec/13
Rob, what are you're thoughts on his claim?
Editor Rob
Rob, what are you're thoughts on his claim?
Editor Rob is he talking about being a 'young 6ft 2' football type guy...maybe in shoes, but I can't see him as 6ft 2
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 29/Dec/13
Click Here
Rob, there's a 6ft2 and 250lbs claim from Austin at 3:57-3:58
Editor Rob
Click Here
Rob, there's a 6ft2 and 250lbs claim from Austin at 3:57-3:58
Editor Rob worth adding up top yeah
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 29/Dec/13
Goldberg is taller than than Austin by at least 1in.
But I'm more in favour of Goldberg being nearer 6ft3
Goldberg is taller than than Austin by at least 1in.
But I'm more in favour of Goldberg being nearer 6ft3
cobra said on 18/Dec/13
He and Goldberg look the same height in almost every picture so why is Goldberg listed 1.5 inches taller?
He and Goldberg look the same height in almost every picture so why is Goldberg listed 1.5 inches taller?
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 12/Dec/13
I'd be shocked if he was as high as 188cm barefoot. Although, next to Adam Sandler and Burt Reynolds in Longest Yard he looked it. Strong 6ft1 is fair
I'd be shocked if he was as high as 188cm barefoot. Although, next to Adam Sandler and Burt Reynolds in Longest Yard he looked it. Strong 6ft1 is fair
Slate said on 20/Nov/13
C'mon guys, no shorter than 6'1". I met the dude, I'm six 2 and we were looking eye to eye. He is tall and big.
C'mon guys, no shorter than 6'1". I met the dude, I'm six 2 and we were looking eye to eye. He is tall and big.
Van said on 29/Oct/13
He is a legit 6'1, which will put the Miz at 6' and Angle at 5'10
He is a legit 6'1, which will put the Miz at 6' and Angle at 5'10
Hell yeah said on 16/Oct/13
I'd give austin 6'to 6'1 in his prime seing him next to paul heyman back in those days. Nowadays not more than a 6'
I'd give austin 6'to 6'1 in his prime seing him next to paul heyman back in those days. Nowadays not more than a 6'
Bakura said on 14/Oct/13
He's noticeably taller than weak 6ft Randy Couture in all of the Expendables premiere photos from 2010. He was 186cm in his WWE days and still is 185-186 nowadays.
He's noticeably taller than weak 6ft Randy Couture in all of the Expendables premiere photos from 2010. He was 186cm in his WWE days and still is 185-186 nowadays.
CLEMENT said on 1/Oct/13
Stone Cold Steve Austin is 6'0"
Stone Cold Steve Austin is 6'0"
Andy 185cm said on 9/Sep/13
Stone Cold is rly tall, Click Here 4:35
He edges out The Miz, and The Miz is taller than Cena.
Stone Cold is rly tall, Click Here 4:35
He edges out The Miz, and The Miz is taller than Cena.
Alex 6ft 0 1/8 said on 5/Sep/13
Austin like Cena is in that 183-184cm range
Austin like Cena is in that 183-184cm range
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 25/Aug/13
Cenas wearing a hat as usual and is nearer the camera.
John Cena - 6ft0.5in/184cm
Steve Austin - 6ft1.25in/186cm
Cenas wearing a hat as usual and is nearer the camera.
John Cena - 6ft0.5in/184cm
Steve Austin - 6ft1.25in/186cm
Andy 185cm said on 11/Aug/13
@Red183 Very good spot! I think i got fooled by his proportions!
@Red183 Very good spot! I think i got fooled by his proportions!
Andy 185cm said on 7/Aug/13
@Red183 10:31
@Red183 10:31
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 10/Jul/13
Austin looks 6"1"-6"2" for definite if Punk's 5"11.75"(182cm) and RVD's 5"11.5"(182cm) are accurate. I think 186cm is strong possibility, possibly 187cm. He definitely held his own with Triple H and Brock Lesnar (both 6"2"-6"3") in the Attitude Era aswell as with The Rock (6"3"-6"4")
Austin looks 6"1"-6"2" for definite if Punk's 5"11.75"(182cm) and RVD's 5"11.5"(182cm) are accurate. I think 186cm is strong possibility, possibly 187cm. He definitely held his own with Triple H and Brock Lesnar (both 6"2"-6"3") in the Attitude Era aswell as with The Rock (6"3"-6"4")
Ajax said on 5/Jul/13
You have to realize that most guys who claim their 6'1" are actually not that tall unlike Austin
who's actually that tall. My friend told me he was 6'1" and that I was 6'3". I measured him at just under 6' (5'11.75") and I'm 6'2". So in essence, most people don't realize that a true
6'1er is actually pretty ample in height.
You have to realize that most guys who claim their 6'1" are actually not that tall unlike Austin
who's actually that tall. My friend told me he was 6'1" and that I was 6'3". I measured him at just under 6' (5'11.75") and I'm 6'2". So in essence, most people don't realize that a true
6'1er is actually pretty ample in height.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 3/Jul/13
Rob, what are the chances of Stone Cold being 5ft11?
Editor Rob
Rob, what are the chances of Stone Cold being 5ft11?
Editor Rob as much chance of him winning an Oscar
Patriot said on 1/Jul/13
I think he is just 5 foot 11 or 6 foot tall. WWE are renowned for exaggerating wrestlers heights. Billed on the World Wrestling Entertainment website as 6 foot 2 inches.
I think he is just 5 foot 11 or 6 foot tall. WWE are renowned for exaggerating wrestlers heights. Billed on the World Wrestling Entertainment website as 6 foot 2 inches.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 27/Feb/13
Maybe he's 186cm and just says 6ft1, Rob?
Maybe he's 186cm and just says 6ft1, Rob?
James said on 22/Feb/13
Yeah your right cause he looked around 6'1.5 next too CM Punk
Yeah your right cause he looked around 6'1.5 next too CM Punk
James said on 21/Feb/13
Rob is there a chance stone cold was 6'1-6'2 range at one stage? He didn't look much smaller than the rock and looked 4cm taller than CM Punk in 2011.
Editor Rob
Rob is there a chance stone cold was 6'1-6'2 range at one stage? He didn't look much smaller than the rock and looked 4cm taller than CM Punk in 2011.
Editor Rob I just reckon he is a real 6ft 1 guy, who can wear timberland style boots and at times look a little taller.
Ali Baba said on 21/Feb/13
The measurement on the left is centimeters. Each line is 2 CMs.
The measurement on the left is centimeters. Each line is 2 CMs.
Swanee123 said on 18/Feb/13
According to his celebrity mugshot, he is standing at the 92" mark, which would make him 7'8" instead of a puny 6'1". Unless the 92 is supposed to represent 192 cm, which would be odd for the USA to use metric.Mugshots/williamssteve.htm" target="_blank">Click Here
According to his celebrity mugshot, he is standing at the 92" mark, which would make him 7'8" instead of a puny 6'1". Unless the 92 is supposed to represent 192 cm, which would be odd for the USA to use metric.Mugshots/williamssteve.htm" target="_blank">Click Here
Swanee123 said on 18/Feb/13
According to his celebrity mugshot, he is standing at the 92" mark, which would make him 7'8" instead of a puny 6'1". Unless the 92 is supposed to represent 192 cm, which would be odd for the USA to use metric.
According to his celebrity mugshot, he is standing at the 92" mark, which would make him 7'8" instead of a puny 6'1". Unless the 92 is supposed to represent 192 cm, which would be odd for the USA to use metric.
Jamesy said on 21/Jan/13
Compared too cm punk appeared 186cm
Compared too cm punk appeared 186cm
Mathew said on 7/Jan/13
Maybe he's 6'0.5" today I don't know, but I always bought the 6'1" peak height, he always came across as that tall to me.
Maybe he's 6'0.5" today I don't know, but I always bought the 6'1" peak height, he always came across as that tall to me.
Chuckie said on 6/Dec/12
If he is 6'1 than how tall is goldberg who luks shorter than 6'2 hhh?
If he is 6'1 than how tall is goldberg who luks shorter than 6'2 hhh?
James said on 14/Nov/12
Looks 182cm next too tony atlas
Looks 182cm next too tony atlas
Alex 6ft 0 1/8 said on 14/Nov/12
6'0 1/2 peak and today 6'0 flat?
6'0 1/2 peak and today 6'0 flat?
Vegas said on 14/Nov/12
austin didn't look 6'1 back in wcw
austin didn't look 6'1 back in wcw
173 said on 13/Nov/12
I agree Alex, he's looked to have shrunk (maybe due to aging plus injuries and such), and looks closer to 6'0" flat today.
I agree Alex, he's looked to have shrunk (maybe due to aging plus injuries and such), and looks closer to 6'0" flat today.
Alex 6ft 0 1/8 said on 12/Nov/12
Could have been 6'1 peak and closer to 6'0 flat today
Could have been 6'1 peak and closer to 6'0 flat today
Clay said on 10/Nov/12
Brad says on 6/Nov/12
6 flat 2012. 6-1 peak.
6'0.5-6'1.
Brad says on 6/Nov/12
6 flat 2012. 6-1 peak.
6'0.5-6'1.
Brad said on 6/Nov/12
6 flat 2012. 6-1 peak.
6 flat 2012. 6-1 peak.
big h said on 29/Oct/12
Austin was billed at 6'2. He is close to 50. He jas had neck surgery and broke 3 vertebre in his back. So he could have shrunk. Im only 30 and i shrunk from 6'1 to 5'11 3/4. Hulk hogan shrunk from 6'7 to 6'4. You have to look at their shoes and posture.
Austin was billed at 6'2. He is close to 50. He jas had neck surgery and broke 3 vertebre in his back. So he could have shrunk. Im only 30 and i shrunk from 6'1 to 5'11 3/4. Hulk hogan shrunk from 6'7 to 6'4. You have to look at their shoes and posture.
Mathew said on 26/Oct/12
I've never doubted his 6'1" is legit, at least back when he was at his most popular. I guess 6'0.5" could be possible as he's approaching 50. But he was a solid 6'1" in my eyes.
I've never doubted his 6'1" is legit, at least back when he was at his most popular. I guess 6'0.5" could be possible as he's approaching 50. But he was a solid 6'1" in my eyes.
Frank said on 5/Oct/12
I personally think Vince wore lifts @ times
I personally think Vince wore lifts @ times
Alex 6ft 0 1/8 said on 3/Oct/12
Danimal, so you think its possible Vince at his age now has went from 6'2 to 6'0 flat? he is over 60 so its def possible.
Danimal, so you think its possible Vince at his age now has went from 6'2 to 6'0 flat? he is over 60 so its def possible.
miko said on 30/Sep/12
Well he was the same height as McMahon, however tall he was in the 90's. We all know McMahon was never a 6'2 guy, but certainly around 6'1.
Well he was the same height as McMahon, however tall he was in the 90's. We all know McMahon was never a 6'2 guy, but certainly around 6'1.
Clay said on 29/Sep/12
Does look just 6'0'' in those pics with the former NFLers.
Does look just 6'0'' in those pics with the former NFLers.
Alex 6ft 0 1/8 said on 29/Sep/12
Looks 6'0.5 with 6'4 3/4 Leavine but looks more like a 6'0 flat guy with 6'6 1/8 Godsey. We dont know for sure his exact height but its very safe to say hes a legit 183-184cm guy I would say
Looks 6'0.5 with 6'4 3/4 Leavine but looks more like a 6'0 flat guy with 6'6 1/8 Godsey. We dont know for sure his exact height but its very safe to say hes a legit 183-184cm guy I would say
Vegas said on 29/Sep/12
andy leavine was measured 6'4 3/4 barefoot at the nfl combine Click Here
gary godsey was measured 6'6 1/8 barefoot at the combine Click Here
andy leavine was measured 6'4 3/4 barefoot at the nfl combine Click Here
gary godsey was measured 6'6 1/8 barefoot at the combine Click Here
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 29/Sep/12
Well anyway he doesn't look under a solid 6ft1. Could be up to 6ft1.5. Unlike most of the wrestlers he's not far off his billed height and would easily be at least 6ft2 in regular shoes.
Well anyway he doesn't look under a solid 6ft1. Could be up to 6ft1.5. Unlike most of the wrestlers he's not far off his billed height and would easily be at least 6ft2 in regular shoes.
Alex 6'0-6'0.75 said on 25/Sep/12
Rampage, your evening is the same as night I would say. Even midday/afternoon you're usually pretty close to your low anyway
Rampage, your evening is the same as night I would say. Even midday/afternoon you're usually pretty close to your low anyway
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 21/Sep/12
6ft1.75(187cm) out of bed
6ft1.5(187cm) morning
6ft1.5(187cm) lunch
6ft1.25(186cm) afternoon
6ft1.25(186cm) evening
6ft1(185cm) night
6ft1.75(187cm) out of bed
6ft1.5(187cm) morning
6ft1.5(187cm) lunch
6ft1.25(186cm) afternoon
6ft1.25(186cm) evening
6ft1(185cm) night
Frank said on 14/Sep/12
Ok Rob let me know Buddy !!! lol
Ok Rob let me know Buddy !!! lol
Alex said on 12/Sep/12
Frank, would be great if Rob got to measure you. If he comes back to NY soon def should meet up
Editor Rob
Frank, would be great if Rob got to measure you. If he comes back to NY soon def should meet up
Editor Rob one day I should return
Frank said on 11/Sep/12
Alex my doctor measured me @ 6ft on those weight scales that have the height stick on the back!! I believe its off alittle i do believe im im over 5ft 11
Alex my doctor measured me @ 6ft on those weight scales that have the height stick on the back!! I believe its off alittle i do believe im im over 5ft 11
Alex said on 11/Sep/12
Frank, yes I can appear an easy 6'1 but in reality my height is 6'0-6'0 1/4. Also in our pic the height difference looked slightly different in certain pics. Some pics can be decieving. A few pics I looked more like 1.5 inches taller then some I thought it looked closer to an inch difference. Have you recently measured yourself again on a stadiometer? I wouldn't say you were under 5'11 though
Frank, yes I can appear an easy 6'1 but in reality my height is 6'0-6'0 1/4. Also in our pic the height difference looked slightly different in certain pics. Some pics can be decieving. A few pics I looked more like 1.5 inches taller then some I thought it looked closer to an inch difference. Have you recently measured yourself again on a stadiometer? I wouldn't say you were under 5'11 though
Mathew said on 10/Sep/12
I believe 6'1", he's looked it enough to me. And I'm generally a skeptic.
I believe 6'1", he's looked it enough to me. And I'm generally a skeptic.
Frank said on 9/Sep/12
Alex your more closer to 6ft 1 than 6ft according to the pictures we took 2 years ago
Alex your more closer to 6ft 1 than 6ft according to the pictures we took 2 years ago
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 6/Sep/12
Stone Cold - 186cm, 250-255lbs
The Rock - 192cm, 265-270lbs
Stone Cold - 186cm, 250-255lbs
The Rock - 192cm, 265-270lbs
Alex said on 3/Sep/12
Austin I could see just over 6'0 like 6'0 1/4 to maybe 6'0 1/2
Austin I could see just over 6'0 like 6'0 1/4 to maybe 6'0 1/2
marc said on 27/Aug/12
maybe one day he was 6'1, but not anymore. Check the poster of the first "Expendables" movie. Austin and Bruce Willis are on the exteremes of the picture, aprox. same distance from the camera. Drawing a line from the top of one bald head to another, you'll see they're same height. Maybe in some places Willis is listed as 6'1, which we know he's not.
maybe one day he was 6'1, but not anymore. Check the poster of the first "Expendables" movie. Austin and Bruce Willis are on the exteremes of the picture, aprox. same distance from the camera. Drawing a line from the top of one bald head to another, you'll see they're same height. Maybe in some places Willis is listed as 6'1, which we know he's not.
Cornbread said on 25/Aug/12
I would list Stone Cold Steve Austin's exact height at 6'0 and a little change. He's a little over 6 feet tall, slightly under 6'1
I would list Stone Cold Steve Austin's exact height at 6'0 and a little change. He's a little over 6 feet tall, slightly under 6'1
Alex said on 25/Aug/12
Austin was always in great shape in his WWF/WWE days. He was never shredded but he was cut enough and had pretty visible abs. Last I seen him he looked to have gotten bigger again
Austin was always in great shape in his WWF/WWE days. He was never shredded but he was cut enough and had pretty visible abs. Last I seen him he looked to have gotten bigger again
Shaun said on 24/Aug/12
I could actually buy anything up to 275 lb for his current size but I think he looks at least 18 stone which is 252 pounds and probably more 19 stone. And he looks more bad ass with the bald head!
I could actually buy anything up to 275 lb for his current size but I think he looks at least 18 stone which is 252 pounds and probably more 19 stone. And he looks more bad ass with the bald head!
Shaun said on 24/Aug/12
@Alex and Danimal. Yeah he's massive. In the latest xxx film he looks 250-260 lbs of solid muscle. Indeed back to his old wrestling size but less body fat, huge.
@Alex and Danimal. Yeah he's massive. In the latest xxx film he looks 250-260 lbs of solid muscle. Indeed back to his old wrestling size but less body fat, huge.
Alex said on 10/Aug/12
Danimal, there were a couple movies he looked maybe 220lbs tops but movies like Rundown and Walking tall he was closer to 250lbs but those movies were in 03-04 not long after he stopped wrestling fulltime in 2002. The movie the Game Plan he looked below 220lbs
Danimal, there were a couple movies he looked maybe 220lbs tops but movies like Rundown and Walking tall he was closer to 250lbs but those movies were in 03-04 not long after he stopped wrestling fulltime in 2002. The movie the Game Plan he looked below 220lbs
Danimal said on 9/Aug/12
Rampage, the Rock dropped to below 230 pounds after retiring from movies. What was his lowest weight Alex? I'd say 210-220 pounds or there abouts..
Rampage, the Rock dropped to below 230 pounds after retiring from movies. What was his lowest weight Alex? I'd say 210-220 pounds or there abouts..
Alex said on 9/Aug/12
Danimal, yea that makes sense. Rock was usually smaller in size in his movies other than the Scorpion King where he was 260. He looks to be back to his old wrestling size again but more cut though!
Danimal, yea that makes sense. Rock was usually smaller in size in his movies other than the Scorpion King where he was 260. He looks to be back to his old wrestling size again but more cut though!
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 8/Aug/12
I think Goldberg's peak height was 280lbs and definitely
the most jacked up. I think The Rock was 5-10lbs lighter at
his heaviest (pre-WWF career), then after he retired from wrestling
withered down to 230lbs. But now is back up to 260lbs (give or take).
No offense to The Rattlesnake but a fair bit of his mass has turned into fat.
Not in great shape. But he was never a typically ripped guy. Just big, blocky
muscles. Upper end of 250lbs.
I think Goldberg's peak height was 280lbs and definitely
the most jacked up. I think The Rock was 5-10lbs lighter at
his heaviest (pre-WWF career), then after he retired from wrestling
withered down to 230lbs. But now is back up to 260lbs (give or take).
No offense to The Rattlesnake but a fair bit of his mass has turned into fat.
Not in great shape. But he was never a typically ripped guy. Just big, blocky
muscles. Upper end of 250lbs.
Danimal said on 7/Aug/12
Alex says on 7/Aug/12
Just saw the pic with Austin, Rock and Goldberg. Austin was always a big guy mainly in his WWF/WWE days but hes look even bigger in that pic. If you look at ROck now hes huge. he really bulked up for his latest movie role. Guy is more jacked at 40 than he was at 25-30 LOL
For real. The Rock, is big time jacked now (looks to be 260-265 pounds). Truthfully, so does Austin look to be that weight. I'm sure he's minimum 255 pounds today. Funny, Goldberg used to be by far the most built of all 3 (290 + pounds legit) and he's looking to be the smallest today (max 265-270 pounds imo).
Alex says on 7/Aug/12
Just saw the pic with Austin, Rock and Goldberg. Austin was always a big guy mainly in his WWF/WWE days but hes look even bigger in that pic. If you look at ROck now hes huge. he really bulked up for his latest movie role. Guy is more jacked at 40 than he was at 25-30 LOL
For real. The Rock, is big time jacked now (looks to be 260-265 pounds). Truthfully, so does Austin look to be that weight. I'm sure he's minimum 255 pounds today. Funny, Goldberg used to be by far the most built of all 3 (290 + pounds legit) and he's looking to be the smallest today (max 265-270 pounds imo).
Alex said on 7/Aug/12
Just saw the pic with Austin, Rock and Goldberg. Austin was always a big guy mainly in his WWF/WWE days but hes look even bigger in that pic. If you look at ROck now hes huge. he really bulked up for his latest movie role. Guy is more jacked at 40 than he was at 25-30 LOL
Just saw the pic with Austin, Rock and Goldberg. Austin was always a big guy mainly in his WWF/WWE days but hes look even bigger in that pic. If you look at ROck now hes huge. he really bulked up for his latest movie role. Guy is more jacked at 40 than he was at 25-30 LOL
Danimal said on 7/Aug/12
Unagi says on 6/Jun/12
if he's 6'1, and Rock 6'3 then Goldberg 6'2.25... could you explain me that?:
Click Here
WOW, Stone Cold has beefed up BIG TIME. He's looking HUGE. He was never that built/large in his wrestling days. His chest and arms are really developed these days. Putting Goldberg and The Rock to shame in that pic.
Unagi says on 6/Jun/12
if he's 6'1, and Rock 6'3 then Goldberg 6'2.25... could you explain me that?:
Click Here
WOW, Stone Cold has beefed up BIG TIME. He's looking HUGE. He was never that built/large in his wrestling days. His chest and arms are really developed these days. Putting Goldberg and The Rock to shame in that pic.
Alex said on 6/Aug/12
I've done a few measurement in the past right out of bed and was in the 6'0.75-6'1 range but that height you lose right away anyway. I've never been taller than 6'0.25 in the afternoon/evening. 6'2 217lbs is a good weight. I weigh 187lbs currently but I've cut down from a solid 205. I was already in good shape, just wanted to cut up more. But I'll rebulk sometime next month back up to at least 205-210
I've done a few measurement in the past right out of bed and was in the 6'0.75-6'1 range but that height you lose right away anyway. I've never been taller than 6'0.25 in the afternoon/evening. 6'2 217lbs is a good weight. I weigh 187lbs currently but I've cut down from a solid 205. I was already in good shape, just wanted to cut up more. But I'll rebulk sometime next month back up to at least 205-210
Ajax said on 6/Aug/12
Have no idea. I'd guess probably 6'2.5-.75". I weigh 217lbs and have a size 14 USA which is a little large for my height IMO. I think depending on your foot wear and posture, you can fool someone into
thinking your maybe 1.5" taller than you are. I mean, the hair over 6'5" challenger fooled people into
thinking he was 6'6"-6'7"
Have no idea. I'd guess probably 6'2.5-.75". I weigh 217lbs and have a size 14 USA which is a little large for my height IMO. I think depending on your foot wear and posture, you can fool someone into
thinking your maybe 1.5" taller than you are. I mean, the hair over 6'5" challenger fooled people into
thinking he was 6'6"-6'7"
Alex said on 5/Aug/12
Ajax, haha yea thats true. Though some 6'2 guys claim 6'4. I could claim 6'2 but some would and wouldn't question it. If I claimed 6'1 from now on 99% of people wouldn't question it. You're a legit 6'2 guy. What are you out of bed and midday?
Ajax, haha yea thats true. Though some 6'2 guys claim 6'4. I could claim 6'2 but some would and wouldn't question it. If I claimed 6'1 from now on 99% of people wouldn't question it. You're a legit 6'2 guy. What are you out of bed and midday?
Ajax said on 4/Aug/12
@Alex
I agree. Basically %99 of men add 1-2" of height. I'm 6'1 7/8" at my low and usually at 6'2" and people think I'm 6'3" and 6'4". But Alex, haven't you noticed most guys 6'2" and up usually don't exaggerate their height? We should claim 6'2" "the height exaggeration cut-off!" :)
@Alex
I agree. Basically %99 of men add 1-2" of height. I'm 6'1 7/8" at my low and usually at 6'2" and people think I'm 6'3" and 6'4". But Alex, haven't you noticed most guys 6'2" and up usually don't exaggerate their height? We should claim 6'2" "the height exaggeration cut-off!" :)
Alex said on 2/Aug/12
Alot of guys who are 6'0 and even some 5'11 will claim 6'1 so it can make a legit 6'1 guy look 6'2-6'3. I am 6'0 at my low and 6'1 is the height I get guessed at most often
Alot of guys who are 6'0 and even some 5'11 will claim 6'1 so it can make a legit 6'1 guy look 6'2-6'3. I am 6'0 at my low and 6'1 is the height I get guessed at most often
Witchdoctor said on 11/Jun/12
1.84m at peak and current.
1.84m at peak and current.
Unagi said on 6/Jun/12
if he's 6'1, and Rock 6'3 then Goldberg 6'2.25... could you explain me that?:
Click Here
if he's 6'1, and Rock 6'3 then Goldberg 6'2.25... could you explain me that?:
Click Here
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 12/Feb/12
He looks 186cm-187cm range in most
places. I definitely wouldn't peg him lower
than this height...
He looks 186cm-187cm range in most
places. I definitely wouldn't peg him lower
than this height...
Rocky said on 10/Feb/12
Derek d:
He could be 6'2'' even though he said 6'1'' himself, because he's already fairly tall and muscular compared to the average man; he's not gonna care about half an inch or 5 pounds here and there. It's not like he's a 5'3'' Joe Pesci who might fudge things a bit.
Derek d:
He could be 6'2'' even though he said 6'1'' himself, because he's already fairly tall and muscular compared to the average man; he's not gonna care about half an inch or 5 pounds here and there. It's not like he's a 5'3'' Joe Pesci who might fudge things a bit.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 21/Jan/12
Doesn't look less than 6ft1...
185cm min and 187cm max
may even scrape 6ft2 out of bed
Doesn't look less than 6ft1...
185cm min and 187cm max
may even scrape 6ft2 out of bed
Johhny said on 13/Jan/12
i didn't know his exact height but those who are interested can have a look at his mugshot here is the pic Mugshots/williamssteve.htm" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Click Here for other celebrities Mugshots link is here Mugshots/index.16.htm" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Click Here
i didn't know his exact height but those who are interested can have a look at his mugshot here is the pic Mugshots/williamssteve.htm" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Click Here for other celebrities Mugshots link is here Mugshots/index.16.htm" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Click Here
Valdor said on 1/Jan/12
6'0" - 6'0"1/2" (184cm sounds fair)
6'0" - 6'0"1/2" (184cm sounds fair)
Derek d said on 18/Dec/11
Why would the man be 6'2 if He said 6'1 himself? Lol.
Why would the man be 6'2 if He said 6'1 himself? Lol.
Tman said on 3/Dec/11
1,84m 255 lbs(peak weight)
1,84m 255 lbs(peak weight)
Tman said on 3/Dec/11
1,84m 255 (peak weight)
1,84m 255 (peak weight)
josh said on 18/Nov/11
6'2 ..same height as shane
6'2 ..same height as shane
Goldberg said on 15/Nov/11
Met Goldberg at a signing ar MCI Center in Washington, DC. I asked him to stand up to get a picture taken with me. I'm 6'1. He was SLIGHTLY taller than me. Definitely NOT 6'3 or 6'4.
Met Goldberg at a signing ar MCI Center in Washington, DC. I asked him to stand up to get a picture taken with me. I'm 6'1. He was SLIGHTLY taller than me. Definitely NOT 6'3 or 6'4.
Alex said on 14/Nov/11
He's max 184cm I think
He's max 184cm I think
jake, 1.82 m- 1.83 m said on 13/Nov/11
He's an honest 6ft 1in.
He's an honest 6ft 1in.
Mathew said on 13/Nov/11
Austin was/likely still is 6'1" legit. He's been billed at 6'2" and sometimes 6'3" but 6'1" is right.
Austin was/likely still is 6'1" legit. He's been billed at 6'2" and sometimes 6'3" but 6'1" is right.
logan noll 1996 said on 12/Nov/11
Stone cold is 6 foot. Almost everybody who is billed 6 foot 2 ends up being 6 foot in real life.
Stone cold is 6 foot. Almost everybody who is billed 6 foot 2 ends up being 6 foot in real life.
Parra said on 8/Nov/11
He is like 6'2
He is like 6'2
Alex said on 30/Oct/11
Henrik, claims like that make no sense LOL. There was no way 6 inches between them. More like 4 inches
Henrik, claims like that make no sense LOL. There was no way 6 inches between them. More like 4 inches
Henrik said on 28/Oct/11
I have only seen Triple H talk about his height once (in USAToday), and he claimed 6'4". Ironically and contradicting, he did say that Shawn Michaels was 5'10". LOL.
I have only seen Triple H talk about his height once (in USAToday), and he claimed 6'4". Ironically and contradicting, he did say that Shawn Michaels was 5'10". LOL.
Alex said on 27/Oct/11
Usually they will say the taller the wrestler the bigger the build but not always true. Kane billed at 7'0 but 6'8 max but Big Show billed at 7'0 and looks within an inch of that height. I do remember HHH was billed at 6'5 in WCW then 6'4 in WWF. I think he claimed 6'3 though?
Usually they will say the taller the wrestler the bigger the build but not always true. Kane billed at 7'0 but 6'8 max but Big Show billed at 7'0 and looks within an inch of that height. I do remember HHH was billed at 6'5 in WCW then 6'4 in WWF. I think he claimed 6'3 though?
Legend said on 27/Oct/11
He's about 6 ft flat today
He's about 6 ft flat today
Henrik said on 26/Oct/11
I think that wrestlers do on average get padded by two inches. An exception seems to be 6'1" types, who from my experience usually get billed as 6'2" ("only" one inch padded).
Then there are a few who get padded even more (Triple H original billing was 6'5") or have, at least close to, their actual heights billed.
I think that wrestlers do on average get padded by two inches. An exception seems to be 6'1" types, who from my experience usually get billed as 6'2" ("only" one inch padded).
Then there are a few who get padded even more (Triple H original billing was 6'5") or have, at least close to, their actual heights billed.
Alex said on 20/Oct/11
He was always billed at 6'2. Seen a few 6'3 billings in magazines but he claimed 6'1 as his height
He was always billed at 6'2. Seen a few 6'3 billings in magazines but he claimed 6'1 as his height
Danimal said on 18/Oct/11
TNTinCA says on 17/Oct/11
Sounds about right.
I think his 'billed height' in his wrestling days was 6'3".
Wrong. It was 6'2".
TNTinCA says on 17/Oct/11
Sounds about right.
I think his 'billed height' in his wrestling days was 6'3".
Wrong. It was 6'2".
tell-em said on 18/Oct/11
cold stone is 6'1"
cold stone is 6'1"
TNTinCA said on 17/Oct/11
Sounds about right.
I think his 'billed height' in his wrestling days was 6'3". Rule of thumb is that most wrestlers get about 2 inches of height added to them for billing purposes. The Rock was always billed as 6'5" while he is actually 6'3". Shawn Michaels was billed at 6 foot when he was around 5'10" or so.
Sounds about right.
I think his 'billed height' in his wrestling days was 6'3". Rule of thumb is that most wrestlers get about 2 inches of height added to them for billing purposes. The Rock was always billed as 6'5" while he is actually 6'3". Shawn Michaels was billed at 6 foot when he was around 5'10" or so.
Clay said on 15/Oct/11
Austin is 6'1'' at most, Goldberg I would say is 6'2.5''.
Austin is 6'1'' at most, Goldberg I would say is 6'2.5''.
tell-em said on 14/Oct/11
goldberg is 6'2, screw 6'1".
goldberg is 6'2, screw 6'1".
Henrik said on 14/Oct/11
Bill Goldberg is listed 6'2.5" on this site (Viper argues that he's 6'1") and he is taller than Bosworth on the picture that Vegas provided. Bosworth being 6'2.5" would make Goldberg a weak or full 6'4" and Austin 6'2.5" as well.
Bill Goldberg is listed 6'2.5" on this site (Viper argues that he's 6'1") and he is taller than Bosworth on the picture that Vegas provided. Bosworth being 6'2.5" would make Goldberg a weak or full 6'4" and Austin 6'2.5" as well.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 14/Oct/11
Brian Bosworth looks 6"2-6"3 range
Brian Bosworth looks 6"2-6"3 range
Alex said on 14/Oct/11
Austin has claimed 6'1 so at most that was his peak. He never looked more than 6'1 tops anyway back then excluding his footwear or those chunky boots he wore. Maybe 6'0 1/2 peak, and today 6'0. If he has lost height it was pretty minimal I would say
Austin has claimed 6'1 so at most that was his peak. He never looked more than 6'1 tops anyway back then excluding his footwear or those chunky boots he wore. Maybe 6'0 1/2 peak, and today 6'0. If he has lost height it was pretty minimal I would say
Legend said on 13/Oct/11
Austin isn't 6'1 anymore Rob. This is his peak height at most.
Austin isn't 6'1 anymore Rob. This is his peak height at most.
Viper said on 12/Oct/11
Goldberg taller than Bosworth? Impossible
Goldberg taller than Bosworth? Impossible
Henrik said on 11/Oct/11
Appears to be about the same height as 6'2" billed Brian Bosworth, and taller than here listed strong 6' or 184cm William Fichtner (who is also closer to the camera) in the movie Longest Yard: Click Here
But I think Bosworth is more like 6'1.25" (186cm) or 6'1.5", as Bill Goldberg seemed to have some height advantage over him. He has no page here.
Appears to be about the same height as 6'2" billed Brian Bosworth, and taller than here listed strong 6' or 184cm William Fichtner (who is also closer to the camera) in the movie Longest Yard: Click Here
But I think Bosworth is more like 6'1.25" (186cm) or 6'1.5", as Bill Goldberg seemed to have some height advantage over him. He has no page here.
Legend said on 11/Oct/11
Ziggler is 5'10.25
Ziggler is 5'10.25
SAM RICK said on 9/Oct/11
IN A VIDEOGAME CALLED RAW STONE COLD IS LISTED AS 6'2 AND 252LBS.A FEW MONTHS AGO JUST BEFORE CAPATIAL PUNISHMENT HE SEEMED TALLER THAN DOLPH ZIGGLER WHO IS LISTED AS 6;0.
IN A VIDEOGAME CALLED RAW STONE COLD IS LISTED AS 6'2 AND 252LBS.A FEW MONTHS AGO JUST BEFORE CAPATIAL PUNISHMENT HE SEEMED TALLER THAN DOLPH ZIGGLER WHO IS LISTED AS 6;0.
ali said on 30/Sep/11
i think was powerful in wwe
i think was powerful in wwe
Legend said on 27/Sep/11
I think he looks 5'11.5-6'0 with Angle. With UT the angle isn't fooling me. He still looks much shorter.
I think he looks 5'11.5-6'0 with Angle. With UT the angle isn't fooling me. He still looks much shorter.
Alex said on 23/Sep/11
Austin looks slightly over 6'0 there with Angle.
With Undertaker he looks even taller LOL but backstage segments look different from in the ring though. I've UT have more inches on Austin in the ring than in that backstage interview
Austin looks slightly over 6'0 there with Angle.
With Undertaker he looks even taller LOL but backstage segments look different from in the ring though. I've UT have more inches on Austin in the ring than in that backstage interview
James said on 22/Sep/11
i have too disagree looking on youtube WWE in 1998 and 2000 was much more cooler than it is now.
the 1998-2000 RAW is War Arena was amazing as well.
i have too disagree looking on youtube WWE in 1998 and 2000 was much more cooler than it is now.
the 1998-2000 RAW is War Arena was amazing as well.
Vegas said on 22/Sep/11
how tall does he look here legend Click Here
remember what i said about backstage stuff :D
how tall does he look here legend Click Here
remember what i said about backstage stuff :D
Alex said on 21/Sep/11
Clay, yes very true. Within the last 3-4 years, mainly the last 2 years these young kids around 10-13 love this stuff.
Clay, yes very true. Within the last 3-4 years, mainly the last 2 years these young kids around 10-13 love this stuff.
Clay said on 20/Sep/11
Well James Im sure 12 year olds think this current brand is the greatest thing ever. Oh and John Cena is superman of course, lol.
Well James Im sure 12 year olds think this current brand is the greatest thing ever. Oh and John Cena is superman of course, lol.
James said on 19/Sep/11
Alex wat do you think the WWE will be like 7 years from now?
Alex wat do you think the WWE will be like 7 years from now?
Alex said on 18/Sep/11
Clay, I was 23 in 2007 and thats the year where I personally lost interest. It was by start of 09 when I was really done with it LOL. Once in a while I'll check it out still
Clay, I was 23 in 2007 and thats the year where I personally lost interest. It was by start of 09 when I was really done with it LOL. Once in a while I'll check it out still
James said on 17/Sep/11
Alex says on 16/Sep/11
James, yea 98 was a new era in WWE. thats when Austin became WWF champion and was the face of the WWF. 05-06 was a new change and the attitude era was at its end. From 07-08 and on is a new era but not sure what to call it.
If you could take a wild guess what do you think the WWE will be like 7 years from now? Do you think it will be like the attitude era again in 7 years time?
i dislike this current WWE era :(
Alex says on 16/Sep/11
James, yea 98 was a new era in WWE. thats when Austin became WWF champion and was the face of the WWF. 05-06 was a new change and the attitude era was at its end. From 07-08 and on is a new era but not sure what to call it.
If you could take a wild guess what do you think the WWE will be like 7 years from now? Do you think it will be like the attitude era again in 7 years time?
i dislike this current WWE era :(
Clay said on 17/Sep/11
James and Alex:
It could be that it was cooler back then because we were just little kids, lol. I'm 23 now and it just seems goofy as hell.
James and Alex:
It could be that it was cooler back then because we were just little kids, lol. I'm 23 now and it just seems goofy as hell.
Alex said on 16/Sep/11
James, yea 98 was a new era in WWE. thats when Austin became WWF champion and was the face of the WWF. 05-06 was a new change and the attitude era was at its end. From 07-08 and on is a new era but not sure what to call it.
James, yea 98 was a new era in WWE. thats when Austin became WWF champion and was the face of the WWF. 05-06 was a new change and the attitude era was at its end. From 07-08 and on is a new era but not sure what to call it.
Tman said on 15/Sep/11
the attitude era was not centrered around jumping off titantrons or 15 foot cages and Danimal you must be talking about Droz who had he's neck brocken after another perfomer(D lo) tried to do a running powerbomb on him and he could not get a good grip on Droz cos he was wearing a lose shirt and a fan had thrown a drink into the ring so D lo brown sliped and Droz landed awkwardly and became paraplegic(so how is that Att'de Era fault?) The Atti'de Era had the best perfomers,story lines came from all angles(not just around world H'vy weight chmpionship title and John cena) Divas were actually "wrestlers" the acting was convincing,the tag teams were legendary while at the same time WWF/E was "Kid friendly".
the attitude era was not centrered around jumping off titantrons or 15 foot cages and Danimal you must be talking about Droz who had he's neck brocken after another perfomer(D lo) tried to do a running powerbomb on him and he could not get a good grip on Droz cos he was wearing a lose shirt and a fan had thrown a drink into the ring so D lo brown sliped and Droz landed awkwardly and became paraplegic(so how is that Att'de Era fault?) The Atti'de Era had the best perfomers,story lines came from all angles(not just around world H'vy weight chmpionship title and John cena) Divas were actually "wrestlers" the acting was convincing,the tag teams were legendary while at the same time WWF/E was "Kid friendly".
Legend said on 14/Sep/11
One of the best matches ever in my opinion is Stone Cold vs Bret Hart Wrestlemania 13.
One of the best matches ever in my opinion is Stone Cold vs Bret Hart Wrestlemania 13.
James said on 14/Sep/11
Alex says on 14/Sep/11
James, the attitude era officially started in 98. 98 was a great year but I thought 99-00 was even better. 01-02 was pretty good too. 03-04 was good. 05-06 went down some but still was watchable. 07 on is when I really started to get out of it and by 08 that was it for me LOL. WM 17 in 2001 was my fave WM of all time
some say 2006 was the last year off the attitude era?
do you agree alex as well that there was a HUGE change in the WWE from 1997-1998? i saw a big change in the WWE as well from 2007-2008.
there will probably be anohter huge change in the theme in 2017-2018 LOL.
Alex says on 14/Sep/11
James, the attitude era officially started in 98. 98 was a great year but I thought 99-00 was even better. 01-02 was pretty good too. 03-04 was good. 05-06 went down some but still was watchable. 07 on is when I really started to get out of it and by 08 that was it for me LOL. WM 17 in 2001 was my fave WM of all time
some say 2006 was the last year off the attitude era?
do you agree alex as well that there was a HUGE change in the WWE from 1997-1998? i saw a big change in the WWE as well from 2007-2008.
there will probably be anohter huge change in the theme in 2017-2018 LOL.
Alex said on 14/Sep/11
James, the attitude era officially started in 98. 98 was a great year but I thought 99-00 was even better. 01-02 was pretty good too. 03-04 was good. 05-06 went down some but still was watchable. 07 on is when I really started to get out of it and by 08 that was it for me LOL. WM 17 in 2001 was my fave WM of all time
James, the attitude era officially started in 98. 98 was a great year but I thought 99-00 was even better. 01-02 was pretty good too. 03-04 was good. 05-06 went down some but still was watchable. 07 on is when I really started to get out of it and by 08 that was it for me LOL. WM 17 in 2001 was my fave WM of all time
James said on 13/Sep/11
Alex says on 13/Sep/11
James, I actually liked 01-03 range a lot. 04 was when it went down a bit but still enjoyable. I do agree 2000 was a great year. Maybe my favorite year. Those times I never missed a raw or smackdown show on TV lol
1999 was very good as well wasn't it?
What do you think off WWE in 1998 Alex? I think it was better than the 1999 season. I really like wrestelmania 1998 when mike tyson was in it although i did enjoy wrestlemania 1999 more.
Alex says on 13/Sep/11
James, I actually liked 01-03 range a lot. 04 was when it went down a bit but still enjoyable. I do agree 2000 was a great year. Maybe my favorite year. Those times I never missed a raw or smackdown show on TV lol
1999 was very good as well wasn't it?
What do you think off WWE in 1998 Alex? I think it was better than the 1999 season. I really like wrestelmania 1998 when mike tyson was in it although i did enjoy wrestlemania 1999 more.
Alex said on 13/Sep/11
James, I actually liked 01-03 range a lot. 04 was when it went down a bit but still enjoyable. I do agree 2000 was a great year. Maybe my favorite year. Those times I never missed a raw or smackdown show on TV lol
James, I actually liked 01-03 range a lot. 04 was when it went down a bit but still enjoyable. I do agree 2000 was a great year. Maybe my favorite year. Those times I never missed a raw or smackdown show on TV lol
James said on 12/Sep/11
Alex says on 12/Sep/11
I started watching wrestling with WWF in 1991-1992 but got more into it by 93-94. I grew up with it in the late 90s-early 2000s when the attitude era was at its best. By 04-06 to me it wasn't quite as good but still enjoyable enough to way but by 07-08 I just got out of it. By that time I felt it was for a new generation of kids. By 07-08 I was 23-24 years old and a lot of it was meant for kids in their teens I felt. A lot of my fave guys were either gone or weren't doing much anymore
I think the WWE become kinda boring in 2001-2002 which is when i lost interest in it. The years 1997-2000 were the most enjoyable for me even though i was very young.
I remember just like it was yesterday 12 years ago that i would tune into too WWE smackdown every saturday morning on sky1. Also i would VERY much enjoy watching WCW every friday night on TNT. WCW Thunder was good as well.
Alex says on 12/Sep/11
I started watching wrestling with WWF in 1991-1992 but got more into it by 93-94. I grew up with it in the late 90s-early 2000s when the attitude era was at its best. By 04-06 to me it wasn't quite as good but still enjoyable enough to way but by 07-08 I just got out of it. By that time I felt it was for a new generation of kids. By 07-08 I was 23-24 years old and a lot of it was meant for kids in their teens I felt. A lot of my fave guys were either gone or weren't doing much anymore
I think the WWE become kinda boring in 2001-2002 which is when i lost interest in it. The years 1997-2000 were the most enjoyable for me even though i was very young.
I remember just like it was yesterday 12 years ago that i would tune into too WWE smackdown every saturday morning on sky1. Also i would VERY much enjoy watching WCW every friday night on TNT. WCW Thunder was good as well.
Alex said on 12/Sep/11
Legend, yea Austin is known for his chunky boots that can give him a taller appearance but 5'11.5 for him I really doubt. I'd put him at 6'0.5 before 5'11.5 but barefoot I think hes 6'0-6'0.25 range
Legend, yea Austin is known for his chunky boots that can give him a taller appearance but 5'11.5 for him I really doubt. I'd put him at 6'0.5 before 5'11.5 but barefoot I think hes 6'0-6'0.25 range
Alex said on 12/Sep/11
I started watching wrestling with WWF in 1991-1992 but got more into it by 93-94. I grew up with it in the late 90s-early 2000s when the attitude era was at its best. By 04-06 to me it wasn't quite as good but still enjoyable enough to way but by 07-08 I just got out of it. By that time I felt it was for a new generation of kids. By 07-08 I was 23-24 years old and a lot of it was meant for kids in their teens I felt. A lot of my fave guys were either gone or weren't doing much anymore
I started watching wrestling with WWF in 1991-1992 but got more into it by 93-94. I grew up with it in the late 90s-early 2000s when the attitude era was at its best. By 04-06 to me it wasn't quite as good but still enjoyable enough to way but by 07-08 I just got out of it. By that time I felt it was for a new generation of kids. By 07-08 I was 23-24 years old and a lot of it was meant for kids in their teens I felt. A lot of my fave guys were either gone or weren't doing much anymore
James said on 12/Sep/11
Danimal in 2011 Vince McMahon seems not so much off a tryant like he used too be in the attitude era. Would u not agree? The guys getting old now so its understandable.
Remember that infamous incident in 1998 when a fan threw a battery at shawn michaels and he walked off letting down loads of fans? In an interview Vince stated that he was less than impressed by shawns behaviour.
Danimal in 2011 Vince McMahon seems not so much off a tryant like he used too be in the attitude era. Would u not agree? The guys getting old now so its understandable.
Remember that infamous incident in 1998 when a fan threw a battery at shawn michaels and he walked off letting down loads of fans? In an interview Vince stated that he was less than impressed by shawns behaviour.
Legend said on 12/Sep/11
I knew I wasn't crazy to think he looked 5'11.5
I knew I wasn't crazy to think he looked 5'11.5
Danimal said on 11/Sep/11
Vegas says on 10/Sep/11
james he is starting to lose height slowly anyway by the normal aging process but your question is his spinal stenosis leading to him losing more height, answer is i don't know, he mentioned that his condition will deteriorate with time not get better so that doesn't sound to good
for the fans that keep saying "wwe should bring back the attitude era" they should have a look at guys like edge, benoit, jeff hardy, kurt angle, steve austin etc and see what jumping off 20ft cages, titantrons, getting speared off ladders, taking unprotected chairshots to the head etc every night did for those guys, jerry lawler is now in his 60s and still wrestling couple of nights a week while edge sits at home unable to ever wrestle again and he is not even 40
What about that young wrestler who is now a paraplegic. I think he took over the role of one half of the Road Warriors? Then we have Mick Foley who has stated in several recent interviews that he has sustained so many concussions from chair shots to the head, that he has permanent brain damage and his whole think process is foggy (very scary stuff). Mick Foley was known for his intelligence. Now even that is gone due to the attitude era. Then we can look at Owen Hart who is DEAD. The list goes on and Vince McMahon takes no responsibility whatsoever for any of these tragedies.
Vegas says on 10/Sep/11
james he is starting to lose height slowly anyway by the normal aging process but your question is his spinal stenosis leading to him losing more height, answer is i don't know, he mentioned that his condition will deteriorate with time not get better so that doesn't sound to good
for the fans that keep saying "wwe should bring back the attitude era" they should have a look at guys like edge, benoit, jeff hardy, kurt angle, steve austin etc and see what jumping off 20ft cages, titantrons, getting speared off ladders, taking unprotected chairshots to the head etc every night did for those guys, jerry lawler is now in his 60s and still wrestling couple of nights a week while edge sits at home unable to ever wrestle again and he is not even 40
What about that young wrestler who is now a paraplegic. I think he took over the role of one half of the Road Warriors? Then we have Mick Foley who has stated in several recent interviews that he has sustained so many concussions from chair shots to the head, that he has permanent brain damage and his whole think process is foggy (very scary stuff). Mick Foley was known for his intelligence. Now even that is gone due to the attitude era. Then we can look at Owen Hart who is DEAD. The list goes on and Vince McMahon takes no responsibility whatsoever for any of these tragedies.
James said on 11/Sep/11
Vegas says on 10/Sep/11
james he is starting to lose height slowly anyway by the normal aging process but your question is his spinal stenosis leading to him losing more height, answer is i don't know, he mentioned that his condition will deteriorate with time not get better so that doesn't sound to good
for the fans that keep saying "wwe should bring back the attitude era" they should have a look at guys like edge, benoit, jeff hardy, kurt angle, steve austin etc and see what jumping off 20ft cages, titantrons, getting speared off ladders, taking unprotected chairshots to the head etc every night did for those guys, jerry lawler is now in his 60s and still wrestling couple of nights a week while edge sits at home unable to ever wrestle again and he is not even 40
Does that mean edge is going too die?
I LOVED the attitude era it was great. also used too really enjoy WCW Nitro everyday friday night when i was 9 or 10 years old.
give it half a decade and we might see a new better era in the WWE. I wish they would change the design for the current WWE arenas :(
Vegas says on 10/Sep/11
james he is starting to lose height slowly anyway by the normal aging process but your question is his spinal stenosis leading to him losing more height, answer is i don't know, he mentioned that his condition will deteriorate with time not get better so that doesn't sound to good
for the fans that keep saying "wwe should bring back the attitude era" they should have a look at guys like edge, benoit, jeff hardy, kurt angle, steve austin etc and see what jumping off 20ft cages, titantrons, getting speared off ladders, taking unprotected chairshots to the head etc every night did for those guys, jerry lawler is now in his 60s and still wrestling couple of nights a week while edge sits at home unable to ever wrestle again and he is not even 40
Does that mean edge is going too die?
I LOVED the attitude era it was great. also used too really enjoy WCW Nitro everyday friday night when i was 9 or 10 years old.
give it half a decade and we might see a new better era in the WWE. I wish they would change the design for the current WWE arenas :(
Legend said on 11/Sep/11
We were lucky to have witnessed the attitude era guys. JR announcing. All the hardcore matches. Stone cold, the Rock, Mankind, Masked Kane, Undertaker. Great times. It feels so empty now.
We were lucky to have witnessed the attitude era guys. JR announcing. All the hardcore matches. Stone cold, the Rock, Mankind, Masked Kane, Undertaker. Great times. It feels so empty now.
Alex said on 10/Sep/11
Vegas, you're right. Attitude era has been gone since the early 2000s. Most will say the attitude era was from 98-03
Vegas, you're right. Attitude era has been gone since the early 2000s. Most will say the attitude era was from 98-03
Alex said on 10/Sep/11
I'd put Austin at 6'0.5 before 5'11.5
I'd put Austin at 6'0.5 before 5'11.5
Vegas said on 10/Sep/11
james he is starting to lose height slowly anyway by the normal aging process but your question is his spinal stenosis leading to him losing more height, answer is i don't know, he mentioned that his condition will deteriorate with time not get better so that doesn't sound to good
for the fans that keep saying "wwe should bring back the attitude era" they should have a look at guys like edge, benoit, jeff hardy, kurt angle, steve austin etc and see what jumping off 20ft cages, titantrons, getting speared off ladders, taking unprotected chairshots to the head etc every night did for those guys, jerry lawler is now in his 60s and still wrestling couple of nights a week while edge sits at home unable to ever wrestle again and he is not even 40
james he is starting to lose height slowly anyway by the normal aging process but your question is his spinal stenosis leading to him losing more height, answer is i don't know, he mentioned that his condition will deteriorate with time not get better so that doesn't sound to good
for the fans that keep saying "wwe should bring back the attitude era" they should have a look at guys like edge, benoit, jeff hardy, kurt angle, steve austin etc and see what jumping off 20ft cages, titantrons, getting speared off ladders, taking unprotected chairshots to the head etc every night did for those guys, jerry lawler is now in his 60s and still wrestling couple of nights a week while edge sits at home unable to ever wrestle again and he is not even 40
Heights are barefeet estimates, derived from quotations, official websites, agency resumes, in person encounters with actors at conventions and pictures/films.
Other vital statistics like weight or shoe size measurements have been sourced from newspapers, books, resumes or social media.
Celebrity Fan Photos and Agency Pictures of stars are © to their respective owners.