Add a Comment1690 comments
Average Guess (319 Votes)
Peak: 6ft 1.11in (185.7cm)
Current: 6ft 0.48in (184.1cm)
Peak: 6ft 1.11in (185.7cm)
Current: 6ft 0.48in (184.1cm)
Alex said on 21/Feb/09
Vegas, yea back in 1998 Austin vs Goldberg would have been HUGE. Nobody would care much if that happened now though.
Yea if Austin or Hogan wrestle they may lose to someone like Cena. Orton is going for a main title so he wont be against either of them.
Vegas, yea back in 1998 Austin vs Goldberg would have been HUGE. Nobody would care much if that happened now though.
Yea if Austin or Hogan wrestle they may lose to someone like Cena. Orton is going for a main title so he wont be against either of them.
Vegas said on 20/Feb/09
hogan vs austin should have taken place in 2002 imo, it wouldn't draw near as much money now as people think, austin is finished, hogan can still go for sure but it would be up to him to dictate the entire course of the match, something which has never been his strong point; the match would probably end up looking horrible. hogan and cena imo would be fine match, hogan losing would signify passing the torch to the next generation of mega-star, if austin or hogan do wrestle they should put one of the current roster over big time, guys like cena, orton, edge are now ready to carry the torch.
regarding biggest match in history, imagine if they booked goldberg (before he lost) against austin in 1998, that would have broken all records
hogan vs austin should have taken place in 2002 imo, it wouldn't draw near as much money now as people think, austin is finished, hogan can still go for sure but it would be up to him to dictate the entire course of the match, something which has never been his strong point; the match would probably end up looking horrible. hogan and cena imo would be fine match, hogan losing would signify passing the torch to the next generation of mega-star, if austin or hogan do wrestle they should put one of the current roster over big time, guys like cena, orton, edge are now ready to carry the torch.
regarding biggest match in history, imagine if they booked goldberg (before he lost) against austin in 1998, that would have broken all records
Alex said on 18/Feb/09
I heard Austin vs Hogan too. That would be cool to see though. I've heard UT vs HBK which would be great. I dont like the Jericho/Hogan idea really.
I heard Austin vs Hogan too. That would be cool to see though. I've heard UT vs HBK which would be great. I dont like the Jericho/Hogan idea really.
Vegas said on 18/Feb/09
Ola says on 17/Feb/09
Austin vs Hogan in WM25 false or true?
austin/hogan a match between two non-regular competitors will never happen at mania, current word is that it could be jericho/hogan or jericho/austin OR hogan/cena
Ola says on 17/Feb/09
Austin vs Hogan in WM25 false or true?
austin/hogan a match between two non-regular competitors will never happen at mania, current word is that it could be jericho/hogan or jericho/austin OR hogan/cena
Alex said on 14/Feb/09
Actually I think if anything Cena may edge out Austin by a hair.
Actually I think if anything Cena may edge out Austin by a hair.
Clay said on 13/Feb/09
Minimum 6'0.5.
Minimum 6'0.5.
\\\\\\\\-_-_-(Hugh)-_-_-/ said on 13/Feb/09
He's about an inch taller than Cena. Cena is 184cm and Austin is 187cm. End of discussion. He towered over everyone in The Condemned and Looked all of 4 inches taller than Adam Sandler whose a legit 5ft10.
He's about an inch taller than Cena. Cena is 184cm and Austin is 187cm. End of discussion. He towered over everyone in The Condemned and Looked all of 4 inches taller than Adam Sandler whose a legit 5ft10.
Vegas said on 12/Feb/09
in your first photo TELLEM the guy in the middle is dane cook who is listed on this site at 6'0 Click Here
in your second photo the guy in the middle is ex soccer/football hardman vinnie jones who is listed on this site at 6'2 Click Here
in your first photo TELLEM the guy in the middle is dane cook who is listed on this site at 6'0 Click Here
in your second photo the guy in the middle is ex soccer/football hardman vinnie jones who is listed on this site at 6'2 Click Here
TELLEM said on 10/Feb/09
steve austin w/ 5'9 jason statham and some other dude in the middle : Click Here Click Here
steve austin w/ 5'9 jason statham and some other dude in the middle : Click Here Click Here
Alex said on 9/Feb/09
Mamun did say Austin looked to have a bit of footwear advantage too. If he was in boots and mamun was in sneakers then for sure Austin's gotta have 1/2 inch advantage.
Mamun did say Austin looked to have a bit of footwear advantage too. If he was in boots and mamun was in sneakers then for sure Austin's gotta have 1/2 inch advantage.
chris said on 6/Feb/09
Stone Cold is 6 feet althought i thought hed be taller Click Here take a look at this its him and kurt angle swicth to 2:46 stone cold has 2 inches on kurt angle
Stone Cold is 6 feet althought i thought hed be taller Click Here take a look at this its him and kurt angle swicth to 2:46 stone cold has 2 inches on kurt angle
Clay said on 5/Feb/09
Nope. Try again - draw a straight line from Austin's right eye it reaches near the top of Mamun's skull - 4'5-5 inches over 5'8ish Supermun'.
Nope. Try again - draw a straight line from Austin's right eye it reaches near the top of Mamun's skull - 4'5-5 inches over 5'8ish Supermun'.
rob89 said on 3/Feb/09
He looks between 5'11 and 6' to me in Mamun's pic, but he's obviously not standing as straight as him. I still think he's closer to an even 6' though, than a legit 6'1. Stone Cold's posture really isn't THAT bad.
He looks between 5'11 and 6' to me in Mamun's pic, but he's obviously not standing as straight as him. I still think he's closer to an even 6' though, than a legit 6'1. Stone Cold's posture really isn't THAT bad.
hs2009 said on 18/Jan/09
In Texas, the crowd would favour Austin HUGELY I would imagine.
I remember WM 17 in Houston, with Austin vs. The Rock. Even though Rocky was amazingly popular in his own right, the crowd was 100% pro-Austin.
In Texas, the crowd would favour Austin HUGELY I would imagine.
I remember WM 17 in Houston, with Austin vs. The Rock. Even though Rocky was amazingly popular in his own right, the crowd was 100% pro-Austin.
Clay said on 17/Jan/09
Thats bizarre how much a mugshot enhances height like that Rob.
Thats bizarre how much a mugshot enhances height like that Rob.
Hugh said on 10/Jan/09
He looks 6ft1-2.
He looks 6ft1-2.
Ian said on 3/Jan/09
How do you get 3 inches taller Rob in those trainers? Can you explain that?
Editor Rob
How do you get 3 inches taller Rob in those trainers? Can you explain that?
Editor Rob they are converse, I was about 5ft 8.75 in them, that old shot was to show even being a few inches in front of somebody else and having a low camera angle and the camera being reasonably close can make you appear taller.
Imagine a 5ft 10 guy standing 4 inches behind me, we would look the same height.
Imagine a 5ft 10 guy standing 4 inches behind me, we would look the same height.
hs2008 said on 3/Jan/09
Hugh, I wouldn't quite go that high IMO but I wouldn't go under 185cm either. He has 4.5" on a 5'8.25" Mamum, so 6'0.75" or a weak 6'1" seems right for Austin.
Hugh, I wouldn't quite go that high IMO but I wouldn't go under 185cm either. He has 4.5" on a 5'8.25" Mamum, so 6'0.75" or a weak 6'1" seems right for Austin.
Alex said on 2/Jan/09
Austin is 184cm.
Austin is 184cm.
Alex said on 1/Jan/09
Rob, so that picture of you is making you look 2 inches taller then. You are about up to the 5'11 mark there.
Rob, so that picture of you is making you look 2 inches taller then. You are about up to the 5'11 mark there.
TELLEM said on 31/Dec/08
heres austin @ 2:38 seconds and on next to 6'0-6'1 peak arn anderson, 6'3-6'4 rick rude, 5'11 larry zbysko Click Here
heres austin @ 2:38 seconds and on next to 6'0-6'1 peak arn anderson, 6'3-6'4 rick rude, 5'11 larry zbysko Click Here
Hugh said on 31/Dec/08
hs2008. I think Austin is around 187cm-188cm.
hs2008. I think Austin is around 187cm-188cm.
hs2008 said on 30/Dec/08
Austin has 3"+ on J.J. Dillon though, who's not under 5'10". J.J looks the same height as Ric Flair. I can't see Austin under 6'1".
Austin has 3"+ on J.J. Dillon though, who's not under 5'10". J.J looks the same height as Ric Flair. I can't see Austin under 6'1".
TELLEM said on 28/Dec/08
thank you alex, now i believe hes under 6'1...i'm serious by the way
thank you alex, now i believe hes under 6'1...i'm serious by the way
Alex said on 28/Dec/08
6'0 1/2 barefoot, plus big boots= 6'2-6'2 1/2 then plus the low angle shot which can make it appear 6'3.
6'0 1/2 barefoot, plus big boots= 6'2-6'2 1/2 then plus the low angle shot which can make it appear 6'3.
TELLEM said on 27/Dec/08
once again, his mugshot has him at 6'3...please explain how a 6'0-6'0 1/2 wrestler goes up to 6'3?
once again, his mugshot has him at 6'3...please explain how a 6'0-6'0 1/2 wrestler goes up to 6'3?
Alex said on 27/Dec/08
I see 6'0 1/2 in the picture above.
I see 6'0 1/2 in the picture above.
Clay said on 26/Dec/08
Stone cold was a wrestler who was billed pretty accuratly, along with Cena, Orton and a few others. If they billed him 6'3'' 265 they could have gotten away with it. I just dont understand how people dont see 6'1'' in this pic next to Mamun. Keep in mind Mamun isnt 5'8, he's 5'8.25 - Austin is SLOUCHING and his right eye reaches the top of Mamun's skull. Use your noggen's people.
Stone cold was a wrestler who was billed pretty accuratly, along with Cena, Orton and a few others. If they billed him 6'3'' 265 they could have gotten away with it. I just dont understand how people dont see 6'1'' in this pic next to Mamun. Keep in mind Mamun isnt 5'8, he's 5'8.25 - Austin is SLOUCHING and his right eye reaches the top of Mamun's skull. Use your noggen's people.
Alex said on 26/Dec/08
Ola, yea Austin is in that 6'0-6'0 1/2 range, no more no less. Thing is Cena is shorter on this site than Austin which I dont believe. If anything Cena may be a smidge taller than Austin.
Ola, yea Austin is in that 6'0-6'0 1/2 range, no more no less. Thing is Cena is shorter on this site than Austin which I dont believe. If anything Cena may be a smidge taller than Austin.
Jason W. said on 25/Dec/08
pro wrestling generally bills there wrestlers at 2 inches taller and maybe 20 lbs heavier. stonecold to my knowledge has always been billed at 6'2, so chances are he is somewhere around the 6'0 range.
pro wrestling generally bills there wrestlers at 2 inches taller and maybe 20 lbs heavier. stonecold to my knowledge has always been billed at 6'2, so chances are he is somewhere around the 6'0 range.
TELLEM said on 24/Dec/08
austin must have worn lifts thenin the mugshot
austin must have worn lifts thenin the mugshot
Hugh said on 22/Dec/08
If he's stacking up at above 6ft3 in the mugshot, he cannot be less than 6ft1. He's between 6ft1 and 6ft2.
If he's stacking up at above 6ft3 in the mugshot, he cannot be less than 6ft1. He's between 6ft1 and 6ft2.
Hugh said on 22/Dec/08
Guys, My cousin whose 5ft9-10 met Austin at a house event just a couple of weeks back and told me he was huge. She showed me a picture of him. He was in low cut sneakers and is towering over her.
Guys, My cousin whose 5ft9-10 met Austin at a house event just a couple of weeks back and told me he was huge. She showed me a picture of him. He was in low cut sneakers and is towering over her.
Anonymous said on 22/Dec/08
i am not comparing mid 1990s this is 1987 and has been posted many times before, roddy is not taller than bret there, if he is its minimal Click Here
march 1992 again minimal or no height difference Click Here
i am not comparing mid 1990s this is 1987 and has been posted many times before, roddy is not taller than bret there, if he is its minimal Click Here
march 1992 again minimal or no height difference Click Here
Danimal said on 21/Dec/08
Anonymous says on 20/Dec/08
Danimal says on 18/Dec/08
Peak Hart was 5'11".
then peak roddy piper was 5'11 too
Roddy was most definitely taller than Bret Hart in the mid-late 80's. Do NOT compare a much shrunken Piper of WCW (mid-late 90's) with Bret Hart. Piper was a tall man in the 1980's. He lost height somewhere along the way (back surgery, hip replacement).
Anonymous says on 20/Dec/08
Danimal says on 18/Dec/08
Peak Hart was 5'11".
then peak roddy piper was 5'11 too
Roddy was most definitely taller than Bret Hart in the mid-late 80's. Do NOT compare a much shrunken Piper of WCW (mid-late 90's) with Bret Hart. Piper was a tall man in the 1980's. He lost height somewhere along the way (back surgery, hip replacement).
Anonymous said on 20/Dec/08
Danimal says on 18/Dec/08
Peak Hart was 5'11".
then peak roddy piper was 5'11 too
Danimal says on 18/Dec/08
Peak Hart was 5'11".
then peak roddy piper was 5'11 too
TELLEM said on 18/Dec/08
the thing that really gets me is austin's mugshot...therefore i cant buy him at 6'0-6'1/2...austin is 6'1
the thing that really gets me is austin's mugshot...therefore i cant buy him at 6'0-6'1/2...austin is 6'1
Danimal said on 18/Dec/08
Red says on 17/Dec/08
I think he
Red says on 17/Dec/08
I think he
Alex said on 18/Dec/08
Next to Shaq I will say he did look as tall as 6'1 but with Glenn and Mamun he looked more 6'0-6'0 1/2.
Next to Shaq I will say he did look as tall as 6'1 but with Glenn and Mamun he looked more 6'0-6'0 1/2.
Clay said on 17/Dec/08
Looked 6'1 next to:
Shaq
Glenn
Mamun
Vince
Looked 6'1 next to:
Shaq
Glenn
Mamun
Vince
Red said on 17/Dec/08
I think he
I think he
Alex said on 15/Dec/08
Austin doesn't look more than 6'0 1/2 unless he's wearing big boots.
Austin doesn't look more than 6'0 1/2 unless he's wearing big boots.
Hugh said on 23/Nov/08
Judging by that picture of him infront of the height chart he must be at least 6ft1. My guess though is 6ft1-2.
Judging by that picture of him infront of the height chart he must be at least 6ft1. My guess though is 6ft1-2.
Jason W. said on 20/Nov/08
I saw the ole Texas Rattlesnake in Huntsville,Ala a few years back at a wrestling event. I was probably as close as 5 feet away and he looked a legit 6'0 maybe 6'1 to me.
I saw the ole Texas Rattlesnake in Huntsville,Ala a few years back at a wrestling event. I was probably as close as 5 feet away and he looked a legit 6'0 maybe 6'1 to me.
Hugh said on 19/Nov/08
I'd say a definate 6ft1
I'd say a definate 6ft1
Alex said on 19/Nov/08
Big T, my waist around my navel is 35 inches but my jean size is 33 to 34, depending on the make. Its pretty tough to put on pure muscle so you gotta expect a bit of weight at the least to go to your stomach area.
Big T, my waist around my navel is 35 inches but my jean size is 33 to 34, depending on the make. Its pretty tough to put on pure muscle so you gotta expect a bit of weight at the least to go to your stomach area.
Big T said on 19/Nov/08
Interestingly Alex, my calves are 15" and thighs 25.5" at 185lbs, so I guess we are in proportion. Unfortunately I am rocking a 36" waist :(
Interestingly Alex, my calves are 15" and thighs 25.5" at 185lbs, so I guess we are in proportion. Unfortunately I am rocking a 36" waist :(
Clay said on 18/Nov/08
I ignore my calves in the gym. Really, theres no need to be carrying huge calves around all the time as long as you're building your thighs and quads, you're laughin.
I ignore my calves in the gym. Really, theres no need to be carrying huge calves around all the time as long as you're building your thighs and quads, you're laughin.
Alex said on 18/Nov/08
Morg, I guess I am pretending if 205lbs is small, haha.
Morg, I guess I am pretending if 205lbs is small, haha.
M.o.r.g said on 18/Nov/08
Still pretending you're big alex? XD
Still pretending you're big alex? XD
Alex said on 18/Nov/08
Big T, I am the same. I carry weight in my lower body except my calves which are no more than average. My upper body is big too but my shoulders just aren't very wide. I gotta measure them to see though.
Derek, yea but he's 200lbs with a 30, you're 160lbs with a 30. Its crazy when you think of it like that too.
Big T, I am the same. I carry weight in my lower body except my calves which are no more than average. My upper body is big too but my shoulders just aren't very wide. I gotta measure them to see though.
Derek, yea but he's 200lbs with a 30, you're 160lbs with a 30. Its crazy when you think of it like that too.
Derek said on 18/Nov/08
Alex- My waist is also a 30. I'm not sure if I have that V shape though. My shoulders are also 40", which is far bigger than my waist.
Alex- My waist is also a 30. I'm not sure if I have that V shape though. My shoulders are also 40", which is far bigger than my waist.
Big T said on 18/Nov/08
Clay, i actually have skinny calves, it's just that my legs are so close to the camera in that pic. Also, i did some sort of online test where i measured my wrist and apparently i am actually small-framed for my height (dunno how accurate that was) which makes me about 50 lbs overweight in that photo. I do however carry a lot of weight in my thighs and ass which people for some reason don't seem to notice in a guy.
Clay, i actually have skinny calves, it's just that my legs are so close to the camera in that pic. Also, i did some sort of online test where i measured my wrist and apparently i am actually small-framed for my height (dunno how accurate that was) which makes me about 50 lbs overweight in that photo. I do however carry a lot of weight in my thighs and ass which people for some reason don't seem to notice in a guy.
Alex said on 17/Nov/08
Derek, yea. This trainer at my gym is 6'1 and 200lbs, about the same weight as me. My arms are bigger unflexed but his are bigger flexed though, lol. We are around thee same size but he can appear a bit bigger because he has more a V shape than I do. I lack the V shape kinda as I use to have a better one.
But he claims his jean size is a 30 which is pretty small for a 6'1 200lb guy. My jeans are 33-34. Personally I wouldnt' wanna go below a 32 jeans at my height, would be too lean even if I was very built.
Derek, yea. This trainer at my gym is 6'1 and 200lbs, about the same weight as me. My arms are bigger unflexed but his are bigger flexed though, lol. We are around thee same size but he can appear a bit bigger because he has more a V shape than I do. I lack the V shape kinda as I use to have a better one.
But he claims his jean size is a 30 which is pretty small for a 6'1 200lb guy. My jeans are 33-34. Personally I wouldnt' wanna go below a 32 jeans at my height, would be too lean even if I was very built.
Derek said on 17/Nov/08
Alex- Yeah, he's very bulky. He pretty much has muscles on top of muscles lol. I actually outweigh him, but I look far smaller because I'm not as bulky and I'm at least 5 inches taller.
Alex- Yeah, he's very bulky. He pretty much has muscles on top of muscles lol. I actually outweigh him, but I look far smaller because I'm not as bulky and I'm at least 5 inches taller.
Alex said on 17/Nov/08
My upper legs are big, 26 inches around but my calves are only 15.5 inches which throws it off.
My upper legs are big, 26 inches around but my calves are only 15.5 inches which throws it off.
Alex said on 17/Nov/08
Clay, I also believe when some gets undeestimated with their weight its because of their stomach/abdominal area If its on the lean side it may make you seem less.
Clay, I also believe when some gets undeestimated with their weight its because of their stomach/abdominal area If its on the lean side it may make you seem less.
Clay said on 17/Nov/08
Big T...your legs look huge a lot of your weight im sure came from there maybe thats how people underestimated you? lol.
Big T...your legs look huge a lot of your weight im sure came from there maybe thats how people underestimated you? lol.
Alex said on 16/Nov/08
Big T, though you're sitting its not the best angle but I'd say you look around 185lbs there. 160-170 is way too low, those who guessed that are bad at guessing weight.
Big T, though you're sitting its not the best angle but I'd say you look around 185lbs there. 160-170 is way too low, those who guessed that are bad at guessing weight.
Big T said on 16/Nov/08
I weigh 185 atm, but at max 3 years ago I was 200lbs, and even I was surprised at how heavy I had got without looking all that big (it wasn't muscle, I'm just a lazy fatty, lol). I asked 2 people what they thought I weighed and they both said 165lbs!
Click Here
Sorry to disappoint that I'm not actually "Big" T, my name has nothing to do with that. It's also not the best pic, but the only one I can find from the time
To me I look chunky there, but it's amazing how many people thought I was between 160-170 there at 5'10 1/2", when I was 200lbs
I weigh 185 atm, but at max 3 years ago I was 200lbs, and even I was surprised at how heavy I had got without looking all that big (it wasn't muscle, I'm just a lazy fatty, lol). I asked 2 people what they thought I weighed and they both said 165lbs!
Click Here
Sorry to disappoint that I'm not actually "Big" T, my name has nothing to do with that. It's also not the best pic, but the only one I can find from the time
To me I look chunky there, but it's amazing how many people thought I was between 160-170 there at 5'10 1/2", when I was 200lbs
Alex said on 15/Nov/08
Derek, I have medium sized bones though I my friend told me I look to be big boned which I don't see. 5'9 155lbs but looked 200lbs? wow he must be bulked up and ripped at the same time to look that much heavier.
Derek, I have medium sized bones though I my friend told me I look to be big boned which I don't see. 5'9 155lbs but looked 200lbs? wow he must be bulked up and ripped at the same time to look that much heavier.
Clay said on 14/Nov/08
A small frame thats very muscular looks bigger than it is - see Carrot top. I've been told I look ''190, at least'' and that was when I was 170. Im 185 now.
A small frame thats very muscular looks bigger than it is - see Carrot top. I've been told I look ''190, at least'' and that was when I was 170. Im 185 now.
Derek said on 14/Nov/08
I'm 6'2" 160 and I almost always get guessed at the minimum 170. When you're muscular and have small bones, you look bigger. I also know someone that is 5'9" at best and he claims he weighs 155, and he looks like he's almost 200 pounds because of a naturally small frame.
I'm 6'2" 160 and I almost always get guessed at the minimum 170. When you're muscular and have small bones, you look bigger. I also know someone that is 5'9" at best and he claims he weighs 155, and he looks like he's almost 200 pounds because of a naturally small frame.
M.o.r.g said on 14/Nov/08
I think people bullsh*t a lot on this site about their size.
I think people bullsh*t a lot on this site about their size.
Alex said on 14/Nov/08
Danimal, that makes sense. But most people who have lower body fat will appear heavier than they are, but bone denisty/size, body frame, height, come into play too. The last picture I saw of you with the UFC guy you looked at least 200-205lbs I would have thought.
Danimal, that makes sense. But most people who have lower body fat will appear heavier than they are, but bone denisty/size, body frame, height, come into play too. The last picture I saw of you with the UFC guy you looked at least 200-205lbs I would have thought.
Danimal said on 13/Nov/08
Annoyed says on 13/Nov/08
right i have to say, about Alex, if you go over to the stallone page, and look at my article on heel height and elevator shows, you will see pics of myself, no I lift weights a little bit, I am 5'7.5" and I weigh 195 lbs. So if Alex is 6'0" he MUST be more than 200 lbs!!!! someone saying not even 170. that is truley ridiculous, i was 170 natural weight at 5'5.5" and i was slim! so Alex is easilly over 200 lbs in that pic.
Onto Austin, 6'1" NO MORE, NO LESS! His mugshot is taken right after his arrest so who knows what footwear he was wearing.
Not necessarily AT ALL. It's all about BONE DENSITY. My friend who is 5'10" and HUGE (muscle) is in his 160's. My brother in law is MAX 5'6" and weighs like 138 pounds. I on the other hand am close to 5'10" and weigh 215-220 pounds most people think I am at least 30 pounds less than that. You can not quality or quantify bodyweight with actual size. We are ALL made differently and most of us carry our bodyweight (muscle and fat) very different from one another.
Annoyed says on 13/Nov/08
right i have to say, about Alex, if you go over to the stallone page, and look at my article on heel height and elevator shows, you will see pics of myself, no I lift weights a little bit, I am 5'7.5" and I weigh 195 lbs. So if Alex is 6'0" he MUST be more than 200 lbs!!!! someone saying not even 170. that is truley ridiculous, i was 170 natural weight at 5'5.5" and i was slim! so Alex is easilly over 200 lbs in that pic.
Onto Austin, 6'1" NO MORE, NO LESS! His mugshot is taken right after his arrest so who knows what footwear he was wearing.
Not necessarily AT ALL. It's all about BONE DENSITY. My friend who is 5'10" and HUGE (muscle) is in his 160's. My brother in law is MAX 5'6" and weighs like 138 pounds. I on the other hand am close to 5'10" and weigh 215-220 pounds most people think I am at least 30 pounds less than that. You can not quality or quantify bodyweight with actual size. We are ALL made differently and most of us carry our bodyweight (muscle and fat) very different from one another.
Alex said on 13/Nov/08
Clay, a lot of the time I get guessed at 210-220lbs, sometimes even a bit more. One time I was guessed at 240 which is too much but was flattering, LOL.
Clay, a lot of the time I get guessed at 210-220lbs, sometimes even a bit more. One time I was guessed at 240 which is too much but was flattering, LOL.
Alex said on 13/Nov/08
The mugshot with Austin is still fishy.
The mugshot with Austin is still fishy.
Clay said on 13/Nov/08
White especially. Yeah, see from that head on view you definitely physically look 190-195 there.
White especially. Yeah, see from that head on view you definitely physically look 190-195 there.
Alex said on 13/Nov/08
Ok here is a picture from a front angle at the same time. Black can really make you look less. Colors like white, blue can make you look bigger I feel.
Click Here
Ok here is a picture from a front angle at the same time. Black can really make you look less. Colors like white, blue can make you look bigger I feel.
Click Here
Alex said on 13/Nov/08
I can give an impression of being less probably because I am at my side and wearing black can make you look less as well.
Clay, well only around 5lbs heavier but I am def a bit bigger. But since that picture in late 2006 I ended up cutting down to 189lbs in summer 2007 then bulked right back up to 200lbs now so I ended up losing fat and keeping most of my muscle and adding more muscle.
I can give an impression of being less probably because I am at my side and wearing black can make you look less as well.
Clay, well only around 5lbs heavier but I am def a bit bigger. But since that picture in late 2006 I ended up cutting down to 189lbs in summer 2007 then bulked right back up to 200lbs now so I ended up losing fat and keeping most of my muscle and adding more muscle.
Annoyed said on 13/Nov/08
right i have to say, about Alex, if you go over to the stallone page, and look at my article on heel height and elevator shows, you will see pics of myself, no I lift weights a little bit, I am 5'7.5" and I weigh 195 lbs. So if Alex is 6'0" he MUST be more than 200 lbs!!!! someone saying not even 170. that is truley ridiculous, i was 170 natural weight at 5'5.5" and i was slim! so Alex is easilly over 200 lbs in that pic.
Onto Austin, 6'1" NO MORE, NO LESS! His mugshot is taken right after his arrest so who knows what footwear he was wearing.
6'1" comfortable.
right i have to say, about Alex, if you go over to the stallone page, and look at my article on heel height and elevator shows, you will see pics of myself, no I lift weights a little bit, I am 5'7.5" and I weigh 195 lbs. So if Alex is 6'0" he MUST be more than 200 lbs!!!! someone saying not even 170. that is truley ridiculous, i was 170 natural weight at 5'5.5" and i was slim! so Alex is easilly over 200 lbs in that pic.
Onto Austin, 6'1" NO MORE, NO LESS! His mugshot is taken right after his arrest so who knows what footwear he was wearing.
6'1" comfortable.
Clay said on 12/Nov/08
I think you would look bigger if you were facing the camera directly. You must be pretty jacked now if you have packed on a few pounds since, good job dude.
I think you would look bigger if you were facing the camera directly. You must be pretty jacked now if you have packed on a few pounds since, good job dude.
Danimal said on 12/Nov/08
In all fairness, you give an impression of being in your 180's in that pic Alex. 170 pounds is just ridiculous.
In all fairness, you give an impression of being in your 180's in that pic Alex. 170 pounds is just ridiculous.
Ivan 6'2.25 said on 12/Nov/08
I met him last year in late September in Saint-Martin. I'am 6'2.25 with 0.5 inch shoes at this time and he wear a flat 0.75 inch shoes.I had 1 inch over him compared to someone I know but when we pass nearby I though we had the same height.
I met him last year in late September in Saint-Martin. I'am 6'2.25 with 0.5 inch shoes at this time and he wear a flat 0.75 inch shoes.I had 1 inch over him compared to someone I know but when we pass nearby I though we had the same height.
Alex said on 12/Nov/08
Morg, you dont have to agree but I am around 14 stone in that picture. Maybe you were built different is why you may have felt beefier.
Morg, you dont have to agree but I am around 14 stone in that picture. Maybe you were built different is why you may have felt beefier.
M.o.r.g said on 12/Nov/08
Uh yeah u didnt post my comment.I'll say it it again.I was 12 stone back in august and i was way beefier than that "alex" person.He's nowhere near 14 stone.
Editor Rob
Uh yeah u didnt post my comment.I'll say it it again.I was 12 stone back in august and i was way beefier than that "alex" person.He's nowhere near 14 stone.
Editor Rob it's not the place to argue over who is beefier or whether someone weighs 14 stone...
Joe said on 12/Nov/08
I'd say he was an easy 6'1 but thereare times when he looks taller or shorter than that. What is he like in person? has anyone met him?
I'd say he was an easy 6'1 but thereare times when he looks taller or shorter than that. What is he like in person? has anyone met him?
Alex said on 11/Nov/08
Kane looks 6'8 with Shaq. Austin looks between 6'0 and 6'1. Orton looks around 6'4 1/2 with him.
Kane looks 6'8 with Shaq. Austin looks between 6'0 and 6'1. Orton looks around 6'4 1/2 with him.
M.o.r.g said on 11/Nov/08
But then again he might look bigger if u saw him standing from the front.
But then again he might look bigger if u saw him standing from the front.
Alex said on 11/Nov/08
Clay, I am 198-200lbs in the picture but I can see someone guessing me at 190-195lbs since its close to my weight but 170lbs is absurd. Guesses like that get me iritated, lol.
Clay, I am 198-200lbs in the picture but I can see someone guessing me at 190-195lbs since its close to my weight but 170lbs is absurd. Guesses like that get me iritated, lol.
hulk said on 11/Nov/08
Just look at the picture of Mamun and Leon White (aka Vader), and though this pic isn't great we can clearly derive that Vader is like 2" taller than Stone cold here. Hence, my estimation is that Stone cold can't be taller than 6".
Just look at the picture of Mamun and Leon White (aka Vader), and though this pic isn't great we can clearly derive that Vader is like 2" taller than Stone cold here. Hence, my estimation is that Stone cold can't be taller than 6".
Clay said on 11/Nov/08
I have to admit I mis-read the Kane/shaq pic slighty. Kane is closer to the camera but slouching like a mother ****er, didn't really put that piece of the puzzle together if he stood straight like Shaq there im sure he checks in at 6'8-6'8.5. Typical Viper trying back up one of his stupid claims. :p
I have to admit I mis-read the Kane/shaq pic slighty. Kane is closer to the camera but slouching like a mother ****er, didn't really put that piece of the puzzle together if he stood straight like Shaq there im sure he checks in at 6'8-6'8.5. Typical Viper trying back up one of his stupid claims. :p
Danimal said on 11/Nov/08
adam says on 10/Nov/08
Shaq has about 6 inches on Kane, no doubts. Kane is clearly closer to the camera. Shaq could look over his head with ease.
4-5" MAX.
adam says on 10/Nov/08
Shaq has about 6 inches on Kane, no doubts. Kane is clearly closer to the camera. Shaq could look over his head with ease.
4-5" MAX.
Josh said on 10/Nov/08
mmmmm 6'0.5
mmmmm 6'0.5
Clay said on 10/Nov/08
Are you kidding Sid? Alex is 6'0-6'0.5 he's proved that I would say he looks a solid 190 there. If he was 5'8 maybe he would be 170 ibs there.
Are you kidding Sid? Alex is 6'0-6'0.5 he's proved that I would say he looks a solid 190 there. If he was 5'8 maybe he would be 170 ibs there.
Anonymous said on 10/Nov/08
Keep dreaming. I just saw a Ripley's's episode where Shaq met a 6'8" 12 y/o and Kane is definitely a bit bigger next to Shaq.
Keep dreaming. I just saw a Ripley's's episode where Shaq met a 6'8" 12 y/o and Kane is definitely a bit bigger next to Shaq.
Alex said on 10/Nov/08
170lbs? I am way more than that in that picture. More around 200lbs. Right now I am around the same weight but a bit bigger. 170lb guy would be much smaller than I look there.
170lbs? I am way more than that in that picture. More around 200lbs. Right now I am around the same weight but a bit bigger. 170lb guy would be much smaller than I look there.
adam said on 10/Nov/08
Shaq has about 6 inches on Kane, no doubts. Kane is clearly closer to the camera. Shaq could look over his head with ease.
Shaq has about 6 inches on Kane, no doubts. Kane is clearly closer to the camera. Shaq could look over his head with ease.
Anonymous said on 10/Nov/08
Edge is above 6'2.5" to be fair. Look at him with 5'4" Trish Stratus in heels. I would agree on the 220lbs though, billing him heavier than Cena at 250lbs is ridiculous.
You do look in good shape in that pic Alex. How much do you weigh now?
Edge is above 6'2.5" to be fair. Look at him with 5'4" Trish Stratus in heels. I would agree on the 220lbs though, billing him heavier than Cena at 250lbs is ridiculous.
You do look in good shape in that pic Alex. How much do you weigh now?
sid said on 10/Nov/08
Alex you dont even look 170. how can you say your bigger then edge. when you barely look 170..??
Alex you dont even look 170. how can you say your bigger then edge. when you barely look 170..??
Alex said on 9/Nov/08
Danimal, thanx. Since then I've gotten a bit bigger and I've gotten stronger too. I'd say I look somewhat bulky in that picture too. I may look leaner because of the black.
Danimal, thanx. Since then I've gotten a bit bigger and I've gotten stronger too. I'd say I look somewhat bulky in that picture too. I may look leaner because of the black.
Danimal said on 9/Nov/08
Alex says on 9/Nov/08
Here is one from 2 years years ago around this time. I was 200lbs or just under here.
Click Here
Looking good there Alex. Lean and mean bro ;).
Alex says on 9/Nov/08
Here is one from 2 years years ago around this time. I was 200lbs or just under here.
Click Here
Looking good there Alex. Lean and mean bro ;).
Alex said on 9/Nov/08
Here is one from 2 years years ago around this time. I was 200lbs or just under here.
Click Here
Here is one from 2 years years ago around this time. I was 200lbs or just under here.
Click Here
Alex said on 9/Nov/08
I'd give Edge 6'2.5-6'3 and 215-220lbs. I am not saying for sure I am bigger than him. I am not trying to sound cocky but just by looking at him I think I may be around his size at least.
I'd give Edge 6'2.5-6'3 and 215-220lbs. I am not saying for sure I am bigger than him. I am not trying to sound cocky but just by looking at him I think I may be around his size at least.
Alex said on 9/Nov/08
See you can't always go with the lowest possible height someone can be.
Clay, I will when I get some developed.
See you can't always go with the lowest possible height someone can be.
Clay, I will when I get some developed.
hs2008 said on 9/Nov/08
Danimal, I agree with you 100% on Kane. He looked very tall next to Shaq.
Vegas, I though Sabu was around 5'9"-5'9.5" since he was a bit shorter than 5'11"-5'11.5" RVD but like you say his posture is awful.
You should post some new pics Alex, you may well be as big as Edge.
Danimal, I agree with you 100% on Kane. He looked very tall next to Shaq.
Vegas, I though Sabu was around 5'9"-5'9.5" since he was a bit shorter than 5'11"-5'11.5" RVD but like you say his posture is awful.
You should post some new pics Alex, you may well be as big as Edge.
Danimal said on 8/Nov/08
BTW Viper, I still love ya man ;).. We've both been on here for probably close to 4 years.
BTW Viper, I still love ya man ;).. We've both been on here for probably close to 4 years.
Danimal said on 8/Nov/08
You have to understand Viper's psychology and M.O. Viper will find the lowest height quote for a person and to Viper, that person will NEVER be over that. So, in this case, Kane was once said to have been billed at 6'7", so Viper will never be able to see Kane over that. Actually, Viper usually knocks .5" off of the lowest possible height for everyone, meaning I am surprised that Viper isn't claiming 6'6.5" for Kane. Anyways, next to Shaq, Kane is standing tall: 6'8.5"-6'9" imo.
You have to understand Viper's psychology and M.O. Viper will find the lowest height quote for a person and to Viper, that person will NEVER be over that. So, in this case, Kane was once said to have been billed at 6'7", so Viper will never be able to see Kane over that. Actually, Viper usually knocks .5" off of the lowest possible height for everyone, meaning I am surprised that Viper isn't claiming 6'6.5" for Kane. Anyways, next to Shaq, Kane is standing tall: 6'8.5"-6'9" imo.
Clay said on 7/Nov/08
Post some man. I think Edge is still 220-225 today and at 6'3-6'4 dont forget he's a bigger boned guy overall as well.
Post some man. I think Edge is still 220-225 today and at 6'3-6'4 dont forget he's a bigger boned guy overall as well.
Alex said on 7/Nov/08
Clay, I could def be wrong but I feel I am def around Edge's size. I think you may have seen a few pics I posted in the past. I was thinking about posting a few new ones soon.
Clay, I could def be wrong but I feel I am def around Edge's size. I think you may have seen a few pics I posted in the past. I was thinking about posting a few new ones soon.
Vegas said on 7/Nov/08
didn't get close enough to sabu to pin down his height but he was much taller than i expected when he stood up straight (i was expecting 5'6 or 5'7) he has a truly awful posture. i noticed in every photo he took (and he sure didn't like taking photos lol) he bent his back making himself like 5-6" shorter
didn't get close enough to sabu to pin down his height but he was much taller than i expected when he stood up straight (i was expecting 5'6 or 5'7) he has a truly awful posture. i noticed in every photo he took (and he sure didn't like taking photos lol) he bent his back making himself like 5-6" shorter
Clay said on 6/Nov/08
Orton could pass for his billed 245 pounds to the blind eye, easily. Edge isnt as big, but thats pretty funny you think you're bigger than him, Al.
Orton could pass for his billed 245 pounds to the blind eye, easily. Edge isnt as big, but thats pretty funny you think you're bigger than him, Al.
Alex said on 6/Nov/08
Edge is still cut and in good shape. If anything he probably lost a bit of mass I'd say. He does look big with Trish but not big next to guys like HHH, Batista, Lesnar, etc.
Edge is still cut and in good shape. If anything he probably lost a bit of mass I'd say. He does look big with Trish but not big next to guys like HHH, Batista, Lesnar, etc.
Hugh said on 6/Nov/08
Orton's pretty lean compared to guys like Cena and Batista, not to mention Triple H.
Orton's pretty lean compared to guys like Cena and Batista, not to mention Triple H.
hs2008 said on 6/Nov/08
Oh yeah, lol Orton & Edge are both far better built than most guys on the street. Orton is more cut than Edge, who is pretty flabby these days compared to how he was in 2001.
Here's Edge with Trish Stratus recently (sporting a big beard):
Click Here
He's a big guy for sure, just when you see him next to Batista & Kane that he looks small.
Vegas, how tall did Sabu look to you?
Oh yeah, lol Orton & Edge are both far better built than most guys on the street. Orton is more cut than Edge, who is pretty flabby these days compared to how he was in 2001.
Here's Edge with Trish Stratus recently (sporting a big beard):
Click Here
He's a big guy for sure, just when you see him next to Batista & Kane that he looks small.
Vegas, how tall did Sabu look to you?
TELLEM said on 6/Nov/08
orton was lanky in 2002-2003...just watch his matches its funny compared to now lol...hey Vegas how tall was Sabu when you met him?
orton was lanky in 2002-2003...just watch his matches its funny compared to now lol...hey Vegas how tall was Sabu when you met him?
Da Man said on 6/Nov/08
Orton looks like he's lost a good bit of weight over the last few years. He was actually getting pretty huge a few years ago, guess he laid off the 'roids.
He seems to be a good bit "lankier" now...
Orton looks like he's lost a good bit of weight over the last few years. He was actually getting pretty huge a few years ago, guess he laid off the 'roids.
He seems to be a good bit "lankier" now...
Alex said on 6/Nov/08
Vegas, yea on the street Orton would be a big guy. Edge I still think wouldn't look that big next to the average guy though. I feel I'd be bigger than Edge but not Orton.
Vegas, yea on the street Orton would be a big guy. Edge I still think wouldn't look that big next to the average guy though. I feel I'd be bigger than Edge but not Orton.
Vegas said on 5/Nov/08
when i met orton in person in 2004 he was far from lanky, very well built guy, never got close enough to edge in person but i know someone who met him and said he was much better built in person than he looks on tv, i met sabu last week and couldn't believe how built he is in person, i was expecting a small thin guy lol
edge/orton might come across as lanky on tv next to some of the roid freaks on the roster but they are far better built than the normal man on the street
when i met orton in person in 2004 he was far from lanky, very well built guy, never got close enough to edge in person but i know someone who met him and said he was much better built in person than he looks on tv, i met sabu last week and couldn't believe how built he is in person, i was expecting a small thin guy lol
edge/orton might come across as lanky on tv next to some of the roid freaks on the roster but they are far better built than the normal man on the street
Derek said on 5/Nov/08
Alex- Both are lanky to an extent, but Edge more so.
Alex- Both are lanky to an extent, but Edge more so.
hs2008 said on 5/Nov/08
Orton is really lanky IMO. He's solidly built for sure, but lanky with really long legs and torso. He's not built like Triple H or Batista, so looks lanky compared to them. Not a criticism of him, I don't mean gangly or awkward looking or anything.
Orton is really lanky IMO. He's solidly built for sure, but lanky with really long legs and torso. He's not built like Triple H or Batista, so looks lanky compared to them. Not a criticism of him, I don't mean gangly or awkward looking or anything.
Alex said on 5/Nov/08
Orton isn't lanky. He's lean but built. Now Edge is more lanky.
Orton isn't lanky. He's lean but built. Now Edge is more lanky.
hs2008 said on 4/Nov/08
I could see Orton at 6'4.5", he's a really lanky guy. Solid 6'4" for sure.
How is anyone seeing 6'7" for Kane with Shaq! He looks 6'8"-6'8.5" for sure.
I could see Orton at 6'4.5", he's a really lanky guy. Solid 6'4" for sure.
How is anyone seeing 6'7" for Kane with Shaq! He looks 6'8"-6'8.5" for sure.
Alex said on 3/Nov/08
I'd say Orton looks 6'4 1/2-6'5 with Shaq but is a bit closer to the camera so 6'4 sounds best for him.
I'd say Orton looks 6'4 1/2-6'5 with Shaq but is a bit closer to the camera so 6'4 sounds best for him.
Da Man said on 3/Nov/08
Clay says on 3/Nov/08
"Viper's right about Kane."
You're wrong about Kane
Clay says on 3/Nov/08
"Viper's right about Kane."
You're wrong about Kane
Clay said on 3/Nov/08
Viper's right about Kane.
Viper's right about Kane.
Da Man said on 3/Nov/08
Viper says on 1/Nov/08
"I see 5 inches there, but I dont think it shows true reality since Kane is closer to the camera. I think hes really 6 inches shorter If he he takes a step back. Does Nick have the technology to move these guys back? lol"
Except...Kane's head isn't notably closer to the camera than Shaq's head.
Are you seeing 5" there, are just trying to justify a 6-7 Kane?
Click Here
Viper says on 1/Nov/08
"I see 5 inches there, but I dont think it shows true reality since Kane is closer to the camera. I think hes really 6 inches shorter If he he takes a step back. Does Nick have the technology to move these guys back? lol"
Except...Kane's head isn't notably closer to the camera than Shaq's head.
Are you seeing 5" there, are just trying to justify a 6-7 Kane?
Click Here
CJ said on 2/Nov/08
Lol @ Viper saying Orton looks 6'3, Im not saying he is but Orton looks over 6'4 in that pic. Look at the pics Vegas posted with Shaq and 6'3.75 Wade, the difference between Orton and Shaq looks smaller.
Lol @ Viper saying Orton looks 6'3, Im not saying he is but Orton looks over 6'4 in that pic. Look at the pics Vegas posted with Shaq and 6'3.75 Wade, the difference between Orton and Shaq looks smaller.
Alex said on 1/Nov/08
A 4.5 inch difference would put Kane at 6'8 1/2 which was the height he claimed in person to the poster Eric.
A 4.5 inch difference would put Kane at 6'8 1/2 which was the height he claimed in person to the poster Eric.
Viper said on 1/Nov/08
I see 5 inches there, but I dont think it shows true reality since Kane is closer to the camera. I think hes really 6 inches shorter If he he takes a step back. Does Nick have the technology to move these guys back? lol
I see 5 inches there, but I dont think it shows true reality since Kane is closer to the camera. I think hes really 6 inches shorter If he he takes a step back. Does Nick have the technology to move these guys back? lol
Da Man said on 31/Oct/08
Alex, 4.5" on a normal adult head would put the line in the center of the eyes, the line being just above the eye would be more of a 4" difference on a typical 9.5" adult head. Shaq's eyes may be a bit further than 4.5" from the top of his head. It's possible, but Shaq doesn't have an abnormally large head like Khali and Show.
I could possibly see a 4.5" diff, but that's the absolute max I can see there.
Alex, 4.5" on a normal adult head would put the line in the center of the eyes, the line being just above the eye would be more of a 4" difference on a typical 9.5" adult head. Shaq's eyes may be a bit further than 4.5" from the top of his head. It's possible, but Shaq doesn't have an abnormally large head like Khali and Show.
I could possibly see a 4.5" diff, but that's the absolute max I can see there.
Alex said on 31/Oct/08
Da Man, based on the line Shaq has 4.5-5 inches on Kane in that picture the way it looks since Shaq's eye level is 5 inches tops I think. Kane is closer to the camera but is also leaning a bit. It should break about even if he took a step back.
Shaq-7'1
Kane-6'8
That makes the most sense I think.
Da Man, based on the line Shaq has 4.5-5 inches on Kane in that picture the way it looks since Shaq's eye level is 5 inches tops I think. Kane is closer to the camera but is also leaning a bit. It should break about even if he took a step back.
Shaq-7'1
Kane-6'8
That makes the most sense I think.
Alex said on 31/Oct/08
If anything Orton can look closer to 6'5 there with Shaq too.
If anything Orton can look closer to 6'5 there with Shaq too.
Da Man said on 30/Oct/08
Viper says on 30/Oct/08
"I see Kane's head just below Shaq's eyeline. Put Kane closer to Shaq and the difference would be even greater."
Just above Shaq's eyeline, actually. Click Here
The good thing about comparing bald guys, you know exactly where their head stops. No guessing.
Viper says on 30/Oct/08
"I see Kane's head just below Shaq's eyeline. Put Kane closer to Shaq and the difference would be even greater."
Just above Shaq's eyeline, actually. Click Here
The good thing about comparing bald guys, you know exactly where their head stops. No guessing.
Clay said on 30/Oct/08
Kane is 5 inches under.
Kane is 5 inches under.
lillo thomas said on 30/Oct/08
I agree with Vegas and the rest of the guys .
I agree with Vegas and the rest of the guys .
Derek said on 30/Oct/08
Judging by the pictures, Kane looks 6'8" and Orton looks 6'4", which was what most of us thought anyway.
Judging by the pictures, Kane looks 6'8" and Orton looks 6'4", which was what most of us thought anyway.
Vegas said on 30/Oct/08
Viper says on 30/Oct/08
I see Kane's head just below Shaq's eyeline. Put Kane closer to Shaq and the difference would be even greater.
i already drew the line and that is not the case
Viper says on 30/Oct/08
I see Kane's head just below Shaq's eyeline. Put Kane closer to Shaq and the difference would be even greater.
i already drew the line and that is not the case
Viper said on 30/Oct/08
I see Kane's head just below Shaq's eyeline. Put Kane closer to Shaq and the difference would be even greater.
I see Kane's head just below Shaq's eyeline. Put Kane closer to Shaq and the difference would be even greater.
Danimal said on 30/Oct/08
Viper says on 30/Oct/08
Pretty good gallery with Shaq.
Kane is looking 6-7 with him, and hes closer to the camera. He might even look shorter If he took a step back.
Randy Orton looks 6-3 there with him.
WOW Viper, you never seize to amaze me. Your eyes see what your mind wants it to. In your mind, you CANNOT have Kane me over 6'7", because he was once billed as such. NO WAY does Shaq have 6" on Kane and Kane is not standing straight. You ALWAYS choose the lowest possible common denominator.
Kane looks to be between 6'8"-6'9" next to Kane and Orton 6'4".
Viper says on 30/Oct/08
Pretty good gallery with Shaq.
Kane is looking 6-7 with him, and hes closer to the camera. He might even look shorter If he took a step back.
Randy Orton looks 6-3 there with him.
WOW Viper, you never seize to amaze me. Your eyes see what your mind wants it to. In your mind, you CANNOT have Kane me over 6'7", because he was once billed as such. NO WAY does Shaq have 6" on Kane and Kane is not standing straight. You ALWAYS choose the lowest possible common denominator.
Kane looks to be between 6'8"-6'9" next to Kane and Orton 6'4".
Alex said on 30/Oct/08
Shaq has 4-4.5 inches on Kane there with Kane closer to the camera but also leaning a bit. Really is around a 5 inch difference with Shaq at 7'1 and Kane at about 6'8.
Orton is clearly looking 6'4 there with Shaq. Looks almost the same as how Kobe looks next to Shaq.
Shaq has 4-4.5 inches on Kane there with Kane closer to the camera but also leaning a bit. Really is around a 5 inch difference with Shaq at 7'1 and Kane at about 6'8.
Orton is clearly looking 6'4 there with Shaq. Looks almost the same as how Kobe looks next to Shaq.
Viper said on 30/Oct/08
Kane looks at least 6 inches shorter than Shaq, and hes closer to the camera.
Kane looks at least 6 inches shorter than Shaq, and hes closer to the camera.
Vegas said on 30/Oct/08
no point eyeing photos when you can compare that kane/shaq photo with these, shaq clearly doesn't have a 13 inch head given that his head is at least 1 inch shorter than khalis
Click Here
Click Here
or orton with these Click Here Click Here Click Here
no point eyeing photos when you can compare that kane/shaq photo with these, shaq clearly doesn't have a 13 inch head given that his head is at least 1 inch shorter than khalis
Click Here
Click Here
or orton with these Click Here Click Here Click Here
hs2008 said on 30/Oct/08
No way does Kane look under 6'8"-6'8.5" with Shaq, he stacks up really well. He may be fractionally closer to the camera but he's leaning too.
Orton looks 6'4"+ IMO & Austin does look a solid 6'1", especially when you compare the Steve Nash photo.
No way does Kane look under 6'8"-6'8.5" with Shaq, he stacks up really well. He may be fractionally closer to the camera but he's leaning too.
Orton looks 6'4"+ IMO & Austin does look a solid 6'1", especially when you compare the Steve Nash photo.
Viper said on 30/Oct/08
Pretty good gallery with Shaq.
Kane is looking 6-7 with him, and hes closer to the camera. He might even look shorter If he took a step back.
Randy Orton looks 6-3 there with him.
Pretty good gallery with Shaq.
Kane is looking 6-7 with him, and hes closer to the camera. He might even look shorter If he took a step back.
Randy Orton looks 6-3 there with him.
Clay said on 29/Oct/08
Austin registers better than Nash. And Nash is 6'1 barefoot - 6'2.5 in shoes and listed at 6'3. Time to give up on your 6'0 quest for Austin Alex! :p
Austin registers better than Nash. And Nash is 6'1 barefoot - 6'2.5 in shoes and listed at 6'3. Time to give up on your 6'0 quest for Austin Alex! :p
Alex said on 29/Oct/08
Iverson is no more than 5'11 tops. Thats def a at least 14 inches between him and Shaq. Austin is def taller next to Shaq then he is. Also Austin is inches closer to the camera than Shaq. If they were the same level I could see a bit over a foot perhaps.
Iverson is no more than 5'11 tops. Thats def a at least 14 inches between him and Shaq. Austin is def taller next to Shaq then he is. Also Austin is inches closer to the camera than Shaq. If they were the same level I could see a bit over a foot perhaps.
Vegas said on 29/Oct/08
you see a full 13 inches there alex, how much does shaq have on AI in this photo so Click Here
austin looks at least 6'1 there imo; i say that because of this photo with steve nash who isn't any taller next to shaq than austin is Click Here
you see a full 13 inches there alex, how much does shaq have on AI in this photo so Click Here
austin looks at least 6'1 there imo; i say that because of this photo with steve nash who isn't any taller next to shaq than austin is Click Here
Alex said on 28/Oct/08
If you look these picture of Shaq at Cyber Sunday, Austin looks 6'0-6'0.5.
Click Here
If you look these picture of Shaq at Cyber Sunday, Austin looks 6'0-6'0.5.
Click Here
Annoyed said on 27/Oct/08
Austin is 6'1" at least clearly. Everyone who has met him says it, he always looks it in pics. and only his appearence is short, but this is more to do with his stockyness, he is clearly over 6 foot though.
Austin is 6'1" at least clearly. Everyone who has met him says it, he always looks it in pics. and only his appearence is short, but this is more to do with his stockyness, he is clearly over 6 foot though.
Alex said on 27/Oct/08
Weightlifting can make your lose height throughout the day more I believe. Will take years to decrease your actual height though.
Weightlifting can make your lose height throughout the day more I believe. Will take years to decrease your actual height though.
Tyler said on 27/Oct/08
Weight Lifting can make you shorter, especially if squats are commonly done. Plus he is stocky so it is hard to tell.
Weight Lifting can make you shorter, especially if squats are commonly done. Plus he is stocky so it is hard to tell.
Clay said on 27/Oct/08
Well a well respected poster met Austin and confirmed he was comfertably 6'1. That was Dave who I trust. Glenn also met the man and said 6'1.
Well a well respected poster met Austin and confirmed he was comfertably 6'1. That was Dave who I trust. Glenn also met the man and said 6'1.
Alex said on 26/Oct/08
Danimal, yea. Maybe he was slightly taller before you met him. I dont see Austin under 5'11.75-6'0 at any point and was maybe slightly over 6'0 back then.
Danimal, yea. Maybe he was slightly taller before you met him. I dont see Austin under 5'11.75-6'0 at any point and was maybe slightly over 6'0 back then.
Derek said on 26/Oct/08
If Austin was ever 6'1", it was out of bed and before his neck injury. As for Bret, 5'11" sounds right and Shawn Michaels was slightly taller if I remember correctly.
If Austin was ever 6'1", it was out of bed and before his neck injury. As for Bret, 5'11" sounds right and Shawn Michaels was slightly taller if I remember correctly.
Clay said on 24/Oct/08
Austin's a weak 6'1''.
Austin's a weak 6'1''.
Danimal said on 24/Oct/08
Alex says on 16/Oct/08
I've seen other pics of where Austin was more a full inch taller than Bret. Bret was at least 5'11 back then though.
I met Bret in person Alex in 2001-2002. He was MAX 5'11".
Alex says on 16/Oct/08
I've seen other pics of where Austin was more a full inch taller than Bret. Bret was at least 5'11 back then though.
I met Bret in person Alex in 2001-2002. He was MAX 5'11".
Hugh said on 17/Oct/08
That picture confuses me a great deal. Austin was normally about 1.5 inches taller than Bret.
That picture confuses me a great deal. Austin was normally about 1.5 inches taller than Bret.
Alex said on 16/Oct/08
I've seen other pics of where Austin was more a full inch taller than Bret. Bret was at least 5'11 back then though.
I've seen other pics of where Austin was more a full inch taller than Bret. Bret was at least 5'11 back then though.
Clay said on 9/Oct/08
Keep in mind Mamun is over 5'8'' though.
Keep in mind Mamun is over 5'8'' though.
Alex said on 7/Oct/08
Mamum also said Austin had biggish boots in the picture too. Austin is also slightly closer to the camera. Mamum is standing pretty straight while Austin is leaning barely and Mamum comes up to Austin's eye level. If Austin stands up more straight he'll gain another 1/2 inch or so but with the footwear advantage it breaks even pretty much. No more than 4.5 inches does Austin have on him.
Mamum also said Austin had biggish boots in the picture too. Austin is also slightly closer to the camera. Mamum is standing pretty straight while Austin is leaning barely and Mamum comes up to Austin's eye level. If Austin stands up more straight he'll gain another 1/2 inch or so but with the footwear advantage it breaks even pretty much. No more than 4.5 inches does Austin have on him.
Clay said on 7/Oct/08
He looks an easy 6'1 next to Mamun.
He looks an easy 6'1 next to Mamun.
Hugh said on 4/Oct/08
Annoyed is correct. Austin is at least 6ft1. Watch the Condemned. He's the same height as Vinnie Jones.
Annoyed is correct. Austin is at least 6ft1. Watch the Condemned. He's the same height as Vinnie Jones.
Annoyed said on 3/Oct/08
hey, btw with regard to the mugshot, i checked it out, this was taken immediately after he was arrested, so id imagine he may be wearing cowboy boots (+1.5) which if he is 6'3" there would make him 6'1".5 barefoot, however the camera is not aligned with the top of his head so the perspective will also add a little height. This is just a hypothesis based on perhaps he was wearing cowboy boots. HOWEVER as this was immediately after his arrest, for all we know he had 1" over barefoot lifts. so maybe he is a flat 6'1" minus perspective which may make him around 6'0" . I have seen enough of him on the TV and in pics to put a 6'1" at least figure.
hey, btw with regard to the mugshot, i checked it out, this was taken immediately after he was arrested, so id imagine he may be wearing cowboy boots (+1.5) which if he is 6'3" there would make him 6'1".5 barefoot, however the camera is not aligned with the top of his head so the perspective will also add a little height. This is just a hypothesis based on perhaps he was wearing cowboy boots. HOWEVER as this was immediately after his arrest, for all we know he had 1" over barefoot lifts. so maybe he is a flat 6'1" minus perspective which may make him around 6'0" . I have seen enough of him on the TV and in pics to put a 6'1" at least figure.
Alex said on 1/Oct/08
Alex 2, yea a 6'2 peak Vince is likely but today I honestly wouldn't be suprised if he was 6'0 and change. He is 60 plus and could have lost over an inch.
Alex 2, yea a 6'2 peak Vince is likely but today I honestly wouldn't be suprised if he was 6'0 and change. He is 60 plus and could have lost over an inch.
Clay said on 27/Sep/08
6'0.5 makes sense.
6'0.5 makes sense.
Hugh said on 26/Sep/08
Alex if that's the case Austin must be 6ft2.
Alex if that's the case Austin must be 6ft2.
Just_D said on 26/Sep/08
I met him...i'm 6'2.5 and he's at the very least a full two inches shorter than me.
I met him...i'm 6'2.5 and he's at the very least a full two inches shorter than me.
Alex2 said on 23/Sep/08
I think a peak Vince could very well ahve been 6'2".
I think a peak Vince could very well ahve been 6'2".
Alex said on 23/Sep/08
Austin barefoot was an inch taller than HBK who was in shoes?
Austin barefoot was an inch taller than HBK who was in shoes?
Clay said on 22/Sep/08
Tippy toes while posing for a mugshot? LOL.
Tippy toes while posing for a mugshot? LOL.
Hugh said on 22/Sep/08
In boots. Barefoot I reckon they're the same height. Maybe Austin is 0.5cm taller.
In boots. Barefoot I reckon they're the same height. Maybe Austin is 0.5cm taller.
Derek said on 22/Sep/08
Alex- Vince did look 1-1.5" taller than Austin, but it looked closer because of Austin's large footwear. Vince had HBK by around 2 inches and Austin in bare feet was no more than an inch taller than HBK.
Alex- Vince did look 1-1.5" taller than Austin, but it looked closer because of Austin's large footwear. Vince had HBK by around 2 inches and Austin in bare feet was no more than an inch taller than HBK.
Alex said on 22/Sep/08
Vince had an inch on Austin? I do remember Vince being a little taller though.
Vince had an inch on Austin? I do remember Vince being a little taller though.
Derek said on 21/Sep/08
Hugh- It's the other way around. Vince was taller.
Hugh- It's the other way around. Vince was taller.
Hugh said on 20/Sep/08
Austin is more 6ft3-4 in boots. He had 1-2 inches on Vince McMahon.
Austin is more 6ft3-4 in boots. He had 1-2 inches on Vince McMahon.
Alex said on 20/Sep/08
Austin's heading is coming to at least 192cm which is 6'3 1/2. There is no way he is that tall unless he was on tip toes or in platform shoes or something. Even from a low angle it can't make you seem too much taller. That mugshot can't be that accurate. I do think Austin looks 6'2ish in his big boots though.
Austin's heading is coming to at least 192cm which is 6'3 1/2. There is no way he is that tall unless he was on tip toes or in platform shoes or something. Even from a low angle it can't make you seem too much taller. That mugshot can't be that accurate. I do think Austin looks 6'2ish in his big boots though.
Hugh said on 20/Sep/08
I just can't buy lower than 6ft1. He came in at 6ft4 in the mugshot, he isn't even standing straight and he clearly has 5-6inches on Mamum.
I just can't buy lower than 6ft1. He came in at 6ft4 in the mugshot, he isn't even standing straight and he clearly has 5-6inches on Mamum.
OutBenchThis said on 17/Sep/08
6.05" is possible but 6'1" isn't.
6.05" is possible but 6'1" isn't.
Clay said on 16/Sep/08
No it doesnt Mamun has poofed hair it cancels out.
No it doesnt Mamun has poofed hair it cancels out.
Captain Spaulding said on 16/Sep/08
Uncle Kracker so I guess cenas 6'7" to lol
Uncle Kracker so I guess cenas 6'7" to lol
Hugh said on 16/Sep/08
He honestly can't see Austin being under the 6ft1 mark. He more likely closer to 6ft2 note that he is bending in that picture.
He honestly can't see Austin being under the 6ft1 mark. He more likely closer to 6ft2 note that he is bending in that picture.
anon said on 16/Sep/08
He is shorter than this. Mamun said he likes to wear big footwear.
He is shorter than this. Mamun said he likes to wear big footwear.
Ian said on 16/Sep/08
He looks 6ft0.75 here(185cm) Stone Cold's eyes is up to Mamun's head add 4.5 inches. Mamun is 5ft8.25 I believe that is the more accurate height of Mamun and stretching to his tallest with the head up look. So that is just under 6ft1 for Stone Cold.
He looks 6ft0.75 here(185cm) Stone Cold's eyes is up to Mamun's head add 4.5 inches. Mamun is 5ft8.25 I believe that is the more accurate height of Mamun and stretching to his tallest with the head up look. So that is just under 6ft1 for Stone Cold.
Anonymous said on 15/Sep/08
I say the chances that he has 2 inch cowboy boots on are about 95%. And that hat gives him a inch right off the bat.
I say the chances that he has 2 inch cowboy boots on are about 95%. And that hat gives him a inch right off the bat.
uncle kracker said on 15/Sep/08
in that picture he looks about 6'7" easily
in that picture he looks about 6'7" easily
Captain Spaulding said on 14/Sep/08
I still think he has some cowboy boots on.
I still think he has some cowboy boots on.
Anonymous said on 13/Sep/08
yeah. I agree with mmm. This pictures looks clearly photo shopped. If it is not, then I'm sorry for saying this: I can see the chop job on Austin's right shoulder/sleeve.
Editor Rob
yeah. I agree with mmm. This pictures looks clearly photo shopped. If it is not, then I'm sorry for saying this: I can see the chop job on Austin's right shoulder/sleeve.
Editor Rob chop job? Light differences? Maybe you are seeing things...light through window, flashes, creases?
Jordan said on 13/Sep/08
HMMM looks 6'1 here def. Always thought he was like 5'11 or 6'0 but now i belive 6'1 for sure.
HMMM looks 6'1 here def. Always thought he was like 5'11 or 6'0 but now i belive 6'1 for sure.
Captain Spaulding said on 13/Sep/08
Stone Cold might have thick-healed boots on in this pic which is why he looks 6'1"
Stone Cold might have thick-healed boots on in this pic which is why he looks 6'1"
Davidoff said on 12/Sep/08
He is one tough looking mofo.
He is one tough looking mofo.
mmm said on 12/Sep/08
just looking at that pic with steve austin and Mamun, it don't look real to me? Austin looks like he has sun on him and the rest is all dark look at his left arm - something about the pic dont add up??????
just looking at that pic with steve austin and Mamun, it don't look real to me? Austin looks like he has sun on him and the rest is all dark look at his left arm - something about the pic dont add up??????
Hugh said on 11/Sep/08
In that Mugshot he comes in at 6ft4!
In that Mugshot he comes in at 6ft4!
Hugh said on 11/Sep/08
I see 6ft1/6ft2 in that picture. He's not even standing straight.
I see 6ft1/6ft2 in that picture. He's not even standing straight.
CoolJ said on 11/Sep/08
The mugshot is a perspective thing. Try taking a picture of yourself from various heights with a ruler taped to the wall.
The mugshot is a perspective thing. Try taking a picture of yourself from various heights with a ruler taped to the wall.
Clay said on 10/Sep/08
Actually Austin would seem taller in ring gear his boots gave him a big lift as evident by his mugshot. Barefoot they're both 6'0.5 I think.
Actually Austin would seem taller in ring gear his boots gave him a big lift as evident by his mugshot. Barefoot they're both 6'0.5 I think.
hs2008 said on 10/Sep/08
Really Alex? Barefoot I think they'd be the same, but in Cena's basketball trainers he would deffo have an advantage by about 0.5" I would think.
Really Alex? Barefoot I think they'd be the same, but in Cena's basketball trainers he would deffo have an advantage by about 0.5" I would think.
Alex said on 9/Sep/08
I do think Cena would be slightly taller than Austin. 1/4-1/2 inch.
I do think Cena would be slightly taller than Austin. 1/4-1/2 inch.
M.o.r.g said on 9/Sep/08
So thats quite an old photo.but anyway if stone cold is 6'1 u need to put cena as 6'1 cos they are the same height.I even put up a video ages ago of cena getting stunnered.
So thats quite an old photo.but anyway if stone cold is 6'1 u need to put cena as 6'1 cos they are the same height.I even put up a video ages ago of cena getting stunnered.
Clay said on 8/Sep/08
Big boots.
Big boots.
Big T said on 8/Sep/08
6'4" in the mugshot guys. Exactly 6'4". How?
6'4" in the mugshot guys. Exactly 6'4". How?
Alex said on 7/Sep/08
I didn't know it was from that long ago. Austin might have been slightly taller back then but I am talking 1/4-1/2 inch and no more. His weight I'd say was def 240-245lbs then, if not around 250lbs.
I didn't know it was from that long ago. Austin might have been slightly taller back then but I am talking 1/4-1/2 inch and no more. His weight I'd say was def 240-245lbs then, if not around 250lbs.
Big King said on 7/Sep/08
Austin looks more 6'2" beside Mamun.
Austin looks more 6'2" beside Mamun.
Danimal said on 7/Sep/08
Austin was being billed at 241 pounds in the WWF in 1996. NO WAY was he over that. I see 230 pounds for him there.
Austin was being billed at 241 pounds in the WWF in 1996. NO WAY was he over that. I see 230 pounds for him there.
Mamun said on 7/Sep/08
2nd December 1996 monday at the Dubai Hollyday INN .
Regards
mamun
2nd December 1996 monday at the Dubai Hollyday INN .
Regards
mamun
Alex said on 7/Sep/08
A flat 6'0 at most would make Mamun 5'7-5'7 1/2 then. Austin is at least 6'0.
A flat 6'0 at most would make Mamun 5'7-5'7 1/2 then. Austin is at least 6'0.
Alex said on 7/Sep/08
Mamun weighs around 220lbs? I'd say Austin looks at least 240-245lbs there.
When was this picture taken anyway?
Mamun weighs around 220lbs? I'd say Austin looks at least 240-245lbs there.
When was this picture taken anyway?
Anonymous said on 7/Sep/08
A flat 6-0 at most.
A flat 6-0 at most.
Clay said on 6/Sep/08
He looks really jacked here next to Mamun who is around 220 pounds. Alex how big would you say he is based on this pic next to Mamun? He does look 245-255 here.
He looks really jacked here next to Mamun who is around 220 pounds. Alex how big would you say he is based on this pic next to Mamun? He does look 245-255 here.
Hugh said on 6/Sep/08
Looks at least 6ft1 there. I think he's 6ft1.5-6ft2.
Looks at least 6ft1 there. I think he's 6ft1.5-6ft2.
dmon said on 6/Sep/08
Check out The smoking Gun.com.It has austins mugshot and height.He is about "6'3
Check out The smoking Gun.com.It has austins mugshot and height.He is about "6'3
Clay said on 5/Sep/08
What do you think he is Viper? Let me guess '' 5'10/5'10.5 ''.
What do you think he is Viper? Let me guess '' 5'10/5'10.5 ''.
Alex said on 5/Sep/08
Austin's eye level I am thinking is 4.5 inches. Him leaning but with bigger footwear may almost break even since he could be losing an inch with that lean. I'd think Austin would have 4 inches bare minimum on Mamun if barefoot.
Austin's eye level I am thinking is 4.5 inches. Him leaning but with bigger footwear may almost break even since he could be losing an inch with that lean. I'd think Austin would have 4 inches bare minimum on Mamun if barefoot.
Derek said on 5/Sep/08
The only time Austin could have been 6'0.5" was before breaking his neck. He's a flat 6'0" at best.
The only time Austin could have been 6'0.5" was before breaking his neck. He's a flat 6'0" at best.
Viper said on 4/Sep/08
You would Clay.
You would Clay.
Clay said on 3/Sep/08
Im actually thinking now 6'0.5 for Steve is correct.
Im actually thinking now 6'0.5 for Steve is correct.
TELLEM said on 3/Sep/08
Alex says on 3/Sep/08
Austin may have around an inch footwear advantage on Mamun then. Austin is still slouching a bit while Mamun is standing pretty straight. Austin could still be 6'0 1/2 though with all that.
yea then that makes sense...that makes 6'1 outt the question...he must of been wearing the same footwear in the mugshot...
Alex says on 3/Sep/08
Austin may have around an inch footwear advantage on Mamun then. Austin is still slouching a bit while Mamun is standing pretty straight. Austin could still be 6'0 1/2 though with all that.
yea then that makes sense...that makes 6'1 outt the question...he must of been wearing the same footwear in the mugshot...
Alex said on 3/Sep/08
Austin may have around an inch footwear advantage on Mamun then. Austin is still slouching a bit while Mamun is standing pretty straight. Austin could still be 6'0 1/2 though with all that.
Austin may have around an inch footwear advantage on Mamun then. Austin is still slouching a bit while Mamun is standing pretty straight. Austin could still be 6'0 1/2 though with all that.
Mamun said on 3/Sep/08
Yes my friends I had said it before that his footwear was significantly much
more than mine . In this picture I was only wearing shoes with 0.5. inches
of soles and very soft too . I had met Stone cold again in march 2006 and
you all know what kind of footwear he loves to wear !
Regards
Mamun
Yes my friends I had said it before that his footwear was significantly much
more than mine . In this picture I was only wearing shoes with 0.5. inches
of soles and very soft too . I had met Stone cold again in march 2006 and
you all know what kind of footwear he loves to wear !
Regards
Mamun
Alex said on 3/Sep/08
I see 4 inches or a bit more with Austin slouching. If he straightens he'll be 4.5-5 inches taller but he's also a slightly closer to the camera and has a bit bigger footwear Mamun said than he had on himself. Results in 6'0-6'0 1/2. Thats how I look near 5'8 guys pretty much.
I see 4 inches or a bit more with Austin slouching. If he straightens he'll be 4.5-5 inches taller but he's also a slightly closer to the camera and has a bit bigger footwear Mamun said than he had on himself. Results in 6'0-6'0 1/2. Thats how I look near 5'8 guys pretty much.
Clay said on 2/Sep/08
And lets not use the Austin is wearing a hat card...Supermun has poofy hair which evens the field. Perhaps a word from you Mamun? I know you thought he looked 5'11.5/6'0 in person could be bad posture.
And lets not use the Austin is wearing a hat card...Supermun has poofy hair which evens the field. Perhaps a word from you Mamun? I know you thought he looked 5'11.5/6'0 in person could be bad posture.
eclectic height said on 2/Sep/08
I met Austin about nine years ago,I'm 6'2" and at eye level with him,Giving an estimation for him was about 6'2" so he's tall but average height in the wwe.
I met Austin about nine years ago,I'm 6'2" and at eye level with him,Giving an estimation for him was about 6'2" so he's tall but average height in the wwe.
Danimal said on 2/Sep/08
Clay says on 2/Sep/08
Also Austin would have been sporting 3 inches worth of heel for his mugshot to be as low as a lfat 6'0. Not likely.
You are not factoring in camera angles. If the camera was being shot from below, looking UP at Stone Cold in that mug shot, it would have give the illusion of a taller man. Nothing over 6'0" imo.
Editor Rob
Clay says on 2/Sep/08
Also Austin would have been sporting 3 inches worth of heel for his mugshot to be as low as a lfat 6'0. Not likely.
You are not factoring in camera angles. If the camera was being shot from below, looking UP at Stone Cold in that mug shot, it would have give the illusion of a taller man. Nothing over 6'0" imo.
Editor Rob I will add the Josh photo, the other guy I think the photo is tough for height as it's over the table.
hs2008 said on 2/Sep/08
Clay, I agree about seeing 5". Maybe we're both losing it :D
I just think that if Austin stood up straight he would look 6'1" comfortably, especially considering that Mamun is standing up really straight.
Clay, I agree about seeing 5". Maybe we're both losing it :D
I just think that if Austin stood up straight he would look 6'1" comfortably, especially considering that Mamun is standing up really straight.
Clay said on 2/Sep/08
Also Austin would have been sporting 3 inches worth of heel for his mugshot to be as low as a lfat 6'0. Not likely.
Also Austin would have been sporting 3 inches worth of heel for his mugshot to be as low as a lfat 6'0. Not likely.
Big T said on 1/Sep/08
How can you drop him below 6'1" when he's 6'4" standing in front of a height chart for a mugshot??
How can you drop him below 6'1" when he's 6'4" standing in front of a height chart for a mugshot??
Clay said on 1/Sep/08
Maybe im losing it, I see 5 inches there easy.
Maybe im losing it, I see 5 inches there easy.
TELLEM said on 1/Sep/08
the only thing that still doesn't make much sense (if he is 6'0-.5)is his mug shot which has him at 6'3
the only thing that still doesn't make much sense (if he is 6'0-.5)is his mug shot which has him at 6'3
Alex said on 1/Sep/08
Rob, so with that you think its time to drop Austin to 6'0.5?
Editor Rob
Rob, so with that you think its time to drop Austin to 6'0.5?
Editor Rob it's possible, I'm still not as convinced as yet.
Alex said on 1/Sep/08
I see 4 inches how the picture looks but also is leaning a bit so he'd get at least 1/2 inch more from that but also Mamun said he had a bit of a footwear advantage so it all breaks even pretty much. I could see Austin at 6'0 1/2 perhaps but no more.
Editor Rob
I see 4 inches how the picture looks but also is leaning a bit so he'd get at least 1/2 inch more from that but also Mamun said he had a bit of a footwear advantage so it all breaks even pretty much. I could see Austin at 6'0 1/2 perhaps but no more.
Editor Rob there does look 4.5 inches in that photo, but then if he has better footwear but a worser posture...
hs2008 said on 1/Sep/08
He's leaning and still has about 4" on him, so if he stood up sraight he'd be 6'1" easy.
He's leaning and still has about 4" on him, so if he stood up sraight he'd be 6'1" easy.
Viper said on 31/Aug/08
He looks 6-0 with Mamum
He looks 6-0 with Mamum
Danimal said on 31/Aug/08
6'0" Flat. Watch Beyong The Mat (the backstage scenes). He is inches shorter then Mankind and The Rock backstage. His boots give him an extra 1-2" for sure.
6'0" Flat. Watch Beyong The Mat (the backstage scenes). He is inches shorter then Mankind and The Rock backstage. His boots give him an extra 1-2" for sure.
hs2008 said on 31/Aug/08
Mamun, I heard that too! Apparently he may wrestle at WM 25 in Houston, TX and beinducted into the HOF the night before. I'd love for that to happen, but we'll just have to wait & see.
Mamun, I heard that too! Apparently he may wrestle at WM 25 in Houston, TX and beinducted into the HOF the night before. I'd love for that to happen, but we'll just have to wait & see.
Mamun said on 31/Aug/08
I heard Stone Cold might make a come back and wrestle again !
Regards
Mamun
I heard Stone Cold might make a come back and wrestle again !
Regards
Mamun
Clay said on 29/Aug/08
No way based on this pic its an easy 5 inches over Mamun. And Mamun is actually a shade over 5'8'' too.
No way based on this pic its an easy 5 inches over Mamun. And Mamun is actually a shade over 5'8'' too.
hs2008 said on 23/Aug/08
Also if you meant NoDQ.com (apologies if you didn't) then you can see from this link that Impact got a 1.22 back in February of this year.
Click Here
Also if you meant NoDQ.com (apologies if you didn't) then you can see from this link that Impact got a 1.22 back in February of this year.
Click Here
hs2008 said on 23/Aug/08
I don't know what country they get 3.8 ratings but in USA they don't! I've posted it for you to see clear as day but if you want to ignore that then fine.
Also I didn't say that RAW gets over 4.0 because they don't anymore, but they usually get mid-high in the 3's. Smackdown usually gets mid-high in the 2's, ECW gets low-mid 1's and Impact gets about 1.0. It's inarguable FACT!.
I don't know what country they get 3.8 ratings but in USA they don't! I've posted it for you to see clear as day but if you want to ignore that then fine.
Also I didn't say that RAW gets over 4.0 because they don't anymore, but they usually get mid-high in the 3's. Smackdown usually gets mid-high in the 2's, ECW gets low-mid 1's and Impact gets about 1.0. It's inarguable FACT!.
Rikashiku said on 22/Aug/08
in 2005 their almost similar. but i was right, lower than 4.0 from 05 to 07 for Raw
TNA usually has better matches and not so slow and their more intense. Magazines have had their ratings over 3.8 aswell as NODQ.
in 2005 their almost similar. but i was right, lower than 4.0 from 05 to 07 for Raw
TNA usually has better matches and not so slow and their more intense. Magazines have had their ratings over 3.8 aswell as NODQ.
Clay said on 22/Aug/08
Paul Sr is huge he looks over 250 pounds to me.
Paul Sr is huge he looks over 250 pounds to me.
Alex2 said on 22/Aug/08
Ola, thanks, yea I could believe 5'11", I hear Paul Jr is 5'10" or just shy of it.
Ola, thanks, yea I could believe 5'11", I hear Paul Jr is 5'10" or just shy of it.
hs2008 said on 22/Aug/08
I was talking about ratings with Rikashiku dude. If people can talk about American Chopper on this page, then we can talk about ratings. At least it's wrstling related.
Although OCC is a good show :p Paul Sr. & Paul Jr. are pretty big guys for sure.
I was talking about ratings with Rikashiku dude. If people can talk about American Chopper on this page, then we can talk about ratings. At least it's wrstling related.
Although OCC is a good show :p Paul Sr. & Paul Jr. are pretty big guys for sure.
Alex2 said on 21/Aug/08
Ola, that's cool, I see he is a huge guy though, giotta have near 20" arms, how tall would you say Pual sr is? Thanks.
Ola, that's cool, I see he is a huge guy though, giotta have near 20" arms, how tall would you say Pual sr is? Thanks.
TELLEM said on 21/Aug/08
hs2008 says on 21/Aug/08
I get my info from FACT! Vegas has already linked ratings info which you have seemingly ignored but i'll do it again:
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
You can't possibly ignore the fact now that Smackdown has lower ratings than RAW and always has and Impact is lower than ECW. This past week for example ECW was 1.45 and Impact 1.00.
There you go, I didn't just say it I linked it.
no offense man but were talking about stone cold's height not ratings
hs2008 says on 21/Aug/08
I get my info from FACT! Vegas has already linked ratings info which you have seemingly ignored but i'll do it again:
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
You can't possibly ignore the fact now that Smackdown has lower ratings than RAW and always has and Impact is lower than ECW. This past week for example ECW was 1.45 and Impact 1.00.
There you go, I didn't just say it I linked it.
no offense man but were talking about stone cold's height not ratings
hs2008 said on 21/Aug/08
I get my info from FACT! Vegas has already linked ratings info which you have seemingly ignored but i'll do it again:
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
You can't possibly ignore the fact now that Smackdown has lower ratings than RAW and always has and Impact is lower than ECW. This past week for example ECW was 1.45 and Impact 1.00.
There you go, I didn't just say it I linked it.
I get my info from FACT! Vegas has already linked ratings info which you have seemingly ignored but i'll do it again:
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
You can't possibly ignore the fact now that Smackdown has lower ratings than RAW and always has and Impact is lower than ECW. This past week for example ECW was 1.45 and Impact 1.00.
There you go, I didn't just say it I linked it.
Alex2 said on 21/Aug/08
Alex, thanks, He could have been 240-245 actually lol, Alex do you ever watch American Chopper? Have you seen big Paul Teutul on there? He's huge, he looks 5'11-6'0 and at least 260lbs to me, but i dont know, what would you say?
Alex, thanks, He could have been 240-245 actually lol, Alex do you ever watch American Chopper? Have you seen big Paul Teutul on there? He's huge, he looks 5'11-6'0 and at least 260lbs to me, but i dont know, what would you say?
Big T said on 21/Aug/08
In this mugshot he is 193cm which is 6'4"
Click Here
Why do ppl so often look taller in Mugshots? Akon was 6' in his, 2pac 5'11", 50 Cent was 6'1", Charles Barkley 6'7" and 6'8"....it's bizarre
In this mugshot he is 193cm which is 6'4"
Click Here
Why do ppl so often look taller in Mugshots? Akon was 6' in his, 2pac 5'11", 50 Cent was 6'1", Charles Barkley 6'7" and 6'8"....it's bizarre
Rikashiku said on 20/Aug/08
He has had some surgery on him so it is possible.
Knee and neck so that could do an inch.
and hs2008.
Impact has had higher ratings.
where did you get your info from?
dont just say it, Link it.
Smackdown ratings have been higher ever since 06.
Raw has been lower than 4.0
Its coz its boring, to much talking. Smackdown has more than 5-6 matches which are actually exciting, even the talking parts are actually worth watching.
ECW is on the rise now. more exciting superstars and better matches, its only an hour long.
He has had some surgery on him so it is possible.
Knee and neck so that could do an inch.
and hs2008.
Impact has had higher ratings.
where did you get your info from?
dont just say it, Link it.
Smackdown ratings have been higher ever since 06.
Raw has been lower than 4.0
Its coz its boring, to much talking. Smackdown has more than 5-6 matches which are actually exciting, even the talking parts are actually worth watching.
ECW is on the rise now. more exciting superstars and better matches, its only an hour long.
TELLEM said on 19/Aug/08
TELLEM says on 18/Aug/08
how is Steve Austin 6'0 when his arrest record showed 6'3?
Those are his measurements in shoes. he was likely 6'1 at that time.
i know those are his measurements in shoes...so how on earth is he 6'0...when he was listed there as 6'3...i doubt he lost height
TELLEM says on 18/Aug/08
how is Steve Austin 6'0 when his arrest record showed 6'3?
Those are his measurements in shoes. he was likely 6'1 at that time.
i know those are his measurements in shoes...so how on earth is he 6'0...when he was listed there as 6'3...i doubt he lost height
Clay said on 19/Aug/08
He looked every bit of 6'1'' in both pictures Brad.
He looked every bit of 6'1'' in both pictures Brad.
hs2008 said on 19/Aug/08
Lol Rikashiku, Smackdown has never beaten RAW in the ratings and TNA can't even beat ECW, the WWE's 3rd brand, never mind RAW & Smackdown. About 1 million people watch Impact and only around 10,000 buy the PPV's i'm afraid to tell you. Whereas RAW gets around 5 million viewers, Smackdown 4 million & ECW 1.5 million. Wherever you get your facts from are WRONG!
Lol Rikashiku, Smackdown has never beaten RAW in the ratings and TNA can't even beat ECW, the WWE's 3rd brand, never mind RAW & Smackdown. About 1 million people watch Impact and only around 10,000 buy the PPV's i'm afraid to tell you. Whereas RAW gets around 5 million viewers, Smackdown 4 million & ECW 1.5 million. Wherever you get your facts from are WRONG!
Rikashiku said on 19/Aug/08
TELLEM says on 18/Aug/08
how is Steve Austin 6'0 when his arrest record showed 6'3?
Those are his measurements in shoes. he was likely 6'1 at that time.
And Vegas, those ratings were listed on im db.
from 2005-2007 Raw Ratings were 3.4 and SD was 4.0
Impact had 4.4 and 4.8 with ppv.
TELLEM says on 18/Aug/08
how is Steve Austin 6'0 when his arrest record showed 6'3?
Those are his measurements in shoes. he was likely 6'1 at that time.
And Vegas, those ratings were listed on im db.
from 2005-2007 Raw Ratings were 3.4 and SD was 4.0
Impact had 4.4 and 4.8 with ppv.
Clay said on 19/Aug/08
That would be why I cant buy as low as 6'0''. He was in his boots which probably give 2 inches so he stacked up at 6'3'' on the charts.
That would be why I cant buy as low as 6'0''. He was in his boots which probably give 2 inches so he stacked up at 6'3'' on the charts.
Brad said on 19/Aug/08
6', the key was the pictures with Glenn and Mamun.
6', the key was the pictures with Glenn and Mamun.
TELLEM said on 18/Aug/08
how is steve austin 6'0 when his arrest record showed 6'3?
how is steve austin 6'0 when his arrest record showed 6'3?
Alex said on 17/Aug/08
Alex 2, yea 240-245lbs. Like HS said I think he was probably billed around 10lbs more than his real weight. But today 230lbs seems more accurate. He's lost a little size but he's still a big guy.
Alex 2, yea 240-245lbs. Like HS said I think he was probably billed around 10lbs more than his real weight. But today 230lbs seems more accurate. He's lost a little size but he's still a big guy.
Clay said on 16/Aug/08
At his biggest he did look 240-250 or around there.
At his biggest he did look 240-250 or around there.
Heights are barefeet estimates, derived from quotations, official websites, agency resumes, in person encounters with actors at conventions and pictures/films.
Other vital statistics like weight or shoe size measurements have been sourced from newspapers, books, resumes or social media.
Celebrity Fan Photos and Agency Pictures of stars are © to their respective owners.