Add a Comment9900 comments
Average Guess (947 Votes)
Peak: 6ft 7.68in (202.4cm)
Current: 6ft 6.4in (199.1cm)
Peak: 6ft 7.68in (202.4cm)
Current: 6ft 6.4in (199.1cm)
Red said on 14/Feb/09
Great find Vegas, look at HHH
Great find Vegas, look at HHH
JT said on 14/Feb/09
Taker and HHH had a decent ~ staredown from 2002 as well. Click Here The height difference looks about the same as compared with last night on Smackdown.
Taker and HHH had a decent ~ staredown from 2002 as well. Click Here The height difference looks about the same as compared with last night on Smackdown.
Alex2 said on 14/Feb/09
Since when was Triple H 6'1" ??? :S a strong 6'2" for sure
Since when was Triple H 6'1" ??? :S a strong 6'2" for sure
KingNick said on 13/Feb/09
Here's another thing about Undertaker's height. His features are very low and he has a long forehead so he can appear shorter than he actually is.
Tuga found a video that Red was nice enough to screen cap. A good close up of Sid and UT from WM 13 Click Here
If Sid wasn't tilting his head back his features would still be higher than UT's and he would appear at first glance to be taller. But in reality UT is taller because of his face and head are longer.
I think this is why he can appear shorter next to smaller wrestlers plus he rarely stands up straight to begin with unless it's with someone as tall or taller than him, which is rare, like The Great Khali.
And not sure if my last post went through or not but here's UT vs. Orton from last Monday's Raw. I see more than a 2" difference there Click Here
I'm open to UT possibly being 6'7" now but I still think he's 6'8".
Here's another thing about Undertaker's height. His features are very low and he has a long forehead so he can appear shorter than he actually is.
Tuga found a video that Red was nice enough to screen cap. A good close up of Sid and UT from WM 13 Click Here
If Sid wasn't tilting his head back his features would still be higher than UT's and he would appear at first glance to be taller. But in reality UT is taller because of his face and head are longer.
I think this is why he can appear shorter next to smaller wrestlers plus he rarely stands up straight to begin with unless it's with someone as tall or taller than him, which is rare, like The Great Khali.
And not sure if my last post went through or not but here's UT vs. Orton from last Monday's Raw. I see more than a 2" difference there Click Here
I'm open to UT possibly being 6'7" now but I still think he's 6'8".
Clay said on 13/Feb/09
Danimal says on 12/Feb/09
Benoit at 5'9.5" is laughable. He's in the 5'8" range. Taker is 6'6"-6'6.5" today.
Going to have to disagree here.
Danimal says on 12/Feb/09
Benoit at 5'9.5" is laughable. He's in the 5'8" range. Taker is 6'6"-6'6.5" today.
Going to have to disagree here.
KingNick said on 13/Feb/09
Undertaker vs. Randy Orton from Raw last Monday Click Here
I see more than a 2" difference.
Undertaker vs. Randy Orton from Raw last Monday Click Here
I see more than a 2" difference.
Ghost said on 13/Feb/09
Danimal says on 12/Feb/09
Benoit at 5'9.5" is laughable. He's in the 5'8" range. Taker is 6'6"-6'6.5" today.
Benoit looked 3 inches taller than mean Gene in WCW and Taker is 5 inches shorter than Khali.
Danimal says on 12/Feb/09
Benoit at 5'9.5" is laughable. He's in the 5'8" range. Taker is 6'6"-6'6.5" today.
Benoit looked 3 inches taller than mean Gene in WCW and Taker is 5 inches shorter than Khali.
1PunchBob said on 13/Feb/09
UT at peak was 6`8...but nowadays looks a shell of his former self, he looks alot thinner and i doubt much more than 260lbs and can look as low as 6`6 now...he bareley looked much taller than Randy Orton and didnt tower 6`1 HHH????
UT at peak was 6`8...but nowadays looks a shell of his former self, he looks alot thinner and i doubt much more than 260lbs and can look as low as 6`6 now...he bareley looked much taller than Randy Orton and didnt tower 6`1 HHH????
Danimal said on 12/Feb/09
Benoit at 5'9.5" is laughable. He's in the 5'8" range. Taker is 6'6"-6'6.5" today.
Benoit at 5'9.5" is laughable. He's in the 5'8" range. Taker is 6'6"-6'6.5" today.
Alex said on 12/Feb/09
Red, I agree on that list but I'd put Benoit down to a flat 5'9.
Red, I agree on that list but I'd put Benoit down to a flat 5'9.
Red said on 12/Feb/09
Alex says on 11/Feb/09
Click Here
Eddie at 5'7 which I can def agree on would put Benoit at 5'8.
Benoit is slouching down to Eddie, look at this
Click Here
My estimate:
Angle: 5
Alex says on 11/Feb/09
Click Here
Eddie at 5'7 which I can def agree on would put Benoit at 5'8.
Benoit is slouching down to Eddie, look at this
Click Here
My estimate:
Angle: 5
Alex said on 12/Feb/09
Yea, Eddie def no way 5'8 anymore. I could lean toward 5'7 but MIGHT be as low as 5'6 1/2 but I'd stick to 5'7.
Yea, Eddie def no way 5'8 anymore. I could lean toward 5'7 but MIGHT be as low as 5'6 1/2 but I'd stick to 5'7.
Jake said on 11/Feb/09
Anyone know how tall Boogeyman (Marty Wright) is compared to other wrestlers?
Anyone know how tall Boogeyman (Marty Wright) is compared to other wrestlers?
Red said on 11/Feb/09
Rob, I really need to buy such a stadiometer. I think the chinline in my pic is a little to low and I just realized in the original pic that my mouth was slightly open.
It
Rob, I really need to buy such a stadiometer. I think the chinline in my pic is a little to low and I just realized in the original pic that my mouth was slightly open.
It
Big Show said on 11/Feb/09
Red says on 11/Feb/09
We still don
Red says on 11/Feb/09
We still don
Alex said on 11/Feb/09
Red, very similar height to me. I wake at 6'0.75 most of the time, can get as high as 6'1 flat but its not often. Midday around the 6'0.25 mark and 6'0 by evening and once in a while 5'11.75 after a long day on my feet and working.
Red, very similar height to me. I wake at 6'0.75 most of the time, can get as high as 6'1 flat but its not often. Midday around the 6'0.25 mark and 6'0 by evening and once in a while 5'11.75 after a long day on my feet and working.
Red said on 11/Feb/09
Alex says on 10/Feb/09
Red, good lines. I can see a 3 inch difference between Angle and Eddie now. Yea Eddie is only 5'7 then. Also Angle's head appears to be just under 10 inches long.
We still don
Alex says on 10/Feb/09
Red, good lines. I can see a 3 inch difference between Angle and Eddie now. Yea Eddie is only 5'7 then. Also Angle's head appears to be just under 10 inches long.
We still don
Red said on 11/Feb/09
Alex says on 10/Feb/09
Red, what time of the day are you 6'0.5?
The most. I
Alex says on 10/Feb/09
Red, what time of the day are you 6'0.5?
The most. I
Clay said on 10/Feb/09
Exactly Red. Khali and Shaq are the same height, but Khali's head and hands are much larger.
Exactly Red. Khali and Shaq are the same height, but Khali's head and hands are much larger.
Da Man said on 10/Feb/09
Red, was the the ruler the same distance from the camera as the right side of your face or was it positioned in the center of your face?
Red, was the the ruler the same distance from the camera as the right side of your face or was it positioned in the center of your face?
Da Man said on 10/Feb/09
nick says
"i would say shaq has a 10.5 and khali 12, big show 12.5"
I agree
nick says
"i would say shaq has a 10.5 and khali 12, big show 12.5"
I agree
Red said on 10/Feb/09
The headposition is very important for the head-measurement, if you raise your chin a bit, you can lose very much.
Da Man, odd proportions? very first time I here something like that, maybe because I
The headposition is very important for the head-measurement, if you raise your chin a bit, you can lose very much.
Da Man, odd proportions? very first time I here something like that, maybe because I
Alex said on 10/Feb/09
Red, what time of the day are you 6'0.5?
Red, what time of the day are you 6'0.5?
Alex said on 10/Feb/09
My head is 9.5 inches at 6'0.
Red, good lines. I can see a 3 inch difference between Angle and Eddie now. Yea Eddie is only 5'7 then. Also Angle's head appears to be just under 10 inches long.
My head is 9.5 inches at 6'0.
Red, good lines. I can see a 3 inch difference between Angle and Eddie now. Yea Eddie is only 5'7 then. Also Angle's head appears to be just under 10 inches long.
Danimal said on 10/Feb/09
My head is less than 10" and it is long. 11" is pretty long.
My head is less than 10" and it is long. 11" is pretty long.
nick said on 9/Feb/09
i would say shaq has a 10.5 and khali 12, big show 12.5
i would say shaq has a 10.5 and khali 12, big show 12.5
Da Man said on 9/Feb/09
Red, so you're saying you're only about 6.65 heads tall. That's pretty odd proportioning. Most people average about 7.5 heads tall, it's not uncommon for taller people to exceed 8 heads tall. I for one do.
Red, so you're saying you're only about 6.65 heads tall. That's pretty odd proportioning. Most people average about 7.5 heads tall, it's not uncommon for taller people to exceed 8 heads tall. I for one do.
Red said on 9/Feb/09
I think Khalis head is much more than 11". Did you measure your head like I did in my pic? Measuring the head in front of the mirror can misleading
I think Khalis head is much more than 11". Did you measure your head like I did in my pic? Measuring the head in front of the mirror can misleading
Big Show said on 9/Feb/09
Red says on 9/Feb/09
I don
Red says on 9/Feb/09
I don
Big Show said on 8/Feb/09
Red says on 8/Feb/09
Click Here
Big Show, why not choose the 2:08 staredown, because that difference is close to 3 inches and we can
Red says on 8/Feb/09
Click Here
Big Show, why not choose the 2:08 staredown, because that difference is close to 3 inches and we can
Red said on 8/Feb/09
Click Here
Big Show, why not choose the 2:08 staredown, because that difference is close to 3 inches and we can
Click Here
Big Show, why not choose the 2:08 staredown, because that difference is close to 3 inches and we can
TELLEM said on 7/Feb/09
eddie was no way close to 5'8. his late tag team partner art barr had him by a few inches , and he was ONLY 5'10!.
eddie was no way close to 5'8. his late tag team partner art barr had him by a few inches , and he was ONLY 5'10!.
Big Show said on 7/Feb/09
hs2009 says on 5/Feb/09
Nice vid Alex. However, I think Eddie looks a good 3" shorter than Angle. I still think Eddie was 5'6.5"-5'7".
It's not even two inches between these two.
Click Here
For that to be a 3" difference, Kurt Angle's head would have to be 15 inches long.
hs2009 says on 5/Feb/09
Nice vid Alex. However, I think Eddie looks a good 3" shorter than Angle. I still think Eddie was 5'6.5"-5'7".
It's not even two inches between these two.
Click Here
For that to be a 3" difference, Kurt Angle's head would have to be 15 inches long.
Alex said on 7/Feb/09
HS, think a good 3 inches? I would have thought 3 inches max looking at that.
HS, think a good 3 inches? I would have thought 3 inches max looking at that.
hs2009 said on 5/Feb/09
Nice vid Alex. However, I think Eddie looks a good 3" shorter than Angle. I still think Eddie was 5'6.5"-5'7".
Has anyone read Jericho's book? If so you'll have seen the pic in street clothes of Jericho, Eddie & Chavo Jr. There's 3" between Y2J & Eddie as well.
Nice vid Alex. However, I think Eddie looks a good 3" shorter than Angle. I still think Eddie was 5'6.5"-5'7".
Has anyone read Jericho's book? If so you'll have seen the pic in street clothes of Jericho, Eddie & Chavo Jr. There's 3" between Y2J & Eddie as well.
Alex said on 4/Feb/09
Clay, I agree on that list but Eddie could be as much as 5'8.
Look here at the 2:08 mark with Angle and Eddie face to face. Not sure if I see a full 3 inches there.
Click Here
Clay, I agree on that list but Eddie could be as much as 5'8.
Look here at the 2:08 mark with Angle and Eddie face to face. Not sure if I see a full 3 inches there.
Click Here
Alex said on 4/Feb/09
I am not even sure how tall Hornswoggle is. 4'2-4'4? Hes so short its tough to guess on him.
I am not even sure how tall Hornswoggle is. 4'2-4'4? Hes so short its tough to guess on him.
sid said on 3/Feb/09
Heres undertaker looking short with hhh, and taker looking surpising short has well there two videos
Click Here
Click Here
Heres undertaker looking short with hhh, and taker looking surpising short has well there two videos
Click Here
Click Here
Clay said on 3/Feb/09
Well Hornswoggle is a little over 4'0 then, who cares.
Well Hornswoggle is a little over 4'0 then, who cares.
hs2009 said on 3/Feb/09
Clay, I agree on 100% on pretty much all of them.
I have no idea how tall Hornswoggle really is though, lol. He's very short is all I'm sure off :p
Clay, I agree on 100% on pretty much all of them.
I have no idea how tall Hornswoggle really is though, lol. He's very short is all I'm sure off :p
Clay said on 2/Feb/09
Angle - 5'10
Jericho - 5'9.5
Benoit - 5'9
Eddie - 5'7
Mysterio - 5'3
Hornswoggle (lol) - 4'0
Angle - 5'10
Jericho - 5'9.5
Benoit - 5'9
Eddie - 5'7
Mysterio - 5'3
Hornswoggle (lol) - 4'0
hs2009 said on 2/Feb/09
I'd give:
Eddie Guerrero (RIP): 5'6.5"
Chris Benoit: 5'9"
Chris Jericho: 5'9.5"
Kurt Angle: 5'10"
I'd give:
Eddie Guerrero (RIP): 5'6.5"
Chris Benoit: 5'9"
Chris Jericho: 5'9.5"
Kurt Angle: 5'10"
Shock of Electric said on 1/Feb/09
Taker came out about 3.5" shorter than Big Show at Rumble, then you have to compensate for boots, which Show's are bigger.
Taker came out about 3.5" shorter than Big Show at Rumble, then you have to compensate for boots, which Show's are bigger.
TELLEM said on 1/Feb/09
this vid right here is from 1999. it shows dean malenko and mene gene in dress shoes. please note that dean malenko and eddie were the same height, possibly dean having .5 inch over eddie. starting at 6:40 you can see dean malenko a bit shorter than mean gene: Click Here
gene could have been a strong 5'7-5'8 around this time
this vid right here is from 1999. it shows dean malenko and mene gene in dress shoes. please note that dean malenko and eddie were the same height, possibly dean having .5 inch over eddie. starting at 6:40 you can see dean malenko a bit shorter than mean gene: Click Here
gene could have been a strong 5'7-5'8 around this time
Red said on 1/Feb/09
I give Benoit 5
I give Benoit 5
JT said on 1/Feb/09
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Benoit really looked around 5'10" in ring gear. No way was he 5'8". He had abnormally short legs for his height, which gave him a very squatty appearance.
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Benoit really looked around 5'10" in ring gear. No way was he 5'8". He had abnormally short legs for his height, which gave him a very squatty appearance.
Red said on 1/Feb/09
Click Here Benoit was 3.5-4inches taller than Eddie in comparable boots, so stop the 5
Click Here Benoit was 3.5-4inches taller than Eddie in comparable boots, so stop the 5
Vegas said on 1/Feb/09
is there any in-ring face-offs between angle and benoit?? backstage somestages angle looked taller but then other times benoit was taller than angle, it was usually 50-50
steve mcmichael is a good one to compare to benoit, he always wore wrestling boots too and he was ~6'2 barefoot, so a 5'8 benoit should only come up to his nose
is there any in-ring face-offs between angle and benoit?? backstage somestages angle looked taller but then other times benoit was taller than angle, it was usually 50-50
steve mcmichael is a good one to compare to benoit, he always wore wrestling boots too and he was ~6'2 barefoot, so a 5'8 benoit should only come up to his nose
Ghost said on 31/Jan/09
There's noway Jericho is under 5'9 and Benoit usually looked 5'9-5'9.
I wouldn't go under 5'7 for Eddie.
There's noway Jericho is under 5'9 and Benoit usually looked 5'9-5'9.
I wouldn't go under 5'7 for Eddie.
Alex said on 31/Jan/09
Angle had Benoit by an inch in most of their faceoffs. Never really saw more than that really. Jericho had an even less difference between him and Benoit.
With Angle at 5'10, it puts Jericho at 5'9 and Benoit at 5'9 max
Angle had Benoit by an inch in most of their faceoffs. Never really saw more than that really. Jericho had an even less difference between him and Benoit.
With Angle at 5'10, it puts Jericho at 5'9 and Benoit at 5'9 max
Vegas said on 31/Jan/09
Ola says on 31/Jan/09
Vegas, i would put it into this way: mango doesnt look 6'2... more likely 6'1
Click Here mcmichael was 6ft 2 remember ola we have had this debate before, this photo was the clincher Click Here
just to refresh memory the 3 men along with mongo behind the line and same distance from camera, matt brock to mongos right was listed at 6ft 5 Click Here
John Jurkovic 6'2 listed and he is shorter than mongo there Click Here
don davey at 6ft 4 Click Here
Ola says on 31/Jan/09
Vegas, i would put it into this way: mango doesnt look 6'2... more likely 6'1
Click Here mcmichael was 6ft 2 remember ola we have had this debate before, this photo was the clincher Click Here
just to refresh memory the 3 men along with mongo behind the line and same distance from camera, matt brock to mongos right was listed at 6ft 5 Click Here
John Jurkovic 6'2 listed and he is shorter than mongo there Click Here
don davey at 6ft 4 Click Here
Danimal said on 31/Jan/09
Vegas says on 30/Jan/09
benoit and mene gene 1997 Click Here
YEAH, in wrestling gear, which proves nothing, seeing Mean Gene by 1997 was in his mid-late 50's and in dress shoes.
Vegas says on 30/Jan/09
benoit and mene gene 1997 Click Here
YEAH, in wrestling gear, which proves nothing, seeing Mean Gene by 1997 was in his mid-late 50's and in dress shoes.
Vegas said on 31/Jan/09
benoit looks 3 inches taller than gene there, gene was taller than regis about 5 years earlier.
here is another with mike tenay (who was taller than a 5ft 9.5 measured nfl player pacman jones in tna last year) and legit 6ft 2 steve mcmichael, benoit doesn't look 6 inches shorter than mcmichael there Click Here
benoit also had a staredown with sid eudy about 1999 i am looking for that
benoit looks 3 inches taller than gene there, gene was taller than regis about 5 years earlier.
here is another with mike tenay (who was taller than a 5ft 9.5 measured nfl player pacman jones in tna last year) and legit 6ft 2 steve mcmichael, benoit doesn't look 6 inches shorter than mcmichael there Click Here
benoit also had a staredown with sid eudy about 1999 i am looking for that
Alex said on 30/Jan/09
I saw only an inch between Benoit and Eddie. Jericho was maybe 1/2 inch tops on Benoit.
I saw only an inch between Benoit and Eddie. Jericho was maybe 1/2 inch tops on Benoit.
Clay said on 30/Jan/09
Dont downgrade someone just to justify a previous downgrade Danimal. Thats viper-esque and annoying.
Dont downgrade someone just to justify a previous downgrade Danimal. Thats viper-esque and annoying.
Rantsrob said on 30/Jan/09
Red says on 27/Jan/09
Click Here
Big Show has about 5 inches on Taker and Taker has the better posture.
hs2009 says on 27/Jan/09
Sid looks 6'7" in that video,...
Sid looks 6
Red says on 27/Jan/09
Click Here
Big Show has about 5 inches on Taker and Taker has the better posture.
hs2009 says on 27/Jan/09
Sid looks 6'7" in that video,...
Sid looks 6
Danimal said on 30/Jan/09
Clay says on 29/Jan/09
Danimal thats laughable Benoit had 2 inches easily over the 5'7-5'7.5 Eddie.
Whatever. Then Eddie was 5'6".
Clay says on 29/Jan/09
Danimal thats laughable Benoit had 2 inches easily over the 5'7-5'7.5 Eddie.
Whatever. Then Eddie was 5'6".
Red said on 30/Jan/09
Eddie was 5
Eddie was 5
Clay said on 29/Jan/09
Danimal thats laughable Benoit had 2 inches easily over the 5'7-5'7.5 Eddie.
Danimal thats laughable Benoit had 2 inches easily over the 5'7-5'7.5 Eddie.
Danimal said on 29/Jan/09
Ghost says on 29/Jan/09
In his lifts Jericho can look very close to guys like Kennedy, MVP and Cena so him being anything under 5'9 doesn't sound very possible. He also was easily taller than Chris Benoit (atleast 5'8) and Eddie Guerrero (maybe 5'7?).
I can live with 5'9" for Jericho, but I'm not ruling out 5'8"-5'8.5" for him. Benoit was a flat 5'8" and Eddie Guerrero was just shy of 5'8". Dean Malenko was barely over 5'7".
Ghost says on 29/Jan/09
In his lifts Jericho can look very close to guys like Kennedy, MVP and Cena so him being anything under 5'9 doesn't sound very possible. He also was easily taller than Chris Benoit (atleast 5'8) and Eddie Guerrero (maybe 5'7?).
I can live with 5'9" for Jericho, but I'm not ruling out 5'8"-5'8.5" for him. Benoit was a flat 5'8" and Eddie Guerrero was just shy of 5'8". Dean Malenko was barely over 5'7".
Ghost said on 29/Jan/09
In his lifts Jericho can look very close to guys like Kennedy, MVP and Cena so him being anything under 5'9 doesn't sound very possible. He also was easily taller than Chris Benoit (atleast 5'8) and Eddie Guerrero (maybe 5'7?).
In his lifts Jericho can look very close to guys like Kennedy, MVP and Cena so him being anything under 5'9 doesn't sound very possible. He also was easily taller than Chris Benoit (atleast 5'8) and Eddie Guerrero (maybe 5'7?).
Bergos said on 27/Jan/09
On RR, Undertaker didn't look more than 4" shorter than big show.
On RR, Undertaker didn't look more than 4" shorter than big show.
Red said on 27/Jan/09
Click Here
Big Show has about 5 inches on Taker and Taker has the better posture.
hs2009 says on 27/Jan/09
Sid looks 6'7" in that video,...
Sid looks 6
Click Here
Big Show has about 5 inches on Taker and Taker has the better posture.
hs2009 says on 27/Jan/09
Sid looks 6'7" in that video,...
Sid looks 6
hs2009 said on 27/Jan/09
Sid looks 6'7" in that video, providing that Scott Hall is 6'4".
I agree on a difference of roughly 3".
Sid looks 6'7" in that video, providing that Scott Hall is 6'4".
I agree on a difference of roughly 3".
Morg said on 27/Jan/09
hs2009 says on 12/Jan/09
Yeah, I've read 5'8" listings for Jericho as well. He's billed all over the place depending where you read, lol. Personally, I think he's about 5'9.5"-5'10" in his barefeet & pushing 6'0" in his wrestling boots.
Are u kidding me? Jericho is barely 5'9-10 in his built up wrestling boots.U can tell He's way shorter than matt hardy,christian etc.
hs2009 says on 12/Jan/09
Yeah, I've read 5'8" listings for Jericho as well. He's billed all over the place depending where you read, lol. Personally, I think he's about 5'9.5"-5'10" in his barefeet & pushing 6'0" in his wrestling boots.
Are u kidding me? Jericho is barely 5'9-10 in his built up wrestling boots.U can tell He's way shorter than matt hardy,christian etc.
Red said on 26/Jan/09
Noway 4 inches, it
Noway 4 inches, it
tuga said on 25/Jan/09
Glad you liked KingNick and Red.
Spivey does have footware advantage with his cowboy style wrestling boots, like it has been posted here before, and also spivey is no less than 6'6.
Frank says on 24/Jan/09
It makes sense Spivey a legit 6ft 6 and Taker 6ft 8 Spivey's heel looks Bigger than Takers and on the interview there looked like a 2 inch difference
I would guess there
Glad you liked KingNick and Red.
Spivey does have footware advantage with his cowboy style wrestling boots, like it has been posted here before, and also spivey is no less than 6'6.
Frank says on 24/Jan/09
It makes sense Spivey a legit 6ft 6 and Taker 6ft 8 Spivey's heel looks Bigger than Takers and on the interview there looked like a 2 inch difference
I would guess there
Frank said on 24/Jan/09
It makes sense Spivey a legit 6ft 6 and Taker 6ft 8 Spivey's heel looks Bigger than Takers and on the interview there looked like a 2 inch difference
It makes sense Spivey a legit 6ft 6 and Taker 6ft 8 Spivey's heel looks Bigger than Takers and on the interview there looked like a 2 inch difference
Red said on 24/Jan/09
tuga says on 23/Jan/09
Here
tuga says on 23/Jan/09
Here
Alex said on 23/Jan/09
I thought when he started talking more in interviews and promos thats when he started to lose some of his character.
I thought when he started talking more in interviews and promos thats when he started to lose some of his character.
KingNick said on 23/Jan/09
Good points, Danimal.
Tuga, thanks for that post man! Wow that's awesome to watch. I didn't realize he would occassionaly walk the top rope without holding someone's arm. It's just awesome. And to think WCW let him go. And how ironic too that he and Sid would end up fueding so much and even main event WM 13.
Interestingly enough, they look around the same height in that video and I dare say Spivey may even be slightly taller, but I think that's due to footwear.
Here they are again with Undertaker looking taller Click Here
Good points, Danimal.
Tuga, thanks for that post man! Wow that's awesome to watch. I didn't realize he would occassionaly walk the top rope without holding someone's arm. It's just awesome. And to think WCW let him go. And how ironic too that he and Sid would end up fueding so much and even main event WM 13.
Interestingly enough, they look around the same height in that video and I dare say Spivey may even be slightly taller, but I think that's due to footwear.
Here they are again with Undertaker looking taller Click Here
Danimal said on 23/Jan/09
KingNick says on 22/Jan/09
I understand what you guys are saying, Danimal and Alex. I think the guy had to adapt the way he did. If you notice from 1990-1993 and even most of 94 and 95, Undertaker never showed any emotion in the ring. No pain, nothing. If you notice, he never even made a sound. Around 96 when he started having his wars with Mankind is when he started doing that. It's the first time I can remember him making sound in the ring, Survivor Series 1996 (his "rebirth") Click Here The guys human, I think he probably decided he no longer wanted to/couldn't hide the pain anymore, which is why he adapted into a more human-like character with supernatural-like qualities.
Also we were talking about his weight a while ago, look at him in the video. I doubt he was over 300 there
He was hovering around 300 pounds at that time. By 1998-1999 he was 335 pounds. He wrote this in a late 90's interview. He also was A LOT stronger at a heavier bodyweight. He used to lift men off the ground and a lot higher off the ground with MUCH MORE ease. I still see him as being taller in the 1990's guaranteed.
KingNick says on 22/Jan/09
I understand what you guys are saying, Danimal and Alex. I think the guy had to adapt the way he did. If you notice from 1990-1993 and even most of 94 and 95, Undertaker never showed any emotion in the ring. No pain, nothing. If you notice, he never even made a sound. Around 96 when he started having his wars with Mankind is when he started doing that. It's the first time I can remember him making sound in the ring, Survivor Series 1996 (his "rebirth") Click Here The guys human, I think he probably decided he no longer wanted to/couldn't hide the pain anymore, which is why he adapted into a more human-like character with supernatural-like qualities.
Also we were talking about his weight a while ago, look at him in the video. I doubt he was over 300 there
He was hovering around 300 pounds at that time. By 1998-1999 he was 335 pounds. He wrote this in a late 90's interview. He also was A LOT stronger at a heavier bodyweight. He used to lift men off the ground and a lot higher off the ground with MUCH MORE ease. I still see him as being taller in the 1990's guaranteed.
tuga said on 23/Jan/09
KingNick says on 22/Jan/09
I understand what you guys are saying, Danimal and Alex. I think the guy had to adapt the way he did.
I agree with you all, times change, taker had to adapt, he didn
KingNick says on 22/Jan/09
I understand what you guys are saying, Danimal and Alex. I think the guy had to adapt the way he did.
I agree with you all, times change, taker had to adapt, he didn
KingNick said on 22/Jan/09
I understand what you guys are saying, Danimal and Alex. I think the guy had to adapt the way he did. If you notice from 1990-1993 and even most of 94 and 95, Undertaker never showed any emotion in the ring. No pain, nothing. If you notice, he never even made a sound. Around 96 when he started having his wars with Mankind is when he started doing that. It's the first time I can remember him making sound in the ring, Survivor Series 1996 (his "rebirth") Click Here The guys human, I think he probably decided he no longer wanted to/couldn't hide the pain anymore, which is why he adapted into a more human-like character with supernatural-like qualities.
Also we were talking about his weight a while ago, look at him in the video. I doubt he was over 300 there.
I understand what you guys are saying, Danimal and Alex. I think the guy had to adapt the way he did. If you notice from 1990-1993 and even most of 94 and 95, Undertaker never showed any emotion in the ring. No pain, nothing. If you notice, he never even made a sound. Around 96 when he started having his wars with Mankind is when he started doing that. It's the first time I can remember him making sound in the ring, Survivor Series 1996 (his "rebirth") Click Here The guys human, I think he probably decided he no longer wanted to/couldn't hide the pain anymore, which is why he adapted into a more human-like character with supernatural-like qualities.
Also we were talking about his weight a while ago, look at him in the video. I doubt he was over 300 there.
Danimal said on 22/Jan/09
Alex says on 21/Jan/09
I was watching some old clips and matches of UT from 1991-1994. I miss that UT. He was good from 94-97 too but after that he went on a decline to me.
I liked his stage presence a lot more back then too Alex. Taker actually acted like a DEAD MAN. He was fun to watch. He was like a walking zombie. He was the best thing about the WWF back then. He started to become TOO human since 1999 or so. He lost his APPEAL at that point imo. He HAD become a better athlete this decade. I will give him that. He puts his body at a higher risk in recent years, instead of just moving slowly like a zombie, but he no longer seems invincible. Remember when he used to get knocked down and he'd SIT UP and everyone would freak out and they would say: "He's NOT human" and the earn would always give him magical powers. He just seemed more imposing back then. I remember in 1993 when he fought Giant Gonzales. That was fun to watch.
Alex says on 21/Jan/09
I was watching some old clips and matches of UT from 1991-1994. I miss that UT. He was good from 94-97 too but after that he went on a decline to me.
I liked his stage presence a lot more back then too Alex. Taker actually acted like a DEAD MAN. He was fun to watch. He was like a walking zombie. He was the best thing about the WWF back then. He started to become TOO human since 1999 or so. He lost his APPEAL at that point imo. He HAD become a better athlete this decade. I will give him that. He puts his body at a higher risk in recent years, instead of just moving slowly like a zombie, but he no longer seems invincible. Remember when he used to get knocked down and he'd SIT UP and everyone would freak out and they would say: "He's NOT human" and the earn would always give him magical powers. He just seemed more imposing back then. I remember in 1993 when he fought Giant Gonzales. That was fun to watch.
AKK said on 22/Jan/09
I don't think it was getting dropped on his head that did in his height so much as trying to take the shock of some 600 lbs on your kneecaps. I did a Tombstone to my cousin many years back(when he was like 5 and I was 13 or so), and even then, on a matress, the impact on my knees was pretty bad(cousin was totally shielded by them). Imagine trying to do that with somebody your own weight. It's like jumping(and landing flat on your feet) from your own height every time you do it.
I don't think it was getting dropped on his head that did in his height so much as trying to take the shock of some 600 lbs on your kneecaps. I did a Tombstone to my cousin many years back(when he was like 5 and I was 13 or so), and even then, on a matress, the impact on my knees was pretty bad(cousin was totally shielded by them). Imagine trying to do that with somebody your own weight. It's like jumping(and landing flat on your feet) from your own height every time you do it.
Alex said on 21/Jan/09
I was watching some old clips and matches of UT from 1991-1994. I miss that UT. He was good from 94-97 too but after that he went on a decline to me.
I was watching some old clips and matches of UT from 1991-1994. I miss that UT. He was good from 94-97 too but after that he went on a decline to me.
Da Man said on 21/Jan/09
KingNick says on 19/Jan/09
"Khali and UT staredown at the 54 sec mark Click Here can't see eithers footwear but Khali's legs aren't too wide apart, more of a normal stance for both"
Click Here
Khali's stance is still a little wider, but it doesn't appear to be anywhere near as wide as it was in the other face-off.
KingNick says on 19/Jan/09
"Khali and UT staredown at the 54 sec mark Click Here can't see eithers footwear but Khali's legs aren't too wide apart, more of a normal stance for both"
Click Here
Khali's stance is still a little wider, but it doesn't appear to be anywhere near as wide as it was in the other face-off.
nick said on 20/Jan/09
i understand da man. The thing is is that if you have a giant man 75 feet tall his feet would be around 20 feet apart if they were shoulder width (from the in soles)Now if the giant stood straight as he could he would maybe be 75 and a half feet tall. Khali has his feet i agree a little more than shoulder width when my feet are a little more than shoulder width i measured a half inch less this time for him it should be the same if he moved them in a bit lilike me. Remember me and you are almost 6'3 he isnt that* much taller than us to scew everything that much.
i understand da man. The thing is is that if you have a giant man 75 feet tall his feet would be around 20 feet apart if they were shoulder width (from the in soles)Now if the giant stood straight as he could he would maybe be 75 and a half feet tall. Khali has his feet i agree a little more than shoulder width when my feet are a little more than shoulder width i measured a half inch less this time for him it should be the same if he moved them in a bit lilike me. Remember me and you are almost 6'3 he isnt that* much taller than us to scew everything that much.
KingNick said on 19/Jan/09
Khali and UT staredown at the 54 sec mark Click Here can't see eithers footwear but Khali's legs aren't too wide apart, more of a normal stance for both
Khali and UT staredown at the 54 sec mark Click Here can't see eithers footwear but Khali's legs aren't too wide apart, more of a normal stance for both
Clay said on 19/Jan/09
I dont think theres any doubt Undertaker is standing on pretty hefty lifts in his boots when he wrestles, but under 6'7'' doesnt seem to work.
I dont think theres any doubt Undertaker is standing on pretty hefty lifts in his boots when he wrestles, but under 6'7'' doesnt seem to work.
Da Man said on 19/Jan/09
JT says on 19/Jan/09
"Shaq has his head tilted back though, which makes his head seem smaller. He'll gain at least an inch, if not more, by lowering his chin. If I had to guess, I'd say Shaq has at least a 10 inch head, Khali close to 11.5 inches, and Big Show probably over 12 inches."
Yes, Shaq has his head tilted back, but as we saw in their pic together Khali's chin is dramatically lower than Shaq's which is where most of his head size comes from. The guy's head is enormous. I would also guess Shaq is around 8 heads tall, putting his head around 10.5".
JT says on 19/Jan/09
"Shaq has his head tilted back though, which makes his head seem smaller. He'll gain at least an inch, if not more, by lowering his chin. If I had to guess, I'd say Shaq has at least a 10 inch head, Khali close to 11.5 inches, and Big Show probably over 12 inches."
Yes, Shaq has his head tilted back, but as we saw in their pic together Khali's chin is dramatically lower than Shaq's which is where most of his head size comes from. The guy's head is enormous. I would also guess Shaq is around 8 heads tall, putting his head around 10.5".
Da Man said on 19/Jan/09
nick says
"nick says on 18/Jan/09
Da man his feet are nowhere near 3 feet apart. It is a shoulder weith stance which for him really loses no height. Khali stands as straight as possible to look his tallest. His feet are shoulder width apart so relative to his size it doesnt matter when i have my feet shoulder with apart or slightly more like khali i lose max quarter of an inch."
What can I say nick, but your wrong. Khali's feet are a bit further out that his shoulders and roughly shoulder width for me puts my feet at 23-24" apart. Khali's feet are a good 3 feet apart there.
nick says
"nick says on 18/Jan/09
Da man his feet are nowhere near 3 feet apart. It is a shoulder weith stance which for him really loses no height. Khali stands as straight as possible to look his tallest. His feet are shoulder width apart so relative to his size it doesnt matter when i have my feet shoulder with apart or slightly more like khali i lose max quarter of an inch."
What can I say nick, but your wrong. Khali's feet are a bit further out that his shoulders and roughly shoulder width for me puts my feet at 23-24" apart. Khali's feet are a good 3 feet apart there.
ABC said on 19/Jan/09
Hey guys. Just thought this would be an interesting piece about Undertaker's height as apparently, he is no taller than 6'6 according to this little tidbit! Not sure if I necessarily believe this but I thought it was interesting.
Click Here
I'm only 5'6 so it's just a tad hard for me to see the difference between 6'6 and Undertaker's debated height ranging from 6'6 to 6'9!
Hey guys. Just thought this would be an interesting piece about Undertaker's height as apparently, he is no taller than 6'6 according to this little tidbit! Not sure if I necessarily believe this but I thought it was interesting.
Click Here
I'm only 5'6 so it's just a tad hard for me to see the difference between 6'6 and Undertaker's debated height ranging from 6'6 to 6'9!
JT said on 19/Jan/09
Da Man says on 18/Jan/09
....Assuming Shaq's head is over 10", Khali's head could be 13".
Photo courtesy of JT: Click Here
Shaq has his head tilted back though, which makes his head seem smaller. He'll gain at least an inch, if not more, by lowering his chin. If I had to guess, I'd say Shaq has at least a 10 inch head, Khali close to 11.5 inches, and Big Show probably over 12 inches.
Da Man says on 18/Jan/09
....Assuming Shaq's head is over 10", Khali's head could be 13".
Photo courtesy of JT: Click Here
Shaq has his head tilted back though, which makes his head seem smaller. He'll gain at least an inch, if not more, by lowering his chin. If I had to guess, I'd say Shaq has at least a 10 inch head, Khali close to 11.5 inches, and Big Show probably over 12 inches.
KingNick said on 18/Jan/09
Vegas says on 11/Jan/09
KingNick; taker played BB in highschool, not sure about college though haven't seen evidence of that, we haven't been able to find a BB listing for him as of yet though but we have a photo Click Here
I found the magazine I was talking about, he played basketball at Texas Wesleyan University. If you find a height listing for him feel free to let us know.
JT says on 18/Jan/09
Click Here Assuming Gonzalez is 7'7" in his wrestling boots. Taker of course is closer to the camera.
JT, that's a great pic for a height comparison. But I think Gonzalez may have been even MORE than 7'7" in his boots. Most will agree he was 7'6" - 7'7" barefoot. Photo #8 on here is a particularly good look at his footwear: Click Here
Also for everyone here's an interesting link, look at the customers Click Here
Vegas says on 11/Jan/09
KingNick; taker played BB in highschool, not sure about college though haven't seen evidence of that, we haven't been able to find a BB listing for him as of yet though but we have a photo Click Here
I found the magazine I was talking about, he played basketball at Texas Wesleyan University. If you find a height listing for him feel free to let us know.
JT says on 18/Jan/09
Click Here Assuming Gonzalez is 7'7" in his wrestling boots. Taker of course is closer to the camera.
JT, that's a great pic for a height comparison. But I think Gonzalez may have been even MORE than 7'7" in his boots. Most will agree he was 7'6" - 7'7" barefoot. Photo #8 on here is a particularly good look at his footwear: Click Here
Also for everyone here's an interesting link, look at the customers Click Here
Danimal said on 18/Jan/09
Da Man says on 16/Jan/09
The thing is though, in that face-off Khali is taking a ridiculously wide stance. This is from the video at 9:13: Click Here
Taker's boots are SO suspect there. I can't believe no one else is seeing that??? They remind me of Jericho and HBK's space boots. I think Taker is compensating because of his height loss.
Da Man says on 16/Jan/09
The thing is though, in that face-off Khali is taking a ridiculously wide stance. This is from the video at 9:13: Click Here
Taker's boots are SO suspect there. I can't believe no one else is seeing that??? They remind me of Jericho and HBK's space boots. I think Taker is compensating because of his height loss.
nick said on 18/Jan/09
Da man his feet are nowhere near 3 feet apart. It is a shoulder weith stance which for him really loses no height. Khali stands as straight as possible to look his tallest. His feet are shoulder width apart so relative to his size it doesnt matter when i have my feet shoulder with apart or slightly more like khali i lose max quarter of an inch.
Da man his feet are nowhere near 3 feet apart. It is a shoulder weith stance which for him really loses no height. Khali stands as straight as possible to look his tallest. His feet are shoulder width apart so relative to his size it doesnt matter when i have my feet shoulder with apart or slightly more like khali i lose max quarter of an inch.
Da Man said on 18/Jan/09
Ghost says on 18/Jan/09
"That would mean Khali head would be like 14 inches long. His head is smaller than Big Show's. Khali at just under 7'1 seems likely."
Assuming Shaq's head is over 10", Khali's head could be 13".
Photo courtesy of JT: Click Here
Ghost says on 18/Jan/09
"That would mean Khali head would be like 14 inches long. His head is smaller than Big Show's. Khali at just under 7'1 seems likely."
Assuming Shaq's head is over 10", Khali's head could be 13".
Photo courtesy of JT: Click Here
JT said on 18/Jan/09
Click Here Assuming Gonzalez is 7'7" in his wrestling boots. Taker of course is closer to the camera.
Click Here Assuming Gonzalez is 7'7" in his wrestling boots. Taker of course is closer to the camera.
Ghost said on 18/Jan/09
Clay says on 17/Jan/09
Nick you have to remember Khali skull isnt normal so when Undertaker comes to his eyes, thats not like a regular person where its a 4.5-5 inch difference, there could be a smuch as 6 inches between them there.
That would mean Khali head would be like 14 inches long. His head is smaller than Big Show's.
Khali at just under 7'1 seems likely.
Clay says on 17/Jan/09
Nick you have to remember Khali skull isnt normal so when Undertaker comes to his eyes, thats not like a regular person where its a 4.5-5 inch difference, there could be a smuch as 6 inches between them there.
That would mean Khali head would be like 14 inches long. His head is smaller than Big Show's.
Khali at just under 7'1 seems likely.
JT said on 18/Jan/09
Click Here I'm sure Khali and Gonzalez could have stood taller next to Taker if they wanted to.
Click Here I'm sure Khali and Gonzalez could have stood taller next to Taker if they wanted to.
Da Man said on 17/Jan/09
nick says on 17/Jan/09
"da man i noticed this as well then i measured myself in a wide stance and i was an 8th of an inch shorter. not much of a difference at all."
I have to disagree, Nick. When I measure with my feet 3" apart versus 2'9" apart (which gives me at 6'2.5" a footing similar to Khali's) I lose between 1-7/8" and 2-1/4" in height. I just verified this.
With my feet 12" apart (similar to Taker) versus 2'9" apart I lose 1-1/4". Khali at 7'1" with much longer legs than me likely has his feet well over 3' apart there, and is more than likely giving up WELL over an inch to Taker with his stance.
nick says on 17/Jan/09
"da man i noticed this as well then i measured myself in a wide stance and i was an 8th of an inch shorter. not much of a difference at all."
I have to disagree, Nick. When I measure with my feet 3" apart versus 2'9" apart (which gives me at 6'2.5" a footing similar to Khali's) I lose between 1-7/8" and 2-1/4" in height. I just verified this.
With my feet 12" apart (similar to Taker) versus 2'9" apart I lose 1-1/4". Khali at 7'1" with much longer legs than me likely has his feet well over 3' apart there, and is more than likely giving up WELL over an inch to Taker with his stance.
Clay said on 17/Jan/09
Nick you have to remember Khali skull isnt normal so when Undertaker comes to his eyes, thats not like a regular person where its a 4.5-5 inch difference, there could be a smuch as 6 inches between them there.
Nick you have to remember Khali skull isnt normal so when Undertaker comes to his eyes, thats not like a regular person where its a 4.5-5 inch difference, there could be a smuch as 6 inches between them there.
nick said on 17/Jan/09
da man i noticed this as well then i measured myself in a wide stance and i was an 8th of an inch shorter. not much of a difference at all. It amazes me The undertaker holds his own with khali so well that i wouldnt be suprised if khali was slightly under 7'1. Imagine if taker is actuaally 6'6.5 that would make a hair under 7 khali, so thats thrown out the window.
da man i noticed this as well then i measured myself in a wide stance and i was an 8th of an inch shorter. not much of a difference at all. It amazes me The undertaker holds his own with khali so well that i wouldnt be suprised if khali was slightly under 7'1. Imagine if taker is actuaally 6'6.5 that would make a hair under 7 khali, so thats thrown out the window.
Anonymous said on 17/Jan/09
da man i noticed this as well then i measured myself in a wide stance and i was an 8th of an inch shorter. not much of a difference at all. It amazes me The undertaker holds his own with khali so well that i wouldnt be suprised if khali was slightly under 7'1. Imagine if taker is actuaally 6'6.5 that would make a hair under 7 khali, so thats thrown out the window.
da man i noticed this as well then i measured myself in a wide stance and i was an 8th of an inch shorter. not much of a difference at all. It amazes me The undertaker holds his own with khali so well that i wouldnt be suprised if khali was slightly under 7'1. Imagine if taker is actuaally 6'6.5 that would make a hair under 7 khali, so thats thrown out the window.
hs2009 said on 17/Jan/09
Khali's wide stance is why Taker looks only 4" shorter in that staredown. He's probably be more like 5" shorter in reality, but he still stacks up really well to Khali.
Khali's wide stance is why Taker looks only 4" shorter in that staredown. He's probably be more like 5" shorter in reality, but he still stacks up really well to Khali.
nick said on 16/Jan/09
anonymous with the videos was me btw
anonymous with the videos was me btw
Da Man said on 16/Jan/09
The thing is though, in that face-off Khali is taking a ridiculously wide stance. This is from the video at 9:13: Click Here
The thing is though, in that face-off Khali is taking a ridiculously wide stance. This is from the video at 9:13: Click Here
Anonymous said on 16/Jan/09
Click Here
Another staredown with khali and taker.
Click Here
Here is a comparison with undertaker with show and khali. The staredown with show was in 1999. Khali and show back in 1999 would have been likely a half inch difference.
pause video at 9:12 when they settle into standing straight, its a 5 inch difference (like above paused photo)
Also pause at 2:12
Click Here
Click Here
Another staredown with khali and taker.
Click Here
Here is a comparison with undertaker with show and khali. The staredown with show was in 1999. Khali and show back in 1999 would have been likely a half inch difference.
pause video at 9:12 when they settle into standing straight, its a 5 inch difference (like above paused photo)
Also pause at 2:12
Click Here
Clay said on 15/Jan/09
Angle wore lifts more than likely was well Alex.
Angle wore lifts more than likely was well Alex.
Ghost said on 15/Jan/09
I don't think Jerico can be anything under 5'9.
I don't think Jerico can be anything under 5'9.
KingNick said on 15/Jan/09
Vegas says on 11/Jan/09
KingNick; taker played BB in highschool, not sure about college though haven't seen evidence of that, we haven't been able to find a BB listing for him as of yet though but we have a photo Click Here
He did play in college I have it in one of the magazines but I've gotta find it. Once I do I'll let you know.
Jericho's a tough one but I say 5'9" - 5'10" I think 5'8" is too short for him.
Vegas says on 11/Jan/09
KingNick; taker played BB in highschool, not sure about college though haven't seen evidence of that, we haven't been able to find a BB listing for him as of yet though but we have a photo Click Here
He did play in college I have it in one of the magazines but I've gotta find it. Once I do I'll let you know.
Jericho's a tough one but I say 5'9" - 5'10" I think 5'8" is too short for him.
TELLEM said on 14/Jan/09
jericho the most is probably a weak 5'10. but most likely a 5'9 guy
jericho the most is probably a weak 5'10. but most likely a 5'9 guy
Vegas said on 14/Jan/09
jericho had an inch on 5'9 nfl listed mike adamele on raw all summer long, adamle had cowboy boots on jericho in dress-shoes or gear (adamle claims 5'9 for himself) Click Here
jericho had an inch on 5'9 nfl listed mike adamele on raw all summer long, adamle had cowboy boots on jericho in dress-shoes or gear (adamle claims 5'9 for himself) Click Here
hs2009 said on 14/Jan/09
If anyone's read Jericho's book, there's loads of pictures in street clothes with Chavo & Eddie Guerrero. In them he has 3"-3.5" on them, so I don't think Jericho is under 5'9.5". He had 0.5"-1" on Chris Benoit in street clothes also.
On a side note, I'd recommend Jericho's book to anyone. It's a great read.
If anyone's read Jericho's book, there's loads of pictures in street clothes with Chavo & Eddie Guerrero. In them he has 3"-3.5" on them, so I don't think Jericho is under 5'9.5". He had 0.5"-1" on Chris Benoit in street clothes also.
On a side note, I'd recommend Jericho's book to anyone. It's a great read.
Alex said on 13/Jan/09
Angle had an inch on both Benoit and Jericho. Maybe a bit more on Benoit. But also Jericho and Benoit wore lifts a lot I heard about a lot. Either way no more than 5'9 for both of them.
Angle had an inch on both Benoit and Jericho. Maybe a bit more on Benoit. But also Jericho and Benoit wore lifts a lot I heard about a lot. Either way no more than 5'9 for both of them.
Frank said on 13/Jan/09
Jericho is probably 5ft 9 barefoot no more than that
Jericho is probably 5ft 9 barefoot no more than that
nick said on 12/Jan/09
Click Here
Here is my friend with chris jericho on the same exact day as that video you posted vegas. My friend has .75 footwear this day and he is 5'7 1/4 confirmed. I measured him myself mid day. This makes jericho about 5'10 in his shoes he was wearing.
Rob if you want to use this picture we will arrange somthing. Ill actually measure my friend and send a picture of him being measured much like you do to yourself.
Click Here
Here is my friend with chris jericho on the same exact day as that video you posted vegas. My friend has .75 footwear this day and he is 5'7 1/4 confirmed. I measured him myself mid day. This makes jericho about 5'10 in his shoes he was wearing.
Rob if you want to use this picture we will arrange somthing. Ill actually measure my friend and send a picture of him being measured much like you do to yourself.
hs2009 said on 12/Jan/09
Yeah, I've read 5'8" listings for Jericho as well. He's billed all over the place depending where you read, lol. Personally, I think he's about 5'9.5"-5'10" in his barefeet & pushing 6'0" in his wrestling boots.
Yeah, I've read 5'8" listings for Jericho as well. He's billed all over the place depending where you read, lol. Personally, I think he's about 5'9.5"-5'10" in his barefeet & pushing 6'0" in his wrestling boots.
Alex said on 12/Jan/09
Kurt Angle was a bit taller than Jericho too. Looked to be an inch.
Kurt Angle was a bit taller than Jericho too. Looked to be an inch.
Alex said on 12/Jan/09
Jericho sometimes looked barely taller than Benoit, like 1/2 inch. Both wore lifts at times and Jericho sometimes did look closer to HHH's height in a few staredowns.
Jericho sometimes looked barely taller than Benoit, like 1/2 inch. Both wore lifts at times and Jericho sometimes did look closer to HHH's height in a few staredowns.
Ghost said on 12/Jan/09
Danimal says on 11/Jan/09
hs2009 says on 11/Jan/09
Danimal, they may have had Jericho at 5'10" before but in all the magazines I have from the past 6 years they say he's 5'8.5"-5'9".
I've read that he was a flat 5'8", along with Chris Benoit (RIP).
That's hard to believe since he can look 6 feet in his lifts.
Danimal says on 11/Jan/09
hs2009 says on 11/Jan/09
Danimal, they may have had Jericho at 5'10" before but in all the magazines I have from the past 6 years they say he's 5'8.5"-5'9".
I've read that he was a flat 5'8", along with Chris Benoit (RIP).
That's hard to believe since he can look 6 feet in his lifts.
JT said on 12/Jan/09
Click Here Jericho and Lance Storm, whom Rob has at just under 6'0". IMO, it's probably more like 5'11" for Storm and around 5'10" for Jericho.
Click Here Jericho and Lance Storm, whom Rob has at just under 6'0". IMO, it's probably more like 5'11" for Storm and around 5'10" for Jericho.
Danimal said on 11/Jan/09
hs2009 says on 11/Jan/09
Danimal, they may have had Jericho at 5'10" before but in all the magazines I have from the past 6 years they say he's 5'8.5"-5'9".
I've read that he was a flat 5'8", along with Chris Benoit (RIP).
hs2009 says on 11/Jan/09
Danimal, they may have had Jericho at 5'10" before but in all the magazines I have from the past 6 years they say he's 5'8.5"-5'9".
I've read that he was a flat 5'8", along with Chris Benoit (RIP).
Vegas said on 11/Jan/09
KingNick; taker played BB in highschool, not sure about college though haven't seen evidence of that, we haven't been able to find a BB listing for him as of yet though but we have a photo Click Here
regarding jericho he looks a solid 5'10 since his return in november 2007, i know most here will put it down to lifts but i am not so sure, he even looks 5'10 in dress-shoes and they fell off in one episode, he was taller standing next to ricky steamboat back in april, i posted this a while back jericho with hal sparks listed on this website at 5'8 and 6ft listed eli roth who is standing closer to the camera Click Here
KingNick; taker played BB in highschool, not sure about college though haven't seen evidence of that, we haven't been able to find a BB listing for him as of yet though but we have a photo Click Here
regarding jericho he looks a solid 5'10 since his return in november 2007, i know most here will put it down to lifts but i am not so sure, he even looks 5'10 in dress-shoes and they fell off in one episode, he was taller standing next to ricky steamboat back in april, i posted this a while back jericho with hal sparks listed on this website at 5'8 and 6ft listed eli roth who is standing closer to the camera Click Here
hs2009 said on 11/Jan/09
Danimal, they may have had Jericho at 5'10" before but in all the magazines I have from the past 6 years they say he's 5'8.5"-5'9".
Danimal, they may have had Jericho at 5'10" before but in all the magazines I have from the past 6 years they say he's 5'8.5"-5'9".
KingNick said on 11/Jan/09
Vegas, Undertaker played football in college. Anyway you can track down a height listing for him?
Vegas, Undertaker played football in college. Anyway you can track down a height listing for him?
Vegas said on 10/Jan/09
i was mostly limiting it to the bigger guys but yeah
lex luger 6'3 in pro football number 72 Larry Pfohl Click Here
bill goldberg 6'2 in nfl Click Here
Brock Lesnar 6'2 in nfl
ron simmons 6'1 in college football, interestingly deion sanders is listed there in college at 6ft flat yet at 6'1 in nfl Click Here Click Here
john cena 6'1 in college football number 54 Click Here
i was mostly limiting it to the bigger guys but yeah
lex luger 6'3 in pro football number 72 Larry Pfohl Click Here
bill goldberg 6'2 in nfl Click Here
Brock Lesnar 6'2 in nfl
ron simmons 6'1 in college football, interestingly deion sanders is listed there in college at 6ft flat yet at 6'1 in nfl Click Here Click Here
john cena 6'1 in college football number 54 Click Here
Danimal said on 10/Jan/09
Vegas says on 10/Jan/09
KingNick; rock was listed at 6ft 4 in college with miami hurricanes, i have seen one or two 6ft 5 high school listings for him too
speaking of listings OUTSIDE of wrestling and because i had time on my hands :) here are all the big men wrestlers past listings prior to entering the world of pro-wrestling, feel free to add any i have missed
giant gonzales 7'6 in nba Click Here
ron reis 7'1 college basketball Click Here
great khali 7'1 in bodybuilding (bodybuilding india link now expired)
big show 7'1 in college basketball Click Here
Kevin nash 6'10 in college basketball Click Here
nathan jones 6'10 in strongman
matt morgan 6'10 in college basketball Click Here Click Here
glen jacobs 6'8 in college BB Click Here 6'7 in HS BB aged 16 Click Here
A-train 6'6 in college football Click Here
jon heidenreich 6'6 in pro football Click Here
JBL 6'5 in pro football Click Here
I know we have Lex Luger's 6'3" football listing out there, as well as Goldberg's. I believe Lesnar's as well.
Vegas says on 10/Jan/09
KingNick; rock was listed at 6ft 4 in college with miami hurricanes, i have seen one or two 6ft 5 high school listings for him too
speaking of listings OUTSIDE of wrestling and because i had time on my hands :) here are all the big men wrestlers past listings prior to entering the world of pro-wrestling, feel free to add any i have missed
giant gonzales 7'6 in nba Click Here
ron reis 7'1 college basketball Click Here
great khali 7'1 in bodybuilding (bodybuilding india link now expired)
big show 7'1 in college basketball Click Here
Kevin nash 6'10 in college basketball Click Here
nathan jones 6'10 in strongman
matt morgan 6'10 in college basketball Click Here Click Here
glen jacobs 6'8 in college BB Click Here 6'7 in HS BB aged 16 Click Here
A-train 6'6 in college football Click Here
jon heidenreich 6'6 in pro football Click Here
JBL 6'5 in pro football Click Here
I know we have Lex Luger's 6'3" football listing out there, as well as Goldberg's. I believe Lesnar's as well.
Ray said on 10/Jan/09
I think there are maybe 4" between Show and Taker; could be a hair less though today. Taker looked pretty tall against him recently. I wouldn't take Kane's high school basketball listing as fact since high schools can and most likely over bill by 2". The biggest guy on the basketball team in my high school was 6'5" and he was billed at 6'7".
I think there are maybe 4" between Show and Taker; could be a hair less though today. Taker looked pretty tall against him recently. I wouldn't take Kane's high school basketball listing as fact since high schools can and most likely over bill by 2". The biggest guy on the basketball team in my high school was 6'5" and he was billed at 6'7".
KingNick said on 9/Jan/09
Da Man says on 8/Jan/09
Danimal
"Lastly, they give a biography on a Glenn Jacobs (kane), who was born in Spain, born to Jewish parents. They state that he tag teamed with Al Snow in Rock Mountain Wrestling and they show a full body picture of the two of them, where Glenn is really NOT towering Al Snow. They state that he is a BIG man standing 6'7" and has gone up to 345 pounds, but weighs around 323 pounds at the current time."
Made all the more ridiculous based on the fact that Glenn Jacobs was listed at 6'8" at 16 y/o by his high school basketball team.
I understand where you're coming from normally that would settle it for me too. The only thing that holds me back with that is I remember The Rock being listed as 6'5" in football (I don't have a link I remember seeing it on a biography way back. There was a photo of it on the show) so what I'm saying is it's possible it could be off. But I do agree whatever the difference is it's not more than .5"
gazz says on 9/Jan/09
why is taker so small compared to big show in the photos below! not even upto his eyeline
I know man (good photos JT). It just goes to show how tall a peak Big Show was with perfect posture. And to think he probably was a full 7' there and had on wrestling boots making him 7'1"ish.
Da Man says on 8/Jan/09
Danimal
"Lastly, they give a biography on a Glenn Jacobs (kane), who was born in Spain, born to Jewish parents. They state that he tag teamed with Al Snow in Rock Mountain Wrestling and they show a full body picture of the two of them, where Glenn is really NOT towering Al Snow. They state that he is a BIG man standing 6'7" and has gone up to 345 pounds, but weighs around 323 pounds at the current time."
Made all the more ridiculous based on the fact that Glenn Jacobs was listed at 6'8" at 16 y/o by his high school basketball team.
I understand where you're coming from normally that would settle it for me too. The only thing that holds me back with that is I remember The Rock being listed as 6'5" in football (I don't have a link I remember seeing it on a biography way back. There was a photo of it on the show) so what I'm saying is it's possible it could be off. But I do agree whatever the difference is it's not more than .5"
gazz says on 9/Jan/09
why is taker so small compared to big show in the photos below! not even upto his eyeline
I know man (good photos JT). It just goes to show how tall a peak Big Show was with perfect posture. And to think he probably was a full 7' there and had on wrestling boots making him 7'1"ish.
tuga said on 9/Jan/09
Anonymous says on 9/Jan/09
tuga says on 8/Jan/09
Eitherway, without his wrestling boots big show does not seem 5 inches taller.
and yet poster Big show uploaded a video of both men side by side in dress-shoes doing an interview, camera angle straight on where big show is 5-6 inches taller
Yeah right...look again...depends on who
Anonymous says on 9/Jan/09
tuga says on 8/Jan/09
Eitherway, without his wrestling boots big show does not seem 5 inches taller.
and yet poster Big show uploaded a video of both men side by side in dress-shoes doing an interview, camera angle straight on where big show is 5-6 inches taller
Yeah right...look again...depends on who
Anonymous said on 9/Jan/09
tuga says on 8/Jan/09
Eitherway, without his wrestling boots big show does not seem 5 inches taller.
and yet poster Big show uploaded a video of both men side by side in dress-shoes doing an interview, camera angle straight on where big show is 5-6 inches taller
tuga says on 8/Jan/09
Eitherway, without his wrestling boots big show does not seem 5 inches taller.
and yet poster Big show uploaded a video of both men side by side in dress-shoes doing an interview, camera angle straight on where big show is 5-6 inches taller
gazz said on 9/Jan/09
why is taker so small compared to big show in the photos below! not even upto his eyeline
why is taker so small compared to big show in the photos below! not even upto his eyeline
Da Man said on 8/Jan/09
tuga says
"In the smokey montain pic taker
tuga says
"In the smokey montain pic taker
JT said on 8/Jan/09
Big Show and Taker are standing side by side at the top of the ramp in this clip from 1999. Click Here There looks like a good 5 inch difference. Click Here Click Here Taker
Big Show and Taker are standing side by side at the top of the ramp in this clip from 1999. Click Here There looks like a good 5 inch difference. Click Here Click Here Taker
Danimal said on 8/Jan/09
hs2009 says on 8/Jan/09
That magazine sounds alright, but if they don't know Undertaker's real DOB then it shows that they are just giving educated guesses like any other wrestling magazine.
Like Vegas says, Powerslam do the same with heights & DOB. They have said Undertaker was born in 1962, Mike Awesome was 6'4" & I think they've listed Jericho at 5'8.5" which is all rubbish.
So I'd take anything from a magazine with a pinch of salt, even if it does sound logical to some.
They had Jericho at 5'10" and Bret Hart at 5'11".
hs2009 says on 8/Jan/09
That magazine sounds alright, but if they don't know Undertaker's real DOB then it shows that they are just giving educated guesses like any other wrestling magazine.
Like Vegas says, Powerslam do the same with heights & DOB. They have said Undertaker was born in 1962, Mike Awesome was 6'4" & I think they've listed Jericho at 5'8.5" which is all rubbish.
So I'd take anything from a magazine with a pinch of salt, even if it does sound logical to some.
They had Jericho at 5'10" and Bret Hart at 5'11".
Danimal said on 8/Jan/09
Vegas says on 7/Jan/09
Frank says on 7/Jan/09
we cant prove anybody wears lifts (We know they do)
we do how?? i haven't seen anybody post good clear evidence of internal list wearing in wrestling, personally if i had two men and one man i listed at 6'10.5 and the other at 7ft i wouldn't go and put lifts on the taller guy to make him 5-6 inches taller, but there you go thats me :)
Big Show was being billed at 7'2" at that time in the WWF.
Vegas says on 7/Jan/09
Frank says on 7/Jan/09
we cant prove anybody wears lifts (We know they do)
we do how?? i haven't seen anybody post good clear evidence of internal list wearing in wrestling, personally if i had two men and one man i listed at 6'10.5 and the other at 7ft i wouldn't go and put lifts on the taller guy to make him 5-6 inches taller, but there you go thats me :)
Big Show was being billed at 7'2" at that time in the WWF.
Da Man said on 8/Jan/09
Danimal
"Lastly, they give a biography on a Glenn Jacobs (kane), who was born in Spain, born to Jewish parents. They state that he tag teamed with Al Snow in Rock Mountain Wrestling and they show a full body picture of the two of them, where Glenn is really NOT towering Al Snow. They state that he is a BIG man standing 6'7" and has gone up to 345 pounds, but weighs around 323 pounds at the current time."
Made all the more ridiculous based on the fact that Glenn Jacobs was listed at 6'8" at 16 y/o by his high school basketball team.
Danimal
"Lastly, they give a biography on a Glenn Jacobs (kane), who was born in Spain, born to Jewish parents. They state that he tag teamed with Al Snow in Rock Mountain Wrestling and they show a full body picture of the two of them, where Glenn is really NOT towering Al Snow. They state that he is a BIG man standing 6'7" and has gone up to 345 pounds, but weighs around 323 pounds at the current time."
Made all the more ridiculous based on the fact that Glenn Jacobs was listed at 6'8" at 16 y/o by his high school basketball team.
tuga said on 8/Jan/09
Anonymous says on 8/Jan/09
if you are going to post a video at least post one where one person hasn't awful posture, big show always had 4-5 inches on taker in 1999 Click Here Click Here
Can you READ? I said big show
Anonymous says on 8/Jan/09
if you are going to post a video at least post one where one person hasn't awful posture, big show always had 4-5 inches on taker in 1999 Click Here Click Here
Can you READ? I said big show
hs2009 said on 8/Jan/09
That magazine sounds alright, but if they don't know Undertaker's real DOB then it shows that they are just giving educated guesses like any other wrestling magazine.
Like Vegas says, Powerslam do the same with heights & DOB. They have said Undertaker was born in 1962, Mike Awesome was 6'4" & I think they've listed Jericho at 5'8.5" which is all rubbish.
So I'd take anything from a magazine with a pinch of salt, even if it does sound logical to some.
That magazine sounds alright, but if they don't know Undertaker's real DOB then it shows that they are just giving educated guesses like any other wrestling magazine.
Like Vegas says, Powerslam do the same with heights & DOB. They have said Undertaker was born in 1962, Mike Awesome was 6'4" & I think they've listed Jericho at 5'8.5" which is all rubbish.
So I'd take anything from a magazine with a pinch of salt, even if it does sound logical to some.
Anonymous said on 8/Jan/09
if you are going to post a video at least post one where one person hasn't awful posture, big show always had 4-5 inches on taker in 1999 Click Here Click Here
if you are going to post a video at least post one where one person hasn't awful posture, big show always had 4-5 inches on taker in 1999 Click Here Click Here
tuga said on 8/Jan/09
About big show and taker, I think big show had max 4 inches on him, never more:
Click Here
Here big show obviously has not footware advantage, big show posture is horrible so he should have 4 inches or real close if he stood straight.
About taker
About big show and taker, I think big show had max 4 inches on him, never more:
Click Here
Here big show obviously has not footware advantage, big show posture is horrible so he should have 4 inches or real close if he stood straight.
About taker
Big Show said on 8/Jan/09
Frank says on 7/Jan/09
We dont see what Big Show was wearing in that Video and we cant prove anybody wears lifts (We know they do)
I extracted this part from RAW 9/6/1999. This was an interview. Later on in the show they also appeared. I can put that part up as well, so you can see there footwear. Unless you want to argue that Big Show changed his footwear in the meantime.
Frank says on 7/Jan/09
We dont see what Big Show was wearing in that Video and we cant prove anybody wears lifts (We know they do)
I extracted this part from RAW 9/6/1999. This was an interview. Later on in the show they also appeared. I can put that part up as well, so you can see there footwear. Unless you want to argue that Big Show changed his footwear in the meantime.
Vegas said on 7/Jan/09
Frank says on 7/Jan/09
we cant prove anybody wears lifts (We know they do)
we do how?? i haven't seen anybody post good clear evidence of internal list wearing in wrestling, personally if i had two men and one man i listed at 6'10.5 and the other at 7ft i wouldn't go and put lifts on the taller guy to make him 5-6 inches taller, but there you go thats me :)
Frank says on 7/Jan/09
we cant prove anybody wears lifts (We know they do)
we do how?? i haven't seen anybody post good clear evidence of internal list wearing in wrestling, personally if i had two men and one man i listed at 6'10.5 and the other at 7ft i wouldn't go and put lifts on the taller guy to make him 5-6 inches taller, but there you go thats me :)
Vegas said on 7/Jan/09
they got takers birth date wrong for one, once again had he been born in 1961 he would have been 23 years old upon leaving high school lol
unless they measured the wrestlers personally that magazine is no more accurate than anyone posting here with estimates, they are taking stats from other sources, powerslam mag had bios for all wrestlers way back in 1993-1996, editor fin martin often estimated heights of wrestlers he met in person, i remember he estimated mike awesome at 6ft 4
this is probably the snow/kane photo, in fairness to kane he has his legs bent slightly Click Here
they got takers birth date wrong for one, once again had he been born in 1961 he would have been 23 years old upon leaving high school lol
unless they measured the wrestlers personally that magazine is no more accurate than anyone posting here with estimates, they are taking stats from other sources, powerslam mag had bios for all wrestlers way back in 1993-1996, editor fin martin often estimated heights of wrestlers he met in person, i remember he estimated mike awesome at 6ft 4
this is probably the snow/kane photo, in fairness to kane he has his legs bent slightly Click Here
Frank said on 7/Jan/09
We dont see what Big Show was wearing in that Video and we cant prove anybody wears lifts (We know they do)
We dont see what Big Show was wearing in that Video and we cant prove anybody wears lifts (We know they do)
KingNick said on 7/Jan/09
Ray says on 6/Jan/09
KingNick: nice post; that all makes sense.
Thanks Ray!
Ray says on 6/Jan/09
KingNick: nice post; that all makes sense.
Thanks Ray!
Atoadaso said on 6/Jan/09
That's a rare moment we've seen before when Big Show stands up at his tallest. Such as with Haystacks and Khali.
That's a rare moment we've seen before when Big Show stands up at his tallest. Such as with Haystacks and Khali.
Ray said on 6/Jan/09
KingNick: nice post; that all makes sense.
KingNick: nice post; that all makes sense.
Big Show said on 6/Jan/09
Frank says on 6/Jan/09
There maybe 5 inches when show wears lifts but i seem them look 3 to 4 inches @ times
The tallest I've ever seen Big Show appear next to Undertaker is here:
Click Here
And Big Show isn't even wearing his big wrestling boots here (who always had a big sole, but no one has ever proven he wore lifts). He's wearing some type of black dressing shoes, which had a considerable smaller sole than on his wrestling boots. Taker's posture isn't good, but I'd say there's at least a 5 inch difference, which makes sense. If Taker is 6'8 he would have to be 6'8.5 in ring gear, which would make Show 7'1.5 in ring gear and just over 7 feet
When Big Show looked 3-4 inches taller than Taker it had more to do with Show's horrible posture than with his boots. It looked to me that Show sometimes deliberately slouched to give the impression that Taker is 6'10.
Frank says on 6/Jan/09
There maybe 5 inches when show wears lifts but i seem them look 3 to 4 inches @ times
The tallest I've ever seen Big Show appear next to Undertaker is here:
Click Here
And Big Show isn't even wearing his big wrestling boots here (who always had a big sole, but no one has ever proven he wore lifts). He's wearing some type of black dressing shoes, which had a considerable smaller sole than on his wrestling boots. Taker's posture isn't good, but I'd say there's at least a 5 inch difference, which makes sense. If Taker is 6'8 he would have to be 6'8.5 in ring gear, which would make Show 7'1.5 in ring gear and just over 7 feet
When Big Show looked 3-4 inches taller than Taker it had more to do with Show's horrible posture than with his boots. It looked to me that Show sometimes deliberately slouched to give the impression that Taker is 6'10.
Frank said on 6/Jan/09
There maybe 5 inches when show wears lifts but i seem them look 3 to 4 inches @ times
There maybe 5 inches when show wears lifts but i seem them look 3 to 4 inches @ times
KingNick said on 5/Jan/09
I'm leaning towards Kane being Rob's guestimate of 6'7.5" and I'll show you why with theories and photos.
Everyone knows I'm a firm believer of UT being 6'8", so let's just say for argument's sake he is. Here they are at WM14 with about a 1.5" - 2" difference in Kane's favor Click Here
That same shot shows Kane's boots from WM 14. I'm trying to find a clearer one but check out the 2:22 mark on this video Click Here now I know the question has been brought up of how big can a lift be for a guy to wrestle but I'm sorry, those have to give him AT LEAST a 2.5" boost.
So if Kane was 6'7.5" barefoot, that'd make him 6'10" in those boots. Now here are UT's boots from that match Click Here nearly flat. TOPS .5" boost, probably more like .25". That would make UT around 6'8.5" TOPS. There's your 1.5" to 2" difference.
This particular 2.5" boost also explains how at times Kane can be within 3" of Big Show. Depending on Show's shoes, Kane can appear very close in height if he wears those.
And Kane obviously didn't/ doesn't always wear these super lifts. Here he is looking only 1" taller than UT Click Here
Now think about it. How Kane be taller already yet wear these lifts such as these to be taller than Undertaker by only an inch? Click Here
It only makes sense that they're either the same height or Kane is just a little shorter. That also explains why Kane and UT appeared the same height in that live fan pic someone posted a while back. UT prob wears a normal wrestling shoe now making him closer to 6'9". Kane is probably around 6'9" in his boots now which may give him up to 1.5" boost. Click Here
I'm leaning towards Kane being Rob's guestimate of 6'7.5" and I'll show you why with theories and photos.
Everyone knows I'm a firm believer of UT being 6'8", so let's just say for argument's sake he is. Here they are at WM14 with about a 1.5" - 2" difference in Kane's favor Click Here
That same shot shows Kane's boots from WM 14. I'm trying to find a clearer one but check out the 2:22 mark on this video Click Here now I know the question has been brought up of how big can a lift be for a guy to wrestle but I'm sorry, those have to give him AT LEAST a 2.5" boost.
So if Kane was 6'7.5" barefoot, that'd make him 6'10" in those boots. Now here are UT's boots from that match Click Here nearly flat. TOPS .5" boost, probably more like .25". That would make UT around 6'8.5" TOPS. There's your 1.5" to 2" difference.
This particular 2.5" boost also explains how at times Kane can be within 3" of Big Show. Depending on Show's shoes, Kane can appear very close in height if he wears those.
And Kane obviously didn't/ doesn't always wear these super lifts. Here he is looking only 1" taller than UT Click Here
Now think about it. How Kane be taller already yet wear these lifts such as these to be taller than Undertaker by only an inch? Click Here
It only makes sense that they're either the same height or Kane is just a little shorter. That also explains why Kane and UT appeared the same height in that live fan pic someone posted a while back. UT prob wears a normal wrestling shoe now making him closer to 6'9". Kane is probably around 6'9" in his boots now which may give him up to 1.5" boost. Click Here
sid said on 5/Jan/09
Anonymous if albert 6'6, that would make taker 6'7 on the nose, seems about right
Anonymous if albert 6'6, that would make taker 6'7 on the nose, seems about right
Anonymous said on 5/Jan/09
good vid nick, but I think its about 5 inches between Taker and Big Show.
good vid nick, but I think its about 5 inches between Taker and Big Show.
Anonymous said on 5/Jan/09
But A-train is a lift-wearer! I think 198-199cm could be A-Trains barefoot height and Undertaker is about 201-202cm barefoot.
But A-train is a lift-wearer! I think 198-199cm could be A-Trains barefoot height and Undertaker is about 201-202cm barefoot.
Anonymous said on 5/Jan/09
I think Undertaker is about 1.99. He is very slightly taller
than 6'6" A Train.
Click Here
I think Undertaker is about 1.99. He is very slightly taller
than 6'6" A Train.
Click Here
tuga said on 5/Jan/09
Nice post Kingnick.
I also think taker edges Yankem in that staredown, but its still close, however Yankem boots are still very suspicious.
In the smokey montain pic taker
Nice post Kingnick.
I also think taker edges Yankem in that staredown, but its still close, however Yankem boots are still very suspicious.
In the smokey montain pic taker
nick said on 5/Jan/09
Click Here 49 seconds with vince. He is slightly slumped but he still seems 6 inches taller
Click Here suprised this one wasnt really posted taker looking 4 inches shorter than the big show 5:15
Click Here no direct heigh6t comparison but at 49 seconds taker looks pretty 6'8
Click Here 49 seconds with vince. He is slightly slumped but he still seems 6 inches taller
Click Here suprised this one wasnt really posted taker looking 4 inches shorter than the big show 5:15
Click Here no direct heigh6t comparison but at 49 seconds taker looks pretty 6'8
KingNick said on 4/Jan/09
See here's what confuses me. yes, Undertaker does have the camera advantage in both these pics. But he looks noticeably taller in the Smokey Mountain pic rather than the WWF pic:
Click Here (credit to JT for awesome photo. Look at the top of UT's head)
Click Here
Now take the youtube video of them and pause it exactly at the 1:34 mark Click Here they look a little closer in height in the shot to me.
And to me, UT DOES look taller in this pic. Again, look at the top of his head
Click Here
I'm still leaning towards UT maybe being slightly taller or them being the same height. And Da Man, I see your point with the hair, but UT's hair was short then, that's most of his forehead.
See here's what confuses me. yes, Undertaker does have the camera advantage in both these pics. But he looks noticeably taller in the Smokey Mountain pic rather than the WWF pic:
Click Here (credit to JT for awesome photo. Look at the top of UT's head)
Click Here
Now take the youtube video of them and pause it exactly at the 1:34 mark Click Here they look a little closer in height in the shot to me.
And to me, UT DOES look taller in this pic. Again, look at the top of his head
Click Here
I'm still leaning towards UT maybe being slightly taller or them being the same height. And Da Man, I see your point with the hair, but UT's hair was short then, that's most of his forehead.
Frank said on 4/Jan/09
Taker is leaning more in the picture with that guy than Russel was so 6ft 8 for Taker is possible.Im not sure if Kane is Taller than Taker barefoot ?? Kane in Big Lifts is still not that much taller
Taker is leaning more in the picture with that guy than Russel was so 6ft 8 for Taker is possible.Im not sure if Kane is Taller than Taker barefoot ?? Kane in Big Lifts is still not that much taller
JT said on 3/Jan/09
Great videos again Big Show
Click Here Click Here
They also had a good staredown at Kane
Great videos again Big Show
Click Here Click Here
They also had a good staredown at Kane
sid said on 3/Jan/09
Ben kane is taller then sid, taker is taller then sid.
Ben kane is taller then sid, taker is taller then sid.
Big Show said on 2/Jan/09
Click Here
If you want to have a good look at Kane's footwear in the 2003 Royal Rumble. Take a loot at 1:06 and onwards. You don't get much better looks at footwear than that.
Click Here
If you want to have a good look at Kane's footwear in the 2003 Royal Rumble. Take a loot at 1:06 and onwards. You don't get much better looks at footwear than that.
Ben said on 2/Jan/09
Undertaker and kane seem pretty much the same height, there really is nothing in it, is there any footage of sid against kane? all 3 seem pretty much the same height give or take an inch.
I will say that isaac yankem never seemed that tall to me, maybe its because Kane has a relatively short neck compared to sid and the undertaker.
When stood by themselves Sid looks tallest but when stood together he appears shortest.
Undertaker and kane seem pretty much the same height, there really is nothing in it, is there any footage of sid against kane? all 3 seem pretty much the same height give or take an inch.
I will say that isaac yankem never seemed that tall to me, maybe its because Kane has a relatively short neck compared to sid and the undertaker.
When stood by themselves Sid looks tallest but when stood together he appears shortest.
Alex said on 1/Jan/09
I was watching some youtube videos of matches of UT back then. Man I miss that. I favorite UT days were from 1992-1994. 95-97 was good too but from 98 on he started changing as a dead man then was the evil UT then came back as the biker. His new dead man character from 2004 I wasn't big on either.
I was watching some youtube videos of matches of UT back then. Man I miss that. I favorite UT days were from 1992-1994. 95-97 was good too but from 98 on he started changing as a dead man then was the evil UT then came back as the biker. His new dead man character from 2004 I wasn't big on either.
Alex2 said on 1/Jan/09
Danimal, Kane is clearly leaning at that point in the video you are reffering too, and I still dont see more than 1" between the two.
Danimal, Kane is clearly leaning at that point in the video you are reffering too, and I still dont see more than 1" between the two.
Big Show said on 1/Jan/09
Click Here
Here's a staredown between Taker & Kane from December 1997. Probably the best staredown these two ever had in the late 90's. Both assume good posture and stand directly opposite of one and other (so no camera advantage to either). Kane looks about an inch taller. See pics below.
Click Here
Click Here (Kane is assuming a Sid-like posture here)
Click Here
For those who think Undertaker is 2 inches taller than Kane, I'd like to know if you guys also think Kane is wearing a 3 inch footwear advantage here over Taker?
Here's a cap from the 2003 Rumble at 5:22.
Click Here
Click Here
Here's a staredown between Taker & Kane from December 1997. Probably the best staredown these two ever had in the late 90's. Both assume good posture and stand directly opposite of one and other (so no camera advantage to either). Kane looks about an inch taller. See pics below.
Click Here
Click Here (Kane is assuming a Sid-like posture here)
Click Here
For those who think Undertaker is 2 inches taller than Kane, I'd like to know if you guys also think Kane is wearing a 3 inch footwear advantage here over Taker?
Here's a cap from the 2003 Rumble at 5:22.
Click Here
Da Man said on 1/Jan/09
KingNick says:
"When Kane starts walking away, like in this shot, his feet must be closer together. He has the camera advantage but UT still looks slightly taller Click Here"
Actually KingNick, the only thing taller in that shot is Taker's hair.
KingNick says:
"When Kane starts walking away, like in this shot, his feet must be closer together. He has the camera advantage but UT still looks slightly taller Click Here"
Actually KingNick, the only thing taller in that shot is Taker's hair.
KingNick said on 31/Dec/08
And Happy New Year everyone!
And Happy New Year everyone!
KingNick said on 31/Dec/08
Big Show, you get the prize of the year from me man! AMAZING FIND!
You're right unfortunately it's not good quality, but it's a great start. Eventually I'm sure a better video will be posted on youtube/dailymotion. I see UT as being slightly taller, (see 2:50 mark) but it may be cuz of the angle/quality. Too close to call.
Da Man, I admire all your tenacity man on proving your point. I'm not sure I agree but here's where I stand:
In the RR video, I see UT as having 1" on Kane tops. Not more than that. At times it may appear it but I believe it's only because Kane has a slightly wider stance like Da Man pointed out. UT still has wide stance himself tho. Still, not as wide as Kane. Click Here
When Kane starts walking away, like in this shot, his feet must be closer together. He has the camera advantage but UT still looks slightly taller Click Here
I'm still not sure yet who's taller. There's too much evidence one way or the other. But I'm leaning way more towards them being the same height or Kane slightly shorter.
It makes more sense if you think about it. Why else would they have Jacobs wear lifts as Kane? They want to make him appear TALLER. They'd have to be really close in size to begin with in order for them to want to do that.
Big Show, you get the prize of the year from me man! AMAZING FIND!
You're right unfortunately it's not good quality, but it's a great start. Eventually I'm sure a better video will be posted on youtube/dailymotion. I see UT as being slightly taller, (see 2:50 mark) but it may be cuz of the angle/quality. Too close to call.
Da Man, I admire all your tenacity man on proving your point. I'm not sure I agree but here's where I stand:
In the RR video, I see UT as having 1" on Kane tops. Not more than that. At times it may appear it but I believe it's only because Kane has a slightly wider stance like Da Man pointed out. UT still has wide stance himself tho. Still, not as wide as Kane. Click Here
When Kane starts walking away, like in this shot, his feet must be closer together. He has the camera advantage but UT still looks slightly taller Click Here
I'm still not sure yet who's taller. There's too much evidence one way or the other. But I'm leaning way more towards them being the same height or Kane slightly shorter.
It makes more sense if you think about it. Why else would they have Jacobs wear lifts as Kane? They want to make him appear TALLER. They'd have to be really close in size to begin with in order for them to want to do that.
Danimal said on 31/Dec/08
NO WAY was that an accurate caption. Can someone else caption it at 5:22: Click Here
NO WAY was that an accurate caption. Can someone else caption it at 5:22: Click Here
hs2008 said on 31/Dec/08
My end of year height review, all barefoot & peak:
The Great Khali - 7'1"
Big Show - 7'0" or 7'0.5"
Kane - 6'8.5"
Undertaker - 6'8"
Sid Vicious - 6'7"
JBL - 6'5.5"
Hulk Hogan - 6'5.5" (Present: 6'3.5")
Goldust - 6'5"
Randy Orton - 6'4"
Edge - 6'3.5"
The Rock - 6'3"
Batista - 6'3"
Triple H - 6'2"
Mark Henry - 6'1.5"
Stone Cold - 6'1"
Jeff Hardy - 6'1"
John Cena - 6'0.5"
Matt Hardy - 6'0.5"
MVP - 6'0"
Shawn Michaels - 5'11.5"
Chris Jericho - 5'10"
Chris Benoit - 5'9"
Chavo Guerrero - 5'7"
Eddie Guerrero - 5'6.5"
Rey Mysterio - 5'3.5"
Happy New Year 2009 to everyone on the site!
My end of year height review, all barefoot & peak:
The Great Khali - 7'1"
Big Show - 7'0" or 7'0.5"
Kane - 6'8.5"
Undertaker - 6'8"
Sid Vicious - 6'7"
JBL - 6'5.5"
Hulk Hogan - 6'5.5" (Present: 6'3.5")
Goldust - 6'5"
Randy Orton - 6'4"
Edge - 6'3.5"
The Rock - 6'3"
Batista - 6'3"
Triple H - 6'2"
Mark Henry - 6'1.5"
Stone Cold - 6'1"
Jeff Hardy - 6'1"
John Cena - 6'0.5"
Matt Hardy - 6'0.5"
MVP - 6'0"
Shawn Michaels - 5'11.5"
Chris Jericho - 5'10"
Chris Benoit - 5'9"
Chavo Guerrero - 5'7"
Eddie Guerrero - 5'6.5"
Rey Mysterio - 5'3.5"
Happy New Year 2009 to everyone on the site!
Da Man said on 31/Dec/08
Danimal says on 30/Dec/08
"Can someone caption this video at the 5:22 mark where it is clear that Taker is noticeably taller than Kane: Click Here"
I already did on the Kane page. Here it is again: Click Here
But his feet were probably 3.5' apart in that frame...
Danimal says on 30/Dec/08
"Can someone caption this video at the 5:22 mark where it is clear that Taker is noticeably taller than Kane: Click Here"
I already did on the Kane page. Here it is again: Click Here
But his feet were probably 3.5' apart in that frame...
Ray said on 31/Dec/08
Nice find Danimal. I'd have to agree, either that's Festus or Kane is liftless and that shows the truth that Taker was always taller than Kane by an inch or so and probably still has about that on him. Today Kane has Taker by an inch usually but sometimes Kane and Taker appear to be almost exactly the same height and Kane wears the bigger boots. If you ask me, you put Taker and Kane face to face/measure and both are standing fully straight with great posture, Taker will have him by an inch - could be a hair more or less.
Nice find Danimal. I'd have to agree, either that's Festus or Kane is liftless and that shows the truth that Taker was always taller than Kane by an inch or so and probably still has about that on him. Today Kane has Taker by an inch usually but sometimes Kane and Taker appear to be almost exactly the same height and Kane wears the bigger boots. If you ask me, you put Taker and Kane face to face/measure and both are standing fully straight with great posture, Taker will have him by an inch - could be a hair more or less.
tuga said on 31/Dec/08
Big Show says on 30/Dec/08
Tuga, there's also a backstage segment between Goldust and The Rock and they virtually looked the same height. Maybe an inch advantage for Goldust.
Thats why I mentioned backstage vids have weird angles and can
Big Show says on 30/Dec/08
Tuga, there's also a backstage segment between Goldust and The Rock and they virtually looked the same height. Maybe an inch advantage for Goldust.
Thats why I mentioned backstage vids have weird angles and can
Marotte said on 30/Dec/08
Click Here
Look at the picture at 1:20 it's the undertaker and shaq really bad angle but....
Click Here
Look at the picture at 1:20 it's the undertaker and shaq really bad angle but....
Danimal said on 30/Dec/08
Can someone caption this video at the 5:22 mark where it is clear that Taker is noticeably taller than Kane: Click Here
Can someone caption this video at the 5:22 mark where it is clear that Taker is noticeably taller than Kane: Click Here
Frank said on 30/Dec/08
There was a guy on here along time ago who said he worked for the WWF and he said Taker was really taller heres what i think as Yankem we more lifts and as Kane he wore Bigger lifts ??
There was a guy on here along time ago who said he worked for the WWF and he said Taker was really taller heres what i think as Yankem we more lifts and as Kane he wore Bigger lifts ??
Big Show said on 30/Dec/08
Click Here
Here's that match between Undertaker and Glenn Jacobs from Smokey Mountain Wrestling 1995. The quality is crap (looks to be filmed by someone from the crowd). There's a good staredown at the beginning of the match, but due to the lack of close-ups there's no telling who's the taller of the two.
In that video from the Rumble, Kane is clearly staggering on his feat and therefore hardly has a good posture. If Taker is 2 inches taller than Kane, Kane must have worn some titanic lifts in order to be only 2 inches shorter than a peak Big Show (who wasn't wearing small footwear either).
Tuga, there's also a backstage segment between Goldust and The Rock and they virtually looked the same height. Maybe an inch advantage for Goldust.
Click Here
Here's that match between Undertaker and Glenn Jacobs from Smokey Mountain Wrestling 1995. The quality is crap (looks to be filmed by someone from the crowd). There's a good staredown at the beginning of the match, but due to the lack of close-ups there's no telling who's the taller of the two.
In that video from the Rumble, Kane is clearly staggering on his feat and therefore hardly has a good posture. If Taker is 2 inches taller than Kane, Kane must have worn some titanic lifts in order to be only 2 inches shorter than a peak Big Show (who wasn't wearing small footwear either).
Tuga, there's also a backstage segment between Goldust and The Rock and they virtually looked the same height. Maybe an inch advantage for Goldust.
Da Man said on 30/Dec/08
Danimal says
"There are even scenes with Golddust from around this time backstage and Kane has only about 1" on Golddsut who was only about 6'4" in reality. Either this was NOT Glenn Jacobs, or without his lifts, he is MAX 6'6". Check it out for yourselves if you don't believe me. It's at exactly 5:22 in. Taker has 2-3" Kane!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!: Click Here"
You've got to be kidding. Kane looked only 1" taller than Goldust during this time?
Click Here
BTW, this is from the backstage video everyone refers to regarding this issue as well. Amazing what perspective and camera angle can do. That is the real difference between them right there.
Not only did Taker not have more than inch on Kane there, this was Kane's foot position in the clip at 5:22. Click Here
Notice when he steps forward (and closes up his stance up a bit) it no longer looks like Taker has anything.
Please find those 2 or 3" here:
Click Here
Click Here
Taker has 2-3" on Kane based on that video? Are you referring to the video you linked? lol
Danimal says
"There are even scenes with Golddust from around this time backstage and Kane has only about 1" on Golddsut who was only about 6'4" in reality. Either this was NOT Glenn Jacobs, or without his lifts, he is MAX 6'6". Check it out for yourselves if you don't believe me. It's at exactly 5:22 in. Taker has 2-3" Kane!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!: Click Here"
You've got to be kidding. Kane looked only 1" taller than Goldust during this time?
Click Here
BTW, this is from the backstage video everyone refers to regarding this issue as well. Amazing what perspective and camera angle can do. That is the real difference between them right there.
Not only did Taker not have more than inch on Kane there, this was Kane's foot position in the clip at 5:22. Click Here
Notice when he steps forward (and closes up his stance up a bit) it no longer looks like Taker has anything.
Please find those 2 or 3" here:
Click Here
Click Here
Taker has 2-3" on Kane based on that video? Are you referring to the video you linked? lol
tuga said on 30/Dec/08
Danimal says on 30/Dec/08
Just watched the 2003 Royal Rumble last night...
Nice video Danimal, shows how much footware can deceive our estimates, but it makes sense, even today kane has considerably bigger footware and is about same height as taker.
Goldust in my opinion is clearly taller than 6'4, he edged 6'5 barry windham in a full body pic, 6'5 1/2 may be a safer estimate for him. Kane still had about 2 inches on goldust, maybe??:
Click Here
Hard to say, these backstage promos have always weird angles...
This also shows how Albert pulled a kane footware trick during his time...as albert was much closer to taker than kane is here in their infamious staredown, and nobody is going to convince me that albert is taller than kane...
Danimal says on 30/Dec/08
Just watched the 2003 Royal Rumble last night...
Nice video Danimal, shows how much footware can deceive our estimates, but it makes sense, even today kane has considerably bigger footware and is about same height as taker.
Goldust in my opinion is clearly taller than 6'4, he edged 6'5 barry windham in a full body pic, 6'5 1/2 may be a safer estimate for him. Kane still had about 2 inches on goldust, maybe??:
Click Here
Hard to say, these backstage promos have always weird angles...
This also shows how Albert pulled a kane footware trick during his time...as albert was much closer to taker than kane is here in their infamious staredown, and nobody is going to convince me that albert is taller than kane...
Frank said on 30/Dec/08
Danimal good find i would say Taker looked alittle taller
Danimal good find i would say Taker looked alittle taller
Danimal said on 30/Dec/08
Just watched the 2003 Royal Rumble last night. WOW, When Undertaker helps up Kane (who is looking very thin and obviously wearing a wig under that mask he soon got rid of), they stood side by side and it was obvious that Kane had NO lifts that day because Taker had what appeared to be almost 2" on Kane. I am NOT exgarating. There are even scenes with Golddust from around this time backstage and Kane has only about 1" on Golddsut who was only about 6'4" in reality. Either this was NOT Glenn Jacobs, or without his lifts, he is MAX 6'6". Check it out for yourselves if you don't believe me. It's at exactly 5:22 in. Taker has 2-3" Kane!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!: Click Here
Just watched the 2003 Royal Rumble last night. WOW, When Undertaker helps up Kane (who is looking very thin and obviously wearing a wig under that mask he soon got rid of), they stood side by side and it was obvious that Kane had NO lifts that day because Taker had what appeared to be almost 2" on Kane. I am NOT exgarating. There are even scenes with Golddust from around this time backstage and Kane has only about 1" on Golddsut who was only about 6'4" in reality. Either this was NOT Glenn Jacobs, or without his lifts, he is MAX 6'6". Check it out for yourselves if you don't believe me. It's at exactly 5:22 in. Taker has 2-3" Kane!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!: Click Here
Big Show said on 30/Dec/08
Da Man says on 29/Dec/08
Here is a page with a guy who appears to be in the 5'11" region with a bunch of the WWE roster, most in street clothes: Click Here
Nice find, but don't you know who this guy, James J. Dillon is? He was a prominent figure in WCW in the mid 90's.
Da Man says on 29/Dec/08
Here is a page with a guy who appears to be in the 5'11" region with a bunch of the WWE roster, most in street clothes: Click Here
Nice find, but don't you know who this guy, James J. Dillon is? He was a prominent figure in WCW in the mid 90's.
Da Man said on 29/Dec/08
Here is a page with a guy who appears to be in the 5'11" region with a bunch of the WWE roster, most in street clothes: Click Here
Taker, Kane, and Show are in there.
Here is a page with a guy who appears to be in the 5'11" region with a bunch of the WWE roster, most in street clothes: Click Here
Taker, Kane, and Show are in there.
KingNick said on 29/Dec/08
I'd say 6'5" - 6'6" for Test. He always stood up very well to Kane and Undertaker. He looks about 3" taller than The Rock who I put at 6'3" so 6'6" sounds right for Test and enough for him to exaggerate to 6'7".
Kamala I'm not sure about b/c he always wrestled barefoot but I would say 6'4" - 6'5" is right.
I'd say 6'5" - 6'6" for Test. He always stood up very well to Kane and Undertaker. He looks about 3" taller than The Rock who I put at 6'3" so 6'6" sounds right for Test and enough for him to exaggerate to 6'7".
Kamala I'm not sure about b/c he always wrestled barefoot but I would say 6'4" - 6'5" is right.
Derek said on 29/Dec/08
There appeared to be around 4 inches between Kamala and Undertaker in 1992. Undertaker was 6'8" then, and probably 6'9" in ring gear. That would put Kamala at 6'5" and he certainly was nothing under 6'4".
There appeared to be around 4 inches between Kamala and Undertaker in 1992. Undertaker was 6'8" then, and probably 6'9" in ring gear. That would put Kamala at 6'5" and he certainly was nothing under 6'4".
Anonymous said on 29/Dec/08
test doesn't look more than 6'4?? here he is with the rock and HBK on his debut Click Here
test doesn't look more than 6'4?? here he is with the rock and HBK on his debut Click Here
Drexyl said on 29/Dec/08
Test isn't 6,7", but he's definitely bigger than 6,4". I'd give him 6,6", maybe 6,5.5" at the lowest.
Test isn't 6,7", but he's definitely bigger than 6,4". I'd give him 6,6", maybe 6,5.5" at the lowest.
hs2008 said on 29/Dec/08
Yeah, Kamala was very tall. Even wrestling in his barefeet he never looked small. He's was probably 6'4" or perhaps a little more.
Yeah, Kamala was very tall. Even wrestling in his barefeet he never looked small. He's was probably 6'4" or perhaps a little more.
Ghost said on 29/Dec/08
Danimal says on 28/Dec/08
Kamala was both billed at 6'5" and 6'7". He used to fight barefoot like Jimmy Snuka. Kamala was a very tall man. I say he was a legit 6'4".
Actually, in the old promo vids shot in Jerry Lawler's backyard, the introduction mentioned Kamala as 6'9!
Danimal says on 28/Dec/08
Kamala was both billed at 6'5" and 6'7". He used to fight barefoot like Jimmy Snuka. Kamala was a very tall man. I say he was a legit 6'4".
Actually, in the old promo vids shot in Jerry Lawler's backyard, the introduction mentioned Kamala as 6'9!
amit said on 28/Dec/08
Have u seen test's myspace.He says he's a legit 6'7...lol.He doesn't look anything more than 6'4
Have u seen test's myspace.He says he's a legit 6'7...lol.He doesn't look anything more than 6'4
Danimal said on 28/Dec/08
Kamala was both billed at 6'5" and 6'7". He used to fight barefoot like Jimmy Snuka. Kamala was a very tall man. I say he was a legit 6'4".
Kamala was both billed at 6'5" and 6'7". He used to fight barefoot like Jimmy Snuka. Kamala was a very tall man. I say he was a legit 6'4".
Ghost said on 28/Dec/08
Alex says on 27/Dec/08
How tall was Kamala who fought the UT back in 92? Or was that the same Kamala from years before that?
In WWF and WCW Kamala always played by Jim Harris. I think he was around 6'4.
Alex says on 27/Dec/08
How tall was Kamala who fought the UT back in 92? Or was that the same Kamala from years before that?
In WWF and WCW Kamala always played by Jim Harris. I think he was around 6'4.
hs2008 said on 28/Dec/08
Danimal, ...................... I've posted soooooooo many picures on this site for over two years. In the last week I've posted about 20 pictures/videos including 10 on this page!
So get your facts straight!
I don't care how long you've been posting on this site or how much alleged credibility you have, stop being such a know-it-all! I'm not going to waste my time looking around several sites on the internet to post pictures & videos of Edge looking taller than 6'2.5" for others on this site to simply dismiss them like they normally do.
Danimal, ...................... I've posted soooooooo many picures on this site for over two years. In the last week I've posted about 20 pictures/videos including 10 on this page!
So get your facts straight!
I don't care how long you've been posting on this site or how much alleged credibility you have, stop being such a know-it-all! I'm not going to waste my time looking around several sites on the internet to post pictures & videos of Edge looking taller than 6'2.5" for others on this site to simply dismiss them like they normally do.
Alex said on 27/Dec/08
How tall was Kamala who fought the UT back in 92? Or was that the same Kamala from years before that?
How tall was Kamala who fought the UT back in 92? Or was that the same Kamala from years before that?
Drexyl said on 27/Dec/08
Test looks more than an inch taller than Edge there. There's a pic around somewhere where he stacks up very well to a 6,10" Kevin Nash.
I give Test 6,6".
Test looks more than an inch taller than Edge there. There's a pic around somewhere where he stacks up very well to a 6,10" Kevin Nash.
I give Test 6,6".
Alex said on 27/Dec/08
Clay, I agree that Test is a legit 6'5. He was about 3 inches shorter than Kane and 2 inches shorter than UT. Rock I dont think is bare minimum 6'3. I'd give him 6'3 but not at the minimum though, just 6'3 I say he is.
Clay, I agree that Test is a legit 6'5. He was about 3 inches shorter than Kane and 2 inches shorter than UT. Rock I dont think is bare minimum 6'3. I'd give him 6'3 but not at the minimum though, just 6'3 I say he is.
Clay said on 26/Dec/08
Test is bare minimum 6'5, Rock is bare minimum 6'3.
Test is bare minimum 6'5, Rock is bare minimum 6'3.
Alex said on 26/Dec/08
Ola, it would be good to see HBK vs UT at WM 25 which may happen. Rock vs Austin is very unlikely to happen.
Ola, it would be good to see HBK vs UT at WM 25 which may happen. Rock vs Austin is very unlikely to happen.
Danimal said on 26/Dec/08
hs2008 says on 24/Dec/08
There's loads of other pictures & videos of Edge with Test online & he's only about 1" shorter, but I'm not going to post them all! Have a look on YouTube etc.
Even if you straightened that particular pic up Edge isn't magically going to shrink 2". He's still only 1" shorter regardless!
Don't be LAZY. Post them. Some of us veteran's spent YEARS posting pics and vids to build out credibility on here. I know I did.
hs2008 says on 24/Dec/08
There's loads of other pictures & videos of Edge with Test online & he's only about 1" shorter, but I'm not going to post them all! Have a look on YouTube etc.
Even if you straightened that particular pic up Edge isn't magically going to shrink 2". He's still only 1" shorter regardless!
Don't be LAZY. Post them. Some of us veteran's spent YEARS posting pics and vids to build out credibility on here. I know I did.
hs2008 said on 26/Dec/08
Lol, there should be an Edge page or an Orton page. They get lots of discussion on here.
Rock vs. Austin is never going to happen again unfortunately IMO. If Austin does wrestle at WM 25, which hopefully he will, I'd have him face either Triple H or Randy Orton. If I were WWE I'd save HBK vs. 'Taker until WM26 & have a streak vs. career match, then HBK can retire in style.
Lol, there should be an Edge page or an Orton page. They get lots of discussion on here.
Rock vs. Austin is never going to happen again unfortunately IMO. If Austin does wrestle at WM 25, which hopefully he will, I'd have him face either Triple H or Randy Orton. If I were WWE I'd save HBK vs. 'Taker until WM26 & have a streak vs. career match, then HBK can retire in style.
Frank said on 25/Dec/08
This is Takers Page who cares about Edge :O)
This is Takers Page who cares about Edge :O)
hs2008 said on 24/Dec/08
There's loads of other pictures & videos of Edge with Test online & he's only about 1" shorter, but I'm not going to post them all! Have a look on YouTube etc.
Even if you straightened that particular pic up Edge isn't magically going to shrink 2". He's still only 1" shorter regardless!
There's loads of other pictures & videos of Edge with Test online & he's only about 1" shorter, but I'm not going to post them all! Have a look on YouTube etc.
Even if you straightened that particular pic up Edge isn't magically going to shrink 2". He's still only 1" shorter regardless!
Big_NK said on 24/Dec/08
I met Kane & Taker years back. I was 14 and about 6ft 5in (i'm 6'9 now), and they were both same size, about 3 inches taller than me, Kane may have been a little taller
I met Kane & Taker years back. I was 14 and about 6ft 5in (i'm 6'9 now), and they were both same size, about 3 inches taller than me, Kane may have been a little taller
Danimal said on 24/Dec/08
Derek says on 24/Dec/08
Danimal says on 23/Dec/08
"Edge and The Rock would be the EXACT same height imo".
It would be very close, no doubt. I personally think Edge would slightly beat out Rock.
In fact, I think it's possible that The Rock would even edge out Edge. No pun intended ;)
Derek says on 24/Dec/08
Danimal says on 23/Dec/08
"Edge and The Rock would be the EXACT same height imo".
It would be very close, no doubt. I personally think Edge would slightly beat out Rock.
In fact, I think it's possible that The Rock would even edge out Edge. No pun intended ;)
Frank said on 24/Dec/08
Thats a bad angle to judge
Thats a bad angle to judge
hs2008 said on 24/Dec/08
Another Edge pic, this time with legit 6'5" Test:
Click Here
He's only about 1" shorter, so there's no way Edge is only 6'2.5". I suppose Test is MAX 6'4" now, lol. :D
Another Edge pic, this time with legit 6'5" Test:
Click Here
He's only about 1" shorter, so there's no way Edge is only 6'2.5". I suppose Test is MAX 6'4" now, lol. :D
hs2008 said on 24/Dec/08
If you compare Edge standing next to Orton & The Rock standing next to Orton then there's no way they'd be the same height IMO.
Rocky was 1"-1.5" shorter than Orton from what I remember, whereas there's only 0.5" either way between Orton & Edge like Clay says. Rocky would be about 1" shorter than Edge I would think.
If you compare Edge standing next to Orton & The Rock standing next to Orton then there's no way they'd be the same height IMO.
Rocky was 1"-1.5" shorter than Orton from what I remember, whereas there's only 0.5" either way between Orton & Edge like Clay says. Rocky would be about 1" shorter than Edge I would think.
Derek said on 24/Dec/08
Danimal says on 23/Dec/08
"Edge and The Rock would be the EXACT same height imo".
It would be very close, no doubt. I personally think Edge would slightly beat out Rock.
Danimal says on 23/Dec/08
"Edge and The Rock would be the EXACT same height imo".
It would be very close, no doubt. I personally think Edge would slightly beat out Rock.
Clay said on 23/Dec/08
Where are the pictures even of Edge registering an inch under Orton? From everything I've seen they're only .5 of an inch max apart (EITHER way!).
Where are the pictures even of Edge registering an inch under Orton? From everything I've seen they're only .5 of an inch max apart (EITHER way!).
Danimal said on 23/Dec/08
Edge and The Rock would be the EXACT same height imo.
Edge and The Rock would be the EXACT same height imo.
hs2008 said on 23/Dec/08
No way does Orton have 1.5" on Edge:
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Lots of pics, but I've posted some before and they always seem to get ignored & Edge then gets called 6'2.5" again. If Edge is about 6'2.5", then so's Orton.
No way does Orton have 1.5" on Edge:
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Lots of pics, but I've posted some before and they always seem to get ignored & Edge then gets called 6'2.5" again. If Edge is about 6'2.5", then so's Orton.
Ghost said on 23/Dec/08
Alex says on 22/Dec/08
Edge could be as low as 6'2.5 at the lowest but I dont agree that its his max height. He's not 6'4 though because Orton is and Orton is an inch or so more than Edge.
What about Edge with Kennedy? Or Hogan? Edge can't be under 6'3.
Alex says on 22/Dec/08
Edge could be as low as 6'2.5 at the lowest but I dont agree that its his max height. He's not 6'4 though because Orton is and Orton is an inch or so more than Edge.
What about Edge with Kennedy? Or Hogan? Edge can't be under 6'3.
Alex said on 22/Dec/08
Edge could be as low as 6'2.5 at the lowest but I dont agree that its his max height. He's not 6'4 though because Orton is and Orton is an inch or so more than Edge.
Edge could be as low as 6'2.5 at the lowest but I dont agree that its his max height. He's not 6'4 though because Orton is and Orton is an inch or so more than Edge.
dave said on 20/Dec/08
clay, you couldnt be more right, there is NO pic showing edge looking under 6'3.....
6'2.5 MAX estimates for him are ludicrous
clay, you couldnt be more right, there is NO pic showing edge looking under 6'3.....
6'2.5 MAX estimates for him are ludicrous
TELLEM said on 20/Dec/08
edge could be 6'3.5...just look at him next to 6'0 christian cage. o and kingnick theres evidence of edge sporting flat converse shoes w/ batista and mvp outside of the ring
edge could be 6'3.5...just look at him next to 6'0 christian cage. o and kingnick theres evidence of edge sporting flat converse shoes w/ batista and mvp outside of the ring
hs2008 said on 20/Dec/08
He could be flat 6'4" IMO, there's pics of him with a lady on MySpace (I've posted a link to the pics) who's 5'7", and she actually looks about that height, and he looks 6'4".
He could be flat 6'4" IMO, there's pics of him with a lady on MySpace (I've posted a link to the pics) who's 5'7", and she actually looks about that height, and he looks 6'4".
Clay said on 19/Dec/08
Has there even been a picture revealing a sub 6'3'' Edge? Doesnt exist.
Has there even been a picture revealing a sub 6'3'' Edge? Doesnt exist.
sid said on 19/Dec/08
Ray cole makes lots of mistakes, thats why vince gets mad at cole, I seen kane and taker in street cloth, kane edges taker out by a inch.
Ray cole makes lots of mistakes, thats why vince gets mad at cole, I seen kane and taker in street cloth, kane edges taker out by a inch.
KingNick said on 19/Dec/08
Big Show says on 19/Dec/08
Ben says on 18/Dec/08
edge was a good bit taller than ashton kutcher on raw, he is taller than hulk hogan here in 2002 Click Here
Edge is wearing some gigantic footwear there. Those boots make the ones from Kane look small.
That's the thing with Edge, he does where big footwear a lot outside of the ring plus he's rail thin, which gives him the illusion of being taller. If I were to look at him at first glance I would guess 6'4" easy.
Big Show says on 19/Dec/08
Ben says on 18/Dec/08
edge was a good bit taller than ashton kutcher on raw, he is taller than hulk hogan here in 2002 Click Here
Edge is wearing some gigantic footwear there. Those boots make the ones from Kane look small.
That's the thing with Edge, he does where big footwear a lot outside of the ring plus he's rail thin, which gives him the illusion of being taller. If I were to look at him at first glance I would guess 6'4" easy.
Da Man said on 19/Dec/08
WTF, Edge had some platform shoes on! Those probably really did add a legit 2+" over barefoot height.
WTF, Edge had some platform shoes on! Those probably really did add a legit 2+" over barefoot height.
Big Show said on 19/Dec/08
Ben says on 18/Dec/08
edge was a good bit taller than ashton kutcher on raw, he is taller than hulk hogan here in 2002 Click Here
Edge is wearing some gigantic footwear there. Those boots make the ones from Kane look small.
Ben says on 18/Dec/08
edge was a good bit taller than ashton kutcher on raw, he is taller than hulk hogan here in 2002 Click Here
Edge is wearing some gigantic footwear there. Those boots make the ones from Kane look small.
hs2008 said on 19/Dec/08
Ola. I've posted several pictures of Edge with 2" on Triple H not 0'5". They always seem to get ignored.
I've also posted pictures of Edge in street clothes with Hulk Hogan. One from 2002, when they're both in sneakers & the other from 2006 with Hogan in sneakers & Edge in dress shoes. Edge looks taller than Hogan in both, so how he's under 6'3.5" I have no idea.
Ola. I've posted several pictures of Edge with 2" on Triple H not 0'5". They always seem to get ignored.
I've also posted pictures of Edge in street clothes with Hulk Hogan. One from 2002, when they're both in sneakers & the other from 2006 with Hogan in sneakers & Edge in dress shoes. Edge looks taller than Hogan in both, so how he's under 6'3.5" I have no idea.
Ben said on 18/Dec/08
edge was a good bit taller than ashton kutcher on raw, he is taller than hulk hogan here in 2002 Click Here
edge was a good bit taller than ashton kutcher on raw, he is taller than hulk hogan here in 2002 Click Here
Alex said on 18/Dec/08
Actually I think Edge is 6'3, lowest possible would be 6'2.5. Most on here will put Edge 6'3ish anyway. Viper actually believed he was more 6'2 and no more.
Actually I think Edge is 6'3, lowest possible would be 6'2.5. Most on here will put Edge 6'3ish anyway. Viper actually believed he was more 6'2 and no more.
Ghost said on 18/Dec/08
Danimal says on 18/Dec/08
Alex, Viper and I are the only ones who believe that Edge is this height.
And it can't see why. Most of the time the guy looks almost 6'4.
Danimal says on 18/Dec/08
Alex, Viper and I are the only ones who believe that Edge is this height.
And it can't see why. Most of the time the guy looks almost 6'4.
Da Man said on 18/Dec/08
More like Cole tripping over his own words, he's the least accurate and least consistent announcer I have ever seen. The anti-JR.
More like Cole tripping over his own words, he's the least accurate and least consistent announcer I have ever seen. The anti-JR.
Danimal said on 18/Dec/08
Alex, Viper and I are the only ones who believe that Edge is this height.
Alex, Viper and I are the only ones who believe that Edge is this height.
Ray said on 18/Dec/08
Here's something interesting. For what it's worth, here's a match between Undertaker and Kane from Smackdown 4/4/08; watch from 5:20-5:28; Michael Cole says "Kane outweighing his brother by just a bit, Undertaker just a little bit taller." This could in fact very well be true IMO. I wonder if Cole came up with that himself or if it was McMahon or someone else saying that in to his headphones for him to say? Very interesting though considering Kane is billed taller. I always thought and still do think Taker is taller than Kane by a little bit. Anyway, here's the video:
Click Here
Here's something interesting. For what it's worth, here's a match between Undertaker and Kane from Smackdown 4/4/08; watch from 5:20-5:28; Michael Cole says "Kane outweighing his brother by just a bit, Undertaker just a little bit taller." This could in fact very well be true IMO. I wonder if Cole came up with that himself or if it was McMahon or someone else saying that in to his headphones for him to say? Very interesting though considering Kane is billed taller. I always thought and still do think Taker is taller than Kane by a little bit. Anyway, here's the video:
Click Here
Ghost said on 18/Dec/08
Danimal says on 16/Dec/08
6'2.5" MAX for Edge.
That makes no sense to me. How do you explain him towering Kennedy and looking MAX 1 inch shorter than Orton.
For once I agree with Ola.
Danimal says on 16/Dec/08
6'2.5" MAX for Edge.
That makes no sense to me. How do you explain him towering Kennedy and looking MAX 1 inch shorter than Orton.
For once I agree with Ola.
hs2008 said on 18/Dec/08
If Edge is MAX 6'2.5" Triple H & Mick Foley are struggling with 6'0". PLEASE!
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Also, with Matt Hardy, who was the same height as Evander Holyfield:
Click Here
He's also the same height as Tomko in streets, who's billed at 6'6" so I highly doubt is 6'2".
If Edge is MAX 6'2.5" Triple H & Mick Foley are struggling with 6'0". PLEASE!
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Also, with Matt Hardy, who was the same height as Evander Holyfield:
Click Here
He's also the same height as Tomko in streets, who's billed at 6'6" so I highly doubt is 6'2".
Danimal said on 16/Dec/08
6'2.5" MAX for Edge.
6'2.5" MAX for Edge.
Anonymous said on 16/Dec/08
Orton has always looked taller than Edge. In boots Orton is probably close to 6,4.5" and Edge is probably just a shade under 6,4".
Orton has always looked taller than Edge. In boots Orton is probably close to 6,4.5" and Edge is probably just a shade under 6,4".
Alex said on 15/Dec/08
I think when you're more 6'4-6'5 and up is when you will almost never see guys try to inflate. Believe it or not but in the 6'1-6'3 range guys will still try to lie a bit. I know a kid who is 6'3 and he claims 6'5. I didnt measure him but I did no way feel 5 inches shorter.
I think when you're more 6'4-6'5 and up is when you will almost never see guys try to inflate. Believe it or not but in the 6'1-6'3 range guys will still try to lie a bit. I know a kid who is 6'3 and he claims 6'5. I didnt measure him but I did no way feel 5 inches shorter.
KingNick said on 15/Dec/08
I posted these a while back but I guess no one looked at them. These are photos of Edge with Orton, who I dare say the majority agree is a legit 6'4"
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Edge is no less than 6'3" IMO maybe even 6'3.5"
I posted these a while back but I guess no one looked at them. These are photos of Edge with Orton, who I dare say the majority agree is a legit 6'4"
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Edge is no less than 6'3" IMO maybe even 6'3.5"
Clay said on 15/Dec/08
Actually from what I've seen 6'2/6'3 guys dont lie about their height as they have no reason to.
Actually from what I've seen 6'2/6'3 guys dont lie about their height as they have no reason to.
hs2008 said on 15/Dec/08
In Edge's book, he says he grew from 5'9" to 6'2" at 16 & over the next few years he grew to 6'4" & 200lbs. He also describes himself as 6'5" & 225lbs. He's NEVER said he's 6'2" as an adult.
In Edge's book, he says he grew from 5'9" to 6'2" at 16 & over the next few years he grew to 6'4" & 200lbs. He also describes himself as 6'5" & 225lbs. He's NEVER said he's 6'2" as an adult.
Alex said on 13/Dec/08
Viper, I agree. You will have a lot of guys 6'2-6'3 claiming 6'4. But when you're 6'2-6'3 you can get away with 6'4 most of the time.
Viper, I agree. You will have a lot of guys 6'2-6'3 claiming 6'4. But when you're 6'2-6'3 you can get away with 6'4 most of the time.
dave said on 13/Dec/08
viper..... edge is not 6'2...... he is 6'3 at least, theres ALOT of evidence to suggest this..... i see NO evidence to support a 6'2 claim, none.... at all!.... he said he was 6'2 at 16 (yes we all watched wwe confidential...)... he NEVER said he was 6'2 nowadays, and if he did, lets see it!!!!!!....
lastly, IF edge is 6'2, that makes jeff about 5'10-5'11 MAX.... and i met jeff hardy, and as a 6'1 barefoot guy we were eye level, only i believe my forehead to be taller than his.... anyways, i have never met edge unfortunatley.. but he looks AT LEAST 3 inches taller than a 6' jeff at ALL times, and often more. besides, brett recently had a pic taken with rob, check his celebheights page, even today the man is at leasta clean 6', and remember his posture is horrible in the pic.
viper..... edge is not 6'2...... he is 6'3 at least, theres ALOT of evidence to suggest this..... i see NO evidence to support a 6'2 claim, none.... at all!.... he said he was 6'2 at 16 (yes we all watched wwe confidential...)... he NEVER said he was 6'2 nowadays, and if he did, lets see it!!!!!!....
lastly, IF edge is 6'2, that makes jeff about 5'10-5'11 MAX.... and i met jeff hardy, and as a 6'1 barefoot guy we were eye level, only i believe my forehead to be taller than his.... anyways, i have never met edge unfortunatley.. but he looks AT LEAST 3 inches taller than a 6' jeff at ALL times, and often more. besides, brett recently had a pic taken with rob, check his celebheights page, even today the man is at leasta clean 6', and remember his posture is horrible in the pic.
Viper said on 12/Dec/08
6-2 guys get quoted as saying they are 6-4 a lot.
6-2 guys get quoted as saying they are 6-4 a lot.
Danimal said on 12/Dec/08
OH YES Bret Hart was billed at 5'11" in the WWF until the very early 1980's and so was Davey Boy Smith AND Shawn Michaels. They were ALL billed at 5'11" KIDDIES up until the very early 1990's, at which point Vince added 2" to ALL of their billed heights and then added 2" MORE to Davey Boy Smith, putting him up to 6'3", when in reality he was only 5'9". Both HBK and Bret Hart were NEVER taller than 5'11".
OH YES Bret Hart was billed at 5'11" in the WWF until the very early 1980's and so was Davey Boy Smith AND Shawn Michaels. They were ALL billed at 5'11" KIDDIES up until the very early 1990's, at which point Vince added 2" to ALL of their billed heights and then added 2" MORE to Davey Boy Smith, putting him up to 6'3", when in reality he was only 5'9". Both HBK and Bret Hart were NEVER taller than 5'11".
Danimal said on 12/Dec/08
Viper says on 11/Dec/08
Why do people think Bret Hart is 6-0 when he was listed at 5-11?
Ghost, Edge has said himself that hes 6-2-6-3. He could be 6-2 1/2 exactly.
+1
Viper says on 11/Dec/08
Why do people think Bret Hart is 6-0 when he was listed at 5-11?
Ghost, Edge has said himself that hes 6-2-6-3. He could be 6-2 1/2 exactly.
+1
Anonymous said on 12/Dec/08
Viper says on 11/Dec/08
Why do people think Bret Hart is 6-0 when he was listed at 5-11?
Ghost, Edge has said himself that hes 6-2-6-3. He could be 6-2 1/2 exactly
bret hart was never listed at 5'11 by a wrestling company, magazine maybe but never a wrestling company
edge said he was 6'2-6'3 at 16 in an interview, of course you failed to mention the 16 part; his ex wife said he was 6'4, if he was 6'2 she sure as hell would have said it Click Here
Viper says on 11/Dec/08
Why do people think Bret Hart is 6-0 when he was listed at 5-11?
Ghost, Edge has said himself that hes 6-2-6-3. He could be 6-2 1/2 exactly
bret hart was never listed at 5'11 by a wrestling company, magazine maybe but never a wrestling company
edge said he was 6'2-6'3 at 16 in an interview, of course you failed to mention the 16 part; his ex wife said he was 6'4, if he was 6'2 she sure as hell would have said it Click Here
Alex said on 12/Dec/08
Bret was listed at 6'0 on some point in WWE and I even saw him listed at 6'1 for sometime.
Bret was listed at 6'0 on some point in WWE and I even saw him listed at 6'1 for sometime.
hs2008 said on 12/Dec/08
Danimal, I've posted pics before of Edge & Hogan in street clothes where Edge is at least the same height as Hogan, who obviously had some help in his boots in 2002 when he & Edge were a tag team.
Edge has 2" on Triple H & Mick Foley, 3" on Jeff Hardy, about 4" on Mr Kennedy, he's about the same height as Randy Orton & Tyson Tomko & yet he's still struggling with 6'3" with some people!
Danimal, I've posted pics before of Edge & Hogan in street clothes where Edge is at least the same height as Hogan, who obviously had some help in his boots in 2002 when he & Edge were a tag team.
Edge has 2" on Triple H & Mick Foley, 3" on Jeff Hardy, about 4" on Mr Kennedy, he's about the same height as Randy Orton & Tyson Tomko & yet he's still struggling with 6'3" with some people!
tr2008 said on 12/Dec/08
How many inches does the undertaker have on Hogan
How many inches does the undertaker have on Hogan
Viper said on 11/Dec/08
Why do people think Bret Hart is 6-0 when he was listed at 5-11?
Ghost, Edge has said himself that hes 6-2-6-3. He could be 6-2 1/2 exactly.
Why do people think Bret Hart is 6-0 when he was listed at 5-11?
Ghost, Edge has said himself that hes 6-2-6-3. He could be 6-2 1/2 exactly.
Clay said on 11/Dec/08
I havent seen any evidence of Orton being taller yet.
I havent seen any evidence of Orton being taller yet.
KingNick said on 11/Dec/08
Did anyone look at the pics I posted of Edge and Orton? If Edge is 6'4" than Orton has to be 6'4.5" or 6'5". I'm open to Edge being 6'3.5" tho.
Did anyone look at the pics I posted of Edge and Orton? If Edge is 6'4" than Orton has to be 6'4.5" or 6'5". I'm open to Edge being 6'3.5" tho.
Ghost said on 11/Dec/08
There's no way in hell Edge is under 6'3. Just look the pics of him and mr. Kennedy (about 6'-6'1, I guess).
There's no way in hell Edge is under 6'3. Just look the pics of him and mr. Kennedy (about 6'-6'1, I guess).
Anonymous said on 11/Dec/08
edge was 4 inches taller than christian who in turn was 2 inches taller than angle so he is at least 6'3
edge was 4 inches taller than christian who in turn was 2 inches taller than angle so he is at least 6'3
Heights are barefeet estimates, derived from quotations, official websites, agency resumes, in person encounters with actors at conventions and pictures/films.
Other vital statistics like weight or shoe size measurements have been sourced from newspapers, books, resumes or social media.
Celebrity Fan Photos and Agency Pictures of stars are © to their respective owners.