Add a Comment9900 comments
Average Guess (947 Votes)
Peak: 6ft 7.68in (202.4cm)
Current: 6ft 6.4in (199.1cm)
Peak: 6ft 7.68in (202.4cm)
Current: 6ft 6.4in (199.1cm)
The Ben said on 29/Dec/11
Frank
I'd say taker looks 6'6 min and he is bending slightly while the other guy is stood tall.
Frank
I'd say taker looks 6'6 min and he is bending slightly while the other guy is stood tall.
valdor said on 29/Dec/11
Frank, always respect it when you post but id have to be honest that pic comparrisson to me kinda makes Taker 6'6-7" . He towers him awready and you may notice he is standing far from straight.
Frank, always respect it when you post but id have to be honest that pic comparrisson to me kinda makes Taker 6'6-7" . He towers him awready and you may notice he is standing far from straight.
Red said on 29/Dec/11
Frank says on 29/Dec/11
If that guy is 6ft Taker looks 6ft 4
Taker looks 6`6" with that posture, 6´7" if he stands straight, same as in the pic with Bret Hart posted by JT.
Frank says on 29/Dec/11
If that guy is 6ft Taker looks 6ft 4
Taker looks 6`6" with that posture, 6´7" if he stands straight, same as in the pic with Bret Hart posted by JT.
Frank said on 29/Dec/11
If that guy is 6ft Taker looks 6ft 4
If that guy is 6ft Taker looks 6ft 4
Silent d said on 29/Dec/11
He is my favourite wrestler of all time next to hulk hogan. He is a huge guy. Big show is scared of him. 205cm is about right. 202 is a little short. He is a giant. If big show is 214cm than undertaker is 208cm easy.
He is my favourite wrestler of all time next to hulk hogan. He is a huge guy. Big show is scared of him. 205cm is about right. 202 is a little short. He is a giant. If big show is 214cm than undertaker is 208cm easy.
The Ben said on 28/Dec/11
This is pretty interesting, You have to scroll down slightly but the guys bio says he's 6ft and 195 lbs. Click Here
Taker could be 6'6-6'8. but if I had to say I'd go 6'7.
This is pretty interesting, You have to scroll down slightly but the guys bio says he's 6ft and 195 lbs. Click Here
Taker could be 6'6-6'8. but if I had to say I'd go 6'7.
logan noll 1996 said on 27/Dec/11
Undertaker is actually the same height(or taller than) Kevin Nash people. Kevin Nash most likely had a footwear advantage and i've seen the two of them in a stare down and both men looked the same height.
Undertaker is actually the same height(or taller than) Kevin Nash people. Kevin Nash most likely had a footwear advantage and i've seen the two of them in a stare down and both men looked the same height.
drummer777 said on 26/Dec/11
I'd say at the most 6'6 barefoot a little over 6'7 in his shoes.
I'd say at the most 6'6 barefoot a little over 6'7 in his shoes.
logan noll 1996 said on 24/Dec/11
6 foot 10 to 6 foot 11 sounds right. He is two inches shorter than 7 foot Big Show. (Big Show has 2 inch soles on his boots to give him a 2 inch boost).
6 foot 10 to 6 foot 11 sounds right. He is two inches shorter than 7 foot Big Show. (Big Show has 2 inch soles on his boots to give him a 2 inch boost).
Kimmberly said on 24/Dec/11
I went to hell in the sell last year in october and got a front row seat and the Undertaker was realy realy tall ill say around 7 feet or so but it was realy cool to see someone in person thats that tall i dont think ill ever see someone that tall in person again while im at it i wanna make a shout out to my home state Miami Florida im 13 years old and am living the dream down here the other day i saw some people nockin coconuts of a couple of palm trees and one of them almost got hit once again my name is Kimmberly im 13 years old and take my word for it the Undertaker is realy realy tall love ya peace out and Merry Christmas Santa Clause is coming to town ho ho ho tell Rudolph i said hi!peace yall
I went to hell in the sell last year in october and got a front row seat and the Undertaker was realy realy tall ill say around 7 feet or so but it was realy cool to see someone in person thats that tall i dont think ill ever see someone that tall in person again while im at it i wanna make a shout out to my home state Miami Florida im 13 years old and am living the dream down here the other day i saw some people nockin coconuts of a couple of palm trees and one of them almost got hit once again my name is Kimmberly im 13 years old and take my word for it the Undertaker is realy realy tall love ya peace out and Merry Christmas Santa Clause is coming to town ho ho ho tell Rudolph i said hi!peace yall
Kimmberly said on 24/Dec/11
I just want the Undertaker to know that im a huge fan ! and i have a question were u ever the tallest person in your class for 10 years straight please reply and again my name is Kimmberly Sharp and i live in Miami Florida
I just want the Undertaker to know that im a huge fan ! and i have a question were u ever the tallest person in your class for 10 years straight please reply and again my name is Kimmberly Sharp and i live in Miami Florida
drummer777 said on 21/Dec/11
Hey Vegas thats what I've been saying, Mane says "I'm 6'8" in the Michael Meyers interview for Halloween. met a guy who is 6'8 last night. thats pretty tall in person.
Hey Vegas thats what I've been saying, Mane says "I'm 6'8" in the Michael Meyers interview for Halloween. met a guy who is 6'8 last night. thats pretty tall in person.
NCL said on 17/Dec/11
Vegas says on 17/Dec/11
NCL says on 16/Dec/11
I think 6'7"-6'7.5" is very realistic for both of them. I know there's a video where Sid is billed 6'7" but and I know I'll get crap for this but it coulda been a mistake. I once read a listing for Festus being 6'3" and I think most would agree he's at least 6'5". But Sid isn't a whole lot shorter than Nash. Click Here I'm sorry I don't buy a 6'9" Nash - maybe now that's possible but I think he was 6'10" at peak
_________
sid wasnt more than 6'7, he was barely 4 inches taller than luger in 1991 and barely an inch taller than dan spivey around same time
as for nash when i started here i believed nash was 6'10 but other evidence has come to light e.g the fact that tyler mane says he is actually 6'8 rather than the 6'10 he was claiming for years, watch any mane/nash tag match from 1993 and tell me if you see 2 inches between nash and mane, i certainly ain't seeing 2 inches Click Here
btw taker is closer to the camera in those photos, he wasn't taller than sid, that memphis video is best evidence we got because both men are in the exact same boots
I see a footwear advantage on Mane and that doesn't explain the other 'Taker photos with Sid plus my point about Sid's hair. Plus 'Taker's foot is closer to the camera - even if his whole body was he's not SO MUCH closer that it would take a way a lot of height
But you and I have been down this road before Vegas, we're not gonna agree :>)
Vegas says on 17/Dec/11
NCL says on 16/Dec/11
I think 6'7"-6'7.5" is very realistic for both of them. I know there's a video where Sid is billed 6'7" but and I know I'll get crap for this but it coulda been a mistake. I once read a listing for Festus being 6'3" and I think most would agree he's at least 6'5". But Sid isn't a whole lot shorter than Nash. Click Here I'm sorry I don't buy a 6'9" Nash - maybe now that's possible but I think he was 6'10" at peak
_________
sid wasnt more than 6'7, he was barely 4 inches taller than luger in 1991 and barely an inch taller than dan spivey around same time
as for nash when i started here i believed nash was 6'10 but other evidence has come to light e.g the fact that tyler mane says he is actually 6'8 rather than the 6'10 he was claiming for years, watch any mane/nash tag match from 1993 and tell me if you see 2 inches between nash and mane, i certainly ain't seeing 2 inches Click Here
btw taker is closer to the camera in those photos, he wasn't taller than sid, that memphis video is best evidence we got because both men are in the exact same boots
I see a footwear advantage on Mane and that doesn't explain the other 'Taker photos with Sid plus my point about Sid's hair. Plus 'Taker's foot is closer to the camera - even if his whole body was he's not SO MUCH closer that it would take a way a lot of height
But you and I have been down this road before Vegas, we're not gonna agree :>)
Vegas said on 17/Dec/11
NCL says on 16/Dec/11
I think 6'7"-6'7.5" is very realistic for both of them. I know there's a video where Sid is billed 6'7" but and I know I'll get crap for this but it coulda been a mistake. I once read a listing for Festus being 6'3" and I think most would agree he's at least 6'5". But Sid isn't a whole lot shorter than Nash. Click Here I'm sorry I don't buy a 6'9" Nash - maybe now that's possible but I think he was 6'10" at peak
_________
sid wasnt more than 6'7, he was barely 4 inches taller than luger in 1991 and barely an inch taller than dan spivey around same time
as for nash when i started here i believed nash was 6'10 but other evidence has come to light e.g the fact that tyler mane says he is actually 6'8 rather than the 6'10 he was claiming for years, watch any mane/nash tag match from 1993 and tell me if you see 2 inches between nash and mane, i certainly ain't seeing 2 inches Click Here
btw taker is closer to the camera in those photos, he wasn't taller than sid, that memphis video is best evidence we got because both men are in the exact same boots
NCL says on 16/Dec/11
I think 6'7"-6'7.5" is very realistic for both of them. I know there's a video where Sid is billed 6'7" but and I know I'll get crap for this but it coulda been a mistake. I once read a listing for Festus being 6'3" and I think most would agree he's at least 6'5". But Sid isn't a whole lot shorter than Nash. Click Here I'm sorry I don't buy a 6'9" Nash - maybe now that's possible but I think he was 6'10" at peak
_________
sid wasnt more than 6'7, he was barely 4 inches taller than luger in 1991 and barely an inch taller than dan spivey around same time
as for nash when i started here i believed nash was 6'10 but other evidence has come to light e.g the fact that tyler mane says he is actually 6'8 rather than the 6'10 he was claiming for years, watch any mane/nash tag match from 1993 and tell me if you see 2 inches between nash and mane, i certainly ain't seeing 2 inches Click Here
btw taker is closer to the camera in those photos, he wasn't taller than sid, that memphis video is best evidence we got because both men are in the exact same boots
NCL said on 16/Dec/11
miko says on 14/Dec/11
I've always believed Taker was a hair over 6'7 and still is today, any height loss is minimal.
Sid was the one guy who made Taker look a flat 6'7 everytime they had a staredown. I can't even rule out Sid being the taller man as face to face it was too close to call, and I've got Sid at 6'6.75/6'7.
I certainly haven't seen a clear photo/video yet of Taker being clearly taller than Sid.
Click Here and Click Here and
Here's the album with several photos of the two of them: Click Here
I've said this a million times - 'Taker has a longer forehead. I doubt he has more than .5" on Sid, prob closer to .25", but his eye level is shorter and he's got a longer neck so at first glance Sid appears to be taller when technically he's not.
What's funny is this photo of Sid and 'Taker from the USWA has been around well before the video was posted on youtube Click Here but no one bothered commenting on it because of what I said. But when the video came out everybody said they were the same height.
Here's some photos in color that Red posted Click Here if you look at any of the staredowns of Sid and Taker w/o Sid wearing the mask, Sid's hair is went so it's not poofy like when he's wearing the mask. You have to take out some of Sid's poofy hair in the masked pic plus 'Taker isn't standing fully straight IMO.
I've always said 'Taker 6'8" and Sid slightly under. Don't get me wrong tho - I think 6'7"-6'7.5" is very realistic for both of them. I know there's a video where Sid is billed 6'7" but and I know I'll get crap for this but it coulda been a mistake. I once read a listing for Festus being 6'3" and I think most would agree he's at least 6'5". But Sid isn't a whole lot shorter than Nash. Click Here I'm sorry I don't buy a 6'9" Nash - maybe now that's possible but I think he was 6'10" at peak, look how well he measures up to Big Show just a year ago Click Here
Btw, I'm going to mark out here for a second. Did anyone see the return of Kane? Was pretty freakin awesome Click Here
miko says on 14/Dec/11
I've always believed Taker was a hair over 6'7 and still is today, any height loss is minimal.
Sid was the one guy who made Taker look a flat 6'7 everytime they had a staredown. I can't even rule out Sid being the taller man as face to face it was too close to call, and I've got Sid at 6'6.75/6'7.
I certainly haven't seen a clear photo/video yet of Taker being clearly taller than Sid.
Click Here and Click Here and
Here's the album with several photos of the two of them: Click Here
I've said this a million times - 'Taker has a longer forehead. I doubt he has more than .5" on Sid, prob closer to .25", but his eye level is shorter and he's got a longer neck so at first glance Sid appears to be taller when technically he's not.
What's funny is this photo of Sid and 'Taker from the USWA has been around well before the video was posted on youtube Click Here but no one bothered commenting on it because of what I said. But when the video came out everybody said they were the same height.
Here's some photos in color that Red posted Click Here if you look at any of the staredowns of Sid and Taker w/o Sid wearing the mask, Sid's hair is went so it's not poofy like when he's wearing the mask. You have to take out some of Sid's poofy hair in the masked pic plus 'Taker isn't standing fully straight IMO.
I've always said 'Taker 6'8" and Sid slightly under. Don't get me wrong tho - I think 6'7"-6'7.5" is very realistic for both of them. I know there's a video where Sid is billed 6'7" but and I know I'll get crap for this but it coulda been a mistake. I once read a listing for Festus being 6'3" and I think most would agree he's at least 6'5". But Sid isn't a whole lot shorter than Nash. Click Here I'm sorry I don't buy a 6'9" Nash - maybe now that's possible but I think he was 6'10" at peak, look how well he measures up to Big Show just a year ago Click Here
Btw, I'm going to mark out here for a second. Did anyone see the return of Kane? Was pretty freakin awesome Click Here
miko said on 14/Dec/11
I've always believed Taker was a hair over 6'7 and still is today, any height loss is minimal.
Sid was the one guy who made Taker look a flat 6'7 everytime they had a staredown. I can't even rule out Sid being the taller man as face to face it was too close to call, and I've got Sid at 6'6.75/6'7.
I certainly haven't seen a clear photo/video yet of Taker being clearly taller than Sid.
I've always believed Taker was a hair over 6'7 and still is today, any height loss is minimal.
Sid was the one guy who made Taker look a flat 6'7 everytime they had a staredown. I can't even rule out Sid being the taller man as face to face it was too close to call, and I've got Sid at 6'6.75/6'7.
I certainly haven't seen a clear photo/video yet of Taker being clearly taller than Sid.
the true said on 14/Dec/11
Undertaker don't look 6'7.5 in that picture with a 5'11.5 Bret Hart. Taker could probably gain 0.5-0.75 in height with better posture but he still doesn't look 8 inches taller.Sid looks taller than taker in that picture with the hockey mask on.
Funny that taker was billed as 6'10 1/2 and 328.
Undertaker don't look 6'7.5 in that picture with a 5'11.5 Bret Hart. Taker could probably gain 0.5-0.75 in height with better posture but he still doesn't look 8 inches taller.Sid looks taller than taker in that picture with the hockey mask on.
Funny that taker was billed as 6'10 1/2 and 328.
drummer777 said on 13/Dec/11
If you look closely Sid is slightly taller than Mark Callaway in that picture with his hockey mask on.
If you look closely Sid is slightly taller than Mark Callaway in that picture with his hockey mask on.
Clay said on 12/Dec/11
Danimal says on 7/Dec/11
gee says on 5/Dec/11
taker 6'6
+1
___
-1.
Danimal says on 7/Dec/11
gee says on 5/Dec/11
taker 6'6
+1
___
-1.
Red said on 12/Dec/11
Tuga says on 9/Dec/11
Red, great video, don´t remember ever seeing it, but taker not much taller than Tenta?...
Good old days vid, ooooh yeah!!!
Maybe I wasn´t very specific :)
Let me try again, I don´t think peak Taker had more than 2 inches on 6´5.75" Earthquake and I think this vid backs me up a little.
Click Here Sid wasn´t really shorter than Taker, they were very close in height, I would give Taker about 5mm-max 1cm height-advantage.
Taker 202cm peak
Sid 201cm peak
Tenta 198cm peak
Hogan 197cm peak
Tuga says on 9/Dec/11
Red, great video, don´t remember ever seeing it, but taker not much taller than Tenta?...
Good old days vid, ooooh yeah!!!
Maybe I wasn´t very specific :)
Let me try again, I don´t think peak Taker had more than 2 inches on 6´5.75" Earthquake and I think this vid backs me up a little.
Click Here Sid wasn´t really shorter than Taker, they were very close in height, I would give Taker about 5mm-max 1cm height-advantage.
Taker 202cm peak
Sid 201cm peak
Tenta 198cm peak
Hogan 197cm peak
Tuga said on 9/Dec/11
6´6 taker? Yeah right, was he and wade barret around same height? Wasn´t taker same height as kane with a footware disavantage?? Is kane also 6'6 max?
I´m guessing some really don´t watch wrestling...what about staredowns with jbl and khali?
Red, great video, don´t remember ever seeing it, but taker not much taller than Tenta? Tenta was around same height as hogan, don´t you remember sid and hogan´s staredowns? Tenta would look about the same next to sid, taker is taller than sid so...
You could say tenta would be not much taller than jbl, and we know what happens when a non peak taker stands straight next to a 6'5 range jbl.
I´ve yet to see a 5'11 bret hart billing , Danimal, Rob met and took a picture with a non peak Bret, Rob´s 6´estimate comes with evidence, I guess you´re being honest about your estimate but you could be wrong and have no pic we could estimate from.
6´6 taker? Yeah right, was he and wade barret around same height? Wasn´t taker same height as kane with a footware disavantage?? Is kane also 6'6 max?
I´m guessing some really don´t watch wrestling...what about staredowns with jbl and khali?
Red, great video, don´t remember ever seeing it, but taker not much taller than Tenta? Tenta was around same height as hogan, don´t you remember sid and hogan´s staredowns? Tenta would look about the same next to sid, taker is taller than sid so...
You could say tenta would be not much taller than jbl, and we know what happens when a non peak taker stands straight next to a 6'5 range jbl.
I´ve yet to see a 5'11 bret hart billing , Danimal, Rob met and took a picture with a non peak Bret, Rob´s 6´estimate comes with evidence, I guess you´re being honest about your estimate but you could be wrong and have no pic we could estimate from.
drummer777 said on 7/Dec/11
As well as being dropped on his which caused him to lose height, after years running back and forth in the ring which cause leg bones to erode a few inches. so he went from 7'0 down to 6'4.
He has the honor of wearing the late great Big JOhn studds shoe lifts to make him appear taller to all the little undertakers out there.
Not to mention Big Show bonked him on the head a couple of times which caused his neck to become shorter.
;)
As well as being dropped on his which caused him to lose height, after years running back and forth in the ring which cause leg bones to erode a few inches. so he went from 7'0 down to 6'4.
He has the honor of wearing the late great Big JOhn studds shoe lifts to make him appear taller to all the little undertakers out there.
Not to mention Big Show bonked him on the head a couple of times which caused his neck to become shorter.
;)
Danimal said on 7/Dec/11
gee says on 5/Dec/11
taker 6'6
+1
gee says on 5/Dec/11
taker 6'6
+1
Danimal said on 7/Dec/11
Red says on 18/Nov/11
JT says on 16/Nov/11
Click Here
Nice pic JT! Taker looks 6´6" range with Bret at 6´0", maybe 6´7"range with perfect posture.
Bret was 5'11", not 6'0". Met the man 10 years ago in Calgary. He also used to be BILLED at 5'11" in the 1980's (same as Shawn Michaels), before he became a single's wrestler.
Red says on 18/Nov/11
JT says on 16/Nov/11
Click Here
Nice pic JT! Taker looks 6´6" range with Bret at 6´0", maybe 6´7"range with perfect posture.
Bret was 5'11", not 6'0". Met the man 10 years ago in Calgary. He also used to be BILLED at 5'11" in the 1980's (same as Shawn Michaels), before he became a single's wrestler.
Red said on 7/Dec/11
I don´t see him under 6´7"peak, but 6´8"legit??, maybe right out of bed.
I don´t see him under 6´7"peak, but 6´8"legit??, maybe right out of bed.
megaadeeel said on 7/Dec/11
big mike says on 6/Dec/11
i'd say undertaker aka mark calaway is 6ft 4 if u ask me.
No we won't ask you.
big mike says on 6/Dec/11
i'd say undertaker aka mark calaway is 6ft 4 if u ask me.
No we won't ask you.
Tonny said on 6/Dec/11
Look first at Undertaker posture, and boots. Everything under 6 ft 7 in is funny
Look first at Undertaker posture, and boots. Everything under 6 ft 7 in is funny
Red said on 6/Dec/11
Click Here
Nice one from the great days.
No staredown, but Taker looks not much taller than 6´5.75" Earthquake.
Click Here
Nice one from the great days.
No staredown, but Taker looks not much taller than 6´5.75" Earthquake.
JT said on 5/Dec/11
NCL says on 4/Dec/11
....I'm apparently just under 6' in the shoes I was wearing (5'11.5" I guess?). I thought I was 5'10" barefoot but I may have to double check that.
Remember that when the camera is below the level of your head, this will make you appear taller relative to objects behind you. Click Here (rob's middle diagram) I think Robert Wadlow was "only" 8'8" in that pic with his father. He had not yet reached his final height of 8'11" and was reportedly still growing when he died.
NCL says on 4/Dec/11
....I'm apparently just under 6' in the shoes I was wearing (5'11.5" I guess?). I thought I was 5'10" barefoot but I may have to double check that.
Remember that when the camera is below the level of your head, this will make you appear taller relative to objects behind you. Click Here (rob's middle diagram) I think Robert Wadlow was "only" 8'8" in that pic with his father. He had not yet reached his final height of 8'11" and was reportedly still growing when he died.
NCL said on 4/Dec/11
Got real cool treat for you guys that may help with some heights!
I went to the Ripley's Believe it or Not museum last night and took a pic with a replica of Robert Waslow - the world's tallest man who ever lived, about 8'11" tall. They had a 9' ruler next to him and I stood there with my friends.
I'm apparently just under 6' in the shoes I was wearing (5'11.5" I guess?). I thought I was 5'10" barefoot but I may have to double check that.
Anyway, this is a legitimate height measurement/ruler if you want to use it for other photos.
Click Here
For comparison, here's a photo of Robert with his father, who was approximately my height Click Here (see w i k i p i d e a for his dad's height, 5'11.5")
Feel free to use these pics! It could be fun to photoshop Undertaker and other wrestlers into it
Got real cool treat for you guys that may help with some heights!
I went to the Ripley's Believe it or Not museum last night and took a pic with a replica of Robert Waslow - the world's tallest man who ever lived, about 8'11" tall. They had a 9' ruler next to him and I stood there with my friends.
I'm apparently just under 6' in the shoes I was wearing (5'11.5" I guess?). I thought I was 5'10" barefoot but I may have to double check that.
Anyway, this is a legitimate height measurement/ruler if you want to use it for other photos.
Click Here
For comparison, here's a photo of Robert with his father, who was approximately my height Click Here (see w i k i p i d e a for his dad's height, 5'11.5")
Feel free to use these pics! It could be fun to photoshop Undertaker and other wrestlers into it
Clay said on 1/Dec/11
Khali with at least 5 inches over Undertaker there.
Khali with at least 5 inches over Undertaker there.
NCL said on 30/Nov/11
Ravi giri says on 29/Nov/11
Undertaker is about 6 feet 11 inches, almost equal to kane and 2 inch shorter than big show.
drummer777 says on 16/Nov/11
Andrew Said it..... no higher than 6'6
What has happened to this page? We keep getting people who jump from one extreme to another! Is this just one dude under a bunch of different names trying to drive everyone crazy? LOL :>)
Ravi giri says on 29/Nov/11
Undertaker is about 6 feet 11 inches, almost equal to kane and 2 inch shorter than big show.
drummer777 says on 16/Nov/11
Andrew Said it..... no higher than 6'6
What has happened to this page? We keep getting people who jump from one extreme to another! Is this just one dude under a bunch of different names trying to drive everyone crazy? LOL :>)
Marvin said on 30/Nov/11
Click Here Shaq was measured multiple times 2,16 m (7-1) without shoes (NBA profile). Dalip Singh is as tall as Shaq.
Click Here This pic is from 2006.
Click Here Shaq was measured multiple times 2,16 m (7-1) without shoes (NBA profile). Dalip Singh is as tall as Shaq.
Click Here This pic is from 2006.
Frank said on 30/Nov/11
Realjam, Ravi girl come on you cant be serious
Realjam, Ravi girl come on you cant be serious
valdor said on 30/Nov/11
Raivi, wretslers are most often overbilled when it comes to their height and weight to make them appear larger than life. The Undertaker and his TV brother are both around 6'7". Thats still pretty dammed big and does not make their ring qualities anyless impressive. Hope this helps abit :-)
Raivi, wretslers are most often overbilled when it comes to their height and weight to make them appear larger than life. The Undertaker and his TV brother are both around 6'7". Thats still pretty dammed big and does not make their ring qualities anyless impressive. Hope this helps abit :-)
Ravi giri said on 29/Nov/11
Undertaker is about 6 feet 11 inches, almost equal to kane and 2 inch shorter than big show.
Undertaker is about 6 feet 11 inches, almost equal to kane and 2 inch shorter than big show.
Clay said on 29/Nov/11
realjam says on 28/Nov/11
Taker is about a bit below 7 but almost because a commentator said he had a 7ft frame and he isn't much shorter than kane who is seven ft and big show and khali as well so I think he is in with the giants
Sorry to break it to you but he's about 4 inches off from 7 feet (at best).
realjam says on 28/Nov/11
Taker is about a bit below 7 but almost because a commentator said he had a 7ft frame and he isn't much shorter than kane who is seven ft and big show and khali as well so I think he is in with the giants
Sorry to break it to you but he's about 4 inches off from 7 feet (at best).
Andrew said on 29/Nov/11
Real jam - oh dear!
Real jam - oh dear!
realjam said on 28/Nov/11
Taker is about a bit below 7 but almost because a commentator said he had a 7ft frame and he isn't much shorter than kane who is seven ft and big show and khali as well so I think he is in with the giants
Taker is about a bit below 7 but almost because a commentator said he had a 7ft frame and he isn't much shorter than kane who is seven ft and big show and khali as well so I think he is in with the giants
Angelo said on 25/Nov/11
Still 6 ft 7.5 in, if not More in Full Stance, Every Height under 6 Ft 7 is a joke for this man.
Still 6 ft 7.5 in, if not More in Full Stance, Every Height under 6 Ft 7 is a joke for this man.
NCL said on 21/Nov/11
Hey all - I was just at the Survivor Series, The Rock made a funny height comment. After the show went off the air he was talking about Zack Ryder and he said, "That dude is TALL! I wasn't expecting that!" I looked it up outta curiousity - I found 6'1" and 6'2" listings for him.
The show was awesome, CRAZY crowd. I was in the nosebleeds so didnt get any good pics for heights or anything. All I can say is that, even in the nosebleeds, Big Show is still an incredible sight to see in person. He's so freakin huge I can't even describe! Mark Henry and Mason Ryan are enormous as well.
And I dunno if anyone watched or read the results but Sin Cara's injury was legit - the ref did the X sign and he's gonna be out 6-9 months
Hey all - I was just at the Survivor Series, The Rock made a funny height comment. After the show went off the air he was talking about Zack Ryder and he said, "That dude is TALL! I wasn't expecting that!" I looked it up outta curiousity - I found 6'1" and 6'2" listings for him.
The show was awesome, CRAZY crowd. I was in the nosebleeds so didnt get any good pics for heights or anything. All I can say is that, even in the nosebleeds, Big Show is still an incredible sight to see in person. He's so freakin huge I can't even describe! Mark Henry and Mason Ryan are enormous as well.
And I dunno if anyone watched or read the results but Sin Cara's injury was legit - the ref did the X sign and he's gonna be out 6-9 months
Red said on 18/Nov/11
JT says on 16/Nov/11
Click Here
Nice pic JT! Taker looks 6´6" range with Bret at 6´0", maybe 6´7"range with perfect posture.
JT says on 16/Nov/11
Click Here
Nice pic JT! Taker looks 6´6" range with Bret at 6´0", maybe 6´7"range with perfect posture.
Grozer said on 17/Nov/11
This guy is a joke, he first said that Taker is 6 ft 4 and 1/2, in his full posture is at least 6 ft 7.5 inches.
This guy is a joke, he first said that Taker is 6 ft 4 and 1/2, in his full posture is at least 6 ft 7.5 inches.
TRIPLEHHH said on 17/Nov/11
I met him a few years ago in Phoenix. If he is standing up straight he is 6'6 barefoot. Triple H is 6'2.
I met him a few years ago in Phoenix. If he is standing up straight he is 6'6 barefoot. Triple H is 6'2.
drummer777 said on 16/Nov/11
Andrew Said it..... no higher than 6'6
Andrew Said it..... no higher than 6'6
Andrew said on 14/Nov/11
Undertaker realistically no higher than 6'6.
Undertaker realistically no higher than 6'6.
WelcomE said on 13/Nov/11
drummer, it's not funny anymore.
drummer, it's not funny anymore.
drummer777 said on 13/Nov/11
Click Here Both pics Spivey and Undertaker look the same height, both standing tall. Barry windham is 6'4 barefoot 6'5 in his shoes, Undertaker more than likely 6'5 barefoot 6'6 with his shoes on.
Click Here Both pics Spivey and Undertaker look the same height, both standing tall. Barry windham is 6'4 barefoot 6'5 in his shoes, Undertaker more than likely 6'5 barefoot 6'6 with his shoes on.
Nishanth Hegde said on 12/Nov/11
drummer777 says on 9/Nov/11
show me a pic where Undertaker had 2 inches over Spivey, don't include pics were Spivey is bending his knees. Spivey is listed as 6'6 in football. If taker is 6'7, that only gives him an inch over Spivey.
Sid was billed as 6'7 in the 80's so no way is Taker 6'8 barefoot. Spivey could be 6'5 to 6'5 1/2 barefoot and 6'6 with his shoes on. I wouldn't go over 6'6 for undertaker. Click Here Click Here
Both pics undertaker and Spivey are the same height, the one pic spivey is bending his knees.
Learn to post proper links bro! :D
drummer777 says on 9/Nov/11
show me a pic where Undertaker had 2 inches over Spivey, don't include pics were Spivey is bending his knees. Spivey is listed as 6'6 in football. If taker is 6'7, that only gives him an inch over Spivey.
Sid was billed as 6'7 in the 80's so no way is Taker 6'8 barefoot. Spivey could be 6'5 to 6'5 1/2 barefoot and 6'6 with his shoes on. I wouldn't go over 6'6 for undertaker. Click Here Click Here
Both pics undertaker and Spivey are the same height, the one pic spivey is bending his knees.
Learn to post proper links bro! :D
logan noll said on 12/Nov/11
undertaker is in real life 6 foot 10 1/2 to 6 foot 11. Giant Gonzales - his opponent at WRESTLEMANIA IX - was 7 foot 7, and Gonzales was a head taller than undertaker.
undertaker is in real life 6 foot 10 1/2 to 6 foot 11. Giant Gonzales - his opponent at WRESTLEMANIA IX - was 7 foot 7, and Gonzales was a head taller than undertaker.
NCL said on 11/Nov/11
drummer777 says on 9/Nov/11
Despite all of us disagreeing with you, you got a lotta pizazz, I like that, you stick to your guns. So my disagreements with you come respectfully, so you know :)
The only argument you have are the pics w/ Spivey. 'Taker has stood tall w/ plenty of other guys in the 6'5"-6'6" range. I posted ages ago their debut match and said the same things I'm about to say but it's worth one more shot then I'm just going to leave well enough alone:
Here's 'Taker's debut match in WCW/NWA. Spivey and 'Taker do appear the same height but if you pause at 1:49-1:51 and particularly 3:37 you can see Spivey's shoes are pretty thick.
Here's a shot of Sid and Spivey: Click Here where Sid is taller and here's a shot of Sid and 'Taker where 'Taker's slightly taller (I can live w/ the argument that they may be the same height): Click Here among many pics in the album Click Here
'Taker w/ 6'5"-6'6" Heidenriech: Click Here and Click Here (Vegas can attest to this because he met him)
'Taker w/ 6'5"-6'6" Mabel Click Here
'Taker w/ 6'5"-6'6" at 6:20 Test Click Here
'Taker w/ 6'5"-6'6" Barry Windham (who has a clear footwear advantage starts at 2:50) Click Here
Goes on and on. That's my end of it guys :>)
drummer777 says on 9/Nov/11
Despite all of us disagreeing with you, you got a lotta pizazz, I like that, you stick to your guns. So my disagreements with you come respectfully, so you know :)
The only argument you have are the pics w/ Spivey. 'Taker has stood tall w/ plenty of other guys in the 6'5"-6'6" range. I posted ages ago their debut match and said the same things I'm about to say but it's worth one more shot then I'm just going to leave well enough alone:
Here's 'Taker's debut match in WCW/NWA. Spivey and 'Taker do appear the same height but if you pause at 1:49-1:51 and particularly 3:37 you can see Spivey's shoes are pretty thick.
Here's a shot of Sid and Spivey: Click Here where Sid is taller and here's a shot of Sid and 'Taker where 'Taker's slightly taller (I can live w/ the argument that they may be the same height): Click Here among many pics in the album Click Here
'Taker w/ 6'5"-6'6" Heidenriech: Click Here and Click Here (Vegas can attest to this because he met him)
'Taker w/ 6'5"-6'6" Mabel Click Here
'Taker w/ 6'5"-6'6" at 6:20 Test Click Here
'Taker w/ 6'5"-6'6" Barry Windham (who has a clear footwear advantage starts at 2:50) Click Here
Goes on and on. That's my end of it guys :>)
Frank said on 11/Nov/11
Spivey wore wrestling boots with a biiger heel than Taker did
Spivey wore wrestling boots with a biiger heel than Taker did
drummer777 said on 9/Nov/11
show me a pic where Undertaker had 2 inches over Spivey, don't include pics were Spivey is bending his knees. Spivey is listed as 6'6 in football. If taker is 6'7, that only gives him an inch over Spivey.
Sid was billed as 6'7 in the 80's so no way is Taker 6'8 barefoot. Spivey could be 6'5 to 6'5 1/2 barefoot and 6'6 with his shoes on. I wouldn't go over 6'6 for undertaker. Click Here Click Here
Both pics undertaker and Spivey are the same height, the one pic spivey is bending his knees.
show me a pic where Undertaker had 2 inches over Spivey, don't include pics were Spivey is bending his knees. Spivey is listed as 6'6 in football. If taker is 6'7, that only gives him an inch over Spivey.
Sid was billed as 6'7 in the 80's so no way is Taker 6'8 barefoot. Spivey could be 6'5 to 6'5 1/2 barefoot and 6'6 with his shoes on. I wouldn't go over 6'6 for undertaker. Click Here Click Here
Both pics undertaker and Spivey are the same height, the one pic spivey is bending his knees.
Nishanth Hegde said on 9/Nov/11
Angelo says on 8/Nov/11
Drummer777 is nice funny guy, Taker is still 6 ft 7 1/2 inches, in full position maybe 6 ft 8 inches, He had 1-2 inches over Spivey, when you find good pics.
I will have to agree with you.Taker had 2 inches on Spivey who is 6ft6!
Angelo says on 8/Nov/11
Drummer777 is nice funny guy, Taker is still 6 ft 7 1/2 inches, in full position maybe 6 ft 8 inches, He had 1-2 inches over Spivey, when you find good pics.
I will have to agree with you.Taker had 2 inches on Spivey who is 6ft6!
AndretheTRUEGiant said on 8/Nov/11
drummer777 says on 31/Oct/11
Click Here Undertaker and JBl looking the same Height not an inch between them.
Even cowbot boots JBL is shorter than Taker, lol!
drummer777 says on 31/Oct/11
Click Here Undertaker and JBl looking the same Height not an inch between them.
Even cowbot boots JBL is shorter than Taker, lol!
Angelo said on 8/Nov/11
Drummer777 is nice funny guy, Taker is still 6 ft 7 1/2 inches, in full position maybe 6 ft 8 inches, He had 1-2 inches over Spivey, when you find good pics.
Drummer777 is nice funny guy, Taker is still 6 ft 7 1/2 inches, in full position maybe 6 ft 8 inches, He had 1-2 inches over Spivey, when you find good pics.
NCL said on 8/Nov/11
Big Mike says on 7/Nov/11
When Undertaker was younger he could very well have been close to 7ft the WWE always had him at 6ft10 weighing from 290-325really big guy of course the wrestling industry could have made him shrink a little bit
drummer777 says on 5/Nov/11
Yeah I know seen that already, I've posted that drivers license on here before, Tyler Mane is 6'8, Taker is 6'5 1/2 or 6'6.
One extreme to another! I think we should put you two in a cage to duke it out! :>)
Big Mike says on 7/Nov/11
When Undertaker was younger he could very well have been close to 7ft the WWE always had him at 6ft10 weighing from 290-325really big guy of course the wrestling industry could have made him shrink a little bit
drummer777 says on 5/Nov/11
Yeah I know seen that already, I've posted that drivers license on here before, Tyler Mane is 6'8, Taker is 6'5 1/2 or 6'6.
One extreme to another! I think we should put you two in a cage to duke it out! :>)
Chetan said on 8/Nov/11
Like me i am 16yrs and 6'6
Like me i am 16yrs and 6'6
Big Mike said on 7/Nov/11
When Undertaker was younger he could very well have been close to 7ft the WWE always had him at 6ft10 weighing from 290-325really big guy of course the wrestling industry could have made him shrink a little bit
When Undertaker was younger he could very well have been close to 7ft the WWE always had him at 6ft10 weighing from 290-325really big guy of course the wrestling industry could have made him shrink a little bit
Nishanth Hegde said on 6/Nov/11
drummer777,Taker and Tyler Mane are the same height! There is no way he would be 2.5 inches shorter than Tyler!
drummer777,Taker and Tyler Mane are the same height! There is no way he would be 2.5 inches shorter than Tyler!
drummer777 said on 5/Nov/11
Yeah I know seen that already, I've posted that drivers license on here before, Tyler Mane is 6'8, Taker is 6'5 1/2 or 6'6.
Yeah I know seen that already, I've posted that drivers license on here before, Tyler Mane is 6'8, Taker is 6'5 1/2 or 6'6.
miko said on 5/Nov/11
Undertaker has looked 6'7 throughout his career. He's never really looked a legit 6'8, especially next to Sid.
Undertaker has looked 6'7 throughout his career. He's never really looked a legit 6'8, especially next to Sid.
Nishanth Hegde said on 5/Nov/11
Oh,and BTW Spivey was billed 6ft8 not 6ft6.His driving license says 6ft6 and Taker was 2 inches taller.
Oh,and BTW Spivey was billed 6ft8 not 6ft6.His driving license says 6ft6 and Taker was 2 inches taller.
Nishanth Hegde said on 5/Nov/11
drummer777 Wrong estimates.There are instances of people billed less than their original height. Taker is 6ft8 and he had 2 inches on Spivey!
drummer777 Wrong estimates.There are instances of people billed less than their original height. Taker is 6ft8 and he had 2 inches on Spivey!
megaadeeel said on 4/Nov/11
Drummer 777 give us a break. you are so annoying and your estimates are ridiculous.
Drummer 777 give us a break. you are so annoying and your estimates are ridiculous.
drummer777 said on 3/Nov/11
What I'm saying is a barefoot 6'6 Sid, will give you a 6'7 man in shoes...
What I'm saying is a barefoot 6'6 Sid, will give you a 6'7 man in shoes...
drummer777 said on 3/Nov/11
Not much height difference between them, Undertaker and Sid are at the most 6'6 and Jbl if shorter I'd put him at 6'4 1/2 barefoot, Listed as 6'5 1/2 in football. Strange how he looks so close in height to Sid but in that one match he looked so much shorter than taker. Taker has to be wearing lifts in some matches and not in others.
Spivey is listed as 6'6 in Football, he is more likely 6'5ish barefoot, Undertaker wasn't taller than Spivey when they wrestled as The Skyscrapers.
In Fact Undertaker who was billed 6'8 back then was a half inch shorter than a billed 6'7 Sid, lol, They had Hogan billed 6'8 in the 80's and we all know Hogan was shorter than a billed 6'7 psycho sid back then..
So Sid,Spivey,Undertaker somewhere in the 6'5 to 6'6 range, with Sid having about half an inch on either man. JbL is at the most 6'5 1/2 so then if Undertaker is 6'6 only half an inch maybe if that is the case.
Not much height difference between them, Undertaker and Sid are at the most 6'6 and Jbl if shorter I'd put him at 6'4 1/2 barefoot, Listed as 6'5 1/2 in football. Strange how he looks so close in height to Sid but in that one match he looked so much shorter than taker. Taker has to be wearing lifts in some matches and not in others.
Spivey is listed as 6'6 in Football, he is more likely 6'5ish barefoot, Undertaker wasn't taller than Spivey when they wrestled as The Skyscrapers.
In Fact Undertaker who was billed 6'8 back then was a half inch shorter than a billed 6'7 Sid, lol, They had Hogan billed 6'8 in the 80's and we all know Hogan was shorter than a billed 6'7 psycho sid back then..
So Sid,Spivey,Undertaker somewhere in the 6'5 to 6'6 range, with Sid having about half an inch on either man. JbL is at the most 6'5 1/2 so then if Undertaker is 6'6 only half an inch maybe if that is the case.
Vegas said on 3/Nov/11
Nishanth Hegde, mysterio is not 5'4 i have met him a few times, more like ~5'2, check out my shot with him, i don't think taker is 6'6, i think ~6'7
drummer, sid and taker were taller than jbl by more than half an inch on video, 1min 19 Click Here jbls in cowboy boots in this clip so about 1 inch footwear advantage Click Here
Nishanth Hegde, mysterio is not 5'4 i have met him a few times, more like ~5'2, check out my shot with him, i don't think taker is 6'6, i think ~6'7
drummer, sid and taker were taller than jbl by more than half an inch on video, 1min 19 Click Here jbls in cowboy boots in this clip so about 1 inch footwear advantage Click Here
Nishanth Hegde said on 3/Nov/11
drummer777 says on 2/Nov/11
Since its a show and Undertaker is Top Billed, and in Height they Billed Undertaker 6'10 and JBL 6'6 for some of their mathes. So in order for Undertaker to get into character he had to wear big jacked up boots to appear taller than JBL.
JBL is listed in football at 6'5 1/2, He may be 6'4 1/2 barefoot, I wouldn't put Undertaker at 6'7. 6'6 at the most for Undertaker, if you notice in that pic Undertaker is wearing boots as well, not cowboy boots but boots just as well.
If Undertaker is Taller I'd say only by a half an inch. In football they give the guys an inch to 3 inch exaggeration. So if JbL is really 6'4 1/2 and Undertaker is 6'5 1/2 or 6'6 that would explaine that as well.
so 6 foot 6 for Undertaker at the most, if Undertaker is not wearing lifts Like Tiny lister did to appear taller than Hogan as the mighty Zeus.
LOL! JBL is 6ft5 bang on! and 0.5 inch between them!!?? LOL!!!!!!!! That would make JBL as tall or 0.25 inch taller than Sid which is not possible.And Undertaker at the most 6ft6?? I have never seen him wear big boots and even is 1999 Taker looked to have 3 to 3.5 inch on Bradshaw.There is no way Taker is as short as 6ft5.5.That would put Kane at 6ft4.
drummer777 says on 2/Nov/11
Since its a show and Undertaker is Top Billed, and in Height they Billed Undertaker 6'10 and JBL 6'6 for some of their mathes. So in order for Undertaker to get into character he had to wear big jacked up boots to appear taller than JBL.
JBL is listed in football at 6'5 1/2, He may be 6'4 1/2 barefoot, I wouldn't put Undertaker at 6'7. 6'6 at the most for Undertaker, if you notice in that pic Undertaker is wearing boots as well, not cowboy boots but boots just as well.
If Undertaker is Taller I'd say only by a half an inch. In football they give the guys an inch to 3 inch exaggeration. So if JbL is really 6'4 1/2 and Undertaker is 6'5 1/2 or 6'6 that would explaine that as well.
so 6 foot 6 for Undertaker at the most, if Undertaker is not wearing lifts Like Tiny lister did to appear taller than Hogan as the mighty Zeus.
LOL! JBL is 6ft5 bang on! and 0.5 inch between them!!?? LOL!!!!!!!! That would make JBL as tall or 0.25 inch taller than Sid which is not possible.And Undertaker at the most 6ft6?? I have never seen him wear big boots and even is 1999 Taker looked to have 3 to 3.5 inch on Bradshaw.There is no way Taker is as short as 6ft5.5.That would put Kane at 6ft4.
drummer777 said on 3/Nov/11
There are many wrestlers who wear lifts in their boots. Besides Chris Jericho, Hulk Hogan used to wear lifts so that he would look taller then 6'4". Lifts are a very common part of wrestling, but the heights vary. I wear 2" lifts in my boots. My lifts are for stability when I walk the top rope. Some wear lifts for more height, some for cushioning, and some for stability and balance. When you get lifts in your boots, walk around with them in the ring for about an hour. This would include running the ropes and doing basic maneuvers and bumps. The lifts will mess you up in the beginning, but about an hour or two after you start wearing them and you will be good to go.
There are many wrestlers who wear lifts in their boots. Besides Chris Jericho, Hulk Hogan used to wear lifts so that he would look taller then 6'4". Lifts are a very common part of wrestling, but the heights vary. I wear 2" lifts in my boots. My lifts are for stability when I walk the top rope. Some wear lifts for more height, some for cushioning, and some for stability and balance. When you get lifts in your boots, walk around with them in the ring for about an hour. This would include running the ropes and doing basic maneuvers and bumps. The lifts will mess you up in the beginning, but about an hour or two after you start wearing them and you will be good to go.
drummer777 said on 2/Nov/11
Since its a show and Undertaker is Top Billed, and in Height they Billed Undertaker 6'10 and JBL 6'6 for some of their mathes. So in order for Undertaker to get into character he had to wear big jacked up boots to appear taller than JBL.
JBL is listed in football at 6'5 1/2, He may be 6'4 1/2 barefoot, I wouldn't put Undertaker at 6'7. 6'6 at the most for Undertaker, if you notice in that pic Undertaker is wearing boots as well, not cowboy boots but boots just as well.
If Undertaker is Taller I'd say only by a half an inch. In football they give the guys an inch to 3 inch exaggeration. So if JbL is really 6'4 1/2 and Undertaker is 6'5 1/2 or 6'6 that would explaine that as well.
so 6 foot 6 for Undertaker at the most, if Undertaker is not wearing lifts Like Tiny lister did to appear taller than Hogan as the mighty Zeus.
Since its a show and Undertaker is Top Billed, and in Height they Billed Undertaker 6'10 and JBL 6'6 for some of their mathes. So in order for Undertaker to get into character he had to wear big jacked up boots to appear taller than JBL.
JBL is listed in football at 6'5 1/2, He may be 6'4 1/2 barefoot, I wouldn't put Undertaker at 6'7. 6'6 at the most for Undertaker, if you notice in that pic Undertaker is wearing boots as well, not cowboy boots but boots just as well.
If Undertaker is Taller I'd say only by a half an inch. In football they give the guys an inch to 3 inch exaggeration. So if JbL is really 6'4 1/2 and Undertaker is 6'5 1/2 or 6'6 that would explaine that as well.
so 6 foot 6 for Undertaker at the most, if Undertaker is not wearing lifts Like Tiny lister did to appear taller than Hogan as the mighty Zeus.
miko said on 2/Nov/11
JBL is around 6'4.5 and Taker around 6'7.
JBL is around 6'4.5 and Taker around 6'7.
Nishanth Hegde said on 2/Nov/11
Vegas says on 31/Oct/11
Nishanth Hegde says on 29/Oct/11
Watch this video(pause at 3:14) and look at the difference b/w Taker and Barret.Undertaker is easily 4 inches taller.Click Here
_______
he is bending his head backwards, his shoulders are just as high as takers, old trick to make someone look taller, rodman does it here too at 6mins 10secs Click Here try that move for yourself in front of a mirror, guarantee you will lose inches, if barrett is easily 4 inches shorter than taker then hhh and lesnar are no more than an inch shorter than barrett as taker had both of them by around 5 inches, funny hhh didn't seem taller than zeke jackson yet barrett has inches on him, barrett and kane Click Here
I agree.But Undertaker CAN NOT be less than 3 inches taller than Barret.If Taker is 3 inches taller,then that easily puts Taker at 6ft 8 and Barrett at 6ft5.If Taker was 6ft6.5 like some people say,then HHH would have been 6ft1 and Brock Lesnar at 6ft1,Khali at 6ft11.5,Big Show at 6ft10.5,Rey Mysterio at 5ft1.5[that's BS because Rey is 5ft4],Shawn Michaels at 5ft9,Mr.McMahon at 5ft9 and Sid at 6ft6[Sid IS 6ft7.5]. Khali was 19 inches taller than Salman Khan[Indian Actor] who is 5ft6.5.So that would put Khali at 7ft1 or 7ft1.5,thereby making Undertaker 6ft8.Taker is an inch and a half taller than Kane and that too puts Taker at 6ft8.Do you agree with me Vegas?? :)
Vegas says on 31/Oct/11
Nishanth Hegde says on 29/Oct/11
Watch this video(pause at 3:14) and look at the difference b/w Taker and Barret.Undertaker is easily 4 inches taller.Click Here
_______
he is bending his head backwards, his shoulders are just as high as takers, old trick to make someone look taller, rodman does it here too at 6mins 10secs Click Here try that move for yourself in front of a mirror, guarantee you will lose inches, if barrett is easily 4 inches shorter than taker then hhh and lesnar are no more than an inch shorter than barrett as taker had both of them by around 5 inches, funny hhh didn't seem taller than zeke jackson yet barrett has inches on him, barrett and kane Click Here
I agree.But Undertaker CAN NOT be less than 3 inches taller than Barret.If Taker is 3 inches taller,then that easily puts Taker at 6ft 8 and Barrett at 6ft5.If Taker was 6ft6.5 like some people say,then HHH would have been 6ft1 and Brock Lesnar at 6ft1,Khali at 6ft11.5,Big Show at 6ft10.5,Rey Mysterio at 5ft1.5[that's BS because Rey is 5ft4],Shawn Michaels at 5ft9,Mr.McMahon at 5ft9 and Sid at 6ft6[Sid IS 6ft7.5]. Khali was 19 inches taller than Salman Khan[Indian Actor] who is 5ft6.5.So that would put Khali at 7ft1 or 7ft1.5,thereby making Undertaker 6ft8.Taker is an inch and a half taller than Kane and that too puts Taker at 6ft8.Do you agree with me Vegas?? :)
megaadeeel said on 2/Nov/11
drummer777 says on 31/Oct/11
Click Here Undertaker and JBl looking the same Height not an inch between them.
Yea but jbl is wearing cowboy boots and closer to the camera. There are tons of other photos where taker looks 3 inches taller than jbl.
drummer777 says on 31/Oct/11
Click Here Undertaker and JBl looking the same Height not an inch between them.
Yea but jbl is wearing cowboy boots and closer to the camera. There are tons of other photos where taker looks 3 inches taller than jbl.
robby said on 1/Nov/11
Drummer in regards to this pic that u posted. Look at the footwear. JBL is wearing big ass cowboy boots. JBL is a big man. Just not as tall as Undertaker. Google Undertaker and JBL Look under images.
Drummer in regards to this pic that u posted. Look at the footwear. JBL is wearing big ass cowboy boots. JBL is a big man. Just not as tall as Undertaker. Google Undertaker and JBL Look under images.
NCL said on 1/Nov/11
Oh random pic but here's Undertaker and HBK backstage - don't see footwear tho: Click Here
Oh random pic but here's Undertaker and HBK backstage - don't see footwear tho: Click Here
NCL said on 1/Nov/11
drummer777 says on 31/Oct/11
Click Here Undertaker and JBl looking the same Height not an inch between them.
JBL has cowboy boots on in that pic
Check this pic: Click Here
It's from the 500th episode of Smackdown. I can't find the full match unfortunately but here's a fan video, you can see both of their footwear: Click Here
drummer777 says on 31/Oct/11
Click Here Undertaker and JBl looking the same Height not an inch between them.
JBL has cowboy boots on in that pic
Check this pic: Click Here
It's from the 500th episode of Smackdown. I can't find the full match unfortunately but here's a fan video, you can see both of their footwear: Click Here
WelcomE said on 1/Nov/11
drummer, did you noticed the HUGE cowboy boots that JBL's wearing?
drummer, did you noticed the HUGE cowboy boots that JBL's wearing?
megaadeeel said on 1/Nov/11
Nishanth you are right, Undertaker looks to have at least 3 inches on barrett
Nishanth you are right, Undertaker looks to have at least 3 inches on barrett
drummer777 said on 31/Oct/11
Click Here Undertaker and JBl looking the same Height not an inch between them.
Click Here Undertaker and JBl looking the same Height not an inch between them.
Nishanth Hegde said on 29/Oct/11
Vegas says on 26/Oct/11
i doubt taker has 4 inches on barrett, barrett seemed to edge out swagger on tv the other week and i have seen swagger and kane stand side by side in person and there is about 2 inches between em
Watch this video(pause at 3:14) and look at the difference b/w Taker and Barret.Undertaker is easily 4 inches taller.Click Here
Vegas says on 26/Oct/11
i doubt taker has 4 inches on barrett, barrett seemed to edge out swagger on tv the other week and i have seen swagger and kane stand side by side in person and there is about 2 inches between em
Watch this video(pause at 3:14) and look at the difference b/w Taker and Barret.Undertaker is easily 4 inches taller.Click Here
Sid said on 29/Oct/11
Wow crazy estimates flouting around lol
Wow crazy estimates flouting around lol
Robby said on 27/Oct/11
Demolition Crush was billed at 6'7". Baby Face Crush 6'8" 315 lbs. Heel Crush 6'7" 322 pounds.
Demolition Crush was billed at 6'7". Baby Face Crush 6'8" 315 lbs. Heel Crush 6'7" 322 pounds.
NCL said on 27/Oct/11
Here's more on WWE changing the weight billings: Click Here apparently they're not going to bill most wrestlers under 210lbs but otherwise they'll bill them their real weight. Didn't mention height tho
Here's more on WWE changing the weight billings: Click Here apparently they're not going to bill most wrestlers under 210lbs but otherwise they'll bill them their real weight. Didn't mention height tho
Vegas said on 27/Oct/11
drummer, dalip singh got 7'7 billings in new japan, crush was billed 6'8 the whole time he was in wwf, warrior was billed 6'5 in the 1980s in wwf, scott hall was billed 6'9 in awa in the 1980s, luger was billed 6'6 as the narcissist in 1993
drummer, dalip singh got 7'7 billings in new japan, crush was billed 6'8 the whole time he was in wwf, warrior was billed 6'5 in the 1980s in wwf, scott hall was billed 6'9 in awa in the 1980s, luger was billed 6'6 as the narcissist in 1993
drummer777 said on 26/Oct/11
Here we Go, Highest billed heights I know of..
El gigante 8'0
Andre The Giant 7'5
Big Show 7'4
dalip singh 7'3
Kevin Nash 7'1
Tyler Mane 7'0
Cane 7'0
Undertaker 6'11
Sid 6'10
Big John Studd 6'10
Ernie Ladd 6'9
Hulk Hogan 6'8
Dan Spivey 6'8
Scott Hall 6'7
Hill Billy 6'7
Crush 6'6
Lex Luger 6'5
Goldberg 6'4
Sting 6'3
Ultimate Warrior 6'3
Randy Savage 6'2
Rowdy piper 6'2
Bret hart 6'1
Rick Flare 6'1
Here we Go, Highest billed heights I know of..
El gigante 8'0
Andre The Giant 7'5
Big Show 7'4
dalip singh 7'3
Kevin Nash 7'1
Tyler Mane 7'0
Cane 7'0
Undertaker 6'11
Sid 6'10
Big John Studd 6'10
Ernie Ladd 6'9
Hulk Hogan 6'8
Dan Spivey 6'8
Scott Hall 6'7
Hill Billy 6'7
Crush 6'6
Lex Luger 6'5
Goldberg 6'4
Sting 6'3
Ultimate Warrior 6'3
Randy Savage 6'2
Rowdy piper 6'2
Bret hart 6'1
Rick Flare 6'1
Vegas said on 26/Oct/11
i doubt taker has 4 inches on barrett, barrett seemed to edge out swagger on tv the other week and i have seen swagger and kane stand side by side in person and there is about 2 inches between em
i doubt taker has 4 inches on barrett, barrett seemed to edge out swagger on tv the other week and i have seen swagger and kane stand side by side in person and there is about 2 inches between em
Nishanth Hegde said on 26/Oct/11
drummer777 says on 25/Oct/11
Kevin Nash 6'8
Tyler Mane 6'8
Sid 6'6
Undertaker 6'6
Spivey 6'6 maybe 6'5
Fralic 6'5 maybe 6'4 3'4
Troy Aikman 6'4
Hogan 6'3 1/2
Goldberg 6'2
Sting 6'1
That makes Wade Barrett 6ft2 if Undertaker is 6ft6.Taker's a full 4 inches taller than Barrett!
drummer777 says on 25/Oct/11
Kevin Nash 6'8
Tyler Mane 6'8
Sid 6'6
Undertaker 6'6
Spivey 6'6 maybe 6'5
Fralic 6'5 maybe 6'4 3'4
Troy Aikman 6'4
Hogan 6'3 1/2
Goldberg 6'2
Sting 6'1
That makes Wade Barrett 6ft2 if Undertaker is 6ft6.Taker's a full 4 inches taller than Barrett!
NCL said on 26/Oct/11
Nishanth Hegde says on 26/Oct/11
NCL says on 25/Oct/11
Has anyone been noticing the change in billings in the weights lately? I heard Orton announced as 235 last night and I'm pretty sure at Vengance Kofi was announced 215 or something and I think I heard 213 for Rhodes recently. It's not often I hear anyone billed under 220 unless its someone relatively small like Mysterio or something. I'm interested to see if they'll change heights but I doubt it
Vince McMahon recently announced that the real weights of wrestlers will be announced :)
Oh awesome thanks man. When did that happen?
Speaking of Vince, here's a real interesting interview about his life and such:
Click Here
Nishanth Hegde says on 26/Oct/11
NCL says on 25/Oct/11
Has anyone been noticing the change in billings in the weights lately? I heard Orton announced as 235 last night and I'm pretty sure at Vengance Kofi was announced 215 or something and I think I heard 213 for Rhodes recently. It's not often I hear anyone billed under 220 unless its someone relatively small like Mysterio or something. I'm interested to see if they'll change heights but I doubt it
Vince McMahon recently announced that the real weights of wrestlers will be announced :)
Oh awesome thanks man. When did that happen?
Speaking of Vince, here's a real interesting interview about his life and such:
Click Here
Vegas said on 26/Oct/11
Nishanth Hegde says on 26/Oct/11
Vince McMahon recently announced that the real weights of wrestlers will be announced :)
____________
that experiment didn't last too long because they upped the weights of most of the guys they dropped again, couple of weeks back they introduced christian at 199lb, ziggler at 203 and punk at 204 but they had christian at 212lb this week on raw, well 212 is a bit better than his previous completely laughable 227lb billing
NCL they changed the heights of a few of the wrestlers, khali dropped to 7'1 and 347lb from 7'3 and 420lb, sheamus dropped to 6'4 from 6'6, both barrett and swagger grew to 6'7, barrett had been listed 6'5 and swagger 6'6, it was about time they made barrett taller than sheamus though, maybe now they will drop kane to a more realistic 6'8 or 6'9, atm they have khali just 1 inch taller than kane and kevin nash listed 2 inches shorter than jacobs :D
Nishanth Hegde says on 26/Oct/11
Vince McMahon recently announced that the real weights of wrestlers will be announced :)
____________
that experiment didn't last too long because they upped the weights of most of the guys they dropped again, couple of weeks back they introduced christian at 199lb, ziggler at 203 and punk at 204 but they had christian at 212lb this week on raw, well 212 is a bit better than his previous completely laughable 227lb billing
NCL they changed the heights of a few of the wrestlers, khali dropped to 7'1 and 347lb from 7'3 and 420lb, sheamus dropped to 6'4 from 6'6, both barrett and swagger grew to 6'7, barrett had been listed 6'5 and swagger 6'6, it was about time they made barrett taller than sheamus though, maybe now they will drop kane to a more realistic 6'8 or 6'9, atm they have khali just 1 inch taller than kane and kevin nash listed 2 inches shorter than jacobs :D
Nishanth Hegde said on 26/Oct/11
NCL says on 25/Oct/11
Has anyone been noticing the change in billings in the weights lately? I heard Orton announced as 235 last night and I'm pretty sure at Vengance Kofi was announced 215 or something and I think I heard 213 for Rhodes recently. It's not often I hear anyone billed under 220 unless its someone relatively small like Mysterio or something. I'm interested to see if they'll change heights but I doubt it
Vince McMahon recently announced that the real weights of wrestlers will be announced :)
NCL says on 25/Oct/11
Has anyone been noticing the change in billings in the weights lately? I heard Orton announced as 235 last night and I'm pretty sure at Vengance Kofi was announced 215 or something and I think I heard 213 for Rhodes recently. It's not often I hear anyone billed under 220 unless its someone relatively small like Mysterio or something. I'm interested to see if they'll change heights but I doubt it
Vince McMahon recently announced that the real weights of wrestlers will be announced :)
drummer777 said on 25/Oct/11
Kevin Nash 6'8
Tyler Mane 6'8
Sid 6'6
Undertaker 6'6
Spivey 6'6 maybe 6'5
Fralic 6'5 maybe 6'4 3'4
Troy Aikman 6'4
Hogan 6'3 1/2
Goldberg 6'2
Sting 6'1
Kevin Nash 6'8
Tyler Mane 6'8
Sid 6'6
Undertaker 6'6
Spivey 6'6 maybe 6'5
Fralic 6'5 maybe 6'4 3'4
Troy Aikman 6'4
Hogan 6'3 1/2
Goldberg 6'2
Sting 6'1
NCL said on 25/Oct/11
Oh I also heard Cole refer to Barrett as 6'5" (normally billed 6'7") and Sheamus as 6'4" (Normally billed 6'6" I think)
Oh I also heard Cole refer to Barrett as 6'5" (normally billed 6'7") and Sheamus as 6'4" (Normally billed 6'6" I think)
NCL said on 25/Oct/11
Has anyone been noticing the change in billings in the weights lately? I heard Orton announced as 235 last night and I'm pretty sure at Vengance Kofi was announced 215 or something and I think I heard 213 for Rhodes recently. It's not often I hear anyone billed under 220 unless its someone relatively small like Mysterio or something. I'm interested to see if they'll change heights but I doubt it
Has anyone been noticing the change in billings in the weights lately? I heard Orton announced as 235 last night and I'm pretty sure at Vengance Kofi was announced 215 or something and I think I heard 213 for Rhodes recently. It's not often I hear anyone billed under 220 unless its someone relatively small like Mysterio or something. I'm interested to see if they'll change heights but I doubt it
Vegas said on 25/Oct/11
miko says on 24/Oct/11
Isis the Amazon girl is huge. If they ever signed her, the only taller guy in WWE they could put her in the ring with is Big Show, and she'd still be able to get in his face at just over 2 inches shorter.
____________
i met and talked with tron couple of weeks back, they had him in development down in fcw under tha name jason mullen, but was let go, he is massive, for sure taller than either kane or taker in person and seemed taller than matt morgan too, very close in height with big show, would love to see both of them staredown, i really had to look way up talking to him and i know two guys who are legit 6'7, they could easily have billed him as big shows son or cousin or something, looks alot like young wight did with the long hair and beard in wcw, no signs of acromegaly though
miko says on 24/Oct/11
Isis the Amazon girl is huge. If they ever signed her, the only taller guy in WWE they could put her in the ring with is Big Show, and she'd still be able to get in his face at just over 2 inches shorter.
____________
i met and talked with tron couple of weeks back, they had him in development down in fcw under tha name jason mullen, but was let go, he is massive, for sure taller than either kane or taker in person and seemed taller than matt morgan too, very close in height with big show, would love to see both of them staredown, i really had to look way up talking to him and i know two guys who are legit 6'7, they could easily have billed him as big shows son or cousin or something, looks alot like young wight did with the long hair and beard in wcw, no signs of acromegaly though
miko said on 24/Oct/11
Isis the Amazon girl is huge. If they ever signed her, the only taller guy in WWE they could put her in the ring with is Big Show, and she'd still be able to get in his face at just over 2 inches shorter.
She'd easily clear out Kane/Taker in height.
They could bill her as Big Show's sister or something crazy.
Isis the Amazon girl is huge. If they ever signed her, the only taller guy in WWE they could put her in the ring with is Big Show, and she'd still be able to get in his face at just over 2 inches shorter.
She'd easily clear out Kane/Taker in height.
They could bill her as Big Show's sister or something crazy.
Danimal said on 21/Oct/11
Lionheart says on 17/Oct/11
Taker - 6 '8''
Kane - 6 '8.5''
Big show - 7''
Kevin Nash - 6 '10''
Orton - 6'5''
Edge - 6'4.5''
Taker - Peak - 6'7"-6'8" - Today - 6'6"-6'6.5"
Kane - 6'7"
Sid - 6'7"
Big Show - Peak - 7'0"-7'1" - Today - 6'11"
Kevin Nash - Peak - 6'10" - Today - 6'9"
John Studd - 6'7"
Edge - 6'2"-6'3"
Hogan - Peak - 6'5"-6'6" - Today - 6'2"-6'3"
Vince McMahon - Peak - 6'1"-6'2" - Today - 6'0"
Roddy Piper - Peak - 6'1.5" - Today - 5'9"
The Rock - 6'2"-6'2.5"
HHH - 6'1"-6'1.5"
Goldberg - 6'2.5"
Brock Lesnar - 6'1.5"-6'2"
Mabel - 6'6"
A-Train - 6'6"
HBK - 5'11" peak - 5'10" today
Bret Hart - 5'11"
Davey Boy Smith - 5'9"
Dynamite Kid - 5'8"
Andre the Giant - Peak - 6'11.5"-7'0.5" - Death - 6'10"
King Kong Bundy - 6'3"-6'4"
One Man Gang/Akeem - 6'6"
Ric Flair - Peak - 5'10"-5'11"
Lionheart says on 17/Oct/11
Taker - 6 '8''
Kane - 6 '8.5''
Big show - 7''
Kevin Nash - 6 '10''
Orton - 6'5''
Edge - 6'4.5''
Taker - Peak - 6'7"-6'8" - Today - 6'6"-6'6.5"
Kane - 6'7"
Sid - 6'7"
Big Show - Peak - 7'0"-7'1" - Today - 6'11"
Kevin Nash - Peak - 6'10" - Today - 6'9"
John Studd - 6'7"
Edge - 6'2"-6'3"
Hogan - Peak - 6'5"-6'6" - Today - 6'2"-6'3"
Vince McMahon - Peak - 6'1"-6'2" - Today - 6'0"
Roddy Piper - Peak - 6'1.5" - Today - 5'9"
The Rock - 6'2"-6'2.5"
HHH - 6'1"-6'1.5"
Goldberg - 6'2.5"
Brock Lesnar - 6'1.5"-6'2"
Mabel - 6'6"
A-Train - 6'6"
HBK - 5'11" peak - 5'10" today
Bret Hart - 5'11"
Davey Boy Smith - 5'9"
Dynamite Kid - 5'8"
Andre the Giant - Peak - 6'11.5"-7'0.5" - Death - 6'10"
King Kong Bundy - 6'3"-6'4"
One Man Gang/Akeem - 6'6"
Ric Flair - Peak - 5'10"-5'11"
Tuga said on 20/Oct/11
Taker 6'8, nash 6'9 1/2, unless you post proof otherwise like jbl at 6'3 and khali at 6'11 for example, as for nash he had 1 and 1/2 inches on taker and at least 2 inches over nba´s oliver miller a measured 6'7 1/2, just examples.
So 6'6 posters do post your evidence...really curious about it.
Isis could be taller than both, well, if her heels count of course...I really can´t see her taller than nash at least.
Taker 6'8, nash 6'9 1/2, unless you post proof otherwise like jbl at 6'3 and khali at 6'11 for example, as for nash he had 1 and 1/2 inches on taker and at least 2 inches over nba´s oliver miller a measured 6'7 1/2, just examples.
So 6'6 posters do post your evidence...really curious about it.
Isis could be taller than both, well, if her heels count of course...I really can´t see her taller than nash at least.
freddy said on 20/Oct/11
Well next to Mamun he looks a good 6'8, looks like Mantel over exaggerates and Meltzer under exaggerates...
Well next to Mamun he looks a good 6'8, looks like Mantel over exaggerates and Meltzer under exaggerates...
drummer777 said on 19/Oct/11
Dutch Mantel says Ernie Ladd was a legit 6'10, his football stats say 6'9, and up next to Big John Studd, Ernie looks 6'5 or 6'6.
Dutch Mantel says Ernie Ladd was a legit 6'10, his football stats say 6'9, and up next to Big John Studd, Ernie looks 6'5 or 6'6.
Danimal said on 19/Oct/11
chriszaun says on 18/Oct/11
taker was 6 foot 9 peak,he is about 6 foot 7.5 today
6'7" ish peak... 6'6" today.
chriszaun says on 18/Oct/11
taker was 6 foot 9 peak,he is about 6 foot 7.5 today
6'7" ish peak... 6'6" today.
LAN Jiao said on 19/Oct/11
Taker is 6'4 because he knocks on his head several times..so he became incredible shrinking wrestler like hogan.. lol..
Well.. he is 6'7flat
Taker is 6'4 because he knocks on his head several times..so he became incredible shrinking wrestler like hogan.. lol..
Well.. he is 6'7flat
Frank said on 19/Oct/11
I think Ladd was abut 6ft 7 tops he did not look 6ft 9 next to Vince
I would say Nash was taller
I think Ladd was abut 6ft 7 tops he did not look 6ft 9 next to Vince
I would say Nash was taller
Drexyl said on 7/Jul/09
Undertaker was almost certainly heavier than Kane in 1999. Kane went from being very thick and heavily built in '98 to what you saw in that video, and then he started to get big again around the middle of 2000.
Undertaker was almost certainly heavier than Kane in 1999. Kane went from being very thick and heavily built in '98 to what you saw in that video, and then he started to get big again around the middle of 2000.
Ray said on 4/Jul/09
Here'a an interesting video: Click Here
Shows how big Undertaker really was during the ministry era. He gets in the ring with Kane at around 7:30 on. Not that it has much merit since there's no staredown but at a glance it looks like Undertaker is taller (even with Kanes large boots) and aside from that, Undertaker very well may have also weighed more than Kane/had more mass at this time than him. Again, doesn't hold too much merit but it's worth a watch and certainly entertaining that Undertaker may have been all around bigger than Kane at this time. Undertaker looked 300 lbs.+ for sure there and was probably around his actual billed weight of 328 lbs.
Here'a an interesting video: Click Here
Shows how big Undertaker really was during the ministry era. He gets in the ring with Kane at around 7:30 on. Not that it has much merit since there's no staredown but at a glance it looks like Undertaker is taller (even with Kanes large boots) and aside from that, Undertaker very well may have also weighed more than Kane/had more mass at this time than him. Again, doesn't hold too much merit but it's worth a watch and certainly entertaining that Undertaker may have been all around bigger than Kane at this time. Undertaker looked 300 lbs.+ for sure there and was probably around his actual billed weight of 328 lbs.
Danimal said on 1/Jul/09
Da Man says on 30/Jun/09
"Being Correct Disorder?"
If that's a disorder then rest easy, because you are symptom free. :)
hahaha
Da Man says on 30/Jun/09
"Being Correct Disorder?"
If that's a disorder then rest easy, because you are symptom free. :)
hahaha
Da Man said on 30/Jun/09
"Being Correct Disorder?"
If that's a disorder then rest easy, because you are symptom free. :)
"Being Correct Disorder?"
If that's a disorder then rest easy, because you are symptom free. :)
Shock said on 29/Jun/09
Being Correct Disorder?
Being Correct Disorder?
Danimal said on 29/Jun/09
Shock says on 27/Jun/09
No, I'm Shock, and use to post as "Shock of Electric" until "Electric Shock" (now just "Electric") started making posts on here because even I found it confusing. I honestly don't remember ever posting as "Electric Shock" in 2007, but I guess I did. I mean it was over 18 months ago.
There is medication for your disorder.
Shock says on 27/Jun/09
No, I'm Shock, and use to post as "Shock of Electric" until "Electric Shock" (now just "Electric") started making posts on here because even I found it confusing. I honestly don't remember ever posting as "Electric Shock" in 2007, but I guess I did. I mean it was over 18 months ago.
There is medication for your disorder.
Shock said on 28/Jun/09
I guess Rob isn't going to check where he will see all the posts in the last 2 months made by Electric were from a different person. It should also be noted that clearly Electric uses a photobucket account to post pic comparisons, and I use my own website. I don't think the name "Electric Shock" was even used between December 6th, 2007 and May of 2009. Rob, I'm curious, as to how many times I did post as "Electric Shock" in 2007? Other than that post, in which I even refer to Electric (the other "avid billbuster"), I only see one post in the Nathan Jones thread which happens to still show posts from 2007 and was on the same day. Maybe a couple vs the dozens made by a different IP in the last two months. I know from running my own board that you have to do a little bit of research at times with this stuff when vbulletin sends out a message about dup account posting. I've had users who can't speak english very well have friends on the site post for them as a translator so it looks like the same person is posting from two different locations.
I guess Rob isn't going to check where he will see all the posts in the last 2 months made by Electric were from a different person. It should also be noted that clearly Electric uses a photobucket account to post pic comparisons, and I use my own website. I don't think the name "Electric Shock" was even used between December 6th, 2007 and May of 2009. Rob, I'm curious, as to how many times I did post as "Electric Shock" in 2007? Other than that post, in which I even refer to Electric (the other "avid billbuster"), I only see one post in the Nathan Jones thread which happens to still show posts from 2007 and was on the same day. Maybe a couple vs the dozens made by a different IP in the last two months. I know from running my own board that you have to do a little bit of research at times with this stuff when vbulletin sends out a message about dup account posting. I've had users who can't speak english very well have friends on the site post for them as a translator so it looks like the same person is posting from two different locations.
Da Man said on 28/Jun/09
Electric says on 26/Jun/09
"Click Here - have a nice day."
LMAO! I wonder how much you paid your buddy to hold that sign up for you.
Electric says on 26/Jun/09
"Click Here - have a nice day."
LMAO! I wonder how much you paid your buddy to hold that sign up for you.
TexasWrestling said on 27/Jun/09
The Undertaker's height is 6 ft 7.5 in (202 cm)
peak height was 6 ft 8 in (203 cm)
John Layfield's height is 6 ft 5.5 in (197 cm)
peak height was 6 ft 6 in (198 cm)
Jake Roberts's height is 6 ft 4.75 in (195 cm)
peak height was 6 ft 5.5 in (197 cm)
those are my estimated heights from my fellow Texas born wrestlers
The Undertaker's height is 6 ft 7.5 in (202 cm)
peak height was 6 ft 8 in (203 cm)
John Layfield's height is 6 ft 5.5 in (197 cm)
peak height was 6 ft 6 in (198 cm)
Jake Roberts's height is 6 ft 4.75 in (195 cm)
peak height was 6 ft 5.5 in (197 cm)
those are my estimated heights from my fellow Texas born wrestlers
drk said on 27/Jun/09
this is why this site needs accounts...
this is why this site needs accounts...
Shock said on 27/Jun/09
No, I'm Shock, and use to post as "Shock of Electric" until "Electric Shock" (now just "Electric") started making posts on here because even I found it confusing. I honestly don't remember ever posting as "Electric Shock" in 2007, but I guess I did. I mean it was over 18 months ago.
But getting back on topic, I still want to know why no one is really saying anything about the series of pics Tom posted. I would call it a smoking gun, and say that clearly Undertaker is a minimum of .5" taller than Kane.
No, I'm Shock, and use to post as "Shock of Electric" until "Electric Shock" (now just "Electric") started making posts on here because even I found it confusing. I honestly don't remember ever posting as "Electric Shock" in 2007, but I guess I did. I mean it was over 18 months ago.
But getting back on topic, I still want to know why no one is really saying anything about the series of pics Tom posted. I would call it a smoking gun, and say that clearly Undertaker is a minimum of .5" taller than Kane.
Danimal said on 26/Jun/09
So now you're Electric, Shock, Shock of Electric and Electric Shock and you're all supposed to be different????
So now you're Electric, Shock, Shock of Electric and Electric Shock and you're all supposed to be different????
Shock said on 26/Jun/09
As of May 31st in this thread and in the Kane thread, May 17th in the Hogan thread, June 7th in the Jesse Ventura thread which I've never even posted in, May 21st in Nathan Jones, (there are two 07 posts from me that were mine however), and I believe May 21st in the Sid thread, were all not made by me.
Again this is why I said that I would go by "Shock" to eliminate confusion.
As of May 31st in this thread and in the Kane thread, May 17th in the Hogan thread, June 7th in the Jesse Ventura thread which I've never even posted in, May 21st in Nathan Jones, (there are two 07 posts from me that were mine however), and I believe May 21st in the Sid thread, were all not made by me.
Again this is why I said that I would go by "Shock" to eliminate confusion.
Electric said on 26/Jun/09
Rob...we started out as two people using one name, and gradually Matt decided to form his own splinter name, as we started to disagree on things.
Rob...we started out as two people using one name, and gradually Matt decided to form his own splinter name, as we started to disagree on things.
Electric said on 26/Jun/09
and yes I posted the 5/8ths just to get under your skin. I have no clue if that's accurate.
and yes I posted the 5/8ths just to get under your skin. I have no clue if that's accurate.
Shock said on 26/Jun/09
But you didn't check Electric Shock's posts and see that it's coming from a very different computer? I think it's important to not leave anything out. Please confirm that so members know who is who and to not erroneously treat two people as one person.
Editor Rob
But you didn't check Electric Shock's posts and see that it's coming from a very different computer? I think it's important to not leave anything out. Please confirm that so members know who is who and to not erroneously treat two people as one person.
Editor Rob What? I showed everybody the first 3 posts each of the usernames made and they all originated from the same computer.
so you can explain on December 6th 2007 how 'Electric Shock' posted from the same computer as Shock/Shock of Electric.
I'd love to hear it...
so you can explain on December 6th 2007 how 'Electric Shock' posted from the same computer as Shock/Shock of Electric.
I'd love to hear it...
C said on 25/Jun/09
I thought Taker was 6'10 and Kane was 7'0
I thought Taker was 6'10 and Kane was 7'0
Shock said on 24/Jun/09
No, he has an approximately 11" tall head. It may be hard to believe at say 6'7.5", but at 6'8" or taller it isn't. If there is say, 2.5" under his mouth, and you are at all below that, it would leave nearly 9" above (since some people don't like referring to 1/4" increments). Compare his skull to anyone else and you will see shocking results. Undertaker's forehead (eyebrows and above) is almost 5" alone. The top of his head is 2/3 - 3/4 into that hat in the picture here.
And btw, I still cannot believe there is any doubt as to Taker being taller than Kane. Kane cannot be any shorter than 6'7.5" and Taker is no less than .5" taller.
No, he has an approximately 11" tall head. It may be hard to believe at say 6'7.5", but at 6'8" or taller it isn't. If there is say, 2.5" under his mouth, and you are at all below that, it would leave nearly 9" above (since some people don't like referring to 1/4" increments). Compare his skull to anyone else and you will see shocking results. Undertaker's forehead (eyebrows and above) is almost 5" alone. The top of his head is 2/3 - 3/4 into that hat in the picture here.
And btw, I still cannot believe there is any doubt as to Taker being taller than Kane. Kane cannot be any shorter than 6'7.5" and Taker is no less than .5" taller.
Clay said on 23/Jun/09
Thats bizarre how anyone could see Undertaker n inch taller than Kane currently.
Thats bizarre how anyone could see Undertaker n inch taller than Kane currently.
Rantsrob said on 23/Jun/09
Shock says on 21/Jun/09
In the pics Tom posted with Kane and MVP, Taker is between .5" and .75" taller than Kane and that's not counting boots, and even when you correct the ropes to be even, since they favor Taker slightly. This agrees with what I've been suggesting all along.
Undertaker = 6'8.25" as of 2007, unlikely to be any shorter today, or any taller in the 90s, unless we want to go up to 6'8.5" or more. I would suggest Kane has lost some height as I believe he was nearly the same height as Taker during the Yankem gimmick.
He is 8.5" taller than Frank in the pic here, with his traditional headlean. Closer to 9" at full posture.
9'' taller? I dont think taker has a 14'' head..
Shock says on 21/Jun/09
In the pics Tom posted with Kane and MVP, Taker is between .5" and .75" taller than Kane and that's not counting boots, and even when you correct the ropes to be even, since they favor Taker slightly. This agrees with what I've been suggesting all along.
Undertaker = 6'8.25" as of 2007, unlikely to be any shorter today, or any taller in the 90s, unless we want to go up to 6'8.5" or more. I would suggest Kane has lost some height as I believe he was nearly the same height as Taker during the Yankem gimmick.
He is 8.5" taller than Frank in the pic here, with his traditional headlean. Closer to 9" at full posture.
9'' taller? I dont think taker has a 14'' head..
Da Man said on 23/Jun/09
Here's what "Shock of Electric" claimed on the Kane page:
Shock of Electric says on 5/Jun/09
"First off, I am not the same person as Electric Shock, I would like to clarify that."
"They" do indeed share the same uncanny "ability" to nail height down to 1/4" increments based on nothing but photographs. It is really quite incredible.
Here's what "Shock of Electric" claimed on the Kane page:
Shock of Electric says on 5/Jun/09
"First off, I am not the same person as Electric Shock, I would like to clarify that."
"They" do indeed share the same uncanny "ability" to nail height down to 1/4" increments based on nothing but photographs. It is really quite incredible.
Paul said on 23/Jun/09
Danimal...maybe you shoud treat them as live, neutral and earth. See if you can see a live spark.
Danimal...maybe you shoud treat them as live, neutral and earth. See if you can see a live spark.
Danimal said on 22/Jun/09
Rob, serious question here. Is SHOCK, Electric SHOCK and SHOCK of electric all the same person??? I'm sure they are seeing they all use the .25" and .75" measurements. Why not expose this split personality user?
Editor Rob
Rob, serious question here. Is SHOCK, Electric SHOCK and SHOCK of electric all the same person??? I'm sure they are seeing they all use the .25" and .75" measurements. Why not expose this split personality user?
Editor Rob yes treat shock/electric as the same poster.
Shock said on 22/Jun/09
Undertaker- 6'8.25"
Kane- 6'7.5"
Big Daddy V- 6'6.75"
JBL- 6'5.25"
Batista- 6'3.75"
Edge- 6'3.5"
Triple H- 6'2.75"
MVP- 6'0.75"
Undertaker- 6'8.25"
Kane- 6'7.5"
Big Daddy V- 6'6.75"
JBL- 6'5.25"
Batista- 6'3.75"
Edge- 6'3.5"
Triple H- 6'2.75"
MVP- 6'0.75"
Anonymous said on 22/Jun/09
Undertaker- 6'6.75"
Kane- 6'7"
Big Daddy V- 6'6.5"
JBL- 6'6"
Edge- 6'3"
Batista- 6'2.5"
Triple H- 6'1.75"
MVP- 6'0.25"
Undertaker- 6'6.75"
Kane- 6'7"
Big Daddy V- 6'6.5"
JBL- 6'6"
Edge- 6'3"
Batista- 6'2.5"
Triple H- 6'1.75"
MVP- 6'0.25"
Shock said on 21/Jun/09
In the pics Tom posted with Kane and MVP, Taker is between .5" and .75" taller than Kane and that's not counting boots, and even when you correct the ropes to be even, since they favor Taker slightly. This agrees with what I've been suggesting all along.
Undertaker = 6'8.25" as of 2007, unlikely to be any shorter today, or any taller in the 90s, unless we want to go up to 6'8.5" or more. I would suggest Kane has lost some height as I believe he was nearly the same height as Taker during the Yankem gimmick.
He is 8.5" taller than Frank in the pic here, with his traditional headlean. Closer to 9" at full posture.
In the pics Tom posted with Kane and MVP, Taker is between .5" and .75" taller than Kane and that's not counting boots, and even when you correct the ropes to be even, since they favor Taker slightly. This agrees with what I've been suggesting all along.
Undertaker = 6'8.25" as of 2007, unlikely to be any shorter today, or any taller in the 90s, unless we want to go up to 6'8.5" or more. I would suggest Kane has lost some height as I believe he was nearly the same height as Taker during the Yankem gimmick.
He is 8.5" taller than Frank in the pic here, with his traditional headlean. Closer to 9" at full posture.
Electric Shock said on 21/Jun/09
Undertaker- 6'8.25"
Kane- 6'7.5"
Big Daddy V- 6'6.75"
JBL- 6'5"
Edge- 6'3.5"
Batista- 6'3.5"
Triple H- 6'2.75"
MVP- 6'0.75"
Undertaker- 6'8.25"
Kane- 6'7.5"
Big Daddy V- 6'6.75"
JBL- 6'5"
Edge- 6'3.5"
Batista- 6'3.5"
Triple H- 6'2.75"
MVP- 6'0.75"
Anonymous said on 21/Jun/09
Ray, Undertaker is 6'6.75 and 6'7.5 in wrestling boots I'd say. Also quite thin so he isn't so intimidating these days as when he was taller and heavier built.
JBL can easily reach Undertaker's height and more when he wears bigger boots. He is about 6'8.25 in cowboy boots and then outsizes UT. Triple H is nearly 6'2.
Ray, Undertaker is 6'6.75 and 6'7.5 in wrestling boots I'd say. Also quite thin so he isn't so intimidating these days as when he was taller and heavier built.
JBL can easily reach Undertaker's height and more when he wears bigger boots. He is about 6'8.25 in cowboy boots and then outsizes UT. Triple H is nearly 6'2.
Ray said on 20/Jun/09
Come on 6'6"-6'6.5" today; that is too low. Also, how did he lose 2" in height? I could see an inch but he really looks pretty much the same height as he always did. Most of the time he looks and hunches down since most are shorter but the times he does stand straight he looks darn tall to me; lowest I will go for him is 6'7" and that is still too low. 6'7" and change and probably 6'8" still is his height. Take a look at this backstage HHH and Taker staredown. Triple H is 6'2" and probably at least 6'3" in his boots if not slightly more. Look at Taker looking down on HHH.
Click Here
Come on 6'6"-6'6.5" today; that is too low. Also, how did he lose 2" in height? I could see an inch but he really looks pretty much the same height as he always did. Most of the time he looks and hunches down since most are shorter but the times he does stand straight he looks darn tall to me; lowest I will go for him is 6'7" and that is still too low. 6'7" and change and probably 6'8" still is his height. Take a look at this backstage HHH and Taker staredown. Triple H is 6'2" and probably at least 6'3" in his boots if not slightly more. Look at Taker looking down on HHH.
Click Here
Danimal said on 19/Jun/09
Clay says on 19/Jun/09
If you ask Danimal the veteran....the Undertaker is 6'6''?
6'6"-6'6.5" today, YES. 6'7.5"-6'8" in the 1990's.
Clay says on 19/Jun/09
If you ask Danimal the veteran....the Undertaker is 6'6''?
6'6"-6'6.5" today, YES. 6'7.5"-6'8" in the 1990's.
Clay said on 19/Jun/09
If you ask Danimal the veteran....the Undertaker is 6'6''?
If you ask Danimal the veteran....the Undertaker is 6'6''?
titan said on 18/Jun/09
I do think that undertakers height needs lookin at again,i just dont agree with the height stated on this page. undertaker is definately a legit 6ft 8in even could be 6ft 8.5in. I just know this height aint right.
I do think that undertakers height needs lookin at again,i just dont agree with the height stated on this page. undertaker is definately a legit 6ft 8in even could be 6ft 8.5in. I just know this height aint right.
Clay said on 17/Jun/09
6'8'' very well may be legit.
6'8'' very well may be legit.
Frank said on 16/Jun/09
Whats Funny Titan when i asked how tall he was he told me 6ft 9 and i believed him he looked it and also he could have said 6ft 10 so i thought he was telling the truth
Whats Funny Titan when i asked how tall he was he told me 6ft 9 and i believed him he looked it and also he could have said 6ft 10 so i thought he was telling the truth
titan said on 16/Jun/09
I definately do think that the undertaker is 6ft 8inches because i have heard him state it in an interview and if he was going to lie he would of said 6ft 10in, which is his wrestling height.
I definately do think that the undertaker is 6ft 8inches because i have heard him state it in an interview and if he was going to lie he would of said 6ft 10in, which is his wrestling height.
Frank said on 15/Jun/09
Titan, Taker and Paul Bearer were about on the same plane i was behind them so i was looking alittle taller Go to the Gary Sinise page and see how much taller i am than a 5ft 8 person but Gary could also be 5ft 7.5 ?? Taker is a Big Dude take my word on that!!
Titan, Taker and Paul Bearer were about on the same plane i was behind them so i was looking alittle taller Go to the Gary Sinise page and see how much taller i am than a 5ft 8 person but Gary could also be 5ft 7.5 ?? Taker is a Big Dude take my word on that!!
hs2009 said on 12/Jun/09
Kurt Angle ALWAYS exaggerates. He's an amazing athlete but can talk a load of rubbish & rewrite history when it suits him.
I still can't see any significant height loss for The Undertaker, I just watched the Royal Rumble 2009 & he was about 3" taller than 6'5" Mike Knox. His boots didn't look anything special either IMO. Still a strong 6'7.5" for me, perhaps 6'8" on a good day.
Kurt Angle ALWAYS exaggerates. He's an amazing athlete but can talk a load of rubbish & rewrite history when it suits him.
I still can't see any significant height loss for The Undertaker, I just watched the Royal Rumble 2009 & he was about 3" taller than 6'5" Mike Knox. His boots didn't look anything special either IMO. Still a strong 6'7.5" for me, perhaps 6'8" on a good day.
Clay said on 11/Jun/09
Kurt is exaggerating. Some of them are billed pretty much properly. Cena and Orton are just a couple that come to me off the top of my head. Undertaker is possibly just 6'7'' today and compensates with lifts, thats why I said theres possibly 6 inches between him and Khali. Probably just 5-5.5.
Kurt is exaggerating. Some of them are billed pretty much properly. Cena and Orton are just a couple that come to me off the top of my head. Undertaker is possibly just 6'7'' today and compensates with lifts, thats why I said theres possibly 6 inches between him and Khali. Probably just 5-5.5.
Frank said on 11/Jun/09
Sam, Taker was more than 6 inches taller than me and i am on Higher ground than him in the picture the ground was going on a upward slope
Sam, Taker was more than 6 inches taller than me and i am on Higher ground than him in the picture the ground was going on a upward slope
BIG Red said on 10/Jun/09
ahh nathan jones and mark callaway are the same height probably an inch of a difference so we cant call taker 6'7 6'8 '69 would be great
ahh nathan jones and mark callaway are the same height probably an inch of a difference so we cant call taker 6'7 6'8 '69 would be great
Sam said on 10/Jun/09
6'6'' Kurt Angle said "everyone is four inches shorter than billed height" and if you look at this pic....the 5'11 man in the middle would have to be 6'4' if takers height is right.. Id say taker is a 6'6 (real life)
6'6'' Kurt Angle said "everyone is four inches shorter than billed height" and if you look at this pic....the 5'11 man in the middle would have to be 6'4' if takers height is right.. Id say taker is a 6'6 (real life)
Shock of Electric said on 10/Jun/09
Taker comes up to Khali's eyes so there's no way Khali's got more than 5" on him. For 6" Taker would have to come up to the middle of his nose. It's more like 4.75", and that's based on Khali with an 11.5" tall head. His is somewhere in height between Taker's and Big Show's.
I think the reason why people downgrade Taker is because of something like Big John Studd's 6'10" bill, which was about 3" more than he actually was, and I believe this was to cover the gap somewhat for Andre's ridiculous 7'4" bill. In fact at times Studd was billed near 7' similarly to Kane. People probably assume that 6'10.5" is just his actual height + 3". Taker's 6'10.5" bill lines up a bit bette with guys like Sid's 6'9" bill, Hogan 6'8", Akeem 6'9", Issac Yankem 6'10" Nash 7', Big Show's original WWF 7'2", Khali 7'3", all 2-2.25" more than their peak heights.
Another big factor is how he leans his head forward, and how often he has smaller boots than his opponents. People still insist that he wore lifts during the Ministry era, he didn't, just really as tall as he comes out if not taller.
I've been saying, if Taker had his head straight up in the above pic, he'd look closer to 9" taller than Frank.
Taker comes up to Khali's eyes so there's no way Khali's got more than 5" on him. For 6" Taker would have to come up to the middle of his nose. It's more like 4.75", and that's based on Khali with an 11.5" tall head. His is somewhere in height between Taker's and Big Show's.
I think the reason why people downgrade Taker is because of something like Big John Studd's 6'10" bill, which was about 3" more than he actually was, and I believe this was to cover the gap somewhat for Andre's ridiculous 7'4" bill. In fact at times Studd was billed near 7' similarly to Kane. People probably assume that 6'10.5" is just his actual height + 3". Taker's 6'10.5" bill lines up a bit bette with guys like Sid's 6'9" bill, Hogan 6'8", Akeem 6'9", Issac Yankem 6'10" Nash 7', Big Show's original WWF 7'2", Khali 7'3", all 2-2.25" more than their peak heights.
Another big factor is how he leans his head forward, and how often he has smaller boots than his opponents. People still insist that he wore lifts during the Ministry era, he didn't, just really as tall as he comes out if not taller.
I've been saying, if Taker had his head straight up in the above pic, he'd look closer to 9" taller than Frank.
Ray said on 9/Jun/09
"Clay says on 8/Jun/09
Taker is possibly 6 inches shorter than Khali."
I never saw this; all pics and vids look like 4" and max 5".
Not sure why people like to try and downgrade Undertaker so much.
"Clay says on 8/Jun/09
Taker is possibly 6 inches shorter than Khali."
I never saw this; all pics and vids look like 4" and max 5".
Not sure why people like to try and downgrade Undertaker so much.
Danimal said on 8/Jun/09
Electric Shock says on 4/Jun/09
Danimal, Hogan comes out too close to Earthquake to be under 6'5". He'd have to be 6'5.5". Earthquake a proven legit 6'5.75".
Go onto Hilbilly Jim's website and you'll see a pic of Hilbilly Jim who is marginally taller than Earthquake. It's a picture from 2004 I believe. Earthquake was sick (dying of Cancer), but what's interesting is that Hogan was taller than Hilbilly Jim from 1985-1989 and her we see Hilbilly taller than Earthquake. Could that mean that Hogan would have been taller than Earthquake in the 1980's? Quite possibly imo. Maybe he really was close to 6'7" at one point.
Electric Shock says on 4/Jun/09
Danimal, Hogan comes out too close to Earthquake to be under 6'5". He'd have to be 6'5.5". Earthquake a proven legit 6'5.75".
Go onto Hilbilly Jim's website and you'll see a pic of Hilbilly Jim who is marginally taller than Earthquake. It's a picture from 2004 I believe. Earthquake was sick (dying of Cancer), but what's interesting is that Hogan was taller than Hilbilly Jim from 1985-1989 and her we see Hilbilly taller than Earthquake. Could that mean that Hogan would have been taller than Earthquake in the 1980's? Quite possibly imo. Maybe he really was close to 6'7" at one point.
Clay said on 8/Jun/09
Taker is possibly 6 inches shorter than Khali.
Taker is possibly 6 inches shorter than Khali.
Rantsrob said on 7/Jun/09
Ahh old Hulk Hogan. The man with the most severe case of height loss in the history of man...
Ahh old Hulk Hogan. The man with the most severe case of height loss in the history of man...
mike said on 7/Jun/09
i see 4 inches between taker and khali,i,d go as far as to give taker max 6'9".
i see 4 inches between taker and khali,i,d go as far as to give taker max 6'9".
... said on 5/Jun/09
the Big Show 6'11.5
Andre the Giant 6'10.75
Kevin Nash 6'9
Undertaker 6'7.5
Kane 6'7
Big John studd 6'6.75
Sid Justice/Vicious 6'6'75
Hulk Hogan 6'5
the Big Show 6'11.5
Andre the Giant 6'10.75
Kevin Nash 6'9
Undertaker 6'7.5
Kane 6'7
Big John studd 6'6.75
Sid Justice/Vicious 6'6'75
Hulk Hogan 6'5
Shock of Electric said on 5/Jun/09
Early 97 Undertaker's boots were 1", from mid 1997 to 1999, they were under 1". This works out very well in effort to make Kane appear taller than Undertaker considering Kane's boots were about 2" at the biggest. In 2000 to 2003, ocassionally Taker wore Tims style wrestling boots. They weren't actually Tims, but they were designed as such, giving him 1.25"-1.5", equal with Kane. During this time, Taker generally came out slightly tall than Kane. This is because Taker is bumped up .75" from the gothic era, and kane is down .5", eliminating the 1.25" boot advantage he had in 1997 to 1999.
As for Nathan Taker, I say max 1.25" difference.
Early 97 Undertaker's boots were 1", from mid 1997 to 1999, they were under 1". This works out very well in effort to make Kane appear taller than Undertaker considering Kane's boots were about 2" at the biggest. In 2000 to 2003, ocassionally Taker wore Tims style wrestling boots. They weren't actually Tims, but they were designed as such, giving him 1.25"-1.5", equal with Kane. During this time, Taker generally came out slightly tall than Kane. This is because Taker is bumped up .75" from the gothic era, and kane is down .5", eliminating the 1.25" boot advantage he had in 1997 to 1999.
As for Nathan Taker, I say max 1.25" difference.
The Ben said on 4/Jun/09
Electric shock
Find some pics of taker in the minestry of darkness days...the man wore pretty huge lifts...
Electric shock
Find some pics of taker in the minestry of darkness days...the man wore pretty huge lifts...
Electric Shock said on 4/Jun/09
Danimal, Hogan comes out too close to Earthquake to be under 6'5". He'd have to be 6'5.5". Earthquake a proven legit 6'5.75".
Danimal, Hogan comes out too close to Earthquake to be under 6'5". He'd have to be 6'5.5". Earthquake a proven legit 6'5.75".
Electric Shock said on 4/Jun/09
The Ben, taker NEVER wore lifts. His boots were ALWAYS small.
The training video is the proof. Nathan Jones is only 1 inch taller.
The Ben, taker NEVER wore lifts. His boots were ALWAYS small.
The training video is the proof. Nathan Jones is only 1 inch taller.
Danimal said on 4/Jun/09
Electricc Shock,
Hogan has been known to have said he underwent back sugery in the early 1990's, reducing his height by 1 1/4". If he was a FULL 6'6" in his younger days (which I believe he was), then he was down to 6'4 3/4" by the early 1990's and maintained that height until the late 90's at which point he was down to 6'4". After 2000, he went to a shade over 6'3".
Electricc Shock,
Hogan has been known to have said he underwent back sugery in the early 1990's, reducing his height by 1 1/4". If he was a FULL 6'6" in his younger days (which I believe he was), then he was down to 6'4 3/4" by the early 1990's and maintained that height until the late 90's at which point he was down to 6'4". After 2000, he went to a shade over 6'3".
The Ben said on 4/Jun/09
The video with undertaker training jones is hard to argue with... Maybe taker was wearing lifts in his boots. (although in 2003 i dont remember him wearing lifts like he did in 1998-2000)
Going by that video i would say jones 6'9 taker 6'8... But going by all other evidence from the begining of the universe until the dawn of hulkamania and right through till today i would say jones 6'10, taker 6'7-8... Taker must have had bigger soles.
The video with undertaker training jones is hard to argue with... Maybe taker was wearing lifts in his boots. (although in 2003 i dont remember him wearing lifts like he did in 1998-2000)
Going by that video i would say jones 6'9 taker 6'8... But going by all other evidence from the begining of the universe until the dawn of hulkamania and right through till today i would say jones 6'10, taker 6'7-8... Taker must have had bigger soles.
Da Man said on 3/Jun/09
Just the opposite, actually.
Just the opposite, actually.
Electric Shock said on 3/Jun/09
Danimal
Hogan came out 6'5" with a distinct posture disadvantage against 6'5.75" Earthquake. If he had been in the same posture they would've been virtually identical. Hogan however, had about a layer of boot advantage, which would put him at 6'5.5".
If you want to ignore boots, since there's been so much disputing on the matter, Sid is 1.5" taller than Hogan, and Taker is 1" taller than Sid.
That'd put them at approximately:
Undertaker- 6'8"
Sid- 6'7"
Hogan- 6'5.5"
I can't buy Undertaker under 6'8", unless you want to bump Kane down to 6'7.25" or 6'7" even, as Undertaker is half an inch taller than Kane.
Danimal
Hogan came out 6'5" with a distinct posture disadvantage against 6'5.75" Earthquake. If he had been in the same posture they would've been virtually identical. Hogan however, had about a layer of boot advantage, which would put him at 6'5.5".
If you want to ignore boots, since there's been so much disputing on the matter, Sid is 1.5" taller than Hogan, and Taker is 1" taller than Sid.
That'd put them at approximately:
Undertaker- 6'8"
Sid- 6'7"
Hogan- 6'5.5"
I can't buy Undertaker under 6'8", unless you want to bump Kane down to 6'7.25" or 6'7" even, as Undertaker is half an inch taller than Kane.
Anonymous said on 3/Jun/09
T says on 3/Jun/09
hey guys, why does sid look taller than taker at WM 13??
Dunno why do you think ? Do you wear magic glasses ?
T says on 3/Jun/09
hey guys, why does sid look taller than taker at WM 13??
Dunno why do you think ? Do you wear magic glasses ?
T said on 3/Jun/09
hey guys, why does sid look taller than taker at WM 13??
hey guys, why does sid look taller than taker at WM 13??
Danimal said on 2/Jun/09
Electric Shock says on 31/May/09
Nathan Jones is NOT 6'10". He's only an inch taller than The Undertaker.
Frank, Hogan had lost height by the time he faced Sid. Hogan was 6'5.5" ish by the time he wrestled Sid. Sid also had a slight boot advantage of 1/4". Sid was never 2 full inches taller than Hogan, at least not until WCW.
I believe that Hogan was down to a FLAT 6'5" by the time he faced Sid and Taker in the early 1990's.
Electric Shock says on 31/May/09
Nathan Jones is NOT 6'10". He's only an inch taller than The Undertaker.
Frank, Hogan had lost height by the time he faced Sid. Hogan was 6'5.5" ish by the time he wrestled Sid. Sid also had a slight boot advantage of 1/4". Sid was never 2 full inches taller than Hogan, at least not until WCW.
I believe that Hogan was down to a FLAT 6'5" by the time he faced Sid and Taker in the early 1990's.
kinggollum said on 2/Jun/09
Anonymous says on 20/May/09
peak heights:
Big Show 6'11
Andre the Giant 6'9 3/4 stood on a box for interviews
undertaker 6'7 1/4
Sid 6'7 1/2
big john studd 6'7 make an allowance for big boots
hogan 6'5 6'8 is a myth
hall 6'6
nash 7'1
Tell me your real name so I can put a name to my laughter.
Anonymous says on 20/May/09
peak heights:
Big Show 6'11
Andre the Giant 6'9 3/4 stood on a box for interviews
undertaker 6'7 1/4
Sid 6'7 1/2
big john studd 6'7 make an allowance for big boots
hogan 6'5 6'8 is a myth
hall 6'6
nash 7'1
Tell me your real name so I can put a name to my laughter.
T said on 2/Jun/09
Paul says on 1/Jun/09
Jones is about 6'10, certainly no less than 6'9 1/2. Undertaker was I believe just over 6'8 when he was working with Nathan in the early 2000's. Sid was about 6'7 1/2-2/3 years ago.
I agree. if you want to lowball his height id say 6'8 so they should change it to 6'8 not 6'7.5
Paul says on 1/Jun/09
Jones is about 6'10, certainly no less than 6'9 1/2. Undertaker was I believe just over 6'8 when he was working with Nathan in the early 2000's. Sid was about 6'7 1/2-2/3 years ago.
I agree. if you want to lowball his height id say 6'8 so they should change it to 6'8 not 6'7.5
Electric Shock said on 1/Jun/09
Jones is 6'9.25" max.
Jones is 6'9.25" max.
Paul said on 1/Jun/09
Jones is about 6'10, certainly no less than 6'9 1/2. Undertaker was I believe just over 6'8 when he was working with Nathan in the early 2000's. Sid was about 6'7 1/2-2/3 years ago.
Jones is about 6'10, certainly no less than 6'9 1/2. Undertaker was I believe just over 6'8 when he was working with Nathan in the early 2000's. Sid was about 6'7 1/2-2/3 years ago.
Electric Shock said on 31/May/09
Nathan Jones is NOT 6'10". He's only an inch taller than The Undertaker.
Frank, Hogan had lost height by the time he faced Sid. Hogan was 6'5.5" ish by the time he wrestled Sid. Sid also had a slight boot advantage of 1/4". Sid was never 2 full inches taller than Hogan, at least not until WCW.
Nathan Jones is NOT 6'10". He's only an inch taller than The Undertaker.
Frank, Hogan had lost height by the time he faced Sid. Hogan was 6'5.5" ish by the time he wrestled Sid. Sid also had a slight boot advantage of 1/4". Sid was never 2 full inches taller than Hogan, at least not until WCW.
Anonymous said on 31/May/09
Nathan Jones is a legit 6`10
Nathan Jones is a legit 6`10
Frank said on 31/May/09
Sid was more than an inch taller than Hogan more like 2 to 2.5
Sid was more than an inch taller than Hogan more like 2 to 2.5
Electric Shock said on 31/May/09
what I get for each guy as of winning their first WWF/E World title:
Great Khali- 7'1"
The Big Show- 6'11.5"
Andre The Giant- 6'11.25"
Kevin Nash- 6'9.75"
Undertaker- 6'8.25"
Kane- 6'7.75"
Sid- 6'7"
Hulk Hogan- 6'6"
what I get for each guy as of winning their first WWF/E World title:
Great Khali- 7'1"
The Big Show- 6'11.5"
Andre The Giant- 6'11.25"
Kevin Nash- 6'9.75"
Undertaker- 6'8.25"
Kane- 6'7.75"
Sid- 6'7"
Hulk Hogan- 6'6"
T said on 31/May/09
on you tube type in Undertaker trains Nathan Jones
he looks maybe 1/2" shorter than nathan jones who is 6'9
on you tube type in Undertaker trains Nathan Jones
he looks maybe 1/2" shorter than nathan jones who is 6'9
elvis himself said on 30/May/09
heres another vid of him as the punisher next to kerry von erich
Click Here
heres another vid of him as the punisher next to kerry von erich
Click Here
Anonymous said on 30/May/09
this vid proves that taker is 6'8. he is looks 5 inches shorter than khali.
Click Here
this vid proves that taker is 6'8. he is looks 5 inches shorter than khali.
Click Here
Frank said on 29/May/09
Again i said this many times to see him in person up close like i was Hes A Big Dude Easily 6ft 8 and nor lower than 6ft 7 he did appear 6ft 9 like he told me
Again i said this many times to see him in person up close like i was Hes A Big Dude Easily 6ft 8 and nor lower than 6ft 7 he did appear 6ft 9 like he told me
Anonymous said on 29/May/09
takers head is down in the pic above. ive met taker with my stepdad that is a true 6'3 and taker has to be 6'8 because he was huge.
takers head is down in the pic above. ive met taker with my stepdad that is a true 6'3 and taker has to be 6'8 because he was huge.
Paul said on 26/May/09
Clay says on 26/May/09
I dont think that list by annonymous was serious. At least, god I hope not..
You never know lol......
Sam says on 24/May/09
Hey guys, just curious as to how you think Matt Morgan from TNA would stack up with the big men from WWE...Show, Taker, Kane and Khali. If there are any pics out there, post them.
I think he is 6'9 or thereabouts. Defintely bigger than Taker and Kane are these days. Don't know what weight they are claiming in TNA but he must be 300lbs or so.
Thanks for reminding me Big Show about the 7'7 WCW billing. I kinda miss Gonzales. Its a shame he had to retire.
Clay says on 26/May/09
I dont think that list by annonymous was serious. At least, god I hope not..
You never know lol......
Sam says on 24/May/09
Hey guys, just curious as to how you think Matt Morgan from TNA would stack up with the big men from WWE...Show, Taker, Kane and Khali. If there are any pics out there, post them.
I think he is 6'9 or thereabouts. Defintely bigger than Taker and Kane are these days. Don't know what weight they are claiming in TNA but he must be 300lbs or so.
Thanks for reminding me Big Show about the 7'7 WCW billing. I kinda miss Gonzales. Its a shame he had to retire.
Clay said on 26/May/09
I dont think that list by annonymous was serious. At least, god I hope not..
I dont think that list by annonymous was serious. At least, god I hope not..
Sam said on 24/May/09
Hey guys, just curious as to how you think Matt Morgan from TNA would stack up with the big men from WWE...Show, Taker, Kane and Khali. If there are any pics out there, post them.
Hey guys, just curious as to how you think Matt Morgan from TNA would stack up with the big men from WWE...Show, Taker, Kane and Khali. If there are any pics out there, post them.
Big Show said on 24/May/09
Paul says on 24/May/09
Danimal says on 20/May/09
"WCW had billed him as high as 7'1".
Yes I can believe it. If anything WCW probably had the edge when it came to exaggeration.
It depends. Sometimes WWF exaggerated a certain wrestler's height more than WCW and sometimes it was the other way around. Look at Giant Gonzalez. He was billed at 8 feet in the WWF and at 7'7 in WCW. Undertaker was also billed at a taller height in WWF than anytime before.
Paul says on 24/May/09
Danimal says on 20/May/09
"WCW had billed him as high as 7'1".
Yes I can believe it. If anything WCW probably had the edge when it came to exaggeration.
It depends. Sometimes WWF exaggerated a certain wrestler's height more than WCW and sometimes it was the other way around. Look at Giant Gonzalez. He was billed at 8 feet in the WWF and at 7'7 in WCW. Undertaker was also billed at a taller height in WWF than anytime before.
Paul said on 24/May/09
Danimal says on 20/May/09
"WCW had billed him as high as 7'1".
Yes I can believe it. If anything WCW probably had the edge when it came to exaggeration.
Danimal says on 20/May/09
"WCW had billed him as high as 7'1".
Yes I can believe it. If anything WCW probably had the edge when it came to exaggeration.
Danimal said on 20/May/09
Paul says on 20/May/09
Frank, Nash has said said '6'10', '6'11', 'between 6'10 and 11' in various interviews and statements over the years. I know WCW and WWF/E have made various bills of between 6'10 and 7'0. I think Shawn Michaels said he was 6'10.5 which is what I think he was at one time. Quite plausible.
WCW had billed him as high as 7'1".
Paul says on 20/May/09
Frank, Nash has said said '6'10', '6'11', 'between 6'10 and 11' in various interviews and statements over the years. I know WCW and WWF/E have made various bills of between 6'10 and 7'0. I think Shawn Michaels said he was 6'10.5 which is what I think he was at one time. Quite plausible.
WCW had billed him as high as 7'1".
Paul said on 20/May/09
Frank, Nash has said said '6'10', '6'11', 'between 6'10 and 11' in various interviews and statements over the years. I know WCW and WWF/E have made various bills of between 6'10 and 7'0. I think Shawn Michaels said he was 6'10.5 which is what I think he was at one time. Quite plausible.
Frank, Nash has said said '6'10', '6'11', 'between 6'10 and 11' in various interviews and statements over the years. I know WCW and WWF/E have made various bills of between 6'10 and 7'0. I think Shawn Michaels said he was 6'10.5 which is what I think he was at one time. Quite plausible.
Danimal said on 20/May/09
Anonymous says on 20/May/09
peak heights:
Big Show 6'11
Andre the Giant 6'9 3/4 stood on a box for interviews
undertaker 6'7 1/4
Sid 6'7 1/2
big john studd 6'7 make an allowance for big boots
hogan 6'5 6'8 is a myth
hall 6'6
nash 7'1
comical.
Anonymous says on 20/May/09
peak heights:
Big Show 6'11
Andre the Giant 6'9 3/4 stood on a box for interviews
undertaker 6'7 1/4
Sid 6'7 1/2
big john studd 6'7 make an allowance for big boots
hogan 6'5 6'8 is a myth
hall 6'6
nash 7'1
comical.
Frank said on 20/May/09
Also Taker was Taller than Sid and Nash says hes 6ft 10
Also Taker was Taller than Sid and Nash says hes 6ft 10
Big Show said on 20/May/09
Anonymous says on 20/May/09
peak heights:
Big Show 6'11
Andre the Giant 6'9 3/4 stood on a box for interviews
undertaker 6'7 1/4
Sid 6'7 1/2
big john studd 6'7 make an allowance for big boots
hogan 6'5 6'8 is a myth
hall 6'6
nash 7'1
Big Show's peak 6'11 and Nash's peak 7'1???? You're telling me that Big Show's footwear must've given him a 5" advantage over Nash's as in their staredowns Big Show had 3 inches over Nash.
Anonymous says on 20/May/09
peak heights:
Big Show 6'11
Andre the Giant 6'9 3/4 stood on a box for interviews
undertaker 6'7 1/4
Sid 6'7 1/2
big john studd 6'7 make an allowance for big boots
hogan 6'5 6'8 is a myth
hall 6'6
nash 7'1
Big Show's peak 6'11 and Nash's peak 7'1???? You're telling me that Big Show's footwear must've given him a 5" advantage over Nash's as in their staredowns Big Show had 3 inches over Nash.
Anonymous said on 20/May/09
peak heights:
Big Show 6'11
Andre the Giant 6'9 3/4 stood on a box for interviews
undertaker 6'7 1/4
Sid 6'7 1/2
big john studd 6'7 make an allowance for big boots
hogan 6'5 6'8 is a myth
hall 6'6
nash 7'1
peak heights:
Big Show 6'11
Andre the Giant 6'9 3/4 stood on a box for interviews
undertaker 6'7 1/4
Sid 6'7 1/2
big john studd 6'7 make an allowance for big boots
hogan 6'5 6'8 is a myth
hall 6'6
nash 7'1
Alex said on 18/May/09
Hogan couldn't have lost much height by the early 90s. Most of his height he had lost I would think came around 2000 and on. Say he was a 6'5.5-6'6 peak, by early 90's still in the 6'5 range and around 2000 6'4ish and from 2002 and on has looked more 6'3ish.
Hogan couldn't have lost much height by the early 90s. Most of his height he had lost I would think came around 2000 and on. Say he was a 6'5.5-6'6 peak, by early 90's still in the 6'5 range and around 2000 6'4ish and from 2002 and on has looked more 6'3ish.
miko said on 17/May/09
Hogan on his tiptoes? When? He just stood tall.
Hogan on his tiptoes? When? He just stood tall.
alex_scandinavia said on 17/May/09
Undertaker had Sid by
Undertaker had Sid by
Red said on 16/May/09
Danimal, my estimations are midday-height, means what they are the most of the day. I think in 1990-1992 Hogan was a flat 6
Danimal, my estimations are midday-height, means what they are the most of the day. I think in 1990-1992 Hogan was a flat 6
Danimal said on 16/May/09
Red says on 16/May/09
Tyler Mane is a legit 6
Red says on 16/May/09
Tyler Mane is a legit 6
Red said on 16/May/09
Tyler Mane is a legit 6
Tyler Mane is a legit 6
mike said on 16/May/09
in that pic nash is just barely scraping the 6'10" mark,taker around 6'8".
in that pic nash is just barely scraping the 6'10" mark,taker around 6'8".
Red said on 15/May/09
First of all, I am sorry because I put in my pic the wrong number for Halls height.
I think he
First of all, I am sorry because I put in my pic the wrong number for Halls height.
I think he
Ray said on 15/May/09
Hard to tell in the video and the pic wouldn't come up so..........I have no opinion on those except Undertaker is clearly taller by inches. I saw an older pic of them in dress clothes and Undertaker had at least 3" on Hall.
Hard to tell in the video and the pic wouldn't come up so..........I have no opinion on those except Undertaker is clearly taller by inches. I saw an older pic of them in dress clothes and Undertaker had at least 3" on Hall.
Seth Anderson AKA The Seth said on 14/May/09
I bet Bruce Lee would have taken down any WWE superstar and leave them for dead. RIP Bruce Lee 1940-1973. How come Dan Severn and Ken Shamrock aren't in WWE anymore? afraid of UFC competition WWE? They sure kicked butt with their techniques!
I bet Bruce Lee would have taken down any WWE superstar and leave them for dead. RIP Bruce Lee 1940-1973. How come Dan Severn and Ken Shamrock aren't in WWE anymore? afraid of UFC competition WWE? They sure kicked butt with their techniques!
KingNick said on 14/May/09
Red, I'm not sure I agree. That looks pretty close to 3" to me, but I could be wrong. It also looks like Hall's shoes are a normal wrestling shoe and UT's are flat. But again, I just looked at everything kind of quick, so I could be wrong. What's everyone else think?
Red, I'm not sure I agree. That looks pretty close to 3" to me, but I could be wrong. It also looks like Hall's shoes are a normal wrestling shoe and UT's are flat. But again, I just looked at everything kind of quick, so I could be wrong. What's everyone else think?
Red said on 13/May/09
Anonymous, maybe he could take out Hogan but Undertaker is one of the toughest man, just look at the impacts he took for the show and for the fans and he knows well about fighting, boxing, MMA. Don
Anonymous, maybe he could take out Hogan but Undertaker is one of the toughest man, just look at the impacts he took for the show and for the fans and he knows well about fighting, boxing, MMA. Don
Anonymous said on 12/May/09
Chuck Norris is only 5'9" and in the last season of Walker Texas ranger, Hulk Hogan made an appearance. He could take down both Hogan and Undertaker. He may not even be 200 lbs. but you don't underestimate the power of an eighth degree black belt in tang soo do and taekwondo
Chuck Norris is only 5'9" and in the last season of Walker Texas ranger, Hulk Hogan made an appearance. He could take down both Hogan and Undertaker. He may not even be 200 lbs. but you don't underestimate the power of an eighth degree black belt in tang soo do and taekwondo
Big King said on 12/May/09
Well, I think that The Undertaker could be 6'9" in his younger days and 6'8" today.
Well, I think that The Undertaker could be 6'9" in his younger days and 6'8" today.
ACE said on 11/May/09
I have read quotes from fellow wrestlers and the man himself that say Taker's real height is 6'8 so there is no reason to believe otherwise. Weight wise he is about 290 now. I have a WWE magazine in which Jim Ross says Undertaker "considered retirement when he had multiple injury problems and by that stage he was tipping the scales at a career high 340 which was only further aggravating his existing knee issues." This was during his biker phase.
I have read quotes from fellow wrestlers and the man himself that say Taker's real height is 6'8 so there is no reason to believe otherwise. Weight wise he is about 290 now. I have a WWE magazine in which Jim Ross says Undertaker "considered retirement when he had multiple injury problems and by that stage he was tipping the scales at a career high 340 which was only further aggravating his existing knee issues." This was during his biker phase.
mike said on 11/May/09
nathan jones is listed at 6'10" and taker is at most an inch shorter,so i say imo taker is at least 6'9" today.
nathan jones is listed at 6'10" and taker is at most an inch shorter,so i say imo taker is at least 6'9" today.
mitchel musso said on 10/May/09
I am better Than you
I am better Than you
Danimal said on 9/May/09
KingNick, you should post those quotes on Big Show's page. It will get more exposure.
KingNick, you should post those quotes on Big Show's page. It will get more exposure.
sidewalk said on 8/May/09
Stop saying wrestler's are never underbilled. They are much more often overbilled but the opposite does happen. I know this is true because a wrestler on a message board said so himself. It wasn't someone impersonating a wrestler either. Weight,I'm guessing would be more often underbilled than height.
Stop saying wrestler's are never underbilled. They are much more often overbilled but the opposite does happen. I know this is true because a wrestler on a message board said so himself. It wasn't someone impersonating a wrestler either. Weight,I'm guessing would be more often underbilled than height.
KingNick said on 8/May/09
Ok, here we go. This is all from WWE UNSCRIPTED copyright 2003.
Since we've been talking about 'Taker's weight, here's some highlights:
P. 105 Undertaker: "When I hurt my pecs ... I was 350 pounds, heaviest I've ever been. I was training like an animal, with heavy weights, but Sara was feeding me so well I was enormous."
Not sure if he was 350 here but he looks well over 300 to me when he debuted as the biker: Click Here
Here's a reference to his height and weight from early in his career:
P. 39 Undertaker in reference to a guy speaking to him about becoming a wrestler: "You fill out a little bit at 6'8", you could go someplace."
Here's Undertaker talking about Mabel on P. 104 "I was wrestling Mabel, who was 6'8" and 450, 500 pounds, maybe more."
And here are some other wrestlers talking out of kayfabe:
P. 12-13 Big Show: "The summer after my sophomore year, I put on 40lbs of muscle and I walked in as a junior at 6'11" and 300 pounds."
P. 73 Big Show: "I'M SEVEN feet tall in my bare feet and I weigh 453 pounds ... At 12, I was 6'2", 220 pounds, at 14, I was 6'8", about 235."
P. 21 Edge: "I was 17 years old, 6'2" or 6'3", about 180 pounds."
P. 61 Nathan Jones: "I'm 6'10". I was always big for my age; I was always a foot taller than the rest of the kids."
P. 195 Stone Cold talking about Jake the Snake: "There was Jake "The Snake" Roberts, 6'4", 6'5", but an A frame ..."
These are all direct quotes.
Ok, here we go. This is all from WWE UNSCRIPTED copyright 2003.
Since we've been talking about 'Taker's weight, here's some highlights:
P. 105 Undertaker: "When I hurt my pecs ... I was 350 pounds, heaviest I've ever been. I was training like an animal, with heavy weights, but Sara was feeding me so well I was enormous."
Not sure if he was 350 here but he looks well over 300 to me when he debuted as the biker: Click Here
Here's a reference to his height and weight from early in his career:
P. 39 Undertaker in reference to a guy speaking to him about becoming a wrestler: "You fill out a little bit at 6'8", you could go someplace."
Here's Undertaker talking about Mabel on P. 104 "I was wrestling Mabel, who was 6'8" and 450, 500 pounds, maybe more."
And here are some other wrestlers talking out of kayfabe:
P. 12-13 Big Show: "The summer after my sophomore year, I put on 40lbs of muscle and I walked in as a junior at 6'11" and 300 pounds."
P. 73 Big Show: "I'M SEVEN feet tall in my bare feet and I weigh 453 pounds ... At 12, I was 6'2", 220 pounds, at 14, I was 6'8", about 235."
P. 21 Edge: "I was 17 years old, 6'2" or 6'3", about 180 pounds."
P. 61 Nathan Jones: "I'm 6'10". I was always big for my age; I was always a foot taller than the rest of the kids."
P. 195 Stone Cold talking about Jake the Snake: "There was Jake "The Snake" Roberts, 6'4", 6'5", but an A frame ..."
These are all direct quotes.
KingNick said on 7/May/09
OK to give everyone a heads up, I have a book called WWE (may have been WWF at the time) Unscripted where all the wrestlers talk out of kayfabe. I usually post this once or twice a year.
Undertaker refers to himself as 6'8" several times and "around" 300 lbs (I have an old UT magazine too where he says the same thing). He talks about how at one point he was close to 350 (when he became the biker) because his wife was feeding him so much but then he lost the weight real quickly. When I have some time I'll find the book and magazine and give you exact quotes.
My personal opinion, I think Undertaker has been AROUND 300lbs throughout his career, meaning a little under or a little over depending on the year. I'd say he was a solid 300lb when he debuted in the WWF, but from 1995-1997 he was very thin, I say maybe as low as 270. When he became the biker, I think he was wwell over 300 until he cut his hair and trimmed down. Now I'd say 280-300. The dude's huge one way or another.
But again, when I get the time, I'll give you exact quotes from the book and some pictures.
OK to give everyone a heads up, I have a book called WWE (may have been WWF at the time) Unscripted where all the wrestlers talk out of kayfabe. I usually post this once or twice a year.
Undertaker refers to himself as 6'8" several times and "around" 300 lbs (I have an old UT magazine too where he says the same thing). He talks about how at one point he was close to 350 (when he became the biker) because his wife was feeding him so much but then he lost the weight real quickly. When I have some time I'll find the book and magazine and give you exact quotes.
My personal opinion, I think Undertaker has been AROUND 300lbs throughout his career, meaning a little under or a little over depending on the year. I'd say he was a solid 300lb when he debuted in the WWF, but from 1995-1997 he was very thin, I say maybe as low as 270. When he became the biker, I think he was wwell over 300 until he cut his hair and trimmed down. Now I'd say 280-300. The dude's huge one way or another.
But again, when I get the time, I'll give you exact quotes from the book and some pictures.
The Ben said on 7/May/09
daniel_sweden says on 7/May/09
no way taker was 335 pounds..it doesn't mater if he sad that in an interwiev, hogan also sad that he slamed andre and that andre's weight was 600 pounds..lol. undertaker was at his prime a 290-300 pounder if he was as tall as 6'7.5 or 6'8..i'm not sure about that guys real height..
Taker easy could have been 335lbs in ministry of darkness days... I read an interview somewhere with shaq and he said he had real weight issues at one time and he went to the undertaker for tips on losing weight, He said undertaker was a big guy he knew who had weight problems at one time and managed to sort it out with sound diet and cardio..
Undertaker's 6'7-6'8.... A guy that big can easily get upto 350Lbs
daniel_sweden says on 7/May/09
no way taker was 335 pounds..it doesn't mater if he sad that in an interwiev, hogan also sad that he slamed andre and that andre's weight was 600 pounds..lol. undertaker was at his prime a 290-300 pounder if he was as tall as 6'7.5 or 6'8..i'm not sure about that guys real height..
Taker easy could have been 335lbs in ministry of darkness days... I read an interview somewhere with shaq and he said he had real weight issues at one time and he went to the undertaker for tips on losing weight, He said undertaker was a big guy he knew who had weight problems at one time and managed to sort it out with sound diet and cardio..
Undertaker's 6'7-6'8.... A guy that big can easily get upto 350Lbs
daniel_sweden said on 7/May/09
no way taker was 335 pounds..it doesn't mater if he sad that in an interwiev, hogan also sad that he slamed andre and that andre's weight was 600 pounds..lol. undertaker was at his prime a 290-300 pounder if he was as tall as 6'7.5 or 6'8..i'm not sure about that guys real height..
no way taker was 335 pounds..it doesn't mater if he sad that in an interwiev, hogan also sad that he slamed andre and that andre's weight was 600 pounds..lol. undertaker was at his prime a 290-300 pounder if he was as tall as 6'7.5 or 6'8..i'm not sure about that guys real height..
thomas said on 6/May/09
I think if Randy Orton was around when undertaker was like that he taker would get his ass kicked!
I think if Randy Orton was around when undertaker was like that he taker would get his ass kicked!
Ray said on 6/May/09
I can believe Taker was 330lbs. in his ministry days (especially when he fought Austin in The First Blood Match in 1999). Today I can't see him any lower than 270lbs. and I think he inflates 10-15 lbs at times. He would have to look a little thinner to be 255-260 since he's IMO 6'7" at least.
I can believe Taker was 330lbs. in his ministry days (especially when he fought Austin in The First Blood Match in 1999). Today I can't see him any lower than 270lbs. and I think he inflates 10-15 lbs at times. He would have to look a little thinner to be 255-260 since he's IMO 6'7" at least.
miko said on 6/May/09
There is such thing as an UNDERBILL. Not all weights/heights are raised.
Look at Randy Orton for example, billed at 6"4 and he is 6"4. If the WWE wanted to they could bill him as 6"6.
There is such thing as an UNDERBILL. Not all weights/heights are raised.
Look at Randy Orton for example, billed at 6"4 and he is 6"4. If the WWE wanted to they could bill him as 6"6.
Danimal said on 6/May/09
Daniel_Sweden,
Taker WAS 335 pounds in 1998. He stated this weight in a 1998 interview, claiming he had gained TOO much weight and by 2000 he slowly began to lose weight. Taker is MAX 255-260 pounds today.
Daniel_Sweden,
Taker WAS 335 pounds in 1998. He stated this weight in a 1998 interview, claiming he had gained TOO much weight and by 2000 he slowly began to lose weight. Taker is MAX 255-260 pounds today.
daniel_Sweden said on 5/May/09
this make sense if the undertaker at his peak was 6'7.5 and built as 6'10 then hogan was 2 inches shorter and that makes hogan a legit 6'5.5..
Undertaker billed as 6'10..peak height 6'7.5 and no more than 290 pounds
Hogan billed as 6'7. peak height 6'5.5 or 6'5.75 and was at hes peak a 295 pounder
this make sense if the undertaker at his peak was 6'7.5 and built as 6'10 then hogan was 2 inches shorter and that makes hogan a legit 6'5.5..
Undertaker billed as 6'10..peak height 6'7.5 and no more than 290 pounds
Hogan billed as 6'7. peak height 6'5.5 or 6'5.75 and was at hes peak a 295 pounder
Marotte said on 5/May/09
Taker is still bigger than 6'6 250 lbs maybe 6'7 I can't go any lower than that and atleast 270 lbs.
Taker is still bigger than 6'6 250 lbs maybe 6'7 I can't go any lower than that and atleast 270 lbs.
Danimal said on 4/May/09
Taker was up to 335 pounds in 1998. He admitted that he had grown overweight in an interview which USED to be on here (4 years ago). He literally looks like he has dropped down to 250 pounds nowadays and looks to be 6'6"-6'6.5". PEAK, I have NO trouble seeing him at 6'7.5"-6'8".
Taker was up to 335 pounds in 1998. He admitted that he had grown overweight in an interview which USED to be on here (4 years ago). He literally looks like he has dropped down to 250 pounds nowadays and looks to be 6'6"-6'6.5". PEAK, I have NO trouble seeing him at 6'7.5"-6'8".
miko said on 4/May/09
Taker just doesn't seem to have a huge imposing presence any more. Probably because of weight loss and fractional height loss.
Peak: 6"7.5 (300lbs+)
Today: 6"6.75.6"7 (280lbs)
If Undertaker was legitimately still over 6"7, he wouldn't have been struggling like hell next to a 6"6 max Albert who had a slight footwear advantage.
Taker just doesn't seem to have a huge imposing presence any more. Probably because of weight loss and fractional height loss.
Peak: 6"7.5 (300lbs+)
Today: 6"6.75.6"7 (280lbs)
If Undertaker was legitimately still over 6"7, he wouldn't have been struggling like hell next to a 6"6 max Albert who had a slight footwear advantage.
Danimal said on 4/May/09
JT says on 3/May/09
Click Here
Ridiculous comparison. Albert's boots with 6'3"-6'4" BAREFOOT Sapp are HUGE..
Albert is 6'5.5"-6'6.25 LEGIT. Taker is SLIGHTLY taller than that.
JT says on 3/May/09
Click Here
Ridiculous comparison. Albert's boots with 6'3"-6'4" BAREFOOT Sapp are HUGE..
Albert is 6'5.5"-6'6.25 LEGIT. Taker is SLIGHTLY taller than that.
Atoadaso said on 3/May/09
If Sapp and Albert were both barefoot I would bet there would be only 1" between them.
If Sapp and Albert were both barefoot I would bet there would be only 1" between them.
Cmomo said on 3/May/09
The only constant with pro wrestling is that they always alter the stated height to make tiny guys sound smaller and the big guys bigger! If your 6'6-6'7 youll probably be billed as 7 foot.
The only constant with pro wrestling is that they always alter the stated height to make tiny guys sound smaller and the big guys bigger! If your 6'6-6'7 youll probably be billed as 7 foot.
Atoadaso said on 1/May/09
wow Jan Nortje only looks 6'5"-6'6" there with Albert. I always thought this guy was a legit 6'9"+. Just goes to show you that almost all these bug guys are drastically overbilled, especially in Japan.
wow Jan Nortje only looks 6'5"-6'6" there with Albert. I always thought this guy was a legit 6'9"+. Just goes to show you that almost all these bug guys are drastically overbilled, especially in Japan.
JT said on 30/Apr/09
Big Show says on 30/Apr/09
....If Jan Nortje is indeed 6'6" than both Semmy Schilt and Julius Long look more like 6'8"-6'9"....
Click Here I don't follow the sport, but IIRC Vegas or another poster identified the second tallest guy as Schilt, who looks in that height range given how he measures up to ~ 7'1" Giant Silva.
Big Show says on 30/Apr/09
....If Jan Nortje is indeed 6'6" than both Semmy Schilt and Julius Long look more like 6'8"-6'9"....
Click Here I don't follow the sport, but IIRC Vegas or another poster identified the second tallest guy as Schilt, who looks in that height range given how he measures up to ~ 7'1" Giant Silva.
Big Show said on 30/Apr/09
Vegas says on 29/Apr/09
great find big show, i have watched quite a bit of Jan 'The Giant' Nortje, he is normally billed at 6'11 but i did find one or two 6'1 (185cm) listings for him believe it or not
here is an even more interesting video its nortje and pro boxer julius long Click Here
long is listed in pro boxing at 7ft 1 tall Click Here
Click Here
not a great photo but here is long looking about 5 inches maybe more taller than audley harrison Click Here
audley was listed in the olympics at 6'6 Click Here
And I thought wrestling were the only ones that are exaggerating their athletes stats to extreme measures.
I guess the 6'1 listings of Jan Nortje are probably typos where they forgot to put the last 1 in it aswell. Nonetheless I'd say after seeing his staredowns with Giant Bernard he's in the 6'6 range. He's also looking in the 6'6 range in his match with Bob Sapp.
If Jan Nortje is indeed 6'6" than both Semmy Schilt and Julius Long look more like 6'8"-6'9".
There's also a tag-team match where Jan Nortje is teaming up with Giant Singh (a.k.a. The Great Khali). Like to get my hands on that one to see how Singh measured up to Nortje.
Vegas says on 29/Apr/09
great find big show, i have watched quite a bit of Jan 'The Giant' Nortje, he is normally billed at 6'11 but i did find one or two 6'1 (185cm) listings for him believe it or not
here is an even more interesting video its nortje and pro boxer julius long Click Here
long is listed in pro boxing at 7ft 1 tall Click Here
Click Here
not a great photo but here is long looking about 5 inches maybe more taller than audley harrison Click Here
audley was listed in the olympics at 6'6 Click Here
And I thought wrestling were the only ones that are exaggerating their athletes stats to extreme measures.
I guess the 6'1 listings of Jan Nortje are probably typos where they forgot to put the last 1 in it aswell. Nonetheless I'd say after seeing his staredowns with Giant Bernard he's in the 6'6 range. He's also looking in the 6'6 range in his match with Bob Sapp.
If Jan Nortje is indeed 6'6" than both Semmy Schilt and Julius Long look more like 6'8"-6'9".
There's also a tag-team match where Jan Nortje is teaming up with Giant Singh (a.k.a. The Great Khali). Like to get my hands on that one to see how Singh measured up to Nortje.
Vegas said on 29/Apr/09
great find big show, i have watched quite a bit of Jan 'The Giant' Nortje, he is normally billed at 6'11 but i did find one or two 6'1 (185cm) listings for him believe it or not
here is an even more interesting video its nortje and pro boxer julius long Click Here
long is listed in pro boxing at 7ft 1 tall Click Here
Click Here
not a great photo but here is long looking about 5 inches maybe more taller than audley harrison Click Here
audley was listed in the olympics at 6'6 Click Here
great find big show, i have watched quite a bit of Jan 'The Giant' Nortje, he is normally billed at 6'11 but i did find one or two 6'1 (185cm) listings for him believe it or not
here is an even more interesting video its nortje and pro boxer julius long Click Here
long is listed in pro boxing at 7ft 1 tall Click Here
Click Here
not a great photo but here is long looking about 5 inches maybe more taller than audley harrison Click Here
audley was listed in the olympics at 6'6 Click Here
Big Show said on 29/Apr/09
Click Here
Click Here
Here's a tag-team Match which involves Giant Bernard and Jan 'The Giant' Nortje. At 6:24 and onwards there's an excellent staredown between Bernard & Nortje.
Click Here
Click Here
They look close in height, but I think Albert edges him out slightly because of his huge head.
Believe it or not both K-1 and MMA has Jan Nortje listed at 6'11"
Click Here
Click Here
Jan 'The Giant' Nortje looks 1-2 inches shorter than Semmy Schilt who's mostly listed at 6'11.5" (which probably is another huge exaggeration).
Click Here
Btw at 0:44 they have Giant Bernard's billings on screen and they say he's 193cm and 150kg which equals 6'4 and 331 lbs. My guess is this Japanese organization doesn't know how to convert inches to centimetres.
Click Here
Click Here
Here's a tag-team Match which involves Giant Bernard and Jan 'The Giant' Nortje. At 6:24 and onwards there's an excellent staredown between Bernard & Nortje.
Click Here
Click Here
They look close in height, but I think Albert edges him out slightly because of his huge head.
Believe it or not both K-1 and MMA has Jan Nortje listed at 6'11"
Click Here
Click Here
Jan 'The Giant' Nortje looks 1-2 inches shorter than Semmy Schilt who's mostly listed at 6'11.5" (which probably is another huge exaggeration).
Click Here
Btw at 0:44 they have Giant Bernard's billings on screen and they say he's 193cm and 150kg which equals 6'4 and 331 lbs. My guess is this Japanese organization doesn't know how to convert inches to centimetres.
Big Show said on 29/Apr/09
Seeing as Matt Bloom/Albert/Giant Bernard doesn't have his own board I thought I'd post it here, as we've had plenty of discussion about him. Here's a match between him and Bob Sapp (who's a confirmed 6'4 in my book). Bob Sapp is barefoot and Albert in his wrestling boots. He better not have major lifts in those as he looks around 3-4 inches taller than Sapp.
Click Here
Seeing as Matt Bloom/Albert/Giant Bernard doesn't have his own board I thought I'd post it here, as we've had plenty of discussion about him. Here's a match between him and Bob Sapp (who's a confirmed 6'4 in my book). Bob Sapp is barefoot and Albert in his wrestling boots. He better not have major lifts in those as he looks around 3-4 inches taller than Sapp.
Click Here
Red said on 29/Apr/09
LOL another Ola-Clone
yoyo, Taker is nothing under 6
LOL another Ola-Clone
yoyo, Taker is nothing under 6
sidewalk said on 29/Apr/09
I put the vid link up to show what he was once billed at not to prove he was 6'8. I didn't think he could be any taller than 6'8 even before I saw the vid. 6'7 is the shortest I would say UT could be. Not that this proves anything but I met a guy 4-5 years ago who had some pics with wrestlers. I said that UT wasn't 6'10-6'10 1/2 and before I even guessed at what height I thought UT really was he said 6'7. I think the estimate on top of page is likely correct.
I put the vid link up to show what he was once billed at not to prove he was 6'8. I didn't think he could be any taller than 6'8 even before I saw the vid. 6'7 is the shortest I would say UT could be. Not that this proves anything but I met a guy 4-5 years ago who had some pics with wrestlers. I said that UT wasn't 6'10-6'10 1/2 and before I even guessed at what height I thought UT really was he said 6'7. I think the estimate on top of page is likely correct.
general93 said on 29/Apr/09
studd at 6'5" wud make him an 1" shorter than a peak hogan wrong.he had 1.5"-2on hogan.he had a shade on omg so i suppose hes 6'4.75" wrong.he had 2" on jake roberts in 1989 who we've all given 6'5".he had loads on mcmahon and over a foot on alfreds hayes in their interview.he was 2-3" taller than his trainer killer kolwalski who was billed 6'7" probably 6'5.5".im not sure y fralic was close to him maybe had a slight elevation but in the battle royle it self spivey who was probably 6'7" at the time was taller than fralic but not studd.when hes elminated from the battle royle 6'10" ed too tall jones certainly does not have a 5" advantage more like 2" at most over studd.and when teaming with 6'9" ernie the cat ladd theres little difference maybe 1" 1.5".taker 6'8" kane 6'9" and yankeem who is kane wasnt billed 6'7" it was 6'11".nash 6'10" sid 6'7.5" big show 7' khali 7'1.5.
studd at 6'5" wud make him an 1" shorter than a peak hogan wrong.he had 1.5"-2on hogan.he had a shade on omg so i suppose hes 6'4.75" wrong.he had 2" on jake roberts in 1989 who we've all given 6'5".he had loads on mcmahon and over a foot on alfreds hayes in their interview.he was 2-3" taller than his trainer killer kolwalski who was billed 6'7" probably 6'5.5".im not sure y fralic was close to him maybe had a slight elevation but in the battle royle it self spivey who was probably 6'7" at the time was taller than fralic but not studd.when hes elminated from the battle royle 6'10" ed too tall jones certainly does not have a 5" advantage more like 2" at most over studd.and when teaming with 6'9" ernie the cat ladd theres little difference maybe 1" 1.5".taker 6'8" kane 6'9" and yankeem who is kane wasnt billed 6'7" it was 6'11".nash 6'10" sid 6'7.5" big show 7' khali 7'1.5.
yoyo said on 29/Apr/09
UnderTaker is even lower than 6ft7.5 under 300pounds as well, i"ll say with big lift his 6ft8 6ft8.5 barefoot ,6ft5.5 ~ 6ft6(197-198) and about 260pounds at most. his no way as tall as his scary looking brother..
UnderTaker is even lower than 6ft7.5 under 300pounds as well, i"ll say with big lift his 6ft8 6ft8.5 barefoot ,6ft5.5 ~ 6ft6(197-198) and about 260pounds at most. his no way as tall as his scary looking brother..
Frank said on 29/Apr/09
Ola i will Agree there a very little difference between them but Studd was taller
Ola i will Agree there a very little difference between them but Studd was taller
Shock of Electric said on 28/Apr/09
Taz's official WWE height bill was 5'9", his ECW height bill was 5'8" in the mid 90s. I met Taz and Tommy Dreamer in 1998 at a local autograph signing and gave them a promo tape of myself doing some indy shows. Taz is no more than 5'7', probably 5'6.5".
Undertaker is about 5.5" taller than Triple H who is closer to 6'3" than 6'2". Trips comes up to his eyes, Taker's head is massive and his eyes are quite centered.
Taker being promoted at 6'8" early in his career by a random commentator has such little value it's really not even worth thinking about. He's been called 6'5" by Roddy Piper, and we don't believe that.
Undertaker is definitely in the low 6'8" range today and always was. He was taller than Sid who everyone seems to think is at least 6'7" which I also agree with. So many people have a hard time believing Taker was an inch taller than Sid, I think there's a chance he was slightly more than 1" taller barefoot because Sid generally either had slightly thicker boots and always did his infamous head tilt.
Taz's official WWE height bill was 5'9", his ECW height bill was 5'8" in the mid 90s. I met Taz and Tommy Dreamer in 1998 at a local autograph signing and gave them a promo tape of myself doing some indy shows. Taz is no more than 5'7', probably 5'6.5".
Undertaker is about 5.5" taller than Triple H who is closer to 6'3" than 6'2". Trips comes up to his eyes, Taker's head is massive and his eyes are quite centered.
Taker being promoted at 6'8" early in his career by a random commentator has such little value it's really not even worth thinking about. He's been called 6'5" by Roddy Piper, and we don't believe that.
Undertaker is definitely in the low 6'8" range today and always was. He was taller than Sid who everyone seems to think is at least 6'7" which I also agree with. So many people have a hard time believing Taker was an inch taller than Sid, I think there's a chance he was slightly more than 1" taller barefoot because Sid generally either had slightly thicker boots and always did his infamous head tilt.
hs2009 said on 27/Apr/09
Anonymous says on 24/Apr/09
sidewalk says on 23/Apr/09
Here's an old vid of Undertaker as the Punisher in it they say 6'8 over 300 lb. So maybe he was 6'8 at most at one time.Click Here
That proves he was never 6'8'' if anything, a guy in his early 20's billed 6'8'' and IS 6'8'' seems fairly improbable, though i still think was at least 6'7'' peak. Maybe its just bad promoting, who knows?
Why is it fairly improbable? Just because wrestlers heights are inflated most of the time, doesn't necessarily mean that his 6'8" listing at the start of his career was. The 6'10"-6'10.5" listing is obviously inflated, but various people in the wrestling buisness have described Taker as 6'8" (non-kayfabe) & he claims that height when he could very easily claim taller. So I really don't see why 6'8" is such a difficult height to believe.
KingNick, that is funny! I also like Taz a lot, but 5'10" is pushing it to say the least :D
Anonymous says on 24/Apr/09
sidewalk says on 23/Apr/09
Here's an old vid of Undertaker as the Punisher in it they say 6'8 over 300 lb. So maybe he was 6'8 at most at one time.Click Here
That proves he was never 6'8'' if anything, a guy in his early 20's billed 6'8'' and IS 6'8'' seems fairly improbable, though i still think was at least 6'7'' peak. Maybe its just bad promoting, who knows?
Why is it fairly improbable? Just because wrestlers heights are inflated most of the time, doesn't necessarily mean that his 6'8" listing at the start of his career was. The 6'10"-6'10.5" listing is obviously inflated, but various people in the wrestling buisness have described Taker as 6'8" (non-kayfabe) & he claims that height when he could very easily claim taller. So I really don't see why 6'8" is such a difficult height to believe.
KingNick, that is funny! I also like Taz a lot, but 5'10" is pushing it to say the least :D
KingNick said on 24/Apr/09
Not to get off topic but I have to post this somewhere.
Taz is easily one of my favorite wrestlers ever. He's extraordinarily talented to say the least. But who does he think he's fooling with this height listing?? :>)
Click Here
Not to get off topic but I have to post this somewhere.
Taz is easily one of my favorite wrestlers ever. He's extraordinarily talented to say the least. But who does he think he's fooling with this height listing?? :>)
Click Here
Anonymous said on 24/Apr/09
sidewalk says on 23/Apr/09
Here's an old vid of Undertaker as the Punisher in it they say 6'8 over 300 lb. So maybe he was 6'8 at most at one time.Click Here
That proves he was never 6'8'' if anything, a guy in his early 20's billed 6'8'' and IS 6'8'' seems fairly improbable, though i still think was at least 6'7'' peak. Maybe its just bad promoting, who knows?
sidewalk says on 23/Apr/09
Here's an old vid of Undertaker as the Punisher in it they say 6'8 over 300 lb. So maybe he was 6'8 at most at one time.Click Here
That proves he was never 6'8'' if anything, a guy in his early 20's billed 6'8'' and IS 6'8'' seems fairly improbable, though i still think was at least 6'7'' peak. Maybe its just bad promoting, who knows?
sidewalk said on 23/Apr/09
Here's an old vid of Undertaker as the Punisher in it they say 6'8 over 300 lb. So maybe he was 6'8 at most at one time.Click Here
Here's an old vid of Undertaker as the Punisher in it they say 6'8 over 300 lb. So maybe he was 6'8 at most at one time.Click Here
general93 said on 23/Apr/09
one picture is all u go by john tenta was 6'5.75" at 19 so i guees its impossible he grew another 3/4".if u honestly think john studd was 6'4" or 5" u should go to specsavers.its probably annoying for u daminal and ola that ur small men urselfs but just relax maybe the next lifetime.
one picture is all u go by john tenta was 6'5.75" at 19 so i guees its impossible he grew another 3/4".if u honestly think john studd was 6'4" or 5" u should go to specsavers.its probably annoying for u daminal and ola that ur small men urselfs but just relax maybe the next lifetime.
kinggollum said on 22/Apr/09
jake roberts was at least 6'5 seeing how he was taller than my 6'4 brother. He also is a piece of garbage and drunk.
jake roberts was at least 6'5 seeing how he was taller than my 6'4 brother. He also is a piece of garbage and drunk.
nick said on 22/Apr/09
yea that vid always got me, i really thing triple h is a 6'2.75-6'3 guy, if he had 1.75 footwear he would be around 6'4.5 in his boots. Taker could be around 6'8.5 with an inch footwear so you have only 4 inches between them which it looks to be. Barefoot i say taker has 5 inches on triple h
yea that vid always got me, i really thing triple h is a 6'2.75-6'3 guy, if he had 1.75 footwear he would be around 6'4.5 in his boots. Taker could be around 6'8.5 with an inch footwear so you have only 4 inches between them which it looks to be. Barefoot i say taker has 5 inches on triple h
Danimal said on 21/Apr/09
general93 says on 21/Apr/09
john tenta was easily 6'6" he was taller than peak hogan who was probably 6'5-6" so 6'6.5" for tenta would be about right. taker peak was closer to 6'9" 6'8" today. sid akeem studd were all around the same height of about 6'7.5"-8.5".jake roberts 6'5" maybe 6'4.5".bossman seemed alot taller when he started looked his billed height of 6'6" but then sometimes looked only 6'2" which is still tall.
Why do you exagerate EVERYONE, even OFFICIALLY MEASURED people like John Tenta who was OFFICIALLY measured at 6'5 3/4", yet you give him 6'6.5". You also claimed Andre was 7'4" and Big John Studd 6'8.5". You're in your 20's. You're no longer a kid. It's as though you fantasize about these men being GIANTS. They were tall, just not as tall as you would have liked for them to have been.
general93 says on 21/Apr/09
john tenta was easily 6'6" he was taller than peak hogan who was probably 6'5-6" so 6'6.5" for tenta would be about right. taker peak was closer to 6'9" 6'8" today. sid akeem studd were all around the same height of about 6'7.5"-8.5".jake roberts 6'5" maybe 6'4.5".bossman seemed alot taller when he started looked his billed height of 6'6" but then sometimes looked only 6'2" which is still tall.
Why do you exagerate EVERYONE, even OFFICIALLY MEASURED people like John Tenta who was OFFICIALLY measured at 6'5 3/4", yet you give him 6'6.5". You also claimed Andre was 7'4" and Big John Studd 6'8.5". You're in your 20's. You're no longer a kid. It's as though you fantasize about these men being GIANTS. They were tall, just not as tall as you would have liked for them to have been.
Alex said on 21/Apr/09
Actually I could see as much as 4 but still that would make UT no more than 6'6 there unless HHH was wearing bigger boots.
Actually I could see as much as 4 but still that would make UT no more than 6'6 there unless HHH was wearing bigger boots.
Alex said on 21/Apr/09
Big Show, yea it appears like UT is only 2 inches taller than HHH there. Crazy.
Big Show, yea it appears like UT is only 2 inches taller than HHH there. Crazy.
Big Show said on 21/Apr/09
Click Here
Triple H looking awfully close in height to Undertaker in this video. You kinda wonder what Triple H is wearing in his boots sometimes as I've seen him look 3 inches taller than Vince and maybe 8 inches shorter than Big Show in the middle of the ring sometimes.
Click Here
Triple H looking awfully close in height to Undertaker in this video. You kinda wonder what Triple H is wearing in his boots sometimes as I've seen him look 3 inches taller than Vince and maybe 8 inches shorter than Big Show in the middle of the ring sometimes.
Heights are barefeet estimates, derived from quotations, official websites, agency resumes, in person encounters with actors at conventions and pictures/films.
Other vital statistics like weight or shoe size measurements have been sourced from newspapers, books, resumes or social media.
Celebrity Fan Photos and Agency Pictures of stars are © to their respective owners.