Add a Comment9900 comments
Average Guess (947 Votes)
Peak: 6ft 7.68in (202.4cm)
Current: 6ft 6.4in (199.1cm)
Peak: 6ft 7.68in (202.4cm)
Current: 6ft 6.4in (199.1cm)
Danimal said on 28/Nov/07
Don't quote me Ghost on things I may have said in the past. When I am confronted with NEW evidence, then my opinions will invaiably change over time. I DO believe that Taker has lost some height since 2001. He could very well be 6'6"-6'7" today. As for Khali, for all I know he's 6'11"-7'0".
Don't quote me Ghost on things I may have said in the past. When I am confronted with NEW evidence, then my opinions will invaiably change over time. I DO believe that Taker has lost some height since 2001. He could very well be 6'6"-6'7" today. As for Khali, for all I know he's 6'11"-7'0".
KingNick said on 28/Nov/07
JT, great pics as usual. Maybe you're right, maybe he is 6'5" or 6'6" and closer to 6'8" in his boots. I believe Vegas a while ago posted the video where he had a staredown with Orton and Snitsky was an inch or two taller.
JT, great pics as usual. Maybe you're right, maybe he is 6'5" or 6'6" and closer to 6'8" in his boots. I believe Vegas a while ago posted the video where he had a staredown with Orton and Snitsky was an inch or two taller.
Ghost said on 28/Nov/07
but Danimal, how can you say Taker is 6'6-6'6,5 and Khali is 7'2? Did i quote you correctly?
but Danimal, how can you say Taker is 6'6-6'6,5 and Khali is 7'2? Did i quote you correctly?
JT said on 27/Nov/07
This is Snitsky with Ben Rothlesberger with the pic straightened (Click Here). Snitsky is standing a little behind Ben and craning his neck forward. Snitsky
This is Snitsky with Ben Rothlesberger with the pic straightened (Click Here). Snitsky is standing a little behind Ben and craning his neck forward. Snitsky
Danimal said on 27/Nov/07
I am confident that post 2001, Taker has just not been the same. We've seen it with so many aging wrestlers, who had killed their body in the ring and the corrective surgery to help them fight another day, which shrinks their body in the process.
I am confident that post 2001, Taker has just not been the same. We've seen it with so many aging wrestlers, who had killed their body in the ring and the corrective surgery to help them fight another day, which shrinks their body in the process.
Vegas said on 27/Nov/07
he barely looked taller than trips last night, 6'8 :D
he barely looked taller than trips last night, 6'8 :D
mike m said on 27/Nov/07
4 inches between taker and big show that,s it.if show is a legit 7 foot then taker is 6,8".
4 inches between taker and big show that,s it.if show is a legit 7 foot then taker is 6,8".
KingNick said on 27/Nov/07
Oh the reason I posted the Snitsky link is cause they're billing him as 6'8" on raw
Oh the reason I posted the Snitsky link is cause they're billing him as 6'8" on raw
mike m said on 27/Nov/07
there looks to 3 inches beteen the two maybe 4.
there looks to 3 inches beteen the two maybe 4.
JT said on 27/Nov/07
Click Here Click Here This was from the corporate ministry days, when Taker wore his largest footwear.
Taker and Kane as Isaac Yankem Click Here Click Here Kane looked taller and his footwear appeared rather conventional too.
Click Here Click Here This was from the corporate ministry days, when Taker wore his largest footwear.
Taker and Kane as Isaac Yankem Click Here Click Here Kane looked taller and his footwear appeared rather conventional too.
Vegas said on 26/Nov/07
show's posture plays a big part in nicks video, he tries to make taker look taller like here Click Here
undertaker a few months previous to taker forming the ministry Click Here taker is wearing different boots there too
show's posture plays a big part in nicks video, he tries to make taker look taller like here Click Here
undertaker a few months previous to taker forming the ministry Click Here taker is wearing different boots there too
Alex said on 26/Nov/07
Big Show doesn't appear to have more than 3 inches on UT there. I just don't see UT more than 6'8 tops during his peak so he's probably in lifts there with Show. And I see Big Show at 7'0.
Big Show doesn't appear to have more than 3 inches on UT there. I just don't see UT more than 6'8 tops during his peak so he's probably in lifts there with Show. And I see Big Show at 7'0.
KingNick said on 26/Nov/07
Nick and Frank, Show isn't in wrestling gear there. It looks like he's wearing a normal shoe. Even I'm willing to admit UT had a boost in his shoes durining that time, but I don't think it was more than 1". UT coulda been 6'9" there and Show 7'0.5". Show is leaning most of the time and UT is standing as straight as he can. So a 3" to 3.5" difference.
Nick and Frank, Show isn't in wrestling gear there. It looks like he's wearing a normal shoe. Even I'm willing to admit UT had a boost in his shoes durining that time, but I don't think it was more than 1". UT coulda been 6'9" there and Show 7'0.5". Show is leaning most of the time and UT is standing as straight as he can. So a 3" to 3.5" difference.
Frank said on 26/Nov/07
Nick, Maybe Big Show was not wearing his lifts that day ??
Nick, Maybe Big Show was not wearing his lifts that day ??
Vegas said on 26/Nov/07
jake is one of the greatest characters in the history of pro-wrestling, this is a funny moment though Click Here
jake is one of the greatest characters in the history of pro-wrestling, this is a funny moment though Click Here
nick said on 25/Nov/07
Click Here BIG SHOW CALLS OUT THE UNDERTAKER***,New Video.
At Around the 3 minute mark taker measures up against the big show, wehn the big show was in decent shape. The undertaker was a lift wearer here but he looks within 2 to 3 inches in the video. And its funny pause the video at 3:08*** and you can almost think the are the same height. This again makes the undertaker to be between 6'7 and 6'8 but in this video raises eyebrows more to 6'8. Remember undertaker is showing good posture in these videos unlike he usually does.. Also take into account that its hard to judge the undertakers height if there isnt a full body shot because he tends to lean in and lazily bend a knee deducting over an inch.
Click Here BIG SHOW CALLS OUT THE UNDERTAKER***,New Video.
At Around the 3 minute mark taker measures up against the big show, wehn the big show was in decent shape. The undertaker was a lift wearer here but he looks within 2 to 3 inches in the video. And its funny pause the video at 3:08*** and you can almost think the are the same height. This again makes the undertaker to be between 6'7 and 6'8 but in this video raises eyebrows more to 6'8. Remember undertaker is showing good posture in these videos unlike he usually does.. Also take into account that its hard to judge the undertakers height if there isnt a full body shot because he tends to lean in and lazily bend a knee deducting over an inch.
KingNick said on 25/Nov/07
SNAKE: "You and I have a real problem. Now I'm standing here and you need to tell me something face to face ... Just who in the hell do you think you are and who's side are you on? YOU tell ME. WHO'S SIDE, ARE YOU ON?!"
UNDERTAKER: "NOT YOURS."
I love it! What a great segment.
I think Jake was 6'5" he was so tall. And he did wear huge shoes in the ring. I think those shoes gave him 1" to 1.5" advantage. UT's shoes '90-'93, in my opinion, didn't give him more than .5"
So in their shoes there, my guess would be Jake at 6'6.5" and UT at 6'8.5" . A full two inch difference.
SNAKE: "You and I have a real problem. Now I'm standing here and you need to tell me something face to face ... Just who in the hell do you think you are and who's side are you on? YOU tell ME. WHO'S SIDE, ARE YOU ON?!"
UNDERTAKER: "NOT YOURS."
I love it! What a great segment.
I think Jake was 6'5" he was so tall. And he did wear huge shoes in the ring. I think those shoes gave him 1" to 1.5" advantage. UT's shoes '90-'93, in my opinion, didn't give him more than .5"
So in their shoes there, my guess would be Jake at 6'6.5" and UT at 6'8.5" . A full two inch difference.
mike m said on 25/Nov/07
i changed my mind after watching the video twice 2 inches sounds more like it.
i changed my mind after watching the video twice 2 inches sounds more like it.
Danimal said on 25/Nov/07
Frank, Roberts was a legite 6'5" guy though in his day. At the very least 6'4". He had inches on my 6'2" step dad in 1990 at the Hilton Hotel where I got his autograph. He wrote: "Never stop believing in yourself Dan".
Frank, Roberts was a legite 6'5" guy though in his day. At the very least 6'4". He had inches on my 6'2" step dad in 1990 at the Hilton Hotel where I got his autograph. He wrote: "Never stop believing in yourself Dan".
Frank said on 25/Nov/07
Roberts wore snake boots with a very Big Heel and also some camera angles does not show the real height difference...I have a friend thats close to 5ft 9 and i am good amount taller than him and in one piture he looked close to my height which he is not
Roberts wore snake boots with a very Big Heel and also some camera angles does not show the real height difference...I have a friend thats close to 5ft 9 and i am good amount taller than him and in one piture he looked close to my height which he is not
mike m said on 25/Nov/07
khali had 5 inches on taker.
khali had 5 inches on taker.
MikeV10 said on 25/Nov/07
Robert was wearing very big boots , and takers were very flat
Robert was wearing very big boots , and takers were very flat
JimmyDavid said on 25/Nov/07
Keep going and soon somebody will say khali has barely 1/5 inch on taker...
Keep going and soon somebody will say khali has barely 1/5 inch on taker...
mike m said on 25/Nov/07
if taker stood with the same type of posture as khali,there would definitely be a 2 1/2 ,3 inch difference.
if taker stood with the same type of posture as khali,there would definitely be a 2 1/2 ,3 inch difference.
anonymous 1 said on 25/Nov/07
Red,basicly what i,m tring to say is if taker stood straight as possible,without his head tilted forward,another words ,military position,you know what i mean? then you would see 3 inches ,bu no more.
Red,basicly what i,m tring to say is if taker stood straight as possible,without his head tilted forward,another words ,military position,you know what i mean? then you would see 3 inches ,bu no more.
Red said on 25/Nov/07
UT is standing more straight than Roberts and the difference is less than 3inches.
UT is standing more straight than Roberts and the difference is less than 3inches.
Alex said on 25/Nov/07
And thats when UT was a this peak too. Kane has a legit 1/2 inch at least on UT, if not an inch. At times it looked at least 2 inches due to Kane's lifts though. I'm now thinking UT was just 6'7 at his peak and Kane is 6'7.5 at least.
And thats when UT was a this peak too. Kane has a legit 1/2 inch at least on UT, if not an inch. At times it looked at least 2 inches due to Kane's lifts though. I'm now thinking UT was just 6'7 at his peak and Kane is 6'7.5 at least.
LV said on 25/Nov/07
Why are Kane and UT both listed at 6'7.5" on this site? This video clearly shows Kane as being taller (Click Here). There is no chance of him wearing lifts either since Yankem was a jobber and they were starting to push UT at this time. Even the announcers commented on how surprised they were that Yankem was taller than UT.
Why are Kane and UT both listed at 6'7.5" on this site? This video clearly shows Kane as being taller (Click Here). There is no chance of him wearing lifts either since Yankem was a jobber and they were starting to push UT at this time. Even the announcers commented on how surprised they were that Yankem was taller than UT.
anonymous 1 said on 24/Nov/07
i see 3 inches if taker stood up straight.jake was how tall 6,5",taker had to be 6,8" peak height.
i see 3 inches if taker stood up straight.jake was how tall 6,5",taker had to be 6,8" peak height.
anonymous 1 said on 24/Nov/07
from that above pic i could tell you taker looks over 6,6" he looks more like 6,8" possibly 6,9" tops.Frank is basicly a 6 footer and taker has at least 8 inches on him.
from that above pic i could tell you taker looks over 6,6" he looks more like 6,8" possibly 6,9" tops.Frank is basicly a 6 footer and taker has at least 8 inches on him.
Red said on 24/Nov/07
peak UT looks 6
peak UT looks 6
nick said on 24/Nov/07
lol, i just dont want to believe it i guess.
lol, i just dont want to believe it i guess.
Viper said on 23/Nov/07
Vegas said he looked to be in the 6-6 range when he saw him.
Vegas said he looked to be in the 6-6 range when he saw him.
cantstop25 said on 23/Nov/07
i actually agree with viper I dont think taker had a full inch on sid either, though I think sid should be upgraded to 6'7"
i actually agree with viper I dont think taker had a full inch on sid either, though I think sid should be upgraded to 6'7"
Danimal said on 23/Nov/07
Nick, have you been posting on this site for 3 years as I have? Didn't think so. We ALL used to talk about Taker having supposedly said he was 6'6.5" on a live radio show. Whether or not that was true, is yet to be confirmed.
Nick, have you been posting on this site for 3 years as I have? Didn't think so. We ALL used to talk about Taker having supposedly said he was 6'6.5" on a live radio show. Whether or not that was true, is yet to be confirmed.
Alex said on 23/Nov/07
Would be something if UT lost a full 2 inches. He actually looked under 3 inches taller than Orton in their feud last year and Orton is a legit 6'4 most here will agree on.
Would be something if UT lost a full 2 inches. He actually looked under 3 inches taller than Orton in their feud last year and Orton is a legit 6'4 most here will agree on.
nick said on 23/Nov/07
not true Danimal, never said that quote, Mark Calloway now* when asked for his real height always says 6'8,
not true Danimal, never said that quote, Mark Calloway now* when asked for his real height always says 6'8,
Danimal said on 22/Nov/07
The mentor had him and Sid at 6'6" (ask Viper to confirm) and there was also a radio show 3 years ago where Taker supposedly stated he was down to 6'6.5". That's where these 6'6" listings come from. Furthermore, ever since 2001-2002, Taker does appear to have lost height, NOT towering over people the way he used to PRE-2001.
The mentor had him and Sid at 6'6" (ask Viper to confirm) and there was also a radio show 3 years ago where Taker supposedly stated he was down to 6'6.5". That's where these 6'6" listings come from. Furthermore, ever since 2001-2002, Taker does appear to have lost height, NOT towering over people the way he used to PRE-2001.
Alex2 said on 22/Nov/07
Khali is 7'2 minimun we have evidence to back this i.i look at him in the ring with 6'3+ Batista there is easily 1 foot difference
Khali is 7'2 minimun we have evidence to back this i.i look at him in the ring with 6'3+ Batista there is easily 1 foot difference
Anonymous said on 22/Nov/07
Where are all these 6'6 estimations for Taker coming from?
All you have to do is look at his staredown with Khali... that's no more than 5 inches of difference. Why on earth would they put Taker on lifts for that segement? Most of us agree that Khali is over 7 feet tall. Not by much, but still over the mark.
I think it's like this: Khali 7'05 Taker 6'7,5 today 6'8 prime.
Where are all these 6'6 estimations for Taker coming from?
All you have to do is look at his staredown with Khali... that's no more than 5 inches of difference. Why on earth would they put Taker on lifts for that segement? Most of us agree that Khali is over 7 feet tall. Not by much, but still over the mark.
I think it's like this: Khali 7'05 Taker 6'7,5 today 6'8 prime.
Red said on 22/Nov/07
I whould like to see a new staredown between UT and Sid. I think UT has lost a full inch, because he was arround 2inches taller than Mabel(Viscera) in 1995 with flat boots. Today UT
I whould like to see a new staredown between UT and Sid. I think UT has lost a full inch, because he was arround 2inches taller than Mabel(Viscera) in 1995 with flat boots. Today UT
Viper said on 20/Nov/07
I honestly do not see 1 inch between Taker and Sid. More like a half an inch at most.
I honestly do not see 1 inch between Taker and Sid. More like a half an inch at most.
Paul said on 20/Nov/07
KingNick, presumably Spivey wore thicker boots to narrow the difference between him and Calaway.
KingNick, presumably Spivey wore thicker boots to narrow the difference between him and Calaway.
KingNick said on 20/Nov/07
Zordon, great find with that video. If you watch part 2 towards the end, when Spivey does the piledriver, you can see that his boots are actually THICKER than Undertaker's. Why, I don't know, since they were billing UT as taller. But that may explain why they seem so close in height in the WCW days. Plus WCW did do a lot of things that didn't make sense.
Zordon, great find with that video. If you watch part 2 towards the end, when Spivey does the piledriver, you can see that his boots are actually THICKER than Undertaker's. Why, I don't know, since they were billing UT as taller. But that may explain why they seem so close in height in the WCW days. Plus WCW did do a lot of things that didn't make sense.
anonymous 1 said on 20/Nov/07
dan spive i,d say is 6,7" mark more like 6,8".animal i,ve seen listed at 6,1"
dan spive i,d say is 6,7" mark more like 6,8".animal i,ve seen listed at 6,1"
Paul said on 20/Nov/07
Well thats your opinion DaMan
Well thats your opinion DaMan
Danimal said on 20/Nov/07
Derek says on 17/Nov/07
I'll throw in my two cents:
1)There is not 2 inches between Taker and Sid. It's 1 inch tops.
2)Hogan in his prime was not under 6'5" and very well could have been closer to 6'6". In his match with Sid in 1992, it was after his surgery, which Hogan supposedly lost 1 1/4". If this is the case, Hogan was 6'4" and change with Sid in the 6'7" neighborhood.
No, Hogan was 6'6" PRE-1990 and lost 1 1/4", bringing him down to 6'4 3/4". If Sid was in fact 6'7", that gave him the 2 1/4" height advantage over Hogan. Hogan dropped to 6'4" and below only years later.
Derek says on 17/Nov/07
I'll throw in my two cents:
1)There is not 2 inches between Taker and Sid. It's 1 inch tops.
2)Hogan in his prime was not under 6'5" and very well could have been closer to 6'6". In his match with Sid in 1992, it was after his surgery, which Hogan supposedly lost 1 1/4". If this is the case, Hogan was 6'4" and change with Sid in the 6'7" neighborhood.
No, Hogan was 6'6" PRE-1990 and lost 1 1/4", bringing him down to 6'4 3/4". If Sid was in fact 6'7", that gave him the 2 1/4" height advantage over Hogan. Hogan dropped to 6'4" and below only years later.
Danimal said on 20/Nov/07
Zordon, I think you're right on the money with that assessment.
Zordon, I think you're right on the money with that assessment.
Frank said on 20/Nov/07
Taker clearly is taller than Spivey and its sometimes its hard to see the height difference on TV. He could be 6ft 8 easily and 6ft 7 1/2 could be possible
Taker clearly is taller than Spivey and its sometimes its hard to see the height difference on TV. He could be 6ft 8 easily and 6ft 7 1/2 could be possible
Da Man said on 20/Nov/07
Paul says on 19/Nov/07
Yaknem did not wear 'standard boots'. Look at the footage on youtube showing the match between the two.
I have, and he did.
Paul says on 19/Nov/07
Yaknem did not wear 'standard boots'. Look at the footage on youtube showing the match between the two.
I have, and he did.
Zordon said on 20/Nov/07
I'm not sure if you guys have already seen this, but I stumbled across this video of "The Skyscrapers" vs. the "Road Warriors": Click Here
In the video, JR claims that the Undertaker (Mean Mark Callous) is 6ft 9in tall while his partner, Dan Spivey, is 6ft 8in tall. If Spivey is 6ft 6in tall, as he once claimed according to some of you on this webpage, and is billed at only one inch shorter than the Undertaker (at least in this video clip), than that would put the Undertaker at 6ft 7in. This claim, however, assumes that JR tacked on 2 inches for both wrestlers (6ft 6in to 6ft 8in, and 6ft 7in to 6ft 9in). In some parts of the clip, Taker appears to be nearly the same height as Spivey, while in other parts the Deadman seems to have a good inch to an inch and half on his partner. My guess is that Spivey is a legit 6ft 6in, while the Undertaker is somewhere around 6ft 7.25in.
What do you guys think?
I'm not sure if you guys have already seen this, but I stumbled across this video of "The Skyscrapers" vs. the "Road Warriors": Click Here
In the video, JR claims that the Undertaker (Mean Mark Callous) is 6ft 9in tall while his partner, Dan Spivey, is 6ft 8in tall. If Spivey is 6ft 6in tall, as he once claimed according to some of you on this webpage, and is billed at only one inch shorter than the Undertaker (at least in this video clip), than that would put the Undertaker at 6ft 7in. This claim, however, assumes that JR tacked on 2 inches for both wrestlers (6ft 6in to 6ft 8in, and 6ft 7in to 6ft 9in). In some parts of the clip, Taker appears to be nearly the same height as Spivey, while in other parts the Deadman seems to have a good inch to an inch and half on his partner. My guess is that Spivey is a legit 6ft 6in, while the Undertaker is somewhere around 6ft 7.25in.
What do you guys think?
Paul said on 19/Nov/07
Yaknem did not wear 'standard boots'. Look at the footage on youtube showing the match between the two.
Yaknem did not wear 'standard boots'. Look at the footage on youtube showing the match between the two.
Da Man said on 19/Nov/07
Frank, how do we know he really worked for the WWE, and even if he did, did he actually witness the two being measured? IIRC, the guy claimed Taker was 1.5" taller than Kane (6'7" vs. 6'8.5") and that just isn't the case, never was. We've seen Isaac Yankem stack up very well against Taker, and Yankem visibly wore standard wrestling boots.
Frank, how do we know he really worked for the WWE, and even if he did, did he actually witness the two being measured? IIRC, the guy claimed Taker was 1.5" taller than Kane (6'7" vs. 6'8.5") and that just isn't the case, never was. We've seen Isaac Yankem stack up very well against Taker, and Yankem visibly wore standard wrestling boots.
Paul said on 19/Nov/07
He was close to it Frank back then, I always had the guy down as 2.05 and Sid 2.03 at their tallest with Nash 2.09 or 2.09.5. Kane about 2.04 peak, Hogan maybe 1.99 in the 1980's, 197-198 early 1990's.
He was close to it Frank back then, I always had the guy down as 2.05 and Sid 2.03 at their tallest with Nash 2.09 or 2.09.5. Kane about 2.04 peak, Hogan maybe 1.99 in the 1980's, 197-198 early 1990's.
anonymous 1 said on 18/Nov/07
billed height punisher, 6,10 is not the actual height, 6,8" is.you want to see someone a legit 6,10" ,look at kevin nash.
billed height punisher, 6,10 is not the actual height, 6,8" is.you want to see someone a legit 6,10" ,look at kevin nash.
Frank said on 18/Nov/07
Punisher, I met Taker and he is not 6ft 10 1/2 he told me he was 6ft 9 and he looked it but im doubting he was that also....Someone posted along time ago that we worked for the WWF and said Taker was taller than Kane (barefoot) kane wears lifs
Punisher, I met Taker and he is not 6ft 10 1/2 he told me he was 6ft 9 and he looked it but im doubting he was that also....Someone posted along time ago that we worked for the WWF and said Taker was taller than Kane (barefoot) kane wears lifs
anonymous 1 said on 17/Nov/07
well i think your wrong,nash is a legit 6'10" and taker is 2-3 inches shorter,taker is no more than 6'8".
well i think your wrong,nash is a legit 6'10" and taker is 2-3 inches shorter,taker is no more than 6'8".
Punisher said on 17/Nov/07
The UNdertaker is 6ft10 1/2 and when standing next to kane he would be about the same height so there is no way his 6ft7
The UNdertaker is 6ft10 1/2 and when standing next to kane he would be about the same height so there is no way his 6ft7
Derek said on 17/Nov/07
I'll throw in my two cents:
1)There is not 2 inches between Taker and Sid. It's 1 inch tops.
2)Hogan in his prime was not under 6'5" and very well could have been closer to 6'6". In his match with Sid in 1992, it was after his surgery, which Hogan supposedly lost 1 1/4". If this is the case, Hogan was 6'4" and change with Sid in the 6'7" neighborhood.
3)Taker is not taller than Kane.
4)Roddy Piper's height is a tough one to figure. Bret Hart was listed at 5'11" prior to becoming WWE Champ, and in 1992, Hart and Piper looked very close in height.
I'll throw in my two cents:
1)There is not 2 inches between Taker and Sid. It's 1 inch tops.
2)Hogan in his prime was not under 6'5" and very well could have been closer to 6'6". In his match with Sid in 1992, it was after his surgery, which Hogan supposedly lost 1 1/4". If this is the case, Hogan was 6'4" and change with Sid in the 6'7" neighborhood.
3)Taker is not taller than Kane.
4)Roddy Piper's height is a tough one to figure. Bret Hart was listed at 5'11" prior to becoming WWE Champ, and in 1992, Hart and Piper looked very close in height.
Cj said on 16/Nov/07
Dan Spivey from his own mouth said he is 6ft6in he cant be any taller or he would of said and if he has shrank he probly is closer to 6ft5in barefoot being over 50 and depending on what time of the day it is and 6ft6in in shoes as it says on his arrest paper.I dont know what the measuring procedure is when you get arrested do they measure you with or without shoes on or do they just ask the suspect there height if theres no measuring chart.At the end of all that i believe 6ft6in is dan spiveys real & peak height and takers height a little taller.
Dan Spivey from his own mouth said he is 6ft6in he cant be any taller or he would of said and if he has shrank he probly is closer to 6ft5in barefoot being over 50 and depending on what time of the day it is and 6ft6in in shoes as it says on his arrest paper.I dont know what the measuring procedure is when you get arrested do they measure you with or without shoes on or do they just ask the suspect there height if theres no measuring chart.At the end of all that i believe 6ft6in is dan spiveys real & peak height and takers height a little taller.
JimmyDavid said on 16/Nov/07
One single inch keeping Hogan and Sid apart?? Taker above both Sid and Kane? The guy was talking BS. Plus, if he's 6'3'' i could believe he had a good guess at guys more or less his heigh, but what makes him so sure Gonzalez was an exact 7'6''? At 6'3'' the guy could not look him above his chest line much less make an exact assumption at inch level. From there on it all loses credibility...
One single inch keeping Hogan and Sid apart?? Taker above both Sid and Kane? The guy was talking BS. Plus, if he's 6'3'' i could believe he had a good guess at guys more or less his heigh, but what makes him so sure Gonzalez was an exact 7'6''? At 6'3'' the guy could not look him above his chest line much less make an exact assumption at inch level. From there on it all loses credibility...
Da Man said on 16/Nov/07
A 6'6" Sid would need boots that provide 2.5" - 3" of height boost to look like he does next to a 6'8" Taker in standard wrestling boots. I don't see it.
A 6'6" Sid would need boots that provide 2.5" - 3" of height boost to look like he does next to a 6'8" Taker in standard wrestling boots. I don't see it.
cantstop25 said on 16/Nov/07
and btw sid towered over hogan even when hogan was at his peak height by atleast 2 inches
and btw sid towered over hogan even when hogan was at his peak height by atleast 2 inches
cantstop25 said on 16/Nov/07
sid does not wear lifts please people just look at the boots he wears in his staredown with taker
sid does not wear lifts please people just look at the boots he wears in his staredown with taker
Frank said on 16/Nov/07
That person could be talking about barefoot height Sid couls be wearing lifts like Kane does
That person could be talking about barefoot height Sid couls be wearing lifts like Kane does
Da Man said on 16/Nov/07
2" diff between Sid and Taker? I don't think so.
2" diff between Sid and Taker? I don't think so.
Vegas said on 15/Nov/07
an entry from a poster on wiki, don't know how accurate it is but it makes interesting reading
The truth of these "height talks": I am 6'3". I have meet numerous wrestlers in my day, including many of the so-called "giants" of wrestling. Khali is above 7 feet, and El Gigante/Giant Gonzales was 7'6" legit. I met Andre during the early 80's when he had his big puffy hair, and I will say for a fact that he was not 7 feet, unless you included his hair puffiness. Hogan is 6'5" legit, not 6'8". Sid Vicious is 6'6", Kane is about 6'7" legit, Undertaker is about 6'8", Nash 6'9 1/2". Please remember that wrestler heights are often exaggerated. I saw Roddy Piper listed at 6'2" one time, and when I met him he was about 5'10".
an entry from a poster on wiki, don't know how accurate it is but it makes interesting reading
The truth of these "height talks": I am 6'3". I have meet numerous wrestlers in my day, including many of the so-called "giants" of wrestling. Khali is above 7 feet, and El Gigante/Giant Gonzales was 7'6" legit. I met Andre during the early 80's when he had his big puffy hair, and I will say for a fact that he was not 7 feet, unless you included his hair puffiness. Hogan is 6'5" legit, not 6'8". Sid Vicious is 6'6", Kane is about 6'7" legit, Undertaker is about 6'8", Nash 6'9 1/2". Please remember that wrestler heights are often exaggerated. I saw Roddy Piper listed at 6'2" one time, and when I met him he was about 5'10".
anonymous 1 said on 15/Nov/07
taker i will leave at 6'8".
taker i will leave at 6'8".
cantstop25 said on 15/Nov/07
alright spivey is a bgi guy in shi mid 50's with a wrestling career that certaintly took a toal on the body, its not hard to believe that hes lost an inch
alright spivey is a bgi guy in shi mid 50's with a wrestling career that certaintly took a toal on the body, its not hard to believe that hes lost an inch
JimmyDavid said on 15/Nov/07
All the 3 Skyscrappers: Spivey, Sid and Mark look about the same height. In some photos one or another can probably look taller but that's normal because no 2 pictures will be the same since the body position of each man changes. Perhaps Sid and Mark were a bit taller than Spivey though.
All the 3 Skyscrappers: Spivey, Sid and Mark look about the same height. In some photos one or another can probably look taller but that's normal because no 2 pictures will be the same since the body position of each man changes. Perhaps Sid and Mark were a bit taller than Spivey though.
Vegas said on 15/Nov/07
Mark; just out of interest what do you peg UFC's Tim Sylvia at??
Mark; just out of interest what do you peg UFC's Tim Sylvia at??
Frank said on 14/Nov/07
I dont know if Spivey wore lifts years ago but he looked a good 2 inches taller than Hogan
I dont know if Spivey wore lifts years ago but he looked a good 2 inches taller than Hogan
Mark said on 14/Nov/07
Spivey same height(mm's)difference than Taker, 6'6 is right, people for whatever reason just don't want to see it.
Spivey same height(mm's)difference than Taker, 6'6 is right, people for whatever reason just don't want to see it.
Paul said on 14/Nov/07
Spivey today is not the same man that roamed the ring nearly 20 years ago.
Spivey today is not the same man that roamed the ring nearly 20 years ago.
anonymous 1 said on 14/Nov/07
so how much shorter would taker be ,3 inches?
so how much shorter would taker be ,3 inches?
Vegas said on 14/Nov/07
spiveys arrest sheet which says 6'6, he was also an inch taller than 6'5 Bill Fralic and HillBilly Jim at Wrestlemania 2 so 6'6 would seem about right Click Here
like goldberg; spivey played football for University of Georgia bulldogs, it would be interesting to see what he was listed at there
spiveys arrest sheet which says 6'6, he was also an inch taller than 6'5 Bill Fralic and HillBilly Jim at Wrestlemania 2 so 6'6 would seem about right Click Here
like goldberg; spivey played football for University of Georgia bulldogs, it would be interesting to see what he was listed at there
Cj said on 13/Nov/07
Undertaker here Click Here with 6ft6in dan spivey looking the same height in some of the pictures but taker looks a inch or so taller in the other pictures.Dan spivey has said if i remeber right that he is 6ft6in in a shoot interview so he cant be any taller than that.
Undertaker here Click Here with 6ft6in dan spivey looking the same height in some of the pictures but taker looks a inch or so taller in the other pictures.Dan spivey has said if i remeber right that he is 6ft6in in a shoot interview so he cant be any taller than that.
Dan said on 13/Nov/07
Definitely 6'8"-6'8.5"
Definitely 6'8"-6'8.5"
Paul said on 13/Nov/07
Thanks for clarifying KingNick. Just wait for my next height list. I will make them 'larger than life'.
Thanks for clarifying KingNick. Just wait for my next height list. I will make them 'larger than life'.
KingNick said on 13/Nov/07
Paul, misunderstanding man, I've always been for UT being 6'8" (see Oct 30 comment) however I'm very open to the fact that he COULD be 6'7", I just don't buy anything lower than that and personally I think 6'8".
Paul, misunderstanding man, I've always been for UT being 6'8" (see Oct 30 comment) however I'm very open to the fact that he COULD be 6'7", I just don't buy anything lower than that and personally I think 6'8".
Paul said on 13/Nov/07
Thats an upgrade from you KingNick. You used to say 6'7 for UT.
Thats an upgrade from you KingNick. You used to say 6'7 for UT.
Frank said on 12/Nov/07
Anonymous1, I would say your right and also I was standing alittle further back from him and we were standing on a upward ramp so i look alittle taller
Anonymous1, I would say your right and also I was standing alittle further back from him and we were standing on a upward ramp so i look alittle taller
anonymous 1 said on 12/Nov/07
frank from that above pic would you say that taker had 8 inches on you?
frank from that above pic would you say that taker had 8 inches on you?
KingNick said on 12/Nov/07
I agree, there was only a 5" difference when they fought on Smackdown this week and whatever their actual heights are their shoes looked the same girth wise. Khali is one of the few guys UT actually has to look up to and force him to stand straight. UT 6'8", Khali 71"
I agree, there was only a 5" difference when they fought on Smackdown this week and whatever their actual heights are their shoes looked the same girth wise. Khali is one of the few guys UT actually has to look up to and force him to stand straight. UT 6'8", Khali 71"
anonymous 1 said on 11/Nov/07
taker 6'8",khali 7'1".there is a 5 inch difference .
taker 6'8",khali 7'1".there is a 5 inch difference .
Frank said on 11/Nov/07
Paul Bearer was about 5ft 10 and Vegas, Stone Cold looked about 2 inches or more shorter than Goldberg who is about 6ft 2 to 6ft 3 So Austin could be 6ft to 6ft.5 barefoot and they are plenty of times he looked shorter than Vince
Paul Bearer was about 5ft 10 and Vegas, Stone Cold looked about 2 inches or more shorter than Goldberg who is about 6ft 2 to 6ft 3 So Austin could be 6ft to 6ft.5 barefoot and they are plenty of times he looked shorter than Vince
anonymous 1 said on 11/Nov/07
taker above looks like he has close to a foot on paul bearer,who is 5,9" i believe.
taker above looks like he has close to a foot on paul bearer,who is 5,9" i believe.
Vegas said on 11/Nov/07
topdweeb26; taker has creative control on his character; it is him who wants to be more mma not the WWE. btw he hates playing the deadman gimmick, he has said so many times in the past.
Frank; austin looks his claimed height and more Click Here and Click Here in order to look that tall and be 6ft flat wouldn't he need to be wearing shoes giving him 3-4" because donald trump is 6'3 in shoes, austin at times wore very flat wrestling boots thats probably why he looked shorter sometimes
Spike; taker looked short next to khali on smackdown, one time he did a chokeslam it looked 7" or thereabouts
topdweeb26; taker has creative control on his character; it is him who wants to be more mma not the WWE. btw he hates playing the deadman gimmick, he has said so many times in the past.
Frank; austin looks his claimed height and more Click Here and Click Here in order to look that tall and be 6ft flat wouldn't he need to be wearing shoes giving him 3-4" because donald trump is 6'3 in shoes, austin at times wore very flat wrestling boots thats probably why he looked shorter sometimes
Spike; taker looked short next to khali on smackdown, one time he did a chokeslam it looked 7" or thereabouts
Atoadaso said on 11/Nov/07
Sylvia very well may have been barefoot or in sandals giving Undertaker up to 1" advantage or so in height. Even so, he is minimum 2", most likely 3" over 6'8" listed Sylvia, and since we all know Taker is not 6'10" or even greater, then the only thing to give is Sylvia's true height. I always thought he was about 6'6", but then 6'8"-6'9" seems to high for Taker so it's hard to say from that video. Could just be Sylvia is actually only 6'5" and everyone across the board in UFC is inflated physically.
Sylvia very well may have been barefoot or in sandals giving Undertaker up to 1" advantage or so in height. Even so, he is minimum 2", most likely 3" over 6'8" listed Sylvia, and since we all know Taker is not 6'10" or even greater, then the only thing to give is Sylvia's true height. I always thought he was about 6'6", but then 6'8"-6'9" seems to high for Taker so it's hard to say from that video. Could just be Sylvia is actually only 6'5" and everyone across the board in UFC is inflated physically.
Spike said on 10/Nov/07
Last night take didnt look that much shorter than kahli, and taker stacked up well against him
6'8 taker
Last night take didnt look that much shorter than kahli, and taker stacked up well against him
6'8 taker
Frank said on 10/Nov/07
Austin @ times looked shorter than the 6ft1 to 6ft 1 1/2 Vince so I believe Austin is about 6ft barefoot
Austin @ times looked shorter than the 6ft1 to 6ft 1 1/2 Vince so I believe Austin is about 6ft barefoot
topdweeb26 said on 10/Nov/07
Speaking of the Undertaker and MMA, anyone else think it's stupid that they are making the Undertaker's character more MMA-like? I know it looked more hokey, but I liked the old school Undertaker, the one who was more supernatural-like.
Speaking of the Undertaker and MMA, anyone else think it's stupid that they are making the Undertaker's character more MMA-like? I know it looked more hokey, but I liked the old school Undertaker, the one who was more supernatural-like.
Paul said on 10/Nov/07
I agree Frank and he would probaby say 6'2 if asked.
I agree Frank and he would probaby say 6'2 if asked.
Frank said on 10/Nov/07
Im not Alex but i would say Austin is about 6ft to 6ft.5 Barefoot but can appear a good amount taller in his boots
Im not Alex but i would say Austin is about 6ft to 6ft.5 Barefoot but can appear a good amount taller in his boots
Paul said on 10/Nov/07
Alex, how tall do you think Austin is ? 6ft or just over ? UT must be at least 6in taller.
Alex, how tall do you think Austin is ? 6ft or just over ? UT must be at least 6in taller.
Da Man said on 9/Nov/07
Sylvia physically doesn't look like a 6'8" guy to me, never really comes across that big on TV either for whatever reason. What I've come to realize is that UFC listed heights are barely more realistic than professional wrestling billed heights.
My opinion - Sylvia 6'5"-ish, Taker 6'7"-ish
Sylvia physically doesn't look like a 6'8" guy to me, never really comes across that big on TV either for whatever reason. What I've come to realize is that UFC listed heights are barely more realistic than professional wrestling billed heights.
My opinion - Sylvia 6'5"-ish, Taker 6'7"-ish
Ray said on 9/Nov/07
Yeah, Mr_6/'5/'/' - that's the famous Taker/UFC video showing Taker having what you said of 2-3 inches on Tim Sylvia. I think it's more 3 inches so Sylva is probably around 6'5" maybe 6'6" barefoot and Taker 6'8" barefoot and maybe 6'9" or a shade over with workboots which he was wearing around that time. Taker clearly has him by around 3 inches so really Sylva is shorter than the 6'8" he's billed in my book cause I would peg Taker at around 6'8" barefoot area.
Yeah, Mr_6/'5/'/' - that's the famous Taker/UFC video showing Taker having what you said of 2-3 inches on Tim Sylvia. I think it's more 3 inches so Sylva is probably around 6'5" maybe 6'6" barefoot and Taker 6'8" barefoot and maybe 6'9" or a shade over with workboots which he was wearing around that time. Taker clearly has him by around 3 inches so really Sylva is shorter than the 6'8" he's billed in my book cause I would peg Taker at around 6'8" barefoot area.
KingNick said on 9/Nov/07
Big Show, I think thats the camera angle.
Big Show, I think thats the camera angle.
Alex said on 8/Nov/07
Big Show, yea Austin is doing something there because I've seen UT looks much more taller than Austin other times.
Big Show, yea Austin is doing something there because I've seen UT looks much more taller than Austin other times.
Mr_6'5'' said on 8/Nov/07
watch this link and tell me what you think. someone is lying about someones height, around 1;56 watch. Tim Sylvia who claims 6'8'' is clearly 2-3 inches shorter then the undertaker. will someone please tell me which is lying Click Here
watch this link and tell me what you think. someone is lying about someones height, around 1;56 watch. Tim Sylvia who claims 6'8'' is clearly 2-3 inches shorter then the undertaker. will someone please tell me which is lying Click Here
thankyou taker said on 8/Nov/07
in that picture with frank look very close to that taker is 6'8" is he very dawn tall?
in that picture with frank look very close to that taker is 6'8" is he very dawn tall?
Big Show said on 8/Nov/07
Click Here
Here's a funny backstage sequence with Undertaker and Austin. It's funny because of the size difference. Is Austin standing on his toes?
Click Here
Here's a funny backstage sequence with Undertaker and Austin. It's funny because of the size difference. Is Austin standing on his toes?
Alex said on 8/Nov/07
Michelle McCool I can believe is 5'10, shortest would be 5'9 at the least.
Michelle McCool I can believe is 5'10, shortest would be 5'9 at the least.
cantstop25 said on 7/Nov/07
amazing how a man in his mid 40s can walk on ropes while wearing lifts
btw here he is with michelle mccool who is said to eb 5'10" i really have no idea how tall she is but she probably is the tallest diva in the wwe nowadays, id say undertaker has about 11 inches on her here
Click Here
amazing how a man in his mid 40s can walk on ropes while wearing lifts
btw here he is with michelle mccool who is said to eb 5'10" i really have no idea how tall she is but she probably is the tallest diva in the wwe nowadays, id say undertaker has about 11 inches on her here
Click Here
Mark said on 6/Nov/07
There's some great comments coming through lately, especially from Gamma (I hope they're intended to be funny as really have no basis of proof at all). Wight and Singh 6'8? Try instead 6'10/6'11 for Wight and 6'11/7'0 for Singh. Taker only looks 6'6 to be fair and lookig at former pictures doesn't appear to have lost any real height (if he has mm's.). Nash is at least 6'8 which I've thought for a long time but saying 6'6 is just wasting peoples time I'm affraid.
There's some great comments coming through lately, especially from Gamma (I hope they're intended to be funny as really have no basis of proof at all). Wight and Singh 6'8? Try instead 6'10/6'11 for Wight and 6'11/7'0 for Singh. Taker only looks 6'6 to be fair and lookig at former pictures doesn't appear to have lost any real height (if he has mm's.). Nash is at least 6'8 which I've thought for a long time but saying 6'6 is just wasting peoples time I'm affraid.
Paul said on 6/Nov/07
You are quite entertaining Gamma. I guess I could go out and do the same. Wear boots and lifts to give me 6'4.5 instead of 6'2.5 and then tell people I'm 6'8.5. I'm sure it would work everytime.
You are quite entertaining Gamma. I guess I could go out and do the same. Wear boots and lifts to give me 6'4.5 instead of 6'2.5 and then tell people I'm 6'8.5. I'm sure it would work everytime.
cantstop25 said on 6/Nov/07
so glenn how tall did the undertaker look when you met him?
so glenn how tall did the undertaker look when you met him?
Ghost said on 6/Nov/07
Danimal,
you have Taker at under 6'7 and Khali at 7'2...
please, explain...
Danimal,
you have Taker at under 6'7 and Khali at 7'2...
please, explain...
Gamma_2008 said on 5/Nov/07
Take a 6'4 Undertaker, make him wear boots giving him an inch, add 1 inch internal lifts which makes him 6'6, then say he's 6'10 - and most of you guys will be quite convinced when you see him on TV.
Take a 6'4 Undertaker, make him wear boots giving him an inch, add 1 inch internal lifts which makes him 6'6, then say he's 6'10 - and most of you guys will be quite convinced when you see him on TV.
Alex said on 5/Nov/07
A-Train could have been 6'6 barefoot.
A-Train could have been 6'6 barefoot.
Paul said on 5/Nov/07
'Which one's Frank?'
Adam, the one to the left.
'Which one's Frank?'
Adam, the one to the left.
anonymous 1 said on 5/Nov/07
big show definitely had more than 3 inches on both a-train and taker,so 6,10" is out of the question,i say he,s minumum 6,11".
big show definitely had more than 3 inches on both a-train and taker,so 6,10" is out of the question,i say he,s minumum 6,11".
Anonymous said on 5/Nov/07
Big show 6'10 and Atrain 6'7 Taker 6'7.5.
Big show 6'10 and Atrain 6'7 Taker 6'7.5.
anonymous said on 5/Nov/07
taker imo was looking 6'9",boots i,d say give em 1.25 without taker is lookin 6,8" overall.taker had albert by an inch,albert is a legit 6,7" i believe.
taker imo was looking 6'9",boots i,d say give em 1.25 without taker is lookin 6,8" overall.taker had albert by an inch,albert is a legit 6,7" i believe.
Adam Brennon said on 5/Nov/07
Which one's Frank?
Which one's Frank?
mike m said on 4/Nov/07
wasn,t taker wearing cowboy boots?
wasn,t taker wearing cowboy boots?
Danimal said on 4/Nov/07
They only listed A-Train at 6'8" and then 6'7". If he was really 6'6"+ I promise you we would have have seen a taller listing for him.
They only listed A-Train at 6'8" and then 6'7". If he was really 6'6"+ I promise you we would have have seen a taller listing for him.
Danimal said on 4/Nov/07
Red, that was a VERY decent list.
Red, that was a VERY decent list.
JimmyDavid said on 4/Nov/07
RED, i noticed you actually gave Zeus less height than you gave Hogan... Doesn't look that way at all. Go rent No holds Barred and you'll see what i mean.
RED, i noticed you actually gave Zeus less height than you gave Hogan... Doesn't look that way at all. Go rent No holds Barred and you'll see what i mean.
Big Show said on 3/Nov/07
JT says on 2/Nov/07
Interesting: (Click Here) (Click Here). I didn
JT says on 2/Nov/07
Interesting: (Click Here) (Click Here). I didn
Red said on 3/Nov/07
My current estimations ( barefoot + peak)
The Undertaker 6
My current estimations ( barefoot + peak)
The Undertaker 6
shawn_g said on 3/Nov/07
kane is 6'9 to 6'10 barefoot and undertaker is 6'8 to 6'9 barefoot
kane is 6'9 to 6'10 barefoot and undertaker is 6'8 to 6'9 barefoot
Derek said on 3/Nov/07
Mike- Jimmy Kimmel is 6'0" tops and very well may be 5'11". I agree that Taker looked very tall.
Mike- Jimmy Kimmel is 6'0" tops and very well may be 5'11". I agree that Taker looked very tall.
TRutt said on 3/Nov/07
thank you mike, someone actually knows jimmy is a legit 6'1. UT deff looked 6'10 there
thank you mike, someone actually knows jimmy is a legit 6'1. UT deff looked 6'10 there
mike m said on 3/Nov/07
taker did look pretty tall next to 6,1" jimmy kimmel.
taker did look pretty tall next to 6,1" jimmy kimmel.
mike m said on 3/Nov/07
jimmy kimmel 6'1" appeared to me to be 7-8 inches shorter than taker.
jimmy kimmel 6'1" appeared to me to be 7-8 inches shorter than taker.
Paul said on 3/Nov/07
Taker does seem a shade taller JT. I think Albert is nearer 6'7 and Taker a full 6'7. Taker had def lost some by this stage. If Big Al is only 6'6 though maybe Taker is just over 6'6. A 2in height loss is conceivable (Hogan lost 3' remember). Personally I favour the former theory though.
Taker does seem a shade taller JT. I think Albert is nearer 6'7 and Taker a full 6'7. Taker had def lost some by this stage. If Big Al is only 6'6 though maybe Taker is just over 6'6. A 2in height loss is conceivable (Hogan lost 3' remember). Personally I favour the former theory though.
mike m said on 2/Nov/07
lol.i know what? kane is nothing less than 6'6" if anything.
lol.i know what? kane is nothing less than 6'6" if anything.
Alex2 said on 2/Nov/07
This gamma guy is freakin weird, he says Kane is 6'3.5!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
OMG please go away!
Editor Rob
This gamma guy is freakin weird, he says Kane is 6'3.5!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
OMG please go away!
Editor Rob this guy has been taking too much radiation pills.
Danimal said on 2/Nov/07
Gamma, what is your problem??
Alex, I think Goldberg was taller than Lesnar. Remember the backstage footage. There looked like 1-1.5" height advantage to Goldberg there.
Gamma, what is your problem??
Alex, I think Goldberg was taller than Lesnar. Remember the backstage footage. There looked like 1-1.5" height advantage to Goldberg there.
Paul said on 31/Oct/07
KingNick: 'And I'm guessing you meant HBK at 6'0.5" current and 6'1" previously?'
Nah KingNick, he's been racked on the ropes a few times which could have stretch him slightly over the years.
KingNick: 'And I'm guessing you meant HBK at 6'0.5" current and 6'1" previously?'
Nah KingNick, he's been racked on the ropes a few times which could have stretch him slightly over the years.
Paul said on 31/Oct/07
Vegas it is Halloween afterall..I can play a trick or two surely!...That list was a real treat.
Vegas it is Halloween afterall..I can play a trick or two surely!...That list was a real treat.
Big Show said on 31/Oct/07
Click Here
I wonder what some of your estimates on Albert are. Here he looks the exact same height as Undertaker (yet WWE billed Undertaker as 6'10 and Albert as 6'8). Albert was having his biggest push in the WWE at that moment and was the Intercontinental Champion.
Click Here
I wonder what some of your estimates on Albert are. Here he looks the exact same height as Undertaker (yet WWE billed Undertaker as 6'10 and Albert as 6'8). Albert was having his biggest push in the WWE at that moment and was the Intercontinental Champion.
Big Show said on 31/Oct/07
Anonymous are you claiming that WWE and in the past WCW were actually downgrading some of their top stars.
Giant Gonzales - 7'9 (he was billed by WCW as 7'7 and credited by Guinness Book of Records with a height of 7'6).
Nathan Jones - 6'11 (WWE and Strong man competitions billed him as 6'10)
Big Show - 7'2 (WWE billed him as 7' when he just joined the WWE)
Kevin Nash - 7' (has claimed a height of 6'10)
Undertaker - 6'10.5 (even WWE billed him at 6'10)
Big John Studd - 6'10 (I guess that 6'5 Footballplayer must've been standing on a box when he was interviewed alongside Studd)
Jake Roberts - 6'7 (billed as 6'5)
I agree with Vegas, this is definately the worst height list I've seen so far. Obviously the poster didn't do any research before making this list.
Anonymous are you claiming that WWE and in the past WCW were actually downgrading some of their top stars.
Giant Gonzales - 7'9 (he was billed by WCW as 7'7 and credited by Guinness Book of Records with a height of 7'6).
Nathan Jones - 6'11 (WWE and Strong man competitions billed him as 6'10)
Big Show - 7'2 (WWE billed him as 7' when he just joined the WWE)
Kevin Nash - 7' (has claimed a height of 6'10)
Undertaker - 6'10.5 (even WWE billed him at 6'10)
Big John Studd - 6'10 (I guess that 6'5 Footballplayer must've been standing on a box when he was interviewed alongside Studd)
Jake Roberts - 6'7 (billed as 6'5)
I agree with Vegas, this is definately the worst height list I've seen so far. Obviously the poster didn't do any research before making this list.
KingNick said on 31/Oct/07
Anyonymous, I respect your opinions, just beware of the feedback you're going to get on here :>)
And I'm guessing you meant HBK at 6'0.5" current and 6'1" previously?
Thanks for your feedback guys!
Happy Halloween everybody!
Anyonymous, I respect your opinions, just beware of the feedback you're going to get on here :>)
And I'm guessing you meant HBK at 6'0.5" current and 6'1" previously?
Thanks for your feedback guys!
Happy Halloween everybody!
Vegas said on 31/Oct/07
omg possible worst list ever, is that you again paul playing tricks, lol
lets just take morgan and jones as an example; 4" difference???
undertaker and kane 4" difference???
big show and akebono 7" difference?? akebono 6'5, what does that make bob sapp, gary goodridge and remy bonjasky so; barely 6'0???
hbk taller than cena :)
omg possible worst list ever, is that you again paul playing tricks, lol
lets just take morgan and jones as an example; 4" difference???
undertaker and kane 4" difference???
big show and akebono 7" difference?? akebono 6'5, what does that make bob sapp, gary goodridge and remy bonjasky so; barely 6'0???
hbk taller than cena :)
Anonymous said on 31/Oct/07
KingNick, some of them I agree with, some are too short. Some are a tall tale.
If I may correct you:
Giant Gonzalez - 7'9"
Great Khali
KingNick, some of them I agree with, some are too short. Some are a tall tale.
If I may correct you:
Giant Gonzalez - 7'9"
Great Khali
Vegas said on 31/Oct/07
goldberg and triple h in streets Click Here goldberg and triple h in Click Here
as torgrim steve said triple h is as tall as goldberg and maybe half an inch taller ;)
JimmyDavid; yes Matt Morgan is/was taller than Eudy but at least 1.5" imo.
goldberg and triple h in streets Click Here goldberg and triple h in Click Here
as torgrim steve said triple h is as tall as goldberg and maybe half an inch taller ;)
JimmyDavid; yes Matt Morgan is/was taller than Eudy but at least 1.5" imo.
Kash said on 31/Oct/07
I've been reading the comments and looking at all the evidence in pictures for a while now without saying anything. It seems to me that the listing of 6'7.5 is more likely to be close to undertaker's peak height, rather now I can't see him at anything more than 6'6.5. For those of you who think that he may have been 6'9 or 10 barefoot, u have to remmeber that he was billed at 6'8 prior to his joining with the WWF, so it is logically unlikley that he was ever beyond this mark (barefoot).
I've been reading the comments and looking at all the evidence in pictures for a while now without saying anything. It seems to me that the listing of 6'7.5 is more likely to be close to undertaker's peak height, rather now I can't see him at anything more than 6'6.5. For those of you who think that he may have been 6'9 or 10 barefoot, u have to remmeber that he was billed at 6'8 prior to his joining with the WWF, so it is logically unlikley that he was ever beyond this mark (barefoot).
Alex said on 31/Oct/07
Rock- 6'2 3/4
Lesnar- 6'2
Goldberg- 6'2
Rock- 6'2 3/4
Lesnar- 6'2
Goldberg- 6'2
JimmyDavid said on 31/Oct/07
I bet anything that Morgan isn't taller than Sid in a million years. They are either the same or Sid is a bit taller then...
I bet anything that Morgan isn't taller than Sid in a million years. They are either the same or Sid is a bit taller then...
Danimal said on 31/Oct/07
KingNick, seems about right except for HHH and Austin. Both are an 1" less than you have them at and chop off a .5" off of Sid, The Rock and Batista while you're at it.
KingNick, seems about right except for HHH and Austin. Both are an 1" less than you have them at and chop off a .5" off of Sid, The Rock and Batista while you're at it.
Alex2 said on 31/Oct/07
I like those estimates KingNick, but i dont agree with Lashley as 6' hes huge, at least 6'2 and i think Cena is at least 6'1 and Hogan still is around 6'4 i reckon.
I like those estimates KingNick, but i dont agree with Lashley as 6' hes huge, at least 6'2 and i think Cena is at least 6'1 and Hogan still is around 6'4 i reckon.
KingNick said on 30/Oct/07
I haven't done this in a while. I changed a couple and left out ones I'm just not sure about:
Giant Gonzalez - 7'7"
Great Khali
I haven't done this in a while. I changed a couple and left out ones I'm just not sure about:
Giant Gonzalez - 7'7"
Great Khali
Alex2 said on 30/Oct/07
Yes but he could have grown since collage...
Yes but he could have grown since collage...
CK said on 30/Oct/07
JBL is 6'5" I have his college football card.
JBL is 6'5" I have his college football card.
Danimal said on 30/Oct/07
gee says on 30/Oct/07
UT- 6'6 1/2-6'6 3/4 (peak),today 6'6
JBL 6'4-6'4 1/2
Kane- 6'6 1/2-6'7
Rock- 6'1 - 6'2
HHH- 6'1
Big Show 6'11
Lesnar- 6'1
Batista, 6'2 may be a bit under
Angle- 5'10
Austin- 6'0
Orton, 6'3
Nash, 6'9(peak)
goldie 6'1 1/4
believe that or not.
Put down the crack pipe son.
gee says on 30/Oct/07
UT- 6'6 1/2-6'6 3/4 (peak),today 6'6
JBL 6'4-6'4 1/2
Kane- 6'6 1/2-6'7
Rock- 6'1 - 6'2
HHH- 6'1
Big Show 6'11
Lesnar- 6'1
Batista, 6'2 may be a bit under
Angle- 5'10
Austin- 6'0
Orton, 6'3
Nash, 6'9(peak)
goldie 6'1 1/4
believe that or not.
Put down the crack pipe son.
Danimal said on 30/Oct/07
Both Lesnar and Goldberg have listed at 6'2" AND 6'3" at different times, in different places. I still give the height advantage to Goldberg. I give Lesnar 6'1.5" and Goldberg 6'2 1/4".
As for The Rock he is under 6'3", that I would bet the entire farm on.
Both Lesnar and Goldberg have listed at 6'2" AND 6'3" at different times, in different places. I still give the height advantage to Goldberg. I give Lesnar 6'1.5" and Goldberg 6'2 1/4".
As for The Rock he is under 6'3", that I would bet the entire farm on.
Alex2 said on 30/Oct/07
Triple H lower than 6'2.5 is rediculous he literally towers over Vince McMahon who is like 6'1 and look he is easily 6'2-6'3 and JBL is at least 6'6 why cant you guys just accept it?
Triple H lower than 6'2.5 is rediculous he literally towers over Vince McMahon who is like 6'1 and look he is easily 6'2-6'3 and JBL is at least 6'6 why cant you guys just accept it?
Vegas said on 30/Oct/07
actually lesnar was listed at 6'3 in ncaa
brock lesnar and 6'4.5" measured 300lb Stephen Neal of New England Patriots in 1999, i see no nearly 4" between the two but then i didn't expect too :P
Click Here the commentators describe lesnar as the bigger guy, (yet some here will have us believe lesnar (or should that be leznar) is less than 6'2, lol)
actually lesnar was listed at 6'3 in ncaa
brock lesnar and 6'4.5" measured 300lb Stephen Neal of New England Patriots in 1999, i see no nearly 4" between the two but then i didn't expect too :P
Click Here the commentators describe lesnar as the bigger guy, (yet some here will have us believe lesnar (or should that be leznar) is less than 6'2, lol)
Big Show said on 30/Oct/07
Gee, you've got Rock at only 6'1-6'2? We can start downgrading a couple of Hollywood celebs if that's the case. If we downgrade those ones, we can start downgrading the guys who appeared with these guys (and that's a lot of people). The Rock was about 2 or 3 inches taller than Schwarzenegger, 0.5 inch taller than Brendan Fraser, about 1.5 inch taller than Samuel L. Jackson. Maybe 1 inch shorter than 6'4 Vince Vaughn. I'd say the Rock is around 6'3. The lowest I see him at is 6'2.5 and the tallest 6'3.5. Triple H doesn't look anything shorter than 6'1.5 to me.
Lesnar has been billed as 6'2 by the Vikings and I believe that was his billing too when he was an amateur wrestling. He might be 6'1.5 and they rounded it up to 6'2, but I doubt he's anything shorter than that. Goldberg is I think 6'2 (he was a smidge taller than Lesnar).
Gee, you've got Rock at only 6'1-6'2? We can start downgrading a couple of Hollywood celebs if that's the case. If we downgrade those ones, we can start downgrading the guys who appeared with these guys (and that's a lot of people). The Rock was about 2 or 3 inches taller than Schwarzenegger, 0.5 inch taller than Brendan Fraser, about 1.5 inch taller than Samuel L. Jackson. Maybe 1 inch shorter than 6'4 Vince Vaughn. I'd say the Rock is around 6'3. The lowest I see him at is 6'2.5 and the tallest 6'3.5. Triple H doesn't look anything shorter than 6'1.5 to me.
Lesnar has been billed as 6'2 by the Vikings and I believe that was his billing too when he was an amateur wrestling. He might be 6'1.5 and they rounded it up to 6'2, but I doubt he's anything shorter than that. Goldberg is I think 6'2 (he was a smidge taller than Lesnar).
Vegas said on 30/Oct/07
what heights are akebono and the coach so viper ;)
what heights are akebono and the coach so viper ;)
Alex said on 30/Oct/07
JBL I'd give 6'5 now but no more. His cowboy boots could make him appear more taller as well.
JBL I'd give 6'5 now but no more. His cowboy boots could make him appear more taller as well.
Kevin Durant said on 30/Oct/07
I think JBL is 6'5" or 6'5.5", he literally towered over the 6'3" Batista in Friday Night Smackdown.
I think JBL is 6'5" or 6'5.5", he literally towered over the 6'3" Batista in Friday Night Smackdown.
Viper said on 30/Oct/07
I agree with JBL at 6-4. 6-6 is inflating him some. Most of those looked pretty accurate Id say. Though I think Big Show could be shorter than 6-11.
I agree with JBL at 6-4. 6-6 is inflating him some. Most of those looked pretty accurate Id say. Though I think Big Show could be shorter than 6-11.
Alex2 said on 30/Oct/07
gee, those are the worst estimates ever, JBL 6'4? pff! hes at least 6'6
gee, those are the worst estimates ever, JBL 6'4? pff! hes at least 6'6
gee said on 30/Oct/07
UT- 6'6 1/2-6'6 3/4 (peak),today 6'6
JBL 6'4-6'4 1/2
Kane- 6'6 1/2-6'7
Rock- 6'1 - 6'2
HHH- 6'1
Big Show 6'11
Lesnar- 6'1
Batista, 6'2 may be a bit under
Angle- 5'10
Austin- 6'0
Orton, 6'3
Nash, 6'9(peak)
goldie 6'1 1/4
believe that or not.
UT- 6'6 1/2-6'6 3/4 (peak),today 6'6
JBL 6'4-6'4 1/2
Kane- 6'6 1/2-6'7
Rock- 6'1 - 6'2
HHH- 6'1
Big Show 6'11
Lesnar- 6'1
Batista, 6'2 may be a bit under
Angle- 5'10
Austin- 6'0
Orton, 6'3
Nash, 6'9(peak)
goldie 6'1 1/4
believe that or not.
Ghost said on 30/Oct/07
Alex2, give it up.
Kane himself says he is 6'8.
Certainly that means he isn't Taller than that, espacially when he is billed 7 feet tall.
Alex2, give it up.
Kane himself says he is 6'8.
Certainly that means he isn't Taller than that, espacially when he is billed 7 feet tall.
Alex2 said on 29/Oct/07
Taker = 6'8 or maybe 6'8.5 and Kane at least 6'9
Taker = 6'8 or maybe 6'8.5 and Kane at least 6'9
Gollum said on 28/Oct/07
Taker 6'8 and so is Kane.
Taker 6'8 and so is Kane.
ShawnG said on 27/Oct/07
taker is 6'9 barefoot and the boots make him 6'10
taker is 6'9 barefoot and the boots make him 6'10
KingNick said on 27/Oct/07
good find ben! I posted that a while back too, there's a buncha other wrestlers that talk about their real size.
good find ben! I posted that a while back too, there's a buncha other wrestlers that talk about their real size.
jack said on 27/Oct/07
as i have viewed these shows for years i notice that undetaker has lost at least 1 inch of height despite wearing the same footwear .In 2000-2005 is appeared to be at his tallest. but recently he has shrunk in size is slimmer than ever and also shorter -either his legs or upper body have shortened .he appeared tallest with his hair short and was 6'9 once but is now about 6'8
as i have viewed these shows for years i notice that undetaker has lost at least 1 inch of height despite wearing the same footwear .In 2000-2005 is appeared to be at his tallest. but recently he has shrunk in size is slimmer than ever and also shorter -either his legs or upper body have shortened .he appeared tallest with his hair short and was 6'9 once but is now about 6'8
ben said on 27/Oct/07
just reading the wwe unscripted book from 2003 or 04.. undertaker in that says he's 6'8.
He also says.
When sara and i moved in together she was cooking 3 square meals a day, plus desert at night. Whein i hurt my pecs- I was originally out with a groin tear, and when rehabbing that i tore my pecs-I was 350 pounds, heaviest i'd ever been. I was training like an animal, with heavy weights, but sara was feeding me so well i was enormous.
just reading the wwe unscripted book from 2003 or 04.. undertaker in that says he's 6'8.
He also says.
When sara and i moved in together she was cooking 3 square meals a day, plus desert at night. Whein i hurt my pecs- I was originally out with a groin tear, and when rehabbing that i tore my pecs-I was 350 pounds, heaviest i'd ever been. I was training like an animal, with heavy weights, but sara was feeding me so well i was enormous.
Supermanfan380 said on 26/Oct/07
Saying Khali does not have gigantism is absurd. Look at his face!, and the boot size gaps between his teeth. {""""}
Saying Khali does not have gigantism is absurd. Look at his face!, and the boot size gaps between his teeth. {""""}
Da Man said on 26/Oct/07
Khali most definitely has acromegaly.
Khali most definitely has acromegaly.
JimmyDavid said on 24/Oct/07
At least i've seen it described that way on some websites. I am going by what i read.
At least i've seen it described that way on some websites. I am going by what i read.
anonymous said on 24/Oct/07
khali doesn,t? he has the physical features the protruding features ,like the chin,large hands.
khali doesn,t? he has the physical features the protruding features ,like the chin,large hands.
undertakeris9ft said on 24/Oct/07
khali does not have gigantism, he is one of very few people who are naturally very tall, i watched a program about him in england, and plus why do you bitches keep harping on about how tall taker is, why does it matter? its obvious that he is at least 6ft 6.786 inches and a maximum of 6 feet 8.132 inches (inc hair)
khali does not have gigantism, he is one of very few people who are naturally very tall, i watched a program about him in england, and plus why do you bitches keep harping on about how tall taker is, why does it matter? its obvious that he is at least 6ft 6.786 inches and a maximum of 6 feet 8.132 inches (inc hair)
KingNick said on 23/Oct/07
I was found a site or two on heights, I have no idea how legitimate it is, it just looks like an opinion but I think its interesting to look at b/c its pretty close to people's opinions around here Click Here and
I was found a site or two on heights, I have no idea how legitimate it is, it just looks like an opinion but I think its interesting to look at b/c its pretty close to people's opinions around here Click Here and
Gollum said on 23/Oct/07
That was just wrong!
That was just wrong!
Paul said on 23/Oct/07
Sorry couldn't resist posting that link. He is nastier even than Khali.
Sorry couldn't resist posting that link. He is nastier even than Khali.
JimmyDavid said on 23/Oct/07
Lol, Anonymous i was having lunch, man.
Well, Khali is not a genetic big man. He has a disease called gigantism. Those people, instead of getting to adult size and stop, most times keep growing. So it's possible he is taller now than he was a few years back.
Lol, Anonymous i was having lunch, man.
Well, Khali is not a genetic big man. He has a disease called gigantism. Those people, instead of getting to adult size and stop, most times keep growing. So it's possible he is taller now than he was a few years back.
Alex said on 22/Oct/07
Khali was measured at 6'11 1/2 somewhere I believe so thats gotta be his minimum height he would be.
Khali was measured at 6'11 1/2 somewhere I believe so thats gotta be his minimum height he would be.
JimmyDavid said on 22/Oct/07
Khali at anything under 7 feet is impossible. The man is huge.
Khali at anything under 7 feet is impossible. The man is huge.
anonymous said on 22/Oct/07
big show 6,9" ? really,so kane being 4 -5 inches shorter than big show would only be 6,4"or 6,5".clearly i remember taker had hogan by 2-3 inches,so lets make it 2 inches,that would put taker at least 6'7",not 6,6".
big show 6,9" ? really,so kane being 4 -5 inches shorter than big show would only be 6,4"or 6,5".clearly i remember taker had hogan by 2-3 inches,so lets make it 2 inches,that would put taker at least 6'7",not 6,6".
dave said on 22/Oct/07
Khali is 6'11''? So I guess Daivari is 5'7''? Shane McMahon in turn is 5'10''?
Khali is 6'11''? So I guess Daivari is 5'7''? Shane McMahon in turn is 5'10''?
Alex said on 22/Oct/07
UT had only 1/2 inch on Sid. UT at his peak was anywhere from 6'7 to 6'8 so Sid was at least 6'7ish then too.
UT had only 1/2 inch on Sid. UT at his peak was anywhere from 6'7 to 6'8 so Sid was at least 6'7ish then too.
Gollum said on 22/Oct/07
lookuptothetallpeople says on 21/Oct/07
undertaker never wis never was and never will be over 6'6.25! he was the most overly exaggerated wrestler ever. big show will never be 7'0 he was 6'9.75-6'10.25 khali is about 6'11. you have to realize wrestling is fake. the only guy i believe was real;ly tall was sid. he was a legit 6'7
Why was Undertaker taller than Sid? Or was Sid really 6'5?
lookuptothetallpeople says on 21/Oct/07
undertaker never wis never was and never will be over 6'6.25! he was the most overly exaggerated wrestler ever. big show will never be 7'0 he was 6'9.75-6'10.25 khali is about 6'11. you have to realize wrestling is fake. the only guy i believe was real;ly tall was sid. he was a legit 6'7
Why was Undertaker taller than Sid? Or was Sid really 6'5?
anonymous said on 22/Oct/07
mean gene looks about shoulder level on taker,im guessing gene is about 5'8",that would put taker closer to 6'8" maybe,gonzales definitely imo has taker by 10 inches,gonzales does look a legit 7'6".
mean gene looks about shoulder level on taker,im guessing gene is about 5'8",that would put taker closer to 6'8" maybe,gonzales definitely imo has taker by 10 inches,gonzales does look a legit 7'6".
TRutt said on 22/Oct/07
yeah.. see then u have guys like me who continuously believe the UT is taller then 6'7 or 6'7.5 w/e the hell and tho sum pics do look like taker may be at least 6'9 but alot of other pics do point to the fact that he moight be 6'8. go figure
yeah.. see then u have guys like me who continuously believe the UT is taller then 6'7 or 6'7.5 w/e the hell and tho sum pics do look like taker may be at least 6'9 but alot of other pics do point to the fact that he moight be 6'8. go figure
lookuptothetallpeople said on 21/Oct/07
undertaker never wis never was and never will be over 6'6.25! he was the most overly exaggerated wrestler ever. big show will never be 7'0 he was 6'9.75-6'10.25 khali is about 6'11. you have to realize wrestling is fake. the only guy i believe was real;ly tall was sid. he was a legit 6'7
undertaker never wis never was and never will be over 6'6.25! he was the most overly exaggerated wrestler ever. big show will never be 7'0 he was 6'9.75-6'10.25 khali is about 6'11. you have to realize wrestling is fake. the only guy i believe was real;ly tall was sid. he was a legit 6'7
KingNick said on 21/Oct/07
anonymous, its not that easy on this site :>)
anonymous, its not that easy on this site :>)
anonymous said on 21/Oct/07
ok then that settles it ,undertaker is 6'7" today.
ok then that settles it ,undertaker is 6'7" today.
Alex said on 20/Oct/07
Batista is 4-5 inches shorter than UT easily based on those pictures.
JBL is around 3 inches taller than Batista.
Batista is 4-5 inches shorter than UT easily based on those pictures.
JBL is around 3 inches taller than Batista.
mikez said on 20/Oct/07
Batista is around 6'2-6'3..no way is he 6'5...here with a 6'4 250 lb guy on the left.
Batista is around 6'2-6'3..no way is he 6'5...here with a 6'4 250 lb guy on the left.
anonymous said on 20/Oct/07
batista is not 6,5" just watch last nights episode of smackdown where jbl interviews him,batista was at least 4-5 inches shorter,batista is 6'2",jbl is 6'6",maybe 6,7" with the cowboy boots.if batista is 6'5" then jbl is 6'9",lol.
batista is not 6,5" just watch last nights episode of smackdown where jbl interviews him,batista was at least 4-5 inches shorter,batista is 6'2",jbl is 6'6",maybe 6,7" with the cowboy boots.if batista is 6'5" then jbl is 6'9",lol.
Vegas said on 20/Oct/07
no hatton weighed in at dead-on 140lb for his last fight, will end up somewhere near 150lb for the mayweather fight coming up soon, he is probably between 140-150lb there.
at 115lb he would be boxing somewhere between flyweight and bantamweight, hatton boxes at welterweight now, thats three steps up from flyweight
no hatton weighed in at dead-on 140lb for his last fight, will end up somewhere near 150lb for the mayweather fight coming up soon, he is probably between 140-150lb there.
at 115lb he would be boxing somewhere between flyweight and bantamweight, hatton boxes at welterweight now, thats three steps up from flyweight
JohnR said on 20/Oct/07
Vegas great pics. Batista is a legit 6-foot-5 have any of you ever seen him in real-life? the guy is just massive in all aspects. Judging by these good pics I'm sorry to say it but UT looks around...dare i say 6'9 or maybe 6'10 here. boo-yah!
Vegas great pics. Batista is a legit 6-foot-5 have any of you ever seen him in real-life? the guy is just massive in all aspects. Judging by these good pics I'm sorry to say it but UT looks around...dare i say 6'9 or maybe 6'10 here. boo-yah!
JimmyDavid said on 20/Oct/07
The little guy looks below 140lbs. Maybe 115lbs max. Again, this is just me guessing...
The little guy looks below 140lbs. Maybe 115lbs max. Again, this is just me guessing...
Vegas said on 20/Oct/07
batista in cowboy boots and undertaker in wrestling gear Click Here
taker and batista again both in streets Click Here
for those wondering the little guy there is 5'6 140lb boxing welterweight ricky hatton
batista in cowboy boots and undertaker in wrestling gear Click Here
taker and batista again both in streets Click Here
for those wondering the little guy there is 5'6 140lb boxing welterweight ricky hatton
Atoadaso said on 20/Oct/07
JBL looked about 3" taller than Batista, on Smackdown this week when he interviewed him. That would put him from 6'5" to 6'6".
JBL looked about 3" taller than Batista, on Smackdown this week when he interviewed him. That would put him from 6'5" to 6'6".
JT said on 19/Oct/07
Thanks Chris. Another great photo! Adrian Street does look around 5'3" as 6'1" or so Vince has him by roughly a head size (~ 10 inches).
Thanks Chris. Another great photo! Adrian Street does look around 5'3" as 6'1" or so Vince has him by roughly a head size (~ 10 inches).
KingNick said on 19/Oct/07
Chris, great pic man! Looks pretty accurate height-wise for me
Chris, great pic man! Looks pretty accurate height-wise for me
Zordon said on 19/Oct/07
More notes from last week's SmackDown! (10/12/2007): Following the Bros. Of Destruction match, when they are showing highlights of it, Michale Cole asks JBL what it feels like to be tombstoned by UT. After a few moments JBL replies, "Why do you think I'm only 6'6" now?"
Basically, JBL was admitting right there that he has lost height. I know that presently he is billed at 6'6" by the WWE, and was billed by them at 6'7" several years ago. So odds are he is about 6'5.5" now, and was 6'6.5" in his prime. This makes sense, seeing as JBL is as tall, if not taller, than the Undertaker when JBL is wearing his cowboy boots (which give him an extra 2 inches or so = 6'7.5" = The Undertaker's height). Then again, a 6'6.5" peak would mean he would have only been a half inch shorter than Sid, which doesn't seem right...I'm all confused! Does anybody have pictures of these two (JBL and Sid) standing next to each other?
More notes from last week's SmackDown! (10/12/2007): Following the Bros. Of Destruction match, when they are showing highlights of it, Michale Cole asks JBL what it feels like to be tombstoned by UT. After a few moments JBL replies, "Why do you think I'm only 6'6" now?"
Basically, JBL was admitting right there that he has lost height. I know that presently he is billed at 6'6" by the WWE, and was billed by them at 6'7" several years ago. So odds are he is about 6'5.5" now, and was 6'6.5" in his prime. This makes sense, seeing as JBL is as tall, if not taller, than the Undertaker when JBL is wearing his cowboy boots (which give him an extra 2 inches or so = 6'7.5" = The Undertaker's height). Then again, a 6'6.5" peak would mean he would have only been a half inch shorter than Sid, which doesn't seem right...I'm all confused! Does anybody have pictures of these two (JBL and Sid) standing next to each other?
Vegas said on 19/Oct/07
street was billed at 5'8 from time to time but for the majority of the time he was billed at 5'7. i saw him on british tv on a few occasions during the early 1980s.
street was billed at 5'8 from time to time but for the majority of the time he was billed at 5'7. i saw him on british tv on a few occasions during the early 1980s.
nick said on 19/Oct/07
Click Here
The undertaker with good posture. Around a 4 inch difference so there is nothing out of the norm.
Click Here
The undertaker with good posture. Around a 4 inch difference so there is nothing out of the norm.
Chris said on 19/Oct/07
I'm not sure if you guys have seen this photo already or not..but I have had it in my collection for awhile now so I'm thinking it was taken backstage at a WWE event in 2002 or 2003. The candid photo shows Vince, Undertaker and Big Show posing with former wrestler British wrestler Adrian Street and his wife/valet, Miss Linda....I believe Street was a legit 5'3" but supposeably a very tough guy.
Click Here
I'm not sure if you guys have seen this photo already or not..but I have had it in my collection for awhile now so I'm thinking it was taken backstage at a WWE event in 2002 or 2003. The candid photo shows Vince, Undertaker and Big Show posing with former wrestler British wrestler Adrian Street and his wife/valet, Miss Linda....I believe Street was a legit 5'3" but supposeably a very tough guy.
Click Here
Alex said on 19/Oct/07
UT had around 5 inches on HHH in most staredowns. UT has a long forehead and if someone comes up to just his eye leve its going to still be a good 5 inch difference.
UT had around 5 inches on HHH in most staredowns. UT has a long forehead and if someone comes up to just his eye leve its going to still be a good 5 inch difference.
anonymous said on 19/Oct/07
taker appeared to have 5-6 inches on hhh,i say taker 6'7"
taker appeared to have 5-6 inches on hhh,i say taker 6'7"
Ray said on 18/Oct/07
The pic of Mamum with Taker is a cool one to have but is pretty mnuch useless to determine his height; Taker isn't even posing for a picture there; he's standing casually with his head tilted slightly down; he is not standing tall/posing for a picture like Kaner and Sid are. Here's my guess for those 3: Sid 6'7", Taker 6'7.5-6'8", and Kane 6'8". In my eyes Taker has Sid by an inch so if Sid is 6'7" then Taker is close to 6'8"; if Sid is 6'6.5" then Taker is around 6'7.5", and if Sid is 6'6" then taker is 6'7". Kane has Taker by .5-1" maybe - questionable due to his boots which are bigger than Taker's.
The pic of Mamum with Taker is a cool one to have but is pretty mnuch useless to determine his height; Taker isn't even posing for a picture there; he's standing casually with his head tilted slightly down; he is not standing tall/posing for a picture like Kaner and Sid are. Here's my guess for those 3: Sid 6'7", Taker 6'7.5-6'8", and Kane 6'8". In my eyes Taker has Sid by an inch so if Sid is 6'7" then Taker is close to 6'8"; if Sid is 6'6.5" then Taker is around 6'7.5", and if Sid is 6'6" then taker is 6'7". Kane has Taker by .5-1" maybe - questionable due to his boots which are bigger than Taker's.
nick said on 17/Oct/07
well shorter than kane, no way bud. At wrestlemania 14 kane and undertaker had a staredown. the top of takers head was a hair under an inch lower, but kane had his big lifts on so it evens out. There is a picture on google of undertaker at a side view when he had his har short I SWEAR TO YOU that he looks shorter only because he has low set eyes or a very high forhead and crown. I measured 5.5 6 inches from eyes but due to my inability to do a perfect measure with the angle he had atleast 5.5 inches when your typical huy has more like 4 inches
well shorter than kane, no way bud. At wrestlemania 14 kane and undertaker had a staredown. the top of takers head was a hair under an inch lower, but kane had his big lifts on so it evens out. There is a picture on google of undertaker at a side view when he had his har short I SWEAR TO YOU that he looks shorter only because he has low set eyes or a very high forhead and crown. I measured 5.5 6 inches from eyes but due to my inability to do a perfect measure with the angle he had atleast 5.5 inches when your typical huy has more like 4 inches
nick said on 17/Oct/07
LISTEN, if the top of mamuns head is 5'8 the top of the picture (end would be 6'6 or 10 inches, undertaker exceeds its so you can not be considering this or that, the picture just proves that hes well into 6;7 or 6;8 thats it.
LISTEN, if the top of mamuns head is 5'8 the top of the picture (end would be 6'6 or 10 inches, undertaker exceeds its so you can not be considering this or that, the picture just proves that hes well into 6;7 or 6;8 thats it.
KingNick said on 17/Oct/07
I think he looks pretty gigantic in the Mamun pic
I think he looks pretty gigantic in the Mamun pic
Frank said on 17/Oct/07
Takers head is down if he had his head tilted up Taker would look taller
Whats Funny that Mamum 6ft 6 cousin looks as tall or taller than alot of these guys i have to admit
Takers head is down if he had his head tilted up Taker would look taller
Whats Funny that Mamum 6ft 6 cousin looks as tall or taller than alot of these guys i have to admit
Vegas said on 16/Oct/07
frank; how many photos of wrestlers does mamun have??
frank; how many photos of wrestlers does mamun have??
Vegas said on 15/Oct/07
JimmyDavid says on 14/Oct/07
Is Festus taller than Nathan Jones
he was shorter than kane, so no
JimmyDavid says on 14/Oct/07
Is Festus taller than Nathan Jones
he was shorter than kane, so no
JimmyDavid said on 14/Oct/07
Is Festus taller than Nathan Jones?
Is Festus taller than Nathan Jones?
Vegas said on 14/Oct/07
good find there zordon, watching smackdown i estimated the guy at 6'6. i really don't know why they would have a jobber that tall???
good find there zordon, watching smackdown i estimated the guy at 6'6. i really don't know why they would have a jobber that tall???
Zordon said on 14/Oct/07
Vegas,
I found out more info. about that guy. Like you said, his real name is Jay Adams. He also wrestles under the name "Eddie Venom." According to his MySpace Click Here he is 6ft 7in tall.
Vegas,
I found out more info. about that guy. Like you said, his real name is Jay Adams. He also wrestles under the name "Eddie Venom." According to his MySpace Click Here he is 6ft 7in tall.
JimmyDavid said on 14/Oct/07
Well, and let's add SID himself to that list. I believe he is returning to WWE soon. He is cured and wrestling again.
Well, and let's add SID himself to that list. I believe he is returning to WWE soon. He is cured and wrestling again.
Frank said on 14/Oct/07
Vegas MAMUN said on The Sid Eudy Page that the guy next to Sid was not his cousin and i asked him who was taller Sid or his 6ft 6 cousin....
Vegas MAMUN said on The Sid Eudy Page that the guy next to Sid was not his cousin and i asked him who was taller Sid or his 6ft 6 cousin....
Danimal said on 14/Oct/07
Ron Reis was 7'2" and when he and Big Show were in the WCW, Reis barely had a full inch on Big Show, who then appeared to be a legite 7'1"-7'2" man himself.
Ron Reis was 7'2" and when he and Big Show were in the WCW, Reis barely had a full inch on Big Show, who then appeared to be a legite 7'1"-7'2" man himself.
Vegas said on 14/Oct/07
that mowhawk dudes name is either Conrad Carnes or Jay Adams. Can't find anything on either to be honest. He looked about the same height as Festus to me....
Reis was pretty well known, he went through some awful gimmicks in WCW such as the yeti, giant ninja, grunge reis etc, he is still wrestling in the indies in some christian wrestling fed.
keep an eye out for some tall guys to make their wwe debuts in the near future. Drew Galloway made his debut on smackdown this week. he is a legit 6'5 225lb (obviously will be billed bigger), seamus o shaughnessy (a 6'4-6'5 260lb) redhaired Irish guy (i wonder what gimmick they will give him, giant leprechaun i suppose lol) will follow soon enough and the biggest of them all Stu Sanders from england who is about 6'6-6'7 250lb. Vince has just about signed up every big guy 6'4+ in the UK/ireland.
ryan wilson aka jacob duncan had a darkmatch on raw this week so expect to see him very very soon on wwe tv. This guy is at least 6'9 from what i have seen of him (not much i will admit). He is usually billed at 7 foot, at least he was in TNA.
that mowhawk dudes name is either Conrad Carnes or Jay Adams. Can't find anything on either to be honest. He looked about the same height as Festus to me....
Reis was pretty well known, he went through some awful gimmicks in WCW such as the yeti, giant ninja, grunge reis etc, he is still wrestling in the indies in some christian wrestling fed.
keep an eye out for some tall guys to make their wwe debuts in the near future. Drew Galloway made his debut on smackdown this week. he is a legit 6'5 225lb (obviously will be billed bigger), seamus o shaughnessy (a 6'4-6'5 260lb) redhaired Irish guy (i wonder what gimmick they will give him, giant leprechaun i suppose lol) will follow soon enough and the biggest of them all Stu Sanders from england who is about 6'6-6'7 250lb. Vince has just about signed up every big guy 6'4+ in the UK/ireland.
ryan wilson aka jacob duncan had a darkmatch on raw this week so expect to see him very very soon on wwe tv. This guy is at least 6'9 from what i have seen of him (not much i will admit). He is usually billed at 7 foot, at least he was in TNA.
JimmyDavid said on 14/Oct/07
I have no idea who that guy is. But another not well known wrestler that hasn't been seen around is Ron Reis. Huge guy!! Much bigger than Sid and Undertaker. Even taller than Big Show or Khali. Where is he these days? Anybody knows?
I have no idea who that guy is. But another not well known wrestler that hasn't been seen around is Ron Reis. Huge guy!! Much bigger than Sid and Undertaker. Even taller than Big Show or Khali. Where is he these days? Anybody knows?
Zordon said on 14/Oct/07
Did anybody see that one guy this last week on SmackDown! (10/12/2007) during the Jesse and Festus tag match? He was on the other team and had a mowhawk haircut. I don't know if it was a funky camera angle or not, but this guy appeared to have Festus (who's what, a legit 6ft 5in or 6ft 5.5in) by around two inches. This guy had to be around the 6ft 7in or 6ft 8in mark (close to the Undertaker's height). Anybody know for sure?
Did anybody see that one guy this last week on SmackDown! (10/12/2007) during the Jesse and Festus tag match? He was on the other team and had a mowhawk haircut. I don't know if it was a funky camera angle or not, but this guy appeared to have Festus (who's what, a legit 6ft 5in or 6ft 5.5in) by around two inches. This guy had to be around the 6ft 7in or 6ft 8in mark (close to the Undertaker's height). Anybody know for sure?
Frank said on 13/Oct/07
The guy in the Picture is not his 6ft 6 cousin Mamun comes below his cousins chin I have the photo and i sent it to Rob and also there is a picture of Mamum standing behing the Undertaker i wish Rob would post that also
The guy in the Picture is not his 6ft 6 cousin Mamun comes below his cousins chin I have the photo and i sent it to Rob and also there is a picture of Mamum standing behing the Undertaker i wish Rob would post that also
KingNick said on 13/Oct/07
Vegas thanks for posting this pic that guy does look a lot like Mamum's cousin. mamum? is it him?
Vegas thanks for posting this pic that guy does look a lot like Mamum's cousin. mamum? is it him?
Vegas said on 13/Oct/07
frank; the guy to Sid's right in the photo has the same height advantage over Mamun as his 6'6 cousin when you rotate the photo correctly (which is interesting).
frank; the guy to Sid's right in the photo has the same height advantage over Mamun as his 6'6 cousin when you rotate the photo correctly (which is interesting).
KingNick said on 13/Oct/07
Waaugh!! Where's the Sid page??
Waaugh!! Where's the Sid page??
Frank said on 12/Oct/07
Vegas i dont think that his 6ft 6 cousin in that picture with Sid ..Mamums cousins towers over Mamum
Vegas i dont think that his 6ft 6 cousin in that picture with Sid ..Mamums cousins towers over Mamum
JT said on 12/Oct/07
I rotated the photo of Mamum with Sid based on the wall/column behind them. If Mamum is a legit 5’8”, Sid looks closer to 6’8” here. (Click Here) I’m not sure where this 6’6” or under estimate is coming from.
Here’s Sid in ring gear next to 5’8” Mean Gene
Click Here
Click Here
Sid looks taller in the second pic since he has his chin raised. From what I can remember, his wrestling boots never had large soles.
I rotated the photo of Mamum with Sid based on the wall/column behind them. If Mamum is a legit 5’8”, Sid looks closer to 6’8” here. (Click Here) I’m not sure where this 6’6” or under estimate is coming from.
Here’s Sid in ring gear next to 5’8” Mean Gene
Click Here
Click Here
Sid looks taller in the second pic since he has his chin raised. From what I can remember, his wrestling boots never had large soles.
Da Man said on 12/Oct/07
JimmyDavid, it raises the facial features in relation to other person. Look at the pic you posted for example, you can't even see the tops of either of their heads due to the camera angle, but you can see facial features.
JimmyDavid, it raises the facial features in relation to other person. Look at the pic you posted for example, you can't even see the tops of either of their heads due to the camera angle, but you can see facial features.
Paul said on 12/Oct/07
You can draw your own conclusions guys, but Taker was taller no doubt. However you can't have Sid at 6'6 and Taker 6'9 Frank...one has to give.
Click Here
You can draw your own conclusions guys, but Taker was taller no doubt. However you can't have Sid at 6'6 and Taker 6'9 Frank...one has to give.
Click Here
Vegas said on 12/Oct/07
that photo of sid and Mamun is tilted in mamuns favour, this looks more like the true angle to me Click Here
frank; did mamun say who the tall guy next to sid is, it looks a bit like his 6'6 cousin but i may be wrong.
JimmyDavid you are correct with your theory.
that photo of sid and Mamun is tilted in mamuns favour, this looks more like the true angle to me Click Here
frank; did mamun say who the tall guy next to sid is, it looks a bit like his 6'6 cousin but i may be wrong.
JimmyDavid you are correct with your theory.
JimmyDavid said on 12/Oct/07
But how exactly does that make him taller? I believe that it even reduces total height because the top of his head leans backwards instead of staying straight up.
The only real "trick in the book" to make you look taller is to stand on your toes.. lol, i believe Sid wouldn't go as silly as that. (But who knows? He did some crazy stuff in his days).
But how exactly does that make him taller? I believe that it even reduces total height because the top of his head leans backwards instead of staying straight up.
The only real "trick in the book" to make you look taller is to stand on your toes.. lol, i believe Sid wouldn't go as silly as that. (But who knows? He did some crazy stuff in his days).
Da Man said on 12/Oct/07
We have pics of them face-to-face with Sid pulling out every trick in the book to look taller. Why is that in every single stare down between the two Sid tilts his head and chin so far upwards and Taker stands totally relaxed?
Where's mikev10, he had a photo of Taker and Sid in a staredown from a near level angle and Taker was clearly taller even though facial features lined up almost perfectly. I believe Sid had his head tilted upwards there as well.
We have pics of them face-to-face with Sid pulling out every trick in the book to look taller. Why is that in every single stare down between the two Sid tilts his head and chin so far upwards and Taker stands totally relaxed?
Where's mikev10, he had a photo of Taker and Sid in a staredown from a near level angle and Taker was clearly taller even though facial features lined up almost perfectly. I believe Sid had his head tilted upwards there as well.
JimmyDavid said on 12/Oct/07
It's pointless to compare Sid and Undertaker using sub-comparissons.."he looked taller next to someone, but shorter next to another and so on..". We do have pics of both FACE TO FACE so any other sub-comparisson is just growing away from acuracy. The truth is that when they stare down it's hard to tell wich is taller wich proves that any difference is minimum between them.
It's pointless to compare Sid and Undertaker using sub-comparissons.."he looked taller next to someone, but shorter next to another and so on..". We do have pics of both FACE TO FACE so any other sub-comparisson is just growing away from acuracy. The truth is that when they stare down it's hard to tell wich is taller wich proves that any difference is minimum between them.
Frank said on 12/Oct/07
Sid looked taller in his ring gear too be honest and when Rob posts the picture with Sid and Mamum Sid looks a good 6ft 5 to 6ft 6 topps
Taker when i seen him Looked atleast 6ft 8 but he was also in Ring gear
Mamum has a picture of Taker in front of him but Takers head was tilted downard so its hard too judge but there was close to a foot difference
Sid looked taller in his ring gear too be honest and when Rob posts the picture with Sid and Mamum Sid looks a good 6ft 5 to 6ft 6 topps
Taker when i seen him Looked atleast 6ft 8 but he was also in Ring gear
Mamum has a picture of Taker in front of him but Takers head was tilted downard so its hard too judge but there was close to a foot difference
Da Man said on 12/Oct/07
Sid's break was only on one leg, wasn't it? I find it unlikely that one leg being marginally shorter than the other is going to dramatically impact height, if at all, unless favoring that leg. That's assuming the broken leg is in fact shorter post healing. I somehow doubt Eudy lost much if any height from his break.
Sid's break was only on one leg, wasn't it? I find it unlikely that one leg being marginally shorter than the other is going to dramatically impact height, if at all, unless favoring that leg. That's assuming the broken leg is in fact shorter post healing. I somehow doubt Eudy lost much if any height from his break.
Vegas said on 12/Oct/07
broken legs in many cases do cause height loss. Eudy's was a severe break (of of the worst i have ever seen).
broken legs in many cases do cause height loss. Eudy's was a severe break (of of the worst i have ever seen).
JimmyDavid said on 12/Oct/07
I don't think Sid lost height because of his injury. When bones heal it's created an extra calcium layer wich actually enlongates the bone instead. What could have happened was a natural height loss related with age.
I still say that Sid and undertaker never had much height difference wich was clear when they were face to face.
I don't think Sid lost height because of his injury. When bones heal it's created an extra calcium layer wich actually enlongates the bone instead. What could have happened was a natural height loss related with age.
I still say that Sid and undertaker never had much height difference wich was clear when they were face to face.
Vegas said on 12/Oct/07
rob its not always reliable to compare photos like that though. Nash was no more than 4" shorter than kareem in a video when they stood side by side and eudy was never that much shorter than nash approx 2.5".
Randy orton looks alot taller than 6'4 david hasselhoff (3 inches approx) standing beside the same 5'9.5" guy but in reality both are the same height.
Anonymous he looks at least 4" taller than goldblum but that probably isn't the case. Sid was approx 6'6.5"-6'7 before his terrible injury imo, nowadays who knows???
rob its not always reliable to compare photos like that though. Nash was no more than 4" shorter than kareem in a video when they stood side by side and eudy was never that much shorter than nash approx 2.5".
Randy orton looks alot taller than 6'4 david hasselhoff (3 inches approx) standing beside the same 5'9.5" guy but in reality both are the same height.
Anonymous he looks at least 4" taller than goldblum but that probably isn't the case. Sid was approx 6'6.5"-6'7 before his terrible injury imo, nowadays who knows???
Frank said on 12/Oct/07
It was never posted Mamum sent it too me and i sent it too Rob
It was never posted Mamum sent it too me and i sent it too Rob
anonymous said on 11/Oct/07
eudy (sid) is 6'9".
Editor Rob
eudy (sid) is 6'9".
Editor Rob never, remember sometime soon I'll post mamun's 7ft 2 kareem photo, and you'll see he's got a lot more than 5 inches compared to sid.
anonymous said on 11/Oct/07
vegas so is sid looking about 6,9" in your opinion.i estimate sid to have 5 inches on goldblum,who,s 6'4".sid definitely imo looks 9 inches taller than that guy.i probably would go as far as to say that sid looks 6'10" max.
vegas so is sid looking about 6,9" in your opinion.i estimate sid to have 5 inches on goldblum,who,s 6'4".sid definitely imo looks 9 inches taller than that guy.i probably would go as far as to say that sid looks 6'10" max.
nick said on 11/Oct/07
frank, whats ure estimate on UT's height.
frank, whats ure estimate on UT's height.
dave said on 11/Oct/07
Sid Eudy either wore lifts in his boots Frank or he's 6'7/6'8. He was right there with the Undertaker in staredowns.
Sid Eudy either wore lifts in his boots Frank or he's 6'7/6'8. He was right there with the Undertaker in staredowns.
KingNick said on 11/Oct/07
Can someone post this pic with Sid and Mamum again? I missed it
Can someone post this pic with Sid and Mamum again? I missed it
Frank said on 11/Oct/07
Well Mazum's 6ft 6 cousin looked taller than Sid in comparison
Well Mazum's 6ft 6 cousin looked taller than Sid in comparison
Vegas said on 11/Oct/07
have you seen the photo of sid and mamun frank?? the rock looks 6'4 next to mamun back in 1997ish. strange that sid wouldn't look 6'7ish
have you seen the photo of sid and mamun frank?? the rock looks 6'4 next to mamun back in 1997ish. strange that sid wouldn't look 6'7ish
Heights are barefeet estimates, derived from quotations, official websites, agency resumes, in person encounters with actors at conventions and pictures/films.
Other vital statistics like weight or shoe size measurements have been sourced from newspapers, books, resumes or social media.
Celebrity Fan Photos and Agency Pictures of stars are © to their respective owners.