Add a Comment7824 comments
Average Guess (664 Votes)
Peak: 6ft 7.86in (202.9cm)
Current: 6ft 6.91in (200.4cm)
Peak: 6ft 7.86in (202.9cm)
Current: 6ft 6.91in (200.4cm)
Da Man said on 1/Jan/09
Danimal says on 31/Dec/08
"Rob, why are you allowing DA MAN to spam on this page? AGAIN, at the 5:22 mark, Taker has 2" on Kane: Click Here"
I kept getting error messages, that's why I had multiple messages. The pic I posted WAS at 5:22, NO WHERE in the video did Taker have 2"! 1" yes, but that is accounted for entirely by stance and posture! Once again, once Kane tightened up his stance at 5:26, he was ROUGHLY the same height as Taker in MID-STRIDE! Click Here
This indicates that Kane YET AGAIN edged Taker.
tuga says on 31/Dec/08
"Good point Ray, people have to separate reality from their WWE characters, in WWE Kane character is supposed to be taller than Undertaker."
But Yankem wasn't, even though he was.
Click Here
Click Here
Danimal says on 31/Dec/08
"Rob, why are you allowing DA MAN to spam on this page? AGAIN, at the 5:22 mark, Taker has 2" on Kane: Click Here"
I kept getting error messages, that's why I had multiple messages. The pic I posted WAS at 5:22, NO WHERE in the video did Taker have 2"! 1" yes, but that is accounted for entirely by stance and posture! Once again, once Kane tightened up his stance at 5:26, he was ROUGHLY the same height as Taker in MID-STRIDE! Click Here
This indicates that Kane YET AGAIN edged Taker.
tuga says on 31/Dec/08
"Good point Ray, people have to separate reality from their WWE characters, in WWE Kane character is supposed to be taller than Undertaker."
But Yankem wasn't, even though he was.
Click Here
Click Here
gazz said on 1/Jan/09
im sticking with kane edging out taker but not even by an inch, its the yankem video where no-one can say he was wearing lifts if anything taker had the larger boots and yankem was still taller, also just going by photos of the both of them with other people of the public kane gives the impression of being the taller...he looked huge next to that 5'11ish guy thats posted below somewhere.
im sticking with kane edging out taker but not even by an inch, its the yankem video where no-one can say he was wearing lifts if anything taker had the larger boots and yankem was still taller, also just going by photos of the both of them with other people of the public kane gives the impression of being the taller...he looked huge next to that 5'11ish guy thats posted below somewhere.
sid said on 1/Jan/09
Danimal your making absurbed asumptions, if taker had 2 inches on kane, that would mean kane would be 6'6, kane is 6'8 barefeet, when he was half mask era, his shoes gave him 0'5 inches, making him 6'8'5, you need your eyes checked, theres no way kane is 2 inches or 1 and 3/4 on shorter, look at the issac yankem video, he had flat soles, still yankem edged taker by a inch
Danimal your making absurbed asumptions, if taker had 2 inches on kane, that would mean kane would be 6'6, kane is 6'8 barefeet, when he was half mask era, his shoes gave him 0'5 inches, making him 6'8'5, you need your eyes checked, theres no way kane is 2 inches or 1 and 3/4 on shorter, look at the issac yankem video, he had flat soles, still yankem edged taker by a inch
KingNick said on 31/Dec/08
Credit here goes to Big Show for the find of the year! UT vs. Jacobs at Smokey Mountain Wrestling Click Here
Unfortunately it's not good quality, but it's a great start. Eventually I'm sure a better video will be posted on youtube/dailymotion. I see UT as being slightly taller, (see 2:50 mark) but it may be cuz of the angle/quality. Too close to call.
Da Man, I admire all your tenacity man on proving your point. I'm not sure I agree but here's where I stand:
In the RR video, I see UT as having 1" on Kane tops. Not more than that. At times it may appear it but I believe it's only because Kane has a slightly wider stance like Da Man pointed out. UT still has wide stance himself tho. Still, not as wide as Kane. Click Here
When Kane starts walking away, like in this shot, his feet must be closer together. He has the camera advantage but UT still looks slightly taller Click Here
I'm still not sure yet who's taller. There's too much evidence one way or the other. But I'm leaning way more towards them being the same height or Kane slightly shorter.
It makes more sense if you think about it. Why else would they have Jacobs wear lifts as Kane? They want to make him appear TALLER. They'd have to be really close in size to begin with in order for them to want to do that.
Credit here goes to Big Show for the find of the year! UT vs. Jacobs at Smokey Mountain Wrestling Click Here
Unfortunately it's not good quality, but it's a great start. Eventually I'm sure a better video will be posted on youtube/dailymotion. I see UT as being slightly taller, (see 2:50 mark) but it may be cuz of the angle/quality. Too close to call.
Da Man, I admire all your tenacity man on proving your point. I'm not sure I agree but here's where I stand:
In the RR video, I see UT as having 1" on Kane tops. Not more than that. At times it may appear it but I believe it's only because Kane has a slightly wider stance like Da Man pointed out. UT still has wide stance himself tho. Still, not as wide as Kane. Click Here
When Kane starts walking away, like in this shot, his feet must be closer together. He has the camera advantage but UT still looks slightly taller Click Here
I'm still not sure yet who's taller. There's too much evidence one way or the other. But I'm leaning way more towards them being the same height or Kane slightly shorter.
It makes more sense if you think about it. Why else would they have Jacobs wear lifts as Kane? They want to make him appear TALLER. They'd have to be really close in size to begin with in order for them to want to do that.
Rantsrob said on 31/Dec/08
Danimal says on 26/Dec/08
Just watched the 2001 Royal Rumble last night and Kane had at least 2" on Taker when they were alone in the ring. I believe that Taker lost height at some point in LATE 2000.
This is the video Danimal chose to not post with his comment. 3:40-3:55 in this video is a staredown almost identical to yankem/taker.
Click Here
Danimal says on 26/Dec/08
Just watched the 2001 Royal Rumble last night and Kane had at least 2" on Taker when they were alone in the ring. I believe that Taker lost height at some point in LATE 2000.
This is the video Danimal chose to not post with his comment. 3:40-3:55 in this video is a staredown almost identical to yankem/taker.
Click Here
Danimal said on 31/Dec/08
Rob, why are you allowing DA MAN to spam on this page? AGAIN, at the 5:22 mark, Taker has 2" on Kane: Click Here
Rob, why are you allowing DA MAN to spam on this page? AGAIN, at the 5:22 mark, Taker has 2" on Kane: Click Here
tuga said on 31/Dec/08
Good point Ray, people have to separate reality from their WWE characters, in WWE Kane character is supposed to be taller than Undertaker.
Da Man, Yankem is NOT taller, his footware is even bigger still, taker is CLEARLY TALLER than kane in that 2003 Royal Rumble video, but NOT 2-3 inches, more like 1 1/2 inches.
Again, even today with bigger footware kane does not look any taller...
Good point Ray, people have to separate reality from their WWE characters, in WWE Kane character is supposed to be taller than Undertaker.
Da Man, Yankem is NOT taller, his footware is even bigger still, taker is CLEARLY TALLER than kane in that 2003 Royal Rumble video, but NOT 2-3 inches, more like 1 1/2 inches.
Again, even today with bigger footware kane does not look any taller...
Drexyl said on 31/Dec/08
That video doesn't prove anything. The camera angles are terrible, and in none of the shots does Kane look anything like 2 inches shorter than Taker.
It does show just how thin Kane was then though. He doesn't look any bigger mass-wise than Taker, and Taker was starting to get pretty thin around then as well. Neither of them could have been much more than 300lbs.
That video doesn't prove anything. The camera angles are terrible, and in none of the shots does Kane look anything like 2 inches shorter than Taker.
It does show just how thin Kane was then though. He doesn't look any bigger mass-wise than Taker, and Taker was starting to get pretty thin around then as well. Neither of them could have been much more than 300lbs.
hs2008 said on 31/Dec/08
I still think Kane has 0.5" on Taker. Kane claims 6'8.5", which is a pretty obscure thing to claim if it's not your actual height or darn close to it.
Yes, Kane had thicker boots in the late 1990's. They probably gave him an inch footwear advantage over The Undertaker, thus making him 1.5"-2" taller. In barefeet, I think he edges Taker just barely.
On a side note, happy new year!
I still think Kane has 0.5" on Taker. Kane claims 6'8.5", which is a pretty obscure thing to claim if it's not your actual height or darn close to it.
Yes, Kane had thicker boots in the late 1990's. They probably gave him an inch footwear advantage over The Undertaker, thus making him 1.5"-2" taller. In barefeet, I think he edges Taker just barely.
On a side note, happy new year!
Ray said on 31/Dec/08
I'm always with Taker edging out Kane by an inch - could be a hari more or a hair less. I think Kane supporters need to just finally accept that Kane is a little shorter. He was always billed about 2" taller for storyline and I think that's what Kane fans hold on to - ignoring his larger boots and all other evidence. Paul Bearer and Michael Cole have been quoted as saying Taker was the taller of the two as well. An older 1998 PWI wrestling Almanac had Taker at 6'9" and Kane as 6'7" and also stated on another page that Kane wears lifts to appear taller. Now that PWI can be suspect since some of the other heights in there were questionable but point is, there's definitely reason to believe Taker is taller.
I'm always with Taker edging out Kane by an inch - could be a hari more or a hair less. I think Kane supporters need to just finally accept that Kane is a little shorter. He was always billed about 2" taller for storyline and I think that's what Kane fans hold on to - ignoring his larger boots and all other evidence. Paul Bearer and Michael Cole have been quoted as saying Taker was the taller of the two as well. An older 1998 PWI wrestling Almanac had Taker at 6'9" and Kane as 6'7" and also stated on another page that Kane wears lifts to appear taller. Now that PWI can be suspect since some of the other heights in there were questionable but point is, there's definitely reason to believe Taker is taller.
Da Man said on 31/Dec/08
Danimal says on 30/Dec/08
"Your BLIND buddy. Taker has 2" on Kane in that video. Sorry, all the men before you can see that but you. What's your ulterior motive?"
Please find those 2" here (5:22 from the Rumble the video):
Click Here
Click Here
And unlike tuga claimed below, Kane did NOT close up his stance in the video until 5:26.
Danimal says on 30/Dec/08
"Your BLIND buddy. Taker has 2" on Kane in that video. Sorry, all the men before you can see that but you. What's your ulterior motive?"
Please find those 2" here (5:22 from the Rumble the video):
Click Here
Click Here
And unlike tuga claimed below, Kane did NOT close up his stance in the video until 5:26.
Da Man said on 31/Dec/08
Since Rob didn't post my reply on the Undertaker page (I have no idea why), I will repost some of the evidence I originally posted over there last night.
This is Kane's stance in the Rumble video right before the close up at 5:22:
Click Here
Good luck finding 2-3" inches in favor or Taker here:
Click Here (Kane mid-stride)
Click Here
Fact is, at 5:21-5:26 Kane's feet are ~3.5 feet apart and he is playing "staggered" and winded. When he closes up his stance just before be begins to walk forward towards the camera Taker's 1" advantage (not 2" or 3", which is a semi-laughable estimate) instantly vanishes.
tuga says on 31/Dec/08
"About footware I would bet he had bigger footware, your second pic about his boots show that, and vince sure was quick to promote yankem
Since Rob didn't post my reply on the Undertaker page (I have no idea why), I will repost some of the evidence I originally posted over there last night.
This is Kane's stance in the Rumble video right before the close up at 5:22:
Click Here
Good luck finding 2-3" inches in favor or Taker here:
Click Here (Kane mid-stride)
Click Here
Fact is, at 5:21-5:26 Kane's feet are ~3.5 feet apart and he is playing "staggered" and winded. When he closes up his stance just before be begins to walk forward towards the camera Taker's 1" advantage (not 2" or 3", which is a semi-laughable estimate) instantly vanishes.
tuga says on 31/Dec/08
"About footware I would bet he had bigger footware, your second pic about his boots show that, and vince sure was quick to promote yankem
Da Man said on 31/Dec/08
tuga says on 31/Dec/08
"Da Man, as Yankeem he was not taller, there
tuga says on 31/Dec/08
"Da Man, as Yankeem he was not taller, there
gazz said on 31/Dec/08
yup id agree yankem was taller maybe even by 1/4 of an inch, is you look where takers mask finishes at the top of his head, the top of his head is just above that and is still marginally shorter. jacobs was slouching in the rumble video more so than taker
yup id agree yankem was taller maybe even by 1/4 of an inch, is you look where takers mask finishes at the top of his head, the top of his head is just above that and is still marginally shorter. jacobs was slouching in the rumble video more so than taker
tuga said on 31/Dec/08
Da Man, as Yankeem he was not taller, there
Da Man, as Yankeem he was not taller, there
Da Man said on 31/Dec/08
KingNick says,
"I'm also not convince that Jacobs was taller than UT when he was Isaac Yankem. At a glance he does look it but if you notice the Royal Rumble video Danimal posted, they're proportions are very close but UT's forehead is longer, making him taller. it's hard to tell, but I think that may have been the same case in 1996"
I am 99% positive Yankem had 1/2" on Taker, and in fact I'm so sure of it I would lay down about $1000 on it.
Here's evidence...
Sid and Taker: Click Here
Sid and Jacobs: Click Here
Now we all know how Sid and Taker really stack up, as they had numerous full-on staredowns. From those pics you can see how the person further from the camera actually has the advantage, not the person closer to the camera as you might expect.
Yankem was a bit taller than Taker, in my opinion this is almost a certainty.
An for those that like the claim Yankem was in lifts (for whatever reason), here's a couple pics for you:
Click Here
Click Here
Wrestling boots don't get too much flatter than that.
KingNick says,
"I'm also not convince that Jacobs was taller than UT when he was Isaac Yankem. At a glance he does look it but if you notice the Royal Rumble video Danimal posted, they're proportions are very close but UT's forehead is longer, making him taller. it's hard to tell, but I think that may have been the same case in 1996"
I am 99% positive Yankem had 1/2" on Taker, and in fact I'm so sure of it I would lay down about $1000 on it.
Here's evidence...
Sid and Taker: Click Here
Sid and Jacobs: Click Here
Now we all know how Sid and Taker really stack up, as they had numerous full-on staredowns. From those pics you can see how the person further from the camera actually has the advantage, not the person closer to the camera as you might expect.
Yankem was a bit taller than Taker, in my opinion this is almost a certainty.
An for those that like the claim Yankem was in lifts (for whatever reason), here's a couple pics for you:
Click Here
Click Here
Wrestling boots don't get too much flatter than that.
Eric 1 said on 30/Dec/08
Before they go into a close camera view you can see that kane was more slouched.
Before they go into a close camera view you can see that kane was more slouched.
dave said on 30/Dec/08
to be fair tho, kanes slouching and his legs are apart and knees bent, ive watched this piece of footage about 30 times now, and i go back to them being within an i nch of eachother, i think kane just might not have been wearing his lifts this night, look when undertaker grabs him, for a second they are both straight and they are very near the same height, so excuse the lifts and we are back to square one, with kane and taker eye to eye..... look at 5:22 again, kane isnt even close to straight, his kees bent and legs apart, id say they are much closer in height that that shot suggests.... PLUS taker has spiked hair....
its def jacobs tho in the pic.
to be fair tho, kanes slouching and his legs are apart and knees bent, ive watched this piece of footage about 30 times now, and i go back to them being within an i nch of eachother, i think kane just might not have been wearing his lifts this night, look when undertaker grabs him, for a second they are both straight and they are very near the same height, so excuse the lifts and we are back to square one, with kane and taker eye to eye..... look at 5:22 again, kane isnt even close to straight, his kees bent and legs apart, id say they are much closer in height that that shot suggests.... PLUS taker has spiked hair....
its def jacobs tho in the pic.
Rantsrob said on 30/Dec/08
Click Here
Your right Danimal, Kane probably was wrestling in 5'' lifts in the 90s.
Click Here
Your right Danimal, Kane probably was wrestling in 5'' lifts in the 90s.
Danimal said on 30/Dec/08
CAN SOMEONE CAPTION the video I just posted at the 5:22 mark? Click Here
Taker clearly has 2" on Kane there.
CAN SOMEONE CAPTION the video I just posted at the 5:22 mark? Click Here
Taker clearly has 2" on Kane there.
Danimal said on 30/Dec/08
sid says on 30/Dec/08
danmial kane in that video had 2 inches on albert who is 6'6, which makes kane 6'8, when undertaker helped kane and stood side by side kane still looked a inch taller, with flat sole era as the half masked kane, u needs your eyes checked
Your BLIND buddy. Taker has 2" on Kane in that video. Sorry, all the men before you can see that but you. What's your ulterior motive?
sid says on 30/Dec/08
danmial kane in that video had 2 inches on albert who is 6'6, which makes kane 6'8, when undertaker helped kane and stood side by side kane still looked a inch taller, with flat sole era as the half masked kane, u needs your eyes checked
Your BLIND buddy. Taker has 2" on Kane in that video. Sorry, all the men before you can see that but you. What's your ulterior motive?
Da Man said on 30/Dec/08
"sid says on 30/Dec/08
Eric 1 daman you crazy, kane 6'4 thats too short for kane, randy is 6'4 kane towers over him, if kane is taller then randy how is kane 6'4, what kane wrestles in 4 inch lifts that impossible."
Who said Kane is 6'4"?! LOL We were saying the guy to Kane's left in the picture rantsob posted is 6'4", NOT KANE!
"sid says on 30/Dec/08
Eric 1 daman you crazy, kane 6'4 thats too short for kane, randy is 6'4 kane towers over him, if kane is taller then randy how is kane 6'4, what kane wrestles in 4 inch lifts that impossible."
Who said Kane is 6'4"?! LOL We were saying the guy to Kane's left in the picture rantsob posted is 6'4", NOT KANE!
Da Man said on 30/Dec/08
KingNick says
"The point is, Kane is noticeably shorter than Undertaker in that shot. The only thing I can think of is maybe Kane's feet were standing wider apart but even that's a stretch."
No, that's exactly what is was. See my post on the Undertaker page, with pics that show exactly what was going on there. Kane was not shorter than Taker in that video.
KingNick says
"The point is, Kane is noticeably shorter than Undertaker in that shot. The only thing I can think of is maybe Kane's feet were standing wider apart but even that's a stretch."
No, that's exactly what is was. See my post on the Undertaker page, with pics that show exactly what was going on there. Kane was not shorter than Taker in that video.
sid said on 30/Dec/08
danmial kane in that video had 2 inches on albert who is 6'6, which makes kane 6'8, when undertaker helped kane and stood side by side kane still looked a inch taller, with flat sole era as the half masked kane, u needs your eyes checked
danmial kane in that video had 2 inches on albert who is 6'6, which makes kane 6'8, when undertaker helped kane and stood side by side kane still looked a inch taller, with flat sole era as the half masked kane, u needs your eyes checked
sid said on 30/Dec/08
Danimal your crazy kane still had 3 inches on golddust who is 6'5, why wouldnt kane have any lifts, just for 1 raw episode, kane always wears lift no matter what show it's on, 6'8 bare, ring gear 6'9
Danimal your crazy kane still had 3 inches on golddust who is 6'5, why wouldnt kane have any lifts, just for 1 raw episode, kane always wears lift no matter what show it's on, 6'8 bare, ring gear 6'9
KingNick said on 30/Dec/08
Danimal says on 30/Dec/08
Just watched the 2003 Royal Rumble last night. WOW, When Undertaker helps up Kane (who is looking very thin and obviously wearing a wig under that mask he soon got rid of), they stood side by side and it was obvious that Kane had NO lifts that day because Taker had what appeared to be almost 2" on Kane. I am NOT exgarating. There are even scenes with Golddust from around this time backstage and Kane has only about 1" on Golddsut who was only about 6'4" in reality. Either this was NOT Glenn Jacobs, or without his lifts, he is MAX 6'6". Check it out for yourselves if you don't believe me. It's at exactly 5:22 in. Taker has 2-3" Kane!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!: Click Here
OH MY GOD, DANIMAL, GOOD FIND.
I don't know if I'd go as far to say Undertaker has 3" on Kane tho. Maybe 2" tops I dare say even 1", what's everyone else think?
The point is, Kane is noticeably shorter than Undertaker in that shot. The only thing I can think of is maybe Kane's feet were standing wider apart but even that's a stretch.
A while ago someone posted a pic from a relatively recent house show with Kane and Undertaker being about the same height, even though Kane had his big shoes on. It was a full shot and we could see both their footwear, Big Show was in the pic too.
The argument was posted that it was only one picture, a very valid argument, but now we have another one from this rumble.
I'm also not convince that Jacobs was taller than UT when he was Isaac Yankem. At a glance he does look it but if you notice the Royal Rumble video Danimal posted, they're proportions are very close but UT's forehead is longer, making him taller. it's hard to tell, but I think that may have been the same case in 1996:
Click Here
and
Click Here
And just on a personal note, I remember watching this on PPV and noticing UT was taller but I wasn't paying attention to footwear and didn't give it a second thought. Their footwear looks about the same.
There is the possibility like Danimal said that this wasn't Glen Jacobs, but I don't agree with that. He cut plenty of interviews during this era and the voice was the same.
I'm not making a definite decision yet, but I'm leaning towards 6'7" for Kane barefoot.
Danimal says on 30/Dec/08
Just watched the 2003 Royal Rumble last night. WOW, When Undertaker helps up Kane (who is looking very thin and obviously wearing a wig under that mask he soon got rid of), they stood side by side and it was obvious that Kane had NO lifts that day because Taker had what appeared to be almost 2" on Kane. I am NOT exgarating. There are even scenes with Golddust from around this time backstage and Kane has only about 1" on Golddsut who was only about 6'4" in reality. Either this was NOT Glenn Jacobs, or without his lifts, he is MAX 6'6". Check it out for yourselves if you don't believe me. It's at exactly 5:22 in. Taker has 2-3" Kane!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!: Click Here
OH MY GOD, DANIMAL, GOOD FIND.
I don't know if I'd go as far to say Undertaker has 3" on Kane tho. Maybe 2" tops I dare say even 1", what's everyone else think?
The point is, Kane is noticeably shorter than Undertaker in that shot. The only thing I can think of is maybe Kane's feet were standing wider apart but even that's a stretch.
A while ago someone posted a pic from a relatively recent house show with Kane and Undertaker being about the same height, even though Kane had his big shoes on. It was a full shot and we could see both their footwear, Big Show was in the pic too.
The argument was posted that it was only one picture, a very valid argument, but now we have another one from this rumble.
I'm also not convince that Jacobs was taller than UT when he was Isaac Yankem. At a glance he does look it but if you notice the Royal Rumble video Danimal posted, they're proportions are very close but UT's forehead is longer, making him taller. it's hard to tell, but I think that may have been the same case in 1996:
Click Here
and
Click Here
And just on a personal note, I remember watching this on PPV and noticing UT was taller but I wasn't paying attention to footwear and didn't give it a second thought. Their footwear looks about the same.
There is the possibility like Danimal said that this wasn't Glen Jacobs, but I don't agree with that. He cut plenty of interviews during this era and the voice was the same.
I'm not making a definite decision yet, but I'm leaning towards 6'7" for Kane barefoot.
gazz said on 30/Dec/08
Danimal thats a great find but to me it seems kane is slouching more so than taker in that particular shot. this will spark some discussions
Danimal thats a great find but to me it seems kane is slouching more so than taker in that particular shot. this will spark some discussions
Danimal said on 30/Dec/08
Just watched the 2003 Royal Rumble last night. WOW, When Undertaker helps up Kane (who is looking very thin and obviously wearing a wig under that mask he soon got rid of), they stood side by side and it was obvious that Kane had NO lifts that day because Taker had what appeared to be almost 2" on Kane. I am NOT exgarating. There are even scenes with Golddust from around this time backstage and Kane has only about 1" on Golddsut who was only about 6'4" in reality. Either this was NOT Glenn Jacobs, or without his lifts, he is MAX 6'6". Check it out for yourselves if you don't believe me. It's at exactly 5:22 in. Taker has 2-3" Kane!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!: Click Here
Just watched the 2003 Royal Rumble last night. WOW, When Undertaker helps up Kane (who is looking very thin and obviously wearing a wig under that mask he soon got rid of), they stood side by side and it was obvious that Kane had NO lifts that day because Taker had what appeared to be almost 2" on Kane. I am NOT exgarating. There are even scenes with Golddust from around this time backstage and Kane has only about 1" on Golddsut who was only about 6'4" in reality. Either this was NOT Glenn Jacobs, or without his lifts, he is MAX 6'6". Check it out for yourselves if you don't believe me. It's at exactly 5:22 in. Taker has 2-3" Kane!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!: Click Here
Eric 1 said on 30/Dec/08
I didnt actually mean that sid. I was being sarcastic cause rantsrob said kane was only a solid 6ft4. kanes real height is 6ft8.25 no matter what anyone wants to argue. He told me himself.
I didnt actually mean that sid. I was being sarcastic cause rantsrob said kane was only a solid 6ft4. kanes real height is 6ft8.25 no matter what anyone wants to argue. He told me himself.
Ray said on 30/Dec/08
If Taker put his head up straight and stood up straight it would be the same difference as JJ and Kane. Show looks to have a few more inches on them which makes everything right to me.
If Taker put his head up straight and stood up straight it would be the same difference as JJ and Kane. Show looks to have a few more inches on them which makes everything right to me.
Anonymous said on 30/Dec/08
if jj dillion is 5'11 today then big show is looking about 6'10 next to him given the size of his head, JJ is still 2-3 inches under big shows mouth, undertaker is looking no more than 6'5, actually he looks the same height next to JJ as hogan does, kane is looking his listed height here or maybe taller about 6'7.5-6'8
if jj dillion is 5'11 today then big show is looking about 6'10 next to him given the size of his head, JJ is still 2-3 inches under big shows mouth, undertaker is looking no more than 6'5, actually he looks the same height next to JJ as hogan does, kane is looking his listed height here or maybe taller about 6'7.5-6'8
sid said on 30/Dec/08
Eric 1 daman you crazy, kane 6'4 thats too short for kane, randy is 6'4 kane towers over him, if kane is taller then randy how is kane 6'4, what kane wrestles in 4 inch lifts that impossible.
Eric 1 daman you crazy, kane 6'4 thats too short for kane, randy is 6'4 kane towers over him, if kane is taller then randy how is kane 6'4, what kane wrestles in 4 inch lifts that impossible.
Frank said on 29/Dec/08
I had posted on here along time ago me standing next to a 7ft man and my head was alittle below his chin and in 5ft 11 1/2 Show does not look even close to 7ft in that picture
I had posted on here along time ago me standing next to a 7ft man and my head was alittle below his chin and in 5ft 11 1/2 Show does not look even close to 7ft in that picture
Eric 1 said on 29/Dec/08
Da Man if kane is only 6ft4 that means undertaker is 6ft2 and also means stone cold and batista are allllll under 6ft. Kanes an easy 6ft8. SOrry correction Rantsrob
Da Man if kane is only 6ft4 that means undertaker is 6ft2 and also means stone cold and batista are allllll under 6ft. Kanes an easy 6ft8. SOrry correction Rantsrob
Frank said on 29/Dec/08
Rantsron your right Taker and Show look very Short in those pictures ??
Rantsron your right Taker and Show look very Short in those pictures ??
Rantsrob said on 27/Dec/08
Awesome find Da man. 5'10.5''-5'11'' sounds fair for that man. Is it me or does undertaker look surprisingly short next to him? Kanes got a mouth over him so i'd say a possibly 8-10in difference guessing kanes head is 11+.
Awesome find Da man. 5'10.5''-5'11'' sounds fair for that man. Is it me or does undertaker look surprisingly short next to him? Kanes got a mouth over him so i'd say a possibly 8-10in difference guessing kanes head is 11+.
Alex said on 27/Dec/08
Danimal, I remember that but also at that time Kane was in his lifts where he had 2-2.5 inches on UT in that staredown. UT has lost a bit of height since then I agree on but Kane then without his lifts would have only been an inch tops taller than UT there.
Danimal, I remember that but also at that time Kane was in his lifts where he had 2-2.5 inches on UT in that staredown. UT has lost a bit of height since then I agree on but Kane then without his lifts would have only been an inch tops taller than UT there.
Da Man said on 27/Dec/08
Rantsrob says on 26/Dec/08
"Well sid i dont like to give away my secret kane picture locations but.....I typed in Glen Jacobs on google images = p. I dont really know the guy doesnt seem to have more then 1.5'' on Triple h i dont know what hes listed on this site but i'd say solid 6'4''"
I would agree, but the guy's head is way further from the camera. He almost looks like a pinhead next to HHH, and based on his pic with Kane we know that isn't the case.
Rantsrob says on 26/Dec/08
"Well sid i dont like to give away my secret kane picture locations but.....I typed in Glen Jacobs on google images = p. I dont really know the guy doesnt seem to have more then 1.5'' on Triple h i dont know what hes listed on this site but i'd say solid 6'4''"
I would agree, but the guy's head is way further from the camera. He almost looks like a pinhead next to HHH, and based on his pic with Kane we know that isn't the case.
Drexyl said on 27/Dec/08
The 2001 Rumble is probably my favourite ever. It was awesome. I loved it when the Big Show came in and just destroyed everyone.
The 2001 Rumble is probably my favourite ever. It was awesome. I loved it when the Big Show came in and just destroyed everyone.
sid said on 26/Dec/08
Danimal kane in the pic with the first pic with that 6'4 guy he had easy 4 to 5 inches on him, why is that hard to believe, kane bigger then the bath room door
Danimal kane in the pic with the first pic with that 6'4 guy he had easy 4 to 5 inches on him, why is that hard to believe, kane bigger then the bath room door
Danimal said on 26/Dec/08
Just watched the 2001 Royal Rumble last night and Kane had at least 2" on Taker when they were alone in the ring. I believe that Taker lost height at some point in LATE 2000.
Just watched the 2001 Royal Rumble last night and Kane had at least 2" on Taker when they were alone in the ring. I believe that Taker lost height at some point in LATE 2000.
Rantsrob said on 26/Dec/08
Well sid i dont like to give away my secret kane picture locations but.....I typed in Glen Jacobs on google images = p. I dont really know the guy doesnt seem to have more then 1.5'' on Triple h i dont know what hes listed on this site but i'd say solid 6'4'' seems fairly accurate. Which would put kane about 6'' taller then trips?
Well sid i dont like to give away my secret kane picture locations but.....I typed in Glen Jacobs on google images = p. I dont really know the guy doesnt seem to have more then 1.5'' on Triple h i dont know what hes listed on this site but i'd say solid 6'4'' seems fairly accurate. Which would put kane about 6'' taller then trips?
Ben said on 26/Dec/08
I would say Kane is 6'7.5 Hard to judge to a certain extent though because he seems to have had different height lifts depending on the character he played, as yankem he never seemed overly tall to me, as fake diesil he looked huge and as scary kane he did as well, its amazing how an outfit can create an illsuion of height, the fashion industry uses it all the time to make people look taller, shorter thinner or fatter.
Kanes build has changes lots as well, he seemed to become more natural around 2002-2003 and now with advanced age you can really see him changing shape, the guys only 2yrs older then triple H. Its amazing what suppliments can do.
I would say Kane is 6'7.5 Hard to judge to a certain extent though because he seems to have had different height lifts depending on the character he played, as yankem he never seemed overly tall to me, as fake diesil he looked huge and as scary kane he did as well, its amazing how an outfit can create an illsuion of height, the fashion industry uses it all the time to make people look taller, shorter thinner or fatter.
Kanes build has changes lots as well, he seemed to become more natural around 2002-2003 and now with advanced age you can really see him changing shape, the guys only 2yrs older then triple H. Its amazing what suppliments can do.
Da Man said on 26/Dec/08
Danimal says on 24/Dec/08
"HAHAHA....With a man who "APPEARS" 6'4"-6'5"???????????? Well isn't that convenient for you to be GUESSING the man's height based on what you WANT Kane to be? Now that is "stupid" as you so eloquently put it."
You spoke too soon, 6'4"+ is a very fair guess for that guy considering the other evidence that exists. He was much taller than HHH despite being further from the camera.
Kane has dwarfed Edge in street clothes, as in Edge was even short of Kane's eyeline. The pic I am referring to was a pic with Edge, Harley Race, Mick Foley and Kane (arranged in that order) all in suits. It's a real shame I can no longer find it, but I posted links to the pic here at least 3 different times to show just how short Edge is next to Kane even in standard footwear.
Here's an update, a guy who "looks" to be roughly 5'11" with various wrestlers in street clothes, including Undertaker, Kane, Big Show, Austin, Edge, Batista, etc. Click Here
Danimal says on 24/Dec/08
"HAHAHA....With a man who "APPEARS" 6'4"-6'5"???????????? Well isn't that convenient for you to be GUESSING the man's height based on what you WANT Kane to be? Now that is "stupid" as you so eloquently put it."
You spoke too soon, 6'4"+ is a very fair guess for that guy considering the other evidence that exists. He was much taller than HHH despite being further from the camera.
Kane has dwarfed Edge in street clothes, as in Edge was even short of Kane's eyeline. The pic I am referring to was a pic with Edge, Harley Race, Mick Foley and Kane (arranged in that order) all in suits. It's a real shame I can no longer find it, but I posted links to the pic here at least 3 different times to show just how short Edge is next to Kane even in standard footwear.
Here's an update, a guy who "looks" to be roughly 5'11" with various wrestlers in street clothes, including Undertaker, Kane, Big Show, Austin, Edge, Batista, etc. Click Here
Ghost said on 25/Dec/08
Yeah, that Ric Flair clip is not much use for comparison, since Kane is standing way further back than Edge or Big Show.
6'7,5-6'8 seems right for Kane. And Taker doesn't really seem much shorter these days.
Yeah, that Ric Flair clip is not much use for comparison, since Kane is standing way further back than Edge or Big Show.
6'7,5-6'8 seems right for Kane. And Taker doesn't really seem much shorter these days.
sid said on 25/Dec/08
rantsrob where did u get this pics of kane.?? kane looked like he had 5 inches on the first pic with that 6'4 guy, kane to me is 6'8 barefeet in shoes 6'9
rantsrob where did u get this pics of kane.?? kane looked like he had 5 inches on the first pic with that 6'4 guy, kane to me is 6'8 barefeet in shoes 6'9
sid said on 25/Dec/08
Danimal just the camera angle.. kane always wears lifts in shoes from the time he became kane, why wouldnt he wear lift in this raw episode, he shoes looks the same as it did when he debuted
Danimal just the camera angle.. kane always wears lifts in shoes from the time he became kane, why wouldnt he wear lift in this raw episode, he shoes looks the same as it did when he debuted
Da Man said on 24/Dec/08
Rantstob, the guy in the first pic you posted also has a picture with HHH, and he looked about 2"-2.5" taller considering he is standing much further from the camera (note head sizes).
Click Here
Danimal, I hope you are just trying to stir the pot, b/c Kane in that video would be able to look straight over the top of Edge's head. Just like he would be able to in his pic with Mick Foley and Harley Race (in suits, not ring gear). Edge is *over* 4" shorter than Kane.
Click Here
Rantstob, the guy in the first pic you posted also has a picture with HHH, and he looked about 2"-2.5" taller considering he is standing much further from the camera (note head sizes).
Click Here
Danimal, I hope you are just trying to stir the pot, b/c Kane in that video would be able to look straight over the top of Edge's head. Just like he would be able to in his pic with Mick Foley and Harley Race (in suits, not ring gear). Edge is *over* 4" shorter than Kane.
Click Here
Danimal said on 24/Dec/08
Rantsrob says on 24/Dec/08
I don't see any viable comparison in that clip. Edge is atleast 2ft closer to the camera and Kane still appears to have considerible height over him possibly being able to look over the top of his head. There isnt any comparison of him with the big show. As for him not wearing any lifts thats stupid why would he be in full ring gear without any lifts. Kanes "Lifts" are essentially the bottom of his boots. so what you'd be saying kane is out there barefoot still having and easy 4''+ over edge in shoes. Heres some photos of kane with a man who appears 6'4'' to 6'5'' plus numerous others
HAHAHA....With a man who "APPEARS" 6'4"-6'5"???????????? Well isn't that convenient for you to be GUESSING the man's height based on what you WANT Kane to be? Now that is "stupid" as you so eloquently put it.
Rantsrob says on 24/Dec/08
I don't see any viable comparison in that clip. Edge is atleast 2ft closer to the camera and Kane still appears to have considerible height over him possibly being able to look over the top of his head. There isnt any comparison of him with the big show. As for him not wearing any lifts thats stupid why would he be in full ring gear without any lifts. Kanes "Lifts" are essentially the bottom of his boots. so what you'd be saying kane is out there barefoot still having and easy 4''+ over edge in shoes. Heres some photos of kane with a man who appears 6'4'' to 6'5'' plus numerous others
HAHAHA....With a man who "APPEARS" 6'4"-6'5"???????????? Well isn't that convenient for you to be GUESSING the man's height based on what you WANT Kane to be? Now that is "stupid" as you so eloquently put it.
Rantsrob said on 24/Dec/08
I don't see any viable comparison in that clip. Edge is atleast 2ft closer to the camera and Kane still appears to have considerible height over him possibly being able to look over the top of his head. There isnt any comparison of him with the big show. As for him not wearing any lifts thats stupid why would he be in full ring gear without any lifts. Kanes "Lifts" are essentially the bottom of his boots. so what you'd be saying kane is out there barefoot still having and easy 4''+ over edge in shoes. Heres some photos of kane with a man who appears 6'4'' to 6'5'' plus numerous others
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
I don't see any viable comparison in that clip. Edge is atleast 2ft closer to the camera and Kane still appears to have considerible height over him possibly being able to look over the top of his head. There isnt any comparison of him with the big show. As for him not wearing any lifts thats stupid why would he be in full ring gear without any lifts. Kanes "Lifts" are essentially the bottom of his boots. so what you'd be saying kane is out there barefoot still having and easy 4''+ over edge in shoes. Heres some photos of kane with a man who appears 6'4'' to 6'5'' plus numerous others
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Alex said on 24/Dec/08
Danimal, yea but the ramp might be a part of that but even so Big Show still has a good amount on him there.
Danimal, yea but the ramp might be a part of that but even so Big Show still has a good amount on him there.
Danimal said on 23/Dec/08
Okay guys, the moment of truth. Here now is some footage of Kane standing side by side MANY pro wrestlers from earlier this year. It is a great clip of Ric Flair's official retirement from the WWE and from the sport of pro wrestling. It's quite emotional. All wrestlers are actually crying, but what's most important is seeing how SHORT Kane is next to Big Show and Edge, when he is probably NOT wearing ANY kind of lifts. It's right around the 44 second mark: Click Here
Okay guys, the moment of truth. Here now is some footage of Kane standing side by side MANY pro wrestlers from earlier this year. It is a great clip of Ric Flair's official retirement from the WWE and from the sport of pro wrestling. It's quite emotional. All wrestlers are actually crying, but what's most important is seeing how SHORT Kane is next to Big Show and Edge, when he is probably NOT wearing ANY kind of lifts. It's right around the 44 second mark: Click Here
Marotte said on 22/Dec/08
I Live in alberta,canada and in commercial building the door are supposed to be 6'8".
I Live in alberta,canada and in commercial building the door are supposed to be 6'8".
sid said on 22/Dec/08
Clay which province are you in fellow canadian....
Clay which province are you in fellow canadian....
Alex said on 22/Dec/08
When someone is an inch or 2 below a doorframe they still hav the tendacy to duck a bit because it appears they may just hit it.
When someone is an inch or 2 below a doorframe they still hav the tendacy to duck a bit because it appears they may just hit it.
Clay said on 22/Dec/08
I live in Canada and if you're 6'7.5 you can comfertably walk under my doorframe.
I live in Canada and if you're 6'7.5 you can comfertably walk under my doorframe.
sid said on 21/Dec/08
danimal which province are you in.?? well I'm from B.c and heres about 6'6, I measured my room door, and my friends room door, and offices there all 6'6, doors can be higher as well. mall doors atleast 7ft room doors can average to 6'6 6'7 6'8
danimal which province are you in.?? well I'm from B.c and heres about 6'6, I measured my room door, and my friends room door, and offices there all 6'6, doors can be higher as well. mall doors atleast 7ft room doors can average to 6'6 6'7 6'8
sid said on 21/Dec/08
Rantsrob kane in the video with fans looked 6'8 6'9
Rantsrob kane in the video with fans looked 6'8 6'9
hs2008 said on 21/Dec/08
Yeah, Snitsky looks huge with that lady. From that pic, he's not under 6'5".
Orton & Edge both have around a full head of height on her as well.
Yeah, Snitsky looks huge with that lady. From that pic, he's not under 6'5".
Orton & Edge both have around a full head of height on her as well.
Da Man said on 21/Dec/08
sid says on 21/Dec/08
"Not here in canada, most doors in a room is 6'6"
I am referring specifically to the US.
sid says on 21/Dec/08
"Not here in canada, most doors in a room is 6'6"
I am referring specifically to the US.
Danimal said on 21/Dec/08
sid says on 21/Dec/08
Not here in canada, most doors in a room is 6'6
There are doors in my house that ARE (you must be french Canadian) 6'7". YES, I also live in Canada.
sid says on 21/Dec/08
Not here in canada, most doors in a room is 6'6
There are doors in my house that ARE (you must be french Canadian) 6'7". YES, I also live in Canada.
Vegas said on 21/Dec/08
the woman in those photos does look 5'7, she is about the same height as beth and 2-3 inches shorter than angle. snitsky looks gigantic next to her though, funny how every photo of snitsky with a fan he looks at least 6'6, cena looks as tall next to her as i saw him in person
the woman in those photos does look 5'7, she is about the same height as beth and 2-3 inches shorter than angle. snitsky looks gigantic next to her though, funny how every photo of snitsky with a fan he looks at least 6'6, cena looks as tall next to her as i saw him in person
sid said on 21/Dec/08
Not here in canada, most doors in a room is 6'6
Not here in canada, most doors in a room is 6'6
hs2008 said on 20/Dec/08
This lady has loads of pics with wrestlers, she claims 5'7"-5'7.5" & looks it IMO.
Click Here
This lady has loads of pics with wrestlers, she claims 5'7"-5'7.5" & looks it IMO.
Click Here
Da Man said on 19/Dec/08
Modern commercial doors are pretty standard. The doors in most arenas are going to be either 7' or 8'. Houses will vary more because of period built and customization, even though the standard residential door size has been 6'8" since the 60s at least.
Modern commercial doors are pretty standard. The doors in most arenas are going to be either 7' or 8'. Houses will vary more because of period built and customization, even though the standard residential door size has been 6'8" since the 60s at least.
Eric 1 said on 19/Dec/08
I dont buy 6ft3. Hes about 6ft even. In wwe he wore monster boots with very huge heels compared to the other guys. Just like kane used to wear. He might even be 5ft11.
I dont buy 6ft3. Hes about 6ft even. In wwe he wore monster boots with very huge heels compared to the other guys. Just like kane used to wear. He might even be 5ft11.
Rantsrob said on 18/Dec/08
Ha yea, lets bash ola for thinking kane is the height listed on the site?
Ha yea, lets bash ola for thinking kane is the height listed on the site?
Alex said on 18/Dec/08
Most door frames for modern houses are 6'8. My house is a much older house and the door frames were 6'6 and only one was 6'7 but the house was rebuilt and the doorframes seem a bit taller. I gotta measure.
Most door frames for modern houses are 6'8. My house is a much older house and the door frames were 6'6 and only one was 6'7 but the house was rebuilt and the doorframes seem a bit taller. I gotta measure.
sid said on 18/Dec/08
Ola get your eyes checked, kane is 6'8, 6'9 in ring gear, kane was 2 inches then the door on raw
Ola get your eyes checked, kane is 6'8, 6'9 in ring gear, kane was 2 inches then the door on raw
robert said on 18/Dec/08
how can you all judge how tall doors are?? alright an average door is 6'6 but not and definately maybe not common. that door could be 7' 6'10 6'11 6'5 who knows.
how can you all judge how tall doors are?? alright an average door is 6'6 but not and definately maybe not common. that door could be 7' 6'10 6'11 6'5 who knows.
Alex said on 17/Dec/08
Angle is no way as short as 5'9 unless he was wearing lifts when I met him which he wasn't. He could have been as tall as 5'10 1/2 since it would be tough to tell 1/2 inch even up close but 5'10 1/2 would be the very max. When he first stood up I was like in my head, he's 5'10, not the 5'11 I thought he was before meeting him.
Angle is no way as short as 5'9 unless he was wearing lifts when I met him which he wasn't. He could have been as tall as 5'10 1/2 since it would be tough to tell 1/2 inch even up close but 5'10 1/2 would be the very max. When he first stood up I was like in my head, he's 5'10, not the 5'11 I thought he was before meeting him.
Da Man said on 17/Dec/08
Standard commercial door heights are 7' and 8'. Click Here
All the doors in arenas and such are going to be commercial doors, residential doors are 6'8".
Standard commercial door heights are 7' and 8'. Click Here
All the doors in arenas and such are going to be commercial doors, residential doors are 6'8".
Da Man said on 17/Dec/08
Doorways in industrial type settings are much taller than 6'8", closer to 7'0".
Residential doorway in the U.S. are typically 6'9" at the frame, 6'8" at the interior of the casing (lowest point).
Kane does have to duck under residential doorways (albeit in footwear) as seen in those New Hampshire Libertarian videos.
Doorways in industrial type settings are much taller than 6'8", closer to 7'0".
Residential doorway in the U.S. are typically 6'9" at the frame, 6'8" at the interior of the casing (lowest point).
Kane does have to duck under residential doorways (albeit in footwear) as seen in those New Hampshire Libertarian videos.
lillo thomas said on 17/Dec/08
Maybe the door in the pic above is 6-6 but 6-8 or 80 inches is the standard size for doors.
Maybe the door in the pic above is 6-6 but 6-8 or 80 inches is the standard size for doors.
DAMN said on 17/Dec/08
I just had a look at the video of Kane an Kelly Kelly and first Kane really seems to edge above the door. But then when he leaves the room, he seems to be walking straight through. I mean he is not ducking his head or anything. So is he actually shorter than 2 meters?
I just had a look at the video of Kane an Kelly Kelly and first Kane really seems to edge above the door. But then when he leaves the room, he seems to be walking straight through. I mean he is not ducking his head or anything. So is he actually shorter than 2 meters?
sid said on 17/Dec/08
Eric 1 The door was 6'6 which is about average door size, kane looked to have 2 inches
Eric 1 The door was 6'6 which is about average door size, kane looked to have 2 inches
Clay said on 17/Dec/08
True Al but still he isnt flat 5'9, being a legit 5'10-5'10.25 makes a differnce.
True Al but still he isnt flat 5'9, being a legit 5'10-5'10.25 makes a differnce.
Alex said on 16/Dec/08
I dont remember UT having a full head on Angle. Close to it and UT's head is probably a good 10-10.5 inches. A 6'7 UT would result in a 5'10 Angle.
I dont remember UT having a full head on Angle. Close to it and UT's head is probably a good 10-10.5 inches. A 6'7 UT would result in a 5'10 Angle.
Eric 1 said on 16/Dec/08
Once again on raw they showed a segment with kelly kelly and kane. IN the segment when kane was standing straight up his head was higher then the door way. He looked huge.
Once again on raw they showed a segment with kelly kelly and kane. IN the segment when kane was standing straight up his head was higher then the door way. He looked huge.
Danimal said on 16/Dec/08
I see Angle at 5'9.5"-5'10.25". If I were to stand next to him after a good night's sleep, I don't think you would be able to see much of a difference in our two heights.
I see Angle at 5'9.5"-5'10.25". If I were to stand next to him after a good night's sleep, I don't think you would be able to see much of a difference in our two heights.
Red said on 16/Dec/08
Anonymous, Alex met Angle, so he can give a closer estimation than most of us
Anonymous, Alex met Angle, so he can give a closer estimation than most of us
Anonymous said on 16/Dec/08
I'd be surprised if he was even 5,10" to be honest. There's a picture floating around somewhere where he looks a full head shorter than the Undertaker.
I'd be surprised if he was even 5,10" to be honest. There's a picture floating around somewhere where he looks a full head shorter than the Undertaker.
Alex said on 15/Dec/08
Angle is 5'10 1/4 max.
Angle is 5'10 1/4 max.
Clay said on 15/Dec/08
No Angle isnt 5'9'' he's 5'10'' possibly a little more.
No Angle isnt 5'9'' he's 5'10'' possibly a little more.
sid said on 12/Dec/08
heres angle and edge, edge looks short here. who is suppose to be 6'4. angle is 5'9. seems like edge had 3 inches on him. whats wrong with this segment click here Click Here
heres angle and edge, edge looks short here. who is suppose to be 6'4. angle is 5'9. seems like edge had 3 inches on him. whats wrong with this segment click here Click Here
sid said on 12/Dec/08
heres kane and shane in 2001. kane had like 6 to 7 inches on shane click this here Click Here
heres kane and shane in 2001. kane had like 6 to 7 inches on shane click this here Click Here
Alex said on 11/Dec/08
Then look at Cena being billed at 6'1. He looks just about that in reality. He was billed at 6'3 in OVW though. I'm suprised they dont give him 6'2 in WWE though like they give Austin.
Then look at Cena being billed at 6'1. He looks just about that in reality. He was billed at 6'3 in OVW though. I'm suprised they dont give him 6'2 in WWE though like they give Austin.
Ghost said on 11/Dec/08
Danimal says on 10/Dec/08
Alex says on 10/Dec/08
Vegas, yea true. Jeff Hardy does look 6'1, Carlito 5'10, Holly a little under 6'0. JBL I think is more closer to 6'4 than 6'5 IMO.
I have read that Carlito is really 5'9". I wonder what I would be billed at if I was in the WWE? Probably somewhere between 6'0"-6'1".
It would depend on your status. Maineventers are usually billed bigger than lower card wrestlers.
Danimal says on 10/Dec/08
Alex says on 10/Dec/08
Vegas, yea true. Jeff Hardy does look 6'1, Carlito 5'10, Holly a little under 6'0. JBL I think is more closer to 6'4 than 6'5 IMO.
I have read that Carlito is really 5'9". I wonder what I would be billed at if I was in the WWE? Probably somewhere between 6'0"-6'1".
It would depend on your status. Maineventers are usually billed bigger than lower card wrestlers.
Alex said on 10/Dec/08
Carlito was close to Angle's height I believe so he's at least 5'9 but his hair can make him appear taller though.
Danimal, at 5'9 1/2 you'd probably be billed at 5'11-6'0. I'd be billed at at least 6'2 if not 6'3 maybe.
Carlito was close to Angle's height I believe so he's at least 5'9 but his hair can make him appear taller though.
Danimal, at 5'9 1/2 you'd probably be billed at 5'11-6'0. I'd be billed at at least 6'2 if not 6'3 maybe.
Clay said on 10/Dec/08
Carlito just looks a little taller due to the fro probably.
Carlito just looks a little taller due to the fro probably.
Danimal said on 10/Dec/08
Alex says on 10/Dec/08
Vegas, yea true. Jeff Hardy does look 6'1, Carlito 5'10, Holly a little under 6'0. JBL I think is more closer to 6'4 than 6'5 IMO.
I have read that Carlito is really 5'9". I wonder what I would be billed at if I was in the WWE? Probably somewhere between 6'0"-6'1".
Alex says on 10/Dec/08
Vegas, yea true. Jeff Hardy does look 6'1, Carlito 5'10, Holly a little under 6'0. JBL I think is more closer to 6'4 than 6'5 IMO.
I have read that Carlito is really 5'9". I wonder what I would be billed at if I was in the WWE? Probably somewhere between 6'0"-6'1".
Alex said on 10/Dec/08
Vegas, yea true. Jeff Hardy does look 6'1, Carlito 5'10, Holly a little under 6'0. JBL I think is more closer to 6'4 than 6'5 IMO.
Vegas, yea true. Jeff Hardy does look 6'1, Carlito 5'10, Holly a little under 6'0. JBL I think is more closer to 6'4 than 6'5 IMO.
sid said on 9/Dec/08
bigfatguysowhat you met kane in street cloth, besides if your 6'9 and he's 6'8 not much of a diff. was he in street cloth, cause in ring gear he's 6'9
bigfatguysowhat you met kane in street cloth, besides if your 6'9 and he's 6'8 not much of a diff. was he in street cloth, cause in ring gear he's 6'9
KingNick said on 9/Dec/08
I'd see Vader at 6'2" being accurate. Henry 6'1", Rock 6'3". Barefoot estimates.
I'd see Vader at 6'2" being accurate. Henry 6'1", Rock 6'3". Barefoot estimates.
Vegas said on 9/Dec/08
Danimal says on 8/Dec/08
That would have put Vader at 6'4", seeing he had him by close to 2" at Summerslam 1996.
Vader and mark henry had a staredown, these photos have already been posted before and i don't see 2 inches Click Here
vader was one inch shorter than rock in a staredown in 1996
Alex couple of others at or near their billed heights off top of my head, those billed very close to their legit heights imo; regal 6'2, carlito 5ft 10, santino 5'10, Hardcore Holly 6ft, jeff hardy 6ft 1
a few about 1 inch shorter than their billed heights; jim duggan 6ft 3, ron simmons 6ft 2, jbl 6ft 6, Scotty Goldman 6ft 1, ted dibiase jr 6'3
Danimal says on 8/Dec/08
That would have put Vader at 6'4", seeing he had him by close to 2" at Summerslam 1996.
Vader and mark henry had a staredown, these photos have already been posted before and i don't see 2 inches Click Here
vader was one inch shorter than rock in a staredown in 1996
Alex couple of others at or near their billed heights off top of my head, those billed very close to their legit heights imo; regal 6'2, carlito 5ft 10, santino 5'10, Hardcore Holly 6ft, jeff hardy 6ft 1
a few about 1 inch shorter than their billed heights; jim duggan 6ft 3, ron simmons 6ft 2, jbl 6ft 6, Scotty Goldman 6ft 1, ted dibiase jr 6'3
bigfatguysowhat said on 9/Dec/08
I believe Kane is about 6'8", I'm only about 6'9" and he's just under my height.
I believe Kane is about 6'8", I'm only about 6'9" and he's just under my height.
Annoyed said on 9/Dec/08
henry is 6'1" and wears 1.5" shoes. That is all, he is listed his actual height because he was measured at 6'1".
henry is 6'1" and wears 1.5" shoes. That is all, he is listed his actual height because he was measured at 6'1".
Shock of Electric said on 9/Dec/08
Mark Henry I use to think was as tall as 6'3" but I noticed last year he wears lifts, I would say 6'1.5" even though he's been listed as 6'1" here and there (you rarely hear fractions in height listings). He SHOULD be a 6'3" bill.
Mark Henry I use to think was as tall as 6'3" but I noticed last year he wears lifts, I would say 6'1.5" even though he's been listed as 6'1" here and there (you rarely hear fractions in height listings). He SHOULD be a 6'3" bill.
Derek said on 8/Dec/08
Mark Henry is billed at 6'1". He's in the same scenario as Randy Orton. Their listed heights are their legitimate heights. That is very rare though.
Mark Henry is billed at 6'1". He's in the same scenario as Randy Orton. Their listed heights are their legitimate heights. That is very rare though.
Alex said on 8/Dec/08
Henry is actually 6'1-6'1 1/2 tops. He was listed at 6'1 so I doubt he's over 6'1 1/2.
Henry is actually 6'1-6'1 1/2 tops. He was listed at 6'1 so I doubt he's over 6'1 1/2.
Danimal said on 8/Dec/08
Clay says on 8/Dec/08
Hahaha, no. He's 6'2-6'2.5 tops.
That would have put Vader at 6'4", seeing he had him by close to 2" at Summerslam 1996.
Mark Henry - 6'1"
Vader - 6'3"
Bam Bam Bigelow - 6'2"
King Kong Bundy - 6'4"
Clay says on 8/Dec/08
Hahaha, no. He's 6'2-6'2.5 tops.
That would have put Vader at 6'4", seeing he had him by close to 2" at Summerslam 1996.
Mark Henry - 6'1"
Vader - 6'3"
Bam Bam Bigelow - 6'2"
King Kong Bundy - 6'4"
Anonymous said on 8/Dec/08
I think Khali would probably win an arm wrestling match because he has bigger hands and wrists.
Any test of strength involving heavy lifting though and Show would dominate.
I think Khali would probably win an arm wrestling match because he has bigger hands and wrists.
Any test of strength involving heavy lifting though and Show would dominate.
Clay said on 8/Dec/08
Hahaha, no. He's 6'2-6'2.5 tops.
Hahaha, no. He's 6'2-6'2.5 tops.
Ghost said on 5/Dec/08
I think khali's arms actually looked a little bigger than Shows.
It would be interesting if they had a legit armwrestling match or some other test of strength between the two.
I think khali's arms actually looked a little bigger than Shows.
It would be interesting if they had a legit armwrestling match or some other test of strength between the two.
Alex said on 4/Dec/08
Big Show may not dwarf Khali in upper body but Khali isn't bigger. Big Show is still a bit bigger up top I think and his arms are slightly bigger than Khali's. But yea Big Show's legs are a much bigger than Khali and his stomach adds more weight as well.
Big Show may not dwarf Khali in upper body but Khali isn't bigger. Big Show is still a bit bigger up top I think and his arms are slightly bigger than Khali's. But yea Big Show's legs are a much bigger than Khali and his stomach adds more weight as well.
Icehole73 said on 2/Dec/08
Just to have a shot of Shaq and Khali together is awesome!!! Makes me think of the Andre and Wilt shot of this era. Also the pic of Peter Mayhew and Richard Kiel. Can't Imagine going your whole life to finally be stared at in the eye.........Cheers to these big men.....Kane fan also..
Just to have a shot of Shaq and Khali together is awesome!!! Makes me think of the Andre and Wilt shot of this era. Also the pic of Peter Mayhew and Richard Kiel. Can't Imagine going your whole life to finally be stared at in the eye.........Cheers to these big men.....Kane fan also..
chris said on 2/Dec/08
if mark was skinny he would look a normal 6'1
if mark was skinny he would look a normal 6'1
Clay said on 2/Dec/08
Khali owns Shaq in muscle mass in the chest, upper back, and shoulders/traps. There is at least 50 pounds between them, and they're virtually the same height/same bone structure. And no, Big Show doesnt dwarf Khali in the upper body. Big Shows big weight advantage over Khali is in the gut and legs. Khali arms actually look a little bigger.
Khali owns Shaq in muscle mass in the chest, upper back, and shoulders/traps. There is at least 50 pounds between them, and they're virtually the same height/same bone structure. And no, Big Show doesnt dwarf Khali in the upper body. Big Shows big weight advantage over Khali is in the gut and legs. Khali arms actually look a little bigger.
Ghost said on 2/Dec/08
Henry can look 6'2. I'm suprised he is billd as low as he is.
I think he really is just 6'1 though, he was very close in height with Cena and atleast an inch shorter than Batista.
Henry can look 6'2. I'm suprised he is billd as low as he is.
I think he really is just 6'1 though, he was very close in height with Cena and atleast an inch shorter than Batista.
Annoyed said on 1/Dec/08
Henry is a legit 6'1" flat !
Henry is a legit 6'1" flat !
Danimal said on 1/Dec/08
Ghost says on 29/Nov/08
Vader is about 6'2. He was only an inch taller than Mark Henry.
I give him at least 6'3" seeing he had 1-2" on Bam Bam Bigelow, who was close to 6'2".
Ghost says on 29/Nov/08
Vader is about 6'2. He was only an inch taller than Mark Henry.
I give him at least 6'3" seeing he had 1-2" on Bam Bam Bigelow, who was close to 6'2".
Anonymous said on 1/Dec/08
they downgraded big show by 42lb on wwe.com
they downgraded big show by 42lb on wwe.com
Danimal said on 28/Nov/08
I don't think Khali is over 375 pounds.
I don't think Khali is over 375 pounds.
Derek said on 28/Nov/08
Shaq I'd say is 325-330 right now. At his peak, he was around 370 around late 2002-early 2003. He came off toe surgery and his response was "I hurt it on company time, I fix it on company time". As for Khali, 380 sounds right. He's definitely pushing 400 pounds.
Shaq I'd say is 325-330 right now. At his peak, he was around 370 around late 2002-early 2003. He came off toe surgery and his response was "I hurt it on company time, I fix it on company time". As for Khali, 380 sounds right. He's definitely pushing 400 pounds.
Anonymous said on 28/Nov/08
Kane does indeed look huge in that match with Vader. He must have been well north of 300 lbs back then, and strong as hell.
I think Khali is probably around 380 lbs. He looks pretty skinny next to the legit 441 lb Big Show.
Kane does indeed look huge in that match with Vader. He must have been well north of 300 lbs back then, and strong as hell.
I think Khali is probably around 380 lbs. He looks pretty skinny next to the legit 441 lb Big Show.
Alex said on 28/Nov/08
Shaq I do believe at 325lbs at least, maybe more. Kane may be around 320lbs today again, he has gained some weight over the last few years again.
Shaq I do believe at 325lbs at least, maybe more. Kane may be around 320lbs today again, he has gained some weight over the last few years again.
KingNick said on 27/Nov/08
I really don't think Khali is his billed 420lbs. I'll be the first to say that I find it more difficult to guess weights. He looks wider than Shaq but I honestly don't think he looks like he weighs much more than Shaq
I really don't think Khali is his billed 420lbs. I'll be the first to say that I find it more difficult to guess weights. He looks wider than Shaq but I honestly don't think he looks like he weighs much more than Shaq
sid said on 27/Nov/08
Alex shaq does not look 325.. he looks 300.. kane looks bigger then shaq...
Alex shaq does not look 325.. he looks 300.. kane looks bigger then shaq...
gazz said on 27/Nov/08
kane looks absolutely huge in that vader match, how tall is vader?
kane looks absolutely huge in that vader match, how tall is vader?
Marotte said on 26/Nov/08
Ola says on 26/Nov/08
what is shaq's real weight and what is khali billed to these days? just curious, since shaq looks heavier
I think you would like shaq to be heavier than khali but unfortunately that's not the case khali is easily 60 pounds heavier than shaq.
Ola says on 26/Nov/08
what is shaq's real weight and what is khali billed to these days? just curious, since shaq looks heavier
I think you would like shaq to be heavier than khali but unfortunately that's not the case khali is easily 60 pounds heavier than shaq.
Clay said on 26/Nov/08
Whats even funnier is saying Khali looks skinny is like saing the Olsen twins are both lard asses. IS Umar for real? Sounds pretty trollish. Shaq may look heavier in the dark picture but its actually not evenb close. Shaq is nowhere near Singh in weight.
Whats even funnier is saying Khali looks skinny is like saing the Olsen twins are both lard asses. IS Umar for real? Sounds pretty trollish. Shaq may look heavier in the dark picture but its actually not evenb close. Shaq is nowhere near Singh in weight.
Alex said on 26/Nov/08
Shaq is billed at 325lbs and looks easily that. Khali is billed at 420lbs but he looks at least 390lbs.
Shaq is billed at 325lbs and looks easily that. Khali is billed at 420lbs but he looks at least 390lbs.
Alex said on 26/Nov/08
Sid, I could agree on that. Looks 8 inches.
Sid, I could agree on that. Looks 8 inches.
Danimal said on 25/Nov/08
Umar says on 23/Nov/08
Click Here
That's just a figure of Khali. Look how skinny Khali looks. And look at his stomach. The figure is made by plastic.
One of the funniest things I've read on here in the last 4 years!! haha..
Umar says on 23/Nov/08
Click Here
That's just a figure of Khali. Look how skinny Khali looks. And look at his stomach. The figure is made by plastic.
One of the funniest things I've read on here in the last 4 years!! haha..
sid said on 25/Nov/08
Heres kane with stone cold backstage.. he has around 8 inches on stece click here
Click Here
Heres kane with stone cold backstage.. he has around 8 inches on stece click here
Click Here
Atoadaso said on 24/Nov/08
Nice pic. I'd wager that shaq has the footwear advantage too. Khali is in his wrestling gear; his flat soled shoes. Shaq in dress shoes or basketball shoes has an advantage, most likely.
Nice pic. I'd wager that shaq has the footwear advantage too. Khali is in his wrestling gear; his flat soled shoes. Shaq in dress shoes or basketball shoes has an advantage, most likely.
Alex said on 24/Nov/08
Based on those lines Khali is a smidge taller but his head is also barely closer to the camera. It breaks even with both guys at 7'1 barefoot.
Based on those lines Khali is a smidge taller but his head is also barely closer to the camera. It breaks even with both guys at 7'1 barefoot.
Anonymous said on 24/Nov/08
Danimal says on 23/Nov/08
I would say Shaq has .75" on Khali in that pic.
negative Click Here this was posted on shaqs page the photo made bright, can't get any clearer Click Here
Danimal says on 23/Nov/08
I would say Shaq has .75" on Khali in that pic.
negative Click Here this was posted on shaqs page the photo made bright, can't get any clearer Click Here
Umar said on 23/Nov/08
Click Here
That's just a figure of Khali. Look how skinny Khali looks. And look at his stomach. The figure is made by plastic.
Click Here
That's just a figure of Khali. Look how skinny Khali looks. And look at his stomach. The figure is made by plastic.
Danimal said on 23/Nov/08
Alex says on 23/Nov/08
Just by looking at that photo again Shaq appears to have about 1/4 inch on Khali, no more than that but likely the same height.
I would say Shaq has .75" on Khali in that pic.
Alex says on 23/Nov/08
Just by looking at that photo again Shaq appears to have about 1/4 inch on Khali, no more than that but likely the same height.
I would say Shaq has .75" on Khali in that pic.
Alex said on 23/Nov/08
Just by looking at that photo again Shaq appears to have about 1/4 inch on Khali, no more than that but likely the same height.
Just by looking at that photo again Shaq appears to have about 1/4 inch on Khali, no more than that but likely the same height.
Umar said on 22/Nov/08
Wow this is real?
Click Here
Sorry I don't know how to send the "click here" thing.
Wow this is real?
Click Here
Sorry I don't know how to send the "click here" thing.
KingNick said on 22/Nov/08
Just out of curiosity, who started this whole, "Shaq said he was 6'11.5" thing? Is there any proof he actually did? Every other source points him to being 7' or 7'1"
Just out of curiosity, who started this whole, "Shaq said he was 6'11.5" thing? Is there any proof he actually did? Every other source points him to being 7' or 7'1"
Umar said on 21/Nov/08
Why are you people giving fake pictures of Khali when he's standing beside Shaq??????
Why are you people giving fake pictures of Khali when he's standing beside Shaq??????
Rory said on 21/Nov/08
Zydrunas Ilgauskas (number 11) is barefoot measured 7ft 2 and nba listed at 7ft 3, as you can see from this photo he has barely an inch on shaq and is closer to the camera Click Here
Zydrunas Ilgauskas (number 11) is barefoot measured 7ft 2 and nba listed at 7ft 3, as you can see from this photo he has barely an inch on shaq and is closer to the camera Click Here
Rory said on 21/Nov/08
that is not a 7ft 1 listing its a barefoot 7ft 1 measurement for shaq, if shaq said he was white and from mars would you believe that too??? where is the proof he said it and then how do you prove he was joking?? shaq said on another interview he doesn
that is not a 7ft 1 listing its a barefoot 7ft 1 measurement for shaq, if shaq said he was white and from mars would you believe that too??? where is the proof he said it and then how do you prove he was joking?? shaq said on another interview he doesn
Anonymous said on 21/Nov/08
Rory says on 20/Nov/08
shaq was measured barefoot at 7ft 1, players who have a * or # were not measured but estimated, shaq was measured and he is 7ft1 barefoot end of story, it clearly says "height without shoes" there Click Here
a 6ft 11 shaq would equal a 6ft 10 david robinson, now that is silly Click Here
i have evidence where shaq has said he is 7ft 1 on more than 5 occasions
That list also says that Tim Duncan is 6'11.5'' without shoes. I doubt he is that tall with shoes.
Rory says on 20/Nov/08
shaq was measured barefoot at 7ft 1, players who have a * or # were not measured but estimated, shaq was measured and he is 7ft1 barefoot end of story, it clearly says "height without shoes" there Click Here
a 6ft 11 shaq would equal a 6ft 10 david robinson, now that is silly Click Here
i have evidence where shaq has said he is 7ft 1 on more than 5 occasions
That list also says that Tim Duncan is 6'11.5'' without shoes. I doubt he is that tall with shoes.
Jeremy L. said on 20/Nov/08
I do not have triple personality, my sister was just on this site the other day. And by the way, I would be Shaq's barefoot height in my tennis shoes. I am 7'0 barefoot/7'1 in shoes. It's not funny I have to duck under doorways and shop at big and tall stores.
I do not have triple personality, my sister was just on this site the other day. And by the way, I would be Shaq's barefoot height in my tennis shoes. I am 7'0 barefoot/7'1 in shoes. It's not funny I have to duck under doorways and shop at big and tall stores.
Alex said on 20/Nov/08
Khali looks 5 inches taller than Kane there. Big Show also has 4 inches on Kane. That putting Big Show and Khali an inch apart again.
Khali looks 5 inches taller than Kane there. Big Show also has 4 inches on Kane. That putting Big Show and Khali an inch apart again.
Frank said on 20/Nov/08
Rory i dont care what he was listed @ Shaq said he was 6ft 11 .5 Himself!!
Unless he lying ???
Rory i dont care what he was listed @ Shaq said he was 6ft 11 .5 Himself!!
Unless he lying ???
Rory said on 20/Nov/08
shaq was measured barefoot at 7ft 1, players who have a * or # were not measured but estimated, shaq was measured and he is 7ft1 barefoot end of story, it clearly says "height without shoes" there Click Here
a 6ft 11 shaq would equal a 6ft 10 david robinson, now that is silly Click Here
i have evidence where shaq has said he is 7ft 1 on more than 5 occasions
shaq was measured barefoot at 7ft 1, players who have a * or # were not measured but estimated, shaq was measured and he is 7ft1 barefoot end of story, it clearly says "height without shoes" there Click Here
a 6ft 11 shaq would equal a 6ft 10 david robinson, now that is silly Click Here
i have evidence where shaq has said he is 7ft 1 on more than 5 occasions
Da Man said on 20/Nov/08
Except, he may actually look a hair taller in the pic with the 7'1" basketball player.
Except, he may actually look a hair taller in the pic with the 7'1" basketball player.
Frank said on 20/Nov/08
Again Shaq said hes 6ft 11.5 that 7ft 1 listing could be Shaq is 7ft .5 in his sneakers and they round it up to 7ft 1 ?????
Again Shaq said hes 6ft 11.5 that 7ft 1 listing could be Shaq is 7ft .5 in his sneakers and they round it up to 7ft 1 ?????
Halb said on 20/Nov/08
A pic where he stands next to a 7'1 basketball player and doesnt look taller?
A pic where he stands next to a 7'1 basketball player and doesnt look taller?
Clay said on 20/Nov/08
Thanks JT. If that isnt proof to a 7'1.5 Khali then what is? Pretty revealing shots there.
Thanks JT. If that isnt proof to a 7'1.5 Khali then what is? Pretty revealing shots there.
JT said on 20/Nov/08
Da Man says on 17/Nov/08
Clay says on 14/Nov/08
"Explain how a 6'8 Kane comes UNDER Khali's eyelevel, Danimal."
Does he? Click Here
He does (or is right at Khali's eye level) Click Here Click Here Kane would have the footwear advantage as well.
Da Man says on 17/Nov/08
Clay says on 14/Nov/08
"Explain how a 6'8 Kane comes UNDER Khali's eyelevel, Danimal."
Does he? Click Here
He does (or is right at Khali's eye level) Click Here Click Here Kane would have the footwear advantage as well.
KingNick said on 19/Nov/08
Have you guys been looking at the UT page? Here are two photos of Kane and Undertaker from the same night at a house show:
Click Here
and
Click Here
Have you guys been looking at the UT page? Here are two photos of Kane and Undertaker from the same night at a house show:
Click Here
and
Click Here
Danimal said on 19/Nov/08
Jeremy L. says on 18/Nov/08
Kane, seven feet, yeah right, in gym shoes Kane would be at most 6'8.5" maybe 6'9" and I'd be 7'1".
What's up with this triple identity of yours??? There is medication for multiple personality btw ;).
Jeremy L. says on 18/Nov/08
Kane, seven feet, yeah right, in gym shoes Kane would be at most 6'8.5" maybe 6'9" and I'd be 7'1".
What's up with this triple identity of yours??? There is medication for multiple personality btw ;).
Da Man said on 19/Nov/08
Jeremy L. says on 18/Nov/08
"Kane, seven feet, yeah right, in gym shoes Kane would be at most 6'8.5" maybe 6'9" and I'd be 7'1"."
I think you're between 5'6" and 5'11"...
Jeremy L. says on 18/Nov/08
"Kane, seven feet, yeah right, in gym shoes Kane would be at most 6'8.5" maybe 6'9" and I'd be 7'1"."
I think you're between 5'6" and 5'11"...
Clay said on 19/Nov/08
Yeah, ok there Jeremy..
Yeah, ok there Jeremy..
Rantsrob said on 19/Nov/08
Jeremy L. says on 18/Nov/08
Kane, seven feet, yeah right, in gym shoes Kane would be at most 6'8.5" maybe 6'9" and I'd be 7'1".
No your not 7'1''..... your not even close
Jeremy L. says on 18/Nov/08
Kane, seven feet, yeah right, in gym shoes Kane would be at most 6'8.5" maybe 6'9" and I'd be 7'1".
No your not 7'1''..... your not even close
Da Man said on 19/Nov/08
Clay says on 18/Nov/08
"Thats a pretty pitiful angle Da man."
Only slightly more pitiful than most already provided...
Clay says on 18/Nov/08
"Thats a pretty pitiful angle Da man."
Only slightly more pitiful than most already provided...
Jeremy L. said on 18/Nov/08
Kane, seven feet, yeah right, in gym shoes Kane would be at most 6'8.5" maybe 6'9" and I'd be 7'1".
Kane, seven feet, yeah right, in gym shoes Kane would be at most 6'8.5" maybe 6'9" and I'd be 7'1".
Clay said on 18/Nov/08
Thats a pretty pitiful angle Da man.
Thats a pretty pitiful angle Da man.
chris said on 18/Nov/08
"i agree with you wholeheartedly chris, but there is a fundemental difference between opinion and fact.
anyhoo, derek i agree with you, 6'8 is fair, he could be 6'7.5"
Ok Dave
"i agree with you wholeheartedly chris, but there is a fundemental difference between opinion and fact.
anyhoo, derek i agree with you, 6'8 is fair, he could be 6'7.5"
Ok Dave
dave said on 17/Nov/08
i agree with you wholeheartedly chris, but there is a fundemental difference between opinion and fact.
anyhoo, derek i agree with you, 6'8 is fair, he could be 6'7.5
i agree with you wholeheartedly chris, but there is a fundemental difference between opinion and fact.
anyhoo, derek i agree with you, 6'8 is fair, he could be 6'7.5
Derek said on 17/Nov/08
A 6'8" Kane seems fair. That puts Khali in the 7'0.5"-7'1" range.
A 6'8" Kane seems fair. That puts Khali in the 7'0.5"-7'1" range.
Alex said on 17/Nov/08
Kane's looking up while Khali is looking down making the difference seem even a little less. I've seen pics where Kane is def 5 inches shorter.
Kane's looking up while Khali is looking down making the difference seem even a little less. I've seen pics where Kane is def 5 inches shorter.
Da Man said on 17/Nov/08
Clay says on 14/Nov/08
"Explain how a 6'8 Kane comes UNDER Khali's eyelevel, Danimal."
Does he? Click Here
Clay says on 14/Nov/08
"Explain how a 6'8 Kane comes UNDER Khali's eyelevel, Danimal."
Does he? Click Here
chris said on 16/Nov/08
dave everyone has the right to there own opinion here as it is a public page - whatever is said
dave everyone has the right to there own opinion here as it is a public page - whatever is said
dave said on 15/Nov/08
could naths comment be deleted please? kane has infact ALWAYS been the same man, i have asked him in person and its a well known fact to those who bother to reasearch..... it will just create more silly arguments on here....
btw nath, my muscle mass/weight etc varies CONSIDERABLY throughout the year, do you really think that just because the nowadays kane is smaller in muscle size that its a different man?.... please.
could naths comment be deleted please? kane has infact ALWAYS been the same man, i have asked him in person and its a well known fact to those who bother to reasearch..... it will just create more silly arguments on here....
btw nath, my muscle mass/weight etc varies CONSIDERABLY throughout the year, do you really think that just because the nowadays kane is smaller in muscle size that its a different man?.... please.
Clay said on 14/Nov/08
Explain how a 6'8 Kane comes UNDER Khali's eyelevel, Danimal.
Explain how a 6'8 Kane comes UNDER Khali's eyelevel, Danimal.
Marotte said on 14/Nov/08
nath says on 14/Nov/08
thats not the real kane i dont know what they did with the old one but its not the same one as in thw past and its not on get that one out and the old one in again i mean come on who didnt notice when the new kane switched he was 2 small not enough beef and so many other things.
You are kiding right?
nath says on 14/Nov/08
thats not the real kane i dont know what they did with the old one but its not the same one as in thw past and its not on get that one out and the old one in again i mean come on who didnt notice when the new kane switched he was 2 small not enough beef and so many other things.
You are kiding right?
nath said on 14/Nov/08
thats not the real kane i dont know what they did with the old one but its not the same one as in thw past and its not on get that one out and the old one in again i mean come on who didnt notice when the new kane switched he was 2 small not enough beef and so many other things
thats not the real kane i dont know what they did with the old one but its not the same one as in thw past and its not on get that one out and the old one in again i mean come on who didnt notice when the new kane switched he was 2 small not enough beef and so many other things
Alex said on 14/Nov/08
I think Khali and Shaq are dead on the same height.
I think Khali and Shaq are dead on the same height.
Danimal said on 13/Nov/08
Clay says on 13/Nov/08
This all further cements my theory that Khali is actually more than 7'1, lets not forget those revealing pics where he had more than 5 inches on Kane...
What are you talking about???? Shaq is MAX 7'1" and Khali is NOT taller than him. He is the same height and if anything fractionally shorter. Your "buddy" Alex even agrees with that kid ;).
Clay says on 13/Nov/08
This all further cements my theory that Khali is actually more than 7'1, lets not forget those revealing pics where he had more than 5 inches on Kane...
What are you talking about???? Shaq is MAX 7'1" and Khali is NOT taller than him. He is the same height and if anything fractionally shorter. Your "buddy" Alex even agrees with that kid ;).
eric m said on 13/Nov/08
it looks like shaq has no more than 3-4 inches max in those pics with kane not even standing straight up .
it looks like shaq has no more than 3-4 inches max in those pics with kane not even standing straight up .
Clay said on 13/Nov/08
This all further cements my theory that Khali is actually more than 7'1, lets not forget those revealing pics where he had more than 5 inches on Kane...
This all further cements my theory that Khali is actually more than 7'1, lets not forget those revealing pics where he had more than 5 inches on Kane...
dave said on 12/Nov/08
adam you are full of it, infact this is one of the best pics for kane, he actually looks pretty big beside shaq.... a MAAAAAX of 5 inches diff, personally if kane was straight i see 4, but still... and kane certainly isnt straight, where shaq most definatley is,.... kane looks a LEGIT 6'8 here, id say kane is no less than 6'7.5......
adam you are full of it, infact this is one of the best pics for kane, he actually looks pretty big beside shaq.... a MAAAAAX of 5 inches diff, personally if kane was straight i see 4, but still... and kane certainly isnt straight, where shaq most definatley is,.... kane looks a LEGIT 6'8 here, id say kane is no less than 6'7.5......
tom said on 12/Nov/08
Glen is 6;8 without shoes, 6;11 in wwe with boots, 6'8 i believe is accurate
Glen is 6;8 without shoes, 6;11 in wwe with boots, 6'8 i believe is accurate
sid said on 12/Nov/08
hs2008 but you got realize kane is in ring gear. making him 6'9. kane has to be 6'8 barefeet. he looks 6'9 in that pic with shaq. 4 inches is about right
hs2008 but you got realize kane is in ring gear. making him 6'9. kane has to be 6'8 barefeet. he looks 6'9 in that pic with shaq. 4 inches is about right
hs2008 said on 12/Nov/08
Yes, but he's also leaning. No way is there 6" between them, MAX 5". Kane is no smaller than 6'8"-6'8.5" IMO.
Yes, but he's also leaning. No way is there 6" between them, MAX 5". Kane is no smaller than 6'8"-6'8.5" IMO.
sid said on 12/Nov/08
adam your blind as a bat. 4 inches shorter. kane is 6'8 bare... in ring gear 6'9. 6 inches is absubed.
adam your blind as a bat. 4 inches shorter. kane is 6'8 bare... in ring gear 6'9. 6 inches is absubed.
adam said on 11/Nov/08
Kane looks half a foot shorter than Shaq. There`s about a six inch difference. Kane is clearly closer to the camera.
Kane looks half a foot shorter than Shaq. There`s about a six inch difference. Kane is clearly closer to the camera.
tuga said on 11/Nov/08
Red says on 10/Nov/08
Giant Silva used to wear Big Boots, I think he
Red says on 10/Nov/08
Giant Silva used to wear Big Boots, I think he
Drexyl said on 10/Nov/08
Khali's hands definitely look bigger. His thumb looks massive compared to Shaq.
Khali's hands definitely look bigger. His thumb looks massive compared to Shaq.
Red said on 10/Nov/08
Giant Silva used to wear Big Boots, I think he
Giant Silva used to wear Big Boots, I think he
Da Man said on 10/Nov/08
Khali's hair is pulled back so tight on his head I doubt it is adding anything to his height.
Khali's hair is pulled back so tight on his head I doubt it is adding anything to his height.
sid said on 10/Nov/08
Heres backstage with kane and randy. randy 6'4 kane 6'9 in ring gear. freeze it in the very beg.. you'll see kane may have 4 to 5 inches kane standing talle same as orton.. kane looks 4 to 5 inches taller click here Click Here
Heres backstage with kane and randy. randy 6'4 kane 6'9 in ring gear. freeze it in the very beg.. you'll see kane may have 4 to 5 inches kane standing talle same as orton.. kane looks 4 to 5 inches taller click here Click Here
sid said on 10/Nov/08
Heres backstage with kane and randy. randy 6'4 kane 6'9 in ring gear. freeze it in the very beg.. you'll see kane may have 4 to 5 inches kane standing talle same as orton.. kane looks 4 to 5 inches taller
Heres backstage with kane and randy. randy 6'4 kane 6'9 in ring gear. freeze it in the very beg.. you'll see kane may have 4 to 5 inches kane standing talle same as orton.. kane looks 4 to 5 inches taller
Yaspaa said on 10/Nov/08
I see your point DM,it must be a bit weird for Khali being about the same height but feeling smaller due to his lower eyeline. Khali still doesn't look taller in the pic though.Khali's hair is a bit taller. Drawing a line accross a two dimensional representation of a three dimensional image isn't conclusive. I have little knowledge of the two though so I will accept what you are saying and stir the pot somewhere else.
I see your point DM,it must be a bit weird for Khali being about the same height but feeling smaller due to his lower eyeline. Khali still doesn't look taller in the pic though.Khali's hair is a bit taller. Drawing a line accross a two dimensional representation of a three dimensional image isn't conclusive. I have little knowledge of the two though so I will accept what you are saying and stir the pot somewhere else.
sid said on 10/Nov/08
this is kane's thread not khali. take it over to khali thread
this is kane's thread not khali. take it over to khali thread
willy79 said on 10/Nov/08
I believe Giant Silva is currently the tallest wrestler at 7'2 with Khali 7'1 and Big Show 7'0.
I believe Giant Silva is currently the tallest wrestler at 7'2 with Khali 7'1 and Big Show 7'0.
Clay said on 9/Nov/08
If anything, Khali comes out on top in the pic by 1 CM.
If anything, Khali comes out on top in the pic by 1 CM.
Da Man said on 9/Nov/08
Khali-Shaq are essentially the same height. And if either one has the edge, it's Khali. Shaq is in no way, shape, or form taller than Khali in this pic. Click Here (readjusted brightness to show the top of Khali's head above the line)
I know your eye at first thinks Khali's head and right hand are closer to the camera, but they aren't. There exists the same kind of size difference between Shaq's & Khali's left and right hands (and they are holding each other's hand). Click Here
Shaq's features are higher, but the top of his head isn't. Khali, like Big Show, is an acromegalic giant with abnormal proportions. The old eye-level/mouth-level gauges are all but useless with these guys. Click Here
Khali-Shaq are essentially the same height. And if either one has the edge, it's Khali. Shaq is in no way, shape, or form taller than Khali in this pic. Click Here (readjusted brightness to show the top of Khali's head above the line)
I know your eye at first thinks Khali's head and right hand are closer to the camera, but they aren't. There exists the same kind of size difference between Shaq's & Khali's left and right hands (and they are holding each other's hand). Click Here
Shaq's features are higher, but the top of his head isn't. Khali, like Big Show, is an acromegalic giant with abnormal proportions. The old eye-level/mouth-level gauges are all but useless with these guys. Click Here
Rantsrob said on 9/Nov/08
I dont see how anyone can tell any height differences in khali/shaq picture.
I dont see how anyone can tell any height differences in khali/shaq picture.
Yaspaa said on 9/Nov/08
Still too subjective.
Still too subjective.
Da Man said on 9/Nov/08
Khali's head isn't closer to the camera, he's a mis-proportioned acromegalic.
Check out Khali's left hand and see how it dwarfs Shaq's right hand.
Also, here's a pic JT provided on the Singh page, Khali's head is just really that big! Click Here
Khali's head isn't closer to the camera, he's a mis-proportioned acromegalic.
Check out Khali's left hand and see how it dwarfs Shaq's right hand.
Also, here's a pic JT provided on the Singh page, Khali's head is just really that big! Click Here
Yaspaa said on 9/Nov/08
Everything on Shaq in the pic from the 4th is higher plus Khali's head is closer to the camera and the camera is looking up at them making it more difficult to judge. Two guys that size 1.5" isn't gonna look very much and what weight is Khali billed at? Shaq is what? 325. 7ft max for Khali and no opinionated mundane Dave retorts,I've got an opinion I want some more evidence. You see shots like this all the time looking up and it always makes people look more similar.
Everything on Shaq in the pic from the 4th is higher plus Khali's head is closer to the camera and the camera is looking up at them making it more difficult to judge. Two guys that size 1.5" isn't gonna look very much and what weight is Khali billed at? Shaq is what? 325. 7ft max for Khali and no opinionated mundane Dave retorts,I've got an opinion I want some more evidence. You see shots like this all the time looking up and it always makes people look more similar.
Vegas said on 9/Nov/08
just because big show was listed at 7'1 doesn't mean he was legit 7'1, i posted those listings to prove he was listed at 7'1 and a center (loads of people here were saying he was listed at 6'10 in college and played at power forward before that)
just because big show was listed at 7'1 doesn't mean he was legit 7'1, i posted those listings to prove he was listed at 7'1 and a center (loads of people here were saying he was listed at 6'10 in college and played at power forward before that)
dave said on 9/Nov/08
HAHAHAHA 1.5 inches!!!!!!!!!!! hilarious!!!!!!!!...... i dont know what pic you are looking at Yaspaa.. but that couldnt be it, because there would be barely a cm in difference, if at all..... absurd comment.
HAHAHAHA 1.5 inches!!!!!!!!!!! hilarious!!!!!!!!...... i dont know what pic you are looking at Yaspaa.. but that couldnt be it, because there would be barely a cm in difference, if at all..... absurd comment.
Yaspaa said on 8/Nov/08
Shaq looks 1.5" taller than Khali in 'that pic',he also looks bigger.
Shaq looks 1.5" taller than Khali in 'that pic',he also looks bigger.
Alex said on 8/Nov/08
I am not too convinced that Big Show has lost any height. Maybe 1/2 inch but thats due to weight gain and his posture can make him seem shorter but when he stands straight he looks taller.
I am not too convinced that Big Show has lost any height. Maybe 1/2 inch but thats due to weight gain and his posture can make him seem shorter but when he stands straight he looks taller.
Danimal said on 8/Nov/08
Alex says on 7/Nov/08
I agree both are the same. And if anything the difference would be like a 1/8 inch which is so minimal it wouldn't even matter really. When someone's eye level is higher it gives an impression they may be a bit taller. The top of your head is what counts.
What's crazy is that Big Show had a 7'1" listing in college basketball. the same height listing as Shaq, YET today he would be shorter than Shaq, based on the fact that Big Show is shorter than Kahli. HOWEVER, peak Big Show (1995-1999) would have been the exact same height as Shaq/Khali FOR SURE.
Alex says on 7/Nov/08
I agree both are the same. And if anything the difference would be like a 1/8 inch which is so minimal it wouldn't even matter really. When someone's eye level is higher it gives an impression they may be a bit taller. The top of your head is what counts.
What's crazy is that Big Show had a 7'1" listing in college basketball. the same height listing as Shaq, YET today he would be shorter than Shaq, based on the fact that Big Show is shorter than Kahli. HOWEVER, peak Big Show (1995-1999) would have been the exact same height as Shaq/Khali FOR SURE.
Ghost said on 8/Nov/08
You can't tell a 0.25 inch difference from a photo.
I think Khali is just under 7'1.
You can't tell a 0.25 inch difference from a photo.
I think Khali is just under 7'1.
Alex said on 7/Nov/08
I agree both are the same. And if anything the difference would be like a 1/8 inch which is so minimal it wouldn't even matter really. When someone's eye level is higher it gives an impression they may be a bit taller. The top of your head is what counts.
I agree both are the same. And if anything the difference would be like a 1/8 inch which is so minimal it wouldn't even matter really. When someone's eye level is higher it gives an impression they may be a bit taller. The top of your head is what counts.
dave said on 7/Nov/08
i wish everyone would shut up about the khali shaq thing,
people.....
JUST because shaq has a smaller head and a higher eye level, DOESNT make him any taller than khali, just because khali has a huge head is does not make him any shorter, SURE khali would have to look up a tiny bit into shaqs eyes, BUT they are technically the same height, and btw..... i have hair similar to khali's only longer, and when i have my hair tied back and in a ponytail kinda wettish like khali has it, honestly when i push down it would add a maximum of a 1/4cm when pulled bacj like this, so that argument isnt viable either....
so lets just be totally objective here, clearly these two men are huge, and WHATEVER height they are, whether it be 7' or 7'1..... they are both that height..... theres not enough of a difference to determine a clear difference in height.
i wish everyone would shut up about the khali shaq thing,
people.....
JUST because shaq has a smaller head and a higher eye level, DOESNT make him any taller than khali, just because khali has a huge head is does not make him any shorter, SURE khali would have to look up a tiny bit into shaqs eyes, BUT they are technically the same height, and btw..... i have hair similar to khali's only longer, and when i have my hair tied back and in a ponytail kinda wettish like khali has it, honestly when i push down it would add a maximum of a 1/4cm when pulled bacj like this, so that argument isnt viable either....
so lets just be totally objective here, clearly these two men are huge, and WHATEVER height they are, whether it be 7' or 7'1..... they are both that height..... theres not enough of a difference to determine a clear difference in height.
Lenad said on 7/Nov/08
Whatever his height he sure does make these other guys look like shrimps
Whatever his height he sure does make these other guys look like shrimps
Alex said on 5/Nov/08
If you look at it Khali's head appears barely closer to the camera than Shaq's head. In the picture alone Khali is barely taller like 1/4 inch at most.If he was back a bit it would break even and both would be the same.
If you look at it Khali's head appears barely closer to the camera than Shaq's head. In the picture alone Khali is barely taller like 1/4 inch at most.If he was back a bit it would break even and both would be the same.
KingNick said on 4/Nov/08
It's a lot like comparing Undertaker to Sid. Sid has a higher eye level but UT is actually taller because of his forehead. In this case, Khali's eye level is lower than Shaq's but they're the same height.
It's a lot like comparing Undertaker to Sid. Sid has a higher eye level but UT is actually taller because of his forehead. In this case, Khali's eye level is lower than Shaq's but they're the same height.
Clay said on 4/Nov/08
Neither is ''clearly'' taller. Whatever way you spin it.
Neither is ''clearly'' taller. Whatever way you spin it.
tuga said on 4/Nov/08
They are most probably same height, if we just could see their feet...
They are most probably same height, if we just could see their feet...
Anonymous said on 4/Nov/08
when khali ties his hair back like in the photo with shaq then his hair gives him no extra height see here the top of his head is about 1 inch about his hairline when his hair is tied back Click Here
btw i have never seen khali wear large footwear in any photo, always low sneakers giving him 1 inch max, this isn't andre the giant we are taking about here with huge cowboys in every photo
when khali ties his hair back like in the photo with shaq then his hair gives him no extra height see here the top of his head is about 1 inch about his hairline when his hair is tied back Click Here
btw i have never seen khali wear large footwear in any photo, always low sneakers giving him 1 inch max, this isn't andre the giant we are taking about here with huge cowboys in every photo
Alex said on 4/Nov/08
Based on those lines they look the same height though.
Based on those lines they look the same height though.
Halb said on 4/Nov/08
"No, not really. If anything, Khali has Shaq by something miniscule like 1/8" of an inch"
I don't see that. I reckon Shaq has 1 centimetre on Singh.
"No, not really. If anything, Khali has Shaq by something miniscule like 1/8" of an inch"
I don't see that. I reckon Shaq has 1 centimetre on Singh.
Da Man said on 4/Nov/08
Halb says on 4/Nov/08
"I concur Danimal. Shaq edges out Dalip by a small margin."
No, not really. If anything, Khali has Shaq by something miniscule like 1/8" of an inch. Click Here
Basically, these guys are the exact same height... 7'1"
Halb says on 4/Nov/08
"I concur Danimal. Shaq edges out Dalip by a small margin."
No, not really. If anything, Khali has Shaq by something miniscule like 1/8" of an inch. Click Here
Basically, these guys are the exact same height... 7'1"
Anonymous said on 4/Nov/08
for people who claim shaq is taller please draw a line on the photo so you can back up your claims
for people who claim shaq is taller please draw a line on the photo so you can back up your claims
Halb said on 4/Nov/08
I concur Danimal. Shaq edges out Dalip by a small margin.
I concur Danimal. Shaq edges out Dalip by a small margin.
Danimal said on 4/Nov/08
Viper says on 4/Nov/08
I really dont see how Khali is taller than Shaq, Shaq looks taller.
Neither do I. Shaq is clearly taller than Khali there, but obviously not by much. I find it amusing how some are gripping at straws to have Khali taller than he really is (which is MAX 7'1") by saying that Shaq has a footwear advantage, when for all we know it could be the other way around. We CANNOT SEE THEIR FEET, so give up that argument.
Viper says on 4/Nov/08
I really dont see how Khali is taller than Shaq, Shaq looks taller.
Neither do I. Shaq is clearly taller than Khali there, but obviously not by much. I find it amusing how some are gripping at straws to have Khali taller than he really is (which is MAX 7'1") by saying that Shaq has a footwear advantage, when for all we know it could be the other way around. We CANNOT SEE THEIR FEET, so give up that argument.
Alex said on 4/Nov/08
Based on those lines is appears Khali is 1/4 inch taller but they look pretty much dead on to me.
Based on those lines is appears Khali is 1/4 inch taller but they look pretty much dead on to me.
Viper said on 4/Nov/08
I really dont see how Khali is taller than Shaq, Shaq looks taller.
I really dont see how Khali is taller than Shaq, Shaq looks taller.
Halb said on 3/Nov/08
Great to see Dalip and Shaq together.
I reckon
Shaq = 7'1"
Khali - 7'0
Great to see Dalip and Shaq together.
I reckon
Shaq = 7'1"
Khali - 7'0
Alex said on 3/Nov/08
Clay, yea its so close to call but it appears both are dead on the same height.
Clay, yea its so close to call but it appears both are dead on the same height.
Da Man said on 3/Nov/08
Clay says on 3/Nov/08
"Neither edges the other in the pic."
The lines say otherwise.
Clay says on 3/Nov/08
"Neither edges the other in the pic."
The lines say otherwise.
Clay said on 3/Nov/08
Neither edges the other in the pic. Look real close, no chance in hell can we definitively say who's taller. Those of you who see Shaq with an inch over Khali are looking at eye level, the same mistake we orignally made between Show and Khali. Khali has a big ass foehead just like Wight. Id put money on Shaw having a footwear advantage there too.
Neither edges the other in the pic. Look real close, no chance in hell can we definitively say who's taller. Those of you who see Shaq with an inch over Khali are looking at eye level, the same mistake we orignally made between Show and Khali. Khali has a big ass foehead just like Wight. Id put money on Shaw having a footwear advantage there too.
Da Man said on 3/Nov/08
Khali slightly edges Shaq in the pic, I don't even see how there's a debate about that.
Khali slightly edges Shaq in the pic, I don't even see how there's a debate about that.
Danimal said on 3/Nov/08
Red says on 1/Nov/08
Khali has a clear angle advantage, because of that reason you can
Red says on 1/Nov/08
Khali has a clear angle advantage, because of that reason you can
Frank said on 3/Nov/08
That picture is to close to call but i believe Shaq would have the footwear advantage ??
That picture is to close to call but i believe Shaq would have the footwear advantage ??
Da Man said on 3/Nov/08
Clay says on 31/Oct/08
"I agree with Viper its at least 5 inches between Kane and Shaq."
You've also said 6" between, I say where's the beef? 'Cause it isn't in that photo...
Clay says on 31/Oct/08
"I agree with Viper its at least 5 inches between Kane and Shaq."
You've also said 6" between, I say where's the beef? 'Cause it isn't in that photo...
tuga said on 3/Nov/08
Shock of Electric says on 3/Nov/08
Something to point out about the Khali/Shaq comparison, if anyone has ever seen Khali in casual footwear, he generally wears something similar to Converse sneakers and Shaq generally basketball sneakers. I believe barefoot there would be as much as 1.25"-1.5" difference between Khali and Shaq, in Khali's favor. If this is all true, I believe Shaq is right around 7' even.
I also remembered that, but Shaq is no way below 7'1, I follow the NBA and he
Shock of Electric says on 3/Nov/08
Something to point out about the Khali/Shaq comparison, if anyone has ever seen Khali in casual footwear, he generally wears something similar to Converse sneakers and Shaq generally basketball sneakers. I believe barefoot there would be as much as 1.25"-1.5" difference between Khali and Shaq, in Khali's favor. If this is all true, I believe Shaq is right around 7' even.
I also remembered that, but Shaq is no way below 7'1, I follow the NBA and he
Shock of Electric said on 3/Nov/08
Something to point out about the Khali/Shaq comparison, if anyone has ever seen Khali in casual footwear, he generally wears something similar to Converse sneakers and Shaq generally basketball sneakers. I believe barefoot there would be as much as 1.25"-1.5" difference between Khali and Shaq, in Khali's favor. If this is all true, I believe Shaq is right around 7' even.
Something to point out about the Khali/Shaq comparison, if anyone has ever seen Khali in casual footwear, he generally wears something similar to Converse sneakers and Shaq generally basketball sneakers. I believe barefoot there would be as much as 1.25"-1.5" difference between Khali and Shaq, in Khali's favor. If this is all true, I believe Shaq is right around 7' even.
Alex said on 1/Nov/08
Danimal, Khali and Shaq are SO close in height. Likely the same height. If anything Shaq may be like 1/4 inch taller.
Danimal, Khali and Shaq are SO close in height. Likely the same height. If anything Shaq may be like 1/4 inch taller.
Alex said on 1/Nov/08
After looking at it again I'd say
Shaq-7'1
Khali-7'1
Big Show-7'0
After looking at it again I'd say
Shaq-7'1
Khali-7'1
Big Show-7'0
Red said on 1/Nov/08
Khali has a clear angle advantage, because of that reason you can
Khali has a clear angle advantage, because of that reason you can
Clay said on 31/Oct/08
I agree with Viper its at least 5 inches between Kane and Shaq.
I agree with Viper its at least 5 inches between Kane and Shaq.
Alex2 said on 31/Oct/08
Lets just leave Shaq and Khali as being the same height, some say Khali is taller some say Shaq is, the difference is MY A HAIR AT THE MOST either way, gees, although I actually think Khali edges Shaq by a hair myself.
Lets just leave Shaq and Khali as being the same height, some say Khali is taller some say Shaq is, the difference is MY A HAIR AT THE MOST either way, gees, although I actually think Khali edges Shaq by a hair myself.
Danimal said on 31/Oct/08
Clay says on 30/Oct/08
Danimal says on 30/Oct/08
Shaq = 7'1"
Khali - 7'0"-7'0.5"
Big Show - Less
Wrong.
Intelligent post kid. Tell me how you are able to articulate yourself with such ease.
Clay says on 30/Oct/08
Danimal says on 30/Oct/08
Shaq = 7'1"
Khali - 7'0"-7'0.5"
Big Show - Less
Wrong.
Intelligent post kid. Tell me how you are able to articulate yourself with such ease.
Danimal said on 31/Oct/08
dicksock says on 30/Oct/08
Shaq was not taller than Khali in that pic. Khali edged him out.
The other way around.
dicksock says on 30/Oct/08
Shaq was not taller than Khali in that pic. Khali edged him out.
The other way around.
Alex said on 31/Oct/08
OK, in the picture with Shaq and Kane how it appears, Shaq has 4-4.5 inches on Kane since Kane is a bit above Shaq's eye level, about the eye brow level. Kane is closer to the camera but is also leaning. If Kane straighted up he'd gain at least 1/2 inch I am guessing but took a step back he'd lose at least an inch. Kane wouldn't be under 6'8 there putting Shaq at 7'1. There would be about a 5 inch difference in reality.
OK, in the picture with Shaq and Kane how it appears, Shaq has 4-4.5 inches on Kane since Kane is a bit above Shaq's eye level, about the eye brow level. Kane is closer to the camera but is also leaning. If Kane straighted up he'd gain at least 1/2 inch I am guessing but took a step back he'd lose at least an inch. Kane wouldn't be under 6'8 there putting Shaq at 7'1. There would be about a 5 inch difference in reality.
Alex said on 31/Oct/08
I no way see Shaq having an inch on Khali though.
I no way see Shaq having an inch on Khali though.
sid said on 31/Oct/08
Viper your blind.. khali has 4 inches. not some bogas 5 6 inches. kane 6'9 in ring gear. 6'8 barefeet
Viper your blind.. khali has 4 inches. not some bogas 5 6 inches. kane 6'9 in ring gear. 6'8 barefeet
Viper said on 31/Oct/08
Nice work Nick. But I see a 5 inch difference there. The top of Shaq's head to his eyes is a good 5 inches I would suspect. And Kane is closer to the camera. If Kane takes a step back it would be 6 inches I reckon.
Nice work Nick. But I see a 5 inch difference there. The top of Shaq's head to his eyes is a good 5 inches I would suspect. And Kane is closer to the camera. If Kane takes a step back it would be 6 inches I reckon.
Viper said on 31/Oct/08
I agree with Danimal.
I agree with Danimal.
Da Man said on 30/Oct/08
dicksock says on 30/Oct/08
"Shaq was not taller than Khali in that pic. Khali edged him out."
Agreed, Khali has an ever so slight edge on Shaq there. This all goes right back to that proportion discussion we had a while back.
dicksock says on 30/Oct/08
"Shaq was not taller than Khali in that pic. Khali edged him out."
Agreed, Khali has an ever so slight edge on Shaq there. This all goes right back to that proportion discussion we had a while back.
Rantsrob said on 30/Oct/08
Put the shaq kane pic as one of the pictures above.
Put the shaq kane pic as one of the pictures above.
Alex said on 30/Oct/08
If Shaq is taller than Khali then its very little. 1/4 to 1/2 inch tops.
If Shaq is taller than Khali then its very little. 1/4 to 1/2 inch tops.
Clay said on 30/Oct/08
Danimal says on 30/Oct/08
Shaq = 7'1"
Khali - 7'0"-7'0.5"
Big Show - Less
Wrong.
Danimal says on 30/Oct/08
Shaq = 7'1"
Khali - 7'0"-7'0.5"
Big Show - Less
Wrong.
dicksock said on 30/Oct/08
Shaq was not taller than Khali in that pic. Khali edged him out.
Shaq was not taller than Khali in that pic. Khali edged him out.
Rantsrob said on 30/Oct/08
Lets break down the facts. I'd assume nba measurements are taken barefoot? 7'1'' barefoot At the very MOST has 1.5 inch heels on but im beting 1'. So 7'2'' in the picture with kane whos arguibly 6'7.5'' kane in 1.5inch usual heels would be 6'9''? According to the site theres a 5'' difference how could that be when most of you peg 4'' difference could kane possibly be 6'8''? Lets have some good arguments. = )
Lets break down the facts. I'd assume nba measurements are taken barefoot? 7'1'' barefoot At the very MOST has 1.5 inch heels on but im beting 1'. So 7'2'' in the picture with kane whos arguibly 6'7.5'' kane in 1.5inch usual heels would be 6'9''? According to the site theres a 5'' difference how could that be when most of you peg 4'' difference could kane possibly be 6'8''? Lets have some good arguments. = )
Da Man said on 30/Oct/08
Danimal says on 30/Oct/08
"What's your point?? They are all wearing shoes, not just Shaq."
My point? Shaq isn't barefoot in the photo, and thus is standing taller than 7'1".
This is what I was responding to:
"Shaq is listed here as 7'1", which I easily agree with. Kane appears to still be in ring gear and I agree there's about a 4" difference between them. This would put Kane at 6'9". So whatever he is barefoot you can deduce from there depending on how much his wrestling shoes give him."
A 4" diff would put Kane at closer to 6'10" in ring gear if Shaq is indeed 7'1" barefoot.
Danimal says on 30/Oct/08
"What's your point?? They are all wearing shoes, not just Shaq."
My point? Shaq isn't barefoot in the photo, and thus is standing taller than 7'1".
This is what I was responding to:
"Shaq is listed here as 7'1", which I easily agree with. Kane appears to still be in ring gear and I agree there's about a 4" difference between them. This would put Kane at 6'9". So whatever he is barefoot you can deduce from there depending on how much his wrestling shoes give him."
A 4" diff would put Kane at closer to 6'10" in ring gear if Shaq is indeed 7'1" barefoot.
Heights are barefeet estimates, derived from quotations, official websites, agency resumes, in person encounters with actors at conventions and pictures/films.
Other vital statistics like weight or shoe size measurements have been sourced from newspapers, books, resumes or social media.
Celebrity Fan Photos and Agency Pictures of stars are © to their respective owners.