Add a Comment7828 comments
Average Guess (667 Votes)
Peak: 6ft 7.86in (202.9cm)
Current: 6ft 6.91in (200.4cm)
Peak: 6ft 7.86in (202.9cm)
Current: 6ft 6.91in (200.4cm)
Clay said on 30/Oct/08
Danimal says on 30/Oct/08
Shaq = 7'1"
Khali - 7'0"-7'0.5"
Big Show - Less
Wrong.
Danimal says on 30/Oct/08
Shaq = 7'1"
Khali - 7'0"-7'0.5"
Big Show - Less
Wrong.
dicksock said on 30/Oct/08
Shaq was not taller than Khali in that pic. Khali edged him out.
Shaq was not taller than Khali in that pic. Khali edged him out.
Rantsrob said on 30/Oct/08
Lets break down the facts. I'd assume nba measurements are taken barefoot? 7'1'' barefoot At the very MOST has 1.5 inch heels on but im beting 1'. So 7'2'' in the picture with kane whos arguibly 6'7.5'' kane in 1.5inch usual heels would be 6'9''? According to the site theres a 5'' difference how could that be when most of you peg 4'' difference could kane possibly be 6'8''? Lets have some good arguments. = )
Lets break down the facts. I'd assume nba measurements are taken barefoot? 7'1'' barefoot At the very MOST has 1.5 inch heels on but im beting 1'. So 7'2'' in the picture with kane whos arguibly 6'7.5'' kane in 1.5inch usual heels would be 6'9''? According to the site theres a 5'' difference how could that be when most of you peg 4'' difference could kane possibly be 6'8''? Lets have some good arguments. = )
Da Man said on 30/Oct/08
Danimal says on 30/Oct/08
"What's your point?? They are all wearing shoes, not just Shaq."
My point? Shaq isn't barefoot in the photo, and thus is standing taller than 7'1".
This is what I was responding to:
"Shaq is listed here as 7'1", which I easily agree with. Kane appears to still be in ring gear and I agree there's about a 4" difference between them. This would put Kane at 6'9". So whatever he is barefoot you can deduce from there depending on how much his wrestling shoes give him."
A 4" diff would put Kane at closer to 6'10" in ring gear if Shaq is indeed 7'1" barefoot.
Danimal says on 30/Oct/08
"What's your point?? They are all wearing shoes, not just Shaq."
My point? Shaq isn't barefoot in the photo, and thus is standing taller than 7'1".
This is what I was responding to:
"Shaq is listed here as 7'1", which I easily agree with. Kane appears to still be in ring gear and I agree there's about a 4" difference between them. This would put Kane at 6'9". So whatever he is barefoot you can deduce from there depending on how much his wrestling shoes give him."
A 4" diff would put Kane at closer to 6'10" in ring gear if Shaq is indeed 7'1" barefoot.
Danimal said on 30/Oct/08
Clay says on 29/Oct/08
According to those lines Khali is taller. And I see at least 5 inches between Kane and Shaq..maybe closer to 6. Which makes sense as Khali had about the same over him.
Wrong. Shaq is taller.
Shaq = 7'1"
Khali - 7'0"-7'0.5"
Big Show - Less
Clay says on 29/Oct/08
According to those lines Khali is taller. And I see at least 5 inches between Kane and Shaq..maybe closer to 6. Which makes sense as Khali had about the same over him.
Wrong. Shaq is taller.
Shaq = 7'1"
Khali - 7'0"-7'0.5"
Big Show - Less
Danimal said on 30/Oct/08
Da Man says on 29/Oct/08
KingNick says on 27/Oct/08
"Shaq is listed here as 7'1", which I easily agree with. Kane appears to still be in ring gear and I agree there's about a 4" difference between them. This would put Kane at 6'9". So whatever he is barefoot you can deduce from there depending on how much his wrestling shoes give him."
The thing is though, Shaq is 7'1" + footwear. So Shaq is likely standing 7'2" or near it there.
What's your point?? They are all wearing shoes, not just Shaq.
Da Man says on 29/Oct/08
KingNick says on 27/Oct/08
"Shaq is listed here as 7'1", which I easily agree with. Kane appears to still be in ring gear and I agree there's about a 4" difference between them. This would put Kane at 6'9". So whatever he is barefoot you can deduce from there depending on how much his wrestling shoes give him."
The thing is though, Shaq is 7'1" + footwear. So Shaq is likely standing 7'2" or near it there.
What's your point?? They are all wearing shoes, not just Shaq.
Da Man said on 30/Oct/08
Clay says on 29/Oct/08
"According to those lines Khali is taller. And I see at least 5 inches between Kane and Shaq..maybe closer to 6. Which makes sense as Khali had about the same over him."
I'm interested to hear how you justify 6" there...
Clay says on 29/Oct/08
"According to those lines Khali is taller. And I see at least 5 inches between Kane and Shaq..maybe closer to 6. Which makes sense as Khali had about the same over him."
I'm interested to hear how you justify 6" there...
Jiga said on 30/Oct/08
agreed Da Man
agreed Da Man
Clay said on 29/Oct/08
According to those lines Khali is taller. And I see at least 5 inches between Kane and Shaq..maybe closer to 6. Which makes sense as Khali had about the same over him.
According to those lines Khali is taller. And I see at least 5 inches between Kane and Shaq..maybe closer to 6. Which makes sense as Khali had about the same over him.
Da Man said on 29/Oct/08
Kane's head isn't closer to the camera...
Kane's head isn't closer to the camera...
Alex said on 29/Oct/08
Kane is still closer to the camera so I'd be its more 5 inches difference.
Kane is still closer to the camera so I'd be its more 5 inches difference.
Da Man said on 29/Oct/08
Also, while Kane's torso and legs are a bit closer to the camera than Shaq, he's leaning back into Shaq so his head isn't any closer than Shaq's. Notice their faces are almost exactly the same size.
If Kane was standing upright instead of leaning backwards, I believe he would have come out at LEAST another 0.5" better against Shaq.
It's hard to argue that Kane is 6'7" there. I think his often mentioned claim of 6'8.5" isn't out of question based on this photo, especially if Shaq is standing roughly 7'2" in footwear.
Also, while Kane's torso and legs are a bit closer to the camera than Shaq, he's leaning back into Shaq so his head isn't any closer than Shaq's. Notice their faces are almost exactly the same size.
If Kane was standing upright instead of leaning backwards, I believe he would have come out at LEAST another 0.5" better against Shaq.
It's hard to argue that Kane is 6'7" there. I think his often mentioned claim of 6'8.5" isn't out of question based on this photo, especially if Shaq is standing roughly 7'2" in footwear.
Da Man said on 29/Oct/08
KingNick says:
"How do you know he was in smaller soles? We can't see their footwear. Or do you mean Kane was just in smaller soles than usual that night?."
Because the pic was taken at Cyber Sunday, I'm guessing after Kane's match with Mysterio. You can find pics of Kane's footwear in the match, the boots are the smaller ones.
How do you know he was in smaller soles? We can't see their footwear. Or do you mean Kane was just in smaller soles than usual that night?
Nick, nice job with that photoshop.
KingNick says:
"How do you know he was in smaller soles? We can't see their footwear. Or do you mean Kane was just in smaller soles than usual that night?."
Because the pic was taken at Cyber Sunday, I'm guessing after Kane's match with Mysterio. You can find pics of Kane's footwear in the match, the boots are the smaller ones.
How do you know he was in smaller soles? We can't see their footwear. Or do you mean Kane was just in smaller soles than usual that night?
Nick, nice job with that photoshop.
Cobra said on 29/Oct/08
Alex2 says on 29/Oct/08
Kane stacks up extremely well with Shaq there, Kane 6'8.5" Shaq 7'1"
fixed. Why is it that hard to believe...
Alex2 says on 29/Oct/08
Kane stacks up extremely well with Shaq there, Kane 6'8.5" Shaq 7'1"
fixed. Why is it that hard to believe...
Nick said on 29/Oct/08
Like I said, Kane's knees aren't completely straight, but, he's closer to the camera. Also as stated, Shaq could possibly be slightly over 7'1" with shoes so taken all into account, KANE - 6'8.5 - 6'9" in boots, 6'7.5 barefoot.
Like I said, Kane's knees aren't completely straight, but, he's closer to the camera. Also as stated, Shaq could possibly be slightly over 7'1" with shoes so taken all into account, KANE - 6'8.5 - 6'9" in boots, 6'7.5 barefoot.
Alex2 said on 29/Oct/08
Kane stacks up extremely well with Shaq there, Kane 6'8.5" Shaq 7'1"
Kane stacks up extremely well with Shaq there, Kane 6'8.5" Shaq 7'1"
KingNick said on 29/Oct/08
Da Man says on 29/Oct/08
KingNick says on 27/Oct/08
"Shaq is listed here as 7'1", which I easily agree with. Kane appears to still be in ring gear and I agree there's about a 4" difference between them. This would put Kane at 6'9". So whatever he is barefoot you can deduce from there depending on how much his wrestling shoes give him."
The thing is though, Shaq is 7'1" + footwear. So Shaq is likely standing 7'2" or near it there.
That's a good point too. But ...
Da Man says on 29/Oct/08
Click Here - 4"
And Kane was in his smaller soled boots too.
How do you know he was in smaller soles? We can't see their footwear. Or do you mean Kane was just in smaller soles than usual that night?
Nick, nice job with that photoshop.
Da Man says on 29/Oct/08
KingNick says on 27/Oct/08
"Shaq is listed here as 7'1", which I easily agree with. Kane appears to still be in ring gear and I agree there's about a 4" difference between them. This would put Kane at 6'9". So whatever he is barefoot you can deduce from there depending on how much his wrestling shoes give him."
The thing is though, Shaq is 7'1" + footwear. So Shaq is likely standing 7'2" or near it there.
That's a good point too. But ...
Da Man says on 29/Oct/08
Click Here - 4"
And Kane was in his smaller soled boots too.
How do you know he was in smaller soles? We can't see their footwear. Or do you mean Kane was just in smaller soles than usual that night?
Nick, nice job with that photoshop.
Alex said on 29/Oct/08
I am suprised on how Khali doesn't look that big mass wise.
At most Shaq would be 1/2 inch taller really. Again in the picture Khali is barely closer to the camera than Shaq. If both guys were the same distance Shaq may have 1/4-1/2 inch on Khali at most.
I am suprised on how Khali doesn't look that big mass wise.
At most Shaq would be 1/2 inch taller really. Again in the picture Khali is barely closer to the camera than Shaq. If both guys were the same distance Shaq may have 1/4-1/2 inch on Khali at most.
Nick said on 29/Oct/08
I've straightened Kane up in the photo with Shaq, though I noticed his knees are very slighty bent, I think with good Posture Kane in boots could be touching 6'9 - which shows the 4" difference to 7'1 Shaq, in my opinion!
Click Here
I've straightened Kane up in the photo with Shaq, though I noticed his knees are very slighty bent, I think with good Posture Kane in boots could be touching 6'9 - which shows the 4" difference to 7'1 Shaq, in my opinion!
Click Here
Anonymous said on 29/Oct/08
Danimal says on 28/Oct/08
Which would mean that Khali is CLEARLY not 7'1" if MAX 7'1" Shaq is taller than him ;).
the lines tell the story Click Here
Danimal says on 28/Oct/08
Which would mean that Khali is CLEARLY not 7'1" if MAX 7'1" Shaq is taller than him ;).
the lines tell the story Click Here
Paul said on 29/Oct/08
What you guys should know is that when one tall guy will be meeting another pre-planned he make take measures to appear as tall as possible. We know Kane has done this many times.
What you guys should know is that when one tall guy will be meeting another pre-planned he make take measures to appear as tall as possible. We know Kane has done this many times.
Da Man said on 29/Oct/08
KingNick says on 27/Oct/08
"Shaq is listed here as 7'1", which I easily agree with. Kane appears to still be in ring gear and I agree there's about a 4" difference between them. This would put Kane at 6'9". So whatever he is barefoot you can deduce from there depending on how much his wrestling shoes give him."
The thing is though, Shaq is 7'1" + footwear. So Shaq is likely standing 7'2" or near it there.
KingNick says on 27/Oct/08
"Shaq is listed here as 7'1", which I easily agree with. Kane appears to still be in ring gear and I agree there's about a 4" difference between them. This would put Kane at 6'9". So whatever he is barefoot you can deduce from there depending on how much his wrestling shoes give him."
The thing is though, Shaq is 7'1" + footwear. So Shaq is likely standing 7'2" or near it there.
dicksock said on 28/Oct/08
If you think Kane has 6" on either Austin or Vince on that video, you're in denial.
If you think Kane has 6" on either Austin or Vince on that video, you're in denial.
KingNick said on 28/Oct/08
Cobra says on 28/Oct/08
Kane looks monstrous in the pic whith Shaq though.
Agreed, Kane has to be 300+. I think he's billed at 320 which may be real close. I still see around a 4" difference. Kane is in gear though. I'd have to see the match to see what kind of boots he had on that night b/c he changes them so much. Barefoot I peg Kane at 6'8" now. I'm even considering less. Nonetheless, one of the best in my view.
Cobra says on 28/Oct/08
Kane looks monstrous in the pic whith Shaq though.
Agreed, Kane has to be 300+. I think he's billed at 320 which may be real close. I still see around a 4" difference. Kane is in gear though. I'd have to see the match to see what kind of boots he had on that night b/c he changes them so much. Barefoot I peg Kane at 6'8" now. I'm even considering less. Nonetheless, one of the best in my view.
Danimal said on 28/Oct/08
Clay says on 27/Oct/08
Kane checks in at 6'7.5-6'8 there I think and Khali looks level with Shaq. I cant get over how Shaq holds his own next to Khali mass-wise.
Khali has no mass in that pic with Squaq. Khali's arms have tremendously atrophied. That means they have shrunk kid ;).
Clay says on 27/Oct/08
Kane checks in at 6'7.5-6'8 there I think and Khali looks level with Shaq. I cant get over how Shaq holds his own next to Khali mass-wise.
Khali has no mass in that pic with Squaq. Khali's arms have tremendously atrophied. That means they have shrunk kid ;).
Danimal said on 28/Oct/08
Red says on 27/Oct/08
Click Here
Kane is slouching and still close to Shaq
Red says on 27/Oct/08
Click Here
Kane is slouching and still close to Shaq
Drexyl said on 28/Oct/08
Kane does look huge in the pic with Shaq. Easily 6,9" there, and he looks well over 300 lbs.
Kane does look huge in the pic with Shaq. Easily 6,9" there, and he looks well over 300 lbs.
sid said on 28/Oct/08
Kane looks 6'9 there. if thats what your people are saying.. that means kane is 6'8 barefeet.. his ring gear gives him a inch. you can have inches on your foot wear trust me it would be hard for kane to walk and wrestle in. i have inches lifts there hard to walk.. kane has to be 6'8 barefeet if he looks 6'9 in gear.
Kane looks 6'9 there. if thats what your people are saying.. that means kane is 6'8 barefeet.. his ring gear gives him a inch. you can have inches on your foot wear trust me it would be hard for kane to walk and wrestle in. i have inches lifts there hard to walk.. kane has to be 6'8 barefeet if he looks 6'9 in gear.
Massimo said on 28/Oct/08
Even considering the slouch, I think Shaq is at least 10 cm taller than Kane.
Even considering the slouch, I think Shaq is at least 10 cm taller than Kane.
Alex said on 28/Oct/08
I think Shaq would have more 5 inches on Kane even if Kane is leaning and is closer to the camera.
I think Shaq would have more 5 inches on Kane even if Kane is leaning and is closer to the camera.
Alex said on 28/Oct/08
Too bad there isn't one with Big Show, that sucks.
Look at Orton and Shaq. Orton looks a legit 6'4 for sure.
Austin looks at least 6'0 there with Shaq.
Too bad there isn't one with Big Show, that sucks.
Look at Orton and Shaq. Orton looks a legit 6'4 for sure.
Austin looks at least 6'0 there with Shaq.
Alex said on 28/Oct/08
Nice set of pictures. Shaq and Khali look the same height but Khali is a bit closer to the camera so Shaq may have 1/2 inch at most on Khali. Kane is inches closer to the camera though but I'd say like 5 inches if both were at the same level. Kane looks 6'8 there.
Nice set of pictures. Shaq and Khali look the same height but Khali is a bit closer to the camera so Shaq may have 1/2 inch at most on Khali. Kane is inches closer to the camera though but I'd say like 5 inches if both were at the same level. Kane looks 6'8 there.
Cobra said on 28/Oct/08
Kane looks monstrous in the pic whith Shaq though.
Kane looks monstrous in the pic whith Shaq though.
Alex2 said on 28/Oct/08
Also, Kane isnt stodd right by Shaq and Kane has a slouch, by no means is Kane dwarfed by Shaq, if anything Kane dwarfs Shaq weight wise.
Also, Kane isnt stodd right by Shaq and Kane has a slouch, by no means is Kane dwarfed by Shaq, if anything Kane dwarfs Shaq weight wise.
chris said on 28/Oct/08
what would be the difference in this pic, and also comparing to shaq
Click Here
what would be the difference in this pic, and also comparing to shaq
Click Here
Anthony said on 28/Oct/08
IMO shaq actually looks slightly taller than Khali, but that all comes down to footware too I suppose. Kane looks an EASY 6'8-6'9 there.
IMO shaq actually looks slightly taller than Khali, but that all comes down to footware too I suppose. Kane looks an EASY 6'8-6'9 there.
Wrestling lover said on 28/Oct/08
TO me Khali looks an inch shorter than Shaq.
TO me Khali looks an inch shorter than Shaq.
KingNick said on 27/Oct/08
Shaq is listed here as 7'1", which I easily agree with. Kane appears to still be in ring gear and I agree there's about a 4" difference between them. This would put Kane at 6'9". So whatever he is barefoot you can deduce from there depending on how much his wrestling shoes give him.
What's more interesting to me is Khali and Shaq. Khali is in regular clothes there. They look more or less the same height to me which means Khali is probably 7'1". Shaq may have a cm on him tops.
Shaq is listed here as 7'1", which I easily agree with. Kane appears to still be in ring gear and I agree there's about a 4" difference between them. This would put Kane at 6'9". So whatever he is barefoot you can deduce from there depending on how much his wrestling shoes give him.
What's more interesting to me is Khali and Shaq. Khali is in regular clothes there. They look more or less the same height to me which means Khali is probably 7'1". Shaq may have a cm on him tops.
Clay said on 27/Oct/08
Kane checks in at 6'7.5-6'8 there I think and Khali looks level with Shaq. I cant get over how Shaq holds his own next to Khali mass-wise.
Kane checks in at 6'7.5-6'8 there I think and Khali looks level with Shaq. I cant get over how Shaq holds his own next to Khali mass-wise.
AnonymousHunter said on 27/Oct/08
There appears to be about 4.5 inches between Kane and Shaq, although Kane is slouching to his left so standing straight there might only be 4 inches.
Khali seems exactly the same height as Shaq, if anything maybe even a small bit taller, mainly because of his huge head though.
There appears to be about 4.5 inches between Kane and Shaq, although Kane is slouching to his left so standing straight there might only be 4 inches.
Khali seems exactly the same height as Shaq, if anything maybe even a small bit taller, mainly because of his huge head though.
Da Man said on 27/Oct/08
Where are these photos of Kane and Shaq?
Where are these photos of Kane and Shaq?
Drexyl said on 27/Oct/08
Whoops, didn't see the one where he is standing next to Khali.
Whoops, didn't see the one where he is standing next to Khali.
Drexyl said on 27/Oct/08
I wouldn't say he towers him that much. If Shaq is 7,1" then Kane looks a good 6,9" there if you take into account the fact that he is slouching and Shaq is standing pretty much completely straight.
I think this confirms that Khali is taller than Shaq though. Kane has never looked that tall next to Khali.
I wouldn't say he towers him that much. If Shaq is 7,1" then Kane looks a good 6,9" there if you take into account the fact that he is slouching and Shaq is standing pretty much completely straight.
I think this confirms that Khali is taller than Shaq though. Kane has never looked that tall next to Khali.
Phillies Fan said on 27/Oct/08
In that same set of pictures. Shaq and the Great Kali are the same height.
In that same set of pictures. Shaq and the Great Kali are the same height.
gazz said on 27/Oct/08
shaq is quite abit taller than kane in that photo but not tower, its not in kanes favour, his knees are bent and he's leaning....where as shaq has got a completly upright stance, kane would probably come to just above shaqs eyes...easy 6'8 at least
shaq is quite abit taller than kane in that photo but not tower, its not in kanes favour, his knees are bent and he's leaning....where as shaq has got a completly upright stance, kane would probably come to just above shaqs eyes...easy 6'8 at least
ichiban said on 27/Oct/08
Shaq towers over Kane in the photos on the WWE website. And i MEAN TOWER!!! Kane is no more than 6'7.5'' nowadays. The listing is spot on.
Shaq towers over Kane in the photos on the WWE website. And i MEAN TOWER!!! Kane is no more than 6'7.5'' nowadays. The listing is spot on.
sid said on 27/Oct/08
dicksock You cant walk or wrestle in 2 or 3 inch lifts. I have 2 inch lifts there hard to walk in.... kane cleary had 6 inches on vince and austin... kane slouched too much.. he is 6'8 barefeet. with gear 6'9
dicksock You cant walk or wrestle in 2 or 3 inch lifts. I have 2 inch lifts there hard to walk in.... kane cleary had 6 inches on vince and austin... kane slouched too much.. he is 6'8 barefeet. with gear 6'9
dicksock said on 27/Oct/08
Rantsrob says on 26/Oct/08
Kane has his head tilted downard the entire video dicksock.
I know he has his head tilted down, but there would be more than 4 inches regardless. Austin came up to the bridge of Kane's nose as did Vince. Neither one of them is above 6'2. I don't see how anyone can give Kane above 6'7 w/o lifts. His lifts likely gave him 2-3".
Rantsrob says on 26/Oct/08
Kane has his head tilted downard the entire video dicksock.
I know he has his head tilted down, but there would be more than 4 inches regardless. Austin came up to the bridge of Kane's nose as did Vince. Neither one of them is above 6'2. I don't see how anyone can give Kane above 6'7 w/o lifts. His lifts likely gave him 2-3".
sid said on 26/Oct/08
dicksock Kane was tilting his head.. he as slouching. tall people normally slouch more then shorter people. cause there spine is so long.. kane has 6 inches on vince if he where to keep his spine and head up.
dicksock Kane was tilting his head.. he as slouching. tall people normally slouch more then shorter people. cause there spine is so long.. kane has 6 inches on vince if he where to keep his spine and head up.
Rantsrob said on 26/Oct/08
Kane has his head tilted downard the entire video dicksock.
Kane has his head tilted downard the entire video dicksock.
dicksock said on 26/Oct/08
Has anyone seen the video on Dailymotion where Vince calls out Kane? It sounds weird but Kane only has the 6'2 Vince by about 4" tops. And he only has Ausin by 4" tops. It is BY FAR the shortest I've ever seen Kane look. He looked dramatically shorter than usual.
Has anyone seen the video on Dailymotion where Vince calls out Kane? It sounds weird but Kane only has the 6'2 Vince by about 4" tops. And he only has Ausin by 4" tops. It is BY FAR the shortest I've ever seen Kane look. He looked dramatically shorter than usual.
Wesley said on 26/Oct/08
I wonder how tall i will become because im 6ft 3 barefoot and my mom and dad are tall compared to other people cuz my mom is 6ft 1 and my dad is 6ft5 but my papa is 7ft 6 and he says im growin the way he did
I wonder how tall i will become because im 6ft 3 barefoot and my mom and dad are tall compared to other people cuz my mom is 6ft 1 and my dad is 6ft5 but my papa is 7ft 6 and he says im growin the way he did
September said on 25/Oct/08
Christ, if the dude in the first pic is close to 6ft, this guy's gotta be 6'9".
Christ, if the dude in the first pic is close to 6ft, this guy's gotta be 6'9".
KingNick said on 25/Oct/08
sid, the closest I've ever been to Kane was about 30ft away. It was after a Raw event. He was getting in the car with Jim Ross (which was pretty comical considering how the year before Kane set him on fire)
So due to the distance I can't say with 100% accuracy, but they looked very close to me.
sid, the closest I've ever been to Kane was about 30ft away. It was after a Raw event. He was getting in the car with Jim Ross (which was pretty comical considering how the year before Kane set him on fire)
So due to the distance I can't say with 100% accuracy, but they looked very close to me.
dl_eric said on 25/Oct/08
Randy Orton is 6ft 5.5, ive met him with my friend who is 6ft 6 and they were both about same height!
Randy Orton is 6ft 5.5, ive met him with my friend who is 6ft 6 and they were both about same height!
sid said on 25/Oct/08
KingNick Did this wrestler dude. look the same height as kane.. or kane looked taller..??
KingNick Did this wrestler dude. look the same height as kane.. or kane looked taller..??
KingNick said on 23/Oct/08
Just an interesting tidbit for you guys and something you may find interesting, I've met quite a few wrestlers who work the Indy circuit. One guy I worked with last year is 6'8". LEGIT, I worked with him. I asked him about if the Indy wrestlers exaggerate heights and he said that his height was always measured in his wrestling boots and that he was billed anywhere from 6'9"-6'10" depending on the promoter. He also said he met Big Show in person and Show was an easy 7' in his opinion.
Just an interesting tidbit for you guys and something you may find interesting, I've met quite a few wrestlers who work the Indy circuit. One guy I worked with last year is 6'8". LEGIT, I worked with him. I asked him about if the Indy wrestlers exaggerate heights and he said that his height was always measured in his wrestling boots and that he was billed anywhere from 6'9"-6'10" depending on the promoter. He also said he met Big Show in person and Show was an easy 7' in his opinion.
Alex said on 23/Oct/08
I saw some videos of UT and Kane in faceoffs from the past and Kane does look to have 2 inches on UT but due to his lifts but I'd think Kane would have around an inch on UT barefoot too.
I saw some videos of UT and Kane in faceoffs from the past and Kane does look to have 2 inches on UT but due to his lifts but I'd think Kane would have around an inch on UT barefoot too.
Alex said on 17/Oct/08
Da man, yea when you get measured it only goes by the top of the head, not the shoulder which some kinda base it on. I have a friend who is my height but his shoulders are a bit higher but my legs are longer.
Da man, yea when you get measured it only goes by the top of the head, not the shoulder which some kinda base it on. I have a friend who is my height but his shoulders are a bit higher but my legs are longer.
Da Man said on 17/Oct/08
Alex, shoulder height can give the impression of being taller to a casual observer or at a quick glance. Obviously shoulder height isn't going to fool frequent visitors to this site.
Alex, shoulder height can give the impression of being taller to a casual observer or at a quick glance. Obviously shoulder height isn't going to fool frequent visitors to this site.
Alex said on 17/Oct/08
I dont get when people base height on shoulders. You can have 2 guys who's shoulders are the same height from the ground but that person's head is longer or something and can be a few inches taller.
I dont get when people base height on shoulders. You can have 2 guys who's shoulders are the same height from the ground but that person's head is longer or something and can be a few inches taller.
Clay said on 17/Oct/08
I dont think they're that conscious about the height listings of them that they try to create camera angles to make Khali appear taller, I think its just genuine that Khali is 1.5 inches taller. Am I the only one that see's slightly more than one inch between them?
I dont think they're that conscious about the height listings of them that they try to create camera angles to make Khali appear taller, I think its just genuine that Khali is 1.5 inches taller. Am I the only one that see's slightly more than one inch between them?
Rantsrob said on 16/Oct/08
Ghost says on 14/Oct/08
Was that during Kane's megalift-period? He looks taller than Taker there.
Post mega lift era. Mega lifts were in full body suits when he got the tanktop/jump suit his lifts shrunk.
Ghost says on 14/Oct/08
Was that during Kane's megalift-period? He looks taller than Taker there.
Post mega lift era. Mega lifts were in full body suits when he got the tanktop/jump suit his lifts shrunk.
Drexyl said on 15/Oct/08
At a glance Khali looks a fair bit taller than Big Show because his shoulders are much higher. When they go face to face though, there's only about an inch of difference between the top of their heads.
It's the same thing with Kane and Big Show. Kane's shoulders are actually about level with Show's so at a glance he looks almost the same height. It's only when they go face to face do you see that Big Show is about 4 inches taller.
At a glance Khali looks a fair bit taller than Big Show because his shoulders are much higher. When they go face to face though, there's only about an inch of difference between the top of their heads.
It's the same thing with Kane and Big Show. Kane's shoulders are actually about level with Show's so at a glance he looks almost the same height. It's only when they go face to face do you see that Big Show is about 4 inches taller.
Da Man said on 15/Oct/08
And the fact that Khali's shoulders and eyeline are probably a good 2" at least above Show's which makes him look taller in comparison than he really is.
And the fact that Khali's shoulders and eyeline are probably a good 2" at least above Show's which makes him look taller in comparison than he really is.
Alex said on 15/Oct/08
I see an inch between Big Show and Khali when face to face and Big Show is standing better. It can appear more at times due to their angles trying to make Khali look 3 inches taller.
I see an inch between Big Show and Khali when face to face and Big Show is standing better. It can appear more at times due to their angles trying to make Khali look 3 inches taller.
Anonymous said on 14/Oct/08
yeah sid, in that vid kane is the taller man, could even be an inch fully straight..... but we cant see footwear.
yeah sid, in that vid kane is the taller man, could even be an inch fully straight..... but we cant see footwear.
Ghost said on 14/Oct/08
Was that during Kane's megalift-period? He looks taller than Taker there.
Was that during Kane's megalift-period? He looks taller than Taker there.
sid said on 14/Oct/08
Heres Kane and taker with jerchio backstage segment. kane looks a hair taller very close in height check it out click here Click Here
Heres Kane and taker with jerchio backstage segment. kane looks a hair taller very close in height check it out click here Click Here
Clay said on 14/Oct/08
Actually Khali is probably, hell likely more than an inch taller than Big Show.
Actually Khali is probably, hell likely more than an inch taller than Big Show.
KingNick said on 14/Oct/08
Da Man says on 9/Oct/08
Alex says on 8/Oct/08
"WWE needs to bill Kane at 6'10. I know they wont go less than that though."
They definitely need to the re-think the billed heights of their big men.
If I was the WWE I'd go with
Khali - 7'3"
Big Show - 7'1"
Kane -6'11"
Taker - 6'10"
I think they should never have stopped billing Show at 7'2". Anyone ever wonder why they did that? They could have easily gotten away with billing Khali as high as 7'4" and they could have kept Kane at 6'11"-7' and UT at 6'10". That way everyone would have been proportionate or at least close to it. Weird.
But Da Man, you make a great point, I agree:
Da Man says on 13/Oct/08
It only matters how they "look" in relation toeach other. Kane smack-dab in the middle of the ring isn't dwarfed by Show because of proportions. Kane's shoulders and such aren't signicantly lower.
Just like Khali is probably less than 1" taller than Show, but it looks more to a casual observer in the ring.
Da Man says on 9/Oct/08
Alex says on 8/Oct/08
"WWE needs to bill Kane at 6'10. I know they wont go less than that though."
They definitely need to the re-think the billed heights of their big men.
If I was the WWE I'd go with
Khali - 7'3"
Big Show - 7'1"
Kane -6'11"
Taker - 6'10"
I think they should never have stopped billing Show at 7'2". Anyone ever wonder why they did that? They could have easily gotten away with billing Khali as high as 7'4" and they could have kept Kane at 6'11"-7' and UT at 6'10". That way everyone would have been proportionate or at least close to it. Weird.
But Da Man, you make a great point, I agree:
Da Man says on 13/Oct/08
It only matters how they "look" in relation toeach other. Kane smack-dab in the middle of the ring isn't dwarfed by Show because of proportions. Kane's shoulders and such aren't signicantly lower.
Just like Khali is probably less than 1" taller than Show, but it looks more to a casual observer in the ring.
Da Man said on 13/Oct/08
Alex says on 9/Oct/08
"Da Man, that would be better but Big Show is still a good 4 inches taller than Kane though."
Alex, it doesn't matter. It only matters how they "look" in relation toeach other. Kane smack-dab in the middle of the ring isn't dwarfed by Show because of proportions. Kane's shoulders and such aren't signicantly lower.
Just like Khali is probably less than 1" taller than Show, but it looks more to a casual observer in the ring.
Alex says on 9/Oct/08
"Da Man, that would be better but Big Show is still a good 4 inches taller than Kane though."
Alex, it doesn't matter. It only matters how they "look" in relation toeach other. Kane smack-dab in the middle of the ring isn't dwarfed by Show because of proportions. Kane's shoulders and such aren't signicantly lower.
Just like Khali is probably less than 1" taller than Show, but it looks more to a casual observer in the ring.
hs2008 said on 13/Oct/08
Alex, I don't think they do regularly. Like you said they normally say 6'4"-6'4.5". At Unforgiven 2004 J.R. did say 6'5" though, if my memory serves me correctly, so there's probably more times that he's been described at that height. He's not under 6'4" for sure IMHO.
Check at 2 mins 45 secs:
Click Here
It's silly isn't it how they call Batista 6'6" and Orton 6'4" when Randy is clearly the taller of the two. Because Batista is much more muscular I guess they want him to seem taller.
Alex, I don't think they do regularly. Like you said they normally say 6'4"-6'4.5". At Unforgiven 2004 J.R. did say 6'5" though, if my memory serves me correctly, so there's probably more times that he's been described at that height. He's not under 6'4" for sure IMHO.
Check at 2 mins 45 secs:
Click Here
It's silly isn't it how they call Batista 6'6" and Orton 6'4" when Randy is clearly the taller of the two. Because Batista is much more muscular I guess they want him to seem taller.
Alex said on 13/Oct/08
Do they ever call Orton 6'5 on TV? I've heard 6'4 and 6'4 1/2. Yet you hear them say Batista is 6'5-6'6 while Orton could be as much as 2 inches taller than Batista.
Do they ever call Orton 6'5 on TV? I've heard 6'4 and 6'4 1/2. Yet you hear them say Batista is 6'5-6'6 while Orton could be as much as 2 inches taller than Batista.
Viper said on 13/Oct/08
I think Orton is around 6-3-6-3 1/2.
I think Orton is around 6-3-6-3 1/2.
hs2008 said on 13/Oct/08
Also, here's an article from 1999. Bob Orton Jr. describes Randy as 19, 6'5" and probably 250lbs. Randy also claims 6'5" on WWE Kids website.
Click Here
Also, here's an article from 1999. Bob Orton Jr. describes Randy as 19, 6'5" and probably 250lbs. Randy also claims 6'5" on WWE Kids website.
Click Here
hs2008 said on 13/Oct/08
Yeah, Orton is a solid 6'4" guy for sure.
Yeah, Orton is a solid 6'4" guy for sure.
Drexyl said on 12/Oct/08
Orton looks like he'd be a solid 6,4" barefoot I reckon. Closer to 6,5" in ring gear. His heels are very small.
Orton looks like he'd be a solid 6,4" barefoot I reckon. Closer to 6,5" in ring gear. His heels are very small.
Umar said on 12/Oct/08
Ok Vegas, great proof. I believe you now. I would put Randy Orton 6"3.5 now.
Ok Vegas, great proof. I believe you now. I would put Randy Orton 6"3.5 now.
Derek said on 12/Oct/08
Orton is bare minimum 1" taller than Rock, though I think it's more 1.5".
Orton is bare minimum 1" taller than Rock, though I think it's more 1.5".
Alex said on 12/Oct/08
Orton looked over an inch taller than Rock in the ring in 2004. Orton looks to be a legit 6'4.
Orton looked over an inch taller than Rock in the ring in 2004. Orton looks to be a legit 6'4.
Viper said on 12/Oct/08
Randy Orton is at least 6-3. Hes taller than the Rock.
Randy Orton is at least 6-3. Hes taller than the Rock.
Umar said on 11/Oct/08
Guys, Randu Orton isn't 6"3+. That's ridiculous. Unless if you have a picture or video to prove that he is that tall. Some people have showed me a viedo, e.g. Rob Van Dam (5 ft 8.5) vs Randy Orton, but he doesn't even look 6"2.5! Actually 6"2.5 is actually tall for him, but I would totally put him as 6"1.5.
Guys, Randu Orton isn't 6"3+. That's ridiculous. Unless if you have a picture or video to prove that he is that tall. Some people have showed me a viedo, e.g. Rob Van Dam (5 ft 8.5) vs Randy Orton, but he doesn't even look 6"2.5! Actually 6"2.5 is actually tall for him, but I would totally put him as 6"1.5.
Alex said on 9/Oct/08
Da Man, that would be better but Big Show is still a good 4 inches taller than Kane though.
Da Man, that would be better but Big Show is still a good 4 inches taller than Kane though.
Da Man said on 9/Oct/08
Alex says on 8/Oct/08
"WWE needs to bill Kane at 6'10. I know they wont go less than that though."
They definitely need to the re-think the billed heights of their big men.
If I was the WWE I'd go with
Khali - 7'3"
Big Show - 7'1"
Kane -6'11"
Taker - 6'10"
Alex says on 8/Oct/08
"WWE needs to bill Kane at 6'10. I know they wont go less than that though."
They definitely need to the re-think the billed heights of their big men.
If I was the WWE I'd go with
Khali - 7'3"
Big Show - 7'1"
Kane -6'11"
Taker - 6'10"
Alex said on 9/Oct/08
Rantsrob, yea a lot still believe he's 7'0. Even when I bought into all those billed heights I never thought he was 7'0. I always thought 6'11 for a while then 6'10.
Rantsrob, yea a lot still believe he's 7'0. Even when I bought into all those billed heights I never thought he was 7'0. I always thought 6'11 for a while then 6'10.
Rantsrob said on 8/Oct/08
Alex says on 8/Oct/08
WWE needs to bill Kane at 6'10. I know they wont go less than that though.
Atleas 75% of the wrestling community believes kane stands 7ft possibly more.
Alex says on 8/Oct/08
WWE needs to bill Kane at 6'10. I know they wont go less than that though.
Atleas 75% of the wrestling community believes kane stands 7ft possibly more.
Drexyl said on 8/Oct/08
He should be billed at 6,10" I agree.
I wouldn't be surprised if they ever went lower though. They've had some
strange changes to billings in the past. I saw Undertaker billed as 6,8" back in 2003 when he was in a feud with A Train, which came out of the blue because he's pretty much always been billed as 6,10" in the WWE. Then there's the Big Show apparently shrinking from 7,2" to 7,0" practically overnight.
They just change them when they feel like it.
He should be billed at 6,10" I agree.
I wouldn't be surprised if they ever went lower though. They've had some
strange changes to billings in the past. I saw Undertaker billed as 6,8" back in 2003 when he was in a feud with A Train, which came out of the blue because he's pretty much always been billed as 6,10" in the WWE. Then there's the Big Show apparently shrinking from 7,2" to 7,0" practically overnight.
They just change them when they feel like it.
Alex said on 8/Oct/08
WWE needs to bill Kane at 6'10. I know they wont go less than that though.
WWE needs to bill Kane at 6'10. I know they wont go less than that though.
madgy said on 7/Oct/08
goldust was wearing high heels and kane was wearing rabens
goldust was wearing high heels and kane was wearing rabens
Anonymous -15 said on 6/Oct/08
WWE still bill him as being 7ft , and with his old ring gear he appeared very close to that , he wears smaller lifts now which make look around 6'9" maybe slightly more. I think 6'7.5 barefoot is on the money.
WWE still bill him as being 7ft , and with his old ring gear he appeared very close to that , he wears smaller lifts now which make look around 6'9" maybe slightly more. I think 6'7.5 barefoot is on the money.
Da Man said on 6/Oct/08
Drexyl says on 5/Oct/08
"He might have 4 inches on him, but in that video he has less than 1."
2" minimum. And Goldust is likely 6'5.5" seeing as how he looks a hair taller than 6'5" Barry Windham.
Drexyl says on 5/Oct/08
"He might have 4 inches on him, but in that video he has less than 1."
2" minimum. And Goldust is likely 6'5.5" seeing as how he looks a hair taller than 6'5" Barry Windham.
sid said on 6/Oct/08
Heres Glenn jacobs as the fake diseal in a match click here theres 2
Click Here
Click Here
Heres Glenn jacobs as the fake diseal in a match click here theres 2
Click Here
Click Here
Clay said on 6/Oct/08
Jericho wears enormous lifts in his boots thats why he looks eye-to-eye with people like CM Punk and only a couple inches shorter than Orton. In reality barefeet Jerocho is 5'9.5-5'10 and Orton is 6'4.
Jericho wears enormous lifts in his boots thats why he looks eye-to-eye with people like CM Punk and only a couple inches shorter than Orton. In reality barefeet Jerocho is 5'9.5-5'10 and Orton is 6'4.
sid said on 5/Oct/08
Viper Kane is 6'8 barefeet, with gear he's 6'9m didnt you read what dicksock said, kane is 6'9 with boots on
Viper Kane is 6'8 barefeet, with gear he's 6'9m didnt you read what dicksock said, kane is 6'9 with boots on
Kendra said on 5/Oct/08
here are my listed heights and/or weights
Kane 6'8.5" 323
Undertaker 6'8" 290
Steve Austin 6'1.5" 245
Batista 6'3.5" 290
John Cena 6'1" 240
Jeremy 7'1" 294
Hulk Hogan 6'4" 255
Shaq 7'1.5" 325
Khali 7'2" 387
here are my listed heights and/or weights
Kane 6'8.5" 323
Undertaker 6'8" 290
Steve Austin 6'1.5" 245
Batista 6'3.5" 290
John Cena 6'1" 240
Jeremy 7'1" 294
Hulk Hogan 6'4" 255
Shaq 7'1.5" 325
Khali 7'2" 387
dave said on 5/Oct/08
orton 6'1.5?! ive never heard more crap in my life..... the man is at THE VERY LEAST 6'3.5......... SOOO ridiculous, if orton is 6'1.5 i, when i met him would be lucky to be 5'9-10.... and im 6'1 barefoot
orton 6'1.5?! ive never heard more crap in my life..... the man is at THE VERY LEAST 6'3.5......... SOOO ridiculous, if orton is 6'1.5 i, when i met him would be lucky to be 5'9-10.... and im 6'1 barefoot
Umar said on 5/Oct/08
No, John Cena isn't 6", unless if you want to add some inches. Ok maybe Cody Rhodes is about 6".
No, John Cena isn't 6", unless if you want to add some inches. Ok maybe Cody Rhodes is about 6".
Drexyl said on 5/Oct/08
He might have 4 inches on him, but in that video he has less than 1.
He might have 4 inches on him, but in that video he has less than 1.
Clay said on 5/Oct/08
Not much better Umar. Cena 5'10.5?? Cody Rhodes 5'10? Those guys are clear 6'0-6'1.
Not much better Umar. Cena 5'10.5?? Cody Rhodes 5'10? Those guys are clear 6'0-6'1.
Viper said on 4/Oct/08
Most of those estimates seem too low Umar but you are right about Triple H and Batista.
dicksock Kane is really 6-7 and not 6-9.
Most of those estimates seem too low Umar but you are right about Triple H and Batista.
dicksock Kane is really 6-7 and not 6-9.
sid said on 4/Oct/08
dicksock, theres no way kane could wrestle with 2 inch lift, I have 2 inch lift very hard to walk in. in order to kane to be 6'9, is 1 inch soles he has, thats making him 6'8 barefeet...
dicksock, theres no way kane could wrestle with 2 inch lift, I have 2 inch lift very hard to walk in. in order to kane to be 6'9, is 1 inch soles he has, thats making him 6'8 barefeet...
eric 1 said on 4/Oct/08
Drexyl your smoking some real good stuff. Can Da Man and I have some of that smoke. Da Man nailed it right on. Kane has and easy height advantage even with the camera favoring goldust. Kane has 4 inches on him .
Drexyl your smoking some real good stuff. Can Da Man and I have some of that smoke. Da Man nailed it right on. Kane has and easy height advantage even with the camera favoring goldust. Kane has 4 inches on him .
Alex said on 4/Oct/08
Goldust isn't more than 6'5. He's sure at least 6'4.
Goldust isn't more than 6'5. He's sure at least 6'4.
dicksock said on 4/Oct/08
I've been like 2 feet from Kane at an episode of Raw a couple years back and he looked about 6'9 in boots. I am friends with a basketball player who actually looks kinda like Kane and he's 6'9. Kane looked like about the same height as my friend only kane was a VERY muscular version of him. Kane could be less, but I doubt it.
I've been like 2 feet from Kane at an episode of Raw a couple years back and he looked about 6'9 in boots. I am friends with a basketball player who actually looks kinda like Kane and he's 6'9. Kane looked like about the same height as my friend only kane was a VERY muscular version of him. Kane could be less, but I doubt it.
Atoadaso said on 3/Oct/08
Goldust could pass as a legit 6'6". At least, that's always what I thought he was. I'm sure he is at least 6'5". He is probably just about the same height as JBL.
Goldust could pass as a legit 6'6". At least, that's always what I thought he was. I'm sure he is at least 6'5". He is probably just about the same height as JBL.
Umar said on 3/Oct/08
Sorry I made a mistake. Here's an advanced list of barefoot estimates.
Big Show-7"
Great Khali-7"1
Undertaker-6"6.5 (Badass was 6"8)
Kane-6"6.5 (6"8.5 when he had the mask)
Randy Orton-6"2 (yes, he only looked a little taller than Chris Jericho face-to-face)
Triple H-6"1
Batista-6"2
John Bradshaw Layfield-6"3
John Cena-5"10.5
Chris Jericho-5"9
Giant Gonzales-7"6
Shawn Michaels-5"10
Rey Mysterio-5"3
Code Rhodes-5"10
Ted Dibiase-5"10.5
Jeff Hardy-6"
Matt Hardy-5"11
Jamie Noble-5"6.5
CM Punk-5"10
William Regal-6"1
Sorry I made a mistake. Here's an advanced list of barefoot estimates.
Big Show-7"
Great Khali-7"1
Undertaker-6"6.5 (Badass was 6"8)
Kane-6"6.5 (6"8.5 when he had the mask)
Randy Orton-6"2 (yes, he only looked a little taller than Chris Jericho face-to-face)
Triple H-6"1
Batista-6"2
John Bradshaw Layfield-6"3
John Cena-5"10.5
Chris Jericho-5"9
Giant Gonzales-7"6
Shawn Michaels-5"10
Rey Mysterio-5"3
Code Rhodes-5"10
Ted Dibiase-5"10.5
Jeff Hardy-6"
Matt Hardy-5"11
Jamie Noble-5"6.5
CM Punk-5"10
William Regal-6"1
KingNick said on 3/Oct/08
Da Man says on 2/Oct/08
KingNick says on 1/Oct/08
Da Man, sorry bud, don't see how the camera angle favors anyone there. Don't get me wrong, I don't think they're the same height, I think it had something to do with footwear.
Drexyl says on 2/Oct/08
The camera angle favours Goldust at the start but then moves round and is more or less right between the two.
It's all in the camera angle. Perspective is shifting throughout the video and is almost always in Goldust's favor, and the entire frame is tilted in Goldust's. Notice the fence, boxed and pillar behind them, all tilted way towards Kane.
Goldust heavily favored: Click Here
Goldust favored: Click Here
No favor: Click Here
Kane favored: Click Here
The entire scene is still tilted into Goldust's advantage in every clip.
Da Man, I gotta admit bro, I didn't notice that. Especially those shots where Kane is taller, I stand corrected. Goldust still seems too close in height to me, but it may be the angles like you said plus he has bigger footwear. Good job.
Da Man says on 2/Oct/08
KingNick says on 1/Oct/08
Da Man, sorry bud, don't see how the camera angle favors anyone there. Don't get me wrong, I don't think they're the same height, I think it had something to do with footwear.
Drexyl says on 2/Oct/08
The camera angle favours Goldust at the start but then moves round and is more or less right between the two.
It's all in the camera angle. Perspective is shifting throughout the video and is almost always in Goldust's favor, and the entire frame is tilted in Goldust's. Notice the fence, boxed and pillar behind them, all tilted way towards Kane.
Goldust heavily favored: Click Here
Goldust favored: Click Here
No favor: Click Here
Kane favored: Click Here
The entire scene is still tilted into Goldust's advantage in every clip.
Da Man, I gotta admit bro, I didn't notice that. Especially those shots where Kane is taller, I stand corrected. Goldust still seems too close in height to me, but it may be the angles like you said plus he has bigger footwear. Good job.
Da Man said on 3/Oct/08
Drexyl says on 3/Oct/08
"But even when the camera favours Kane...Goldust still looks the same height. Even if Kane has an advantage, it's certainly no more than about half an inch.
I don't understand how you can't see this."
1. The entire frame is rotated in Goldust's favor! (see below)
2. Even when the camera favors Kane it is MUCH less of a advantage than Goldust gets early on.
If you think there's only half an inch between them in the pics with Kane favored and no favor, you need either pay more attention or have your eyes checked. Open the pic in MS paint and draw the lines yourself, you'll see.
No favor, no rotation - the real height difference between them in that video: Click Here
Drexyl says on 3/Oct/08
"But even when the camera favours Kane...Goldust still looks the same height. Even if Kane has an advantage, it's certainly no more than about half an inch.
I don't understand how you can't see this."
1. The entire frame is rotated in Goldust's favor! (see below)
2. Even when the camera favors Kane it is MUCH less of a advantage than Goldust gets early on.
If you think there's only half an inch between them in the pics with Kane favored and no favor, you need either pay more attention or have your eyes checked. Open the pic in MS paint and draw the lines yourself, you'll see.
No favor, no rotation - the real height difference between them in that video: Click Here
Da Man said on 3/Oct/08
Drexyl says on 3/Oct/08
"But even when the camera favours Kane...Goldust still looks the same height. Even if Kane has an advantage, it's certainly no more than about half an inch.
I don't understand how you can't see this."
1. The entire frame is rotated in Goldust's favor! (see below)
2. Even when the camera favors Kane it is MUCH less of a advantage than Goldust gets early on.
If you think there's only half an inch between them in the pics with Kane favored and no favor, you need either pay more attention or have your eyes checked. Open the pic in MS paint and draw the lines yourself, you'll see.
No favor, no rotation - the real height difference between them in that video: Click Here
This is the height difference between them in that video. The 2 degrees rotation is removed and no they are equal distance from the camera.
Are you being serious?
Drexyl says on 3/Oct/08
"But even when the camera favours Kane...Goldust still looks the same height. Even if Kane has an advantage, it's certainly no more than about half an inch.
I don't understand how you can't see this."
1. The entire frame is rotated in Goldust's favor! (see below)
2. Even when the camera favors Kane it is MUCH less of a advantage than Goldust gets early on.
If you think there's only half an inch between them in the pics with Kane favored and no favor, you need either pay more attention or have your eyes checked. Open the pic in MS paint and draw the lines yourself, you'll see.
No favor, no rotation - the real height difference between them in that video: Click Here
This is the height difference between them in that video. The 2 degrees rotation is removed and no they are equal distance from the camera.
Are you being serious?
Drexyl said on 3/Oct/08
But even when the camera favours Kane...Goldust still looks the same height. Even if Kane has an advantage, it's certainly no more than about half an inch.
I don't understand how you can't see this.
But even when the camera favours Kane...Goldust still looks the same height. Even if Kane has an advantage, it's certainly no more than about half an inch.
I don't understand how you can't see this.
Anonymous said on 3/Oct/08
What did the mentor iist have Goldust at? I want to say 6-4.
What did the mentor iist have Goldust at? I want to say 6-4.
Clay said on 2/Oct/08
I actually threw up on my screen laughing Umar.
I actually threw up on my screen laughing Umar.
Alex said on 2/Oct/08
Umar, what kind of list is that. A few are close but Cena at 5'10, Orton 6'1.5 are the worst.
Umar, what kind of list is that. A few are close but Cena at 5'10, Orton 6'1.5 are the worst.
Da Man said on 2/Oct/08
KingNick says on 1/Oct/08
Da Man, sorry bud, don't see how the camera angle favors anyone there. Don't get me wrong, I don't think they're the same height, I think it had something to do with footwear.
Drexyl says on 2/Oct/08
The camera angle favours Goldust at the start but then moves round and is more or less right between the two.
It's all in the camera angle. Perspective is shifting throughout the video and is almost always in Goldust's favor, and the entire frame is tilted in Goldust's. Notice the fence, boxed and pillar behind them, all tilted way towards Kane.
Goldust heavily favored: Click Here
Goldust favored: Click Here
No favor: Click Here
Kane favored: Click Here
The entire scene is still tilted into Goldust's advantage in every clip.
KingNick says on 1/Oct/08
Da Man, sorry bud, don't see how the camera angle favors anyone there. Don't get me wrong, I don't think they're the same height, I think it had something to do with footwear.
Drexyl says on 2/Oct/08
The camera angle favours Goldust at the start but then moves round and is more or less right between the two.
It's all in the camera angle. Perspective is shifting throughout the video and is almost always in Goldust's favor, and the entire frame is tilted in Goldust's. Notice the fence, boxed and pillar behind them, all tilted way towards Kane.
Goldust heavily favored: Click Here
Goldust favored: Click Here
No favor: Click Here
Kane favored: Click Here
The entire scene is still tilted into Goldust's advantage in every clip.
Umar said on 2/Oct/08
These are my barefoot estimates:
Big Show-6"10
Great Khali-6"11
Undertaker-6"6.5
Kane-6"6.5
Randy Orton-6"1.5
Triple H-6"0.5
Batista-6"2
John Bradshaw Layfield-6"3
John Cena-5"10
Chris Jericho-5"9
Giant Gonzales-7"6
Shawn Michaels-5"10
Rey Mysterio-5"3
Code Rhodes-5"10
John Cena-5"
These are my barefoot estimates:
Big Show-6"10
Great Khali-6"11
Undertaker-6"6.5
Kane-6"6.5
Randy Orton-6"1.5
Triple H-6"0.5
Batista-6"2
John Bradshaw Layfield-6"3
John Cena-5"10
Chris Jericho-5"9
Giant Gonzales-7"6
Shawn Michaels-5"10
Rey Mysterio-5"3
Code Rhodes-5"10
John Cena-5"
Drexyl said on 2/Oct/08
The camera angle favours Goldust at the start but then moves round and is more or less right between the two.
The camera angle favours Goldust at the start but then moves round and is more or less right between the two.
KingNick said on 1/Oct/08
Da Man, sorry bud, don't see how the camera angle favors anyone there. Don't get me wrong, I don't think they're the same height, I think it had something to do with footwear.
Da Man, sorry bud, don't see how the camera angle favors anyone there. Don't get me wrong, I don't think they're the same height, I think it had something to do with footwear.
Derek said on 1/Oct/08
Goldust was billed at 6'6" and was easily 3 inches shorter than UT.
Goldust was billed at 6'6" and was easily 3 inches shorter than UT.
sid said on 1/Oct/08
Da Man In that pic, kane had easy 2 inches, you blind, goldust at 6'6, kane at 6'8. kane with lifts is 6'9, in those shoes are flat, so flat 6'8, bare 6'8
Da Man In that pic, kane had easy 2 inches, you blind, goldust at 6'6, kane at 6'8. kane with lifts is 6'9, in those shoes are flat, so flat 6'8, bare 6'8
sid said on 1/Oct/08
Alex Kane was in ring gear, why would they wanna have goldust near same height, when kane is a bigger star, he is't taller, kane looked 2 to 3 inches, barefeet is for the movies, not wrestling, this isn't hollywood.
Alex Kane was in ring gear, why would they wanna have goldust near same height, when kane is a bigger star, he is't taller, kane looked 2 to 3 inches, barefeet is for the movies, not wrestling, this isn't hollywood.
sid said on 1/Oct/08
Anonymous Golddust does not look everybit as tall as kane, kane had 2 inches to 3 inches with he was standing straight, more like 2 inches
Anonymous Golddust does not look everybit as tall as kane, kane had 2 inches to 3 inches with he was standing straight, more like 2 inches
Da Man said on 1/Oct/08
Anonymous says on 1/Oct/08
"It's got nothing to do with the camera angle. In fact it's pretty neutral for much of it."
No offense, but you're flat out wrong.
Anonymous says on 1/Oct/08
"It's got nothing to do with the camera angle. In fact it's pretty neutral for much of it."
No offense, but you're flat out wrong.
Anonymous said on 1/Oct/08
It's got nothing to do with the camera angle. In fact it's pretty neutral for much of it. Goldust is slouched through most of the video. Watch him stand straight at 0.15. There's not a hair between them.
I'm not trying to say Kane is 6,6" or anything like that. In fact I'm in support of him being upgraded to 6,8". But there's no denying there that Goldust looks every bit as tall as him. Maybe Goldust was wearing some monster heels, maybe the floor was uneven. Who knows.
It's got nothing to do with the camera angle. In fact it's pretty neutral for much of it. Goldust is slouched through most of the video. Watch him stand straight at 0.15. There's not a hair between them.
I'm not trying to say Kane is 6,6" or anything like that. In fact I'm in support of him being upgraded to 6,8". But there's no denying there that Goldust looks every bit as tall as him. Maybe Goldust was wearing some monster heels, maybe the floor was uneven. Who knows.
Alex said on 1/Oct/08
That video of Kane and Goldust was backstage so we never know what could be going on. Kane maybe barefoot or something or in sandals or converse type sneakers or Goldust could be in lifts. They could have done that for Goldust to appear closer to Kane's height.
That video of Kane and Goldust was backstage so we never know what could be going on. Kane maybe barefoot or something or in sandals or converse type sneakers or Goldust could be in lifts. They could have done that for Goldust to appear closer to Kane's height.
Da Man said on 1/Oct/08
KingNick says on 30/Sep/08
"This is the video drexyl is referring to Click Here Kane isn't any taller here and I don't think it's the camera angle. My guess is at the time when Kane was brought back he was more of a comedic figure so they slapped some lifts on Goldust to make Kane seem less intimidating. Doesn't make too much sense, but it's the only thing I can think of. All the other evidence points to Kane being a minimum of 6'7.5", like Rob points out. I hate it when the WWE does that. They bill a guy 7', another 6'6", and have them look the same height in a video. It's weird."
They don't look the same height if you bother to consider camera angles. See below. Kane's got a minimum of 2" on Goldust in that video.
KingNick says on 30/Sep/08
"This is the video drexyl is referring to Click Here Kane isn't any taller here and I don't think it's the camera angle. My guess is at the time when Kane was brought back he was more of a comedic figure so they slapped some lifts on Goldust to make Kane seem less intimidating. Doesn't make too much sense, but it's the only thing I can think of. All the other evidence points to Kane being a minimum of 6'7.5", like Rob points out. I hate it when the WWE does that. They bill a guy 7', another 6'6", and have them look the same height in a video. It's weird."
They don't look the same height if you bother to consider camera angles. See below. Kane's got a minimum of 2" on Goldust in that video.
eric 1 said on 30/Sep/08
It was a bad angle. Kane has an easy 3 inches on goldust there.
It was a bad angle. Kane has an easy 3 inches on goldust there.
Rantsrob said on 30/Sep/08
Kanes billed 7' on the site. Any given time they say hes 6'10'' or near 7'. Kanes what? 3rd tallest man in wwe today with a majority of the roster 6'2'' and under its not hard to get him off as 7'. Wwe just doesnt have those big 6'5'' mid carders they use to anymore.
Kanes billed 7' on the site. Any given time they say hes 6'10'' or near 7'. Kanes what? 3rd tallest man in wwe today with a majority of the roster 6'2'' and under its not hard to get him off as 7'. Wwe just doesnt have those big 6'5'' mid carders they use to anymore.
KingNick said on 30/Sep/08
This is the video drexyl is referring to Click Here Kane isn't any taller here and I don't think it's the camera angle. My guess is at the time when Kane was brought back he was more of a comedic figure so they slapped some lifts on Goldust to make Kane seem less intimidating. Doesn't make too much sense, but it's the only thing I can think of. All the other evidence points to Kane being a minimum of 6'7.5", like Rob points out. I hate it when the WWE does that. They bill a guy 7', another 6'6", and have them look the same height in a video. It's weird.
This is the video drexyl is referring to Click Here Kane isn't any taller here and I don't think it's the camera angle. My guess is at the time when Kane was brought back he was more of a comedic figure so they slapped some lifts on Goldust to make Kane seem less intimidating. Doesn't make too much sense, but it's the only thing I can think of. All the other evidence points to Kane being a minimum of 6'7.5", like Rob points out. I hate it when the WWE does that. They bill a guy 7', another 6'6", and have them look the same height in a video. It's weird.
Da Man said on 30/Sep/08
Drexyl says on 30/Sep/08
"I know Kane is taller, but he doesn't look it there. I know Goldust would have had a footwear advantage as well, but it seems odd that they'd let a guy that they usually bill at 6,6" look as tall as a guy they bill at 7 feet.
And there's no way there's 3 inches there at all. Watch Kane lift his head at 0.33 to make himself look taller."
There's at least 2 inches there. Most of the video is shot over Goldust's shoulder, making him look bigger overall. At 0:30 there are about the same distance from the camera, but Kane is sort of leaned over. Even still there is 2" there.
Click Here
Drexyl says on 30/Sep/08
"I know Kane is taller, but he doesn't look it there. I know Goldust would have had a footwear advantage as well, but it seems odd that they'd let a guy that they usually bill at 6,6" look as tall as a guy they bill at 7 feet.
And there's no way there's 3 inches there at all. Watch Kane lift his head at 0.33 to make himself look taller."
There's at least 2 inches there. Most of the video is shot over Goldust's shoulder, making him look bigger overall. At 0:30 there are about the same distance from the camera, but Kane is sort of leaned over. Even still there is 2" there.
Click Here
tuga said on 30/Sep/08
I guess he forgot his monster boots there with goldust...
This is also weird, look at 1:52:
Click Here
Nearly big show
I guess he forgot his monster boots there with goldust...
This is also weird, look at 1:52:
Click Here
Nearly big show
Drexyl said on 30/Sep/08
I know Kane is taller, but he doesn't look it there. I know Goldust would have had a footwear advantage as well, but it seems odd that they'd let a guy that they usually bill at 6,6" look as tall as a guy they bill at 7 feet.
And there's no way there's 3 inches there at all. Watch Kane lift his head at 0.33 to make himself look taller.
I know Kane is taller, but he doesn't look it there. I know Goldust would have had a footwear advantage as well, but it seems odd that they'd let a guy that they usually bill at 6,6" look as tall as a guy they bill at 7 feet.
And there's no way there's 3 inches there at all. Watch Kane lift his head at 0.33 to make himself look taller.
sid said on 30/Sep/08
Alex You blind, kane had 2 inches 3 max.
Alex You blind, kane had 2 inches 3 max.
Alex said on 29/Sep/08
Kane only looked 1-2 inches taller than Goldust there. Something fishy in that photo.
Kane only looked 1-2 inches taller than Goldust there. Something fishy in that photo.
sid said on 29/Sep/08
Drexyl Your blind, kane had 3 inches on goldust, goldust 6'5, makes kane 6'8 with no internal lifts, just flat.
Drexyl Your blind, kane had 3 inches on goldust, goldust 6'5, makes kane 6'8 with no internal lifts, just flat.
AnonymousHunter said on 29/Sep/08
Drexyl, it is just the camera angle; Dustin Runnels (Goldust) is really like 6'5. Dustin is about 3 inches shorter than Kane. Also, this was around the time that Kane came back from injury and he did not wear thick boots/lifts during this period; whereas Dustin's footwear was thick as ever!
Speaking of angles, I can't remember where, but I've seen a picture of where 6'5 JBL looked like he stood slightly taller than 6'7.5 Undertaker..
Drexyl, it is just the camera angle; Dustin Runnels (Goldust) is really like 6'5. Dustin is about 3 inches shorter than Kane. Also, this was around the time that Kane came back from injury and he did not wear thick boots/lifts during this period; whereas Dustin's footwear was thick as ever!
Speaking of angles, I can't remember where, but I've seen a picture of where 6'5 JBL looked like he stood slightly taller than 6'7.5 Undertaker..
Drexyl said on 29/Sep/08
Goldust actually appears to stand slightly taller than Kane in that second segment with Booker T.
Goldust actually appears to stand slightly taller than Kane in that second segment with Booker T.
sid said on 28/Sep/08
Heres 7 taker backstage segment from the late 90's kane still looks taller by a inch click here Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Heres 7 taker backstage segment from the late 90's kane still looks taller by a inch click here Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
sid said on 28/Sep/08
Heres two backstage segment with kane and booker t he looked 5 inches taller then booker in both. Click Here
Click Here
Heres two backstage segment with kane and booker t he looked 5 inches taller then booker in both. Click Here
Click Here
Clay said on 27/Sep/08
If Kane is 6'8 Khali=7'1.5/7'2.
If Kane is 6'8 Khali=7'1.5/7'2.
the said on 27/Sep/08
Why does this height have Kane and the Undertaker at the same height when Kane is clearly taller. There is about a 1 inch difference between the two. Kane is 6'8'' and the Undertaker is 6'7''.
Why does this height have Kane and the Undertaker at the same height when Kane is clearly taller. There is about a 1 inch difference between the two. Kane is 6'8'' and the Undertaker is 6'7''.
M.o.r.g said on 25/Sep/08
Lol sid youre a n*b seriously im not going to even bother arguing with u.Ive actually seen wrestlers in real life.have u? I said kane is probably 6'6 when he's at home with no shoes on.Any fool can see kane wears frankenstein boots.Oh yeah and i'll put up a photo of goldberg/kane/triple h from armageddon.
Lol sid youre a n*b seriously im not going to even bother arguing with u.Ive actually seen wrestlers in real life.have u? I said kane is probably 6'6 when he's at home with no shoes on.Any fool can see kane wears frankenstein boots.Oh yeah and i'll put up a photo of goldberg/kane/triple h from armageddon.
Rantsrob said on 25/Sep/08
Click Here Lets all take a look at this kane/big show staredown probably the best one to date. Kane seems to have more height over orton then big show does over kane to me. Also remember big show does not have flat footwear either.
Click Here Lets all take a look at this kane/big show staredown probably the best one to date. Kane seems to have more height over orton then big show does over kane to me. Also remember big show does not have flat footwear either.
Anonymous said on 25/Sep/08
Alex says on 25/Sep/08
Based on that backstage video Kane does look 4.5-5 inches taller than Orton but we know how backstage can be. Now I am thinking Kane may be a flat 6'8 still putting Orton at 6'4.
backstage sucks, here rock looks nearly as tall as kane about a 1 inch difference, meaning rock must be 4 inches taller than orton Click Here
Alex says on 25/Sep/08
Based on that backstage video Kane does look 4.5-5 inches taller than Orton but we know how backstage can be. Now I am thinking Kane may be a flat 6'8 still putting Orton at 6'4.
backstage sucks, here rock looks nearly as tall as kane about a 1 inch difference, meaning rock must be 4 inches taller than orton Click Here
Viper said on 25/Sep/08
Orton could be as low as 6-3. Hes looked it before.
Orton could be as low as 6-3. Hes looked it before.
Alex said on 25/Sep/08
Based on that backstage video Kane does look 4.5-5 inches taller than Orton but we know how backstage can be. Now I am thinking Kane may be a flat 6'8 still putting Orton at 6'4.
Based on that backstage video Kane does look 4.5-5 inches taller than Orton but we know how backstage can be. Now I am thinking Kane may be a flat 6'8 still putting Orton at 6'4.
sid said on 25/Sep/08
Rantsrob I didnt see kane, it's celb site, what site are you referring about, with kane and a door..??
Rantsrob I didnt see kane, it's celb site, what site are you referring about, with kane and a door..??
Da Man said on 25/Sep/08
Uh, you said Kane is barely taller than HHH and Goldberg. You just shot down any and all credibility with that one statement.
Uh, you said Kane is barely taller than HHH and Goldberg. You just shot down any and all credibility with that one statement.
D-Lurker said on 25/Sep/08
Nice bravado, morg..I respect each and every persons opinions, including yours but a sniff of arrogance in an opinion can raise ones heckles. sorry bud but those "noobs" have been hanging around long enough to make an informed descision..
Nice bravado, morg..I respect each and every persons opinions, including yours but a sniff of arrogance in an opinion can raise ones heckles. sorry bud but those "noobs" have been hanging around long enough to make an informed descision..
Rantsrob said on 24/Sep/08
Click Here Kane doorway comparisons anyone? 3:02 in this video. Kane seems to tower over the doorway. it must only be a 6'6'' doorway under that u.s standard 6'8'' from what others have said.
Click Here Kane doorway comparisons anyone? 3:02 in this video. Kane seems to tower over the doorway. it must only be a 6'6'' doorway under that u.s standard 6'8'' from what others have said.
sid said on 24/Sep/08
lubne 2 inches your just blind as M.o.r.g kid, try 4 inches maybe 5, your a dullard
lubne 2 inches your just blind as M.o.r.g kid, try 4 inches maybe 5, your a dullard
sid said on 24/Sep/08
M.o.r.g well kid your not very smart, also on this one to, your too blind to see kane at 6'8, 6'6 you got to be joking, how do you explain kane kane 3 inches taller then jbl maybe 2 inches the min, jbl is 6'6. hey kido get your eyes check. chuck palumbo, is 6'6 kane had atleast 2 inches maybe 3 max, putting him at 6'8 barefeet, ring gear 6'9
M.o.r.g well kid your not very smart, also on this one to, your too blind to see kane at 6'8, 6'6 you got to be joking, how do you explain kane kane 3 inches taller then jbl maybe 2 inches the min, jbl is 6'6. hey kido get your eyes check. chuck palumbo, is 6'6 kane had atleast 2 inches maybe 3 max, putting him at 6'8 barefeet, ring gear 6'9
Alex2 said on 24/Sep/08
lubne says on 23/Sep/08
sid kane only has 2 inchs on randy there. JBL 6'7, undertaken 6'5, kane 6'6.5,
randy orton 6'5.35
What am I seeing here? ???????
lubne says on 23/Sep/08
sid kane only has 2 inchs on randy there. JBL 6'7, undertaken 6'5, kane 6'6.5,
randy orton 6'5.35
What am I seeing here? ???????
M.o.r.g said on 24/Sep/08
Lol the noobs on the kevin nash page think kane is 6'9 and got all pissy cos i said kane is probably 6'6 with no shoes on.
Lol the noobs on the kevin nash page think kane is 6'9 and got all pissy cos i said kane is probably 6'6 with no shoes on.
Da Man said on 24/Sep/08
lubne says on 23/Sep/08
"sid kane only has 2 inchs on randy there. JBL 6'7, undertaken 6'5, kane 6'6.5,
randy orton 6'5.35"
This guy has to be messing with sid.
Orton is struggling to meet Kane's eyeline there, especially considering Kane is looking down at Orton the whole time lowering his features! The average male adult has 4.5" from the eyeline to the top of the head.
lubne says on 23/Sep/08
"sid kane only has 2 inchs on randy there. JBL 6'7, undertaken 6'5, kane 6'6.5,
randy orton 6'5.35"
This guy has to be messing with sid.
Orton is struggling to meet Kane's eyeline there, especially considering Kane is looking down at Orton the whole time lowering his features! The average male adult has 4.5" from the eyeline to the top of the head.
Jiga said on 24/Sep/08
Kane has said numerous times 6'8.5, he's not saying his billed height of 7' so that has to add some credibility to his height being between 6'8 and 6'9...!!!
Kane has said numerous times 6'8.5, he's not saying his billed height of 7' so that has to add some credibility to his height being between 6'8 and 6'9...!!!
lubne said on 23/Sep/08
sid kane only has 2 inchs on randy there. JBL 6'7, undertaken 6'5, kane 6'6.5,
randy orton 6'5.35
sid kane only has 2 inchs on randy there. JBL 6'7, undertaken 6'5, kane 6'6.5,
randy orton 6'5.35
Rantsrob said on 23/Sep/08
lubne says on 21/Sep/08
kane looked 1-2 inchs taller than randy in that video, proves kane is 6'7max maybe 6'6.5
Leave our site.
lubne says on 21/Sep/08
kane looked 1-2 inchs taller than randy in that video, proves kane is 6'7max maybe 6'6.5
Leave our site.
Anthony said on 23/Sep/08
IMO kane had at least 4 inches on Randy orton in that video. I think some people may have a difficult time estimating height differences. Pull out a ruler or tape measure and check out how long 4 inches actually looks
IMO kane had at least 4 inches on Randy orton in that video. I think some people may have a difficult time estimating height differences. Pull out a ruler or tape measure and check out how long 4 inches actually looks
eric 1 said on 22/Sep/08
he told me 6ft8 and change in person. I asked him .
he told me 6ft8 and change in person. I asked him .
sid said on 22/Sep/08
ubne 2 inches then orton, no way kid, your blind, 6'6 is too low for kane, kane is 6'8, jbl is 6'6, he has 3 inches on jbl explain that kid, and the lifts in he shoes isnt 3 inches, if they where they would be hard to walk and wrestle in kid, i have 2 inches in my shoes there hard to walk. kane had 4 inches on randy there kido
ubne 2 inches then orton, no way kid, your blind, 6'6 is too low for kane, kane is 6'8, jbl is 6'6, he has 3 inches on jbl explain that kid, and the lifts in he shoes isnt 3 inches, if they where they would be hard to walk and wrestle in kid, i have 2 inches in my shoes there hard to walk. kane had 4 inches on randy there kido
Anthony said on 22/Sep/08
IMO Kane easily had 4-5 inches on Randy Orton in that video. Looks about the same as what Bigshow has on Kane, maybe slightly less. Some people have a very poor perception of what an inch of height looks like
IMO Kane easily had 4-5 inches on Randy Orton in that video. Looks about the same as what Bigshow has on Kane, maybe slightly less. Some people have a very poor perception of what an inch of height looks like
Alex said on 22/Sep/08
Kane looked 4 inches taller than Orton. 3.5 at minimum.
Kane looked 4 inches taller than Orton. 3.5 at minimum.
Drexyl said on 22/Sep/08
What? He looked at LEAST 3.5 inches taller than Orton.
What? He looked at LEAST 3.5 inches taller than Orton.
lubne said on 21/Sep/08
kane looked 1-2 inchs taller than randy in that video, proves kane is 6'7max maybe 6'6.5
kane looked 1-2 inchs taller than randy in that video, proves kane is 6'7max maybe 6'6.5
sid said on 21/Sep/08
Rantsrob sorry dude... I tend to overlook sometimes get right to the point without fully reading, I'd still say 6'8 bare today, kane hasn't lost any height, only reason why he looked taller when he first came in was cause he had 2 inches of lifts in him, and check out new video of Glen jacobs towering over people I POSTED DUDE.
Rantsrob sorry dude... I tend to overlook sometimes get right to the point without fully reading, I'd still say 6'8 bare today, kane hasn't lost any height, only reason why he looked taller when he first came in was cause he had 2 inches of lifts in him, and check out new video of Glen jacobs towering over people I POSTED DUDE.
Rantsrob said on 21/Sep/08
Rocky says on 20/Sep/08
Rantsrob I doubt randy was in his barefeet, Kane is 6'8 barefeet, ring gear 6'9, randy 6'4, his ring gear doesnt give out much, maybe o .5cm still kane looked to have 4 to 5 inches on him, ya i read what you said, kane is 6'7 bare, nah i'd say 6'8
No my good sir. I quoted somone who SAID kane was 6'7'' barefoot. My opinions are a 6'8''PRIME Kane 6'7.5'' Present, 6'10'' in ring gear (1997) 6'9.5'' - 6'9'' In ring gear (2003-present). Read the entire post and you'll realize i quoted somone.
Rocky says on 20/Sep/08
Rantsrob I doubt randy was in his barefeet, Kane is 6'8 barefeet, ring gear 6'9, randy 6'4, his ring gear doesnt give out much, maybe o .5cm still kane looked to have 4 to 5 inches on him, ya i read what you said, kane is 6'7 bare, nah i'd say 6'8
No my good sir. I quoted somone who SAID kane was 6'7'' barefoot. My opinions are a 6'8''PRIME Kane 6'7.5'' Present, 6'10'' in ring gear (1997) 6'9.5'' - 6'9'' In ring gear (2003-present). Read the entire post and you'll realize i quoted somone.
Alex said on 21/Sep/08
I think Big Show had around 3 inches on Morgan too. Morgan is minimum 6'8 and 6'9 maximum. I thought Jones edged out Morgan a bit, an inch tops taller.
I think Big Show had around 3 inches on Morgan too. Morgan is minimum 6'8 and 6'9 maximum. I thought Jones edged out Morgan a bit, an inch tops taller.
sid said on 21/Sep/08
Heres a video with Glen jacobs, and ron paul, in this video which was in jan of this year, glen jacobs is towering all people by a foot, he looks 6.8 here. theres lots of glen jacobs scene in this video, watch the whole thing, here click here
Click Here
Heres a video with Glen jacobs, and ron paul, in this video which was in jan of this year, glen jacobs is towering all people by a foot, he looks 6.8 here. theres lots of glen jacobs scene in this video, watch the whole thing, here click here
Click Here
Mr. X said on 20/Sep/08
I am 5'8" AnonymousHunter
I am 5'8" AnonymousHunter
Rocky said on 20/Sep/08
Kane heaviest was 330, I remember a interview years ago in a mag, kane said his heaviest was 330 pounds, he talked about his working out regime, when he got a infection in his arm that drained his weight down to 325 or so he kept it till he screwed up his bicep, came back skinner, then he gained most of his weight back no, like he's around 317 to 320
Kane heaviest was 330, I remember a interview years ago in a mag, kane said his heaviest was 330 pounds, he talked about his working out regime, when he got a infection in his arm that drained his weight down to 325 or so he kept it till he screwed up his bicep, came back skinner, then he gained most of his weight back no, like he's around 317 to 320
Rocky said on 20/Sep/08
Rantsrob I doubt randy was in his barefeet, Kane is 6'8 barefeet, ring gear 6'9, randy 6'4, his ring gear doesnt give out much, maybe o .5cm still kane looked to have 4 to 5 inches on him, ya i read what you said, kane is 6'7 bare, nah i'd say 6'8
Rantsrob I doubt randy was in his barefeet, Kane is 6'8 barefeet, ring gear 6'9, randy 6'4, his ring gear doesnt give out much, maybe o .5cm still kane looked to have 4 to 5 inches on him, ya i read what you said, kane is 6'7 bare, nah i'd say 6'8
Alex2 said on 20/Sep/08
I actually think morgan is a legit 6'9" Alex.
I actually think morgan is a legit 6'9" Alex.
Alex2 said on 20/Sep/08
Alex, yea, definatley, he could even be 6'4.5" very likely since he stack up very well to 6'5-6'6" JBL.
Alex, yea, definatley, he could even be 6'4.5" very likely since he stack up very well to 6'5-6'6" JBL.
Alex said on 20/Sep/08
Orton is a legit 6'4 I really believe.
Orton is a legit 6'4 I really believe.
Rantsrob said on 19/Sep/08
Rocky says on 17/Sep/08
Rantsrob Randy wasn't barefeet, this isn't the movies it's wrestling, randy was probably in ring gear same as kane, ring gear 5'9, barefeet 6'8, looked to me 4 to 5 inches on randy, ring shots aren't clear, backstage shots are more clear, you see how randy was looking up at kane. mp wau randy was 2 inch shorter then kane.
Did you read anything i said?
Rocky says on 17/Sep/08
Rantsrob Randy wasn't barefeet, this isn't the movies it's wrestling, randy was probably in ring gear same as kane, ring gear 5'9, barefeet 6'8, looked to me 4 to 5 inches on randy, ring shots aren't clear, backstage shots are more clear, you see how randy was looking up at kane. mp wau randy was 2 inch shorter then kane.
Did you read anything i said?
Da Man said on 19/Sep/08
KingNick says on 18/Sep/08
"Anyone see Raw on Monday? It's why I think JBL is 6'6" he was with 6'4" Randy Orton, Orton even appears to have larger footwear."
Orton is close to 6'4", he may even be a legit 6'4" who knows. But I don't see JBL at 6'6" based on that staredown. JBL was obviously the taller man but I couldn't see 2 inches between them. If Orton is 6'3.5"-6'4", I'd give JBL 6'5".
KingNick says on 18/Sep/08
"Anyone see Raw on Monday? It's why I think JBL is 6'6" he was with 6'4" Randy Orton, Orton even appears to have larger footwear."
Orton is close to 6'4", he may even be a legit 6'4" who knows. But I don't see JBL at 6'6" based on that staredown. JBL was obviously the taller man but I couldn't see 2 inches between them. If Orton is 6'3.5"-6'4", I'd give JBL 6'5".
AnonymousHunter said on 19/Sep/08
Mr. X - how tall are you ?
Mr. X - how tall are you ?
Mr. X said on 18/Sep/08
if you're under 6'6" don't bother bragging or claiming your height because no one will care, it's no big deal to most of us.
if you're under 6'6" don't bother bragging or claiming your height because no one will care, it's no big deal to most of us.
KingNick said on 18/Sep/08
Anyone see Raw on Monday? It's why I think JBL is 6'6" he was with 6'4" Randy Orton, Orton even appears to have larger footwear.
Anyone see Raw on Monday? It's why I think JBL is 6'6" he was with 6'4" Randy Orton, Orton even appears to have larger footwear.
Rocky said on 17/Sep/08
Rantsrob Randy wasn't barefeet, this isn't the movies it's wrestling, randy was probably in ring gear same as kane, ring gear 5'9, barefeet 6'8, looked to me 4 to 5 inches on randy, ring shots aren't clear, backstage shots are more clear, you see how randy was looking up at kane. mp wau randy was 2 inch shorter then kane.
Rantsrob Randy wasn't barefeet, this isn't the movies it's wrestling, randy was probably in ring gear same as kane, ring gear 5'9, barefeet 6'8, looked to me 4 to 5 inches on randy, ring shots aren't clear, backstage shots are more clear, you see how randy was looking up at kane. mp wau randy was 2 inch shorter then kane.
Rantsrob said on 17/Sep/08
Dave says on 16/Sep/08
sid, yeah i saw that promo too, but they clearly have randy barefoot or kane with MONSTER lifts (they are known for doing this, especially with kane and other wrestlers who are clearly not their billing)..... so id say a 6'7 barefoot kane is fairer, as the height difference is never this big in the ring, and when i met randy IRL (im 6'1 flat), he looked a legit and easy 6'4
We've discussed this video and i have another video of a 6 man tag with kane and randy where the same height difference can be seen. Kanes 6'9.5'' in ring gear and randy is 6'5'' with footwear theres a soild 4'' to 4.5'' difference in the video. It sounds like your trying to say kane only has 2'' on randy which makes little to no sence
Dave says on 16/Sep/08
sid, yeah i saw that promo too, but they clearly have randy barefoot or kane with MONSTER lifts (they are known for doing this, especially with kane and other wrestlers who are clearly not their billing)..... so id say a 6'7 barefoot kane is fairer, as the height difference is never this big in the ring, and when i met randy IRL (im 6'1 flat), he looked a legit and easy 6'4
We've discussed this video and i have another video of a 6 man tag with kane and randy where the same height difference can be seen. Kanes 6'9.5'' in ring gear and randy is 6'5'' with footwear theres a soild 4'' to 4.5'' difference in the video. It sounds like your trying to say kane only has 2'' on randy which makes little to no sence
Da Man said on 17/Sep/08
Dave says on 16/Sep/08
"sid, yeah i saw that promo too, but they clearly have randy barefoot or kane with MONSTER lifts (they are known for doing this, especially with kane and other wrestlers who are clearly not their billing)..... so id say a 6'7 barefoot kane is fairer, as the height difference is never this big in the ring, and when i met randy IRL (im 6'1 flat), he looked a legit and easy 6'4"
I wouldn't be so sure about that. Kane recently had a staredown with JBL IN RING where he looked IMO 3.5" taller.
Just last night on Raw JBL with poor posture clearly had an inch at least on Orton in the ring.
I'm not so sure that backstage promo was as manipulated as you think. There have been numerous videos posted here where Kane has looked at least 4.5" taller than Orton in the ring. Notably in a somewhat recent (in the last 2 years) lumberjack match Kane and Randy where standing next to each other outside the ring, the height difference looked just about like it did in that promo.
Also, Kane has dwarfed Edge by over 4" in the ring as well, and Orton and Edge are within 0.5" of one another.
Dave says on 16/Sep/08
"sid, yeah i saw that promo too, but they clearly have randy barefoot or kane with MONSTER lifts (they are known for doing this, especially with kane and other wrestlers who are clearly not their billing)..... so id say a 6'7 barefoot kane is fairer, as the height difference is never this big in the ring, and when i met randy IRL (im 6'1 flat), he looked a legit and easy 6'4"
I wouldn't be so sure about that. Kane recently had a staredown with JBL IN RING where he looked IMO 3.5" taller.
Just last night on Raw JBL with poor posture clearly had an inch at least on Orton in the ring.
I'm not so sure that backstage promo was as manipulated as you think. There have been numerous videos posted here where Kane has looked at least 4.5" taller than Orton in the ring. Notably in a somewhat recent (in the last 2 years) lumberjack match Kane and Randy where standing next to each other outside the ring, the height difference looked just about like it did in that promo.
Also, Kane has dwarfed Edge by over 4" in the ring as well, and Orton and Edge are within 0.5" of one another.
AnonymousHunter said on 17/Sep/08
Here's my list:
JBL 6'5 1/2
Snitsky 6'5 1/2
Heidenreich 6'6
Matt Bloom 6'6 (can look much taller)
Test 6'6
Viscera 6'6 1/2
Matt Morgan 6'8 1/2
Undertaker 6'8
Kane 6'8 to 6'8 1/2
Nash 6'9 1/2
Hall 6'5 1/2
Hogan 6'4 1/2
Big Show 6'11 1/2
Khali 7'0 1/2
Nathan Jones 6'10
Sid 6'7
Orton 6'4
Kip James 6'3 (also can look much taller)
Here's my list:
JBL 6'5 1/2
Snitsky 6'5 1/2
Heidenreich 6'6
Matt Bloom 6'6 (can look much taller)
Test 6'6
Viscera 6'6 1/2
Matt Morgan 6'8 1/2
Undertaker 6'8
Kane 6'8 to 6'8 1/2
Nash 6'9 1/2
Hall 6'5 1/2
Hogan 6'4 1/2
Big Show 6'11 1/2
Khali 7'0 1/2
Nathan Jones 6'10
Sid 6'7
Orton 6'4
Kip James 6'3 (also can look much taller)
Rantsrob said on 16/Sep/08
Seen the video of kane and randy backstage.
Seen the video of kane and randy backstage.
Dave said on 16/Sep/08
id say 6'8-9 for morgan btw, nash's posture isnt as good and nash had shrunk an inch from his peak height during these pics (knee surgeries and his age/height), i still think even now..... that a totally straight upright nash is taller than morgan, and a 1998 nash would easily be taller than morgan, and visibly..... check the way nash used to stand in the ring to the second link with him and morgan..... and also, nash's shoes are SOOOOOO flat (nash was always known for not using lifts because they killed his knees, he has even admitted this in interviews)
id say 6'8-9 for morgan btw, nash's posture isnt as good and nash had shrunk an inch from his peak height during these pics (knee surgeries and his age/height), i still think even now..... that a totally straight upright nash is taller than morgan, and a 1998 nash would easily be taller than morgan, and visibly..... check the way nash used to stand in the ring to the second link with him and morgan..... and also, nash's shoes are SOOOOOO flat (nash was always known for not using lifts because they killed his knees, he has even admitted this in interviews)
Dave said on 16/Sep/08
sid, yeah i saw that promo too, but they clearly have randy barefoot or kane with MONSTER lifts (they are known for doing this, especially with kane and other wrestlers who are clearly not their billing)..... so id say a 6'7 barefoot kane is fairer, as the height difference is never this big in the ring, and when i met randy IRL (im 6'1 flat), he looked a legit and easy 6'4
sid, yeah i saw that promo too, but they clearly have randy barefoot or kane with MONSTER lifts (they are known for doing this, especially with kane and other wrestlers who are clearly not their billing)..... so id say a 6'7 barefoot kane is fairer, as the height difference is never this big in the ring, and when i met randy IRL (im 6'1 flat), he looked a legit and easy 6'4
sid said on 16/Sep/08
Heres Kane with randy backstage segment. Kane looks like he has 5 inches on randy, kane barefeet 6'8 in ring gear making him 6'9. randy 6'4 check it out
Click Here
Heres Kane with randy backstage segment. Kane looks like he has 5 inches on randy, kane barefeet 6'8 in ring gear making him 6'9. randy 6'4 check it out
Click Here
Rantsrob said on 14/Sep/08
Drexyl says on 14/Sep/08
Morgan looks an easy 6,10" there.
No
Drexyl says on 14/Sep/08
Morgan looks an easy 6,10" there.
No
sid said on 14/Sep/08
Vegas Nash still looks taller by a inch
Vegas Nash still looks taller by a inch
Drexyl said on 14/Sep/08
Morgan looks an easy 6,10" there.
Morgan looks an easy 6,10" there.
Gazz said on 13/Sep/08
Has anyone got any pics of a morgan and nash staredown?
Has anyone got any pics of a morgan and nash staredown?
sid said on 12/Sep/08
Rolf If your 6'9 and kane is 6'8 it's not much diff, how could tell he was shorter when 6'8 to 6'9 is barely noticeable, perhaps your b.sing
Rolf If your 6'9 and kane is 6'8 it's not much diff, how could tell he was shorter when 6'8 to 6'9 is barely noticeable, perhaps your b.sing
KingNick said on 11/Sep/08
Kane's got quite a bit of height on Randy Orton here and this was when he prob didn't have lifts Click Here
I think Kip is about 6'4" here's his footwear Click Here
Kane's got quite a bit of height on Randy Orton here and this was when he prob didn't have lifts Click Here
I think Kip is about 6'4" here's his footwear Click Here
Robby said on 11/Sep/08
I am not sure if Kipp James/ Billy Gunn had lifts on his wrestling boots during his career. but he is definitely taller then 6'3". I would say 6'4" for sure.
I am not sure if Kipp James/ Billy Gunn had lifts on his wrestling boots during his career. but he is definitely taller then 6'3". I would say 6'4" for sure.
hs2008 said on 11/Sep/08
It's funny that TNA bills Kip James at 6'3" when he's clearly taller than that. He claims 6'5" on his official website and WWE billed him at 6'4"-6'5" from what I can remember.
It's funny that TNA bills Kip James at 6'3" when he's clearly taller than that. He claims 6'5" on his official website and WWE billed him at 6'4"-6'5" from what I can remember.
JT said on 11/Sep/08
Gazz says on 11/Sep/08
Matt morgan had maybe 2 inches on Kipp James one time in TNA when they had a staredown....
A little more than that. Click Here James does look in the 6'4" to 6'5" range though. James looked considerably taller than Schwarzenegger when he appeared on Smackdown many years ago.
Gazz says on 11/Sep/08
Matt morgan had maybe 2 inches on Kipp James one time in TNA when they had a staredown....
A little more than that. Click Here James does look in the 6'4" to 6'5" range though. James looked considerably taller than Schwarzenegger when he appeared on Smackdown many years ago.
Drexyl said on 11/Sep/08
Morgan is nothing under 6,9" in wrestling boots. There's just no way. He was every bit as tall as Nash in their staredowns and Nash is 6,9" at the very LEAST.
Morgan is nothing under 6,9" in wrestling boots. There's just no way. He was every bit as tall as Nash in their staredowns and Nash is 6,9" at the very LEAST.
Ghost said on 11/Sep/08
I see Morgan as 6'9. He looked very little if at all shorter than Nathan Jones who claims 6'10 and only a couple of inches shorter than Big Show.
I see Morgan as 6'9. He looked very little if at all shorter than Nathan Jones who claims 6'10 and only a couple of inches shorter than Big Show.
Gazz said on 11/Sep/08
Matt morgan had maybe 2 inches on Kipp James one time in TNA when they had a staredown, I remember hearing Kipp saying before i think on a shoot interview that he's 6'5.
Matt morgan had maybe 2 inches on Kipp James one time in TNA when they had a staredown, I remember hearing Kipp saying before i think on a shoot interview that he's 6'5.
Gazz said on 11/Sep/08
matt morgan in my opinion isnt the same height as nash, plus nash has lost some height for sure, I'm gonna go with morgan and kane the same height 6'8.5
matt morgan in my opinion isnt the same height as nash, plus nash has lost some height for sure, I'm gonna go with morgan and kane the same height 6'8.5
Rantsrob said on 10/Sep/08
Ill take your word for it then. Also, I thought it was agreed on this site morgan was 6'8.5'' or am i just seeing things.
Ill take your word for it then. Also, I thought it was agreed on this site morgan was 6'8.5'' or am i just seeing things.
Rolf said on 10/Sep/08
Kane is usually billed 6'9" to 7'0" , yeah right, no way! I stood next to Kane when I saw him in wrestling event, I stood taller than him and I am 6 ft 9 in. tall. Kane is I would say at most 6'8"
Kane is usually billed 6'9" to 7'0" , yeah right, no way! I stood next to Kane when I saw him in wrestling event, I stood taller than him and I am 6 ft 9 in. tall. Kane is I would say at most 6'8"
Alex said on 10/Sep/08
Kane and Morgan would be around the same height. Morgan may edge Kane out a bit. Morgan I'd say is a solid 6'8 at least.
Kane and Morgan would be around the same height. Morgan may edge Kane out a bit. Morgan I'd say is a solid 6'8 at least.
rocky said on 10/Sep/08
People kane never lost any height, If kane was listed 6'8 in his college stats then most likely kane is that today, kane can't lose height he's only 41, you don't lose your height till your maybe 45 to 50's on onnnnnnn, kane is still a young man, maybe kane was always 6'8, not 6'8'5 who knows. Kane stacks up to matt morgan pretty well, i think kane is the same height as matt morgan, i seen kane and morgan match on ppv was it the rumble, kane was the same height, didnt look any diff there
People kane never lost any height, If kane was listed 6'8 in his college stats then most likely kane is that today, kane can't lose height he's only 41, you don't lose your height till your maybe 45 to 50's on onnnnnnn, kane is still a young man, maybe kane was always 6'8, not 6'8'5 who knows. Kane stacks up to matt morgan pretty well, i think kane is the same height as matt morgan, i seen kane and morgan match on ppv was it the rumble, kane was the same height, didnt look any diff there
KingNick said on 10/Sep/08
I can't find this Matt Morgan vs. Kane match anywhere but as eric 1 mentioned it definitely exists it's even mentioned in this match Click Here I messaged this guy asking if he had it, keep your eyes open it's bound to turn up
I can't find this Matt Morgan vs. Kane match anywhere but as eric 1 mentioned it definitely exists it's even mentioned in this match Click Here I messaged this guy asking if he had it, keep your eyes open it's bound to turn up
Drexyl said on 10/Sep/08
Kane definitely wasn't wearing lifts around that time. There's a video on youtube of him standing face to face with Goldust and looking only a hair taller than him.
Kane definitely wasn't wearing lifts around that time. There's a video on youtube of him standing face to face with Goldust and looking only a hair taller than him.
eric 1 said on 10/Sep/08
Ranstrob im going by the fact that he looked shorter for sure. On top of that he didnt have a those big boots with the extra sized heel. He wore a regular wrestling boot. If he had somthing on the inside then ranstrob your right about that i dont know. But no one knows. All i can go by is when i met him 2 of the 3 times i met him . The 2 times he had on regular dress shoes. He stood next to my 6ft6 friend fred and had a easy 2-3 inches on him .
Ranstrob im going by the fact that he looked shorter for sure. On top of that he didnt have a those big boots with the extra sized heel. He wore a regular wrestling boot. If he had somthing on the inside then ranstrob your right about that i dont know. But no one knows. All i can go by is when i met him 2 of the 3 times i met him . The 2 times he had on regular dress shoes. He stood next to my 6ft6 friend fred and had a easy 2-3 inches on him .
hs2008 said on 10/Sep/08
He did stack up well to Morgan, who is no smaller than 6'9" IMO.
He did stack up well to Morgan, who is no smaller than 6'9" IMO.
Drexyl said on 9/Sep/08
I think it was actually the '04 Rumble when Kane chokeslammed Morgan. It's on youtube so go and look for it. You only see it for a split second but Kane appears to stack up well to Morgan.
I think it was actually the '04 Rumble when Kane chokeslammed Morgan. It's on youtube so go and look for it. You only see it for a split second but Kane appears to stack up well to Morgan.
KingNick said on 9/Sep/08
Ranstrob, I believe eric 1 is referring to the Kane era right before he lost his mask. I don't think he wore lifts during that period either. His boots looked like a normal wrestling shoe: Click Here (see 1:39, 2:19. Not the best shots but they look more normal)
It was actually the 2004 Royal Rumble where Kane chokeslammed Matt M-M-M-Morgan Click Here Kane starts wrestling Morgan at the 7 min mark, it's hard to tell heights tho because they don't have a staredown, but it looks close.
eric 1, if you happen to find that match between kane and morgan please post it. I looked but didn't find anything
Ranstrob, I believe eric 1 is referring to the Kane era right before he lost his mask. I don't think he wore lifts during that period either. His boots looked like a normal wrestling shoe: Click Here (see 1:39, 2:19. Not the best shots but they look more normal)
It was actually the 2004 Royal Rumble where Kane chokeslammed Matt M-M-M-Morgan Click Here Kane starts wrestling Morgan at the 7 min mark, it's hard to tell heights tho because they don't have a staredown, but it looks close.
eric 1, if you happen to find that match between kane and morgan please post it. I looked but didn't find anything
eric 1 said on 9/Sep/08
just found this off a matt morgan website.
- OVW Spring Break-Out '03 (April 11) = Morgan lost a "Respect" Match to Kane.
just found this off a matt morgan website.
- OVW Spring Break-Out '03 (April 11) = Morgan lost a "Respect" Match to Kane.
eric 1 said on 9/Sep/08
the match they did was in Japan. It was in an arena that was outside. I saw the pic on a kane website sometime ago. Wouldnt know where to locate it.
the match they did was in Japan. It was in an arena that was outside. I saw the pic on a kane website sometime ago. Wouldnt know where to locate it.
kishik said on 9/Sep/08
eric 1 show the pics of kane and matt morgan
eric 1 show the pics of kane and matt morgan
eric 1 said on 8/Sep/08
kane wrestled matt morgan when he wore the regular wrestling footwear.Im talking about when they tried making kane do comic segments when he first came back in 2002 from his injury. At that time he didnot wear lifts and in the pics with them wrestling there very close in height.
kane wrestled matt morgan when he wore the regular wrestling footwear.Im talking about when they tried making kane do comic segments when he first came back in 2002 from his injury. At that time he didnot wear lifts and in the pics with them wrestling there very close in height.
Da Man said on 8/Sep/08
Kane's head will be more 10.5", absolute max 11". Mamun's head is only barely above the lowest point of Kane's collar.
Kane's head will be more 10.5", absolute max 11". Mamun's head is only barely above the lowest point of Kane's collar.
Drexyl said on 8/Sep/08
Kane made JBL look very small during their encounters at Unforgiven last night.
Kane made JBL look very small during their encounters at Unforgiven last night.
Viper said on 8/Sep/08
Well, its a fact. Just because you are listed as 6-8 in college basketball doesnt mean so.
Well, its a fact. Just because you are listed as 6-8 in college basketball doesnt mean so.
Alex said on 7/Sep/08
Kane's head is probably 11 inches long. Mamun is a bit more than a head shorter than Kane. I am not 100% sure on Kane's head length though but looking at the picture I'd say thats about a foot or 11.5 inches.
Kane's head is probably 11 inches long. Mamun is a bit more than a head shorter than Kane. I am not 100% sure on Kane's head length though but looking at the picture I'd say thats about a foot or 11.5 inches.
Viper said on 6/Sep/08
Well, the 6-8 listing isnt any proof because its just a listing.
Well, the 6-8 listing isnt any proof because its just a listing.
KingNick said on 6/Sep/08
Big King, care to share the link?
Big King, care to share the link?
Alex2 said on 6/Sep/08
I dont think its possible for JBL to be below 6'5".
I dont think its possible for JBL to be below 6'5".
Drexyl said on 6/Sep/08
Kane stood taller over JBL than Matt Morgan does in that photo. I'm not saying Kane is taller than Morgan as we all know he's not, but when taking into account the stance and footwear, Kane can't be very far off Morgan (who went toe to toe with a 6,9" Kevin Nash and looked every bit as tall as him).
Kane can't be under 6,8". It just doesn't add up.
Kane stood taller over JBL than Matt Morgan does in that photo. I'm not saying Kane is taller than Morgan as we all know he's not, but when taking into account the stance and footwear, Kane can't be very far off Morgan (who went toe to toe with a 6,9" Kevin Nash and looked every bit as tall as him).
Kane can't be under 6,8". It just doesn't add up.
Rantsrob said on 6/Sep/08
Big King says on 6/Sep/08
JBL's real height is 6'5 1/2", not 6'6". There are websites where there are real heights of wrestlers and other celebrities and there it is written that JBL is 6'5 1/2" and Kane at 6'8".
Uhh, isnt that this site.
Big King says on 6/Sep/08
JBL's real height is 6'5 1/2", not 6'6". There are websites where there are real heights of wrestlers and other celebrities and there it is written that JBL is 6'5 1/2" and Kane at 6'8".
Uhh, isnt that this site.
Alex2 said on 6/Sep/08
To be honest I didnt see more than 3" in the Kane, JBL staredown. JBL alos ahd is hat on thou.
To be honest I didnt see more than 3" in the Kane, JBL staredown. JBL alos ahd is hat on thou.
Big King said on 6/Sep/08
JBL's real height is 6'5 1/2", not 6'6". There are websites where there are real heights of wrestlers and other celebrities and there it is written that JBL is 6'5 1/2" and Kane at 6'8".
JBL's real height is 6'5 1/2", not 6'6". There are websites where there are real heights of wrestlers and other celebrities and there it is written that JBL is 6'5 1/2" and Kane at 6'8".
Viper said on 6/Sep/08
Rob has him perfectly really. There is no good concrete evidence to suggests hes at least 6-8 or 6-8 1/2. But we do have very good evidence that hes at least around the 6-7-6-7 1/2 region.
Rob has him perfectly really. There is no good concrete evidence to suggests hes at least 6-8 or 6-8 1/2. But we do have very good evidence that hes at least around the 6-7-6-7 1/2 region.
KingNick said on 6/Sep/08
We were talking about JBL earlier, here's why I think he's 6'6". I don't think Matt M-M-M-M-Morgan is anything less than 6'9"
Click Here
We were talking about JBL earlier, here's why I think he's 6'6". I don't think Matt M-M-M-M-Morgan is anything less than 6'9"
Click Here
Monte said on 5/Sep/08
Kane is actually 6ft 11in because The Undertaker is 6ft 10in
Kane is actually 6ft 11in because The Undertaker is 6ft 10in
Drexyl said on 5/Sep/08
I think he should be upgraded to at least 6,8". There's too much evidence to suggest he's anything less.
I think he should be upgraded to at least 6,8". There's too much evidence to suggest he's anything less.
Sid said on 5/Sep/08
PJ You met kane, he said almost 6'7, he told me and Eric and other that he is 6'8 or over, when did you meet kane.??? and where
PJ You met kane, he said almost 6'7, he told me and Eric and other that he is 6'8 or over, when did you meet kane.??? and where
Clay said on 5/Sep/08
RantsRob, I have heard from numerous fans that they asked Kane when they met him and each one said that Kane says 6'8/6'8.5.
RantsRob, I have heard from numerous fans that they asked Kane when they met him and each one said that Kane says 6'8/6'8.5.
Alex said on 5/Sep/08
I am still sticking with 6'7 1/2-6'8 for Kane.
I am still sticking with 6'7 1/2-6'8 for Kane.
Big King said on 5/Sep/08
How old is Glen Jacobs? When he's over 40, maybe he was 6'8 1/2" in his prime. On these photos, 6'7 1/2" doesn't sound bad. I changed my mind.
How old is Glen Jacobs? When he's over 40, maybe he was 6'8 1/2" in his prime. On these photos, 6'7 1/2" doesn't sound bad. I changed my mind.
Big King said on 5/Sep/08
I think we should give Kane 6'8 1/2".
I think we should give Kane 6'8 1/2".
Ghost said on 5/Sep/08
Rantsrob says on 4/Sep/08
It frusterates me when i here people say "Kane said hes 6'8.5'' in person" Or hes stated in an interview that he 6'8''. No he didnt come on people why would kane tell you anything under his billed height thats breaking kayfabe and it just sounds silly. Until proof of these claims rise i wont take any of these claims serious.
I wouldn't doubt the people who say Kane told them he is 6'8 or 6'8,5. These were not official conversations and weren't going to be printed anywhere. Kane breaks kayfabe already by talking to people and being nice. Pretty much every wrestler breaks kayfabe these days by appearing in talk shows and such. From all I've heard, Kane strikes me as an honest, kind person and I doubt he would lie about his height saying he is 7 feet tall, espacially if the person asking him was over 6 feet tall so that it would be obvious he would be lying.
Rantsrob says on 4/Sep/08
It frusterates me when i here people say "Kane said hes 6'8.5'' in person" Or hes stated in an interview that he 6'8''. No he didnt come on people why would kane tell you anything under his billed height thats breaking kayfabe and it just sounds silly. Until proof of these claims rise i wont take any of these claims serious.
I wouldn't doubt the people who say Kane told them he is 6'8 or 6'8,5. These were not official conversations and weren't going to be printed anywhere. Kane breaks kayfabe already by talking to people and being nice. Pretty much every wrestler breaks kayfabe these days by appearing in talk shows and such. From all I've heard, Kane strikes me as an honest, kind person and I doubt he would lie about his height saying he is 7 feet tall, espacially if the person asking him was over 6 feet tall so that it would be obvious he would be lying.
Alex said on 5/Sep/08
Kane looks no more than inch taller than Viscera but Vis looks to have bigger footwear. Vis I think is a legit 6'6 at least.
Kane looks no more than inch taller than Viscera but Vis looks to have bigger footwear. Vis I think is a legit 6'6 at least.
Rantsrob said on 4/Sep/08
It frusterates me when i here people say "Kane said hes 6'8.5'' in person" Or hes stated in an interview that he 6'8''. No he didnt come on people why would kane tell you anything under his billed height thats breaking kayfabe and it just sounds silly. Until proof of these claims rise i wont take any of these claims serious.
It frusterates me when i here people say "Kane said hes 6'8.5'' in person" Or hes stated in an interview that he 6'8''. No he didnt come on people why would kane tell you anything under his billed height thats breaking kayfabe and it just sounds silly. Until proof of these claims rise i wont take any of these claims serious.
Big King said on 4/Sep/08
kane's official wwe profile says 7 feet.
kane's official wwe profile says 7 feet.
Clay said on 4/Sep/08
JBL could be as low as 6'4'' with those cowboy boots he weras.
JBL could be as low as 6'4'' with those cowboy boots he weras.
PJ said on 4/Sep/08
I met Kane, he told me "almost 6'8" but I'd say 6'7 is accurate.
I met Kane, he told me "almost 6'8" but I'd say 6'7 is accurate.
Viper said on 4/Sep/08
Kane looks barely 6-7 with Viscera. They almost look the same height there.
Kane looks barely 6-7 with Viscera. They almost look the same height there.
Alex said on 4/Sep/08
How long does Kane's head look? I'd say likely could be 11 inches. If so then thats a foot between the 2 and we're looking at a 6'8 Kane. Eric's height I am not too sure of. He's claimed 5'11.5, 5'11.75 and 6'0. Either way Kane's 6'7.5-6'8 with him as well.
How long does Kane's head look? I'd say likely could be 11 inches. If so then thats a foot between the 2 and we're looking at a 6'8 Kane. Eric's height I am not too sure of. He's claimed 5'11.5, 5'11.75 and 6'0. Either way Kane's 6'7.5-6'8 with him as well.
Heights are barefeet estimates, derived from quotations, official websites, agency resumes, in person encounters with actors at conventions and pictures/films.
Other vital statistics like weight or shoe size measurements have been sourced from newspapers, books, resumes or social media.
Celebrity Fan Photos and Agency Pictures of stars are © to their respective owners.