How tall is Big Show - Page 20

Add a Comment7420 comments

Average Guess (761 Votes)
Peak: 7ft 0.06in (213.5cm)
Current: 6ft 10.39in (209.3cm)
Danimal said on 26/Jun/08
Alex says on 25/Jun/08
UT has no more than 1/2 inch on Albert, thats if the footwear is equal. I see Albert at a 6'6 at least. Albert also came not too far from Big Show on some ocassions.

Does this change your opinion on peak height for Taker Alex? He does not look over 6'7" with 6'6" Albert in their 2001 Face-Off. Could it be that he was never really 6'8"? I still say though that he lost height after 2000.

BTW Alex, I've officially dropped 30 pounds!!
topdweeb26 said on 25/Jun/08
Big Show says on 25/Jun/08
"Kane lost cleanly to Mark Henry, which kinda surprises me."

Not me. Kane sucks.
topdweeb26 said on 25/Jun/08
I'd like to see the pics of Albert where he supposedly is close to Big Show in height. Btw, is it just me, or is just simply "Albert" a really dumb name to go by in pro-wrestling?
tuga said on 25/Jun/08
Big Show says on 25/Jun/08
Click Here

There's nothing wrong with Albert's footwear in his match with Undertaker.

Pause at 2:11, big soles and inside lift, look at the shape of the boots...
Besides...remember how close he looked sometimes next to 7
Vegas said on 25/Jun/08
6'4 nfl combine measured bob sapp and albert, hard to see if sapp is actually wearing boots or not there though, he is slightly shorter than akebono though next to sapp Click Here
Alex said on 25/Jun/08
UT has no more than 1/2 inch on Albert, thats if the footwear is equal. I see Albert at a 6'6 at least. Albert also came not too far from Big Show on some ocassions.
Big Show said on 25/Jun/08
Has anyone seen ECW last night. Big Show referred to Kane as 6'10 and Kane lost cleanly to Mark Henry, which kinda surprises me. I'm guessing since Kane moved over to RAW, Big Show will probably win the ECW title and mover from Smackdown to ECW.
Big Show said on 25/Jun/08
Click Here

There's nothing wrong with Albert's footwear in his match with Undertaker.
Red said on 25/Jun/08
Big Show - look careful at the vid Albert vs Undertaker on youtube,
Albert has a clear footwear-advantage. Barefoot I think a good 6
tuga said on 25/Jun/08
KingNick says on 24/Jun/08
Someone posted a while ago a blurry, yet full picture of the UT/Albert staredown. To me, it looked like Albert had some heavy footwear.

There you have it, this was discussed on taker
Danimal said on 24/Jun/08
Alex2 says on 24/Jun/08
A 6'6" Albert would eman a 6'6.5"-6'7" peakish Taker....

2001 wasn't peak Taker. He seemed to have started to lose height AFTER 2000.
KingNick said on 24/Jun/08
Someone posted a while ago a blurry, yet full picture of the UT/Albert staredown. To me, it looked like Albert had some heavy footwear.
Big Show said on 24/Jun/08
Alex2 says on 24/Jun/08
A 6'6" Albert would eman a 6'6.5"-6'7" peakish Taker....

Indeed in 2001 they had a very good staredown in the middle of the ring and Taker was barely taller.

Click Here
Click Here

Taker is barely taller (I fail to see even an inch between them)and I don't think Albert had a footwear advantage there.
Rantsrob said on 24/Jun/08
I wouldnt put albert as high as 6'7'' but i always seen albert as a big 6'6''. And alex2 where would you put albert then. Surely not 6'7'' or 6'8'' as a college football team wouldnt downgrade their players heights.
hulk said on 24/Jun/08
I don't think that BigShow is 213cm, at least he doesn't look to be that tall on this picture, lets say that Mike here is a legit 187cm (6/1.5),in that case BigShow is like 208cm, Mike is some 20 cm shorter.
Alex2 said on 24/Jun/08
A 6'6" Albert would eman a 6'6.5"-6'7" peakish Taker....
Alex said on 24/Jun/08
I'd give Albert at least 6'6.
MK said on 24/Jun/08
Atoadaso says on 24/Jun/08
Michael Cole referred to Khali as 7'4", this past smackdown I believe. Usually he refers to him as 7'3", and I have heard 7'2" as well. I dont get it.

Whats not to get, he's a corporate shill who's clearly lost any passion he had for profesional wrestling, and will say anything to keep us watching. Best not to listen.
Atoadaso said on 24/Jun/08
Michael Cole referred to Khali as 7'4", this past smackdown I believe. Usually he refers to him as 7'3", and I have heard 7'2" as well. I dont get it.
Danimal said on 24/Jun/08
Vegas says on 23/Jun/08
albert was listed as 6'6 in college football with pittsburgh panthers Click Here

photo of him during his college days Click Here

Sounds about right. I give him 6'5.5"-6'6" (as tall as a prime Hogan).
Danimal said on 23/Jun/08
Alex2 says on 7/Jun/08
JT nice, work I also see Albert in there, he looks huge even when hes sloching there! Id say Albert is pushing 6'8 if not more.

Albert has been listed at 6'7" in the WWE. He is not over that.
Clay said on 22/Jun/08
I've heard them describe him as either 7'2'', 7'3'', or 7'4''. And Cena quipped with 7'5'' for Khali, lol. I thought I saw about 1.5/2 inches between Show and Khali back in 2006 when they first met in the ring, and lately of course no more than 1 inch between them.
Alex2 said on 22/Jun/08
Alex, I know you got that from Gerweck, he could be, but he COULD be 7'2" like some sources say, we will never know lol. WWE recently said Khali is 7'4" man they need to sort out their billings for these giants!
Alex said on 22/Jun/08
1 full inch between Big Show and Khali I think is most accurate.
topdweeb26 said on 22/Jun/08
Sometimes I struggle to even see a full inch between Khali and Show. When people start saying Khali is 2 or more taller than him, I begin to wonder if we are looking at the same pics, or if these people are looking at the tops of their heads. I can almost see the 2 inch different if I look at their eye level, chin level and stuff like that. But height is based on the top of the head, nothing else.
Alex said on 22/Jun/08
I dont see 2 inches between Show and Khali though. I read that Khali's legit height is really 7'0.5 and if thats true then that makes Big Show in the 6'11 range. Around 6'11 1/2. That may be a very logical.
Clay said on 22/Jun/08
Show at 6'11'' and 7'1'' or there abouts in Ring gear is very possible.
Alex2 said on 20/Jun/08
You know I highly doubt Kane is below 6'8", look at him with Show, I highly doubt anything below 6'8" he also looks to have about 1 foot on Chavo Guerrero who is 5'8-5'9
Rantsrob said on 20/Jun/08
I see Kane to stand slightly above Shows eyebrows. Good to see kane stand erect. Huge dude
Rantsrob said on 20/Jun/08
JT says on 20/Jun/08
Click Here
Click Here
It looks like over a 4 inch difference given the size of Big Show
topdweeb26 said on 20/Jun/08
KingNick: I think it is pretty obvious that WWE thinks its fans are a bunch of gullible idiots. And sad thing is, if you ask the average wrestling fan how tall Kane is, they would probably tell you 7'.

Again, it frustrates me because it really waters down Big Show, a legit 7'. It makes him not seem that special, because it gives the impression that 7' wrestlers are actually pretty common.
KingNick said on 20/Jun/08
If you look closely at JT's pic Kane has some massive footwear going on. Also, he's standing up straight for once. I say he's still no less than 6'8" barefoot but 6'10ish in shoes.

I know this drives everyone else crazy too, but can anyone figure out why the WWE bills both Kane and Show at the same height yet Show is clearly taller no matter what the footwear??
topdweeb26 said on 20/Jun/08
No, from the eyebrows to the top of the head is about 4 inches, so I would say Show has about 4 1/4 inches on Kane. This makes Kane's 7' billing even more stupid.
MagicTouch said on 20/Jun/08
The pic shows about 3.5 inches and about 3.75 inch max difference between Kane and Big Show if taking into account of Kane's extra thick boots.
JT said on 20/Jun/08
Click Here
Click Here
It looks like over a 4 inch difference given the size of Big Show
Alex said on 18/Jun/08
Well he was billed at 7'2 up until late 2002. I am just saying bill him at 7'2 is you're going to continue to bill Khali at 7'3. That or have Khali billed at 7'1 and keep Show at 7'0.
Cobra said on 18/Jun/08
7ft2 billed height for Show would be perfect, also 6ft3 or 6ft4 for Henry. Have no idea who is responsible for this, but this is just flat out stupid.
Alex said on 17/Jun/08
Alex 2, they're still billing Big Show and Kane both at 7'0. And they're facing each other for the ECW title so they're hyping it even more. Really needs a change. At least say Kane is 6'10 and Big Show 7'0. Its more than 2 inches between them but saying 2 inches is better than saying they're the exact same. I think since they bill Khali at 7'3 they should bill Big Show at 7'2 and just have Kane at 6'10.
Mattiew_- said on 12/Jun/08
Typhoon wasn't under 360 , 384 seems legit to me at his natural disaster epoch , maybe even more ( they didn't update everyday , i'm around 200 and can go as high as 218/220 in a month when i'm not pushing on the cardio so I guess a 350/400pounder must be able to give/take 20+pounds rather easily )

Big Show was no way under 7' at his WCW epoch , hell I'd even give him 7'1 when he was leaner ( around 380/400 ) he had 3 inches at least on Nash back then ...
But he definitely lost some height when he put on around 100 pounds ( due to having his pituary gland removed , prolly because HGH is the hormone that helps keeps you lean )
Alex2 said on 11/Jun/08
Alex, also Show never really has great posture anymore, I can believe in WCWhe may well have been around 7'1" as he was 1" shorther than 7'2" Ron Reis, but 6'10.5-7'0 today is reasonable.
Alex said on 7/Jun/08
I could swallow someone saying Big Show is 6'11 since it looks within reason like Topdweeb says and may be the truth. 6'10 for Big Show I can deal with even though I think thats the lowest possible he can ever look. Anything under that I just can't buy.
topdweeb26 said on 7/Jun/08
Danimal: i don't know all of Ola's estimates but he does say that Big Show is 6' 11, which is within reason.

Ola: Jason says Big Show is 6' 8, and at one point, he was even toying with the idea of possibly 6' 7 (though not for long). I don't call that a good estimate.
MK said on 7/Jun/08
Ola says on 6/Jun/08
Alex2, those kinda harrassments are ridiculous, i hope you're not one of these ppl. Danimal has been against me since day 1 in here - for no reason

If there was no reason it would be Danimal and not yourself who Rob would be giving the repeated warnings to, it should be obvious to you by now that you are an unwelcome presence on this site to both its owner and users, so its not just Danimal and its NOT for no reason.
Alex2 said on 7/Jun/08
JT nice, work I also see Albert in there, he looks huge even when hes sloching there! Id say Albert is pushing 6'8 if not more.
anonymous said on 7/Jun/08
i give khali 7,2 1/2 ,big show 7,0" on the money minumum 6,11.5
Clay said on 7/Jun/08
Its obvious Big Show is around 7'0'' when you see him looking down at Kane, stacking up to Khali and basically dwarfing everyone in sight. Either that or we've all been fooled, Jason is right and Show is 6'8''....Khali is 6'9''.
JT said on 7/Jun/08
Not great video quality but here are a few screen caps of Big Show with Nathan Jones and Matt Morgan (Click Here) (Click Here) . The little guy is 6
anonymous said on 6/Jun/08
hey did anyone notice that big show had to duck his head through the doorway into the room where he was stictched up?. that doorway has to be at lest 6,10" so he has to be another 2 inches talleer i,d give him 7.0" even.
Alex2 said on 5/Jun/08
Isu Alam, LOL how is Khali not at peak? He's 30 something, and if anything hes growing! 7'1-7'2 also. Undertaker WASNT below 6'8 peak also!
lsu alum said on 5/Jun/08
big show peak7'.5"
andre peak 7'0
Kali peak 7'1"
kevin nash peak6'10"
kane peak 6'8"
undertaker peak 6'7.5"
all may have drop a half of an inch to an inch due to age,injury etc.
KingNick said on 4/Jun/08
topdweeb26 , about Lord Alfred Hayes, I have the Ultimate Warrior DVD and in an old match Hayes comments him as being 6'5". He also constantly referred to Andre as being 7'5". I just think he guessed heights wrong. Lots of respect to him tho, seemed like a cool guy.
Alex said on 3/Jun/08
Bigelow I think at his biggest was around 350lbs legit probably.
topdweeb26 said on 3/Jun/08
anonymous: kane is known for wearing big lifts.
Big Show said on 3/Jun/08
Big Show has sustained an injury during his match at Sunday's PPV. His eye is completely swollen. Here's a pic of Big Show. Please don't look at this before lunch.

Click Here
topdweeb26 said on 2/Jun/08
Ola: I gotta say, that I'll be the first to admit that your estimates really aren't that bad. I think you're much more down to earth than someone like Jason. I mean, don't get me wrong, every forum usually has a guy that gets picked on constantly, and as long as it isn't me, I could careless that it is you. And I love jumping on the bandwagon of bashing you when it comes around, but for the most part, your height estimates aren't bad.
anonymous said on 2/Jun/08
it,s kinda funny either big show wore 2 inch lifts or maybe it was kane,cause big show only looked 3 inches taller in one pic,and 5 inches taller in another hmmmm,something kinda fishy there.
Alex said on 2/Jun/08
Typhoon looked to be around 400lbs legit at some point. At least 375lbs I'd give him. Earthquake was probably 440-450lbs legit.
topdweeb26 said on 2/Jun/08
Ola: I saw Bam Bam up close before, but I didn't really pay attention to how tall her was. He didn't seem that tall though, maybe about 6' if I remember correctly. Anyway, I would say he looked like he was around 350. I don't think he was 400 or over.
Alex2 said on 2/Jun/08
Danimal, I nearly had the chance to meet Bret at a wrestling convention, but unfortunatley I could not make it, I wish I had though :(
Danimal said on 2/Jun/08
Typhoon was being billed in his 380's and Earthquake was being billed in his 460's in 1990. The Natural Disasters as they were called for all those who were too young to remember.

Alex2, just because Rob says something, it does not make it a fact. I doubt Rob ever met 95% of the stars on this site (no offense Rob). I HAVE met Bret and he was not over 5'11" and btw, that is what he was billed at until the early 1990's, where they gave him a boost to 6'1". Same goes for Davey Boy Smith, who they gave a 4" boost in height to.
topdweeb26 said on 2/Jun/08
Vegas: actually I am wrong. Fink said Typhoon was 384 lbs and Monsoon asked Perfect how many pounds, and Perfect said "486"... but he was obviously correcting Fink because Fink isn't perfect.
topdweeb26 said on 2/Jun/08
Vegas: No, you example of Typhoon vs. Bam Bam is wrong. I watched the match on Youtube recently, and the announcer announced Typhoon as 486 pounds. In response to that, Monsoon asked Perfect,

Monsoon: "How many pounds did he say Typhoon was?" And Perfect said, "486 pounds".

Monsoon: "486?! I don't think so!"

Perfect: "He wouldn't lie."

BTW, it is in my opinion, he had to really be 486 lbs, beause Mr. Perfect said so, and he was the perfect commentator.

Ola: He had to be heavier than 320 lbs. I have a friend who is legitimately 320 lbs, and he is only about 5' 11 and definitely not as big as Typhoon was.
Alex said on 2/Jun/08
JT, nice pictures. I swear I see 2.5 inches tops there and more likely 2 inches between Big Show and Kane in 99 but in 2006 you see a good 4 inch difference if not a bit more.
Vegas said on 2/Jun/08
ottman was billed at 384lb by the ring announcers in the WWF as both tugboat and typhoon, loads of examples on youtube such as against perfect, bigelow, hogan, tenta, taker

the commentators as usual were clueless, monsoon in one match said "close to the 500lb mark" and perfect said 486lb
topdweeb26 said on 1/Jun/08
KingNick: Yeah, I watched it again today, and the announcer said Typhoon was 486 lbs. And Monsoon said, "How many pounds did he say Typhoon was?" Mr. P replied with, "486 lbs", Monsoon: "486? I don't think so." Mr P. "He wouldn't lie".

So I don't think they were in on it or something. The same thing kinda happened at Rampage '91 or something like that when the Undertaker faced the Ultimate Warrior. When the Undertaker came to the ring Alfred Hayes said something like, "This is a huge man, what do you think he is, about 6' 6 or 6' 7?" and Sean Mooney said, "Oh, taller than that. About 6' 9" and Hayes said, "6' 9" (questioningly)... in fact, when the UT debuted, the commentators were saying he was 6' 10 and Piper was one of the commentators, and he said, "6' 10? I don't know about that, but he is tall". Funny now that I think about it.

As for Typhoon vs. Bam Bam... it was an ok match... but we all knew who'd win. There were always wrestlers who were just one notch ahead of being a full-time jobber. Those wrestlers were: Dino Bravo, Hercules, Tito Santana, and Typhoon. What's really sad is when those guys face each other and one of them has to lose.. because the one who loses realizes he is the ultimate jobber.. that being Hercules. He's lost to Tito Santana, and lost all the time to Dino Bravo.. don't know if he ever faced Typhoon/Tugboat.
Big Show said on 1/Jun/08
JT says on 31/May/08
I did not see the show but from the videos available on YouTube, they never had a face-to-face stare down. The pic on WWE looks like a PhotoShop job, since Kane
Ghost said on 1/Jun/08
Typhoon was/is a huge man even in today's standards. He was about 6'3 (He wasn't that much shorter than Earthquake) and must have weighed close 400 lbs which wasn't all fat, he looked very strong and muscular too. Hi arms were enormous.
KingNick said on 1/Jun/08
topdweeb26 , if I remember correctly, Typhoon was billed at 358 normally maybe the announcer just made a mistake. I remember that match too. Great match between to great big men wrestlers.
Massimo said on 1/Jun/08
This guy thinks that Big Show is much shorter than 7'.
Click Here
I am not sure if it's true though. What I know is that, apart from Dalip Sing, he is
the tallest wrestler in the wordl.
Alex said on 1/Jun/08
I just watched the video. They said Typhoon weighed 384lbs but Heenan dais 486lbs and Monsoon said I dont think so.
Alex said on 1/Jun/08
Actually back then you had more fat and heavy guys than you do now.
topdweeb26 said on 1/Jun/08
Are wrestling commentators not always in on the billed heights and weights or something? I was watching a match of the loser/jobber Typhoon vs. Bam Bam Bigelow on Youtube. When Typhoon was announced to the ring, the announcer said he was 460 lbs or something like that. Gorilla Monsoon said, "How much did he say Typhoon weighs" and I think it was Mr. Perfect (the best heel ever) said, "460", and Monsoon said, "460? I don't think so." Btw, I think it is kinda funny how you were considered a super heavyweight back then if you weighed over 350 lbs, but now it seems like that is nothing.
Rantsrob said on 1/Jun/08
Im gunna highly doubt the the photo was shopped. I've never seen more then 3in between show and kane. Kane is 6'9'' in his boots or perhaps 6'10''. If show is a ligit 7' he would need to be 7'1'' in his boots. Putting Khali around 7'2'' or so in his
JT said on 31/May/08
Alex says on 29/May/08
Back to about Big Show. I didn't see ECW last night but I saw pictures and Big Show only looked 3 inches tops taller than Kane. Now 2 years ago Big Show has more 4 inches or a bit more on Kane. Kane in lifts probably?

I did not see the show but from the videos available on YouTube, they never had a face-to-face stare down. The pic on WWE looks like a PhotoShop job, since Kane
JT said on 31/May/08
DiBiase was a great heel Click Here but Piper was my favorite. DiBiase had the best laugh hands down.
Alex2 said on 30/May/08
You know, Its not impossible Bret was 6'0" prime, hes even listed that here, and thats Rob!
Chris said on 30/May/08
Here are the screen shots from the Piper's Pit (december 1985) with Roddy, Bret Hart and Jim Neidhart. You guys can judge for yourselves:

Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Ghost said on 30/May/08
Ola,

Tenta measured with his shoes on?! Sumo wrestlers wrestle barefoot! Why on earth would they measure a contestant with their shoes on?? One guy even had an implant planted under the skin of his head just to be tall enough to become a sumo wrestler. That's how strict the rules are. You think they measured Tenta with shoes on? C'mon...

Danimal,

Piper certainly doesn't look anymore than an inch taller than Hart. If there is proof that he was more taller, please provide the pics. I really doubt people who think he was shorter than you think he was automatically hate Piper. I atleast dont' have any strong feelings about the guy. I just call it as I see it.
hs2008 said on 30/May/08
Ted Sr. was for a sure an awesome heel. Ted Jr. was listed at 6'2" on his arrest record also, but billed at 6'3" in FCW.
Click Here
Alex2 said on 30/May/08
Yea, ok Ola, you actually think they would BILLED someone 6'5.75"? Tey are NEVER that accurate unless its OFFICIALY, Shoes my ASS,your ecuses get more lame every day!
Vegas said on 30/May/08
ted dibiase jr made his debut on raw last monday and looked to have at least an inch+ on his dad, ted jr told me he was 6'2 in april 2006, maybe it was camera angle; we will know for sure in the coming weeks, great to see Ted Sr back though what a legend, greatest heel ever imo Click Here
Anonymous said on 30/May/08
hearns looks a legit 6'1 there next to Jerry Brisco who i met in orlando in march and no more than an inch taller than neidhart, now thats a very very interesting find, got any with marty jannetty and neidhart, IIRC frank said jannetty looked 5'11 legit in person

ola; kurt angle was listed at 5'11 in the olympics and mark henry at 6'3 so i am not so sure i would agree that olympics do legit measurements. Sumo i would believe as we know they are measured and weighed and then fight barefoot thus hiding nothing.

K1 and UFC are entertainment. i would also disagree on the football, the last world cup fifa had peter crouch at <6'6; 197cm i believe which is stupid beyond belief, they had beckham listed at 181 or 182cm and crouch is more than 7 inches taller than him Click Here they also had dutch man dirk kuyt at either 184cm or 185cm and they play as teammates for liverpool every week and crouch dwarfs him by far more than 5 inches Click Here
JT said on 30/May/08
Frank, you
Danimal said on 29/May/08
Vegas says on 28/May/08
Danimal says on 27/May/08
A 1980's Piper had more than 1" on Bret. At least 2-3". Piper lost some serious height some time in the 90's (MAJOR surgeries)..

that video JT posted is from early 1987 and piper has no 3 inches on hart, not even an inch, same as 1992

There're your hatred for Piper again. Bret was MAX 5'11" and Piper was minimum 6'1". He had spinal surgery AND hip replacement and with all that, he is down to Bret's height TODAY.
Anonymous said on 29/May/08
big show has a good 4.5 to 5 inch height advantage over kane.
Alex2 said on 29/May/08
Ola, no disrespect but please explain why Tenta was OFFICIALY measured as 6'5.75" in Sumo, and come on the guys looks it! Yea id also say 6'0 give or take for piper.
Alex said on 29/May/08
Back to about Big Show. I didn't see ECW last night but I saw pictures and Big Show only looked 3 inches tops taller than Kane. Now 2 years ago Big Show has more 4 inches or a bit more on Kane. Kane in lifts probably?
Frank said on 29/May/08
Topdweeb believe me Neidhart was no 5ft 11 because i was looking down@ him when we were speaking and these guys probably wore lifts in there Wrestlng boots and i will still say he was 5ft9.5 to 5ft 10
Alex said on 29/May/08
I am not too sure on how tall Piper was back then. Gave around a 6'0 tall impression.
Jason said on 29/May/08
I always said 6'1''-6'2'' peak for Piper was rubbish -- 6'0'' at most.
Chris said on 28/May/08
Hey guys -
I will post photos of Roddy, Bret and Jim from a Piper's Pit from December 1985. Either Bret wasn't wearing lifts at the time or Roddy has lost some serious height...but he was a few inches taller than Bret. I will look up the video today.
topdweeb26 said on 28/May/08
Frank, I agree with you, Hart definitely looks taller in that video than Niedhart.
KingNick said on 28/May/08
I think Piper was probably about 6' at peak and around 5'10" now. Wasn't he 2" taller than a 5'10" Mr. T?
MK said on 28/May/08
JT says on 27/May/08
Neidhart and Hart were both around the same height (probably 5'11") Click Here If Neidhart's 5'9", Piper's 5'10". Neidhart had Owen Hart (around 5'9") by 2 inches. With his flat top and fireplug build, he does not seem as tall as he really is.

So Piper was a definite 6'0'' peak yes?, yet today looks barely 5'10'', hence a 2'' height loss, surely this will serve as proof to anyone who doubts this could befall a much larger individual such as Haystacks, Hogan, Andre etc.
Vegas said on 28/May/08
Danimal says on 27/May/08
A 1980's Piper had more than 1" on Bret. At least 2-3". Piper lost some serious height some time in the 90's (MAJOR surgeries)..

that video JT posted is from early 1987 and piper has no 3 inches on hart, not even an inch, same as 1992
Danimal said on 27/May/08
A 1980's Piper had more than 1" on Bret. At least 2-3". Piper lost some serious height some time in the 90's (MAJOR surgeries)..
Frank said on 27/May/08
JT, Hart looks taller than Neidhart in that video with Piper and i was talking to Neidhart for about 5 minutes and i was a good amount taller than him and im 5ft 11 1/2 and we were both wearing sneakers Hes no 5ft 11 for sure I bet my life on that !!! I best guess is 5ft 9.5 5ft 10 topps but i believe he looked under 5ft 10
JT said on 27/May/08
Neidhart and Hart were both around the same height (probably 5'11") Click Here If Neidhart's 5'9", Piper's 5'10". Neidhart had Owen Hart (around 5'9") by 2 inches. With his flat top and fireplug build, he does not seem as tall as he really is.
KingNick said on 26/May/08
I gotta agree, I don't think Neidhart is any taller than 5'10". Built like a brick house tho. Anyone see his kid wrestle? She's pretty awesome.
Michael W. said on 26/May/08
There is no way that the Big Show is 7 feet tall. Khali who is 7'1 stood atleast 3 inches over Show when they stood face to face a month ago on RAW. That and when Big Show approached Y2J he looked about 1 foot taller than Chris Jericho. If Chris Jericho is 5'9 than Show must be 6'9 or 6'10. I have a friend who is a legit 6'10 without shoes and him and I met Big Show here in Fort Myers about 2 years ago and they stood eye to eye. Can anyone else agree he is not 7'0???
Derek said on 26/May/08
Jim Neidhart was about an inch shorter than Bret Hart. Bret was around 5'11", so 5'10"ish makes sense for Neidhart.
Danimal said on 26/May/08
Bret Hart had an inch on Jim Neidhart. Bret was in the 5'10"-5'11" region. Neidhart an inch shorter.
Frank said on 26/May/08
Jason, its true believe me and im Honored i gave a lower height than you :o)
Like i said the tallest Neidhart could be is 5ft 10 but i think he was alittle shorter than that
Jason said on 26/May/08
Wow ... even I thought Neidhart was 5'11''.
OOFatman said on 25/May/08
JT, those pics don't depict a whole lot. They are too grainy to decipher much of anything. However, it could be the camera angle, but IMO Show's fibula should be closer to the back of the boot. If you have a lift under your heel it moves your fibula a little higher as well as forward. This is getting rediculous. All I am saying is that on the DVD I have, it definitely appears that he has lifts; grainy pics won't change my mind.
topdweeb26 said on 25/May/08
Big Show: wow, he still looks to be in great shape, especially for his age. I never really thought he was that "big". Like there were a lot of wrestlers more massive than he was. But, he certainly wasn't small, and he definitely had one of the most defined physiques in wrestling history.
Frank said on 25/May/08
JT, I met Neihhart and he looked 5ft 9 to 5ft 10 i was surprized i was looking down at him but my guess he 5ft 9.5
Ghost said on 25/May/08
Yep, That sounded pretty desperate there Ola. All of a sudden we can't take any backstage interviews in to account just because Tenta looks easily taller than you say he is.
JT said on 25/May/08
Ola says on 24/May/08
this backstage interview cant be used to judge height out from(since they're standing on a box)... neither tenta or hogan is this much taller than gene in the RING. we can take off 2 inches right there

Click Here Think before you write:) Tenta wore some really thin-soled boots at that time as well.
Alex2 said on 25/May/08
Ola says on 24/May/08
this backstage interview cant be used to judge height out from(since they're standing on a box)... neither tenta or hogan is this much taller than gene in the RING. we can take off 2 inches right there

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Wow you're funny you know that! Wow what a lame excuse, AS IF either of those super heavyweight were standing on a 2" box? HAHAHAHA! You make me laugh soooo hard!
Big Show said on 25/May/08
topdweeb26 says on 24/May/08
Has anyone heard anything about the Ultimate Warrior returning to wrestling? I heard a rumor about it... will it be WWE?

He's returning, but not in the WWE. His return match is in Barcelona. I doubt he will ever return to the WWE, he hasn't made himself popular with the WWE with his rants against Vince and HHH over the years. However Ultimate Warrior did say he would like to face Vince McMahon in the ring one day.

Click Here
Clay said on 25/May/08
How can Big Show have more than a head over a 5'11''/6'0'' guy there yet 6'1.5 Mike reaches his mustache?
MK said on 25/May/08
topdweeb26 says on 24/May/08
Has anyone heard anything about the Ultimate Warrior returning to wrestling? I heard a rumor about it... will it be WWE?

Hell no.
JT said on 25/May/08
Big Show and Jim Neidhart, who was listed at 6
topdweeb26 said on 24/May/08
Has anyone heard anything about the Ultimate Warrior returning to wrestling? I heard a rumor about it... will it be WWE?
Danimal said on 24/May/08
Kiat says on 24/May/08
Hogan - 6'5" (peak). He clearly looked shorter than Earthquake when compared to Mean Gene.
Today - 6'4"

Lets get something straight. He was TALLER than HBJ in the 1980's, who was taller than Earthquake.
Peak Hogan 6'6"
Today 6'3"-6'3.5"
mike said on 24/May/08
earthquake looked as much as 6,6" imo next to mean gene.the giant clearly had quake my 7-8 inches.
Kiat said on 24/May/08
Hogan - 6'5" (peak). He clearly looked shorter than Earthquake when compared to Mean Gene.
Today - 6'4"
Big Show said on 24/May/08
Click Here

Here's a match between Big Show and John Tenta from WCW 1996. I've also uploaded Tenta's pre-match interview with Mean Gene. And there's an interesting Hogan segment in between which features Hogan and some celebrities such as George Foreman and Shaquille O'Neal. The close-up segment of Hogan and Shaq is interesting as Shaq only looks 6 inches taller than Hogan (accounting the fact that Shaq is leaning towards Hogan). Hogan must've cowboy boots on. See some of the pics below.

Click Here
Click Here
Click Here

Here's also a pic of Hogan and Big Show (the quality isn't great) standing side by side in the ring. Big Show is in street clothes there, so don't come up with the lifts excuses here.
Click Here
JT said on 24/May/08
OOFatman says on 22/May/08
JT, I didn't say his boots had 2" heels. I said that the lifts INSIDE the boots were approximately 2"
topdweeb26 said on 23/May/08
Alex & Frank: So are we in agreement that if a 7' person was being billed as 7' 4 or 7' 5, then it would make sense that they would wear lifts? I take everything Jason says with a grain of salt. Even Ola gives Big Show 6' 11. I think Jason often just tries to stir up controversy, and at times, just purposely downgrades people for no reason at all.
Danimal said on 23/May/08
Alex says on 23/May/08
But really Andre had 5 inches max on Hogan at WM 3, more likely closer to 4 inches.

Andre was still around 6'11" to me in 1987. Hogan was 6'6", so yeah, 5" makes sense.
Alex said on 23/May/08
But really Andre had 5 inches max on Hogan at WM 3, more likely closer to 4 inches.
KingNick said on 22/May/08
I'm not sure if Big Show lost height. I think like Andre his posture deceives it to looking like he has. For example, my cousin is 6'1". I'm 5'10.5". When he stood next to me, there only looked like a 1" difference. Then his mother yelled at him to, "Stand up straight!" and he did, THEN you could see the larger difference. I think it's the same case with Big Show and most tall wrestlers who've been around for a long time. Big Show may very well be 6'9.5" or so with bad posture, but if he were to actually stand up straight he's probably 6'11" to 7' (I think 6'11"). Even in this pic here Click Here he's not wearing any ring gear but he still can't stand completely straight as he could ten years earlier.

JT, sorry buddy, but Show's shoes in 1996 look like they give a boost to me. 2"? I dunno if I'd go that far, but I would say 1.5" compared to that other pic you got from Vegas with the shoes.
Danimal said on 22/May/08
Alex says on 22/May/08
Topdweeb, even as a kid I doubted the 8 inch difference they wanted up to believe. No way was Andre 7'4 even if Hogan was 6'8. No idea what they were thinking trying to fool us, LOL.

I would have loved to see Big Show face off with a peak Andre.

That would be a 9" height difference Alex. Andre was ONLY billed at 7'5" from 1983-1984 onwards.
Anonymous said on 22/May/08
6'8-6'9 karl malone didn't pass off for 7ft+ in WCW; when he locked up with hogan in the ring the height difference didn't look that great
Frank said on 22/May/08
The 7ft 4 billing for Andre was becasue they wanted to pass Andre as the Tallest Athlete Kareem was 7ft 2 and was the tallest in the NBA @ THAT TIME
Brah said on 22/May/08
I don't think Big Show wore lifts in WCW. He did wear some good-sized boots. He looked taller because he was alot leaner and the WCW ring is also a lot smaller.

Look at the end of video to see Kevin Nash and Big Show. Keep in mind that Kevin Nash has flatter footwear:
Click Here
topdweeb26 said on 22/May/08
Jason: first, times have changed. In our current time, there are way too many taller wrestlers for a 7' wrestler to get away with a 7' 4 billing without wearing lifts. I mean, even in Andre's day, he couldn't get away with it (granted he wasn't 7', but he was close). And, I think Paul Wight probably did convince most of the TV audience who didn't pay much attention, into thinking he was 7' 4. But to those who actually put some thought into it, probably didn't believe it. Like I said, people who are most likely to believe in billed heights, are people who know "of" the wrestlers, but never actually seen them much. It only took my gf about two seconds to figure out Andre wasn't 7' 5 at WM 3, and she had never really seen Andre before then.

Alex: that's what I'm saying. People seem to think that just because a wrestler is tall, they can get away with any height. They can to a certain extent. But exaggerating someone by 4 or 5 inches is a significant amount to exaggerate them by. Giant Gonzalez got away with hit, because being 7 1/2 feet tall is so unusual looking, that people were just mesmorized. Being 7' is tall, especially compared to the general population, but like I said, it's not so tall that they can get away with 4+ inch exaggerations.

It didn't take any of use long to figure out Khali wasn't 7' 3, and especially not after he went face to face with the Big Show.
MK said on 22/May/08
OOFatman says on 22/May/08
JT, I didn't say his boots had 2" heels. I said that the lifts INSIDE the boots were approximately 2". And yes, I know it doesn't mean that they actually gave him 2", it's just an explanation as to why he appeared taller. Do NOT even try and use grainy pics to disprove that he wore lifts there. I have the match on DVD and they are very evident.

Then be a sport and SHOW US these lifts, prove your point as JT did.
Alex said on 22/May/08
And personally I am not even sure Big Show lost any height. He's only 36 years old but maybe 1/2 inch he could have lost for whatever reasons. I think it's mainly due to to the fact he was leaner in WCW, and had lifts at times. Also in 1999-2000 he had better posture than he does now. NOw Andre I think easily lost around 2 inches of height going from a 6'11 peak down to 6'9ish.
Alex said on 22/May/08
Topdweeb, even as a kid I doubted the 8 inch difference they wanted up to believe. No way was Andre 7'4 even if Hogan was 6'8. No idea what they were thinking trying to fool us, LOL.

I would have loved to see Big Show face off with a peak Andre.
Anonymous said on 22/May/08
well if he is wearing "2 inch lifts and huge boots" he must have grown since 1996 because he was taller next to mayweather at no way out in flat shoes than here next to gene or maybe gene was close to 6ft there Click Here
Jason said on 22/May/08
Someone that's 7'0'' wouldn't need lifts for a 7'4'' billing. There's a couple here who think a wrestler has to actually be their billed height, or almost, in boots + lifts -- it pretty much just has to make the TV audience think they're it or something like it. Then there's the listings where you don't know what they were on when they came up with them. So many people would think someone that tall in person is 7'4'' (or more), anyway...
OOFatman said on 22/May/08
JT, I didn't say his boots had 2" heels. I said that the lifts INSIDE the boots were approximately 2". And yes, I know it doesn't mean that they actually gave him 2", it's just an explanation as to why he appeared taller. Do NOT even try and use grainy pics to disprove that he wore lifts there. I have the match on DVD and they are very evident.
Clay said on 22/May/08
Jason, I can actually see how you thought Show looked 6'8'' in person. If anyone saw the episode of him on ''Hogan knows best'' he really does look 6'8/6'9, although of course with horrendous posture.
JT said on 22/May/08
OOFatman says on 20/May/08
topdweeb26, I also had heard of his supposed 6-11 listing in basketball. Even though he appeared much taller in WCW, i KNOW lifts had to do with it. I was just re-watching his match with Hogan in Sturgis and his lifts are clear as day. They looked about 2". Personally, I believe he is 6-11 today. IMO he WAS a legit 7-0 when he was younger.



2 inch heels?? Click Here These are no bigger than the boots he wears now and may even be smaller.
This is a 2 inch heel Click Here Please everyone bookmark this link so Vegas and I don
OOFatman said on 21/May/08
topdweeb26, I FULLY agree w/ everything you just said. For anyone who doesn't think Show wore lifts, check out WCW's Hog Wild '96. It's on 1 of my 3 Hulk Hogan Ultimate Anthology DVD's. The lifts are clear as day.

Jason says on 20/May/08
Why would a 7'0'' guy need to wear lifts...?

R U SERIOUS??? I don't know, maybe to be passed off as 7-4?! LMAO!
KingNick said on 21/May/08
The funny thing is with Andre was he never even wore big soled shoes. They just billed him as 7'4" when in reality he wasn't anywhere near that. I'm a firm believer of Andre hitting the 7' mark at one point, but the point is other than the whole box thing they never tried to make him appear any larger. Maybe the box thing just solidified it in people's minds. Also, there werent too many guys measuring up to Andre back then. Really Hogan and Studd were the two tallest guys of those eras next to Andre. Nowadays you have guys like Undertaker, Kane, Kevin Nash, etc. So you can't really get away with billing a guy as 7'4" who's actually 7', such as Paul Wight, without foot enhancement.
LV said on 21/May/08
Why would a tall person wear lifts? Silly questions really. You can always make something big appear bigger or in some cases, someone small can appear average. A legit 7 footer can be 7'2" ot 7'3" with thick boots and insole lifts.
Ghost said on 21/May/08
Topweed26,

You are right. Anybody who really paid attention probably figured out that Andre really wasn't 7'5. However in those days people believed what the WWF told them alot more than today. Therefor I think many people probably didn't really question any height listings and didn't pay too much attention to such things.

The height Andre is remembered as is 7'4. That's the height he is always given when he is mentioned and most people who are not Obsessed With Heights probably believe it was legit. Hell, at the Andre page whe have general93 still insisting that the 7'4 was his real height.

People want to remember him as a larger-than-life figure and when asked "Who was the tallest wrestler ever?" some people will still say "Andre the Giant". He was certainly one of the largest considering both height and weight, though.
topdweeb26 said on 21/May/08
Ghost: I don't now ANYONE who is a wrestling fan who is familiar with Andre's matches, who literally believe he was really 7' 5. In fact, just take WM 3 for example. Even IF Hulk was his very exaggerated 6' 8, there is no way in hell Andre would be 7' 5, at BEST he looked like he was 7' IF Hulk was a legit 6' 8. In fact, once while I was watching that match, my gf saw them stare down, and she said, "that guy isn't 7' 4, he's barely taller than Hulk Hogan". And she doesn't even watch wrestling. The ONLY people I have ever see that believe Andre is 7' 4, are people who know of him, but haven't really watched him. When we were kids, my sister used to think Andre had to be on his knees for the Princess Bride because even she thought he didn't look that tall. You get my drift? Andre, being around 6' 10, can NOT, and did NOT successfully pass off as 7' 4. He fooled no one who actually paid attention.

Frank: I'm not sure that aren't on the same page. They put Andre on the box because they knew he couldn't pass off as 7' 4/5. I understand that the taller you are, the easier it is to be passed off as being taller. BUT, 7 isn't quite in the range of "bill him as anything". For example, would you believe Khali is 7' 7? Really? I wouldn't. In fact, ever since his debute, there have been people questioning whether or not he is really even 7', like Jason. You met the Undertaker. For the sake of argument, say he is around 6' 8. Could he fool you into thinking he was a legit 7' 2 or even 7' 3 without the aid of lifts? You see where I am coming from?

Heck, from the day I saw Paul Wight, I didn't believe he was 7' 4. I could have bought 7' and maybe even 7' 2, but not 7' 4.

My point is, the reason these guys are in lifts is because they aren't tall enough to reasonably pass of as their billed heights. I mean, who believes Kane is 7' ?

The REAL question should be: why does the wrestling industry feel the need to exaggerate their performers, especially ones who are 7' and above? Who wouldn't be impressed with someone who is 7', why the need to make him 7' 4/5?
Alex said on 21/May/08
Ghost, thats very true. Its way harder for a 6'0 to get away with 6'4-6'5 while a legit 7'0 can pass for 7'4-7'5.
I have even gotten 6'4 just once but really at 6'0 someone is going to have to be a big time overestimator to guess you are more than 6'2.
MK said on 21/May/08
Wight's 7'4'' wcw billing was obviously made proportionate to guys like 6'7'' Hogan, 6'9'' One man gang etc, the thick heels were probably to make sure of this.
Frank said on 21/May/08
Topdwweeb i usually agree with you but why Put Andre on a Box in an interveiw with Vince when your as Big as Andre was I can believe Show wore lifts and the taller you are its easier to exaggerate height example Giant Gonzalez 7ft 6 and billed at almost 8ft seem hin in person could have looked 8 ft i dont know what 8ft looks like
Big Show said on 21/May/08
Jason says on 20/May/08
Why would a 7'0'' guy need to wear lifts...?

To pass off for 7'4! But seriously I don't think Big Show wore lifts. He wore boots with big soles, but I doubt he wore lifts.
Ghost said on 21/May/08
However when you're 7 ft it's alot easier to get away with being 4-5 inches taller than if yor 6 ft. People used to buy 7'5 for 6'10 Andre.

Steve Carrell estimated Khali at 7'7 or something.
topdweeb26 said on 21/May/08
Jason: you know, sometimes I don't even get your comments. You ask, "Why would a 7'0" guy need to wear lifts...?" and I'm just sitting here thinking, "Are you serious?" I mean Paul Wight was being billed as 7' 4, and at times, 7' 5. I dont' care if he is a legit 7', there's no way he'll fool people into thinking he is 7' 4 or 7' 5... he can't even do that with lifts, let alone without them.

Imagine someone who is 6' trying to be passed off as 6' 4 or 6' 5. It just isn't gonna happen without the aid of lifts, and even then, it will look suspicious.

You can't figure that out for yourself? Really?
topdweeb26 said on 21/May/08
Jason: if that 7' guy is trying to be passed off as 7' 4 and sometimes 7' 5, yeah.
Alex said on 21/May/08
Even a guy who is like 6'6 shouldn't need to wear lifts, lol.
Jason said on 20/May/08
Why would a 7'0'' guy need to wear lifts...?
topdweeb26 said on 20/May/08
OOFatman: that sounds reasonable to me.
OOFatman said on 20/May/08
topdweeb26, I also had heard of his supposed 6-11 listing in basketball. Even though he appeared much taller in WCW, i KNOW lifts had to do with it. I was just re-watching his match with Hogan in Sturgis and his lifts are clear as day. They looked about 2". Personally, I believe he is 6-11 today. IMO he WAS a legit 7-0 when he was younger.
topdweeb26 said on 19/May/08
Man... you know a site is dying down and people are running out of things to say when the discussion has turned to what size coat (of all things) the Big Show wears.
Danimal said on 18/May/08
I would need a 50 coat then, seeing my chest is 47" nowadays (biggest it's ever been).
Viper said on 18/May/08
Size 70 coat, lol.
Alex said on 18/May/08
JT, I have that magazine too with the picture you just posted.
Coat size isn't going to be your chest size though. I can wear a 46 coat but my chest size is only about 43 inches or just under. But a size 70 coat would def put his chest around 65 inches which I believe.
topdweeb26 said on 17/May/08
Alex: well, that pic they chose to use does definitely make Khali look taller, but not by 3 inches... but in the ring, they look closer in height. I think they manipulated the wrestlers to make Khali appear a bit taller to the Big Show than he really is. I think the shortest Big Show could ever be argued to be is 6' 10.5 since the shortest listing ever for Khali is 6' 11.5.

Although Vegas' links showing how Big Show was listed as 7' 1 in college ball pretty much cements it in my mind that Big Show had to be at least 7'. Which is also kind of weird, because I used to always hear rumors that Big Show was listed as 6' 11 in college basketball, but no one ever offered any proof. But then when someone (Vegas) shows actual listings, he is not only taller than 6' 11, but he is listed as taller than 7'.

I still believe Big Show is a legit 7' in barefeet.
JT said on 17/May/08
A shot of his shoes Click Here He said on some show when he was around 450 lbs. that he wore a size 70 coat. At his peak weight, it would not surprise me if his chest size was at least 65 inches.
Alex said on 17/May/08
Big Show, that tale of the tape with Big Show and Khali gets me annoyed. They have them face to face looking no more than an inch apart yet they still have them at 3 inches apart. 67 chest for Big Show? I read it was 62 and 65 on difference occasions. I'd also think Big Show's fists are a bit bigger than Khali's or at least the same.
Alex said on 17/May/08
Big Show's footsize has been described as 22 5E a lot by JR. Also he has been described as having a size 19. He says himself he is size 18 6E which is probably legit.
JT said on 17/May/08
Vegas says on 17/May/08
my mistake liston was actually listed as having BIGGER fists than wight


Click Here I probably made Lister too tall as well, given how much he is leaning and the size of his shoes. This assumes he was a legit 6
Big Show said on 17/May/08
Vegas says on 17/May/08
my mistake liston was actually listed as having BIGGER fists than wight Click Here

They probably measured them while he was wearing his gloves, lol.
Vegas said on 17/May/08
my mistake liston was actually listed as having BIGGER fists than wight Click Here
Vegas said on 17/May/08
Click Here big shows reach of 84" means haystacks reach is under 80" based on this pic given how much longer shows arms are than haystacks (they start higher and end at the same point)

according to boxing stats sonny liston who was listed at 6'1 has the same reach as big show and the same size fist (84 inches and 15 inches respectively), how many people buy that???
Big Show said on 17/May/08
Vegas says on 16/May/08
for anyone wondering what size shoes big show wears or at least wore age 19 Click Here

Click Here

The WWE also bills Big Show's shoesize as 18 (with width EEEEEE).
mike said on 17/May/08
i agree show was 7,1",but today i,d say more like 6,11.5".
Vegas said on 16/May/08
shaqs are size 21 according to this photo Click Here

mick foley said big show's shoes are size 18 on smackdown this week so they ain't exaggerating that, jim ross said his reach is 84 inches during the mayweather match at WM24 and thats only the same as lennox lewis so they ain't exaggerating that either
Danimal said on 16/May/08
Vegas says on 16/May/08
for anyone wondering what size shoes big show wears or at least wore age 19 Click Here

3 different listings of Big Show, all 3 different weights, yet all bill him at 7'1", which I believe he was until the late 90's.
Alex said on 16/May/08
I'd also say Bret was 5'11 compared to Stone Cold who is 6'0.
Alex2 said on 16/May/08
Yea I hear 18 for Show, I hear Shaq has size 20 something (24 may be correct) Danimal when did you meet Bret? I think he looked 6'0" at his peak days.
Danimal said on 15/May/08
JT says on 15/May/08
Vegas says on 15/May/08
duggan is taller than volkoff here so volkoff being 1 inch taller is hard to believe Click Here


I had posted these on Hogan's page of Volkoff (age 38) with 6'4" Chet Coppock
Click Here
Click Here

If I am not mistaken, Coppock was 6'5".

In any case, Volkoff was a minimum of 6'3".

As far as Bret Hart goes, I met the man and he was not 6'0". He was at most 5'11".
JT said on 15/May/08
Vegas says on 15/May/08
duggan is taller than volkoff here so volkoff being 1 inch taller is hard to believe Click Here


I had posted these on Hogan's page of Volkoff (age 38) with 6'4" Chet Coppock
Click Here
Click Here
Vegas said on 15/May/08
duggan is taller than volkoff here so volkoff being 1 inch taller is hard to believe Click Here

i have met bret and duggan in person, stood right next to both men and duggan is the taller man by at least 2.5 inches, more likely 3 inches though. Here at the end of this video you can see he is by far the bigger man Click Here
Jason said on 14/May/08
He may have been the full 5'11''. 6'0'' is too much.
Alex2 said on 14/May/08
Ahh Bret was 6'0" peak you idiot! And why do you always use pictures for evidence???
Ghost said on 14/May/08
I don't know what's so unbelievable about mean Gene being 5'8 once.

He later dropped down to about 5'7 and thus was 4-5 inches shorter than 5'11-6 Bret Hart.

Ola, Shouldn't it tell you something that there is a huge amount of people on this site, many of whom have watched wrestling for over 10-20 years and some who have met various wrestlers in person and yet NOBODY agrees with your estimations.
Danimal said on 13/May/08
Volkoff was taller than 6'2" in his prime. At least 6'3" and probably 6'4" in his younger days. Duggan was at least 6'3" in his younger days. They were both 300 pounders at their largest.
Alex2 said on 13/May/08
Ola why would ANYONE listen to ANYTHING you say!?! Its all utter ########!
MK said on 13/May/08
Duggan definitely has never looked under 6'2'', even still today, i'd give him just under 6'3'' peak, btw Mean Gene was at least 5'8''.
JT said on 12/May/08
Duggan always looked a solid 6'2" to me. With ~ 5'8" Mean Gene from the late 1980s Click Here IIRC, Duggan was about the same height as Nikolai Volkoff, whom I've seen backstage and looked 6'2".
Vegas said on 12/May/08
debatable how much duggan lost if anything because he is clearly taller than dibiase here last year Click Here

i have a few photos with of duggan and me and my friends
Alex2 said on 12/May/08
I think Duggan was 6'3" peak and 6'2" now.
Big Show said on 12/May/08
Click Here

Duggan looks to be around 5 inches taller than Mean Gene Okerlund (Probably 6 if he stood straight).
Duggan used to play for the Atlanta Falcons, anybody knows what his listings there were. He always looked around 6'2 to me.
Frank said on 12/May/08
Steveie Ray was alittle Taller than Hulk in the NWO Days
MK said on 12/May/08
6'1'' for Booker sounds right, 6'3'' is just ridiculous. 6'4'' legit Stevie Ray always looked to have him by 3'' or so.
mike said on 12/May/08
booker t is not under or 6,1" he,s 6,3" so is jim duggan.
Vegas said on 12/May/08
met duggan in person last month, nice guy, 6'2 was my estimate, great posture even at his age
Alex2 said on 11/May/08
Well Hogan must be 6'1" now to Ola LOL!
anon said on 11/May/08
6'1.5" mike is more like a 6'4" mike.really,if mike is 6'1.5,then big show is 6'8.mike is a lot taller than 6'1.5,thats for sure-unless there's a difference of floors.
topdweeb26 said on 11/May/08
mike: yeah, it's amazing that pic still remains as it obviously isn't accurate. Either mike isn't truthful about his size, or he was standing on something, or not on level ground and didn't realize it. There is simply no way Big Show is that short. Vince McMahon is around 6' 1 himself, and he NEVER has looked that tall to the Big Show.
mike said on 11/May/08
big show had a solid 3 inches on big sexy kevin nash,but shows soles on his boots during his wcw run were noticeably thicker also. that which made the 3 inch difference and probably gave a height of around 7,1" without the thick soles i could see big show around 6,11".
Big Show said on 11/May/08
JT says on 10/May/08
Click Here One Man Gang looked a legit 6'6" to me. Not sure about his footwear for this match though, since he looks at least an inch taller than Haystacks.

Check out the segment I posted on 10/May/08, it looks to be the other way around, Haystacks having an inch on The One Man Gang.
mike said on 11/May/08
mike in the above pic would have to be more than 6,1" more like 6,5" to be that tall next to big show.
mike said on 10/May/08
duggan is around 6,3" i believe,so the giant probably has a good 8-9 inches on him.
Vegas said on 10/May/08
here is a good video of a couple of nfl/nba stars with a couple of WWE guys, mvp looks a little taller than 6'0 next to 6'6.5 t-mac, booker t edges out DeMeco Ryans there and he is 6'1.2 barefoot (he is the first guy booker shakes hands with in the whiteish top) Click Here
Danimal said on 10/May/08
JT says on 10/May/08
Danimal says on 9/May/08
LV, you should post those two pics on Hogan's page and then PLEASE include the recent pic of him and Hilbilly Jim, where Hogan is 2" shoter than him. I want to see Vegas, JT and Ola squirm baby!!!

Maybe a 1 to 1.25
topdweeb26 said on 10/May/08
Danimal says on 9/May/08
"I want to see Vegas, JT and Ola squirm baby!!!"

Eh... ? All I can say is, that I am REALLY glad I am not Vegas, JT or Ola.
JT said on 10/May/08
Danimal says on 9/May/08
LV, you should post those two pics on Hogan's page and then PLEASE include the recent pic of him and Hilbilly Jim, where Hogan is 2" shoter than him. I want to see Vegas, JT and Ola squirm baby!!!

Maybe a 1 to 1.25
Big Show said on 10/May/08
Click Here

Here's something interesting. It's the ending of Superbrawl VI where Big Show (as the Giant) has a steel cage match with Hulk Hogan. In the end the steel cage gets swarmed by big men like The One Man Gang, John Tenta and Giant Haystacks. Haystacks looks to be the tallest of them all. He and The One Man Gang could be twin brothers. Unfortunately the video has no sound, so I've only uploaded the last part where the big men come in.
Danimal said on 9/May/08
LV, you should post those two pics on Hogan's page and then PLEASE include the recent pic of him and Hilbilly Jim, where Hogan is 2" shoter than him. I want to see Vegas, JT and Ola squirm baby!!!
LV said on 9/May/08
I agree about Hogan's height. I've been pretty consistent and think Hogan was just shy of 6'6" barefoot (my guess is 6'5 3/4"). I think he was easily 6'7" in ring gear. That's why Andre never had more than about 5" on him plus Hogan's boots were typically thicker. I think he's around 6'4" now.
Alex2 said on 9/May/08
HBJ was around 6'5-6'6" peak.
Big Show said on 9/May/08
Click Here

Here's a match of Big Show vs. Jim Duggan from 1996. Big Show looks a hell of a lot taller than Duggan. That chokeslam at the end looks pretty cool, he holds a big guy like Duggan up in the air for a few seconds before dropping him to the mat.
mike said on 9/May/08
vegas that cyrus dude looks like he could be nathan jones.
franz said on 9/May/08
pardon, i think i made a mistake, it's the wrong forum
Vegas said on 9/May/08
yeah its funny in the first pic hogan is shorter next to mr t Click Here than he was 20 years later in December 2005 but people ain't too quick to point this out Click Here
Ghost said on 9/May/08
In the first pic of Hogan and Hillbilly Jim Hogan is much closer to the camera giving him atleast an inch of advantage.

I believe Jim was and pretty much is 6'5. Maybe Hogan waas a hair taller, but not much.
Danimal said on 9/May/08
ALEX, check this out. Here is VERY RARE footage of Arnold guest posing in 1974 at 260 pounds. This HAS been confirmed by Arnold. WAY ahead of his time: Click Here
LV said on 9/May/08
Ola says on 8/May/08
Danimal, imo hogan wasnt taller than hillbilly jim. dont you have any pic to prove your claim?

Ola, you are frustrating. We've been discussing Hogan and HBJ on Hogan's page for weeks (you've been a part of these discussions as well) yet you're asking to see pictures of Hogan taller than HBJ?! Well here they are...again (Click Here) and (Click Here).
Vegas said on 8/May/08
here is an impressive indie wrestler going by the name of Cyrus, he works for booker t's pwa in houston and is billed at 7ft, i would expect tna or wwe to sign him up in the future Click Here
Danimal said on 8/May/08
Frank says on 8/May/08
Ola , There is a picture on Jim's site where Hogan looks alittle taller
but we dont see Hogans foot wear ??

Yes we do?? Hogan is in TWO pics with HBJ on his website. One from 1985, where Hogan is taller (decked out in white) and the other from 1989, where it's HBJ, Ed Leslie and Hogan. Hogan towering Ed and again, taller than HBJ and in that pic we DO see his shoes. There is yet ANOTHER pic of them from 1985 where Hogan has his arms around Hilbilly. Hogan is in a cut sleeve blue jogging tank top. Yet again, Hogan is taller. There was a reason he was billed 6'8" and Hilbilly 6'7". Legit height were 6'6" and 6'5" respectively. What's most interesting and sad is to see the recent pic of Hogan next to HBJ on his page, where Hogan is about 2" shorter than HBJ. That sealed the deal for me when I saw that on there 2-3 years ago.
Big Show said on 8/May/08
Click Here

Now this ain't really good for any height comparison (we already got one between these two anyway), but it's cool to see another confrontation between Big Show & Giant Haystacks.
Big Show said on 8/May/08
Big Ron Studd & Chris Benoit
Click Here
Click Here

Chris Benoit with about 2 inches on Mean Gene Okerlund.
Click Here
Rantsrob said on 8/May/08
Ola says on 8/May/08
Ghost plz learn something: if a wrestler claims something about his weight or height: ignore it!

Please learn to stay away from this site
Ghost said on 8/May/08
Ola,

I didn't say I believe that Tenta ever was 6'7.
Frank said on 8/May/08
Ola , There is a picture on Jim's site where Hogan looks alittle taller
but we dont see Hogans foot wear ??
topdweeb26 said on 8/May/08
Ola: some how I think Big Show's basketball measurements hold a little more water than your opinion. I mean, college basketball is a legitimate sport, it's not a circus like the WWE is where they do nothing but exaggerate.
Ghost said on 8/May/08
Ola,

So Tenta lost height but Andre never did? Remember that Earthquake always wore very flat boots atleast in his WWF days.

I remember Tenta saying that he used to be 6'7 but had gone down to 6'6. That seems to be a bit of a stretch.
Danimal said on 8/May/08
We know that Tenta appeared shorter than Hilbilly Jim and YET Hogan was taller than Hilbilly in the 1980's. Would have loved to see a PRIME Hogan have a face-off with a beaten down 2008 Big Show. He would have matched up to him the way he matched up to Andre in 1987.
JT said on 7/May/08
Vegas says on 6/May/08
John Tenta aka earthquake and big show, hard to pinpoint the date of that pic though, the little guy is also a pro-wrestler btw (i forgot his name) Click Here


That's a great pic Vegas. It looks like around 1997-1998 or so, as Big Show's starting to put on some weight. Tenta was only in his mid-30s then. That kid's probably around 5'7"-5'8". Tenta and Haystacks would have matched up well height-wise, with Tenta at most an inch shorter. Click Here
Rantsrob said on 7/May/08
A 6'11'' bigshow is not hard to believe but he probably was 7' plus at one point. The mike piture should be removed, as it is very deciving.
Alex2 said on 7/May/08
Ola it is not impossible that Show was close to 7'1" at peak, just look at him in WCW, he was huge! Today id say 6'11-6'11.5" though.
Danimal said on 7/May/08
Ola says on 7/May/08
you're right danimal! ;)

Thank you Ola. That means a lot to me coming from you ;)
Ghost said on 7/May/08
Ola,

You seem to act like like every measurement ever was a fraud. there are legit measurements. Tenta being measured as 6'5.75 is one of those. In sumo they measure and weigh every contestant. It's not like the WWF where they just announce an overblown height and weight billing. Tenta being measured as almost 6'6 in sumo is alot better evidence of his height than how tall he appeared next to Hogan or warrior in the ring.

Also Bigh Show WAS listed 7'1 in college football. I think he could have been 7'05 in his prime.

And saying Mamun is 5'6,5 is ridicolous. Why would he lie? You just seem to deperately want everybody to shorter. It's strange.
topdweeb26 said on 7/May/08
Ola says on 6/May/08
"big show would be like nearly 7'1 if tenta is 6'6"

Paul Wight was listed as 7' 1 in college basketball... I bet that is because he was close to 7' 1... I dunno, just what I would logically conclude... oh hey, that would make Tenta 6' 6, just like LSU said he was measured at... gee, could this all just be coincidence???
Gollum said on 7/May/08
Very Well said Danimal
MK said on 7/May/08
Danimal says on 7/May/08
To get serious for a second here. I used to frequent Tenta's website, where he used to post all the time. He was such a nice man. I remember distinctly him saying that he his cancer that was in remission had just resurfaced, but that he was going to beat it for good this time and he was SO optomistic. It's really sad to know that it got the better of him. Whether he was 6'4", 6'5" or 6'6" he had a HUGE heart and had such courage. That is what he should be remembered by.

Well said.
mike said on 7/May/08
big shows peak would have to had been during his run in wcw.big show i believe was a legit 7,1" then ,now 6,11.5".
Danimal said on 7/May/08
To get serious for a second here. I used to frequent Tenta's website, where he used to post all the time. He was such a nice man. I remember distinctly him saying that he his cancer that was in remission had just resurfaced, but that he was going to beat it for good this time and he was SO optomistic. It's really sad to know that it got the better of him. Whether he was 6'4", 6'5" or 6'6" he had a HUGE heart and had such courage. That is what he should be remembered by.
davo said on 7/May/08
if that guy is 6.1 o the lft then big show is now way 7 feet. more like 6'8'', 6'9'' maybe
Gollum said on 6/May/08
I want to see chris or vegas do a line thing with kurrgan, silva, andre tenta and show now that we have this pic.
Alex said on 6/May/08
They always say with Big Show and Kane, we have 2 7-footers here while Kane isn't a legit 7 footer. They really want us to believe they are the same height.
Alex said on 6/May/08
Danimal, thats the thing, When you bulk up you're going to have higher body fat. Thats why I kidna fear of getting to 220-225lbs since I know I'd end up being at least 16-17% body fat. Right now I am 11-12% so if I could get up to 205-210lbs without putting on any body fat which would be tough then I'd be happy.

So this girl is into working out a lot? The whole dieting thing or just naturally in good shape? How does she look?
topdweeb26 said on 6/May/08
Ola: oh please. You're the one always telling Mamum he looks 5' 6 not 5' 8... and you obviously know better since you know him better than himself. You are now saying Tenta was 6' 4 even though LSU said he was recently measured at 6' 6. But, if you noticed, Tenta looks slightly taller than Vegas' 6 '4 friend... I suppose now you're going to say that know his friend better than he does, and his friend is really only 6' 2. Hell, while we're at it, we might as well all forget about measuring ourselves, we should just simply go by what you say our height is.
Big Show said on 6/May/08
Nice find there Vegas, I've been looking for Big Show's match with John Tenta for some time now to see how they measure up against each other. They squared off against one and other on Nitro in July 1996. Although the pic is clearly from a later date as Big Show was a lot leaner in 1996.
topdweeb26 said on 6/May/08
Vegas: that makes sense, based on that pic, it does look like he slightly edges out your 6' 4 friend, so I think it's accurate. And that LSU article said he was recently measured at 6' 6, so he had to be close to that.. amazing how tiny he looks compared to Wight. I mean, he Tenta wasn't a small man by any means, but Wight makes him look short and Wight is so massive, that he makes "Earthquake" look more like a tremor.
Vegas said on 6/May/08
John Tenta aka earthquake and big show, hard to pinpoint the date of that pic though, the little guy is also a pro-wrestler btw (i forgot his name) Click Here

for those you will no doubt come on here and say either tenta lost height due to bladder cancer lol or old age/weight gain etc (42 when he died) or was never the 198cm he was measured at in sumo, please read here and direct your complaints to the LSU sports dept :) Click Here

Click Here
KingNick said on 6/May/08
Kevin Durant , are you talking about Kane in lifts or barefoot?
Kevin Durant said on 6/May/08
Great Khali 7'3
Big Show 7'1
Kane 6'11
Undertaker 6'7.5"
Viscera 6'6.5"
Chuck Palumbo 6'5"
Gene Snitsky 6'5
JBL 6'5.5"
Batista 6'3"
topdweeb26 said on 6/May/08
Viper: but believe me, I am gonna see if I can somehow get a pic of him with some type of reference frame that can show off/validate his height. Because I know most of you won't believe me otherwise, which I don't blame you. One thing I have thought about and noticed though, is that he doesn't seem to suffer from acromegaly. Like he doesn't have any of the facial feature associated with acromegaly, and he walks normally, not like Khali, but more like Big Show. I think he is just naturally that tall without any disease.
Viper said on 6/May/08
topdweeb, ask that guy for a pic.
KingNick said on 6/May/08
topdweeb26 and Alex, completely agree about Show/Kane. That drives me nuts too.
Danimal said on 6/May/08
Alex, I got up to 220 pounds in November. I just started dating this new very hot girl, who is in SICK shape, so, I've decided to cut back a little bit and am now down to 205 pounds. For my height and muscle mass, I think a perfect weight for me is somewhere between 180 and 190 pounds. At a higher bodyweight, I have larger measurements (17 3/4" bicep, 47" chest, 27" thighs), but my bodyfat count is too high.
Gollum said on 5/May/08
Here is what I think they should bill the taller wrestlers:
Great Khali 7'3
Big Show 7'1
Kane 6'11
Undertaker 6'10
Viscera 6'9
Chuck Pulumbo 6'7
Snisky 6'7
JBL 6'6.5
Batista 6'5
Mind you I said bill. I do not believe heights on these wrestlers, I just think it would make more sense in comparison.
Alex said on 5/May/08
Topdweeb, its still annoying that when they had Big Show vs Kane on ECW and did the tale of the tape and had they both at 7'0 but in the ring Big Show was at least 4 inches taller. Who are they trying to fool?! LOL
Alex said on 5/May/08
Well I am 3-3.25 inches taller if we're using our max heights during the day but I never claim my max height.
Alex said on 5/May/08
Danimal, well some nights you'll sleep longer which can cause you to be slightly taller out of bed.
Right now I actually lost a bit of weight and went from 200lbs down to 195lbs but I was thinking maybe of getting to 220-225lbs but then risking putting on some body fat but I'd now rather get to 205-210lbs but put on pure muscle.
Danimal said on 5/May/08
Alex, I hit 5'9 3/4" today right out of bed! I haven't seen this height in 3 years. I was consistently either 5'9 3/4, 5'9 7/8 or 5'10" up until 27. Since then, my tallest was 5'9.5" (until recently that is). Now I was 5'9 5/8" a week ago and 5'9 3/4" over the weekend!! I'm growing at 30, or at least regaining some of my lost height!!
topdweeb26 said on 5/May/08
Big Show: more than likely. Remember Kane is billed at 7' and he is most likely 6' 7 or 6' 8. Big Show is probably the only legit 7' footer who is billed at 7'.

Heights are barefeet estimates, derived from quotations, official websites, agency resumes, in person encounters with actors at conventions and pictures/films.

Other vital statistics like weight or shoe size measurements have been sourced from newspapers, books, resumes or social media.

Celebrity Fan Photos and Agency Pictures of stars are © to their respective owners.