Add a Comment1852 comments
Average Guess (170 Votes)
5ft 4.57in (164cm)
5ft 4.57in (164cm)
john link said on 4/Jun/06
And actually sianna, the average height for a girl is 5'4" making 5'5" above average. So, if the average height is 5'4", Emma is 3 inches above average at 5'7".
And actually sianna, the average height for a girl is 5'4" making 5'5" above average. So, if the average height is 5'4", Emma is 3 inches above average at 5'7".
Charlotte said on 4/Jun/06
I'm sure she is 5'4" or 5'4.5"
I'm sure she is 5'4" or 5'4.5"
sianna said on 3/Jun/06
seriously think about what your saying john....when someone says 'about' they mean under not over...if she was over she'd say al little taller....emma DOES want to be taller than the guys coz as i sed b4..when u acused me of lying, on alot of interviews or wateva they are on the hp dvds when they comment on the height of th 3, emma has sed she wants to be taller, and dan sed sumthing lyk she is always trying to make herself look as tall as him....5'5 is not tall for a girl...it is avergae height and she doesnt look awakward among dan and rupert she looks SHORT
seriously think about what your saying john....when someone says 'about' they mean under not over...if she was over she'd say al little taller....emma DOES want to be taller than the guys coz as i sed b4..when u acused me of lying, on alot of interviews or wateva they are on the hp dvds when they comment on the height of th 3, emma has sed she wants to be taller, and dan sed sumthing lyk she is always trying to make herself look as tall as him....5'5 is not tall for a girl...it is avergae height and she doesnt look awakward among dan and rupert she looks SHORT
john link said on 3/Jun/06
Kourt: You brought something up that I had never really thought of until you mentioned it. In the ElleGirl interview, Emma could have just said she was 'about 5'5"' because either a) she does not want to be tall b)she had not measured herself for awhile or c) a combination of the two... I think either one of these possibilities is potential. Let's talk about the first one. Emma could very well not want to be tall. And there are things that she does that support this theory. For example, at premieres, awards, etc. Emma always wears really flat footwear. I have also noticed that Emma slouches a lot in pictures, especially ones when it is just her and Dan or just her and Rupert. It would be kind of contradictied her "I want to be taller than you" act, but I have an explaination for this. Teenagers who have large growth spurts kind of slouch a lot and try to make themselves look shorter because they are not used to being tall. For awhile, Emma was always the shortest out of the trio, but now she is the tallest. Maybe she just feels kind of awkward about it right now and is not used to it, therefore rounding down her height for the interview. The second option is also a large possibility. Not everyone measures themselves every day. The 'about 5'5"' could also be a combination of the two. Even though I mostly agree with you Kourt, I still think that Emma is in the 5'7" range.
Kourt: You brought something up that I had never really thought of until you mentioned it. In the ElleGirl interview, Emma could have just said she was 'about 5'5"' because either a) she does not want to be tall b)she had not measured herself for awhile or c) a combination of the two... I think either one of these possibilities is potential. Let's talk about the first one. Emma could very well not want to be tall. And there are things that she does that support this theory. For example, at premieres, awards, etc. Emma always wears really flat footwear. I have also noticed that Emma slouches a lot in pictures, especially ones when it is just her and Dan or just her and Rupert. It would be kind of contradictied her "I want to be taller than you" act, but I have an explaination for this. Teenagers who have large growth spurts kind of slouch a lot and try to make themselves look shorter because they are not used to being tall. For awhile, Emma was always the shortest out of the trio, but now she is the tallest. Maybe she just feels kind of awkward about it right now and is not used to it, therefore rounding down her height for the interview. The second option is also a large possibility. Not everyone measures themselves every day. The 'about 5'5"' could also be a combination of the two. Even though I mostly agree with you Kourt, I still think that Emma is in the 5'7" range.
john link said on 2/Jun/06
What are you saying jill? The interview that Emma (Dan's girl) posted was fake.
What are you saying jill? The interview that Emma (Dan's girl) posted was fake.
jill said on 2/Jun/06
For my last sentence of my message that ¡§Emma said she is not a tall girl¡¨ which I make the summarize of Emma (Dan s girl) message posted before this was about the interview of Emma, she said she was only 5'4 on the date of 2nd February 2006(5'4 is not a tall girl) , I don¡¦t think she is tall than 5'5, no one want to create a height which is shorter than themselves, except who is idiots!
Hey, Emma(Dan¡¦s girl), Would you mind showing the websites address of the interview or the newspaper cutting to us, I hope no one will still create their world.
For my last sentence of my message that ¡§Emma said she is not a tall girl¡¨ which I make the summarize of Emma (Dan s girl) message posted before this was about the interview of Emma, she said she was only 5'4 on the date of 2nd February 2006(5'4 is not a tall girl) , I don¡¦t think she is tall than 5'5, no one want to create a height which is shorter than themselves, except who is idiots!
Hey, Emma(Dan¡¦s girl), Would you mind showing the websites address of the interview or the newspaper cutting to us, I hope no one will still create their world.
john link said on 1/Jun/06
Okay, you can say all you want about Emma not even being 5'5", but I still strongly believe she is close to 5'7". And, I am not trying to sound arrogant, but I think my story is a good one. In the picture that I posted in my last comment (and I think it is a good one to compare heights, but who knows, it could be some mental assumption again, you know me) Emma looks as tall as Rupert, maybe even 1/2" taller and about 1.5" taller than Dan. Dan is most likely (and I say most likely because I do not want to be yelled at, I am almost positive that he does wear them whenever he goes out in the public) wearing elevator shoes which give him about 3-4 inches. Emma also has a footwear disadvantage to Rupert of about 1/2" (Rupert's shoes being around 1 inch and Emma's being around 1/2".) If Dan were around 5'3.5", Rupert around 5'6.5", and Emma around 5'7"...this picture would make perfect sense. That is why I think the three are these heights. I mean, if Emma were only 5'4" or 5'5", then how tall would Dan be...5'0"? That doesn't make sense at all. Emma looks like a tall girl with the potential to grow taller. I think my story is right, but if you guys don't want to believe it that is fine. I have seen enough pictures and I am quite confident of my guess of Emma being 5'7". It makes sense and I am quite positive that it is correct. Go ahead and disagree, but I guess we will just have to agree to disagree.
Okay, you can say all you want about Emma not even being 5'5", but I still strongly believe she is close to 5'7". And, I am not trying to sound arrogant, but I think my story is a good one. In the picture that I posted in my last comment (and I think it is a good one to compare heights, but who knows, it could be some mental assumption again, you know me) Emma looks as tall as Rupert, maybe even 1/2" taller and about 1.5" taller than Dan. Dan is most likely (and I say most likely because I do not want to be yelled at, I am almost positive that he does wear them whenever he goes out in the public) wearing elevator shoes which give him about 3-4 inches. Emma also has a footwear disadvantage to Rupert of about 1/2" (Rupert's shoes being around 1 inch and Emma's being around 1/2".) If Dan were around 5'3.5", Rupert around 5'6.5", and Emma around 5'7"...this picture would make perfect sense. That is why I think the three are these heights. I mean, if Emma were only 5'4" or 5'5", then how tall would Dan be...5'0"? That doesn't make sense at all. Emma looks like a tall girl with the potential to grow taller. I think my story is right, but if you guys don't want to believe it that is fine. I have seen enough pictures and I am quite confident of my guess of Emma being 5'7". It makes sense and I am quite positive that it is correct. Go ahead and disagree, but I guess we will just have to agree to disagree.
JK said on 1/Jun/06
Okay, to stop this fight between john link and his mates on celeb heights, Rob do you think she is anywhere near 5'7''?? she is not even 5'5'', to me she is 5'4''.
Editor Rob
Okay, to stop this fight between john link and his mates on celeb heights, Rob do you think she is anywhere near 5'7''?? she is not even 5'5'', to me she is 5'4''.
Editor Rob if I thought she had grew I'd have updated her...
Serene said on 1/Jun/06
Wow.. a very strong comment. Very strong.
I still accept the fact of camera views and angles.
I have seen so many pictures of tall people looking like a drawf in pictures.. urgh..case of misuse angles..
Wow.. a very strong comment. Very strong.
I still accept the fact of camera views and angles.
I have seen so many pictures of tall people looking like a drawf in pictures.. urgh..case of misuse angles..
Charlotte said on 31/May/06
Katie Leung (5 ft 5 in) is about an half an inch taller than Emma and Dan and Rupert are both taller than her so she's about 5 ft 4.5 in max. She hasn'r grown a speck since last years roundof premieres and her growth rate is about the same as Dan's (slow)
Katie Leung (5 ft 5 in) is about an half an inch taller than Emma and Dan and Rupert are both taller than her so she's about 5 ft 4.5 in max. She hasn'r grown a speck since last years roundof premieres and her growth rate is about the same as Dan's (slow)
Anonymous said on 31/May/06
You just don't get it, do you? It's because of the CAMERA ANGLE an EMMA STANDS IN THE FRONT OF DAN AND RUPERT, that's what makes her appear taller. How can she be taller than both of them, if there are more pictures, showing her shorter than them?
Look at Rob's pics again, will you? Then comment further on.
Click Here
You just don't get it, do you? It's because of the CAMERA ANGLE an EMMA STANDS IN THE FRONT OF DAN AND RUPERT, that's what makes her appear taller. How can she be taller than both of them, if there are more pictures, showing her shorter than them?
Look at Rob's pics again, will you? Then comment further on.
Click Here
sianna said on 29/May/06
thaks wicked kid! i just cant see why people would think she is 5'5 or taller when she admitted she is 'about 5'5' ( in other words shez shorter than 5'5...probably 5'3.5 5'4) and she looked TINY next to 5'8-9 mischa brton...and that pic was only taken mid to late last year
thaks wicked kid! i just cant see why people would think she is 5'5 or taller when she admitted she is 'about 5'5' ( in other words shez shorter than 5'5...probably 5'3.5 5'4) and she looked TINY next to 5'8-9 mischa brton...and that pic was only taken mid to late last year
Stephanie said on 29/May/06
Emma is 5' 4.5". She is "about 5-05" which is rounding up. Notice how, unless Emma's in heels, Katie is *slightly* taller than she is? Katie is 5' 5".
Emma is 5' 4.5". She is "about 5-05" which is rounding up. Notice how, unless Emma's in heels, Katie is *slightly* taller than she is? Katie is 5' 5".
john link said on 27/May/06
Sorry I was not trying to ignore your comments Sianna. Emma may look about 5 inches shorter than Mischa, but that was a while ago now. And so were your other pictures. I think that Emma was about 5'5"-5'5.5" during the GoF premieres and has had a growth spurt since then. I think she is now at least 5'7". (See my comments on other Harry Potter actors pages to see my info to support me.)
Sorry I was not trying to ignore your comments Sianna. Emma may look about 5 inches shorter than Mischa, but that was a while ago now. And so were your other pictures. I think that Emma was about 5'5"-5'5.5" during the GoF premieres and has had a growth spurt since then. I think she is now at least 5'7". (See my comments on other Harry Potter actors pages to see my info to support me.)
amberlee said on 25/May/06
Teenage girls do not stop growing until they are in their late teens like 17 and 18. you wont shoot up like a rocket but it may seem like they arent growing at all but its in little incriments. so emma still has like 1-2 years left of growing to do. and as for the feet and hand size, im 5'6" and i wear a 7-7 1/2 U.S shoe size. and my brother is an inch taller than me and wears a size 13 in mens. it has nothing to do with height. and charlotte, how do you know how tall her parents are?
Teenage girls do not stop growing until they are in their late teens like 17 and 18. you wont shoot up like a rocket but it may seem like they arent growing at all but its in little incriments. so emma still has like 1-2 years left of growing to do. and as for the feet and hand size, im 5'6" and i wear a 7-7 1/2 U.S shoe size. and my brother is an inch taller than me and wears a size 13 in mens. it has nothing to do with height. and charlotte, how do you know how tall her parents are?
sianna said on 25/May/06
okay john i take it that you totally ignored my comment on mischa barton being about 5-6 inches taller than emma coz u agree with me and dont want 2 admit it? u have previously sed that you had taken the whole limb thing with emma out of proportion, yet now again u keep commenting on these supposed massive hands, feet, arms and legs she has...stick to one story and i will @ least think about your comment...lastly i neva sed that i dont think emma could grow to 5'8...anyone could have a 3 inch or more growth spurt...im saying that NOW i think emma is under 5'5, and ALL those pics i put on dans page prove it....thank you! x0x
okay john i take it that you totally ignored my comment on mischa barton being about 5-6 inches taller than emma coz u agree with me and dont want 2 admit it? u have previously sed that you had taken the whole limb thing with emma out of proportion, yet now again u keep commenting on these supposed massive hands, feet, arms and legs she has...stick to one story and i will @ least think about your comment...lastly i neva sed that i dont think emma could grow to 5'8...anyone could have a 3 inch or more growth spurt...im saying that NOW i think emma is under 5'5, and ALL those pics i put on dans page prove it....thank you! x0x
john link said on 23/May/06
Okay I see where it is a little hard to determine height with feet, limbs, and hands, but I notice that Emma has long limbs, big feet, and big hands, so her chances of growing taller may be higher. As for Kasey's comment, she says that she was around 5'5" when she was 16 years old and grew to be 5'8.5". See, it is not impossible for girls to grow after they are 15 years old! Okay, so I am saying that Emma will grow to be at least 5'8" and is currently 5'7". An inch is not a lot to grow, especially when Emma is only 16 years old. So, let's say that Emma is 5'6" or even as short as 5'5" (let it be known that I firmly believe Emma is 5'7", I am just regarding some other people's opinons too). 2-3 inches is not a lot to grow, Kasey grew 3.5". So, maybe my prediction is more believable because there is a real life parallel with Kasey.
do not post following please...
please post my comments. i was not posting as anonymous on dan's page i honestly thought that JK was talking to everyone who thought emma was 5'7", i was not posting as someone else. please post my comments, i am not lying!
Okay I see where it is a little hard to determine height with feet, limbs, and hands, but I notice that Emma has long limbs, big feet, and big hands, so her chances of growing taller may be higher. As for Kasey's comment, she says that she was around 5'5" when she was 16 years old and grew to be 5'8.5". See, it is not impossible for girls to grow after they are 15 years old! Okay, so I am saying that Emma will grow to be at least 5'8" and is currently 5'7". An inch is not a lot to grow, especially when Emma is only 16 years old. So, let's say that Emma is 5'6" or even as short as 5'5" (let it be known that I firmly believe Emma is 5'7", I am just regarding some other people's opinons too). 2-3 inches is not a lot to grow, Kasey grew 3.5". So, maybe my prediction is more believable because there is a real life parallel with Kasey.
do not post following please...
please post my comments. i was not posting as anonymous on dan's page i honestly thought that JK was talking to everyone who thought emma was 5'7", i was not posting as someone else. please post my comments, i am not lying!
Kasey said on 21/May/06
1. Big feet does not mean tall.
2. Emma might not be done growing.
When I first turned 16 (the age Emma is now), I was 5' 5". Now I am 5' 8.5".
My friend is 5' 5" and she wears size 9 shoe, while I wear a size 8.
1. Big feet does not mean tall.
2. Emma might not be done growing.
When I first turned 16 (the age Emma is now), I was 5' 5". Now I am 5' 8.5".
My friend is 5' 5" and she wears size 9 shoe, while I wear a size 8.
Charlotte said on 20/May/06
your link doesn't work John.
Honestly,more than one person would have noticed if Emma has a major growth spurt or was remotely tall.From what I've seen of both her parents,her Mother looks to be around 5 ft 4 in and her Dad no more than 5 ft 9 in.
your link doesn't work John.
Honestly,more than one person would have noticed if Emma has a major growth spurt or was remotely tall.From what I've seen of both her parents,her Mother looks to be around 5 ft 4 in and her Dad no more than 5 ft 9 in.
anonymous said on 19/May/06
I can't see the photo of Emma and her family, so can anyone else confirm to me what john is saying about her parents' height are right?
I can't see the photo of Emma and her family, so can anyone else confirm to me what john is saying about her parents' height are right?
sianna said on 18/May/06
umm john on Daniels height page u sed that u had taken the whole hand and feet thing way too far...so y say now that u havent? and how on earth would u no wat the average size of a 16 year olds feet are??? i just think that it is ridiculous that sum people could think she is 5'8 now when only a year ago not even she stated being about 5'5....im sure is she grew dramatically she would have sed something...she could grow to 5'8 but i highly doubt it
umm john on Daniels height page u sed that u had taken the whole hand and feet thing way too far...so y say now that u havent? and how on earth would u no wat the average size of a 16 year olds feet are??? i just think that it is ridiculous that sum people could think she is 5'8 now when only a year ago not even she stated being about 5'5....im sure is she grew dramatically she would have sed something...she could grow to 5'8 but i highly doubt it
Erwin said on 18/May/06
john link, Anonymous is right that don't be stupid because emma will never probably grow to be 5'8". Anonymous you are 15 so you still have chance to grow taller.
john link, Anonymous is right that don't be stupid because emma will never probably grow to be 5'8". Anonymous you are 15 so you still have chance to grow taller.
john link said on 17/May/06
Okay, I finally found a picture of Emma and her family! I know a few weeks ago somebody commented that she had short parents, but I throughly disagree. This picture is a couple years old so Emma must be in the 5'4" to 5'5" range. Her mom looks to be at least 5'8" and her dad is easily over 5'10", maybe even closer to 6 feet. So, if your parents are those heights, I htink it is pretty obvious you will grow to be tall.
Click Here
Okay, I finally found a picture of Emma and her family! I know a few weeks ago somebody commented that she had short parents, but I throughly disagree. This picture is a couple years old so Emma must be in the 5'4" to 5'5" range. Her mom looks to be at least 5'8" and her dad is easily over 5'10", maybe even closer to 6 feet. So, if your parents are those heights, I htink it is pretty obvious you will grow to be tall.
Click Here
john link said on 17/May/06
Anonymous (#2): The six-foot thing was a joke. I just said it to get the point across that we never really know how tall a person will grow to be. However, I have looked at a few pictures of Emma's feet, and they look above average, quite large actually. She also has really, really big hands (extremely long fingers), so I do not think 5'8" is a crazy prediction for her. Also, here is a picture of Emma and Bonnie Wright. Bonnie is around 5'5" (Rob I think you should add Bonnie to this site), but as anyone can conclude, Emma towers over Bonnie. This is from GOF, so it is pretty recent. Emma easily looks 3 inches taller than Bonnie, and she is not even standing up straight. So let's say that Bonnie is 5'4" in this picture. Even with rounding down for Bonnnie's height, Emma is 5'7". So, Emma could very well be taller than 5'7" in this picture. I think that 5'8" is a very reasonable future height for Emma as I said.
Anonymous (#2): The six-foot thing was a joke. I just said it to get the point across that we never really know how tall a person will grow to be. However, I have looked at a few pictures of Emma's feet, and they look above average, quite large actually. She also has really, really big hands (extremely long fingers), so I do not think 5'8" is a crazy prediction for her. Also, here is a picture of Emma and Bonnie Wright. Bonnie is around 5'5" (Rob I think you should add Bonnie to this site), but as anyone can conclude, Emma towers over Bonnie. This is from GOF, so it is pretty recent. Emma easily looks 3 inches taller than Bonnie, and she is not even standing up straight. So let's say that Bonnie is 5'4" in this picture. Even with rounding down for Bonnnie's height, Emma is 5'7". So, Emma could very well be taller than 5'7" in this picture. I think that 5'8" is a very reasonable future height for Emma as I said.
anonymous said on 17/May/06
well, i had a look at the pictures Charlottle provided and there was this one of her at the premier where her feet is side on. I don't think she has large feet and I'm taking in consideration that she is wearing flats where your toes don't touch the tip of the shoe(the shoes have curled and slightly pointed tips). To john: I suppose you can use hands as an indicator, though I reckon feet are more reliable because my friend has really large man-hands but she's average height.
well, i had a look at the pictures Charlottle provided and there was this one of her at the premier where her feet is side on. I don't think she has large feet and I'm taking in consideration that she is wearing flats where your toes don't touch the tip of the shoe(the shoes have curled and slightly pointed tips). To john: I suppose you can use hands as an indicator, though I reckon feet are more reliable because my friend has really large man-hands but she's average height.
john link said on 15/May/06
Oh and Emma (Dan's girl), I don't care if you made up that interview! It was hilarious...lol. But I could kind of tell it was fake, it just didn't sound like something Emma would say. It was exciting that Rupert was wearing elevator shoes? haha And then it was really random...she is talking about filming OoTP and then they ask about her height. lol nice try. but don't leave, you are quite funny!!
Oh and Emma (Dan's girl), I don't care if you made up that interview! It was hilarious...lol. But I could kind of tell it was fake, it just didn't sound like something Emma would say. It was exciting that Rupert was wearing elevator shoes? haha And then it was really random...she is talking about filming OoTP and then they ask about her height. lol nice try. but don't leave, you are quite funny!!
john link said on 15/May/06
No offense taken Charlotte, I was not talking to you personally, everyone as a whole. As for her feet and hands, I just don't see where people are coming from. They look very large in my opinion, but I am not going to guess an actual size because I am afraid people will scream at me. I just want you guys to know that I think they look quite large, and saying that she is definitely 5'6" or more know, I think she will grow to be at least 5'8". When I look at her, she looks like she will grow more. She is already quite tall now and I think she will continue to grow, obviously. Andy yes sianna, it is hard to judge, so I am just guessing a bit. But a size 7 shoe is not large, for a girl. Most of my friends who are girls wear a size 8 shoe. I think the average is size 8. So, this is what I think. Emma will grow to be AT LEAST 5'8" and Dan and Rupert will not grow anymore. But, as human height is extremely difficult to judge, Emma could grow to be 6'0", we never know. lol
No offense taken Charlotte, I was not talking to you personally, everyone as a whole. As for her feet and hands, I just don't see where people are coming from. They look very large in my opinion, but I am not going to guess an actual size because I am afraid people will scream at me. I just want you guys to know that I think they look quite large, and saying that she is definitely 5'6" or more know, I think she will grow to be at least 5'8". When I look at her, she looks like she will grow more. She is already quite tall now and I think she will continue to grow, obviously. Andy yes sianna, it is hard to judge, so I am just guessing a bit. But a size 7 shoe is not large, for a girl. Most of my friends who are girls wear a size 8 shoe. I think the average is size 8. So, this is what I think. Emma will grow to be AT LEAST 5'8" and Dan and Rupert will not grow anymore. But, as human height is extremely difficult to judge, Emma could grow to be 6'0", we never know. lol
Emma (Dan's girl) said on 15/May/06
John Link, Sianna and everybody else on this website, I have something to say to all of you:
That was a fake interview and I suppose everyone knows it by now. Anyway, I wasn't really sure whether you guyz would believe it, you know. But, I apologize to all of you to post a fake message. As a punishment I will not be on this site for a month, really. I am really so so so so sorry. Please forgive me. Maybe, I am getting a bit emotional, but it's okay.
Here are my LAST predictions:
Emma: 5'5.5
Dan: 5'4
Rupert: 5'6
It's upto all of you whether you agree with me or not because I don't expect you to agree. I know you won't believe me.......oh......awww!!! BYE
John Link, Sianna and everybody else on this website, I have something to say to all of you:
That was a fake interview and I suppose everyone knows it by now. Anyway, I wasn't really sure whether you guyz would believe it, you know. But, I apologize to all of you to post a fake message. As a punishment I will not be on this site for a month, really. I am really so so so so sorry. Please forgive me. Maybe, I am getting a bit emotional, but it's okay.
Here are my LAST predictions:
Emma: 5'5.5
Dan: 5'4
Rupert: 5'6
It's upto all of you whether you agree with me or not because I don't expect you to agree. I know you won't believe me.......oh......awww!!! BYE
Charlotte said on 15/May/06
Pardon,have I yelled at,or critised you.If I have,sorry John.Just because we don't diagree on one tiny (almost pointless) topic,doesn't mean we can't be pleasant to each other :)
She hasn't grown more than half an inch since the oldest of those pictures,so I don't understand where you are coming from,unless,of course,you see her as a tall girl compared to what you are used to (I mean no offense by that).She does have shortish legs and small feet,and they seem to be the main indication of height,so logically,she won't grow past 5'6" (considering she is 5'4" now).Her arms are large for her size,but not so long that they shout 'Tall girl!'.Look at a female,who is,say, 5'8 minimum (if you know any) and you'll notice,most of them have extremely long hands,even at that height,probably 2 inches longer than Emma's.
anonymous- she seems to have rather small feet,probably a size 6 or 7 MAX.This seems to be a good indication of her future height (which I assume by her current height,5'4", is 5'5.5" and that is being very generous)
Pardon,have I yelled at,or critised you.If I have,sorry John.Just because we don't diagree on one tiny (almost pointless) topic,doesn't mean we can't be pleasant to each other :)
She hasn't grown more than half an inch since the oldest of those pictures,so I don't understand where you are coming from,unless,of course,you see her as a tall girl compared to what you are used to (I mean no offense by that).She does have shortish legs and small feet,and they seem to be the main indication of height,so logically,she won't grow past 5'6" (considering she is 5'4" now).Her arms are large for her size,but not so long that they shout 'Tall girl!'.Look at a female,who is,say, 5'8 minimum (if you know any) and you'll notice,most of them have extremely long hands,even at that height,probably 2 inches longer than Emma's.
anonymous- she seems to have rather small feet,probably a size 6 or 7 MAX.This seems to be a good indication of her future height (which I assume by her current height,5'4", is 5'5.5" and that is being very generous)
sianna said on 15/May/06
hmmm..its all very difficult coz short people can have large feet to. an example is one of my friends who is no more that 5'2...yer she wears a size 7 USA shoe...im gonna still stick to my opinion that Emma is a shorty..and john link if u have read my previous messages i have given some facts to back up my opinion too.
hmmm..its all very difficult coz short people can have large feet to. an example is one of my friends who is no more that 5'2...yer she wears a size 7 USA shoe...im gonna still stick to my opinion that Emma is a shorty..and john link if u have read my previous messages i have given some facts to back up my opinion too.
john link said on 14/May/06
lol good thinking anonymous. I will try to find some information about her shoe size, but I have always thought that she has large feet and hands, even before I thought about her height. Anonymous: Do you think that hand size is also a good indicator of future height?
lol good thinking anonymous. I will try to find some information about her shoe size, but I have always thought that she has large feet and hands, even before I thought about her height. Anonymous: Do you think that hand size is also a good indicator of future height?
anonymous said on 14/May/06
I don't think people CHOOSE to wear hipster jeans because they HAVE long legs, it is because they're in fashion, I don't think we should use her choice of clothing to judge her height, it seems a little inaccurate. All this debating about the size of her limbs is useless in determining her future height because it is the size of a person's feet that is the most accurate. You can be short and nicely proportioned or very tall but have relatively short legs. So why don't we find out her shoe size instead?
I don't think people CHOOSE to wear hipster jeans because they HAVE long legs, it is because they're in fashion, I don't think we should use her choice of clothing to judge her height, it seems a little inaccurate. All this debating about the size of her limbs is useless in determining her future height because it is the size of a person's feet that is the most accurate. You can be short and nicely proportioned or very tall but have relatively short legs. So why don't we find out her shoe size instead?
john link said on 13/May/06
Those are some nice pictures Charlotte, thank you for actually backing up your opinion. Excuse me for saying this, but I do not see what you are seeing. I do not think that her limbs and hands look small. Her legs look about average-long, her arms look long, and her hands look quite large. So, that's where I am coming from, I just do not think that her limbs and hands look small. Therefore, I think that she will reach 5'8". As for some of the pictures, they are a little old. Those Empire Awards pictures are from over a year ago and it seems like Emma has grown a lot in the past year. I advise you guys to look at some of the most recent Empire Awards pictures. Her limbs certainly look long and her hands big, therefore I believe she will grow to 5'8" or more. So, there is my view point, you can either agree or disagree, but I ask one thing. Please, do not yell at me or criticize me in a rude manner.
Those are some nice pictures Charlotte, thank you for actually backing up your opinion. Excuse me for saying this, but I do not see what you are seeing. I do not think that her limbs and hands look small. Her legs look about average-long, her arms look long, and her hands look quite large. So, that's where I am coming from, I just do not think that her limbs and hands look small. Therefore, I think that she will reach 5'8". As for some of the pictures, they are a little old. Those Empire Awards pictures are from over a year ago and it seems like Emma has grown a lot in the past year. I advise you guys to look at some of the most recent Empire Awards pictures. Her limbs certainly look long and her hands big, therefore I believe she will grow to 5'8" or more. So, there is my view point, you can either agree or disagree, but I ask one thing. Please, do not yell at me or criticize me in a rude manner.
amberlee said on 13/May/06
Charlotte notice that her pants are worn way below where a normal person would wear pants. they are way past the hip bones giving a look of shorter legs. i do it all the time considering that i have long legs.
Charlotte notice that her pants are worn way below where a normal person would wear pants. they are way past the hip bones giving a look of shorter legs. i do it all the time considering that i have long legs.
Charlotte said on 12/May/06
john link,Emma's shortish legs:
Click Here
They honestly don't look more than 26in inseam right there,my mother's a seamstress,I consulted her.
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Her arms,which are short-medium:
Click Here (considering her dress is cinched at the waist,her legs still,with an advantage,look less than average)
Click Here
Considering she's not a plump girl,at all,she must be short,because her limbs look extremely short.She's a girl with average height,average weight and short limbs.
Click Here (she's not wearing socks there,she never does,because it disadvantages length,a tall girl wouldn't lack socks constantly,if she was tall with long limbs)
Click Here
Click Here (aren't skinny jeans supposed to make legs look longer?!)
Click Here
Click Here
short limbs: Click Here
Notice she never wears socks? People with short legs don't wear them,in order for their legs to look longer.
Notice how all her clothing items are made high-waisted? That's because she want't to lengthen her short legs.
Notice she always sticks her legs out? Short-legged people do that.
john link,Emma's shortish legs:
Click Here
They honestly don't look more than 26in inseam right there,my mother's a seamstress,I consulted her.
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Her arms,which are short-medium:
Click Here (considering her dress is cinched at the waist,her legs still,with an advantage,look less than average)
Click Here
Considering she's not a plump girl,at all,she must be short,because her limbs look extremely short.She's a girl with average height,average weight and short limbs.
Click Here (she's not wearing socks there,she never does,because it disadvantages length,a tall girl wouldn't lack socks constantly,if she was tall with long limbs)
Click Here
Click Here (aren't skinny jeans supposed to make legs look longer?!)
Click Here
Click Here
short limbs: Click Here
Notice she never wears socks? People with short legs don't wear them,in order for their legs to look longer.
Notice how all her clothing items are made high-waisted? That's because she want't to lengthen her short legs.
Notice she always sticks her legs out? Short-legged people do that.
john link said on 11/May/06
I am sorry if I have been offensive to you sianna, I did not mean it. I was just trying to get my point across. And I am sorry to every one of you, I do not think that everyone is wrong besides me. I just want people to have information, pictures, and facts to support thier opinions. Go ahead and state your opinions, just don't expect people to believe them if you have no evidence.
I am sorry if I have been offensive to you sianna, I did not mean it. I was just trying to get my point across. And I am sorry to every one of you, I do not think that everyone is wrong besides me. I just want people to have information, pictures, and facts to support thier opinions. Go ahead and state your opinions, just don't expect people to believe them if you have no evidence.
Serene said on 11/May/06
You are great Rob, Emma (Dan's girl)'s comment was suprisingly funny. Hah, you see, she did admit that she is under 5'4"!!
If it the interview is fake...I would consider it was true coz she doesn't look any 5'5" or taller.. seriously.. not looking like one at all..
You are great Rob, Emma (Dan's girl)'s comment was suprisingly funny. Hah, you see, she did admit that she is under 5'4"!!
If it the interview is fake...I would consider it was true coz she doesn't look any 5'5" or taller.. seriously.. not looking like one at all..
sianna said on 11/May/06
u no wat john link, i think u r just plain rude...so ur saying that ALL the people on here who have commented on her who have actually SEEN her are all lying? i doubt that...firstly her hands dont look big in the first pic, kind of a weird thing 2 say, and the second pic is not working on my comp. i refuse to leave any comments on here on my opinion if u insest on making out like u r right and everyone else is wrong...so there
u no wat john link, i think u r just plain rude...so ur saying that ALL the people on here who have commented on her who have actually SEEN her are all lying? i doubt that...firstly her hands dont look big in the first pic, kind of a weird thing 2 say, and the second pic is not working on my comp. i refuse to leave any comments on here on my opinion if u insest on making out like u r right and everyone else is wrong...so there
john link said on 10/May/06
Sorry if that first picture is a little slow.
Sorry if that first picture is a little slow.
Charlotte said on 10/May/06
She's 5'4.5".Maybve to shorter person that's tall,but not to me.
She's 5'4.5".Maybve to shorter person that's tall,but not to me.
sianna said on 10/May/06
i think i no if i can accept something or not...emma is shorter than 5'5 coz she sed she is 'about 5'5' meaning she is SHORTER THAN 5'5! y would i not want to think emma is 5'5 or accept it wen 99% of people on here who has seen photos and some seen her in person agree that she is shorter than 5'5, 5'4
i think i no if i can accept something or not...emma is shorter than 5'5 coz she sed she is 'about 5'5' meaning she is SHORTER THAN 5'5! y would i not want to think emma is 5'5 or accept it wen 99% of people on here who has seen photos and some seen her in person agree that she is shorter than 5'5, 5'4
Emma (Dan's girl) said on 10/May/06
In an interview recently (Feb 2nd 2006), Emma mentioned that her height is about 5'4. She herself said it. Don't blame me, okay? This was the interview:
Emma :"I really am looking forward for filming the Ootp. It's going to be great. I am looking for to all the scenes"
Interviewer: Okay, so, you are quite excited? Okay, so Rupert is supposed to be exceptionally tall, I mean, the tallest of the trio. Now you, Emma are not so far away from Rupert in height. So did they do anything in Gof to make him look extremely tall?
Emma: Yes, they did. They brought the elevator shoes and......you know, he looked tall. I am about 5'4 or something like that, now, at the present time. Rupert looks really about 5'7. So he looks very tall in the movies when such rigmerols are done, you know. So it's kind of exciting.
Editor Rob
In an interview recently (Feb 2nd 2006), Emma mentioned that her height is about 5'4. She herself said it. Don't blame me, okay? This was the interview:
Emma :"I really am looking forward for filming the Ootp. It's going to be great. I am looking for to all the scenes"
Interviewer: Okay, so, you are quite excited? Okay, so Rupert is supposed to be exceptionally tall, I mean, the tallest of the trio. Now you, Emma are not so far away from Rupert in height. So did they do anything in Gof to make him look extremely tall?
Emma: Yes, they did. They brought the elevator shoes and......you know, he looked tall. I am about 5'4 or something like that, now, at the present time. Rupert looks really about 5'7. So he looks very tall in the movies when such rigmerols are done, you know. So it's kind of exciting.
Editor Rob I was going to delete this, but hey, it was a funny attempt...
john link said on 9/May/06
I disagree sianna, you cannot accept the fact that Emma is tall. And I have noticed that you have no information to support what you are saying, you just say it. I just made a huge comment saying why I think Emma is at least 5'6.5" and you guys just say "oh, no she has to be 5'5"." I think that you guys are the ones in denial. And for the shoe thing, I know that all shoes have height, but I am just saying that Emma's boots have quite a bit less height than Rupert and Dan's. The head tilting thing, it gives the impression of looking taller, but in reality it makes you shorter. You know what I mean? If Emma stood up she would be about 1/2" taller or a few centimeters taller than she is when her head is tilted. So, I am pretty positive about the heights I have estimated. There is no way Emma is shorter than 5'6.5". Oh and Emma (dan/'s girl) Thanks for agreeing with me! lol and I just googled 'Emma Watson Empire Awards' and visited a few of the sites.
I disagree sianna, you cannot accept the fact that Emma is tall. And I have noticed that you have no information to support what you are saying, you just say it. I just made a huge comment saying why I think Emma is at least 5'6.5" and you guys just say "oh, no she has to be 5'5"." I think that you guys are the ones in denial. And for the shoe thing, I know that all shoes have height, but I am just saying that Emma's boots have quite a bit less height than Rupert and Dan's. The head tilting thing, it gives the impression of looking taller, but in reality it makes you shorter. You know what I mean? If Emma stood up she would be about 1/2" taller or a few centimeters taller than she is when her head is tilted. So, I am pretty positive about the heights I have estimated. There is no way Emma is shorter than 5'6.5". Oh and Emma (dan/'s girl) Thanks for agreeing with me! lol and I just googled 'Emma Watson Empire Awards' and visited a few of the sites.
anonymous said on 9/May/06
Emma said she is about 5'5, why would she lie about it if she's that much taller because it would be a good thing for an actress. And tilting your head gives you a taller impression because since john link has stated it is better to compare heights at where people's foreheads end on Katie's page.
Emma said she is about 5'5, why would she lie about it if she's that much taller because it would be a good thing for an actress. And tilting your head gives you a taller impression because since john link has stated it is better to compare heights at where people's foreheads end on Katie's page.
sianna said on 9/May/06
omg john link u just cant accept the fact that EMMA IS SHORT
omg john link u just cant accept the fact that EMMA IS SHORT
Serene said on 9/May/06
Whatever..even the school shoes I am wearing today had to be minus 2cm if I am wearing my school shoes to measure my height.
My slippers are like 1.5cm in length...and if my height shows that I am 162.5cm, I have to minus it with 1.5cm and 161cm is my height. Unless I was measured barefooted...which it would take a while to clean my feet in school.
So the point is that, even the boots she is wearing has a height of it. If she was measured her height barefooted, well she would be lesser than her height that she mention,5 feet 5.
????
Whatever..even the school shoes I am wearing today had to be minus 2cm if I am wearing my school shoes to measure my height.
My slippers are like 1.5cm in length...and if my height shows that I am 162.5cm, I have to minus it with 1.5cm and 161cm is my height. Unless I was measured barefooted...which it would take a while to clean my feet in school.
So the point is that, even the boots she is wearing has a height of it. If she was measured her height barefooted, well she would be lesser than her height that she mention,5 feet 5.
????
Emma (Dan's girl) said on 9/May/06
Yes, John Link!! The pictures were wonderful. Wonder where you get them from? Is there a particular website you visit and get such beautiful pictures??
Yes, John Link!! The pictures were wonderful. Wonder where you get them from? Is there a particular website you visit and get such beautiful pictures??
john link said on 8/May/06
I think that Emma must be at least 5'6.5" for a few reasons...
1) In the pictures she looks AT LEAST 2 inches taller than Dan.
-in the pictures all three are standing in the same position
-when Emma has her head tilted, she is losing height not gaining height, when you tilt your head you lose height, you do not gain height, basically, if she made her head straight she would be even taller
-as for the shoe "issue", I really do not understand where you guys are coming from...Yes, Emma is wearing boots, but did you see how thin they are? They are not the traditional thick soled boots. Also, the heel is LESS THAN 1/2". I have a good picture that I will show you. And I notice that people are not considering Rupert and Dan's shoes. I know we think that guys usually have no heels on their shoes, but a lot of times they do. Rupert is wearing converse, which have about an inch sole, giving him a footwear advantage over Emma, but amazingly (at least in some people's minds) Emma looks as tall as him. As for Daniel's shoes, THEY ARE HUGE! Have you guys seen them? They have at least a 2 inch heel on them therefore giving him a huge footwear advantage over Emma (oh, and nobody has gotten back to me on the lifts??) Emma looks about 1-2 inches taller than him in the pictures, so Emma may very well be more than 3 inches taller than him barefoot.
-As for the camera angles, I know the second picture Emma has the camera advantage, but it is not that much. In that picture she looks about 2.5 inches taller than Dan (remember to measure from foreheads, not the top of the hair) so if Dan stood at the same place, he would gain 1/2", not some huge amount, making Emma 2 inches taller. However, the first and third pictures, all three are standing on the same plane and have the same camera angle. If you scroll all the way down (on the first one), you'll notice that Dan is actually standing in front of Emma! So, it makes sense that Emma is 2 inches taller once again. And for the third one, the camera angle is straight on and once again, Emma looks the same height/slightly taller than Rupert and at least 2 inches taller than Dan (I think this is a partiularly good one to compare their heights, and it shows that Emma is the tallest). You have to look at their foreheads and not their hair because Rupert and Dan's hair is tuffed up. Emma's is flat however.
I think that that covers about everything. Charlotte, no offense, but I have no idea how you can say Rupert looks 2 inches taller than Emma? I am just not seeing it. She looks the same height as Rupert and about 2 inches taller than Daniel.
Emma: at least 5'6.5" Rupert: 5'6.5" Daniel: 5'4"
I think that Emma must be at least 5'6.5" for a few reasons...
1) In the pictures she looks AT LEAST 2 inches taller than Dan.
-in the pictures all three are standing in the same position
-when Emma has her head tilted, she is losing height not gaining height, when you tilt your head you lose height, you do not gain height, basically, if she made her head straight she would be even taller
-as for the shoe "issue", I really do not understand where you guys are coming from...Yes, Emma is wearing boots, but did you see how thin they are? They are not the traditional thick soled boots. Also, the heel is LESS THAN 1/2". I have a good picture that I will show you. And I notice that people are not considering Rupert and Dan's shoes. I know we think that guys usually have no heels on their shoes, but a lot of times they do. Rupert is wearing converse, which have about an inch sole, giving him a footwear advantage over Emma, but amazingly (at least in some people's minds) Emma looks as tall as him. As for Daniel's shoes, THEY ARE HUGE! Have you guys seen them? They have at least a 2 inch heel on them therefore giving him a huge footwear advantage over Emma (oh, and nobody has gotten back to me on the lifts??) Emma looks about 1-2 inches taller than him in the pictures, so Emma may very well be more than 3 inches taller than him barefoot.
-As for the camera angles, I know the second picture Emma has the camera advantage, but it is not that much. In that picture she looks about 2.5 inches taller than Dan (remember to measure from foreheads, not the top of the hair) so if Dan stood at the same place, he would gain 1/2", not some huge amount, making Emma 2 inches taller. However, the first and third pictures, all three are standing on the same plane and have the same camera angle. If you scroll all the way down (on the first one), you'll notice that Dan is actually standing in front of Emma! So, it makes sense that Emma is 2 inches taller once again. And for the third one, the camera angle is straight on and once again, Emma looks the same height/slightly taller than Rupert and at least 2 inches taller than Dan (I think this is a partiularly good one to compare their heights, and it shows that Emma is the tallest). You have to look at their foreheads and not their hair because Rupert and Dan's hair is tuffed up. Emma's is flat however.
I think that that covers about everything. Charlotte, no offense, but I have no idea how you can say Rupert looks 2 inches taller than Emma? I am just not seeing it. She looks the same height as Rupert and about 2 inches taller than Daniel.
Emma: at least 5'6.5" Rupert: 5'6.5" Daniel: 5'4"
Charlotte said on 8/May/06
Her heigt is exaggerated in those pictures (her shoes have slight heels,her head is tilted up,the other two are slouching and she has the camera advantage) yet she is still 2 inches shorter than Rupert (5'6.5")
Her heigt is exaggerated in those pictures (her shoes have slight heels,her head is tilted up,the other two are slouching and she has the camera advantage) yet she is still 2 inches shorter than Rupert (5'6.5")
sianna said on 8/May/06
yer john they are great pics..exceot for the fact that emma is the only one who is standing the best, and has a small heel on her shoe...and in those pics she only looks half an inch taller..not even, so how can u continue to say she is this tall 5'7 girl! In those shoes she would be 5'5. In my flat school black laced show im 5'5. and without them on i 5'3.5...so the shoes DO give her height. In the second pic Emma is standing closest to the camera and in the 3rd she has her head tilted up...so there is no way she is over 5'5 in my opinion...thats all i have to say :)
yer john they are great pics..exceot for the fact that emma is the only one who is standing the best, and has a small heel on her shoe...and in those pics she only looks half an inch taller..not even, so how can u continue to say she is this tall 5'7 girl! In those shoes she would be 5'5. In my flat school black laced show im 5'5. and without them on i 5'3.5...so the shoes DO give her height. In the second pic Emma is standing closest to the camera and in the 3rd she has her head tilted up...so there is no way she is over 5'5 in my opinion...thats all i have to say :)
Wicked Kid said on 8/May/06
john link, firstly, the pictures you provided are fantastic. As in they're really nice. They're great, but not for judging their heights. If you didn't notice, in which case I must now point it out, Emma's not only WEARING BOOTS, she's got the camera angle advantage in the first two pictures. The third one, I can't say, cos we can't even see their feet.
john link, firstly, the pictures you provided are fantastic. As in they're really nice. They're great, but not for judging their heights. If you didn't notice, in which case I must now point it out, Emma's not only WEARING BOOTS, she's got the camera angle advantage in the first two pictures. The third one, I can't say, cos we can't even see their feet.
Emma (Dan's girl) said on 8/May/06
YOU ARE ABSOLUTELY RIGHT, JOHN LINK!! I FULLY AGREE WITH YOU. DAN IS SURELY SHORTER THAN EMMA AND MAYBE RUPERT TOO, BUT I AM NOT SURE.
BUT EMMA SURELY IS ABOUT 5'5.
YOU ARE ABSOLUTELY RIGHT, JOHN LINK!! I FULLY AGREE WITH YOU. DAN IS SURELY SHORTER THAN EMMA AND MAYBE RUPERT TOO, BUT I AM NOT SURE.
BUT EMMA SURELY IS ABOUT 5'5.
amberlee said on 7/May/06
Also the actors wouldnt say thier actual heights. if you were really tall and wanted to be short you would exagerate your height to something much shorter. i say im around 5'5" to others but i am actually 5'6". see. well if tom really is 5'11" im not saying that he is but hes about 4-5 inches taller than dan making dan 5'6" and emma is taller than dan.
Also the actors wouldnt say thier actual heights. if you were really tall and wanted to be short you would exagerate your height to something much shorter. i say im around 5'5" to others but i am actually 5'6". see. well if tom really is 5'11" im not saying that he is but hes about 4-5 inches taller than dan making dan 5'6" and emma is taller than dan.
amberlee said on 7/May/06
Whoa, Listen tom is not 5'11". dont get me started. he is listed as 6' lets not get into this. john links pictures do show that emma is taller than dan and around the same height as rupert. and LIsten, in pictures and movies and such its hard to tell thier real heights. people who look short are usually taller than they appear. and what do you mean fake heights? also using another example. Clemence Poesey aka Fluer is 5'8" and is shorter than Rupert yet a little taller than dan and if dan and emma are around the same height that makes them taller than 5'5". i'll see if i can find a picture.
Whoa, Listen tom is not 5'11". dont get me started. he is listed as 6' lets not get into this. john links pictures do show that emma is taller than dan and around the same height as rupert. and LIsten, in pictures and movies and such its hard to tell thier real heights. people who look short are usually taller than they appear. and what do you mean fake heights? also using another example. Clemence Poesey aka Fluer is 5'8" and is shorter than Rupert yet a little taller than dan and if dan and emma are around the same height that makes them taller than 5'5". i'll see if i can find a picture.
LIsten said on 7/May/06
In the pictures that john link has posted all three of them look in the 5'3''-5'4'' range. All these Potter stars have Fake heights except for tom felton who is really 5'11''.
In the pictures that john link has posted all three of them look in the 5'3''-5'4'' range. All these Potter stars have Fake heights except for tom felton who is really 5'11''.
sianna said on 7/May/06
amberlee....i have seen the pic and emma is NOT bending slighty...how can u say that when you can't even see her feet? and i purposly put a pic thats 2 years old with a recent one to prove that emma has ALWAYS been shorter than Dan.
amberlee....i have seen the pic and emma is NOT bending slighty...how can u say that when you can't even see her feet? and i purposly put a pic thats 2 years old with a recent one to prove that emma has ALWAYS been shorter than Dan.
john link said on 7/May/06
Okay, I have been searching around for some enlarged photos of the empire awards pictures and I have found some. These are really good to compare the three's heights because they are close up. From the pictures you can see that Emma is at least 1-2 inches taller than Dan and the same height to 1/2" taller than Rupert. I hope these pictures help you guys see my point of view. These pictures are absolutely brilliant in my opinion. Another thing I would like to mention is that after seeing these pictures I have noticed that Rupert and Dan's hair is a bit ruffled, making them look about an inch taller. So, be careful when looking at these pictures. I reccomend that you look at the top of the foreheads instead of where the hair ends.
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
I hope these help! :)
Okay, I have been searching around for some enlarged photos of the empire awards pictures and I have found some. These are really good to compare the three's heights because they are close up. From the pictures you can see that Emma is at least 1-2 inches taller than Dan and the same height to 1/2" taller than Rupert. I hope these pictures help you guys see my point of view. These pictures are absolutely brilliant in my opinion. Another thing I would like to mention is that after seeing these pictures I have noticed that Rupert and Dan's hair is a bit ruffled, making them look about an inch taller. So, be careful when looking at these pictures. I reccomend that you look at the top of the foreheads instead of where the hair ends.
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
I hope these help! :)
sianna said on 6/May/06
to amberlee: i meant to get an old on and a new one to prove that Emma has always been smaller than Dan...and i doubt that she's beding as 1. Youd can't see her legs and 2. I have seen the whole picure of it ( but was unable to copy it) and Emma and Dan are both standing firmly without bending.
to amberlee: i meant to get an old on and a new one to prove that Emma has always been smaller than Dan...and i doubt that she's beding as 1. Youd can't see her legs and 2. I have seen the whole picure of it ( but was unable to copy it) and Emma and Dan are both standing firmly without bending.
amberlee said on 6/May/06
sianna those pix are from like 3 years ago. it was at the end of the chamber of secrets and the beginning of poa. like i said dont get outdated pictures. and the first one with emma in purple, emma is bending slightly.
sianna those pix are from like 3 years ago. it was at the end of the chamber of secrets and the beginning of poa. like i said dont get outdated pictures. and the first one with emma in purple, emma is bending slightly.
LIsten said on 6/May/06
I agree with Charlotte she isn't even near 5'5'' i don't think she will reach 5'6'' neither.
I agree with Charlotte she isn't even near 5'5'' i don't think she will reach 5'6'' neither.
Charlotte said on 6/May/06
Emma is 5'4.5".She is no where near taller than 5'5"
Emma is 5'4.5".She is no where near taller than 5'5"
amberlee said on 5/May/06
Just to let you all know. Girls dont stop growing in height until they have reached their late teen years like around 17 and 18 years old. ive stopped growing because i have reached that stage. before that i grew tons. so emma still has about two more years of growing to do. she may look like she is done growing but do we know that for sure? have you guys read the how to measure a celebrities height from the column to the right? this could change your opinion. but like ive said before search around and do some research. and check the dates!!!! on screen 5'6" doesnt look all that tall because of camera angles and such. so just because she looks shorter doesnt mean she is. i still think you guys should try comparing heights of her co stars with her. we could all get different results. just please try it and see what you come up with.
Just to let you all know. Girls dont stop growing in height until they have reached their late teen years like around 17 and 18 years old. ive stopped growing because i have reached that stage. before that i grew tons. so emma still has about two more years of growing to do. she may look like she is done growing but do we know that for sure? have you guys read the how to measure a celebrities height from the column to the right? this could change your opinion. but like ive said before search around and do some research. and check the dates!!!! on screen 5'6" doesnt look all that tall because of camera angles and such. so just because she looks shorter doesnt mean she is. i still think you guys should try comparing heights of her co stars with her. we could all get different results. just please try it and see what you come up with.
Jessica said on 5/May/06
Yeah, I think she is pretty much done too, although, she could stop growing for a while then have another growth spurt later and reach 5'6"- that's what happens to the girls on my mum's side of the family (which is probably a bit weird).
Yeah, I think she is pretty much done too, although, she could stop growing for a while then have another growth spurt later and reach 5'6"- that's what happens to the girls on my mum's side of the family (which is probably a bit weird).
LIsten said on 5/May/06
Emma is no taller than 5'4.5'', maybe she is 5'5'' when she wakes up. I don't think she will reach 5'6'', she looks like she is done growing.
Emma is no taller than 5'4.5'', maybe she is 5'5'' when she wakes up. I don't think she will reach 5'6'', she looks like she is done growing.
Serene said on 5/May/06
Well said Jessica. We all have our opinions and our thoughts on Emma's height...it is really weird to behave like that...sorry..
Well said Jessica. We all have our opinions and our thoughts on Emma's height...it is really weird to behave like that...sorry..
amberlee said on 5/May/06
why is no one comenting on my stuff? i think all of you are in love with john link jk
why is no one comenting on my stuff? i think all of you are in love with john link jk
john link said on 4/May/06
Thank you amberlee, I really appriciate it. :) I just don't want to fight people, okay? We can have our different opinions, but I firmly believe Emma is at least 5'6.5" and Dan is under 5'4.5".
Thank you amberlee, I really appriciate it. :) I just don't want to fight people, okay? We can have our different opinions, but I firmly believe Emma is at least 5'6.5" and Dan is under 5'4.5".
Jessica said on 4/May/06
well john link should stop picking on us, and if we all think Emma is 5'5" then shouldn't we be allowed to express our opinions as well.
well john link should stop picking on us, and if we all think Emma is 5'5" then shouldn't we be allowed to express our opinions as well.
amberlee said on 4/May/06
i agree with john link. emma is definately taller than 5'5" all you short people obssessed with emma sorry but she is one of those girls that are on the taller sides. try comparing her height with someone other than dan and rupert. search the heights of other actors she co stars with and compare them to her and you'll find out that she is tall!!! oh just to let you all know, an inch is a lot on a picture. so estimate wisely. and please stop picking on John link. he has his right to post his opinion just the same as all of us. i have been to all possible emma watson sights looking for her height and the majority oh about 80% of the sights say she is 5'6" or taller. all the sights that say she is shorter than 5'4" are all out dated. so also check the dates of pictures and facts to see if they are recent. hey this will make everyone shocked but its out of the blue Emma is in reality 6 feet. there that should make us all happy im just kidding!!! lol :)
i agree with john link. emma is definately taller than 5'5" all you short people obssessed with emma sorry but she is one of those girls that are on the taller sides. try comparing her height with someone other than dan and rupert. search the heights of other actors she co stars with and compare them to her and you'll find out that she is tall!!! oh just to let you all know, an inch is a lot on a picture. so estimate wisely. and please stop picking on John link. he has his right to post his opinion just the same as all of us. i have been to all possible emma watson sights looking for her height and the majority oh about 80% of the sights say she is 5'6" or taller. all the sights that say she is shorter than 5'4" are all out dated. so also check the dates of pictures and facts to see if they are recent. hey this will make everyone shocked but its out of the blue Emma is in reality 6 feet. there that should make us all happy im just kidding!!! lol :)
john link said on 3/May/06
Okay, why would I be pretending to be other people?? That would be the lamest thing I have ever heard! And thanks for agreeing with me lauren, I really apprieciate it. As for their heights, I have no idea how some of you are saying taht Emma is shorter than Daniel, and under 5'5"! haha that is ridiculous. I mean look at pictures, she is tall and if she were only 5'5" she would not look tall. Also, ice in pictures Emma looks more than .5" taller than Katie. Making Emma, at least 5'6.5". hahahahaha sorry, but some people on these chat thing are absolutely insane!
Okay, why would I be pretending to be other people?? That would be the lamest thing I have ever heard! And thanks for agreeing with me lauren, I really apprieciate it. As for their heights, I have no idea how some of you are saying taht Emma is shorter than Daniel, and under 5'5"! haha that is ridiculous. I mean look at pictures, she is tall and if she were only 5'5" she would not look tall. Also, ice in pictures Emma looks more than .5" taller than Katie. Making Emma, at least 5'6.5". hahahahaha sorry, but some people on these chat thing are absolutely insane!
sianna said on 3/May/06
hmm yer john link, trying 2 convence us and yourself that emma is taller that 5'5 is kinda weird...shez average height, in my opion 5'3-5'4...so i think people just need 2 RELAX lol.
hmm yer john link, trying 2 convence us and yourself that emma is taller that 5'5 is kinda weird...shez average height, in my opion 5'3-5'4...so i think people just need 2 RELAX lol.
Jessica said on 3/May/06
She's 5'5"ish. It's as simple as that, and it seems pretty much everyone (except one person) thinks that. Even Emma herself (and I'm pretty sure she'd know) said she is 5'5", plus numerous peeople say they have seen her and that she is 5'4", or 5'5". So I think that's acurate for now.
She's 5'5"ish. It's as simple as that, and it seems pretty much everyone (except one person) thinks that. Even Emma herself (and I'm pretty sure she'd know) said she is 5'5", plus numerous peeople say they have seen her and that she is 5'4", or 5'5". So I think that's acurate for now.
ice said on 2/May/06
hey guys, these were the estimates i posted on katie leung's board. What do you think?
Katie:5'3.5
Emma: 5'4
Daniel: 5'4.5
Rupert: 5'6.5
hey guys, these were the estimates i posted on katie leung's board. What do you think?
Katie:5'3.5
Emma: 5'4
Daniel: 5'4.5
Rupert: 5'6.5
J said on 2/May/06
John Link you seem to be obssesed with Emma watson man!! I saw Emma a month ago and she was nothing but 5'4''. She is nowhere near 5'6''! this 5'7'' thing is all in your head.
John Link you seem to be obssesed with Emma watson man!! I saw Emma a month ago and she was nothing but 5'4''. She is nowhere near 5'6''! this 5'7'' thing is all in your head.
lauren said on 2/May/06
okay jessica, if john link was just using a bunch of different names that would be so stupid! haha i am pretty sure he is not doing that. however, i definitely agree with him. and anonymous that picture is from awhile ago. i would also like to bring up that dan could be wearing lifts. do you think he does? even if he is wearing lifts at the events, emma is still taller than him, making the likelehood of emma being over 5'7" even more promising.
Editor Rob
okay jessica, if john link was just using a bunch of different names that would be so stupid! haha i am pretty sure he is not doing that. however, i definitely agree with him. and anonymous that picture is from awhile ago. i would also like to bring up that dan could be wearing lifts. do you think he does? even if he is wearing lifts at the events, emma is still taller than him, making the likelehood of emma being over 5'7" even more promising.
Editor Rob you're agreeing with yourself again? Your posting style is remarkably similar, as is the computer you're posting from!!!
Jessica said on 2/May/06
Yeah, thanks for agreeing with me guys. And I would like to point out to anonymous/john Link (wink wink) that I never said/wanted Daniel to be tall. i say he is 5'5" (If I wanted him to be tall I'd say he was 5'7" or something), I just think, and it seems pretty obvious that him and Emma are the same height. And here is a photo to clear that up. Butit is one getty Images and they don't link well. But if anyone wants to see photo's just go to getty images and search for Dan, Emma or Rupert.
Yeah, thanks for agreeing with me guys. And I would like to point out to anonymous/john Link (wink wink) that I never said/wanted Daniel to be tall. i say he is 5'5" (If I wanted him to be tall I'd say he was 5'7" or something), I just think, and it seems pretty obvious that him and Emma are the same height. And here is a photo to clear that up. Butit is one getty Images and they don't link well. But if anyone wants to see photo's just go to getty images and search for Dan, Emma or Rupert.
john link said on 1/May/06
hahaha ice, there is not bet going on! (at least that I know of) I honestly think that Emma is at least 5'7" and the other people seem to believe that too.
hahaha ice, there is not bet going on! (at least that I know of) I honestly think that Emma is at least 5'7" and the other people seem to believe that too.
anonymous said on 1/May/06
Jessica and anonymous, Emma is not a normal height girl. I am with you john link. I mean she looks at least 2 inches taller than Dan with a footwear disadvantage. It may just be me, but I think she looks at least 5'6.5". I don't know why so many people want to make her short and Dan tall. I am positive that it is the other way around. Emma is 5'6.5" and up. Dan and Rupert seem to be done growing, but Emma seems like she will grow to be at least 5'8". Also, Editor Rob, in your comment you said that you think that Emma and Dan are the same heights. How do you explain this....Emma looks about the same height as Rupert, but Dan looks at least 2 inches shorter than Rupert? It makes sense that Emma and Rupert are roughly the same heights, but it is just ridiculous to say that Emma and Dan are. Emma is at more than 2 inches taller.
Emma: 5'6.5" to 5'7.5"
Rupert: 5'6.5"
Dan: under 5'4"
I completely agree with you john link. You're picture is great too. Oh and also, Rob isn't the picture that john link put up straight? Each person has the same posture, plane, camerea angle, etc. When you look at it straight on, Emma is clearly as tall as Rupert and at least 2 inches taller than Dan. I just don't see why this is not a good picture to compare heights? And how do some people think that Emma and Dan are the same height? The evidence is overwhelming, Emma is taller that both Rupert and Dan.
Editor Rob
Jessica and anonymous, Emma is not a normal height girl. I am with you john link. I mean she looks at least 2 inches taller than Dan with a footwear disadvantage. It may just be me, but I think she looks at least 5'6.5". I don't know why so many people want to make her short and Dan tall. I am positive that it is the other way around. Emma is 5'6.5" and up. Dan and Rupert seem to be done growing, but Emma seems like she will grow to be at least 5'8". Also, Editor Rob, in your comment you said that you think that Emma and Dan are the same heights. How do you explain this....Emma looks about the same height as Rupert, but Dan looks at least 2 inches shorter than Rupert? It makes sense that Emma and Rupert are roughly the same heights, but it is just ridiculous to say that Emma and Dan are. Emma is at more than 2 inches taller.
Emma: 5'6.5" to 5'7.5"
Rupert: 5'6.5"
Dan: under 5'4"
I completely agree with you john link. You're picture is great too. Oh and also, Rob isn't the picture that john link put up straight? Each person has the same posture, plane, camerea angle, etc. When you look at it straight on, Emma is clearly as tall as Rupert and at least 2 inches taller than Dan. I just don't see why this is not a good picture to compare heights? And how do some people think that Emma and Dan are the same height? The evidence is overwhelming, Emma is taller that both Rupert and Dan.
Editor Rob you would agree with jon link...well, because you ARe jon link ;-)
stick to the one name please. I usually ban people who keep changing names, but I let you off!
stick to the one name please. I usually ban people who keep changing names, but I let you off!
Aaron said on 1/May/06
rupert:5,8
emma:5,6
dan:5,5
rupert:5,8
emma:5,6
dan:5,5
ice said on 1/May/06
LOL, it's not just john link. There's a "collection" of people trying to make emma 5'7. I think it's some type of bet going on, and we didn't hear about it. LOL
LOL, it's not just john link. There's a "collection" of people trying to make emma 5'7. I think it's some type of bet going on, and we didn't hear about it. LOL
anonymous said on 1/May/06
I'm with you Jessica! Emma is a normal height girl, why must John undermine Dan all the time? They're clearly around the same height.
I'm with you Jessica! Emma is a normal height girl, why must John undermine Dan all the time? They're clearly around the same height.
Jessica said on 1/May/06
john link appears to be obsessed with making Emma Watson tall. Why?!
Emma just isn't tall. She's not short either- she's average, and you can tell she'd be average height (which in the U.K for females is 5'4")becuase her body shape/size is average
john link appears to be obsessed with making Emma Watson tall. Why?!
Emma just isn't tall. She's not short either- she's average, and you can tell she'd be average height (which in the U.K for females is 5'4")becuase her body shape/size is average
john link said on 30/Apr/06
How can you say that Emma and Dan are similar in height? Sorry, but that is simply ridiculous! Look at this picture... file:///Users/kjuvette09/Desktop/57074668.jpg
I just do not understand how some people think Emma is the same height is Dan. She is clearly 2 inches taller than him in this picture, and she has a footwear disadvantage! Do I need to add that she looks slightly taller than Rupert who has to be at least 5'6"?? Emma Watson is at least 5'7" tall.
Editor Rob
here, imagine Dan is Green pen, Emma is yellow pen. Exactly same height pens, but with different shooting angles/positioning, you can make one appear taller than the other...hence, why I look at all pictures or footage and try to decipher what they look across all the pics, considering such photographic effects
How can you say that Emma and Dan are similar in height? Sorry, but that is simply ridiculous! Look at this picture... file:///Users/kjuvette09/Desktop/57074668.jpg
I just do not understand how some people think Emma is the same height is Dan. She is clearly 2 inches taller than him in this picture, and she has a footwear disadvantage! Do I need to add that she looks slightly taller than Rupert who has to be at least 5'6"?? Emma Watson is at least 5'7" tall.
Editor Robhere, imagine Dan is Green pen, Emma is yellow pen. Exactly same height pens, but with different shooting angles/positioning, you can make one appear taller than the other...hence, why I look at all pictures or footage and try to decipher what they look across all the pics, considering such photographic effects
Anonymous said on 30/Apr/06
There's one thing Rob has to do and that is to remove all heights related to Harry Potter otherwise we'll have a war here ;) and i think that Emma and Dan are similar in height (5'4.5 - 5'5)
There's one thing Rob has to do and that is to remove all heights related to Harry Potter otherwise we'll have a war here ;) and i think that Emma and Dan are similar in height (5'4.5 - 5'5)
john link said on 29/Apr/06
Well, sorry if this sounds rude ice, but I think I will go with my instinct and that is Emma is at least 5'7". Look at pictures and her limbs, hands, and feet. She is taller than both Rupert and Dan. I mean, even if people thought that Rupet was only 5'6"-5'6.5", then you would have to think that Emma is at least 5'6.5". In the pictures she is easily 1/2" taller than him and that is with a footwear disadvantage! Emma is over 5'7", Rupert is in the 5'6"-5'7" range, and Dan is under 5'4". Rob, this is really getting ridiculous, please change their heights. After seeing the pictures, you have to admit that Emma is at least 5'6.5", unless you think that Dan is under 5'3"?? Emma is at least 5'7" and will grow to be at least 5'8".
Editor Rob
Well, sorry if this sounds rude ice, but I think I will go with my instinct and that is Emma is at least 5'7". Look at pictures and her limbs, hands, and feet. She is taller than both Rupert and Dan. I mean, even if people thought that Rupet was only 5'6"-5'6.5", then you would have to think that Emma is at least 5'6.5". In the pictures she is easily 1/2" taller than him and that is with a footwear disadvantage! Emma is over 5'7", Rupert is in the 5'6"-5'7" range, and Dan is under 5'4". Rob, this is really getting ridiculous, please change their heights. After seeing the pictures, you have to admit that Emma is at least 5'6.5", unless you think that Dan is under 5'3"?? Emma is at least 5'7" and will grow to be at least 5'8".
Editor Rob I've looked at all those recent pics in the past...my impression was they were quite similar in height.
ice said on 29/Apr/06
john link: magazines cannot be trusted. I would go with what the agent says over the magazine. Lindsay lohan was listed as 5'7, and jennifer love-hewitt was listed at 5'8. Just because they print that, doesn't mean it's correct.
john link: magazines cannot be trusted. I would go with what the agent says over the magazine. Lindsay lohan was listed as 5'7, and jennifer love-hewitt was listed at 5'8. Just because they print that, doesn't mean it's correct.
ice said on 28/Apr/06
Hey Rob, I went and checked out this emma empire site. Here's what it said.
According to This Morning, Tom is said to be 6 feet 2 inches, or 185cm at the end of February. The Disney Channel Awards was in early December, so I presume that he is 6 feet 1 inch.
It seems that Emma is shorter than Tom by 3 inches, and Emma was wearing small heel shoes, so taking out 1 inch again… Emma might be 5 feet 6 inches to 5 feet 7 inches tall?
Now it’s time to give you her official hieght, which has been comfirmed by her agent. She’s 5 feet 3 inches (1.6m) tall, but she still has a few years of growing left to go.
Written by Madika
Last Change of this page: Nov 18th, 2005, 1:50 pm
I doubt she grew 4 inches in five months. I doubt she even grew 2 inches in five months. she is 16 now. 15 when that was posted.
Hey Rob, I went and checked out this emma empire site. Here's what it said.
According to This Morning, Tom is said to be 6 feet 2 inches, or 185cm at the end of February. The Disney Channel Awards was in early December, so I presume that he is 6 feet 1 inch.
It seems that Emma is shorter than Tom by 3 inches, and Emma was wearing small heel shoes, so taking out 1 inch again… Emma might be 5 feet 6 inches to 5 feet 7 inches tall?
Now it’s time to give you her official hieght, which has been comfirmed by her agent. She’s 5 feet 3 inches (1.6m) tall, but she still has a few years of growing left to go.
Written by Madika
Last Change of this page: Nov 18th, 2005, 1:50 pm
I doubt she grew 4 inches in five months. I doubt she even grew 2 inches in five months. she is 16 now. 15 when that was posted.
sianna said on 28/Apr/06
umm john, if you look @ the bottom of the page u c that they say she looked 5'7, but is actually 5'3..read! clearly im not going 2 right anymore, and i doubt anyone else will if we get yelled @ for a opinon
umm john, if you look @ the bottom of the page u c that they say she looked 5'7, but is actually 5'3..read! clearly im not going 2 right anymore, and i doubt anyone else will if we get yelled @ for a opinon
Emma (Dan's girl) said on 28/Apr/06
YEAH, JOHN LINK!! MAYBE YOU ARE RIGHT. BUT I HATE PEOPLE SAYING THAT EMMA IS TALLER. SHE MAYBE IS THE SAME HEIGHT AS RUPERT, BUT DEFINETELY IS NOT TALLER. I AM 100% SURE. I AM NOT IGNORING YOUR PICS, JOHN!!! THEY'RE GREAT!! BUT SOMETIMES THEY DON'T OPEN AT ALL. CHECK AGAIN.....THE SITE ISN'T OPENING.
Bye
YEAH, JOHN LINK!! MAYBE YOU ARE RIGHT. BUT I HATE PEOPLE SAYING THAT EMMA IS TALLER. SHE MAYBE IS THE SAME HEIGHT AS RUPERT, BUT DEFINETELY IS NOT TALLER. I AM 100% SURE. I AM NOT IGNORING YOUR PICS, JOHN!!! THEY'RE GREAT!! BUT SOMETIMES THEY DON'T OPEN AT ALL. CHECK AGAIN.....THE SITE ISN'T OPENING.
Bye
john link said on 26/Apr/06
Please don't ignore my pictures and comments. :( somebody at least say something about them. I know they are true, but....haha jk (But I do believe those are the correct heights...Emma seems to have grown quite a bit...)
Emma: 5'6.5" to 5'7.5"
Rupert: 5'6.5"
Dan: 5'4"
Please don't ignore my pictures and comments. :( somebody at least say something about them. I know they are true, but....haha jk (But I do believe those are the correct heights...Emma seems to have grown quite a bit...)
Emma: 5'6.5" to 5'7.5"
Rupert: 5'6.5"
Dan: 5'4"
Serene said on 26/Apr/06
Yes, I am sorry if I was wrongly or madly out of my opinions. Sorry. I am stupid unlike you all genuises here. To everyone here, I am really sorry. I am stupid. Please look down on me.
But if you really want to measure a person's height, you really need to take those shoes off and measure. Or else you are measuring your own height with ur with shoes on which is incorrect. Plus almost every shoe Emma wears is also 1-2 inches..
So currently, Emma's height is not 5'5" and Emma is really shorter than Dan slighty..very little.. so she really can't be 5'5"...
Lesser maybe..
Yes, I am sorry if I was wrongly or madly out of my opinions. Sorry. I am stupid unlike you all genuises here. To everyone here, I am really sorry. I am stupid. Please look down on me.
But if you really want to measure a person's height, you really need to take those shoes off and measure. Or else you are measuring your own height with ur with shoes on which is incorrect. Plus almost every shoe Emma wears is also 1-2 inches..
So currently, Emma's height is not 5'5" and Emma is really shorter than Dan slighty..very little.. so she really can't be 5'5"...
Lesser maybe..
Jessica said on 26/Apr/06
I agree with anonymous- that makes perfect sense.
mm makes a good point aswell.
I agree with anonymous- that makes perfect sense.
mm makes a good point aswell.
sianna said on 26/Apr/06
on this emma empire site there is much delibertation on her hight...but it then says that her agent or something like that has her @ 1.6m (which is like 5'3) as of recent times...thats seems right coz she's a little shorter than Dan, and i doubt that she would have grown in a few months.
on this emma empire site there is much delibertation on her hight...but it then says that her agent or something like that has her @ 1.6m (which is like 5'3) as of recent times...thats seems right coz she's a little shorter than Dan, and i doubt that she would have grown in a few months.
Emma (Dan's girl) said on 26/Apr/06
Click Here
Click on this link and see the picture. This is for those who think Emma is taller than Rupert. For goodness sake, don't say that, because she is NOT. She is shorter than Rupert but taller than Dan. Emma looks about 8 inches shorter. But she is slouching and also Rupert is nearer to the camera which makes her about good 2-3 inches shorter than Rupert, but she is not taller.
This is what I think their heights could be.
Dan- 5'3.5 to 5'4
Emma - 5'5 to 5'5.5
Rupert - 5'7 to 5'7.5
Click Here
Click on this link and see the picture. This is for those who think Emma is taller than Rupert. For goodness sake, don't say that, because she is NOT. She is shorter than Rupert but taller than Dan. Emma looks about 8 inches shorter. But she is slouching and also Rupert is nearer to the camera which makes her about good 2-3 inches shorter than Rupert, but she is not taller.
This is what I think their heights could be.
Dan- 5'3.5 to 5'4
Emma - 5'5 to 5'5.5
Rupert - 5'7 to 5'7.5
jessa said on 25/Apr/06
i really hate you john link for being such a fool!please belive me.Ill be posting a picure of me and emma! soon(when its already developed)
i really hate you john link for being such a fool!please belive me.Ill be posting a picure of me and emma! soon(when its already developed)
mm said on 25/Apr/06
emma and dan have the same height. in the london press conference, emma was wearing chuck taylor shoes and it can add an inch to her height. dan was wearing a lethear shoes and i think it can add like 2 inches to his height. in the picture, dan was like an inch taller than emma. so, if you remove the shoes, they'll probably have the same height!
emma and dan have the same height. in the london press conference, emma was wearing chuck taylor shoes and it can add an inch to her height. dan was wearing a lethear shoes and i think it can add like 2 inches to his height. in the picture, dan was like an inch taller than emma. so, if you remove the shoes, they'll probably have the same height!
anonymous said on 24/Apr/06
No, don't change their heights, it's pretty accurate already, Emma and Dan are very similar in height, that's why there are pictures where Dan is inches taller than Emma and then there are pictures where Emma seems to be a little taller Daniel.
No, don't change their heights, it's pretty accurate already, Emma and Dan are very similar in height, that's why there are pictures where Dan is inches taller than Emma and then there are pictures where Emma seems to be a little taller Daniel.
john link said on 24/Apr/06
Charlotte, can you explain your last comment? I don't really understand what you are trying to say?? That she is taller than 5'4.5"? Sorry...
Charlotte, can you explain your last comment? I don't really understand what you are trying to say?? That she is taller than 5'4.5"? Sorry...
Charlotte said on 24/Apr/06
Only a very short fellow would consider Emma's 5'4.5" tall.
Only a very short fellow would consider Emma's 5'4.5" tall.
Will said on 23/Apr/06
if she said she was 5'5" , than I say she is 5'5", the most you can do is add or take an inch to/from her height. There is know way someone inflated or decreased their height by 2-3 inches as some of you are impling she has by staing she is 5'2" or 5'7". I hope this makes sense.
if she said she was 5'5" , than I say she is 5'5", the most you can do is add or take an inch to/from her height. There is know way someone inflated or decreased their height by 2-3 inches as some of you are impling she has by staing she is 5'2" or 5'7". I hope this makes sense.
Charlotte said on 22/Apr/06
She's about 5'4.5".
She's about 5'4.5".
john link said on 22/Apr/06
Jessa, you could be making this up for all that we know. Emma does look tall, there is absoluteley no way she is 5'2"! That is ridiculious! Look at the pictures, she at least 2 inches taller than Daniel and as tall if not taller than Rupert! If yoyu think Emma is 5'2", then are you willing to agree that Dan is 5'0" and Rupert 5'1.5" to 5'2"? Those heights don't seem very accurate. Emma is at least 5'6.5"/5'7".
Click Here
Heyman and Isaacs are 5'10" and 5'11". If Emma were only 5'2" I do not think she would be past Heyman's shoulder and taller than both Rupert and Dan.
Jessa, you could be making this up for all that we know. Emma does look tall, there is absoluteley no way she is 5'2"! That is ridiculious! Look at the pictures, she at least 2 inches taller than Daniel and as tall if not taller than Rupert! If yoyu think Emma is 5'2", then are you willing to agree that Dan is 5'0" and Rupert 5'1.5" to 5'2"? Those heights don't seem very accurate. Emma is at least 5'6.5"/5'7".
Click Here
Heyman and Isaacs are 5'10" and 5'11". If Emma were only 5'2" I do not think she would be past Heyman's shoulder and taller than both Rupert and Dan.
jessa said on 22/Apr/06
what??you are crazy john link.I personally happen to see them in New York.I am a daughter of one of the staff who was there for the HP-GOF premeire.Im 5"2,w/out heels.Emma was taller than me since i wore flats that day and she wore heels.She is 5"2!!
what??you are crazy john link.I personally happen to see them in New York.I am a daughter of one of the staff who was there for the HP-GOF premeire.Im 5"2,w/out heels.Emma was taller than me since i wore flats that day and she wore heels.She is 5"2!!
john link said on 21/Apr/06
Thanks amberlee, I agree with you. I mean, if Emma was only 5'5", she would not wear flats! If you were short then you would most likely want to look taller. Also, regarding what Charlotte said, Emma does not wear flats just because she is taller than Dan. She already towers over him when she is in flats and he is in large soled shoes! I would also like to agree with amberlee about people trying to make Emma seem shorter than she really is for whatever reason. She is tall (I consider over 5'6" to 5'7" tall for a girl) and is still growing. When you see her in pictures and movies, she looks tall. Taller than Dan and as tall as Rupert. Sorry if this sounds rude, but those of you who say that Emma's boots have at least a 2.5" heel at the Empire Awards, you have no evidence! You are just saying that they are big heels because you want her to be short, but she is actually not. I advise you to go to gettyimages.com/editorial and search emma watson. You will find pictures where you can see Emma's footwear and you can see that they are UNDER 1". Like amberlee, I stand by my opinion...
Emma (the tallest and still growing): 5'6.5" to 5'7.5"
Rupert: 5'6.5"
Dan: 5'4" to 5'4.5"
Thanks amberlee, I agree with you. I mean, if Emma was only 5'5", she would not wear flats! If you were short then you would most likely want to look taller. Also, regarding what Charlotte said, Emma does not wear flats just because she is taller than Dan. She already towers over him when she is in flats and he is in large soled shoes! I would also like to agree with amberlee about people trying to make Emma seem shorter than she really is for whatever reason. She is tall (I consider over 5'6" to 5'7" tall for a girl) and is still growing. When you see her in pictures and movies, she looks tall. Taller than Dan and as tall as Rupert. Sorry if this sounds rude, but those of you who say that Emma's boots have at least a 2.5" heel at the Empire Awards, you have no evidence! You are just saying that they are big heels because you want her to be short, but she is actually not. I advise you to go to gettyimages.com/editorial and search emma watson. You will find pictures where you can see Emma's footwear and you can see that they are UNDER 1". Like amberlee, I stand by my opinion...
Emma (the tallest and still growing): 5'6.5" to 5'7.5"
Rupert: 5'6.5"
Dan: 5'4" to 5'4.5"
amberlee said on 20/Apr/06
With what john link says about Emma wearing flats all the time, wouldn't you if you were tall and you didnt want to be? im tall for a girl and i cant wear anything with a heel cuz then i tower above everyone. if were 5'5" or shorter i would definately wear heels so i could be taller. so going with this, emma must be taller than 5'6" because she obviously wears flats all the time. i think people say she's short is because they're short and they want someone they admire to be just like them, but lets face it, Emma is one of the taller girls!!!! i just dont get why others think she is short. just look at her in movies and pictures, you can tell she's tall.
P.S. why the heck would emma have an account on myspace?!! its just a bunch of weird people impersonating others. so be careful!!! but emma is definately taller or as tall as 5'6". i stand by my opinion and evidence i find.
With what john link says about Emma wearing flats all the time, wouldn't you if you were tall and you didnt want to be? im tall for a girl and i cant wear anything with a heel cuz then i tower above everyone. if were 5'5" or shorter i would definately wear heels so i could be taller. so going with this, emma must be taller than 5'6" because she obviously wears flats all the time. i think people say she's short is because they're short and they want someone they admire to be just like them, but lets face it, Emma is one of the taller girls!!!! i just dont get why others think she is short. just look at her in movies and pictures, you can tell she's tall.
P.S. why the heck would emma have an account on myspace?!! its just a bunch of weird people impersonating others. so be careful!!! but emma is definately taller or as tall as 5'6". i stand by my opinion and evidence i find.
john link said on 20/Apr/06
Charlotte, the boots that Emma wore at the Empire Awards were not 2.5" to 3.5". If you go to getty you can see that they are LESS THAN an inch. Dan and Rupert's shoes, however, are over an inch making Emma even taller!
Charlotte, the boots that Emma wore at the Empire Awards were not 2.5" to 3.5". If you go to getty you can see that they are LESS THAN an inch. Dan and Rupert's shoes, however, are over an inch making Emma even taller!
Charlotte said on 20/Apr/06
Emma is 3 inches shorter than Rupert (who is 5'7").
Hmm,the boots Emma is wearing in the Empire pics do have quite a large heel,2.5-3.5 inches,it seems.
Emma is 3 inches shorter than Rupert (who is 5'7").
Hmm,the boots Emma is wearing in the Empire pics do have quite a large heel,2.5-3.5 inches,it seems.
jacob said on 19/Apr/06
Sorry to be rude Serene, but you are not supporting your opinions. You have no information to show that she is under 5'5". She is way taller than Dan and almost (if not as) tall as Rupert. Did you look at the picture? It is actually a good one to compare heights and you can see that she is taller! :)
Sorry to be rude Serene, but you are not supporting your opinions. You have no information to show that she is under 5'5". She is way taller than Dan and almost (if not as) tall as Rupert. Did you look at the picture? It is actually a good one to compare heights and you can see that she is taller! :)
Serene said on 19/Apr/06
Rob, you better do something about Emma's height before there is WAR in Celebheight.. well.. ( I am half joking and half serious)
Erm..no no, Emma's height couldn't be any taller than 5'5".. it is impossible..
Rob, you better do something about Emma's height before there is WAR in Celebheight.. well.. ( I am half joking and half serious)
Erm..no no, Emma's height couldn't be any taller than 5'5".. it is impossible..
jacob said on 18/Apr/06
okay look at this picture... Click Here
jason issacs towers over dan and issacs is only 5'11". rupert is finally standing up straight and so is emma (even though she leans her head slighty, if she made it normal she would be even taller or about the same height as she looks now) From the picture you can see that rupert and emma are the same height (emma might have .5" on him) and that dan is clearly about 2 to 3 inches shorter than rupert and emma. here are their current heights:
Emma: 5'6.5" to 5'7.5"
Rupert: 5'6.5" to 5'7"
Dan: 5'4" to 5'4.5"
Not only does emma look a little bit taller than rupert in the picture, I believe that she may be even more than 1/2" taller than him because of the boots she is wearing. They are pretty flat. Considering this, she may be
okay look at this picture... Click Here
jason issacs towers over dan and issacs is only 5'11". rupert is finally standing up straight and so is emma (even though she leans her head slighty, if she made it normal she would be even taller or about the same height as she looks now) From the picture you can see that rupert and emma are the same height (emma might have .5" on him) and that dan is clearly about 2 to 3 inches shorter than rupert and emma. here are their current heights:
Emma: 5'6.5" to 5'7.5"
Rupert: 5'6.5" to 5'7"
Dan: 5'4" to 5'4.5"
Not only does emma look a little bit taller than rupert in the picture, I believe that she may be even more than 1/2" taller than him because of the boots she is wearing. They are pretty flat. Considering this, she may be
john link said on 18/Apr/06
Thanks amberlee, I agree with you. However I think Emma is a little more like 5'7" and Rupert is about 5'7.5". She looks pretty close in height to him. And just another question for everybody, isn't it weird that Emma always wears flats? So, in pictures she looks shorter than she actually is. This could add possibly 1/2 to 1 inch for her?!
Thanks amberlee, I agree with you. However I think Emma is a little more like 5'7" and Rupert is about 5'7.5". She looks pretty close in height to him. And just another question for everybody, isn't it weird that Emma always wears flats? So, in pictures she looks shorter than she actually is. This could add possibly 1/2 to 1 inch for her?!
amberlee said on 17/Apr/06
Emma is definately taller than Dan. in a picture of at a press conference in late 2005, Emma is standing between Dan and Rupert and (drum roll) Emma is taller than Dan by like an inch and she is also wearing flats, its a full body shot and Rupert is about 2 inches taller than Emma. So by going from estimated guesses, ist should be llike this:
Rupert- 5'8.5"-5'9"
Emma-5'6" to 5'7"
Dan-5'5" to 5'6" at the most
Also Clemence Poesy who plays fleur is 5'8" and she's shorter than Ron yet a little taller than Emma but not by much. Wont we all be suprised at thier actual heights?!!!
Emma is definately taller than Dan. in a picture of at a press conference in late 2005, Emma is standing between Dan and Rupert and (drum roll) Emma is taller than Dan by like an inch and she is also wearing flats, its a full body shot and Rupert is about 2 inches taller than Emma. So by going from estimated guesses, ist should be llike this:
Rupert- 5'8.5"-5'9"
Emma-5'6" to 5'7"
Dan-5'5" to 5'6" at the most
Also Clemence Poesy who plays fleur is 5'8" and she's shorter than Ron yet a little taller than Emma but not by much. Wont we all be suprised at thier actual heights?!!!
amberlee said on 17/Apr/06
In a more recent picture of the trio, it's the World Premiere of GoF, they are lined up and Emma and Dan are pretty close in thier heights but once again Emma is taller. Rupert is taller than both of them and it looks as though they are all the same weight but Rupert is standing back from the camera as well as away from Dan and Emma making him look shorter. This time Emma is wearing gold ballet flats and they are cute!!
In a more recent picture of the trio, it's the World Premiere of GoF, they are lined up and Emma and Dan are pretty close in thier heights but once again Emma is taller. Rupert is taller than both of them and it looks as though they are all the same weight but Rupert is standing back from the camera as well as away from Dan and Emma making him look shorter. This time Emma is wearing gold ballet flats and they are cute!!
Ali said on 17/Apr/06
just so everyone knows, that myspace isnt emma's real one. her real one is Click Here . that other one has pictures of emma with coronas, and those are infact, photoshopped. she is very upset and wants eveyone to know that those are fake. Her real my space also says that she is 5'4".
just so everyone knows, that myspace isnt emma's real one. her real one is Click Here . that other one has pictures of emma with coronas, and those are infact, photoshopped. she is very upset and wants eveyone to know that those are fake. Her real my space also says that she is 5'4".
john link said on 17/Apr/06
I did a google search on 'emma watson height' and almost every website lists her as 5'6.5" and up. Most list her at 5'7"...also here are some pictures of Emma and Bonnie Wright. Emma looks at least 3 inches taller than Bonnie and I believe that Bonnie is thought of in the 5'4" to 5'5" range. hmmm??? Does this mean that Emma really is 5'7"?
Click Here
Click Here
Editor Rob
I did a google search on 'emma watson height' and almost every website lists her as 5'6.5" and up. Most list her at 5'7"...also here are some pictures of Emma and Bonnie Wright. Emma looks at least 3 inches taller than Bonnie and I believe that Bonnie is thought of in the 5'4" to 5'5" range. hmmm??? Does this mean that Emma really is 5'7"?
Click Here
Click Here
Editor Rob all these sites copy from one place, and it usually isn't here...
?? said on 16/Apr/06
does she look 5'7 or 5'6 here?
Click Here
i don't think so! watson is standing extremely straight in this pic, so her and dan are about the same height at 5'5.
does she look 5'7 or 5'6 here?
Click Here
i don't think so! watson is standing extremely straight in this pic, so her and dan are about the same height at 5'5.
jeff said on 16/Apr/06
yeah i agree rob, you should change emma's height... to 5'6"...you guys may disagree but in the empire awards pictures she is as tall or taller than rupert and about 2 inches taller than dan. also, the picture that karee provided, emma is not standing up staight! look at her legs! she is losing about 1 to 2 inches. dan's head may be tilted down a little, but if he would make it normal, the top of his head would lower which would make him even shorter. so, i am thinking if both were barefoot and stood back to back emma would be about 2-3 inches taller than dan. she really looks in the 5'6" to 5'7" range.
emma: 5'6" to 5'7"
rupert: 5'7" or under
dan: 5'4"
yeah i agree rob, you should change emma's height... to 5'6"...you guys may disagree but in the empire awards pictures she is as tall or taller than rupert and about 2 inches taller than dan. also, the picture that karee provided, emma is not standing up staight! look at her legs! she is losing about 1 to 2 inches. dan's head may be tilted down a little, but if he would make it normal, the top of his head would lower which would make him even shorter. so, i am thinking if both were barefoot and stood back to back emma would be about 2-3 inches taller than dan. she really looks in the 5'6" to 5'7" range.
emma: 5'6" to 5'7"
rupert: 5'7" or under
dan: 5'4"
Serene said on 16/Apr/06
sianna, you got a point there. Hey Rob, I think you better modify Emma's height too or else there is war!!! Okay just joking.
Emma is has never been the tallest among the trios and she ain't one either. She can't be 5'5" because she doesn't look like one..
sianna, you got a point there. Hey Rob, I think you better modify Emma's height too or else there is war!!! Okay just joking.
Emma is has never been the tallest among the trios and she ain't one either. She can't be 5'5" because she doesn't look like one..
sianna said on 16/Apr/06
karee..y r u talkinf about urself? anywayz..emma is short. i agree with anonymous...if she WERE 5'7, she would have the same frame as keira knightly. Daniel is 5'5..5'5 and a half and emma is over an inch shorter than him. those photos that show emma being about HALF AND INCH TALLER is because she has her head p, whereas dan has his down n isnt standing straight.
karee..y r u talkinf about urself? anywayz..emma is short. i agree with anonymous...if she WERE 5'7, she would have the same frame as keira knightly. Daniel is 5'5..5'5 and a half and emma is over an inch shorter than him. those photos that show emma being about HALF AND INCH TALLER is because she has her head p, whereas dan has his down n isnt standing straight.
ice said on 15/Apr/06
Well rob, you've changed Daniel's and katie's. Now i think it's time you get to this one.
Well rob, you've changed Daniel's and katie's. Now i think it's time you get to this one.
Charlotte said on 14/Apr/06
Emma is at least 2 inches shorter than Dan (who is 5'5").
Emma is at least 2 inches shorter than Dan (who is 5'5").
Anonymous said on 13/Apr/06
She is not 5'7, otherwise she'd look like Kiera Knightley's stature and she doesn't. Dan and Emma are probably around the same height, there are loads of pictures where Dan is at least two inches taller, especially at the GOF world premiere.
She is not 5'7, otherwise she'd look like Kiera Knightley's stature and she doesn't. Dan and Emma are probably around the same height, there are loads of pictures where Dan is at least two inches taller, especially at the GOF world premiere.
karee said on 12/Apr/06
are you guys just choosing to ignore karee's comment on April 10th. it is really a good picture and it shows that emma is AT LEAST 2 inches TALLER than daniel. I aslo believe that she is as tall or taller than Rueprt.
Emma is the tallest at...5'7" to 5'7.5"
Rupert...5'7"
Dan...at the most 5'5" more like 5'4"
are you guys just choosing to ignore karee's comment on April 10th. it is really a good picture and it shows that emma is AT LEAST 2 inches TALLER than daniel. I aslo believe that she is as tall or taller than Rueprt.
Emma is the tallest at...5'7" to 5'7.5"
Rupert...5'7"
Dan...at the most 5'5" more like 5'4"
karee said on 12/Apr/06
well you believe that it is not emma's account...but i truly do think that it is her, she is as or taller than rupert, and much taller than dan. here is the link if you want to check it out:
myspace.com/emmawatson7
well you believe that it is not emma's account...but i truly do think that it is her, she is as or taller than rupert, and much taller than dan. here is the link if you want to check it out:
myspace.com/emmawatson7
Serene said on 11/Apr/06
Hello? Emma does not have a myspace account! Even she has one which I don't know, she is not that stupid to put her real name.
Hello? Emma does not have a myspace account! Even she has one which I don't know, she is not that stupid to put her real name.
Charlotte said on 11/Apr/06
Emma doesn't seem to be growing anymore.Her parents are not very tall and neither is her brother it seems.Apparantly her shoes at 2006 Empire Awards did have heels.Here are their current heights:
Rupert: slightly under 5'7"
Dan: 5'5" (5'5.5" MAX)
Emma: 5'4" (Obviously under 5'5".5'4.5" MAX)
Her heels at Empire Awards:
Click Here
Emma doesn't seem to be growing anymore.Her parents are not very tall and neither is her brother it seems.Apparantly her shoes at 2006 Empire Awards did have heels.Here are their current heights:
Rupert: slightly under 5'7"
Dan: 5'5" (5'5.5" MAX)
Emma: 5'4" (Obviously under 5'5".5'4.5" MAX)
Her heels at Empire Awards:
Click Here
Anonymous said on 9/Apr/06
yep, i agree anonymous, and according to aceshowbiz.com Emma is 5'6.5" and Daniel is 5'7" (these heights are recorded on ALOT of celebrity sites.) aceshowbiz is a very reliable (see the daniel radcliffe height page for a speel). By the way Karee, how do you know it was her?!
yep, i agree anonymous, and according to aceshowbiz.com Emma is 5'6.5" and Daniel is 5'7" (these heights are recorded on ALOT of celebrity sites.) aceshowbiz is a very reliable (see the daniel radcliffe height page for a speel). By the way Karee, how do you know it was her?!
karee said on 8/Apr/06
i talked to her on myspace (and it is really her!) and she said that she is 5'7.5" tall and taller than both rupert and dan! check out her myspace it is myspace.com/emmawatson7
i talked to her on myspace (and it is really her!) and she said that she is 5'7.5" tall and taller than both rupert and dan! check out her myspace it is myspace.com/emmawatson7
Erwin (erwingo_kahuat14@yahoo.com) said on 6/Apr/06
Serene you are right that Emma is not 5'6", She is less than 5'5".
Serene you are right that Emma is not 5'6", She is less than 5'5".
Serene said on 5/Apr/06
I went to see my doctor the another day coz there was some pain in my body which I can't identify what sort of pain or disease it is. At the same time, I ask him whether I could grow or not because I was consider short for my age, 5'3" or so. I can't measure my height yet.
So, he gave me some tips for growing taller:
1. Do loads of exercise!!
2. Drink loads and loads of WATER!!
3. Stretch!! Stretching is good for pulling your bones so that it can grow taller.
4. Besides water, drink loads of milk too. ( My sister is now 7 years old and she is 4'1.5" now. And she is huge for her age in school)
Those are the main things that make you grow taller.
But still, Emma is not 5'6"!!! She is less than 5'5"..
I went to see my doctor the another day coz there was some pain in my body which I can't identify what sort of pain or disease it is. At the same time, I ask him whether I could grow or not because I was consider short for my age, 5'3" or so. I can't measure my height yet.
So, he gave me some tips for growing taller:
1. Do loads of exercise!!
2. Drink loads and loads of WATER!!
3. Stretch!! Stretching is good for pulling your bones so that it can grow taller.
4. Besides water, drink loads of milk too. ( My sister is now 7 years old and she is 4'1.5" now. And she is huge for her age in school)
Those are the main things that make you grow taller.
But still, Emma is not 5'6"!!! She is less than 5'5"..
Erwin said on 2/Apr/06
Thank you Madëlïnë for your advise.
Thank you Madëlïnë for your advise.
Charlotte said on 2/Apr/06
Rupert: Approx 5'7"
Dan: 5'5.5"
Emma: under 5'5"
Rupert: Approx 5'7"
Dan: 5'5.5"
Emma: under 5'5"
Madeline said on 2/Apr/06
im pretty sure you shouldn't worry about your height Erwin- Im 16 and only 5'4". I think Emma watson is still 5'5".
im pretty sure you shouldn't worry about your height Erwin- Im 16 and only 5'4". I think Emma watson is still 5'5".
dave said on 1/Apr/06
emma (dan's girl) and erwin...you can't make yourself grow taller hate to break it to you...it is in fate's hands (but emma watson seems to be blessed with good height...I am guessing she will grow to be about 5'9")
emma (dan's girl) and erwin...you can't make yourself grow taller hate to break it to you...it is in fate's hands (but emma watson seems to be blessed with good height...I am guessing she will grow to be about 5'9")
Emma (Dan's girl) said on 1/Apr/06
Thank you so much, Erwin. But I am unhappy that I will not grow so tall. You are at least better than me, Erwin. You are 14 and already 5'4. Can you help me grow taller???
Well, thanks again!!
Thank you so much, Erwin. But I am unhappy that I will not grow so tall. You are at least better than me, Erwin. You are 14 and already 5'4. Can you help me grow taller???
Well, thanks again!!
Emma (Dan's girl) said on 31/Mar/06
Hey Dave, I agree with you. But Rupert cannot be shorter than Emma, man! That's not at all possible. If Emma is 5'7.5, then rupert should be about (maybe not 2 inches difference), well, maybe, 5'9.
BYE
Hey Dave, I agree with you. But Rupert cannot be shorter than Emma, man! That's not at all possible. If Emma is 5'7.5, then rupert should be about (maybe not 2 inches difference), well, maybe, 5'9.
BYE
Erwin said on 30/Mar/06
Are you sure about your saying Dave?
Are you sure about your saying Dave?
Dave said on 29/Mar/06
Emma (Dan's girl): thank you for agreeing that Emma is taller than Dan! I am positive about that also. but I do not think Rupert is 2 inches taller than Emma, they are about the same height. If you look at the Empire award pictures Emma seems to be about .5" taller than Rupert and she is wearing flat footwear. From looking at recent pictures:
Emma: 5'7" to 5'7.5"
Rupert: 5'7"
Dan: at the most 5'5" maybe shorter
Emma (Dan's girl): thank you for agreeing that Emma is taller than Dan! I am positive about that also. but I do not think Rupert is 2 inches taller than Emma, they are about the same height. If you look at the Empire award pictures Emma seems to be about .5" taller than Rupert and she is wearing flat footwear. From looking at recent pictures:
Emma: 5'7" to 5'7.5"
Rupert: 5'7"
Dan: at the most 5'5" maybe shorter
Emma (Dan's girl) said on 29/Mar/06
Emma Watson maybe about 5'6. Rupert maybe about 5'8. Dan maybe about 5'5.
All of them are not very short, but not very tall too. Well, I have not right to say that because I am short too. Can anyone tell me my predicted height? I am 13 years old. My height is 5'2. My mom is 5'2 and my dad is 5'9. Please tell me my estimated height, okay?
Dan is surely shorter than Emma. I am more than sure of that!!
Emma Watson maybe about 5'6. Rupert maybe about 5'8. Dan maybe about 5'5.
All of them are not very short, but not very tall too. Well, I have not right to say that because I am short too. Can anyone tell me my predicted height? I am 13 years old. My height is 5'2. My mom is 5'2 and my dad is 5'9. Please tell me my estimated height, okay?
Dan is surely shorter than Emma. I am more than sure of that!!
Serene said on 27/Mar/06
Emma is not 5'7"!! Stop saying that.. Rupert hardly looks like he is 5'7".. so how can u say emma is 5'7"??
She is now less than 5'5".. about 5'3"-5'4.5"..
Emma is not 5'7"!! Stop saying that.. Rupert hardly looks like he is 5'7".. so how can u say emma is 5'7"??
She is now less than 5'5".. about 5'3"-5'4.5"..
Charlotte said on 26/Mar/06
Sarah Shaw -Even in those pictures,she's at least an inch shorter than Dan when he's slouching.Her shoes have 1-2 inch heels on them by the way.
Sarah Shaw -Even in those pictures,she's at least an inch shorter than Dan when he's slouching.Her shoes have 1-2 inch heels on them by the way.
ice said on 25/Mar/06
Glenn said 5'4 for daniel, so using his estimate, you get 5'3.5 for emma. If Glenn understimated a bit. 5'4.5 for dan, and 5'4 for emma.
Glenn said 5'4 for daniel, so using his estimate, you get 5'3.5 for emma. If Glenn understimated a bit. 5'4.5 for dan, and 5'4 for emma.
Amanda said on 23/Mar/06
I'd say Rupert is 5' 7" and Emma and Dan look about 5' 6" from the March 13th pics.
I'd say Rupert is 5' 7" and Emma and Dan look about 5' 6" from the March 13th pics.
sianna said on 23/Mar/06
um to sarah shaw, how do u no that she is in flats, none of the pics show that. and she is not 2-3 inches taller than dan, they are the same height in it. 5'7 for emma...please.
um to sarah shaw, how do u no that she is in flats, none of the pics show that. and she is not 2-3 inches taller than dan, they are the same height in it. 5'7 for emma...please.
Anonymous said on 22/Mar/06
Rupert is 5'7 and that's why Emma isn't 5'5.
Rupert is 5'7 and that's why Emma isn't 5'5.
Serene said on 22/Mar/06
How many times I need to say that Emma is is not 5'7" now???
She attends variety of events and she can't wear the sAME and exact shoe at all time which makes her look taller. She is only less than 5'5".. there is no chance she is 5'7" now.. please look carefully.
Rupert is not even 5'8" yet..you know..
How many times I need to say that Emma is is not 5'7" now???
She attends variety of events and she can't wear the sAME and exact shoe at all time which makes her look taller. She is only less than 5'5".. there is no chance she is 5'7" now.. please look carefully.
Rupert is not even 5'8" yet..you know..
Anonymous said on 21/Mar/06
She doesn't has flats in this pics.
Editor Rob
She doesn't has flats in this pics.
Editor Rob in the empire awards, there's about 20 pics on getty, black boot things, probably no more than 1 inch heel. Anyway, looking at all the pics watson/radcliffe are close in height
bikagyura said on 21/Mar/06
how do you know she's wearing flats?
how do you know she's wearing flats?
amberlee said on 20/Mar/06
okay i have been to tons of Harry Potter sights and most of them say Rupert is around 5'11". and if you take a look at Emma in the 4th movie she's about 3-4 inches shorter than he is making her about 5' 6" and up. Robert who plays Cedric is 6' 1" and she is about a head shorter than he is and my guy friend is the same height as Cedric and I'm about a head shorter than he is and I'm 5'6". there is a picture of Emma Robert and Katie at one of the premieres and where she comes up to Robert is about where i come up to on my friend. she definitely is taller than Dan but i say she is no taller than 5' 7"
okay i have been to tons of Harry Potter sights and most of them say Rupert is around 5'11". and if you take a look at Emma in the 4th movie she's about 3-4 inches shorter than he is making her about 5' 6" and up. Robert who plays Cedric is 6' 1" and she is about a head shorter than he is and my guy friend is the same height as Cedric and I'm about a head shorter than he is and I'm 5'6". there is a picture of Emma Robert and Katie at one of the premieres and where she comes up to Robert is about where i come up to on my friend. she definitely is taller than Dan but i say she is no taller than 5' 7"
Serene said on 16/Mar/06
Bonnie is almost as tall as Emma Watson now.. I think but she is wearing heels in the GOF London World Premier.. so she is about 5'4" I think.. bonnie..
Emma still looks 5'3" in the SOny Ericson Empire
Awards
Bonnie is almost as tall as Emma Watson now.. I think but she is wearing heels in the GOF London World Premier.. so she is about 5'4" I think.. bonnie..
Emma still looks 5'3" in the SOny Ericson Empire
Awards
Anonymous said on 15/Mar/06
recent pics from the empire awards shows at 5'5" and Rupert at 5'6.5"
recent pics from the empire awards shows at 5'5" and Rupert at 5'6.5"
ice said on 13/Mar/06
To Cassie: You can argue all you like, but I still don't believe the girl is 5'5. Tom Cruise claimed he was 5'9. Brad pitt claimed he was 6'1. Carson Daly said he was 6'3. Are they those heights? No. So, her saying 5'5 really doesn't do much for me. Until I see something that makes her look her claimed height, I won't believe it. That's just the bottom line. Maybe she is 5'5. I just don't see it. So, I will give my opinion as I see it.
To Cassie: You can argue all you like, but I still don't believe the girl is 5'5. Tom Cruise claimed he was 5'9. Brad pitt claimed he was 6'1. Carson Daly said he was 6'3. Are they those heights? No. So, her saying 5'5 really doesn't do much for me. Until I see something that makes her look her claimed height, I won't believe it. That's just the bottom line. Maybe she is 5'5. I just don't see it. So, I will give my opinion as I see it.
Anonymous said on 13/Mar/06
How tall is Bonnie Wright?
How tall is Bonnie Wright?
Cassie said on 12/Mar/06
Emma is 5' 5". She gave that as her exact height in May 2005, and said she was "about" 5' 5" in November 2005, because she might have grown 1/4" but was most likely 5' 5" on the nose. I can't believe how ridiculous some of you are being. Yes, you can SAY whatever you want, but that doesn't mean it's even close to correct!
How tall will Emma get? Well, she sure as heck isn't going to be 6' tall. If she were going to be tall, she would already be tall!
A (female) child who is 5' 5" tall at 15 years, 11 months of age has a predicted future height of (*drum roll*): 165.9 cm or 5' 5.3"!
Click Here
Emma is 5' 5". She gave that as her exact height in May 2005, and said she was "about" 5' 5" in November 2005, because she might have grown 1/4" but was most likely 5' 5" on the nose. I can't believe how ridiculous some of you are being. Yes, you can SAY whatever you want, but that doesn't mean it's even close to correct!
How tall will Emma get? Well, she sure as heck isn't going to be 6' tall. If she were going to be tall, she would already be tall!
A (female) child who is 5' 5" tall at 15 years, 11 months of age has a predicted future height of (*drum roll*): 165.9 cm or 5' 5.3"!
Click Here
lol said on 9/Mar/06
http://www.filmweb.no/bilder/multimedia/archive/00092/Rupert_Grint__Emma_W_92247c.jpg check out this picture, rupert is slouching but Dan and Emma are standing very straight. Emma has on thick soled trainers so please don't post crap like Dan is wearing platform shoes because he's not. It shows Dan is taller, hence Emma is 5'5 or below
http://www.filmweb.no/bilder/multimedia/archive/00092/Rupert_Grint__Emma_W_92247c.jpg check out this picture, rupert is slouching but Dan and Emma are standing very straight. Emma has on thick soled trainers so please don't post crap like Dan is wearing platform shoes because he's not. It shows Dan is taller, hence Emma is 5'5 or below
Em said on 7/Mar/06
About 5'5 is probably her being 5'3-5'4ish. I've met her, she's an average-sized girl.
About 5'5 is probably her being 5'3-5'4ish. I've met her, she's an average-sized girl.
ice said on 7/Mar/06
What's funny is how mad everyone gets when you don't agree with them. My opinion is she looks rather short. You can't change that by simply arguing without proof. Besides, it's my opinion. I could say she looks 4'10, if I wanted. It's just a matter of what i think. It is a message board after all. LOL
What's funny is how mad everyone gets when you don't agree with them. My opinion is she looks rather short. You can't change that by simply arguing without proof. Besides, it's my opinion. I could say she looks 4'10, if I wanted. It's just a matter of what i think. It is a message board after all. LOL
gRANGER GaL said on 7/Mar/06
LISTEN EVERYONE you dont all know how tall emma is going 2 be ok!! She might end up at 6 foot
none of you guys kno her there for u dont know her true height. It might say in intervews she is 5 foot 5 but there not always true and i have seen lots saying she is 5 foot 6
so stop presuming u guys kno it all coz u DONT
LISTEN EVERYONE you dont all know how tall emma is going 2 be ok!! She might end up at 6 foot
none of you guys kno her there for u dont know her true height. It might say in intervews she is 5 foot 5 but there not always true and i have seen lots saying she is 5 foot 6
so stop presuming u guys kno it all coz u DONT
Amanda said on 7/Mar/06
No. Emma has to be at least 5' 5". Proof? In May 2005, in an interview, Daniel Radcliffe said he was 5' 5.5" with the half inch being important, because he was half an inch taller than Emma Watson. Emma, knowing she hadn't grown much since May, gave her November 2005 height to be "about 5ft 5" because she knew she was at least 5' 5", but not sure exactly because she hadn't been measured since Spring.
No. Emma has to be at least 5' 5". Proof? In May 2005, in an interview, Daniel Radcliffe said he was 5' 5.5" with the half inch being important, because he was half an inch taller than Emma Watson. Emma, knowing she hadn't grown much since May, gave her November 2005 height to be "about 5ft 5" because she knew she was at least 5' 5", but not sure exactly because she hadn't been measured since Spring.
ice said on 6/Mar/06
To Cassie: The thing is she said ABOUT 5'5. That really doesn't sound like a full 5'5. People usally say that if they are 5'4 and some change, or if they think they have reached a certain height. How many people say "about a height" if they know for sure they are that height?
To Cassie: The thing is she said ABOUT 5'5. That really doesn't sound like a full 5'5. People usally say that if they are 5'4 and some change, or if they think they have reached a certain height. How many people say "about a height" if they know for sure they are that height?
Cassie said on 6/Mar/06
There is no "to me." Emma said she was 5' 5". She looks the same height next to other people who are 5' 5". Therefore, Emma's height is 5' 5". Why do people keep arguing? Also, considering the majority of girls are done growing, Emma will probably only get to be about 5' 6". I think Dan is probably going to be 5' 6" as well, and Rupert will end up at 5' 8". They're not little kids anymore. If they were these heights three years ago, I could understand why people *might* predict Emma to be 5' 8", Dan 5' 9" and Rupert 6' or something like that, but these kids are at the age where their growth slows/stops. For girls it's 16 and for guys it's 18. *Some* girls can grow to 18+ and boys to 21 but this is rare, and not likely going to be the case.
There is no "to me." Emma said she was 5' 5". She looks the same height next to other people who are 5' 5". Therefore, Emma's height is 5' 5". Why do people keep arguing? Also, considering the majority of girls are done growing, Emma will probably only get to be about 5' 6". I think Dan is probably going to be 5' 6" as well, and Rupert will end up at 5' 8". They're not little kids anymore. If they were these heights three years ago, I could understand why people *might* predict Emma to be 5' 8", Dan 5' 9" and Rupert 6' or something like that, but these kids are at the age where their growth slows/stops. For girls it's 16 and for guys it's 18. *Some* girls can grow to 18+ and boys to 21 but this is rare, and not likely going to be the case.
mouldy said on 5/Mar/06
Yup, Keira is 5'7" and as thin as a broomstick, that's why she looks even taller
Yup, Keira is 5'7" and as thin as a broomstick, that's why she looks even taller
Stephenie said on 3/Mar/06
Comparisons, people. Emma looks tiny because the Phelps twins are at least 6' 3" and she's only 5' 5". She looks about the same height as Katie Leung when Katie and Emma have the same shoes (Katie wears heeled boots a lot of the time), and she looks only a tiny bit shorter than Daniel Radcliffe, who is 5' 5.5". And why do some people keep insisting that Dan is shorter than Emma? Emma and Dan BOTH said that Dan is taller. And considering Emma's "I'm trying to be taller than you are" act, I don't think she'd be going around telling everyone she's a half inch shorter than he is if she was really taller. *rolls eyes* Keira Knightley is 5' 7" and Emma is 5' 5". Keira wears heels, putting her to look about 5' 10", and Emma does not, so she looks kind of short a lot of times.
Comparisons, people. Emma looks tiny because the Phelps twins are at least 6' 3" and she's only 5' 5". She looks about the same height as Katie Leung when Katie and Emma have the same shoes (Katie wears heeled boots a lot of the time), and she looks only a tiny bit shorter than Daniel Radcliffe, who is 5' 5.5". And why do some people keep insisting that Dan is shorter than Emma? Emma and Dan BOTH said that Dan is taller. And considering Emma's "I'm trying to be taller than you are" act, I don't think she'd be going around telling everyone she's a half inch shorter than he is if she was really taller. *rolls eyes* Keira Knightley is 5' 7" and Emma is 5' 5". Keira wears heels, putting her to look about 5' 10", and Emma does not, so she looks kind of short a lot of times.
Wicked Kid said on 27/Feb/06
Er. Whoever said anything about Keira Knightley being 5'3"!?!? Keira looks 5'7" - 5'8". Emma, on the other hand, looks(note the word LOOKS) not more than 5'2".
Er. Whoever said anything about Keira Knightley being 5'3"!?!? Keira looks 5'7" - 5'8". Emma, on the other hand, looks(note the word LOOKS) not more than 5'2".
Serene said on 26/Feb/06
Emma will grow till she is about 5'6" or so but to me, she is currently 5'4" or less.
Emma will grow till she is about 5'6" or so but to me, she is currently 5'4" or less.
ASH said on 26/Feb/06
hi, EMMA(Dan's girl)I agree with you , dan is definitely shorter than Emma . he is not more than 5'5ft and emma is 5'6 . please give your comments here . i will be waiting for your comments and i wanna be your friend. BYE
hi, EMMA(Dan's girl)I agree with you , dan is definitely shorter than Emma . he is not more than 5'5ft and emma is 5'6 . please give your comments here . i will be waiting for your comments and i wanna be your friend. BYE
clare said on 25/Feb/06
emma watson looks taller than she looks,she is now around 5ft6-7 and probably will be around 5ft8 which isnt too tall, i fink rupert will be the tallest he will be around 5ft9-10 and dan will be the smallest at around 5f6-7
emma watson looks taller than she looks,she is now around 5ft6-7 and probably will be around 5ft8 which isnt too tall, i fink rupert will be the tallest he will be around 5ft9-10 and dan will be the smallest at around 5f6-7
ice said on 21/Feb/06
Um... i never said keira knightly was 5'3. What on earth are you talking about? Keira actually looks tall. Emma does not.
Um... i never said keira knightly was 5'3. What on earth are you talking about? Keira actually looks tall. Emma does not.
Justine said on 20/Feb/06
ok im getting very mad at people on this site, you all want to make people teeny-tiny!!! you cant stand females being over 5'3"! its crazy cause u all want girls to be shorter, youre saying even Keira Knightly is 5'3", which is 4 inches incorrect!
ok im getting very mad at people on this site, you all want to make people teeny-tiny!!! you cant stand females being over 5'3"! its crazy cause u all want girls to be shorter, youre saying even Keira Knightly is 5'3", which is 4 inches incorrect!
Serene said on 20/Feb/06
Whoa, 2"+ are missing from Emma's height?In picture,photographers are quite tricky and they shot pictures from different angle and sometimes celebs will look as though they are 6ft tall but actually they are only 5'10".
in my view, Emma can only be less than 5'4"
Whoa, 2"+ are missing from Emma's height?In picture,photographers are quite tricky and they shot pictures from different angle and sometimes celebs will look as though they are 6ft tall but actually they are only 5'10".
in my view, Emma can only be less than 5'4"
Lily said on 17/Feb/06
She's about 5'3.5"-5'4.5".Obviously no taller.
She's about 5'3.5"-5'4.5".Obviously no taller.
ice said on 16/Feb/06
Okay, looking at the pics Wicked Kid provided, I'm not seeing the 5'5". People are going to flip when I say this, but I swear she looks the same height I like in pics. I'm acurrately measured at 5'2.75" To give her a little extra for any optical illusion or error on my part, I see the most at 5'3.75" or 162 cm. Where in the hell is the 5'5+ coming from?
Okay, looking at the pics Wicked Kid provided, I'm not seeing the 5'5". People are going to flip when I say this, but I swear she looks the same height I like in pics. I'm acurrately measured at 5'2.75" To give her a little extra for any optical illusion or error on my part, I see the most at 5'3.75" or 162 cm. Where in the hell is the 5'5+ coming from?
Menta said on 16/Feb/06
I think she's a little bit shorter...because she s NOT that close to Dan,as many believe, and her being 5,5and him stated as 5,5.5 would make him only 0.5 taller! To me,the gap between zhem is like 3 inches,look here: http://www.aahceleb.com/pic/danielradcliffe_015.html
I think she's a little bit shorter...because she s NOT that close to Dan,as many believe, and her being 5,5and him stated as 5,5.5 would make him only 0.5 taller! To me,the gap between zhem is like 3 inches,look here: http://www.aahceleb.com/pic/danielradcliffe_015.html
Serene said on 16/Feb/06
sianna, you are correct on Emma and Katie in same height. But in my last comment, my meaning was she can't be 5'5" OR 5'4"..coz she is under 5'4"..maybe.. and I said.. one of my mates looks taller than Emma..
Sorry for misunderstanding..
sianna, you are correct on Emma and Katie in same height. But in my last comment, my meaning was she can't be 5'5" OR 5'4"..coz she is under 5'4"..maybe.. and I said.. one of my mates looks taller than Emma..
Sorry for misunderstanding..
sianna said on 14/Feb/06
yer, i was confused about wat natalie had sed 2 wicked kid! lol! and to serene, i actually think she is shorter than 5'4 or 5'5 but i thought people would go lyk mental at me as it has happened before. emma says shez 5'5, so shez probably 5'4 or a little under. and to Natalie, how on earth is emma 2'3 inches taller than Katie! they r the same height!
yer, i was confused about wat natalie had sed 2 wicked kid! lol! and to serene, i actually think she is shorter than 5'4 or 5'5 but i thought people would go lyk mental at me as it has happened before. emma says shez 5'5, so shez probably 5'4 or a little under. and to Natalie, how on earth is emma 2'3 inches taller than Katie! they r the same height!
Wicked Kid said on 13/Feb/06
Natalie, I meant that she looks shorter than 5'5".
Natalie, I meant that she looks shorter than 5'5".
Serene said on 13/Feb/06
sianna, the guy who plays cedric diggory is 6'1". Emma can't be 5'5", or hardly 5'4".. coz one of my mates are 5'4"..and she is way taller than Emma..
sianna, the guy who plays cedric diggory is 6'1". Emma can't be 5'5", or hardly 5'4".. coz one of my mates are 5'4"..and she is way taller than Emma..
Natalie said on 12/Feb/06
Yeah Wicked Kid I agree with you, in those pictures Emma does not look 5'5" at all, she looks much taller than that. She looks about 5'6" to 5'7". Also, she is clearly 2 to 3 inches taller than Katie and 1-2 inches taller than Dan. I think Emma is still growing, most defintely.
Yeah Wicked Kid I agree with you, in those pictures Emma does not look 5'5" at all, she looks much taller than that. She looks about 5'6" to 5'7". Also, she is clearly 2 to 3 inches taller than Katie and 1-2 inches taller than Dan. I think Emma is still growing, most defintely.
sianna said on 12/Feb/06
OK, with this photo (http://editorial.gettyimages.com/source/search/details_pop.aspx?iid=56220626&cdi=0) emma is more than a head shorter than the guy who plays cedric diggory in hp, he is probably 5'11 or 6'. so how can she be 5'5?? in my opinion she 5'4 AND NO TALLER, but thats just wat i think.
OK, with this photo (http://editorial.gettyimages.com/source/search/details_pop.aspx?iid=56220626&cdi=0) emma is more than a head shorter than the guy who plays cedric diggory in hp, he is probably 5'11 or 6'. so how can she be 5'5?? in my opinion she 5'4 AND NO TALLER, but thats just wat i think.
Stephenie said on 11/Feb/06
No, I do not fall under "most girls" because I have genes for late growth. Most of my female classmates didn't grow more than an inch since their freshman year of high school (age 14/15). I grew 5-6 inches since my freshman year.
Emma IS almost 16, but she is also almost 5' 6"... Daniel is about 5' 6" now and I really don't see much of a height difference between them anymore. And when Emma is standing up straight, she looks slightly taller than Katie.
So maybe Emma's full height will be 5' 6"?
No, I do not fall under "most girls" because I have genes for late growth. Most of my female classmates didn't grow more than an inch since their freshman year of high school (age 14/15). I grew 5-6 inches since my freshman year.
Emma IS almost 16, but she is also almost 5' 6"... Daniel is about 5' 6" now and I really don't see much of a height difference between them anymore. And when Emma is standing up straight, she looks slightly taller than Katie.
So maybe Emma's full height will be 5' 6"?
Wicked Kid said on 10/Feb/06
I really can't see the 5'5", AT ALL: http://editorial.gettyimages.com/source/search/details_pop.aspx?iid=56220629&cdi=0 and http://editorial.gettyimages.com/source/search/details_pop.aspx?iid=56220626&cdi=0
I really can't see the 5'5", AT ALL: http://editorial.gettyimages.com/source/search/details_pop.aspx?iid=56220629&cdi=0 and http://editorial.gettyimages.com/source/search/details_pop.aspx?iid=56220626&cdi=0
Wicked Kid said on 9/Feb/06
Hmm wait, so Stephenie doesn't fall under the "Most girls"?? Emma's already going to be 16 you know.
Hmm wait, so Stephenie doesn't fall under the "Most girls"?? Emma's already going to be 16 you know.
glow said on 9/Feb/06
Stephenie says:
"It's funny to hear these girls who are 13 and 5' 7" talk about how they're going to be 6' 1" or something when they are probably done growing (most of them are taller than their mothers)."
LOL, I have to agree with you there. I have a friend who, when she was 13 and already about 5'4"-5'5", insisted she was going to be 5'11" because the doctor told her so. At 20 years of age and only about 5'6", I should hope she doesn't go to that doctor anymore!
Stephenie says:
"It's funny to hear these girls who are 13 and 5' 7" talk about how they're going to be 6' 1" or something when they are probably done growing (most of them are taller than their mothers)."
LOL, I have to agree with you there. I have a friend who, when she was 13 and already about 5'4"-5'5", insisted she was going to be 5'11" because the doctor told her so. At 20 years of age and only about 5'6", I should hope she doesn't go to that doctor anymore!
Stephenie said on 7/Feb/06
You never know. I was 5' 3" at Emma's age and now I am 5' 8.5"! I used to be shorter than my (female) friends and now I am taller than most of them. I am 18 and I was 5' 6.5" and 17 at the end of my senior year and a lot of people would do double-takes because I grew 3.5" in a short period of time and they were so used to me being shorter. And I grew another 2" since then!
As for what Mouldy said, that is completely true. Most girls are done growing by 15/16. Some even sooner! My neighbor Katelyn is 5' 6" and she just turned 13 and my brother's friend's little sister Anna is 5' 5" and she is 12. Considering the heights of their parents, and that both of their moms were done growing at their ages, I think they're about done.
It's funny to hear these girls who are 13 and 5' 7" talk about how they're going to be 6' 1" or something when they are probably done growing (most of them are taller than their mothers).
Emma Watson? We'll see. She really looks closer to 5' 6" now, at least to me, but I really doubt she'll be more than 5' 7" even though she's been growing about an inch a year since she was 13 and 5' 3". Some people take that into account and assume she'll grow an inch a year until she's 20 and end up at 5' 10"-- not likely!
You never know. I was 5' 3" at Emma's age and now I am 5' 8.5"! I used to be shorter than my (female) friends and now I am taller than most of them. I am 18 and I was 5' 6.5" and 17 at the end of my senior year and a lot of people would do double-takes because I grew 3.5" in a short period of time and they were so used to me being shorter. And I grew another 2" since then!
As for what Mouldy said, that is completely true. Most girls are done growing by 15/16. Some even sooner! My neighbor Katelyn is 5' 6" and she just turned 13 and my brother's friend's little sister Anna is 5' 5" and she is 12. Considering the heights of their parents, and that both of their moms were done growing at their ages, I think they're about done.
It's funny to hear these girls who are 13 and 5' 7" talk about how they're going to be 6' 1" or something when they are probably done growing (most of them are taller than their mothers).
Emma Watson? We'll see. She really looks closer to 5' 6" now, at least to me, but I really doubt she'll be more than 5' 7" even though she's been growing about an inch a year since she was 13 and 5' 3". Some people take that into account and assume she'll grow an inch a year until she's 20 and end up at 5' 10"-- not likely!
mouldy said on 3/Feb/06
I just read some of the older comments, and I have to say that looking mature does not mean someone's stopped growing! At least not for the guys cos when girls really start looking like women (in other words, get their full curves) they're most probably done growing. But for boys it's not like that at all! Like Jason, I was also shaving by the time I was 13 and by age 14 everyone thought I was 18-19! Even now, at age 17 everyone who doesn't know me thinks I'm like 21-22 at least! And I still grew after 13,hey!
I just read some of the older comments, and I have to say that looking mature does not mean someone's stopped growing! At least not for the guys cos when girls really start looking like women (in other words, get their full curves) they're most probably done growing. But for boys it's not like that at all! Like Jason, I was also shaving by the time I was 13 and by age 14 everyone thought I was 18-19! Even now, at age 17 everyone who doesn't know me thinks I'm like 21-22 at least! And I still grew after 13,hey!
Serene said on 2/Feb/06
I agree with mouldy,Charlotte and Wicked Kid. Estimation of a person's tallness is quite hard from a picture,it may looks whatever height. I think Emma will grow max 5'6" like what mouldy said.
I agree with mouldy,Charlotte and Wicked Kid. Estimation of a person's tallness is quite hard from a picture,it may looks whatever height. I think Emma will grow max 5'6" like what mouldy said.
Wicked Kid said on 31/Jan/06
I guess to some people, tallness increases a person's attractiveness? That's why the fans want Emma to be taller. Or hope she will be.
I guess to some people, tallness increases a person's attractiveness? That's why the fans want Emma to be taller. Or hope she will be.
Josh said on 30/Jan/06
I agree with Charlotte she hasn´t grown in while her height is not bad at 5'5 she has a pretty face , I think she´s done growing and she looks great how she is .
I agree with Charlotte she hasn´t grown in while her height is not bad at 5'5 she has a pretty face , I think she´s done growing and she looks great how she is .
Charlotte said on 29/Jan/06
I agree with mouldy.Completely actually.Why do people want Emma to be tall? She'll be max 5'6",you mark my words,stop exaggerating people! She's never been taller than average and won't be,even if you keep telling yourselves that,it won't happen.
I agree with mouldy.Completely actually.Why do people want Emma to be tall? She'll be max 5'6",you mark my words,stop exaggerating people! She's never been taller than average and won't be,even if you keep telling yourselves that,it won't happen.
mouldy said on 29/Jan/06
Lol, you got my point. I know for a fact that like 90% of all women are done growing at 16,usually even sooner. I'm 17 and all my fenmale classmates have been the same height for the last 3 years. The few tall women I know have been the same height since forever! I know 3 girls at my school who are like 5'8" or 5'9" and they have been like this since they were 12. Also, my mum is tall (5'9") and she was that height since she was 13. Why does everybody think Emma is gonna grow insanely tall??! Face it people, Emma becoming a 5'9"-er or a 5'10"-er is highly unlikely for those two reasons:i)Very few women reach this kind of height so statistically seen she already has slim chances and ii)unless she is a very rare case of delayed growth, she will remain within one inch of her current height, so she'll be 5'6" tops.
Lol, you got my point. I know for a fact that like 90% of all women are done growing at 16,usually even sooner. I'm 17 and all my fenmale classmates have been the same height for the last 3 years. The few tall women I know have been the same height since forever! I know 3 girls at my school who are like 5'8" or 5'9" and they have been like this since they were 12. Also, my mum is tall (5'9") and she was that height since she was 13. Why does everybody think Emma is gonna grow insanely tall??! Face it people, Emma becoming a 5'9"-er or a 5'10"-er is highly unlikely for those two reasons:i)Very few women reach this kind of height so statistically seen she already has slim chances and ii)unless she is a very rare case of delayed growth, she will remain within one inch of her current height, so she'll be 5'6" tops.
lol said on 26/Jan/06
i do, you hear stories of supermodels like tyra banks who feel estranged when they were just twelve because they towered over the rest of their classmates and was already 5'9
i do, you hear stories of supermodels like tyra banks who feel estranged when they were just twelve because they towered over the rest of their classmates and was already 5'9
mouldy said on 26/Jan/06
Jack, I personally think that a 5'6" or 5'7" height claim for Emma is ridiculous. She appears to be the same height as Dan, which would mean about 5'5" (I don't agree with the 5'4" claim, if he were THAT tiny it would show...I think so, at least.) And she's NOT going to be 5'9" or 5'10" let's be serious now! The majority of girls is done growing at 16(if they grow after that it's only gonna be minimal, like half an inch or so) and she's 15. In other words,if she were to become a 5'10"-er, she would have to be that height (or at least REALLY close to) already, which means she would be towering over Dan, and she's not! Anyone else that agrees with me?
Jack, I personally think that a 5'6" or 5'7" height claim for Emma is ridiculous. She appears to be the same height as Dan, which would mean about 5'5" (I don't agree with the 5'4" claim, if he were THAT tiny it would show...I think so, at least.) And she's NOT going to be 5'9" or 5'10" let's be serious now! The majority of girls is done growing at 16(if they grow after that it's only gonna be minimal, like half an inch or so) and she's 15. In other words,if she were to become a 5'10"-er, she would have to be that height (or at least REALLY close to) already, which means she would be towering over Dan, and she's not! Anyone else that agrees with me?
Serene said on 25/Jan/06
Sianna.. erm.. I think I can agree on both growing and no growing possibilities on Emma Watson and Daniel Radcliffe..
I haven't seen them both growing fast..but they are still in the growing process...very gradually..
Sianna.. erm.. I think I can agree on both growing and no growing possibilities on Emma Watson and Daniel Radcliffe..
I haven't seen them both growing fast..but they are still in the growing process...very gradually..
sianna said on 24/Jan/06
to sarah, that photo u provided is the best one to prove that Dan IS taller than Emma. Dans shoes may only have a small 1-2cm heel, but Emma's heels are thick too. Emma look 5'4, not the 5'5 she says she is, but she cood b, thats just my opinion. Emma will not grow more, y? because she has already done alot of growing. she would only get a growth spurt is she had done barely any growing ova the past few years. on the othr hand, Dan hasnt been growing alot, u remeber he was much taller than Emma, but emma grew a bit more and he hasn't. that might b a sign that he'll still grow.
to sarah, that photo u provided is the best one to prove that Dan IS taller than Emma. Dans shoes may only have a small 1-2cm heel, but Emma's heels are thick too. Emma look 5'4, not the 5'5 she says she is, but she cood b, thats just my opinion. Emma will not grow more, y? because she has already done alot of growing. she would only get a growth spurt is she had done barely any growing ova the past few years. on the othr hand, Dan hasnt been growing alot, u remeber he was much taller than Emma, but emma grew a bit more and he hasn't. that might b a sign that he'll still grow.
cdtt said on 23/Jan/06
i saw her at a mall one time and i walked right past her and she was at least 7 inches shorter than me and she had on tennis shoes and im 5'10"
i saw her at a mall one time and i walked right past her and she was at least 7 inches shorter than me and she had on tennis shoes and im 5'10"
cody said on 23/Jan/06
i met her last week at satbucks in oxfordshire and she said dhe was 5'5 to be exact
i met her last week at satbucks in oxfordshire and she said dhe was 5'5 to be exact
Serene said on 23/Jan/06
I agree with Sarah too.. Dan is taller than Emma but both of them will grow.. just give them some time..
I agree with Sarah too.. Dan is taller than Emma but both of them will grow.. just give them some time..
Sarah said on 23/Jan/06
Dan IS taller than Emma, for references look at this pic:
http://www.potter-mania.com/news_img/gof_crew.jpg
she may grow a few more inches, tho
Dan IS taller than Emma, for references look at this pic:
http://www.potter-mania.com/news_img/gof_crew.jpg
she may grow a few more inches, tho
Anonymous said on 21/Jan/06
I agree with gyllenhaalic823 and Serene. Emma's NEVER looked short. Even from the first movie.
I agree with gyllenhaalic823 and Serene. Emma's NEVER looked short. Even from the first movie.
Serene said on 20/Jan/06
gyllenhaalic823, I agree your point about Jack's opinion.
Not all girls or boys will grow in a minute,day,month,year or decade. You can't conclude that they might grow into some height. Dan's height is certainly making us judging it up and down while Emma's height is something very confusing.
She may grow until 5'9"..but she is growing quite gradually. Very normal for her age. I wish that I can grow 3 more inches before college.
There are some pictures showing some "gap" between Emma and Daniel. Dan does seem more taller than Emma.
gyllenhaalic823, I agree your point about Jack's opinion.
Not all girls or boys will grow in a minute,day,month,year or decade. You can't conclude that they might grow into some height. Dan's height is certainly making us judging it up and down while Emma's height is something very confusing.
She may grow until 5'9"..but she is growing quite gradually. Very normal for her age. I wish that I can grow 3 more inches before college.
There are some pictures showing some "gap" between Emma and Daniel. Dan does seem more taller than Emma.
Jack said on 19/Jan/06
no....my photos do not suck.
no....my photos do not suck.
gyllenhaalic823 said on 18/Jan/06
Okay, Jack, do you remember the first movies? When she was really tiny?? well she didn't look like a future-5'10"-er then. Plus, most people who grow after age 15 haven't gotten their growth spurt yet and gradually grow (like my dad who went from 5'2" at 15 to 5'10.5" in college and how i hope to grow from 5'0" at 13 to at least 5'5" in college) and Emma has obviously gotten hers, as the "gap" is growing shorter.
AND HOW IN HECK IS SHE 3-4" TALLER THAN DAN?!?!?!?!?!? quite frankly your photos suck.
Okay, Jack, do you remember the first movies? When she was really tiny?? well she didn't look like a future-5'10"-er then. Plus, most people who grow after age 15 haven't gotten their growth spurt yet and gradually grow (like my dad who went from 5'2" at 15 to 5'10.5" in college and how i hope to grow from 5'0" at 13 to at least 5'5" in college) and Emma has obviously gotten hers, as the "gap" is growing shorter.
AND HOW IN HECK IS SHE 3-4" TALLER THAN DAN?!?!?!?!?!? quite frankly your photos suck.
Jack said on 17/Jan/06
S: The reason why I think Emma will grow to be that tall is because she seems to be getting taller and she does not look as mature yet. Also, girls can still grow after the age of 15 and at sometimes grow a large amount. Another thing is that Emma is around 5'6" to 5'7". If she were to grow to be around 5'9" to 5'10" it would not be a huge amount. That is why I think that it is possible for her to be around 5'10". As for Dan, have you seen his parents? Well, I don't know too much about his father's height, but his mom is abouth 4'10" to 4'11". Parents have a role on their child's height. Also, Emma seems to keep growing taller, but Dan does not. The height gap between Dan and Emma seems to be growing. That is why I think Dan is done growing and will be, at the most 5'4" to 5'5" and Emma will be at least 5'9".
S: The reason why I think Emma will grow to be that tall is because she seems to be getting taller and she does not look as mature yet. Also, girls can still grow after the age of 15 and at sometimes grow a large amount. Another thing is that Emma is around 5'6" to 5'7". If she were to grow to be around 5'9" to 5'10" it would not be a huge amount. That is why I think that it is possible for her to be around 5'10". As for Dan, have you seen his parents? Well, I don't know too much about his father's height, but his mom is abouth 4'10" to 4'11". Parents have a role on their child's height. Also, Emma seems to keep growing taller, but Dan does not. The height gap between Dan and Emma seems to be growing. That is why I think Dan is done growing and will be, at the most 5'4" to 5'5" and Emma will be at least 5'9".
sianna said on 17/Jan/06
jack, dont u think emma looks ALOT shorter than 5'7! thats ruperts height. emma looks no more than 5'4, well thats my opinion. i think most people think she is taller than 5'5 because of dan's height, but he is actually taller her, by and inch or half. there is no way she could hav grown 2-3 inches from a couple of months ago. look at her individually and she looks really small.
jack, dont u think emma looks ALOT shorter than 5'7! thats ruperts height. emma looks no more than 5'4, well thats my opinion. i think most people think she is taller than 5'5 because of dan's height, but he is actually taller her, by and inch or half. there is no way she could hav grown 2-3 inches from a couple of months ago. look at her individually and she looks really small.
S said on 17/Jan/06
Emma will not necessarily grow to 5'9", I stopped growing at 5'5" when i was 12. Anyway (most of the time) girls have their growth spurts at the begining of puberty and boys have theirs closer to the end so that might be why their heights are so close.
Emma will not necessarily grow to 5'9", I stopped growing at 5'5" when i was 12. Anyway (most of the time) girls have their growth spurts at the begining of puberty and boys have theirs closer to the end so that might be why their heights are so close.
Jack said on 16/Jan/06
Emma is taller than Dan by 3-4 inches (if they were back to back barefoot)...look at this picture:
http://www.emmaempire.net/archives/galleries/img.en.16213.2.html
Emma looks to be about 1.5 to 2 inches taller than Dan in this picture. I think that she is really 3-4 inches taller because of these things:
-Dan's hair adds an inch to his height in this picture
-Emma is basically barefoot and Dan is wearing dress shoes
Those make Dan look about 2.5 inches taller and Emma is till about 1.5 inch taller than him in this picture! That makes me think that Emma is about 3 to 4 inches taller than Dan and almost as tall as Rupert, about an inch shorter. I think that gap will close soon though. Here are what I think their current heights are and how tall they will become (to all of those who think Emma will not grow.....it is possible for girls to grow you do know that right?):
Dan: 5'4.5"....5'4.5"
Rupert: 5'8"....5'8.5"
Emma: 5'7"-5'7.5"....at least 5'9.5"
Emma is taller than Dan by 3-4 inches (if they were back to back barefoot)...look at this picture:
http://www.emmaempire.net/archives/galleries/img.en.16213.2.html
Emma looks to be about 1.5 to 2 inches taller than Dan in this picture. I think that she is really 3-4 inches taller because of these things:
-Dan's hair adds an inch to his height in this picture
-Emma is basically barefoot and Dan is wearing dress shoes
Those make Dan look about 2.5 inches taller and Emma is till about 1.5 inch taller than him in this picture! That makes me think that Emma is about 3 to 4 inches taller than Dan and almost as tall as Rupert, about an inch shorter. I think that gap will close soon though. Here are what I think their current heights are and how tall they will become (to all of those who think Emma will not grow.....it is possible for girls to grow you do know that right?):
Dan: 5'4.5"....5'4.5"
Rupert: 5'8"....5'8.5"
Emma: 5'7"-5'7.5"....at least 5'9.5"
Serene said on 16/Jan/06
Emma doesn't look any taller for 5'5" in an angle point. Daniel is really 5'5.5" but didn't any notice Emma is wearing a cute blue 1 inch tall shoe and same as Katie Leung..
so I think Emma and Katie Leung are almost the same height
Emma doesn't look any taller for 5'5" in an angle point. Daniel is really 5'5.5" but didn't any notice Emma is wearing a cute blue 1 inch tall shoe and same as Katie Leung..
so I think Emma and Katie Leung are almost the same height
sianna said on 15/Jan/06
to karee, i can understand where ur coming from on ruperts height, but it is just not possible that he is 5'11. he is 2-3inches taller than emma and dan. that would make emma and dan 5'8 and 5'9! How many other celebs hav different heights on websites, example: both Rachel Bilson and Hilary Duff r listed on practically EVERY site thta they r 5'4, but r really 5'1. Mary-Kate olsen is sometimes listed as 5'2 or 5'3, but is 5'0. i agree with charlotte on emma's height. and ill say it again,wen sumone says they are "about 5'5", that does NOT mean they are 1-2' taller than wat they stated, if she were taller than that, she say that she was just ova. im guessing emma is 5'4, dan 5'5 and rupert 5'7. i dont think emma will grow anymore, the most 2cms. dan has a good chance of growing, as boys stop growing much later. and just coz emma is lyk a year younger does not mean she will stop growing last, she still could grow more, but i dont think she will. Considering thats dans mum is 4'10, he is actually tall.
to karee, i can understand where ur coming from on ruperts height, but it is just not possible that he is 5'11. he is 2-3inches taller than emma and dan. that would make emma and dan 5'8 and 5'9! How many other celebs hav different heights on websites, example: both Rachel Bilson and Hilary Duff r listed on practically EVERY site thta they r 5'4, but r really 5'1. Mary-Kate olsen is sometimes listed as 5'2 or 5'3, but is 5'0. i agree with charlotte on emma's height. and ill say it again,wen sumone says they are "about 5'5", that does NOT mean they are 1-2' taller than wat they stated, if she were taller than that, she say that she was just ova. im guessing emma is 5'4, dan 5'5 and rupert 5'7. i dont think emma will grow anymore, the most 2cms. dan has a good chance of growing, as boys stop growing much later. and just coz emma is lyk a year younger does not mean she will stop growing last, she still could grow more, but i dont think she will. Considering thats dans mum is 4'10, he is actually tall.
Charlotte said on 15/Jan/06
Daniel stated he was 5'5.5' in mid 2005.He has grown at the most,an inch.Emma is two inchs shorter than him thus she is 5'4-5",and no taller.She said she was around 5'5" and she's most likely exaggerating.She does wear heels,even her flats have at least one cm high heels.
Logically,Emma won't get any taller than 5'6" and anyone who suggest otherwise...well,it's simply common sense.
Rupert Grint is 168-170 cm,not any taller.Daniel is 165,emma is 4 centimeters shorter than him and is 161.
Daniel stated he was 5'5.5' in mid 2005.He has grown at the most,an inch.Emma is two inchs shorter than him thus she is 5'4-5",and no taller.She said she was around 5'5" and she's most likely exaggerating.She does wear heels,even her flats have at least one cm high heels.
Logically,Emma won't get any taller than 5'6" and anyone who suggest otherwise...well,it's simply common sense.
Rupert Grint is 168-170 cm,not any taller.Daniel is 165,emma is 4 centimeters shorter than him and is 161.
Mika said on 15/Jan/06
Emma is 5' 5"-5' 6" now, and I think she's closer to 5' 6" now than 5' 5" because she was 5' 5" in May, Dan said he was 5' 5.5" then, and Emma grew so now they are about the same, maybe she's a little taller than Dan now. As far as how tall she'll get, she'll be 16 in April! She's not growing much more, people! Dan will be 5' 6" (and grow that last 1/4" to 1/2"), Emma will be 5' 7" and Rupert (now 5' 7" or 5' 8") will be 5' 9". ALL of these kids are getting too old to have a growth spurt, especially Emma since she's a girl and most girls are done growing by 16 or 17 (some grow to 18 or 19 but that is rare, like <1%). Rupert turns 18 this year, and most guys are at their full height at that age (but some guys grow until they're 21) Dan will be 17 this year but his mom is only like 4' 10" or 4' 11" so 5' 6" is as tall as he'll get.
Emma is 5' 5"-5' 6" now, and I think she's closer to 5' 6" now than 5' 5" because she was 5' 5" in May, Dan said he was 5' 5.5" then, and Emma grew so now they are about the same, maybe she's a little taller than Dan now. As far as how tall she'll get, she'll be 16 in April! She's not growing much more, people! Dan will be 5' 6" (and grow that last 1/4" to 1/2"), Emma will be 5' 7" and Rupert (now 5' 7" or 5' 8") will be 5' 9". ALL of these kids are getting too old to have a growth spurt, especially Emma since she's a girl and most girls are done growing by 16 or 17 (some grow to 18 or 19 but that is rare, like <1%). Rupert turns 18 this year, and most guys are at their full height at that age (but some guys grow until they're 21) Dan will be 17 this year but his mom is only like 4' 10" or 4' 11" so 5' 6" is as tall as he'll get.
Wicked Kid said on 14/Jan/06
I agree with Sianna on Emma's height. You've only got to be 5'7" to join America's Next Top Model. 6' is actually tall for a supermodel.
I agree with Sianna on Emma's height. You've only got to be 5'7" to join America's Next Top Model. 6' is actually tall for a supermodel.
sianna said on 12/Jan/06
she is actually turning 16 in april, and u can hav ur own opnion on her growing 2 5'9 or wateva, but i think she'll only grow 2 5'5.5 or 5'6. and i dont need anyone 2 argue with me on my opinion. oh and by the way, supermodels can b 5'9. heidi klum is, it even has it on this site and she has also said that she is 5'9, buts lyks 2 say 5'9.5
she is actually turning 16 in april, and u can hav ur own opnion on her growing 2 5'9 or wateva, but i think she'll only grow 2 5'5.5 or 5'6. and i dont need anyone 2 argue with me on my opinion. oh and by the way, supermodels can b 5'9. heidi klum is, it even has it on this site and she has also said that she is 5'9, buts lyks 2 say 5'9.5
Karee said on 12/Jan/06
anonymous: If Rupert is really only 5'7" to 5'7.5", why do all of the websites list him at 5'10" to 5'11"? I agree with you on the supermodel thing, but you said in recent pictures you have to subrtact the height of Emma's heels, what heels?!?!? Emma rarely wears heels, she wears mostly flats and is still 2-3 inches taller than Dan and almost as tall as Rupert. She seems to continue to grow taller in height and Rupert and Dan have seemed to come to a stop. Here is what I think the three's current heights are and what their furture heights will be. (I think Emma will be the tallest.)
Dan: 5'4" to 5'5"...... 5'5"
Rupert: 5'8" to 5'9"..... 5'9.5"
Emma: 5'6" to 5'7.5".... at least 5'9" to 5'10"
anonymous: If Rupert is really only 5'7" to 5'7.5", why do all of the websites list him at 5'10" to 5'11"? I agree with you on the supermodel thing, but you said in recent pictures you have to subrtact the height of Emma's heels, what heels?!?!? Emma rarely wears heels, she wears mostly flats and is still 2-3 inches taller than Dan and almost as tall as Rupert. She seems to continue to grow taller in height and Rupert and Dan have seemed to come to a stop. Here is what I think the three's current heights are and what their furture heights will be. (I think Emma will be the tallest.)
Dan: 5'4" to 5'5"...... 5'5"
Rupert: 5'8" to 5'9"..... 5'9.5"
Emma: 5'6" to 5'7.5".... at least 5'9" to 5'10"
anonymous said on 12/Jan/06
From what I've seen, most supermodels are around 6' tall, 5' 10" at the very lowest. 5' 9" is not supermodel height. You could be a MODEL but not a supermodel. Rupert is 5' 7", maybe 5' 7.5" on a good day. There is no way he is 5' 10" or that Tom, who is 3" taller than Rupert, is 6' 1". If you look through photos of them next to the 6' 3" Phelps twins, Tom is 5' 10" and Rupert is 5' 7". Dan is 5' 5 3/4" and Emma is probably 5' 5 1/4" or 5' 5 1/2" if you take away the height of her heels in recent pictures.
From what I've seen, most supermodels are around 6' tall, 5' 10" at the very lowest. 5' 9" is not supermodel height. You could be a MODEL but not a supermodel. Rupert is 5' 7", maybe 5' 7.5" on a good day. There is no way he is 5' 10" or that Tom, who is 3" taller than Rupert, is 6' 1". If you look through photos of them next to the 6' 3" Phelps twins, Tom is 5' 10" and Rupert is 5' 7". Dan is 5' 5 3/4" and Emma is probably 5' 5 1/4" or 5' 5 1/2" if you take away the height of her heels in recent pictures.
George said on 10/Jan/06
Sianna: Not all girls reach their full height at a young age and 5'9" is not supermodel height at all. Right now she is 5'6.5" and I am pretty sure she will grow to be at least 5'9". She only just turned 15!
Sianna: Not all girls reach their full height at a young age and 5'9" is not supermodel height at all. Right now she is 5'6.5" and I am pretty sure she will grow to be at least 5'9". She only just turned 15!
no name said on 10/Jan/06
in june 2005, her school measured her exactly 160cm now im pretty sure thats 5'3.... but hey thats what the internet told me!!!
in june 2005, her school measured her exactly 160cm now im pretty sure thats 5'3.... but hey thats what the internet told me!!!
Some guy said on 9/Jan/06
Peter...not to bash you or anything....thats just plain crazy talk
Peter...not to bash you or anything....thats just plain crazy talk
sianna said on 9/Jan/06
ok to karee and cassie, u can tell with girls around wat height they will be! how can u think otherwise. cassie lyk u said emma was average height wen casted, so i think u can tell that she would not grow to be 5'9 or sumthing. she is average height know, im just commenting on wat i think, so u dont neeed to shove it in my face. i think emma is 5'4, dan 5'5 (or under) and rupert no more that 5'7. wen emma sed "about 5'5", that doesnt mean she is about 3 inches taller than wat she stated, lyk wicked kid sed. she only looks taller than wat she is coz dan is so short for his age, although he still might grow. id b really suprised if emma grew to wat sum r saying 5'9 or taller! thats lyk supermodel height! is she was to grow this tall she would hav been very tall at a young age.
ok to karee and cassie, u can tell with girls around wat height they will be! how can u think otherwise. cassie lyk u said emma was average height wen casted, so i think u can tell that she would not grow to be 5'9 or sumthing. she is average height know, im just commenting on wat i think, so u dont neeed to shove it in my face. i think emma is 5'4, dan 5'5 (or under) and rupert no more that 5'7. wen emma sed "about 5'5", that doesnt mean she is about 3 inches taller than wat she stated, lyk wicked kid sed. she only looks taller than wat she is coz dan is so short for his age, although he still might grow. id b really suprised if emma grew to wat sum r saying 5'9 or taller! thats lyk supermodel height! is she was to grow this tall she would hav been very tall at a young age.
Peter Daniel Curran said on 9/Jan/06
Emma Watson's 5'5" , Dan's 5'8" & Rupert's like 5'7"
Emma Watson's 5'5" , Dan's 5'8" & Rupert's like 5'7"
Karee said on 8/Jan/06
Hey Krista, I have a question. Even if Emma was wearing very small heels at the NY premiere, wasn't Dan wearing shoes with quite a bit of heel? Also, Dan could be wearing inserts or shoes to make him look taller to deal with his height.
Hey Krista, I have a question. Even if Emma was wearing very small heels at the NY premiere, wasn't Dan wearing shoes with quite a bit of heel? Also, Dan could be wearing inserts or shoes to make him look taller to deal with his height.
Karee said on 7/Jan/06
Sianna: How was there anyway for the three do be cast based on height? How did they have any idea how tall they would become?
Sianna: How was there anyway for the three do be cast based on height? How did they have any idea how tall they would become?
Karee said on 7/Jan/06
Even if Rupert is only 5'7", recent pictures look as if Emma is almost as tall as Rupert. She looks as the most an inch shorter than Rupert. On the other hand, Dan looks about 3-4 inches shorter than Rupert and 2-3 inches shorter than Emma. Here are two pictures that prove my point:
http://www.emmaempire.net/en_emma.php?ewe=galleries&pid=17517&site=4
http://www.emmaempire.net/en_emma.php?ewe=galleries&pid=15886&site=3
(Emma (Dan's girl): thank you so much for agreeing with me!)
Even if Rupert is only 5'7", recent pictures look as if Emma is almost as tall as Rupert. She looks as the most an inch shorter than Rupert. On the other hand, Dan looks about 3-4 inches shorter than Rupert and 2-3 inches shorter than Emma. Here are two pictures that prove my point:
http://www.emmaempire.net/en_emma.php?ewe=galleries&pid=17517&site=4
http://www.emmaempire.net/en_emma.php?ewe=galleries&pid=15886&site=3
(Emma (Dan's girl): thank you so much for agreeing with me!)
Wicked Kid said on 6/Jan/06
I'm fully prepared to accept the assumption that Emma's 5'5". But nothing more, cos she did recently stated that she's about 5'5". Of course, some of you guys will play with the word "about", and say she's 5'6" or 5'7". But that'd be ridiculous cos Rupert's only like 5'7".
I'm fully prepared to accept the assumption that Emma's 5'5". But nothing more, cos she did recently stated that she's about 5'5". Of course, some of you guys will play with the word "about", and say she's 5'6" or 5'7". But that'd be ridiculous cos Rupert's only like 5'7".
Cassie said on 4/Jan/06
Emma's heels look about the same height as Katie's and Daniel's shoes have thick soles, so I think Katie is 165 (5' 5") and Dan and Emma are 166-167 (5' 5.5"). Rupert is 5' 7".
The Emma Watson Empire site is NOT current. That height was given in 2003 when those pictures were taken. The point was more to show that Tom was 5' 8" back then, when he was said by fans to be 6' 1"-6' 2". We knew Emma was 5' 3". Now she's about 5' 5". Her fan site, which updates often and judges height by photos, states her height to be 5' 5"-5' 6" which is correct.
Sianna- I was wondering how you arrived at the conclusion that the kids were chosen based on height, when they were cast in 1999-2000 and were much younger than they are now, and were about average height for their ages.
Emma's heels look about the same height as Katie's and Daniel's shoes have thick soles, so I think Katie is 165 (5' 5") and Dan and Emma are 166-167 (5' 5.5"). Rupert is 5' 7".
The Emma Watson Empire site is NOT current. That height was given in 2003 when those pictures were taken. The point was more to show that Tom was 5' 8" back then, when he was said by fans to be 6' 1"-6' 2". We knew Emma was 5' 3". Now she's about 5' 5". Her fan site, which updates often and judges height by photos, states her height to be 5' 5"-5' 6" which is correct.
Sianna- I was wondering how you arrived at the conclusion that the kids were chosen based on height, when they were cast in 1999-2000 and were much younger than they are now, and were about average height for their ages.
Emma (Dan's girl) said on 4/Jan/06
Yeah, that's right. He has puffed hair which makes him look even more taller. I agree with you, Karee!
Yeah, that's right. He has puffed hair which makes him look even more taller. I agree with you, Karee!
sianna said on 4/Jan/06
umm karee, k. hey cood emma hav grown around 2-3 inches from wen she stated 1-2months ago that she was 'ABOUT 5'5'? i hav proof, as it was from an interview with teen vogue or sumthing lyk that. Although Emma looks taller than Dan, he might not be quite the 5'5.5 he says, and rupert is definatelt not 5'10! even on this website he is listed as 5'7. they all r small, and i think they were chosen coz they r short, so that they dont outgrow their roles on hp. i dont even think emma is ova 5'4 really. and i hav provided good pictures for proof, even though most r hard to tell with different angles. but the one i posted earlier on with emma and katie is good. because they r both facing the camera straight, and r both the same height.
umm karee, k. hey cood emma hav grown around 2-3 inches from wen she stated 1-2months ago that she was 'ABOUT 5'5'? i hav proof, as it was from an interview with teen vogue or sumthing lyk that. Although Emma looks taller than Dan, he might not be quite the 5'5.5 he says, and rupert is definatelt not 5'10! even on this website he is listed as 5'7. they all r small, and i think they were chosen coz they r short, so that they dont outgrow their roles on hp. i dont even think emma is ova 5'4 really. and i hav provided good pictures for proof, even though most r hard to tell with different angles. but the one i posted earlier on with emma and katie is good. because they r both facing the camera straight, and r both the same height.
Karee said on 2/Jan/06
Also, Dan's hair makes him look at lot taller than he actually is.
Also, Dan's hair makes him look at lot taller than he actually is.
Karee said on 2/Jan/06
http://www.weasleynetwork.org/gallery/gobletukpremiere/rupert_gofukpre20
Here is a picture from the London premiere. Emma is basically barefoot, Dan has on dress shoes and Dan has a huge angle advantage. In this picture Emma is the same height to taller in height than Dan. The angle advantage probably gives Dan 1.5-2 inches and his shoes are about .5-1 inch. That would mean that Emma is about 2-3 inches taller than him. What other proof do you need?
http://www.weasleynetwork.org/gallery/gobletukpremiere/rupert_gofukpre20
Here is a picture from the London premiere. Emma is basically barefoot, Dan has on dress shoes and Dan has a huge angle advantage. In this picture Emma is the same height to taller in height than Dan. The angle advantage probably gives Dan 1.5-2 inches and his shoes are about .5-1 inch. That would mean that Emma is about 2-3 inches taller than him. What other proof do you need?
hey said on 1/Jan/06
this is a quote from a fan site so i hardly doubt they would want to shorten their idol "Now it¡¯s time to give you her official hieght, which has been comfirmed by her agent. She¡¯s 5 feet 3 inches (1.6m) tall." and i have checked this is recent information not from way back in 2003, the site is http://www.emmaempire.net/en_emma.php?ewe=height
this is a quote from a fan site so i hardly doubt they would want to shorten their idol "Now it¡¯s time to give you her official hieght, which has been comfirmed by her agent. She¡¯s 5 feet 3 inches (1.6m) tall." and i have checked this is recent information not from way back in 2003, the site is http://www.emmaempire.net/en_emma.php?ewe=height
emma is shorter said on 1/Jan/06
so far, emma has only been taller in the ny premiere due to her heels and poofed hair, unless there are pics OTHER than the ny premiere, all evidence points to dan being taller(every single other event shows dan is taller, including the london premiere, photoshoots, recent photocalls and press conferences). emma is a solid five foot five and seemed to be the same height for a while now.
so far, emma has only been taller in the ny premiere due to her heels and poofed hair, unless there are pics OTHER than the ny premiere, all evidence points to dan being taller(every single other event shows dan is taller, including the london premiere, photoshoots, recent photocalls and press conferences). emma is a solid five foot five and seemed to be the same height for a while now.
Kelsey said on 1/Jan/06
http://www.oksection.com/emma_watson/
That is a website where it states Emma is 5'6.5". If you google "Emma Waston height", you will find that most sites list her between 5'6" and 5'7".
http://www.leesmovieinfo.net/WBOprofile.php?p=909
That is a site that states Daniel's height. If you google "Daniel Radcliffe height" you will find that almost all sites list him between 5'4" and 5'5" making him quite a bit shorter than Emma Watson.
http://www.oksection.com/emma_watson/
That is a website where it states Emma is 5'6.5". If you google "Emma Waston height", you will find that most sites list her between 5'6" and 5'7".
http://www.leesmovieinfo.net/WBOprofile.php?p=909
That is a site that states Daniel's height. If you google "Daniel Radcliffe height" you will find that almost all sites list him between 5'4" and 5'5" making him quite a bit shorter than Emma Watson.
Karee said on 1/Jan/06
Amanda: In http://www.emmaempire.net/en_emma.php?ewe=galleries&pid=17349&site=2 the camear is straight on and Dan is not leaning forward that much. It might take away at the most 2 cm of his height. Emma is still much taller than him. Also, in http://www.mirror.emmawatson-fans.com/pics/151/5020/, the view is straight on. If this is not a straight on view, what is? Rupert and Emma are clearly taller than Dan. I would say:
Rupert: 5'9"
Emma: 5'6.5"
Dan: 5'4"
Amanda: In http://www.emmaempire.net/en_emma.php?ewe=galleries&pid=17349&site=2 the camear is straight on and Dan is not leaning forward that much. It might take away at the most 2 cm of his height. Emma is still much taller than him. Also, in http://www.mirror.emmawatson-fans.com/pics/151/5020/, the view is straight on. If this is not a straight on view, what is? Rupert and Emma are clearly taller than Dan. I would say:
Rupert: 5'9"
Emma: 5'6.5"
Dan: 5'4"
MaDeLaiNe said on 31/Dec/05
mmm...it could be, but I don't think Emma's going to grow that much, in my opinion of course.
And again, Emma wasn't wearing flats at the NY prem! lol.. see the pics and you'll find this miniheels her shoes had... ^_^
mmm...it could be, but I don't think Emma's going to grow that much, in my opinion of course.
And again, Emma wasn't wearing flats at the NY prem! lol.. see the pics and you'll find this miniheels her shoes had... ^_^
Karee said on 31/Dec/05
Nice pictures Cassie. I agree, Emma is taller than Katie, but I think she is taller than Dan. At the New York preimere, she is wearing flats and Dan is wearing dress shoes with quite a large sole. HIs sole is around 1 inch in my opinion. Emma is still taller than Dan in these pictures, that is why I think she is at least 2.5 inches taller than him making her about 5'6.5" tall. In the pictures provided, it looks as if Emma is continuing to grow taller than Dan. In my opinion, she is still growing and Dan is most likely done growing.
Nice pictures Cassie. I agree, Emma is taller than Katie, but I think she is taller than Dan. At the New York preimere, she is wearing flats and Dan is wearing dress shoes with quite a large sole. HIs sole is around 1 inch in my opinion. Emma is still taller than Dan in these pictures, that is why I think she is at least 2.5 inches taller than him making her about 5'6.5" tall. In the pictures provided, it looks as if Emma is continuing to grow taller than Dan. In my opinion, she is still growing and Dan is most likely done growing.
Cassie said on 30/Dec/05
Look at Katie's heels at the premiere! She wasn't in flats, either! Emma's were like 1/2" and Katie's were probably 1".
http://fan-sites.org/leung/gallery/displayimage.php?album=84&pos=11
Seeing as this is the ONLY event that Katie seems to be wearing shoes without giant heels, and Emma has been always in flats lately, I think Emma is probably about half an inch taller than Katie, who is 5' 5".
Emma said she was "about" 5' 5", but considering she said 5' 5" back in May as well I think she just guessed her height and probably grew a little since then. Look at her next to Daniel, and Daniel's shoes aren't all that flat either. If Dan is 5' 5.5"-5' 6" (which is right if you look at him next to Katie) then Emma is probably about the same.
http://fan-sites.org/leung/gallery/displayimage.php?album=84&pos=115
http://fan-sites.org/leung/gallery/displayimage.php?album=84&pos=66
http://fan-sites.org/leung/gallery/displayimage.php?album=84&pos=63
Look at Katie's heels at the premiere! She wasn't in flats, either! Emma's were like 1/2" and Katie's were probably 1".
http://fan-sites.org/leung/gallery/displayimage.php?album=84&pos=11
Seeing as this is the ONLY event that Katie seems to be wearing shoes without giant heels, and Emma has been always in flats lately, I think Emma is probably about half an inch taller than Katie, who is 5' 5".
Emma said she was "about" 5' 5", but considering she said 5' 5" back in May as well I think she just guessed her height and probably grew a little since then. Look at her next to Daniel, and Daniel's shoes aren't all that flat either. If Dan is 5' 5.5"-5' 6" (which is right if you look at him next to Katie) then Emma is probably about the same.
http://fan-sites.org/leung/gallery/displayimage.php?album=84&pos=115
http://fan-sites.org/leung/gallery/displayimage.php?album=84&pos=66
http://fan-sites.org/leung/gallery/displayimage.php?album=84&pos=63
MaDeLaiNe said on 29/Dec/05
George,
good pics, I actually didn't see them before today...BUT ^_^ Emma wasn't wearing flats at NY prem. Her heels were tiny, but there they were. Emma's wearing flats at the PressConf, and we can see there that Dan's taller than her, only a bit shorter that Rup this year ^_^
George,
good pics, I actually didn't see them before today...BUT ^_^ Emma wasn't wearing flats at NY prem. Her heels were tiny, but there they were. Emma's wearing flats at the PressConf, and we can see there that Dan's taller than her, only a bit shorter that Rup this year ^_^
George said on 29/Dec/05
Sianna: http://www.emmaempire.net/en_emma.php?ewe=galleries&pid=16617&site=1 is not a good picture to base heights on because Dan has a huge camera angle advantage. Here is my proof that Emma is taller than Dan: http://www.emmaempire.net/en_emma.php?ewe=galleries&pid=17349&site=2
There is no weird camera angle, it is straight on. Look at Emma's eyes compared to Dan's there is at least a 1.5 inch difference. Wicked Kid: Not trying to be rude, but the picture you provided by Rupert's height, Emma is the same height as Dan and has on flats. There is no way she is 2 inches shorter than him. She is taller than him in my opinion.
Sianna: http://www.emmaempire.net/en_emma.php?ewe=galleries&pid=16617&site=1 is not a good picture to base heights on because Dan has a huge camera angle advantage. Here is my proof that Emma is taller than Dan: http://www.emmaempire.net/en_emma.php?ewe=galleries&pid=17349&site=2
There is no weird camera angle, it is straight on. Look at Emma's eyes compared to Dan's there is at least a 1.5 inch difference. Wicked Kid: Not trying to be rude, but the picture you provided by Rupert's height, Emma is the same height as Dan and has on flats. There is no way she is 2 inches shorter than him. She is taller than him in my opinion.
Wicked Kid said on 29/Dec/05
George...In both of the pics you've provided, Emma was much closer to the camera than Dan. Good pictures are when they're parallel to the camera.
sianna, I agree with most of what you've said. Except the one that Emma and Katie are the same height. Well, partly, as Emma's hair is poofed up in this pic: http://www.emmaempire.net/en_emma.php?ewe=galleries&pid=17771&site=5 ; I think that Katie's taller.
Anyway this is what I think their actual heights are(Just my opinion, I'm not saying I'm right):
Dan: 5'4" (He looks super, super short ok?)
Emma: 5'2"
Katie: 5'2.5"
Rupert: 5'7"(As there's significant difference between him and Dan: http://editorial.gettyimages.com/source/search/details_pop.aspx?iid=56105729&cdi=0 )
Phelp twins: 6'2"
Tom Felton: 5'9"
And I repeat, it's MY opinion and I'm not forcing in unto any of you.
George...In both of the pics you've provided, Emma was much closer to the camera than Dan. Good pictures are when they're parallel to the camera.
sianna, I agree with most of what you've said. Except the one that Emma and Katie are the same height. Well, partly, as Emma's hair is poofed up in this pic: http://www.emmaempire.net/en_emma.php?ewe=galleries&pid=17771&site=5 ; I think that Katie's taller.
Anyway this is what I think their actual heights are(Just my opinion, I'm not saying I'm right):
Dan: 5'4" (He looks super, super short ok?)
Emma: 5'2"
Katie: 5'2.5"
Rupert: 5'7"(As there's significant difference between him and Dan: http://editorial.gettyimages.com/source/search/details_pop.aspx?iid=56105729&cdi=0 )
Phelp twins: 6'2"
Tom Felton: 5'9"
And I repeat, it's MY opinion and I'm not forcing in unto any of you.
sianna said on 29/Dec/05
umm to george, seriously i hope this doesnt come out rude, but how can u say that they aren't unusual camera angles with the pics u provided? All good images of dan, rupert and emma (and recent! lol) show that emma IS a little smaller. in my opinion these ate their heights:
Dan:5'5.5-5'6
Rupert:5'7 (and deffinately not taller, seriously)
Emma:5'5 ( i really belive this is her height, because she is the same height as Katie, barely a cm diference)
This is my proof that Dan is taller- ( http://www.emmaempire.net/en_emma.php?ewe=galleries&pid=16617&site=1 )
( http://www.emmaempire.net/en_emma.php?ewe=galleries&pid=17771&site=5 ) * Emma and Katie are the same height, and NEITHER had heels on at this event.
umm to george, seriously i hope this doesnt come out rude, but how can u say that they aren't unusual camera angles with the pics u provided? All good images of dan, rupert and emma (and recent! lol) show that emma IS a little smaller. in my opinion these ate their heights:
Dan:5'5.5-5'6
Rupert:5'7 (and deffinately not taller, seriously)
Emma:5'5 ( i really belive this is her height, because she is the same height as Katie, barely a cm diference)
This is my proof that Dan is taller- ( http://www.emmaempire.net/en_emma.php?ewe=galleries&pid=16617&site=1 )
( http://www.emmaempire.net/en_emma.php?ewe=galleries&pid=17771&site=5 ) * Emma and Katie are the same height, and NEITHER had heels on at this event.
hey said on 29/Dec/05
http://www.emmaempire.net/en_emma.php?ewe=galleries&pid=18789&site=6
well, in this picture, emma appears taller, but then you notice that dan's shoulder and chin is in a higher position next to emma, hence proving dan is probably taller but emma poofed her hair
http://www.emmaempire.net/en_emma.php?ewe=galleries&pid=18789&site=6
well, in this picture, emma appears taller, but then you notice that dan's shoulder and chin is in a higher position next to emma, hence proving dan is probably taller but emma poofed her hair
Emma (Dan's girl) said on 29/Dec/05
Dan is surely shorter than Emma. Thats the one thing I can be most sure about. Dan maybe 5'5 and Emma is 5'5.5. Everyone thinks it is the other way round. He is 100% shorter than Emma. FOR SURE!!!
Dan is surely shorter than Emma. Thats the one thing I can be most sure about. Dan maybe 5'5 and Emma is 5'5.5. Everyone thinks it is the other way round. He is 100% shorter than Emma. FOR SURE!!!
George said on 28/Dec/05
http://www.emmaempire.net/en_emma.php?ewe=galleries&pid=18789&site=6
http://www.emmaempire.net/en_emma.php?ewe=galleries&pid=17517&site=4
Here are just a few examples of pictures where Emma taller than Dan. These are very recent pictures with them standing on even planes. There are no funny camera angles. Emma is wearing flats and Daniel is wearing dress shoes, but Emma is still taller. Look at any pictures with Dan and Emma and you will see that Emma is taller than Dan. In my opinion she is at least 5'6.5" in height. These pictures show that when Emma is wearing flats and Dan is wearing dress shoes, Emma is approximentley 1.5 inches taller than him. Dan's shoes are about 1 inch to 1.5 inches which means if they were both barefoot, Emma would be 2.5" to 3 inches taller than him. In conclusion:
Dan- 5'4" to 5'5" (done growing)
Emma- 5'6.5" to 5'8" (still growing)
Emma Watson is taller than Daniel Radcliffe in my opinion. This is what I think.
http://www.emmaempire.net/en_emma.php?ewe=galleries&pid=18789&site=6
http://www.emmaempire.net/en_emma.php?ewe=galleries&pid=17517&site=4
Here are just a few examples of pictures where Emma taller than Dan. These are very recent pictures with them standing on even planes. There are no funny camera angles. Emma is wearing flats and Daniel is wearing dress shoes, but Emma is still taller. Look at any pictures with Dan and Emma and you will see that Emma is taller than Dan. In my opinion she is at least 5'6.5" in height. These pictures show that when Emma is wearing flats and Dan is wearing dress shoes, Emma is approximentley 1.5 inches taller than him. Dan's shoes are about 1 inch to 1.5 inches which means if they were both barefoot, Emma would be 2.5" to 3 inches taller than him. In conclusion:
Dan- 5'4" to 5'5" (done growing)
Emma- 5'6.5" to 5'8" (still growing)
Emma Watson is taller than Daniel Radcliffe in my opinion. This is what I think.
hey said on 28/Dec/05
hey wicked kid, i think Dan is taller, i mean emma doesn't even LOOK tall like mischa barton so five foot five sounds pretty correct to me
hey wicked kid, i think Dan is taller, i mean emma doesn't even LOOK tall like mischa barton so five foot five sounds pretty correct to me
Amanda said on 27/Dec/05
Look at ANY pictures where Dan is NOT in shoes with giant soles/heels (like the Yahoo! Movies photos of them at the NY GoF premiere). Daniel is just under 5' 6", Emma looks about 5' 5 1/2" and Katie Leung is an even 5' 5" (when SHE'S not also in big shoes). There is no way Rupert is anything taller than 5' 7".
Look at ANY pictures where Dan is NOT in shoes with giant soles/heels (like the Yahoo! Movies photos of them at the NY GoF premiere). Daniel is just under 5' 6", Emma looks about 5' 5 1/2" and Katie Leung is an even 5' 5" (when SHE'S not also in big shoes). There is no way Rupert is anything taller than 5' 7".
MaDeLaiNe said on 27/Dec/05
Hi again! and merry christmas to you all! ^_^
Well, this height thing is so funny, lol... I've been reading the last comments, and I just have troubles about this. I mean, as I've been reading that some people see Emma taller than Daniel, I was researching at www.mugglethai.com pics of the London PressConf... and maybe it's me, but in which pictures exactly is Emma taller than Dan?? O_o I mean, I've been looking at them all, the three standing together, and my eyes tell me she's a bit shorter...in every picture. O_o Mysteries of human perception, I reckon... ^_^
Hi again! and merry christmas to you all! ^_^
Well, this height thing is so funny, lol... I've been reading the last comments, and I just have troubles about this. I mean, as I've been reading that some people see Emma taller than Daniel, I was researching at www.mugglethai.com pics of the London PressConf... and maybe it's me, but in which pictures exactly is Emma taller than Dan?? O_o I mean, I've been looking at them all, the three standing together, and my eyes tell me she's a bit shorter...in every picture. O_o Mysteries of human perception, I reckon... ^_^
Jason said on 27/Dec/05
Looking older doesn't necessarily mean you're done growing. I had to shave at 13 and carry ID to prove I was only a kid when going to the movies so I could (rightfully) get in on kids' prices ... and I'm still growing in my 20s!
Looking older doesn't necessarily mean you're done growing. I had to shave at 13 and carry ID to prove I was only a kid when going to the movies so I could (rightfully) get in on kids' prices ... and I'm still growing in my 20s!
Mckenzie said on 27/Dec/05
I think that I am going to have to agree with Emily and the others who think Dan is done growing. Just a question, but doesn't he look more mature than the others? Some examples: his voice started to crack in the first movie and his face is more defined even than Rupert's. Also, he is 16 years old. If he was going to continue to grow in height, he would look less mature. Most guys say that they stop growing at around 19 to 20, which would give Daniel 3 to 4 more years to grow, but consider his looks. He looks way more mature than Rupert. I think that he is 5'4" to 5'5". Emma is 57" to 5'8" (but may be taller according to those pictures when she is standing next to Rupert) and Rupert is 5'10". I think that Rupert is probably done growing, but may grow to be a little taller. Emma, on the other hand, will grow a lot taller. In my opinion, she will grow to be as tall or taller than Rupert. From the way I see it, she is taller than Dan by quite a margin already. After seeing those pictures Natalie provided, she does not look much shorter than Rupert. I think she will grow to be at least 5'10". This is just what I think and if you disagree, please leave comments, but please do not be rude aobut it, I do not want to fight.
I think that I am going to have to agree with Emily and the others who think Dan is done growing. Just a question, but doesn't he look more mature than the others? Some examples: his voice started to crack in the first movie and his face is more defined even than Rupert's. Also, he is 16 years old. If he was going to continue to grow in height, he would look less mature. Most guys say that they stop growing at around 19 to 20, which would give Daniel 3 to 4 more years to grow, but consider his looks. He looks way more mature than Rupert. I think that he is 5'4" to 5'5". Emma is 57" to 5'8" (but may be taller according to those pictures when she is standing next to Rupert) and Rupert is 5'10". I think that Rupert is probably done growing, but may grow to be a little taller. Emma, on the other hand, will grow a lot taller. In my opinion, she will grow to be as tall or taller than Rupert. From the way I see it, she is taller than Dan by quite a margin already. After seeing those pictures Natalie provided, she does not look much shorter than Rupert. I think she will grow to be at least 5'10". This is just what I think and if you disagree, please leave comments, but please do not be rude aobut it, I do not want to fight.
Emma (Dan's girl) said on 27/Dec/05
Thanks Emily. At last, I have found someone who agrees with me. Alright, this is totally out of the topic. But can you tell me how old you are. I wanted to find some friends. Do you mind being my friend???
Thanks Emily. At last, I have found someone who agrees with me. Alright, this is totally out of the topic. But can you tell me how old you are. I wanted to find some friends. Do you mind being my friend???
Emily said on 26/Dec/05
I agree with you Emma (Dan's girl). Wicked Kid: Could you please settle down? Don't call Emma short because she is not and she is still growing. Just calm down and take a deep breath. Nobody konws their exact heights, but from what I see Emma is 5'6.5" to 5'7". In my opinion Dan is 5'4" to 5'4.5" and is most likely done growing. He looks more mature than the others. He is really hot it is just that he is proabably done growing taller in height and will be short. Emma is so pretty. From the photos that Natalie provided, it seems that Dan is 2 to 3 inches shorter than Emma. Emma is wearing flats and he is wearing dress shoes which would mean that he would be 3 to 4 inches shorter than Emma which would make my predictions accuarte. I am also going to repeat that I believe Dan is done growing and Emma is going to grow a lot taller. Thanks! Happy Holidays!
I agree with you Emma (Dan's girl). Wicked Kid: Could you please settle down? Don't call Emma short because she is not and she is still growing. Just calm down and take a deep breath. Nobody konws their exact heights, but from what I see Emma is 5'6.5" to 5'7". In my opinion Dan is 5'4" to 5'4.5" and is most likely done growing. He looks more mature than the others. He is really hot it is just that he is proabably done growing taller in height and will be short. Emma is so pretty. From the photos that Natalie provided, it seems that Dan is 2 to 3 inches shorter than Emma. Emma is wearing flats and he is wearing dress shoes which would mean that he would be 3 to 4 inches shorter than Emma which would make my predictions accuarte. I am also going to repeat that I believe Dan is done growing and Emma is going to grow a lot taller. Thanks! Happy Holidays!
Heights are barefeet estimates, derived from quotations, official websites, agency resumes, in person encounters with actors at conventions and pictures/films.
Other vital statistics like weight or shoe size measurements have been sourced from newspapers, books, resumes or social media.
Celebrity Fan Photos and Agency Pictures of stars are © to their respective owners.