dicksock said on 5/Dec/11
lalll says on 4/Dec/11
eak height: 6'5.25 = 196,5 cm
peak weight (1978-1980) 287 = 130 kg
arms: 22 inch without a pump
hahaahahaa
6'4 (he had 6 inches on 5'10 bulldog)
280 lbs TOPS
20 inch arms top
______________
(sigh) Trolls...Will they ever cease?
slade said on 4/Dec/11
I live in Clearwater Florida as does Hulk Hogan and I've seen him in person many times. Up close he looks about 6'4". He's been in commercials lately with Troy Aikman, who is 6'4" and if anything, Hulk looks to be slightly shorter.
The Ben said on 4/Dec/11
I say a peak Hogan was a strong 6'5, Maybe 6'6, Weight is harder to tell, Two guys can look the same size and have very different weights, He looks quite thick so i'd say 330max. Today he looks 6'3, Maybe a little more and anywhere between 260-280. Hard to tell without seeing him in person.
dicksock said on 4/Dec/11
Sean says on 4/Dec/11
LOL Barkley is not 6'5.5. Dicksock, you really, really suck at this height thing.
___________
Actually, no I don't. I consistently estimate people's heights in real live. I can assure you I'm never more than an inch off. Many times I'll even test myself on this site. I'll look at the random photo in the top right corner of the page and try to guess the height of someone I've never seen. If I suck so bad at estimating heights, why am I never more than an inch off when I actually go to that person's page? I guess Rob sucks as well. Barkley is around 6'5" for a fact. He is no less than 6'4.5" and no more than 6'5.5". Why don't you enlighten me by showing me your estimates.
lalll said on 4/Dec/11
eak height: 6'5.25 = 196,5 cm
peak weight (1978-1980) 287 = 130 kg
arms: 22 inch without a pump
hahaahahaa
6'4 (he had 6 inches on 5'10 bulldog)
280 lbs TOPS
20 inch arms top
drummer777 said on 4/Dec/11
They did measure Hulks biceps fully flexed at 24 inches on Vinces talk show back in the 80's, its on youtube, I don't believe now hulk was ever 6'7 I did give him the benefit of the doubt because its possible to lose inches from spinal surgery.
You can tell he was heavier back in the 80's, I think he was around 305 pounds at that time and then went down to 275 in his WCW days.
He would of had to started losing his height before he met Sid and taker back in the 80's. but problem is he was shorter than a so called 6'7 JOhn studd back in the 70's.
true said on 4/Dec/11
yes i understand your point. If a 5'10.5 - 5'11 guy stood next to a 6'5 - 6'5.5 guy with the same size of arms, the shorter guys arms would look much taller as the are much shorter.
Hogan was billed as 6'6, 6'7 and 6'8
in the WWF he was billed between 294 - 303 pounds
Arms: in the beginning mentioned and promoted as 26 inches, later (WWF era) 24
reality:
peak height: 6'5.25 = 196,5 cm
peak weight (1978-1980) 287 = 130 kg
arms: 22 inch without a pump
Sean said on 4/Dec/11
LOL Barkley is not 6'5.5. Dicksock, you really, really suck at this height thing.
Henry said on 3/Dec/11
I want Admin to compare the IP addresses of the mine compared to Ronster.
I bet it's the height cutters who are all 1 person, and they're trying to accuse me of doing what they're actually doing to deflect attention away from themselves.
Stone said on 3/Dec/11
In 1979 Bruno Sammartino . Described Hulk Hogan as being 6'5" during one of his matches . After the match Vince McMahon who is 6'1" did an interview with him Hulk Hogan looked to be no more than 3 1/2 inches taller. Which once again puts him at an absolute most of 6'5"
Jake T. said on 3/Dec/11
I used to believe Hogan was 6'5 max in his prime but now I realize Hulk was very tall back in the day. Maybe 6'8 would be too much, that height would've made him taller than Undertaker, although I admit he could have been 6'6.5 probably at his tallest in his 20's he was a towering man. Currently I think he is 6'3.5 but 6'3 is possible too.
dicksock said on 3/Dec/11
Henry: Do us all a favor and stop
trolling.
miko said on 2/Dec/11
In his prime he was 6'5/6'5.5 and around 290/295lbs.
Today he is 6'3.5/6'4 and around 265lbs.
He still is a very 'large' man, very big upper body and his arms are still around 19/20 inches down from his 22 inch peak.
dicksock said on 2/Dec/11
Barkley is probably 6'5.5" barefoot.
BigDickMcgee said on 2/Dec/11
Hulk was measured at 6'7 and I take him at his word. There's no reason to believe otherwise. If anything, he'd be half an inch taller because he probably had been awake all day when he went to his parents house.
Eric said on 1/Dec/11
Barkley is well known as 6'5. It's easy to look taller in a mugshot when the camera is pointing up instead of being level.
Ronster said on 1/Dec/11
Sorry Dicksock, i was confusing you with Mike (AKA Vegas!). Go on and explain how the mugshot of Barkley showing him at 6'8" can be false in any way??? And Dicksock, i said he was a stong 6'7" meaning he was 6'7.5" and that was barefoot. Hogan by the way was 330-340lbs when he was all bulked up in the days of Thunderlips and Terry Boulder, anyone with a set of working eyes can see from a photo how much thicker and bulked up he was then compared to the late eighties when he was down around 300lbs. His arms were at their peak 26" and 23-24" in his prime. Today they are around 20" and his legs are nowhere near the size they were either. Those are just facts buddy, not speculation.
drummer777 said on 30/Nov/11
That mugshot of charles barkley has him at 6'8, Hogan said he noticed he was 6'4 just before his dad died, his dad died in 2001. The problem is he was billed 6'6 in 1982 and was shorter than John Studd who is 6'5 or 6'6.
Sid vicious was billed 6'7 in the 80's and Hogan was definitely shorter than a 6'7 Sid back than in the 80's I doubt that what he was refering to when he said "just before his dad died he noticed he was 6'4" back in the 80's His dad died in 2001.
Mike said on 29/Nov/11
dicksock says on 28/Nov/11
Mike says on 26/Nov/11
Hulk Hogan is lier ! ther NO way in hell he was ever 6'7" . hew was 6'5" TOPS and even that was with boots/shoes on
_________________
For those of you who can't read gibberish; let me translate.
Hulk Hogan is a liar! There is no way in hell he was ever 6'7". He was 6'5" tops and even that was with boots/shoes on.
Your estimate for Hogan is just like your grammar; pure crap.
DICKSOCK ROO7 MUSS ZIB GO LOOK TAHT UP!
dicksock said on 29/Nov/11
Henry says on 28/Nov/11
Hulk Hogan was always very humble about his height and had classic tall man syndrome where he downplayed his height
________________
Oh my god mate; seek help. You are delusional.
Henry said on 28/Nov/11
Hulk Hogan was always very humble about his height and had classic tall man syndrome where he downplayed his height just like 7 footers Bill Walton and Kevin Garnett always did. Even guys like Charles Barkley do it.
Barkley has claimed to by 6'5", 6'4 1/2", 6'4 1/4", and even 6'4" before.
It's classic "tall man syndrome".
Click Here
dicksock said on 28/Nov/11
Mike says on 26/Nov/11
Hulk Hogan is lier ! ther NO way in hell he was ever 6'7" . hew was 6'5" TOPS and even that was with boots/shoes on
_________________
For those of you who can't read gibberish; let me translate.
Hulk Hogan is a liar! There is no way in hell he was ever 6'7". He was 6'5" tops and even that was with boots/shoes on.
Your estimate for Hogan is just like your grammar; pure crap.
sean christensen said on 28/Nov/11
you should try to make a movie about big john.no one else has and its one of the best stories
Eric said on 27/Nov/11
This may be one of the few times dicksock and I agree. He is not me and I am not him although the evidence still points to Ronster being Henry.
dicksock said on 26/Nov/11
This should put some arguments to rest. Here is an absolute prime Hulk Hogan with 6'2" Bam Bam Bigelow and Hogan is clearly around 4" taller:
Click HereLet there be no more doubt. Hogan was at least 6'5.5" and probably 6'6". Also, does anybody else think Hogan was messed up during this interview?
miko said on 26/Nov/11
Hogan probably never even saw 6'7 in his cowboy boots, let alone barefoot!
6'6 out of bed in the 80's I can live with.
Mike said on 26/Nov/11
Hulk Hogan is lier ! ther NO way in hell he was ever 6'7" . hew was 6'5" TOPS and even that was with boots/shoes on
dicksock said on 26/Nov/11
Ronster says on 25/Nov/11
Sorry Eric/Dick sock/Vegas or whatever other alias's you use
____________
You must be stupid or something. Eric, Vegas and myself don't even have anywhere near the same estimates. Did you just choose three random posters? Hogan never said he was a strong 6'7". He just said he was 6'7" when he started training in 1976. He was 23 years old in 1976 so he wouldn't have grown after that. Anyone who thinks Hogan was taller than 6'7" is a fool and that's a fact. At his biggest he was billed at 295lbs and was billed at 295lbs by Wrestlemania III so you can forget about 340lbs or whatever nonsense you think is true. In fact, his most famous billing is 303lbs. Hogan was 6'5.5"-6'6" in his prime. He's 6'4" and about 260lbs tops now.
dicksock said on 25/Nov/11
Henry says on 24/Nov/11
Lou Ferrigno was measured @ 6'4 1/2" at age 50. He was over 6'5" peak.
Even after losing all that height, Hogan is still taller.
Peak Lou Ferrigno 6'5 1/4", Hulk Hogan 6'8 1/16".
_____________
Please answer me this: How could Hulk Hogan have been 6'8" in his prime if he claims 6'7" for himself?
Watch this clip and explain:
Click Here
RP said on 25/Nov/11
Big Lou's peak barefoot was 6'4.5" and this was taking & listed during the filming of Pumping Iron in the Mid-70's. Lou competed at 268-275 and would bulk up to about 290 in the off-seasons during the 70's. When he returned to competive Body Building in the early 90's he was HUGE! He competed in the low 300's & bulked up to 320-325 in the off-season. His arms were 22" cold in the 70's & a reported 23.5" cold in the early 90's when he got over 300 lbs. His Chest was 58" relaxed & 60" expanded"....and he was ripped! That is just enormous! 6'4.5" & 310-320 lbs 23" arms a 58"-60" chest! Now Lou at 60 is a weak 6'3" & his posture is'nt what it used to be.. When he stands perfectly straight he's still 6'3.5"
Ronster said on 25/Nov/11
Sorry Eric/Dick sock/Vegas or whatever other alias's you use but I am not this Henry who is posting figures much closer to the truth. Hogan said he was 6'7" in his youth, and a as you like to say "strong" 6'7" at that so he was close to 6'8". His weight was well over 300lbs most of his life, he is 280-290 right now when his arms are 3-4" smaller and his legs are 10-15 pounds lighter each. He is over 6'5" and 285lbs right now and was easily over 6'7" and 320 lbs when he was under 34 years old. Those are just simple facts, and i don't go lowering or raising other peoples heights like you all do to make what i say right lol.
Gene said on 24/Nov/11
Well Lou has been measured barefoot at 6'5- maxing out at 316. thats a big big man. So, if its true that Hogan was bigger than Lou at that celebrated talk show, then we have to give Hogan at least 6'6
Eric said on 24/Nov/11
Sal/Ronster, now your new name is Henry? When will you stop?
dg said on 24/Nov/11
Henry says on 24/Nov/11
peak Hulk Hogan 6'8 1/16".
LMFAO!!!!!!
Henry said on 24/Nov/11
Lou Ferrigno was measured @ 6'4 1/2" at age 50. He was over 6'5" peak.
Even after losing all that height, Hogan is still taller.
Peak Lou Ferrigno 6'5 1/4", Hulk Hogan 6'8 1/16".
Henry said on 24/Nov/11
Mason Ryan is at least 3" shorter than Peak Hoan. He also has a much smaller head, shorter arms, thiner arms, shorter and thinner legs, than Hogan, etc.
Hogan has really long arms like a basketball player. His arms are big so people don't realize how long his arms really are.
dicksock said on 23/Nov/11
Henry says on 22/Nov/11
I'm sure that photo you're talking about is to show Hogan's arm size, not his weight. The Hulkster was every bit of that 6'8" 340lbs peak.
Click Here
_______________
You are totally void of common sense.
RP said on 23/Nov/11
A barefoot Terry "Hulk" was never even close to 6'8" & 340.."Never" Barefoot Terry '78-'80 was 6'5.5" & 290-305. From '81-'83 was 6'5.5" 300-305..and '84-'89 he was 6'5.5" & 285-295,. sometimes hitting 300. And early 90's he was 6'5" & 265-280. The mid to late 90's "NWO era" he was 6'4.5" & 255-265. early 2000's 6'4" & 250-265 & mid-2000's 6'3.5" & 245-260. Right now he's right at 6'3.5"-6'3.75" & 245-255...sometimes Terry will hit 265 when he gets lazy & gets his gut back on him.
Ali said on 23/Nov/11
I am pretty sure Hulk hogan was under 200cm and above
190cm. Big tall dude. I am guessing he was closer to 200cm
than he was to 190cm. I'll give him 196cm. That is 6'5 I guess.
Henry said on 22/Nov/11
I'm sure that photo you're talking about is to show Hogan's arm size, not his weight. The Hulkster was every bit of that 6'8" 340lbs peak.
Click Here
robby said on 19/Nov/11
Eric, JJ Dillon is not 5'9". I am 5'9.5" had my picture taken with Jerry Lawler who is 5'10". Dillion was taller then Lawler by 1", making him 5'11" The Austin picture with Dillon I feel is easy to explain. Austin likes wearing combat boots which gives extra height. Austin looks close 6'3". Though wearing normal footwear would put at 6'1".
Vegas said on 19/Nov/11
Eric says on 18/Nov/11
James J Dillon is around 5'9 and Hulk was no taller next to JJ than Stone Cold was and I know for a fact Stone Cold is not taller than 6'1 because I met him.
_____________
to be fair austin comes out about 4 inches taller than bret hart and taller than triple h if you compare straight shots like that (neither of which are true), dillon was about 4 inches taller than mene gene mid to late 1990s in wcw and same height as ric flair back in the 80s
dicksock said on 19/Nov/11
Henry says on 17/Nov/11
You guys are living in a dream world, you've never seen a young Hulkster from the late 1970s up close. He was every bit of that 6'8" 340lbs.
Here's PROOF that was posted earlier.
Click Here
_____________________
Ok, I'm going to just ignore all of the obvious nonsense in that blog or whatever you posted the link to. Why would Hogan claim that he measured himself at 6'7" barefoot in his parent's house when he started wrestling if he was really 6'8"? Also, why would promoters bill Hogan at 295lbs when he started wrestling if he was 340lbs? Please use common sense. If Hogan claims that he peaked at 6'7", why are you claiming he was 6'8"?
RP said on 18/Nov/11
Yes...JJ Dillon is 5'11" in his older age. I met him in 2005. I'm 5'11" barefoot & we were the exact same height when I met him & shook his hand..See my comments from The Rock's page.
Vegas said on 18/Nov/11
Henry says on 17/Nov/11
You guys are living in a dream world, you've never seen a young Hulkster from the late 1970s up close. He was every bit of that 6'8" 340lbs.
_____________
i love how you use this photo to prove hogan was 340lb
Click Here when in fact hogan was billed 295lb in that exact match.....7mins 43secs
Click Heremason ryan is currently billed 289lb and if you think hogan was 50lb bigger than him i suggest you go see an eyedoctor
Eric said on 18/Nov/11
James J Dillon is around 5'9 and Hulk was no taller next to JJ than Stone Cold was and I know for a fact Stone Cold is not taller than 6'1 because I met him.
Tim said on 18/Nov/11
This man has photos with even more wrestlers. Look through all the pages. Don't know if anyone had seen this though.
Click Here
RP said on 17/Nov/11
Hogan looks spot on 6'3.5" with 5'11" JJ Dillon.
Eric said on 17/Nov/11
Hogan the poster got all the peak heights correct.
Mike said on 17/Nov/11
Hogan says on 16/Nov/11
Hogan looks pretty tall next to piper but we don't know how tall piper was at his peak! At most he was 6 foot tall. Hogan looks no more than 5 inches taller. And andre looked maximum half a foot taller then the hulkster.
Piper 6'
Hulk Hogan 6'5
Andre the Giant 6'11
Could it make sense? That's My personal opinion but i am not gonna say i'm right this absolutely correct from start to finish!!!!!!!!
Henry said on 17/Nov/11
You guys are living in a dream world, you've never seen a young Hulkster from the late 1970s up close. He was every bit of that 6'8" 340lbs.
Here's PROOF that was posted earlier.
Click Here
Robby said on 17/Nov/11
Nice Link Danimal. I am going to use myself as a cross reference. I am 5'9.5" and here I am with Jerry Lawler
Click Here who is a fraction taller then me. I would put Lawler at 5'10" JJ Dillion is taller then Lawler. I would put JJ Dillion in the 5'11" range.
Danimal said on 17/Nov/11
ATTENTION!!! ATTENTION!!!! Having been on this site for 7 years, I have FINALLY FOUND a link to a website with wrestler comparison heights from 2007/2008 that is in my estimation THE BEST SITE EVER!! You have JJ Dillon next to EVERY SINGLE WRESTLER in 2007/2008 from Hulk Hogan, to Undertaker, Big Show, Lex Luger, Batista, Kane, Roddy Piper, Bret Hart, Shawn Michaels, Mick Foley, Dusty Rhodes, Iron Sheik, Steve Austin, JR, Jimmy Snuka, Arn Anderson, Jerry Lawler, John Cena, HHH, Ric Flair, George Steele, Bruno Sammartino, Tito Santana, Funk Brothers, Honky Tonk Man, Sgt. Slaugther, Ole Anderson, Ultimate Warrior, Harley Race, Bob Orton, Pat Patterson, etc...
Look NO FURTHER and this puts an end TO A LOT OF DEBATES... DO NOT IGNORE THIS LINK:
Click Here
RP said on 16/Nov/11
A lot of people thought Chistopher Lloyd was at least 6'3" due to all of The Back To The Future movies & Michael J Fox being so short (5'4") which made Lloyd look very tall. So, Most people assumed he was at least 6'3"...because in the 80's MJ Fox tried to pass himself off as 5'6". But...Chris Lloyd is actually a "weak" 6'1"...6'2" in shoes.
Hogan said on 16/Nov/11
Hogan looks pretty tall next to piper but we don't know how tall piper was at his peak! At most he was 6 foot tall. Hogan looks no more than 5 inches taller. And andre looked maximum half a foot taller then the hulkster.
Piper 6'
Hulk Hogan 6'5
Andre the Giant 6'11
Could it make sense? That's My personal opinion but i am not gonna say i'm right
JT said on 16/Nov/11
1986
Click HereBobby Heenan has suffered from throat cancer. It looks like the doctors have now had to remove part of his jaw. He’s one of my all-time favorites and easily the funniest guy I’ve heard in wrestling.
Tman said on 15/Nov/11
Vegas in the Video you posted Hogan and Windham are very close in height and Windham is 1,94m(was an inch under 1,96 JBL when they were tag team) that just goes to show that hulk hogan was 1,95m at his peak.
Danimal said on 13/Nov/11
Tom101 says on 13/Nov/11
prime 6-6"+ defo looking at this photo,its 6" there at least,now i think 6-2-3" mark due to age and surgeries.
+1
Tom101 said on 13/Nov/11
prime 6-6"+ defo looking at this photo,its 6" there at least,now i think 6-2-3" mark due to age and surgeries.
dicksock said on 11/Nov/11
Vegas says on 11/Nov/11
Danimal says on 11/Nov/11
Hogan looking about 6'1" last year:
_________
i posted that shot months ago, Baron Von Raschke with the bald head is how tall do you think then?? btw ask chris over on andres page he will tell you as he met him recently
if hogan looks 6'1 there and he has 5+ inches on bobby heenan then how tall does bundy look next to heenan around same time Click Here
---------------------
Danimal's 6'1" Hogan garbage aside, I am so saddened to see the great Bobby Heenan in such bad shape. I knew that he had/has cancer but I didn't realize he had gotten so much worse in the last 5 years or so. Truly shocking.
Ronster says on 10/Nov/11
Go to 15 seconds and pause, Hogan when the two are standing the same id an inch taller than Troy in his high lift sneakers, oh that would put Hogan over 6'5" haters. Click Here
----------------
We should just ignore that footage though. Let's focus on all the times Hogan has bad posture or has a camera angle disadvantage. Let's also just ignore the fact that he's consistently 2"-3" taller than a legit 6'2" man.
JT said on 11/Nov/11
Post-back surgery Hogan and Troy Aikman from the latest Rent-A-Center commercial
Click Here Click Here This is probably from before Hogan’s back surgery.
Click Here
JT said on 11/Nov/11
Hogan in platform boots with 6’1” (not 6’2”) Christopher Lloyd
Click HereHere’s a better shot of Hogan and Mr. T from that Saturday Night Live in 1985
Click Here Hogan has the footwear advantage too.
Vegas said on 11/Nov/11
Danimal says on 11/Nov/11
Hogan looking about 6'1" last year:
_________
i posted that shot months ago, Baron Von Raschke with the bald head is how tall do you think then?? btw ask chris over on andres page he will tell you as he met him recently
if hogan looks 6'1 there and he has 5+ inches on bobby heenan then how tall does bundy look next to heenan around same time
Click Here
Danimal said on 11/Nov/11
Roddy Piper and 5'11" Bobby Heenan in 1986:
Click HereRoddy Piper and a much older Bobby Heena in 2005:
Click Here
Danimal said on 11/Nov/11
Hogan looking about 6'1" last year:
Click Here
Flynnster said on 10/Nov/11
In this Rent-A-Center commercial (
Click Here )
if you stop it at 15r seconds, you can see that Troy Aikmen is definitely 2" taller than the Hogan. And Aikman, who has no reason to exaggerate, is 6'4" tall
Ronster said on 10/Nov/11
Go to 15 seconds and pause, Hogan when the two are standing the same id an inch taller than Troy in his high lift sneakers, oh that would put Hogan over 6'5" haters.
Click Here
Danimal said on 9/Nov/11
andre says on 8/Nov/11
Zeus from wwf was 6ft5(196cm) was more taller then hogan(193cm)
21 years old hulk hogan was 6ft4(194cm)
today he is 6ft2.99(190cm7189) ok
HOGAN WAS NOT LESS THAN 6'5" in his prime KIDDIES!!!
Chuck said on 8/Nov/11
Billcompton says on 7/Nov/11
I must admit I first found this site because somebody bet me about Hogans height and I found ot interesting how many people think Hogan is shorter than what he says. Well I bet nobody on here has ever stood face to face with the man. I have met Hogan several times through out his career and I know how tall he is. I never measured him but Im 6'2 and Im taller then most men. Hogan curently is no shorter than 6'4 he could even be closer to 6'5. I live in the Tampa area and a Hogan sighting is not a rare thing. I bet the hatters on here are little boys who have never touched a weight or have never gotten into fight. I will not redpond to this boys.
I live in Tampa too, and I met Hulk the very morning that he had his most recent back surgery in the lobby of the hospital he had it at. I'd estimate his height at 6'3.5 ~ 6'4" that morning and that was a man who was obviously walking and standing in pain, I was literally 3 feet away from the man and even congratulated him and his wife on their marriage the day before. I have no doubt he's at least 6'5" after the surgery. Hulk's main problem is his posture, it can make him appear shorter than he is, he's constantly standing with a hunched back, neck slightly forward and knees slightly bent, if he straightened up he'd be around 6' 5.5" still.
andre says on 8/Nov/11
Zeus from wwf was 6ft5(196cm) was more taller then hogan(193cm)
Tom Lister was wearing boots with a 2 inch sole during the movie and those matches so he would appear taller than the at the time 6' 6" Hogan who was 6' 7" in wresting gear and with good posture
Danimal said on 8/Nov/11
Frank says on 8/Nov/11
Billcompton, Why was he shorter than Troy Aikman whos 6ft 4 ??? Why was he shorter than David Hasselhoff and Snoop Dogg all guys about 6ft 4?? and Hogan was a good amount shorter than 6ft 5 listed Lennox Lewis The Biggerst Hogan fan on her is Danimal and im sure he would agree with me on this
Since when am I the biggest Hogan fan? Can't stand the guy. I'm just not as biased as most on here.
Danimal said on 8/Nov/11
drummer777 says on 4/Nov/11
Larry(Lex Luger) was listed 6'4 in football, Hogan was billed 6'6 in the early 80's, Hogan is still slightly shorter than listed 6'4 Troy Aikman. Something is a miss at the circle K...
You're always wrong aren't you? Lex Luger was never listed as 6'4" in football. 6'3". JT, I know you have the listing. Can you provide it, so this guy who makes things up can be exposed?
andre said on 8/Nov/11
Zeus from wwf was 6ft5(196cm) was more taller then hogan(193cm)
21 years old hulk hogan was 6ft4(194cm)
today he is 6ft2.99(190cm7189) ok
Frank said on 8/Nov/11
Billcompton, Why was he shorter than Troy Aikman whos 6ft 4 ??? Why was he shorter than David Hasselhoff and Snoop Dogg all guys about 6ft 4?? and Hogan was a good amount shorter than 6ft 5 listed Lennox Lewis The Biggerst Hogan fan on her is Danimal and im sure he would agree with me on this
Eric said on 8/Nov/11
Billy, you grossly overestimated the heights of Hulk Hogan and Chris Lloyd. Isn't it possible you may not be 6'2? If you are 6'-6'1, that would make Hulk 6'2-6'3 according to your height difference.
Eric said on 8/Nov/11
Hulk Hogan hasn't been close to 6'5 in years. If he were that tall, that would make Troy 6'7 and we all know that's not the case.
Billcompton said on 8/Nov/11
Hogan and 6'2 James Durbin. Hogan looks 6'5.
Click Here
Big Mike said on 7/Nov/11
This looks somewhat right although I think Hulk was definately well over 6ft in his younger years the WWE had him as being 6ft6 or 6ft7and weighing anywhere from 285-310 when he wrestled but of course with age and the job he was in with all the surgeries yea he could've dropped a few inches I think 6ft3 is too short for him I guess 6ft5 right now and weighing about 250-275 not as big as he used 2 but still fairly big
Billcompton said on 7/Nov/11
I must admit I first found this site because somebody bet me about Hogans height and I found ot interesting how many people think Hogan is shorter than what he says. Well I bet nobody on here has ever stood face to face with the man. I have met Hogan several times through out his career and I know how tall he is. I never measured him but Im 6'2 and Im taller then most men. Hogan curently is no shorter than 6'4 he could even be closer to 6'5. I live in the Tampa area and a Hogan sighting is not a rare thing. I bet the hatters on here are little boys who have never touched a weight or have never gotten into fight. I will not redpond to this boys.
Frank said on 7/Nov/11
I doubt Christopher Loyd is 6ft 2 he's no where near 6ft 2
Eric said on 7/Nov/11
Troy was clearly taller than Hulk in EVERY SINGLE RAC commercial they've ever done.
Eric said on 6/Nov/11
How anyone can mistake 5'10 for 6'2 is beyond me.
Chuck said on 6/Nov/11
Has anyone seen the latest Rent-a-center ad. the black friday one? In that one Hulk actually looks taller than Troyby a good 1/2 to 1 inch.he's also standing straighter than he usually does posture does wonders.
Billcompton said on 4/Nov/11
Check out Hogan with 6'2 Christopher Loyd
Click Here
drummer777 said on 4/Nov/11
Larry(Lex Luger) was listed 6'4 in football, Hogan was billed 6'6 in the early 80's, Hogan is still slightly shorter than listed 6'4 Troy Aikman. Something is a miss at the circle K...
Mike said on 4/Nov/11
Peak Hogan: 6'4" barefoot
w/ wrestling boots : 6'5"
w/ cowboy boots: 6 feet 5 1/2 inches
WCW era: 6'4" with boots
2002 WWE return: 6'3
TNA debut: 6'3
Currently: 6'3.
Sam said on 3/Nov/11
Peak Hogan: 6'5
w/ wrestling boots : 6'6
w/ cowboy boots: 6'7
WCW era: 6'4.75 down to 6'4
2002 WWE return: 6'3.25
TNA debut: 6'3
Currently: 6'3.75
dicksock said on 3/Nov/11
Eric says on 2/Nov/11
Sock, in that wcw clip you posted, Lex had on dress shoes and was still within an inch of Hulk's height. If Lex really was 6'3 back then, that would make Hulk 6'3 and a half in 1995.
No man, Luger's heels were about as big as Hogan's cowboy boots at Bash at the Beach 1996 when he joined the NWO. He definitely had a footware advantage over Hogan. You must not have watched the whole clip if you think Luger was within an inch of Hogan. I would bet anything there was 2" between them. Hogan was staring down at him the whole time. Honestly, if you can watch the footage of Luger and Hogan from 1995 and come to the conclusion that Hogan was 6'3.5", then you are clearly clueless on this subject.
Eric says on 2/Nov/11
Hogan edged out Windham? Were you watching the same youtube clip? Anyone with a working pair of eyes could see that Barry was taller than Hulk.
The clip of them is useless. Windham clearly had the camera advantage. This is a case of people seeing what they want to see.
Eric said on 2/Nov/11
Sock, in that wcw clip you posted, Lex had on dress shoes and was still within an inch of Hulk's height. If Lex really was 6'3 back then, that would make Hulk 6'3 and a half in 1995.
Eric said on 2/Nov/11
Hogan edged out Windham? Were you watching the same youtube clip? Anyone with a working pair of eyes could see that Barry was taller than Hulk.
LAN Jiao said on 2/Nov/11
cant believe hogan lost 3in at height his only 58years old. im thinking peak he wore heel boots out 6'7 barefoot 6'5 and heading down 190cm flat maybe closer truth. his bill height was 6'9 during WWF. kurt angle had mention every wrestler get bill 4" higher than real height.
drummer777 said on 2/Nov/11
Definitely, Luger is listed as 6'4 in Football, Luger could be 6'3ish with hogan each man in the 6'3 to 6'4 range. I think you can put Barry windham at 6'4 barefoot and Sid at 6'5 1/2 to 6'6 barefoot. luger is more like 6'3ish barefoot. so you can make Barry windham 6'5 with his shoes on.
Hogan and Barry Windham have the same slight height advantage over Lex luger very minute though.
miko said on 2/Nov/11
Hogan and Windham were definately both 6'5 range.
Actually looking at new footage of them, I really don't know who was taller.
NCL said on 1/Nov/11
Big Show says on 1/Nov/11
Speaking of Barry Windham! Keep this guy in your prayers as he had a massive heart attack a few days ago! As of the latest report, his condition is stable now. Let's hope he will fully recover.
Had no idea! Praying for him
JT said on 1/Nov/11
robby says on 29/Oct/11
Judging from the video Vegas posted Barry Windham is taller then Hulk Hogan. However my only question is what kind of boots did Windham and Hogan wear at this point in what 1985??? Footwear does make a difference when u have two guys very close in height.
Both have standard wrestling boots on
Click Here Costas is probably in the 5'6" range.
6’7” Sid had an easy 2 inches on Windham, just like he did on Hogan
Click Here Click Here Click Here
dicksock said on 1/Nov/11
I'd like to add a couple of more points to the 1995 Hogan/Luger comparison: Luger was at least 6'3" for a fact and may have been 6'3.5" or something. There is no way in the world Hogan had less than 2" on him in 1995. I believe that segment should end any notion of Hogan "losing height" by 1995. He probably did, but I'm talking about like .25" or something like that; not this 1-2" nonsense or as mamun thinks, 3". Luger also had a small footware advantage in that segment. Hogan was absolutely no less than 6'5" in that clip. I would give him ~6'5.5" at that time. Logically, a younger Hogan would have been even a little bit closer to 6'6".
Peak Hogan- 6'5.5"-6'6"
Early WCW era Hogan- ~6'5.5"
Late WCW era Hogan- 6'5"
2002 WWF return Hogan- 6'4.5"
TNA debut Hogan- 6'3"-6'3.5"
Current Hogan- ~6'4"
dicksock said on 1/Nov/11
If Windham was taller than Hogan, why did he look the same or even shorter next to Lex Luger in the 80s than Hogan did in the mid 90s?
Click HereClick HereBoth men were in the 6'5" range for sure. Hogan would have probably edged out Barry though.
Eric said on 1/Nov/11
Definitely will say a prayer for Barry. It's hard to believe that a thin kid started bulking up so much. Barry was 240 early in his career and then moved up to 275 by his wwf stint. All that food was a heart attack in progress. Get well soon, Barry.
Big Show said on 1/Nov/11
Speaking of Barry Windham! Keep this guy in your prayers as he had a massive heart attack a few days ago! As of the latest report, his condition is stable now. Let's hope he will fully recover.
LAN Jiao said on 31/Oct/11
he was 6'6 peak and probably now at 6'3(190). he don look about 6'4 but 6'3.
Eric said on 30/Oct/11
At 4:40 of that youtube clip, Barry is bending over. Watch them at 4:50 when Barry stands straight. Barry is clearly taller than Hulk, and that's a 1985 Hulk. Barry probably has him by 3 inches today!
scottb80 said on 29/Oct/11
Here is a pic of Hogan standing next to 5'10" Mr.T during their 1985 SNL appearance. Hogan looks very tall next to Mr. T.
Click Here
robby said on 29/Oct/11
Judging from the video Vegas posted Barry Windham is taller then Hulk Hogan. However my only question is what kind of boots did Windham and Hogan wear at this point in what 1985??? Footwear does make a difference when u have two guys very close in height.
Eric said on 29/Oct/11
Good find, Vegas. You proved my point. Barry Windham was at least half an inch taller than a peak Hulk Hogan.
Mike said on 28/Oct/11
RP . No way Hulk Hogan . Was 6'4" barefoot common sense would say his wrestling boots . Would give him an extra inch. Which once again brings us back to a peak hights of 6'5" at best
miko said on 28/Oct/11
Hogan and Windham barefoot would have been interesting. If I had to put money on it, I'd probably go for Windham edging Hogan out.
Vegas said on 28/Oct/11
RP says on 27/Oct/11
A peak Barry Windham was NOT a 1/2"inch taller than a Peak Hulk Hogan! It was the very opposite. A peak Hogan was a 1/2"inch taller than Windham. When they were in the WWF together 1985-1986 Hogan always had by about a 1/2"inch.
___________
4mins 40secs
Click Here
Billcompton said on 27/Oct/11
We are talking about peak height not old broken down height. Andre was 7' in his prime. 6'10 after surgery and years of abuse.
RP said on 27/Oct/11
A peak Barry Windham was NOT a 1/2"inch taller than a Peak Hulk Hogan! It was the very opposite. A peak Hogan was a 1/2"inch taller than Windham. When they were in the WWF together 1985-1986 Hogan always had by about a 1/2"inch. Just google the pic from '85-'86 with Bob Costas, Hulk Hogan, Barry Windham, Mike Rotunda, & believe JYD & Hillbilly Jim are also in the pic. And Hogan is a 1/2" taller than Windham and they have identical wrestling boots. So....for the last time!....in his prime Terry "Hulk" was 6'5 1/2" barefoot.
Mike said on 27/Oct/11
Billcompton Andre was actually only 6'10" in 1987.
Billcompton said on 26/Oct/11
Well I guess if Hogan was only 6'5 in his prime then Andre was only 6'9 in his prime. It is crazy how many people on this website bash Hogan. Why do they care so much about Hogans height? Hogan in the 90's was 2 inches shorter than Dennis Rodman. Dennis Rodman is 6'7 and said so on Howard Stern two months ago. A prime Hogan was 6'6 minimum.
Mike said on 26/Oct/11
If you were to take a peek Hulk Hogan . and put him in a stare down with let's say somebody like gold dust Hulk Hogan would be absolutely no taller.
Thomas said on 26/Oct/11
DDP was 6'4 and may be even 6'4 today, but Hogan edged him out 1997 by at least 0.75 inch.. DDP is taller than Orton today. just go to DDP's page
Peak Hogan was 6'5.25 or 6'5
Mike said on 25/Oct/11
Eric it's good to see you there are some smart people. Hulk Hogan was NEVER 6'8" 6'7" or even 6'6" the absolute maximum was 6'5"
Danny B said on 25/Oct/11
Hulk at his prime without back surgery was 6'6", after surgery he now stands around 6'4.5"
Eric said on 24/Oct/11
That's correct, Mike. Hulk was never taller than 6'5, but he definitely was taller at one time. Hulk was about a half inch shorter than Barry Windham who was a legit 6'5.
Mike said on 23/Oct/11
I would be willing to bet. $1000 . That Hulk Hogan was absolutely no more than 6'5". Even as far back as 1979.
Vegas said on 22/Oct/11
on the espn scott hall documentary hogan describes hall as standing 6'8....so is hogan admitting hall was taller than him???
Billcompton said on 20/Oct/11
Hogan is 6'5 today. When he stands next to Sting it is very clear. When he stands next to Aikman in the new comercials he bending his knees all the time. Dont forget that Aikman wears those Sketcher sneakers. Those have like a 2 and a half inch heal on them.
miko said on 19/Oct/11
A VERY rare moment, where Hogan stands up straight next to Sting. Hogan has a small camera advantage as he's a little further back, but you can tell that Hogan is clearly a taller man.
Click HereHogan 6'2 today? Haha, your having a laugh...
rk said on 6/Jul/09
compared to stallone in rocky 3 hogans height is about 6'6 maybe even 6'7
Danimal said on 3/Jul/09
John says on 2/Jul/09
Click Here
This is a video of Hogan with Brooke Shields at about 1998. Shields is listed as 6'0. She's wearing high heels in the video, so that might bump her up to 6'1.5. Hogan seems to have three inches on her when he stands upright, so that'd put him in the area of 6'4.5 for the time.
Yeah, something funky happened between 2000 and 2002 (neck fusion and a hip replacement. I also believe he has a knee replacement as well). The man went from close to 6'5" before he left the WCW to barely over 6'3" upon his return to the WWE 2 years later imo.
John said on 2/Jul/09
Click HereThis is a video of Hogan with Brooke Shields at about 1998. Shields is listed as 6'0. She's wearing high heels in the video, so that might bump her up to 6'1.5. Hogan seems to have three inches on her when he stands upright, so that'd put him in the area of 6'4.5 for the time.
Anonymous said on 1/Jul/09
Hogan is still 280 today. In the recent pictures with the Hoff hogan is WAY, WAY heavier than Hoff, he looks like a stick next to hogan. Hoff who at 6'4 and well built has to be over 200.
Anonymous said on 1/Jul/09
Would love to have seen Hogan stand next to a LEGIT 6'6" man in 1981 and would love to see Hogan stand next to a legit 6'4" today.
My money would be Hogan would have been the exact same height as that 6'6" man in 1981 and close to 1" shorter than the 6'4" man today.
miko said on 1/Jul/09
If someone got a pic with Hogan they would have to be at least 6"2 as any shorter guy would mean a badly slouching Hogan.
Hogan only stands tall when he needs to.
Big King said on 1/Jul/09
And if Rob gets a pic with Hogan, so what? We all know that Hogan stands a weak 6'4" nowadays, such as he claimed.
Anonymous said on 30/Jun/09
It should not be so hard for this site to get Rob or Manum to get a picture with Hogan. Some celeb's are inexcessable but Hogan is like a regular joe who is everywhere.
Daniel_Sweden said on 28/Jun/09
hogan at peak was 6.5 1/2 and no more..yes he comes out as 6'7 or 6'7.5 with his cowboy boots...i would say hogan was 1987 6'5.5 and 290IBS...1978-1980 still of course 6'5.5 but more like 305 pounds... today he is 6'3 or 6'3.5 and maybe 260 pounds...
Doug said on 28/Jun/09
I agree at peak he was 6'5.5" and around 295 lbs. At one point though he was 315 in the late 70s and early 80s. At one point before he was a wrestler he has said he was a low as 240 pounds after he lost all the fat and then he started power building to become a wrestler.
Doug said on 28/Jun/09
Danimal I agree, he was very close to 6'6" at peak, 6'5.5". Today he is 6'3" ish and looks indeed to weigh around 255-260.
Danimal said on 27/Jun/09
Anonymous says on 26/Jun/09
Hogan gets jobbed with the comments on this site. He was huge back in 1981. No less than 6'6 315. Davidson was 6'8 and may have been the only person who found boots that were .25 bigger than Hogan's. He was only 2 inches shorter making him 6'6. Stll 6'4 280 today.
Lucky if he is 6'3" today and he's not over 255 pounds today.
Anonymous said on 26/Jun/09
Hogan gets jobbed with the comments on this site. He was huge back in 1981. No less than 6'6 315. Davidson was 6'8 and may have been the only person who found boots that were .25 bigger than Hogan's. He was only 2 inches shorter making him 6'6. Stll 6'4 280 today.
Danimal said on 26/Jun/09
rony192cm says on 23/Jun/09
That picture with Davidson is excellent. Their boots seems to have the same sole and is obvious that Davidson has 3" on Hogan. Davidson in this picture is definatly no less then 6'7 but also no more than 6'7.5 so Hogan's peek would be 6'4 to 6'4.5 and nowdayds he's about 6'2
2" between Hogan and Davidson, putting Hogan at 6'5.5"-6'6". 6'3"-6'3.5" today.
Daniel_Sweden said on 26/Jun/09
yes i remember that episode when hogan said he was 6'5 285ibs..he was no shorter than 6'5 barefoot at his peak..maybe he was 6'5 1/2 barefoot at hiis peak....and in cowboy boots he comes out at 6'7 or 6'7.5 depending on if he was 6'5 or 6'5.5...
i would say he was 6'5.5 peak and 290-300ibs in good shape (1979-1981)
general93 said on 25/Jun/09
on hogan knows best when searching for a bodygaurd for his daughter brooke, he says hes 6'5" 285lbs nothing to do with wwe.although i myself belief he was 6'6" and around 6'4" tallest today.
Clay said on 25/Jun/09
6'2 is a joke. He is still 6'3.5-6'4 today if he bothers to stand up. Claims 6'5''.
Richard said on 24/Jun/09
I'd give Hogan a peak 6'5 rony and today he looks like a very strong 6'3. I see only a little more than 2 inches between Hulk and Davidson.
rony192cm said on 23/Jun/09
That picture with Davidson is excellent. Their boots seems to have the same sole and is obvious that Davidson has 3" on Hogan. Davidson in this picture is definatly no less then 6'7 but also no more than 6'7.5 so Hogan's peek would be 6'4 to 6'4.5 and nowdayds he's about 6'2
aarod said on 22/Jun/09
christ, hogan has a HUGE head, hahaha
Danimal said on 21/Jun/09
Hogan was every bit 6'7"-6'8" in his cowboy boots in the 1980's.
Electric Shock said on 20/Jun/09
JT:
Hogan came out 6'7" in most street encounters due to his famous golden cowboy boots.
JT said on 19/Jun/09
Anonymous says on 18/Jun/09
I saw the Goldie and the Three Bears episode in question.(1984)Forget the picture, in the show Davidson and Hogan stand side by side talking for about 15 seconds, same footware, same stance. And just as the picture would suggest Davidson was about exactly 2 inches taller, definatly no less, maybe 2.25 inches...
Saw it too (and wasted an hour of my life). Davidson was easily 2 inches taller if not more. I believed Hogan was 6'8" at the time and was trying to come up with every excuse how he was really still the same height as Davidson when the height advantage was so obvious. I also recall one scene where Hogan is standing behind Davidson and craning his neck all he could just to be noticed over Davidson's shoulder. IIRC at the end, Hogan, Davidson and some third guy are standing together. Hogan did not look much shorter but the camera angle is very low so you can't really judge their heights.
topdweeb said on 19/Jun/09
Big Show says on 18/Jun/09
"Btw, Ronster have you ever considered that wrestlers are mostly not as tall as what they're billed at?"
Hell no, this guy seems to fall for them hook, line and sinker. He probably really thinks the Big Show was 7' 4 and must think he just simply lost four inches of height over the years. It's hilarious to see him on here trying to defend a 6' 8 Hogan, and using a 6' 10 Undertaker to help support his idiocy.
Vegas said on 19/Jun/09
Anonymous, hogan was only 37 when he first went face to face with sid in 1991, thats about the same age as chris jericho is today and jericho has been wrestling for 19 years, like hogan in 1991 jericho is still the same height he was in his peak imo
you got your numbers wrong too, sid was hogans age at WM8 in 1999 and yes he was still peak height then and in 2001 imo
topdweeb said on 18/Jun/09
Ronster: again, Sid was BILLED at 6' 7, he's no taller than that. The Undertaker is NOT 6' 10, but is more like 6' 7.5 to 6' 8 and the Undertaker himself once even stated that he is 6' 8 on an episode of Smackdown.
Anonymous said on 18/Jun/09
Peak heights, Ben Davidson 6'8 1965 25yr old. Hulk Hogan 6'5.75 1978 25yr old.
Sid Eudy 6'7 1985 25yr old. There was a big overlap in ages during the stairdowns with these guys. A peak Hogan with a diminished Davidson, and a peak Sid with a diminished Hogan. No way Hogan was peak in 1992 after 16 years already in the wrestling wars. And Davidson 13 years retired by 1984. Sid was no longer peak by about 2001 either.
Anonymous said on 18/Jun/09
I saw the Goldie and the Three Bears episode in question.(1984)Forget the picture, in the show Davidson and Hogan stand side by side talking for about 15 seconds, same footware, same stance. And just as the picture would suggest Davidson was about exactly 2 inches taller, definatly no less, maybe 2.25 inches. About the same as
Sid Eudy was taller than Hogan in the early 90's stairdowns, Davidson might have been a quarter to half inch taller than those. Davidson was 44 then, not peak. No one would suggest Hogan was at his peak at 44 in 1998. I suppose that if you gave Hogan the benifit of the doubt he could have been a flat 6'6 but more likely he was a little under that because Davidson was also called 6'7 sometimes.
topdweeb said on 18/Jun/09
6' 5.5" seems right for a peak Hogan.
Daniel_Sweden said on 17/Jun/09
topdweeb says on 16/Jun/09
I'm only interested in Sid's lowest billing, because we know that wrestlers are either billed at their actual height or exaggerated, and only on very rare occasions are they billed under. Since Sid was billed at 6' 7 originally, he isn't any taller than that (but I don't think he is any shorter either). And I seriously doubt Hulk wasn't at his prime in the early 90s. My goodness that argument gets ridiculous. It's like some people must think Hogan had like a 1 year prime or something.
If Sid was 6'7 at wrestlemania 8, how tall do you think hogan was? i would say hogan was around 6'5.5..i think that sid had a little footwear advantage..maybe 0.5
topdweeb said on 16/Jun/09
I'm only interested in Sid's lowest billing, because we know that wrestlers are either billed at their actual height or exaggerated, and only on very rare occasions are they billed under. Since Sid was billed at 6' 7 originally, he isn't any taller than that (but I don't think he is any shorter either). And I seriously doubt Hulk wasn't at his prime in the early 90s. My goodness that argument gets ridiculous. It's like some people must think Hogan had like a 1 year prime or something.
Danimal said on 16/Jun/09
Daniel_Sweden says on 16/Jun/09
topdweeb says on 15/Jun/09
Sid Eudy was originally billed at 6' 7, anyone who questions me on that, I can get you the videos for that where he is referred to as 6' 7. That means this is Sid's maximum height. And everyone knows, that Sid had at least a couple inches on Hogan way back in the very early 90s. Hogan was in no way 6' 7 or even 6' 6, but possibly in the 6' 5 range.
yes Sid was billed as 6'7 in the beginning later as 6'8 and sometimes as 6'9..
He has also been given a 6'10" billing upon his return to the WWF in 1996-1997.
Daniel_Sweden said on 16/Jun/09
topdweeb says on 15/Jun/09
Sid Eudy was originally billed at 6' 7, anyone who questions me on that, I can get you the videos for that where he is referred to as 6' 7. That means this is Sid's maximum height. And everyone knows, that Sid had at least a couple inches on Hogan way back in the very early 90s. Hogan was in no way 6' 7 or even 6' 6, but possibly in the 6' 5 range.
yes Sid was billed as 6'7 in the beginning later as 6'8 and sometimes as 6'9..
Sid was probably 6'7 at his peak barefoot...Hogan was at his peak 6'5.5 barefoot..Sid had a fotwear advantage over hogan..Sid was 6'7 and with 1 inch boots he comes out as 6'8, Hogan was 6'5.5 with 0.5 boots comes out as a 6'6 man..the difference with boots 2 inches without 1 1/2 inch...or i'm a wrong?
Danimal said on 15/Jun/09
topdweeb says on 15/Jun/09
Sid Eudy was originally billed at 6' 7, anyone who questions me on that, I can get you the videos for that where he is referred to as 6' 7. That means this is Sid's maximum height. And everyone knows, that Sid had at least a couple inches on Hogan way back in the very early 90s. Hogan was in no way 6' 7 or even 6' 6, but possibly in the 6' 5 range.
MANY believe that he was no longer at his peak height in 1991-1992.
topdweeb said on 15/Jun/09
Sid Eudy was originally billed at 6' 7, anyone who questions me on that, I can get you the videos for that where he is referred to as 6' 7. That means this is Sid's maximum height. And everyone knows, that Sid had at least a couple inches on Hogan way back in the very early 90s. Hogan was in no way 6' 7 or even 6' 6, but possibly in the 6' 5 range.
Vegas said on 15/Jun/09
hogans head is big but its nowhere near 18 inches long :D probably 10-10.5 inches
Ronster said on 14/Jun/09
Hogan was not wearing boots when he was standing next to my friend, he was in his wrestling boots which by the way had no more lift than any pair of running shoes. Hogan makes off the cuff remarks all the time, and probably has not even measured his own height in the last 20 years. As I stated before, i know for a fact ( not based on some picture) that he was at least 6'7-6'8" when i saw him in the late eighties without shoes or any help. Now he is around 6'5"-6'6" when he stands straight up. How can any of you look at the picture above where he clears a 6' guy by almost a foot and say he was never over 6'5"? What are you smoking???? Remember, he has an enormous head which is easily a foot and a half from top of head to his chin. I have no issues with him being a couple of inches shorter now, that is normal for a big man who has had hip replacement surgery, but some people are trying to say he is only 6'2-6'3" tall? And they base it on pictures where you cannot make any sound judgment or even be accurate to within 6" of his height. Look at the picture of him with KISS in the 90's, he stood between two guys who are 6'1" tall with 6-8" platform boots on and he was only 1-2"" shorter than either of them, that would by the way for the mathematically challenged put him at 6'7" average with his boots on. For the nay sayers who just won't stop trying to diminish his stature, deal with it.
topdweeb said on 14/Jun/09
Danimal: man, I bet those were the days. Wrestling back then was a lot more clean, yet, so much more entertaining.
Cutterstops said on 14/Jun/09
Hogan could be 6-2 these days. He doesnt look taller than 6-2 next to this guy comparing him to other wrestlers and a couple of NFL players here.
Click Here
Danimal said on 13/Jun/09
topdweeb says on 12/Jun/09
Guys, this is hilarious, check this out: Click Here
I actually saw this when it was first aired in 1984!
miko said on 13/Jun/09
I still get a sneaky feeling that Hogan fully stretched out could be 6"4.
Big King said on 13/Jun/09
Well I think that Hogan looks a strong 6'4" nowadays and a weak 6'6" in his prime.
topdweeb said on 13/Jun/09
Ron says on 9/Jun/09
"I see pics every day almost of him next to his daughter who is just under 6' barely"
By Brooke's own admission on Hogan Knows Best, she is 5' 10. She stated that when some guy estimated her height to be 5' 8 and she "corrected" him by stating she is 5' 10.
Anonymous said on 13/Jun/09
Hogan was 6'7 with his head of hair in the 70's. he went down to 6'6 when he lost it in the 80's Lost a natural inch in his 40's down to 6'5 by the end of the 90's. And lost an inch down to 6'4 from the surgeries by the 2000's. He can give the appearence of less than 6'4 now because his wheels are shot and he walks around like the missing link. If he had to stand up straight for a offical measuring I sure he would be 6'4. He only lost about 2 inches of real height(not including hair) over the past 35 years.
topdweeb said on 12/Jun/09
Guys, this is hilarious, check this out:
Click Here
Big King said on 11/Jun/09
I know crap about this guy. On the one hand he's down at 6'4" nowadays but he has clearly almost an inch on Lou Ferrigno who stood near 6'5".
Ron said on 9/Jun/09
I went and saw him live at ringside in the late eighties, and a friend of mine who is 6'5" tall had to look up to Hogan as he walked by. Hulk had at least 4-5" on guys in the 6'3-6'4" range in those days, and lifts won't get you more than an inch. He was billed at times as nearly 7' tall which was an exageration, but he was minimum 6'7-6'8" tall. Today by his own admission he has lost about 1-2" to wear and tear, but he still is between 6'5-6'6" tall. I am forever amused by all you so called experts who think they can judge from a photo someone's height. For instance, the pic everyone is citing now of him with Hasselhoff. He is slouching/leaning to one side and David was standing as straight as an arrow, plus we cannot see what they are standing on. I can be less than two feet from someone, but if the ground is uneven ( it always is) I can easily appear two inches or more taller/shorter depending on where i am. I see pics every day almost of him next to his daughter who is just under 6' barely, and he clears her by at least 4-6". You all need to stop trying to tear down the giants of our generation and get a hobby or something better to do with your time. Stop being so insecure about tall people already, gosh. For the record, Andre was over 7' tall when he stood up straight, which was not very often after 1980.(And remember he kept growing his whole life).
Doug said on 9/Jun/09
Today Hogan is in the 191 or 192 cm range. Strong 6'3", weak 6'4".
Doug said on 9/Jun/09
Hulkster below is just about right. Hogan was around a legit 6'5.5" barefoot at peak and you can see in the picture above he had the propotions of a genuine 6'5-6'6" man. HUGE. and was listed as 6'7"-6'8" today he is struggling with 6'4" barefoot, 6'3" ish. He is still a huge man obviously but a lot smaller than peak. Hogan is taller than 6'2" Brooke is 5'10.5" and in heels can reach a close 6'2" and Hogan is still an inch or two taller.
Danimal said on 8/Jun/09
Electric Shock says on 7/Jun/09
Danimal, that's laughable. Have you seen how small Jesse comes offon taller wrestlers? Jesse isn't even as tall as 6'3.75" Ted Dibiase.
Enough with the 6'3 3/4" Ted Dibiase. You and your 1/4" and 3/4" is like talking with a robot.
6'2" is what the man is TODAY. He was a tall man in his younger days. Still is, just not as tall.
Anonymous said on 7/Jun/09
Looks 6'7.5-6'7.75 in the picture above. And 1988 was hardly peak height for Hogan, 1977 would have been more like it.(24yr old) He's 35 in the photo above. His WWF days were starting to wind down by 1988. Even if you were to say that Greg is only 5'10.75 Hogan would be as much as 6'6.
Hulkster said on 7/Jun/09
Hogan was very huge, tall and strong back in the 70's and mid 80's it's just sad that everyone remembers Hogan in the nWo days or the WWE days when was way behind his prime..There was not really many guys who was taller than Hogan in the 80's execpt for a few like Big John Studd, Andre the Giant and One Man Gang..some says wrestlers is taller today than before..but Hogan was taller than Hillbilly Jim (6'5) Jake Roberts (6'5) Zeus (6'5) he was only 1.5 inches shorter than Big John Studd and Sid Justice. He stood up really good to a 7 feet Andre back in the late 70's. Todays wrestlers like Batista, Triple H, John Cena, Steve Austin, Randy Orton and so on are all shorter than many of the wrestlers in the 80's..
Hogan was at his peak a legit 6'5.75 (197,5 cm) barefoot...in the NWO he looked like 195cm then in the WWE 2004-2006 like 193cm.. Hogan is probably today 192,5 cm and peak 197,5 cm....
Electric Shock said on 7/Jun/09
Danimal, that's laughable. Have you seen how small Jesse comes offon taller wrestlers? Jesse isn't even as tall as 6'3.75" Ted Dibiase.
Jesse Ventura is a maximum of 6'2".
Danimal said on 6/Jun/09
Vegas says on 5/Jun/09
Danimal says on 5/Jun/09
A-Train was billed at 6'6", as well as Viscera, as well as One Man Gang (1984). None of them were over that height.
if you are using lowest billings for wrestlers you can't just pick and choose, you must include andre, big show and jesse ventura too
Ventura wasn't billed at 6'2" in his wrestling days. As a Governor in his 50's, yes he is. Jesse was billed at 6'7" in the WWF if I'm not mistaken, yet he referred to himself as 6'4"-6'5".
Anonymous said on 6/Jun/09
Ladd 4 inches taller than CRUSH!? lol no way
Daniel_Sweden said on 5/Jun/09
i would say that hogans peak height probably was 6'5.75 if you compare him to Jake Roberts, Jesse Ventura, zeus and Hillbilly Jim..Hogan was taller than all of them back in the 80's no doubt..Hogan was 6'5.75 (197cm) barefoot in the morning at his peak
Hulk Hogan 6'5.75 billead as 6'8 then 6'7 after height loss
Scott Hall 6'5.5 (billed 6'7)
Jake Roberts 6'5 (billed 6'6 and 6'7)
Hillbilly Jim 6'5.25 (billed 6'7)
One Man Gang/Akeem 6'6.75 (billed as high as 6'9)
Big John Studd 6'7.5 (billed as 6'10)
Sid 6'7.5 (billed as 6'8 and 6'9)
Undertaker 6'8 (billed as 6'10 1/2 then later 6'10)
Kevin Nash 6'10 (7'1 in WCW)
the Big Show 7'0 ( WCW 7'4 1/2 then 7'2, then 7'1 and at last 7'0)
Andre the Giant 6'11.5 - 7'0 (was probably 6'11 around wrestlemania III) (7'4 and 7'5)
Electric Shock said on 5/Jun/09
Danimal
Do you think Mideon is only 6'3"? Because he was billed that, and he was at least 6'5.5". Christian? Billed 5'10". was more like 6'.
You are using PWI bills, not actual bills. You have yet to prove One Man Gang was ever billed under 6'9". The truth is he never was. Mid-South billed him 6'10". ICW billed him 7'. UWF billed him 6'9". WWF billed him 6'9". in WCW J.R. once called him "6'8", maybe 6'10"." On the indie circuit, he is billed 7'.
There was NEVER a 6'6" bill unless you've created some fantasy league in your mind with your action figures.
Jake said on 5/Jun/09
This is good evidence that Hogan could be 6-2 these days.
This guy actually looks a little shorter next to 6-2.4 measured Kerry Rhodes than he does with Hogan.
Click HereClick Here
Vegas said on 5/Jun/09
Danimal says on 5/Jun/09
A-Train was billed at 6'6", as well as Viscera, as well as One Man Gang (1984). None of them were over that height.
if you are using lowest billings for wrestlers you can't just pick and choose, you must include andre, big show and jesse ventura too
Danimal said on 5/Jun/09
A-Train was billed at 6'6", as well as Viscera, as well as One Man Gang (1984). None of them were over that height. Crush was definitely not as tall as 6'6". He was in the 6'4"-6'5" range. Ernie Ladd was not as short as 6'7". He was 6'8"-6'9".
Shock of Electric said on 5/Jun/09
I get The Giant at 5.25" taller Gang, I also believe Big Show to have been a peak 7' as the Giant, putting Gang at 6.75", he was around .75-1" taller than Hogan in the late 80s.
Peaks:
The Great Khali 7'1"
Big Show 7'
Andre *maybe* 7' even
Kevin Nash 6'10"
The Undertaker 6'8.25"
Kane 6'8"
Sid 6'7"
Big John Studd 6'7"
Big Daddy V 6'6.75"
One Man Gang 6'6.75"
Hulk Hogan 6'6"
Jake Roberts 6'5.25"
Electric Shock said on 5/Jun/09
Gang's boots aren't any bigger than Big Show's in the staredown.
I'm getting 273 pixel OMG and a 289 pixel Big Show, making One Man Gang 94.5% as tall as Big Show. So punch in however tall you believe Big Show is into a calculator, and that'll be what Gang is.
I'm personally getting 6'11.5" Big Show and 6'6.9" One Man Gang.
Ali said on 4/Jun/09
HH looks about 190-192cm. I think
6'4 is perfect.
Wrestling is really damaging. He might have lost
2 inches height.
JT said on 4/Jun/09
Vegas says on 4/Jun/09
big show wasn't 7 inches taller than OMG face to face in wcw in 1996, it was more like 5-5.5 inches in the staredown, gang and studd were identical in height at the 1989 royal rumble and we know studd wasn't 2.5 inches taller than fralic in 1986
Click HereOMG had some really big-heeled boots on though:
Click HereOMG has more conventional boots on here
Click Here and Big Show (standing very erect) really towers over him despite the camera angle favoring OMG.
Click Here OMG still has ~ 6
The Ben said on 4/Jun/09
Danimal says on 4/Jun/09
Peak (rounded) - (even though I've done this ad-nauseum) -
Hogan - 6'6"
One Man Gang - 6'6"
John Studd - 6'7"
Andre - 7'0"
Taker - 6'8"
Sid - 6'7"
Big Show - 7'1"
Nash - 6'10"
Jake Roberts - 6'5"
Viscera - 6'6"
Kane - 6'7"
Khali - 7'1"
Good estimates Danimal!
The Ben said on 4/Jun/09
Electric shock..
Giant silva is taller then khali and reese
Electric Shock said on 4/Jun/09
Danimal it has been proven TIME AND TIME again that One Man Gang is taller than Hulk Hogan. How can you have them listed as the same peak?
flash_of_eden said on 4/Jun/09
Looks an easy 6'7" in that pic still.
Vegas said on 4/Jun/09
big show wasn't 7 inches taller than OMG face to face in wcw in 1996, it was more like 5-5.5 inches in the staredown, gang and studd were identical in height at the 1989 royal rumble and we know studd wasn't 2.5 inches taller than fralic in 1986
Danimal said on 4/Jun/09
Peak (rounded) - (even though I've done this ad-nauseum) -
Hogan - 6'6"
One Man Gang - 6'6"
John Studd - 6'7"
Andre - 7'0"
Taker - 6'8"
Sid - 6'7"
Big Show - 7'1"
Nash - 6'10"
Jake Roberts - 6'5"
Viscera - 6'6"
Kane - 6'7"
Khali - 7'1"
miko said on 4/Jun/09
Interesting pic here, not great for height gauging though.
Click Here
Danimal said on 4/Jun/09
Electric Shock says on 3/Jun/09
Danimal, One Man Gang was never billed 6'6" in an actual wrestling promotion. He was billed 6'9" and 6'10" through out his career. In his early days as Crusher Broomfield he was billed 7' even.
wrong.
Vegas said on 4/Jun/09
Electric Shock says on 3/Jun/09
Jesse Ventura was never more than like, 6'2". Watch Summerslam 88. In cowboy boots he's still shorter than 6'4" Ted Dibiase.
jesse is in sneakers at SS88, but he does look slighly shorter than dibiase and about 3 inches shorter than hogan, ventura is a strange one, he is listed at 6'2 at wwe.com, i was watching some older stuff from 1987 the other day, one segment he is standing beside vince and they are the same height, another time he has like 2 inches on vince, read into it what you will
btw at WM20 jesse is a hair shorter than 6-2 donald trump when he is interviewing him
Daniel_Sweden said on 4/Jun/09
Hogan 6'5.75
One Man Gang 6'7
Big John Studd 6'7.5
Sid Justice/Vicious 6'7.5
Undertaker 6'8
jake Roberts 6'5
Zeus 6'5
Andre the Giant 6'11 (1987) 7'0 (peak)
Big King said on 3/Jun/09
Electric Shock, that's strange, on some german websites I read 198cm/6'6" for One Man Gang too but he really looks like a big beast.
Electric Shock said on 3/Jun/09
Big King, Gang was somewhere between 1"-2" taller than Hogan depending on the era. Really, 6'9" bill for the Gang is even more exaggerated than a 6'7" Hogan bill, it's just more believable because One Man Gang almost never wrestled someone taller than him.
Electric Shock said on 3/Jun/09
Danimal, One Man Gang was never billed 6'6" in an actual wrestling promotion. He was billed 6'9" and 6'10" through out his career. In his early days as Crusher Broomfield he was billed 7' even.
There's no way One Man Gang was under 6'6", as he had at least an inch on Hogan. He was at most a half an inch shorter than Sid, probably more like a quarter inch.
The 6'6" was a PWI bill. This is the same magazine that had a picture of Kane and Big Show standing face to face and listed Kane 6'7", and Big Show 7'4", when the difference was more like 3". They also had Kane at 6'7" with Scott Hall as 6'8". They've also had Triple H at 6'5", Viscera at 6'10", and Great Khali at 7'5". They are FAR from a credible source for height information.
Electric Shock said on 3/Jun/09
Jesse Ventura was never more than like, 6'2". Watch Summerslam 88. In cowboy boots he's still shorter than 6'4" Ted Dibiase.
Danimal said on 2/Jun/09
Hogan was 6'6"
Jesse was 6'4"
John said on 2/Jun/09
Here in this recent interview with Howard Stern, Jesse Ventura says that he was 6'4, now 6'3 because he's shrunk with age.
Click HereI believe it. Hogan was always a couple inches taller than Ventura back in the day. I'd put Hogan at 6'6 back in the day. Maybe 6'3 now because of the surgeries.
Big King said on 1/Jun/09
Electric Shock, then I wonder why the height of some wrestlers are too exaggerated. I really don't believe that Hogan stood 6'7" in his younger days. He was really a weak 6'6" or 6'5.5" but nothing above it. But One Man Gang could be 6'9" because he looked really huge!
Danimal said on 1/Jun/09
Electric Shock says on 31/May/09
Big King, honestly, wrestlers don't get measured.
Look at Finlay; he has a 6'2" bill. The only way Finlay could ever be 6'2" is if he was standing on a phone book. He's like 5'10" max.
A lot of bills were due to Andre the Giant. Andre was about 6'11". In order the make him bigger than Kareem Abdul Jabaar, who was listed at 7'2", they lied and said he was 7'4". This created a chain effect with a lot of guys getting 2-3 inch advantages on their bills.
6'7"-6'7.5" John Studd became 6'10"
6'6.5"-6'7" One Man Gang became 6'9"
One Man Gang was being billed at 6'6" in 1984 (BEFORE the WWF). That was his MAX height.
sidewalk said on 1/Jun/09
Electric Shock your a bit off with what you're saying. Wrestler's heights are exagerrated.Some may even be because they want it to align with another tall wrestler. But to say a lot of bills were due to Andre is overstating. The guys would have been overbilled with or w/o Andre ever wrestling. It's not like Andre set off a chain reaction of overbilling in the wrestling world.
The Ben said on 1/Jun/09
Electric Shock
Great post!...
Electric Shock said on 31/May/09
Big King, honestly, wrestlers don't get measured.
Look at Finlay; he has a 6'2" bill. The only way Finlay could ever be 6'2" is if he was standing on a phone book. He's like 5'10" max.
A lot of bills were due to Andre the Giant. Andre was about 6'11". In order the make him bigger than Kareem Abdul Jabaar, who was listed at 7'2", they lied and said he was 7'4". This created a chain effect with a lot of guys getting 2-3 inch advantages on their bills.
6'7"-6'7.5" John Studd became 6'10"
6'6.5"-6'7" One Man Gang became 6'9"
6'5.5"-6'6" Hulk Hogan became 6'8"
The thing that bungled it up is certain guys (6'5" Jake Roberts, 6'4" Ted Dibiase, 6'2" Ultimate Warrior) didn't get overbills. So at Wrestlemania 6 6'8" Hulk Hogan only came out between three to four inches taller than 6'2" Ultimate Warrior. The worst of these was Dibiase, who was actually billed 6'3" when he was more like 6'4". Hogan came out less than a full 2" taller than him, but was billed about 5" taller. Yikes.
T said on 30/May/09
Big King says on 27/May/09
Do the wrestlers get measured with shoes?
id have to say thats true because you never see them without shoes.
Ghost said on 30/May/09
Hogan was still pretty much the same height as David Hasselhoff and Conan O'Brien.
He also seemed to have the same height advantage over mean Gene (who I think lost an inch) through the years.
I Hogan has lost about 2 inches, from 6'5,5 to 6'3,5.
Remember people Hogan likes to excaggerate (700 lbs Andre for example) so I wouldn't be suprised if he would excaggerate the amount of height he has lost.
Boss said on 29/May/09
Hogan claims that he was 6'7 peak and Andre was 6 inches taller than him when they met. So Hogan claims a 7'1 for Andre but Andre was in his 30's by the time they met. Since we know Hogan was between 6'5.5-6'6 peak than Andre would be 6'11.5-7' when they met in Andre's early 30's in late 1970's.
Doug said on 29/May/09
On Hogan KNows Best interestingly Hogan looked about 1.5-2 inches shorter than 6'5" Davie Boy Smith's son Harry. He was looking up at him and said "Dude you're huge". Hogan looked 6'3" in comparison if he is a legit 6'5".
Dallas said on 28/May/09
He looked 6'7 back in the day, but like he said after all those knee and back surgeries he looks to have lost nearly three inches.
Red said on 28/May/09
Big King says on 27/May/09
Do the wrestlers get measured with shoes?
;)
Do they (WWE,TNA ...) say the billed heights are barefoot? Never heard they announced a wrestler like " standing 6
Daniel_Sweden said on 28/May/09
after comoparing sid and hogan i have come to this, that hogans peak height then was probably around 6'5.5 and sid was 6'7..don't forget sid also had a footwear advantage over hogan just like zeus that is pretty clear if you watch the picture...
Anonymous said on 28/May/09
Hogan was 6'6. Only the very tallest guys were even Slightly taller than him years back. Super tall guys like Big John Studd and
Sid Eudy, Ben davidson, were as litle as a inch or inch and a half taller and those guys had an accepted height range of 6'7-6'8. Hogan even stood up remarkably well with Andre in the late 70's early 80's at as little as 5 inches shorter, when Andre had to be 7 foot because he was only slightly shorter than 7'1-7'2 Wilt Chamberlin.
Big King said on 27/May/09
Do the wrestlers get measured with shoes?
Chaz said on 27/May/09
It's not just Sid's shoulders that are higher his waist is much higher he is a much taller and bigger man,Hogan is looking up and Sid is looking down,and if you put them lines over Hogan's nose,and Hogan has got one big long nose,you will see it is nearly as long, there is a lot more than 1'5''between them lines,more like 2.5'' and Sid is looking down,or are some saying hogan's long nose is only 2''.
Kiat said on 27/May/09
The thing is Sid has higher shoulders, which creates the illusion of a taller man. Hogan's height is in his head. Also Earthquake looked taller than Hogan next to Mean Gene because of his shoulders, where in reality he is only slightly taller than Hogan, about 1/2 an inch.
JT said on 27/May/09
Shock of Electric says on 26/May/09
....Who has the camera/position advantage here? I have seem this angle staredown so many times and it seems like the advantage always changes, and usually it's towards the guy who is just taller. I believe I've seen this angle work in Undertaker's favor from different posters whether he's front or back, like it's part of his DNA to always have camera advantage.....
As long as the camera is above the wrestlers' heads, the guy farther from the camera always has the advantage. It's Hogan in that staredown. That's why the top of Piper's head is above Hogan's and Sid's, when he is at least 4-5 inches shorter that Hogan.
Click Here
Electric Shock said on 27/May/09
Something worth noting: I recently looked up the article about Earthquake and it had him listed as 198 cm, with 6'5.75" listed in parenthesis. This got me thinking; did the writer of the article just make a math error?
Quake would have obviously been measured in Japan, where they use the metric system. That leads me to believe that Quake was measured 198 cm, and the author just made an error in the conversion. 198 cm is basically 6'6", not 6'5.75".
Just something to think about.
Danimal said on 26/May/09
Big King says on 26/May/09
That sounds like a result. Hogan's height was 6'5.5" in his younger days and nowadays he's nothing more than 6'3.5", end of discussion. That guy has lost exactly 2 inches. He was written as 6'7" and 6'8" because the WWE wanted to list him at that height but anything above 6'6" was obviously a joke for Hogan.
He was 6'6" and is struggling with 6'3" today. In my book, that's 3".
Vegas said on 26/May/09
Shock of Electric says on 26/May/09
Who has the camera/position advantage here?
hogan has the slight high camera advantage there, if the camera zoomed in then sid would have it but from the high camera position the person furthest away from the camera has the advantage
Big King said on 26/May/09
That sounds like a result. Hogan's height was 6'5.5" in his younger days and nowadays he's nothing more than 6'3.5", end of discussion. That guy has lost exactly 2 inches. He was written as 6'7" and 6'8" because the WWE wanted to list him at that height but anything above 6'6" was obviously a joke for Hogan.
Shock of Electric said on 26/May/09
These caps are rope adjusted because the camera was tilted in Hogan's favor.
Click HereClick HereClick Here2" is going to be tough for Sid to come by here. I'll even say their boots are even in this match for the sake of argument. You can't even squeeze 1.5" out here. That's approximately 4pix/in and the most I get there is 5px difference. If you want to say it's 3pix/in to get Sid into the 2" barrier, then Hogan's head is 13" tall. Sid's posture is impeccable and he's leaning his head back in 2 of them, Hogan's posture is sloppy.
Who has the camera/position advantage here? I have seem this angle staredown so many times and it seems like the advantage always changes, and usually it's towards the guy who is just taller. I believe I've seen this angle work in Undertaker's favor from different posters whether he's front or back, like it's part of his DNA to always have camera advantage.
As of 1992 I see Sid 6'6.75" and Hogan 6'5.5"-.75"
Can someone post a solid shot where Sid comes out 2" taller? I guarantee it's just overstating the value of 2" or aiming Sid's head top too high due to his fluffy hair.
There was a point in time even after I realized wrestlers generally aren't their billed heights where I thought Sid was 6'8". I even met him some time after, stared directly at his bicep in an indy show locker room and still thought he was 6'8" when I was 17. Years later, it just doesn't add up.
Daniel_Sweden said on 26/May/09
let's forget how hogan looks today..he is out of his time and far away from his peak..the guy was born 1953...if you compare todays hogan with 1978-1985. it's like comparing Elvis (1956) and fat elvis at 280 pounds (1977) or a young clint eastwood and todays eastwood.. Hogan for sure was nothing under 6'5.5 barefoot at his prime...he was a very very strong 6'5.5 barefoot guy...maybe also 6'6...the hulkster was huge back then..he was very tall,heavy and strong for sure...Hogan looks much better today then his fellow restlers who is at the same age as him..like Lex Luger, Randy Savage, Ric Flair, Roddy Piper, Jim Duggan, Iron Sheik, nikolai volkoff, ted dibiase and so on..
today he is a strong 6'3.5 around 265 pounds
Peak 6'5.5 and maybe 6'5.75 and 305 pounds at his heaviest(1978-1979)
Cameron said on 25/May/09
Wow, Hogan looks shorter than 6-2 Sting. Hogan looks only 6-1 there.
Anonymous said on 25/May/09
Strong 6'6 peak. Even in the 90's when he paired up with 6'3 NFL Kevin Greene he was way taller, about 3 inches, and he was way taller around 1980 than he was in the mid 90's. Back in the 80's he was way taller, about 3 inches, than Jesse Ventura who, even if you knock him down to 6'3 instead of the 6'4-6'5 that he called himself, still leaves Hogan at a strong 6'6.
Anonymous said on 25/May/09
Hogan was 6'6, not 6'8 and not 6'4, 6'6. I think the truth slipped out in that 1979 match with Andre when he was listed at 6'6 on the poster. He went to 6'8 and even 6'9 immediatly after that. That was the kayfab. 6'6 was not seen again for years and years.
Electric Shock said on 25/May/09
Vegas
I believe he had hip replacement surgery in the early 00s.
Chaz said on 25/May/09
It is quite clear Hogan is at least 2.5''shorter than Sid,why do you think he was billed at 6'9''and 6'10'' and Hogan 6'7''Cos he was 2-3'' taller, ether Sid was 6'8.5''or Hogan was 6'4.5-6'5'', it is one or the other.All this talk of Hogan loseing all this height is crap,the only thing he as lost is the abillty to walk in 2'5''cowboy boots,cos of he's hips,if he realy had been 6'7''he would have been amost 10''taller than Peppard in them and he had 6'' at most.in big boots.face it he was a big guy nere 6'5''and 290lbs. with 21''arms but no Manfrid Hoebrel that is for sure,
Vegas said on 25/May/09
Danimal says on 25/May/09
Looks like Hogan gradually lost height up until 2000 and then BAMM, he lost a TON of height all at once between 2000 and 2002
hogan and sting staredown from 1999 (6.48 onwards)
Click Here
JT said on 25/May/09
Shock of Electric says on 25/May/09
Sid in any reasonable, stable comparison has never come out more than 1.5" taller than Hogan and many people believe Hogan started shrinking in the early 90s.
Here is one Click Here....
Hogan was closer to the camera for that entire video. Sid comes out at least 2 inches taller in every staredown and in comparison photos when they are of a similar distance from the camera.
Vegas said on 25/May/09
omg and tenta are together in this video, not great for comparing
Click HereShock, hogan is also slightly closer to the camera in your photo
Click Here
Big Show said on 25/May/09
JT says on 24/May/09
Big Show, I've yet to come across any pure staredown between Hogan and Studd
It's bound to show up one day, as Hogan and Studd had several matches together which have probably been televised back then.
That Studd is billed taller than Hogan does not necessarily mean he is taller. Batista is billed taller than Randy Orton, yet he's shorter in reality. Kane and Big Show are also billed at the same height (which they're not).
Studd was a huge guy (both in height and weight) so it's no surprise the WWF billed him as a monster at the time (which could explain the higher billings).
I've read somewhere that Studd was billed at 6'7 in his early days, but have thusfar been unable to find any proof of this.
Anonymous said on 25/May/09
I think that the picture of Hulk with Goerge Foreman next to the heavy bag shows just how huge Hogan was. Foreman was always 6'4 and Hogan towers over him, 6'6+ in that picture and that is way past his prime. and that was at the peak of the big George days when he weighed a ton like 280 give or take 20 pounds. Hogan has got to be 300 lbs even at that time, Foreman looks slight!. And that is the biggest Hogan's arms have ever looked, I believe the 24" from that photo. Foreman had Huge arms and Hogan's are twice as big!! I think Hogan simply lost a amazing amount of height, He was very close to 6'7 back in 1979. About 6'6.75.
Shock of Electric said on 25/May/09
Sid in any reasonable, stable comparison has never come out more than 1.5" taller than Hogan and many people believe Hogan started shrinking in the early 90s.
Here is one
Click HereMax head height I can give either man is 10" and they both are pretty dead even in skull height. This has also been observed from countless staredowns with other wrestlers. It's the most reasonable number. In any event, Sid here coming out 1.5" taller than Hogan, and Sid has a .25" boot advantage (1" vs .75" in 1992). The final difference is 1.25", making Sid 6'6.75-6'7" whether you believe Hogan was 6'5.5" or 6'5.75". I believe the latter.
Electric Shock said on 25/May/09
Sid is 1.5 taller than Hogan with a .25 boot advantage.
Is there a video of Tenta with Gang? I've never seen such a video. I was always under the impression Tenta was at least an inch shorter than Gang.
Danimal said on 24/May/09
JT says on 24/May/09
Danimal says on 24/May/09
....JT, provide some PROOF that John Studd had 1" on Hogan.
You're a walking contradiction - you also believed a peak height Hogan was 6'6" and Studd at least 6'7". Click Here Now, we'll anxiously await your PROOF that they were the same height. Quit emoting - it adds nothing to the debate.
I still believe that, but I don't agree with your 1" height difference, because it has Studd at 6'6" and Hogan at 6'5". My 1" height difference has Hogan at 6'6" or close to it and Studd an 1" more. I see more than 1" difference between Studd and Fralic. I also see Hogan having had 2" on 6'4" Ray Traylor (Big Bossman) in the pic below.
JT said on 24/May/09
Big Show, I've yet to come across any pure staredown between Hogan and Studd, though the 5:30 mark here is interesting
Click Here Click Here Also, just compare how Hogan measured up to guys like Andre and Bundy with how Studd did. Hogan had Bundy by around 2 inches; Studd had Bundy by around 3. Andre was around 5 inches taller than Hogan; Andre had Studd by 3-4 inches max in the late 1990s. The fact that WWF billed Hogan at 6'8" and Studd at 6'10" makes it pretty clear that Studd was the taller of the two.
Big Show said on 24/May/09
Red says on 24/May/09
Big Show, great vid again, but Studd isn
Red said on 24/May/09
Big Show, great vid again, but Studd isn
Chaz said on 24/May/09
Lets get real here Hogan is 2-2.5'' shorter than a 6'7''Sid, Hogan was at best 6'5'' he is now about 6'3''.
Big Show said on 24/May/09
Click HerePause at 4:55 til 4:58 (too bad the video skips at that point). Hogan and Studd look close to the same height if you ask me. If Hogan is really 1 inch shorter than Studd it would mean he's basically the same height as Bill Fralic (who's 6'4.5"-6'5").
Vegas said on 24/May/09
interesting match, i know JT has posted stills before, good comparison between sid/hogan and piper
Click Herehogan and sid have a staredown in this part
Click Here
JT said on 24/May/09
Danimal says on 24/May/09
....JT, provide some PROOF that John Studd had 1" on Hogan.
You're a walking contradiction - you also believed a peak height Hogan was 6'6" and Studd at least 6'7".
Click Here Now, we'll anxiously await your PROOF that they were the same height. Quit emoting - it adds nothing to the debate.
Electric Shock, Sid's boots were no bigger than Hogan's. Sid was a solid 2 inches taller than Hogan.
Danimal said on 24/May/09
One Man Gang was billed at 6'6" in the early/mid 80's. I have OLD Pro Wrestling Illustrated magazines and he BILLED at 6'6".
JT, provide some PROOF that John Studd had 1" on Hogan.
Anonymous said on 24/May/09
No way a peak Hogan was not at least 6'6. For every picture/video that shows him looking shorter than that, there are 2 pictures/video's that show him looking TALLER than that. Hogan's peak height should not be discussed as being anything after about 1985. In the picture with Mean Gene below, that is not from 1981. Hogan was not donning the Hulk rules tee shirt and Hulkamania bandana back then, in 1981 Hogan was in Verne Gangea's orginization. He would not be the champ for two years yet and did not even have a truely set persona yet, he had not even filmed Rocky 3, a transition time from the Terry Boulder/Sterling Golden/Super Destroyer days to the Hulkster days. That picture is from years later. Just showing that a peak Hogan would have stacked up even better to Sid.
Electric Shock said on 23/May/09
Click Here Sid coming out roughly 1.25" shorter than Sid with a .25" boot disadvantage.
Click Here Hogan coming out about 1.75" taller than Big Boss Man with a .25" advantage (Boss Man's boots were pretty small.)
Electric Shock said on 23/May/09
JT
I never understood why Gang went between the ropes. Look how low he has to stoop lol.
I guess my initial estimates for Gang were low. Gang at least an even 6'7", basically coming out the exact same height as Sid.
Danimal said on 23/May/09
Miko, Hogan only came off the juice in 1993-1994 (for the steroid trials). He was juiced to the gills during the ENTIRE NWO years (way too much definition) and was juiced upon his return to the WWE in 2002-2003, as well as 2005. He's never really been OFF the juice since 1975, with exception to the steroid trials. Sometimes he's cycling more often, or for longer periods and sometimes he UPS the dosage, but he's always on some levels of dianobol FOR SURE.
JT said on 23/May/09
Electric Shock says on 23/May/09
Click Here I know not entirely scientific, but I used a (Rare) screen cap of Gang standing straight up and lined up the shoulders and head size with Gang hunched facing Hogan...
OMG was doing his stupid African dance with Hogan. It all depends on when you cap it.
Click Here OMG was every bit as tall as John Studd, who was at least an inch taller than Hogan. OMG sometimes wore big-heeled boots in WCW. In OMG's normal wrestling boots, you can see how Big Show standing really straight measured up to him even with the high camera angle favoring OMG.
Click Here ~ 6'1" Ed Leslie (Brutus Beefcake) is in the video too.
Big Show said on 23/May/09
Vegas says on 22/May/09
Boss says on 22/May/09
Also Hogan underwent his first back surgery in 1990. In 1990 he took a few months off before he first wrestled Earthquake at Summerslam 1990 so this is probably when he had the surgery.
when hogan took time off from wwf (between april and july 1990) he was filming suburban commando and wrestling in japan, i have posted proof of that on here on more than one occasion
When Shawn Michaels had major spinal fusion surgery he retired from wrestling and didn't come back after 4 years. Some were saying he was crazy as his injury at the time would've ended most careers.
Yet Hogan, who's supposed to have the same surgery came back in 3 months!!!
People with torn biceps are out longer than 3 months. A broken back would've taken Hogan out for a year if not more.
Electric Shock said on 23/May/09
Click Here I know not entirely scientific, but I used a (Rare) screen cap of Gang standing straight up and lined up the shoulders and head size with Gang hunched facing Hogan.
Gang coming out about 1.5 taller than Hulkster. If we're saying Hogan 6'5.5", then Gang would be just under 6'7" given a slight boot advantage. If we're still saying Hogan 6'6" prime, than Gang is a giant of a man at over 6'7".