How tall is Clint Eastwood ?

Home :: Bookmark :: About  

Clint Eastwood's height is 6ft 0.5in (184 cm)

Peak height was 6ft 4in (193 cm)
American actor and Director best known for films such as The Good, the Bad and the Ugly, Dirty Harry films, Unforgiven, Every Which Way But Loose, The Outlaw Josey Wales, Million Dollar Baby, Escape from Alcatraz, Space Cowboys and Gran Torino. In a racquetball website he stated he was '6ft 4'.
Add your opinion on the Height of Clint Eastwood

Your Comment:

James B says on 23/Jul/14
Arch if I did not know clints height and if someone said he was 6'5 in play misty for me I would not question it.
James B says on 23/Jul/14
I think he was being honest when he was measured at 6 ft 4 in his last year in school or something and there was only one kid in the school taller at 6 ft 5. I think most of us (except James) agree he looked in that 6'3.5-6'4" range in the 60s and 70s. Also if you consider his lanky build to weigh 205-216 pounds as he did he'd have to be very tall with decent muscle mass to weigh that on a lanky frame. Hasselhoff at 6'4" is a naturally well built guy and a meso unlike Clint and weighs only 191 pounds.

Arch you misunderstand me in the 70s he never looked anything less than 6'3 range but I was just saying in his later movies from the 80s he started to look slightly under 6'3 'AT TIMES.' Granted there was the occasional moment in hang em high where he looked under 6'3.
Arch Stanton says on 23/Jul/14
I think he was being honest when he was measured at 6 ft 4 in his last year in school or something and there was only one kid in the school taller at 6 ft 5. I think most of us (except James) agree he looked in that 6'3.5-6'4" range in the 60s and 70s. Also if you consider his lanky build to weigh 205-216 pounds as he did he'd have to be very tall with decent muscle mass to weigh that on a lanky frame. Hasselhoff at 6'4" is a naturally well built guy and a meso unlike Clint and weighs only 191 pounds.
Arch Stanton says on 23/Jul/14
James B says on 16/Jul/14
Where do the 6'2 estimates for clint come from?

You!!
jervis says on 17/Jul/14
Strong 6ft3 or weak 6ft4 peak.
James B says on 16/Jul/14
Where do the 6'2 estimates for clint come from?
Sam says on 15/Jul/14
Agree with Rob, a weak 6'4", woke up a bit over 6'4", could have been 6'3.5" range by afternoon...there's no way he peaked as low as 6'3" or under at full height IMO just to consistent too tall in comparison to other tall men like Sutherland, George Kennedy and that all star line-up including Hudson.
James B says on 11/Jul/14
Rob sometime in the future will you consider downgrading clints peak to 6'3 1/2 like you did with Donald sutherland. Or are you convinced he was the full 6'4?
[Editor Rob: both 6ft 3.5 and 4 are arguable peaks for him]
Gonzalo says on 10/Jul/14
Sam says on 8/Jul/14
Cool to see Clint with James Stewart, but I don't see it as proof that Clint was 6'3".
So, Sam, what`s your guess about Eastwood?
He was as tall as George Kennedy, not much shorter than Rock Hudson. IMO in his prime he looked in the 1`93 area
James B says on 8/Jul/14
I find hard to believe as well that a peak clint would have had 2 inches on jackman
Sam says on 8/Jul/14
Cool to see Clint with James Stewart, but I don't see it as proof that Clint was 6'3".
Gonzalo says on 7/Jul/14
Clint Eastwood and James Stewart
Click Here
Iosu says on 6/Jul/14
Click Here

Clint and James
crazy cajun says on 6/Jul/14
Clint was never 6'4 . 6'3 or 6'3 1/2 at most. His lanky build and thick bushy hair made him look about 1 inch taller than he really was . In million dollar baby he looked about 2 inches shorter than 6'2 Morgan Freeman . So nothing over 6 feet now .
jervis says on 6/Jul/14
There is a photo of Clint with James Stewart Clint is about 60 in it and Stewart 82.Clint has about 2 inches on Stewart.At 60 Clint would have been around 6ft3,the same as Stewarts peek.lts just an example of how much hight you can lose in old age.Stewart looks to have lost about 2 inches from his peak.Also Clints posture can change his hight a lot in photos in bad posture he can look 2 inches shorter thann when he stands stright,I think that is a very important thing to remember when judging Clints hight.
Arch Stanton says on 6/Jul/14
jervis says on 3/Jul/14
Its hard to belive that the young Clint would have 2inches on Jackman.

Why? Clint's much more lankier in the leg.~~~~
nrbobh5344 says on 3/Jul/14
In 'Million Dollar Baby' Clint walks with 6'2" Brian O'Byrne (the priest) and he is about 1 inch shorter than Brian. Seems like Clint was about 6'1"-ish in 2004.
jervis says on 3/Jul/14
Its hard to belive that the young Clint would have 2inches on Jackman.Clint was a weak 6ft4 in his younger days to me know less than 6ft3,but in the photo with Jackman looks bearly 6ft.For a man who held his own against the likes of George Kenedey and Rock Hudson and now is bearly taller than Brad Pitt its a lot of hight loss.l think it was all that bad posture in his younger days
caused his hight loss.Liam Neeson is heading that way to because his posture is very bad too.
James B says on 2/Jul/14
Clint would defo have been no taller than 192cm at night in his prime
filmfan says on 2/Jul/14
I can buy 6'4'' but I do think he was at the lower end of the mark, where 6'3'' goes to 6'4'' rather than where 6'4'' goes to 6'5''. I know people dispute this but I thought George Kennedy was a little taller in 2 films they made together.
Greg says on 30/Jun/14
I think he lost height over the years, accelerated recently - I don't think that's real unusual, though some people do keep their height into old age. Regarding the John Humphries (the BBC newsreader/broadcaster) interview on YouTube, the difference in height is bizarre. Humphries looks like a schoolboy (I assume he wasn't) and would have been about 5'9"-5'10" yet only reaching Eastwood's chin. It's hard to imagine earth Eastwood is much less than 6'4" there. Also, in his brief movie appearance with 6'5" Rock Hudson as a Lab Technician ten years earlier, he looks slightly shorter than Hudson, but not much. Remember that Eastwood was in his mid-30's when he hit the big time with the spaghetti westerns - really looking 6'4" - and in later movies like Thunderbolt/lightfoot, Eiger sanction etc. he's in his 40's plus. Clearly with movie-star looks, he has very long arms (appears a little awkward in some shots) and a massive adams apple that he'd cover up with neckchiefs in cowboy movies or using high collar shirts. He was interviewed by Simon Dee about the same time as the Humphries interview, but I think they wiped those early shows.
James B says on 18/Jun/14
He looks 6ft flat with 6'1.5 hugh jackman
mike says on 16/Jun/14
Rob, could Clint be heading towards 6ft flat now?
[Editor Rob: he might be around it]
Arch Stanton says on 15/Jun/14
And what actor does she think was/is James? Warren Beatty? Robert Redford? James Garner?
James B says on 14/Jun/14
Clint and hugh jackman
Click Here
avi says on 14/Jun/14
Again never 6'4...
James B says on 12/Jun/14
Arch my mum said earlier tonight that david Beckham looking like clint Eastwood was not a good thing since in her own words "clint Eastwood was not the best looking guy in the world"
James B says on 12/Jun/14
Well the girls who wrote the comments still thought he looked good.
Arch Stanton says on 12/Jun/14
He's in flat slippers and a dressing gown in White Hunter and in all honesty he really looked near 6'4" still proportionally IMO. Yes, he looked an inch shorter than Nesosn in Dead Pool but he looked a strong 6'3" still in that film.
Arch Stanton says on 12/Jun/14
Still looked a strong 6'3" in White Hunter Black Heart in 1990 next to Jeff Fahey who Rob has at 6 ft. Eastwood had almost 4 inches on him.
Arch Stanton says on 10/Jun/14
Click Here

Ha James, Jackman goes one step worse!!
Gonzalo says on 2/Jun/14
Eastwood, Freeman and Kobe Bryant

Click Here

Click Here
littlesue says on 30/May/14
Clint lost a few inches of height
https://www.facebook.com/OldHollywood.net/photos/a.287290144724822.70224.287289148058255/569802326473601/?type=1&theater
Sam says on 28/May/14
I think Arch's second Jackman shot was from Les Mis, in the part where he had an ugly scraggly beard and lost a bunch of weight to look gaunt. I recently saw Prisoners, there he had a shorter beard but looked fairly bulky and imposing. Jackman's lucky that he can change his weight so rapidly at his age. From shots from the new X Men he definitely was back in Wolverine-fighting shape.
Arch Stanton says on 28/May/14
Of course I've seen it Tommo!! Even Jackman says it's like a different guy on screen to himself! I would strongly doubt he drinks much James, he's the opposite from the alcoholic type I would think. He said himself in one of the links that he is "Labradorish" and not tortured at all like his character.
Tommo says on 25/May/14
@Arch Stanton have you seen the X-men film days of future past? Jackman looks like something out of a Greek myth in that! Though I think it was shot about a year ago .
James B says on 25/May/14
Arch my uncle who has had very bad health problems cause he is an alcoholic looks identical to Hugh jackman in particular around the eyes and the facial wrinkles also. Different colouring to jackman though (he has fair hair and blue eyes). That and my uncle is only 5'8 (was 5'9 when he was healthy) and weighs 8 and a half stone aged 47 'YIKES.'

Doubt hugh is an alcoholic though......
Arch Stanton says on 24/May/14
In fairness though most people look better during the summer than during the winter and at different times of the year and if he's been ill too. But there's definitely two of them hehe!
Arch Stanton says on 24/May/14
Oh yeah I'm sure most women would kill for a guy like Jackman. I think most guys would be lying if they said they wouldn't want to look like him and have his physique too. You can see what I mean though.

Compare
Click Here (looks pretty much male perfection, tanned and well there) vs now Click Here He looks really drawn and washed out under the eyes and the beard that length is really aging on him. He looks better tanned with the beard neatly trimmed to a stubble.
[Editor Rob: beards like that generally attract hobo type comments...although to be fair, the kind of clobber I go around in at times I probably look like a hobo...but I keep my beard shortish most of the time. Recently 2-3mm and a weekly trim]
Arch Stanton says on 24/May/14
Click Here

Jackman apologises for it here! I think he's aware that a longer beard ages him!
Arch Stanton says on 24/May/14
Not sure what they have to do with anything... Hugh Jackman's the sort of guy who can look very handsome at times but other times and especially recently he's sort of starting to look like an aging geography teacher and looks pale and unwell. I've read he had some cancerous lump or something removed from his nose, might explain it, although I think it was a minor skin thing. A full beard on him really looks aging.
[Editor Rob: to be fair if you looked like Jackman and had his height you are going to have no problem at all with women even with a beard.

But I can see nowadays at times maybe he doesn't look as well as a few years ago...maybe the skin cancer mole/stresses with that has took a little toll?]
James B says on 19/May/14
Arch Stanton says on 16/May/14
James have you seen Firefox? He looked 6'3" max in that film.


I thought he looked tall in that movie.


Arch also having excess body fat has not held leonardo dicaprio back from being a heartthrob has it? More women would go for him then guys in better shape such as Hugh jackman or david beckham.
Arch Stanton says on 16/May/14
James have you seen Firefox? He looked 6'3" max in that film.
Arch Stanton says on 16/May/14
It's mainly diet yeah, but if you want to blast off any excess fat quicker then intense cardio sessions is the way to go and eating clean. My craving is bread, hot cross buns, crisps and pasta. Other than that I eat pretty well! I'm already in good shape, but to look ripped you really have to lose as much body fat as possible! The problem is when you get hungry later in the evening. If I eat a bowl of popcorn and celery at 7 o clock I find it cures it later at night then!
Jake: 1.84 m- 1.85 m says on 14/May/14
Looked about 6ft 3in still in 'A Perfect World'.
James B says on 14/May/14
Arch Stanton says on 14/May/14
6'1 and a half and 196 pounds currently, I wasn't at that age! Under 190 seems light to me, I'm seeing if I can get down to 180s range as a test over the summer but I'm not sure it's possible without some serious dieting and exercise!


Losing weight is all about having the right diet.
Arch Stanton says on 14/May/14
6'1 and a half and 196 pounds currently, I wasn't at that age! Under 190 seems light to me, I'm seeing if I can get down to 180s range as a test over the summer but I'm not sure it's possible without some serious dieting and exercise!
James B says on 13/May/14
Arch Stanton says on 12/May/14
Oh generally Vogt I thought Wayne looked 240-260 pounds in the 50s, 60s and 70s, but yeah at the end of the 60s he looked nearer 280-300 for a few years to me. Generally I'd have thought around 17-18 stone.

140-150 is perfectly normal for that height James. I can't even begin to imagine how different it would feel at that weight though, I haven't been that weight since I was about 15!


Obviously. I mean aren't you like 6'2?
filmfan says on 12/May/14
Interesting shot of Eastwood and Connery. Connery is closer to camera so makes it hard to gauge height but in that photo not much difference. Connery is clearly a thicker set man though making Eastwood look slightly weedy.
Arch Stanton says on 12/May/14
@Randomperson Nah, Eastwood didn't look taller than Walcott at all! If anything he looked as if Walcott edged him out by a whisker but they looked roughly the same height in Eiger, not in Joe Kidd though, Walcott looked taller in that.
Arch Stanton says on 12/May/14
Oh generally Vogt I thought Wayne looked 240-260 pounds in the 50s, 60s and 70s, but yeah at the end of the 60s he looked nearer 280-300 for a few years to me. Generally I'd have thought around 17-18 stone.

140-150 is perfectly normal for that height James. I can't even begin to imagine how different it would feel at that weight though, I haven't been that weight since I was about 15!
Arch Stanton says on 12/May/14
Connery's near the camera though and Clint had already lost -1.1.5 inches by then. Sutherland had an easy 2 inches on Connery in TGTR, and Eastwood edged Sutherland out in Kelly's Heroes.
James B says on 12/May/14
Vogt is 140 pound range to thin for a 5'7-5'8 guy?
Gonzalo says on 12/May/14
Clint Eastwood and Sean Connery
Click Here
Vogt says on 11/May/14
203 is less than average for a 6'4 guy in modern days. But even in the 60s it would have been only average for someone that tall. I agree arch, wayne looked like he was pushing 300, but apparently he was only 260 even in True Grit. Hathaway told him " I want you big-bellied at 260 pounds." and aissa wayne said "the heaviest he'd ever get was about 260"

Don't mean to offend but when you saw John Wayne's legs they were pretty slim compared to the rest of him, so that's probably why he looked like he weighed more because we judge weight from the upper body.
Randomperson says on 11/May/14
In the eiger sanction eastwood looks taller then gregory walcot who played pope by an inch or more and gregory walcott is listed on here as 6 foot 4 inches tall. Next to george kennedy who was also in the movie eastwood looked the same height in some shots and half an inch taller in others. George kennedy is also listed as 6 foot 4 inches tall on this website, kennedy actually said in an interview in the 70's that he is over 6 foot 4. I'd say he could be 6'4 and a half. Which would put eastwood in the height range of between 6'4 and 6'5. But that's if all these guy's are being honest with there heights. Anyway it's a good film to check out and it might give a bit more clarity to eastwoods height either way.
James B says on 11/May/14
Well Arch maybe I am just saying that cause I am 5'7 1/2 and only weigh like 141 pounds currently
Arch Stanton says on 11/May/14
John Wayne at his heaviest though must have been 280-300 pounds in the late 60s, although he looked more 240-260 to me in a lot of films of the 50s and 60s. That's heavy build. 203 isn't heavy for a 6'4" guy.
James B says on 10/May/14
Arch Stanton says on 10/May/14
I disagree James. Wayne might have looked bigger to you because of his heavy build. See the Undefeated, he looked 6'3" range next to Rock Hudson. I think peak they were both around 6'4".


Well clint at 203 pounds in some of his westerns had quite a big build as well
Arch Stanton says on 10/May/14
I disagree James. Wayne might have looked bigger to you because of his heavy build. See the Undefeated, he looked 6'3" range next to Rock Hudson. I think peak they were both around 6'4".
Arch Stanton says on 10/May/14
Minimum 2 inches next to guys like Lee Marvin yeah. When I say minimum I mean he really didn't even look a smidge under 6'4" next to most 6'2" listed guys of that era, not that I really though he was 6'4.5".
James B says on 9/May/14
Minimum 2 inches taller than 6'2 guys Arch? Maybe with his hairstyle or cowboy boots cause there is no way clint was over 6'4 at his peak. More likely under than over.
James B says on 9/May/14
Arch john Wayne looked like a guy who could have been a big 6ft4 like say Stephenfry whereas as clint eastwood looked 6'3.

I guess john Wayne disliked clint cause he was ahead of his time whereas as Wayne was more old school.
Wingnut says on 9/May/14
On one of the eastwood forums there's a photo of clint
Visiting john Wayne on the set of the shootist.
They are standing talking with,I think,don segal
Arch Stanton says on 9/May/14
LOL. John Wayne was probably the only guy in the history of the world to call Eastwood a "big kid" and be justified in doing so LOL. I've heard a few negative comments from Wayne about Eastwood. I know that he sent a letter criticising High Plains Drifter as un-American for instance. I think Wayne probably saw him as a threat to his traditional cowboy image and all-American wholesome portrayal. I know that Clint has only said positive words about Wayne though. Clint would have to be pretty big for John Wayne to refer to him as big!
Arch Stanton says on 9/May/14
He's slouched in that scene though James. As I say I could see a full 6'4" up until about 1981. Stroud was a legit 6'2" guy peak I think as he was even with Robert Davi in License to Kill and looked it next to many in other films. Clint did look 6'5" in Coogan's Bluff but as you say hair and boots.. Every 6'2 listed guy he stood next to in the 60s and 70s he consistently looked minimum 2 inches taller. Stroud look like Glenn? WTF LOL? Click Here Actually he does a bit there but he usually looks nothing like him!! Goog img Al Capone if you want a G lookalike!!

I always thought Clint and John Wayne looked the same height on screen, although clearly different builds. The thing is Clint was barely shorter than Rock Hudson in Never Say Goodbye yet in the Undefeated Rock had about 1.5 inches on Wayne...
Wingnut says on 8/May/14
Havn't posted for a while;but here's an quote
From john Wayne it doesn't mention height,though:
69. (1973) My build-up was done through constant exposure. By the time I went overseas to visit our boys during the Second World War, they had already seen my movies when they were back home. Now their kids are grown up and their kids are seeing my movies. I'm part of the familyÖ I think Steve McQueen and Robert Redford have a chance of becoming lasting stars. And certainly that big kid - what the hell's his name? Jesus, I have such a hard time remembering my own name sometimes. Oh, you know the one I mean, that big kid, the one that's been directing some of his own movies lately. Yeah, that's the one - Clint Eastwood!
James B says on 7/May/14
Arch do you agree that in this scene from Dirty Harry clint does not look over 6ft3?

Click Here
James B says on 7/May/14
Assuming don Stroud is 6'2 I'd say clint looks 6'5 in comparison but his hair is giving him advantage. Is it just me or does don Stroud look like Glenn? LOL
Arch Stanton says on 7/May/14
Must have been Sondra Locke who aged him quickly LOL!
Arch Stanton says on 7/May/14
Only in the last two, Sudden Impact and Dead Pool. He looked a proper 6'4" to me up until about Any Which Way you Can in the very early 80s. That was about the time he began to seriously age too, he looks like ten years older in Sudden Impact than he did in The Gauntlet!
Arch Stanton says on 7/May/14
Only in the last one Sudden Impact. He looked a proper 6'4" to me up until about Any Which Way you Can in the very early 80s. That was about the time he began to seriously age too, he looks like ten years older in Sudden Impact than he did in The Gauntlet!
Tony D says on 6/May/14
Alongside alongside 6'2" Don Stroud in Coogan's Bluff.
Click Here
Gonzalo says on 6/May/14
In Eiger Sanction he looked the same height as George Kennedy, who was undoubtedly 1`93
James B says on 6/May/14
Arch Stanton says on 5/May/14
OI agree that he looked more 6'3" range by the early 80s I think, if you see films like Firefox and Sudden impact he looked more 6'3 to me. I could see a full 6'4" up until the late 70s anyway.


Do you think clint looked more 6'3 in Dirty Harry?
Arch Stanton says on 5/May/14
OI agree that he looked more 6'3" range by the early 80s I think, if you see films like Firefox and Sudden impact he looked more 6'3 to me. I could see a full 6'4" up until the late 70s anyway.
Arch Stanton says on 5/May/14
Actually in The Eiger Sanction Eastwood looked the same height as Gregory Walcott too walking side by side, maybe slightly shorter, a cm at best. In Joe Kidd however Walcott seemed taller.
James B says on 4/May/14
Arch Stanton says on 4/May/14
James do you seriously think Eastwood looked under 6'4 in The Eiger Sanction? No way was Kennedy taller than him and did you see how lanky he actually looked in that film in jeans and a vest? If you can't see 6'4" in that film then you're unlikely to ever see it!


Yeah I'd say he could pass for 6'4 flat in eiger sanction. As I said before clint could look anywhere from 6'3 to 6'4 in his movies in the 1970s.


I remember these scenes from hang em high where 6'4 just looked unimaginable for clint when you compare him to legit 6'4ers like Liam neeson, Christopher Reeve, Jeff goldblum and Steven seagal. Seriously he looks 6'1.5-6'2 in those scenes.

Click Here

Click Here


Yet in this clip from the enforcer nearly 10 years later clint looks a lanky 6'4.
Click Here

Weird huh?
Arch Stanton says on 4/May/14
James do you seriously think Eastwood looked under 6'4 in The Eiger Sanction? No way was Kennedy taller than him and did you see how lanky he actually looked in that film in jeans and a vest? If you can't see 6'4" in that film then you're unlikely to ever see it!
IosuLM says on 29/Apr/14
Clint has a scoliosis? Maybe, it's the reason of loss of height
filmfan says on 27/Apr/14
He deliberately bulked up for the Every which, Any which way films. Naturally lean though looks strong and apparently could handle himself if pushed. Once got bullied by a marine because of relatively long hair and gave the guy a hiding. This is a story of a young Clint mentioned in a bio.
James B says on 26/Apr/14
Dont get me wrong I mean in the any which way you can films he was in tremendous shape at 15 stone of muscle. He reminded me of hugh jackman in that movie in terms of build and looks. He was starting to get more wrinkles and his hair was greying in that movie but he still looked great though.

In the 80s he may have looked a lot older all of a sudden but he was at his heaviest and most muscular during that era. In the 90s though he got a lot thinner.
James B says on 26/Apr/14
Arch Stanton says on 25/Apr/14
Click Here

Can't see ground or footwear but if you don't think he looked anything less than 6'4" there and in that film then you're never likely to agree!

In the pic he looks 6'4 yes. Personally I think clint looked his best in fistful of dollars.

Would you agree clint started to look not as good in any which way but lose?
Arch Stanton says on 25/Apr/14
Click Here

Can't see ground or footwear but if you don't think he looked anything less than 6'4" there and in that film then you're never likely to agree!
Arch Stanton says on 25/Apr/14
James, watch Paint Your Wagon. He had an easy 2 inches on 6'2" Marvin. There is a scene in which they're stood side by side at a wedding and Eastwood actually looked 6'4.5" in comparison. He looked his all time best in that movie I think. And he was having an affair with Jean Seberg on set!
James B says on 24/Apr/14
play misty for me was one of his few movies where a full 6'4 looked believable for him I must say. Even 6'5 would not be hard to imagine for him in that particular movie. Ironic though how in Dirty Harry which came out the same year he only looked 6'3 or 6'3 1/2.
Sam says on 24/Apr/14
In Gran Torino, because of his "gook" co-stars it makes Clint seem taller and my girlfriend at the time thought he was still close to my height but I knew better!
James B says on 24/Apr/14
Arch Stanton says on 24/Apr/14
Yeah but when you start saying things like "Clint was only 6'2" as Neeson was 6'3"... You're claiming even Neeson wasn't 6'4" peak now which is just ridiculous. He's about as solid an example of a proper 6'4 guy as you can get. He may have lost a bit today but you seem to have a very hard job believing anybody could really be 6'4". Seagal and Robbins seem to be the only ones you believe are that big.


No I think Neeson was a legit 6'4
Arch Stanton says on 24/Apr/14
Yeah but when you start saying things like "Clint was only 6'2" as Neeson was 6'3"... You're claiming even Neeson wasn't 6'4" peak now which is just ridiculous. He's about as solid an example of a proper 6'4 guy as you can get. He may have lost a bit today but you seem to have a very hard job believing anybody could really be 6'4". Seagal and Robbins seem to be the only ones you believe are that big.
James B says on 23/Apr/14
Also Arch I only said I was taller before because I never knew how to measure myself properly.
James B says on 23/Apr/14
Arch Stanton says on 23/Apr/14
Eastwood looked 6'1" range in Gran Torino I think (although it might be because of the short "gook" actors in it) It was in Million Dollar Baby he looked nothing over 6' flat. James, just because you're a lot shorter than you claimed it doesn't mean Clint was. There's not a single film from the 80s or early 90s where Clint looked as low as a flat 6'2". Please stop with the "Clint was 6'2" max" claims. You're even downgrading Jackman to 6'1 now...


What are you talking about? I never said he was 6'2 max. I just said in my opinion he could look 188/189cm in some of his later movies from the 80s and 90s. In his earlier movies like fistful of dollars, play misty for me and the gauntlet he looked at least 191cm.


Also rob agrees with me that 6'1.5 is not impossible for Hugh jackman either.
Arch Stanton says on 23/Apr/14
Eastwood looked 6'1" range in Gran Torino I think (although it might be because of the short "gook" actors in it) It was in Million Dollar Baby he looked nothing over 6' flat. James, just because you're a lot shorter than you claimed it doesn't mean Clint was. There's not a single film from the 80s or early 90s where Clint looked as low as a flat 6'2". Please stop with the "Clint was 6'2" max" claims. You're even downgrading Jackman to 6'1 now...
James B says on 22/Apr/14
Sam says on 22/Apr/14
Gran Torino to be a big dude, closer to 6'4" than 6'0"

Lol is that a joke? In gran Torino looked MUCH closer to 6'0 than 6'4. Even back in his movies from the 80s only looked between 6'0 and 6'4 like 6'2. In his 60s and 70s films looked much nearer 6'4 than 6'0 though.
James B says on 22/Apr/14
In gran Torino I thought he looked 6'0-6'1
Sam says on 22/Apr/14
Yeah, he still seems on film in both Blood Work and Gran Torino to be a big dude, closer to 6'4" than 6'0", it seems to be only off-screen that his true height loss is apparent. Robbins pretty much towered him in 2004/05.
Arch Stanton says on 22/Apr/14
No James. Eastwood actually looked 6'4 in that film if Daniels is 6'3" but as Sam says he tends to slouch. That's why I said it's an anomaly for that period, I mean 6'4" looks a joke next to Tim Robbins in the Mystic River promo photos of course and that was only a year later.
James B says on 21/Apr/14
Sam says on 21/Apr/14
Yeah, Clint held his own with Jeff Daniels, which is an anomaly, but Daniels can be a bit slouchy and was supposed to be presenting a Dude-like demeanor in the role. Actually, Daniels would have been a good back-up if Bridges was unavailable for The Big Lebowski.


In blood work clint looked near 6'2 would you agree?
Sam says on 21/Apr/14
Yeah, Clint held his own with Jeff Daniels, which is an anomaly, but Daniels can be a bit slouchy and was supposed to be presenting a Dude-like demeanor in the role. Actually, Daniels would have been a good back-up if Bridges was unavailable for The Big Lebowski.
Arch Stanton says on 19/Apr/14
OK, I'll remember that.
Arch Stanton says on 19/Apr/14
Rob, how does a 9-10 film limit on mentioning films sound to you? That way next time I help you out on the empty pages for prolific actors I'll know what you consider to be the limit. Obviously with lesser prolific new actors you only need to mention one or two and for quite a lot of actors mentioning just 4 or 5 should suffice though. It depends on the actor of course but no more than 9 or 10 sounds reasonable don't you think for veteran actors who have over 50 films and are well known for quite a lot of different roles?
[Editor Rob: I think 9 is probably a max I think.]
Arch Stanton says on 19/Apr/14
Fair enough. I agree with your choices out of those. It's difficult when you've seen almost every film of Clint's to draw a line at what he is best known for and exclude some because there isn't a single film of his I haven't enjoyed, even if films like Pink Cadillac and City Heat were among his weaker efforts.
James B says on 18/Apr/14
Arch in where eagles dare clint looked about 190cm in my opinion. In dead pool looked 6'2ish however next to liam neeson looked a good 6'3 I agree.
Arch Stanton says on 18/Apr/14
Rob can you add some more films, best known for films like The Good, the Bad, and The Ugly, the Dirty Harry films, Unforgiven, The Outlaw Josey Wales, Hang 'Em High, Joe Kidd, High Plains Drifter, The Eiger Sanction, Every Which Way But Loose, Escape from Alcatraz, Firefox, Pale Rider, Heartbreak Ridge, The Bridges of Madison County, Space Cowboys, Million Dollar Baby and Gran Torino.
[Editor Rob: I need to watch the amount I put in sometimes, I'll add a few more though.]
Arch Stanton says on 18/Apr/14
There are certainly some questionable comparisons like Fleming as you say Sam and he did look a bit shorter than Gregory Walcott in Joe Kidd, but there's at least a dozen films in which a full 6'4" seems to check out in comparison to every other actor who claimed a certain height and as you say he always looked a couple of inches taller than 6'2" listed guys. I find it hard to believe the majority were wrong. In Where Eagles Dare they did their best to reduce the height difference between Eastwood and Burton through camera angles and at times it could look only 4 or 5 inches but you could often see during level shots etc just how much taller Eastwood really was than Burton and it was easily 6 inches. See the scene for instance just after they shoot the Germans inside the castle room and Burton is holding the notebook of names and Clint is stood next to him. Eastwood towered him. He began to lose height in the 1980s I think and by 1988 I think he was a little over 6'3", Neeson being 6'4.25 peak according to himself which looks believable. One anomaly of later is that in Blood Work from 2002 Eastwood actually looked easily an inch taller than Jeff Daniels in most scenes, although in one scene it looked the other way around.
IosuLM says on 17/Apr/14
Click Here

2:38... Donald and Clint...
Sam says on 17/Apr/14
I have to say in some of those photos with 6'3" Eric Fleming and the weirdly angled one with Buddy Ebsen, it's hard to believe a full 6'4" from those. However, look at him next George Kennedy, he's quite equal and there's no way Kennedy was under 6'4" IMO and Eastwood was clearly a couple inches taller than 6'2"ers like Gene Hackman and Lee Van Cleef, as well as Lee Marvin as Arch mentioned. Also, I don't think he looks under 6'3.5" next to 6'4" Liam Neeson at 57 y/o in The Dead Pool.
James B says on 16/Apr/14
Lillo thomas says on 16/Apr/14
Clint Eastwood was 6'3 at best peak . No way 6'4 barefoot.


Well in the Gauntlet looked close to 6'4.
Lewis says on 16/Apr/14
These days Clint is probably 6' on the nose. Age on the bones have not been well to him.
Lillo thomas says on 16/Apr/14
Clint Eastwood was 6'3 at best peak . No way 6'4 barefoot.
Arch Stanton says on 16/Apr/14
Yeah it's a good idea sometimes I think. You value it more I find when you pop in after a while and still see the same comments appearing :-)
James B says on 15/Apr/14
If you stood a peak Seagal and peak clint side by side there would be about 1 inch between the 2.
Arch Stanton says on 15/Apr/14
Greetings Rob and co hope you're well, I'm still on a break from the site, but I'll comment occasionally. LOL, enough of the Jackman-Beckham comparisons! Neither of them are really comparable to Eastwood.If anybody doubts Eastwood was 6'4 peak watch Paint Your Wagon, he had a strong 2 inches on Lee Marvin, actually looked 6'4.5" if Marvin was 6'2" at the time. Also recommend watching Any Which Way You Can where he looked a good 2 inches taller than 6'2" listed William Smith too aside from all the other comparisons we frequently talked about in the past. Not 6'3", he really looked the full 6'4" in most comparisons peak.
[Editor Rob: well, a break is always useful. I sometimes need a break myself, and it's only very occasionally at an event I don't do much with the site.]
Chaz says on 14/Apr/14
Armold Schwarzenegger could Bench more than 350lbs lol,he bench 212.5kg in 1968 powerlifting Contest,that was at 260lbs body weight,and could do sets of 12-15 reps with 3 plates 315lbs in he's peack bodybuilding days at only 235lbs,

and Beckham is as thin as a rake,have you seen them Arms? lucky if they could push 140lbs
Sam says on 10/Apr/14
In terms of strength? Probably a lot less at peak upper-body strength but he's very lean, with powerful legs as is necessary of football/soccer players. Beckham has never struck me as having much of a personality from what little I've seen of him. I don't know if he tries to laconic like Eastwood but Eastwood is an actor and subscribes to the Cooper school of communicating a lot with little at the surface.
James B says on 9/Apr/14
How does beckham compare to jackman and eastwood?
chucker says on 9/Apr/14
I they are very close in terms of strengh (Eastwood 1978, Jackman present). Jackman is pretty strong to BP 315. Guys with longer arms alway have a disadvange in the BP department. More range of motion makes it more difficult than their shorter armed counterparts. Eastwood has long arms too.
Sam says on 9/Apr/14
Perhaps I'm wrong...I wasn't sure if Eastwood could have bench-pressed more than 300 pounds like Jackman did but it's possible. I think Jackamn's top bench was 315 lb, Schwarzenegger around 350 lb and Shaq 400+ lb, Lou Ferrigno probably close to 400 lb. I'd be Joe Manganiello would be up there as well.
chucker says on 7/Apr/14
Jackmans stonger than Eastwood ever was?? I respectfully disagree. Have you seen the movie Any which way but Loose. Eastwood looked like one strong SOB!
James B says on 2/Apr/14
Sam says on 2/Apr/14
I wouldn't be surprised that when he's fully trained for the Wolverine role, Jackman's stronger than Eastwood ever was...but Jackman can't help but seem like a nice guy who's always going to do the right thing even in that role, Eastwood's guys back in the day were almost as nasty as the villains and would pretty much shoot you for looking at them funny. Beckham isn't even an actor, so it's hard to compare personality but physically he's obviously smaller.
I was thinking about Death Rides a Horse where they even put John Philip Law, who was taller and bigger than Eastwood, in basically the same poncho and gave him a similar role, but he just couldn't come close to the same screen presence as Eastwood as the Man with No Name.


In dead pool eastwood was stronger thn hugh jckman
Sam says on 2/Apr/14
I wouldn't be surprised that when he's fully trained for the Wolverine role, Jackman's stronger than Eastwood ever was...but Jackman can't help but seem like a nice guy who's always going to do the right thing even in that role, Eastwood's guys back in the day were almost as nasty as the villains and would pretty much shoot you for looking at them funny. Beckham isn't even an actor, so it's hard to compare personality but physically he's obviously smaller.
I was thinking about Death Rides a Horse where they even put John Philip Law, who was taller and bigger than Eastwood, in basically the same poncho and gave him a similar role, but he just couldn't come close to the same screen presence as Eastwood as the Man with No Name.
James B says on 1/Apr/14
Sam says on 1/Apr/14
Clint is also a top-knotch director, he takes after John Ford a lot in his style, with a sense of economy he probably got from Don Siegel. There's little obvious Leone influence outside of High Plains Drifter. I can see a dim resemblance in both Beckman and Jackman to a young Eastwood but both are obviously not at the stage to have as storied careers and, although both are very fit, strong dudes, not as formidable in nature

Eastwood was probably stronger than Beckham and had a larger frame. Clint weighed like 203 pounds in his 30s. Beckham on the other hand weighs like 154 pounds these days and is more like Bruce lee in terms of build and quickness.

Jackman on the other hand is very robust but has to work hard for it. That said dont buy his listing of 15 stone 5 he looks more like 14 stone range to me. In my opinion he as well he looks more like 6'1.5 or 6'1 in stature does not look a legit 6'2.
Sam says on 1/Apr/14
Clint is also a top-knotch director, he takes after John Ford a lot in his style, with a sense of economy he probably got from Don Siegel. There's little obvious Leone influence outside of High Plains Drifter. I can see a dim resemblance in both Beckman and Jackman to a young Eastwood but both are obviously not at the stage to have as storied careers and, although both are very fit, strong dudes, not as formidable in nature.
James B says on 1/Apr/14
Arch Stanton says on 1/Apr/14
Agreed Sam. I actually thought Clint looked at his best in the late 60s and early 70s James, more rugged and weathered and more virile than he was smooth faced in the 50s. Looked better with the beard than clean shaven too. James, Beckham spends thousands of dollars on his appearance and undoubtedly spends considerable time every day to look the way he does, he didn't use to look like that, see his mid 1990s United days! I can't imagine Clint being the same, although it is clear he always took good care of himself. Beckham's clearly trying to look like Steve McQueen/Clint Eastwood.


I dunno I think even from a young age becks and clint looked alike

Go to 4:42 in the video here

Click Here


If you look at clint eastwood as a child in that clip and beckham at the same age even back then they looked very similar (especially around the eyes)
Arch Stanton says on 1/Apr/14
Agreed Sam. I actually thought Clint looked at his best in the late 60s and early 70s James, more rugged and weathered and more virile than he was smooth faced in the 50s. Looked better with the beard than clean shaven too. James, Beckham spends thousands of dollars on his appearance and undoubtedly spends considerable time every day to look the way he does, he didn't use to look like that, see his mid 1990s United days! I can't imagine Clint being the same, although it is clear he always took good care of himself. Beckham's clearly trying to look like Steve McQueen/Clint Eastwood.
James B says on 31/Mar/14
littlesue says on 31/Mar/14
I would say to most women Beckham a better height than Eastwood although I agree that Eastwood more charismatic and smarter.


I bet a young eastwood could get more women than beckham. I am sure there are plenty of women would like a near 6'4 guy to a 5'11 man.
littlesue says on 31/Mar/14
I would say to most women Beckham a better height than Eastwood although I agree that Eastwood more charismatic and smarter.
Sam says on 31/Mar/14
Clint undoubtedly has a charitable side, too. There's an amusing quote from Hugh Jackman about his less than friendly interaction with Eastwood, on the other hand. I understand Eastwood gets pretty fuming mad when someone brings up his checkered love life as a bit of a womanizing, faithless scoundrel but that is personal stuff. No matter what I've read about his personal life or politics, I'm still a fan of Clint and his movies, the guy's a badass.
James B says on 30/Mar/14
Arch Stanton says on 29/Mar/14
Oh that's undoubtedly true. Eastwood wouldn't be up on British comedy and Gervais is sort of out of his league over in the states IMO. I can quite imagine that would be Eastwood's response to them, he is cantankerous and quite a lot like he is in films in RL.


Gervais and Kate winslet we're born in a town called 'Reading' which is only 17 miles away from where I live. Small world eh?
filmfan says on 30/Mar/14
I can't believe someone says Clint looks like Ricky. Tbh the way Clint is shrinking Gervais will tower him soon.
Knowen says on 29/Mar/14
He was an inch shorter than 6ft2,5 ali, ali was about an inch shorter than harve wich makes harve 6ft3,5
James B says on 29/Mar/14
Arch Stanton says on 27/Mar/14
LOL, it's just you. That's probably the biggest compliment you could ever give Ricky Gervais!! Did he pay you to write that!! Looks absolutely nothing like him and couldn't be built more differently!! Beckham's hair on the other hand you could argue looks like Gervais at times and of course course at times Beckham can resemble Clint from that period.

Between becks and a young eastwood who would you say is better looking?

I personally think eastwood is better looking for these reasons......

A lot taller
Smarter
More charisma
More masculine/bad ass voice

In think 'facially' beckham has a better face though cause he has a stronger jaw and nose no denying though beckham is a nicer more charitable person. Hands down though a young clint is better looking than hugh jackman (no homo).
IosuLM says on 29/Mar/14
Minute 2.53.... Chevy Chase (192 cms) and Charlton Heston (65 years old)

Click Here

Clint and Charlton

Click Here
Arch Stanton says on 29/Mar/14
Yeah that's the impression I got Sam from his biographies. He can be friendly and easy going one moment but if anybody does the slightest thing to cross him or annoy him he'll turn on you and come down on you like a ton of bricks. Not a man you want to be on the wrong side of! That's a Taurus trait though, the bull who is friendly until crossed and shown the red flag, I'm a typical Taurus myself, but Clint's birthday May 20 is actually Gemini.
Arch Stanton says on 29/Mar/14
Oh that's undoubtedly true. Eastwood wouldn't be up on British comedy and Gervais is sort of out of his league over in the states IMO. I can quite imagine that would be Eastwood's response to them, he is cantankerous and quite a lot like he is in films in RL.
IosuLM says on 28/Mar/14
Clint next to Julio Iglesia (6.1)

Click Here

Julio with Enrique (6 1.5)

Click Here
Sam says on 28/Mar/14
Yeah, about as little as two Caucasian could resemble each other. I've read that quote from Gervais too and it entirely in fitting with Eastwood's personality from what I've read and people who've met him, a gentlemen one minute, a grimacing old crank (pretty much like a less racist version of his character in Gran Torino) the next.
Lillo thomas says on 27/Mar/14
James b . What the hell you are talking about ? In the pic you posted Clint eastwood doesn't look 6'4 at all with 6'1 peak arnold. I see less than 2 inches difference there. By the way cute babies.
James B says on 27/Mar/14
Arch Stanton says on 27/Mar/14
LOL, it's just you. That's probably the biggest compliment you could ever give Ricky Gervais!! Did he pay you to write that!! Looks absolutely nothing like him and couldn't be built more differently!! Beckham's hair on the other hand you could argue looks like Gervais at times and of course course at times Beckham can resemble Clint from that period.


I tell you a funny story from Ricky's own mouth:

"Apparently, I donít know if this is true but I hope it is, Iíve heard it from a few reports, when we went up to get our awards apparently Clint Eastwood turned to someone that he was with and went, Who the **** are they?"

LOL

Ricky might have been joking though?
Arch Stanton says on 27/Mar/14
LOL, it's just you. That's probably the biggest compliment you could ever give Ricky Gervais!! Did he pay you to write that!! Looks absolutely nothing like him and couldn't be built more differently!! Beckham's hair on the other hand you could argue looks like Gervais at times and of course course at times Beckham can resemble Clint from that period.
James B says on 26/Mar/14
Off topic but is it just me or does clint Eastwood bear a resemblance to ricky Gervais in the good the bad and the ugly?
Click Here
jervis says on 26/Mar/14
Clint looks more like 6ft3 next to Arnold about 2 inches taller.I would put clints peak at a bit lower than 6ft4' maybe 6ft3.5 or 6ft3.
jervis says on 26/Mar/14
I think looking at eastwood and Fleming again they look the same hight.
jervis says on 26/Mar/14
Very close in hight with Fleming.
IosuLM says on 26/Mar/14
Click Here

With Eric Fleming, who was 6.3
Arch Stanton says on 26/Mar/14
He looked 6'3 in the 80s yeah.
James B says on 25/Mar/14
Clint looks 6'4 next to arnie here
Click Here
James B says on 25/Mar/14
Arch Stanton says on 24/Mar/14
James B says on 21/Mar/14
Do u agree lillo Thomas that clint looked 188cm in escape from Alcatraz?
[Editor Rob: I'm going to do a clint rewatch at some point. I've been through Seagal/Sly/Ford in last few months....]

If Clint was 6'2" in Escape from Alcatraz Paul Benjamin was struggling with a flat 6 ft. And guys who were as tall as Clint don't need to add false inches to their own height James.


Well would you agree clint looked shorter in heartbreak ridge and the dead pool compared to how tall he looked in the enforcer for instance? I think between 1976-1978 clint lost a bit of height.
jervis says on 24/Mar/14
Looked the same hight as 6ft4 Larry Hankin in escape from Alcatraz to me.Also looked taller by about 1 inch than 6ft2 big Bill Smith and about 1 inch shorter than Neeson in thr dead pool.He looked in the 6ft3 range to me in the eghties,in the nineties more 6ft2.5.Down to 6ft2 in 2000 to 2005.From age 75 to 80 droped below 6Ft2,now at almost 84 he is about 6ft1 or 6ft.5 depending on posture.
Lillo thomas says on 24/Mar/14
Nick of course at 85 years of age . Clint eastwood is expected to lose height but between 1-2 inches. If clint eastwood was really 6'4 peak than means he is about 4 inches shorter . This fact is very hard to believe. My father is 82 years old and about 1.5 inch shorter from his peak.
Lillo thomas says on 24/Mar/14
James B Clint eastwood never give me a legit 6'4 impression watching his films as a kid. I always thought he was between 6'2 and 6'3.
Arch Stanton says on 24/Mar/14
James B says on 21/Mar/14
Do u agree lillo Thomas that clint looked 188cm in escape from Alcatraz?
[Editor Rob: I'm going to do a clint rewatch at some point. I've been through Seagal/Sly/Ford in last few months....]

If Clint was 6'2" in Escape from Alcatraz Paul Benjamin was struggling with a flat 6 ft. And guys who were as tall as Clint don't need to add false inches to their own height James.
James B says on 24/Mar/14
James B says on 21/Mar/14
Do u agree lillo Thomas that clint looked 188cm in escape from Alcatraz?
[Editor Rob: I'm going to do a clint rewatch at some point. I've been through Seagal/Sly/Ford in last few months....]


Did me remarking that he looked 6'2 in escape from Alcatraz prompt you to have another look at his peak height? In all of films from the 80s and up to 2002 he looked like a strong 6'2 guy but not 6'4 or even 6'3.

In blood work which was only made in 2002 clint looked 188cm since then though he has been looking shorter than that
[Editor Rob: no, I have been meaning to rewatch his films for a while.]
nick says on 24/Mar/14
Of course hes lost inches hes nearly 85 years old for crying out loud.
the shredder says on 21/Mar/14
I find it to believe Danny Glover lost 2 inches. He is 6'1 but looked 6'3 peak. I actually am strating to think glover was 6'2.5 max.
James B says on 21/Mar/14
Do u agree lillo Thomas that clint looked 188cm in escape from Alcatraz?
[Editor Rob: I'm going to do a clint rewatch at some point. I've been through Seagal/Sly/Ford in last few months....]
Sam says on 21/Mar/14
Not all older men have a distinct hump along their back (I think Rob calls it a dowager's hump), but Eastwood does. Think of other tall guys like Sidney Poitier and Christopher Lee who maintained a relatively straight spine until they were in their 80s. Even with his obviously greater health problems, John Wayne maintained more height it seems than Clint has.
Lillo thomas says on 20/Mar/14
I agree Clint losing nearly 4 inches from his peak is unbelievable. Most guys as his age are around 2 inches shorter max.
littlesue says on 20/Mar/14
My Mom last 2 inches and she 77, my Nan and her 3 sisters all lived to 93 and lost between 6 to 8 inches
Realist says on 20/Mar/14
Rob can people really lose almost 4 inches in a life time that means a 5'8 guy would become 5'4.
[Editor Rob: the longer your spine the more potential for losing more. If you lost an inch by 70's that is pretty common for men, 2 inches would be more common for women, but once you get to 80-90 that's when you can lose a fair chunk. ]
James B says on 19/Mar/14
Orbach was probably 6'1 flat by that stage
jervis says on 19/Mar/14
In escape from alcatraz there is a tall tin actor in many sceans with clint.I forget his name but I seen him listed as 6ft4 and clint looks as tall as him.If humprys was 5ft8 then clint was easly 6ft4 in at his peak.
chucker says on 19/Mar/14
Jeff Bridges is not and never was 6'2. 6'1" max.
IosuLM says on 19/Mar/14
Click Here

Look this picture... Michael Moriarty is taller than jerry orbach (6 1.5)... In Pale Rider Clint is taller tan Michael... (2 cms)
James B says on 19/Mar/14
Arch Stanton says on 19/Mar/14
Eastwood was looking around 6'2.5 by 1995. Looks about that in Bridges if Madison.


I think clint looked 6'2 or 6'2.5 even back in escape from Alcatraz. Looked the same height range as Morgan freeman in that film. Granted I think he appears 6'3 in the any which way you can films.

Also I can't see clint looking any taller than 189cm in the line of fire.
Arch Stanton says on 19/Mar/14
Eastwood was looking around 6'2.5 by 1995. Looks about that in Bridges if Madison.
Arch Stanton says on 19/Mar/14
John Humphreys? 5 ft 8. And yeah in that 1967 interview Eastwood looks easily 6'4".
jervis says on 18/Mar/14
Dose anybody no how tall john humprys the bbc news reader is,because there is an interview with him and clint on YouTube,and clint is so much taller than him he makes humprys look like a little boy.On the photo of clint and arnie both men look almost the same hight with clint slightly taller.But there is another photo of both men from the same peroid,both are holding a baby,and in that photo clint is clerarly 2inches taller than arnie.
James B says on 17/Mar/14
By 1995 arnie was probably no taller than 186cm. In this photo clint looks 6'1.5-6'2

Click Here
James B says on 17/Mar/14
Bridges might have been 186cm at peak?

Even though I thought clint looked 6'2 range in dead pool that might have just because he was much bulkier. in heartbreak ridge, in the line of fire and unforgiven, escape from alcatraz as well I thought he looked more 6'2 in those particular movies. I agree with arch though in the enforcer he looked 6'4 or 6'3 1/2.

He defo looked shorter in his movies from the 80s compared to his 70s movies. Thinning hairstlye, natural shrinking and being heavier could have had something to do with that?
Sam says on 17/Mar/14
This article claims "about 6'3"" as the height for both Eastwood and John Wayne:
Click Here
Arch Stanton says on 17/Mar/14
Eastwood had about 2.5 inches on Bridges.
James B says on 16/Mar/14
In thunderbolt looked 6'3
filmfan says on 16/Mar/14
Just watched Thunderbolt and Lightfoot again and Eastwood is about two inches taller than Jeff Bridges. I think Eastwood possibly was about a 6'4'' guy afterall. Having said that it is hard to think of him as tall as say Jeff Goldblum as has already been mentioned. On a side note I work with a guy who claims he is 6'4'' when he is no taller than 6'2'' max. Plus a 5'9'' to 5'10'' who claims 5'11''. A guy who might or might not scrape 6ft and who claims 6'1''. Most guys seem to think they are an inch or two taller than they are. On this site most of the comments tend to suggest film stars are shorter than their 'official' heights. Rarely do the comments go the other way with the official height possibly an underestimate. I think it's an ego thing with guys to exaggerate their height. Although as few people are actually measured properly they probably don't realise their mistake.
James B says on 14/Mar/14
Sutherland often looked 6'2 1/2 range
IosuLM says on 13/Mar/14
Click Here
mirad el minuto 0:09... son similares
Arch Stanton says on 13/Mar/14
Goldblum looks 2cm taller than Sutherland to me.
James B says on 12/Mar/14
With muhammed Ali in th 70s

Click Here
James B says on 11/Mar/14
Eastwood looked 6'3 range in a lot of his films
IosuLM says on 11/Mar/14
Click Here
They look at jeef and Donald ... are similar in cutting height ... and clint was higher than donald!
Arch Stanton says on 9/Mar/14
So have I Jervis and him and Sutherland barely ever stand next to each other in the film but on the occasions where they're together Eastwood look ed a bit taller. Look at the chin level when they first meet. Aside from that anyway Eastwood LOOKED 6'4 in Kelly's Heroes as he did in most of his 60s and 70s films.
jervis says on 8/Mar/14
I have seen kellys heros many times and to my eye clint and Sutherland look the same hight,even in photos from the movie i see no difference in hight between both men.But in space cowboys Sutherland looks taller by at lest 1inch showing clint had lost at least 1inch by the age of 70.
jervis says on 8/Mar/14
I ment he looked shorter than 6ft3.5 because of slouching when he eas young.l think now he is around 6ft1 but never stands stright so tendes to look shorter.
Arch Stanton says on 8/Mar/14
He's lost a lot of height, not just slouching. He actually looked 4 inches shorter in Million Dollar Baby than he did in the 70s.
jervis says on 8/Mar/14
Eastwood weak 6ft4 more like 6f t3.5 most of the day,but looks shorter now because of slouching.
arbuckle says on 2/Mar/14
I think Clint was inches taller when he first became famous than he is now.
He is at least 80 years old after all. 3-2-2014.
Bruno says on 1/Mar/14
Presnell does look taller but then he is listed on other sites as 6'5''.
berta says on 28/Feb/14
Click Here about the same height as ali here. I think clint was 191 and measured 193 in the morning and then said he was that height and probably didnt thinkm utch about morning and evening height. He is listed the same height as goldblum but i think goldblum was almost 3 cm taller when both was in peak.
filmfan says on 27/Feb/14
The clip with Clint Eastwood and Harve Presnell is on youtube. Titled Muhammad Ali and Clint Eastwood on David Frost or something. It's a great clip. You see Eastwood standing next to Harve Presnell who is listed 6'4''. They are close in height but to my eyes Presnell appears slightly taller. Ali says he is 6'2'' and also states both Eastwood and Presnell are bigger than him.
Ronster says on 22/Feb/14
Thebad7, excellent post. Sadly not many on here are the least bit interseted in the truth lol.
chucker says on 12/Feb/14
Okay Arch, For peak height I'll say 6'3" and POSSIBLY some change, barefoot, in the morning.
Arch Stanton says on 12/Feb/14
You can argue 6'3" range barefoot but I think it's obvious in the comparisons he wasn't under that.
chucker says on 11/Feb/14
Hey lighten up Arch. No body said Clint was .5" to 1" taller than Van Cleef and Bridges. I believe if he was a legit 6' 4" he would tower over them. I always thought Bridges was only 6'1" anyway. Clint was taller than those actors but not by too much. I and many here believe Clint was not 6'4" but quite tall none the less. A legit 6 3" guy is tall and he would seem taller if he was lean like Eastwood.
Arch Stanton says on 10/Feb/14
Yea Avim don't both answering the "he was 6'2.5" tops type of posters. Anybody who thinks he was only 0.5-1 inch taller at 6'2.5" next to guys like Van Cleef and Jeff Bridges really needs glasses!!
avi says on 8/Feb/14
@Mark says on 30/Jan/14

Aren't you the guy from the roger Moore page? If so you have no idea of height as you thought Lee was over 4 inches taller. Your judgement is skewed.
chucker says on 8/Feb/14
I do not believe Clint was ever 6'4" I think 6'3" tops. Just the way I see it folks. He had the kind of lean build that made him look taller than he really was. Plus as a leading man directors used camera shots enhanced his height. He definitly did not tower over alot of actors who were in the 6'1 to 6'2" range like Lee Van Cleef and Jeff Bridges.
rowdy yates 188cm says on 7/Feb/14
Clint's always looked like a 6'2"1/2 guy to me right back from the start. He was'nt 6'4" There are far to many pics from the 80's 90's to prove this. Beside he would stood at around 6'4" any way. There' s no way the guy lost nearly ten cm in height. He would still stand around 187/188cm today even at his age. Iknow a few 70 80 yr olds and are still 6'5 or 6'4" evev
Even at 80 the most shrinkage would be 4cm maximum.
jervis says on 4/Feb/14
Just watched that show Presnell looks to have an inch on Clint,Ali an inch shorter than Clint,making 40 year old unshrunken Clint 6ft3 as I always taught he was.
jervis says on 4/Feb/14
Just watched that show Presnell looks to have an inch on Clint,Ali an inch shorter than Clint,making 40 year old unshrunken Clint 6ft3 as I always taught he was.
filmfan says on 2/Feb/14
Have watched a David Frost show from 1969 at the time Paint Your Wagon was released. Eastwood's co-star from that film Harve Presnell appears alongisde Eastwood. When they are both standing 6'4'' Presnell looks the bigger man although the difference is not great. Muhammad Ali is also on the show and seems slightly shorter than Eastwood. Incredible guest list btw and the actors speak their mind onn the show. Not like today where the stars answers to questions are rehearsed whenever they are interviewed.
176,2Tunman says on 2/Feb/14
Looked very similar to 191-2 Sutherland in Kelly's Heroes.

All heights are barefeet Estimates, derived from quotations by celebrities, official websites, agency resumes, actors I've met at conventions and pictures/films.

Vital statistics like weight, shoe or bra size measurements have been taken from quotes by the actors themselves in interviews, resumes or articles.

Celebrity Fan Photos and Agency Pictures of stars are © to their respective owners.