How tall is Brad Pitt

Brad Pitt's Height

5ft 11in (180 cm)

American actor best known for movies such as Se7en, Fight Club, Snatch, Oceans Thirteen, Troy and World War Z. A newspaper article on heights (washington post) quoted as saying people had seen Pitt put down 5ft 10 on an audition form for his height. Well, before he was A-list, aged 24 he wrote his own height as 5ft 11 in a teen magazine profile. At times he can appear taller, but with impeccable posture and at times, in the last few years, cuban type heels, that is a given. Even his good friend George Clooney was wise to his footwear, saying once in USA Today that "He's tall. He's like 6-1. It's irritating."

How tall is Brad Pitt
Brad with Angelina Jolie, Jonah Hill and Claudia Schiffer
Photo by PR Photos

Add a Comment 250 comments

CS said on 4/May/16
180 cm give or take a few millimeters
truth said on 1/May/16
Might be more 179cm-180cm/5ft10.5-5ft10.75 night range (does not look over 6ft1 range with lifts and looked shorter than 6ft2-6ft2.5 range Bana).
Heylo said on 1/May/16
Alucard, You don't have any proof of Paltrow being 5'8 anyway, she is listed at 5'9. Brad looks minimum 5'10 in that photo with Paltrow if you count angle and the way he tilts his head.
But you're probably not going to change your mind about it because you've already made up your mind. Try to drop your ego and analyse the photo again more objectively.
Dmeyer said on 30/Apr/16
Looks similar to 5ft 11 guys like Aaron Taylor or Jon bernthal so if hé stood on same floor as beckam hé will look about same
Alucard said on 28/Apr/16
Peter ever heard of lifts? And Bana is around 6', certainly not 6'2 or 6'3... Yeah, let's throw away the best proof we have with both Paltrow and Pitt barefoot, we can still use pictures of other celebrities, with blown up heights, all dressed up with custom footwear to compare, lol...
Peter 180cm said on 26/Apr/16
@ Alucard yet he still managed to look atleast 5-6cm taller than Beckham and nomore than a solid 2 inches shorter than 188-189cm Eric Bana...Nowaay a 5'9 range man can look that tall next to 5'11 and 6'2 guys...Yet you speculated his height judging on a pic with a bad angle when both Paltrow and Pitt had different posture too...The guy is 179cm minimum barefoot and can easily look close to 6 foot when wearing lifts...
5'11 Stud said on 26/Apr/16
Pitt is letting go of lifts. It must a combination of having reached the height of his career and he has enough money in the bank. Maybe wisdom of old age. He can chalk loss of height to old age. His shoes look less "lifty" than before.
c-mo said on 25/Apr/16
some of you try to downgrade every celebrity . especially good looking male celebs

on a lot of pages I see various people doing it. that is just pathetic. complexed trolls

brad pitt seems to be in the 178-182cm range less no more 180cm seems to be a good shout .some here even tried downgrading him to 5'8 . will you feel better about yourself if he is 5'8 ? . well he is not . dude is ~ 5'11 . get over it
Dave said on 24/Apr/16
@Alucard, I agree. Pitt is 5'9-5'9.5 barefoot.
hijopotamus said on 23/Apr/16
Alucard, true! Let's forget about that pic. Looool
Ayush said on 23/Apr/16
O more than 5/10 feet
Alucard said on 22/Apr/16
Let's keep ignoring the known barefoot picture with 5'8 Paltrow, wich is the best evidence we have for Pitt's real height... Barefoot, 5'9-5'9.5 for Brad Pitt...
Dmeyer said on 22/Apr/16
Arguable for Pitt is 5ft 10,5-11,25 179-81 , most likely 179,5-180,5
Mathew Robinson (190 cm) said on 20/Apr/16
A lot of the big name stars like Pitt, Clooney, Damon, Bieber, Stallone, Cruise, Hanks, DiCaprio, etc... Rob generally has them consistently about .5" higher than I think they are.

To me, I see Pitt at 5'10.5", not over it. Terrific posture, somewhat bigger footwear, etc can make him look a bit taller at times.
paulkersey32 said on 19/Apr/16
Exact height. Leo is 6'. Find the in a same shoe pic standing straight I have no doubt. Also at fit peak 170 lbs
Adam said on 18/Apr/16
He's just under 5'11"... lifts are usually 1-1.5 " and shoe heels about 0.75-1" so he can look about 6' 1" with footwear. No more than 179cm barefoot... slim torso and tailored clothing gives him the appearance of more height. Either way, he looks proportional.
Adam said on 18/Apr/16
He's just under 5'11"... lifts are usually 1-1.5 " and shoe heels about 0.75-1" so he can look about 6' 1" with footwear. No more than 179cm barefoot... slim torso and tailored clothing gives him the appearance of more height. Either way, he looks proportional.
Dmeyer said on 15/Apr/16
The biggest shoe Pitt ever wears is in the 1,6-1,7in , but mostly 1-1,4in and somtimes 0,6in , like rob said 0,5in lifts is possible so 1,4 plus 0,5in that actualy gives only 0,3-0,4in because of povoting hé will still get under 2in , wish isnt so much over à regular 0,8-1,1in normal dress shoe , yet can look about 6' at times , the Guy is 5ft 11
184-182 said on 10/Apr/16
At a 5'11 listing, you reckon he could get close to 6'2 in lifts? Maybe pull off looking around 6'1 when he wants to?
Editor Rob:
Guys like Burt Reynolds used to have cowboy boots+lifts, Stallone maybe at times had real big ones, but today I can't see anybody, apart from say Downey Jr wearing obvious 'beasts'. Cruise last year definitely appeared to wear a typical elevator shoe that was easy to spot...

Pitt I think for a period went for the cuban-heel approach on some of his footwear...not so much an internal lift but an extra half inch outside. Maybe at times he has also had a 1cm lift inside giving him overall an inch of extra height though - I wouldn't rule it out.

I don't know about his boots though and whether he ever put an inch inside them.
Johno said on 10/Apr/16
Marion is about 5'5.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 9/Apr/16
Rob, which would Pitt most likely slot into?

A) 183.5cm/181.5cm
B) 183cm/181cm
C) 182.5cm/180.5cm
D) 182cm/180cm
E) 181.5cm/179.5cm
Editor Rob: I've settled on C-D zone for him and sometimes when he appears taller I think it is just slightly bigger shoes and impeccable posture.
B Webster said on 9/Apr/16
How tall is Marion Cotillard?

Click Here
truth said on 7/Apr/16
He is probably somewhere from 180cm to 182cm in the morning. In the evening a few fractions over 178cm.
Alex said on 6/Apr/16
Yep, Pitt is 178 cm barefoot, and 180 with shoes.
Ian said on 5/Apr/16
Anyone who thinks he's a true 5'11 is out of their minds! 178cm maximum barefoot in the evening.
Joe said on 5/Apr/16
Brad Pitt isn't anything shorter than 5'10.5". I rest my case here. He seems to stand quite well next to 6 footers like Edward Norton or Ryan Gosling. The 5'9" estimates are completely bull.
Mike Lowrey said on 5/Apr/16
Tiny man. Everyone knows he wear the height extending nipple bands to make him appear taller to uninitiated unlookers.
paciugo said on 3/Apr/16
he looks 5'10 next to 6'1 Tarantino.
184.3cm (Night) said on 2/Apr/16
Yeah i have changed my mind about him being 5'10.5".

He is a 5'10.75" guy (180 cm) after seeing him next to a few other actors without lifts. Clooney -5'10.5", which is why they look so close at times and other times Brad is taller ( big footwear)

Also explains why he can pull off looking 6'1" with elevators. He would probably come in at 6'1.-6'1.25" under a meter with his trick shoes minus hair.

With boat shoes he looked shorter than Clooney

0.5-0.6 in boost so only 5'11.25" with those on. Clooney had 1 inch shoe so edged him - 5'11.5".

Also noticeably shorter than a 5'11.5" peak Willis as its almost an inch difference.
Aaron Zamora said on 1/Apr/16
Rob, in the picture that everyone is talking about Leo and Brad Pitt who do you think is taller? I think They were fairly close but I think Brad looks a tiny bit taller. What is your opinion?
Editor Rob: they look close enough that you could probably class them as similar height, many wouldn't say there was anything different. But then 1 guy at near measured posture and another guy standing 1cm off his measured posture could account for situations like that.
Marzi said on 1/Apr/16
He looks the same height as Leo in that pic (maybe a cm shorter) which means that Rob's listing is pretty much spot on for both. Also, are people in here serious about that pic of him with Gwyneth? He's clearly taller then her. He might not be 5'11' on the dot but whoever is saying that he's under 5'10' is compensating for something. What's next, someone is going to pop in here claiming that he/she saw Pitt without the lifts and that he's actually shorter then Angelina and their adopted kids?
Del Mar said on 31/Mar/16
I guess I'd ctrl+f the comments I'd look for, but yes helluva lot of comments! For Pitt I think it's interesting to look back at pics of him from the 90's. He always looks 6' nowadays, and I guess elevators is to blame
mrtguy said on 31/Mar/16
doesn't give me the strong impression of 5'11''
James St. said on 30/Mar/16
Rob says: "...if I'm in this for the long haul, it is something that could be of use in the future."

Rob, if you still have records of all the past comments, you could publish a book of the funniest ones! I'm sure you've lolled plenty over some of the gems that popped up over the years . It could be a best-seller! distributed by Penguin publishing or something. Height of adult penguins varies ranges between 30cm and 130cm :-)

Height of Brad Pitt - anywhere between 177cm and 180cm
Editor Rob:
As I say, it's never dismissed and may be a future improvement or use in some way. The craziest claims or something. I mean the database has near 300,000 comments I believe (and near 3000 pitt comments!!), so there's a helluva lot of stuff stored!
Original said on 29/Mar/16
All people know that he use lifts, 2' or 2'5 inc. He is 5'9.5".
007 said on 29/Mar/16
Rob is 182cm morning height a stretch for Brad Pitt?
Editor Rob: not really, it is believable.
Del Mar said on 28/Mar/16
Damn, I wish you would save up old comments Rob! I remember I commented here way back in 06 and would be fun to look back at. I also posted a pic from Madame Tussaud which I remember Pitt doll looked 5'11 as I see Brad is steadily listet at, and I think celebheights has the most accurate and honest listing on those celebss for sure
Editor Rob: I don't know who would want to read 10 pages of Pitt comments. Although I've never ruled out the possibility one day to do an archive of old comments...if I'm in this for the long haul, it is something that could be of use in the future.
Johno said on 27/Mar/16
I do believe Leonardo does edge out Pitt though but not by much.

Click Here
Heylo said on 27/Mar/16
Syk: Yes I can explain that to you. That site is full of low intelligent bimbos who want to degrade Brad Pitt and his wife because of true jealousy, it's pathetic. They call him everything from 5'8 to 5'6 and spit hate about Brad and his wife in other threads. Don't take that seriously. Any decent person understands that hating on another man is retarded, especially if you don't know the man at all.
And the photos are obviously huge illusions which any person with an analytical ability could see.
hijopotamus said on 25/Mar/16
Leo is 181...
Brad 5'10" max
184.3cm (Night) said on 24/Mar/16
I just saw a pic of him next to Di caprio and leo is an inch taller at most but still...that makes Leo almost 6 foot and we know he isn't. So 5'10.5"-5'10.75" tops for Pitt.
Jedi Master 5'11 said on 24/Mar/16
@Kit Ah I see now. lol
Johno said on 23/Mar/16
With Gosling, Pitt's footwear does not seem abnormal from the outside but there is an arch within at the front of the shoe. Gosling's shoes appear flat whereas Pitt's have an incline even though he apparently has no large heels meaning, he probably has inner wedges.
Pitch_Fork said on 23/Mar/16
Guys, all of us have seen those pics with Gwyneth Paltrow but some still believe that is not a proof of Brad being in the 5'9'' range.
So here you go (Rob, please check this one out too):
That's just not how a 5'11'' guy would look next to a 5'4'' woman + Brad's closer to the camera
jasperwazup said on 23/Mar/16
Pitt is 178cm his head is slightly below 9''. 9''-9.4'' is average-ish. He doesn't look to have a big forehead maybe 22'' around. Normal range is 23''-24''. Large is 25''+. Huge 27''+
Kit said on 22/Mar/16
@Jedi Master, that's the whole point of the joke Clooney is making. Pointing out Brad's choice of footwear.
hijopotamus said on 22/Mar/16
syk, I see Brad same height as Paltrow. Nobody can deny that.
Alucard said on 22/Mar/16
Yes, Clooney is probably a legit 5'10, and he's the tallest of the bunch... Pitt is 5'9-5'9.5, the picture with Paltrow is the best evidence we have, like it or not... Damon is fairly short, always has been, if he gets to 5'8 he's lucky...
Dmeyer said on 22/Mar/16
Its true in walking scène they can apear same Clooney pitt
berta said on 22/Mar/16
He can look 182 with gosling he doesnt look 4 cm shorter no way.either he is wearing elevator shoes ore he is a Little taller than this, like 181-2
Brendan said on 20/Mar/16
Rob let us suppose that he uses 1.5 inch lift all the time. If you get sure about that, what number you put on list for him?
Editor Rob: looking at his footwear over the years, I can't see him wearing big lifts like 1.5. In a boot that might be possible, but in normal shoes, you struggle to get more than a 2cm lift.
Dmeyer said on 20/Mar/16
Cobsidering the posture Pitt has near Gosling And the very slight footwear adavantage you could say he looks no more than 1in smaller so if Gosling is truly 184 cm Pitt could be 181cm
Jedi Master 5'11 said on 19/Mar/16
Whatever Height he is = George Clooney in all of the Ocean's movies. They are shoulder to shoulder, head to head / same height. You can balance a plank of wood across their head/shoulders. So I don't know what George is thinking when he's saying that Pitt towers over him. They're both 5'11"
syk said on 18/Mar/16
can anyone explain this? Click Here
Blink said on 18/Mar/16
@Dmeyer yeah, I remember that for sure, Brad himself claimed to be almost 6ft.
pauly e said on 18/Mar/16
regarding Pitt's claim of his own height, I remember reading a few years back (might have been posted by a user on this site) that someone claimed Pitt was 6'0 and one of his people (publicist maybe) argued that he was not 6'0 but instead 5'11. I have been trying to google it but can't seem to find it now....
truth said on 18/Mar/16
Alucard what are you smoking? Want some of that, lol. Pitt is 5ft10.5, Clooney is 5ft10 and Matt Damon is 5ft9.5.
MarcusTheSwede said on 18/Mar/16
Agree 100% with Alucard. Finally someone who gets it.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 17/Mar/16
Pitt looks 180/181cm
TJE said on 17/Mar/16
If Gosling's just a strong 6'0 then Pitt's 5'11 tops. Not far off from 5'11, but no more.
Jen said on 17/Mar/16
I just found one article about height which supposedly came from some height site. Here is what i read there:

Tom Cruise is 170 cm
Jeorge Clooney 177.5 cm
Jason statham 175 cm
all of this sounds pretty believable, isnt it?
And then i read this:
Brad Pitt 188 cm
Woah, looks like his tricks really make some people believe him been really tall.
Alucard said on 16/Mar/16
5'9-5'9.5 for Brad Pitt, nothing more, the picture with Paltrow is pretty clear... Without lifts he's not taller than Clooney who himself is 5'10 at best, probably less, Matt Damon being the shorter of the bunch at around 5'7-5'8 max...
Appe 6ft 0.5 said on 16/Mar/16
If Gosling is 183cm as I think Brad Pitt can be easily 181cm (not under).
I am not very well informed about Clooney height, but I ve seen he is listed here 180cm and it surprised me ( he always appeared me as a tipical 178cm guy. He's infact an inch shorter than Brad Pitt (Clooney talked about Pitt as a "tall guy").
Dmeyer said on 15/Mar/16
i thaught i read someWere pitt claimed he was almost 6ft
pauly e said on 14/Mar/16
Dmeyer said on 9/Mar/16
Click Here , rare shot similar distance from camera similar shoes foot pose is normal for both and pitt is not standing as good as clooney and yet looks 2cm over clooney , you could argue 181cm from this shot , 180cm is fair

I would argue that Clooney isn't anything over 5'10, so I would say that 180 cm is fair for Pitt.
Noah said on 12/Mar/16
Rob, do you find it strange that Brad Pitt only claims 5'11? Most men that are 5'11 would claim 6 foot, especially actors.
Editor Rob: he claimed it early in his career when he was D-list. As an A-lister I've not heard him say his height!
Pitch_Fork said on 11/Mar/16
Rob, you cant ignore the pic from Dmeyer, really
Editor Rob: sometimes Pitt will look an inch taller. How often Clooney really stands as tall posture-wise as Pitt is another matter.
curious said on 11/Mar/16
He looks between 5' 10'' - 5' 11'', could be 179 cm.
Dmeyer said on 9/Mar/16
Click Here , rare shot similar distance from camera similar shoes foot pose is normal for both and pitt is not standing as good as clooney and yet looks 2cm over clooney , you could argue 181cm from this shot , 180cm is fair
Silent_D said on 8/Mar/16
5 foot 10.
Johno said on 8/Mar/16
Will Ferrell has about 4 inches on Brad and Will although he claims 6'3, is between 6'1-6'2 tall.
YAY said on 8/Mar/16
do all actors add an inch or 2 to their height when they become A-listers?
Dan said on 6/Mar/16
A 5-10 man would wear lifts so he can be 5-11 if he claims 5-11.
Dejavu said on 4/Mar/16
He looks 6'0 with Ryan Gosling
LOL2 said on 4/Mar/16
why does a 5'11 man feel the need to wear lifts?

he can be as short as 5'10 but no taller than 5'11
mrtguy said on 28/Feb/16
I don't know about legit 5'11'' for pitt
Johno said on 27/Feb/16
@Kurtz, yeh i think in real life a height between 5'11 - 6'1 might be the best.
Sam said on 27/Feb/16
Having a bigger head isn't always a bad thing if you have longer limbs. The one disadvantage is eye level.
richie said on 27/Feb/16
Solid 5'11" for Pitt, probably 6' in shoes...
Rich Hall said on 26/Feb/16
@ Johno and Dan, good points regarding height perception in movies vs real life. Here's an interesting quote from Alan Ladd : "I have the face of an aging choirboy and the build of an undernourished featherweight. If you can figure out my success on the screen you're a better man than I."
Dude was super popular throughout the 40s. Turned down the role of Giant played by James Dean. Interesting that both Neymar & Messi seem to be more popular with kids than the likes of Ronaldo or Bale. Maybe it's that identification factor that you guys mentioned... Still think Brad is 5'11" though. lol
kurtz said on 25/Feb/16
best height for a man is btwn 5 11 and 6 1 not a mm. more, not a mm. less.
if we could ask to people what is best height, that would be in this range 99.9 % of times.
no way, no arguments against this, nada de nada
Johno said on 25/Feb/16
Don't get me wrong 191-193 cm, tall aswell as a short height are secondary to character and everyone should learn to embrace their height. Non of us, well maybe just me, are supermodels. I am speaking generally.

In terms if muscle mass, "too much" muscle is relative, sure not many women drool over your average height Mr Olympias but nor would they with a huge muscular tall guy ----- that has got more to do with relativity and proportions.

I believe the entertainment industry is more a niche area and image plays a large part in entry and popularity. I believe the fact that there are less tall people in the World should not effect the representation of heights in peak popularity and brand ie there is only one Tom Cruise. It is so hard to get a break in popular entertainment that you would expect a higher number of taller entertainers but i generally believe that these taller entertainers are filtered out over time because the audience and in particular the female audience take a greater liking to the shorter entertainer and the versatility of the shorter entertainer as opposed to the taller entertainer who is usually type-cast. The shorter entertainer or the image of the shorter entertainer may lend itself more well to the audience's perceived notion of emotion and empathy, the ability to gain trust and the ability to relate and these traits greatly effect or are related to the laws of attraction. For me, the taller individuals just at times seem a bit awkward and maybe our characters and emotions are moulded in how they are physically judged in society as they grew up.

For me a height of 6'3 even is where you have start to have this stretched look, even when someone is in the 6'2-range you tend to ask about their height. I can a few tall guys with good looks who are or were popular with the ladies such as Chris Hemsworth, Jason Mamoa, Joe Manganiello, Christopher Reeves but are the comparable to say the Young Brad Pitt or Tom Cruise? Leonardo Dicaprio or Johnny Depp? Even the ultimate female magnets such Elvis and arguably Michael Jackson, who even guys like Beckham or Pitt could not compare to when it came to total and ultimate female attention did not even touch 6'0.

This begs the question, what is tall and what is short? ------ where is the cut-off point? Everything 6'0 to 5'7 ----- short? Everything 6'0 to 6'4 ----- tall?
hijopotamus said on 25/Feb/16
Poor Hall, Sly Stallone reaches the 5'10" mark, same as Cruise. No big deal. Brad can reach the 6' ish mark easily, even when he is only 5'10"
Rich Hall said on 24/Feb/16
ok folks, looks like Rob had it right all these years lol. 5'11" for Pitt does look right. Check out this vid where he's pretty much taller than everyone
Click Here
Granted, many of them are old but still... Not saying he only eats sweet peas and that he secretly is the Greeeen Giant HO HO HO but no way a 5'10" guy would look like that. Also take note of his height relative to the door at the 4.25 mark. That's similar to mine. Were it not for his shorter limbs, I'd say he could easily pass for 6' guy

and @ Dan, well to the Dan with the weird rants, in what parallel dimension is 5'10" the perfect height? Dude, that's such a weird statement. If so, why are most male models 6'2" and up? Daniel Craig who is 5'10" took a lot of flack for being "too short" to play Bond. I'm 6'1" and no way would I wanna be 5'10". Dunno if you're trolling when you say that girls don't like tall guys because their head is too long or too distant. Srs you sound like a Beta misc
Most ladies I've been with are pretty tall and love wearing heels but I dated some small ladies as well and they just loved to cuddle up to my waist when we take a romantic stroll. But hey, you sound so convinced that I doubt you'll ever get it. No biggie, to each their own I guess :^)
Dan said on 23/Feb/16
Julian, I don't know how you're referring to, but it definitely ain't me. I never mentioned anything about girls or dating. That's not me. But I stick to my opinion that Pitt is 5-10. And he wears lifts. It's clear as day. It's not a big deal.
191-193 said on 21/Feb/16

Why are Hollywood pretty boys usually under 6 foot? For the same reason why most Miss Universes are brunettes; there are just so much more of them on this planet.
That head size and body propotion issue is also somewhat individual, usually you start to have that "stretched look" if you're closer to 2 meters tall. Besides, you could as well say that a larger head and shorter limbs are not ideal either, and if you gain a significant amount of muscle mass, it will make your limbs look even shorter. Taller guys don't have that problem. 190-195 cm is perfect for a 180 cm supermodel, just ask Gisele Bundchen.
Julian said on 20/Feb/16
I agree with the listed height; 5'11" for Pitt and he often looks taller. Dan maybe consider anger management. Sorry to hear about your lack of game with girls but doesn't mean you need to downgrade everyone under the sun so as to feel better about yourself _ smh
Heylo said on 20/Feb/16
@5ft 9.25: Brad has one of the most proportioned faces I've seen. I don't know where you get that he has a small head from?

Anyway. I agree with one of the Dans. That you can't pull off looking 6ft like Brad Pitt if you're under 5'10, it's impossible without looking suspicious.
What we should discuss is wether Brad is 178, 179 or 180cm and provide photos with celebrities around 5'10 to 6ft. We know that he barefoot next to Paltrow looked about 5'10 (everyone doesn't agree with me but for me it's crystal clear, If Gwyneth is 5'9, then Brad looked at least 5'10).
Brad also looks taller than every celebrity around 5'10. He often looks a small bit taller than people around 5'11 except for a few times, and those few times is the times where we assume that he skipped the lifts? In any case, he can't be under 5'10.
Johno said on 19/Feb/16
Click Here

Another shot where footwear is evident and you see the difference Pitt and Damon is less then 1-inch. You can clearly see Clooney and Damon looking like to one another as the always do, the only personnel looking any different is Pitt ---- clearly losing his 2-inch or so advantage his lifts normally give him.

Damon is listed at 5'10, is never this height in a million years. 5'9 could be the middle-ground but he does strike me as a 5'8-ranger; an average just like Rob. Certainly with Glenn he used to look 5'8 and with 5'7.5 James Corden, he just about looks 5'8 thus even having Damon at an average of 5'9 or Jamie Foxx height, Pitt hardly makes the 5'10 mark. As i said before ------ 5'10 is his max.

Matt Damon 5'9, 5'8-5'9
Clooney 5'9.5
Brad Pitt 5'10 max, can look in the average 5'9-range if Damon is below 5'9.
Johno said on 19/Feb/16
Click Here

A better comparison of Matt Damon and Pitt; the difference betweem them is not more the 1-inch and most likely less thus, you need to keep Damon's height within an inch of Brad's ---- these 1.5-inch or 2-inch differences are just silly assumptions and only achieved by lifts, Damon seldom wears lifts as comoared to Brad.
Johno said on 19/Feb/16
Dan, whilst i can agree Pitt could be 5'10, i would not put him in the 5'10-range. 5'10 for me, is his ceiling. Whatever height Pitt maybe ---- Damon is not more then an inch below and more rather 0.75 inches. Damon can often look max 5'9 and often in the 5'8-range. Pitt is visibly shorter then the elderly Harrison Ford and Clint Eastwood. He did not even have more then 1-inch Shia. As i said before, Pitt right is up there with the 24/7 lift wearers. He is nearly as bad RDJ. You do at times see guys like Leonardo is normal footwear, aswell guys such as Matt Damon but hardly ever Pitt.

Pitt 5'10 max
hijopotamus said on 19/Feb/16
Jeff, most celebrities lie about height, weight, plastic surgeries, fake hair, fake teeth, etc. They are pros of image. This site is about debunking some of these "perfect" people. Some people might be insecure and have height issues, thats obvious. Celebrities and regular people.
Spike said on 19/Feb/16
5 '11 (180cm) in his prime sounds perfectly legit, but considering the fact that he's over 50, he's probably more like 5'10.25 (178.4) to 5'10.5 (179).
What do you think Rob?
Jeff said on 18/Feb/16
@Dan: When you constantly downgrade every singe celebrity here, don't you think your perception of height might be a little biased? This comment goes for all the "serial downgraders" here. Use your intellect, not your height complex
The_Punisher said on 17/Feb/16
5'10'' barefoot
Dan said on 16/Feb/16
Pitt is definitely in the 5-10 range. No taller. Damon is probably about 5-9 or a smidge shorter. I think clooney is a solid 5-10. Dicaprio is definitely no shorter than 5-11. I stood right next to Don Cheadle and he is 5-8. I am 1000% sure that Dicaprio is about an inch taller than Pitt.
177-178 cm guy said on 16/Feb/16
@Johno Leo is clearly at least an inch taller than Damon in this picture:

Click Here
Dan said on 15/Feb/16
Johno, try Stallone, Robert Downey Jr., there are way too many to count. They all wear lifts
Johno said on 15/Feb/16
@177-178cm? 5'10.75 minimum? Exactly how tall do you think Damon is and what is the difference between him and Pitt? Give me some estimates and let us deal with it.
Rich Hall said on 13/Feb/16
yo dan, you're gonna give yourself a stroke lol
sure, Hijodude sees Pitt as a bit smaller than most here but I think he's on to something. Check out Jolie next to dustin & jack black, She looks no more than 5'5"! don't get bummed out hijo.Even if you're in the minority, stay true to your opinions and accept what you see in ze mirror !!! --> Click Here
177-178 cm guy said on 13/Feb/16
@Johno Leo is 5'10.75" at worst. He never looks under 5'10". And Brad is at least 5'10". Deal with it.
Johno said on 12/Feb/16
I cannot think of many male A-listers who wear lifts more then Pitt does
MarcusTheSwede said on 12/Feb/16
Dan: You are wrong in all youre rambling about. Hijopotamus is correct. Pitt hasnt by a fantasy wizard grown its called height insoles and special build footwear. Dont listen to Dan. Cuz he is dead wrong in all his jibberish. Bye.
Sam said on 12/Feb/16
Btw I peg Leo 181cm and Pitt more 5'10 range than the full 5'11.
Sam said on 12/Feb/16
Actually, even though some won't agree, I have confidence that Dicaprio could possibly be a full inch taller than a liftless Pitt.
Mathew Robinson (190 cm) said on 12/Feb/16
5ft 9.25 said on 12/Feb/16
Gosling 6'.25
Pitt 5'10.5
We all know he uses lifts (at lest .75"). The small head makes him appear taller...


Knock Gosling down another quarter inch and I'm on board.
5ft 9.25 said on 12/Feb/16
Gosling 6'.25
Pitt 5'10.5
We all know he uses lifts (at lest .75"). The small head makes him appear taller...
TJE said on 11/Feb/16

What brand of tin foil do you use to fashion your hats out of? I'm going to a Reptilians did 9/11 convention this weekend and I need something that can last for a few days. The sooner the better; Thanks!
thething said on 11/Feb/16
@ johno

You are using logic and not just going with what people say.bravo. Proportions are a sign of healthy genes and are way more attractive to women than height plus Statistically very tall men live shorter lives and have way more health problems after 40.tell me a logical reason why women should want these kind of genes for their offsprings?Women are more attracted to men with normal or short limbs compared to torso, long limbs are not sexy to ladies.The most beautful face is not a long,short or large face,it's a normal face.not too long ,not too large or too short.That goes for height too.Average height is the best to get the girls.i'd say 5'8 to 6'1 is good for a man,ideal would be 5'9 to 6'1
Dan said on 11/Feb/16
Dude, I am the original Dan here. Now there are two other Dans. I'm definitely not a Dan that suffers from height insecurity, and I'm not
The Dan who says that women prefer six footers. Change your names guys, I've been here a long time.
Dan said on 11/Feb/16
Amen Johno
hijopotamus said on 11/Feb/16
Dan, show me Pitt is whatever height you claim or just prove he is not a certain height.
If you cant, dont spread missinformation.
hijopotamus said on 11/Feb/16
Dan, you don't know **** about shoes.
And I mean "this type" of shoes.
Get educated and come back.
Jeff said on 10/Feb/16
Rob, on the Michael Vartan page, I saw that you used to have Pitt at 181. Why did you downgrade him? Is it related to your discovery of his 5'11 claim on the teen magazine profile?
Editor Rob: he could pull off looking over 5ft 11 at times, but then in his early 20's he did put down 5'11 in his own handwriting on a profile sheet.
Dan said on 10/Feb/16
There are new pictures of Pitt on set of War Machine. He is on the street jogging in short shorts and running sneakers. You can see his legs really well and it's very obvious how much help he's getting from his sneakers. Not that much.
Johno said on 9/Feb/16
How can most women prefer guys who are 6'0 + when guys like Beckham, Pitt, Cruise, Depp, Clooney, Brando, Dean, Dicaprio and not to forget all your typical teen idols such as Bieber and all your typical boybands have all been largely under 6'0 and nothing more then average? All these males have had normal dimensions and proportions. A relatively smaller head and long legs are not all that appealing. Taller guys tend to have these features. Also when the head is to far up, it is hard to emphaise with the individual ---- women usually have a lower centre of gravity. Also the facial bone structure of the shorter guy has been less susceptible for excess bone growth and it is more aqualine and can be quite angelic and metrosexual.

Women believe they prefer tall guys because all their idols overlist their heights. Pitt and Dicaprio would be lucky to average 5'10 or over but their body proportions are good as they are, they are ideal for the big screen.
Dan said on 8/Feb/16
hijopotamus, your constant efforts to cling on to your fantastic claims that Brad Pitt is under 5'10" is simply baffling. At least the other Dan who suffers from height insecurity follows a logical train of thought when it comes to assessing heights. You on the other hand make no sense at allr. It is perfectly clear without the shadow of any doubt that Brad would still be taller than the regular joe even if he didn't lift, and seriously dan, it's not the lifts you insist on wearing that will help you finally get a date. It's how you carry yourself. Brad Pitt is 5-10 and yes he's often seen wearing boots, big heels and the occasional lift but think about it. If he really was under 5-10, he would never look 6-0, which he often does in movies.
and to the other dan, 5-10 is the perfect height for film. If you're having issues with girls, believe me, it's not because of your height.
Dmeyer said on 8/Feb/16
Shoes that give 2-2,25in have a dodgy look And yet they make you look just 1-1,25in taller than you are Pitt shoes arnt as big And hé can look near 6ft so 5'11 it is
Dan said on 8/Feb/16
Hijopotamus, show me one pair of tricky shoes Brad Pitt has ever worn. Show me one pair. If you can't, then don't spread missinformation.
Abode46 said on 8/Feb/16
Strong 5'10" barefoot, but has perfect posture and can look 6'0" or over.
hijopotamus said on 7/Feb/16
Dan, Pitt wears lifts or custom tricky shoes 24/7.
So, nothing to do with having to look taller in movies.
We all saw those pics getting off a private jet with friends Clooney and Damon. Pitt looked shorter than Clooney...
Wonder why haha.
Sam said on 7/Feb/16
My assumption is that some women just hear what they want to hear. Would a 5'10 guy that claims 6 foot honestly have a better chance than another guy that is 182cm and says he's under 6 foot, all things being equal? I think its dependant on how tall you look in the flesh because eye level, shoes, posture, hair and build all add to illusion of more height. I doubt any legit 5'10+ guy should have dating issues even if those "illusions" go against him. But your right about 5'10 not sounding very impressive on paper even though its a good height. Just not as ideal as say 6 foot but there's nothing wrong with that.
Myth Buster said on 4/Feb/16
He has got the body structure of a short man (5' 8'') despite being 5' 11'', same as David Beckham.
kurtz said on 3/Feb/16
5' 11'' or 180 cm. spot on

in my opinion btwn 5' 11'' and 6' 1'' (180-185 cm.) best height range for man
Dan said on 2/Feb/16
@dan, Guys Johnny Depp and Brad Pitt lift because they're movie stars and have a certain look they need to have. It has nothing to do with their height insecurity. I'm pretty sure neither of them would lift it they were regular joes. If you're s legit barefoot 5-10 and you're lifting, you got issues. Barefoot 5-10 is the perfect movie star Hollywood height. There should be no reason to lift, and I seriously can't imagine any woman not being satisfied with a 5-10 guy unless of course, the woman is 5-9,5-10 or taller. I'm basically saying that if you're a barefoot 5-10 guy dating a woman anywhere from 5-3 all the way up to 5-8 and she's telling you she prefers guys 6-0 and up, then there's probably something else going on there. When a woman and man go out and she wears heels, even a height difference of 1 inch between a man and woman is enough. Two inch difference is probably ideal, but 1 inch difference is still acceptable. If the guy is too much taller than the woman, she's basically a shrimp. And ideally, a couple shouldn't have such a drastic difference in height. That's why John Mayer and Jennifer aniston looked like ****.
Dmeyer said on 2/Feb/16
Ok mat , relax men i just said girls told me that they préfère 6'0-6'4 wich means 5'10,5-6'2 in reality , i dont have the problème anyway i am 5'11,5 And most girls guess me 6'0-6'1 or even more so whi would i lie , also 5ft 10,25 is à very décent height its not like you are 5'7-8in , in the US the height is à réal problem ,
Tunman said on 1/Feb/16
Really no average man should have height complex,just think that I'm 5'9.5 and almost never wore anything over 0.5" for years.Missing a hottie just because you're thinking about your lifts is a pity.
Okay the only case where I could agree with you is if an average man is attracted by a very tall woman,say in the 5'11-6' range.Here it's true that women may prefer taller guys like 6'0-4 range,so yeah average men chances are indeed very weak.But just think that when I was in NY I saw a guy who was probably 175 with a 188 or so girlfriend and in Montreal a 165 guy with a 186-7 girl.Quite genuine girls who never had the kind of thoughts like"he will need a ladder to kiss me".Height should never be a condition for love whether for men or women in my opinion.If one starts to quantify sexuality in terms of inches,then what about other issues which happen to be much more important actually?(personnality,behaviour,kindness,respect...)just ask Rob,after all Jenny could be near 5'11 in heels,hmmm?
Dan said on 31/Jan/16
Heylo says: "I think insecure men are more likely to be with shallow and stupid women."
Yeah true dat. I've always dated models or tanned gym bunnies. Except for high school, I've never been with a "normal" down to earth girl. Probably a reflection of my own issues. Even though my friends point out that I'm taller than average, somehow I can't seem to feel good about my height unless I wear lifts. Except when doing sports. Like on the beach, I suddenly don't care which really shows it depends on my state of mind.
I know it sounds ridiculous but I've tried not to wear lifts for 1 day and it was torture! There was this hot girl who was flirting with me but I couldn't even enjoy it. All I was thinking about was put my lifts back on. Sigh
Mat, don't forget that celebrity is a huge turn on for girls. Besides, Johnny Depp lifts all the time as well so it's pretty clear he too wished he was taller. Not saying he's insecure like me though
NBAer said on 31/Jan/16
dan said on 27/Jan/16
I don't get your height problem,and i also don't get how you think height is such a big factor when it comes to girls and dating...As long as you're atleast abit taller than your girl(in most cases anyway),you won't have a problem.Besides,when meeting people,you don't dudge them by their physical appearance,but from their character and height is sth MAYBE secondary(i'm talking about myself).Also,i can't get it how mostly everyone on this website claiming to be under 5'11 but over 5'7 feel short and subhuman,just because they're not 6ft++ with broad shoulders,6packs,good looks and loads of money...I'm barely 5'11 myself barefoot,and i never ever ever feel short or undersized wherever i go.On the worst case, i may feel average,and i rarely meet taller women with or without heels.And i'm supposedly living in a country where men are about 5'9 on average and women 5'4...By the way,Brad looks 5'11 and rarely below in most of his pics with other celebrities,and closer to 6 feet when he's lifting
hijopotamus said on 31/Jan/16
Dan, relax dude! I understand you have some kind of weird issues in the ladies department and that must suck pretty much. If you are cool enough, alfa and have some power you shouldnt have.any problems even if you are short.
The Paltrow pics are the ONLY reliable source we have which is a guy barefoot besides another person barefoot. You don't need a brain surgery to get it.
Pitt 5'10" in the 90s.
Emil 183 cm said on 30/Jan/16
those girls have no idea how tall a genuine 6'0 guy is - let alone 6'4 lol.
And why even bother chasing girls who are so narrowminded? Height shouldn't play a factor
Mat said on 30/Jan/16
Dan i totaly understand you , i use to live in us and girls anywere 5'0-5'11 all told me they wouldnt date a Guy shorter than me about 6'0 ,and most of them prefer 6'0-6'4 with normal looks than 5'9-10in with perfect looks ,they father date ed norton than tom cruise

First of all, Edward Norton is better looking than Cruise in my opinion. Secondly, who do you think women would rather date, Johnny Depp (5'9) or Norton (6') ? Johnny Depp of course. So what you are saying abut the 5'9-5'10 guys is BS. From my experience, women have absolutely no problem dating an average height man. Being average is neither a pros nor a con. It's just neutral. It doesn't matter. If a guy is on the short side, it starts becoming a con, if he is on the taller side it becomes a pros.

Any woman would rather date a 5'9 guy with perfect looks than a 6+ with average looks. Just because you don't have any luck with the ladies doesn't mean that applies to all of us. I am actually described as tallish by most girls, and my height has never been a deal breaker. I'm 5'10.25 by the way.
Heylo said on 30/Jan/16
My experience is that girls tend to sound disappointed when hearing that I'm barely 5'10 but I could have said 5'11 and get away with it cause people in general are pretty bad at estimating heights. Also, 5'10 sounds shorter in paper than what it looks like in reality. With this said, I'm not saying that girls wouldn't prefer a 6'2 version of me, I'm just saying that average isn't that bad in reality.

And I think we all have certain preferences that suddenly don't mean much if you meet the right person. I've had girls around my height (5'10) that were interested and these are very tall girls. I also had girls who thought I was pretty short. I definitely don't think you're doomed in any way if you're around average in height.
It's when the height goes to extreme differences compared to your own ideals, that's where problems arises. If a girl wants a 6'2 man but starts to like a 5'5 man, she may actually think about leaving him because of his height, because of that extreme difference from heir ideals. There are exceptions of course but honestly, to every average man out there, you don't have to look like a model to get attractive girls. It's kind of sad how everyone wants to look like a greek god, nature wouldn't make sense if everyone looked like a tall Brad Pitt. Diversity is necessary.

Keep in mind that you only have to be taller than the girl and as long as you make the best of what you have and are a genteman, you should make it. A girl who disses someone for being some inches smaller than her ideal, then she may be nothing to have. At least I feel like mature and intelligent women are more attractive. I think insecure men are more likely to be with shallow and stupid women.
dan said on 27/Jan/16
dmeyer is spot on. The shorter the guy, the more he has to "work" and make up for it. It's a permanent curse and that's a fact. And if there's one thing females hate more than a short dude, it's a short smiling dude with a high pitched voice. In that case, we're not even talking about mere preference, for 99% of ladies, this combo is a deal breaker with no hope of rescue. You could take the ideal man with perfect features and personality and shrink him to say 5'5", women would still pick an average or even ugly looking 6'2" dude. We live in a No Country for Short Men world and short dudes are the equivalent of fat, really ugly chicks with bad breath and chlamydia. Some may say it's not fair or politically correct but it's the plain truth and that's just the way the cookie crumbles. And even in cases where some girls actually dig short guys physically or aren't planning on having kids, they'd still give preferences to taller guys because of the status appeal and what society paints as the image of a cool boyfriend or husband. A short boyfriend is not exactly show off material, and often, it's seen as an embarrassment so if a dude is short, he better be minted. Why do you figure so many short dudes are nerds? That's because money is the great equalizer. Evolution 101

Sorry to burst your bubble hijopota but you're wrong about Pitt being my height. He's 5'11" minimum and he wasn't just barely taller than Redford. I dunno why you keep bringing up the Paltrow pics. He's not short. Get over it dude
Editor Rob: many women are quite happy to overlook shortness in stature for tallness in bank balance.
Johno said on 26/Jan/16
An average height guy. Him, Clooney and Damon are all within 1-inch of another although, Clooney and Damon wear lifts alot less then Pitt does; both seem to be more comfortable with their average heights.

Brad Pitt (Average height man)
hijopotamus said on 26/Jan/16
Dan, Pitt was wearing massive heels in Spy Games and barely taller than Redford. Dude, you are weird!
dmeyer said on 26/Jan/16
Dan i totaly understand you , i use to live in us and girls anywere 5'0-5'11 all told me they wouldnt date a Guy shorter than me about 6'0 ,and most of them prefer 6'0-6'4 with normal looks than 5'9-10in with perfect looks ,they father date ed norton than tom cruise
Dan said on 26/Jan/16
Well I ended up dating them anyways but when the conversation turned to height, they confirmed they'd have preferred a taller version of me. I don't know how tall you are but I've never met a 5'10 dude who wouldn't rather be 6'2" or vice versa, a 6'2" dude who'd wanna be shorter. I'm 5'10 barefoot and I often feel short when I'm not lifting.I guess it's because I've gotten too used to them. Wish there was a minimal shoes rehab program. Detox could wreck my self-esteem but coming out of it, I wouldn't be dependant on lifts anymore. In my post, I said I've had a height complex for years so you telling me there's something wrong with me or my girlfriends is kinda redundant, don't you think? Of course there's something wrong! I'm an insecure dude with a height complex and they're tall lanky beauties with eating issues.
Anyways truthfully, most girls I know would rather date tall guys. Not just the models. In fact, in my experience, it's the smaller girls who crave really tall boyfriends. Weird, I know, but that's what I've observed.

Pitt towered over Robert Redford in Spy Games. In that movie, he actually looked like he a 6'2" dude. Peace out
Dan said on 24/Jan/16
Brad Pitt doesn't always look 6-1. No way. He has looked anywhere from 5-11 to 6-1 depending on the role. In moneyball and basterds he looked really tall. And 5-10 flat barefoot is definitely not short. If a girl tells you you'd be a hottie if you were 2 inches taller than sorry bud, but there's either something wrong with you or those girls. I've never ever met a girl who requires a man above 5-10 unless they're 5-9 or 5-10 themselves.
Alex said on 23/Jan/16
If Pitt use some lift, he could be less than 180 cm.
Smith said on 21/Jan/16
Brad is 183 cm tall. And in those pictures that he looks shorter than others it's because they are wearing lifts and he is not. You think he is the only one who wears lifts?
Dmeyer said on 19/Jan/16
Relooking at pics dicaprio could look easily as tall if not 1/4 in taller , its à shame there is à récent pic of leo And Pitt but they are not side by side
Dmeyer said on 18/Jan/16
pitt looks taller than dicaprio near 5'10 innaritu and dicaprio looks taller than brad near tarantino , and thats counting footwear , wich means they are similar heights
Dmeyer said on 16/Jan/16
gosling isnt less than 183-4cm pitt has to be 179-80cm tu pull off this tall near him in shoes that dont look like big elevators
a said on 14/Jan/16
Pitt is 180 max. Gosling is 184 max. I doubt Gosling wears lifts but Pitt def does. In some films he can look over 183cm and yet in others he can look much shorter next to a taller actor
Dan said on 14/Jan/16
I am 5'10" on the dot and ladies often say that if I were 2 inches taller, I'd be a hottie. I've had a height complex for years. Once, a girl model told me she 'd never date a short guy. It's like anything under 5'11" is subhuman. That's why even dudes like Collin FarrelI are forced to wear lifts. I take care of myself and am well built but without the height, it just seems like wasted efforts. That's why most short dudes I know look angry and always ready to pick a fight. Being short is a life sentence so no wonder so many walk around being pissed off at life. Tall dudes on the other hand can get any girl they want just by saying hi.It's a natural thing. Females want the tall gene for their offspring or just for social status. Dating a short dude puts you in the loser category unless he's filthy rich or a celeb. Never seen a Pitt movie where he doesn't look tall. He's got wide shoulder and a slim waist and which I suspect help accentuate his tallness on screen but it's not like they surround him with midgets! He always looks 6'1" or more. I really don't get the logic of those saying he's just 5'10".
Tom Cruise on the other hand always looks short irrespective of camera angles, short co-stars or lifts. 5'11 is the bare minimum for Pitt.
pauly e said on 14/Jan/16
Dmeyer said on 13/Jan/16
They look close enaugh to wath Gosling has if anithing Gosling heels are a few mm thicker but but could have a 0,5-6in lifts anyway hé manages to look just 0,75-1in smaller while in max 1-1,5cm more shoes hé has to be max 3-4cm under Gosling who isnt under 6'0,25

so 6'0.25 is 183.5 if Pitt is 3-4 cm under him, then that is 179.5-180.5 or just a bit over 5'10.5 - just a bit over 5'11. I think that is reasonable.
Dmeyer said on 14/Jan/16
Cobsidering how Pitt looks near Gosling even cobsidering very slightly more shoes as they dont look that suspicions he has to be max 3-4cm shorter no more And Gosling is in the 183-4cm no less so Pitt 180cm anyone 179 or less couldnt pull that off
Mathew Robinson (190 cm) said on 14/Jan/16
jtm said on 13/Jan/16
hasn't there been enough evidence gosling isn't even 6'0? still sticking with under 5'10 for pitt.


Gosling isn't over 6'0". But as for Pitt, I really don't think he's less than 5'10". I think 5'10.25" - 5'10.5" is likely what he'd measure. I see a strong 5'10"-er who likes thick heels and at times puts lifts in them.
Adam said on 14/Jan/16
Yeah, good spot, definite elevators from Pitt there. Even with those and Goslings somewhat slouching posture Pitt still looks a little shorter...still think 5'11 about right for him, though it does prove Gosling is no less than 6.25.
hijopotamus said on 14/Jan/16
Guys, Brad is wearing elevators!
How como Tom Cruise be as tall as Cameron Diaz in high heels? We all have seen it. Well, we all know how...
Why some people deny the true facts? Why Brad cannot be just average height?
jasperwazup said on 13/Jan/16
Brad's 5'9.75'' at shortest time of day.Ryan is an actual 5'11.5'' tall but looks 6 foot most of the time.
mickey said on 13/Jan/16
i guess we can safely say that he hasn't lost any height through the years. Strong 5'11, maybe at morning with perfect posture he can scratch 6ft.
Dmeyer said on 13/Jan/16
They look close enaugh to wath Gosling has if anithing Gosling heels are a few mm thicker but but could have a 0,5-6in lifts anyway hé manages to look just 0,75-1in smaller while in max 1-1,5cm more shoes hé has to be max 3-4cm under Gosling who isnt under 6'0,25
jtm said on 13/Jan/16
hasn't there been enough evidence gosling isn't even 6'0? still sticking with under 5'10 for pitt.
Tom said on 12/Jan/16
If you zoom in on his shoes they look very questionable. Look at how the tongue/lace area are almost flat on Gosling's shoes yet on Brad's it looks up to a 45 degree angle. Very much how elevator shoes such as Don's look. Because of the extra heel height it is like wearing a small pair of heels like those that females wear and it is clear how that changes the angle of the foot. Much like when you stand on your tip toes.

Click Here
Josh said on 12/Jan/16
doc you need an eye doc for not seeing Pitt same height as Paltrow. telling other commentors "stupid" does not make Pitt any taller than Platrow. You need to learn some manners that in such websites people only argue about their own opinions not insulting others like 14 year old kids.
HeightObsession said on 12/Jan/16
Can be either 5'11 to 5'11.5. He is virtually the same height as my boyfriend who I have constantly measured as 5'11.5. I had my boyfriend stand next to the Madame Tussauds London Eye Brad Pitt wax model. Even though my boyfriend was did not have the best posture next to him, it looked like they were almost the same height. However, I suspect that Brad Pitt's heels were .25 inch taller than my boyfriend's. It could be possible Pitt was wearing lifts in his shoes, but I would confidently say 5'11.25 looks accurate.
6ft-on-a-good-day said on 12/Jan/16
closer look at the shoes. Click Here surpisingly the heel looks about a cm more than regular dress shoes for both. But i think this puts to bed the below 5"10 claims unless they're both shorter than claimed. I'd say the listing was there or there abouts.
Keith said on 12/Jan/16
Am I the only one who watched the video all the way through and noticed that any time Brad straightened up, he was at least as tall as Ryan? 0:20, 0:25, 0:30, 0:53 etc. Look at 0:57 to see Brad looking taller. Then 1:10 Brad goes full height and he just looks visibly bigger.
Dejavu said on 12/Jan/16
In that video brad Pitt looked an inch shorter than Gosling
TJE said on 11/Jan/16

Brad has a camera advantage later in the video, but in the beginning he doesn't. Also in the beginning, Ryan looks barely an inch taller than Brad when their posture is equal. Brad's shoes is questionable though; they look close to 2 inches thick.
Josh said on 11/Jan/16
Maybe Gosling had threatened Brad that if he wears his massive lifts he will do the same and dwarf Brad by billions of inches lol
Doc said on 11/Jan/16
Such a good looking man as Brad Pitt can't have a perfectly good height.., no no. Some people just want to downgrade him because they can. Jealous ****s.
And if you think Brad looks the same height as Paltrow barefoot then you're stupid, I've been looking at those photos now and any person with a slight hint of intelligence should be able to see that Brad is taller.
Jed said on 11/Jan/16
This video at the golden globes is interesting. He's standing next to Gosling and looks an inch or so shorter, but then he straightens up a couple of times and looks pretty much the same height. You'd think that if he was that height conscious he wouldn't slouch next to a taller dude for the bulk of the time he was standing next to him. He could have lifts in his shoes, but the shoes themselves look pretty standard.

Click Here

I don't think he could be under 5'11. 5'10 and below claims are a little silly.
whoa said on 10/Jan/16
Pitt is either 5'11 or 5'10. No taller, no shorter.

But honestly if he was 5'11 why would he desire to wear 2 or 3 inch lifts? Is he that insecure
Sam said on 10/Jan/16
I bet Pitt measures around the same height as Big Josh would, upper 5'10 range, maybe 179cm but no more.
Filippo said on 10/Jan/16
hijopotamus said on 27/Dec/15
Dan, if his height varies between 2 it means he is definetly the lowest, hello!

By far the most clever thing I read around here in a while!
Matt179 said on 9/Jan/16
Hes probaly 179cm out of bed, Hes defenetly Height concious, he wear Lift and big heel dress shoes.

I got a dress shoes generic brand(Not elevator) That got 1.25 heel, they look perfectly normal. I can stuff a 1 Inch lift inside the shoes and walk completly normal. Im 178cm midday, With these shoes it take me to 183cm(6 feet).

At 6 feet i dont tower Anyone i meet everywhere i go, But also i dont get tower by anyone. Feels good.
Josh said on 9/Jan/16
Brad Pitt is even shorter than Matt Damon. Search Matt Damon and Gwyneth Platrow and you will see that she's taller a little bit than Matt with heels and Matt has no height boost. As we have seen before Brad is the same height as Paltrow barefeet.
mickey said on 9/Jan/16
5'11 seems correct. though he can appear to be 6ft with his good posture.
Aaron Zamora said on 8/Jan/16
He looked huge in the movie The big Short he looked much bigger than Finn Whitrock who you have listed here as 5'9. Brad really does give the impression of a 6'1 or taller man as Clooney states. His height is actually irritating!
John said on 8/Jan/16
I'm going to say he is about 5'10. He is as tall as Michelle Forbes and shorter than David Duchovny. I don't think he was allowed to wear lifts in Kalifornia.
Celebheights 6'1.75/187 CM said on 7/Jan/16
Or if I offer him a few billion dollars, and some classes to grow taller lol.
hijopotamus said on 7/Jan/16
Mat, because he is not 5'11"! It's so obvious he is shorter than Willis and Geena Davis in flats while Pitt in COWBOYS! If Geena is 6' and Brad 5'11" Brad should have looked same height or even taller as cowboys are 5 cm heel....2 inches!

Anyone has seen Brad barefoot? Not even in the beach! Only in that pic with Paltrow where they look same height.
Mat said on 5/Jan/16
Rob, why wouldn't Brad let anyone measure him? He is supposed to be honest about his height since he is listed everywhere as 5'11. It's not like he claims a bigger height or the public believes he is taller. Since you estimate him a legit 5'11, he shouldn't have any objections. Unless... he is not that tall ;)
Editor Rob: to retain an air of mystery.
Josh said on 5/Jan/16
Mat the second picture of yours shows Brad having a smaller bone structure than Norton! It's obvious.
Collin said on 5/Jan/16
unless he was 5'3+ LOL
176.2 said on 4/Jan/16
@Kim Jansson
Next time please measure the most important part of his body haha
Celebheights 6'1.75/187 CM said on 3/Jan/16
There's no way that Brad Pitt would EVER let somebody measure him (unless he was 6'0"+).
Editor Rob: the only way you'll get to measure Brad Pitt is if you agree to do it blindfolded.
Mathew Robinson (190 cm) said on 2/Jan/16
Could this be the guy? Click Here
Aaron zamora said on 2/Jan/16
Rob, do you personally believe that Brad Pitt wears lifts or not?
Editor Rob: I think he's obviously at times worn a bigger heel like a 1.5 range shoe. Other times I think he may well have used a 1/2 inch lift, the kind that fits in a dress shoe and really is harder to spot.
brendan said on 2/Jan/16
Rob did you check The Big Short premiere photos?
Brad Pitt and Ryan Gosling was there.
I think they seemed same height or may be Gosling was just 1 cm taller.
What do you think Rob?
Editor Rob: Ryan could look no more than 6ft with Pitt, whose footwear really didn't look anything that suspicious!
Collin said on 1/Jan/16
You measured each other last year? Hahahaha! Are you sure he was Brad Pitt himself? lol. I think someone was trying to seduce you! lmfao
and if you think people have nothing good to do with their lives for posting here then you have found this website all of a sudden and out of nowhere I suppose? Who ever you are you made us laugh!
Josh said on 31/Dec/15
@Kim Jansson
I can't stop laughing. You're the funniest of all!
What did you think before posting exactly? Even if you were an A List superstar, Brad wouldn't let you wipe his back for him LOL
Derian said on 30/Dec/15
Honestly if he is short how is he standing taller than Claudia Schiffer. Even if he is using lifts he has to be tall enough to stand 6'0 or taller. That depends on Schiffer's real height though.
Kim Jansson said on 30/Dec/15
This is soo weird to read,havnt you people got better things to do? None of you knows **** and are just guessing and dissing each other. Im a danish actor,who are a friend of Brad. Im 180 cm and Brad is 177. We measured each other last year.
Mat said on 30/Dec/15
Rob, is it safe to say there's an inch between Pitt and Norton here? Click Here

Also look at that: Click Here

It's safe to say that Pitt had at least a 0.5 inch advantage on Norton shoe-wise in the film, and always came 0.5 shorter than Norton (who was slouching). Is 5'10.5 possible?
Editor Rob: stationery photos can be easier to judge than when people are in motion, but at times Pitt could look less than Norton, other times closer in height. Generally though, Pitt has the better posture out of the two.
Dmeyer said on 30/Dec/15
Just to let know , at telma and louise première Pitt has à shoes in the 1in type low cut and Witt almost no room for lifts also hé wasnt à list so no reason for , and hé looks close enaugh d'avis height like 1in smaller max and not more than 3,5-4in smaller than mac Donald whom i met met and was near 6ft3 10 years back
Heylo said on 29/Dec/15
Hijopotamus, He never looked under 5'10. Only in very strange angled photos where an NBA star would look like a midget (best example of this is the Ocean's 12 movie, in which he looks 5'8 or 5'7 next to George Clooney, the problem is that he is standing several meters from him, but for people who only glance at the photo, it looks like Brad is 5'8 and standing besides his pal George)
I've seen a lot of photos from the 90s. Go on Getty Images and search his name. Then go through the gallery from the 80s through the 90s. He did never look under 5'10, never. The Paltrow photo isn't as good evidence of his "5'9" height as you might think. Analyze the photo more and you will get an 5'10+ estimate of Brad's height.

Simple conclusion, he can't be under 5'10. If so, by a very small amount, almost unnoticeable.
Josh said on 28/Dec/15
In the picture that he is naked it is obvious that he has the legs of a 5'7-5'8 perosn. If you wanna claim 5'9 or 5'10 then his torso has to be unnaturally long! LOL
MarcusTheSwede said on 28/Dec/15
Hijopotamus: AGREE finally somebody seeing thru all crap. Brad hasnt magicly grown since movie with Geena Davis yeez and also liten to LEN below, Thanks hijopotamus
MarcusTheSwede said on 28/Dec/15
Hijopotamus: AGREE finally somebody seeing thru all crap. Brad hasnt magicly grown since movie with Geena Davis yeez Thanks hijopotamus
Dan said on 28/Dec/15
Geena Davis is 6 feet tall. Of course she's gonna look taller than him. And Bruce Willis had to be taller than him in 12 monkeys. It's the characters they were playing. I think Bruce Willis is easily 5-11, but could also be a little over 5-10. Brad Pitt is 5-10 and wears boots, big heeled shoes and sometimes lifts. That's why Pitt can near 6-0.
hijopotamus said on 27/Dec/15
Dan, if his height varies between 2 it means he is definetly the lowest, hello!
Shorter than Bruce Willies and shorter than Geena Davis even Pitt wearing cowboy boots! Pic with Paltrow, slightly taller than Redford. Too much evidence! PITT was never 5'11" in the 90s so theres no way he grew up in the 00s.
Dont you guys feel weird claiming 5'11"??
Dan said on 27/Dec/15
I'm anywhere from 5'10.5 to 5'11 and people assume I'm 6'0 to 6'1. I guess I would say Pitt is in the 5'10-11 range. I wouldn't pin a specific height on him since it always seems to change through his various roles.
hijopotamus said on 25/Dec/15
Under 5'10" for sure and 6' with his tricks.
Merry Xmas.
Blink said on 25/Dec/15
This is my take on it: Brad is 5'11 late night, which means throughout the day he ranges from 5'11.5-5'11. With shoes with an inch-an inch an a half (which isn't unreasonable at all), he would be at 6'0-6'1, which makes a lot of sense to me.
TJE said on 24/Dec/15
Emil, you're being WAY TOO GENEROUS!

Brad's MAYBE a weak 5' the morning.....on a perfect his platforms....and on his tiptoes.
Emil 183 cm said on 24/Dec/15
Haha, Rob, true that. But for real, Pitt being anything under than 5'10 is hysterical
Josh said on 24/Dec/15
Strong 5'10"? Who ONLY enjoys lifts? LOL!
Mathew Robinson (190 cm) said on 23/Dec/15
177-178 cm guy said on 23/Dec/15
I've said it before and i'll say it again: Strong 5'10" guy who enjoys lifts.


Dan said on 23/Dec/15
5-7 lmao.
Idk said on 23/Dec/15
I think listing is accurate. A 5'10 guy would have a much harder time pulling off 6 footer look which Pitt has
177-178 cm guy said on 23/Dec/15
I've said it before and i'll say it again: Strong 5'10" guy who enjoys lifts.
Emil 183 cm said on 22/Dec/15
Brad Pitt is actually 5'7. He's just wearing lifts and has photoshopped every picture of himself
Editor Rob: in the future there may be some form of virtualization technology that projects a realistic holographic 'overlay', so the wearer can program their desired height.

you won't need photoshop, you'll have guys like Justin Bieber looking 6ft 8 in public in 50 years time!
Len said on 21/Dec/15
Pitt isn't over 5'10".

Plenty of pics with him not looking more than about 4" taller than ex Jennifer Aniston (who's about 5' 4.5", and in heels would have 1.5" of footwear over Pitt in dress shoes).
Dmeyer said on 21/Dec/15
There are plenty of pics were Pitt looks 5cm taller than paltow while Pitt has shoes with no lifts
Simon said on 20/Dec/15
Rob, is 5'11 peak and 5'10.3/4 now possible?
Editor Rob: Pitt is a pretty fit guy. Was he a smoker for a while? If so that would increase the risks of disc degeneration.

I think he's held his height well though, I doubt he's lost anything noticeable.
Dan said on 20/Dec/15
5'5 you don't know what you're taking about. No one is saying Brad is a bad person, but everyone in Hollywood lies about their height. It's part of the job to appear taller and better looking. It's a fact.
Josh said on 20/Dec/15
Now even retards know that Brad isn't 5'11 you stupid 5'5 person. You are a troll too for posting here.
yes he could be 5'8 if Paltrow was 5'7. Depends on her REAL height. And yes Robert Downey Jr looks around 6 feet with Jude Law even though he is short. Thanks to Hollywood for faking their stature.
5'5 said on 20/Dec/15
He's 5'11 and does NOT wear lifts or inserts, you jealous midget men with your jealous inferiority complexes. You lot trying to downgrade Brad Pitt's height to make yourselves feel better are hilarious as well as pitiful! Instead of debating, try being a philanthropic humanitarian like Pitt instead of online trolls that you are.
RisingForce said on 20/Dec/15
People definitely make too much of the Paltrow pic. Remember, it's ONE pic. As Rob has shown many times, height differences can easily look bigger or smaller than they are in pics. Where did people get the idea that a pic will reflect the exact measured difference between two people? Plus, Pitt is still taller in the pic going by eye level, hairline and how much of his head his cut off by the frame. No, he doesn't look 2 inches taller, but it's not a perfect straight on angle anyway and probably taken from a distance. Looking 5'10" max in one pic doesn't mean he is.
dmeyer said on 20/Dec/15
All the pics were clooney is taller than brad have bad agles or clooney is Closer to camera
S.J.H said on 18/Dec/15
I know pitt could be 5'10 or 5'10.5 in reality as i have just seen the barefeet picture with a 5'9 gwyneth paltrow. Unless paltrow was 5'9.25 there pitt could comfortably hit 5'11. Added that clooney was not over 5'10 and maybe dipping few mm below 178cm and Damon 5'9.25
sebs said on 17/Dec/15
5'11 for the last time
MJKoP said on 17/Dec/15
5'11", plain and simple.
Dan said on 17/Dec/15
If Brad Pitt was 5-8 ( my height ), how do you explain him standing at 5-11 in flat Vans sneakers. Not tricky shoes like you guys say. Actual Vans sneakers. Sneakers that I own. Cole haan boots that I also own. Guidi boots. A 5-8 guy CANNOT pull of 5-11 to 6-0 in regular shoes or boots. You cannot fit two inch lift in a pair of normal fitting boots. It's impossible. The boot won't close. I've tried it before with an inch lift. Your feet start hurting like crazy. I've made countless posts on here tell you guys the specific brand and model of the shoes and boots he's worn for about ten years now. The only time Brad Pitt wears true elevator shoes is during major premiers when he's standing next tall celebs.
Dan said on 17/Dec/15
Lmao!!! 5-8!!! Now he's short. So now Pitt is as tall as Johnny Depp and Downey Jr. Hilarious bro.
nathaniel said on 16/Dec/15
5'10''.75 or 5'11''
hijopotamus said on 16/Dec/15
Dmeyer, we all saw pics of Clooney taller than Brad...
dmeyer said on 16/Dec/15
Clloney is not less than 179 peak at least and damon not less than 177 so its hard to see brad under 179.5-180 , in the sleepers pic up you can tell his foot is not lifted and that he get max 0,5-0,75 out of those and look 182cm with them on
Josh said on 15/Dec/15
Mat, you are no one to say anything EXACT and CERTAIN about his height. saying " no, he's nowhere near 5'9." is stupid. You haven't seen him to be this certain. I have a friend who saw him while filming moneyball and he said that Brad is around 5'9 or 5'8. Yes he is short. And yes you are fooled.
Mat said on 15/Dec/15
lil steve said on 13/Dec/15
Brad Pitt is exactly 5 feet 9 inches tall which is not bad at all. met him in Los An a while back. he's a cool dude. we were at the exact same eye level so I am almost more than certain. pretty average height. average sized man. I am a super big fan of his acting ability too. brad is an astonishing actor. very outstanding. his movies are obviously awesome. everybody loves this man and his high caliber performances. whatta great guy.

It's really funny how these downgraders are trying to mask their hate for actors saying a bunch of nice things along with their 2 inch donwngrade to make it sound believable. No, Pitt is nowhere near 5'9. If want to argue a lower height, argue 5'10 for him. Anything below 5'10 is nonsense. Pitt is somewhere in the 5'10-5'11 range for sure. A legit 5'10.5 at night sounds really probable to me, at that height you can appear tall with the right pair of shoes and posture to almost everyone.
Jim said on 14/Dec/15
Why does he look taller then eddie redmayne? Either eddie is 5'9 or Brad 6'1
Collin said on 14/Dec/15
Paltrow is not standing straight in that photo.
hijopotamus said on 14/Dec/15
Heylo, Rob had Brad at 6' not so long ago...
ok, lets asume Brad is taller than Paltrow, ok, but 2 inches??? are you crazy? half an inch at the very most! 5'9" Paltrow, under 5'10" Brad....under 5'10"...
Editor Rob: 10 years is a long time, he's been holding 5ft 11 for a long time now, he doesn't want to lose it...
TJE said on 13/Dec/15
You'll find more lift wearers on the General Height page than in Hollywood...Just sayin...
lil steve said on 13/Dec/15
I am an average sized guy too. "lil steve" just sounds better than plain ol "steve"
lil steve said on 13/Dec/15
Brad Pitt is exactly 5 feet 9 inches tall which is not bad at all. met him in Los An a while back. he's a cool dude. we were at the exact same eye level so I am almost more than certain. pretty average height. average sized man. I am a super big fan of his acting ability too. brad is an astonishing actor. very outstanding. his movies are obviously awesome. everybody loves this man and his high caliber performances. whatta great guy.
Heylo said on 12/Dec/15
Josh, I never saw Brad as tall. What I've said in the past on this site is that he could be anywhere around 178-181cm. I also said that he looks tall with some shoes. A journalist who met him said he looked tall as well. I'm sure he can LOOK tall in height boosting shoes. Tall = 6ft+

hijo, what do you mean "show us"? He is tilting his god damn head in the Paltrow photo. Look at his forehead and how he would look at least 1 inch taller than her if he stood up straight. The angle of the photo is not super perfect either. Of course we can't know for 100% though. I THINK he LOOKS like a natural 5'11 but counting in lifts, I think he COULD be 5'10 barefoot. But I DON'T think he's as low as 5'9.
You can think whatever you want. Rob has him listed at 5'11, 2 inches from his real height you say? No, Brad can't be fooling us all, looking 5'11 consistently through his life being 5'9...
Josh said on 10/Dec/15
Heylo, You think you're good at counting? you're not that good at it my friend. I saw your comments from very long ago that you argued with people and insisted on Brad's height being tall. Ok dude, just don't hurt yourself. I know the truth yes but I don't care if you'll accept it or not. Everything about Hollywood actors is fake. Brad's height is fake as well. He is short. End of story.
hijopotamus said on 10/Dec/15
Heylo, show us how he is 2,54 cm taller than 5'9 Paltrow.
What is obvious is that he is not 5'11"
so bad listing, Rob!
Heylo said on 9/Dec/15
Josh, yeah yeah yeah, keep talking like you know the truth. "no way on earth that he is taller than 5'9" lol. He can't be 5'9, it's impossible. Weak 5'10 maybe but as low as 5'9.. no.
Everyone who can count in angles and head tilting on photos know that Brad looks taller than Gwyneth by at least an inch. He's 5'10+.
RisingForce said on 9/Dec/15
I agree, bam, or at least I think he has to be between 5'10.5" and 5'11". Usually looks more 5'11.5"-6' due to boots and posture. Heylo, nobody has posted a direct 6 ft claim from Brad. He seemed to still be listed 5'11" at the time of Interview with the Vampire, but seemed to start getting 6 ft listings mid to late 90's. But for claims from Brad himself, the only one anyone has posted here is the 5'11" claim from 1987.
Josh said on 8/Dec/15
and Paltrow was listed 172 before all these 175 claims. These people trying to prove that Brad is 5'10 are either Brad Pitt himself commenting with different names or they are highly paid to close their eyes on the facts LOL
Josh said on 8/Dec/15
what does it have to do with other people wearing shoes. What I said is easily understandable. No 5'10 guy is in need of huge lifts! There is no way on earth that he is taller than 5'9. those lifts give him at least 12 cm height boost.
Josh said on 8/Dec/15
what does it have to do with other people wearing shoes. What I said is easily understandable. No 5'10 guy is in need of huge lifts! There is no way on earth that he is taller than 5'9. those lifts give him at least 12 cm height boost.
Dan said on 8/Dec/15
Brad was about 1-2 inches shorter than Geena Davis at the Thelma and Louise premiere. He was in flat rockabilly wing tip shoes. No way Geena Davis is under 6-0, when she's looked taller than Bruce Willis and about the same height as Tom Hanks and Sam Jackson. I think that Thelma and Louise is a big part of why people can think Pitt is in the 5-9 range. And guy 5-10 is gonna look small next to Davis.
dmeyer said on 8/Dec/15
Brad looks same height as Chris pine if You compare him to cumberbatch
bam said on 7/Dec/15
the guy is 5'11. Perfect height to look both tall or average. why debate this?
dmeyer said on 7/Dec/15
Click Here , 6'0.25 in This pic
hijopotamus said on 7/Dec/15
Josh, you are so right!! a guy that stands 5'11" as this site states, should be 6 feet with regular dress shoes. I'm 182 and I reach 188 with army boots plus an extra insole (not even a lift).
Why we never see Pitt barefoot? why he was the only one wearing boots in Troy??? hhmmm....a bit strange, huh? Brad is 5'10" max and after a good morning stretch. 5'9"ish in the evening. Too much evidence. Paltrow pic should should shut up everyone that disagrees with me.
Jason said on 7/Dec/15
@Josh You don't look 181 cm when you're 178 because you wear shoes, unless people are standing in socks. No way, he's not below 5' 9". He is 5' 10" at his lowest in my opinion, as stated in the audition form. Pretty average guy.
Joe said on 6/Dec/15

Brad Pitt actually looks the same height as Tarantino in his custom shoes: Click Here

I think this just confirms that Brad Pitt uses enormous lifts at times. Tarantino seems pretty secure about his height. He's a director, not an actor, and he seems to be truly 6'1'' with a broad frame as well. Gosling also strikes me as a pretty tall actor who is confident about his height. Brad Pitt is the one who feels insecure about his height because his stature doesn't match his ego. His listing at 5'11'' throws everything else off because it simply isn't true.
Dmeyer said on 6/Dec/15
The shortest i have seen Brad looks is with Tarantino and Paltrow but with can also look 5'11+
Dan said on 6/Dec/15
Guys, Brad Pitt is 5-10 and wears lifts to get up to 6-0 for premieres or anywhere that he'll be photographed with actors who are over 5-10. No mystery. He has very small feet ( he mentioned it in his 20's ) which allow him to wear inserts and elevator shoes and still appear to have regular feet. He has thick calves and thick ankles so when he wears shorts his legs don't look abnormally long with lifts.
dmeyer said on 6/Dec/15
Click Here , those add just over 0.25in 7mm i tried them with many shoes , if brad wear those in a 3.5cm shoes he get a lidl over 4cm boots thats a lot over a typical 0.9in shoe
Josh said on 5/Dec/15
to all these genius people claiming that Brad is 178! every 178 cm guy on this planet EASILY looks 181 cm with NORMAL shoes on! So he CLEARLY is short! and CLEARLY shorter than 5'9!
Dejavu said on 5/Dec/15
Something doesn't add up here. Brad Pitt could look up to 3 inches shorter than 6'1 Tarantino yet he could look similar to Ryan Gosling. Either Ryan Gosling is not as listed or Brad Pitt occasionally wears lifts.

Click Here
Click Here

Heights are barefeet estimates, derived from quotations, official websites, agency resumes, in person encounters with actors at conventions and pictures/films.

Other vital statistics like weight, shoe or bra size measurements have been sourced from newspapers, books, resumes or social media.

Celebrity Fan Photos and Agency Pictures of stars are © to their respective owners.