How tall is Brad Pitt ?

Home :: Bookmark :: About  

Brad Pitt height: 5ft 11in (180 cm)

American actor best known for movies such as Se7en, Fight Club, Snatch, Oceans Thirteen, Troy and World War Z. A newspaper article on heights (washington post) quoted as saying people had seen Pitt put down 5ft 10 on an audition form for his height. Well, before he was A-list, aged 24 he wrote his own height as 5ft 11 in a teen magazine profile. At times he can appear taller, but with impeccable posture and at times, in the last few years, cuban type heels, that is a given. Even his good friend George Clooney was wise to his footwear, saying once in USA Today:) "He's tall. He's like 6-1. It's irritating".


Brad with Angelina Jolie, Jonah Hill and Claudia Schiffer
Photo by PR Photos
Add your opinion on the Height of Brad Pitt

Your Comment:

smokingnun says on 24/Oct/14
There was a post by Dan with an image of pitt standing next to high school lockers and he was barefeet. It was for a ABC pilot back in 1989. I searched online for sizes of thsese high school lockers, and they come in three sizes (height) 48.5", 60" and 72". So I calculated pitt's height to the relative lockers nearby and can conclusively and confidently say he is between 5'9" and 5'9.5" see my link for my analysis.

Click Here

you can now close all arguments about pitt's height and everyone can agree he is around 5'9". case closed!
pauly e says on 23/Oct/14
Dmeyer says on 23/Oct/14
Wath are you Talking about pitt shoes are skate type the Heel starts well way below wath it looks it give 0.6in range

I wouldn't argue with that, but Fallon's give next to nothing. in the shot where you see the shoes you can tell Fallon's shoes have virtually no sole....I have a pair like them and they give almost no boost at all. so i stand by my statement that Pitt has the footwear advantage and is closer to 179 than 180 cm.
Heylo says on 23/Oct/14
Looks like Pitt might have a very small advantage with his shoes (an advantage not very noticeable). Fallon is probably like 2cm taller in this particular video. But i think the difference would be slightly bigger if they were barefeet, like 3-4cm. Just a theory. I could be wrong! But if that's the case, then Brad is once again put at 178cm/5'10.
lelman says on 23/Oct/14
Pitt looks a weak 5ft 11 with Fallon, which is exactly what he is. In his prime I'm sure he was a fraction taller, but I doubt he has lost much height considering his excellent posture and active lifestlye.
Dmeyer says on 23/Oct/14
Click Here , pitt shoes with fallon 0.6in type also his foot pose is very normal , brad is secure about his height if he faced fallon Like that he could have worn nike shox plus 0.5in and he would have looked 1in taller than fallon
Dmeyer says on 23/Oct/14
Wath are you Talking about pitt shoes are skate type the Heel starts well way below wath it looks it give 0.6in range
ed says on 23/Oct/14
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here

pitt is in the 178-179 range without his footwear
Jon says on 23/Oct/14
Brad Pitt is definitely my favorite actor. In my opinion one of the greatest living actors along with Samuel Jackson and Gary Oldman. What would you say his head size is Rob?
[Editor Rob: possibly a little over average, but not really much.]
truth says on 22/Oct/14
@Brad he is only 50 lol, at that age you probably only start shrinking.
pauly e says on 22/Oct/14
those shoes fallon has on do not add much. i have a pair similar to them. Fallon looks about a half inch taller to me, but Pitt's shoes are bigger. assuming Pitt is not packing, Pitt is probably an inch less than Fallon. What is Fallon: 5'11.5?
Dmeyer says on 22/Oct/14
Pitt has no advantage over fallon if anything d'allonger could have a few MM more shoes , brad foot pose is normal , brad at 50 with normal shoes can look a 5'11 Guy looks similar to arnold who has more shoes , arnie is defenetly not 6ft and brad is defenetly close to 5'11
Dmeyer says on 22/Oct/14
Click Here , brad is doing ok facing a 182cm solid Guy also back to back he looks barely shorter type brad pitt jimmy fallon on the net if he is not 180cm he has got to be 179.5cm
cobra says on 21/Oct/14
Click Here

Pitt face to face with Fallon at 2:18, and then BACK TO BACK with Fallon at 2:41.

If you pause at EXACTLY 2:26 you get a close up of Pitt's shoe, he has a definite advantage there, and still comes off as a bit shorter.
Dmeyer says on 21/Oct/14
Jon bernthal looked a bit smaller than pitt in première now in Paris he looked a bit taller than pitt , jon had 0.2in léss shoes but better posture and closer to camera
Brad says on 21/Oct/14
Dude is getting older. He was probably taller.5-11 6ft.
Heylo says on 20/Oct/14
Snatch... Your statements about proportions is way wrong. You can have short legs & be tall, that is seen everyday. Now go & never come back unless you have something interesting to point out about Brad's height.
Ella says on 20/Oct/14
@Fillipo thanks for that sayin, you took the words outta my mouth.. I mean does height really matter? Its aboit what you use it to achieve, I'm 5'11.5 tall as a girl, and believe me I plan on using it to make waves, really "no one can really judge an inch in normal life"
cole says on 20/Oct/14
@snatch (I take it that's what you meant when you wrote "snath" as your nickname): Seriously, what on earth are you on about? You don't even understand your own arguments. You go ahead and believe he's a 176-177 cm guy wearing 3-4in footwear everywhere he goes, and keep neglecting the very fact that proportions don't matter - it's the difference between the top of two people's heads you should be focusing on. And if you believe Pitt is wearing lifts all the time, at least take the time to look at some pics and consider how much of an advantage he would ACTUALLY have.
5ft10guy says on 19/Oct/14
5ft9-5ft10 I saw him riding a motorcycle in tmz I think and his arms and legs didnt look long .I think hes just 5ft9.5 with lifts 5ft11 to 6ft
Yep says on 19/Oct/14
1 thing to add 1 inch to your height but to add 2-3 inches is just crazy.
Yep says on 19/Oct/14
So he wrote 5'10 when he was auditioning? Then he's 5'10 but since he became an A-lister he was 5'11-6'1.
Filippo says on 18/Oct/14
I think heylo put it perfectly. Not a full 180, but not under 178. Solid tallish average guy. Ok, he is not a giant, so what? He has goddamn face, hair, body proportions and..height too. Tall average means he is perfect for the vast majority of female population out there. Who needs to reach 6' when you have his blessings? mind that virtually no one could really judge an inch in normal life..
Master Jedi says on 18/Oct/14
At the Fury Premiere with 5'7.5 listed Logan Lerman, 5'7 Michael Pena, 5'11 Jon Bernthal, and 5'9 listed Shia Labeouf

Click Here

Click Here

Click Here

Click Here
Joe says on 18/Oct/14
I bet you he's no taller than 5'11". He's not even 5'11" out of bed.
Chris says on 17/Oct/14
It doesn't matter how tall he is because he's such a good actor jelly manlet brahs
Dan says on 17/Oct/14
As you can see, the guys proportions are so perfect he even has thick muscular calves and small feet. You know how hard it is to have muscular thick calves on a very lean frame? Perfect athletic body.
Dan says on 17/Oct/14
Click Here This is a pic of brad from 1989. So hard to gauge this guy because of his shoulders and his physique. It's funny. It looks like he can be both above average and average. Still can't imagine him being shorter than 5-10 or a hair under.
snath says on 17/Oct/14
cole

so your saying if someone is 5 foot 10 with a 14 inch head
then we still shouldn't use proportions?

that is ludacris

he has short legs and a normal torso

just because pitt flaunts his average torso
and walks around like he's the man
does not mean he has a super mans torso

so please stop using his torso as if it is out the
ordinary its not its average

usually 99% of the time if someone has short legs
then they are short

your legs are the big factor in which if you are tall or not
NOT your torso your legs are the biggest muscle


seeing his barefoot photos and clearly seeing me and him have
about the same length legs and just about the same torso i just can't
see him reach 178 maybe in the morning but definitely not
during the day

ok legs say pitt at 176.cm wearing 1.5 heels with 1.5 lifts now add 7 cm
to 176 you get= 184.12

now eric bana at 6 foot 2 with 1 inch shoes would be 6 foot 3 would be 190.5

explains why pitt was 5 to 7 CM'S shorter then bans

its all in the math
truth says on 17/Oct/14
@cole well to me he looks like a strong 5ft10 mostly disregarding proportions.
ajcf1995 says on 17/Oct/14
Click Here
Heylo says on 17/Oct/14
Cole, that's right but some people here think proportions are evidence of someones height, that is pure bull****.
Celebheights 188 CM says on 16/Oct/14
6'3" Will Ferrell isn't that much taller than him:

Click Here

183 CM doesn't seem impossible.
cole says on 16/Oct/14
Stop using his goddamn proportions as an excuse. I'm 5'11, my legs are the same length as a bunch of 5'8-9 friends, my torso the same length as a 6'1.5 friend - I've got longer arms than him too. Proportions don't matter.
C-MO says on 15/Oct/14
180cm morning 178cm night would be my guess for him ...so 179cm as midday height

he looks that height proportion wise to me ...just gives that vibe

same height as mike tyson
Heylo says on 15/Oct/14
Here are newly photos for those who think Brad have "average" or long legs. He doesn't have extremely short legs by any means but some fracture under average is possible. That's why he looks so perfectly proportioned in heeled shoes with small lifts.

Click Here
Click Here

Keep in mind when looking at the photos that his legs probably look shorter than what they are with those saggy pants too. However, if you would judge his height on those photos you would probably say that he doesn't look tall at all, that's the illusion of short legs. Having the shirt stuck into your pants & heeled shoes with this bodytype gives off the best look where the upperbody & the legs looks quite balanced. And he looks fractions over 6ft on big events.

He is around 5'10, anything else under 177 is madness.
Heylo says on 15/Oct/14
Snatch, you are so full of ****. You are saying that "he can't be taller than me(5'8) with that kind of bone structure". You can be 7 inches tall and have legs of a 6'4 guy, proportions is very individual. Ever heard of Michael Phelps? Swimmers for example have to have long upper bodies to be successful.

Brad have the same body proportions & structure as i do too. Just as you Snatch, guess what, i am 5'10 (or at least almost, 177cm). I know a guy who's 6'3 and he have the same body structure as i do.

Brad is a typical Ectomorph, long relatively small neck, naturally thin forearms & calves. That + the proportions, rather short legs & a long torso(not necessarily part of the ectomorph though) . Perfect body for looking good with lifts. Perfect body from a beauty aspect when it comes to fitness.

The only reason Clooney might look taller than Pitt just by looking at them is Clooneys legs. Long legs gives off that tall look. But long legs are at the same giving off a very "weak" upperbody look. Then there are some people, very few that have almost perfect balanced proportions.


I don't agree with you Snatch about Brad Pitt's head either. It's definitely not small, it's not huge either but it's definitely not small. His jaw is about the same size as his head(which shows how wide jaw he has=testosterone), look at when he had a buzzcut. When you have hair the actual hairline makes the head look smaller cause we are often judging headsize by how big the forehead LOOKS.
Silent_D says on 15/Oct/14
177cm. He looked quite taller than shia labeouf in fury and the other costars. He is wearing huge army boots too.
Dan says on 14/Oct/14
Sam put it right on the money
truth says on 14/Oct/14
@Sam fully agree with you, he looks around 178-179cm mostly.
Dmeyer says on 14/Oct/14
I agree if he was 5'9-10 he would need huge shoes to look 6ft
Tim says on 13/Oct/14
5-10.25 to 5-11
178-180
Sam says on 13/Oct/14
Don't think he's the full 5'11 myself, but I don't think he's under 5'10 either, more a fraction over if anything. Solid 5'10 no doubt. 178cm - 179cm. Looks the same as me proportionally. Legit 5'11 guys like Timberlake or Beckham just give a taller impression and don't look that far away from the tallish range, whereas Pitt looks a bit shy of that in normal footwear. However I have no problem with people saying he's 5'11, just think its a little too kind for him but still in that 5'10 - 5'11 area he has to be in.
cole says on 13/Oct/14
@Snatch: A lot of people think he's near 5'11, and rightly so - he'd have had to wear much bigger footwear than he does to pull off looking as tall as he can look, had he been just 5'9-10.
Nate 177 says on 13/Oct/14
Brad Pitt is 5' 11".
Dmeyer says on 12/Oct/14
Me and rob think pitt is 5'10.75-11
Parker says on 12/Oct/14
snatch says on 10/Oct/14
blink no one here thinks pitt is 5 11

I think he's 5'11. 5'10.5 minimum.
Arch Stanton says on 12/Oct/14
jamie179cm says on 11/Oct/14
Arch Stanton 1 5ft11 isn't tall 2 im 5ft10.5 and i think i have a bigger body frame

I know it's not, upper average more like, but you can tell a lot of visitors here want him to be short or average and seem angry with 5'11 for him!
jamie179cm says on 12/Oct/14
ok i could wrong about pitts body frame and body structures but look at him next Claudia Schiffer who i think could be as low as 178cm shes in flats and hes in lifts without the lifts i think she would be a bit taller than him and anyway why would a legit 5ft11 wear lifts all the time? also a 5ft11 guy in lifts would be around 6ft1 6ft2 which i doubt pitt is in his lifts
184.3cm says on 12/Oct/14
Not Shorter than 179cm. Hits 185 in his elevators, 183 in boots, 182 in sneakers. Never looks shorter.
jamie179cm says on 12/Oct/14
@cole ok man that your opinion
cole says on 11/Oct/14
@jamie179cm: Look man... He's taller than you - at worst the same height, just accept it already.
jamie179cm says on 11/Oct/14
Arch Stanton 1 5ft11 isn't tall 2 im 5ft10.5 and i think i have a bigger body frame than he does 3 that picture with Paltrow he wasn't much taller than her and i think she 5ft8 4 a 5ft9 guy can wear 2.5 to to get up to 182cm 5 i doubt hes 6ft1 in lifts
cole says on 11/Oct/14
That should do it haha. A fine reminder at the top now for you guys wishing to argue 5'9-10 ;)
Arch Stanton says on 11/Oct/14
Jay 184cm says on 9/Oct/14
Scroll down to the famous photo of 5'9" Paltrow with Pitt barefoot:
Click Here
Then tell me again that he is 5'11".....

It's one picture. And what about the many many comparison with Paltrow where he looks 5'10.5-5'11?
Arch Stanton says on 11/Oct/14
Nice photos for comparison, LOL he always wears black and grey.
snath says on 10/Oct/14
willam hague posture is terrible

plus lifts make someone with good posture appear even taller

he has never hit 6 foot 1 in lifts eric bana proved that
snath says on 10/Oct/14
willam hague posture is terrible

plus lifts make someone with good posture appear even taller

he has never hit 6 foot 1 in lifts eric bana proved that
blink says on 10/Oct/14
Right snatch, you actually believe Rob is wrong and Pitt actually lies about his height. He might be a lift wearer at times but there's no way he would ever measure below 5'10.75.
Arch Stanton says on 10/Oct/14
snatch says on 10/Oct/14
blink no one here thinks pitt is 5 11

let alone it being a fact lol

I do. I think he'd measure near it, at least earlier in the day.
jed says on 10/Oct/14
There's a picture of him next to 5'10 William Hague where he looks 6'1. I mean lifts or no lifts getting from 5'10-6'1 is some accomplishment.
cole says on 10/Oct/14
@Editor Rob: Maybe it's time to do something about these people who come to Brad's page every single day with mockery, offensive comments and a fresh load of 5'9-crap?
pauly e says on 10/Oct/14
Jay 184cm says on 9/Oct/14
Scroll down to the famous photo of 5'9" Paltrow with Pitt barefoot:
Click Here
Then tell me again that he is 5'11".....

yeah, he does not look 2" taller than here there....and that's assuming she really is 5'9. she may be a bit less.
Arch Stanton says on 10/Oct/14
Rob can you add a photo or two like Cruise? @Blink Because to some (short or barely average) people commenting here 5 ft 11 is tall and they don't want the man to look as good as he is and be tall. They want to think he's average height as some consolation :-) In the early 90s they have a point, he did seem smaller, but since about 1995 I don't know how anybody could really think he's under 5 ft 10. He mostly looks 182 than 178 or lower. On occasions he can look 5'10 ish though,
snatch says on 10/Oct/14
blink no one here thinks pitt is 5 11

let alone it being a fact lol
kyuss says on 9/Oct/14
5-11" for sure
Jay 184cm says on 9/Oct/14
Scroll down to the famous photo of 5'9" Paltrow with Pitt barefoot:
Click Here
Then tell me again that he is 5'11".....
snatch says on 9/Oct/14
lmao at blink

how do you know for a fact that pitt is 5 11 have you measured him?

no one is upset in fact if anyone is upset is his fans that he
lied about his height

so before you write non sense try to find a reason why
we should not downgrade him

show us some pictures or references that prove your opinion no sorry i mean
your fact

because i have listed 100 posibilites that even 5 foot 10 is a stretch for him
and i can say a lot of people here have agreed that he has never passed
178 cm after the morning

heres a fact blink

the man has been in lifts since the 80s till this day

if you have been in lifts since the 80s you should
grab a box of tissues because thats sad
truth178cm says on 9/Oct/14
Because blink he is good looking succesfull male with a decent height and that upsets the majority who do not share his experience.
blink says on 8/Oct/14
Why are people so upset with the fact Pitt is 5'11? I see lots of people trying to downgrade him for no reason lol.
snatch says on 7/Oct/14
haha! some of you people trying to get brad above 180! how stupid and ridiculous. its so simple. you can say he has really really short legs, they are not average legs that you would find on most men. the rest of his height is his average torso . he is not a very normal height guy. he can't even pass for a 180 guy let alone 6

chris you need to see a doctor 95% of the people here say that 5 foot 10 is a stretch for him

actually chris should no pitts exact height he is brad pitts slave lmao
Chris says on 7/Oct/14
Haha! Some of you people trying to get Brad under 180! How stupid and ridiculous. It is so simple. You can't say he has short legs. They are standard, average legs that you would find on most men, even men who are below world average. The rest of his height is his above average torso length. He is a very normal 180 guy and to look at he could easily pass for 6 foot.
snath says on 5/Oct/14
he is not 2 inches off six feet
hes more like 3 and half inches off

say what you say he's short he has short legs

if someone has short legs its Impossible for them to b 2 inches 6 feet
i don't no how you do no know that

short legs = not a 6 footer
short legs = short
short legs = impossible for being anything close to 6 feet
short legs = average height
short legs = using lifts
short legs = not tall
short legs = no way even close to 178
short legs= small body structure
short legs = always look short

long torso = average
long torso= doesn't really have anything to do with height
long torso= even a short person could have a long torso
long torso= is not the reason why people are tall
long torso = really doesn't mean your tall


the people commenting are funny you show them a picture thats solid evidence
then they will say the camera angle was off ( what certification do you have in photography
to make such a assumption)

if you show pitt under a height chart that shows he's 5 foo t9
people here will say that the height chart was off by a inch or two

i have met pitt and i have met jauqin phoenix

jauqin phoenix saids he's only 5 foot 8

and when i met pitt he was the same exact height as jauqin same
body structures

pitt looked 1.5 to 2 inches taller then me max and he was in
heeled shoes at hollywood

he was short in person so don't tell me he's 5 foot 10
i have a 5 foot 10 friend and he was taller then pitt
Vibram says on 5/Oct/14
snath, I'd give Pitt the benefit of the doubt he's probably a weak 5ft10 out of bed.
Magnet99 says on 5/Oct/14
B. Pitt is min. 180 cm tall - claims under 179 cm is absolute nonsense!
snath says on 4/Oct/14
vibram

best photos i have ever seen proof he's shorter then clooney

and when lifted is taller
TJE says on 4/Oct/14
*I've seen
truth178cm says on 4/Oct/14
I think he is being pretty honest with 5ft11, he is only rounding a few fractions up, less than an inch. Pitt is 6ft0.5-6ft1 in lifts, not 5ft11, and he owns Clooney in that regard, that pic that Vibram posted is a perfect example of a bad camera angle, just like the one where Pitt is a few meters closer to the camera and he looks a lot shorter than Clooney. In 90% of pics he looks 1-2cm taller than him, mostly he is not lifted unless at carpet events.
snath says on 4/Oct/14
5 foot 10 is ok tall

its only 2 inches off 6 feet

i just can't see him bang on 178
i can't see him only 2 inches off 6 feet

i can see him 3 inches off 6 feet
or even 2 and half inches off 6 feet

but a solid 2 inches seems highly unlikely

he does have good proportions but thats it
he doesn't have long legs

usually torsos have really nothing to do with height
legs are what make people tall
if someone has long legs they are always tall

if someone has a long torso it doesn't mean there tall

pitt has short legs if someone has short legs theres no chance
they are only 2 inches off 6 feet
Justanotherguy says on 4/Oct/14
Oh great, sluthate A.K.A. PUA Hate. A depressing forum of lonely guys who sit around all day and post how unfair the world is to them. And coming from Vibram. Classic.

All those pictures that show Brad Pitt as "short" are completely unfavorable and taken at angles to intentionally make him look shorter than his co-stars.

There is one in particular that show Christolph Waltz who is 5'7 look close to his height.. Yeah right.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 3/Oct/14
Pitt has never really lied about his height, in fairness to him. He could easily have claimed 6ft or even taken the biscuit and claimed 6ft1.

His claim is feasible enough.
TJE says on 3/Oct/14
Lol at all these people claiming Brad slips chunky insoles into his shoes. With some of the pics I 've being posted here, the only possible way for him to do that is have the bottom half of his feet amputated, but he wouldn't be walking if he did. The closest Brad gets to lifts is a 3-4 cm thick shoe with a 1-1.5 cm insole slipped in.

With that said, he can look anywhere from 178 to 182. I think 179-180 range is fair.
Heylo says on 3/Oct/14
I'm pretty sure by now that he is 177cm. Take or give a few mm. But he is actually about the exact same height as me then.. lol But i feel his little concern about his height, i mean, you're one inch from a perfectly "accepted" height by both women & men even though you are about 2-3 inches from the "ideal".
jamie179cm says on 3/Oct/14
truth178cm look celebrity lie about there heights i would say paltrow is 5ft8 and brad is between 175cm 177cm im sorry but his body frame doesn't give me a impression of 5ft10 guy
Vibram says on 2/Oct/14
lol. Click Here
truth178cm says on 2/Oct/14
Looks taller than 5ft9-5ft9.5 Schroeder by an inch. Looks at least around 5ft11 with 5ft9 Paltrow. Stop downgrading him lol.
cobra says on 2/Oct/14
What about this picture with Julia Roberts?

Click Here
Jay 184cm says on 1/Oct/14
Pitt and Paltrow - almost identical height in most of these photos, except the ones where he's wearing boots: Click Here
He looks 176-177cm here, natural height.
Jay 184cm says on 1/Oct/14
Once you've seen Pitt in Across The Tracks it's hard to see him past 177cm. He looks no taller than 177cm-listed Rick Schroeder in that film: Click Here
He didn't grow after that film - he was already 27! He's 5'9.5" or at the very most 5'10".
snatch says on 1/Oct/14
Lawrence Gilliard Jr's

^ pitt is the same exact height as him
snatch says on 1/Oct/14
i know he's taller then me but not by much

if i were to compare my bone structure with clooenys i would say
clooney has a bigger bone structure

but if i were to compare pitt and me i would say we are close ( I'm not saying I'm
attractive or whatever im saying very similar bone structure)

i would say he's 5 10 only in the morning
in the day and night he's about at 5 foot 9 and 5 or 75

if he was walking 5 foot 10 at night with 1.5 heels and 1.5 lifts then he would be
6 foot 1 flat in shoes with lifts

but he struggles to hit 6 foot 1 all the time which is why
i don't see him at 5 foot 10

he seems to hit 5 11 on the dot

but he struggles to hit 6 foot in lifts

which is why people here argue that he is in the 5 foot 9 range

a 5 foot 10 guy with proper shoes would hit 6 feet without struggle

i have never seen him hit 6 feet without struggle he always looks like
he's walking on heels


look at the jacka** cameo he did when he was being kidnapped
look at how he walks with the shoes he's got it looks like
he's wearing heels walking down the street
truth178cm says on 1/Oct/14
Anywhere from 177-178cm to 180-181cm is fine. Can look from strong average to slightly above average. Never ever short or below average.
Dan says on 30/Sep/14
In Thelma and Louise germs Davis michael madsen and the guy who played Davis' husband are all tall. Reason he looked shorter in those days is because he didn't have the star power to have people cast shorter then him. In interview with a vamp he easily looks 5-10 considering cruise was lifted. In fight club he looks easily 5-11 with the big shoes he wears the hodgman Lakestream fishing boots. In meet joe black he was really really lifted and often looked 6-1 in the film. His star had risen and he had to be tall in the film. That's probably when he started really lifting. In seven he did appear 5-11.
Dan says on 30/Sep/14
First, I do agree clooney is either as tall or a less the an inch taller then pitt. Second, I don't know what you mean about a stocky 5-10 guy looking 5-8. That statement is only regarding peoples perception of what 5-8 or 5-10 looks like. And since everyone is bad at telling height, that argument is not valid. Anyone who has a good eye for height would never confuse 5-8 with 5-10. Never. It's two inches of difference which maker he difference between short then average and average. Also, brad has a small head yes, the dome of his skull is small and round, but his face is not small at all. He has a tall face. From his hair line to his chin is long. Trust me, I've owned many sunglasses that he has and even the biggest sunglasses don't look huge on him. Just look at him in fight club. Clooney appears to have bigger bones cause he is way slimmer and bonier then pitt. Pitt has a lot of muscle. Even on his calves which are hard to gain muscle on. Look up the brad of sunglasses pitt wears and you'll see he doesn't have a short face. He has a narrow head but his face and neck are wide. Snatch you may have the same bone structure but on a smaller body. You probably mean you have similar proportions, which has more to do with muscle and length of limbs and torso. I really can't see pitt shorter then 5-10. And in hollywood that's not tall. Only to short guys
snatch says on 30/Sep/14
my friend who was exactly 5 foot 10 he was skinny to he looked
like a giant next to me and he was only 5 foot 10

sometimes even if someone is a inch or two taller there porportions
is what matters

someone can be taller and still not dwarf in a way someone can with
better porportions
snatch says on 30/Sep/14
i mean when i think of clooney
for some reason i thinks he's
taller then pitt

clooney looks like he has a bigger bone structure
than pitt

even clooney stated as a joke that he's 6 foot 1

in my opinion clooney is taller than him

some pics I've seen he's either shorter then clooney
or taller

i can say he's 5 foot 10 in the morning
but during the day he has to be 5 foot 9 and half
just can't see him standing 178 at the end of the day

he has short legs thats a clear indication he's nothing over
the average height
Arch Stanton says on 30/Sep/14
I remember before the Internet days I was always puzzled at how tall Pitt was, he was one of the few actors I really found difficult to accurately guess. I thought 5'9" in Across the Tracks, 5'9.5 in Kalifornia, 5'10 in Interview with the Vampire, 5'10.5 in Seven, 5'11 in Meet Joe Black and the Devil's Own, 6 ft in Fight Club etc. Basically anything between 5'9 and 6'1". I remember he did say he wanted to be 2 inches taller though in a 1995 magazine, and I used to watch Interview with the Vampire a fair bit and always thought he looked 5 ft 10 range in it,
cole says on 30/Sep/14
@snatch: I'm sure you can mistake a 2 inch difference when seeing people on their own, in a picture for example, but it really doesn't matter, as anyone should be able to tell if there are something in the vicinity of 2 inches between the TOP of two peoples heads when stacked up against eachother. What's between head and feet doesn't really matter as long as the measurement from top to bottom is what it is. You can't just take something like head/leg-length and say people can't be this or that height, it doesn't work like that. I have the legs of a 173-175 cm (5'8-9) guy, the torso of a 183-185 cm (6'0-1) guy and a fairly average head (24 cm - 9.5in), but at the end of the day there's still 180 cm (5'10.75 - 5'11) from the soles of my feet to the highest point of my head.
184.3cm says on 30/Sep/14
@jamie179cm wills has never be over 180cm in his life

He didnt look average height at all next to guys like Samuel L Jackson, Alan Rickman , Jeremy Irons..the list goes on and they are all tall guys. His peak height listing here of 182cm seems legit to me.Tallish guy at his peak and now average height.
snatch says on 29/Sep/14
same exact height as Lawrence Gilliard Jr's
my honest opinion
snatch says on 29/Sep/14
2 inches does not dwarf someone like 6 inches

i have had friend who are 5 foot 10 and i thought they were 6 feet
they looked 6 feet

but i have friends who are 5 10 and were stocky and i thought
that they were 5 foot 8

my point you can mistake a 2 inch difference

but a 4 or 6 you can't

what if someone is 5 11 and has a 1inch bigger head that someone who is 5 foot 9?

pitt has a small head i don't see him scraping more than 5 foot 10 in the morning

hes 176.5 max during the day

i have the same bone structure as him i have a small head with a long neck
short legs with long torso and I'm only 173 i don't no how he can be 178
someone with my proportions can't be that tall thats all I'm saying
jamie179cm says on 29/Sep/14
@184.3cm wills has never be over 180cm in his life
184.3cm says on 28/Sep/14
179cm is what Brad would measure i think. Remember he was shorter than Willis years ago by an inch or so .
Dan says on 27/Sep/14
Zac efron, Matt Damon and Johnny depp all claim 5-10 and they are all obviously not 5-10. I didn't say 2 " is a big difference and that he would be way taller, but a legit barefoot 5-10 guy is noticeably taller then a 5-8 guy. Even if the 5-8 guy is wearing boots and lifts, he's still gonna look shorter. I got 5-11 friends and 6-1 friends and when I wore boots with inserts inside I didn't look short next to them but they were still taller then me and they were in sneakers. I was probably scraping 5-10
cole says on 27/Sep/14
@snatch: Do you think it's ok for a 5'11 guy to claim 6'1 then?...
2 inches is absolutely something to argue about, it is a very noticable and big difference.
snatch says on 27/Sep/14
dan

i didn't know 2 inches is that big of a difference

4 inches yes 6 inches hess

but a measly 2 inches is really nothing to argue about

he's easily 5 10
then I'm easily 5 foot 8

and god knows if he even is 5 foot 10 lol
Dan says on 25/Sep/14
Brad is definitely about 5-10. Solid 5-10 guy with good proportions. Snatch, you continue to say stuff like pitt doesn't look that much taller then you or he looks close to your height, trust me. I'm 5-8.5 and I am no where near pitt's height. Sure if you saw him in person, he'd be significantly taller. I stood two feet away from Andrew Dominick the director of Jesse James and killing them softly. He was a sold 5-11. Brad never appears much shorter than him. And I'm telling you guys, brad pitt does not walk around with 3" lifts in his vans sneakers. Impossible. He is about 5-10 and probably uses about 1.25 " lift inside vans sneakers which in total probably give a solid 1.5" of actual noticeable height increase. That doesn't explain how he still looks 5-11 when he's walking around and not just standing on big lifts. He is easily 5-10. If he is shorter, it's only by tiny increments unnoticeable to the naked eye
cole says on 25/Sep/14
@Editor Rob: Yeah you're right. But Bernthal would probably have the edge on him barefoot. 5'10.75 a good shout for a listing?
mike says on 25/Sep/14
Jon Bernthal: 5ft 11in 180 cm
Brad Pitt: 5ft 11.25in 181 cm
cole says on 24/Sep/14
@Editor Rob: In these "Pitt posing for pics with Bernthal" times, it should be a good opportunity to have another look at Pitt. Now, at first when I saw this pic in low res, I didn't think there was anything too suspicious about Pitt's footwear, but when the higher res ones came out it seems as though Pitt (Lerman aswell) does have a little more footwear-help than Jon does: Click Here Jon's not standing his tallest either, so whatever edge Pitt has on him in this shot maybe wouldn't be as big if Jon stood taller. What do you think?
[Editor Rob: if Pitt has lifts they will be a subtle kind, just a 0.5-0.75 incher to make himself look a comfortable 5ft 11 range...I don't think there's much between jon and brad, I know he's got a slight lean but then sometimes you don't lose much from a slight lean, a fraction or so.]
snatch says on 23/Sep/14
if he was 5 foot 11 barefoot then in 2 inch shoes he would be
6 foot 1
and in lifts he would be 6 foot 2

sorry but i have never seen him hit 6 foot 2
or 6 foot 1 for that matter

hes aways scraping 6 feet with lifts which leads me to
believe he's a strong 5 foot 9 or a weak 5 foot 10

in other words he's not past 177

he looks max 4 cm taller then me and I'm 173

i no for sure he's not 178 he just doesn't have the
skeletons of a guy who's only 2 inches off 6 feet

he has the body structure of someone who's like 3 inches
off 6 feet
pauly e says on 22/Sep/14
Jay 184cm says on 21/Sep/14
It's been said before but if he is a legit 5'11" or even 5'10.5", why is his height never listed as 6'0"? A 5'11" guy in Hollywood would 95% of the time claim 6'0" I believe. Likely a 5'10.5" guy might try his luck at it too. Many do. You have to ask yourself that.

^this. Most guys I see claim "6'0" are 5'10.25 - 5'10.75. Most guys I see claim "6'1" are 5'11.25 - 5'11.75. Pitt's claim of 5'11 leads me to think he is 5'10 at best.
Andrea says on 22/Sep/14
That's not the way you should think, Jay. So, anybody who does not get listed at 6' can't be near 5'11? I do remember Jon Bertnhal was listed at 5'10 on the net but he's actually near 5'11. So what? He can't be more than 5'9 for the same rule? Let alone the listings on the net and just try to guess his height on your own. I've not seen much of him but, in the few things i've seen, he looks near enough 5'11 and could easily pull off looking taller than 5'11 flat, even if i guess footwear and good posture play a role in that!
jamie179cm says on 22/Sep/14
jay 184cm good point 5ft10 guy would claim 6ft pitt probably is 177cm 175cm Wouldn't shock me and most celebrity lie about there height
Jay 184cm says on 21/Sep/14
It's been said before but if he is a legit 5'11" or even 5'10.5", why is his height never listed as 6'0"? A 5'11" guy in Hollywood would 95% of the time claim 6'0" I believe. Likely a 5'10.5" guy might try his luck at it too. Many do. You have to ask yourself that.
sum says on 21/Sep/14
5'10.5
Dmeyer says on 20/Sep/14
He consistently beats 5'10.5 Guys and 5'11 Guys when in none monster looking footwear Like eli roth Clooney trophée grâce , berthal fassbender malkovich , the Guy has to be at worst 179.5cm if not 180cm
Heylo says on 20/Sep/14
Why would a director lie about his height? LOL make no sense.

Brad looks to be taller than the claimed 5'11 guy next to him in that Fury photoshoot but Brad does that often nowadays, always look half an inch taller than 5'11 guys. 177.5 + 2 inches = 182.5. That's the height i think Brad Pitt reaches at best. He always has the best posture too so he might appear taller than co stars because of that.

Snatch, your low IQ comment made no sense. No one of us here know how tall Brad really is at the exact number, don't act smart lol.
Jay 184cm says on 19/Sep/14
@lelman It's an interesting pic but I think the answer is that none of their listed heights are accurate except maybe the far-right guy. Pitt looks a solid 5'11 or just under 6'0 in body frame in this picture - same height as Beckham in appearance, but I suspect he is stealing an inch somewhere there. The guy on the left looks like a 6'1 dude claiming to be taller.
lelman says on 19/Sep/14
@Jay 184cm Dermot could have been wearing lifts at that event, you don't know. You can't take a single event as evidence because all it takes is one person wearing lifts to completely skew the perspective. In general Pitt looks on par with 6ft + guys, even with lifts thats gonna be hard to do for a man under 5ft 11. I'd buy slightly under 5ft 11 for him, at the very least.
Jay 184cm says on 18/Sep/14
I don't get how people can claim Pitt is 5'11 or 6'0 after Dural's pictures a little lower down. He looks the exact same height as 5'9" Dermot Mulroney in the 90's, Norton towers over Mulroney and Bowie, and then in the 00's Pitt is suddenly the same height as Norton or even slightly taller?! Seriously, work it out - he's found a whole 3 whole inches from somewhere...
Blink says on 18/Sep/14
I saw an interview with her on Jonathan Ross and he said something like "not a lot of people have to bend down to give me a kiss, how tall are you without the heel?" and claudia said 181 and then added 5'11
lelman says on 18/Sep/14
Click Here

From left to right (these are their listed heights)
David Ayer - 6ft 2.5in
Logan Lerman - 5ft 9in
Brad Pitt - 5ft 11in
John Berthnal - 5ft 11in

Right off the bat it is obvious that Logan is not 5ft 9, look at his shoes and compare him to Berthnal - looks more like a 5ft 7 guy. Berthnal and Ayer look to be dropping a bit of height, Pitt is standing straight. He looks about 6ft 1in here to me, max, if all the other heights are to be believed.

How much height do you think his boots are giving him? More than 2 inches? I don't think it would be possible for him to look this tall if he was under 5ft 10.
Tim says on 17/Sep/14
@ snatch, he is at least 2 inches taller than you, calm down.
jamie179cm says on 17/Sep/14
snatch i agree i can't see him over 177cm
Fred says on 17/Sep/14
snatch says on 16/Sep/14 claudia was 1 inch shorter then him when she was basically barefoot
while he was in heeled shoes

Snatch, how do you know how tall Claudia Schiffer is? I´m from Berlin and I saw her two times in real - she's about 1.82 cm - and not 1.80 cm as so many Click Here say!

I´m sorry, but I see Pitt more at 5 foot 11 or 6 ft.
snatch says on 16/Sep/14
if he's not 5 11 then for sure he's not 5 foot 10

claudia was 1 inch shorter then him when she was basically barefoot
while he was in heeled shoes

5 foot 9 and half max
he hits 5 foot 10 in the morning
and shrinks down

its obvious who ever says he's 5 foot 10 clearly has
a low IQ
Tim says on 14/Sep/14
@ Jed, I think they are very close, difference can be like 1 cm
Jed says on 13/Sep/14
If he is 5'10 then Fassbender is under 5'10, which he isn't. He's 5'11 flat.
pauly e says on 12/Sep/14
I'm starting to think that even if we had a picture of Pitt standing in front of a height chart scraping 5'10 barefoot, we would have someone on here arguing about the camera angle or whatever and trying to still back up him being 5'11, which he clearly is not...
Dural says on 12/Sep/14
It doesn't work that way Vegas. Pitt is closer to the camera in the original photo anyway and has footwear advantage. Norton is clearly taller, there's no doubt about it.
Vegas says on 12/Sep/14
here is that high camera angle shot of pitt and norton modified so they are both equidistant from the camera Click Here
jamie179cm says on 12/Sep/14
Heylo i guess your right everyone has different body structure but sometimes you can tell by body frame how tall someone is
Jay says on 12/Sep/14
@Heylo
Hmm, there seems a bit of an angle, yeah. I would give Pitt maybe 1 inch over Bowie but no more. So we're saying Pitt is just about 5'10" based on that. I would say no taller.
c says on 12/Sep/14
Durals picks are solid evidence of Pitt standing 5'10 flat
Heylo says on 11/Sep/14
Jay, you are fooled by the angle. Please think some before making a comment like that.

1. He is standing a bit behind Bowie and Brad still appear almost 1 inch taller.

2. Bowie (great musician btw!) likes to wear high heeled shoes.

Both Brad & Bowie have height increasing shoes on and still Brad who is behind Bowie looks about 1 inch taller. Conclusion: On that night if they were standing right next to each other Brad would have looked 1.5 inch taller than Bowie. Both barefoot & Brad would have been 2cm taller. (My last sentence is just a theory! )
snatch says on 11/Sep/14
dural there was this older photo of pitt and dermot

it was in black and white pitt was like 1 inch taller then him
now if you see photos with him and dermot pitt is like 2 to 3 inches
taller

the photo that you posted with him and ptit

you can clearly see dermot has longer legs then
pitts legs look really short in comparison with dermot
in the latest photos you posted
Heylo says on 11/Sep/14
jamie, body structure & **** doesn't mean anything because everyone doesn't have the same proportions.

Based on more photos from the 90s (which obviously seems to be a better source than looking photos from the 00s) i think he is 177cm. 176.5 isn't impossible but 177-178 is my bet still.
Jay says on 11/Sep/14
@Dural
Wow, that looks pretty categorical there! Pitt looks the exact same height as 5'9" Bowie whereas Norton towers over Bowie at a clear 6'0", and then suddenly Pitt is equal or taller than Norton?!
He's obviously making up 3 inches in extras.
jamie179cm says on 11/Sep/14
snatch i agree i always thought he had a body structure of 5ft9 guy because im 5ft10.5 im pretty sure i have a bigger body structure than pitt does
Dural says on 11/Sep/14
Here's Pitt with 5'9" listed David Bowie

Click Here
Click Here

David Bowie with Edward Norton and Dermot Mulroney (Norton is closer to the camera). Remember Bowie and Mulroney look the same height.

Click Here

Pitt with Dermot Mulroney in the 90s, about the same height.

Click Here
Click Here
Click Here

Pitt with Dermot Mulroney in the 2000s. Either Pitt is standing on something, or he must be in huge lifts in the third pic.

Click Here
Click Here
Click Here


Pitt with Edward Norton. The second pic is from the same event as the third pic with Mulroney in the 2000.

Click Here
Click Here
snatch says on 11/Sep/14
brains on

there was a picture that is not on the web anymore but i clearly remember
pitt being the same height or a inch taller than dormant murloney they were
just about the same height pitt just had a inch on him

fast forward 10 years now in pictures if you see him with dormant he is like
3 inches taller

i no its due to lifts but he's always packing like this

so let me do the math people on here say dormant is short in person
like he is 5 foot 8 to 5 foot 9 max

in old pictures pictures pitt was barely 1 inch taller then him
now in newer photos he's about 2.5 to 3 inches taller

5 foot 10 is not tall and even if he was 5 foot 10 he would still be
at the very average
i still say he has never been a full bloated 178 cm flat
if you have people here saying he's definitely not 5 11

then i am one of those people who say he's definitely 5 foot 10

for the love of fame he wore lifts in a pringles commercial while
the other actors were in sandals

brain use your brain he's in the 5 foot 9 range

looks can be deceiving you might think one of your friends what a
6 footer but then come of find out that they were only 5 foot 10 and half

pitt never looked like my friend who's 5 foot 10
im 5 foot 8 and he looks likes he has the same
bone structure as me maybe he has a inch or 1 inch and half on me
Common Sense!!! says on 10/Sep/14
Established fact 1. Brad Pitt wears decent lifts more often than not and is never seen in barefoot.

Established fact 2. Brad Pitt is listed as BAREFOOT 5'11.

Taking these two simple truths into account - in his boots & lifts Pitt would be standing at a regular 6'1 - 6'2, but he never looks that tall!

He clearly isn't 5'11. A strong 5'9.5 would mean that in his boots & lifts he would be hitting a regular 5'11 - 6'0 - WHICH HE DOES.

Logical conclusion, Brad Pitt is a strong 5'9.5.

Listing 5'11 for him barefoot makes a mockery of this entire site.
Dmeyer says on 10/Sep/14
Can look taller than 5'11.5 leo near berthal and hill
pauly e says on 10/Sep/14
Tim says on 9/Sep/14
Can see him in 5-10 to 5-11 range, not shorter and not taller... And I really doubt that he is in 5-9 range.
178-180 for Brad


I agree, and will take it one step further and say 178.5 - 179.5. i don't think he is 180. i know we are splitting hairs here, but that's what this site is all about...
Brains on says on 9/Sep/14
Snatch you gotta believe me, Pitt is surely taller than 5'10".
I am that height and I know that I don't look
Brains on says on 9/Sep/14
Snatch you gotta believe me, Pitt is surely taller than 5'10".
I am that height and I know that I don't look
Tim says on 9/Sep/14
Can see him in 5-10 to 5-11 range, not shorter and not taller... And I really doubt that he is in 5-9 range.
178-180 for Brad
Dog says on 8/Sep/14
Looks 5' 11" most of the time. But can certainly look taller at times.
snatch says on 7/Sep/14
im 5 foot 8 I'm not saying pitt is the same height as me

but he isn't that much taller by any means

in my opinion he is 1.5 inches taller then me at most

i know to many people who are 5 foot 10 who all have
bigger body structures and limbs then he does

he is 176.5cm max 177 in the morning
Clay says on 6/Sep/14
Solid 5'10 barefoot evening and 6'0'' if he wants to bust out some lifts for a carpet. This 5'8-5'9 stuff is wacky. Well, 5'9 isn't really wacky but it's not real either.
Dmeyer says on 5/Sep/14
I agree up tu 0.5in round up is ok no more thaugh
RobV says on 4/Sep/14
@ Heylo That is absolutely my perception. Most people are fairly hopeless at gauging the height of others, even in fact when someone is stood in front of them. Which is why it is so pointless when people say "Can I claim, 6' if I am 5'11.5"?" Just *#&$* do it, man, and stop agonising. Go ahead and even claim 6'1" and you will probably get away with it. Just do it all with confidence.
Heylo says on 3/Sep/14
I don't find the source but one swedish blogger wrote that she saw Brad Pitt back in 2009 in New York, he had a full beard and looked shorter than "she had expected".

She never said how tall she thought he was or so so my contribution might be useless but i think most girls expect movie stars to be like at least 6ft and he may not have been 6ft in shoes then?

But then we have interviewers that have said that Brad seemed "taller than they expected" at over 6ft. The problem is that people are in general very bad at estimating heights.

Michael Jackson (175-177cm)was according to an reporter "a giant" in height so we might not believe anyone who says they met a celebrity.
snatch says on 3/Sep/14
Emmanuelle says on 2/Sep/14
@Snatch, Claudia is 6'0".

no emmanuelle she is 6 foot 1 bro

lol that was the most uncalled for opinion i have ever heard

how is she 6 feet when her site has her at 5 11
while i have seen other sites where they say she
added a extra inch and is really 5 foot 10

ur telling a pretty girl like claudia at 5 foot 10 would not
be a good model? or agency would have ignored
her because she's 5 foot 10? thats tall for a women

she was pregnant in that picture and was kind of hunching

he's short get over it he has to wear bigger shoes than her
to appear her height

without his shoes she would have been taller ( which debunks the 5 11 claims)
PS he looks miserable in that photo with a women in ballerina shoes his height
while he's wearing lord knows what

smoking gun

she even has a bigger body frame then him

so anyone who says pitt his 180 cm in the morning is
clearly looking at the wrong photo
njp says on 3/Sep/14
I literally ran into him in Covent Garden in London, as in walked into him and his friend and inadvertently shoulder barged him. I apologized and noted at the time that he was the same height as me and I remember saying to my-then girlfriend that you'd think he'd be taller. He wore casual trainers and I was wearing vans slipons. I'm 178cm in the evening and this was mid morning.
Brad says on 3/Sep/14
He can really stuff those dress boots with everything including a TV.
Emmanuelle says on 2/Sep/14
@Snatch, Claudia is 6'0".
pauly e says on 2/Sep/14
Claudia Shiffer is 5'11 I think, so she's 5'11.25 in those shoes. Pitt looks about the same in his shoes. If he is not packing, than he might scrape 5'10, if he is packing then he is under. no way he is a full 5'11.....and he is standing straigher in that picture than she is!
truth178cm says on 2/Sep/14
@mightyheight roflmao
Dural says on 2/Sep/14
@Parker
I said Pitt looks like someone who's 5'11" barefoot when he wears shoes with lifts, which means 6' in shoes. 1.5in insoles and he's almost 6' in shoes.

Why does it even matter what DiCaprio is listed at? Rob's opinion isn't necessarily the truth. Jonah can look 5 inches shorter than DiCaprio as well, just like Pitt can look only 4 inches taller. DiCaprio is 5'10.5" if you ask me, but unlike Pitt doesn't wear lifts.

Click Here
Click Here
Parker says on 1/Sep/14
Always looks 5 inches taller than Jonah Hill when they are both standing straight. @Dural, Jonah Hill is not in his bare feet. You do the math.
Click Here

Only looks 4 inches shorter than De-Caprio though. What's De-Caprio listed at?
Click Here

5'9 for Pitt? Tosh.
jamie179cm says on 1/Sep/14
ok guys 5ft10 is possible for pitt i slowly doubting his 175cm i think now hes more like 177cm or 178cm
mightyheighty says on 1/Sep/14
Take almost all celebrities/so called celebrities and take two inches off their height and that is their true barefoot height. I'm 6'1 (a fraction under) but my celeb height would be 6'3 and if I stood next to brad pitt people on here would compare our heights BUT it would not be accurate... UNDERSTAND?

I have stood right next to sting and bryan adams(nice guy) and both where much shorter than stated on this site.

I not obsessed with celebheights I just can't stand narcissistic hollywood liars... 5'9 pitt who LOOKS 5'11 big difference.

These women know what's up. Click Here
Dural says on 1/Sep/14
@Parker
Why 3 inches inside his sneakers, when he only looks 5'11" with Jonah? The photo is tiltet in Pitts favor btw..

Click Here
Click Here
Click Here

@Heylo
Pitt looks like someone who's 5'11" barefoot with lifts, sometimes close to 6' which is easily possible depending on the shoes he wears at 5'9.5".
Even Sly can look 6' with lifts.

With Bernthal for example Pitt looks more like 5'11". The position of his knees should tell you he's in lifts.

Click Here
jamie179cm says on 1/Sep/14
Heylo what about hidden insole? and could he be 182cm max in lifts?
Parker says on 1/Sep/14
@Dural. Pitt 5 inches taller than 5'6 Jonah Hill
Click Here

Presume you think he has 3 inches inside his low cut sneakers.? As I say, each to their own.
Heylo says on 1/Sep/14
Dural, what is your problem? He isn't only 5'11 in lifts, he is 6ft. Therefor he is 5'10, he would look like an idiot being 5'9 reaching 6ft in superlifts.
snatch says on 1/Sep/14
he was claudia shifters height with shoes on
while she was in ballerina shoes which don't even give 1 cm

clauda is 5 foot 10 to 5 foot 11 her model height

he is wearing heeled shoes (maybe wearing lifts or not) but
he was her height with shoes
without shoes he's shorter then her

^ please someone debunk this i bet some one is going to come
and say (the angles are not right) ( or blah blah blah)

but this picture is one of the smoking guns that he's right in the 5 foot 9 range

type in brad pitt claudia schiffer she was pregnant to so it might
have made her loose a cm
Dural says on 31/Aug/14
That's just stupid Parker, there's a difference between wearing high heels or lifts inside your shoes. You can get 3-4 inches taller with less ridiculous looking shoes than Downey's.

Downey doesn't hide his height insecurity, he even admits wearing lifts. Pitt would never admit wearing lifts. He doesn't look 6' with Bernthal btw., more like the same height which is most likely 5'10.5-5'11". An 176cm tall man (which I believe he is) can easily get to 179-180cm with lifts.
Dmeyer says on 31/Aug/14
Pitt is at worst 179.5cm at low at night and likely. 180cm
jamie179cm says on 31/Aug/14
this is how i see it gwyneth 173cm brad 175cm or 177cm
Chris says on 30/Aug/14
To me his 5ft 9 tall because he lost 3 inches when he cheated on Jennifer aniston but angelina jolie is so hot he gets another 1 inch from me so we cool now
Dan says on 30/Aug/14
Guys, in the fury photo call brad is wearing guidi leather boots that only give about 1" or less. Do you think he has 2" or 3" lifts inside those boots? That's impossible.
Parker says on 30/Aug/14
Dural says on 30/Aug/14
It not that difficult for someone 5'9" or 5'10" to look 5'11" or even 6' with lifts and posture.

I doubt these will give you 3 inches
Click Here

If you think Pitt is getting 3 inches from his footwear in that pic, there's nothing else I can say.
jamie179cm says on 30/Aug/14
Giulio thanks for telling me but still not sure how do that i have to how learn how to that
jamie179cm says on 30/Aug/14
heylo i heard that in the avengers that downey jr is taller than in Gwyneth in his lifts i think downey jr could be 5ft6 barefoot so i think 5ft8 is possible for Gwyneth and i think 5ft8 woman can appear tall aswell imo the picture with brad and gwyneth barefoot they are about same height when brad tilts his head but if he stands up i think he would be a inche taller or maybe a inche and a half so i think 5ft9 or 5ft9.5 is most likely brad height just my opinion though
Dural says on 30/Aug/14
Bernthal looks 5'11" max with Rob and Pitt wears lifts even on the beach, what makes you think he doesn't wear lifts at a photo session for a $80.000.000 movie? It not that difficult for someone 5'9" or 5'10" to look 5'11" or even 6' with lifts and posture.
Heylo says on 30/Aug/14
The photos that Parker are linking are just two of hundred photos of him being taller than 5'10-5'11 guys. I wouldn't be surprised if Pitt actually was close to 179cm.
Parker says on 30/Aug/14
Picture with 5'11 listed Jon Bernthal (pictured with Rob)
Click Here

Hopefully should put to bed the ludicrous 5'9 estimates for Pitt.
Parker says on 30/Aug/14
Contrary to ed's comment, I think Schiffer in this pic is standing tall, which puts Pitt at 6 foot in his footwear.
Click Here

5'10.5-5'11. Rob will never change it for at least 20 years.
Dan says on 29/Aug/14
Snatch lol how do you know he was wearing lifts in the Pringles commercial? Did you look inside his shoes? I know you'd probably like it if pitt were closer to your 5-8 height, but trust me, he's not. The guy is clearly and easily a 5-10 guy. .5" or .25" shorter then 5-10, I don't know. But he is taller then 5-8 and taller then 5-9. He has even proportions meaning he doesn't have long limbs like Dicaprio. His proportions are that of a 5-10 guy or maybe a tiny bit smaller. But trust me young man, pitt easily hits 6-0 when in boots and a short guy would never be able to do that. I think the most Pitt lifts is 2" or 2.5" max.
Normal Norman says on 29/Aug/14
More 5' 10.5" I think. Can look a lot taller at times, with decent shoes and military posture though.
The Exorcist says on 29/Aug/14
@truth: I agree.

Brad Pitt: 5'10.5"
George Clooney: 5'10"
Matt Damon: 5'9.5"
snatch says on 28/Aug/14
the pringles commercial says it all

that was about 25 years ago or more and he was in lifts

WOW 25 or more years in lifts thats older then me
cole says on 28/Aug/14
@Editor Rob: Why no picture at the top for Brad? :O
Heylo says on 28/Aug/14
jamieorr4, i have seen those photos with Gwyneth and in my opinions he looks about close to 5'10 considering that he tilts his head down which makes him look shorter(he has a quite long neck too). But yes, 177cm could be possible. Not shorter than that though. This is based on that Gwyneth is 5'9, if she isn't. Then Brad could absolutely be 5'9 but there is no real proof of Gwyneth being 5'8 either.
ed says on 28/Aug/14
Rob, have you seen these pictures of brad pitt with claudia schiffer and her husband.

claudia schiffer whom you listed as 5'11.
She's not standing straight in the photos.

Click Here
Click Here
Click Here

do you think its possible pitt is in the 178-179 range without his footware??
Giulio says on 28/Aug/14
jamieorr4 says on 28/Aug/14
Heylo the best proof i can give you is the picture were brad and gwyneth are in barefeet there is no way pitt is more than a inche taller than gwyneth and gwyneth might not be a legit 5ft9 woman she could be 5ft8 so to me 5ft9 for pitt is very possible and to me this proofs that he can't be over 178cm i would put the picture here if i know how

----------------------------------------------
use tinyurl to make a new small link and than copy the new link in your comment, i m pretty sure he was leaning and was still taller
jamieorr4 says on 28/Aug/14
Heylo the best proof i can give you is the picture were brad and gwyneth are in barefeet there is no way pitt is more than a inche taller than gwyneth and gwyneth might not be a legit 5ft9 woman she could be 5ft8 so to me 5ft9 for pitt is very possible and to me this proofs that he can't be over 178cm i would put the picture here if i know how
jamieorr4 says on 28/Aug/14
Heylo Jude Law i think he is 5ft9 and in lifts he can be 5ft11 or 6ft one of the reason why 5ft9 for pitt is possible im pretty sure a 5ft9 guy can get to 6ft in lifts
truth says on 28/Aug/14
Brad Pitt 5ft10.25-5ft10.5
George Clooney 5ft9.75-5ft10
Matt Damon 5ft9.5-5ft9.75

all afternoon height ranges of course.
snatch says on 27/Aug/14
so you guys are saying he is 5 foot 10. 25

if he was that height barefoot all day and night he could have
easily claimed 6 foot

i think he's that tall in shoes lol

i really think he hits 5 foot 10 and something in shoes and close
to 5 11

i don't think he hits a full 5 f11 in shoes i just don't see it

in the pringles commercial he looked 5 foot 10 5 foot 11 in lifts

someone please please evaluate or make the best educated guess on how
tall he looked in that pringles commercial pause around 5 or 6 seconds

and make you best educated guess

im guessing hes 5 11.25 with those lifts on

he is not 6 feet with those shoes on maybe .75 off 6 feet
to a whole inch

just watch below
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mucuLrWHGqc
Dan says on 27/Aug/14
Snatch, just because the shoes have 2" and you add 1" doesn't actually give you 3" in total. Ask rob and others on here. It's weird but it only gives you a fraction of what you add
snatch says on 26/Aug/14
laughing at me for saying my jordans give 2 inches?

im 5 foot 8 barefoot when i wear my jordans
im 5 foot 10

i measured it a hundred times it clearly gives 2 inches
or really really close to that

if i wear 1 inch lifts with those shoes i will be 5 foot 11

i will measure it again but the shoes don't look like they give
that much in height but they do
Heylo says on 26/Aug/14
Okay so why didn't he add more to his height that he did in his claim? Brad Pitt was (according to himself) very uncomfortable when he first started out with movies and he didn't know much about the industry, he just loved movies, that's all he knew. He claimed 5'11 BEFORE he was an A-list. He obviously added 0.75-1 inch to his height, maybe even less, he was maybe just rounding up like most people do.

Do you guys really think he would claim 5'11 today? I have seen in interviews after that in the information box at the right that he is 6ft. He obviously got the tip when he became big in Hollywood that he must add 2 inches to his height. If someone asked him today on a show or big interview of some kind, he would claim 6ft, that's for sure.

That's my theory that i think is way more logical than your claims on him being 5'9 without proper evidence.
Heylo says on 26/Aug/14
Snatch, i don't agree with you. Of course you can be seen as short at 5'10, you can be seen as short as 6ft too, all depends on what people you hang around with but we talk IN GENERAL in a specific country. 5'10 isn't considered short anywhere really besides in some countries in Scandinavia and Holland, even in those countries 5'10 is an okay looking height.

I know, i live in Sweden where the average height is between 5'11 & 6ft and i am as 5'10 not even considered short. It's on the PAPER though that 5'10 could be seen as short here in Sweden but people would never guess my height at 5'10 because people can't estimate heights for ****, they always overestimate.

Brad have a good height at 5'10, but in Hollywood where it's superficial as hell it is an advantage to be over 2 inches from Average height and he's obviously not. When i was in New York man, i was often even feeling tall at supermarkets, i never feel tall in Sweden.

You should know that a height on paper isn't the same as in reality, most people lie about their heights, add one or two inches. Brad is at his smallest 177 but even that height is debatable, i think it's more logical that he is about 178.5 or something but that's my thought about it and i could be wrong because people tend to look taller than they are. But if people really are gonna put Brad at 5'9, we can downgrade every celebrity with two inches so it makes more sense.

You guys saying he is 176 or a full 5'9 when he is clearly at least one inch taller than Statham, Stallone & Wesley Snipes.
184.9 on a bad day says on 26/Aug/14
The picture on description with Matt and Clooney shows 5 ft 9 is impossible for Brad. 5ft10.5 minimum.
nah says on 26/Aug/14
lmao@ the guy who said that jordan's add 2 inches xD
jamieorr4 says on 26/Aug/14
blink how ridiculous 5ft9 the guy wears lifts and celebrity lie about their heights
MarcusTheSwede says on 26/Aug/14
snatch: Agree. He wears lifts huge lifts and always has. When he was together with Gwyneth Paltrow..that showed clearly as day.
Brad Pitt is not taller then 176 at best without his shoes AND Lifts. And thats generous in mind the soles here wears are atleast 4-5cm high.
Thanks

All heights are barefeet Estimates, derived from quotations by celebrities, official websites, agency resumes, actors I've met at conventions and pictures/films.

Vital statistics like weight, shoe or bra size measurements have been taken from quotes by the actors themselves in interviews, resumes or articles.

Celebrity Fan Photos and Agency Pictures of stars are © to their respective owners.