How tall is Brad Pitt

Brad Pitt's Height

5ft 11in (180 cm)

American actor best known for movies such as Se7en, Fight Club, Snatch, Oceans Thirteen, Troy and World War Z. A newspaper article on heights (washington post) quoted as saying people had seen Pitt put down 5ft 10 on an audition form for his height. Well, before he was A-list, aged 24 he wrote his own height as 5ft 11 in a teen magazine profile. At times he can appear taller, but with impeccable posture and at times, in the last few years, cuban type heels, that is a given. Even his good friend George Clooney was wise to his footwear, saying once in USA Today that "He's tall. He's like 6-1. It's irritating."

How tall is Brad Pitt
Brad with Angelina Jolie, Jonah Hill and Claudia Schiffer
Photo by PR Photos

Add a Comment 250 comments




175 cm said on 25/May/16
Allen said on 24/May/16
@Heylo

I love the way you carry on insisting on the lie that he is 178 cm on this website. First of all I'm only downgrading Pitt. Why wouldn't I say the same thing about Dicaprio or Bale? Because they are honest and they don't wear lifts. And if they had a naked picture beside Paltrow they were gonna tower over her like for at least 10 cm. When you have a good enough vision to see that one of her knees is bended then you must still have a good enough intelect as you claim, to know that she is not standing straight. So she is the same height as Pitt.

Why do you think Brad Pitt Sued the photographers that had distributed those naked photos of Pitt and Paltrow? Definitely because his height has been revealed. Poor Pitt wouldn't know that it was too late for suing the photographers.
But he has got away in victory for having you guys. He has been downgraded by only 2 cm for your sake than the height he had claimed. And also Paltrow's height was upgraded for his sake. You guys make me laugh as you see Pitt 3 cm taller than her in that photo. 3 cm? Really? Till when are you guys going to lie about his height? And answering me with no other logic than typing "HAHAHA"!
"HAHAHA" ain't gonna make Pitt 178 cm Heylo. He is 173 at best.

For a "good reason" we don't see him without footwear on any beach pic. He is height conscious that's pretty clear. But 5ft 8 com on! liiiiiiiitle bit exaggerated
175 cm said on 25/May/16
Allen said on 24/May/16
If you guys who claim to be amazing at counting heights or something of the sort. Take a look at Pitt-Aniston Picture that I mentioned. Look how short his legs are and how hard he struggles to keep his torso straight. Those legs are not the legs of a 5'10 guy. NEVER! He has a small frame in the real world in which he is not on the screen. If he was 5'10 he was gonna be taller beside Aniston. The guy lacks 6 or 7 more cm to reach his imaginary height there.

Yes, Pitt s legs appear too short for 5'11" guy but his torso is quite long.. so dunno
Allen said on 25/May/16
@Dan

There is actually a way in hell for him to be under 5'9. Sorry Bradders.
Allen said on 25/May/16
@Johan

You can easily search Brad Pitt and Aniston at beach.
5'8 tops.
CS said on 25/May/16
@Johan I agree.
Johan said on 25/May/16
Could you post this pic of Pitt and Aniston? I saw a few online and he always had 5 inches on her when they were on the carpet. So an almost 5'5" woman in heels and he had in the 5 inch area height on her. Alot of the pics his head is shaved so no advantage there either.

Now I don't know the footwear but he couldn't have had more than her so again 5'10" flat is the minimum he can be.
Johan said on 25/May/16
Dmeyer said on 24/May/16
The absolute biggest footwear hé has is near 2in but not 2-2,5in And many of his are 1-1,5in And yet can look over 5ft11


Thats a bold statement. The dress shoes that Rob got from Don's look perfectly normal with the top of the shoe covered and those aren't the kind of elevators Brad would buy.

I still think he has at times worn those types of elevator but as we know from Rob's research in the subject 2.5 inches would be a max for a dress shoe. Anything more would require a boot.

I think as well Brad can appear sometimes taller than what he would actually measure. He stands well and is slim, also enjoys some volume in his hair as of late.
Still with boat shoes he wasn't far off Clooney so anything under 5'10" is outside of reality.

I own boat shoes myself they only give 1/2 inch or something.
CS said on 25/May/16
Heylo said on 23/May/16
Allen, HAHAHA okay let's say that Brad is 5'8, what makes him look taller than 5'11 guys without looking like he's walking on stilts? Give me an intelligent answer.
What makes him tower over 5'9 guys? Yes, he probably uses small lifts but to say that he's 5'8-5'9 is ridiculous. Do you think Rob who owns this site can be taller than 5'11 people without looking like a complete dork?
Think people, THINK, use your damn intellect. Brad tilts his head in the Paltrow photo, Paltrow has a bended knee but her other leg is completely straight which means that she is basically getting her optimal height more or less, if Brad was 5'8, he would look WAY shorter in those photos, WAY shorter.

--------------------------------

Real talk man. Set these fools straight lol.
Dan said on 24/May/16
No shorter than 5-10. Sorry Allen. No way in hell Brad Pitt is 5-9 or under.
tiny said on 24/May/16
i think his peak height 5'11", but now 5'10".
Dmeyer said on 24/May/16
The absolute biggest footwear hé has is near 2in but not 2-2,5in And many of his are 1-1,5in And yet can look over 5ft11
Allen said on 24/May/16
If you guys who claim to be amazing at counting heights or something of the sort. Take a look at Pitt-Aniston Picture that I mentioned. Look how short his legs are and how hard he struggles to keep his torso straight. Those legs are not the legs of a 5'10 guy. NEVER! He has a small frame in the real world in which he is not on the screen. If he was 5'10 he was gonna be taller beside Aniston. The guy lacks 6 or 7 more cm to reach his imaginary height there.
Allen said on 24/May/16
@Johan

As far as I know there are 10 cm lifts that could be inserted inside the footwear. Regardless of the shoe's heel. So Pitt sounds short to me for wearing those massive lifts. I'm not claiming to know how thick his lifts are. Remember that we are all guessing heights here. Even the owner of this page himself. So we have nothing to be aggressive about. But the pictures that he has normal shoes in, are my evidence. Like the Pitt Aniston photo that I mentioned which everyone here keeps ignoring. Because that photo might downgrade Pitt even more!
Allen said on 24/May/16
@Heylo

I love the way you carry on insisting on the lie that he is 178 cm on this website. First of all I'm only downgrading Pitt. Why wouldn't I say the same thing about Dicaprio or Bale? Because they are honest and they don't wear lifts. And if they had a naked picture beside Paltrow they were gonna tower over her like for at least 10 cm. When you have a good enough vision to see that one of her knees is bended then you must still have a good enough intelect as you claim, to know that she is not standing straight. So she is the same height as Pitt.

Why do you think Brad Pitt Sued the photographers that had distributed those naked photos of Pitt and Paltrow? Definitely because his height has been revealed. Poor Pitt wouldn't know that it was too late for suing the photographers.
But he has got away in victory for having you guys. He has been downgraded by only 2 cm for your sake than the height he had claimed. And also Paltrow's height was upgraded for his sake. You guys make me laugh as you see Pitt 3 cm taller than her in that photo. 3 cm? Really? Till when are you guys going to lie about his height? And answering me with no other logic than typing "HAHAHA"!
"HAHAHA" ain't gonna make Pitt 178 cm Heylo. He is 173 at best.
Heylo said on 24/May/16
Allen, I didn't say that I would. I assumed that you thought I was a crazy fanatic that would cut my wrists if Brad was 5'8, therefor I added that "I would say it without shame". Of course there's more important issues in the world than Brad's height.

I genuinely think that he's 5'10+.
Johan said on 24/May/16
There is not a chance he is under 5'10". Damn this page just went crazy. Its well known that he likes to wear lifts at times but then he is taller than legit 5'11" guys.

His shoes never looks really weird so I doubt its more than 2.25-2.5 inches he gets even from customs.

He sometimes likes to wear cuban heels -1.5 inch or chunky boots that are around 1.75 inch.

So lets take his biggest shoe which is probably 2.5 inch. At 5'10" flat he would reach 6'0.5" passing for a 5'11.5" guy. Thats the smallest I could guess for him.

Problem with that is he has appeared a bit more than that over the years. Which had me convinced he was 5'10.5" for a long time same as I judge George Clooney.

So anything between 5'10.5-5'11" I think is a good guess so taking the average would be 5'10.75" - 180cm.
Johno said on 23/May/16
I would not put Paltrow and Pitt at the same height though, he has upto an inch on her i am pretty confident on that and Rob has Paltrow at 5'9.
Allen said on 23/May/16
Brad's footwear next to Hague looks more like a box that he is walking on and Hague's footwear seems to be normal. Neither politicians lie nor actors.
Allen said on 23/May/16
@Heylo

Why would you be ashamed claiming Pitt to be 5'8 if you thought so? Are you his father or something? Be ashamed? Really? And no. He's far under 177. Nothing more than 173 at best. Paltrow herself is 173 at best! Sorry to burst your bubble.
Allen said on 23/May/16
@Parker

Yeah man good for you. But there are a few on this planet earth that can attain the truth as it seems. And the truth is that he's under 175 cm. I know that it is hard to digest for Bradders. But pictures of him with Aniston and Paltrow convinced me that this guy is around 173 cm. He has been trying to fake Leo Dicaprio's height all these years. Sorry Bradders.
Heylo said on 23/May/16
Allen, HAHAHA okay let's say that Brad is 5'8, what makes him look taller than 5'11 guys without looking like he's walking on stilts? Give me an intelligent answer.
What makes him tower over 5'9 guys? Yes, he probably uses small lifts but to say that he's 5'8-5'9 is ridiculous. Do you think Rob who owns this site can be taller than 5'11 people without looking like a complete dork?
Think people, THINK, use your damn intellect. Brad tilts his head in the Paltrow photo, Paltrow has a bended knee but her other leg is completely straight which means that she is basically getting her optimal height more or less, if Brad was 5'8, he would look WAY shorter in those photos, WAY shorter.


I hate to say it but you guys know nothing about judging heights objectively. If you ran this site, every celebrity would be downgraded with 3 inches. I wouldn't be shocked in any way if there was evidence of Brad being 5'10( like he put down on an audition in the past) but shorter than that and you're getting unrealistic. Brad has been described as being 6ft in many magazines over the years, a 5'8 or 5'9 man would never claim that he's 6ft and he would NEVER be described as 6ft.
Parker said on 22/May/16
Arch Stanton said on 21/May/16
Allen said on 17/May/16
I don't think that anyone on this planet earth still thinks that Brad Pitt is 180 cm as he has been listed.

I do for two

In fact since Allen wrote that post 4 of the last 5 posters think he's 5'10.5/11 and if you include Rob that's 5. Multiply that by the planet earth ......

The pics next to William Hague convinced me that this guy cannot be under 5'10.
Editor Rob: William Hague actually claimed to be 5ft 11 himself, I'd forgotten about it but it is on the recovered comment on Tony Blair's page:

"I'm 5ft 11in and whenever I meet people they say, 'We thought you were small, and you're not.' So it's not my actual appearance, it's my perceived appearance"

Now, we all know politicians don't lie, so 5ft 11 makes Pitt 6ft ;)
Allen said on 22/May/16
@hijopotamus

Yes. The Pitt-Paltrow pictures prove that Pitt wore massive lifts when he was with her.
His true height is somewhere around 172-173 at best!
Allen said on 22/May/16
@Arch Stanton

I said that Pitt-Paltrow picture is not the only evidence we have. There is another picture of Pitt in sneakers with Aniston and he looks to be 10 cm taller than her tops. He's pretty much the same height as Justin Theroux.
And I do kind of agree with you about the 90's. Pitt looks short in his early movies. And he's shorter than anybody on the screen. Like in Johnny Suede.
Heylo said on 22/May/16
Why does every celebrity around 5'9 come to never look as tall as Brad Pitt even though they use lifts (Ian Somerhalder, Johnny Depp, Stallone etc etc...) You can literally SEE that they're using lifts and still they can't reach 6ft like Brad comfortably can. Under 5'10 is pure bull****. If I thought Brad was 5'8 or 5'9 I would say it without shame.
Brad looks MINIMUM 177cm with Paltrow which is a weak 5'10 and let's not forget that the photos are far from perfect. Based on his early career, + Paltrow pics, + pics of today, we can easily conclude that Brad is between 177 and 180. The exact number is impossible to know unless he measures himself on television barefoot.
Johno said on 22/May/16
Admittingly, Pitt looks nothing more than 5'8.75 in those barefoot comparisons with Paltrow and the only other way to corroborate that by other means is to compare him to Matt Damon, who looked only 5'8 next to James Corden and knowing that Pitt has upto 1-inch on Damon; would basically make him look around 5'8.75-5'9 however, you would need a stadiometer to confirm those extreme and controversial heights for Pitt and Damon and having Pitt at 5'10 would cover many bases, not stating time of day. I am still keeping 5'10 for Pitt for now.
hijopotamus said on 21/May/16
Real Paltrows height? well Pitt would be 1cm shorter.
Case closed.
...and the amount of time spent discussing his height when in shoes, customs, lifts etc was pointless...
Arch Stanton said on 21/May/16
I think of him much as I do Beckham or Hugh Grant, upper average.
Arch Stanton said on 21/May/16
Allen said on 17/May/16
I don't think that anyone on this planet earth still thinks that Brad Pitt is 180 cm as he has been listed.

I do for one. And I would never use one picture as "evidence". And I don't think of Pitt as tall. I don't think the media portrays him as a tall man. In fact in 90s his image was shorter I thought. He pulls off looking over 5 ft 11 enough to not really be much under it, though 5'10 range is always possible.
Saqib said on 20/May/16
Rob,was george clooney joking or does he really think Pitt is 6'1?


Personally i think pitt is 5'10.5 or 5'11. I dont think Pitt has ever been shorter than 179cm/ 5'10.5
Editor Rob: if you were going to accuse someone of wearing lifts or big heels, maybe you can phrase it in such a way like Clooney did, especially if it's a friend.
175 cm said on 20/May/16
@Eric
Again there's a good reason why Pitt put down his height as 5ft 10. He has the poorer stance but I think 5ft 10.5 is max...
Click Here
Allen said on 17/May/16
I don't think that anyone on this planet earth still thinks that Brad Pitt is 180 cm as he has been listed. But when it comes to Paltrow everyone actually believes that she is 175 cm as listed. And years ago she was listed as 172 cm. Probably because of that Pitt and Paltrow naked picture and arguements she has been upgraded. The thing is if as some of you claim Pitt to be taller in that photo which is barely only 1 cm (and as I said before that is just because Paltrow is not standing straight in those pictures) still Pitt will be downgraded drastically and still you people cannot believe it because you have always perceived Pitt as a tall man thanks to the media.
Johno said on 16/May/16
The problem is, Clooney can stand very close to Pitt, probably just 0.25-inches between and Clooney can often look pretty low with some celebrities, just 5'9-ish-ISH, that is a big problem and with Shia, he can barely look more than 1-inch taller; maybe 1.25-inches. Just watch them in Fury.
Dan said on 16/May/16
Sure Andy lol. Sure...
Allen said on 15/May/16
Paltrow picture is not the only picture that we could count on. There is a photo of Pitt and Aniston at a beach and Pitt is wearing sneakers. Obviously Brad is 10 cm taller than her in that photo. Still that ain't gonna make the guy 5'10.
truth said on 15/May/16
So a lot of people on this site think that Bieber is at least 5ft9/175cm, but Pitt cannot be more than that. Really funny.
Heylo said on 15/May/16
He is taller than 177cm Rick Schroeder in Across The Tracks, a small budget film he was in before he got famous. He looks noticeably taller. He can't be under 5'10.
truth said on 15/May/16
@Johno Yes, Pitt is strong average/above average, at least around 5ft10-5ft10.5/178-179cm and 5ft11/180cm at best. Under 5ft10/178cm for him is just as bad as anything over 5ft11/180cm imho.
Dan said on 13/May/16
These are the boot and shoe brands Brad pitt's worn in the last decade : Wesco boss engineer boots, Sidi moto boots, Martin margiela engineer boots, guidi cordovan front zip boots, guidi back zip boots in horse leather with low heel, guidi back zip boots in horse with stacked 2" heel. He's currently wearing guidi back zip boots with stacked 2" heel with the vibram lug sole. His sneakers are vans half crepe surf shoes in multiple colors. Vans alomar shoes, vans raglan shoes, vans half cab, vans cojo slip on. Merrell spirit moc slip ons. Those are the only brands I can confirm which he's worn in his personal life. I can't confirm his red carpet shoes which are probably elevator shoes, but I do know he's been on the red carpet in Cannes to promote tree of life in vans alomar in moon color suede and joined Angelina Jolie at the Kung fu panda premiere wearing vans cojo slip ons. If he were extremely concerned with his height, I doubt he's go on the red carpet in slip ons.
Andy said on 12/May/16
I wish I had the pictures to prove it, but I used to know his keygrip and stuntman from one of his earlier movies. He's no more than 5'9 tops. With heels or lifts he's easily in the 6-foot range. I've seen several pictures of my friend alongside him and there's very little between them ,if anything,and he's 5'8 on the button!
On a side note, the movie I believe was "Cutting Class', and my friend told me Brad had a serious crush on the leading lady but she didn't reciprocate. Brad would come to my friend's trailer in tears over it apparently.
Greg said on 11/May/16
lol it's funny as hell I'm reading some of the comments here, who seriously thinks that he is between 5'8/5'9? He has the build of a solid 5'11 guy, maybe he's 5'11 during the morning and drops a little below it, but I can't see him dipping lower then 5'10.5 by night time.
Eric said on 11/May/16
to me he looks like a typical 5'11-6'0:the tall but not that tall guy type...i belive 181 barefoot
Dan said on 10/May/16
If you watch Johnny Suede it'll be pretty hard to say he's any shorter than 5-10. Consistently taller or as tall as every other male and female actor who is 5-10.
Johno said on 8/May/16
For.me, Pitt is an average-tall at best.
Alucard said on 6/May/16
Ego? What ego? Downgrading someone is about ego now? On the other hand you Heylo must be a rabid Brad Pitt fanboy, am i right? I just call it for what i see, Paltrow is shorter than 5'9, around 5'8, still tall for a woman, Pitt is around 5'9-5'9.5 barefoot, nothing wrong with it... He's a lifts wearer and without them he's shorter than 5'10 George Clooney...
Johnny said on 4/May/16
@Rob can you please post the photo of the magazine profile which had 5ft 11 in listing of Pitt.
Editor Rob: unfortunately don't have it, was talked about on here 10 years ago and there was a link to a scan of it at the time.
CS said on 4/May/16
180 cm give or take a few millimeters
truth said on 1/May/16
Might be more 179cm-180cm/5ft10.5-5ft10.75 night range (does not look over 6ft1 range with lifts and looked shorter than 6ft2-6ft2.5 range Bana).
Heylo said on 1/May/16
Alucard, You don't have any proof of Paltrow being 5'8 anyway, she is listed at 5'9. Brad looks minimum 5'10 in that photo with Paltrow if you count angle and the way he tilts his head.
But you're probably not going to change your mind about it because you've already made up your mind. Try to drop your ego and analyse the photo again more objectively.
Dmeyer said on 30/Apr/16
Looks similar to 5ft 11 guys like Aaron Taylor or Jon bernthal so if hé stood on same floor as beckam hé will look about same
Alucard said on 28/Apr/16
Peter ever heard of lifts? And Bana is around 6', certainly not 6'2 or 6'3... Yeah, let's throw away the best proof we have with both Paltrow and Pitt barefoot, we can still use pictures of other celebrities, with blown up heights, all dressed up with custom footwear to compare, lol...
Peter 180cm said on 26/Apr/16
@ Alucard yet he still managed to look atleast 5-6cm taller than Beckham and nomore than a solid 2 inches shorter than 188-189cm Eric Bana...Nowaay a 5'9 range man can look that tall next to 5'11 and 6'2 guys...Yet you speculated his height judging on a pic with a bad angle when both Paltrow and Pitt had different posture too...The guy is 179cm minimum barefoot and can easily look close to 6 foot when wearing lifts...
5'11 Stud said on 26/Apr/16
Pitt is letting go of lifts. It must a combination of having reached the height of his career and he has enough money in the bank. Maybe wisdom of old age. He can chalk loss of height to old age. His shoes look less "lifty" than before.
c-mo said on 25/Apr/16
some of you try to downgrade every celebrity . especially good looking male celebs

on a lot of pages I see various people doing it. that is just pathetic. complexed trolls

brad pitt seems to be in the 178-182cm range ...no less no more ...so 180cm seems to be a good shout .some here even tried downgrading him to 5'8 . will you feel better about yourself if he is 5'8 ? . well he is not . dude is ~ 5'11 . get over it
Dave said on 24/Apr/16
@Alucard, I agree. Pitt is 5'9-5'9.5 barefoot.
hijopotamus said on 23/Apr/16
Alucard, true! Let's forget about that pic. Looool
Ayush said on 23/Apr/16
O more than 5/10 feet
Alucard said on 22/Apr/16
Let's keep ignoring the known barefoot picture with 5'8 Paltrow, wich is the best evidence we have for Pitt's real height... Barefoot, 5'9-5'9.5 for Brad Pitt...
Dmeyer said on 22/Apr/16
Arguable for Pitt is 5ft 10,5-11,25 179-81 , most likely 179,5-180,5
Mathew Robinson (190 cm) said on 20/Apr/16
A lot of the big name stars like Pitt, Clooney, Damon, Bieber, Stallone, Cruise, Hanks, DiCaprio, etc... Rob generally has them consistently about .5" higher than I think they are.

To me, I see Pitt at 5'10.5", not over it. Terrific posture, somewhat bigger footwear, etc can make him look a bit taller at times.
paulkersey32 said on 19/Apr/16
Exact height. Leo is 6'. Find the in a same shoe pic standing straight I have no doubt. Also at fit peak 170 lbs
Adam said on 18/Apr/16
He's just under 5'11"... lifts are usually 1-1.5 " and shoe heels about 0.75-1" so he can look about 6' 1" with footwear. No more than 179cm barefoot... slim torso and tailored clothing gives him the appearance of more height. Either way, he looks proportional.
Adam said on 18/Apr/16
He's just under 5'11"... lifts are usually 1-1.5 " and shoe heels about 0.75-1" so he can look about 6' 1" with footwear. No more than 179cm barefoot... slim torso and tailored clothing gives him the appearance of more height. Either way, he looks proportional.
Dmeyer said on 15/Apr/16
The biggest shoe Pitt ever wears is in the 1,6-1,7in , but mostly 1-1,4in and somtimes 0,6in , like rob said 0,5in lifts is possible so 1,4 plus 0,5in that actualy gives only 0,3-0,4in because of povoting hé will still get under 2in , wish isnt so much over à regular 0,8-1,1in normal dress shoe , yet can look about 6' at times , the Guy is 5ft 11
184-182 said on 10/Apr/16
At a 5'11 listing, you reckon he could get close to 6'2 in lifts? Maybe pull off looking around 6'1 when he wants to?
Editor Rob:
Guys like Burt Reynolds used to have cowboy boots+lifts, Stallone maybe at times had real big ones, but today I can't see anybody, apart from say Downey Jr wearing obvious 'beasts'. Cruise last year definitely appeared to wear a typical elevator shoe that was easy to spot...

Pitt I think for a period went for the cuban-heel approach on some of his footwear...not so much an internal lift but an extra half inch outside. Maybe at times he has also had a 1cm lift inside giving him overall an inch of extra height though - I wouldn't rule it out.

I don't know about his boots though and whether he ever put an inch inside them.
Johno said on 10/Apr/16
Marion is about 5'5.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 9/Apr/16
Rob, which would Pitt most likely slot into?

A) 183.5cm/181.5cm
B) 183cm/181cm
C) 182.5cm/180.5cm
D) 182cm/180cm
E) 181.5cm/179.5cm
Editor Rob: I've settled on C-D zone for him and sometimes when he appears taller I think it is just slightly bigger shoes and impeccable posture.
B Webster said on 9/Apr/16
How tall is Marion Cotillard?

Click Here
truth said on 7/Apr/16
He is probably somewhere from 180cm to 182cm in the morning. In the evening a few fractions over 178cm.
Alex said on 6/Apr/16
Yep, Pitt is 178 cm barefoot, and 180 with shoes.
Ian said on 5/Apr/16
Anyone who thinks he's a true 5'11 is out of their minds! 178cm maximum barefoot in the evening.
Joe said on 5/Apr/16
Brad Pitt isn't anything shorter than 5'10.5". I rest my case here. He seems to stand quite well next to 6 footers like Edward Norton or Ryan Gosling. The 5'9" estimates are completely bull.
Mike Lowrey said on 5/Apr/16
Tiny man. Everyone knows he wear the height extending nipple bands to make him appear taller to uninitiated unlookers.
paciugo said on 3/Apr/16
he looks 5'10 next to 6'1 Tarantino.
184.3cm (Night) said on 2/Apr/16
Yeah i have changed my mind about him being 5'10.5".

He is a 5'10.75" guy (180 cm) after seeing him next to a few other actors without lifts. Clooney -5'10.5", which is why they look so close at times and other times Brad is taller ( big footwear)

Also explains why he can pull off looking 6'1" with elevators. He would probably come in at 6'1.-6'1.25" under a meter with his trick shoes minus hair.

With boat shoes he looked shorter than Clooney

0.5-0.6 in boost so only 5'11.25" with those on. Clooney had 1 inch shoe so edged him - 5'11.5".

Also noticeably shorter than a 5'11.5" peak Willis as its almost an inch difference.
Aaron Zamora said on 1/Apr/16
Rob, in the picture that everyone is talking about Leo and Brad Pitt who do you think is taller? I think They were fairly close but I think Brad looks a tiny bit taller. What is your opinion?
Editor Rob: they look close enough that you could probably class them as similar height, many wouldn't say there was anything different. But then 1 guy at near measured posture and another guy standing 1cm off his measured posture could account for situations like that.
Marzi said on 1/Apr/16
He looks the same height as Leo in that pic (maybe a cm shorter) which means that Rob's listing is pretty much spot on for both. Also, are people in here serious about that pic of him with Gwyneth? He's clearly taller then her. He might not be 5'11' on the dot but whoever is saying that he's under 5'10' is compensating for something. What's next, someone is going to pop in here claiming that he/she saw Pitt without the lifts and that he's actually shorter then Angelina and their adopted kids?
Del Mar said on 31/Mar/16
I guess I'd ctrl+f the comments I'd look for, but yes helluva lot of comments! For Pitt I think it's interesting to look back at pics of him from the 90's. He always looks 6' nowadays, and I guess elevators is to blame
mrtguy said on 31/Mar/16
doesn't give me the strong impression of 5'11''
James St. said on 30/Mar/16
Rob says: "...if I'm in this for the long haul, it is something that could be of use in the future."

Rob, if you still have records of all the past comments, you could publish a book of the funniest ones! I'm sure you've lolled plenty over some of the gems that popped up over the years . It could be a best-seller! distributed by Penguin publishing or something. Height of adult penguins varies ranges between 30cm and 130cm :-)

Height of Brad Pitt - anywhere between 177cm and 180cm
Editor Rob:
As I say, it's never dismissed and may be a future improvement or use in some way. The craziest claims or something. I mean the database has near 300,000 comments I believe (and near 3000 pitt comments!!), so there's a helluva lot of stuff stored!
Original said on 29/Mar/16
All people know that he use lifts, 2' or 2'5 inc. He is 5'9.5".
007 said on 29/Mar/16
Rob is 182cm morning height a stretch for Brad Pitt?
Editor Rob: not really, it is believable.
Del Mar said on 28/Mar/16
Damn, I wish you would save up old comments Rob! I remember I commented here way back in 06 and would be fun to look back at. I also posted a pic from Madame Tussaud which I remember Pitt doll looked 5'11 as I see Brad is steadily listet at, and I think celebheights has the most accurate and honest listing on those celebss for sure
Editor Rob: I don't know who would want to read 10 pages of Pitt comments. Although I've never ruled out the possibility one day to do an archive of old comments...if I'm in this for the long haul, it is something that could be of use in the future.
Johno said on 27/Mar/16
I do believe Leonardo does edge out Pitt though but not by much.

Click Here
Heylo said on 27/Mar/16
Syk: Yes I can explain that to you. That site is full of low intelligent bimbos who want to degrade Brad Pitt and his wife because of true jealousy, it's pathetic. They call him everything from 5'8 to 5'6 and spit hate about Brad and his wife in other threads. Don't take that seriously. Any decent person understands that hating on another man is retarded, especially if you don't know the man at all.
And the photos are obviously huge illusions which any person with an analytical ability could see.
hijopotamus said on 25/Mar/16
Leo is 181...
Brad 5'10" max
184.3cm (Night) said on 24/Mar/16
I just saw a pic of him next to Di caprio and leo is an inch taller at most but still...that makes Leo almost 6 foot and we know he isn't. So 5'10.5"-5'10.75" tops for Pitt.
Jedi Master 5'11 said on 24/Mar/16
@Kit Ah I see now. lol
Johno said on 23/Mar/16
With Gosling, Pitt's footwear does not seem abnormal from the outside but there is an arch within at the front of the shoe. Gosling's shoes appear flat whereas Pitt's have an incline even though he apparently has no large heels meaning, he probably has inner wedges.
Pitch_Fork said on 23/Mar/16
Guys, all of us have seen those pics with Gwyneth Paltrow but some still believe that is not a proof of Brad being in the 5'9'' range.
So here you go (Rob, please check this one out too): tinyurl.com/hfvpj9p.
That's just not how a 5'11'' guy would look next to a 5'4'' woman + Brad's closer to the camera
jasperwazup said on 23/Mar/16
Pitt is 178cm his head is slightly below 9''. 9''-9.4'' is average-ish. He doesn't look to have a big forehead maybe 22'' around. Normal range is 23''-24''. Large is 25''+. Huge 27''+
Kit said on 22/Mar/16
@Jedi Master, that's the whole point of the joke Clooney is making. Pointing out Brad's choice of footwear.
hijopotamus said on 22/Mar/16
syk, I see Brad same height as Paltrow. Nobody can deny that.
Alucard said on 22/Mar/16
Yes, Clooney is probably a legit 5'10, and he's the tallest of the bunch... Pitt is 5'9-5'9.5, the picture with Paltrow is the best evidence we have, like it or not... Damon is fairly short, always has been, if he gets to 5'8 he's lucky...
Dmeyer said on 22/Mar/16
Its true in walking scène they can apear same Clooney pitt
berta said on 22/Mar/16
He can look 182 with gosling he doesnt look 4 cm shorter no way.either he is wearing elevator shoes ore he is a Little taller than this, like 181-2
Brendan said on 20/Mar/16
Rob let us suppose that he uses 1.5 inch lift all the time. If you get sure about that, what number you put on list for him?
Editor Rob: looking at his footwear over the years, I can't see him wearing big lifts like 1.5. In a boot that might be possible, but in normal shoes, you struggle to get more than a 2cm lift.
Dmeyer said on 20/Mar/16
Cobsidering the posture Pitt has near Gosling And the very slight footwear adavantage you could say he looks no more than 1in smaller so if Gosling is truly 184 cm Pitt could be 181cm
Jedi Master 5'11 said on 19/Mar/16
Whatever Height he is = George Clooney in all of the Ocean's movies. They are shoulder to shoulder, head to head / same height. You can balance a plank of wood across their head/shoulders. So I don't know what George is thinking when he's saying that Pitt towers over him. They're both 5'11"
syk said on 18/Mar/16
can anyone explain this? Click Here
Blink said on 18/Mar/16
@Dmeyer yeah, I remember that for sure, Brad himself claimed to be almost 6ft.
pauly e said on 18/Mar/16
regarding Pitt's claim of his own height, I remember reading a few years back (might have been posted by a user on this site) that someone claimed Pitt was 6'0 and one of his people (publicist maybe) argued that he was not 6'0 but instead 5'11. I have been trying to google it but can't seem to find it now....
truth said on 18/Mar/16
Alucard what are you smoking? Want some of that, lol. Pitt is 5ft10.5, Clooney is 5ft10 and Matt Damon is 5ft9.5.
MarcusTheSwede said on 18/Mar/16
Agree 100% with Alucard. Finally someone who gets it.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 17/Mar/16
Pitt looks 180/181cm
TJE said on 17/Mar/16
If Gosling's just a strong 6'0 then Pitt's 5'11 tops. Not far off from 5'11, but no more.
Jen said on 17/Mar/16
I just found one article about height which supposedly came from some height site. Here is what i read there:

Tom Cruise is 170 cm
Jeorge Clooney 177.5 cm
Jason statham 175 cm
all of this sounds pretty believable, isnt it?
And then i read this:
Brad Pitt 188 cm
Woah, looks like his tricks really make some people believe him been really tall.
Alucard said on 16/Mar/16
5'9-5'9.5 for Brad Pitt, nothing more, the picture with Paltrow is pretty clear... Without lifts he's not taller than Clooney who himself is 5'10 at best, probably less, Matt Damon being the shorter of the bunch at around 5'7-5'8 max...
Appe 6ft 0.5 said on 16/Mar/16
If Gosling is 183cm as I think Brad Pitt can be easily 181cm (not under).
I am not very well informed about Clooney height, but I ve seen he is listed here 180cm and it surprised me ( he always appeared me as a tipical 178cm guy. He's infact an inch shorter than Brad Pitt (Clooney talked about Pitt as a "tall guy").
Dmeyer said on 15/Mar/16
i thaught i read someWere pitt claimed he was almost 6ft
pauly e said on 14/Mar/16
Dmeyer said on 9/Mar/16
Click Here , rare shot similar distance from camera similar shoes foot pose is normal for both and pitt is not standing as good as clooney and yet looks 2cm over clooney , you could argue 181cm from this shot , 180cm is fair

I would argue that Clooney isn't anything over 5'10, so I would say that 180 cm is fair for Pitt.
Noah said on 12/Mar/16
Rob, do you find it strange that Brad Pitt only claims 5'11? Most men that are 5'11 would claim 6 foot, especially actors.
Editor Rob: he claimed it early in his career when he was D-list. As an A-lister I've not heard him say his height!
Pitch_Fork said on 11/Mar/16
Rob, you cant ignore the pic from Dmeyer, really
Editor Rob: sometimes Pitt will look an inch taller. How often Clooney really stands as tall posture-wise as Pitt is another matter.
curious said on 11/Mar/16
He looks between 5' 10'' - 5' 11'', could be 179 cm.
Dmeyer said on 9/Mar/16
Click Here , rare shot similar distance from camera similar shoes foot pose is normal for both and pitt is not standing as good as clooney and yet looks 2cm over clooney , you could argue 181cm from this shot , 180cm is fair
Silent_D said on 8/Mar/16
5 foot 10.
Johno said on 8/Mar/16
Will Ferrell has about 4 inches on Brad and Will although he claims 6'3, is between 6'1-6'2 tall.
YAY said on 8/Mar/16
do all actors add an inch or 2 to their height when they become A-listers?
Dan said on 6/Mar/16
A 5-10 man would wear lifts so he can be 5-11 if he claims 5-11.
Dejavu said on 4/Mar/16
He looks 6'0 with Ryan Gosling
LOL2 said on 4/Mar/16
why does a 5'11 man feel the need to wear lifts?

he can be as short as 5'10 but no taller than 5'11
mrtguy said on 28/Feb/16
I don't know about legit 5'11'' for pitt
Johno said on 27/Feb/16
@Kurtz, yeh i think in real life a height between 5'11 - 6'1 might be the best.
Sam said on 27/Feb/16
Having a bigger head isn't always a bad thing if you have longer limbs. The one disadvantage is eye level.
richie said on 27/Feb/16
Solid 5'11" for Pitt, probably 6' in shoes...
Rich Hall said on 26/Feb/16
@ Johno and Dan, good points regarding height perception in movies vs real life. Here's an interesting quote from Alan Ladd : "I have the face of an aging choirboy and the build of an undernourished featherweight. If you can figure out my success on the screen you're a better man than I."
Dude was super popular throughout the 40s. Turned down the role of Giant played by James Dean. Interesting that both Neymar & Messi seem to be more popular with kids than the likes of Ronaldo or Bale. Maybe it's that identification factor that you guys mentioned... Still think Brad is 5'11" though. lol
kurtz said on 25/Feb/16
best height for a man is btwn 5 11 and 6 1 not a mm. more, not a mm. less.
if we could ask to people what is best height, that would be in this range 99.9 % of times.
no way, no arguments against this, nada de nada
Johno said on 25/Feb/16
Don't get me wrong 191-193 cm, tall aswell as a short height are secondary to character and everyone should learn to embrace their height. Non of us, well maybe just me, are supermodels. I am speaking generally.

In terms if muscle mass, "too much" muscle is relative, sure not many women drool over your average height Mr Olympias but nor would they with a huge muscular tall guy ----- that has got more to do with relativity and proportions.

I believe the entertainment industry is more a niche area and image plays a large part in entry and popularity. I believe the fact that there are less tall people in the World should not effect the representation of heights in peak popularity and brand ie there is only one Tom Cruise. It is so hard to get a break in popular entertainment that you would expect a higher number of taller entertainers but i generally believe that these taller entertainers are filtered out over time because the audience and in particular the female audience take a greater liking to the shorter entertainer and the versatility of the shorter entertainer as opposed to the taller entertainer who is usually type-cast. The shorter entertainer or the image of the shorter entertainer may lend itself more well to the audience's perceived notion of emotion and empathy, the ability to gain trust and the ability to relate and these traits greatly effect or are related to the laws of attraction. For me, the taller individuals just at times seem a bit awkward and maybe our characters and emotions are moulded in how they are physically judged in society as they grew up.

For me a height of 6'3 even is where you have start to have this stretched look, even when someone is in the 6'2-range you tend to ask about their height. I can a few tall guys with good looks who are or were popular with the ladies such as Chris Hemsworth, Jason Mamoa, Joe Manganiello, Christopher Reeves but are the comparable to say the Young Brad Pitt or Tom Cruise? Leonardo Dicaprio or Johnny Depp? Even the ultimate female magnets such Elvis and arguably Michael Jackson, who even guys like Beckham or Pitt could not compare to when it came to total and ultimate female attention did not even touch 6'0.

This begs the question, what is tall and what is short? ------ where is the cut-off point? Everything 6'0 to 5'7 ----- short? Everything 6'0 to 6'4 ----- tall?
hijopotamus said on 25/Feb/16
Poor Hall, Sly Stallone reaches the 5'10" mark, same as Cruise. No big deal. Brad can reach the 6' ish mark easily, even when he is only 5'10"
Rich Hall said on 24/Feb/16
ok folks, looks like Rob had it right all these years lol. 5'11" for Pitt does look right. Check out this vid where he's pretty much taller than everyone
Click Here
Granted, many of them are old but still... Not saying he only eats sweet peas and that he secretly is the Greeeen Giant HO HO HO but no way a 5'10" guy would look like that. Also take note of his height relative to the door at the 4.25 mark. That's similar to mine. Were it not for his shorter limbs, I'd say he could easily pass for 6' guy

and @ Dan, well to the Dan with the weird rants, in what parallel dimension is 5'10" the perfect height? Dude, that's such a weird statement. If so, why are most male models 6'2" and up? Daniel Craig who is 5'10" took a lot of flack for being "too short" to play Bond. I'm 6'1" and no way would I wanna be 5'10". Dunno if you're trolling when you say that girls don't like tall guys because their head is too long or too distant. Srs you sound like a Beta misc
Most ladies I've been with are pretty tall and love wearing heels but I dated some small ladies as well and they just loved to cuddle up to my waist when we take a romantic stroll. But hey, you sound so convinced that I doubt you'll ever get it. No biggie, to each their own I guess :^)
Dan said on 23/Feb/16
Julian, I don't know how you're referring to, but it definitely ain't me. I never mentioned anything about girls or dating. That's not me. But I stick to my opinion that Pitt is 5-10. And he wears lifts. It's clear as day. It's not a big deal.
191-193 said on 21/Feb/16
@Johno

Why are Hollywood pretty boys usually under 6 foot? For the same reason why most Miss Universes are brunettes; there are just so much more of them on this planet.
That head size and body propotion issue is also somewhat individual, usually you start to have that "stretched look" if you're closer to 2 meters tall. Besides, you could as well say that a larger head and shorter limbs are not ideal either, and if you gain a significant amount of muscle mass, it will make your limbs look even shorter. Taller guys don't have that problem. 190-195 cm is perfect for a 180 cm supermodel, just ask Gisele Bundchen.
Julian said on 20/Feb/16
I agree with the listed height; 5'11" for Pitt and he often looks taller. Dan maybe consider anger management. Sorry to hear about your lack of game with girls but doesn't mean you need to downgrade everyone under the sun so as to feel better about yourself _ smh
Heylo said on 20/Feb/16
@5ft 9.25: Brad has one of the most proportioned faces I've seen. I don't know where you get that he has a small head from?

Anyway. I agree with one of the Dans. That you can't pull off looking 6ft like Brad Pitt if you're under 5'10, it's impossible without looking suspicious.
What we should discuss is wether Brad is 178, 179 or 180cm and provide photos with celebrities around 5'10 to 6ft. We know that he barefoot next to Paltrow looked about 5'10 (everyone doesn't agree with me but for me it's crystal clear, If Gwyneth is 5'9, then Brad looked at least 5'10).
Brad also looks taller than every celebrity around 5'10. He often looks a small bit taller than people around 5'11 except for a few times, and those few times is the times where we assume that he skipped the lifts? In any case, he can't be under 5'10.
Johno said on 19/Feb/16
Click Here

Another shot where footwear is evident and you see the difference Pitt and Damon is less then 1-inch. You can clearly see Clooney and Damon looking like to one another as the always do, the only personnel looking any different is Pitt ---- clearly losing his 2-inch or so advantage his lifts normally give him.

Damon is listed at 5'10, is never this height in a million years. 5'9 could be the middle-ground but he does strike me as a 5'8-ranger; an average just like Rob. Certainly with Glenn he used to look 5'8 and with 5'7.5 James Corden, he just about looks 5'8 thus even having Damon at an average of 5'9 or Jamie Foxx height, Pitt hardly makes the 5'10 mark. As i said before ------ 5'10 is his max.

Matt Damon 5'9, 5'8-5'9
Clooney 5'9.5
Brad Pitt 5'10 max, can look in the average 5'9-range if Damon is below 5'9.
Johno said on 19/Feb/16
Click Here

A better comparison of Matt Damon and Pitt; the difference betweem them is not more the 1-inch and most likely less thus, you need to keep Damon's height within an inch of Brad's ---- these 1.5-inch or 2-inch differences are just silly assumptions and only achieved by lifts, Damon seldom wears lifts as comoared to Brad.
Johno said on 19/Feb/16
Dan, whilst i can agree Pitt could be 5'10, i would not put him in the 5'10-range. 5'10 for me, is his ceiling. Whatever height Pitt maybe ---- Damon is not more then an inch below and more rather 0.75 inches. Damon can often look max 5'9 and often in the 5'8-range. Pitt is visibly shorter then the elderly Harrison Ford and Clint Eastwood. He did not even have more then 1-inch Shia. As i said before, Pitt right is up there with the 24/7 lift wearers. He is nearly as bad RDJ. You do at times see guys like Leonardo is normal footwear, aswell guys such as Matt Damon but hardly ever Pitt.

Pitt 5'10 max
hijopotamus said on 19/Feb/16
Jeff, most celebrities lie about height, weight, plastic surgeries, fake hair, fake teeth, etc. They are pros of image. This site is about debunking some of these "perfect" people. Some people might be insecure and have height issues, thats obvious. Celebrities and regular people.
Spike said on 19/Feb/16
5 '11 (180cm) in his prime sounds perfectly legit, but considering the fact that he's over 50, he's probably more like 5'10.25 (178.4) to 5'10.5 (179).
What do you think Rob?
Jeff said on 18/Feb/16
@Dan: When you constantly downgrade every singe celebrity here, don't you think your perception of height might be a little biased? This comment goes for all the "serial downgraders" here. Use your intellect, not your height complex
The_Punisher said on 17/Feb/16
5'10'' barefoot
Dan said on 16/Feb/16
Pitt is definitely in the 5-10 range. No taller. Damon is probably about 5-9 or a smidge shorter. I think clooney is a solid 5-10. Dicaprio is definitely no shorter than 5-11. I stood right next to Don Cheadle and he is 5-8. I am 1000% sure that Dicaprio is about an inch taller than Pitt.
177-178 cm guy said on 16/Feb/16
@Johno Leo is clearly at least an inch taller than Damon in this picture:

Click Here
Dan said on 15/Feb/16
Johno, try Stallone, Robert Downey Jr., there are way too many to count. They all wear lifts
Johno said on 15/Feb/16
@177-178cm? 5'10.75 minimum? Exactly how tall do you think Damon is and what is the difference between him and Pitt? Give me some estimates and let us deal with it.
Rich Hall said on 13/Feb/16
yo dan, you're gonna give yourself a stroke lol
sure, Hijodude sees Pitt as a bit smaller than most here but I think he's on to something. Check out Jolie next to dustin & jack black, She looks no more than 5'5"! don't get bummed out hijo.Even if you're in the minority, stay true to your opinions and accept what you see in ze mirror !!! --> Click Here
177-178 cm guy said on 13/Feb/16
@Johno Leo is 5'10.75" at worst. He never looks under 5'10". And Brad is at least 5'10". Deal with it.
Johno said on 12/Feb/16
I cannot think of many male A-listers who wear lifts more then Pitt does
MarcusTheSwede said on 12/Feb/16
Dan: You are wrong in all youre rambling about. Hijopotamus is correct. Pitt hasnt by a fantasy wizard grown its called height insoles and special build footwear. Dont listen to Dan. Cuz he is dead wrong in all his jibberish. Bye.
Sam said on 12/Feb/16
Btw I peg Leo 181cm and Pitt more 5'10 range than the full 5'11.
Sam said on 12/Feb/16
Actually, even though some won't agree, I have confidence that Dicaprio could possibly be a full inch taller than a liftless Pitt.
Mathew Robinson (190 cm) said on 12/Feb/16
5ft 9.25 said on 12/Feb/16
Gosling 6'.25
Pitt 5'10.5
We all know he uses lifts (at lest .75"). The small head makes him appear taller...

---

Knock Gosling down another quarter inch and I'm on board.
5ft 9.25 said on 12/Feb/16
Gosling 6'.25
Pitt 5'10.5
We all know he uses lifts (at lest .75"). The small head makes him appear taller...
TJE said on 11/Feb/16
@hijopotamus

What brand of tin foil do you use to fashion your hats out of? I'm going to a Reptilians did 9/11 convention this weekend and I need something that can last for a few days. The sooner the better; Thanks!
thething said on 11/Feb/16
@ johno

You are using logic and not just going with what people say.bravo. Proportions are a sign of healthy genes and are way more attractive to women than height plus Statistically very tall men live shorter lives and have way more health problems after 40.tell me a logical reason why women should want these kind of genes for their offsprings?Women are more attracted to men with normal or short limbs compared to torso, long limbs are not sexy to ladies.The most beautful face is not a long,short or large face,it's a normal face.not too long ,not too large or too short.That goes for height too.Average height is the best to get the girls.i'd say 5'8 to 6'1 is good for a man,ideal would be 5'9 to 6'1
Dan said on 11/Feb/16
Dude, I am the original Dan here. Now there are two other Dans. I'm definitely not a Dan that suffers from height insecurity, and I'm not
The Dan who says that women prefer six footers. Change your names guys, I've been here a long time.
Dan said on 11/Feb/16
Amen Johno
hijopotamus said on 11/Feb/16
Dan, show me Pitt is whatever height you claim or just prove he is not a certain height.
If you cant, dont spread missinformation.
...
hijopotamus said on 11/Feb/16
Dan, you don't know **** about shoes.
And I mean "this type" of shoes.
Get educated and come back.
Jeff said on 10/Feb/16
Rob, on the Michael Vartan page, I saw that you used to have Pitt at 181. Why did you downgrade him? Is it related to your discovery of his 5'11 claim on the teen magazine profile?
Editor Rob: he could pull off looking over 5ft 11 at times, but then in his early 20's he did put down 5'11 in his own handwriting on a profile sheet.
Dan said on 10/Feb/16
There are new pictures of Pitt on set of War Machine. He is on the street jogging in short shorts and running sneakers. You can see his legs really well and it's very obvious how much help he's getting from his sneakers. Not that much.
Johno said on 9/Feb/16
How can most women prefer guys who are 6'0 + when guys like Beckham, Pitt, Cruise, Depp, Clooney, Brando, Dean, Dicaprio and not to forget all your typical teen idols such as Bieber and all your typical boybands have all been largely under 6'0 and nothing more then average? All these males have had normal dimensions and proportions. A relatively smaller head and long legs are not all that appealing. Taller guys tend to have these features. Also when the head is to far up, it is hard to emphaise with the individual ---- women usually have a lower centre of gravity. Also the facial bone structure of the shorter guy has been less susceptible for excess bone growth and it is more aqualine and can be quite angelic and metrosexual.

Women believe they prefer tall guys because all their idols overlist their heights. Pitt and Dicaprio would be lucky to average 5'10 or over but their body proportions are good as they are, they are ideal for the big screen.
Dan said on 8/Feb/16
hijopotamus, your constant efforts to cling on to your fantastic claims that Brad Pitt is under 5'10" is simply baffling. At least the other Dan who suffers from height insecurity follows a logical train of thought when it comes to assessing heights. You on the other hand make no sense at allr. It is perfectly clear without the shadow of any doubt that Brad would still be taller than the regular joe even if he didn't lift, and seriously dan, it's not the lifts you insist on wearing that will help you finally get a date. It's how you carry yourself. Brad Pitt is 5-10 and yes he's often seen wearing boots, big heels and the occasional lift but think about it. If he really was under 5-10, he would never look 6-0, which he often does in movies.
and to the other dan, 5-10 is the perfect height for film. If you're having issues with girls, believe me, it's not because of your height.
Dmeyer said on 8/Feb/16
Shoes that give 2-2,25in have a dodgy look And yet they make you look just 1-1,25in taller than you are Pitt shoes arnt as big And hé can look near 6ft so 5'11 it is
Dan said on 8/Feb/16
Hijopotamus, show me one pair of tricky shoes Brad Pitt has ever worn. Show me one pair. If you can't, then don't spread missinformation.
Abode46 said on 8/Feb/16
Strong 5'10" barefoot, but has perfect posture and can look 6'0" or over.
hijopotamus said on 7/Feb/16
Dan, Pitt wears lifts or custom tricky shoes 24/7.
So, nothing to do with having to look taller in movies.
We all saw those pics getting off a private jet with friends Clooney and Damon. Pitt looked shorter than Clooney...
Wonder why haha.
Sam said on 7/Feb/16
My assumption is that some women just hear what they want to hear. Would a 5'10 guy that claims 6 foot honestly have a better chance than another guy that is 182cm and says he's under 6 foot, all things being equal? I think its dependant on how tall you look in the flesh because eye level, shoes, posture, hair and build all add to illusion of more height. I doubt any legit 5'10+ guy should have dating issues even if those "illusions" go against him. But your right about 5'10 not sounding very impressive on paper even though its a good height. Just not as ideal as say 6 foot but there's nothing wrong with that.
Myth Buster said on 4/Feb/16
He has got the body structure of a short man (5' 8'') despite being 5' 11'', same as David Beckham.
kurtz said on 3/Feb/16
5' 11'' or 180 cm. spot on

in my opinion btwn 5' 11'' and 6' 1'' (180-185 cm.) best height range for man
Dan said on 2/Feb/16
@dan, Guys Johnny Depp and Brad Pitt lift because they're movie stars and have a certain look they need to have. It has nothing to do with their height insecurity. I'm pretty sure neither of them would lift it they were regular joes. If you're s legit barefoot 5-10 and you're lifting, you got issues. Barefoot 5-10 is the perfect movie star Hollywood height. There should be no reason to lift, and I seriously can't imagine any woman not being satisfied with a 5-10 guy unless of course, the woman is 5-9,5-10 or taller. I'm basically saying that if you're a barefoot 5-10 guy dating a woman anywhere from 5-3 all the way up to 5-8 and she's telling you she prefers guys 6-0 and up, then there's probably something else going on there. When a woman and man go out and she wears heels, even a height difference of 1 inch between a man and woman is enough. Two inch difference is probably ideal, but 1 inch difference is still acceptable. If the guy is too much taller than the woman, she's basically a shrimp. And ideally, a couple shouldn't have such a drastic difference in height. That's why John Mayer and Jennifer aniston looked like ****.
Dmeyer said on 2/Feb/16
Ok mat , relax men i just said girls told me that they préfère 6'0-6'4 wich means 5'10,5-6'2 in reality , i dont have the problème anyway i am 5'11,5 And most girls guess me 6'0-6'1 or even more so whi would i lie , also 5ft 10,25 is à very décent height its not like you are 5'7-8in , in the US the height is à réal problem ,
Tunman said on 1/Feb/16
@Dan
Really no average man should have height complex,just think that I'm 5'9.5 and almost never wore anything over 0.5" for years.Missing a hottie just because you're thinking about your lifts is a pity.
Okay the only case where I could agree with you is if an average man is attracted by a very tall woman,say in the 5'11-6' range.Here it's true that women may prefer taller guys like 6'0-4 range,so yeah average men chances are indeed very weak.But just think that when I was in NY I saw a guy who was probably 175 with a 188 or so girlfriend and in Montreal a 165 guy with a 186-7 girl.Quite genuine girls who never had the kind of thoughts like"he will need a ladder to kiss me".Height should never be a condition for love whether for men or women in my opinion.If one starts to quantify sexuality in terms of inches,then what about other issues which happen to be much more important actually?(personnality,behaviour,kindness,respect...)just ask Rob,after all Jenny could be near 5'11 in heels,hmmm?
Dan said on 31/Jan/16
Heylo says: "I think insecure men are more likely to be with shallow and stupid women."
Yeah true dat. I've always dated models or tanned gym bunnies. Except for high school, I've never been with a "normal" down to earth girl. Probably a reflection of my own issues. Even though my friends point out that I'm taller than average, somehow I can't seem to feel good about my height unless I wear lifts. Except when doing sports. Like on the beach, I suddenly don't care which really shows it depends on my state of mind.
I know it sounds ridiculous but I've tried not to wear lifts for 1 day and it was torture! There was this hot girl who was flirting with me but I couldn't even enjoy it. All I was thinking about was put my lifts back on. Sigh
Mat, don't forget that celebrity is a huge turn on for girls. Besides, Johnny Depp lifts all the time as well so it's pretty clear he too wished he was taller. Not saying he's insecure like me though
NBAer said on 31/Jan/16
dan said on 27/Jan/16
I don't get your height problem,and i also don't get how you think height is such a big factor when it comes to girls and dating...As long as you're atleast abit taller than your girl(in most cases anyway),you won't have a problem.Besides,when meeting people,you don't dudge them by their physical appearance,but from their character and height is sth MAYBE secondary(i'm talking about myself).Also,i can't get it how mostly everyone on this website claiming to be under 5'11 but over 5'7 feel short and subhuman,just because they're not 6ft++ with broad shoulders,6packs,good looks and loads of money...I'm barely 5'11 myself barefoot,and i never ever ever feel short or undersized wherever i go.On the worst case, i may feel average,and i rarely meet taller women with or without heels.And i'm supposedly living in a country where men are about 5'9 on average and women 5'4...By the way,Brad looks 5'11 and rarely below in most of his pics with other celebrities,and closer to 6 feet when he's lifting
hijopotamus said on 31/Jan/16
Dan, relax dude! I understand you have some kind of weird issues in the ladies department and that must suck pretty much. If you are cool enough, alfa and have some power you shouldnt have.any problems even if you are short.
The Paltrow pics are the ONLY reliable source we have which is a guy barefoot besides another person barefoot. You don't need a brain surgery to get it.
Pitt 5'10" in the 90s.
Emil 183 cm said on 30/Jan/16
@dmeyer
those girls have no idea how tall a genuine 6'0 guy is - let alone 6'4 lol.
And why even bother chasing girls who are so narrowminded? Height shouldn't play a factor
Mat said on 30/Jan/16
@dmeyer
Dan i totaly understand you , i use to live in us and girls anywere 5'0-5'11 all told me they wouldnt date a Guy shorter than me about 6'0 ,and most of them prefer 6'0-6'4 with normal looks than 5'9-10in with perfect looks ,they father date ed norton than tom cruise

First of all, Edward Norton is better looking than Cruise in my opinion. Secondly, who do you think women would rather date, Johnny Depp (5'9) or Norton (6') ? Johnny Depp of course. So what you are saying abut the 5'9-5'10 guys is BS. From my experience, women have absolutely no problem dating an average height man. Being average is neither a pros nor a con. It's just neutral. It doesn't matter. If a guy is on the short side, it starts becoming a con, if he is on the taller side it becomes a pros.

Any woman would rather date a 5'9 guy with perfect looks than a 6+ with average looks. Just because you don't have any luck with the ladies doesn't mean that applies to all of us. I am actually described as tallish by most girls, and my height has never been a deal breaker. I'm 5'10.25 by the way.
Heylo said on 30/Jan/16
My experience is that girls tend to sound disappointed when hearing that I'm barely 5'10 but I could have said 5'11 and get away with it cause people in general are pretty bad at estimating heights. Also, 5'10 sounds shorter in paper than what it looks like in reality. With this said, I'm not saying that girls wouldn't prefer a 6'2 version of me, I'm just saying that average isn't that bad in reality.

And I think we all have certain preferences that suddenly don't mean much if you meet the right person. I've had girls around my height (5'10) that were interested and these are very tall girls. I also had girls who thought I was pretty short. I definitely don't think you're doomed in any way if you're around average in height.
It's when the height goes to extreme differences compared to your own ideals, that's where problems arises. If a girl wants a 6'2 man but starts to like a 5'5 man, she may actually think about leaving him because of his height, because of that extreme difference from heir ideals. There are exceptions of course but honestly, to every average man out there, you don't have to look like a model to get attractive girls. It's kind of sad how everyone wants to look like a greek god, nature wouldn't make sense if everyone looked like a tall Brad Pitt. Diversity is necessary.

Keep in mind that you only have to be taller than the girl and as long as you make the best of what you have and are a genteman, you should make it. A girl who disses someone for being some inches smaller than her ideal, then she may be nothing to have. At least I feel like mature and intelligent women are more attractive. I think insecure men are more likely to be with shallow and stupid women.
dan said on 27/Jan/16
dmeyer is spot on. The shorter the guy, the more he has to "work" and make up for it. It's a permanent curse and that's a fact. And if there's one thing females hate more than a short dude, it's a short smiling dude with a high pitched voice. In that case, we're not even talking about mere preference, for 99% of ladies, this combo is a deal breaker with no hope of rescue. You could take the ideal man with perfect features and personality and shrink him to say 5'5", women would still pick an average or even ugly looking 6'2" dude. We live in a No Country for Short Men world and short dudes are the equivalent of fat, really ugly chicks with bad breath and chlamydia. Some may say it's not fair or politically correct but it's the plain truth and that's just the way the cookie crumbles. And even in cases where some girls actually dig short guys physically or aren't planning on having kids, they'd still give preferences to taller guys because of the status appeal and what society paints as the image of a cool boyfriend or husband. A short boyfriend is not exactly show off material, and often, it's seen as an embarrassment so if a dude is short, he better be minted. Why do you figure so many short dudes are nerds? That's because money is the great equalizer. Evolution 101

Sorry to burst your bubble hijopota but you're wrong about Pitt being my height. He's 5'11" minimum and he wasn't just barely taller than Redford. I dunno why you keep bringing up the Paltrow pics. He's not short. Get over it dude
Editor Rob: many women are quite happy to overlook shortness in stature for tallness in bank balance.
Johno said on 26/Jan/16
An average height guy. Him, Clooney and Damon are all within 1-inch of another although, Clooney and Damon wear lifts alot less then Pitt does; both seem to be more comfortable with their average heights.

Brad Pitt (Average height man)
hijopotamus said on 26/Jan/16
Dan, Pitt was wearing massive heels in Spy Games and barely taller than Redford. Dude, you are weird!
dmeyer said on 26/Jan/16
Dan i totaly understand you , i use to live in us and girls anywere 5'0-5'11 all told me they wouldnt date a Guy shorter than me about 6'0 ,and most of them prefer 6'0-6'4 with normal looks than 5'9-10in with perfect looks ,they father date ed norton than tom cruise
Dan said on 26/Jan/16
Well I ended up dating them anyways but when the conversation turned to height, they confirmed they'd have preferred a taller version of me. I don't know how tall you are but I've never met a 5'10 dude who wouldn't rather be 6'2" or vice versa, a 6'2" dude who'd wanna be shorter. I'm 5'10 barefoot and I often feel short when I'm not lifting.I guess it's because I've gotten too used to them. Wish there was a minimal shoes rehab program. Detox could wreck my self-esteem but coming out of it, I wouldn't be dependant on lifts anymore. In my post, I said I've had a height complex for years so you telling me there's something wrong with me or my girlfriends is kinda redundant, don't you think? Of course there's something wrong! I'm an insecure dude with a height complex and they're tall lanky beauties with eating issues.
Anyways truthfully, most girls I know would rather date tall guys. Not just the models. In fact, in my experience, it's the smaller girls who crave really tall boyfriends. Weird, I know, but that's what I've observed.

Pitt towered over Robert Redford in Spy Games. In that movie, he actually looked like he a 6'2" dude. Peace out
Dan said on 24/Jan/16
Brad Pitt doesn't always look 6-1. No way. He has looked anywhere from 5-11 to 6-1 depending on the role. In moneyball and basterds he looked really tall. And 5-10 flat barefoot is definitely not short. If a girl tells you you'd be a hottie if you were 2 inches taller than sorry bud, but there's either something wrong with you or those girls. I've never ever met a girl who requires a man above 5-10 unless they're 5-9 or 5-10 themselves.
Alex said on 23/Jan/16
If Pitt use some lift, he could be less than 180 cm.
Smith said on 21/Jan/16
Brad is 183 cm tall. And in those pictures that he looks shorter than others it's because they are wearing lifts and he is not. You think he is the only one who wears lifts?
Dmeyer said on 19/Jan/16
Relooking at pics dicaprio could look easily as tall if not 1/4 in taller , its à shame there is à récent pic of leo And Pitt but they are not side by side
Dmeyer said on 18/Jan/16
pitt looks taller than dicaprio near 5'10 innaritu and dicaprio looks taller than brad near tarantino , and thats counting footwear , wich means they are similar heights
Dmeyer said on 16/Jan/16
gosling isnt less than 183-4cm pitt has to be 179-80cm tu pull off this tall near him in shoes that dont look like big elevators
a said on 14/Jan/16
Pitt is 180 max. Gosling is 184 max. I doubt Gosling wears lifts but Pitt def does. In some films he can look over 183cm and yet in others he can look much shorter next to a taller actor
Dan said on 14/Jan/16
I am 5'10" on the dot and ladies often say that if I were 2 inches taller, I'd be a hottie. I've had a height complex for years. Once, a girl model told me she 'd never date a short guy. It's like anything under 5'11" is subhuman. That's why even dudes like Collin FarrelI are forced to wear lifts. I take care of myself and am well built but without the height, it just seems like wasted efforts. That's why most short dudes I know look angry and always ready to pick a fight. Being short is a life sentence so no wonder so many walk around being pissed off at life. Tall dudes on the other hand can get any girl they want just by saying hi.It's a natural thing. Females want the tall gene for their offspring or just for social status. Dating a short dude puts you in the loser category unless he's filthy rich or a celeb. Never seen a Pitt movie where he doesn't look tall. He's got wide shoulder and a slim waist and which I suspect help accentuate his tallness on screen but it's not like they surround him with midgets! He always looks 6'1" or more. I really don't get the logic of those saying he's just 5'10".
Tom Cruise on the other hand always looks short irrespective of camera angles, short co-stars or lifts. 5'11 is the bare minimum for Pitt.
pauly e said on 14/Jan/16
Dmeyer said on 13/Jan/16
They look close enaugh to wath Gosling has if anithing Gosling heels are a few mm thicker but but could have a 0,5-6in lifts anyway hé manages to look just 0,75-1in smaller while in max 1-1,5cm more shoes hé has to be max 3-4cm under Gosling who isnt under 6'0,25

so 6'0.25 is 183.5 cm....so if Pitt is 3-4 cm under him, then that is 179.5-180.5 or just a bit over 5'10.5 - just a bit over 5'11. I think that is reasonable.
Dmeyer said on 14/Jan/16
Cobsidering how Pitt looks near Gosling even cobsidering very slightly more shoes as they dont look that suspicions he has to be max 3-4cm shorter no more And Gosling is in the 183-4cm no less so Pitt 180cm anyone 179 or less couldnt pull that off
Mathew Robinson (190 cm) said on 14/Jan/16
jtm said on 13/Jan/16
hasn't there been enough evidence gosling isn't even 6'0? still sticking with under 5'10 for pitt.

---

Gosling isn't over 6'0". But as for Pitt, I really don't think he's less than 5'10". I think 5'10.25" - 5'10.5" is likely what he'd measure. I see a strong 5'10"-er who likes thick heels and at times puts lifts in them.
Adam said on 14/Jan/16
Yeah, good spot, definite elevators from Pitt there. Even with those and Goslings somewhat slouching posture Pitt still looks a little shorter...still think 5'11 about right for him, though it does prove Gosling is no less than 6.25.
hijopotamus said on 14/Jan/16
Guys, Brad is wearing elevators!
How como Tom Cruise be as tall as Cameron Diaz in high heels? We all have seen it. Well, we all know how...
Why some people deny the true facts? Why Brad cannot be just average height?
jasperwazup said on 13/Jan/16
Brad's 5'9.75'' at shortest time of day.Ryan is an actual 5'11.5'' tall but looks 6 foot most of the time.
mickey said on 13/Jan/16
i guess we can safely say that he hasn't lost any height through the years. Strong 5'11, maybe at morning with perfect posture he can scratch 6ft.
Dmeyer said on 13/Jan/16
They look close enaugh to wath Gosling has if anithing Gosling heels are a few mm thicker but but could have a 0,5-6in lifts anyway hé manages to look just 0,75-1in smaller while in max 1-1,5cm more shoes hé has to be max 3-4cm under Gosling who isnt under 6'0,25
jtm said on 13/Jan/16
hasn't there been enough evidence gosling isn't even 6'0? still sticking with under 5'10 for pitt.
Tom said on 12/Jan/16
If you zoom in on his shoes they look very questionable. Look at how the tongue/lace area are almost flat on Gosling's shoes yet on Brad's it looks up to a 45 degree angle. Very much how elevator shoes such as Don's look. Because of the extra heel height it is like wearing a small pair of heels like those that females wear and it is clear how that changes the angle of the foot. Much like when you stand on your tip toes.

Click Here
Josh said on 12/Jan/16
doc you need an eye doc for not seeing Pitt same height as Paltrow. telling other commentors "stupid" does not make Pitt any taller than Platrow. You need to learn some manners that in such websites people only argue about their own opinions not insulting others like 14 year old kids.
HeightObsession said on 12/Jan/16
Can be either 5'11 to 5'11.5. He is virtually the same height as my boyfriend who I have constantly measured as 5'11.5. I had my boyfriend stand next to the Madame Tussauds London Eye Brad Pitt wax model. Even though my boyfriend was did not have the best posture next to him, it looked like they were almost the same height. However, I suspect that Brad Pitt's heels were .25 inch taller than my boyfriend's. It could be possible Pitt was wearing lifts in his shoes, but I would confidently say 5'11.25 looks accurate.
6ft-on-a-good-day said on 12/Jan/16
closer look at the shoes. Click Here surpisingly the heel looks about a cm more than regular dress shoes for both. But i think this puts to bed the below 5"10 claims unless they're both shorter than claimed. I'd say the listing was there or there abouts.
Keith said on 12/Jan/16
Am I the only one who watched the video all the way through and noticed that any time Brad straightened up, he was at least as tall as Ryan? 0:20, 0:25, 0:30, 0:53 etc. Look at 0:57 to see Brad looking taller. Then 1:10 Brad goes full height and he just looks visibly bigger.
Dejavu said on 12/Jan/16
In that video brad Pitt looked an inch shorter than Gosling
TJE said on 11/Jan/16
@Jed

Brad has a camera advantage later in the video, but in the beginning he doesn't. Also in the beginning, Ryan looks barely an inch taller than Brad when their posture is equal. Brad's shoes is questionable though; they look close to 2 inches thick.
Josh said on 11/Jan/16
Maybe Gosling had threatened Brad that if he wears his massive lifts he will do the same and dwarf Brad by billions of inches lol
Doc said on 11/Jan/16
Such a good looking man as Brad Pitt can't have a perfectly good height.., no no. Some people just want to downgrade him because they can. Jealous ****s.
And if you think Brad looks the same height as Paltrow barefoot then you're stupid, I've been looking at those photos now and any person with a slight hint of intelligence should be able to see that Brad is taller.
Jed said on 11/Jan/16
This video at the golden globes is interesting. He's standing next to Gosling and looks an inch or so shorter, but then he straightens up a couple of times and looks pretty much the same height. You'd think that if he was that height conscious he wouldn't slouch next to a taller dude for the bulk of the time he was standing next to him. He could have lifts in his shoes, but the shoes themselves look pretty standard.

Click Here

I don't think he could be under 5'11. 5'10 and below claims are a little silly.
whoa said on 10/Jan/16
Pitt is either 5'11 or 5'10. No taller, no shorter.

But honestly if he was 5'11 why would he desire to wear 2 or 3 inch lifts? Is he that insecure
Sam said on 10/Jan/16
I bet Pitt measures around the same height as Big Josh would, upper 5'10 range, maybe 179cm but no more.
Filippo said on 10/Jan/16
hijopotamus said on 27/Dec/15
Dan, if his height varies between 2 it means he is definetly the lowest, hello!

By far the most clever thing I read around here in a while!
Matt179 said on 9/Jan/16
Hes probaly 179cm out of bed, Hes defenetly Height concious, he wear Lift and big heel dress shoes.

I got a dress shoes generic brand(Not elevator) That got 1.25 heel, they look perfectly normal. I can stuff a 1 Inch lift inside the shoes and walk completly normal. Im 178cm midday, With these shoes it take me to 183cm(6 feet).

At 6 feet i dont tower Anyone i meet everywhere i go, But also i dont get tower by anyone. Feels good.
Josh said on 9/Jan/16
Brad Pitt is even shorter than Matt Damon. Search Matt Damon and Gwyneth Platrow and you will see that she's taller a little bit than Matt with heels and Matt has no height boost. As we have seen before Brad is the same height as Paltrow barefeet.
mickey said on 9/Jan/16
5'11 seems correct. though he can appear to be 6ft with his good posture.
Aaron Zamora said on 8/Jan/16
He looked huge in the movie The big Short he looked much bigger than Finn Whitrock who you have listed here as 5'9. Brad really does give the impression of a 6'1 or taller man as Clooney states. His height is actually irritating!
John said on 8/Jan/16
I'm going to say he is about 5'10. He is as tall as Michelle Forbes and shorter than David Duchovny. I don't think he was allowed to wear lifts in Kalifornia.
Celebheights 6'1.75/187 CM said on 7/Jan/16
Or if I offer him a few billion dollars, and some classes to grow taller lol.
hijopotamus said on 7/Jan/16
Mat, because he is not 5'11"! It's so obvious he is shorter than Willis and Geena Davis in flats while Pitt in COWBOYS! If Geena is 6' and Brad 5'11" Brad should have looked same height or even taller as cowboys are 5 cm heel....2 inches!

Anyone has seen Brad barefoot? Not even in the beach! Only in that pic with Paltrow where they look same height.
Mat said on 5/Jan/16
Rob, why wouldn't Brad let anyone measure him? He is supposed to be honest about his height since he is listed everywhere as 5'11. It's not like he claims a bigger height or the public believes he is taller. Since you estimate him a legit 5'11, he shouldn't have any objections. Unless... he is not that tall ;)
Editor Rob: to retain an air of mystery.
Josh said on 5/Jan/16
Mat the second picture of yours shows Brad having a smaller bone structure than Norton! It's obvious.
Collin said on 5/Jan/16
unless he was 5'3+ LOL
176.2 said on 4/Jan/16
@Kim Jansson
Next time please measure the most important part of his body haha
Celebheights 6'1.75/187 CM said on 3/Jan/16
There's no way that Brad Pitt would EVER let somebody measure him (unless he was 6'0"+).
Editor Rob: the only way you'll get to measure Brad Pitt is if you agree to do it blindfolded.
Mathew Robinson (190 cm) said on 2/Jan/16
Could this be the guy? Click Here
Aaron zamora said on 2/Jan/16
Rob, do you personally believe that Brad Pitt wears lifts or not?
Editor Rob: I think he's obviously at times worn a bigger heel like a 1.5 range shoe. Other times I think he may well have used a 1/2 inch lift, the kind that fits in a dress shoe and really is harder to spot.
brendan said on 2/Jan/16
Rob did you check The Big Short premiere photos?
Brad Pitt and Ryan Gosling was there.
I think they seemed same height or may be Gosling was just 1 cm taller.
What do you think Rob?
Editor Rob: Ryan could look no more than 6ft with Pitt, whose footwear really didn't look anything that suspicious!
Collin said on 1/Jan/16
You measured each other last year? Hahahaha! Are you sure he was Brad Pitt himself? lol. I think someone was trying to seduce you! lmfao
and if you think people have nothing good to do with their lives for posting here then you have found this website all of a sudden and out of nowhere I suppose? Who ever you are you made us laugh!
Josh said on 31/Dec/15
@Kim Jansson
LOL
I can't stop laughing. You're the funniest of all!
What did you think before posting exactly? Even if you were an A List superstar, Brad wouldn't let you wipe his back for him LOL
Derian said on 30/Dec/15
Honestly if he is short how is he standing taller than Claudia Schiffer. Even if he is using lifts he has to be tall enough to stand 6'0 or taller. That depends on Schiffer's real height though.
Kim Jansson said on 30/Dec/15
This is soo weird to read,havnt you people got better things to do? None of you knows **** and are just guessing and dissing each other. Im a danish actor,who are a friend of Brad. Im 180 cm and Brad is 177. We measured each other last year.
Mat said on 30/Dec/15
Rob, is it safe to say there's an inch between Pitt and Norton here? Click Here

Also look at that: Click Here

It's safe to say that Pitt had at least a 0.5 inch advantage on Norton shoe-wise in the film, and always came 0.5 shorter than Norton (who was slouching). Is 5'10.5 possible?
Editor Rob: stationery photos can be easier to judge than when people are in motion, but at times Pitt could look less than Norton, other times closer in height. Generally though, Pitt has the better posture out of the two.
Dmeyer said on 30/Dec/15
Just to let know , at telma and louise première Pitt has à shoes in the 1in type low cut and Witt almost no room for lifts also hé wasnt à list so no reason for , and hé looks close enaugh d'avis height like 1in smaller max and not more than 3,5-4in smaller than mac Donald whom i met met and was near 6ft3 10 years back
Heylo said on 29/Dec/15
Hijopotamus, He never looked under 5'10. Only in very strange angled photos where an NBA star would look like a midget (best example of this is the Ocean's 12 movie, in which he looks 5'8 or 5'7 next to George Clooney, the problem is that he is standing several meters from him, but for people who only glance at the photo, it looks like Brad is 5'8 and standing besides his pal George)
I've seen a lot of photos from the 90s. Go on Getty Images and search his name. Then go through the gallery from the 80s through the 90s. He did never look under 5'10, never. The Paltrow photo isn't as good evidence of his "5'9" height as you might think. Analyze the photo more and you will get an 5'10+ estimate of Brad's height.

Simple conclusion, he can't be under 5'10. If so, by a very small amount, almost unnoticeable.
Josh said on 28/Dec/15
In the picture that he is naked it is obvious that he has the legs of a 5'7-5'8 perosn. If you wanna claim 5'9 or 5'10 then his torso has to be unnaturally long! LOL
MarcusTheSwede said on 28/Dec/15
Hijopotamus: AGREE finally somebody seeing thru all crap. Brad hasnt magicly grown since movie with Geena Davis yeez and also liten to LEN below, Thanks hijopotamus
MarcusTheSwede said on 28/Dec/15
Hijopotamus: AGREE finally somebody seeing thru all crap. Brad hasnt magicly grown since movie with Geena Davis yeez Thanks hijopotamus
Dan said on 28/Dec/15
Geena Davis is 6 feet tall. Of course she's gonna look taller than him. And Bruce Willis had to be taller than him in 12 monkeys. It's the characters they were playing. I think Bruce Willis is easily 5-11, but could also be a little over 5-10. Brad Pitt is 5-10 and wears boots, big heeled shoes and sometimes lifts. That's why Pitt can near 6-0.
hijopotamus said on 27/Dec/15
Dan, if his height varies between 2 it means he is definetly the lowest, hello!
Shorter than Bruce Willies and shorter than Geena Davis even Pitt wearing cowboy boots! Pic with Paltrow, slightly taller than Redford. Too much evidence! PITT was never 5'11" in the 90s so theres no way he grew up in the 00s.
Dont you guys feel weird claiming 5'11"??
Jesus!
Dan said on 27/Dec/15
I'm anywhere from 5'10.5 to 5'11 and people assume I'm 6'0 to 6'1. I guess I would say Pitt is in the 5'10-11 range. I wouldn't pin a specific height on him since it always seems to change through his various roles.
hijopotamus said on 25/Dec/15
Under 5'10" for sure and 6' with his tricks.
Merry Xmas.
Blink said on 25/Dec/15
This is my take on it: Brad is 5'11 late night, which means throughout the day he ranges from 5'11.5-5'11. With shoes with an inch-an inch an a half (which isn't unreasonable at all), he would be at 6'0-6'1, which makes a lot of sense to me.
TJE said on 24/Dec/15
Emil, you're being WAY TOO GENEROUS!

Brad's MAYBE a weak 5'4....in the morning.....on a perfect day......in his platforms....and on his tiptoes.
Emil 183 cm said on 24/Dec/15
Haha, Rob, true that. But for real, Pitt being anything under than 5'10 is hysterical
Josh said on 24/Dec/15
Strong 5'10"? Who ONLY enjoys lifts? LOL!
Mathew Robinson (190 cm) said on 23/Dec/15
177-178 cm guy said on 23/Dec/15
I've said it before and i'll say it again: Strong 5'10" guy who enjoys lifts.

---

Bingo.
Dan said on 23/Dec/15
5-7 lmao.
Idk said on 23/Dec/15
I think listing is accurate. A 5'10 guy would have a much harder time pulling off 6 footer look which Pitt has

Heights are barefeet estimates, derived from quotations, official websites, agency resumes, in person encounters with actors at conventions and pictures/films.

Other vital statistics like weight, shoe or bra size measurements have been sourced from newspapers, books, resumes or social media.

Celebrity Fan Photos and Agency Pictures of stars are © to their respective owners.