Glenn Close's Height
5ft 4.5in (164 cm)
American actress best known for roles in movies like Fatal Attraction, Dangerous Laisons and 101 Dalmations. On tv, she has earned plaudits for the drama series Damages. In the Virginian Pilot (Nov 22, 2000) she commented on her height in regards to reprising her role as Cruella De Vil in 102 Dalmations: "I'm just five feet five inches tall. I had to wear four and a half inch heels for most of the film"
Photos by PR Photos
Add a Comment 20 comments
Average Guess (1 Votes)
AM said on 29/Nov/16
Passed her a few times on set while working on a film with her recently - a lot smaller than she appears on-screen, but considering I grew up watching her in the Dalmatian films, where she also wore large shoulder pads, the above quote explains that.
Pedro said on 15/Nov/14
She is listed 5'4" in her resume.
Arch Stanton said on 18/Jan/14
Yeah about 2 inches shorter in heels next to Douglas, 5'5" ish seems about right.
Arch Stanton said on 18/Jan/14
Looks 5'5 to me in Fatal Attraction, really scares me in that film!!
Ted said on 7/Jan/14
@J. lee - 5'7"? No way.
Watch her in Dangerous Liaisons standing side by side with 6'0" John Malkovich. He towers over her and then some. 5'5" is about the most you could claim for Close.
J.lee said on 7/Aug/13
she looks 5 ft 7, rob
Jack said on 26/Mar/11
No way in hell is she 5'4.5"... I stood next to her for 3 minutes or so when she filming some commerical in Grand Central back in August 2009. I'm 6'0.5", the top of her head barely reached my shoulder. As Susie Diamon said, 5'1"-ish at best.
Dom said on 16/Jan/11
She looked taller than Meryl Streep in the movie they did together, cant remmeber the title so she can't be under 5'6"
Kyle said on 18/Nov/10
She always looked close to Michael Chiklis' Height in The Shield (despite his huge forehead). Therefore I didn't imagined her to be that small (or Chiklis really ist shorter than 5'7).
Anonymous Rex said on 10/Jun/07
At 5-4 I don't see claiming 5-5 would get you any more parts beacause 5-4 IS average. 5-2 or 5-3 might give you trouble getting parts but only with very tall leading men. I don't think Jodie Foster or Sarah Michelle Gellar have any problems. Plus there are so many 5-7 to 5-9 male actors out there that under 5-5 can't possibly be a problem for an actress!
Miss Talented but Difficult Actor said on 23/May/07
It is a strange and interesting phenomenon that even actors as famous and well established as Glenn Close should feel the need to inflate themselves vertically. It may have something to do with the fact that when they were first starting out, they believed that claiming an "average" height on their CVs would help them get more auditions. Until Close hit the big time with Fatal Attraction her bio in several theatre anthology books listed her year of birth as 1945. But after that her media bios always stated 1947. So with actors, it often seems that if it's not adding inches, it's shaving off years. Me? Of course, I'm only 39.
footballed28 said on 6/Feb/07
she certainly looked very tall in 101 Dalmations
Editor Rob said on 10/May/06
You know, I had another look at this women and the couple of sightings mentioning her shorter, I begin to agree with...close to 5ft 4!
SK said on 22/Apr/06
I met Glenn face-to-face at a celebrity Bowl-A-Thon about 15 years ago. We were both wearing bowling shoes. Like Ruby I'm 5'6" and Glenn was much shorter than me.
CelebHeights Editor said on 1/Oct/05
From Tiscali.co.uk Interview, "Oddly enough, at five foot two inches tall, Close is non-intimidating in the flesh"
CelebHeights Editor said on 22/Aug/05
From gossip newsgroup: "Glenn is *teeny-tiny*. I know her sister (who is much taller than me...I'm 5'4") but Glenn is a tiny little petite thing."
said on 17/Aug/05
From Saga Magazine
, "She is fairly small in real life, about 5ft 5in, but tall in sling-back stilettos and fishnet stockings"
Anonymous said on 6/Jul/05
I remember when she did the TV movie 'Sarah Plain and Tall' she said they put her in shoes that elevated her 4 inches, jacking her up from 5'4 to 5'8. I remember being struck by that because I didn't think she was that short.
ruby said on 16/May/05
I met Ms. Close at a party in '97...since I am 5'6" and towered over her, I have to say that she can't be 5'6". She was a tiny thing. I guessed her to be in the 5'0" to 5'2" range (we were both wearing heels of a similar height).
Mr. R said on 19/Apr/05
I have met her twice in New York, and this is pretty close - no pun intended. She may be a half inch or so shorter.