Add a Comment948 comments
Average Guess (207 Votes)
Peak: 5ft 10.06in (177.9cm)
Current: 5ft 9.36in (176.2cm)
Peak: 5ft 10.06in (177.9cm)
Current: 5ft 9.36in (176.2cm)
JT said on 25/Jan/08
Alex says on 25/Jan/08
JT, could you take the picture of me and Angle and have the ruler on the side like you did with many other pics? I am just curious on how that would look even if its the most accurate.
Alex, since you don
Alex says on 25/Jan/08
JT, could you take the picture of me and Angle and have the ruler on the side like you did with many other pics? I am just curious on how that would look even if its the most accurate.
Alex, since you don
karl said on 24/Jan/08
there is no way that at 10% ur abs start to show. im 5'9 200lbs and around 17% and my abs show. i do however do 45 inverted sit ups 3 times a week.
there is no way that at 10% ur abs start to show. im 5'9 200lbs and around 17% and my abs show. i do however do 45 inverted sit ups 3 times a week.
Alex2 said on 24/Jan/08
I must admit from 2 months + hard training in the gym 5 times per week i still dont have great abs. But i do have really big arms. P.S. Do you go to Gold's gym? I dont have one near me so i just use a standard gym with about 20 members.
I must admit from 2 months + hard training in the gym 5 times per week i still dont have great abs. But i do have really big arms. P.S. Do you go to Gold's gym? I dont have one near me so i just use a standard gym with about 20 members.
Alex said on 22/Jan/08
They say 10% and under is when your abs start showing most. Right now mine show but not enough to be 10% or under. I feel about 12% or maybe 11%. Still low body fat.
They say 10% and under is when your abs start showing most. Right now mine show but not enough to be 10% or under. I feel about 12% or maybe 11%. Still low body fat.
Alex2 said on 21/Jan/08
I will try and find a device that does that Alex, but i do know i once got 12% when i was kinda skinny.
I will try and find a device that does that Alex, but i do know i once got 12% when i was kinda skinny.
Alex said on 21/Jan/08
Alex 2, I weighed this morning at 200lbs. My weight flucuates from 198-200lbs. I was 190lbs for the summer into fall and gained 10lbs since but my weight is normally less in the summer.
Whats your body fat %? Mine is 14-15% according to some hand held machine at my gym but they only take your height and weight and get an estimate. I am too cut to be 14-15%, not saying its a bad %. I believe I am more 11-12%.
Alex 2, I weighed this morning at 200lbs. My weight flucuates from 198-200lbs. I was 190lbs for the summer into fall and gained 10lbs since but my weight is normally less in the summer.
Whats your body fat %? Mine is 14-15% according to some hand held machine at my gym but they only take your height and weight and get an estimate. I am too cut to be 14-15%, not saying its a bad %. I believe I am more 11-12%.
Alex2 said on 20/Jan/08
Cool, thanks for that info Alex :) P.S. Whats your current weight? I weighed myself at 176lbs this morning.
Cool, thanks for that info Alex :) P.S. Whats your current weight? I weighed myself at 176lbs this morning.
Alex said on 19/Jan/08
I could agree on that mostly but I'd say more toward 210lbs right now. When I met him he looked 220lbs in late 2005 but at his biggest I'd say he was at least 225lbs, he said in his book he was about 230lbs and his book was made him 2002.
I could agree on that mostly but I'd say more toward 210lbs right now. When I met him he looked 220lbs in late 2005 but at his biggest I'd say he was at least 225lbs, he said in his book he was about 230lbs and his book was made him 2002.
Alex2 said on 19/Jan/08
Id say Angles a solid 200lbs today.
Id say Angles a solid 200lbs today.
Alex said on 19/Jan/08
Also I think Angle is natural. Of course he could have been on steriods to get bigger but I doubt it. He looked more natural to me. Hes at the size where if someone works out hard enough they can get to, not like Batista or Steiner where you'd have to take steriods.
Also he has lost a little size at least over the last few years.
Also I think Angle is natural. Of course he could have been on steriods to get bigger but I doubt it. He looked more natural to me. Hes at the size where if someone works out hard enough they can get to, not like Batista or Steiner where you'd have to take steriods.
Also he has lost a little size at least over the last few years.
Alex2 said on 18/Jan/08
Lol, yea well you lokk excellent for a natural anyway, but to be on those guys level you would need some sort of anobolics of some sort, but anyway i look forward to see the pictures.
Lol, yea well you lokk excellent for a natural anyway, but to be on those guys level you would need some sort of anobolics of some sort, but anyway i look forward to see the pictures.
Alex said on 17/Jan/08
Alex 2, thanx, but I wouldn't go as far and say I was bigger than my 6'5 friend in mass. I had more lean muscle even though he was more massive still. But I meant in general I looked smaller near Angle than my friend and I was same size in both pics. I had some new ones of me on the general height page where I am a bit bigger. I can post some new ones in the near future as well.
I never tried to enter any contests. I am in good shape but not like those guys are though.
Alex 2, thanx, but I wouldn't go as far and say I was bigger than my 6'5 friend in mass. I had more lean muscle even though he was more massive still. But I meant in general I looked smaller near Angle than my friend and I was same size in both pics. I had some new ones of me on the general height page where I am a bit bigger. I can post some new ones in the near future as well.
I never tried to enter any contests. I am in good shape but not like those guys are though.
Alex2 said on 17/Jan/08
I think you looked bigger than your 6'5 friend in mass, you do have a very good physique. I have recently noticed now i am protein powders, my mass and strangth is increasing alot, so that helps me and i have develope more mass since, and yes 1/4 inch can matter lol. Have you tried entering any bodybuilding contests at all?
I think you looked bigger than your 6'5 friend in mass, you do have a very good physique. I have recently noticed now i am protein powders, my mass and strangth is increasing alot, so that helps me and i have develope more mass since, and yes 1/4 inch can matter lol. Have you tried entering any bodybuilding contests at all?
Alex said on 16/Jan/08
On this site 1/4 can matter a bit though, lol.
Thats impressive, 661 pounds is a lot.
Alex 2, I am looking at the picture with me and Angle and its funny how he makes me look more leaner than I am, but I can still hold my own in that picture. Alone or with normal people or even guys with muscle I can still look big, like the picture with my 6'5 260lbs friend I still looked big. Also right now I am a little bigger than I was with Angle in that picture.
On this site 1/4 can matter a bit though, lol.
Thats impressive, 661 pounds is a lot.
Alex 2, I am looking at the picture with me and Angle and its funny how he makes me look more leaner than I am, but I can still hold my own in that picture. Alone or with normal people or even guys with muscle I can still look big, like the picture with my 6'5 260lbs friend I still looked big. Also right now I am a little bigger than I was with Angle in that picture.
Alex2 said on 15/Jan/08
Yea 0.25" isnt a big deal really, i will go with what you have said, thanks. On another note hear is a video of the guy that goes to my gym deadlifting 300kg, sorry its low quality but hey, Click Here
Yea 0.25" isnt a big deal really, i will go with what you have said, thanks. On another note hear is a video of the guy that goes to my gym deadlifting 300kg, sorry its low quality but hey, Click Here
Alex said on 14/Jan/08
Alex 2, when I first went there I expected a solid 5'11 from him but once he stood up I felt at least 2 inches taller if not a smidge more. Footwear looked about the same. I was point blank so 6'0 to 5'10 is reasonable or 6'0.25 to 5'10.25. Even point blank a 1/4 isn't easy to tell.
Alex 2, when I first went there I expected a solid 5'11 from him but once he stood up I felt at least 2 inches taller if not a smidge more. Footwear looked about the same. I was point blank so 6'0 to 5'10 is reasonable or 6'0.25 to 5'10.25. Even point blank a 1/4 isn't easy to tell.
Alex2 said on 14/Jan/08
Humm he is leaning there i bit Alex, does look 5'10.5 though if stood up straight, but probably like 5'10.25" its quite reasonable he is that
Humm he is leaning there i bit Alex, does look 5'10.5 though if stood up straight, but probably like 5'10.25" its quite reasonable he is that
Alex said on 12/Jan/08
If he was 5'11 then I'm 6'1 at least which isn't the case.
If he was 5'11 then I'm 6'1 at least which isn't the case.
Alex2 said on 11/Jan/08
I think Angles 5'11 maybe but sure looks 5'10.25
I think Angles 5'11 maybe but sure looks 5'10.25
Alex said on 9/Jan/08
Actually the picture JT posted of me and Angle straighted I don't think is 100% accurate even though he would pretty much look about that if he wasn't hunched over a bit.
Actually the picture JT posted of me and Angle straighted I don't think is 100% accurate even though he would pretty much look about that if he wasn't hunched over a bit.
Alex2 said on 3/Jan/08
Im from the UK
Im from the UK
Alex said on 2/Jan/08
Alex 2, I am from New York. What about you?
Ted, I do phyical labor kinda. I use to be helper with my dad's job with carpentry. That was years ago when I was in my mid teens. Right now I have a city job in my town. Once I finish school I may go onto something else.
Alex 2, I am from New York. What about you?
Ted, I do phyical labor kinda. I use to be helper with my dad's job with carpentry. That was years ago when I was in my mid teens. Right now I have a city job in my town. Once I finish school I may go onto something else.
Alex2 said on 1/Jan/08
Alex, what part of US are you from? If you are from US?
Alex, what part of US are you from? If you are from US?
ted T said on 28/Dec/07
Alex,what do you do as a job?
Alex,what do you do as a job?
Alex said on 26/Dec/07
Alex 2, when I said 150lbs I mean it went up that much. My max right now is 305lbs compared to my max when I joined 4 1/2 years ago which was 150-160lbs 1 rep. Yea, I use powders with training.
Alex 2, when I said 150lbs I mean it went up that much. My max right now is 305lbs compared to my max when I joined 4 1/2 years ago which was 150-160lbs 1 rep. Yea, I use powders with training.
Alex2 said on 25/Dec/07
Cool 150 lbs, i can at the moment bench 135 lbs max, i started lifting weights about 1 month ago and have noticed amazing results, do you use protein supplements with your training?
Cool 150 lbs, i can at the moment bench 135 lbs max, i started lifting weights about 1 month ago and have noticed amazing results, do you use protein supplements with your training?
Alex said on 25/Dec/07
In over 4 1/2 years I've gotten a lot good results from doing things natural, no steriods ever. Got stronger, bigger, more toned and still I'd wanna improve. I believe my max bench has gone up 150lbs or so since I joined.
In over 4 1/2 years I've gotten a lot good results from doing things natural, no steriods ever. Got stronger, bigger, more toned and still I'd wanna improve. I believe my max bench has gone up 150lbs or so since I joined.
Alex2 said on 24/Dec/07
Thankyou Alex, i will continue to weightflift, but did you know Schwarzenegger and Ferrigno started at 13 and grew 6'1.5, 6'4.5 so it must be a myth =p
Thankyou Alex, i will continue to weightflift, but did you know Schwarzenegger and Ferrigno started at 13 and grew 6'1.5, 6'4.5 so it must be a myth =p
Alex said on 23/Dec/07
Alex 2, I've heard that but I started doing weights consistant when I just turned 19 and by then I was done growing. They say 16 is the minimum age you should start lifting. It could just be a myth about growth being stunted with weights at an early age, not 100% sure on that.
Alex 2, I've heard that but I started doing weights consistant when I just turned 19 and by then I was done growing. They say 16 is the minimum age you should start lifting. It could just be a myth about growth being stunted with weights at an early age, not 100% sure on that.
Alex2 said on 23/Dec/07
Alex, i suppose youve heard the rumor that doing heavy weight lifting at an early age like me will stunt your growth, is this true? Thanks
Alex, i suppose youve heard the rumor that doing heavy weight lifting at an early age like me will stunt your growth, is this true? Thanks
Alex2 said on 23/Dec/07
Cool, i hope i grow to about 6'0 maybe more, how often do you hit the gym? I normally go about 3-4 times per week for 1 1/2 hours
Cool, i hope i grow to about 6'0 maybe more, how often do you hit the gym? I normally go about 3-4 times per week for 1 1/2 hours
Alex said on 22/Dec/07
Alex 2, I am done growing. I am about the same exact height as I was when I was 18 which was 6'0 on the nose and now I am like a smidge over. I am 23.
Thanx, my arms are an inch bigger now then they were there 3 years ago.
Alex 2, I am done growing. I am about the same exact height as I was when I was 18 which was 6'0 on the nose and now I am like a smidge over. I am 23.
Thanx, my arms are an inch bigger now then they were there 3 years ago.
Alex2 said on 22/Dec/07
Cool, Alex are you still growing by any chance? How old are you? P.S. Your arms look big.
Cool, Alex are you still growing by any chance? How old are you? P.S. Your arms look big.
Alex said on 22/Dec/07
Alex 2, I posted it on the general height page a month or so ago but its gone. But here it is again since you wanna see it. My head is a bit tilted but he's slightly closer to the camera so breaks about even with a 5 inch difference. This was from a little over 3 years ago and it was in the late afternoon/early evening around 5:00.
Click Here
Alex 2, I posted it on the general height page a month or so ago but its gone. But here it is again since you wanna see it. My head is a bit tilted but he's slightly closer to the camera so breaks about even with a 5 inch difference. This was from a little over 3 years ago and it was in the late afternoon/early evening around 5:00.
Click Here
Alex2 said on 21/Dec/07
Alex, can we have a pic of your 6'5 friend?
Alex, can we have a pic of your 6'5 friend?
Alex said on 19/Dec/07
Angle is close to 6'0 in wrestling boots. If you look at him compared to when he wears sneakers or shoes he is always a little bit taller in them.
Angle is close to 6'0 in wrestling boots. If you look at him compared to when he wears sneakers or shoes he is always a little bit taller in them.
ted T said on 18/Dec/07
Kurt Angle is not 5-11.HBK is 5-11 and 1 inch taller than Angle.
Kurt Angle is not 5-11.HBK is 5-11 and 1 inch taller than Angle.
Alex said on 11/Dec/07
JT, it only favors me because he's leaning slightly. We're both the same distance from the camera, no trick angles or anything, about the same footwear. Almost a perfect pic other than him leaning a tad which has him lose 1/2 inch in height. Based on your straightened picture I have him by 2 inches which is what I guessed rather than the 3 inches it looks like in the above picture.
JT, it only favors me because he's leaning slightly. We're both the same distance from the camera, no trick angles or anything, about the same footwear. Almost a perfect pic other than him leaning a tad which has him lose 1/2 inch in height. Based on your straightened picture I have him by 2 inches which is what I guessed rather than the 3 inches it looks like in the above picture.
JT said on 10/Dec/07
You have it backwards Ted T. The original pic favors Alex. This is the straightened pic. Click Here
You have it backwards Ted T. The original pic favors Alex. This is the straightened pic. Click Here
I.R. said on 10/Dec/07
Kurt Angle was 5'11" listed 1.80m at the 1996 olympics, and that was when he had a broken frickin' neck so I believe he's 5'11
Kurt Angle was 5'11" listed 1.80m at the 1996 olympics, and that was when he had a broken frickin' neck so I believe he's 5'11
ted T said on 9/Dec/07
Alex,i think the photo is placed in a way that favors Kurt.It's crooked;i can't judge from this pic.
Alex,i think the photo is placed in a way that favors Kurt.It's crooked;i can't judge from this pic.
Alex said on 6/Dec/07
Ted, I am minimum 6'0 barefoot. The difference was 2 inches minimum, 2.5 inches maximum.
Ted, I am minimum 6'0 barefoot. The difference was 2 inches minimum, 2.5 inches maximum.
ted T said on 6/Dec/07
I think the difference is 2,25 in.But Kurt Angle could be 177cm.
I think the difference is 2,25 in.But Kurt Angle could be 177cm.
Alex said on 4/Dec/07
Ted, I still have at least 2 inches on Angle even in the picture blown up.
Ted, I still have at least 2 inches on Angle even in the picture blown up.
ted T said on 1/Dec/07
That's a funny pic.Kurt looks like he is 6-2 and Alex 6-3.
That's a funny pic.Kurt looks like he is 6-2 and Alex 6-3.
Alex said on 12/Nov/07
I actually wore my smallest shoes that gave me just an inch on purpose that day so I wouldn't have any advantage in footwear.
I actually wore my smallest shoes that gave me just an inch on purpose that day so I wouldn't have any advantage in footwear.
Vegas said on 12/Nov/07
depends i have dress shoes that practically give nothing, there are completely flat, no heel, insole, nothing. then i have another pair which give 1" at least so it depends. usually the average dress shoe gives ~1" though
depends i have dress shoes that practically give nothing, there are completely flat, no heel, insole, nothing. then i have another pair which give 1" at least so it depends. usually the average dress shoe gives ~1" though
Alex said on 11/Nov/07
In reality I had him by 2-2.25 inches with him standing straight, not the 3 or more inches it looks in the photo above. Also I could straighten out a bit more there too if I wanted.
What do dress shoes give anyway because thats what he had on while I had 1 inch sneakers on.
In reality I had him by 2-2.25 inches with him standing straight, not the 3 or more inches it looks in the photo above. Also I could straighten out a bit more there too if I wanted.
What do dress shoes give anyway because thats what he had on while I had 1 inch sneakers on.
Vegas said on 11/Nov/07
Alex; JT straightened the photo but angle is still leaning badly though and would make up another 1" at least if he stood straight, totally ruling out anything under 5'10 and actually putting him closer to his olympic listing.
i never noticed the angle was favouring you before that, but looking again at the photo posted above it clearly is.
Alex; JT straightened the photo but angle is still leaning badly though and would make up another 1" at least if he stood straight, totally ruling out anything under 5'10 and actually putting him closer to his olympic listing.
i never noticed the angle was favouring you before that, but looking again at the photo posted above it clearly is.
JT said on 10/Nov/07
Alex and Angle with the picture straightened (Click Here) This is probably why many see a larger difference than there actually is.
Alex and Angle with the picture straightened (Click Here) This is probably why many see a larger difference than there actually is.
ted T said on 7/Nov/07
When you standing next to sb it isn't easy to guess his height but the best thing you can do is ask sb else.My father is 5-5 with huge lifts, i'm 6-2 barefoot and it's never easy to realise that the difference is that huge,i guess his height at 5-7.Kind of a dissapointment (or a relief) how short people really is.
When you standing next to sb it isn't easy to guess his height but the best thing you can do is ask sb else.My father is 5-5 with huge lifts, i'm 6-2 barefoot and it's never easy to realise that the difference is that huge,i guess his height at 5-7.Kind of a dissapointment (or a relief) how short people really is.
ted T said on 7/Nov/07
Alex,i think HBK was always 5-11.He never was 6ft.I think he was a good 5-11 peak and now a weak 5-11.
Alex,i think HBK was always 5-11.He never was 6ft.I think he was a good 5-11 peak and now a weak 5-11.
Alex said on 5/Nov/07
Ted, I don't think HBK is 6'0. I think 5'11. He had around an inch on Angle in their face off.
Ted, I don't think HBK is 6'0. I think 5'11. He had around an inch on Angle in their face off.
ted T said on 5/Nov/07
Alex,even if Kurt is 5-10 Shawn Michaels didn't get any taller.I don't understand though about 60 percent here claim that HBK is 6ft.No way.I think 5-11 for hbk and 5-9,75 for Angle.
Alex,even if Kurt is 5-10 Shawn Michaels didn't get any taller.I don't understand though about 60 percent here claim that HBK is 6ft.No way.I think 5-11 for hbk and 5-9,75 for Angle.
Alex said on 4/Nov/07
Ted, I understand why you thought Angle looked 5'9.25 because it does look 3 inches between us but again its only because he's leaning in a bit which is going to make him lose at least 1/2 inch of height. At most I was 2.5 inches taller than him so he's a legit 5'10 or if under he'd be like 5'9.75, no less. I was that close to him.
Ted, I understand why you thought Angle looked 5'9.25 because it does look 3 inches between us but again its only because he's leaning in a bit which is going to make him lose at least 1/2 inch of height. At most I was 2.5 inches taller than him so he's a legit 5'10 or if under he'd be like 5'9.75, no less. I was that close to him.
Eurohouse said on 4/Nov/07
On TNA Kurt Angle billed himself between 5'11" to 6'0", but back in the WWF he was 5'10" not 6'2"
On TNA Kurt Angle billed himself between 5'11" to 6'0", but back in the WWF he was 5'10" not 6'2"
ted T said on 2/Nov/07
I've heard roumors that Bobby Lashley is 5-11 in person.I bet he wears lifts in wrestling.But he is 180cm;again 5-11 is tall but people insist to consider this short.
I've heard roumors that Bobby Lashley is 5-11 in person.I bet he wears lifts in wrestling.But he is 180cm;again 5-11 is tall but people insist to consider this short.
Alex said on 31/Oct/07
Umaga is at least 6'2 and Lashley I'd say is 6'0.
Umaga is at least 6'2 and Lashley I'd say is 6'0.
dave said on 29/Oct/07
Umaga 187 and Lashley 180 Ted? I know Umaga is barefoot but a booted Lashley was the same height as Umaga or a little taller. Umaga is 6'2.5 max, leaving Lashley at 6'1'' or so barefoot. Not 5'11'' (180 cm).
Umaga 187 and Lashley 180 Ted? I know Umaga is barefoot but a booted Lashley was the same height as Umaga or a little taller. Umaga is 6'2.5 max, leaving Lashley at 6'1'' or so barefoot. Not 5'11'' (180 cm).
Alex said on 18/Oct/07
Also look at his shoulders. They're not even level with each other. You can tell easily that he'd be taller if they were.
Also look at his shoulders. They're not even level with each other. You can tell easily that he'd be taller if they were.
Alex said on 18/Oct/07
I sure don't see 4 inches even with him leaning. Its more 3 inches with the lean. My eye level is 4.5 inches taller and he's easily an inch over that while leaning. Angle looks 5'9-5'9.5 in the picture because he is leaning a bit. When he first stood up he was more about 5'10, but no more. I was right near him so I'm going to know, thats he closest you're going to get really. I'm no more than 2.5 inches taller than him at most, 2.25 inches may be the exact amount I am taller than him by.
I'm not 6'1 or close to it by that time of the day. Only 6'1 right out of bed then I lose height right away. The picture was taken around 3:30-4:00 so I'm no more than 6'0 1/4 there. I think 6'0 1/4 and 5'10 looks accurate there if he stood straight for the picture.
I sure don't see 4 inches even with him leaning. Its more 3 inches with the lean. My eye level is 4.5 inches taller and he's easily an inch over that while leaning. Angle looks 5'9-5'9.5 in the picture because he is leaning a bit. When he first stood up he was more about 5'10, but no more. I was right near him so I'm going to know, thats he closest you're going to get really. I'm no more than 2.5 inches taller than him at most, 2.25 inches may be the exact amount I am taller than him by.
I'm not 6'1 or close to it by that time of the day. Only 6'1 right out of bed then I lose height right away. The picture was taken around 3:30-4:00 so I'm no more than 6'0 1/4 there. I think 6'0 1/4 and 5'10 looks accurate there if he stood straight for the picture.
6'3.5'' JK said on 18/Oct/07
If Kurt is 5'9.25'' then Alexs gotta be 5'10.75'' which is not the case, Kurt looks 5'10'' in that picture with Alex even though he's leaning and Alex looks somewhere around 6'1''
If Kurt is 5'9.25'' then Alexs gotta be 5'10.75'' which is not the case, Kurt looks 5'10'' in that picture with Alex even though he's leaning and Alex looks somewhere around 6'1''
ted said on 18/Oct/07
Alex can look 8cm taller than Kurt;Here is some true wrestlers heights in cm:
1.Kurt Angle:176
2.Shawn Michaels:180 (always)
3.John Cena:182
4.Bobby Lashley:180
5.Umaga:187
6.HHH:186
7.RVD:180
8.Ric Flair:179 (now)
9.Brock Lesnar:188
10.Roddy Piper:180
11.Steve Austin:183
Alex can look 8cm taller than Kurt;Here is some true wrestlers heights in cm:
1.Kurt Angle:176
2.Shawn Michaels:180 (always)
3.John Cena:182
4.Bobby Lashley:180
5.Umaga:187
6.HHH:186
7.RVD:180
8.Ric Flair:179 (now)
9.Brock Lesnar:188
10.Roddy Piper:180
11.Steve Austin:183
Alex said on 10/Sep/07
And I'm not a small guy myself. I'm quite built but standing next to Angle I only look average size kinda.
And I'm not a small guy myself. I'm quite built but standing next to Angle I only look average size kinda.
dave said on 10/Sep/07
Not easy to tell man but he looks a good 20 or 30 ibs heavier. you're taller and have longer limbs which titls it in your favour in ways but you can tell Kurt has a wide torse even just looking at this picture. Imagine what me, 5'9.5 175 pounds would look like next to him.lol.
Not easy to tell man but he looks a good 20 or 30 ibs heavier. you're taller and have longer limbs which titls it in your favour in ways but you can tell Kurt has a wide torse even just looking at this picture. Imagine what me, 5'9.5 175 pounds would look like next to him.lol.
Alex said on 9/Sep/07
Dave, how much do me and Angle look apart in weight in the picture above? I weigh between 185-190lbs there. I actually weigh the same now then I did there but I'm a little bigger.
He was no more than 225lbs at his heaviest and at 5'10 with less than 10% body fat thats pretty big. I rememeber that interview too. In the picture with me he was about 220lbs. Now I could say as low as 210lbs but no less.
Dave, how much do me and Angle look apart in weight in the picture above? I weigh between 185-190lbs there. I actually weigh the same now then I did there but I'm a little bigger.
He was no more than 225lbs at his heaviest and at 5'10 with less than 10% body fat thats pretty big. I rememeber that interview too. In the picture with me he was about 220lbs. Now I could say as low as 210lbs but no less.
dave said on 7/Sep/07
I dont know Alex. He packed on a lot of muscle after leaving amateur wrestling. I would say 225 was his highest weight, he did say he was that in an interview I saw. I agree he looks lighter now with TNA, around 215. He couldn't have been anything over 230 at his peak.
I dont know Alex. He packed on a lot of muscle after leaving amateur wrestling. I would say 225 was his highest weight, he did say he was that in an interview I saw. I agree he looks lighter now with TNA, around 215. He couldn't have been anything over 230 at his peak.
Alex said on 6/Sep/07
Dave, what do you think Angle weighed? At his heaviest in WWE in 2002-2003 he weighed about 225lbs I think. Today he looks as low as 210lbs. In the picture with me I guessed about 220lbs and I'm 185-190lbs there myself so that would mean he was 30-35lbs more than me where it doesn't look that much and I'm a built guy myself. Bigger now then I was in that picture by a little at least.
Dave, what do you think Angle weighed? At his heaviest in WWE in 2002-2003 he weighed about 225lbs I think. Today he looks as low as 210lbs. In the picture with me I guessed about 220lbs and I'm 185-190lbs there myself so that would mean he was 30-35lbs more than me where it doesn't look that much and I'm a built guy myself. Bigger now then I was in that picture by a little at least.
Alex said on 5/Sep/07
Dave thats because he's leaning it why he looked a bit shorter, he's losing an inch in height about from doing that. I get 6'2 sometimes too. Legit 6'0-6'0.5 guys can be guessed at 6'2 often.
Dave thats because he's leaning it why he looked a bit shorter, he's losing an inch in height about from doing that. I get 6'2 sometimes too. Legit 6'0-6'0.5 guys can be guessed at 6'2 often.
dave said on 5/Sep/07
Yup, just by looking at the picture without knowing how tall you are I would have guessed you were 6'2''!. Your eye level is like 4inches higher. Shocking how short Kurt is.
Yup, just by looking at the picture without knowing how tall you are I would have guessed you were 6'2''!. Your eye level is like 4inches higher. Shocking how short Kurt is.
Alex said on 5/Sep/07
Dave, yea I thought he was going to be a solid 5'11 buy before I met him. I easily told the difference between 5'10 and 5'11 since I knew I had him by at least 2 inches. The picture was also taken by 4PM so I'm probably closer to 6'0 barefoot then 6'0.5 so say 6'0.25 and with sneakers I was 6'1 or slightly over.
Dave, yea I thought he was going to be a solid 5'11 buy before I met him. I easily told the difference between 5'10 and 5'11 since I knew I had him by at least 2 inches. The picture was also taken by 4PM so I'm probably closer to 6'0 barefoot then 6'0.5 so say 6'0.25 and with sneakers I was 6'1 or slightly over.
dave said on 4/Sep/07
Wow, he looks shorter than you would expect. He looks barely 5'10'' here with Alex.
Wow, he looks shorter than you would expect. He looks barely 5'10'' here with Alex.
Alex said on 30/Aug/07
5'9.5 and 5'10 isn't easy to tell the difference from but I was basically point blank on Angle and thought he was 5'10 since he came to a bit above my eyebrows. I actually thought 5'11 before he stood up then I figured I had a minimum 2 inches on him when he stood up.
5'9.5 and 5'10 isn't easy to tell the difference from but I was basically point blank on Angle and thought he was 5'10 since he came to a bit above my eyebrows. I actually thought 5'11 before he stood up then I figured I had a minimum 2 inches on him when he stood up.
Anonymous said on 30/Aug/07
I saw Angle in a match with John Cena... He was a loooot shorter...he is 5 ft 9.5 i think... Cena is maybe 6.1
I saw Angle in a match with John Cena... He was a loooot shorter...he is 5 ft 9.5 i think... Cena is maybe 6.1
Dustin said on 4/Aug/07
I have a picture, taken on 8/3/2007, on my MySpace of myself -- 5 ft. 10 in good shoes -- with Kurt Angle. Click Here
I have a picture, taken on 8/3/2007, on my MySpace of myself -- 5 ft. 10 in good shoes -- with Kurt Angle. Click Here
Alex said on 26/Jul/07
Jason, I got a big neck myself. Well its actually a little bigger now than in that picture up there. I've got it measured at 17 inches but Angle's is 20 inches! He quoted in his book in 2002 that he was up to 225lbs at his heaviest during his wrestling years. He actually said he got up to 250lbs for football in high school or college and was bulky as hell. I think he could be as low as 210lbs today but looked 215-220lbs in 2005 in the picture above when I met him so its very possible he lost 10-15lbs over the last few years.
Jason, I got a big neck myself. Well its actually a little bigger now than in that picture up there. I've got it measured at 17 inches but Angle's is 20 inches! He quoted in his book in 2002 that he was up to 225lbs at his heaviest during his wrestling years. He actually said he got up to 250lbs for football in high school or college and was bulky as hell. I think he could be as low as 210lbs today but looked 215-220lbs in 2005 in the picture above when I met him so its very possible he lost 10-15lbs over the last few years.
Jason said on 26/Jul/07
He's nowhere remotely near being a 250-pounder, but he's sure got the neck of one...
He's nowhere remotely near being a 250-pounder, but he's sure got the neck of one...
Matt said on 25/Jul/07
Right Alex. A 5'10" man weighing 250 pounds would not have upper arms as small as his. (Don't tell him I said that.) 250? No way.
Right Alex. A 5'10" man weighing 250 pounds would not have upper arms as small as his. (Don't tell him I said that.) 250? No way.
Arjun said on 25/Jul/07
There you go Alex. Your head being 9.5 inches, makes it just under 3 inches difference while Angle is leaning - basically 3, actually. Not over that though. My head is 9.5 inches too, although I'm a fair bit shorter than you, a little over 4 inches.
There you go Alex. Your head being 9.5 inches, makes it just under 3 inches difference while Angle is leaning - basically 3, actually. Not over that though. My head is 9.5 inches too, although I'm a fair bit shorter than you, a little over 4 inches.
Alex said on 24/Jul/07
I find it funny he is listed at 5'10 but yet at 250lbs. He's nowhere near 250lbs. At his heaviest was 225lbs and today looks as low as 210-215lbs.
I find it funny he is listed at 5'10 but yet at 250lbs. He's nowhere near 250lbs. At his heaviest was 225lbs and today looks as low as 210-215lbs.
Alex said on 23/Jul/07
I measured my head at 9.5 inches exactly. What is your head length?
I measured my head at 9.5 inches exactly. What is your head length?
Anonymous said on 23/Jul/07
Kurt Angle is a legit 5'10 i saw TNA Impact a few days ago and he is an inch shorter than 5'11 Samoa Joe.
Kurt Angle is a legit 5'10 i saw TNA Impact a few days ago and he is an inch shorter than 5'11 Samoa Joe.
Arjun said on 23/Jul/07
Alex, we know that your head is 9.5 inches max, as you have measured it so, and I calculated in photo editor that the difference between you and Angle (while he is leaning) is about 0.31 times your head length. 0.31 * 9.5 = 2.945 or almost 3 inches. I'll say it's 3 inches, certainly not more than that. And Angle easily gains another 1/2" by straightening up. If your head is less than 9.5 inches, the difference is even less than 3 inches, even with Angle leaning. I really don't know what Danimal was thinking when he thought that Angle looks 5'8.5" in this pic. He's definitely a solid 5'10", since both of you have about equal footwear.
Alex, we know that your head is 9.5 inches max, as you have measured it so, and I calculated in photo editor that the difference between you and Angle (while he is leaning) is about 0.31 times your head length. 0.31 * 9.5 = 2.945 or almost 3 inches. I'll say it's 3 inches, certainly not more than that. And Angle easily gains another 1/2" by straightening up. If your head is less than 9.5 inches, the difference is even less than 3 inches, even with Angle leaning. I really don't know what Danimal was thinking when he thought that Angle looks 5'8.5" in this pic. He's definitely a solid 5'10", since both of you have about equal footwear.
Alex said on 22/Jul/07
Arjun, didn't you say you thought me and Angle were less than 3 inches apart even though he was leaning a bit? If you look again you'll see its really 3-3.5 inches with him leaning since my eye level is 4.5 inches from the top of my head, take that away and you'll get 2-2.5 inches which he was before he leaned in a tad. He was losing 1/2 to an inch in height while I was standing up more straight.
My shoulders aren't small either so you know Angle's are pretty big then.
Arjun, didn't you say you thought me and Angle were less than 3 inches apart even though he was leaning a bit? If you look again you'll see its really 3-3.5 inches with him leaning since my eye level is 4.5 inches from the top of my head, take that away and you'll get 2-2.5 inches which he was before he leaned in a tad. He was losing 1/2 to an inch in height while I was standing up more straight.
My shoulders aren't small either so you know Angle's are pretty big then.
JLA said on 21/Jul/07
Ok. When Kurt was in the olympics they said he was 5'10.
Do they measure you Barefoot or with regular shoes on?
Ok. When Kurt was in the olympics they said he was 5'10.
Do they measure you Barefoot or with regular shoes on?
Arjun said on 21/Jul/07
He has pretty wide shoulders for a man of average height, too.
He has pretty wide shoulders for a man of average height, too.
Alex said on 19/Jul/07
He lost a little weight by 2005 so probably at his heaviest I would go with 225lbs and this was from 2001-2003. 215-220lbs he looked to me in person too in late 2005. Nowadays I could go as low as 210lbs.
He lost a little weight by 2005 so probably at his heaviest I would go with 225lbs and this was from 2001-2003. 215-220lbs he looked to me in person too in late 2005. Nowadays I could go as low as 210lbs.
Jason said on 18/Jul/07
He also looked in the 215-220 range to me in person in 2005. Though I agree he's never looked 230 to me, either...
He also looked in the 215-220 range to me in person in 2005. Though I agree he's never looked 230 to me, either...
Alex said on 17/Jul/07
He was billed at 237lbs and said in his book he was about 230lbs in 2002 so 225lbs bare minimum and I can believe it as he did look it.
He still looked minimum 20-25lbs more than me in person. I personally guessed 220lbs in person but on TV looked leaner sometimes. These guys in person can sometimes look bigger than on TV I tell you.
I'm actually only about 2.5 inches taller than him since he's leaning a bit. He was a little taller when he first stood up straight.
He was billed at 237lbs and said in his book he was about 230lbs in 2002 so 225lbs bare minimum and I can believe it as he did look it.
He still looked minimum 20-25lbs more than me in person. I personally guessed 220lbs in person but on TV looked leaner sometimes. These guys in person can sometimes look bigger than on TV I tell you.
I'm actually only about 2.5 inches taller than him since he's leaning a bit. He was a little taller when he first stood up straight.
Anonymous said on 17/Jul/07
If Angle was 230 lbs he would look as muscular as Batista or Lashley, which he never did. And don't forget that 230 lbs was around his billed weight, so if he really weighed so much, WWE would have billed him at much more than 230.
About the picture of you two, I think that 30 lbs difference is too much. Don't forget that you are 6-7 cm taller.
I've always said that for the people using standard units it is more difficult
to estimate someone's weight.
If Angle was 230 lbs he would look as muscular as Batista or Lashley, which he never did. And don't forget that 230 lbs was around his billed weight, so if he really weighed so much, WWE would have billed him at much more than 230.
About the picture of you two, I think that 30 lbs difference is too much. Don't forget that you are 6-7 cm taller.
I've always said that for the people using standard units it is more difficult
to estimate someone's weight.
Alex said on 16/Jul/07
He was 225-230lbs for most of his career in WWE until 2004 when he looked more leaner. I met the guy in late 2005 and looked 215-220lbs. Look in the picture above and I weighed about 190lbs there and I'm built too.
He was 225-230lbs for most of his career in WWE until 2004 when he looked more leaner. I met the guy in late 2005 and looked 215-220lbs. Look in the picture above and I weighed about 190lbs there and I'm built too.
Anonymous said on 16/Jul/07
210 lbs for a 5'10'' guy is not low. Maybe in his prime he reached this mark, but most of the time he didn't look over 200 lbs.
210 lbs for a 5'10'' guy is not low. Maybe in his prime he reached this mark, but most of the time he didn't look over 200 lbs.
Alex said on 14/Jul/07
If you see Angle in TNA he can look as low as 210lbs.
If you see Angle in TNA he can look as low as 210lbs.
Alex said on 1/Jul/07
I could see Angle getting billed at 6'0 but 6'2 is really too much. On WWE matches between the 2 they billed Angle at 6'0 and Lesnar at 6'4 since they're both about 4 inches apart.
I could see Angle getting billed at 6'0 but 6'2 is really too much. On WWE matches between the 2 they billed Angle at 6'0 and Lesnar at 6'4 since they're both about 4 inches apart.
Big Show said on 1/Jul/07
Click Here
Here's a recent match (29th of June 2007) between Angle and Lesnar. Lesnar and Angle are still billed as 6'4 and 6'2 there.
Click Here
Here's a recent match (29th of June 2007) between Angle and Lesnar. Lesnar and Angle are still billed as 6'4 and 6'2 there.
Alex said on 12/Apr/07
The Jerk, it was taken between 3 and 4 PM that day where I wouldn't be my max height at all. Most likely 6'0 1/4-6'0 1/2 there plus 1 inch sneakers to get 6'1 1/4 to 6'1 1/2. Angle was 5'11 or so in shoes. If he stands up straight he'll gain 1/2 to an inch in height. My posture is good there while he's leaning a bit. When he first stood up he was a little taller.
The Jerk, it was taken between 3 and 4 PM that day where I wouldn't be my max height at all. Most likely 6'0 1/4-6'0 1/2 there plus 1 inch sneakers to get 6'1 1/4 to 6'1 1/2. Angle was 5'11 or so in shoes. If he stands up straight he'll gain 1/2 to an inch in height. My posture is good there while he's leaning a bit. When he first stood up he was a little taller.
TheJerk said on 11/Apr/07
If we didn't know the height of Angle then Alex would look 6-1, maybe this was taken early in the day?
If we didn't know the height of Angle then Alex would look 6-1, maybe this was taken early in the day?
6'2.5'' JK said on 10/Apr/07
Alex you look a LEGIT 6'0.5'', if not 6'1''
Alex you look a LEGIT 6'0.5'', if not 6'1''
mike m said on 10/Apr/07
alex looks more like 6'2" next to angle.
alex looks more like 6'2" next to angle.
Alex said on 9/Apr/07
Arjun, true his forehead is longer than mine but with him leaning he looked a good 3 inches shorter than me but him standing up straight before the picture was taken I only had him by 2-2.5 inches. 5'10 was what I estimated him at exactly when he first stood up because before he stood up I thought he was more 5'11ish. Another thing was shoes. I had on sneakers that gave me an inch in height. I can bet he had on some sort of dress shoes so our footwear breaks even pretty much but I didn't look at his footwear though.
Arjun, true his forehead is longer than mine but with him leaning he looked a good 3 inches shorter than me but him standing up straight before the picture was taken I only had him by 2-2.5 inches. 5'10 was what I estimated him at exactly when he first stood up because before he stood up I thought he was more 5'11ish. Another thing was shoes. I had on sneakers that gave me an inch in height. I can bet he had on some sort of dress shoes so our footwear breaks even pretty much but I didn't look at his footwear though.
Arjun said on 7/Apr/07
Alex, Angle looks atleast 5'10" next to you. He does'nt even look a full 3 inches IMO shorter even though he's leaning. Of course your eye level is easily 3 inches above his - but his forehead is longer than yours. You said your eye level is 4.5", his looks a good 5".
Cheers,
Arjun
Alex, Angle looks atleast 5'10" next to you. He does'nt even look a full 3 inches IMO shorter even though he's leaning. Of course your eye level is easily 3 inches above his - but his forehead is longer than yours. You said your eye level is 4.5", his looks a good 5".
Cheers,
Arjun
Alex said on 22/Feb/07
BGKing, Angle was 5'11 or a tad more in shoes I estimated him at. He was dressed casually so you can bet he was in dress type shoes that give what 1-1.25 inches of height. The sneakers I had on gave me 1-1.25 inches of height as well. Shortest he could have been was maybe 5'9 3/4 but looked a full 5'10 to me and guys gotta take into consideration that he's leaning a bit losing probably an inch of height. When he first stood up he was a little taller. And if you're 6'3.5 someone 5'10 is going to be short to you.
BGKing, Angle was 5'11 or a tad more in shoes I estimated him at. He was dressed casually so you can bet he was in dress type shoes that give what 1-1.25 inches of height. The sneakers I had on gave me 1-1.25 inches of height as well. Shortest he could have been was maybe 5'9 3/4 but looked a full 5'10 to me and guys gotta take into consideration that he's leaning a bit losing probably an inch of height. When he first stood up he was a little taller. And if you're 6'3.5 someone 5'10 is going to be short to you.
Ali said on 16/Feb/07
You guys lie alot, Kane is 6'10 with his boots on just like Undertaker is 6'8 with his boots on. The Big Show might be wearing bigger clunkier boots that makes him 7'2 total. Without his boots Big Show, is probably 6'11 or 7'0. with my shoes or boots on I am 6'1; without them I am a very high 6'0; not a big difference guys. The different wrestlers wear different types of boots though which may make them taller in real life. Now JBL, that is a hard one, he is probably about 6'6 or 6'6 1/2 with his boots on and a high 6'5 without them. Kurt Angle has stop wearing those high boots I see recently in wrestling... hmmmmmmmmmmmmmm!!! CLUE, don't you think???
You guys lie alot, Kane is 6'10 with his boots on just like Undertaker is 6'8 with his boots on. The Big Show might be wearing bigger clunkier boots that makes him 7'2 total. Without his boots Big Show, is probably 6'11 or 7'0. with my shoes or boots on I am 6'1; without them I am a very high 6'0; not a big difference guys. The different wrestlers wear different types of boots though which may make them taller in real life. Now JBL, that is a hard one, he is probably about 6'6 or 6'6 1/2 with his boots on and a high 6'5 without them. Kurt Angle has stop wearing those high boots I see recently in wrestling... hmmmmmmmmmmmmmm!!! CLUE, don't you think???
BGKing said on 13/Feb/07
I am 6'3.5 and Kurt looked short to me. I think he is only about 5'10 in shoes.
I am 6'3.5 and Kurt looked short to me. I think he is only about 5'10 in shoes.
Alex said on 14/Jan/07
Dmeyer, straight up def 5'10. The problem is people are looking at the picture the way it looks and Angle looks 5'8.5-5'9 because I'm straight and Angle is hunched over a little causing him to def lose an inch in height. When he first stood up for the picture he was taller than he is in that picture. I had him by 2.5 inches.
Dmeyer, straight up def 5'10. The problem is people are looking at the picture the way it looks and Angle looks 5'8.5-5'9 because I'm straight and Angle is hunched over a little causing him to def lose an inch in height. When he first stood up for the picture he was taller than he is in that picture. I had him by 2.5 inches.
dmeyer said on 8/Jan/07
if straight up easy 5'10 possibly 10.5
if straight up easy 5'10 possibly 10.5
Carlito said on 20/Dec/06
I think Kurt is 5'10. He could be 5'11. Thats Cool
I think Kurt is 5'10. He could be 5'11. Thats Cool
Alex said on 18/Dec/06
And Jason, he makes me appear leaner and I consider myself a medium framed guy, not lean really but in that picture I am leaner though. Also take into account that I weigh about 200lbs in those pictures on the Nathon Jones page and in this picture with Angle I am between 185-190lbs but still at that weight I looked big in general but with Angle I look like a normal sized guy.
And Jason, he makes me appear leaner and I consider myself a medium framed guy, not lean really but in that picture I am leaner though. Also take into account that I weigh about 200lbs in those pictures on the Nathon Jones page and in this picture with Angle I am between 185-190lbs but still at that weight I looked big in general but with Angle I look like a normal sized guy.
Jason said on 18/Dec/06
Yeah, he was between 215-220lbs when I saw him too.
Yeah, he was between 215-220lbs when I saw him too.
Alex said on 16/Dec/06
250lbs for Angle? He was big in person but was more like 220lbs, maybe even 215lbs. He has leaned out over the years a little. Was more 230lbs for a while.
250lbs for Angle? He was big in person but was more like 220lbs, maybe even 215lbs. He has leaned out over the years a little. Was more 230lbs for a while.
Alex said on 16/Dec/06
Viper, the 6'2 for Angle was rediculous if you ask me but never once did they say he was 6'2 on TV. It was just listed on his profile on WWE.com for years. They always referred to him as 6'0 on TV. When he debuted I thought he was 6'0 for a while then 5'11 then 5'10 when I met him. I had 2.5 inches on the guy but the picture makes it appear 3.5 because of the bit of leaning.
Viper, the 6'2 for Angle was rediculous if you ask me but never once did they say he was 6'2 on TV. It was just listed on his profile on WWE.com for years. They always referred to him as 6'0 on TV. When he debuted I thought he was 6'0 for a while then 5'11 then 5'10 when I met him. I had 2.5 inches on the guy but the picture makes it appear 3.5 because of the bit of leaning.
Viper said on 16/Dec/06
Im pretty shocked that TNA is listing him at 5-10. Young fans who beleive in all of their billed heights will think he shrunk big time.
Im pretty shocked that TNA is listing him at 5-10. Young fans who beleive in all of their billed heights will think he shrunk big time.
Alex said on 8/Nov/06
I don't think I've seen a bigger exaggeration than the 5'8 guy claiming to 6'0. I see a lot of people say they are 1-2 inches taller than they really are, sometimes 3 but 4 or more only once. Well there was this kid in 10th grade when I was in 9th grade who was 6'7 and I asked him how tall he was and he told me 7'3 but he was joking though.
I don't think I've seen a bigger exaggeration than the 5'8 guy claiming to 6'0. I see a lot of people say they are 1-2 inches taller than they really are, sometimes 3 but 4 or more only once. Well there was this kid in 10th grade when I was in 9th grade who was 6'7 and I asked him how tall he was and he told me 7'3 but he was joking though.
Alex said on 6/Nov/06
Viper, it is true, not lieing. The guy was old and I mean 65-70 so maybe he was once 5'11-6'0 when he was much younger but I told him I was 6'0 and he was like he's 6'0 and said I was 6'3-6'4 while he was 5'8-5'8.5 claiming he was 6'0. This was 4 years ago.
Viper, it is true, not lieing. The guy was old and I mean 65-70 so maybe he was once 5'11-6'0 when he was much younger but I told him I was 6'0 and he was like he's 6'0 and said I was 6'3-6'4 while he was 5'8-5'8.5 claiming he was 6'0. This was 4 years ago.
Viper652 said on 6/Nov/06
A 5-8 dude claiming he was 6-0? That sounds impossible.
A 5-8 dude claiming he was 6-0? That sounds impossible.
Alex said on 3/Nov/06
Cantstop no suprise for a guy 6'4.5 to get guessed at 6'6. My tall friend in the picture below was guessed at 6'7-6'8 2 times and was even guessed at as low as 6'2-6'3 which to me is crazy while he's a legit 6'5-6'5.5.
Cantstop no suprise for a guy 6'4.5 to get guessed at 6'6. My tall friend in the picture below was guessed at 6'7-6'8 2 times and was even guessed at as low as 6'2-6'3 which to me is crazy while he's a legit 6'5-6'5.5.
Alex said on 3/Nov/06
Viper, I got a 6'4 esimate once when I was 6'0 flat almost 4 years ago. It was funny because they guy was really 5'8 claiming he was 6'0.
Viper, I got a 6'4 esimate once when I was 6'0 flat almost 4 years ago. It was funny because they guy was really 5'8 claiming he was 6'0.
Viper652 said on 2/Nov/06
Ive gotten a 6-8 estimate once from some chick who was below 5-0. A 5 inch exaggeration.
Ive gotten a 6-8 estimate once from some chick who was below 5-0. A 5 inch exaggeration.
Alex said on 1/Nov/06
Cantstop, I am actually over 6'0 but its not as much as people think. I am just a fraction over 6'0.
Cantstop, I am actually over 6'0 but its not as much as people think. I am just a fraction over 6'0.
Alex said on 1/Nov/06
Viper, I get 6'2 estimates sometimes, 6'1 often. That tall friend I posted got a 6'7-6'8 estimate 1-2 times and even as low as 6'2-6'3. Shows how people can overestimate and underestimate.
Cantstop, maybe 5 inches but looked a little less to me, but my head is titled a bit up too which makes me like 1/4 inch taller looking. When I am with him I feel that my head would be a bit under his eye level. Once I asked him where my head was on him and he said just under the eye.
Viper, I get 6'2 estimates sometimes, 6'1 often. That tall friend I posted got a 6'7-6'8 estimate 1-2 times and even as low as 6'2-6'3. Shows how people can overestimate and underestimate.
Cantstop, maybe 5 inches but looked a little less to me, but my head is titled a bit up too which makes me like 1/4 inch taller looking. When I am with him I feel that my head would be a bit under his eye level. Once I asked him where my head was on him and he said just under the eye.
Viper652 said on 1/Nov/06
Cantstop, do people think you are over 6-6?
Cantstop, do people think you are over 6-6?
Alex said on 31/Oct/06
Also my head is titled a bit up, if my head was more straight it would make me like 1/4 inch shorter. His eye level looks to be 4.5 inches and my head is a bit under his eyes so 5 inches seems right. 6 inches on Angle? More like 2.5 considering his slight lean. When he stood up straight I only had him by 2.5 inches I estimated.
Also my head is titled a bit up, if my head was more straight it would make me like 1/4 inch shorter. His eye level looks to be 4.5 inches and my head is a bit under his eyes so 5 inches seems right. 6 inches on Angle? More like 2.5 considering his slight lean. When he stood up straight I only had him by 2.5 inches I estimated.
Alex said on 30/Oct/06
Cantstop, you're a big guy. So my friend is 1/2 to an inch taller, just a little taller. He looks tall in the picture but in person he looks a little taller as pictures can be deceiving. HOw much taller does he look than me in that picture. 5 inches you'd say?
Cantstop, you're a big guy. So my friend is 1/2 to an inch taller, just a little taller. He looks tall in the picture but in person he looks a little taller as pictures can be deceiving. HOw much taller does he look than me in that picture. 5 inches you'd say?
Alex said on 28/Oct/06
Cantstop go to the Nathan Jones page and guess my 2 heavy friend's weights? A pic of each of them I posted. A few people there have already underestimated them.
Cantstop go to the Nathan Jones page and guess my 2 heavy friend's weights? A pic of each of them I posted. A few people there have already underestimated them.
Alex said on 28/Oct/06
And yea next to Angle I look lean and its weird because next to the average guy I look big.
And yea next to Angle I look lean and its weird because next to the average guy I look big.
Alex said on 28/Oct/06
Cantstop, me lanky? haha never. I don't even consider myself thin. I am a medium frame. This picture was taken in September 2004 so around 2 years ago. I was 195lbs there then peaked at 215lbs a couple months later then dropped to 185lbs last summer and now this year I got back up to 195-200lbs. My friend in that picture was 260lbs at that time. Now he's much leaner around 205lbs but in better shape. How tall are you anyway since you say he's taller than you are?
Cantstop, me lanky? haha never. I don't even consider myself thin. I am a medium frame. This picture was taken in September 2004 so around 2 years ago. I was 195lbs there then peaked at 215lbs a couple months later then dropped to 185lbs last summer and now this year I got back up to 195-200lbs. My friend in that picture was 260lbs at that time. Now he's much leaner around 205lbs but in better shape. How tall are you anyway since you say he's taller than you are?
Alex said on 26/Oct/06
Louie, thats a real 6'5 guy now. Could be closer to 6'5.5 though. I actually have to measure him myself during midday. But there is no way HHH would only be an inch shorter than him unless HHH was in lifts or big boots.
Louie, thats a real 6'5 guy now. Could be closer to 6'5.5 though. I actually have to measure him myself during midday. But there is no way HHH would only be an inch shorter than him unless HHH was in lifts or big boots.
Alex said on 25/Oct/06
Daniaml, haha I wasn't sure what he meant the way he said it.
Daniaml, haha I wasn't sure what he meant the way he said it.
Dkko said on 25/Oct/06
Exactly Danimal, Angle along with Ken Shamrock are the two guys that the WWE's ever had that can legitimately snap anyone's neck in an instant, that's why a real-life shootfight between the two would be very interesting, not to mention very, very scary
Exactly Danimal, Angle along with Ken Shamrock are the two guys that the WWE's ever had that can legitimately snap anyone's neck in an instant, that's why a real-life shootfight between the two would be very interesting, not to mention very, very scary
Danimal said on 25/Oct/06
I would never try to catch Angle off-guard. That man could end your life in a heart beat.
I would never try to catch Angle off-guard. That man could end your life in a heart beat.
Alex said on 24/Oct/06
Paul, well in summer time in the pool where the water isn't high enough for the water to give an advantage. But I can FU one who is 6'0 and he weighed 320 then 325-330lbs the following year. Now he's supposedly closer to 350lbs now. I can also give him a back suplex, german suplex and an angle slam. The other friend who is 5'7 and 320-330lbs I never tried it on him since he wouldn't let me but I bet I could do it on him too. Catch Angle off guard with what??
Paul, well in summer time in the pool where the water isn't high enough for the water to give an advantage. But I can FU one who is 6'0 and he weighed 320 then 325-330lbs the following year. Now he's supposedly closer to 350lbs now. I can also give him a back suplex, german suplex and an angle slam. The other friend who is 5'7 and 320-330lbs I never tried it on him since he wouldn't let me but I bet I could do it on him too. Catch Angle off guard with what??
Paul said on 23/Oct/06
Alex, are you still f5'n or whatever they call it those big buddies of yours ? You should have caught Angle off guard with it too.
Alex, are you still f5'n or whatever they call it those big buddies of yours ? You should have caught Angle off guard with it too.
Dkko said on 22/Oct/06
Of course I mean height-wise Alex, Benoit was also much more muscular than I am
Of course I mean height-wise Alex, Benoit was also much more muscular than I am
Alex said on 22/Oct/06
DKKO, you outsize him the same as I do in height or you mean weight? He's bigger than me and I am built too but not like he is. He has me by at least 30lbs I'd say in that picture.
DKKO, you outsize him the same as I do in height or you mean weight? He's bigger than me and I am built too but not like he is. He has me by at least 30lbs I'd say in that picture.
Dkko said on 20/Oct/06
Alex, I got a picture of myself and with Benoit and I outsize him by just exactly the same that you do with Kurt, I would like to compare my height to yours
Alex, I got a picture of myself and with Benoit and I outsize him by just exactly the same that you do with Kurt, I would like to compare my height to yours
JK said on 9/Oct/06
What type of crap are u typing in Louie, This is a height website don't forget.
What type of crap are u typing in Louie, This is a height website don't forget.
ralph said on 8/Sep/06
now angle is released from wwe, so he is older than I thought.Maybe 38?
now angle is released from wwe, so he is older than I thought.Maybe 38?
KingNick said on 3/Sep/06
Harry, how recently you see these guys out of curiousity? Some therories, especially with UT, suggest he shrunk over the years. It sounds like when you saw him he was around 6'8" like you said (w/o shoes). And how did you get to meet all these guys???
Harry, how recently you see these guys out of curiousity? Some therories, especially with UT, suggest he shrunk over the years. It sounds like when you saw him he was around 6'8" like you said (w/o shoes). And how did you get to meet all these guys???
Alex said on 31/Aug/06
Shortest Angle could be is 5'9.5, no shorter than that as I still believe him to be 5'10.
Shortest Angle could be is 5'9.5, no shorter than that as I still believe him to be 5'10.
Danimal said on 28/Aug/06
Harry, take an inch off all your estimates and you're right on the money ;).
Harry, take an inch off all your estimates and you're right on the money ;).
harry said on 27/Aug/06
kurt angle must be close to his 40's right?,so that means he shrunk at 35 that happens sometimes(not trying to sound smart)i mean i saw him at the newzealand tour and he came up to my shoulders (i was 6'9 back then)and undertaker was just slightly shorter than me and he looked up at me and nodded his head(thought he was gonna punch me)no doubt,i agree with 5'10 in shoes and 5'9 without,taker 6'9 in shoes,6'8 and prolly a half without,batista 6'5 in shoes 6'4 without,and ortin so randy,is 6'5 in shoes 6'4 without.yay i got rey mysterio's aortograph(i cant spell)
kurt angle must be close to his 40's right?,so that means he shrunk at 35 that happens sometimes(not trying to sound smart)i mean i saw him at the newzealand tour and he came up to my shoulders (i was 6'9 back then)and undertaker was just slightly shorter than me and he looked up at me and nodded his head(thought he was gonna punch me)no doubt,i agree with 5'10 in shoes and 5'9 without,taker 6'9 in shoes,6'8 and prolly a half without,batista 6'5 in shoes 6'4 without,and ortin so randy,is 6'5 in shoes 6'4 without.yay i got rey mysterio's aortograph(i cant spell)
Alex said on 25/Aug/06
I got a few pairs of running sneakers and all give 1.5 inch except for one which is more closer to 1 inch, maybe 1.25 inches and my basketball sneakers give about 1.5 inches too. Most sneakers won't give 2 inches of height that I know of. Which sneakers give you the least height? Walking sneakers?
I got a few pairs of running sneakers and all give 1.5 inch except for one which is more closer to 1 inch, maybe 1.25 inches and my basketball sneakers give about 1.5 inches too. Most sneakers won't give 2 inches of height that I know of. Which sneakers give you the least height? Walking sneakers?
Danimal said on 25/Aug/06
Running shoes give over an inch in height. Minimum 1.5". I believe he may have been over 5'10" and they rounded. He doesn't appear as tall as that today. Could have been the back surgeries that shaved off an inch.
Running shoes give over an inch in height. Minimum 1.5". I believe he may have been over 5'10" and they rounded. He doesn't appear as tall as that today. Could have been the back surgeries that shaved off an inch.
Alex said on 25/Aug/06
If he was listed at 5'11 then it was either in shoes or he was taller back then. Most likely in shoe measurement.
If he was listed at 5'11 then it was either in shoes or he was taller back then. Most likely in shoe measurement.
Alex said on 24/Aug/06
I remember he was listed at 5'10 during the olympics and the olympics are going to be pretty legit too with their listings.
I remember he was listed at 5'10 during the olympics and the olympics are going to be pretty legit too with their listings.
Danimal said on 23/Aug/06
Ralph, he was listed at 5'10" in the olympics, wasn't he?
Ralph, he was listed at 5'10" in the olympics, wasn't he?
Alex said on 18/Aug/06
Ralph, the picture with me and Kurt is not a bad picture. Just people judge it and forget that the man is leaning a bit which is going to make him 1/2 inch to an inch shorter while I am standing up more straight. With that it looks a good 3 inch difference but when he stood up straight he was 5'10.
Ralph, the picture with me and Kurt is not a bad picture. Just people judge it and forget that the man is leaning a bit which is going to make him 1/2 inch to an inch shorter while I am standing up more straight. With that it looks a good 3 inch difference but when he stood up straight he was 5'10.
ralph said on 17/Aug/06
This guy was listed as a 5'11" at the 1996 olympic games. And the pic with alex is horrible to see differences.
This guy was listed as a 5'11" at the 1996 olympic games. And the pic with alex is horrible to see differences.
Alex said on 14/Aug/06
Danimal, I'll talk about height/weight sometimes but not too too much. Depends on the conversation. But if someone gets into the height talk and claims they are taller than they really are even by just an inch, more often its 2-3 inches I'll actually argue a bit until I get my point across. I'll say at the end I know you're not that tall and I know how tall you are while they think they are really that tall.
Danimal, I'll talk about height/weight sometimes but not too too much. Depends on the conversation. But if someone gets into the height talk and claims they are taller than they really are even by just an inch, more often its 2-3 inches I'll actually argue a bit until I get my point across. I'll say at the end I know you're not that tall and I know how tall you are while they think they are really that tall.
Louie John Buluran said on 12/Aug/06
Orton is 6 ft 4 Barefeet and 6 ft 5 with Boots... That is what they call him Big O.....
Orton is 6 ft 4 Barefeet and 6 ft 5 with Boots... That is what they call him Big O.....
Danimal said on 11/Aug/06
Alex, I'm curious, do you talk about height with your friends a lot? Actually, do most of the people on here obsess about it with the rest of the world when they're not on here? I sure hope not. When I was younger, I asked everyone's height, but today that can be an intrusive question.
Alex, I'm curious, do you talk about height with your friends a lot? Actually, do most of the people on here obsess about it with the rest of the world when they're not on here? I sure hope not. When I was younger, I asked everyone's height, but today that can be an intrusive question.
Viper652 said on 11/Aug/06
I think Orton is taller than just 6-2 1/2. He looks 6-3 at least barefoot. Over 6-4 in boots.
I think Orton is taller than just 6-2 1/2. He looks 6-3 at least barefoot. Over 6-4 in boots.
Alex said on 11/Aug/06
Funny today I was talking to my friend who says he thought Angle was 6'0 then he goes to WWE and thought he was 6'2 because of that absurd listing. I tell him the man is only 5'10 and he was surprised to hear he was a bit shorter than him so I am going to show him the picture.
Funny today I was talking to my friend who says he thought Angle was 6'0 then he goes to WWE and thought he was 6'2 because of that absurd listing. I tell him the man is only 5'10 and he was surprised to hear he was a bit shorter than him so I am going to show him the picture.
Alex said on 11/Aug/06
Orton looks 6'4 to me. Too tall to be under that but at the very least 6'3.5.
Orton looks 6'4 to me. Too tall to be under that but at the very least 6'3.5.
Alex said on 10/Aug/06
I remember someone said Undertaker said on a radio show a few years ago he was 6'6.5.
I remember someone said Undertaker said on a radio show a few years ago he was 6'6.5.
Dude said on 10/Aug/06
Orton is 6'3 wearing boots but in barefeet he would be nearer 6'2.5
Orton is 6'3 wearing boots but in barefeet he would be nearer 6'2.5
Alex said on 10/Aug/06
The Man, I do remember when they said Hogan was nearly 7'0 on Rocky too. LOL
The Man, I do remember when they said Hogan was nearly 7'0 on Rocky too. LOL
Danimal said on 8/Aug/06
Louie, Batista has said he is only 6'3". UT is not 6'8" today. I'm sure he's struggling with 6'7". I agree with you about Kane, Angle and Orton though.
Louie, Batista has said he is only 6'3". UT is not 6'8" today. I'm sure he's struggling with 6'7". I agree with you about Kane, Angle and Orton though.
TheMan said on 8/Aug/06
I still don't know why they list angle as 6,2 i guess it's for little kids that would have no idea id belive it lol. Everyone would know from watching wrestlemania when he fought brock that if they didnt know he was he's real 5,10 that he was at max 6,0 as they stated that themeselves silly really. WWE also use the he's 7 foot etc alot. Guys like Kain when infact inches shorter are 7 footers all fo a sudden. It's rounding up to it's extreme. Remember rocky 3 they said Hogan stood nealy 7 feet in that insane.
I still don't know why they list angle as 6,2 i guess it's for little kids that would have no idea id belive it lol. Everyone would know from watching wrestlemania when he fought brock that if they didnt know he was he's real 5,10 that he was at max 6,0 as they stated that themeselves silly really. WWE also use the he's 7 foot etc alot. Guys like Kain when infact inches shorter are 7 footers all fo a sudden. It's rounding up to it's extreme. Remember rocky 3 they said Hogan stood nealy 7 feet in that insane.
Louie John Buluran said on 8/Aug/06
Ok... here are the real height of WWE Superstars
Kurt Angle- 5 ft 10
Randy Orton - 6 ft 4
Undertaker- 6ft 8
kane- 6 ft 8
Batista - 6 ft 3 1/2
Ok... here are the real height of WWE Superstars
Kurt Angle- 5 ft 10
Randy Orton - 6 ft 4
Undertaker- 6ft 8
kane- 6 ft 8
Batista - 6 ft 3 1/2
Louie John Buluran said on 8/Aug/06
i am an inch taller than my Olympic hero Kurt Angle.... but as a 5 ft 11...billed as 6 ft 3 is weird
i am an inch taller than my Olympic hero Kurt Angle.... but as a 5 ft 11...billed as 6 ft 3 is weird
Louie John Buluran said on 8/Aug/06
Ok..... but i think that the wwe.com must be able to retrograde all their wrestlers height
Ok..... but i think that the wwe.com must be able to retrograde all their wrestlers height
Danimal said on 7/Aug/06
We know Kurt is 5'10". I don't think anyone is disputing that Louie. He's the benchmark to compare ALL other wrestlers to. Him and Mark Henry (2 guys measured for the Olympics).
We know Kurt is 5'10". I don't think anyone is disputing that Louie. He's the benchmark to compare ALL other wrestlers to. Him and Mark Henry (2 guys measured for the Olympics).
Alex said on 7/Aug/06
Louie I'd say so too but you can get the impression that the guy is only 5'9-5'9.5 in this picture with me because of his posture which is going to make him at least 1/2 inch shorter, maybe 1 inch like Rob said. I tell you the man was a bit taller when he first stood up before he leaned a bit for the pic. He wasn't more than 2.5 inches shorter than me.
Louie I'd say so too but you can get the impression that the guy is only 5'9-5'9.5 in this picture with me because of his posture which is going to make him at least 1/2 inch shorter, maybe 1 inch like Rob said. I tell you the man was a bit taller when he first stood up before he leaned a bit for the pic. He wasn't more than 2.5 inches shorter than me.
Rocker said on 7/Aug/06
Angle is 5'11 with boots on ,in barefeet 5'9.5.
Angle is 5'11 with boots on ,in barefeet 5'9.5.
Louie John Buluran said on 7/Aug/06
Kurt is 5-10...
Kurt is 5-10...
Danimal said on 6/Aug/06
In my experience some didn't.
In my experience some didn't.
Alex said on 6/Aug/06
Danimal is right when it comes to the shorter girls, 5'3 and under. They tend to boost their height up an inch a lot. With the much taller girls 5'10 and up , some may downgrade themselves just because they don't wanna be that all.
Danimal is right when it comes to the shorter girls, 5'3 and under. They tend to boost their height up an inch a lot. With the much taller girls 5'10 and up , some may downgrade themselves just because they don't wanna be that all.
Viper652 said on 6/Aug/06
In my experience most chicks knew their correct height.
In my experience most chicks knew their correct height.
Danimal said on 5/Aug/06
I just don't think she knew how tall she was. Most girls don't. Others do. The ones that do, may add a half an inch if they are on the shorter side.
I just don't think she knew how tall she was. Most girls don't. Others do. The ones that do, may add a half an inch if they are on the shorter side.
TheMan said on 4/Aug/06
I think women don't really measure themselves i remember a girl saying she was 5,4 and honestly she was only about 5,1 5,2. I know becuase my mums 5,4 and looks reasenbly tall but she looked tiny.
I think women don't really measure themselves i remember a girl saying she was 5,4 and honestly she was only about 5,1 5,2. I know becuase my mums 5,4 and looks reasenbly tall but she looked tiny.
Alex said on 4/Aug/06
Danimal, odd you don't see girls infating their height too much. Its mostly guys. Also I don't think its often that guys just lie and boost their height up on purpose, a lot of the time they don't know how tall they really are and think they're taller than they are.
Danimal, odd you don't see girls infating their height too much. Its mostly guys. Also I don't think its often that guys just lie and boost their height up on purpose, a lot of the time they don't know how tall they really are and think they're taller than they are.
Alex said on 4/Aug/06
The Man, I think Angle may be 220lbs now, 215 at least. When he was a little bit bigger he was 230lbs. So he's lost 10-15lbs.
The Man, I think Angle may be 220lbs now, 215 at least. When he was a little bit bigger he was 230lbs. So he's lost 10-15lbs.
Danimal said on 3/Aug/06
Even my recent ex said she was 5'3" (she was gorgeous) and I always thought she seemed taller, because my ex before her WAS 5'3" and this one seemed taller. One night I measured her and she was 5'4". She was shocked, but happy. Now whenever anyone ever asks her how tall she is, she'll think of me ;) (I hope...I miss her!!!) lol.
Even my recent ex said she was 5'3" (she was gorgeous) and I always thought she seemed taller, because my ex before her WAS 5'3" and this one seemed taller. One night I measured her and she was 5'4". She was shocked, but happy. Now whenever anyone ever asks her how tall she is, she'll think of me ;) (I hope...I miss her!!!) lol.
Danimal said on 3/Aug/06
Funny, I was training a girl at my gym last week and I asked her how tall she was and she said 5'7". I didn't want to argue with her, but I had at least 5" on her and I'm like 5'9.5". I can't see her at anything more than 5'5" at most. Goes to show that some people have no idea.
Funny, I was training a girl at my gym last week and I asked her how tall she was and she said 5'7". I didn't want to argue with her, but I had at least 5" on her and I'm like 5'9.5". I can't see her at anything more than 5'5" at most. Goes to show that some people have no idea.
TheMan said on 3/Aug/06
There is a huge shadow above youre head though alex maybe that adds to the illusion. Oh yeah Kurt used to be alot bigger id say about 235. When he first arrived on the scene he was quite immpressivly built. Id say he's in amazing shape for about 210-215 pounds now. Id say on youre height though Alex looking there you don't look under 6,1.
There is a huge shadow above youre head though alex maybe that adds to the illusion. Oh yeah Kurt used to be alot bigger id say about 235. When he first arrived on the scene he was quite immpressivly built. Id say he's in amazing shape for about 210-215 pounds now. Id say on youre height though Alex looking there you don't look under 6,1.
Alex said on 3/Aug/06
It looks 3 inches in the picture due to his posture but 4 inches? don't see that though.
It looks 3 inches in the picture due to his posture but 4 inches? don't see that though.
Alex said on 3/Aug/06
Danimal, I get many 6'1-6'2 estimates for me while I am officially 6'0 1/4. 2-3 2 times I've gotten 6'3-6'4 estimates and even a few times estimated at 5'11 and once at 5'10 and even once at 5'8 by someone who had no clue on how to guess height.
Danimal, I get many 6'1-6'2 estimates for me while I am officially 6'0 1/4. 2-3 2 times I've gotten 6'3-6'4 estimates and even a few times estimated at 5'11 and once at 5'10 and even once at 5'8 by someone who had no clue on how to guess height.
Danimal said on 3/Aug/06
or maybe 6'1.5" minimum.
or maybe 6'1.5" minimum.
Danimal said on 3/Aug/06
Next to Angle in that pic, he was really is 5'10", I would have given you 6'2".
Next to Angle in that pic, he was really is 5'10", I would have given you 6'2".
Alex said on 3/Aug/06
So Danimal you think I look 6'1 or more?
So Danimal you think I look 6'1 or more?
Alex said on 3/Aug/06
Danimal, Angle's posture isn't the best there. When he first stood up he was a bit taller, maybe an inch. I had on sneakers that gave 1-1.25 inches of height I know for sure. My posture in that picture is pretty good as I am standing fully straight pretty much. Last time I went to the doctor and got measured in midday it was 6'0 1/4 too so I am not taller than I think I am. I am pretty sure on my height. If you put Angle standing straight then it comes to 2-2.5 inches of height but looks 3 or so as he's leaning a bit.
Danimal, Angle's posture isn't the best there. When he first stood up he was a bit taller, maybe an inch. I had on sneakers that gave 1-1.25 inches of height I know for sure. My posture in that picture is pretty good as I am standing fully straight pretty much. Last time I went to the doctor and got measured in midday it was 6'0 1/4 too so I am not taller than I think I am. I am pretty sure on my height. If you put Angle standing straight then it comes to 2-2.5 inches of height but looks 3 or so as he's leaning a bit.
Danimal said on 2/Aug/06
You know Alex, Kurt looks closer to Lesnar's height in that pic Viper provided than he does to you in your pic with him. I see more than 2-2.5" difference. I think you're only saying that you see the 2-2.5", because you know you're 6'0.5" and you want to believe that Kurt is really 5'10", but that could just be what you want to see in that pic. If someone showed me that pic of you two, I would guess that Kurt is MAX 5'9", but more like 5'8.5". NO way would I guess 5'10" from that pic. Either you were wearing some serious shoes, or you're taller than you think you are, or he's SHORTER.
Editor Rob
You know Alex, Kurt looks closer to Lesnar's height in that pic Viper provided than he does to you in your pic with him. I see more than 2-2.5" difference. I think you're only saying that you see the 2-2.5", because you know you're 6'0.5" and you want to believe that Kurt is really 5'10", but that could just be what you want to see in that pic. If someone showed me that pic of you two, I would guess that Kurt is MAX 5'9", but more like 5'8.5". NO way would I guess 5'10" from that pic. Either you were wearing some serious shoes, or you're taller than you think you are, or he's SHORTER.
Editor Rob angle's stance is looking bit poorer than alex, so he could be losing an inch in posture
Alex said on 2/Aug/06
The Man, Angle I believe was 230lbs or so when he was bigger. He has leaned out, lost a bit of size but still big. I'd say he waighs 220lbs, but no more than that. He's lost a good 10lbs, maybe closer to 15lbs in the last 2 years.
I get estimated at 6'2 kinda often, at least 6'1 a lot so doesn't suprise me.
The Man, Angle I believe was 230lbs or so when he was bigger. He has leaned out, lost a bit of size but still big. I'd say he waighs 220lbs, but no more than that. He's lost a good 10lbs, maybe closer to 15lbs in the last 2 years.
I get estimated at 6'2 kinda often, at least 6'1 a lot so doesn't suprise me.
TheMan said on 2/Aug/06
Actually ive got their wrestlemania match on dvd. As i recall there was only a marginal diffrence to youre pic if not greater in youre favour. Laughable really Micheal cole goes to stay in the stare off that Angle is 6 foot 230 something and Lesnar a whopping 6,4 lol. WWEs height exagerations are ridiclous. But you do look 6,2 in that pic alex lol if you said you were 6,2 id belive it. But he is bending down im sure he did look taller.
Actually ive got their wrestlemania match on dvd. As i recall there was only a marginal diffrence to youre pic if not greater in youre favour. Laughable really Micheal cole goes to stay in the stare off that Angle is 6 foot 230 something and Lesnar a whopping 6,4 lol. WWEs height exagerations are ridiclous. But you do look 6,2 in that pic alex lol if you said you were 6,2 id belive it. But he is bending down im sure he did look taller.
RudeBoy said on 2/Aug/06
Angle and Lesnar barefoot toe to toe Angle is 5'11 and Lesnar 6'2 thats their true heights.
Angle and Lesnar barefoot toe to toe Angle is 5'11 and Lesnar 6'2 thats their true heights.
Alex said on 1/Aug/06
The difference between Angle and Lesnar looks pretty similar to the difference between me and Angle but that picture is shot low while mine is shot at an even level, plus Angle is leaning a bit and isn't fully standing up straight. When he first stood up he was a bit taller.
The difference between Angle and Lesnar looks pretty similar to the difference between me and Angle but that picture is shot low while mine is shot at an even level, plus Angle is leaning a bit and isn't fully standing up straight. When he first stood up he was a bit taller.
Alex said on 30/Jul/06
Well its stupid that they did and still list him at 6'2 in WWE. No way is a 5'10 guy getting away with 6'2. Thats rediculous. When he first came I honestly thought he was 5'11-6'0 then after somtime I thought he was just 5'11 for a few years then I met him and he's just 5'10.
Well its stupid that they did and still list him at 6'2 in WWE. No way is a 5'10 guy getting away with 6'2. Thats rediculous. When he first came I honestly thought he was 5'11-6'0 then after somtime I thought he was just 5'11 for a few years then I met him and he's just 5'10.
Jordan said on 29/Jul/06
Angle was measured at 5'10 in the olimpics---thats got to be his height.
Angle was measured at 5'10 in the olimpics---thats got to be his height.
Alex said on 25/Jul/06
You're one of those big time underestimaters. My dad thinks Angle is 5'8 but he thinks I am 6'1 but it doens't make any sense since there isn't near 5 inches between me and Angle. Its 2 inches, 2.5 inches at most.
You're one of those big time underestimaters. My dad thinks Angle is 5'8 but he thinks I am 6'1 but it doens't make any sense since there isn't near 5 inches between me and Angle. Its 2 inches, 2.5 inches at most.
Francesco said on 24/Jul/06
I'm Italian and I think that kurt Angle is very small...maybe 5'7
Editor Rob
I'm Italian and I think that kurt Angle is very small...maybe 5'7
Editor Rob that's pretty scandalous...I'd bet he's 5ft 10
Alex said on 20/Jul/06
Stephanie is 5'8 I think. She just had on heels when he was in boots or sneakers where they were than at the same height.
Stephanie is 5'8 I think. She just had on heels when he was in boots or sneakers where they were than at the same height.
Anonymous said on 18/Jul/06
Of course he wasn't 6ft cause he is the same height as Stephanie McMahon and when she has on heels she was a little taller then him.
Of course he wasn't 6ft cause he is the same height as Stephanie McMahon and when she has on heels she was a little taller then him.
Kevin said on 13/Jul/06
I met Kurt Angle at a show last month and asked him how tall he was. He said he's 5'11", just thought I'd pass that along.
I met Kurt Angle at a show last month and asked him how tall he was. He said he's 5'11", just thought I'd pass that along.
KingNick said on 9/Jun/06
I met a former wrestler while working on a set this weekend and he wrestled Kurt Angle at a dark mathc back in 2001. He claimed Angle was the same height as him, 5'10". He also said he was very nice and was very flexible in terms of what they could do in the ring.
I met a former wrestler while working on a set this weekend and he wrestled Kurt Angle at a dark mathc back in 2001. He claimed Angle was the same height as him, 5'10". He also said he was very nice and was very flexible in terms of what they could do in the ring.
Heights are barefeet estimates, derived from quotations, official websites, agency resumes, in person encounters with actors at conventions and pictures/films.
Other vital statistics like weight or shoe size measurements have been sourced from newspapers, books, resumes or social media.
Celebrity Fan Photos and Agency Pictures of stars are © to their respective owners.