How tall is Mila Kunis

Mila Kunis Height

5ft 4in (163 cm)

Ukranian/American Actress best known for roles in films like Black Swan, The Book of Eli, Friends with Benefits and Oz: The Great and Powerful. On tv she is well known for her voice role as Meg in Family Guy and also for her role on That 70's Show.
My friends call me hobbit. I come across shorter than I am. People will say, 'You're not five foot four.' And I'll say, 'People, I know my height.' I'm constantly winning bets - hundreds of dollars

So, if you ever meet Mila, please don't bet on her height, she may have a few tricks up her sleeve and you might end up with an empty wallet! She also talked about her weight, "I went down to 95 pounds. I weigh 117 usually, like today. I looked like Gollum".
At 95 pounds, I would literally look at myself in the mirror and I was like, 'Oh my God!' I had no shape, no boobs, no a$$ .. All you saw was bone. I was like, 'This looks gross'. But in photographs and on film, it looked amazing...It took me five months to lose 20 pounds, but it took me just five days - days! - to gain it all back.

How tall is Mila Kunis
5ft 11.5 Justin Timberlake with Mila
Photo by PR Photos

You May Be Interested

Scarlett Johansson
Height of Scarlett Johansson
5ft 3in (160 cm)
Ashton Kutcher
Height of Ashton Kutcher
6ft 2.5in (189 cm)
Natalie Portman
Height of Natalie Portman
5ft 3in (160 cm)
Emma Stone
Height of Emma Stone
5ft 6in (168 cm)

Add a Comment 188 comments

Average Guess (1 Votes)
5ft 4in
Dom said on 21/Jul/16
Looks between 5'4" and 5'5"
Adolfus said on 25/Jun/16
I agree, winteriscoming, and I'm still convinced that she is actually 5'5". For someone who people think is so short, she sure makes a lot of other people look short.
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
winteriscoming said on 1/Jun/16
shes no less than 5'4

In these recent pictures with 5'1 Kristen Bell, as well as 5'5 Kathryn Han and Christina Applegate, 5'4 looks about right - shoes and posture considered.

Click Here
Click Here
Rollo Tomasi said on 21/Apr/16
Thought she was shorter
Editor Rob: just don't make a bet with her about it!
Adolfus said on 16/Mar/16
Mila Kunis was taller than Mark Wahlberg with her high heels on. Here she stands next to him and leans in to a microphone set for his height.
Click Here
Adolfus said on 12/Nov/15
She is 5'5" - I don't care what anyone else says.
Fluffi Fluffsson said on 5/Aug/15
I thought she was smaller...
jake said on 4/Jul/15
She keeps insisting that she's 5'4", but she keeps looking like she's 5'3"... maybe 5'3.5", tops.
Susie said on 1/Jul/15
She has a small frame but I never thought she looked that short. If she's under 5'4", it's probably not by much. I'd say she's at least 161 cm and could be as tall as 164 cm.
NBAer said on 18/Mar/15
She really looks like 5'4 in the picture next to Timberlake,maybe 5'3.5 at worst,but she's bending her knee a bit,so 5'4 looks reasonable IF Justin really is 5'11.5...She's truthful about her height as it seems,unlike most 5'0-5'1 girls i know who genuinely believe they're 5'5 and claim it without a ''red dace''
zzz said on 13/Mar/15
How many inches in gap do you all see between both? I see 4 to 5.
[Editor Rob: with Justin? I don't think there's anymore than 4]
dvd said on 10/Feb/15
Mila looks a bit over an inch shorter than Macaulay culkin in these pics, and she's wearing flats. there shoes probably give them the same advantage.

Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here

Which makes 5'4 sound about right.
dvd said on 10/Feb/15
Mila looks a bit over an inch shorter than Macaulay culkin in these pics, and she's wearing flats. there shoes probably give them the same advantage.

Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
184.3cm said on 5/Feb/15
If Timberlake is 5'11 flat like i think, then he is about 6' in those shoes putting her around 5'8 in heels. So a 4 inch gain seems more than reasonable to me. SHe is maybe a few cm taller/shorter but thats all.

@Sky

You are maybe 5'9 in heels, a 5'11 guy is 6'0 in shoes so you are 1 inch taller than Mila is in this photo. Your eyelevel would be roughly where her eyebrows are in this photo.
yeah right said on 5/Feb/15
So you're 5'4-5'4.5 and in the shoes that add 4-4.5 inches, making you 5'9 at max, you feel almost as tall as a 5'11-6 foot guy?? Now I understand why so many guys lie about their height.
Sky said on 4/Feb/15
There's a huge gap between her and Justin, 4 to 5'' maybe?? I am 5'4'', well 5'4'' 1/2 and when i wear shoes as tall as hers i always look and feel like i'm just as the same height as a guy who's almost 6 feet tall. You are a liar Mila..
Anon said on 4/Feb/15
I think 5'4 seems about right.
In this photo of her and Ellen, she seems about Ellen's height (listed at 5'7, even a bit taller with her heals on, heels prob give her 3 inches.

(scroll to the bottom to see the pic im a referring to)

Click Here
Me said on 13/Jan/15
Thanks Rob. Yeah..She definitely looks shorter than 5'4''
Me said on 11/Jan/15
Rob, How many inches do you think those shoes are? They have platform so i would think her shoes are 5 inches?
[Editor Rob: they probably give her nearly 4 inches of actual height, but in a shop would be getting called 5 or 5.5 inch heels.]
Rach893 said on 28/Dec/14
I met Mila Kunis a year ago, I'm 5'4 and she was my height, we were both wearing flats
Hellokitty said on 27/Dec/14
Height is an illusion. Natalie Portman is 5'3 if you look at pictures of Mila and her together you could tell that she is a bit taller than here. I think Mila is above 5'3 and slightly below 5'4, maybe if she stands straight up and really stretches her posture it will elongate her making her barely hit 5'4. It's puzzling because not everybody looks their height. I'm 5'3 and people think I'm taller. She has a quite weird body but super hot.
Hellokitty said on 27/Dec/14
Height is an illusion. Natalie Portman is 5'3 if you look at pictures of Mila and her together you could tell that she is a bit taller than here. I think Mila is above 5'3 and slightly below 5'4, maybe if she stands straight up and really stretches her posture it will elongate her making her barely hit 5'4. It's puzzling because not everybody looks their height. I'm 5'3 and people think I'm taller. She has a quite weird body but super hot.
Cami said on 28/Oct/14
She does look about 5'2 but I'm willing to believe she is 5'3 with "short" proportions. She may even be 5'4 as she claims but since celebs lie about their heights all the time...
SAMMY DERRICK said on 24/Sep/14
5'4.With the PRETTIEST EYES!!!!
J.Lee said on 10/Sep/14
Rob, does she look less than her height? Why do people think she's shorter?
[Editor Rob: I think she can look anywhere in 5ft 3-4 range at times]
Dom said on 14/Aug/14
Doesn't look a milimeter under 5'4" Might even be a tiny bit over that.
Jack said on 11/Jul/14
She looks about 5'7" in this picture next to JT who looks to be in 1 inch sneakers. If she was wearing 3 inch heels that would make her 5'4" on the dot.
Me said on 15/Jun/14
@Stephanie..If you look closely, those shoes does have platforms. They have to be above 4 inches. I would 5 or so. I wear heals everyday for years. Shoes with platforms are at least 5 inches.
Stephanie said on 22/May/14
@Me Mila's heels are nowhere near high enough to make a 5' 4" person be almost 5' 11"... she would need big platforms and heels on the platforms to be that tall!
Me said on 21/Apr/14
I am exactly 5'4'' and if Justin's height is accurate (5'11'') and i wear the same heals Mila have on in that picture, i would say 5' heals?, i would be almost the same height as Justin. I think Mila is no more than 5'2''.
Raida said on 7/Feb/14
She might be 5'3" or 5'4",bt however she is.she is gorgeous!
Ted said on 24/Jan/14
@GUI - A lot of celebs DO fib about their heights, so it's not at all 'pathetic' to notice that and be skeptical. I agree that one shouldn't insult a celeb over it, that's uncalled for.

Far as Mila goes, I'd believe 5'3", possibly even 5'3.5" at the outside, but not 5'4". That'd put her at very near average height for a woman, and she simply has never looked it.

Oh and Mila, I would bet with you... I'd just watch your feet carefully to see if you were tippy-toeing very slightly during the measurement. ;-)
Ed Kline said on 22/Dec/13
Clint says on 3/May/13
"...So anyone claiming she is anything other than 5'5" is stupid,..."
SO Mila Kunis is stupid for claiming she is exactly 5'4?
Brilliant Clint, brilliant!
Nadya said on 27/Nov/13
Usually people in Hollywood lie about their age and height. I mean just by looking at her I can tell shes like 5"2 ish. I think the short neck and small shoulders makes her appear to be shorter. She does not have a sophisticated body type. But my educated guess would be 5"3. Jodie Foster is a solid 5"4, and looks it. Milla, though very pretty, does not look like a solid 5"4. Isn't Megan Fox 5"4? Thats what 5"4 looks like. Period. People look like what they are. Always. Milla looks 5"2 1/2 and thats what I BET she is.
Randomgirl said on 14/Oct/13
164cm
Sam said on 14/Oct/13
She is fairly petite, striking me as 5'3"-5'4"...but is gorgeous.
GUI said on 11/Oct/13
People on here insulting her and claiming she's lying about her height are so pathetic.
[Editor Rob: just do not make a bet with her...]
ROJINA said on 6/Oct/13
I thought that she looked 5"6 at least in "Friends With Benefits"!
Stephanie said on 4/Oct/13
She's definitely 5' 4"... she's been winning bets so she would know if she were taller or shorter. Because in order to win she would (obviously) have to measure herself in front of them.
I am short guy said on 23/Sep/13
She is 5'5" for sure!
Marcus Hickman said on 14/Aug/13
she was 5' 3" in 1998 when That 70's Show premiered. At the time she was 15 years old, she must have grown an extra inch.
MaskDeMasque said on 12/Aug/13
She looked pretty average in Ted. 5'4 seems right. She's constantly winning bets on her height? right.....
Enid said on 21/Jul/13
I actually passed by her a couple of weeks ago in London and she is my height, maybe a bit shorter, so 5'4 is pretty accurate
lol93 said on 20/Jul/13
I don't know maybe 161-162
Jonathan said on 17/Jul/13
She's 5'3", and she knows it.
Doink said on 15/Jul/13
Casting notice for a stand-in for her new movie calls for a 5-4 actress

Click Here
Vivi said on 3/Jun/13
I would have guessed 5'2"! What was her height on here before she made the comment on betting and being 5'4"?
clint said on 3/May/13
Clearly 2" taller than Natalie Portman who is legit 5'3". So 5'5", always believed she was that height. So anyone claiming she is anything other than 5'5" is stupid, because all legit evidence points to her being 5'5". Do you read me, ROb?
Doc Halister said on 26/Apr/13
5'2 or 5'3 at tops. People are so easily fooled by camera angles, unseen platforms, ultra-heels, etc.
Len said on 16/Apr/13
She looks about 5'3" in almost every film or TV show she does.

Don't understand why some women have a height complex. Few guys care how tall a woman is, i.e. 'hot is hot'. It only matters for runway models, and Mila would never be tall enough to be one of those.

In other words, no one cares that she's short, so she shouldn't either.
Roger said on 12/Apr/13
5 ft 4, you are having a laugh! This woman is 5 ft 2 and no more, please people stop being stupid!
Lol said on 29/Mar/13
In Ted she looks 5'4 5'5 she ain't short
Jupitar said on 14/Mar/13
I'm surprised people think she looks shorter than 5'4". I had assumed she was reasonably tall, 5'6" at the least.
h2theg said on 9/Mar/13
She looks 5'4" to me. I'm just under 5'1" and 3 extra inches would make a big difference!
K said on 6/Mar/13
Maybe she's lying about winning bets. Or exaggerating? Being sarcastic? She really does seem shorter.
nona said on 6/Mar/13
Yeah Mila Kunis is very tiny, at the most 5'2" & 100 lbs. Laura Prepon at 5'10" & 160 lbs is a big tall girl but looked like a giant next to Mila in "That 70's Show"
Rock said on 5/Mar/13
I seen her filming in NYC... She is very small.. She was about 5 to 5.2ft 80-90 pounds the most..Was in 2009 or so.
anonymous said on 1/Mar/13
If Mila Kunis was six inches shorter in four inch heels that would make her 5" tall!!! She's at least 5'3"! Seeing her next to Michelle Williams and Rachel Weisz at all the Oz premiers I believe she is probably 5'4" or a weak 5'4". I always THOUGHT she was 5'2" but some people just look shorter than they are and some people just look taller. I thought Michelle Williams would be taller than Mila. Michelle Williams is shorter than Mila in every single picture, even with bigger heels, and she is listed on this site, and has claimed 5'4". Michelle Williams is probably 5'3"-5'3.5".
Stephanie said on 27/Feb/13
People, if she's winning bets about her height it's because she really is 5' 4". Her posture and body type make her look an inch or two shorter, but I think she's telling the truth.
little sue said on 20/Feb/13
She looks about 2.5 inches shorter than Rachel Weisz on the red carpet for the Oz premier,s. Rachel about 5ft 6. I would say about 5ft 3.5 for Mia.
BellaPetite said on 17/Feb/13
Mila Kunis is definitely no taller than 5'2" I have seen her on the red carpet! Plus, all you need to do is compare Justin Timberlake who is like 5'10" tall and you can see how Mila is clearly six inches shorter even in her four inch heels! Hey Rob, we give you credits often at Bella Petite :) So funny to see how many celebrities do not tell the truth about their height.
Anonymous said on 11/Feb/13
This website is great. I like it.(Click Here)N_X_D_S.
Silent d said on 4/Feb/13
161cm.
K said on 19/Jan/13
I think 5'4" is right. She looks 5'4" next to Ashton Kutcher. She does seem shorter than she is but I think she's telling the truth.
Alexandra said on 29/Dec/12
I think Mila looks shorter than she really is, because the size of her head is somewhat bigger than that of the average woman of a shorter height, so that makes her look even shorter. Look at all her pics when she is with someone and even this one with Justin, she definitely has a large head. But I guess she's about my height, 5'3''.
theblacklab said on 18/Dec/12
Hieghtgirl, the camera is angled slightly towards Emma - giving her somewhat of a height advantage. I agree that in that particular photo she does indeed look three inches shorter, but perhaps if the camera panned around to directly face both of them, it may look like more of a 2" or at most 2.5" difference. This would make Mila around 5'3.5" to 5'4" - which seems to satisfy the conditions of her bet.
ajay said on 4/Dec/12
5 feet 4 inchens..
TILA said on 24/Nov/12
She looks much shorter. I would guess about 5'2 1/2.
Rob, is this possible ?
[Editor Rob: if she is speaking the truth about betting she isn't under 5ft 3 and winning, maybe there is something to it]
195jerry said on 21/Nov/12
im not one to downgrade, but i always thought she looked around 5'2
Alice said on 16/Nov/12
I am 5'3 1/2-5'4 never lower than 5'3 1/2 but never over 5'4, i would say im 5'4 though if people ask me because adding the half sounds bad and i dont wanna say im 5'3 when im not. I am a lot younger than mila so i could still grow but I am the same as mila some of my really tall friends think that im short but they all actually lie about their height and say they are an inch shorter because i guess they dont like being tall girls for some reason. I definitely think Mila is about the same as me, definitely over 5'3 but possibly the same as me, not quite 5'4 but she is still not short though in my opinion even if people say she is 5'4/5'5 is average and she is a good average height!
Johnnyfive said on 7/Nov/12
This girl never looked 5'4 more like 5'3. I find it hard to believe Mila is the same height as Selena Gomez..no way! Justin looks 5'10.5 in that photo if she really is 5'4 but since i think she's 5'3 then that makes him 5'9.5. Both need a downgrade.
Heightgirl said on 22/Oct/12
I think Mila is 5f3 or a bit under because I found a pic of her with some people and 5f6 Emma Stone and she looks more than 3 inches shorter than her. Click Here
Jessii said on 8/Oct/12
Looks a good 3 inches shorter than 5'6 Emma stone
Silent d said on 8/Oct/12
In that photo above, she looks 163cm plus heel height which would make her about 170cm. 163cm. Justin doesn't look like a 6 footer in that photo.
Anon said on 1/Oct/12
I think petite girls look great 5'3 and 5'4 are nice heights for women, although 5'4 is more of a low average as opposed to petite.
Practically every site has Timberlake at 6'1 and a few list him 6'2. In the film 'Friends with Benefits' he himself said he was a little over 6ft. He doesn't look over 182cm to me. But it's perfectly acceptable for him to claim 6ft.
marla singer said on 4/Sep/12
5'3.75" to be more accurate
Lee said on 5/Aug/12
Maybe at best five foot-three and a half, and rounds up.

Sorry not to believe you Mila, but five-four for you does sound far-fetched. =
little sue said on 29/Jul/12
She says she is 5ft 4 in the Sunday Magazine today but then goes on to say how she was bullied at school because she was so small!! its annoying how everyone states her as small or tiny when she is a good average height. I'm under 4ft 11 and no one ever bullied me about height and I'm a genuine Smurf!!
Stephanie said on 17/Jun/12
I always thought she was 5' 2" or 5' 3". I wouldn't have guessed she was 5' 4". Glad I didn't bet on it. XD

Mila is average height for an American woman (5' 4"). And I don't think she's calling herself short. She is saying her friends think she's shorter than she actually is. She is neither tall nor short, just average.
Elodie said on 15/Jun/12
I completely agree with you, Amy 6/Feb/12. Average height people complaining about being short... it just makes me die a little inside. -__-
Mila seems small-boned. But I think she's telling the truth when she says that she's 163.
Eddie said on 13/Jun/12
With high heels on she looked taller than 5'8 mark wahlberg. She must have been wearing 6inch heels for her to be taller than him.
Amy said on 6/Feb/12
ARgh I hate it when celebrities say "I'm really short" when in reality they're not even that short.. I'm 154cm and I think that's short.. Anyways Mila Kunis is gorgeous, and 161 seems a good height.
Silent d said on 5/Feb/12
161cm. She looks tiny.
ANDREA[ITA] said on 23/Jan/12
She actually talks about 5'4 in your quote, not 5'3... Anyway she looks really short to me, i would have guessed she was in the 5'2-5'3 range, no more!
[Editor Rob: I am aware of that, but I think her bet might have been someone saying she might not measure over 5ft 3]
ANDREA[ITA] said on 23/Jan/12
She looks really short in Friends with Benefits, next to max 182 Justin Timberlake. Rob, you think is it possible she's under 5'3?
[Editor Rob: she has said she won a bet about her height, so maybe she bet she was over 5ft 3 rather than under and won it...]
Hanna said on 21/Dec/11
Come to Norway people! most of the grown up girls here are at least 5'7-5'11. But most of the people at my class (10 grade) are 5'7-5'9. So they're pretty tall..
Silent d said on 15/Dec/11
She was taller than portman. 161cm is about right. She looked tall next to justin timberlake in friends with benefits.
Cindy said on 16/Nov/11
She's not short. She's a perfectly average 5'3"-5'4". People these days are really bad at judging height and all have a distorted view as most celebs add an inch or two extra.
Awesomeimous said on 13/Nov/11
@tall greek guy

that was an idiotic response.
drako said on 29/Oct/11
@tall greek guy Lyv Tyler shouldnt excluded from your list
tall greek guy said on 22/Oct/11
@Awesomeimous...so??? i dont care to NAME women by height.
actually i care about one beautiful tall women in this wordl...if you know what i mean...
Awesomeimous said on 17/Oct/11
@tall greek guy
for every one beautiful tall woman, anyone here can name 50 more beautiful short women, including you. and you know its the truth. and you are a twerp for posting the idiotically fail sarcastic comment that you did.
tall greek guy said on 30/Sep/11
@sara
Jeanene Fox-stacy keibler-mandy moore-ana ivanovic-maria sharapova-adriana lima-doutzen kroes-kesha
nope,Tallness is not a sign of beauty in women,you are right
tall greek guy said on 30/Sep/11
@Gina do you know how height works???you grow or you dont grow.nature.there is no society opinion about that,everyoune has his own tastes.my gfriend is 5'11'' tall and gorgeous.are you better than her?no.i she better than you?no.we are not in a war
@sara beauty is a sign of of beauty,not height alone.
i hope both of you will be able to get get through you insecurities,because you sound a little ridiculous(go short people,attaaaaaack-death to tall people-LOL)
Phil said on 28/Sep/11
She wears 6 inch monster high heels. She is 5 foot 9 with high heels.
John said on 3/Sep/11
She's no where near 5'3! She's 5'1
Dom said on 2/Sep/11
Mila always looks MINIMUM 5'4" to a bit taller than that.
Ashala said on 1/Sep/11
So, I'm watching Friends with Benefits right now. Mila Kunis is wearing heals the majority of the time. I am 5'3" and when I wear heals like the one's she's wearing, I'm 5'7"/5'8". I only wear size 6, Mila's feet are an 8, which means she can get more lift on her heal, making her even taller. Plus she has long legs, which creates the llusion of height. This leaves Justin Timberlake at his current height of 5'11.5"
SharpEye said on 25/Aug/11
Man, something just doesn't add up, watch Friends with benefits it's either Mila Kunis is 5'5.5 or Justin Timberlake is only 5'9 - 5'10 ! the height difference between them is 5 -6 inches tops ! (and I'm even exaggerating, I think it's actually closer to 4 inches). It's either Mila Kunis should get an upgrade or JT needs a downgrade .
5\'6 said on 18/Aug/11
It's unbelievable that you guys are saying short people are more attractive and tall women are "freakish". Height is like the one thing (aside from race) that you can't control. I'm a 5'6 14 year old girl, which is like average in the real world, but freakishly tall compared to my friends and boys in my class. Believe me, I would do anything to be 5'2. But where do average women fit into this. Yes, tons of tall women are beautiful, yes tons of short women are beautiful but what about average women? IMO, everyone deserves to think they're beautiful. I'm on a long road (very long!) to believing I'm beautiful, and you guys really aren't helping me. In fact, you're discouraging me. So I hope you feel good knowing that you're discouraging a 14 year old girl from feeling pretty, which is all she really wants right now.
Yum said on 4/Aug/11
The height of Mila Kunis determins how tall Justin Timberlake really is. There is 4 inches difference between them, when they are both barefoot in friends with benefits. If Mila is 53.5", JT is 57.5", if Mila is around 5`5", JT is still just 59". And honestly, I dont see Mila over 55", therefore JT must not be 61", 60", 511", or not even 510".
sara said on 4/Aug/11
I also agree with you Gina. Tallness is not a sign of beauty in women, petiteness is. I also cannot believe they would call those amazons beautiful.Shortness in women is associated with attractiveness and femininity.
TruebloodFan said on 27/Jul/11
@Bon_ says on 26/Jul/11
she's a strong 5'4, the listing is a little stupid.

sure looked it in 'The Book of Eli'.
Bon_ said on 26/Jul/11
she's a strong 5'4, the listing is a little stupid.
Zineb said on 25/Jul/11
I SO AGREE WITH YOU GINA! :)
Gina said on 23/Jul/11
Go short people! Finally...letting people of smaller stature get some glory. Personally, I'm sick of society and Horrorwood telling the rest of us what 'beauty' is!!! Some of those tall women are Amazon sized...what's so great about that??? I think it's great!
Gina said on 23/Jul/11
I think it's great. I'm so sick and tired of TALL people making smaller people feel inferior because SOCIETY says they are more attractive. BULL. Petite/short people are just as attractive. If you ask me...the taller women, especially, are like amazon women. Big freakin' deal that they are tall!!! Go smaller people...I like it!
Tony said on 22/Jul/11
3' 10" says on 21/Jul/11
To the person below me. You should look at a picture of Justin Timberlake with 5' 9" Cameron Diaz in heels. He is definitely not Five-Nine.
Mila Kunis is probably like 5' 2" - 5' 3" . Honestly who cares when you're that low anyway.

Ever heard of lifts or heels? Something Justin is well known for wearing. Cameron Diaz is 5'7".
On the note of that mugshot, you can't see her footwear so that argument is invalid.
3\' 10\" said on 21/Jul/11
To the person below me. You should look at a picture of Justin Timberlake with 5' 9" Cameron Diaz in heels. He is definitely not Five-Nine.
Mila Kunis is probably like 5' 2" - 5' 3" . Honestly who cares when you're that low anyway.
Mila Kunis is very short said on 19/Jul/11
I am 5'6" and I met Mila at a 99 cents store in Hollywood. I towered over her. She is maybe 5' 1" which is my moms height. On a similar note, Justin Timberlake who is starring in a movie with her and claims he's 6 foot? Bull! Just look at him standing to Mila without shoes in the movie. Justin is maybe 5'9" at best!
TruebloodFan said on 14/Jul/11
she seems taller than 161cm
roxanne said on 14/Jul/11
What is it with all these tiny little people who are stars? Don't tall people act anymore?
Big Mike said on 3/Jul/11
she is definately a little over 5 ft she appears 5 ft 4 in certain movies like in That 70's Show but then sometimes she wore high heels she's really hot though so who really cares
clint said on 17/Jun/11
I'm convinced the mila is 5foot5 to 5foot5 and a half. she's easily taller than natalie portman, and absolutely towers over kristin bell, who i am sure hits over the five foot mark. That would make her taller than 70% or so of all women. I would also sell my soul to be 5'5" because I really am 5'3", and a dude!
Button said on 14/Jun/11
Tala, no, ai is not blind. Natalie Portman is no less than 5'2.5" (159cm). You can try and downgrade her all you like, but it won't change the facts that she is not 5'2" flat, let alone shorter than that. 5'2.5" is absolutely the lowest she can be, but I personally think she is the full 5'3" (160cm). You should go and check pictures of her with Scarlett Johansson, who is currently listed 5'3" on here, but may in fact be more 5'3.5" (161cm). I mean, she used to be listed on this site at 5'3.75" (162cm), so let's bear that in mind. Since then, she's been downgraded by 0.75 inch down to 5'3", which I think was a little too much of a downgrade for her but I won't full on argue it for now. It's Rob's choice to downgrade her and he's the expert. I do still think Scarlett is 5'3.5", but as I said I won't argue it full on. But either way, we know she clearly is not under 5'3", and if you see pictures of Natalie with her, you'll see Natalie is very, very nearly matching her height. This is when they have both got similar heels on. There may be 0.5 inch difference at the most, but no more. Therefore, if Scarlett did happen to be as low as 5'3", that's how Natalie is potentially as low as 5'2.5". Less than that though just isn't possible in my opinion. The only way it's possible is if Scarlett is also shorter than her listing on this site. But her listing already seems like it could be a tad too low, as she has been downgraded by 0.75 inches from her previous 5'3.75". That's a significant amount. I don't see how we can downgrade her further.

As for Mila Kunis, there's no doubt about it that she is taller than Natalie by a noticeable amount. From what I can see, Mila stands taller against Natalie than Scarlett does against Natalie, if that makes sense. So I personally cannot see anything less than 5'3.5" for Mila. If she says she constantly wins bets on her height being 5'4", then I don't see any reason not to believe her. And, she does indeed look like she could be 5'4". Take a look at that image posted by bk on 15th January, where she stands alongside Justin Timberlake. Justin is just a bit below 6'0" barefoot I think, but in the shoes he is wearing he would be 6'0" range. Mila looks 7 inches shorter at the most. For her to be 5'3" or under she would have to be a minimum of 9 inches shorter. But, it's nothing like 9 inches in that image. 7 inches at the most and if anything Justin's heels are slightly thicker than Mila's. I've no idea how anyone can look at the image and say they only see 5'3" tops for Mila. I don't understand. Unless you reckon Justin is no more than 5'10". Come on. 5'10" maximum for Justin is so silly. No chance there is even a speck of truth in Justin being 5'10" or under. Anyway I say in one of my older messages that I thought if Mila hit 5'4", it would only be first thing in the morning, and it wouldn't be her height later in the day. But, the more I see of her, the more I won't rule out the full 5'4" as her afternoon height too. The 5'3.5" listing is good though, far better than any 5'3" or under suggestion I see on this page.
Tala said on 7/Jun/11
Natalie isn't 5'3 , are u BLIND ? she's max 5'2.
linke said on 3/Jun/11
5'3 tops
ai said on 2/May/11
For the fact that she said that she wins bets about her height being 5'4, I believe that, its her height. She stood taller than 5'3 Natalie Portman
Dom said on 20/Apr/11
There are pics of her on Getty and she looks the same height as 5'5" Ginnifer Goodwing or maybe 0,5 inch shorter.
Pete said on 16/Apr/11
By comparing to other actors she has to be 5 foot 2 inches maybe 3 inches
Button said on 1/Apr/11
I think Mila Kunis looks every bit of 5'3.5" and might even be the full 5'4" she claims to be. I am surprised some people here think she is 5'2" or even 5'1". In my opinion there is no way she is anything under 5'3". She does not look to have the proportions of an under 5'3" girl. Yes she does still look a little bit less than average female height, but not by much. And this might sound weird but I am 5'1.5" myself, and I can tell just by looking at her that she is taller than me. Definitely. I don't see how she can be any less than 5'3". In fact I don't even believe she goes below 5'3.5". She could be 5'4" first thing out of bed and then 5'3.5" last thing at night. 5'3.75" (162cm) might be on the money as the most accurate height for Mila.
faith said on 15/Mar/11
mila kunis has to be shorter then 5 feet 3
kookierx said on 15/Mar/11
MAX 5-3

I'd say barefoot 5-2.5 even 5-2
A&J said on 11/Mar/11
@elle, I think she might be even a few inches taller, Natalie is standing straight, while Mila holds her head down a bit and her knee is bended.
Monica said on 10/Mar/11
I know she often looks short, but I'd say she's around 5'4
pickle430 said on 20/Feb/11
sry to say it but I'd choose mila over leeloo lol
elle said on 4/Feb/11
Click Here Mila has higher hells.. She's probably 1 inch taller than Natalie.. so she's 5.3 (160cm)
lalalala said on 31/Jan/11
it's so obvious she is taller than natalie portman. even when kneeling to the side she looks at the very least an inch and a half taller. i'd say she's 5'4 or taller
Emily said on 19/Jan/11
Click Here
Look at these pictures , Mila is wearing high heels with platforme and Natalie (5'2) is not. So she must be the same height as Natalie! Maybe 0'5 taller at most.
m said on 16/Jan/11
I'd say spot on 5'4.
bk said on 15/Jan/11
Looks at least 5'4.5" to me.

Click Here
judge said on 7/Jan/11
She is hot, and an average size girl, perfect height for her frame.
Master Of Rolls said on 1/Jan/11
@...Anonymous says on 30/Dec/10
Here she is standing near the jail height measurements, and even slouching she looks to be a strong 5'5''

i concur with the evidence given by Anonymous

Click Here
Anonymous said on 30/Dec/10
Here she is standing near the jail height measurements, and even slouching she looks to be a strong 5'5'' Click Here
Adam said on 26/Dec/10
I just saw Black Swan and Mila is clearly taller than Natalie through out the whole movie. Unless Portman is 5' or 5'1" (which I doubt because everyone would tower over her) then she is the height she claims. Deal with it. Not everyone lies about their height. This may be shocking but lots of people are fine with what they are given.
Tamora said on 21/Dec/10
Mila is clearly about an inch taller than Portman. Bent head and all.Look at the tops of their heads. Clearly.
Tamora said on 21/Dec/10
Mila is clearly about an inch taller than Portman. Bent head and all.Look at the tops of their heads. Clearly.
Sofia said on 18/Dec/10
Look at this picture Anonymous is right.
Mila wears platforme-shoes , so she must be about the same height as Natalie.
I think Natalie is 5'2 maaybe 5'3.
Click Here
amy said on 17/Dec/10
no portman is clearly wearing heels
Kaylene said on 17/Dec/10
Click Here
Check it out, she's noticeably taller than Natalie Portman(said to be 5'3) and Winona(who claimed 5'4) It seems like Mila is actually 5'4 while Natalie and Winona 5'2 max.
Anonymous said on 12/Nov/10
Click Here
Anonymous said on 10/Nov/10
IN THE PICTURE WITH PORTMAN , MILA IS WEARING PLATFORME SHOES NATALIE IS NOT. SO SHE'S ABOUT THE SAME HEIGHT AS HER (5.25-5.3)
Anonymous said on 7/Nov/10
i bet shes 5'4"
Anonymous said on 4/Nov/10
she was so young back then,probably 17. if you look at pictures of her with natalie portman you can see shes clearly taller. i think 5 ft 4 is fair
jtm said on 30/Oct/10
i think 5'2-5'2.5 is more likely now since dunst has a good 3 inches on her in that video but does anyone know if they were both barefoot or if either one of them were wearing any footwear because i have never seen that movie before.
Anonymous said on 27/Oct/10
HERE WITH 5'5 Kristen Dunst
Click Here
NO WAY SHE'S 5'4 AT BEST SHE'S 5'2
Anonymous said on 12/Sep/07
It's strange, except for Laura Prepon, Mila never really looks tiny compared to most other actors and actresses, unlike other short actresses like Elisha Cuthbert or Rachel Bilson.
Danny Boy said on 3/Sep/07
I didn't realize how small Seth Green is. He makes petite little Mila look so butch it's scary.
Anonymous said on 27/Aug/07
Probably in heels, but she's like a head taller than Seth Green in these photos:
Click Here

[Editor Rob: head taller? That ain't even 4 inches...]
Dave said on 26/Aug/07
5'3" sounds about right. I wouldn't give more than 5'4" to her, judging by her hills that she wear almost all the time. When a girl is about 5"6 or more, its pretty recognizable that she's tall, even on tv or in a pic, however Mila seems constantly short(not to mention comparing to other casts) on that 70's show. She's absolutely cute tho
phil said on 10/Aug/07
wears oversized heals in nearly every episode of that 70's show
little miss s said on 27/Jul/07
Mila was 5'3" at the start of That 70's Show. Are you trying to tell me she completely stopped growing at 14?
HellBoundPower said on 22/May/07
Mila is well known for wearing huge heels on That 70s Show so she doesn't look so short next to Laura Prepon or Ashton Kutcher. I'd say 5'3" is right, and she wears large heels in all the pictures where she looks tall.
val said on 19/May/07
i don't think mila kunis is that short. she's average and definitley taller than jessica simpson.
Alex said on 19/Apr/07
Bombay Rocker, I agree. Based on that mugshot she looks 5'5 or so in footwear but thats gotta be in heels or something or the camera angle, plus the mugshots aint the best to go by. On the 70s show she always looks short and petite like you said. 5'3 is probably her height and no more. 5'2.5 she could be too.
Bombay Rocker said on 29/Mar/07
As far as elisha cuthbert is concerned......she is tiny, very tiny. She might be 5 feet 1. Emile hirsch, He might be a full 5 feet 5 or maybe 5 feet 5.5, People are still debating on his height, as one of the fella said he said 5 feet 5 on the commentary. So if emile is 5 feet 5, there is no way in hell she is more than 5 feet 1. Rachel bilson, look at her page, people want her to be downgraded. Mila is tiny but not abnormally so, She is reffered to as tiny, midget on that 70's so i dont need to comment more on that, as i have stated in my previous posts.
Anonymous said on 28/Mar/07
I don't know, Mila easily looked more than an 1.5" taller than Elisha Cuthbert and Rachel Bilson. I think Mila either needs to be upgraded, or the two of them should be downgraded.
Bombay Rocker said on 24/Mar/07
Rob man c,mon, you can't even accept that piece of shit. You can't see her feet, she might be waering heels. That height chart looks suspicious and besides if she is even 5 feet 4 then i bet wilmers claim of 5 feet 9.5 is true and everyone believes he was rounding up there and he is more like 5 feet 8 - 5 feet 8.5 and you list him 5 feet 7.5. I compared her to wilmer cause that's the best possible comparison since everyother cast memeber is considerably taller. Rob its common sense that when she is called a midget repeatedly in that 70's then she must be reall short and she is always wearing atleast 3.5 - 4 inchers in that 70's and is still atleast 3.5 inches shorter than wilmer who wears 1 inch shoes. So its 5 feet 8 wilmer + 1 inch shoes which makes wilmer 5 feet 9 and then mila 5 feet 3 inch height + 3 inch heels + 3 inch height difference = 5 feet 9. So my estimate is atmost 5 feet 3, maybe even 5 feet 2.5 and besides she is listed as 5 feet 3 on each and every site. Downgrade editor. Culkin is atmost 5 feet 6 maybe even 5 feet 5.5, no shorter than that though but more 5 feet 6 and that pic of mila with culkin, u can't compare the pic since the angle is bad and you can't see mila's shoes. They might have some heel and culkin might be slouching and still looks an inch taller and his shoes have like maybe 2 cm heels.

[Editor Rob: its not a problem...]
bikagyura said on 23/Mar/07
Rob (mugshot): She wish i Guess! :P
Bombay Rocker said on 23/Mar/07
In many of the episodes of that 70's show she is reffered to as midget by all the cast.......even wilmer valderrama whose 5 feet 8. I doubt if she was like 5 feet 5, she would be considered a midget. Does't make any freakin sense. She looks petite and pretty short in that 70's. I think she is atmost 5 feet 3 maybe even less.

[Editor Rob: remember someone posted This Mugshot thing]
Anonymous said on 28/Feb/07
She had a solid couple inches on Jessica Simpson when she guest starred in an episode of That 70's Show
Anonymous said on 3/Jan/07
The mugshot is a promo shot, like she would be barefoot. I don't think she is more than 5'3". She is about 2.5" - 3" shorter than Kirsten and she is listed at 5'5.5" here - plus movie or show shots, they use shoes, boxes, angles to soften height differences.
Alex said on 27/Dec/06
Kirsten looks to have Mila by over 2 inches. 2.5 inches probably.
Alex said on 21/Dec/06
Mila wears big platforms sometimes in order to look closer in height t 5'10 Laura Prepon. The 5'3 for her is most likely right, she never really appears 5'4 or taller to me. But her at 5'3 puts Culkin at 5'5 most likely.
Alex said on 2/Dec/06
Rob, in that picture you have above, she makes Culkin look only 5'4.
Alex said on 19/Oct/06
Looks 5'3 to me on that 70's show but sometimes she wears huge platform shoes I read too on the show so watch out for those.
Anonymous said on 15/Oct/06
I read that on the 70's show, Mila wears platforms to make herself taller so that Laura Prepon doesn't look like she is towering over Mila because Laura is 6-7 inches taller then her. So, I think that 5'3.5 or 5'4" is about right.
Anonymous said on 28/Aug/06
Click Here

Not sure about her footwear, but she definitely seems taller than 5'3.5" here...
Anonymous said on 13/Aug/06
I was atching a re-run of "That 70's show" that had jessica Simpson guest starring.....isn't Simpson listed as 5"3? She looked a few inches shorter than Kunis. Which is really 5"3? Or was it maybe the shoes? They both had heels, so the difference shouldn't have been much.
ice said on 1/Aug/06
Hey Rob, this doesn't work. You have Mila at 5'3.5 and Dunst at 5'5.5" I saw more then 2 inches in that pic of them barefooted together, and barefoot pics are the best ones to go by.
ice said on 28/Jan/06
If you insist that Kunis is 5'3.5 or more, then Kirsten Dunst needs to be upgraded to 5'7 or more. That is the only way their listings would make sense.
Greg said on 28/Jan/06
i agree with the comments by the others on this page. She seems quite a bit taller than 5'3.5. On that's 70's show mila is almost as tall as the red head when she wears heals
D.D said on 17/Jan/06
oh yea Mila, if u can read this i am russian. Yukrain and Russian are basically the same. , ? . . hee hee!! anyways ur the best mila and very very pretty! oh yea and a lot of people say i look like u.
D.D said on 17/Jan/06
i think that famous girls like Rachel Bilson lies about her height. One time, i read that she was 5'4" at the very beginning on the computer. Later on, i read that she is 5'2". i think that Rachel Bilson lies about her height, because she wants to be taller when she really is 5'0". Mila Kunis probably also lied, because she probably wants to be shorter like some other famous actresses and singers. Celebrities just try really hard to hide something from them just so other people would like them even more.
Anonymous said on 11/Jan/06
rob can you explain why she looks tall on the photos?

[Editor Rob: I think 5ft 4 is possible, but to see 5ft 7? Pics beside the other 70's show cast don't suggest it...some pics she can look taller yes]
Josefin said on 8/Jan/06
Yes, i think that Mila Kunis is lying about her height.. she wants to appear short and cute but actually she is quite tall !!! But i cannot blame her.. Which girl wants to be tall???
Ice said on 7/Jan/06
Um... If kirsten dunst is listed at 5'6, how can Mila be 5'3.5? Editor?
Anonymous said on 5/Jan/06
Milla is atleast 5'7.She is tall like Macouly http://www.pure-zen.com/Gallery/displayimage.php?album=7&pos=74 http://www.pure-zen.com/Gallery/displayimage.php?album=7&pos=73 http://www.pure-zen.com/Gallery/displayimage.php?album=7&pos=143 http://www.pure-zen.com/Gallery/displayimage.php?album=7&pos=144 and here she is next to the 5'8 Vannessa Minnilo http://www.pure-zen.com/Gallery/displayimage.php?album=21&pos=18
Malin said on 28/Dec/05
How lucky mila musst be!! She is pretty and 5.ft 3.5in is a perfect height for a women! I wish my growth would had been stopped at 5'3"
=( Now iam 5'6" and i feel tall and dumb eventhough iam very pretty =/
Mila said on 29/Nov/05
Hey everybody!
I just want to say thakyou to ya'll! And as you have said allready, i am 5.ft 3.5in.
Thanks to my fans,everybody,thanks!

Love,Mila
Anonymous said on 16/Oct/05
It has been said that Mila Kunis is seven inches shorter than Laura Prepon, who is five feet ten inches. This would make Mila 5'3"
Anonymous said on 16/Oct/05
ice, that is a good point regarding the height difference between Kunis and Dunst. Mila is unquestionably noticably taller than Rachel Bilson, so I too have to wonder how little that girl really is. ALso, Mila is at least an inch or so taller than Elisha Cuthbert, so I'm cuious what her real height is as well.
ice said on 15/Oct/05
Question: There is a picture out there of Kirsten Dunst with Mila. Here, Kirsten is listed at 5'6. That would make Mila at most 5'2.5, and bilson at 5'0. What is up with there heights? Any ideas?
ice said on 14/Oct/05
i just did a scan on the web. EVERYWHERE she is listed at 5'3. That makes me wonder just how short Rachel Bilson is then?
tashiboshi said on 16/Sep/05
i think mila is 5'4.5" and i usually try to downgrade people! but i think she's taller.
Anonymous said on 16/Sep/05
I feel like Mila should either be boosted up, or Rachel Bilson should be lowered down....because the height difference between the two of them from those screencaps seems very noticable.
Anonymous said on 8/Aug/05
In the photo where Mila and Elisha are standing face to face, it appears to me as if Mila is looking downward (opposed to Elisha, who is looking relatively straight on), giving the perception that she is shorter than she appears. If Mila's head was not at an inclination, I believe the height difference would be even more noticable.
Smoke said on 5/May/05
Sorry if this pic is a maybe a little bit on the censorable side Rob, but it's good height gauger. She really looks atleast 4 inches shorter than Kirsten Dunst (apprarently really is 5'7"), I think this listing is generous. On the 70's show she really looks 5'3" at best. She rounds up to 5'3" I'd bet.

Heights are barefeet estimates, derived from quotations, official websites, agency resumes, in person encounters with actors at conventions and pictures/films.

Other vital statistics like weight, shoe or bra size measurements have been sourced from newspapers, books, resumes or social media.

Celebrity Fan Photos and Agency Pictures of stars are © to their respective owners.