How tall is Mila Kunis ?

Home :: About  Latest :: Comments :: Top 50 

Mila Kunis Height is 5ft 4in (163 cm)

Ukranian/American Actress best known for roles in films like Black Swan, The Book of Eli, Friends with Benefits and Oz: The Great and Powerful. On tv she is well known for her voice role as Meg in Family Guy and also for her role on That 70's Show. Speaking about her own height she says: "My friends call me hobbit. I come across shorter than I am. People will say, 'You're not five foot four.' And I'll say, 'People, I know my height.' I'm constantly winning bets - hundreds of dollars". So, if you meet Mila just don't bet on her height, she may have a few tricks up her sleeve!

5ft 11.5 Justin Timberlake with Mila
Photo by PR Photos
Comment on the Height of Mila Kunis

Adolfus said on 12/Nov/15
She is 5'5" - I don't care what anyone else says.
Fluffi Fluffsson said on 5/Aug/15
I thought she was smaller...
jake said on 4/Jul/15
She keeps insisting that she's 5'4", but she keeps looking like she's 5'3"... maybe 5'3.5", tops.
Susie said on 1/Jul/15
She has a small frame but I never thought she looked that short. If she's under 5'4", it's probably not by much. I'd say she's at least 161 cm and could be as tall as 164 cm.
NBAer said on 18/Mar/15
She really looks like 5'4 in the picture next to Timberlake,maybe 5'3.5 at worst,but she's bending her knee a bit,so 5'4 looks reasonable IF Justin really is 5'11.5...She's truthful about her height as it seems,unlike most 5'0-5'1 girls i know who genuinely believe they're 5'5 and claim it without a ''red dace''
zzz said on 13/Mar/15
How many inches in gap do you all see between both? I see 4 to 5.
[Editor Rob: with Justin? I don't think there's anymore than 4]
dvd said on 10/Feb/15
Mila looks a bit over an inch shorter than Macaulay culkin in these pics, and she's wearing flats. there shoes probably give them the same advantage.

Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here

Which makes 5'4 sound about right.
dvd said on 10/Feb/15
Mila looks a bit over an inch shorter than Macaulay culkin in these pics, and she's wearing flats. there shoes probably give them the same advantage.

Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
184.3cm said on 5/Feb/15
If Timberlake is 5'11 flat like i think, then he is about 6' in those shoes putting her around 5'8 in heels. So a 4 inch gain seems more than reasonable to me. SHe is maybe a few cm taller/shorter but thats all.


You are maybe 5'9 in heels, a 5'11 guy is 6'0 in shoes so you are 1 inch taller than Mila is in this photo. Your eyelevel would be roughly where her eyebrows are in this photo.
yeah right said on 5/Feb/15
So you're 5'4-5'4.5 and in the shoes that add 4-4.5 inches, making you 5'9 at max, you feel almost as tall as a 5'11-6 foot guy?? Now I understand why so many guys lie about their height.
Sky said on 4/Feb/15
There's a huge gap between her and Justin, 4 to 5'' maybe?? I am 5'4'', well 5'4'' 1/2 and when i wear shoes as tall as hers i always look and feel like i'm just as the same height as a guy who's almost 6 feet tall. You are a liar Mila..
Anon said on 4/Feb/15
I think 5'4 seems about right.
In this photo of her and Ellen, she seems about Ellen's height (listed at 5'7, even a bit taller with her heals on, heels prob give her 3 inches.

(scroll to the bottom to see the pic im a referring to)

Click Here
Me said on 13/Jan/15
Thanks Rob. Yeah..She definitely looks shorter than 5'4''
Me said on 11/Jan/15
Rob, How many inches do you think those shoes are? They have platform so i would think her shoes are 5 inches?
[Editor Rob: they probably give her nearly 4 inches of actual height, but in a shop would be getting called 5 or 5.5 inch heels.]
Rach893 said on 28/Dec/14
I met Mila Kunis a year ago, I'm 5'4 and she was my height, we were both wearing flats
Hellokitty said on 27/Dec/14
Height is an illusion. Natalie Portman is 5'3 if you look at pictures of Mila and her together you could tell that she is a bit taller than here. I think Mila is above 5'3 and slightly below 5'4, maybe if she stands straight up and really stretches her posture it will elongate her making her barely hit 5'4. It's puzzling because not everybody looks their height. I'm 5'3 and people think I'm taller. She has a quite weird body but super hot.
Hellokitty said on 27/Dec/14
Height is an illusion. Natalie Portman is 5'3 if you look at pictures of Mila and her together you could tell that she is a bit taller than here. I think Mila is above 5'3 and slightly below 5'4, maybe if she stands straight up and really stretches her posture it will elongate her making her barely hit 5'4. It's puzzling because not everybody looks their height. I'm 5'3 and people think I'm taller. She has a quite weird body but super hot.
Cami said on 28/Oct/14
She does look about 5'2 but I'm willing to believe she is 5'3 with "short" proportions. She may even be 5'4 as she claims but since celebs lie about their heights all the time...
SAMMY DERRICK said on 24/Sep/14
5'4.With the PRETTIEST EYES!!!!
J.Lee said on 10/Sep/14
Rob, does she look less than her height? Why do people think she's shorter?
[Editor Rob: I think she can look anywhere in 5ft 3-4 range at times]
Dom said on 14/Aug/14
Doesn't look a milimeter under 5'4" Might even be a tiny bit over that.
Jack said on 11/Jul/14
She looks about 5'7" in this picture next to JT who looks to be in 1 inch sneakers. If she was wearing 3 inch heels that would make her 5'4" on the dot.
Me said on 15/Jun/14
@Stephanie..If you look closely, those shoes does have platforms. They have to be above 4 inches. I would 5 or so. I wear heals everyday for years. Shoes with platforms are at least 5 inches.
Stephanie said on 22/May/14
@Me Mila's heels are nowhere near high enough to make a 5' 4" person be almost 5' 11"... she would need big platforms and heels on the platforms to be that tall!
Me said on 21/Apr/14
I am exactly 5'4'' and if Justin's height is accurate (5'11'') and i wear the same heals Mila have on in that picture, i would say 5' heals?, i would be almost the same height as Justin. I think Mila is no more than 5'2''.
Raida said on 7/Feb/14
She might be 5'3" or 5'4",bt however she is.she is gorgeous!
Ted said on 24/Jan/14
@GUI - A lot of celebs DO fib about their heights, so it's not at all 'pathetic' to notice that and be skeptical. I agree that one shouldn't insult a celeb over it, that's uncalled for.

Far as Mila goes, I'd believe 5'3", possibly even 5'3.5" at the outside, but not 5'4". That'd put her at very near average height for a woman, and she simply has never looked it.

Oh and Mila, I would bet with you... I'd just watch your feet carefully to see if you were tippy-toeing very slightly during the measurement. ;-)
Ed Kline said on 22/Dec/13
Clint says on 3/May/13
"...So anyone claiming she is anything other than 5'5" is stupid,..."
SO Mila Kunis is stupid for claiming she is exactly 5'4?
Brilliant Clint, brilliant!
Nadya said on 27/Nov/13
Usually people in Hollywood lie about their age and height. I mean just by looking at her I can tell shes like 5"2 ish. I think the short neck and small shoulders makes her appear to be shorter. She does not have a sophisticated body type. But my educated guess would be 5"3. Jodie Foster is a solid 5"4, and looks it. Milla, though very pretty, does not look like a solid 5"4. Isn't Megan Fox 5"4? Thats what 5"4 looks like. Period. People look like what they are. Always. Milla looks 5"2 1/2 and thats what I BET she is.
Randomgirl said on 14/Oct/13
Sam said on 14/Oct/13
She is fairly petite, striking me as 5'3"-5'4"...but is gorgeous.
GUI said on 11/Oct/13
People on here insulting her and claiming she's lying about her height are so pathetic.
[Editor Rob: just do not make a bet with her...]
ROJINA said on 6/Oct/13
I thought that she looked 5"6 at least in "Friends With Benefits"!
Stephanie said on 4/Oct/13
She's definitely 5' 4"... she's been winning bets so she would know if she were taller or shorter. Because in order to win she would (obviously) have to measure herself in front of them.
I am short guy said on 23/Sep/13
She is 5'5" for sure!
Marcus Hickman said on 14/Aug/13
she was 5' 3" in 1998 when That 70's Show premiered. At the time she was 15 years old, she must have grown an extra inch.
MaskDeMasque said on 12/Aug/13
She looked pretty average in Ted. 5'4 seems right. She's constantly winning bets on her height? right.....
Enid said on 21/Jul/13
I actually passed by her a couple of weeks ago in London and she is my height, maybe a bit shorter, so 5'4 is pretty accurate
lol93 said on 20/Jul/13
I don't know maybe 161-162
Jonathan said on 17/Jul/13
She's 5'3", and she knows it.
Doink said on 15/Jul/13
Casting notice for a stand-in for her new movie calls for a 5-4 actress

Click Here
Vivi said on 3/Jun/13
I would have guessed 5'2"! What was her height on here before she made the comment on betting and being 5'4"?
clint said on 3/May/13
Clearly 2" taller than Natalie Portman who is legit 5'3". So 5'5", always believed she was that height. So anyone claiming she is anything other than 5'5" is stupid, because all legit evidence points to her being 5'5". Do you read me, ROb?
Doc Halister said on 26/Apr/13
5'2 or 5'3 at tops. People are so easily fooled by camera angles, unseen platforms, ultra-heels, etc.
Len said on 16/Apr/13
She looks about 5'3" in almost every film or TV show she does.

Don't understand why some women have a height complex. Few guys care how tall a woman is, i.e. 'hot is hot'. It only matters for runway models, and Mila would never be tall enough to be one of those.

In other words, no one cares that she's short, so she shouldn't either.
Roger said on 12/Apr/13
5 ft 4, you are having a laugh! This woman is 5 ft 2 and no more, please people stop being stupid!
Lol said on 29/Mar/13
In Ted she looks 5'4 5'5 she ain't short
Jupitar said on 14/Mar/13
I'm surprised people think she looks shorter than 5'4". I had assumed she was reasonably tall, 5'6" at the least.
h2theg said on 9/Mar/13
She looks 5'4" to me. I'm just under 5'1" and 3 extra inches would make a big difference!
K said on 6/Mar/13
Maybe she's lying about winning bets. Or exaggerating? Being sarcastic? She really does seem shorter.
nona said on 6/Mar/13
Yeah Mila Kunis is very tiny, at the most 5'2" & 100 lbs. Laura Prepon at 5'10" & 160 lbs is a big tall girl but looked like a giant next to Mila in "That 70's Show"
Rock said on 5/Mar/13
I seen her filming in NYC... She is very small.. She was about 5 to 5.2ft 80-90 pounds the most..Was in 2009 or so.
anonymous said on 1/Mar/13
If Mila Kunis was six inches shorter in four inch heels that would make her 5" tall!!! She's at least 5'3"! Seeing her next to Michelle Williams and Rachel Weisz at all the Oz premiers I believe she is probably 5'4" or a weak 5'4". I always THOUGHT she was 5'2" but some people just look shorter than they are and some people just look taller. I thought Michelle Williams would be taller than Mila. Michelle Williams is shorter than Mila in every single picture, even with bigger heels, and she is listed on this site, and has claimed 5'4". Michelle Williams is probably 5'3"-5'3.5".
Stephanie said on 27/Feb/13
People, if she's winning bets about her height it's because she really is 5' 4". Her posture and body type make her look an inch or two shorter, but I think she's telling the truth.
little sue said on 20/Feb/13
She looks about 2.5 inches shorter than Rachel Weisz on the red carpet for the Oz premier,s. Rachel about 5ft 6. I would say about 5ft 3.5 for Mia.
BellaPetite said on 17/Feb/13
Mila Kunis is definitely no taller than 5'2" I have seen her on the red carpet! Plus, all you need to do is compare Justin Timberlake who is like 5'10" tall and you can see how Mila is clearly six inches shorter even in her four inch heels! Hey Rob, we give you credits often at Bella Petite :) So funny to see how many celebrities do not tell the truth about their height.
Anonymous said on 11/Feb/13
This website is great. I like it.(Click Here)N_X_D_S.
Silent d said on 4/Feb/13
K said on 19/Jan/13
I think 5'4" is right. She looks 5'4" next to Ashton Kutcher. She does seem shorter than she is but I think she's telling the truth.
Alexandra said on 29/Dec/12
I think Mila looks shorter than she really is, because the size of her head is somewhat bigger than that of the average woman of a shorter height, so that makes her look even shorter. Look at all her pics when she is with someone and even this one with Justin, she definitely has a large head. But I guess she's about my height, 5'3''.
theblacklab said on 18/Dec/12
Hieghtgirl, the camera is angled slightly towards Emma - giving her somewhat of a height advantage. I agree that in that particular photo she does indeed look three inches shorter, but perhaps if the camera panned around to directly face both of them, it may look like more of a 2" or at most 2.5" difference. This would make Mila around 5'3.5" to 5'4" - which seems to satisfy the conditions of her bet.
ajay said on 4/Dec/12
5 feet 4 inchens..
TILA said on 24/Nov/12
She looks much shorter. I would guess about 5'2 1/2.
Rob, is this possible ?
[Editor Rob: if she is speaking the truth about betting she isn't under 5ft 3 and winning, maybe there is something to it]
195jerry said on 21/Nov/12
im not one to downgrade, but i always thought she looked around 5'2
Alice said on 16/Nov/12
I am 5'3 1/2-5'4 never lower than 5'3 1/2 but never over 5'4, i would say im 5'4 though if people ask me because adding the half sounds bad and i dont wanna say im 5'3 when im not. I am a lot younger than mila so i could still grow but I am the same as mila some of my really tall friends think that im short but they all actually lie about their height and say they are an inch shorter because i guess they dont like being tall girls for some reason. I definitely think Mila is about the same as me, definitely over 5'3 but possibly the same as me, not quite 5'4 but she is still not short though in my opinion even if people say she is 5'4/5'5 is average and she is a good average height!
Johnnyfive said on 7/Nov/12
This girl never looked 5'4 more like 5'3. I find it hard to believe Mila is the same height as Selena way! Justin looks 5'10.5 in that photo if she really is 5'4 but since i think she's 5'3 then that makes him 5'9.5. Both need a downgrade.
Heightgirl said on 22/Oct/12
I think Mila is 5f3 or a bit under because I found a pic of her with some people and 5f6 Emma Stone and she looks more than 3 inches shorter than her. Click Here
Jessii said on 8/Oct/12
Looks a good 3 inches shorter than 5'6 Emma stone
Silent d said on 8/Oct/12
In that photo above, she looks 163cm plus heel height which would make her about 170cm. 163cm. Justin doesn't look like a 6 footer in that photo.
Anon said on 1/Oct/12
I think petite girls look great 5'3 and 5'4 are nice heights for women, although 5'4 is more of a low average as opposed to petite.
Practically every site has Timberlake at 6'1 and a few list him 6'2. In the film 'Friends with Benefits' he himself said he was a little over 6ft. He doesn't look over 182cm to me. But it's perfectly acceptable for him to claim 6ft.
marla singer said on 4/Sep/12
5'3.75" to be more accurate
Lee said on 5/Aug/12
Maybe at best five foot-three and a half, and rounds up.

Sorry not to believe you Mila, but five-four for you does sound far-fetched. =
little sue said on 29/Jul/12
She says she is 5ft 4 in the Sunday Magazine today but then goes on to say how she was bullied at school because she was so small!! its annoying how everyone states her as small or tiny when she is a good average height. I'm under 4ft 11 and no one ever bullied me about height and I'm a genuine Smurf!!
Stephanie said on 17/Jun/12
I always thought she was 5' 2" or 5' 3". I wouldn't have guessed she was 5' 4". Glad I didn't bet on it. XD

Mila is average height for an American woman (5' 4"). And I don't think she's calling herself short. She is saying her friends think she's shorter than she actually is. She is neither tall nor short, just average.
Elodie said on 15/Jun/12
I completely agree with you, Amy 6/Feb/12. Average height people complaining about being short... it just makes me die a little inside. -__-
Mila seems small-boned. But I think she's telling the truth when she says that she's 163.
Eddie said on 13/Jun/12
With high heels on she looked taller than 5'8 mark wahlberg. She must have been wearing 6inch heels for her to be taller than him.
Amy said on 6/Feb/12
ARgh I hate it when celebrities say "I'm really short" when in reality they're not even that short.. I'm 154cm and I think that's short.. Anyways Mila Kunis is gorgeous, and 161 seems a good height.
Silent d said on 5/Feb/12
161cm. She looks tiny.
ANDREA[ITA] said on 23/Jan/12
She actually talks about 5'4 in your quote, not 5'3... Anyway she looks really short to me, i would have guessed she was in the 5'2-5'3 range, no more!
[Editor Rob: I am aware of that, but I think her bet might have been someone saying she might not measure over 5ft 3]
ANDREA[ITA] said on 23/Jan/12
She looks really short in Friends with Benefits, next to max 182 Justin Timberlake. Rob, you think is it possible she's under 5'3?
[Editor Rob: she has said she won a bet about her height, so maybe she bet she was over 5ft 3 rather than under and won it...]
Anonymous said on 12/Sep/07
It's strange, except for Laura Prepon, Mila never really looks tiny compared to most other actors and actresses, unlike other short actresses like Elisha Cuthbert or Rachel Bilson.
Danny Boy said on 3/Sep/07
I didn't realize how small Seth Green is. He makes petite little Mila look so butch it's scary.
Anonymous said on 27/Aug/07
Probably in heels, but she's like a head taller than Seth Green in these photos:
Click Here

[Editor Rob: head taller? That ain't even 4 inches...]
Dave said on 26/Aug/07
5'3" sounds about right. I wouldn't give more than 5'4" to her, judging by her hills that she wear almost all the time. When a girl is about 5"6 or more, its pretty recognizable that she's tall, even on tv or in a pic, however Mila seems constantly short(not to mention comparing to other casts) on that 70's show. She's absolutely cute tho
phil said on 10/Aug/07
wears oversized heals in nearly every episode of that 70's show
little miss s said on 27/Jul/07
Mila was 5'3" at the start of That 70's Show. Are you trying to tell me she completely stopped growing at 14?
HellBoundPower said on 22/May/07
Mila is well known for wearing huge heels on That 70s Show so she doesn't look so short next to Laura Prepon or Ashton Kutcher. I'd say 5'3" is right, and she wears large heels in all the pictures where she looks tall.
val said on 19/May/07
i don't think mila kunis is that short. she's average and definitley taller than jessica simpson.
Alex said on 19/Apr/07
Bombay Rocker, I agree. Based on that mugshot she looks 5'5 or so in footwear but thats gotta be in heels or something or the camera angle, plus the mugshots aint the best to go by. On the 70s show she always looks short and petite like you said. 5'3 is probably her height and no more. 5'2.5 she could be too.
Bombay Rocker said on 29/Mar/07
As far as elisha cuthbert is concerned......she is tiny, very tiny. She might be 5 feet 1. Emile hirsch, He might be a full 5 feet 5 or maybe 5 feet 5.5, People are still debating on his height, as one of the fella said he said 5 feet 5 on the commentary. So if emile is 5 feet 5, there is no way in hell she is more than 5 feet 1. Rachel bilson, look at her page, people want her to be downgraded. Mila is tiny but not abnormally so, She is reffered to as tiny, midget on that 70's so i dont need to comment more on that, as i have stated in my previous posts.
Anonymous said on 28/Mar/07
I don't know, Mila easily looked more than an 1.5" taller than Elisha Cuthbert and Rachel Bilson. I think Mila either needs to be upgraded, or the two of them should be downgraded.
Bombay Rocker said on 24/Mar/07
Rob man c,mon, you can't even accept that piece of shit. You can't see her feet, she might be waering heels. That height chart looks suspicious and besides if she is even 5 feet 4 then i bet wilmers claim of 5 feet 9.5 is true and everyone believes he was rounding up there and he is more like 5 feet 8 - 5 feet 8.5 and you list him 5 feet 7.5. I compared her to wilmer cause that's the best possible comparison since everyother cast memeber is considerably taller. Rob its common sense that when she is called a midget repeatedly in that 70's then she must be reall short and she is always wearing atleast 3.5 - 4 inchers in that 70's and is still atleast 3.5 inches shorter than wilmer who wears 1 inch shoes. So its 5 feet 8 wilmer + 1 inch shoes which makes wilmer 5 feet 9 and then mila 5 feet 3 inch height + 3 inch heels + 3 inch height difference = 5 feet 9. So my estimate is atmost 5 feet 3, maybe even 5 feet 2.5 and besides she is listed as 5 feet 3 on each and every site. Downgrade editor. Culkin is atmost 5 feet 6 maybe even 5 feet 5.5, no shorter than that though but more 5 feet 6 and that pic of mila with culkin, u can't compare the pic since the angle is bad and you can't see mila's shoes. They might have some heel and culkin might be slouching and still looks an inch taller and his shoes have like maybe 2 cm heels.

[Editor Rob: its not a problem...]
bikagyura said on 23/Mar/07
Rob (mugshot): She wish i Guess! :P
Bombay Rocker said on 23/Mar/07
In many of the episodes of that 70's show she is reffered to as midget by all the cast.......even wilmer valderrama whose 5 feet 8. I doubt if she was like 5 feet 5, she would be considered a midget. Does't make any freakin sense. She looks petite and pretty short in that 70's. I think she is atmost 5 feet 3 maybe even less.

[Editor Rob: remember someone posted This Mugshot thing]
Anonymous said on 28/Feb/07
She had a solid couple inches on Jessica Simpson when she guest starred in an episode of That 70's Show
Anonymous said on 3/Jan/07
The mugshot is a promo shot, like she would be barefoot. I don't think she is more than 5'3". She is about 2.5" - 3" shorter than Kirsten and she is listed at 5'5.5" here - plus movie or show shots, they use shoes, boxes, angles to soften height differences.
Alex said on 27/Dec/06
Kirsten looks to have Mila by over 2 inches. 2.5 inches probably.
Alex said on 21/Dec/06
Mila wears big platforms sometimes in order to look closer in height t 5'10 Laura Prepon. The 5'3 for her is most likely right, she never really appears 5'4 or taller to me. But her at 5'3 puts Culkin at 5'5 most likely.
Alex said on 2/Dec/06
Rob, in that picture you have above, she makes Culkin look only 5'4.
Alex said on 19/Oct/06
Looks 5'3 to me on that 70's show but sometimes she wears huge platform shoes I read too on the show so watch out for those.
Anonymous said on 15/Oct/06
I read that on the 70's show, Mila wears platforms to make herself taller so that Laura Prepon doesn't look like she is towering over Mila because Laura is 6-7 inches taller then her. So, I think that 5'3.5 or 5'4" is about right.
Anonymous said on 28/Aug/06
Click Here

Not sure about her footwear, but she definitely seems taller than 5'3.5" here...
Anonymous said on 13/Aug/06
I was atching a re-run of "That 70's show" that had jessica Simpson guest starring.....isn't Simpson listed as 5"3? She looked a few inches shorter than Kunis. Which is really 5"3? Or was it maybe the shoes? They both had heels, so the difference shouldn't have been much.
ice said on 1/Aug/06
Hey Rob, this doesn't work. You have Mila at 5'3.5 and Dunst at 5'5.5" I saw more then 2 inches in that pic of them barefooted together, and barefoot pics are the best ones to go by.
ice said on 28/Jan/06
If you insist that Kunis is 5'3.5 or more, then Kirsten Dunst needs to be upgraded to 5'7 or more. That is the only way their listings would make sense.
Greg said on 28/Jan/06
i agree with the comments by the others on this page. She seems quite a bit taller than 5'3.5. On that's 70's show mila is almost as tall as the red head when she wears heals
D.D said on 17/Jan/06
oh yea Mila, if u can read this i am russian. Yukrain and Russian are basically the same. привет, как дила? ти очин красивая. я очин хачу быть похожа на тебе. hee hee!! anyways ur the best mila and very very pretty! oh yea and a lot of people say i look like u.
D.D said on 17/Jan/06
i think that famous girls like Rachel Bilson lies about her height. One time, i read that she was 5'4" at the very beginning on the computer. Later on, i read that she is 5'2". i think that Rachel Bilson lies about her height, because she wants to be taller when she really is 5'0". Mila Kunis probably also lied, because she probably wants to be shorter like some other famous actresses and singers. Celebrities just try really hard to hide something from them just so other people would like them even more.
Anonymous said on 11/Jan/06
rob can you explain why she looks tall on the photos?

[Editor Rob: I think 5ft 4 is possible, but to see 5ft 7? Pics beside the other 70's show cast don't suggest it...some pics she can look taller yes]
Josefin said on 8/Jan/06
Yes, i think that Mila Kunis is lying about her height.. she wants to appear short and cute but actually she is quite tall !!! But i cannot blame her.. Which girl wants to be tall???
Ice said on 7/Jan/06
Um... If kirsten dunst is listed at 5'6, how can Mila be 5'3.5? Editor?
Anonymous said on 5/Jan/06
Milla is atleast 5'7.She is tall like Macouly and here she is next to the 5'8 Vannessa Minnilo
Malin said on 28/Dec/05
How lucky mila musst be!! She is pretty and 5.ft 3.5in is a perfect height for a women! I wish my growth would had been stopped at 5'3"
=( Now iam 5'6" and i feel tall and dumb eventhough iam very pretty =/
Mila said on 29/Nov/05
Hey everybody!
I just want to say thakyou to ya'll! And as you have said allready, i am 5.ft 3.5in.
Thanks to my fans,everybody,thanks!

Anonymous said on 16/Oct/05
It has been said that Mila Kunis is seven inches shorter than Laura Prepon, who is five feet ten inches. This would make Mila 5'3"
Anonymous said on 16/Oct/05
ice, that is a good point regarding the height difference between Kunis and Dunst. Mila is unquestionably noticably taller than Rachel Bilson, so I too have to wonder how little that girl really is. ALso, Mila is at least an inch or so taller than Elisha Cuthbert, so I'm cuious what her real height is as well.
ice said on 15/Oct/05
Question: There is a picture out there of Kirsten Dunst with Mila. Here, Kirsten is listed at 5'6. That would make Mila at most 5'2.5, and bilson at 5'0. What is up with there heights? Any ideas?
ice said on 14/Oct/05
i just did a scan on the web. EVERYWHERE she is listed at 5'3. That makes me wonder just how short Rachel Bilson is then?
tashiboshi said on 16/Sep/05
i think mila is 5'4.5" and i usually try to downgrade people! but i think she's taller.
Anonymous said on 16/Sep/05
I feel like Mila should either be boosted up, or Rachel Bilson should be lowered down....because the height difference between the two of them from those screencaps seems very noticable.
Anonymous said on 8/Aug/05
In the photo where Mila and Elisha are standing face to face, it appears to me as if Mila is looking downward (opposed to Elisha, who is looking relatively straight on), giving the perception that she is shorter than she appears. If Mila's head was not at an inclination, I believe the height difference would be even more noticable.
Smoke said on 5/May/05
Sorry if this pic is a maybe a little bit on the censorable side Rob, but it's good height gauger. She really looks atleast 4 inches shorter than Kirsten Dunst (apprarently really is 5'7"), I think this listing is generous. On the 70's show she really looks 5'3" at best. She rounds up to 5'3" I'd bet.

Heights are barefeet estimates, derived from quotations, official websites, agency resumes, in person encounters with actors at conventions and pictures/films.

Other vital statistics like weight, shoe or bra size measurements have been sourced from newspapers, books, resumes or social media.

Celebrity Fan Photos and Agency Pictures of stars are © to their respective owners.